2010 Regional Bicycle/Pedestrian Count Summary

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "2010 Regional Bicycle/Pedestrian Count Summary"

Transcription

1 2010 Regional Bicycle/Pedestrian Count Summary

2 Introduction In October 2010, volunteers counted bicycles and pedestrians at various locations throughout the Tucson region. This was the third year of the annual bicycle count program and the inaugural year for counting pedestrians. Five primary reasons why Pima Association of Governments (PAG) conducts an annual bicycle/pedestrian count program are: 1. Conditions and trend analysis document the number of people currently bicycling/walking, how this number is changing over time and how it may relate to the characteristics of Tucson cyclists. 2. Network planning - help find locations needing attention and prioritize improvements. 3. Crash analysis - develop exposure measures (comparing crash data to actual level of cycling). 4. Travel Demand Management - measure Travel Demand Management and Safety/Outreach program effectiveness by producing tangible data that can be compared over time. Methodology In general, each location was counted for two hours during one morning weekday peak period and for two hours during one afternoon weekday peak period for a total of four hours of observation time. For most of the locations, morning peak was counted from 7-9 a.m. and afternoon peak was counted from 4-6 p.m. However, some locations were counted at different peak period hours because of unique conditions in that area. For example, Green Valley locations were counted from 8-10 a.m. and 2-4 p.m. because these hours are more representative of peak travel in the retirement community. Some weekend morning counts (7-10 a.m.) also were taken to gauge recreation cycling numbers. These counts took place on either the Saturday or Sunday during the count period. In cases where repeat counts were done at a location, the counts were averaged to yield a four-hour estimate. Counts were performed throughout the region by jurisdictional and regional staff, volunteers from the community, including students from the University of Arizona. In total, 98 locations were counted. For each location, volunteers recorded the number of cyclists and pedestrians that entered the intersection. In addition, the following attribute data was collected: gender, approximate age, helmet usage, sidewalk riding and wrong way riding. See Appendix 1 for the data collection sheet used by volunteers in the count. Figure 1 is a graph comparing volume numbers of the three years ( ) that the Bicycle Count has been conducted. Figure 2 is a map of the 2010 count locations by area Data Summary The total number of bicycle and pedestrians counted from all 98 locations is: 20,896 Cyclists 14,248 Pedestrians In conjunction with the annual count program, 15 of the 98 locations were on the University of Arizona (UA) campus and were selected in order to obtain data for a UA Bicycle and Pedestrian Study. These locations are analyzed separately because bicycle and pedestrian travel on the UA campus is not indicative of regional travel patterns. Table 1 shows the top 15 cyclist locations in the Tucson region. Cyclist Attribute Information (Without UA Study Locations) Female 27.7% ; Male 72.3% AM 57.7% ; PM 42.3% Age <18 3.3% ; % ; >65 4.1% Helmet Usage 51.6% Wrong Way Riding 3.2% Sidewalk Riding 5.8%

3 Table #1 Top 15 Cyclist Locations (No UA Study Locations) Volume Rank Location VOLUME 1 3rd St / Campbell Ave University Blvd / Park Ave Helen St / Mountain Ave nd St / Highland Ave Old Spanish Trail / Freeman Rd Weekend rd St / Country Club Rd Blacklidge Dr / Mountain Ave Rillito Pathway / Mountain Ave - North Weekend University Blvd / Stone Ave th St / 4th Ave Toole Ave / Congress St Rancho Vistoso / Oracle Rd Weekend Speedway Blvd / Park Ave Rillito Pathway / Mountain Ave - North Elm St / Tucson Blvd Bicycling Count Comparison to 2009 Comparing the locations that were counted BOTH years ONLY: 2010 Total 8,972 cyclists 2009 Total 7,294 cyclists Difference: +1,678 Percent Change: +23% 2010 Female 28.7%; 2010 Male 71.2% 2009 Female 27.8%; 2009 Male 72.2% 2010 Helmet Usage 47.0% 2009 Helmet Usage 43.4% 2010 Riding Wrong Way 3.4% 2009 Riding Wrong Way 4.0% 2010 Sidewalk Riding 5.7% 2009 Sidewalk Riding 7.5% Trend Data Comparing count volumes for locations that were counted each year Figure 1 Tucson Bicyclists Bicycle Count Trend Data Bicyclist Count Volume Average Annual Count Volume 2010 count volume is close to the average of the three years. There was a dip in total cyclists for the study in 2009, with 2008 being the year with the highest volume of cyclists. For more information on the annual PAG Bicycle Count and to see past years reports, visit the PAG web site at: ms/transportationplanning/bike Pedestrians/tabid/486/Default.a spx

4 Figure 2: Map of 2010 Bicycle Count Locations by Area

5 Bicycle Counts by Location and Area Count locations were chosen based on estimated levels of cycling activity and achieving a reasonable regional/geographic distribution. Of the 99 count locations counted in 2009, 55 of them were repeated in The 98 count locations of 2010 were divided into six categories for purposes of geographic comparison: University, Downtown, Urban Core, North & Northwest, Green Valley/Sahuarita and Eastside. These areas were drawn and chosen based on geographic parameters that most Tucsonans can identify with. Figure 2 (on previous page) shows a map of Tucson and the area lines that were selected by PAG staff to analyze the Bike/Pedestrian Count Study. Figure 3 shows a summary of data collected by count location and area. Figure 3 also indicates percentages of each attribute by count location and area. Overall, 12,057 bicyclists were counted at 83 locations throughout the region. During the PM peak hours, 42 percent of all cyclists were counted, with 58 percent counted during the AM peak hours. Seventy-two percent of the cyclists counted were male, and more than 92 percent were between the ages of 18 and 65. Approximately 51 percent wore helmets, an 8 percent increase from Three percent were observed riding on the wrong side of the road, and approximately 6 percent were riding on the sidewalk. University of Arizona (UA) Locations: 9 Total Cyclists Observed: 4,061 Average Count Per Location: 451 Borders: As far west as Euclid Avenue, as far east as Campbell Avenue, as far north as Ring Road and as far south as 6 th Street. The proportion of female cycling around the university was the highest in the region at 36 percent. For the 3 rd straight year, the UA area exhibited one of the lowest levels of wrong-way riding, 2 percent, and sidewalk riding, 3 percent (two discouraged behaviors). However, it had the lowest level of helmetwearing (an encouraged behavior) at 27 percent. Downtown Locations: 13 Total Cyclists Observed: 1,888 Average Count Per Location: 145 Borders: As far west as Grande Avenue, as far east as Euclid Avenue, as far north as Speedway Boulevard and as far south as 22 nd Street. The 13 Downtown count locations yielded 1,888 cyclists, 75 percent of which were male. Forty-six percent of downtown cyclists wore helmets, 4 percent were observed wrong-way riding and 9 percent rode on the sidewalk. Urban Core Locations: 34 Total Cyclists Observed: 3,741 Average Count Per Location: 113 Borders: As far west as Camino de Oeste, as far east as Kolb Road, as far north as River Road and as far south as Valencia Road. Eighty percent of the 3,741 cyclists that were observed were male. Sixty percent of the area s cyclists wore helmets, 4 percent were wrong-way riding, and over 7 percent rode on the sidewalk. North & Northwest Locations: 14 Total Cyclists Observed: 1,156 Average Count Per Location: 83 Borders: As far west as Coachline Road, as far east as Kolb Road, as far north as Wilds Road and as far south as River Road. The 14 North and Northwest area count locations had 1,156 cyclists counted, 77 percent of which were counted in the AM peak hours. Roughly 80 percent were male and 82 percent wore helmets (the secondhighest proportion in the region).

6 East Locations: 10 Total Cyclists Observed: 1,048 Average Count Per Location: 105 Borders: As far west as Kolb Road, as far east as Freeman Road, as far north as Snyder Road and as far south as Rita Road. The East area observed 1,048 cyclists at 10 locations. This was an increase of over 250 cyclists observed in the 2009 count. Over 87 percent of the cyclists were observed in the AM (the highest in the region) and roughly 78 percent were male. 92 percent wore helmets, the highest proportion in the region. The percentages and figures that were observed in the East Area indicate the high levels of recreational cycling exhibited by that region of Tucson. Green Valley/Sahuarita Locations: 4 Total Cyclists Observed: Average Count Per Location: 41 Borders: As far west as La Cañada Drive, as far east as Old Nogales Highway, as far north as Pima Mine Road and as far south as Continental Road. The four Green Valley/Sahuarita count locations showed 163 cyclists, an 88 percent increase in the number of riders that were counted there in This increase is likely in part the result of a change in the counting methodology for that area. The counting times were changed this year to better reflect the peak hours observed in Green Valley and Sahuarita. Sixty-two percent of the riders were observed in the AM. Green Valley/Sahuarita had the highest proportion of sidewalk riders at 40 percent, likely due to the intersection of Rancho Sahuarita Boulevard and La Villita Road that had over 70 percent of its riders observed on the sidewalk.

