APPENDIX D. May 22, 2002 Open House Summary and Materials
|
|
- Agatha Douglas
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 APPENDIX D May 22, 2002 Open House Summary and Materials
2 TH 36 Partnership Study Open House May 22, 2002 Summary of Survey Responses 1. If no new crossing of the St. Croix River is built (e.g. the existing bridge remains as a vehicular crossing), which of the future concepts do you believe is most appropriate? Concept A 6-lane express-way Concept B 6-lane express-way (Norell/Washington overpass) Concept C 4-lane parkway, 45 mph Concept D Single interchange at Osgood Concept E Single interchange at Greeley Concept F Buttonhooks east of Norell and west of Osgood Concept G Split interchanges at Osgood and Oakgreen/ Greeley Why? No Build avoid increased traffic and sprawl, give people a reason to use public transit No Build Any improvement in TH 36 would be constrained by 2 lane bridge and existing TH 36 west of Route 5 Parkway No new bridge will result in massive bottleneck Parkway is a good first step to a slow speed multi-way boulevard I don t think it needs to be made into a freeway Parkway would be least disruptive to the community Parkway would give a sense of calm rather than hellish speed Native landscaping would improve air/water quality 2. If a new St. Croix River crossing is constructed, which of the future concepts do you believe is most appropriate? Concept A 6-lane expressway Concept B 6-lane express-way (Norell/Washington overpass) Concept C 4-lane parkway, 45 mph Concept D Single interchange at Osgood Concept E Single interchange at Greeley Concept F Buttonhooks east of Norell and west of Osgood Concept G Split interchanges at Osgood and Oakgreen/ Greeley No-Build Why? No Build Don t encourage more traffic flow through the area Concept F would make it difficult to access the hospital Parkway Slower speeds Concept F modified with split diamond interchanges at Osgood and Washington Parkway would let people enjoy the beauty of the TH 36 corridor 3. Which concept or what specific improvements, if any, do you believe are the most appropriate for the short term (next 5-10 years), prior to the implementation of 1 or 2 above? No- Build
3 No new construction Concept E provides for immediate and future travel needs. Concept E provides efficient access to the hospital Add more cross streets Parking on frontage roads Regional and local circulation transit Landscaping Pedestrian/Bicycle safety measures Eliminate on and off ramp at Omaha Build a new bridge with an interchange to 95 Signs to route people to Hudson Crossing Multi-way boulevard None Frontage roads Build a light rail line Slower speed 4. How often (a), and when (b), do you typically travel this segment of TH 36? (a) 1-2 times a week or less 1-2 times per day More than twice daily 3-5 times a week or less (b) Most trips during peak Most trips during noncommuting 50/50 No response commuting hours hours *3 *one non-responder said they took the bus to St. Paul everyday 5. Of the concepts that include at-grade intersections (non-freeway), which do you believe is preferable? Concept A 6-lane express-way Concept B 6-lane express-way (Norell/Washington overpass) Concept C 4-lane parkway, 45 mph No-Build No Response Why? It is foolish to build anything until the bridge question is settled Parkway This corridor should serve community needs first and interregional needs second Until new bridge is built and road to North St. Paul improved, existing intersections are adequate There needs to be an interchange between 36 & Of the grade separated concept alternatives, which do you believe would be preferable if future traffic volumes make a freeway design unnecessary? Concept D Single interchange at Osgood Concept E Single interchange at Greeley Concept F Buttonhooks east of Norell and west of Osgood Concept G Split interchanges at Osgood and Oakgreen/ No-Build None
4 Greeley Why? Freeways are not necessary I want a parkway. I believe roads should bring towns of Stillwater and Oak Park together, not divide Modified Concept F Future traffic can only be handled with grade separation type interchanges Interchange to Greeley Street is important for hospital access Concept E would stop traffic on 3 rd and 4 th None Build a train I hope Mn/DOT and SRF will start to think outside the box and develop Hwy 36 as a Main Street/Boulevard 7. Landscaping and other aesthetic considerations (such as lighting, railing design, etc.) are part of any major highway project. For this segment of TH 36, these factors are: Not important Somewhat Very important Essential No response important Comments: No additional lighting Light pollution is already rampant along Hwy 36 Expansion should occur within the personality and flavor of the community Use native plants I want a lowered speed, a parkway with pedestrian paths 8. Would it be acceptable for local taxes to be used to pay for and maintain roadway plantings and other aesthetics? YES NO Maybe No Response Would you personally be willing to pay $10 every year to install and maintain plantings and other aesthetics? YES NO No Response Consideration of pedestrians and bicyclists needs are part of any major highway project. For this segment of TH 36, these factors are: Not important Somewhat Very important Essential No response important Comments:
