To: The results of these surveys have been analysed and are summarised within this Technical Note.
|
|
- Amanda Hoover
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Technical Note Project: Histon Road / Milton Road, Cambridge Parking Surveys To: Andy Harrison Subject: Survey Report v1.6 From: Jonathan Barlow Date: 18 th February 2016 cc: Richard Jones / Dave Boddy Introduction Skanska has been commissioned by Cambridgeshire County Council (CCC) to undertake a review of private vehicle parking on two major roads into Cambridge; Histon Road and Milton Road. These roads are currently subject to a review of existing parking restrictions which may result in the transfer of existing provision onto adjoining side roads. To determine the schemes viability, surveys have been commissioned on each of the named main roads and selected side roads which may have capacity to accommodate additional parking spaces for private vehicles. The results of these surveys have been analysed and are summarised within this Technical Note. Study Area Both roads within the study area are located north of Cambridge City Centre, a location map indicating their relative position and the sections of study are seen within Figure 1. Figure 1: Study Area Location Map
2 Histon Road The area as outlined within Figure 2 below is 850m long and located west of Milton Road. The location for study is the full extent of Histon Road between its junctions with Victoria Road and Gilbert Road / Warwick Road. The side roads that have been included within the Parking Survey are shown beneath in red. Figure 2: Histon Road Study Area
3 Milton Road Milton Road is the longer of the two roads within the study, and is approximately 2.1km long within the study area. As shown beneath in Figure 3, the section of road included within this survey begins at the junction with the A1134 Chesterton Road (Mitcham s Corner) in the south and extends to approximately 80 metres north of the junction with Lovell Road. The locations of the side roads that have been surveyed are identified below in red. Figure 3: Milton Road Study Area
4 Data Collection Parking surveys were commissioned to understand the available provision and usage of parking on adjacent side roads. These were undertaken during over four neutral days in accordance with best practice, the dates and times can be seen below within Table 1 below. Day Date Times 1 09/11/ :00-19: /11/ :00-19: /11/ :00-19: /11/ :00-19:00 Table 1: Study Dates and Times Whilst the majority of roads were reviewed on an hourly basis between the hours of 07:00-19:00, there were several which were reviewed only once during the morning and during the evening. This was specified within the survey brief, and although occupancy rates can be determined from these surveys, the average parking duration cannot. Data Cleansing Several issues were identified with the data that was collected during the surveys. These issues are described beneath along, with the action taken to mitigate their impact on the analysis: On 11th November (Day 2) the surveyor filled out the log for Milton Road Part 2 incorrectly and included a longer section of the road than was necessary. To rectify this the site has been remeasured and the excess bays excluded from that dataset; The survey specification stated that Windsor Road should be surveyed as far as the width restriction (approximately 140 metres), however the entire length of the road has been surveyed. To rectify this the site has been re-measured and the excess bays excluded from that dataset; The survey for Rackham Close included the privately controlled residents parking bays at the eastern end of the road. These bays have access barriers that are controlled by the residents and are inaccessible to non-residential parking. As these cannot be considered as legitimate bays for the potential re-location of parking from Histon Road, they have been excluded from the dataset, and; The survey in the vicinity of the Aldi Supermarket located off Histon Road recorded parking in the shops parking spaces (private) and also along the access road (public), but did not differentiate between the two. Because of this it is not possible to determine which vehicles should have been included within the survey, and which vehicles should not, potentially implying that more parking spaces are available for public use than actually exist. As a result of this issue, this survey data from this location has been excluded from the analysis. It is important to note that the parking survey did not necessarily include the full length of each of the adjacent side roads, and was specified to vary by site due to the presence of features such as Primary Schools and traffic calming because these sections of road are not considered appropriate locations to redistribute parking from the main roads. The length of each road surveyed is provided below in the column Measured Road Length.
5 Calculation of Number of Bays Available To calculate the number of bays considered available for public parking, each road was measured using aerial imagery to determine the Road Length Available for Parking. This measurement excluded sections of road that were not considered to be viable for parking, including sections that: Provided access to a driveway, side road, garage or other similar access point, and; Within approximately 4 metres of a junction (this is less than guidance states, but better reflects driver parking behaviour on busy side roads), and; Where the carriageway was considered too narrow to accommodate a parked vehicle still allow other vehicles to pass in at least one direction then. The measurement of the Road Length Available for Parking did include: Residential parking spaces (to remain consistent with the surveyor), but that the number of residential parking spaces have been identified and separately recorded; Sections of road currently marked with double yellow lines, as the proposals to re-distribute parking from Histon Road and Milton Road include the removal of existing parking restrictions, which would create legitimate parking spaces along these sections, and; Narrow sections of road where parking along one side of the carriageway would impede two way travel, but allow vehicles to pass in one direction, giving way to oncoming traffic if necessary. These sections have been specifically noted. The Road Length Available for Parking was then divided by 5 (metres) to calculate the Number of Bays Available. The measurement of 5 metres was validated by measuring the space between parked vehicles using aerial imagery. The Number of Bays Available for each of the locations studied are shown in the tables beneath. Note that Histon Road and the Milton Road sections are highlighted in blue to designate these as the roads from which parking will be removed under the proposal. The number of bays, along with the average parking duration and average daily occupancy are shown beneath for each of the side roads. The averages are based on the data from all four days. Histon Road Road Name Measured Road Length (Metres) Road Length Available for Parking (Metres) Number of Bays (@5m per bay) Comments Akeman Street Histon Road Includes 200m of residential parking / 60m associated with shops Rackham Close Assumed north side only - would impede two way traffic Windsor Road Excludes anything beyond the width restriction Linden Close Includes 16 bays in parking area at the end Public Parking near Aldi N/a N/a N/a Parking is only for Aldi customers North Street Includes 90m of residential parking Benson Place Includes 55m of residential parking Benson Street Includes 185m of residential parking Westfield Lane Includes 20m of residential parking Priory Street Includes 155m of residential parking Canterbury Street Includes 370m of residential parking Canterbury Close Includes 50m of residential parking Table 2: Histon Road Parking Bays Calculation
6 Milton Road Road Name Milton Road Part 1 Milton Road Part 2 Milton Road Part 3 Milton Road Part 4 Chesterton Hall Crescent Measured Road Length (Metres) 2100 Road Length Available for Parking (Metres) Number of Bays (@5m per bay) Comments Includes 165m associated with shops Based on verges due to bus lane / double yellow lines George Street Assumed south side only Herbert Street Oak Tree Avenue Includes 85m of residential parking Highworth Avenue Hurst Park Avenue Ascham Road Fraser Road Middleton Close Downhams Lane Assumed north side only Birch Close Assumed north side only Kendal Way Includes 20m currently used by cycle feature Lovell Road Ramsden Square Woodhead Drive Table 3: Milton Road Parking Bays Calculation Treatment of Residential Parking The remaining capacity along the side roads has been reported for two different scenarios, these are: Residential Parking Removed ( Remove Res ) assumes that the parking bays currently identified as residential parking will have their parking restrictions lifted as part of the proposal and become available for general public parking, thereby freeing up any spare capacity in these locations, and; Residential Parking Retained ( Retain Res ) assumes that the parking bays currently identified as residential parking will retain their restrictions, and will not be available for general public parking as part of the proposals. The Retain Res scenario assumes that the vehicles recorded during the parking survey occupied the residential parking bays in the first instance, and then occupied non restricted spaces once the residential parking spaces were fully occupied. The number of remaining bays (spare capacity) are reported below for both scenarios.
