"MONORAIL" --- MONORAIL BEAM ANALYSIS
|
|
- Scott Cain
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 "MONORAIL" --- MONORAIL BEAM ANALYSIS Program Description: "MONORAIL" is a spreadsheet program written in MS-Excel for the purpose of analysis of either S-shape or W-shape underhung monorail beams analyzed as simple-spans with or without overhangs (cantilevers). Specifically, the x-axis and y-axis bending moments as well as any torsion effects are calculated. The actual and allowable stresses are determined, and the effect of lower flange bending is also addressed by two different approaches. This program is a workbook consisting of three (3) worksheets, described as follows: Worksheet Name Doc S-shaped Monorail Beam W-shaped Monorail Beam Description This documentation sheet Monorail beam analysis for S-shaped beams Monorail beam analysis for W-shaped beams Program Assumptions and Limitations: 1. The following references were used in the development of this program: a. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. - Guideline "Hoisting Facilities" (August 22, 2005) b. Dupont Engineering Design Standard: DB1X - "Design and Installation of Monorail Beams" (May 2000) c. American National Standards Institute (ANSI): MH "Underhung Cranes and Monorail Syatems" d. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) 9th Edition Allowable Stress Design (ASD) Manual (1989) e. "Allowable Bending Stresses for Overhanging Monorails" - by N. Stephen Tanner - AISC Engineering Journal (3rd Quarter, 1985) f. Crane Manufacturers Association of America, Inc. (CMAA) - Publication No "Specifications for Top Running & Under Running Single Girder Electric Traveling Cranes Utilizing Under Running Trolley Hoist" (2004) g. "Design of Monorail Systems" - by Thomas H. Orihuela Jr., PE ( h. British Steel Code B.S. 449, pages (1959) i. USS Steel Design Manual - Chapter 7 "Torsion" - by R. L. Brockenbrough and B.G. Johnston (1981) j. AISC Steel Design Guide Series No. 9 - "Torsional Analysis of Structural Steel Members" - by Paul A. Seaburg, PhD, PE and Charlie J. Carter, PE (1997) k. "Technical Note: Torsion Analysis of Steel Sections" - by William E. Moore II and Keith M. Mueller - AISC Engineering Journal (4th Quarter, 2002) 2. The unbraced length for the overhang (cantilever) portion, 'Lbo', of an underhung monorail beam is often debated. The following are some recommendations from the references cited above: a. Fluor Guideline : Lbo = Lo+L/2 b. Dupont Standard DB1X: Lbo = 3*Lo c. ANSI Standard MH27.1: Lbo = 2*Lo d. British Steel Code B.S. 449: Lbo = 2*Lo (for top flange of monorail beam restrained at support) British Steel Code B.S. 449: Lbo = 3*Lo (for top flange of monorail beam unrestrained at support) e. AISC Eng. Journal Article by Tanner: Lbo = Lo+L (used with a computed value of 'Cbo' from article) 3. This program also determines the calculated value of the bending coefficient, 'Cbo', for the overhang (cantilever) portion of the monorail beam from reference "e" in note #1 above. This is located off of the main calculation page. Note: if this computed value of 'Cbo' is used and input, then per this reference the total value of Lo+L should be used for the unbraced length, 'Lbo', for the overhang portion of the monorail beam. 4. This program ignores effects of axial compressive stress produced by any longitudinal (traction) force which is usually considered minimal for underhung, hand-operated monorail systems. 5. This program contains comment boxes which contain a wide variety of information including explanations of input or output items, equations used, data tables, etc. (Note: presence of a comment box is denoted by a red triangle in the upper right-hand corner of a cell. Merely move the mouse pointer to the desired cell to view the contents of that particular "comment box".)
2 MONORAIL BEAM ANALYSIS For S-shaped Underhung Monorails Analyzed as Simple-Spans with / without Overhang Per AISC 9th Edition ASD Manual and CMAA Specification No. 74 (2004) Job Name: Subject: Job Number: Originator: Checker: Input: RL(min)=-0.73 RR(max)=9.13 Monorail Size: L=17 Lo=3 Select: S12x50 x=8.313 Design Parameters: S=0.75 Beam Fy = 36 ksi Beam Simple-Span, L = ft. S12x50 Unbraced Length, Lb = ft. Bending Coef., Cb = 1.00 Pv=7.4 Overhang Length, Lo = ft. Nomenclature Unbraced Length, Lbo = ft. Bending Coef., Cbo = 1.00 S12x50 Member Properties: Lifted Load, P = kips A = in.^2 d/af = 3.32 Trolley Weight, Wt = kips d = in. Ix = in.^4 Hoist Weight, Wh = kips tw = in. Sx = in.^3 Vert. Impact Factor, Vi = 15 % bf = in. Iy = in.^4 Horz. Load Factor, HLF = 10 % tf = in. Sy = 5.69 in.^3 Total No. Wheels, Nw = 4 k= in. J = in.^4 Wheel Spacing, S = ft. rt = in. Cw = in.