7 Figure 3a: Summary chart of data collected by count location and area Count ID Regional Location Volume Rank VOLUME GENDER AGE OTHER ATTRIBUTES PEDS Location AM Total PM Total Total Female Male < >65 Helmet Wrong-Way Sidewalk AM % PM % Female % Male % <18 % % >65 % Helmet %Wrong-Way %Sidewalk % 54 Downtown 10 University Blvd / Stone Ave % 51.55% 29.55% 70.45% 2.06% 93.81% 4.12% 40.21% 0.34% 2.41% Downtown 11 9th St / 4th Ave % 53.14% 32.47% 67.53% 2.21% 95.94% 1.85% 43.54% 2.21% 2.21% Downtown 12 Toole Ave / Congress St % 59.26% 27.78% 72.22% 3.33% 93.70% 2.96% 34.07% 6.67% 20.74% Downtown 18 St. Mary's/Santa Cruz River % 39.30% 25.87% 74.13% 3.48% 87.56% 8.96% 48.76% 6.47% 15.92% Downtown 23 St. Mary's Rd / Santa Cruz Pathway WE % 0.00% 15.09% 84.91% 1.26% 98.11% 0.63% 89.94% 1.26% 6.29% Downtown 27 Alameda St / Church Ave % 59.85% 28.03% 71.97% 6.82% 87.12% 6.06% 50.00% 0.76% 3.79% Downtown 28 Broadway Blvd / Aviation Pkwy (Snake Br % 59.68% 20.16% 79.84% 11.29% 87.10% 1.61% 65.32% 0.00% 1.61% Downtown 39 6th St / 9th Ave % 69.07% 21.65% 78.35% 7.22% 92.78% 0.00% 41.24% 18.56% 0.00% Downtown 41 Congress St / Granada Ave % 62.64% 15.38% 84.62% 13.19% 86.81% 0.00% 34.07% 7.69% 36.26% Downtown 43 Toole Ave / 7th Ave % 77.50% 25.00% 75.00% 11.25% 88.75% 0.00% 18.75% 2.50% 0.00% Downtown 49 7th St / 7th Ave % 59.70% 19.40% 80.60% 0.00% 98.51% 1.49% 34.33% 0.00% 0.00% 52 7 Downtown 54 18th St / 6th Ave % 55.93% 16.95% 83.05% 1.69% 98.31% 0.00% 23.73% 11.86% 20.34% Downtown 62 Congress Rd / Grande Ave % 73.91% 17.39% 82.61% 6.52% 93.48% 0.00% 47.83% 6.52% 8.70% 91 DOWNTOWN TOTAL % 51.85% 25.05% 74.95% 4.50% 92.58% 2.91% 45.55% 4.13% 8.85% East 5 Old Spanish Trail / Freeman Rd WE % 0.00% 25.05% 74.95% 0.21% 96.10% 3.70% 98.56% 1.23% 1.64% East 17 Snyder Rd / Catalina Hwy WE % 0.00% 14.56% 85.44% 0.97% 93.69% 5.34% 99.51% 0.00% 0.00% East 33 Old Spanish Trail / Freeman Rd % 30.19% 17.92% 82.08% 0.94% 83.02% 16.04% 99.06% 0.00% 0.00% East 55 22nd St / Kolb % 63.16% 10.53% 89.47% 50.88% 45.61% 3.51% 21.05% 22.81% 61.40% East 42 Catalina Hwy / Harrison Rd % 15.66% 46.99% 53.01% 10.84% 78.31% 10.84% 93.98% 2.41% 0.00% East 73 Speedway Blvd / Pantano Pathway % 38.46% 3.85% 96.15% 0.00% 96.15% 3.85% 61.54% 23.08% 19.23% East 74 Rita Rd / Esmond-Rankin % 37.50% 16.67% 83.33% 54.17% 25.00% 20.83% 62.50% 25.00% 66.67% East 76 Valencia Rd / Kolb Rd % 52.17% 13.04% 86.96% 4.35% 95.65% 0.00% 91.30% 0.00% 0.00% East 78 Old Spanish Trail / Kenyon Dr % 57.14% 4.76% 95.24% 4.76% 90.48% 4.76% 90.48% 0.00% 0.00% East 80 Broadway Blvd / Houghton Rd % 60.00% 6.67% 93.33% 33.33% 60.00% 6.67% 53.33% 6.67% 13.33% 7 EAST TOTAL % 12.69% 21.56% 78.44% 5.92% 87.88% 6.20% 91.51% 3.24% 6.30% Green Valley / Sahuarita 46 Rancho Sahuarita Blvd / La Villita Rd % 53.95% 28.95% 71.05% 51.32% 42.11% 6.58% 40.79% 0.00% 72.37% Green Valley / Sahuarita 66 Duval Mine Rd / La Canada Dr % 27.03% 32.43% 67.57% 0.00% 40.54% 59.46% 83.78% 5.41% 10.81% Green Valley / Sahuarita 69 Continental / Camino del Sol % 20.00% 28.57% 71.43% 0.00% 48.57% 51.43% 77.14% 2.86% 17.14% Green Valley / Sahuarita 81 Continental Rd / Abrego Dr % 26.67% 33.33% 66.67% 0.00% 53.33% 46.67% 80.00% 6.67% 0.00% 13 GREEN VALLEY / SAHUARITA TOTAL % 38.04% 30.06% 69.94% 23.93% 44.17% 31.90% 61.96% 2.45% 39.88% North and NW 13 Rancho Vistoso / Oracle Rd WE % 0.00% 26.71% 73.29% 0.29% 95.49% 4.23% 78.35% 4.90% 0.00% North and NW 19 Wilds Rd / Oracle Rd WE % 0.00% 22.90% 77.10% 0.00% 96.44% 3.56% 99.11% 0.00% 0.76% North and NW 32 Sunrise Dr / Swan Rd % 19.63% 18.69% 81.31% 0.00% 99.07% 0.93% 71.03% 0.93% 1.87% 67 1 North and NW 37 Tangerine Rd / 1st Ave % 34.95% 24.27% 75.73% 4.85% 92.23% 2.91% 90.29% 0.97% 2.91% North and NW 38 Naranja Dr / La Canada Dr % 49.51% 22.33% 77.67% 22.33% 70.87% 6.80% % 0.00% 7.77% North and NW 50 River Rd / La Cholla Blvd % 30.30% 10.61% 89.39% 6.06% 90.91% 3.03% 57.58% 1.52% 10.61% North and NW 52 River Rd / Sabino Canyon Rd % 41.54% 16.92% 83.08% 0.00% 95.38% 4.62% 87.69% 1.54% 0.00% 9 43 North and NW 53 Ina Rd / Oracle Rd % 36.07% 3.28% 96.72% 0.00% % 0.00% 78.69% 8.20% 6.56% North and NW 59 Twin Peaks Rd / Coachline Rd % 46.23% 24.53% 75.47% 35.85% 54.72% 9.43% 57.55% 13.21% 35.85% North and NW 67 Rancho Vistoso / Oracle Rd % 45.05% 11.71% 88.29% 0.00% 98.20% 1.80% 92.79% 0.00% 0.00% North and NW 68 Wilds Rd / Oracle Rd % 35.45% 9.09% 90.91% 11.82% 53.64% 34.55% 99.09% 0.00% 0.91% North and NW 71 Ina Rd / Thornydale Rd % 57.63% 11.86% 88.14% 10.17% 84.75% 5.08% 55.93% 3.39% 22.03% North and NW 75 Silverbell Rd / Cortaro Rd % 38.30% 19.15% 80.85% 23.40% 68.09% 8.51% 76.60% 8.51% 19.15% North and NW 82 Orange Grove Rd / Thornydale Rd % 86.67% 13.33% 86.67% 0.00% % 0.00% 26.67% 0.00% 40.00% 12 NORTH / NORTHWEST TOTAL % 23.36% 20.16% 79.84% 5.58% 89.59% 4.83% 82.44% 2.75% 5.35% UA 1 3rd St / Campbell Ave % 52.42% 35.89% 64.11% 0.81% 97.58% 1.61% 26.81% 1.61% 1.21% UA 2 University Blvd / Park Ave % 55.27% 36.21% 63.79% 0.00% 96.75% 3.25% 31.24% 0.51% 3.25% UA 3 Helen St / Mountain Ave % 46.95% 30.74% 69.26% 0.13% 96.37% 3.50% 35.28% 2.20% 3.37% UA 4 2nd St / Highland Ave % 57.07% 50.35% 49.65% 0.00% 98.76% 1.24% 22.26% 2.30% 1.41% UA 14 Speedway Blvd / Park Ave % 53.94% 26.97% 73.03% 0.00% 95.85% 4.15% 17.01% 7.88% 10.79% UA 21 6th St / Park Ave % 66.85% 34.27% 65.73% 0.00% 99.44% 0.56% 11.24% 5.62% 15.17% UA 31 Ring Rd / Warren Ave % 58.12% 26.50% 73.50% 0.00% 98.29% 1.71% 35.04% 0.00% 0.00% UA 35 6th St / Cherry Ave % 47.62% 21.90% 78.10% 0.00% 98.10% 1.90% 7.62% 1.90% 0.00% UA 36 Speedway Blvd / Cherry Ave % 59.05% 34.29% 65.71% 0.00% 93.33% 6.67% 31.43% 2.86% 4.76% 287 UA TOTAL % 53.66% 35.73% 64.27% 0.22% 97.22% 2.56% 27.46% 2.09% 3.35% 5562