5 Build parkway, but include bike/pedestrian way to get out of Stillwater These factors are essential for a place where people may use other forms of transportation Do not use 36 as a freeway These are public roadways aren t they? Transit should begin to look towards walking and bikes for health and to ease congestion Pedestrians and bicyclists can only be accommodated with a depressed freeway 10. If there were paths along TH 36 or its frontage roads would you use them for walking or bicycling? YES NO No Response If no, why? Plenty of other paths to walk This is out of my home territory Too far from my home Air quality If yes, would you use them primarily for: Shopping Exercise/Recreation Other *1 3 **2 *Respondent also answered exercise/recreation **One respondent answered exercise/recreation as well as other (visiting family) If yes, how often would you use them: A few times/year 1-2 times/week 3 or more times/week No response Would you use these facilities in the winter? YES NO No Response Comments: Probably wouldn t use it for biking in the winter without proper maintenance. Ice would make it unsafe. I walk year round 11. During the morning or afternoon rush hour would you be willing to wait at traffic signals or otherwise delayed for more than 10 minutes to travel on TH 36 between TH 5 and TH 95? YES NO No Response 7 2 1
6 12. During the morning or afternoon rush hour would you be willing to wait at traffic signals for more than 2 minutes to get across TH 36 or to get on TH 36 from a local street? YES NO No Response Other comments: Building new larger highways encourages a car culture complete with sprawl, pollution, noise, dependence on foreign or arctic oil and adds to the hectic pace of a fastpaced society. No more studies and plans until Mn/DOT has the money to build something Advertise open house more. No one I know was area of it. Use Hudson 94 freeway to go quickly though to Twin Cities or Wisconsin Protect neighborhoods. People, children, and families don t need the freeway concepts. We need a transit hub We need bus stops in dedicated shoulders Thank you for helping the communities find a solution everyone can live with This study is totally unacceptable to me. Why wasn t alternative transit included in the analysis? You did not address any issues regarding increased water pollution due to storm water runoff. Re-do analysis and include light rail alternative. Thank you for the handouts that included the copies of your presentation boards.
7 Trunk Highway 36 Partnership Study Public Open House The Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) for the TH 36 Partnership Study invites you to participate in a public open house: Wednesday, May 22, :30 7:30 p.m. Stillwater Area High School Cafeteria 5701 Stillwater Blvd. N., Stillwater MN The purpose of the study is to plan for long-term TH 36 improvements between TH 5 and TH 95 given a range of future conditions for the Stillwater-Oak Park Heights area. The study will examine alternative designs of intersections (including possible construction of interchanges) as well as modifications for TH 36 itself (expansion to six-lanes, conversion to a parkway or to a freeway) under both future conditions with no new bridge and with a new bridge. A Policy Advisory Committee consisting of representatives from Stillwater, Oak Park Heights and Washington County has been set up to guide the study. These study partners and the Minnesota Department of Transportation are sponsoring the partnership study. The open house will provide information on the possible alternatives listed below. The Policy Advisory Committee seeks public input and comments on community priorities and the presented alternatives. The PAC has selected Alternatives B, E and F to represent the range of alternatives for detailed traffic operations analysis, but none of the alternatives have been rejected. Information presented at the open house will include: future traffic volumes and traffic operations, cost estimates, safety concerns, pedestrian and bicycle connections, and roadway aesthetics. TH 36 Concept Alternatives Please note that these alternative descriptions focus only on the functional description of the roadway system itself. More detailed design of any of the concepts could include pedestrian and bicycle facilities, aesthetic improvements, such as lighting or parkway-type plantings or other amenities as desired by the community and as agreed to by the funding agencies. Specific right-of-way impacts are not available at this time. L E G E N D Existing Frontage Road Improved Frontage Road Proposed New River Crossing and TH 36/TH 95 Interchange At-Grade Intersection Overpass Concept A: Expansion of TH 36 to six-lanes; preservation of all three at-grade intersections HWY 5 WASHINGTON GREELEY OSGOOD HWY 95 HWY 36/64 Additional TH 36 capacity provided by expansion to 6-lanes Access to TH 36 provided at Norell/Washington, Oakgreen/Greeley, and Osgood HWY 36 Frontage roads improved HWY 5 NORELL OAKGREEN OSGOOD HWY 95 Concept B: Expansion of TH 36 to six lanes; preservation of two at-grade intersections with Norell-Washington intersection converted to an overpass HWY 5 WASHINGTON GREELEY OSGOOD HWY 95 HWY 36/6 Additional TH 36 capacity provided by expansion to 6-lanes Access to TH 36 provided at Oakgreen/Greeley and Osgood only HWY 36 Overpass provided at Norell/Washington; no direct access to TH 36 HWY 5 NORELL OAKGREEN OSGOOD HWY 95 Frontage roads improved