^6 Distance on Flange, a = in. Support Reactions: (with overhang) Results: RR(max) = 9.13 = Pv*(L+(Lo-S/2))/L+w/1000/(2*L)*(L+Lo)^2 RL(min) = = -Pv*(Lo-S/2)/L+w/1000/(2*L)*(L^2-Lo^2) Parameters and Coefficients: Pv = kips Pv = P*(1+Vi/100)+Wt+Wh (vertical load) = kips/wheel = Pv/Nw (load per trolley wheel) Ph = kips Ph = HLF*P (horizontal load) ta = in. ta = tf-bf/24+a/6 (for S-shape) l = l = 2*a/(bf-tw) Cxo = Cxo = *l+0.192*e^(-6.0*l) Cx1 = Cx1 = *l-3.965*e^(-2.675*l) Czo = Czo = *l+1.120*e^(1.322*l) Cz1 = Cz1 = *l+1.060*e^(-7.70*l) Bending Moments for Simple-Span: x = ft. x = 1/2*(L-S/2) (location of max. moments from left end of simple-span) Mx = ft-kips Mx = (Pv/2)/(2*L)*(L-S/2)^2+w/1000*x/2*(L-x) My = 2.44 ft-kips My = (Ph/2)/(2*L)*(L-S/2)^2 Lateral Flange Bending Moment from Torsion for Simple-Span: (per USS Steel Design Manual, 1981) e = in. e = d/2 (assume horiz. load taken at bot. flange) at = at = SQRT(E*Cw/(J*G)), E=29000 ksi and G=11200 ksi Mt = 0.29 ft-kips Mt = Ph*e*at/(2*(d-tf))*TANH(L*12/(2*at))/12 X-axis Stresses for Simple-Span: fbx = 7.56 ksi fbx = Mx/Sx Lb/rt = Lb/rt = Lb*12/rt Fbx = ksi Fbx = 12000*Cb/(Lb*12*(d/Af)) <= 0.60*Fy fbx <= Fbx, O.K. 2 of 7 7/22/2013 7:29 AM
3 Y-axis Stresses for Simple-Span: fby = 5.14 ksi fby = My/Sy fwns = 1.21 ksi fwns = Mt*12/(Sy/2) (warping normal stress) fby(total) = 6.35 ksi fby(total) = fby+fwns Combined Stress Ratio for Simple-Span: S.R. = S.R. = fbx/fbx+fby(total)/fby S.R. <= 1.0, O.K. Vertical Deflection for Simple-Span: D(max) = in. D(max) = Pv/2*(L-S)/2/(24*E*I)*(3*L^2-4*((L-S)/2)^2)+5*w/12000*L^4/(384*E*I) D(ratio) = L/1445 D(ratio) = L*12/D(max) D(allow) = in. D(allow) = L*12/450 Defl.(max) <= Defl.(allow), O.K. Bending Moments for Overhang: Mx = ft-kips Mx = (Pv/2)*(Lo+(Lo-S))+w/1000*Lo^2/2 My = 1.58 ft-kips My = (Ph/2)*(Lo+(Lo-S)) Lateral Flange Bending Moment from Torsion for Overhang: (per USS Steel Design Manual, 1981) e = in. e = d/2 (assume horiz. load taken at bot. flange) at = at = SQRT(E*Cw/(J*G)), E=29000 ksi and G=11200 ksi Mt = 0.57 ft-kips Mt = Ph*e*at/(d-tf)*TANH(Lo*12/at)/12 X-axis Stresses for Overhang: fbx = 4.66 ksi fbx = Mx/Sx Lbo/rt = Lbo/rt = Lbo*12/rt Fbx = ksi Fbx = 12000*Cbo/(Lbo*12*(d/Af)) <= 0.60*Fy fbx <= Fbx, O.K. Y-axis Stresses for Overhang: fby = 3.32 ksi fby = My/Sy fwns = 2.42 ksi fwns = Mt*12/(Sy/2) (warping normal stress) fby(total) = 5.74 ksi fby(total) = fby+fwns Combined Stress Ratio for Overhang: S.R. = S.R. = fbx/fbx+fby(total)/fby S.R. <= 1.0, O.K. Vertical Deflection for Overhang: (assuming full design load, Pv without impact, at end of overhang) D(max) = in. D(max) = Pv*Lo^2*(L+Lo)/(3*E*I)+w/12000*Lo*(4*Lo^2*L-L^3+3*Lo^3)/(24*E*I) D(ratio) = L/503 D(ratio) = Lo*12/D(max) D(allow) = in. D(allow) = Lo*12/450 Defl.(max) <= Defl.(allow), O.K. Bottom Flange Bending (simplified): be = in. Min. of: be = 12*tf or S*12 (effective flange bending length) tf2 = in. tf2 = tf+(bf/2-tw/2)/2*(1/6) (flange thk. at web based on 1:6 slope of flange) am = in. am = (bf/2-tw/2)-(k-tf2) (where: k-tf2 = radius of fillet) Mf = in.-kips Mf = *am Sf = in.^3 Sf = be*tf^2/6 fb = 5.88 ksi fb = Mf/Sf Fb = ksi Fb = 0.75*Fy fb <= Fb, O.K. 3 of 7 7/22/2013 7:29 AM
4 Bottom Flange Bending per CMAA Specification No. 74 (2004): Local Flange Bending Point 0: sxo = ksi sxo = Cxo*/ta^2 szo = 1.25 ksi szo = Czo*/ta^2 Local Flange Bending Point 1: sx1 = 4.56 ksi sx1 = Cx1*/ta^2 sz1 = ksi sz1 = Cz1*/ta^2 (Note: torsion is neglected) (Sign convention: + = tension, - = compression) S-shape Trolley Wheel Local Flange Bending Point 2: sx2 = 6.46 ksi sx2 = -sxo sz2 = ksi sz2 = -szo Resultant Biaxial Point 0: sz = ksi sz = fbx+fby+0.75*szo sx = ksi sx = 0.75*sxo sto = ksi sto = SQRT(sx^2+sz^2-sx*sz+3*txz^2) <= Fb = 0.66*Fy = ksi, O.K. Resultant Biaxial Point 1: sz = ksi sz = fbx+fby+0.75*sz1 sx = 3.42 ksi sx = 0.75*sx1 st1 = ksi st1 = SQRT(sx^2+sz^2-sx*sz+3*txz^2) <= Fb = 0.66*Fy = ksi, O.K. Resultant Biaxial Point 2: sz = ksi sz = fbx+fby+0.75*sz2 sx = 4.85 ksi sx = 0.75*sx2 st2 = ksi st2 = SQRT(sx^2+sz^2-sx*sz+3*txz^2) <= Fb = 0.66*Fy = ksi, O.K. Y tw Z X tf Point 2 Point 0 tw/2 Point 1 bf/4 bf ta 4 of 7 7/22/2013 7:29 AM
5 MONORAIL BEAM ANALYSIS For W-shaped Underhung Monorails Analyzed as Simple-Spans with / without Overhang Per AISC 9th Edition ASD Manual and CMAA Specification No. 74 (2004) Job Name: Subject: Job Number: Originator: Checker: Input: RL(min)=-0.73 RR(max)=9.13 Monorail Size: L=17 Lo=3 Select: W12x50 x=8.313 Design Parameters: S=0.75 Beam Fy = 36 ksi Beam Simple-Span, L = ft. W12x50 Unbraced Length, Lb = ft. Bending Coef., Cb = 1.00 Pv=7.4 Overhang Length, Lo = ft. Nomenclature Unbraced Length, Lbo = ft. Bending Coef., Cbo = 1.00 W12x50 Member Properties: Lifted Load, P = kips A = in.^2 d/af = 2.36 Trolley Weight, Wt = kips d = in. Ix = in.^4 Hoist Weight, Wh = kips tw = in. Sx = in.^3 Vert. Impact Factor, Vi = 15 % bf = in. Iy = in.^4 Horz. Load Factor, HLF = 10 % tf = in. Sy = in.^3 Total No. Wheels, Nw = 4 k= in. J = in.^4 Wheel Spacing, S = ft. rt = in. Cw = in.