8 Figure 3b: Summary chart of data collected by count location and area continued 380 Urban Core 6 Rillito Pathway / Mountain Ave - North % 47.64% 21.89% 78.11% 2.58% 87.12% 9.44% 72.53% 0.00% 0.00% Urban Core 7 3rd St / Country Club Rd % 38.82% 29.12% 70.88% 3.53% 95.00% 1.47% 42.35% 0.00% 5.00% Urban Core 8 Blacklidge Dr / Mountain Ave % 43.97% 29.32% 70.68% 0.65% 99.35% 0.00% 52.77% 0.65% 0.33% Urban Core 9 Rillito Pathway / Mountain Ave - North WE % 0.00% 38.36% 61.64% 1.71% 83.22% 15.07% 75.68% 0.00% 0.00% Urban Core 15 Elm St / Tucson Blvd % 47.86% 26.50% 73.50% 0.00% 94.44% 5.56% 47.86% 2.56% 2.99% Urban Core 16 Rillito Pathway / Oracle Rd % 53.10% 26.99% 73.01% 3.10% 88.05% 8.85% 69.03% 4.42% 11.95% Urban Core 20 Gates Pass Rd / Camino de Oeste WE % 0.00% 20.11% 79.89% 12.17% 83.60% 4.23% 96.83% 0.00% 0.00% Urban Core 22 Valencia Ave / Mission Rd WE % 0.00% 4.68% 95.32% 0.58% 98.25% 1.17% 88.89% 0.58% 0.00% Urban Core 24 Glenn St / Treat Ave % 58.60% 19.75% 80.25% 4.46% 94.27% 1.27% 61.15% 2.55% 0.00% Urban Core 25 Rillito Pathway / Mountain Ave - South W % 0.00% 44.14% 55.86% 2.07% 90.34% 7.59% 80.69% 0.00% 10.34% Urban Core 26 Pima St / Columbus Blvd % 50.00% 19.29% 80.71% 9.29% 82.86% 7.86% 60.00% 7.86% 10.71% Urban Core 29 Rillito Pathway / Mountain Ave - South % 45.16% 24.19% 75.81% 4.84% 88.71% 6.45% 67.74% 0.00% 0.00% Urban Core 30 Speedway Blvd / Treat Ave % 42.98% 34.89% 65.11% 4.26% 94.89% 0.85% 51.91% 16.17% 6.81% Urban Core 34 Grant Rd / Campbell Ave % 61.90% 26.67% 73.33% 0.00% % 0.00% 33.33% 12.38% 16.19% Urban Core 40 Broadway Blvd / Alvernon Way % 57.35% 13.62% 86.38% 0.36% 99.64% 0.00% 57.71% 0.36% 9.32% Urban Core 44 3rd St / Swan Rd % 48.72% 25.64% 74.36% 2.56% 97.44% 0.00% 48.72% 6.41% 6.41% Urban Core 45 Broadway Blvd / Wilmot Rd % 53.95% 13.16% 86.84% 6.58% 93.42% 0.00% 59.21% 11.84% 32.89% Urban Core 47 St.Mary's Rd / Anklam Rd % 64.00% 29.33% 70.67% 0.00% % 0.00% 82.67% 1.33% 1.33% Urban Core 48 Tanque Verde Rd / Kolb Rd % 62.50% 22.22% 77.78% 5.56% 93.06% 1.39% 62.50% 9.72% 19.44% Urban Core 51 Prince Rd / Fairview Ave % 53.85% 6.15% 93.85% 9.23% 87.69% 3.08% 7.69% 18.46% 35.38% Urban Core St / 6th Ave % 69.64% 7.14% 92.86% 8.93% 76.79% 14.29% 16.07% 23.21% 42.86% Urban Core 57 Yavapai Rd / Fontana Ave % 68.52% 40.74% 59.26% 18.52% 75.93% 9.26% 16.67% 22.22% 18.52% Urban Core 58 River Rd / Campbell Ave % 33.64% 18.69% 81.31% 0.00% % 0.00% 84.11% 0.00% 0.00% Urban Core 60 Lester St / 4th Ave % 62.00% 20.00% 80.00% 0.00% % 0.00% 28.00% 0.00% 0.00% Urban Core 61 Golf Links / Craycroft Rd % 70.21% 19.15% 80.85% 23.40% 74.47% 2.13% 70.21% 4.26% 6.38% 26 9 Urban Core 63 Ft Lowell Rd / Alvernon Way % 32.56% 6.98% 93.02% 0.00% % 0.00% 46.51% 11.63% 16.28% Urban Core 64 Arroyo Chico / Tucson Blvd % 46.34% 21.95% 78.05% 2.44% 92.68% 4.88% 48.78% 0.00% 2.44% Urban Core 65 Ironwood Hill Dr / Silverbell Rd % 51.35% 5.41% 94.59% 0.00% % 0.00% 62.16% 0.00% 21.62% 74 6 Urban Core 70 29th St / 4th Ave % 67.65% 20.59% 79.41% 2.94% 94.12% 2.94% 26.47% 0.00% 14.71% Urban Core 72 Ajo Way / Mission Rd % 46.43% 7.14% 92.86% 3.57% 96.43% 0.00% 50.00% 14.29% 25.00% Urban Core 77 43rd St / 10th Ave % 50.00% 9.09% 90.91% 4.55% 90.91% 4.55% 45.45% 13.64% 18.18% Urban Core 79 Nebraska St / Liberty Ave % 38.10% 0.00% % 14.29% 85.71% 0.00% 19.05% 19.05% 14.29% Urban Core 83 Valencia Rd / San Fernando Ave % 53.33% 0.00% % 13.33% 86.67% 0.00% 0.00% 46.67% 60.00% 318 URBAN CORE TOTAL % 39.48% 24.24% 75.76% 3.80% 91.70% 4.49% 59.73% 4.02% 7.07% 3917 AM Total PM Total Total Female Male < >65 aring Helmong-Way Ri dewalk Ridi AM % PM % Female % Male % <18 % % >65 % Helmet %Wrong-Way %Sidewalk % Pedestri Regional Total (NO UA Study) % 42.30% 27.69% 72.31% 3.33% 92.52% 3.61% 51.61% 3.18% 5.77% Regional Total % 42.82% 28.33% 71.67% 3.25% 92.67% 4.08% 50.12% 3.02% 6.17% 24664

9 Figure 4: Map indicating volume of cyclists per count location. Count volume symbols are colorcoded by count area and proportional to the volume of cyclists at each location.

