List of Exhibits...ii

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "List of Exhibits...ii"

Transcription

1

2

3 One Brickell Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Exhibits...ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Study Area Study Objective EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Data Collection Roadway Characteristics Traffic Counts Intersection Data Corridor Capacity Analysis Intersection Capacity Analysis PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Background Traffic Project Traffic Project Trip Generation Project Trip Assignment Future Corridor Capacity Analysis Future Intersection Capacity Analysis Site Access CONCLUSIONS...26 Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Appendix F: Appendix G: Site Plan Approved Transportation Methodology Traffic Counts, FDOT Adjustment Factors, Historic Data & Signal Timing FDOT s Quality/LOS Handbook LOS Table Downtown Miami DRI Increment II Transit Ridership Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets Committed Development Transportation Demand Management Plan Page Page i

4 One Brickell Traffic Study LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Page 1 Location Map Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Existing Lane Configurations Existing Corridor and Transit Conditions Person-trip Volume and Capacity Existing Conditions Matrix Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Committed Development Trip Generation Project Trip Generation Summary Cardinal Distribution Project Trip Distribution Person-Trip Volume and Capacity Future Conditions Matrix Future with Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Future with Project Intersection Capacity Analysis...25 Page ii

5 One Brickell Traffic Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY One Brickell will be located at 444 Brickell Avenue in Miami, Florida. The project proposes 1,4 residential units, a 25-room hotel, and 24,463 SF of specialty retail. The site is currently occupied by 342,978 SF of office space. Inbound/outbound access to the site will be provided via two two-way driveways accessing SE 5 th Street. Build out of the project is anticipate by the year 218. The subject is located within the boundaries of the Downtown Miami Area-wide DRI. Existing and future traffic conditions for the project area corridors were established using the person-trip based corridor capacity method. This method, consistent with the City of Miami Comprehensive Plan, promotes improved transportation efficiency through increased private vehicle occupancies and makes mass transit a full partner in the urban transportation system. Analysis results show that the project area corridors are projected to operate within the established corridor threshold. An assessment of the PM peak hour traffic associated with the One Brickell development was performed in accordance with the approved methodology submitted to the city. Analysis of existing (214) and future (218) traffic conditions with the project during the PM peak hour shows that the City of Miami s adopted Level of Service standards will not be exceeded. Adequate capacity during the PM peak hour is available to accommodate the proposed project trips within the study area at the intersections and on the transportation corridor segments analyzed. Results of the future intersection analysis show that the following intersections are projected to operate within the LOS standard adopted by the city: Brickell Avenue /SE 4 th Street, Brickell Avenue /SE 5 th Street, Brickell Avenue /SE 7 th Street, Brickell Avenue /SE 8 th Street. However, the major approach at the Brickell Avenue / NE 7 th Street intersection and minor approach at the Brickell Avenue / NE 5 th Street intersection are projected to operate at low levels of service. With signal timing improvements these intersections will operate within the city s LOS standard. Page 1

6 One Brickell Traffic Study 1. INTRODUCTION One Brickell will be located at 444 Brickell Avenue in Miami, Florida (see Ex hibit 1). The project proposes 1,4 residential units, a 25-room hotel, and 24,463 SF of specialty retail. The site is currently occupied by 342,978 SF of office space. Inbound/outbound access to the site will be provided via two two-way driveways accessing SE 5 th Street. The project site plan is included in Appendix A. Build out of the project is anticipate by the year 218. The subject site is located within the boundaries of the Downtown Miami Area-wide DRI. 1.1 Study Area Consistent with the approved methodology for this project (see Appendix B), the traffic study was performed for PM peak conditions. For traffic analysis purposes, the study area limits are defined as NE 1 st Street to the north, SE 8 th Street to the south, Brickell Avenue to the east, and SW 1 st Avenue west. Turning movement traffic counts were collected during the PM (4: -6:) peak period at four major intersections in the immediate project vicinity. 1. Brickell Avenue / SE 4 th Street (S Biscayne Boulevard) 2. Brickell Avenue / SE 5 th Street 3. Brickell Avenue / SE 7 th Street 4. Brickell Avenue / SE 8 th Street In addition to these intersections, we analyze the project driveways. Segment traffic volumes were collected as 24-hour machine counts at the following locations: 1. Brickell Avenue / Biscayne Blvd between NE 1 st Street and SE 8 th Street 2. SE 7 th Street between Brickell Avenue and SW 1 st Avenue 3. SE 8 th Street between Brickell Avenue and S Miami Avenue Available Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) counts will be consulted where appropriate. Raw traffic counts were adjusted to peak season (for the peak hour period). The signal timing and phasing at the study signalized intersections were obtained from Miami-Dade County. Page 2