^6 Distance on Flange, a = in. Support Reactions: (with overhang) Results: RR(max) = 9.13 = Pv*(L+(Lo-S/2))/L+w/1000/(2*L)*(L+Lo)^2 RL(min) = = -Pv*(Lo-S/2)/L+w/1000/(2*L)*(L^2-Lo^2) Parameters and Coefficients: Pv = kips Pv = P*(1+Vi/100)+Wt+Wh (vertical load) = kips/wheel = Pv/Nw (load per trolley wheel) Ph = kips Ph = HLF*P (horizontal load) ta = in. ta = tf (for W-shape) l = l = 2*a/(bf-tw) Cxo = Cxo = *l *e^(6.53*l) Cx1 = Cx1 = *l *e^(-1.364*l) Czo = Czo = *l+0.148*e^(3.015*l) Cz1 = Cz1 = *l+1.390*e^(-18.33*l) Bending Moments for Simple-Span: x = ft. x = 1/2*(L-S/2) (location of max. moments from left end of simple-span) Mx = ft-kips Mx = (Pv/2)/(2*L)*(L-S/2)^2+w/1000*x/2*(L-x) My = 2.44 ft-kips My = (Ph/2)/(2*L)*(L-S/2)^2 Lateral Flange Bending Moment from Torsion for Simple-Span: (per USS Steel Design Manual, 1981) e = in. e = d/2 (assume horiz. load taken at bot. flange) at = at = SQRT(E*Cw/(J*G)), E=29000 ksi and G=11200 ksi Mt = 0.67 ft-kips Mt = Ph*e*at/(2*(d-tf))*TANH(L*12/(2*at))/12 X-axis Stresses for Simple-Span: fbx = 5.96 ksi fbx = Mx/Sx Lb/rt = Lb/rt = Lb*12/rt Fbx = ksi Fbx = 12000*Cb/(Lb*12*(d/Af)) <= 0.60*Fy fbx <= Fbx, O.K. 5 of 7 7/22/2013 7:29 AM
6 Y-axis Stresses for Simple-Span: fby = 2.11 ksi fby = My/Sy fwns = 1.16 ksi fwns = Mt*12/(Sy/2) (warping normal stress) fby(total) = 3.27 ksi fby(total) = fby+fwns Combined Stress Ratio for Simple-Span: S.R. = S.R. = fbx/fbx+fby(total)/fby S.R. <= 1.0, O.K. Vertical Deflection for Simple-Span: D(max) = in. D(max) = Pv/2*(L-S)/2/(24*E*I)*(3*L^2-4*((L-S)/2)^2)+5*w/12000*L^4/(384*E*I) D(ratio) = L/1865 D(ratio) = L*12/D(max) D(allow) = in. D(allow) = L*12/450 Defl.(max) <= Defl.(allow), O.K. Bending Moments for Overhang: Mx = ft-kips Mx = (Pv/2)*(Lo+(Lo-S))+w/1000*Lo^2/2 My = 1.58 ft-kips My = (Ph/2)*(Lo+(Lo-S)) Lateral Flange Bending Moment from Torsion for Overhang: (per USS Steel Design Manual, 1981) e = in. e = d/2 (assume horiz. load taken at bot. flange) at = at = SQRT(E*Cw/(J*G)), E=29000 ksi and G=11200 ksi Mt = 1.41 ft-kips Mt = Ph*e*at/(d-tf)*TANH(Lo*12/at)/12 X-axis Stresses for Overhang: fbx = 3.67 ksi fbx = Mx/Sx Lbo/rt = Lbo/rt = Lbo*12/rt Fbx = ksi Fbx = 12000*Cbo/(Lbo*12*(d/Af)) <= 0.60*Fy fbx <= Fbx, O.K. Y-axis Stresses for Overhang: fby = 1.36 ksi fby = My/Sy fwns = 2.43 ksi fwns = Mt*12/(Sy/2) (warping normal stress) fby(total) = 3.79 ksi fby(total) = fby+fwns Combined Stress Ratio for Overhang: S.R. = S.R. = fbx/fbx+fby(total)/fby S.R. <= 1.0, O.K. Vertical Deflection for Overhang: (assuming full design load, Pv without impact, at end of overhang) D(max) = in. D(max) = Pv*Lo^2*(L+Lo)/(3*E*I)+w/12000*Lo*(4*Lo^2*L-L^3+3*Lo^3)/(24*E*I) D(ratio) = L/650 D(ratio) = Lo*12/D(max) D(allow) = in. D(allow) = Lo*12/450 Defl.(max) <= Defl.(allow), O.K. Bottom Flange Bending (simplified): be = in. Min. of: be = 12*tf or S*12 (effective flange bending length) am = in. am = (bf/2-tw/2)-(k-tf) (where: k-tf = radius of fillet) Mf = in.-kips Mf = *am Sf = in.^3 Sf = be*tf^2/6 fb = ksi fb = Mf/Sf Fb = ksi Fb = 0.75*Fy fb <= Fb, O.K. 6 of 7 7/22/2013 7:29 AM
7 Bottom Flange Bending per CMAA Specification No. 74 (2004): Local Flange Bending Point 0: sxo = ksi sxo = Cxo*/ta^2 szo = 0.87 ksi szo = Czo*/ta^2 (Note: torsion is neglected) (Sign convention: + = tension, - = compression) Local Flange Bending Point 1: sx1 = 2.42 ksi sx1 = Cx1*/ta^2 sz1 = ksi sz1 = Cz1*/ta^2 Local Flange Bending Point 2: sx2 = 8.60 ksi sx2 = -sxo sz2 = ksi sz2 = -szo Resultant Biaxial Point 0: sz = 8.72 ksi sz = fbx+fby+0.75*szo sx = ksi sx = 0.75*sxo sto = ksi sto = SQRT(sx^2+sz^2-sx*sz+3*txz^2) <= Fb = 0.66*Fy = ksi, O.K. Resultant Biaxial Point 1: sz = ksi sz = fbx+fby+0.75*sz1 sx = 1.81 ksi sx = 0.75*sx1 st1 = ksi st1 = SQRT(sx^2+sz^2-sx*sz+3*txz^2) <= Fb = 0.66*Fy = ksi, O.K. Resultant Biaxial Point 2: sz = 7.41 ksi sz = fbx+fby+0.75*sz2 sx = 6.45 ksi sx = 0.75*sx2 st2 = 6.98 ksi st2 = SQRT(sx^2+sz^2-sx*sz+3*txz^2) <= Fb = 0.66*Fy = ksi, O.K. Y Z X tw Point 2 Point 0 tf Point 1 bf 7 of 7 7/22/2013 7:29 AM
for Cold-Formed Steel Framing Products
Technical Guide for Cold-Formed Steel Framing Products The data in this guide is based upon the 2007 American Iron and Steel Institute s S00-07 North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed
More informationfor Cold-Formed Steel Framing Products
Technical Guide for Cold-Formed Steel Framing Products Technical Data in this publication is applicable to the following SFIA Member Company: For a complete directory of SFIA Members who are certified
More informationINTRODUCTION. Disclaimer
3 INTRODUCTION The Steel Framing Industry Association (SFIA) was formed with the objective of assisting companies having interests in the cold-formed steel framing industry to be more successful by unifying
More informationNow with SUPREME FRAMING SYSTEM! PRODUCT TECHNICAL GUIDE. Steel Stud Manufacturers Association
Now with SUPREME FRAMING SYSTEM! PRODUCT TECHNICAL GUIDE Steel Stud Manufacturers Association 2507 3064P Product Identification "S" and "SFS" - C-STUD/JOIST S and SFS-SECTIONS* * For "S" and "SFS" members,
More informationProduct Identification
Product Identification All SCAFCO products have a four part identification code which identifies the size (both depth and flange width), style, and material thickness of each member. Example: Member Depth:
More informationSTRONGER THAN STEEL SṂ
ProSTUD product catalog STRONGER THAN STEEL SṂ DRYWALL FRAMING SYSTEM ProSTUD D R Y W A L L FRAMING SYSTEM ClarkDietrich. WHERE INNOVATION TAKES FORM. 3 The ProSTUD Drywall Framing System can be called
More informationDESIGN OF AXIALLY LOADED STEPPED FOOTING DATA :- SBC of soil =200 KN /m 2 Concrete Mix =M20 Steel Grade = Fe 415 Clear cover of bottom slab =50 mm
STEPPED FOOTING The construction of sloped footing is sometimes difficult and when the slope of the top face of footing is more, say more than 1 vertically to 3 horizontally, it may be difficult to finish
More informationREPORT HOLDER: FRAMECAD LICENSING LTD. POST OFFICE BOX 1292 AUCKLAND 1140 NEW ZEALAND EVALUATION SUBJECT: COLD FORMED STEEL C SHAPES AND TRACKS
0 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ICC ES Evaluation Report ICC ES 000 (800) 423 6587 (562) 699 0543 www.icc es.org ESR 2361 Reissued 05/2017 This report is subject to renewal 05/2019. DIVISION: 05 00
More informationScissor Mechanisms. Figure 1 Torero Cabin Service Truck. Scissor Mechanism was chassis mounted and lifted the cabin to service aircraft
Scissor Mechanisms Scissor mechanisms are very common for lifting and stabilizing platforms. A variety of manlifts, service platforms and cargo lifts utilize this visually simple but structurally complex
More informationTank Tie off Report for Pipes Albuquerque 1/3
Tank Tie off Report for Pipes Albuquerque 1/3 Summary: The following report contains an analysis created by Core Engineering LLC for NuStar Energy. This report was commissioned to analyze anchor points
More informationprovides an increased stiffness and strength compared with standard cee studs, resulting in lighter headers which require less labor to install.
CURTAIN WALL SYSTEMS HEADER/SILL SOLUTIONS JAMSTUD HEADER/SILL ASSEMBLY VALUE delivers exceptional value when utilized as part of a header or sill assembly. s unique shape allows for the design and construction
More informationPractical Steel Connection Software Design Using AISC 2010 Standard
Practical Steel Connection Software Design Using AISC 2010 Standard Including: Practical Advice for Reviewing Software Generated Connection Designs Steve Ashton, P.E., SECB Limit States that Changed 2
More informationSTRONGER THAN STEEL SṂ
ProSTUD product catalog STRONGER THAN STEEL SṂ DRYWALL FRAMING SYSTEM ProSTUD D R Y W A L L FRAMING SYSTEM ClarkDietrich. WHERE INNOVATION TAKES FORM. The ProSTUD Drywall Framing System can be called many
More informationLevel 3 Cambridge Technical in Engineering 05822/05823/05824/05825/05873 Unit 3: Principles of mechanical engineering
Level 3 Cambridge Technical in Engineering 05822/05823/05824/05825/05873 Unit 3: Principles of mechanical engineering Monday 16 January 2017 Afternoon Time allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes You must have: the
More informationWELCOME: EXCEL ENGINE FOR SHIP CARGO ACCELERATIONS
WELCOME: EXCEL ENGINE FOR SHIP CARGO ACCELERATIONS What this Excel Sheet does This excel sheet calculates the accelerations on a Cargo being carried by a ship a. Accelerations due to ship motions: It calculates
More informationL-header Testing, Evaluation and Design Methodology
Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Specialty Conference on Cold- Formed Steel Structures (2000) - 15th International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures
More informationProperties: Flexural Stress: Deflection: Input Data: P = 0 kn/m width. L/2 w(total) = 17 kn/m²
For 19-W Light Duty Welded Subjected to Uniform Live Loading and/or Concentrated (Line-Type) Live Loading Light Duty Grating Size = 1-1/4 3/16 Grating Clear Span L = 4.08 ft = 1243.58 mm Uniform Live Load
More information2001 AASHTO Training Manual
2001 AASHTO Training Manual December 2004 MSC4014 12/04 Table of Contents I. 2001 AASHTO General Overview 1 General Overview 2 II. Wind and Allowable Stress Design 3 Three Second Gust vs. Fastest Mile
More informationFRAMING SYSTEM product catalog HDS STRONGER THAN STEEL. INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR FRAMING
product catalog STRONGER SM THAN STEEL. INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR FRAMING 2 Framing System The Framing System is a high-performance, cost-effective, multipurpose, heavy-duty framing stud for headers, jambs,
More informationCode Compliance Research Report CCRR-0224
Code Compliance Research Report CCRR-0224 Issued: 06-8-205 Renewal Due: 06-8-208 Revised: 09-29-207 DIVISION: 05 00 00 METALS Section: 05 40 00 Cold-Formed Metal Framing Section: 05 4 00 Structural Metal
More informationME311 Machine Design
E311 achine Design Lecture 6: Fluctuating Fatigue and the Goodman Diagram; Impact W Dornfeld 19Oct17 Fairfield University chool of Engineering Fluctuating Fatigue o far we have discussed loading that ernately
More informationMini Channel & Fittings
Our mini channels and fittings provide for an economical method of supporting light load requirements on a strut system. Channel Channels are cold formed on our modern rolling mills from 18 Ga. (1.2 mm)