10 Gender Women represented 27 percent of total riders observed. The percentage of female cyclists varied between 0 percent and 50 percent, depending on count location. The University of Arizona was the regional location that had the highest average of female cyclists, with 36 percent. In addition, the intersection with the highest percentage of female ridership was at the UA s 2 nd Street and Highland Avenue, with 50.4 percent. The lowest percentage (20.16%) of female cyclists was observed in the North/Northwest region. Figure 5 shows the locations with the highest proportion of women. The data indicates that low-stress bikeways have a higher proportion of female riders than other types of bikeways. Low stress bikeways are bike facilities such as shared-use paths and residential routes that limit cyclists exposure to fast-moving traffic. Figure 6 shows the percentage of women by area. Figure 7 shows a map depicting the gender-split throughout the region. Figure 5- Top 12 Female Ridership Locations Low-Stress Bikeways Gender by Location Top 12 Female Ridership Locations Number of Cyclists % 50% 47% 53% 44% 56% 41% 59% 39% 61% 36% 36% 35% 64% 64% 65% 34% 66% 34% 66% 33% 67% 32% 68% Female Male Location

11 Figure 6- Gender by Area Gender by Area Female Male Number of Cyclists % 24% % % 76% % 20% 75% % 30% 80% 0 70% Downtown East GV/Sahuarita North & NW UofA Urban Core Female Male

12 Figure 7- Percentage of Female Riders

13 Helmet Usage Bicycle helmets provide substantial protection against head injuries for cyclists of all ages involved in crashes. Tracking helmet usage is an important way to gauge education and outreach efforts aimed at increasing safe riding behaviors. Pima County and City of Tucson laws require all bicyclists under the age of 18 to wear a helmet. Regionwide, 52 percent of cyclists wore helmets. Helmet usage varied between 0 percent and 100 percent, depending on location. The East region had the highest rate of helmet wearing at 91 percent. The University of Arizona had the lowest rate of helmet wearing at 27 percent. Figure 8 shows the locations with the highest rate of helmet usage, Figure 9 shows the locations with the lowest rate of usage. Figure 10 shows helmet usage by area while, Figure 11 is a map of helmet usage. Figure 8 Highest Helmet Usage Locations Helmet Usage Highest Helmet Usage by Location 100% 100% 99% 99% 99% 99% 98% 96% 93% 92% 91% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50%

14 Figure 9 Lowest Helmet Usage Locations Figure 9 Helmet Usage by Area Helmet Usage by Area Wearing Helmet Not Wearing Helmet 27% % % 73% % 96% 82% 45% % 4% 18% 38% 0 Downtown East GV/Sahuarita North & NW UofA Urban Core Wearing Helmet Not Wearing Helmet

15 Figure 11- Helmet Usage

16 Age The vast majority of cyclists counted in the region were between the ages of 18 and 65. Cyclists under 18 years of age comprised of 3.3 percent of the total and those over 65 made up 3.61 percent. Figures 12 and 13 show locations with the highest rates for cyclists under 18 and over 65, respectively. Figure 14 indicates age by regional location. Figure 15 shows a map depicting age ranges through the region. Figure 12- Top 10 Locations, Under 18-Years of Age Top 10 Locations with Cyclists Under 18 Years Old > <18 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 7% 4% 21% 9% 7% 46% 60% 25% 42% 55% 54% 51% 51% 36% 33% 2% 9% 7% 9% 0% 68% 72% 86% 74% 71% 23% 23% 22% 19% 14%

17 Figure 13-Top 10 Locations, Over 65 Years of Age Figure 14- Age by Area Age by Area Number of Cyclists % 92% > <18 6% 32% 44% 90% 24% 0 5% 4% 6% 0% 5% Downtown East GV/Sahuarita North & NW UofA Urban Core > < % 90% 3% 97& 4% 91%

18 Figure 15- Age Range

19 Wrong-Way Riding Bicycling against traffic is a dangerous and illegal way to ride. Traffic signals and signs are posted for traffic traveling on the right side of the road, and drivers, when entering and exiting intersections and driveways, do not expect to see cyclists riding against normal traffic patterns. Violation of wrong-way riding laws in Pima County can result in a fine up to $ Tracking wrong-way riding is an important way to gauge education and outreach efforts aimed at increasing safe riding behaviors, and to identify potentially needed improvements. The regionwide 2010 count average for wrong-way riding was 3.18 percent. Figure 16 shows the top 10 locations for wrong-way riding. The intersection of Valencia Road and San Fernando Avenue had the highest rate of wrong-way ridership at 47 percent. Figure 17 shows wrong-way riding by area. The Downtown and Urban Core regional locations had the highest rates of wrong-way riding, both at 4 percent. Figure 18 shows a map depicting wrong-way riding in the region. Figure 16- Wrong-Way Riding Top 10 Locations Top 10 Locations with Wrong-Way Riding 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 47% 25% 23% 23% 23% 22% 19% Wrong Way 19% 18% 16% 1 Pima County Department of Transportation- pg. 45

20 Figure 17-Wrong-Way Riding by Area Wrong-Way Riding by Area Number of Cyclists Wrong Way NOT Wrong Way 4% % 2% 3% % % 2% 0 98% Downtown East GV/Sahuarita North & NW UofA Urban Core Wrong Way NOT Wrong Way % 98% 4% 96%

21 Figure18- Wrong-Way Riding

22 Sidewalk Riding Much like wrong-way riding, riding on the sidewalk is an unsafe and prohibited activity in many of the jurisdictions in the region, and can result in a fine up to $50 2. Cyclists riding on the sidewalk often go unseen by auto drivers and can constitute a danger to pedestrians due to their comparatively high speed. Tracking sidewalk riding is another important way to gauge education and outreach efforts aimed at increasing safe riding behaviors, and to identify potentially needed improvements. The regional average for sidewalk riding for the 2010 count was 5.77 percent. Sidewalk riding varied from 0 to 72 percent, depending on count location. The location with the most sidewalk riding was Rancho Sahuarita Blvd / La Villita Rd. Figure 19 shows locations with the highest rate of sidewalk riding. Rita Rd / Esmond-Rankin was the location in 2009 with the highest rate of sidewalk riding, and once again showed up in 2010 as the second highest. Figure 20 shows sidewalk riding by area. The Green Valley / Sahuarita was the regional location with the highest rate of sidewalk riding at 40 percent. Figure 21 shows a map depicting sidewalk riding throughout the region. Figure 19 Locations with Highest Rates of Sidewalk Riding Locations with Highest Rate of Sidewalk Riding 80% 70% 60% 72% 67% 61% 60% Sidewalk Riding 50% 40% 30% 43% 40% 36% 36% 35% 33% 20% 10% 0% 2 Pima County Department of Transportation- pg. 42

23 Figure 20- Sidewalk Riding by Area Sidewalk Riding by Area % Number of Cyclists Sidewalk Riding NOT Sidewalk Riding 9% 97% 7% 93% % 5% % % 40% 95% 0 60% Downtown East GV/ North & NW UofA Urban Core Sahuarita Sidewalk Riding NOT Sidewalk Riding

24 Figure 21- Sidewalk Riding

25 Comparing 2010 to 2009 With the annual bicycle count now three years under way, there are some trends that are beginning to develop. However, the majority of the data that has been collected thus far has varied, and it is premature to make any true comparisons between years. Also, the bike count helps to gauge cycling levels but it is only a snapshot in time at certain locations and does not account for all cycling behavior. However, it is common practice to take a look at data from year to year. Fifty five locations that were counted in 2009 were also counted in The table below summarizes the count data for repeat locations Total 2009 Total Change: % Change: Attribute statistic percentages are fairly consistent between 2009 and 2010: 2010 Total 2009 Total Female % Male % Age <18 % Age % Age >65 % Wearing Helmet % Wrong-Way Riding % Riding on Sidewalk % 27.69% 72.31% 3.33% 92.52% 3.61% 51.61% 3.18% 5.77% 27.79% 72.21% 2.77% 95.01% 2.22% 43.41% 3.95% 7.54% In general, the total volume of bicycle traffic observed is higher in 2010 than in Table 2 is a table that compares 2009 and 2010 count data for each location that was counted both years. Figure 22 is a map that compares count volumes from 2009 to 2010.

26 Table 2 Table comparing 2009 and 2010 count numbers by location Count ID Location 2010 Total 09 Total Change % Change 15 3rd St/Campbell Park & University Mountain/Helen nd St / Highland Ave Old Spanish Trail / Freeman Rd WE Mountain/Blacklidge Stone/University th St / 4th Ave Speedway Blvd / Park Ave Tucson/Elm Oracle/Rillito Pathway Snyder Rd / Catalina Hwy WE St. Mary's/Santa Cruz River Gates Pass Rd / Camino de Oeste WE th St / Park Ave Glenn/Treat Pima/Columbus Snake Bridge (Bdwy/Aviation) Speedway/Treat Ring Rd / Warren Ave Swan/Sunrise Old Spanish Trail / Freeman Rd Campbell/Grant th St / Cherry Ave Tangerine/1st Ave th Ave./6th St Alvernon/Broadway Congress/Granada Catalina HY/Harrison rd/Swan Broadway/Wilmot St. Mary's/Anklam Tanque Verde/Kolb th St/7th Ave River/La Cholla Prince/Fairview Sabino Canyon/River Ina/Oracle th ST/6TH Ave Kolb/22nd River Rd./Campbell Yavapai Rd / Fontana Ave th Ave/Lester Craycroft/Golf Links Congress Rd / Grande Ave Alvernon/Ft.Lowell Tucson/Arroyo Chico Silverbell/Ironwood Hill Camino del sol/continental th St / 4th Ave Mission/Ajo Silverbell/Cortaro Rita Rd / Esmond-Rankin th Ave/43rd Total 09 Total Change % Change