7 One Brickell Traffic Study Existing and future traffic conditions for the project area were established using the persontrip method. The methodology for this method is outlined in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. Corridor capacities were estimated using generalized vehicular capacities (converted to person-trips) from the Downtown DRI, FDOT LOS Manual, or other acceptable equivalent. Project Traffic Project trip generation were based on the calculation of person-trips consistent with the city of Miami Comprehensive Plan. Person-trips generated by the project will be established using the following procedure: 1. Determine the gross vehicular trip generation for each land use using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation rates or formulas. 2. Reduce gross vehicular trips by a vehicle occupancy adjustment based upon the use of the ITE trip rates (City of Miami s 1.4 vs. ITE s 1.2 pers/veh). 3. Reduce gross vehicular trips by a transit reduction based on projected modal splits from Increment II of the Downtown DRI or other acceptable equivalent. 4. Reduce gross vehicular trips by a pedestrian/bicycle reduction based on estimates from Increment II of the Downtown DRI or other acceptable equivalent. 5. Establish the net external vehicle trips. 6. Convert the net external vehicle trips to person-trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. 7. Convert the vehicular trips assigned to transit back to person-trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. 8. Add together the project net external person-trips for the vehicle and transit modes. Background Traffic - A growth factor consistent with historical annual growth in the area was applied to the existing traffic volumes. Committed Developments - were based on the list of relevant projects included in the City s web based application or as provided by city staff. Committed development trips were converted to person-trips based on the methodology described above. Synchro software or the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) based on the 21 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) was used for existing and future intersection capacity analysis. Project and committed development net external vehicle trips (adjusted for transit, pedestrian and occupancy as described above) was used for the intersection capacity analysis. Intersection capacity analyses were performed at the study intersections and the proposed project driveways. Trip Assignment - Net new external project traffic were assigned to the adjacent street network using the appropriate cardinal distribution from the Miami-Dade Long Range Transportation Plan, published by the Metropolitan Planning Organization. Normal traffic patterns were considered when assigning project trips. Site Access and Circulation Analysis for large vehicles was done using Auto Turn software to assess site access and circulation maneuverability. A Transportation Control Measure Plan is included in the report. Page 3

8

9 One Brickell Traffic Study 1.2 Study Objective The objective of this traffic study is to assess the possible PM peak hour impacts on adjacent intersections using vehicular volumes and the Synchro Software, based on the procedures of the 21 Highway Capacity Manual. The study also assess possible PM peak hour impacts on the project area corridors using the person-trip corridor capacity method. This method is designed to meet the challenges posed by Florida s growth management laws: to promote compact urban development, discourage suburban sprawl and improve urban mobility. The method is consistent with the City s Comprehensive Plan and promotes improved transportation efficiency through increased private vehicle occupancies, thus making mass transit a full partner in the urban transportation system. Page 5