8 TH 36 Concept Alternatives (cont.) Concept C: Parkway concept TH 36 remains 4-lanes; posted speed reduced to 45 mph; preservation of all three at-grade intersections HWY 5 WASHINGTON GREELEY OSGOOD HWY 95 HWY 36/64 Access to TH 36 provided at Norell/Washington, Oakgreen/Greeley, and Osgood Frontage roads improved HWY 36 Posted speed reduced from currently posted 50 mph to 45 mph HWY 5 NORELL OAKGREEN OSGOOD HWY 95 Assumes aesthetic improvements to corridor Concept D: Single interchange at Osgood HWY 5 WASHINGTON GREELEY OSGOOD HWY 95 HWY 36/64 Additional TH 36 capacity provided by conversion of this segment to a freeway; TH 36 remains 4 lanes HWY 36 Access to TH 36 provided at Osgood in addition to TH 5 and TH 95 Overpasses provided at Norell/Washington and Oakgreen/Greeley; no direct access to TH 36 HWY 5 NORELL OAKGREEN OSGOOD HWY 95 Frontage roads improved Concept E: HWY 36 HWY 5 Single interchange at Oakgreen/Greeley HWY 5 NORELL WASHINGTON OAKGREEN GREELEY OSGOOD OSGOOD HWY 95 HWY 36/64 HWY 95 Additional TH 36 capacity provided by conversion of this segment to a freeway; TH 36 remains 4 lanes Access to TH 36 provided at Oakgreen/Greeley in addition to TH 5 and TH 95 Overpasses provided at Norell/Washington and Osgood; no direct access to TH 36 Frontage roads improved Concept F: Buttonhook Interchanges at Osgood and Norell/Washington Additional TH 36 capacity provided by HWY 95 HWY 36/64 HWY 5 conversion of this segment to a freeway; Th 36 remains 4 lanes Access to TH 36 provided to/from frontage roads at locations west of at Osgood and east of HWY 36 Norell/Washington; no other access to TH 36 Overpass provided at Oakgreen/Greeley; Osgood and Norell/Washington HWY 95 HWY 5 Frontage roads improved HWY 5 NORELL NORELL WASHINGTON WASHINGTON OAKGREEN OAKGREEN GREELEY GREELEY OSGOOD OSGOOD Concept G: Split Interchanges at Osgood and Oakgreen/Greeley HWY 95 HWY 36/64 Additional TH 36 capacity provided by HWY 5 conversion of this segment to a freeway; TH 36 remains 4 lanes Access split between Osgood and Oakgreen/Greeley HWY 36 Overpass provided at Norell/Washington; no direct access to T 36 HWY 95 Frontage roads improved OSGOOD OSGOOD For more information about the TH 36 Partnership Study, please contact Lynne Bly, Mn/DOT Project Manager, at
9 Trunk Highway 36 Partnership Study Open House Project Information Sheet May 22, 2002 Recent examinations of future traffic volumes on Highway 36 during planning for a new St. Croix River Crossing and the more recent Highway 36 Corridor Management Plan have raised concerns about the ability of the existing roadway to adequately handle traffic in future years. Discussions with local leaders have revealed many different visions for the future of Highway 36 freeway, parkway, interchanges, at-grade intersections. These discussions also raised concerns regarding the condition and safety of the existing roadway and frontage roads. The current suspension of the St. Croix River Crossing project provides an opportunity to examine the range of options for the Stillwater-Oak Park Heights segment of Highway 36 and develop consensus about the future of this roadway. The Minnesota Department of Transportation has teamed with its local partners the City of Stillwater, the City of Oak Park Heights, and Washington County - to analyze various configurations of grade-separated or at-grade intersections in this segment of Highway 36 and determine which options best meet local as well as state highway needs, both long-term and as interim measures. A committee representing these partners the Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) - has been established to help ensure that the study accurately reflects local concerns, to identify relevant issues and potential alternatives, to evaluate study findings, and to make recommendations to Mn/DOT regarding potential future roadway and intersection designs. Study Process Previous design alternatives identified for this segment of TH 36 are represented by the seven concepts alternatives presented at this open house. The Policy Advisory Committee has chosen three representative concepts for more detailed traffic operations analysis. These three alternatives, when considered with the No Build Alternative (no future improvements to the roadways), provide information about the operations of all the alternatives. The Policy Advisory Committee will consider this information, and your input, as they make their recommendations. The study is scheduled for completion in July of Variable Conditions Because no decision has been made regarding the proposed St. Croix River Crossing, the study analysis has been conducted under both new bridge and no new bridge conditions. Other variables, such as local decisions regarding the location and intensity of new development, will affect the degree and timing of impacts to the roadway system. Given these variables, an outcome of the study may not be a recommendation for only one alternative. It is hoped that the Policy Advisory Committee can reach consensus about the benefits and limitations of the alternatives considered and indicate under what circumstances each is best suited. Final recommendations may likely have an If then format, identifying alternatives that either allow for incremental upgrades and/or flexibility in their implementation. (over)
10 Information presented at tonight s open house The information presented at tonight s open house includes: A map of the existing transportation system Land use plans for the Cities of Stillwater and Oak Park Heights A map of identified issues Concept Alternatives for the future development of TH 36 Representative layouts of these concept alternatives 2020 operational characteristics for 3 concept alternatives and the No Build condition Travel time analysis for 3 concept alternatives and the No Build condition Impacts to pedestrians and bicyclists Illustrated cross sections and perspective sketches of the parkway and freeway alternatives Your Input Written comments received at tonight s meeting will be used by the Policy Advisory Committee in determining their recommendations for the study. Please review the information presented tonight and complete a comment sheet and return it to project staff before you leave. We would prefer that all comment sheets be returned tonight as the Committee will be meeting next Wednesday, May 29, to review your input. If you have questions regarding the information presented, several project staff and Policy Advisory Committee members will be available to answer your questions. For additional information, please contact: Lynne Bly, Senior Transportation Planner Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Division Water s Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN (651) lynne.bly@dot.state.mn.us