More informationSTRESS ANALYSIS OF BICYCLE PADDLE AND OPTIMIZED BY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD. S. Abeygunasekara 1, T. M. M. Amarasekara 2
- 96 - STRESS ANALYSIS OF BICYCLE PADDLE AND OPTIMIZED BY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD S. Abeygunasekara 1, T. M. M. Amarasekara 2 1 Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Colombo International Nautical Engineering
More informationGANTRY CRANES CAPACITIES: SPANS: TRACKS: OPTIONS: Up to 5 tons Up to 30' Steel Fixed or Adjustable
GANTRY CRANES CAPACITIES: SPANS: TRACKS: OPTIONS: Up to 5 tons Up to 30' Steel Fixed or Adjustable Material Handling Solutions For Your Unique Applications Since 1977, Gorbel has been an innovator and
More informationTutorial on Flange Qualification using CAEPIPE
Tutorial on Flange Qualification using CAEPIPE This document explains the procedure on performing Flange Qualification using CAEPIPE. General Flange joints are essential components in all pressurized systems;
More informationCOLUMNS. Treated Glulam Column 1.9E Laminated Column Architectural Glulam Column
COLUMNS Treated Glulam 1.9E Laminated Architectural Glulam Glulam: The Builder s Choice Glued laminated timber, or glulam, combines the structural values and product consistency of engineered wood, with
More informationCopyrights Stainless Cable Solutions llc
9020 SW Washington Square Dr., Suite 505 Portland, Oregon 97223 P: (503) 641-8311 F: (503) 643-7905 www.sfadg.com STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS Residential/Commercial Aluminum Guardrail System Solutions LLC
More informationEvaluating the Design Safety of Highway Structural Supports
Evaluating the Design Safety of Highway Structural Supports by Fouad H. Fouad and Elizabeth A. Calvert Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham,
More informationExpanding Your Solutions. Viper-X Product Catalog. Interior Non-Load Bearing Wall Framing
Expanding Your Solutions Viper-X Product Catalog Interior Non-Load Bearing Wall Framing Effective 04/26/2018 Viper-X is the solution you ve been waiting for: BIGGER, BETTER, STRONGER! YOU demand a better
More informationS-60-TO : 1 ton tower system INSTRUCTION MANUAL
S-60-TO : 1 ton tower system INSTRUCTION MANUAL LIVE SYSTEMS bvba Mandellaan 282 8800 B-Roeselare Tel: +32(0)51 69 38 14 Mobile : +32 (0) 495 24 24 67 e-mail: ricky@livesystems.be BTW : 0859.636.665 1
More informationShear Strength Assessment of Ship Hulls Alice Mathai, Alice T.V., Ancy Joseph
Shear Strength Assessment of Ship Hulls Alice Mathai, Alice T.V., Ancy Joseph Abstract The primary aim of the study is to investigate the ultimate strength characteristics of ship hulls with large hatch
More informationSession 1. Pushover Analysis of a Torsionally Eccentric Cellular Abutment. Date 11/03/ PM 4 PM Eastern Time
Session 1 Pushover Analysis of a Torsionally Eccentric Cellular Abutment Date 11/03/2016 3 PM 4 PM Eastern Time Today s Presenter: Jon Emenheiser, PE Copyright Materials This presentation is protected
More informationFALL ARREST TETHER TRACK RIGID RAIL ANCHOR SYSTEMS DESIGN:
FALL ARREST TETHER TRACK RIGID RAIL ANCHOR SYSTEMS DESIGN: MOUNTING STYLE: LENGTHS: Built to withstand 900 pound maximum arresting force Ceiling mounted or free standing monorail & bridge anchor systems
More informationModule # 8 DISTILLATION AND ABSORPTION COLUMN
Module # 8 MECHANICAL DESIGN OF MASS TRANSFER COLUMN: DESIGN OF DISTILLATION AND ABSORPTION COLUMN 1. Design and construction features of column internals 1.1. Plate construction 1.2. Downcomer details
More information25 year warranty! Columns Are Available in Common Sizes: Widths: 3-1/2, 5-7/16, 5-1/2 and 7 Depths: 3-1/2, 5-1/2 and 7
The OUTSIDER TM the finest pressure-treated glulam beams and columns engineered for building outdoors The Outsider beams and columns are made of Southern Yellow Pine and then pressure treated to resist
More informationLOAD CHARTS RT540E 85% STABILITY ON OUTRIGGERS 75% STABILITY ON RUBBER
LOAD CHARTS RT540E 85% STABILITY ON OUTRIGGERS 75% STABILITY ON RUBBER SERIAL NUMBER 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL NOTES... 4 WT. REDUCTIONS / LINE PULLS & REEVING INFO / HOIST PERFORMANCE. 5 LIFTING AREA
More informationRULES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS IDENTIFIED BY THEIR MISSIONS CHAPTERS SCOPE
PART II RULES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS IDENTIFIED BY THEIR MISSIONS TITLE 12 CONTAINER SHIPS SECTION 2 STRUCTURES CHAPTERS A B C SCOPE DOCUMENTS, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS See Part
More informationAppendix M Structural Analysis of the Macondo #252 Work String. Appendix M Structural Analysis of the Macondo #252 Work String
Appendix M Structural Analysis of the Macondo #252 Work String Appendix M Structural Analysis of the Macondo #252 Work String Structural Analysis of the Macondo #252 Work String SES Document No.: 1101190-ST-RP-0003