7 Histon Road The results from the Histon Road parking survey are shown in Table 4 beneath. Histon Road Road Name Number of Bays (@5m per bay) Time in Bays (Hours) Daily Occupancy Remaining Capacity Bays Used () Remaining bays (Remove Res) Remaining bays (Retain Res) Akeman Street 40 03:46:52 34% 66% Histon Road 57 03:21:30 69% 31% Rackham Close 12 04:33:39 63% 37% Windsor Road 11 02:13:20 26% 74% Linden Close 34 04:07:47 37% 63% Public Parking near Aldi N/a N/a N/a N/a N/a N/a N/a North Street 22 N/a 25% 75% Benson Place 11 N/a 25% 75% Benson Street 37 N/a 41% 59% Westfield Lane 7 N/a 33% 67% Priory Street 33 N/a 25% 75% Canterbury Street 89 N/a 66% 34% Canterbury Close 16 N/a Table 4: Histon Road Results Summary The sites where the average parking duration is reported as N/A are those that were only surveyed once during the morning and once during the afternoon. Public Parking near Aldi has been excluded from the analysis as discussed earlier in this note. The surveys identified that with the exception of Rackham Close and Canterbury Street, each of the adjacent side roads have over spare capacity to accommodate additional on street vehicle parking based on the average of the results from all four days. If the 57 identified parking spaces identified along Histon Road were to be removed, then there would be sufficient available capacity on the side roads to accommodate the re-distributed vehicles. The survey identified the following average number of available spaces on the side roads adjacent to Histon Road: 90 available spaces should the existing residential parking be retained, and; 178 available spaces should the existing residential parking be removed. This figure has been calculated by multiplying the number of bays available by the average remaining capacity for each of the roads (but not including Histon Road). The spare parking capacity on the adjacent side roads to Histon Road is shown on the following pages.
8 WINDSOR ROAD 11 EXISTING BAYS 8 AVAILABLE BAYS HISTON ROAD 57 EXISTING BAYS 18 AVAILABLE BAYS AKEMAN STREET 40 EXISTING BAYS 26 AVAILABLE BAYS RACKHAM CLOSE 12 EXISTING BAYS 4 AVAILABLE BAYS CANTERBURY STREET 89 EXISTING BAYS 15 AVAILABLE BAYS CANTERBURY CLOSE 16 EXISTING BAYS 6 AVAILABLE BAYS LINDEN CLOSE 34 EXISTING BAYS 21 AVAILABLE BAYS PRIORY STREET 33 EXISTING BAYS 2 AVAILABLE BAYS WESTFIELD LANE 7 EXISTING BAYS 3 AVAILABLE BAYS BENSON STREET 37 EXISTING BAYS 0 AVAILABLE BAYS BENSON PLACE 11 EXISTING BAYS 0 AVAILABLE BAYS NORTH STREET 22 EXISTING BAYS 4 AVAILABLE BAYS
9 WINDSOR ROAD 11 EXISTING BAYS 8 AVAILABLE BAYS HISTON ROAD 57 EXISTING BAYS 18 AVAILABLE BAYS AKEMAN STREET 40 EXISTING BAYS 26 AVAILABLE BAYS RACKHAM CLOSE 12 EXISTING BAYS 4 AVAILABLE BAYS CANTERBURY STREET 89 EXISTING BAYS 31 AVAILABLE BAYS CANTERBURY CLOSE 16 EXISTING BAYS 11 AVAILABLE BAYS LINDEN CLOSE 34 EXISTING BAYS 21 AVAILABLE BAYS PRIORY STREET 33 EXISTING BAYS 25 AVAILABLE BAYS WESTFIELD LANE 7 EXISTING BAYS 5 AVAILABLE BAYS BENSON STREET 37 EXISTING BAYS 22 AVAILABLE BAYS BENSON PLACE 11 EXISTING BAYS 8 AVAILABLE BAYS NORTH STREET 22 EXISTING BAYS 17 AVAILABLE BAYS
10 Milton Road The results from Milton Road are reported beneath in Table 5. Milton Road Road Name Number of Bays per bay) Time in Bays (Hours) Daily Occupancy Remaining Capacity Bays Used () Remaining bays (Remove Res) Remaining bays (Retain Res) Milton Road Part :24:59 38% 62% Milton Road Part :51:33 28% 72% Milton Road Part :04:04 9% 91% Milton Road Part :35:20 7% 93% Chesterton Hall Crescent 72 03:42:41 53% 47% George Street 48 03:55:35 54% 46% Herbert Street 80 03:23:03 54% 46% Oak Tree Avenue 62 03:11:36 21% 79% Highworth Avenue 52 03:19:12 33% 67% Hurst Park Avenue 68 02:49:31 32% 68% Ascham Road 34 02:50:13 42% 58% Fraser Road 16 03:45:03 47% 53% Middleton Close 11 05:37:30 11% 89% Downhams Lane 7 03:19:19 34% 66% Birch Close 7 04:30:44 86% 14% Kendal Way 32 02:18:05 9% 91% Lovell Road 28 03:54:55 38% 62% Ramsden Square 27 02:57:22 9% 91% Woodhead Drive 29 03:09:50 16% 84% Table 5: Milton Road Results Summary The surveys identified that with the exception of Birch Close, each of the adjacent side roads have over, or close to, spare capacity to accommodate additional on street vehicle parking based on the average of the results from all four days. It is notable the average remaining capacity varies significantly across the sites surveyed. It is also noticeable that the southern sections of Milton Road (Parts 1 and 2) have less capacity than Parts 3 and 4, this is most likely because they are closer to the Cambridge City Centre. If the 160 identified parking spaces identified along Milton Road were to be removed, then there would be sufficient available capacity on the side roads to accommodate the re-distributed vehicles. The survey identified the following average number of available spaces on the side roads adjacent to Milton Road: 357 available spaces should the existing residential parking be retained, and; 363 available spaces should the existing residential parking be removed. This figure has been calculated by multiplying the number of bays available by the average remaining capacity for each of the roads (but not including Milton Road). The spare parking capacity on the adjacent side roads to Milton Road is shown on the following pages.