27 Figure 22- Map Indicating the Change in the Number of Cyclists from

28 A Look Back: This year s 2010 bicycle count yielded a higher volume of cyclists than the last year; however, 2008 still had the highest number of cyclists. After a 26 percent decline in cycling activity from 2008 to 2009, the study shows a significant increase in ridership in the year 2010 from One likely factor in the 23 percent increase in cyclists from was the horrible weather during the 2009 count Weather- There were record lows reached during the 2009 count. However, in 2010, conditions returned to typical Tucson weather, with the average temperature for the month of October 2010 being 84 F. Similarly, the 2008 count (which also saw typical Tucson weather) had high numbers of cyclists observed. Other Factors- 41 locations were counted all three years, below is a table summarizing other factors that affect bicycle travel in Tucson. Tucson- October: Year Total Cyclists Average Retail Gas Price $ $ $ Unemployment Rate 4 The recession has clearly had an effect on bicycle travel in Tucson; 2008 saw the highest number of cyclists in common locations, while also having the lowest unemployment rate during that span. Unemployment normally results in less travel overall. In relation with the recession, gas prices also play a role in what mode of travel people choose. The higher gas prices in 2008 combined with high numbers of cyclists may suggest that people choose to bike with more regularity when gas prices are higher. Trend Data Comparing count volumes for locations that were counted each year count volume is close to the average of the three years. There was a dip in total cyclists for the study in 2009, with 2008 being the year with the highest volume of cyclists. Tucson Bicyclists Bicycle Count Trend Data Bicyclist Count Volume Average Annual Count Volume TucsonGasPrices.com- 4 Bureau of Labor Statisticshttp://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet?series_id=LAUMT &data_tool=XGtable

29 Pedestrian Summary 2010 was the inaugural year for the pedestrian count. Tracking pedestrian volume numbers is important for future travel demand and improvement projects in the region. During the count, 14,248 pedestrians were observed. Only count information was collected for pedestrians; no attribute data was recorded. The pedestrian counts were observed in conjunction with the bicycle count, between peak hours 7-9 a.m. and 4-6 p.m. The tables below show that the majority of pedestrian activity resides in the UA, Urban Core, and Downtown areas. The University of Arizona shows an overwhelming amount of pedestrian activity compared to other Tucson areas, which coincides with the high amount of bicycle activity that has been demonstrated there during the three years this study has been conducted. Generally, many of the UA students bike or walk to campus as opposed to driving. Table 3 shows the locations with the highest volumes of pedestrians (more information on this will be available in the UA Bike/Ped Study). Table 4 shows the top 5 volumes of pedestrians by area. Figure 23 shows the pedestrian volumes by count site throughout the region. Table 3 Top 15 Pedestrian Locations Volume Rank Regional Location Location Volume 1 UA University Blvd / Park Ave Downtown Alameda St / Church Ave UA 2nd St / Highland Ave Downtown Congress St / Granada Ave UA Speedway Blvd / Park Ave UA 6th St / Cherry Ave UA Helen St / Mountain Ave UA 6th St / Park Ave East 22nd St / Kolb Downtown Toole Ave / Congress St Urban Core Broadway Blvd / Alvernon Way UA 3rd St / Campbell Ave Urban Core Valencia Rd / San Fernando Ave Downtown 9th St / 4th Ave Green Valley / Sahuarita Rancho Sahuarita Blvd / La Villita Rd 290 Table 4 Pedestrian Counts by Regional Location Rank Regional Location Volume 1 University of Arizona Urban Core Downtown East North and NW Green Valley & Sahuarita 336 Regional Total 14248

30 Figure 23- Map Indicating Pedestrian Volumes Per Count Site

31 Conclusion The attribute results for the 3 rd annual bicycle count are consistent with 2008 and However, after a decrease in total ridership from 2008 to 2009, the 2010 bicycle count yielded figures that are consistent with the average for all three years. It can be inferred one of the reasons for the dip in total cyclists in 2009 was a result of the record low temperatures that forced daily ridership to decline. Twenty-eight percent of cyclists observed were female. Figure 4 of this report shows the locations with the highest percentages of female riders. Nine of the 12 locations with the highest percentages of female riders were considered low-stress bikeways. This data helps support the assumption that females prefer lower-stress bikeways, which are bike facilities that are more physically separated from automobiles such as shared-use paths and residential streets. However, more data needs to be gathered to confirm this concept. Tucson saw a significant increase in helmet usage in 2010 (52%) from 2009 (43%). However, helmet usage in Tucson is still considered low compared to other bicycle-friendly communities. For example, the Portland, Oregon 2010 bicycle count reveals that 77 percent of cyclists wear a helmet. 5 In only its third year, the regional bicycle count is useful to planners and engineers to identify areas needing increased targeted enforcement, education and outreach. For example, stencils were installed near intersections with the highest percentage of wrong-way riding to help educate cyclists on the proper direction to ride. Over time, the annual count will help the region evaluate the effectiveness of the programs geared at bicycling encouragement and safety. 5 Portland Bicycle Count Report

32 Appendix Item 1- Data Collection Sheet Date: Location: HOUR APPROACH DIRECTION COUNT NB :00 SB EB WB NB :15 SB EB WB NB :30 SB EB WB NB :45 SB EB WB Observations: Construction, etc. Motorized Bicycles: Count Sheet INDICATE GENDER IF: INDICATE AGE IF: FEMALE < WEARING HELMET WRONG WAY RIDING RIDING ON SIDEWALK PEDESTRIANS

Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Summary Report

Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Summary Report 2013 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Summary Report Prepared by PAG staff Published June 2014 Table of Contents Introduction and Overview... 1 Process and Methodology... 1 2013 Bicycle and Pedestrian

More information

Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Summary Report

Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Summary Report 2015 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Summary Report Prepared by PAG staff Published September 2016 Table of Contents Introduction and Overview... 1 This Report... 1 Process and Methodology... 2 Part

More information

Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Summary Report

Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Summary Report 2014 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Summary Report Prepared by PAG staff Published July 2015 Revised September 2015 Table of Contents Introduction and Overview... 1 This Report... 1 Process and

More information

Regional. Featuring the Tucson streetcar. Over jobs created! See inside projects complete and more on the way!

Regional. Featuring the Tucson streetcar. Over jobs created! See inside projects complete and more on the way! Over 2000 Regional jobs created! 460+ projects complete and more on the way! APRIL 2012 Featuring the Tucson streetcar See inside 177 N. Church Ave. Suite 405 Tucson AZ 85701 (520) 770-9410 [tel] (520)

More information

DRAFT Proposed 2045 RTP Project List - 10/29/2015 Projects Listed Alphabetically by Name

DRAFT Proposed 2045 RTP Project List - 10/29/2015 Projects Listed Alphabetically by Name DRAFT Proposed 2045 RTP Project List - 10/29/2015 Projects Listed Alphabetically by Name RTP ID Name Location Description 300.98 40th St Extension Between 4th and 6th Av Nogales Hwy to Sonoran 429.03*

More information

Tempe Bike Count Report 2014

Tempe Bike Count Report 2014 Tempe Bike Count Report 2014 Tempe Bicycle Action Group Report date: 3/24/2015 1. Abstract In April the fourth annual city-wide bike count in Tempe was conducted as a way of understanding cycling habits

More information

TIP Amendment #4 - Proposed PAG TIP PROJECTS. A Add project and funding to match ADOT 5-year Program PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED.

TIP Amendment #4 - Proposed PAG TIP PROJECTS. A Add project and funding to match ADOT 5-year Program PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED. PAG 213-217 PROJETS A and funding to match AOT 5-year I I State/Fed I STREET/PROJET NAME PROJET ESRIPTION 56.12 I-1: ortaro Road TI (Right-of-Way). I-1 and ortaro Road Purchase ROW for ortaro Road TI FUNING

More information

BICYCLE SAFETY OBSERVATION STUDY 2014

BICYCLE SAFETY OBSERVATION STUDY 2014 County of Santa Cruz Health Services Agency BICYCLE SAFETY OBSERVATION STUDY BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The County of Santa Cruz Health Services Agency (HSA) in conjunction with the Community Safety Coalition

More information

PORTLAND BICYCLE COUNTS 2007

PORTLAND BICYCLE COUNTS 2007 PORTLAND BICYCLE COUNTS 2007 The Portland Office of Transportation s (PDOT) annual bicycle counts constitute the City s primary means of assessing progress in its efforts to make the bicycle an integral

More information

Marin County. Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program. Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts Update

Marin County. Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program. Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts Update Marin County Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts 2013 Update Prepared for: County of Marin Department of Public works Contact: Dan Dawson walkbikemarin@marincounty.org

More information

Bicycle Count Data. December 2008

Bicycle Count Data. December 2008 Bicycle Count Data December 28 Published By: San Luis Obispo Public Works Department 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California 9341 Telephone (85) 781 719; FAX (85) 781 7198 www.slocity.org Introduction