11 Purpose of this Study
12 Transportation System
13 Land Use - Stillwater
14 Land Use -Oak Park Heights
15 Issues map
16 Concept Alts
17 No Build Alternative
18 Concept B
19 Concept E
20 Concept F
21 Tavel Times
22 Primary Ped and Bike
23 Concept Illustration
24 Summary of Alternatives
25 COMMENT SHEET TH36 PARTNERSHIP STUDY From Highway 5 to TH 95 in Stillwater and Oak Park Heights Open House Wednesday, May 22, 2002 Name: Address: Phone: The Policy Advisory Committee will consider a variety of conditions when making their final recommendations for roadway improvements that probably will not be made to years. The committee would appreciate your comments about the following questions: 1. If no new crossing of the St. Croix River is built (e.g. the existing bridge remains as a vehicular crossing), which of the future concepts do you believe is most appropriate? Concept: A B C D E F G No Build Why? 2. If a new St. Croix River crossing is constructed, which of the future concepts do you believe is most appropriate? Concept: A B C D E F G No Build Why? 3. Which concept or what specific improvements, if any, do you believe are most appropriate for the short term (next 5 10) years, prior to the implementation of 1 or 2 above? 4. How often (a), and when (b), do you typically travel this segment of TH 36? a. 1-2 times a week or less 1-2 times per day more than twice daily b. most trips during peak commuting hours most trips during non-commuting hours 5. Of the concepts that include at-grade intersections (non-freeway), which do you believe is preferable? Concept: A B C No Build Why? 6. Of the grade-separated concept alternatives, which do you believe would be preferable if future traffic volumes make a freeway design necessary? Concept: D E F G Why?
26 7. Landscaping and other aesthetic considerations (such as lighting, railing design, etc.) are part of any major highway project. For this segment of TH 36, these factors are: (circle one) Not important Somewhat important Very important Essential Comments: 8. Would it be acceptable for local taxes to be used to pay for and maintain roadway plantings and other aesthetics? (circle one) Yes No Would you personally be willing to pay $10 every year to install and maintain plantings and other aesthetics? (circle one) Yes No 9. Consideration of pedestrians and bicyclists needs are part of any major highway project. For this segment of TH 36, these factors are: (circle one) Not important Somewhat important Very important Essential Comments: 10. If there were paths along TH 36 or its frontage roads would you use them for walking or bicycling? (circle one) Yes No If no, why? If yes, would you use them primarily for (circle one): shopping exercise/recreation other If yes, how often would you use them (circle one): a few times/yr. 1-2 times/wk. 3 or more times/wk. Would you use these facilities in the winter? Yes No Comments: 11. During the morning or afternoon rush hour would you be willing to wait at traffic signals or otherwise delayed for more than 10 minutes to travel on TH 36 between TH 5 and TH 95? (circle one) Yes No 12. During the morning or afternoon rush hour would you be willing to wait at traffic signals for more than 2 minutes to get across TH 36 or to get on TH 36 from a local street? (circle one) Yes No Other comments:
27
28
DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP
DRAFT NOT FINAL (Note: document was not finalized due to an eastbound stopping site distance design issue that requires more detailed bridge and roadway design considerations. This discussion starts on
More informationLee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses
Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses Introduction At the Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House held Thursday, June 7, 2007
More informationRegional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin
Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin #118274 May 24, 2006 1 Introduction The Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) is the official areawide planning agency
More informationCity of Davis East Covell Corridor Plan
Community Open House #2 January 22, 2014 6:00 8:00 p.m. Veterans Memorial Center, Club Room City of Davis Introduction The (ECCP) is a taking a comprehensive look at the existing transportation systems
More informationEnvironmental Assessment Findings & Recommendations. Public Hearing November 13, 2014
Environmental Assessment Findings & Recommendations Public Hearing November 13, 2014 Welcome! Welcome and Introductions Project and Environmental Assessment Overview Public Comments Adjourn Purpose of
More informationApplication of a Complete Street
Application of a Complete Street Southbend to Prima Vista Update May 14, 2018 Meeting Agenda Perspective and History Public input received Typical sections being considered Presentation of the 2-lane master
More informationMASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
VILLAGE OF NORTHBROOK MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN DRAFT PLAN OPEN HOUSE May 2, 2018 AGENDA 1. Community Engagement 2. Vision and Goals 3. General Structure of Plan 4. Recommendations Overview 5.