11 FRASER ROAD 16 EXISTING BAYS 9 AVAILABLE BAYS MIDDLETON CLOSE 11 EXISTING BAYS 10 AVAILABLE BAYS DOWNHAM'S LANE 7 EXISTING BAYS 5 AVAILABLE BAYS MILTON ROAD 3 38 EXISTING BAYS 35 AVAILABLE BAYS BIRCH CLOSE 7 EXISTING BAYS 1 AVAILABLE BAYS OAK TREE AVENUE 62 EXISTING BAYS 45 AVAILABLE BAYS HIGHWORTH AVENUE 52 EXISTING BAYS 35 AVAILABLE BAYS HURST PARK AVENUE 68 EXISTING BAYS 46 AVAILABLE BAYS MILTON ROAD 2 56 EXISTING BAYS 40 AVAILABLE BAYS CHESTERTON HALL CRESCENT 72 EXISTING BAYS 34 AVAILABLE BAYS LOVELL ROAD 28 EXISTING BAYS 17 AVAILABLE BAYS ASCHAM ROAD 34 EXISTING BAYS 20 AVAILABLE BAYS GEORGE STREET 48 EXISTING BAYS 22 AVAILABLE BAYS MILTON ROAD 1 41 EXISTING BAYS 25 AVAILABLE BAYS MILTON ROAD 4 25 EXISTING BAYS 23 AVAILABLE BAYS RAMSDEN SQUARE 27 EXISTING BAYS 25 AVAILABLE BAYS HERBERT STREET 80 EXISTING BAYS 37 AVAILABLE BAYS WOODHEAD DRIVE 29 EXISTING BAYS 24 AVAILABLE BAYS KENDAL WAY 32 EXISTING BAYS 28 AVAILABLE BAYS
12 FRASER ROAD 16 EXISTING BAYS 9 AVAILABLE BAYS MIDDLETON CLOSE 11 EXISTING BAYS 10 AVAILABLE BAYS DOWNHAM'S LANE 7 EXISTING BAYS 5 AVAILABLE BAYS MILTON ROAD 3 38 EXISTING BAYS 35 AVAILABLE BAYS BIRCH CLOSE 7 EXISTING BAYS 1 AVAILABLE BAYS OAK TREE AVENUE 62 EXISTING BAYS 49 AVAILABLE BAYS HIGHWORTH AVENUE 52 EXISTING BAYS 35 AVAILABLE BAYS HURST PARK AVENUE 68 EXISTING BAYS 46 AVAILABLE BAYS MILTON ROAD 2 56 EXISTING BAYS 40 AVAILABLE BAYS CHESTERTON HALL CRESCENT 72 EXISTING BAYS 34 AVAILABLE BAYS LOVELL ROAD 28 EXISTING BAYS 17 AVAILABLE BAYS ASCHAM ROAD 34 EXISTING BAYS 20 AVAILABLE BAYS GEORGE STREET 48 EXISTING BAYS 22 AVAILABLE BAYS MILTON ROAD 1 41 EXISTING BAYS 25 AVAILABLE BAYS MILTON ROAD 4 25 EXISTING BAYS 23 AVAILABLE BAYS RAMSDEN SQUARE 27 EXISTING BAYS 25 AVAILABLE BAYS HERBERT STREET 80 EXISTING BAYS 37 AVAILABLE BAYS WOODHEAD DRIVE 29 EXISTING BAYS 24 AVAILABLE BAYS KENDAL WAY 32 EXISTING BAYS 29 AVAILABLE BAYS
13 This section outlines the analysis of the parking duration in greater detail. In order to undertake this assessment, the parking data for each street was reviewed and the duration of stay for each recorded vehicle was classified as; 00:00-1:00 hours; 1:00-2:00 hours; 2:00-3:00 hours; 3:00-4:00 hours, and; 4:00 hours and above. This has been reported beneath by road for each of the four survey days, along with an average based on all of the days. The data has been displayed as a percentage in the graphs beneath, and is also shown in tabular form in Annex 1. In addition to this, the full analysis of the survey data will be supplied along with this technical note. 7 Akeman Street to to to Figure 8. Akeman Street Parking Durations At Akeman Street, a clear majority of vehicles parked at this location stayed for over four hours and this pattern was repeated throughout each of the surveyed days.
14 Histon Road to to to Figure 9. Histon Road Parking Durations Histon Road is characterised by two peaks of parking, the first less than one hour in duration and the second for longer than four hours. This pattern is seen across all four days of the parking study. Rackham Close to to to Figure 10. Rackham Close Parking Durations The data for Rackham Close indicates that over 45% of vehicles parking do so for a duration of four hours or more and this is consistent across each of the surveyed days.
15 Windsor Road to to to Figure 11. Windsor Road Parking Durations In comparison to Rackham Close, Windsor Road is characterised by short stay parking, generally less than one hour, this was particularly noticeable on and, whereas parking on and had a wider distribution across all time periods. 7 Linden Close Axis Title to to to Figure 12. Linden Close Parking Durations Within Linden Close there is a strong trend towards long term parking at this location; this trend is seen across all days. In addition to this, there is an above average trend for short term parking for up to two hours on a that is double the average and greater than during weekdays.
16 Milton Road Part 1 7 to to to Figure 13. Milton Road Part 1 Parking Durations Within the first section of Milton Road there is a strong trend for short term parking of less than one hour. All four surveyed days reported at least of vehicles parking for less than one hour. However, during this decreases slightly with an increase in the proportion of vehicles staying for between 1:00-2:00 hours. Milton Road Part 2 Frequency Figure 14. Milton Road Part 2 Parking Durations As seen within Figure 14 the general pattern of parking duration at Milton Road Part 2 is very similar in terms of percentages and distribution to Milton Road Part 1. This is characterised by significantly higher volumes of parking with a duration of less than one hour, and approximately 28% of vehicles parking for over four hours. The trend across all four days is fairly consistent with the exception of when there was a significantly higher proportion of parking of less than an hour (approximately 78% of vehicles) and less vehicles staying for over four hours (4%).
17 Milton Road Part 3 7 to to to Figure 15. Milton Road Part 3 Parking Durations This section of Milton Road is different to the previous two and is characterised by a much more evenly defined distribution of parking duration. It is notable that a significant proportion of the parking recorded on the was for four hours or greater. The and also generally experienced shorter duration parking, but as stated, the pattern at this site is much less defined than at the previous two sections of Milton Road Milton Road Part 4 8 to to to Figure 16. Milton Road Part 4 Parking Durations As with section 3 of Milton Road, the general pattern of parking is much less defined. This average trend shows that the majority of vehicles generally stay for less than one hour, or for greater than four hours. However, there were very few vehicles recorded at this site, which has led to all recorded vehicles, parked on being recorded as having parked for less than one hour`.
18 Chesterton Hall Crescent 8 7 to to to Figure 17. Chesterton Hall Crescent Parking Durations At Chesterton Hall Crescent there is a trend towards parking for over four hour, particularly on. This however this is offset by lower levels of parking across the other time periods, particularly for durations of between 3-4 hours. 7 George Street to to to Figure 18. George Street Parking Durations George Street is generally characterised by low volumes of parking throughout all time periods except four hours and above where they are found to be between 10- higher. In addition to this there is usually one day within each category that exceeds the average duration by approximately.
19 Herbert Street 7 to to to Figure 19. Herbert Street Parking Durations The results at this location are very consistent across all four surveyed days, and show that the vast majority of vehicles park for either less than one hour, or for four hours or more. The proportion of traffic that parks for between one and four hours is generally quite low. Oak Tree Avenue 8 7 to to to Figure 20. Oak Tree Avenue Parking Durations Oak Tree Avenue is generally characterised by low percentages of vehicles parking for short durations, and a clear trend for long term parking of four hours or more. The exception to this is, when the vast majority of recorded vehicles parked for less than one hour.
20 Highworth Avenue 7 to to to Figure 21. Highworth Avenue Parking Durations Like Herbert Street, Highworth Avenue has two clear peaks of parking duration, the first of less than one hour and the second of four hours or more. This is replicated across all days with the exception of, where recorded stays for over 4 hours were nearly twice the average. 7 Hurst Park Avenue to to to Table 22. Hurst Park Avenue Parking Durations Hurst Park Avenue also has general peaks of parking of less than one hour, or four hours and greater. In addition to this, cars parked on and were observed to stay for the longest period of time. This is in contrast to, where over of vehicles surveyed parked for less than one hour.