More information

2019 Runner and Driver Handbook. (Information within this Handbook is subject to change.)

2019 Runner and Driver Handbook. (Information within this Handbook is subject to change.) 2019 Runner and Driver Handbook (Information within this Handbook is subject to change.) What s In Here 1) Organizing a Team...... 3 2) Registration...... 3 3) Refunds/Transfer Policy...... 3 4) Race Start

More information

Capitol Region Council of Governments Bike/Pedestrian Count Project

Capitol Region Council of Governments Bike/Pedestrian Count Project Capitol Region Council of Governments Bike/Pedestrian Count Project 2015 REPORT CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Bike / Pedestrian Count Project 2015 Count Introduction This report presents an analysis

More information

BICYCLE COUNT THE CITY OF CALGARY. Onward/ Providing more travel choices helps to improve overall mobility in Calgary s transportation system

BICYCLE COUNT THE CITY OF CALGARY. Onward/ Providing more travel choices helps to improve overall mobility in Calgary s transportation system THE CITY OF CALGARY 2013 BICYCLE COUNT calgary.ca contact 311 Onward/ Providing more travel choices helps to improve overall mobility in Calgary s transportation system 1 THE CITY OF CALGARY 2013 BICYCLE

More information

Summary of NWA Trail Usage Report November 2, 2015

Summary of NWA Trail Usage Report November 2, 2015 Summary of NWA Trail Usage Report November 2, 2015 Summary Findings: The study showed that Northwest Arkansas (NWA) had relatively high cyclist user counts per capita aggregated across the top three usage

More information

Lessons Learned from Cycle Tracks (Class IV Bikeways) Design Practice

Lessons Learned from Cycle Tracks (Class IV Bikeways) Design Practice Lessons Learned from Cycle Tracks (Class IV Bikeways) Design Practice By: Min Zhou, P.E., Principal/Vice President KOA Corporation 1 What is a Cycle Track (Class IV) TYPICAL BIKEWAY CLASSIFICATION CLASS

More information

CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. Bike / Pedestrian Count Project

CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. Bike / Pedestrian Count Project CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Bike / Pedestrian Count Project October 2009 Introduction In 2008, the Capitol Region Council of Governments (CRCOG) updated the Regional Bike/Ped Plan, The CRCOG

More information

Detailed Status Report

Detailed Status Report Detailed Status Report Jurisdiction: ADOT Project Name: I-10: Ina TI RTA ID: 06 TIP ID: 3.02 Status: Under Construction I-10: Ina TI (Reconstruct TI and construct RR Overpass) Under Construction Roadway

More information

Saturday 12:00 p.m 2:00 p.m Bicycle Pedestrian

Saturday 12:00 p.m 2:00 p.m Bicycle Pedestrian Overall Trip Numbers by Time Period Weekday 5:00 p.m. 7:00 p.m. Saturday 12:00 p.m 2:00 p.m. 2009 2010 2009 2010 Bicycle 216 336 180 260 Pedestrian 1384 1362 1936 2507 Summary by Location Count locations

More information

AGENDA: November IO, 1998 REPORT BACK ON BICYCLE SAFETY PROGRAMS

AGENDA: November IO, 1998 REPORT BACK ON BICYCLE SAFETY PROGRAMS COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ HEALTH SEWiCES AGENCY ADMINISTRATION HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY P.O. BOX 962, 1080 EMELINE AVENUE SANTA CRUZ, CA 95061 (408) 454-4066 FAX: (408) 454-4770 TDD: (408) 454-4123 October 21,

More information

2040 RTP Roadways Draft Project List

2040 RTP Roadways Draft Project List 2040 RTP Roadways Draft Project List RTP ID Street Name 157.08 Multiple 1st Av Corridor Project 161.08 Tucson 22nd St Corridor Project Description of Project Grant to Ina Rd 6 Widen 1st Ave. to a 4-6 roadway

More information

EAST VILLAGE SHOPPERS STUDY A SNAPSHOT OF TRAVEL AND SPENDING PATTERNS OF RESIDENTS AND VISITORS IN THE EAST VILLAGE

EAST VILLAGE SHOPPERS STUDY A SNAPSHOT OF TRAVEL AND SPENDING PATTERNS OF RESIDENTS AND VISITORS IN THE EAST VILLAGE EAST VILLAGE SHOPPERS STUDY A SNAPSHOT OF TRAVEL AND SPENDING PATTERNS OF RESIDENTS AND VISITORS IN THE EAST VILLAGE CONTENTS 2 4 5 6 7 16 17 19 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND METHODOLOGY RESULTS CONCLUSION

More information

Dear Mr. Tweed: Sincerely, Min Zhou, P.E. Vice President

Dear Mr. Tweed: Sincerely, Min Zhou, P.E. Vice President December 17, 2012 Mr. Steve Tweed City of Long Beach, Department of Public Works Traffic & Transportation Bureau, 10 th Floor City Hall 333 West Ocean Boulevard Long Beach, CA 90802 Subject: Broadway and

More information

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN COUNTS

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN COUNTS Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organization 61 E. Kennedy, 18th Floor Tampa, Florida 3361 111 813/272 594 FAX NO. 813/31 7172 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN COUNTS 2 & 25 TABLE OF

More information

2017 Northwest Arkansas Trail Usage Monitoring Report

2017 Northwest Arkansas Trail Usage Monitoring Report 2017 Northwest Arkansas Trail Usage Monitoring Report Summary Findings: The study showed that average daily weekday bicycle volumes per study site increased by about 32% between 2015 and 2017, from 142

More information

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey SACOG-00-009 1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey June 2000 Sacramento Area Council of Governments 1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey June 2000 Table of Contents

More information

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY Final Report Prepared for PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS AND THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Prepared by April 2008 Acknowledgments University of Arizona Parking

More information

Chapter PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND ACCOUNTABILITY. Introduction

Chapter PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND ACCOUNTABILITY. Introduction PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND ACCOUNTABILITY Introduction Performance measures are helpful in evaluating the progress being made toward achieving the goals and objectives of the Gateway Bicycle Plan. The Plan

More information

Tempe Bike Count Report 2017

Tempe Bike Count Report 2017 Tempe Bike Count Report 2017 By Clifford Anderson, Stevie Milne, William T. Terrance Tempe Bicycle Action Group Report Date: 9/18/2017 1. Abstract In March, the seventh annual city-wide bike count in Tempe

More information

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share 2011 Metro Vancouver Regional Trip Diary Survey Briefing Paper #1 An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share Introduction The 2011 Metro Vancouver Regional Trip Diary Survey is the latest survey conducted

More information

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented By: The Inavero Institute September 8, 2009

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented By: The Inavero Institute September 8, 2009 Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington Presented By: The Inavero Institute September 8, 2009 404 NW 10th Ave Suite 201 Portland, OR 97209 P 800.921.2640 www.inavero.com

More information

Roadway. Safety. Environment. Transit. FY Annual Report Valencia Rd. Magee Rd. Walking path along Sahuarita Rd.

Roadway. Safety. Environment. Transit. FY Annual Report   Valencia Rd. Magee Rd. Walking path along Sahuarita Rd. FY 2014-2015 Annual Report www.rtamobility.com 1 E. Broadway Blvd., Suite 401, Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 792-1093 [tel] (520) 620-6981 [fax] Roadway Valencia Rd. Safety Magee Rd. Environment Walking path

More information

2017 Annual Traffic Safety Report

2017 Annual Traffic Safety Report 2017 Annual Traffic Safety Report City of Santa Cruz Public Works Department I. Introduction The purpose of the 2017 City of Santa Cruz Traffic Safety Report is to provide an overview of traffic safety

More information

Final Report. Evaluation of Flashing Yellow Right Turn Arrow at Silverbell Rd and Cortaro Rd. FHWA Experimentation #4-329(E)

Final Report. Evaluation of Flashing Yellow Right Turn Arrow at Silverbell Rd and Cortaro Rd. FHWA Experimentation #4-329(E) Final Report Evaluation of Flashing Yellow Right Turn Arrow at Silverbell Rd and Cortaro Rd FHWA Experimentation #4-329(E) Marana, Arizona January 2009 Submitted To: Submitted By: FINAL REPORT EVALUATION

More information

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO EXPERIMENT WITH A BICYCLE BOX INTERSECTION TREATMENT Submitted by: City of Columbus Department of Public Service Date: June 26, 2009

More information

2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) ThinkTank Data Analysis Projects and Programs

2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) ThinkTank Data Analysis Projects and Programs 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) ThinkTank Data Analysis Projects and Programs Between October 2008 and February 2009, PAG held 20 ThinkTank sessions for the 2040 RTP with 275 participants. The