More informationSouthbend to Prima Vista. October 30, Floresta Corridor Master Plan
Application of a Complete Street initiative and how it might function operationally 8 8 Southbend to Prima Vista October 30, 2017 Presentation Agenda 2 Perspective and History Traffic projections, Levels
More informationWelcome. Thank you for your interest in the Lewis & Clark Viaduct Concept Study
Welcome Thank you for your interest in the Lewis & Clark Viaduct Concept Study Please use the arrows in the upper left hand corner to navigate through the presentation. Use the envelope icon to ask a question
More informationSacramento Grid 2.0. The Downtown Transportation Study
Sacramento Grid 2.0 The Downtown Transportation Study April 20, 2016 The Grid 4.25 square miles Street grid defined at birth of City Lettered and numbered streets spaced every 400 ft East-west alleys halfway
More informationUS 41 COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY from University Parkway to Whitfield Avenue
41 US 41 COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY from University Parkway to Whitfield Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT FEBRUARY 2019 Project Overview The US 41 Complete Streets Corridor Planning Study,
More informationM-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016
M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Prepared for CITY OF BELTON By May 2016 Introduction Missouri State Highway 58 (M-58 Highway) is a major commercial corridor in the City of Belton. As development has
More informationLincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial
Lincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial Data Collection Report June 1, 2015 Department of Transportation Table of Contents I. Introduction...... 3 II. Data Collection Methodology & Results...... 5 A. Traffic Volume
More informationSanta Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY
Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY OCTOBER 2017 PREPARED BY: 1.1 Background The I-280 Corridor Study within Santa Clara County is a high-level highway planning study led by the Santa Clara VTA, in partnership
More informationBus Rapid Transit Plans
Twin Cities Region Bus Rapid Transit Plans ULI Minnesota Workshop Connecting Bus Rapid Transit to the Community December 15, 2009 John Levin Director of Service Development Metro Transit Metropolitan Area
More informationChapter 6 Transportation Plan
Chapter 6 Transportation Plan Transportation Plan Introduction Chapter 6 Transportation Plan Transportation Plan Introduction This chapter describes the components of Arvada s transportation system, comprised
More informationLos Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation
Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, 2015 AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation Previous Presentations Los Altos Hills Town Council in May 2014 and February 2015 Palo Alto
More informationIntersection Control Evaluation Report Project: Alternative: Location: Evaluator:
Report Project: Alternative: Location: Evaluator: Franklin/Interstate-15 Interchange City of Lake Elsinore, 33 40'13.08"N 117 18'34.30"W Jeffrey Hsu 1 Introduction Policy Directive 13-02 calls for the
More informationState Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway
State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway SUNCOAST PARKWAY Both I 75 and the Suncoast Parkway are planning, or in the process of constructing,
More informationCOWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51
COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51 Lack of sidewalks along Ben Lumpkin Rd. Lack of crosswalks and ramps at intersection. Hwy 51 is wide to cross as a pedestrian. No ADA compliance or connection to
More informationBasalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations
Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations Introduction The Basalt Creek transportation planning effort analyzed future transportation conditions and evaluated alternative strategies for
More informationRoad Diets FDOT Process
Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Road Diets FDOT Process Humberto Castillero, PE, PTOE Roadway Design Office Purpose of Guide Develop a statewide lane elimination review process Balance state & local
More informationClackamas County Comprehensive Plan
ROADWAYS The County s road system permits the movement of goods and people between communities and regions, using any of a variety of modes of travel. Roads provide access to virtually all property. They
More informationSan Jose Transportation Policy
San Jose Transportation Policy Protected Intersections in LOS Policies to Support Smart Growth Presented by: Manuel Pineda City of San Jose Department of Transportation Bay Area Map San Francisco Oakland
More informationGeneral Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701
General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Meeting Agenda 1. Purpose of Scoping Meeting 2. Project Overview 3.