21 Ascham Road to to to Table 23. Ascham Road Parking Durations At Ascham Road approximately of the vehicles surveyed parked for one hour or less (with the exception of the when there was a much stronger bias towards parking of four hours or more). This next most significant parking duration observed was for four hours or more, which was on average 25% of the vehicles recorded over the four days. Parking between one and two hours on a is also nearly four times the average of that recorded during weekdays. 7 Fraser Road to to to Figure 24. Fraser Road Parking Durations Fraser Road has a reasonably even distribution of parking durations between; one hour or less and three to four hours. This ranges between 10-35% by day, but increases notably for vehicles parking for over four hours at this location. Parking by day is also reasonably evenly distributed with the exception of when no vehicles were recorded as staying for less than one hour, or between three and four hours, and approximately 65% of vehicles were parked for four hours or more.
22 1 Middleton Close 10 8 to to to Figure 25. Middleton Close Parking Durations In a similar situation to Fraser Road, Middleton Close has high levels of parking for four hours or more. Noticeably, no vehicles were recorded as parking for less than four hours on, and. Downhams Lane to to to Figure 26. Downhams Lane Parking Durations At Downhams Lane parking durations are varied with no clearly distinct pattern. The average for parking for four hours or more is higher than the other categories, however the range is variable for each day of the survey.
23 Birch Close to to to Figure 27. Birch Close Parking Durations Vehicles at this location tended to park for four hours or more on average. This is even more exaggerated during the survey when approximately 65% of vehicles parked for over four hours. All other parking durations are typically less than 25%, with the exception of where parking between one and two hours was approximately 38% of the total vehicles on that day. Kendal Way to to to Figure 28. Kendal Way Parking Durations The majority of vehicles at this location were reported as parking for less than one hour. Whilst this is the case, the average duration of stay is typically higher on at between one and two hours, or four hours or more.
24 Lovell Road 7 to to to Figure 29. Lovell Road Parking Durations At Lovell Road there is a clear trend towards parking for four hours or more, particularly on the when this figure was over of the vehicles recorded. The average across the other parking categories is relatively stable at approximately 15% per duration Ramsden Square 8 to to to Figure 30. Ramsden Square Parking Durations The surveys indicate that there is no consistent pattern to parking duration at Ramsden Square.
25 Woodhead Drive 8 7 to to to Figure 31. Woodhead Drive Parking Durations Woodhead Drive was observed to have large percentages of vehicles parked, either for stays of less than one hour or four hours or more. This varies by day, with short term parking being more prominent on the weekdays, and longer term parking more evident on the.
26 Summary The parking surveys were commissioned to investigate the potential for relocating existing parking provision from two major roads into Cambridge; Histon Road and Milton Road to adjoining side roads. Data from the traffic surveys indicates that there is an adequate amount of available parking capacity on the side roads adjacent to Histon Road and Milton Road. The analysis considered two scenarios, one with the existing residential parking spaces on the side roads retained, and the second with these restrictions removed (making the space available to general public use). With the existing residential parking retained, the survey identified an average of 90 available parking spaces on the side roads adjacent to Histon Road, and an average of 357 available parking spaces on the side roads adjacent to Milton Road. If the existing residential parking were to be removed, then there would be an average of 178 available parking spaces on the side roads adjacent to Histon Road, and an average of 363 parking spaces available on the side roads adjacent to Milton Road. The figures above are based on the average of all four survey days. The analysis has also considered parking patterns by road, and identified the percentage of vehicles that parked by duration based on the following classifications: 00:00-1:00 hours; 1:00-2:00 hours; 2:00-3:00 hours; 3:00-4:00 hours, and; 4:00 hours and above. The analysis of parking duration has been reported within this technical note. It was noticeable that where anomalies in parking patterns were identified, that these were generally on the survey, which may suggest a local event or incident that may have had an impact on normal parking behaviour. Full analysis of the survey data is supplied with this technical note.
27 Annex 1 Parking Duration Tables Akeman Street Duration (Hours) 14% to 7% 11% 24% 14% to 11% 9% 4% 5% 8% to 5% 2% 5% 57% 58% 47% 55% 54% Total Table 6. Akeman Street Duration Table Histon Road Duration (Hours) 35% 22% 37% 32% 32% to 4% 21% 19% 19% 15% to 11% 16% 6% 2% 9% to 1% 7% 3% 4% 4% 49% 33% 34% 43% Total Table 7. Histon Road Duration Table Rackham Close Duration (Hours) 27% 8% 17% to 8% 7% to 8% 9% 8% to 4% 18% 5% 48% 92% 73% 85% 63% Total Table 8. Rackham Close Duration Table Windsor Road Duration (Hours) 19% 10 64% 41% to 15% 27% 27% 21% to 4% 9% 9% 6% to 4% 2% 59% 14% Total Table 9. Windsor Road Duration Table
28 Linden Close Duration (Hours) 6% 2% 13% 26% 13% to 14% 13% 14% 27% 18% to 8% 9% 12% 3% 8% to 8% 13% 9% 7% 9% 64% 63% 53% 37% 52% Total Table 10. Linden Close Parking Durations Milton Road Part 1 Duration (Hours) 62% 41% 53% to 21% 9% 16% 21% 16% to 15% 7% 4% to 3% 7% 8% 13% 6% 12% 12% 21% 15% Total Table 11. Milton Road Part 1 Duration Table Milton Road Part 2 Duration (Hours) 52% 79% 34% 33% to 17% 9% 21% 15% 13% to 4% 8% 14% 17% to 4% 4% 4% 3% 27% 2% 28% 14% Total Table 12. Milton Road Part 2 Duration Table Milton Road Part 3 Duration (Hours) 12% 8% 18% to 35% 35% 33% 33% to 9% 29% 8% 33% 16% to 4% 6% 4% 22% 18% 67% 29% Total Table 13. Milton Road Part 3 Duration Table
29 Milton Road Part 4 Duration (Hours) 10 55% to 25% 9% to 9% to 5% 25% 23% Total Table 14. Milton Road Part 4 Duration Table Chesterton Hall Crescent Duration (Hours) 31% 5% 29% 25% 26% to 17% 2% 12% 34% 19% to 19% 14% 6% 13% to 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 76% 46% 33% 39% Total Table 15. Chesterton Hall Crescent George Street Duration (Hours) 35% 18% 18% 24% to 2% 11% 27% 13% to 8% 24% 4% 15% 11% to 6% 2% 7% 5% 5% 41% 61% 61% 35% 47% Total Table 16. George Street Herbert Street Duration (Hours) 39% 44% 16% 16% 34% to 17% 14% 12% 12% 14% to 3% 9% 5% 7% to 2% 6% 8% 9% 5% 33% 33% 55% 59% Total Table 17. Herbert Street
30 Oak Tree Avenue Duration (Hours) 27% 76% 13% 14% 45% to 23% 3% 17% 11% to 9% 6% 7% 5% to 5% 6% 7% 7% 6% 36% 63% 61% 34% Total Table 18. Oak Tree Avenue Highworth Avenue Duration (Hours) 58% 47% 17% 43% to 4% 11% 4% 14% 8% to 4% 3% 9% 3% 5% to 3% 14% 7% 3% 8% 25% 62% 36% Total Table 19. Highworth Avenue Hurst Park Avenue Duration (Hours) 65% 32% 32% 14% 44% to 6% 17% 15% 14% 12% to 3% 13% 3% 5% 6% to 6% 16% 9% 28% 39% 51% 29% Total Figure 20. Hurst Park Avenue Ascham Road Duration (Hours) 48% 29% 22% 45% to 11% 14% 16% 39% 16% to 4% 14% to 7% 3% 9% 4% 28% 55% 26% Total Figure 21. Ascham Road