More informationStudy to Establish Relations for the Relative Strength of API 650 Cone Roof Roof-to-Shell and Shell-to- Bottom Joints
Thunderhead Engineering Consultants I N C O R P O R A T E D 1006 Poyntz Ave. Manhattan, KS 66502-5459 785-770-8511 www. thunderheadeng.com Study to Establish Relations for the Relative Strength of API
More informationw(z) distance down wing [ft]
Loading [lb/ft] SAE Aero Design Regular Class 2017 Analysis performed by Aida Hrickson Bing Moment on the Wing & Strut Location One of the primary advantages of using an external strut to support the wing
More informationPRESSURE TANKS HANDLING & INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS INSTALLATION MANUAL CONTROL VALVES
PRESSURE TANKS HANDLING & INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS CONTROL VALVES INSTALLATION MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Receiving & Handling 3 Basic Handling Continued 4 Approved Lifting Methods 5 Installing Pressure
More informationWave Load Pattern Definition
COMPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., AUGUST 2010 AUTOMATIC WAVE LOADS TECHNICAL NOTE DEFINING WAVE LOADS This section describes how to define automatic wave loads. The automatic wave load is a special type
More informationRELIABILITY ASSESSMENT, STATIC AND DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF TRANSMISSION LINE TOWER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT, STATIC AND DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF TRANSMISSION LINE TOWER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY Yusuf Mansur Hashim M. Tech (Structural Engineering) Student, Sharda University, Greater Noida, (India)
More informationLoads, Structures, and Mechanisms. Team C5 Matthew Marcus Chris O'Hare Alex Slafkosky Scott Wingate
Loads, Structures, and Mechanisms Matthew Marcus Chris O'Hare Alex Slafkosky Scott Wingate Presentation Overview Design requirements Initial crew capsule design choice Pressure vessel design Pressure loads
More informationTIE DOWN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR STS CONTAINER CRANES
TIE DOWN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR STS CONTAINER CRANES Published in Port Technology International, Spring 2018 Edition 77 BY SIMO HOITE, PATRICK MCCARTHY, AND MICHAEL JORDAN LIFTECH CONSULTANTS INC. Introduction
More informationStep 1: Step 2: psi psi
General Tutorial on Evaluation of Nozzles by computing Local Shell Stresses as per WRC 537 and Stress Evaluation as per ASME Section VIII Division 2 using CAEPIPE Whenever Pressure Vessel or Heat exchanger
More informationJAR-23 Normal, Utility, Aerobatic, and Commuter Category Aeroplanes \ Issued 11 March 1994 \ Section 1- Requirements \ Subpart C - Structure \ General
JAR 23.301 Loads \ JAR 23.301 Loads (a) Strength requirements are specified in terms of limit loads (the maximum loads to be expected in service) and ultimate loads (limit loads multiplied by prescribed
More informationMechanical Anchoring Systems HDA Undercut Anchor Product description. HDA-P Undercut Anchor Pre-Set Type
Mechanical Anchoring Systems 3.3 3.3.1 HDA Undercut Anchor 3.3.1.1 Product description The Hilti HDA undercut anchor is a heavy-duty mechanical anchor with carbide-tipped undercut segments used to perform
More informationISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Cranes and lifting appliances Selection of wire ropes Part 1: General
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 4308-1 Third edition 2003-05-01 Cranes and lifting appliances Selection of wire ropes Part 1: General Grues et appareils de levage Choix des câbles Partie 1: Généralités Reference
More informationOPENINGS AND REINFORCEMENTS 26
ASME BPVC.VIII.1-2015 UG-35.2 UG-36 (4) It is recognized that it is impractical to write requirements to cover the multiplicity of devices used for quick access, or to prevent negligent operation or the
More informationReinforced Soil Retaining Walls-Design and Construction
Lecture 32 Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls-Design and Construction Prof. G L Sivakumar Babu Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560012 Example calculation An 8 m high
More informationLow Profile Load Cells
Low Profile Load Cells World Leading Performance With Improved Linearity, Hysteresis, Creep & Thermal Performance Introducing Interface s Enhanced Low Profile Load Cell Interface Inc. pioneered the first
More informationView thousands of Crane Specifications on FreeCraneSpecs.com. MANITOWOC M-85W 95-Ton liftcrane 20,000 lb CLAMSHELL 18,000 lb DRAGLINE
MANITOWOC M-85W 95-Ton liftcrane 20,000 lb CLAMSHELL 18,000 lb DRAGLINE 94 MANITOWOC M-85W Outline dimensions 95 MANITOWOC M-85W Performance data 96 MANITOWOC M-85W Shipping data (all dimensions length
More informationTB-354 March 2017 (Expires 3/2019) Select Beam Design Tables
TB-35 March 017 (Expires 3/019) Select Beam Design Tables The following information is intended to assist building designers and/or building officials in selecting appropriate Trus Joist beam products.