More informationI-20 ODESSA-MIDLAND CORRIDOR STUDY. Public Meeting for Schematic Design
I-20 ODESSA-MIDLAND CORRIDOR STUDY Public Meeting for Schematic Design The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being,
More informationTerwillegar Drive Expressway Draft Concept Plan
Terwillegar Drive Expressway Draft Concept Plan Anthony Henday Drive to Whitemud Drive November 28 5:00-8:00 p.m. December 1 10:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. Let s Talk Today you can: Learn about the new direction
More informationTRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010
TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS April 6, 2010 Roles of Transportation Providers Context and Policy Makers Division of Transportation and Traffic Other City Operations Other Transportation Operators CMA
More informationBay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project
Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project Dale Mabry Highway to Bayshore Boulevard February 08, 2018 Photo Source: Tampa Bay Times Alessandra Da Pra Meeting Format Introduction Resurfacing Information
More informationCorridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011
Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10 July 27, 2011 1 Agenda Recap CAG/TF #9 Public Meeting #2 Summary Single Mode Alternatives Evaluation Results Next Steps 2 3 CAG/TF #9 Recap CAG /TF #9
More informationFrequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions Business US 190 in Copperas Cove From Avenue D to Constitution Drive What is access management? A. Access Management is a growing effort by government agencies to improve how
More informationCorpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:
Introduction: The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) has continued the efforts started through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency
More informationHennepin County Transportation Department
Hennepin County Transportation Department Complete Streets Design and Implementation Prepared for the Complete Streets Task Force Craig Twinem, P.E. Design Division Manager Tom Johnson, P.E. Transportation
More informationHighway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report
Highway 217 Corridor Study Phase I Overview Report November 3, 24 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW Study purpose The Highway 217 Corridor Study is developing multi-modal transportation solutions for traffic problems
More information# Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan
#70421 Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan Public Information Meetings and Hearings May June 2002 1 Reason for Freeway System Study 270-mile
More informationHighway 169 Mobility Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #9 Meeting Record
Highway 169 Mobility Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #9 Meeting Record Thursday, May 25, 2017 8:30-10:30 a.m. City of Eden Prairie Heritage Rooms I and II Attendees Brad Larsen, MnDOT Angie
More informationTRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT
TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT A travel demand analysis was carried out to determine the operational issues and the potential benefit that adding traffic capacity would have on the road network. All the
More informationNorth Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy
North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy Preliminary, Near-term Recommendation 2016 April Transportation Improvement Strategy (TIS) Comprehensive and Analytical A multi-modal transportation strategy
More informationBrooklyn Boulevard (County Road 152) Reconstruction Project Phase I. OPEN HOUSE June 20, 2017
Brooklyn Boulevard (County Road 152) Reconstruction Project Phase I OPEN HOUSE June 20, 2017 Brooklyn Boulevard (County Road 152) Phase I Project Partners Project Lead Other Project Partners include Brooklyn
More informationSANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008
SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008 To assist VTA and Member Agencies in the planning, development and programming of bicycle improvements in Santa Clara County. Vision Statement To establish,
More information4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 4.9.1 INTRODUCTION The following section addresses the Proposed Project s impact on transportation and traffic based on the Traffic Study
More informationTransportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations
Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations Route 4 Corridor Study: Route 10 Corridor Study: Route 44 Corridor Study: Route 175 Corridor Study: Route 5/15 Corridor Study: Rentschler Field
More informationHARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE Community Workshop #4: Draft Plan Review December 3, 2009 D E S I G N, C O M M U N I T Y & E N V I R O N M E N T INTRODUCTIONS Key Project Staff: Alisa Shen, Project Manager,
More informationSection 7 Complete Green Street Guidelines DRAFT
Section 7 Complete Green Street Guidelines DRAFT 1 Section: 7.0 COMPLETE GREEN STREET GUIDELINES These guidelines serve as options to mitigate the environmental impact of a project as well as guide the
More informationCity of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session
City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session Agenda Item # 4c City Council Meeting 6/2/2015 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Robert Sisson, City Manager Discussion
More informationMonroe Street Reconstruction
Total participants: 45+ Monroe Street Reconstruction Cross Section Workshop Notes September 29, 2016, Wingra School Workshop Orientation, Technical and Functional Considerations: The workshop began with
More informationOcean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Alternatives & Trade Offs
Planning Commission March 4, 2009 Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Alternatives & Trade Offs Purpose of Tonight s Meeting Review concept plans and options Provide input on alternatives and trade-offs
More informationDULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director
DULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, 2015 Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director I-66 Corridor Conditions Steady population growth Employment growth in activity centers Congestion
More informationCOMMUNITY MEETING #1 Summary
COMMUNITY MEETING #1 Summary October 26, 2016 LOCATION: TIME: ATTENDEES: Dr. Phillips High School Cafeteria 6500 Turkey Lake Road, Orlando, FL 32819 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm 79 citizens Commissioner Scott Boyd,
More informationMASONIC AVENUE STREET DESIGN STUDY Community Workshop 3. Masonic Ave Street Design Study Community Workshop 3 September 30, 2010
Masonic Ave Street Design Study Community Workshop 3 September 30, 2010 Introduction MASONIC AVENUE STREET DESIGN STUDY Community Workshop 3 SF Municipal Transportation Agency Javad Mirabdal, Project Manager
More informationProject Description Form 6V
Project Description Form 6V Basic Project Information Submitting Jurisdiction/Agency: Prince William County Project Title: Route 15 Widening: Route 55 to south of RR tracks & Construct RR Overpass Project
More informationList of Display Boards
List of Display Boards Welcome Introduction Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Process Need and Justification for an Interchange Alternatives for Evaluation Vertical and Horizontal Alignments
More informationBroad Street Bicycle Boulevard City Council Study Session Summary
Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard City Council Study Session Summary Overview: On August 15 th, 2017, a City Council Study Session was held to invite community input and request City Council guidance on a
More informationYou are invited to an... OPEN HOUSE. Recommended Approach for the Franklin Avenue / East River Parkway Intersection
You are invited to an... OPEN HOUSE Recommended Approach for the Franklin Avenue / East River Parkway Intersection Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:30 to 8:30 pm St. Frances Cabrini Catholic Church 1500 Franklin
More informationCity of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary
City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary Prepared by: February 28, 2011 Why Plan? Encouraging healthy, active lifestyles through pathway and sidewalk connectivity has been a focus
More informationTonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.