31 Fraser Road Duration (Hours) 37% 16% to 25% 13% 16% 18% to 16% 3% 26% 13% to 16% 7% 28% 65% 37% 42% 41% Total Figure 22. Fraser Road Middleton Close Duration (Hours) 11% to 11% to 11% to % Total Figure 23. Middleton Close Downhams Lane Duration (Hours) 13% 29% 25% 19% to 25% 12% 14% 19% to 13% 24% 43% 22% to 6% 3% 29% 43% 25% 36% Total Figure 24. Downhams Lane Birch Close Duration (Hours) 17% 6% 14% 11% to 24% 38% 21% to 17% 8% to 17% 6% 11% 14% 13% 24% 89% 71% 46% Total Figure 25. Birch Close
32 Kendal Way Duration (Hours) 33% 53% 8 13% 46% to 44% 7% 19% to 3% 2% to 13% 8% 22% 23% 38% 25% Total Figure 26. Kendal Way Lovell Road Duration (Hours) 31% 11% 11% to 31% 5% 18% 12% 15% to 5% 7% 22% 11% to 15% 25% 2% 38% 55% 39% 63% 51% Total Figure 27. Lovell Road Ramsden Square Duration (Hours) 10 42% to 14% 12% to 9% 67% 12% to 27% 33% 8 33% Total Figure 28. Ramsden Square Woodhead Drive Duration (Hours) 76% 61% 52% to 14% 19% 22% 21% to 3% 17% 22% 6% to 5% 1% 5% 16% 33% 56% 19% Total Figure 29. Woodhead Drive
MILTON ROAD LLF PROJECT UPDATE
Greater Cambridge City Deal MILTON ROAD LLF PROJECT UPDATE 9 th May 2017 Project objectives Comprehensive priority for buses in both directions wherever practicable; Additional capacity for sustainable
More informationCambridge Cycling Campaign
February 15, 2016 Our Ref: RH 160215 Milton Road Consultation Response City Deal Team, SH1311, Shire Hall, Cambridge CB3 0AP Cambridge Cycling Campaign Llandaff Cambers, 2 Regent Street, Cambridge CB2
More informationThe Greater Cambridge City Deal
The Greater Cambridge City Deal Submission concerning the Histon Road initial consultation on better bus, cycling and walking trips. From: Carina O Reilly, Charlotte Perry and Mike Todd-Jones, City Councillors,
More informationHISTON ROAD Have your say on better public transport, cycling and walking journeys
HISTON ROAD Have your say on better public transport, cycling and walking journeys Have your say: Please complete the survey inside this leaflet or online at www.greatercambridge.org.uk/histonconsultation
More informationDesign Workshops Summary of all Feedback January 2017
Histon Road Corridor Design Workshops Summary of all Feedback January 2017 CITY DEAL AND GROWTH Commitment to Growth: Government, County, City and District Emerging Local Plans: 33,000 new homes 45,000
More informationMilton Road Project Update. Paul van de Bulk 30 January 2018
Milton Road Project Update Paul van de Bulk 30 January 2018 Milton Road Project Objectives Comprehensive priority for buses in both directions wherever practicable; Safer and more convenient routes for
More informationMILTON ROAD ~ MITCHAM'S CORNER PARAMICS MODEL INITIAL OPTION TESTING
MILTON ROAD ~ MITCHAM'S CORNER PARAMICS MODEL INITIAL OPTION TESTING NOVEMBER 216 MILTON ROAD ~ MITCHAM'S CORNER PARAMICS MODEL INITIAL OPTION TESTING Cambridgeshire County Council Type of document (version)
More informationM9/A90/M90 Edinburgh to Fraserburgh Trunk Road. A90 Tealing. Moving Cursor Programme Junction Study
A90 Tealing Moving Cursor Programme Junction Study This is an unpublished report prepared for the Transport Scotland, Trunk Road and Bus Operations Division (TRBO) and must not be referred to in any publication
More informationMILTON ROAD CONSULTATION REPORT THE GREATER CAMBRIDGE CITY DEAL
MILTON ROAD CONSULTATION REPORT THE GREATER CAMBRIDGE CITY DEAL MAY 2016 MILTON ROAD CONSULTATION REPORT THE GREATER CAMBRIDGE CITY DEAL Cambridgeshire County Council Consultation Report Project no: 70012012
More informationEUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK
EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK CITY OF SYRACUSE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1200 CANAL STREET EXTENSION SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13210 DRAFT REPORT DATE: November 13,
More informationNorth West Non-Technical Summary of the Transport Assessment September 2011
North West Non-Technical Summary of the Transport Assessment September 2011 Introduction This is a Non-Technical Summary of the findings of the Transport assessment work undertaken for the proposed North
More informationMap 1 shows the two roads, and how they fit into the public transport network in and around Cambridge.
Milton Road and Histon Road corridors bus priority infrastructure 1. Purpose The County Council would like to understand in more detail, the options to deliver the most effective corridor-based public
More informationGreater Cambridge City Deal. Initial consultation on better bus, cycling and walking trips. Milton Road
Greater Cambridge City Deal Initial consultation on better bus, cycling and walking trips Milton Road Response by Kings Hedges, East and West Chesterton Labour Parties The Greater Cambridge City Deal has
More informationCabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Highway Infrastructure Manager
LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES DATE: AUGUST 2015 DECISION MAKER: LEAD OFFICER: SUBJECT: WARDS: Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene Highway Infrastructure Manager PROPOSED CYCLING IMPROVEMENTS
More informationReduction of Speed Limit at Approaches to Railway Level Crossings in WA. Main Roads WA. Presenter - Brian Kidd
Australasian College of Road Safety Conference A Safe System: Making it Happen! Melbourne 1-2 September 2011 Reduction of Speed Limit at Approaches to Railway Level Crossings in WA Radalj T 1, Kidd B 1
More informationConsultation Report & Results August 2016
Queen Edith s Way Consultation Report & Results August 216 Summary The consultation on walking and cycling improvements along Queen Edith s Way took place from 2 June to 1 August 216. A total of 64 survey
More informationAt each type of conflict location, the risk is affected by certain parameters:
TN001 April 2016 The separated cycleway options tool (SCOT) was developed to partially address some of the gaps identified in Stage 1 of the Cycling Network Guidance project relating to separated cycleways.
More informationDESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21
DESIGN CODE Enterprise West Essex @ Harlow London Road North Design Code 21 4 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS 4.1 Table 4A sets out maximum building height standards for each character area within the LDO boundary.
More informationCycle journeys on the Anderston-Argyle Street footbridge: a descriptive analysis. Karen McPherson. Glasgow Centre for Population Health
Cycle journeys on the Anderston-Argyle Street footbridge: a descriptive analysis Karen McPherson Glasgow Centre for Population Health March 2017 Key points: There were 116,334 cycle journeys made using
More informationMEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner
MEMORANDUM Date: Updated August 22, 2017 To: Organization: Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner Boston Transportation Department From: Jason DeGray, P.E., PTOE, Regional Director of Engineering
More informationTo position power poles a safe distance from the road to minimise the likelihood of being accidentally hit by vehicles.
