Vision Zero Task Force February 28, Collision Landscape Analysis

Transcription

1 Vision Zero Task Force February 28, 2017 Collision Landscape Analysis

2 Welcome! What happened since our last Task Force meeting: City Council adopted the Vision Zero Resolution Applied for an OTS grant for a Vision Zero Safety and Outreach Campaign Data analysis

3 Updated Schedule October 2016: Introduction and Purpose (done) November 2016: Guiding Principles (done) February 2017: Data Analysis March-April 2017: Collision Profiles June 2017: Draft Actions, Engineering June 2017: Draft Actions, Non-Engineering August 2017: Draft Action Plan

4 1. Review data analysis a. Trends b. Location c. Vulnerable populations d. Behavior 2. Breakout discussion 3. Next steps Today s Agenda

5 About the Data Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) Injury collisions only (not property damage) (2014 and 2015 data is provisional) Does not include state highway facilities Only includes collisions within the City of Sacramento Key Terms KSI = killed or severely injured vehicle includes motorcycle and truck, unless otherwise stated

6 TRENDS

7 All Collisions 519 collisions with victims killed or severely injured (KSI) between 2009 and 2013 non-ksi KSI

8 All Collisions 2,400 2,000 1,600 1, truck motorcycle pedestrian bicycle auto

9 Over the same period of time, the number of collisions with victims killed or severely injured increased by 7%

10 KSI Collisions truck motorcycle pedestrian bicycle auto

11 KSI Collisions Auto Collisions Down 14% Bike Collisions Up 40% Pedestrian Collisions Up 57%

12 Pedestrian collisions account for 10% of all collisions, but 43% of fatal collisions

13 Fatal Collisions truck motorcycle pedestrian bicycle auto

14 Mode Split ALL TRIPS* ALL COLLISIONS KSI COLLISIONS FATAL COLLISIONS 3% 13% 10% 11% 31% 55% 43% 50% 84% 79% 14% 7% pedestrian *2012 California Household Travel Survey, City of Sacramento bicycle vehicle

15 LOCATION

16 High Injury Network The HIN accounts for 64% of all collisions, on 11% of the roadway network ALL COLLISIONS

17 Commercial Areas Total Roadway Network KSI Collisions commercial areas non-commercial areas

18 Intersections 100% 80% 82% 60% 68% 61% 59% 56% 40% 20% 0% all KSI KSI vehicle KSI bicycle KSI pedestrian

19 60% of fatal collisions occur on streets with posted speed 40+ mph. These streets account for less than 10% of street network.

20 Posted Speeds 100% 8% 80% 12% 36% 39% 41% 30% 40% 60% 56% 40% 79% 44% 40% 40% 46% 39% 20% 29% 0% 16% 18% 16% Total Miles All Collisions KSI Collisions KSI Vehicle Collisions 20% 19% KSI Bike Collisions KSI Ped Collisions 10% Fatal Collisions 25 mph and under mph mph 50+ mph

21 Roadway Types 100% 80% 60% 77% 13% 16% 15% 7% 11% 21% 8% 11% 11% 10% 11% 14% 7% 7% 14% 19% 40% 70% 65% 64% 62% 67% 67% 20% 0% 13% Share of Roadway Network All Collisions KSI Collisions Vehicle KSI Collisions Bike KSI Collisions Pedestrian KSI Collisions Fatal Collisions arterials major collectors minor collectors local/other

22 Light Rail Stations All Collisions Collisions Near Light Rail Stations bicycle collisions pedestrian collisions vehicle collisions

23 VULNERABLE POPULATIONS

24 KSI Victims Share of Auto Driver/Passenger Victims Killed or Severely Injured Share of Bicyclist Victims Killed or Severely Injured Share of Pedestrian Victims Killed or Severely Injured KSI non-ksi

25 People age 60 and older account for less than 10% of all collisions, but over 25% of KSI pedestrian collisions

26 Age 100% 80% 60% 57% 66% 68% 75% 58% 69% 40% 20% 0% 16% 9% 6% 27% 25% 25% 11% Total Population All Victims Bicyclist Victims KSI Driver and Passenger Victims 26% 13% 14% 16% 19% KSI Pedestrian Victims KSI Bike Victims under

27 Disadvantaged communities account for ¼ of street network, but nearly half of fatal collisions

28 Disadvantaged Communities 100% 80% 60% 75% 62% 61% 63% 68% 54% 52% 40% 20% 25% 38% 39% 37% 32% 46% 48% 0% Share of Roadway Network All Collisions KSI Collisions Vehicle KSI Collisions Bike KSI Collisions Pedestrian KSI Collisions Fatal Collisions disadvantaged communities non-disadvantaged communities CalEnviroScreen 2.0 Disadvantaged Communities are defined under Senate Bill 535 as the top 25% census tracts within the State of California with the highest CalEnviroScreen 2.0 score. The score takes into account indicators related to environmental exposure and effects, sensitive populations, and socioeconomic factors.

29 HIN in Disadvantaged Communities 38% of the HIN falls within disadvantaged communities

30 BEHAVIOR

31 Alcohol Involved All Collisions KSI Collisions alcohol involved no alcohol involved

32 Hit-and-Run 25% 20% 23% 19% 15% 10% 13% 14% 9% 5% 0% all KSI KSI vehicle KSI bicycle KSI pedestrian

33 Top Violation for all collisions: Unsafe Speed (25%) Under the influence: 22% of KSI vehicle collisions Wrong side of road: 18% of KSI bike collisions Pedestrian violation: 46% of KSI pedestrian collisions

34 Driver Action 100% 80% 26% 23% 26% 9% 19% 18% 8% 60% 14% 13% 14% 40% 20% 56% 62% 59% 65% 70% 0% Drivers in All Collisions Drivers in KSI Collisions Drivers in KSI Vehicle Collisions Drivers in KSI Bike Collisions Drivers in KSI Pedestrian Collisions proceeding straight right turn left turn other

35 Pedestrian Action All Pedestrian Collisions KSI Pedestrian Collisions 21% 27% 28% 49% 29% 45% crossing in crosswalk crossing not in crosswalk other

36 Bicyclist Action All Bicycle Collisions KSI Bicycle Collisions 13% 16% 2% 7% 5% 73% 3% 7% 7% 67% proceeding straight right turn left turn traveling wrong way other

37 Breakout Discussion What was unexpected? Which findings do you think the community will find most compelling? Which findings make you want to learn more? What follow-up questions do you have?

38 Next Steps March-April 2017: Collision Profiles June 2017: Draft Actions, Engineering June 2017: Draft Actions, Non-Engineering August 2017: Draft Action Plan