Strathcona Neighbourhood Renewal Draft Concept Design Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas. What is Neighbourhood Renewal? Creating a design with you for your neighbourhood.
More informationCity of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A
A1. Functional Classification Table A-1 illustrates the Metropolitan Council s detailed criteria established for the functional classification of roadways within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Table
More informationWhat Is a Complete Street?
Session 5 Charleen Zimmer, AICP, Zan Associates May 5-7, 2010 What Is a Complete Street? May 2010 5-1 Not a Complete Street More of a Complete Street May 2010 5-2 Benefits of Complete Streets Safety for
More informationFI-2 I-66 Between Route 29, Lee Highway and Route 15, James Madison Highway
TRANSPORTATION PLAN INTENT Transportation is the key to the economic and social development of Prince William County and especially to the I 66/Route 29 Sector Plan area. This includes transportation for
More informationGiles Run Connector Road
Giles Run Connector Road Laurel Hill Adaptive Reuse Area to Laurel Crest Drive South County Federation Meeting June 14, 2016 History Connector road included in the Laurel Hill Comprehensive Plan amendment
More informationBroadway Complete Streets Project
Broadway Complete Streets Project Megan Johnson, P.E. Associate Civil Engineer James Pangburn, P.E. Consultant Project Manager After the construction of the highway system, Broadway was cut off
More informationEliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %
Traffic Dashboard Priorities Survey Responses Introduction 1) Are you familiar with bus rapid transit (BRT)? a. No, BRT is new to me. 597 23.5% b. I ve heard of BRT, but I don t know much about it. 1,136
More informationCITY OF SLO SEEKS INPUT ON PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FOR BROAD STREET BICYCLE BOULEVARD PROJECT
City of San Luis Obispo, News Release DATE: August 1, 2017 RELEASE: Immediate CONTACT: Luke Schwartz (805) 781-7190 Transportation Planner-Engineer, Public Works CITY OF SLO SEEKS INPUT ON PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
More informationCity of CENTER. Welcome! from I-694 to TH 610. Public Open House
Welcome! Public Open House Study Goals, & Objectives Goals: Establish the long-term vision for TH 252 Identify short-term improvements and strategies to address existing congestion, safety, and neighborhood
More informationMCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx
MCTC 8 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV.xlsx Madera County Transportation Commission Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy Multi-Modal Project
More informationLiving Streets Policy
Living Streets Policy Introduction Living streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create
More information5.0 Roadway System Plan
Southwest Boise Transportation Study Page 16 5.0 Roadway System Plan The Roadway System Plan outlines roadway improvements in the Initial Study Area. It forecasts future deficiencies on the arterial system,
More informationActive Transportation Rail to River Corridor. Community Meeting - Segment A
Active Transportation Rail to River Corridor Community Meeting - Segment A June 29, 2017 Tonight s Agenda > Open House (30 min) > Welcome / Project Overview > Presentation of 30% Design Refinements > Next
More informationPublic Meeting #1 Comment Summary
Public Meeting #1 Comment Summary This summary includes comments received on comment forms and during conversations between attendees and project team staff at the February 18, 2016 public open house.
More informationCherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary
Cherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary I. LEAD-IN TO SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION, POLLING AND STEERING COMMITTEE/TECHNICAL TASK FORCE DISCUSSION The meeting began
More informationJONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY
JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY Craighead County May 2007 JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY Craighead County May 2007 Prepared by Planning and Research Division Arkansas State
More informationAppendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD
Appendix T CCMP 3.3.4 TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD 3.3.4 Trail Traffic and Transportation Design Multi-use trails have certain design standards, which vary depending on the agency that
More information2011 Capital Projects University Area - Community Council Priority List Municipality of Anchorage
2011 Capital Projects University Area - Community Council Priority List Municipality of Anchorage 2 Project Management and Engineering Projects on 40th Ave Extension - Lake Otis Pkwy to Dale St $18,103,000
More informationChapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT
Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT OVERVIEW This chapter describes a cohesive set of strategies to create a bicycle boulevard, namely to make streets safer and more efficient for bicycle
More informationHighway 111 Corridor Study
Highway 111 Corridor Study June, 2009 LINCOLN CO. HWY 111 CORRIDOR STUDY Draft Study Tea, South Dakota Prepared for City of Tea Sioux Falls Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by HDR Engineering,
More informationEl Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan
El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan Connect-our-County Online Transportation User Survey Preliminary Results June 24, 2010 Years of Residence 2. How many years have you LIVED HERE?
More informationAPPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD INTERSECTION NEEDS AT SR 7 and OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SR 7 Extension Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study From Okeechobee Boulevard (SR
More informationWelcome. Background. Goals. Vision
Welcome The formal Public Information Centre (PIC) for the Transportation Master Plan How We GO will be held in early 2017. At that time we will present the recommended transportation system for Niagara
More informationCity of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session
City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session Agenda Item # 4b City Council Meeting 6/2/2015 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ISSUE(S): SUMMARY: FISCAL IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION: ALTERNATIVE COURSE OF ACTION: RESPONSIBLE
More informationUS 19 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFE ACCESS
US 19 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFE ACCESS TO TRANSIT CORRIDOR STUDY A JOINT EFFORT OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND FORWARD PINELLAS (F.K.A. PINELLAS COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION)
More informationPreliminary Design of Wayzata Boulevard Improvements(CSAH 112)
Project Area Map 6 COUNTY 112 COUNTY Preliminary Design of Wayzata Boulevard Improvements(CSAH 112) Public Open House Open House To Do List: Sign in Visit with Hennepin County staff and design team Learn
More informationProposed White Flint Separated Bike Lane Network September 2015
Proposed White Flint Separated Bike Lane Network September 2015 Abstract This report includes a proposed separated bike lane network for the White Flint Sector Plan area. Separated bike lanes create a
More informationExecutive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan
Route Corridor Master Plan Project Overview The Route Corridor Master Plan is a coordinated multimodal transportation and land use plan for the entire stretch of Route through East Whiteland Township,
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary
Executive Summary Background... ES-1 Pedestrian Network... ES-2 Bikeway Network... ES-2 Collision History... ES-2 Public Input... ES-4 Conclusions and Recommendations... ES-4 1. Introduction and Setting
More informationHIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015
HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Municipal Class Environmental Assessment PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015 ACCESSIBILITY Under the Accessibility Standards 2015 for Customer
More informationPrinceton Avenue and Spruce Street Transportation and Site Access Enhancements Project
Princeton Avenue and Spruce Street Transportation and Site Access Enhancements Project Mercer County Planning Division AECOM Transportation (formerly DMJM Harris) January 29, 2009 Agenda Project Status
More informationC C C
C-012-001 Thank you for your support for the creation of new public space and nonmotorized access between downtown and the waterfront through the Overlook Walk, the East-West Connections, and the Promenade.
More informationVision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods
N D. Focus Area II Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods Transit Road Focus Area II is located in the Hamlet
More informationSANTA CLARA COUNTY I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY
SANTA CLARA COUNTY I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY Appendix D CrowdSpot Outreach Summary SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (VTA) 1-1 Introduction Background I-280 Corridor Study project used Crowdspot mapping
More informationMaywood Town Hall Meeting. May 4, 2016
Maywood Town Hall Meeting May 4, 2016 1 AGENDA Overall I-290 Study Background Maywood Advisory Working Group (AWG) findings to date Noise Wall Update Next Steps 2 Questions? Study team members also available
More informationLong Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville
Long Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville Final Environmental Impact Statement Appendix 1-D Complete Streets Policy Checklist April 2017 0902ML PIN: Project Location: 18A-4 Floral
More informationBalancing Operation & Safety for Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic
Balancing Operation & Safety for Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic Brian Willham, PE, PTOE Iowa Director - MOVITE June 30, 2014 Learning Objectives: When & Why should we measure the performance of complete
More informationTransportation Day at the Capitol. Charlie Zelle Commissioner, MnDOT Feb. 16, 2017
Transportation Day at the Capitol Charlie Zelle Commissioner, MnDOT Feb. 16, 2017 State Transportation System Highways 59.1 billion annual vehicle miles traveled 33.1 billion on trunk highways Bridges
More informationBicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017
Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview TAB September 20, 2017 Bicycling & Walking in the Twin Cities Where are we now? The Bike-Pedestrian system Current trends New developments Where are we
More informationHennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning
Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning 1 Value of bicycle and sidewalk systems Safety Livability Mobility Health Personal Finances Economic Sustainability Clean Air Recreation Parking and congestion
More informationReport. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI
Report Typical Sections City of Middleton, WI December 2006 Report for City of Middleton, Wisconsin Typical Sections repared by: Traffic Associates LLC and STRAND ASSOCIATES, INC. 910 West Wingra Drive
More informationFreeway System Considerations
Session 11 Jack Broz, PE, HR Green May 5-7, 2010 Freeway System Considerations Mainline Transit: Shoulder Operations, BRT, Stations HOV, HOT, UPA Interchanges Exit Ramps Entrance Ramps Bridges Local Crossings
More informationTRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Agenda Staff Report
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Agenda Staff Report Agenda Item No. 5.a DATE: JULY 31, 2014 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DRAFT OLYMPIC CORRIDOR PREFERRED
More information3.9 Recreational Trails and Natural Areas
3.9 Recreational Trails and Natural Areas 3.9.1 Introduction Parks and other recreational facilities such as trails, bicycle routes, and open space are important community resources. This section discusses
More informationMAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report
Page 1 MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report August 1, 2012 MAG Project #481 Page 2 Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report Introduction
More information