Policy Statement Subject Placement of Rigid Distribution Poles Along Roads With Speed Limits Exceeding 70KM/H Approved by Robert Rogerson Signature & Date Distribution Standards and Policy Manager Authorised
More informationKings Road, Herne Bay: Proposed Crash Remedial Measure
Kings Road, Herne Bay: Proposed Crash Remedial Measure To: Canterbury Joint Transportation Board 17 February 2015 By: Classification: Ward: Tim Read - Head of Transportation Unrestricted Herne Bay Summary:
More informationGuide to the Cycle Enfield Public Consultation on Enfield Town. Produced by the Save Our Enfield Town Campaign Group
Guide to the Cycle Enfield Public Consultation on Enfield Town Produced by the Save Our Enfield Town Campaign Group What s in this guide? Introduction Page 3 What Enfield Council says about Option 1 Page
More informationTable 1. Greatest Reductions in Traffic Volume
Interstate MAX Light Rail Traffic Impact Summary Portland Office of Transportation October 2005 Summary The majority of streets after construction of the Interstate MAX light rail extension experienced
More informationCorporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998
R1500 : Traffic Safety at 25 Avenue and 128 Street Intersection Corporate NO: R1500 Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 REGULAR COUNCIL TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998 FROM: General Manager, Engineering
More informationReport on trends in mode share of vehicles and people crossing the Canal Cordon to 2013
Report on trends in mode share of vehicles and people crossing the Canal Cordon 2006 to 2013 Dublin City Council, National Transport Authority, Civic Offices, Dun Scèine, Wood Quay, Harcourt Lane, Dublin
More informationTechnical note. 1. Introduction
Project: A428 study - Phase 2 To: Adrian Shepherd Subject: Park & Ride site locations From: Atkins Date: Jun 3, 2016 cc: Ashley Heller 1. Introduction 1.1. Purpose of Technical Note The purpose of this
More informationAppendix A. Road Classification Review of Outstanding Issues and Proposed Classifications (All Wards) Staff Report Road Classification System
Appendix A Road Classification Review of Outstanding Issues and Proposed Classifications (All Wards) Staff Report 2000 A.1 of A.10 A.2 of A.10 STAFF REPORT January 26, 2000 To: From: Works Committee Barry
More information5. The speed camera site outside the Parkwood Rest Home opposite Linwood College is a valuable deterrent. The speed camera site should be retained.
27. ALDWINS ROAD SPEED LIMIT General Manager responsible: General Manager City Environment, DDI 941-8656 Officer responsible: Author: PURPOSE OF THE REPORT Unit Manager, Transport and Greenspace Brian
More informationAPPENDIX I: ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND PROJECT CONSISTENCY STANDARDS
APPENDIX I: ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND PROJECT CONSISTENCY STANDARDS The Santa Barbara County Comprehensive General Plan Circulation Element Policy A states that: "The roadway classifications, intersection
More informationClassification Criteria
SCHEDULE D TO RECOMMENDED OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 40 SCHEDULE C-4 Road Criteria Criteria Traffic Service Objective Land Service/Access Typical Daily Traffic Volume Flow characteristics Travel Speed
More informationGrove Hall Business District Parking Analysis
Grove Hall Business District Parking Analysis February 2014 Prepared for The Roxbury Great Neighborhoods Partnership Nuestra Comunidad Development Corporation Dudley Square Main Streets Greater Grove Hall
More informationHarriet Fraser Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning
Appendix 5: Traffic Assessment 71 26 February 2015 Mr James Beban Senior Resource Consents Planner Cuttriss Consultants Ltd PO Box 30429 Lower Hutt PO Box 40170 Upper Hutt 5140 P 04 526 2979 M 027 668
More informationChapter 4 Route Window C3 Hyde Park and Park Lane shafts. Transport for London
Chapter 4 Route Window C3 Hyde Park and Park Lane shafts Transport for London HYDE PARK AND PARK LANE SHAFTS 4 Route Window C3 Hyde Park and Park Lane shafts Introduction 4.1 In this route window, which
More informationThe Commissioner of Engineering and Public Works recommends:
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE NOVEMBER 21, 2005 WESTON DOWNS COMMUNITY VILLAGE GREEN DRIVE REVIEW Recommendation The Commissioner of Engineering and Public Works recommends: That no further traffic calming measures
More informationLocal road mountable roundabouts are there safety benefits?
Local road mountable roundabouts are there safety benefits? Nimmi Monash University Accident Research Centre Abstract Roundabouts are internationally accepted as being highly effective in improving safety
More informationSHOTLEY BRIDGE VILLAGE TRUST
SHOTLEY BRIDGE VILLAGE TRUST Traffic & Parking Study - 2009 The Parking Lot, a focus group of the Shotley Bridge Village Trust, has undertaken this study. Evidence was gathered, through surveys during
More informationCambridge Parking Strategy Review
Cambridge Parking Strategy Review Cambridgeshire County Council Report May 2017 Our ref: 23132601 Client ref: SH Cambridge Parking Strategy Review Cambridgeshire County Council Report May 2017 Our ref:
More informationWoodward Hill Elementary School School Safety and Operation Review
Address: 6082-142 nd Street Surrey, BC, V3X 1C1 Site Visit: March 7, 2011 Principal Anne Mackie Report Date: November 25, 2011 Phone: (604) 594-2408 Email: Mackie_A@sd36.bc.ca The following report is one
More informationTERM CONTRACT FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SCOTTISH TRUNK ROAD NETWORK NORTH EAST UNIT
TERM CONTRACT FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SCOTTISH TRUNK ROAD NETWORK NORTH EAST UNIT A90 LAURENCEKIRK ROAD SAFETY SCHEME MONITORING STUDY Client: Transport Scotland Trunk Road and Bus Operations
More informationAPPELLANT S STATEMENT OF CASE
TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (AS AMENDED) APPEAL BY FOCUS INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CENTRE (FICC) AGAINST REFUSAL OF PLANNING PERMISSION BY THE LONDON BOROUGH OF HILLINGDON PLANNING PERMISSION IS SOUGHT
More informationCURRENT ORIGINAL REFERENCE SECTIONS. (Typical Section) (Typical Section) The Parade Island Bay : Concept Option Summary Sheets.
ORIGINAL (Typical Section) CURRENT (Typical Section) 3,900 3,000 2,000 1,500 3,100 1,600 3,100 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,900 3,000 1,800 600 2,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 600 1,800 2,500 Existing Planting Traffic
More informationGREY LYNN TOWN CENTRE PEDESTRIAN INTERCEPT SURVEY FINAL REPORT JUNE 2015
GREY LYNN TOWN CENTRE PEDESTRIAN INTERCEPT SURVEY FINAL REPORT JUNE 2015 Prepared for: Auckland Transport Prepared by: Aleph Limited Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 3 2.0 METHODOLOGY... 4 3.0 RESULTS...