More information

Community and Business Outreach November 2015 Goal #1: Improve safety in the corridor Goal #2: Make a more livable corridor Goal #3: Improve mobility for all Data Collection Alternatives Recommendations

More information

Executive Summary. September 3, 2014

Executive Summary. September 3, 2014 D Executive Summary September 3, 2014 Study Background and Purpose Citizens for Picture Rocks is a community advocacy group representing the Picture Rocks Fire Department, Pima County Sheriff s Department,

More information

Results from the 2009 City of Los Angeles Bicycle and Pedestrian Count

Results from the 2009 City of Los Angeles Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Results from the 2009 City of Los Angeles Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 About the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition 3 2009 Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Objectives

More information

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9 MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9 December 18, 2012 112-566 Brief_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates

More information

January Project No

January Project No January 13 2015 Project No. 5070.05 Neil Connelly, Director University of Victoria, Campus Planning and Sustainability PO Box 1700 STN CSC Victoria, BC V8P 5C2 Dear Neil: Re: UVic 2014 Traffic Final Report

More information

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias, Bill Cisco Abstract As part of evaluating the feasibility of a road diet on Orange Grove Boulevard in Pasadena,

More information

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: 2294170 Ontario Inc. February 2, 2017 117-652 Report_1.doc

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary Executive Summary Background... ES-1 Pedestrian Network... ES-2 Bikeway Network... ES-2 Collision History... ES-2 Public Input... ES-4 Conclusions and Recommendations... ES-4 1. Introduction and Setting

More information

2012 Transit Study Randolph County

2012 Transit Study Randolph County 2012 Transit Study Randolph County Appendix B Technical Memorandum 2011 Transportation Survey Prepared for: Randolph County Housing Authority Country Roads Transit Submitted by: July 1, 2012 Table of Contents

More information

Appendix E: Bike Crash Analysis ( )

Appendix E: Bike Crash Analysis ( ) Appendix E: Bike Crash Analysis (2009-2012) Davis Bicycle Crashes Analysis 2009-2012 December 2013 Ride Walk Davis Active Transportation Program City of Davis December 2013 Prepared by: Jimmy Fong Active

More information

2012 TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT FACTS PREPARED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

2012 TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT FACTS PREPARED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT A 2012 TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT FACTS PREPARED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was assembled from data provided by the Castle Rock Police Department

More information

Safer Cycling: How the City of Vancouver is Proactively Improving Cycling Safety

Safer Cycling: How the City of Vancouver is Proactively Improving Cycling Safety Safer Cycling: How the City of Vancouver is Proactively Improving Cycling Safety Brian Patterson, MCIP, RPP Urban Systems 2015 Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals (CARSP) Conference Session

More information

This page intentionally left blank.

This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. COMMUNITY Coweta Community Overview Coweta Coweta, a residential community located in Wagoner County, is a suburb of Tulsa situated southeast of the metropolitan area

More information

This page intentionally left blank.

This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. COMMUNITY Glenpool Community Overview Glenpool Glenpool is a city of nearly 12,000 residents located in Tulsa County southwest of Tulsa and Jenks. The city is growing

More information

The Traffic Monitoring Guide: Counting Bicyclists and Pedestrians. APBP 2017 June 28: 11:15am-12:45pm

The Traffic Monitoring Guide: Counting Bicyclists and Pedestrians. APBP 2017 June 28: 11:15am-12:45pm The Traffic Monitoring Guide: Counting Bicyclists and Pedestrians APBP 2017 June 28: 11:15am-12:45pm 2 Presentation Organization Why count bicyclists and pedestrians? Why report count data? What resources

More information

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK CITY OF SYRACUSE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1200 CANAL STREET EXTENSION SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13210 DRAFT REPORT DATE: November 13,

More information

Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation

Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation Executive Summary TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October 2004 Prepared for: City of Tucson Department of Transportation May 2005 TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION

More information

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OUTREACH: INTERACTIVE MAP SUMMARY REPORT- 10/03/14

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OUTREACH: INTERACTIVE MAP SUMMARY REPORT- 10/03/14 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OUTREACH: INTERACTIVE MAP SUMMARY REPORT- 10/03/14 INTRODUCTION This document summarizes the results of the online interactive mapping exercise implemented by MIG for the

More information

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN VILLAGE OF NORTHBROOK MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN DRAFT PLAN OPEN HOUSE May 2, 2018 AGENDA 1. Community Engagement 2. Vision and Goals 3. General Structure of Plan 4. Recommendations Overview 5.

More information

Open Response to Public Comments

Open Response to Public Comments Open Response to Public Comments received for the FY2016-2020 Draft Transportation Improvement Program Introduction: Public comment was solicited as part of the development of the region s Transportation

More information

Bike Walk Twin Cities 2013 Count Report

Bike Walk Twin Cities 2013 Count Report Bike Walk Twin Cities 2013 Count Report Issued December 12, 2013 a program of transit for livable communities Executive Summary This annual report, the 2013 Bike Walk Twin Cities Pedestrian and Bicycle

More information

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Magnolia Place Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: City of San Mateo Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Updated January 4, 2010 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1 2. Existing Conditions...6

More information

Northbound San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project

Northbound San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project Project Overview Fed by a two-lane Interstate-280 (I-280) off-ramp, high vehicular volumes and speeds are longstanding issues along San Jose Avenue. Residents in the surrounding neighborhoods have expressed

More information

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN Bikeway action plan Summary The was held on March 5, 2007 at the Rochester Mayo Civic Center. The workshop was hosted by Rochester-Olmsted County Planning Department in collaboration with the League of

More information

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented to: The Bicycle Transportation Alliance September 8, 2009

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented to: The Bicycle Transportation Alliance September 8, 2009 Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington Presented to: The Bicycle Transportation Alliance September 8, 2009 404 NW 10th Ave Suite 201 Portland, OR 97209 P 800.921.2640

More information

Implementation challenge 2: Is there room for Complete Streets? Does street classification enable Complete Streets?

Implementation challenge 2: Is there room for Complete Streets? Does street classification enable Complete Streets? Implementation challenge 2: Is there room for Complete Streets? Does street classification enable Complete Streets? 1 Do we have to widen roads to fit everything? 2 There s room; it needs to be recaptured

More information

Proposed White Flint Separated Bike Lane Network September 2015

Proposed White Flint Separated Bike Lane Network September 2015 Proposed White Flint Separated Bike Lane Network September 2015 Abstract This report includes a proposed separated bike lane network for the White Flint Sector Plan area. Separated bike lanes create a

More information

Lincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial

Lincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial Lincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial Data Collection Report June 1, 2015 Department of Transportation Table of Contents I. Introduction...... 3 II. Data Collection Methodology & Results...... 5 A. Traffic Volume

More information

Traffic Signals at Bike Boulevards

Traffic Signals at Bike Boulevards Traffic Signals at Bike Boulevards A Review of Eight Locations in Seattle Presented at ITE Western District Annual Meeting July 13 th, 2016 Introduction What? Analysis of eight intersections before and

More information

City of Coronado Bicycle Map, Schools, Traffic Signals and Crossing Guard Locations

City of Coronado Bicycle Map, Schools, Traffic Signals and Crossing Guard Locations City of Coronado Bicycle Map, Schools, Traffic Signals and Crossing Guard Locations Early Childhood Development Center Crossing Guard - AM Crossing Guard - PM Coronado Middle Village Elementary Coronado

More information

City of San Francisco 2010 Bicycle Count Report

City of San Francisco 2010 Bicycle Count Report City of San Francisco 2010 Bicycle Count Report November 2010 0 Table of Contents Page No. List of Tables & Figures 2 Report Highlights 3 Introduction 4 Methodology 6 Results 6 Recommendations 12 Conclusions

More information

San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan - Chapter 5

San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan - Chapter 5 City of Yucaipa Population 51,476 City Overview Yucaipa is located in the eastern portion of the San Bernardino Valley area, at the foot of the San Bernardino Mountains, between the Cities of Redlands

More information

Fairview and Main Local Streets Improvement Plan

Fairview and Main Local Streets Improvement Plan PIM#2 Summary Report Meeting Format Date & Time: Location: Address: Prepared By: Community Open House August 11, 2016 5:30 p.m. 7:30 p.m. Red Lion Hotel 1800 W. Fairview Avenue, Boise Stephanie Borders,

More information

Appendix B. Summary of Public Comments Tri County Health Department Comments

Appendix B. Summary of Public Comments Tri County Health Department Comments Appendix B Summary of Public Comments Tri County Health Department Comments PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED AT THE OPEN HOUSES HELD ON NOVEMBER 17, 2010, NOVEMBER 18, 2010 AND NOVEMBER 22, 2010, AND FROM THE