More informationWind effects on tall building frames-influence of dynamic parameters
Indian Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 3 No. 5 (May 21) ISSN: 974-6846 583 Wind effects on tall building frames-influence of dynamic parameters B. Dean Kumar 1 and B.L.P. Swami 2 1 Department of
More informationRing-Loc System Technical Manual
FORMWORK & SCAFFOLDING Ring-Loc System Technical Manual Canada: CAN/CSA S269.2 M87 USA: ANSI/ASSE A10.8-2001 Ring-Loc System Technical Manual 2015 United Scaffold Supply Company Inc info@unitedscaffold.ca
More informationSTEEL VESSELS UNDER 90 METERS (295 FEET) IN LENGTH 2018
RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING STEEL VESSELS UNDER 90 METERS (95 FEET) IN LENGTH 018 NOTICE NO. 1 JULY 018 The following Rule Changes were approved by the ABS Rules Committee on 1 June 018 and become
More informationASCE D Wind Loading
ASCE 7-10 3D Wind Loading 1 All information in this document is subject to modification without prior notice. No part or this manual may be reproduced, stored in a database or retrieval system or published,
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS PRODUCTS & INFORMATION
SHORING CATALO G TABLE OF CONTENTS PRODUCTS & INFORMATION PAGE HL SHORING FRAMES (10k/leg)...3 STEEL SHORING ACCESSORIES... 4 SHORING TOWER... 5 SHORING JACK... 6 SHORING FRAME ALLOWABLE WORKING LOADS...7
More informationYasuyuki Hirose 1. Abstract
Study on Tsunami force for PC box girder Yasuyuki Hirose 1 Abstract In this study, a waterway experiment was performed in order to understand the influence of tsunami forms on tsunami forces acting on
More informationENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDE. D-M-E Hydraulic Unscrewing Device
ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDE D-M-E Hydraulic Unscrewing Device ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDE D-M-E Hydraulic Unscrewing Device Hydraulic Unscrewing Device Without guiding thread with cam Safety Considerations Mold
More informationStress evaluation of a bicycle crank arm connection using BEM
Stress evaluation of a bicycle crank arm connection using BEM C. J. Hoff, R. E. Dippery & 3. Knapp Department of Mechanical Engineering Kettering University, USA Abstract An interesting problem encountered
More informationCENTER PIVOT EVALUATION AND DESIGN
CENTER PIVOT EVALUATION AND DESIGN Dale F. Heermann Agricultural Engineer USDA-ARS 2150 Centre Avenue, Building D, Suite 320 Fort Collins, CO 80526 Voice -970-492-7410 Fax - 970-492-7408 Email - dale.heermann@ars.usda.gov
More informationNIOSH Equation Outputs: Recommended Weight Limit (RWL): Lifting Index (LI):
The NIOSH Equation is a tool used by occupational health and safety professionals to assess the manual material handling risks associated with lifting and lowering tasks in the workplace. This equation
More informationCHAPTER IV FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE KNEE JOINT WITHOUT A MEDICAL IMPLANT
39 CHAPTER IV FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE KNEE JOINT WITHOUT A MEDICAL IMPLANT 4.1 Modeling in Biomechanics The human body, apart of all its other functions is a mechanical mechanism and a structure,
More information2 Available: 1390/08/02 Date of returning: 1390/08/17 1. A suction cup is used to support a plate of weight as shown in below Figure. For the conditio
1. A suction cup is used to support a plate of weight as shown in below Figure. For the conditions shown, determine. 2. A tanker truck carries water, and the cross section of the truck s tank is shown
More informationGROVE MODEL RT58D - 20 TON CAPACITY
LIFTING CHARTS - Rough Terrain Cranes GROVE MODEL - 20 TON CAPACITY WEIGHT REDUCTIONS FOR LOAD HANDLING DEVICES 23 JIB with 28-70 BOOM * Stowed - 381 lbs. * Erected - 1,950 lbs. 23-38 TELE. JIB with 28-70
More information6.0 ENGINEERING. Build Anything Better. REPRINTED 2017
6.0 ENGINEERING TABLE OF CONTENTS 6.1 U.S. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS REPORT... P. 6-3 BELOW-GRADE WALL REINFORCEMENT TABLES... P. 6-5 ABOVE-GRADE WALL REINFORCEMENT TABLES.. P. 6-21 LINTEL REINFORCEMENT TABLES...P.
More informationTension Cracks. Topics Covered. Tension crack boundaries Tension crack depth Query slice data Thrust line Sensitivity analysis.
Tension Cracks 16-1 Tension Cracks In slope stability analyses with cohesive soils, tension forces may be observed in the upper part of the slope. In general, soils cannot support tension so the results
More informationVertical Alignment. Concepts of design & guidelines Computing elevations along vertical curves Designing vertical curves
Vertical Alignment Concepts of design & guidelines Computing elevations along vertical curves Designing vertical curves Flat terrain You can select smooth horizontal alignment and smooth vertical alignment
More informationLINK-BELT MODEL HC-278H TON CAPACITY
TRANSPORTATION SPECS - Conventional Truck Cranes LINK-BELT MODEL HC-278H - 300 TON CAPACITY COMPONENT WEIGHTS LBS. KGS. BOOM TYPE: TUBULAR 80 X 68 LBS. KGS. Complete Crane C/W 70 Boom, 320,123 145 207
More informationSUBPART C - STRUCTURE
SUBPART C - STRUCTURE GENERAL CS 23.301 Loads (a) Strength requirements are specified in terms of limit loads (the maximum loads to be expected in service) and ultimate loads (limit loads multiplied by
More informationAnalysis and design of tall concrete buildings : an investigation regarding the use of cracked versus uncracked moment of inertia
Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-31-2004 Analysis and design of tall concrete buildings : an investigation regarding
More informationFormation level = m. Foundation level = m. Height of the wall above the Ground Level = 7.42 m
DESIGN OF RETAINING WALL INTRODUCTION: This wall is designed for active earth pressure and live load surcharge pressure The loads for the purpose of design are calculated per meter length of wall. BASIC
More informationimportant information
important information Use and installation Installation of metal hose connections is mainly determined by direction of movements, size of movements and frequency of movements. The ways of installation,
More informationROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Mini-project 3 Tennis ball launcher
Mini-project 3 Tennis ball launcher Mini-Project 3 requires you to use MATLAB to model the trajectory of a tennis ball being shot from a tennis ball launcher to a player. The tennis ball trajectory model
More informationChapter 4: Single Vertical Arch
Chapter 4: Single Vertical Arch 4.1 Introduction This chapter considers a single pressurized arch in a vertical plane. This arch is similar to the arches that will be studied in the following chapter.
More informationRUNWAYS BRIDGE MONORAIL HANGERS
Installation, Operation, & Maintenance Manual RUNWAYS BRIDGE HANGERS MONORAIL IMPORTANT! DO NOT DESTROY Tether Track Rigid Rail Anchor Systems Gorbel Dealer Gorbel Customer Order No. Date Month Year TABLE
More informationCEE 345, Part 2, Winter 2012, Final Exam Solutions (Open Channel Flow)
CEE 45, Part, Winter 0, Final Exam Solutions (Open Channel Flow). (a) (8) List and briefl describe the forces that must be considered in an analsis of flow in a trapezoidal channel with a slope of 0.006.