More informationUNIT V 1. What are the traffic management measures? [N/D-13] 2. What is Transportation System Management (TSM)? [N/D-14]
UNIT V 1. What are the traffic management measures? [N/D-13] Some of the well-known traffic management measures are: a) Restrictions on turning movements b) One - way streets c) Tidal - flow operations
More informationAPPENDIX H EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
APPENDIX H EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS MEMO : Peter Steacy, P.Eng. Date: December 3, 2014 : Ian Borsuk, P.Eng. Job No.: 3414015-000 Subject: City of Ottawa O-Train Extension Planning & EA Study
More informationPROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PART OF TARNEIT ROAD & 1121 DOHERTYS ROAD, TARNEIT Prepared For: TCG (RM) Developments Pty Ltd MARCH 2014 OUR REF: 16740R#1 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PART OF TARNEIT
More informationMay Canal Cordon Report 2017
May 2018 Canal Cordon Report 2017 Report on trends in mode share of vehicles and people crossing the Canal Cordon to 2017 2 Analysis of trends in mode share of people crossing the canal cordon - 2017 Contents
More informationCycle Lanes Dixon Street (Worksop Road to Crayne Street)
Cycle Lanes Dixon Street (Worksop Road to Crayne Street) Purpose of the Report To seek a decision to continue the on-road cycle lanes from Worksop Road to Crayne Street along Dixon Street in conjunction
More informationLow Level Cycle Signals with an early release Appendices
Low Level Cycle Signals with an early release Appendices Track trial report This document contains the appendices to accompany the report from the second subtrial of a larger track trial investigating
More informationRhebogue Neighbourhood Greenway. Road Safety Audit Stage 2
Rhebogue Neighbourhood Greenway Road Safety Audit Stage 2 Report Number: 12/007/00/00057 July 2014 Mid West National Road Design Office Lissanalta House, Dooradoyle County Limerick Tel: 061 496 800 Fax:
More informationFORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION
FORM 901.3.A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION The following information is required from all applicants directly or indirectly accessing any collector or arterial road or as otherwise
More informationTraffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas
ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA February 13, 2015 Mr. Meran Dadgostar P.E., R.S. Town of Highland Park 4700 Drexel Dr. Highland Park, Texas 75205 Re: Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest
More informationTRAFFIC ADVISORY LEAFLET
TRAFFIC ADVISORY LEAFLET 2/04 Rural traffic calming: Bird Lane, Essex INTRODUCTION Many rural communities are concerned about traffic growth and high vehicle speeds. Local authorities have to balance the
More informationLand at Chesterton, Cirencester
Land at Chesterton, Cirencester Transport Update 22 October 2014 By Mark Gimingham BA (Hons) BTP CMILT MCIHT, Partner, i-transport LLP Purpose To provide an update on progress with the development of the
More informationMinistry of Education Flat Bush School Notice of Requirement. Integrated Transportation Assessment Report. February 2016
Ministry of Education Flat Bush School Notice of Requirement Integrated Transportation Assessment Report February 2016 TDG Ref: 12988-2 151105 ita flat bush.docx Ministry of Education Flat Bush School
More information10 SHERFORD Town Code
Key Fixes (Ref: Masterplan Book, section 4a. Land Use Budget and Key Fixes ) The Town Plan designs and allocates buildings, streets and spaces as accurately as possible in the understandable absence of
More informationBaseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings
Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings Highlights 67% of urban New Zealanders, 18 years of age or more own or have access to a bicycle that is in
More informationAccessibility, mobility and social exclusion
Accessibility, mobility and social exclusion Dionisis Balourdos Kostas Sakellaropoulos Aim The aim of this paper is to present data from the four cities in the project SceneSusTech concerning the issues
More informationTYPES OF CYCLING. Figure 1: Types of Cycling by Gender (Actual) Figure 2: Types of Cycling by Gender (%) 65% Chi-squared significance test results 65%
TYPES OF CYCLING 1,980 responses were received to this question (multiple answers were allowed), 727 female (41%) and 1,242 (71%) from male respondents. The most common responses for both genders were
More informationCambridgeshire floating bus stops interaction analysis
Cambridgeshire floating bus stops interaction analysis Final report December 2015 About Sustrans Sustrans makes smarter travel choices possible, desirable and inevitable. We re a leading UK charity enabling
More informationTraffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017
TMS Engineers, Inc. Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio June 5, 2017 Prepared for: Westlake City Schools - Board of Education 27200 Hilliard Boulevard Westlake, OH 44145 TRAFFIC
More informationFollowing are our comments and findings based on the site visit and review of the complete Traffic Impact Study:
3600 Horizon Boulevard Suite 250 Trevose, Pennsylvania 19053-4900 Voice 215.355.3577 Fax 215.355.3147 www.ekcorp.com November 1, 2006 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bureau of Highway Safety
More informationSpeed Limit Policy Isle of Wight Council
APPENDIX B Speed Limit Policy Isle of Wight Council 2009 Contents Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Links with the Local Transport Plan Section 2 Speed Limits on Urban Roads and Residential Areas 2.1 20mph Limits
More informationStreets for All : 9 Use of white lines
Streets for All : 9 Use of white lines On 1st April 2015 the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England changed its common name from English Heritage to Historic England. We are now re-branding
More informationLYNNWOOD ROAD ARTERIAL STUDY The effect of intersection spacing on arterial operation
LYNNWOOD ROAD ARTERIAL STUDY The effect of intersection spacing on arterial operation A J Joubert*, S L Burnett**, and T Ueckermann* *PWV Consortium, PO Box 1109, Sunninghill 2157 **Gautrans, Gauteng Department
More informationBirmingham City Council
Birmingham City Council A summary of the recommendations for the calculation of Saturation Flows at Traffic Signals. Index to Recommended Method of Calculating Saturation Flows 1 Introduction 2 Summary
More informationAs the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Avenue Road, City Council approval of this report is required.