More information

Moving Ahead. (Community Engagement) Chapter Three

Moving Ahead. (Community Engagement) Chapter Three 3 Community Chapter Three Moving Ahead (Community Engagement) engagement provided an exciting opportunity to engage Redwood City residents, workers, and business owners people who walk, bike, take transit,

More information

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning 1 Value of bicycle and sidewalk systems Safety Livability Mobility Health Personal Finances Economic Sustainability Clean Air Recreation Parking and congestion

More information

2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile

2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile TRANS Committee 2011 Origin-Destination Survey National Capital Region December 2012 TRANS Committee Members: City of Ottawa, including OC Transpo Ville de Gatineau Société de transport de l Outaouais

More information

Driverless Vehicles Potential Influence on Bicyclist Facility Preferences

Driverless Vehicles Potential Influence on Bicyclist Facility Preferences Driverless Vehicles Potential Influence on Bicyclist Facility Preferences MICHAEL BLAU, MCRP, LCI O T E C O C T O B E R 2 6, 2 0 1 6 S E S S I O N # 8 2 - E V A L U AT I N G T H E P E R F O R M A N C E

More information

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLIST CRASH ANALYSIS 2015

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLIST CRASH ANALYSIS 2015 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLIST CRASH ANALYSIS 2015 Central Arkansas Regional Transportation Study Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 CARTS Pedestrian/Bicycle Crash Analysis... 3 Report Format... 3 Results...

More information

2014 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children February 2016 Edition

2014 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children   February 2016 Edition 2014 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION February 2016 Edition Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children www.luhs.org/emsc Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

2012 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children September 2014 Edition

2012 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children   September 2014 Edition 2012 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION September 2014 Edition Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children www.luhs.org/emsc Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

2017 North Texas Regional Bicycle Opinion Survey

2017 North Texas Regional Bicycle Opinion Survey 2017 North Texas Regional Bicycle Opinion Survey Sustainable Development Program Kevin Kokes, AICP Public Meetings April, 2018 North Central Texas Council of Governments MPO for the Dallas-Fort Worth Region

More information

CITY OF SLO SEEKS INPUT ON PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FOR BROAD STREET BICYCLE BOULEVARD PROJECT

CITY OF SLO SEEKS INPUT ON PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FOR BROAD STREET BICYCLE BOULEVARD PROJECT City of San Luis Obispo, News Release DATE: August 1, 2017 RELEASE: Immediate CONTACT: Luke Schwartz (805) 781-7190 Transportation Planner-Engineer, Public Works CITY OF SLO SEEKS INPUT ON PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

More information

SANTA CLARA COUNTY I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY

SANTA CLARA COUNTY I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY SANTA CLARA COUNTY I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY Appendix D CrowdSpot Outreach Summary SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (VTA) 1-1 Introduction Background I-280 Corridor Study project used Crowdspot mapping

More information

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016 December 216 I. OVERVIEW & OUTREACH SUMMARY Introduction Washington County evaluated long-term transportation investments and strategies as part of the Transportation Futures Study. The purpose of the

More information

Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY

Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY OCTOBER 2017 PREPARED BY: 1.1 Background The I-280 Corridor Study within Santa Clara County is a high-level highway planning study led by the Santa Clara VTA, in partnership

More information

Elon Bicycle, Pedestrian and Lighting Plan. Pedestrian Rail Crossings Study

Elon Bicycle, Pedestrian and Lighting Plan. Pedestrian Rail Crossings Study Elon Bicycle, Pedestrian and Lighting Plan Pedestrian Rail Crossings Study Project Overview The Town of Elon, Elon University and the Twin Lakes Retirement Community began a comprehensive bicycle, pedestrian

More information

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need Chapter 2 Purpose and Need 2.1 Introduction The El Camino Real Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project (Project) would make transit and other transportation improvements along a 17.6-mile segment of the El Camino

More information

Bicycle Helmet Use Among Winnipeg Cyclists January 2012

Bicycle Helmet Use Among Winnipeg Cyclists January 2012 Bicycle Helmet Use Among Winnipeg Cyclists January 2012 By: IMPACT, the injury prevention program Winnipeg Regional Health Authority 2 nd Floor, 490 Hargrave Street Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 0X7 TEL: 204-940-8300

More information

Castro Valley Municipal Advisory Council March 19, 2018

Castro Valley Municipal Advisory Council March 19, 2018 Castro Valley Municipal Advisory Council March 19, 2018 1 Background 2 Draft Bicycle Vision and Pedestrian Networks 3 Next Steps 4 Updates Agenda 2 PROJECT AREA: Unincorporated Areas of Alameda County

More information

Conducting Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts in Your Community: Count Manager Training. MnDOT and MDH Bicycle and Pedestrian Counting Initiative 2015

Conducting Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts in Your Community: Count Manager Training. MnDOT and MDH Bicycle and Pedestrian Counting Initiative 2015 Conducting Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts in Your Community: Count Manager Training MnDOT and MDH Bicycle and Pedestrian Counting Initiative 2015 Objectives 1. Understand what the Bike/Ped Count Program

More information

RE: City of Portland Request to Experiment with HAWK/Bike signal

RE: City of Portland Request to Experiment with HAWK/Bike signal October 4, 2005 Regina S. McElroy, Director Office of Transportation Operations HOTO Room 3401 400 7 th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 RE: City of Portland Request to Experiment with HAWK/Bike signal

More information

Traffic Safety Plan Traffic Safety Plan 2015

Traffic Safety Plan Traffic Safety Plan 2015 Traffic Safety Plan 2015 Purpose Airdrie s last Traffic Safety Plan was created in 2011. The 2015 Traffic Safety Plan is a revised model of the traffic operations for the City of Airdrie. The purpose of

More information

Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Bicycle Safety Action Plan

Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Bicycle Safety Action Plan Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Bicycle Safety Action Plan January 24, 2017 VISION: Safe travel for all MISSION STATEMENT: Partner with the community to plan and fund transportation projects and programs

More information

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES 82 EAST BENCH MASTER PLAN 07 Introduction The East Bench transportation system is a collection of slow moving, treelined residential streets and major arteries that are the

More information

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Existing Traffic Conditions PREPARED FOR: ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION ORLANDO, FLORIDA PREPARED WITH: INWOOD CONSULTING ENGINEERS

More information

Lessons from the Green Lanes:

Lessons from the Green Lanes: Executive Summary Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes in the U.S. By Portland State University Chris Monsere Jennifer Dill Nathan McNeil Kelly Clifton Nick Foster Tara Goddard

More information

Vallecito Elementary School. Travel Plan

Vallecito Elementary School. Travel Plan Vallecito Elementary School Travel Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE... 1 1.1. SR2S PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING... 1 1.2. MARIN COUNTY MEASURE A... 1 2. VALLECITO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROFILE...

More information

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE CRASH STUDY

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE CRASH STUDY PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE CRASH STUDY This report summarizes an analysis of pedestrian and bicycle crashes that has been conducted by the CRCOG staff. In 2004, CRCOG completed a study of pedestrian crash data

More information

MEMORANDUM. DATE March 1, 2012 TO Town of Milton Mark Abbott, Seth Asante, and Efi Pagitsas Boston Region MPO Staff

MEMORANDUM. DATE March 1, 2012 TO Town of Milton Mark Abbott, Seth Asante, and Efi Pagitsas Boston Region MPO Staff MEMORANDUM DATE March 1, 212 TO Town of Milton FROM RE Mark Abbott, Seth Asante, and Efi Pagitsas Boston Region MPO Staff FFY 211 Safety and Operations Analyses at Selected Boston Region MPO Intersections:

More information

MIT Kendall Square Initiative

MIT Kendall Square Initiative MIT Kendall Square Initiative Volume II: Technical Studies and Information (NoMa Project and SoMa Project) Final Development Plan Submission Cambridge Planning Board #302 and #303 November 5, Submitted

More information

As a part of the San Mateo Bicycle Master Plan update, Toole Design conducted a needs and demand analysis that included:

As a part of the San Mateo Bicycle Master Plan update, Toole Design conducted a needs and demand analysis that included: To: Sue-Ellen Atkinson and Henry Choi, City of San Mateo From: Megan Wooley-Ousdahl, Laura Krull, and Jess Zdeb, Toole Design Date: March 1, 2019 Project: San Mateo Bicycle Master Plan Subject: Needs and

More information

City of Davis East Covell Corridor Plan

City of Davis East Covell Corridor Plan Community Open House #2 January 22, 2014 6:00 8:00 p.m. Veterans Memorial Center, Club Room City of Davis Introduction The (ECCP) is a taking a comprehensive look at the existing transportation systems

More information

9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd.

9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd. TIA GUIDELINES CHECKLIST Report Context Municipal Address Comment: Section 1.1 Location relative to major

More information