More informationM ANITOWOC M-65 W. 65-MTon liftcrane 6,804 6,124. Courtesy of Crane.Market KG CLAMSHELL KG DRAGLINE
M ANITOWOC M-65 W 6,804 KG CLAMSHELL 6,124 65-MTon liftcrane KG DRAGLINE 45 M ANITOWOC M-65 W Outline dimensions 46 M ANITOWOC M-65 W Performance data 47 M ANITOWOC M-65 W Shipping data (all dimensions
More informationINTERIM GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING MINIMUM PROPULSION POWER TO MAINTAIN THE MANOEUVRABILITY OF SHIPS IN ADVERSE CONDITIONS
E 4 ALBERT EMBANKMENT LONDON SE1 7SR Telephone: +44 (0)20 7735 7611 Fax: +44 (0)20 7587 3210 MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.11 3 December 2012 INTERIM GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING MINIMUM PROPULSION POWER TO MAINTAIN THE
More informationGuide for Assessing Hull-Girder Residual Strength for Tankers. July 1995
AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING 8, AFFILIATED COMPANIES Guide for Assessing Hull-Girder Residual Strength for Tankers July 1995 American Bureau of Shipping Incorporated by the Legislature of the State of New
More informationCrane & Rigging Brain Teasers
Crane & Rigging Brain Teasers Host: Mike Parnell President/CEO, ITI ASME B30 Vice Chair (Cranes & Rigging) ASME P30 Chair (Lift Planning) The views expressed in this presentation are that of ITI and are
More informationA Basic Approach to the Installation of Small Movement Expansion Joints. Peter Weykamp, P.E.
A Basic Approach to the Installation of Small Movement Expansion Joints Peter Weykamp, P.E. OBJECTIVE Avoid failures Share practices Simplify Guide Dialog NYSDOT TRANSITION Armor to Elastomeric Systems
More informationDesign and Analysis of Rotary Lawn Mower
Design and Analysis of Rotary Lawn Mower Vivek P Revi Vishnu N V Akhil K A Rohith P Kevin Rozario Abstract- KAMCO Industries, Athani, India is a reputed industry undertaken by Kerala state government producing
More informationWind and Fastener Calculation Report for property located at
Martinez Antonio Wind and Fastener Calculation Report for property located at Martinez Antonio Universal Engineering, Inc 12828 Buckland St., Wellington FL 33414 Tel: 561-204-5000, Fax:561-204-1050 e-mail:
More informationASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Analysis of the 1497 MHz High-Current Cryomodule Helium Vessel
1.0 Introduction ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Analysis of the 1497 MHz High-Current Cryomodule Helium Vessel Katherine Wilson 28 May 2007 To minimize the hazards associated with vacuum and pressure
More informationHomework of chapter (3)
The Islamic University of Gaza, Civil Engineering Department, Fluid mechanics-discussion, Instructor: Dr. Khalil M. Al Astal T.A: Eng. Hasan Almassri T.A: Eng. Mahmoud AlQazzaz First semester, 2013. Homework
More informationHydrostatic Force on a Submerged Surface
Experiment 3 Hydrostatic Force on a Submerged Surface Purpose The purpose of this experiment is to experimentally locate the center of pressure of a vertical, submerged, plane surface. The experimental
More informationRULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 5 Hull girder strength. Edition October 2015 DNV GL AS
RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships Edition October 2015 Part 3 Hull Chapter 5 The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by ("DNV GL"). The user accepts that
More informationPVP2006-ICPVT
Proceedings of PVP2006 / ICPVT-11: 11 th International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology July 23-37, 2006, Vancouver, Canada PVP2006-ICPVT11-93020 DESIGN OF A LARGE RECTANGULAR FLANGE Bharat Batra,
More informationThe Use of BS 5400: Part 10: Code of Practice for Fatigue
THE HIGHWAYS AGENCY THE SCOTTISH OFFICE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Amendment No. 1, dated November 1983 THE WELSH OFFICE Y SWYDDFA GYMREIG THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT FOR NORTHERN IRELAND The Use of
More informationAnalysis of Shear Lag in Steel Angle Connectors
University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Honors Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2013 Analysis of Shear Lag in Steel Angle Connectors Benjamin Sawyer
More informationThe Study of Half-tooth Master Gear Structure Optimization Yazhou Xie a, Zhiliang Qian b
X 3rd International Conference on Mechatronics, Robotics and Automation (ICMRA 2015) The Study of Half-tooth Master Gear Structure Optimization Yazhou Xie a, Zhiliang Qian b School of Mechanical and Electric
More informationC-1: Aerodynamics of Airfoils 1 C-2: Aerodynamics of Airfoils 2 C-3: Panel Methods C-4: Thin Airfoil Theory
ROAD MAP... AE301 Aerodynamics I UNIT C: 2-D Airfoils C-1: Aerodynamics of Airfoils 1 C-2: Aerodynamics of Airfoils 2 C-3: Panel Methods C-4: Thin Airfoil Theory AE301 Aerodynamics I : List of Subjects
More informationSECTION A INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
SECTION A INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The objective of the Phase 1 wind study is to determine the performance of the Golden Gate Bridge in strong winds with a variety of possible suicide deterrent systems
More informationSubject: FRP Flange Design Ref: Thomas E. Graham, FRP Flanges for Process Pipe and Tanks, NACE, 1989
Britt Engineering Associates, Inc. Birmingham. Alabama www.beacom.com September 30, 2018 Technical Note Subject: FRP Flange Design Ref: Thomas E. Graham, FRP Flanges for Process Pipe and Tanks, NACE, 1989
More informationInternational Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Research e-issn No.: , Date: 2-4 July, 2015
International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Research www.ijmter.com e-issn No.:2349-9745, Date: 2-4 July, 2015 Fillet Radius Optimization of Bell Crank Lever Swapneel R. Zende 1, Mohammed
More informationDesign and Optimization of Weld Neck Flange for Pressure Vessel
V th International Symposium on Fusion of Science & Technology, New Delhi, India, January 18-22, 2016 ID: 2016-ISFT-430 Design and Optimization of Weld Neck Flange for Pressure Vessel Vinod Kumar 1, Vivek
More informationCIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design
Loading for most of the structures are obtained from the relevant British Standards, the manufacturers data and similar sources. CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design CHAPTER 2 Loading and Load Combinations
More information