REPORT FOR ACTION Corridor Safety Review - Avenue Road Date: September 27, 2017 To: Toronto and East York Community Council From: Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District
More informationTransport Assessment. Curtis Street Plan Change
Transport Assessment Curtis Street Plan Change Transport Assessment for Curtis Street Plan Change i Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Existing Conditions... 2 2.1 Location... 2 2.2 Study Area... 3 2.3
More informationThe Wincheap Society
The Wincheap Society s on sections of: Thanington 4th Arm Slip Road, Walking, Cycling & Horse-Riding Assessment & Review Report, by Peter Brett Associates, October 2017, on behalf of Pentland Properties
More informationFINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM July 2014 FINAL (SR 43) Project Development and Environment Study From State Road 60 (Adamo Drive) to I-4 (SR 400) Hillsborough County, Florida Work Program Item
More informationPublic Consultation on Braintree Integrated Transport Package (ITP) HAVE YOUR. Consultation open from 24 September to 5 November 2018 SAY
Public Consultation on Braintree Integrated Transport Package (ITP) HAVE YOUR SAY Consultation open from 24 September to 5 November 2018 Contents Introduction 3 Background 4 Springwood Drive Roundabout
More informationPUBLISHED PROJECT REPORT PPR850. Optimisation of water flow depth for SCRIM. S Brittain, P Sanders and H Viner
PUBLISHED PROJECT REPORT PPR850 Optimisation of water flow depth for SCRIM S Brittain, P Sanders and H Viner Report details Report prepared for: Project/customer reference: Copyright: Highways England,
More informationNORTH EAST UNIT 17/NE/0801/013. A90 Tealing Junction. Accident Investigation Study
NORTH EAST UNIT 17/NE/0801/013 A90 Tealing Junction Accident Investigation Study This is an unpublished report prepared for the Transport Scotland, Trunk Road and Bus Operations Directorate (TRBO) and
More informationProposed Strategic Housing Development at the Former Doyle s Nursery and Garden Centre and Benoni, Brennanstown Road, Cabinteely, Dublin 18
Proposed Strategic Housing Development at the Former Doyle s Nursery and Garden Centre and Benoni, Brennanstown Road, Cabinteely, Mobility Management Plan Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved
More informationLEA BRIDGE ROAD - A STREET FOR EVERYONE Public consultation document
LEA BRIDGE ROAD - A STREET FOR EVERYONE Public consultation document TELL US Bakers Arms to Leyton Green Road (Section D, E, F) Leyton Green Road to Whipps Cross Roundabout (Section G) YOUR VIEWS www.enjoywalthamforest.co.uk
More informationChicane Schemes. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 12/97 December Introduction
Traffic Advisory Leaflet 12/97 December 1997 Chicane Schemes Introduction Traffic Advisory Leaflet 9/94 "Horizontal Deflections" reported on the results of track trials carried out by the Transport Research
More information1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Division Prepared by: HNTB North Carolina, PC 343
More informationCITY OF WEST KELOWNA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL
CITY OF WEST KELOWNA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL Page 1 of 7 DEPARTMENT: Engineering Services SUBJECT: Traffic Calming Policy (Revised June 6, 2017) Policy Statement: The provision of traffic calming measures
More informationTravel Plan Monitoring Report. Bourton View, Wellingborough - Residential
Travel Plan Monitoring Report Bourton View, Wellingborough - Residential Prepared by: Developer Eyes Property and Estate Management, Broughton Grange Business Centre, Headlands, Kettering, Northants, NN15
More informationTraffic Sensitive Streets. Guidance Notes. GeoPlace Streets Team. Traffic Sensitive Streets. Guidance Note Page 1 of 7.
Guidance Notes GeoPlace Streets Team Guidance Note Page 1 of 7 Introduction The guidance note provides information on the definition, role and value of. It will also focus on how and why Traffic Sensitive
More informationRIVER CROSSINGS: EAST OF SILVERTOWN CROSSINGS
TRANSPORT FOR LONDON RIVER CROSSINGS: EAST OF SILVERTOWN CROSSINGS SUPPORTING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT Neil Georgeson July 2014 This report examines the traffic impacts that potential
More informationRESPONSIVE ROUNDABOUTS MYTH OR REALITY
RESPONSIVE ROUNDABOUTS MYTH OR REALITY Andy Poole WSP UK Three White Rose Office Park Millshaw Park Lane Leeds LS11 0DL andy.poole@wspgroup.com Keywords: Traffic signals, optimisation, micro-simulation,
More informationTOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES
TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES (Adopted by the Town Council on June 30, 2004) (Revised December 6, 2010) (Revised February 8, 2016) POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC
More informationMaynooth Traffic Management Plan & Traffic Model
Maynooth Traffic Management Plan & Traffic Model Traffic Survey Report Draft September 6 Designer AECOM Adelphi Plaza George's Street Upper Dún Laoghaire Co.Dublin Client Kildare County Council Aras Cill
More informationLIVERPOOL TRANSPORTATION MODELING TECHNICAL MEMO MAY 2009
LIVERPOOL TRANSPORTATION MODELING TECHNICAL MEMO MAY 2009 Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council 100 Clinton Square 126 N. Salina Street, Suite 100 Syracuse, NY 13202 Telephone (315) 422-5716; Fax
More informationComplete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias, Bill Cisco Abstract As part of evaluating the feasibility of a road diet on Orange Grove Boulevard in Pasadena,
More informationAppendix 5 Traffic Assessment
Appendix 5 Traffic Assessment 44 Harrison Transportation Best Start Educare Shelly Bay Road Beachlands Transportation Assessment Report September 2017 PO Box 11 557 Palm Beach Papamoa 3151 Reference: 187
More informationIMPROVEMENT OPTIONS REPORT - WONERSH VILLAGE. for WONERSH PARISH COUNCIL. March V3.0 stilwell-ltd.co.uk
IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS REPORT - WONERSH VILLAGE for WONERSH PARISH COUNCIL March 2016 V3.0 stilwell-ltd.co.uk Improvement Options Report Wonersh Village, Wonersh Date of Prepared Checked Revision Comments
More informationChelmsford City Growth Package
Chelmsford City Growth Package Public Consultation Document Volume 2 West Chelmsford July - August 2017 Chelmsford City Growth Package Public Consultation Document - Volume 2 - West Chelmsford Contents
More informationPOLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING
POLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING I. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This policy provides a procedure for the consideration, evaluation and implementation of requests for traffic calming measures. II. DEFINITIONS
More informationManaged Motorway Compliance Support. Hard Shoulder Abuse Final Report. December 2012
Managed Motorway Compliance Support Hard Shoulder Abuse Final Report December 12 Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for the Highways Agency s information and
More informationKings College, Otahuhu Proposed Plan Change. Integrated Transportation Assessment Report
Proposed Plan Change Integrated Transportation Assessment Report 23 October 2017 Project: Report title: Document reference: Kings College, Otahuhu Integrated Transportation Assessment Report J00700 Kings
More informationStrategic Director for Environment. Enclosures Appendix A - Option drawings. Jamie Blake- Strategic Director for Environment
Chipping Barnet Area Committee 9 July 2018 Title Report of Wards Status Urgent Key Cromer Road Request for 20mph Zone Strategic Director for Environment High Barnet Public No No Enclosures Appendix A -
More informationChristchurch City Council Assets & Network Unit Transport Technical Services & Design
Date: 6 th May 2014 From: To: Bill Homewood Transportation Engineer TOC Subject: Main South Road / Carmen Road Optimisation Budget Category: Network Optimisation Appendices Appendix 1 - Turning Counts
More informationScarlett Road Bridge & Road Improvements Lambton Park Community School - Gymnasium Tuesday November 28 th, 2017
Scarlett Road Bridge & Road Improvements Lambton Park Community School - Gymnasium Tuesday November 28 th, 2017 PROJECT LOCATION 2 SCARLETT ROAD BRIDGE Constructed in 1912, the bridge carries 4 active
More informationPost impact trajectory of vehicles at rural intersections
Post impact trajectory of vehicles at rural intersections Doecke SD., Woolley JE. and Mackenzie JR. Centre for Automotive Safety Research Abstract This report describes the path of vehicles after a collision
More informationTRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio December 12, 2012 Prepared for: The City of Huron 417 Main Huron, OH 44839 Providing Practical Experience Technical Excellence and Client
More informationWinterborne Houghton Parish Council Application for a Village Speed Limit
Winterborne Houghton Parish Council Application for a Village Speed Limit Winterborne Houghton Parish Council October 2016 Winterborne Houghton Application for a Village Speed Limit The purpose of this
More informationAccess Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF
Access Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF Table of Contents Introduction 2 Review and Approval Process 5 Technical Guidelines 9... 10... 12 3. Separation Distance: Non-Signalized All-Turns
More informationDetermining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin
*Manuscript Click here to view linked References 1 Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin Brian Caulfield 1, Elaine Brick 2, Orla Thérèse McCarthy 1 1 Department of Civil,
More information