10 One Brickell Traffic Study 2. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 2.1 Data Collection Data collection for this study included roadway characteristics, intersection data, intersection volumes, and signal timing. The data collection effort is described in detail in the following sections Roadway Characteristics Biscayne Boulevard Biscayne Boulevard (US -1) is a major arterial that provides north/south access throughout the city of Miami from the downtown (the CBD) north to the Broward County line. It is a two-way, divided arterial. The number of lanes varies from 6 to 8 within the downtown area. Biscayne Boulevard between SE 2 nd Street and NE 5 th Avenue has a wide median, which operates as a municipal parking lot by the Miami Parking System. It provides the CBD area with connectivity to I-395 and Miami Beach. The elevated metromover runs along the Biscayne Boulevard median between SE 2 nd Street and NE 1 st Street. The Metromover s Bayfront Park Station is located on Biscayne Boulevard in the Vicinity of SE 2 nd Street. On-street parking is not permitted within the study area. The posted speed limit is 3 mph. Brickell Avenue Brickell Avenue (US -1) is a major arterial that provides north/south access throughout Downtown Miami. Brickell Avenue connects the Central Business District (CBD) with the financial and residential district on Brickell. Between SE 8 th Street and SE 5 th Street, Brickell Avenue is a two-way, six-lane, divided roadway. Brickell Avenue south of SE 4 th Street over the Miami River operates as a two-way, five-lane (two northbound lanes and three southbound lanes), divided roadway. The bridge is six lanes wide but the northbound lanes narrow to two lanes due to right-of-way constraints. The extension of Brickell Avenue north of SE 4 th Street is SE 2 nd Avenue. Northbound traffic on Brickell Avenue must turn right onto eastbound SE 4 th Street, which extends east to become Biscayne Boulevard Way. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. On-street parking is not permitted along Brickell Avenue within the study limits. SE 5 th Street SE 5 th Street is local road that provides east/west access within the project area. Between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue, SE 5 th Street is a two-way, two-lane undivided roadway. Page 6

11 One Brickell Traffic Study The speed limit is not posted within the study area. On-street parallel parking is permitted within the study area. Pedestrian signals and marked crosswalks are provided across all approaches of the Brickell Avenue and SE 5 th Street intersection. SE 7 th Street SE 7 th Street is principal arterial road that provides west access within the project area. Between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue, SE 7 th Street is a one-way, three-lane roadway in the westbound direction. The speed limit is not posted within the study area. Pedestrian signals and marked crosswalks are provided across all approaches of the Brickell Avenue and SE 7 th Street intersection. SE 8 th Street SE 8 th Street is principal arterial road that provides east access within the project area. Between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue, South 8 th Street is a one-way, three-lane roadway in the eastbound direction. There is no posted speed limit within the study area. On-street parking is not permitted along SW 8 th Street within the study area. Pedestrian signals and marked crosswalks are provided across all approaches of the Brickell Avenue and SE 8 th Street intersection Traffic Counts Consistent with the methodology submitted to and approved by the City, peak period vehicle turning movement counts and 24-hour directional counts were collected at the intersections and segments under study. Traffic counts were collected on Tuesday, November 25 th 214 and Wednesday, December 1 th 214. Seasonal adjustment factors were obtained from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Exhibit 2 shows the adjusted 214 PM peak season, peak hour period traffic volumes at the study intersections Intersection Data A field survey was conducted to determine the lane configurations for the roadways and intersections under study. Existing signal timing data was obtained from Miami-Dade County for the analyzed intersection. Signal information is included in Appendix C. This information provided the signal phasing and timing used in the intersection capacity analysis. Exhibit 3 shows the existing lane configurations for the intersections and roadways studied. Page 7

12

13

14 One Brickell Traffic Study 2.2 Corridor Capacity Analysis Existing traffic conditions for the project area corridors have been established using the persontrip based corridor capacity method. The methodology for this analysis is outlined in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. The existing traffic conditions analysis identifies the person-trip volumes and person-trip capacities of the corridors, establishes existing person-trip usage and identifies whether or not person-trip deficiencies exist. An adopted standard of LOS E applies to the transportation corridors as measured by the person-trip method. The existing conditions analysis establishes the multi-modal corridor conditions within the project area. The person-trip capacities and volumes for the study corridors have been developed consistent with the approved methodology for this project as described below: Person-Trip Volumes Link volumes collected were adjusted to peak season traffic conditions using seasonal adjustment factors provided by FDOT. Peak hour maximum service volumes were obtained from FDOT s 213 Quality/Level of Service Handbook. Transit (bus and fixed rail) ri dership and capacity were obtained from Increment II of the Downtown Miami Area-wide DRI. An analysis of existing vehicle roadway and transit conditions is shown in Exhibit 4, supporting information included in Appendix D. Person-Trip Capacity Vehicle occupancy for the person-trip capacity calculations is based upon a comprehensive study performed for the City of Miami. The vehicle occupancy factor of 1.6 persons per vehicle is approved for use as the practical capacity of a private passenger vehicle to determine the persontrip capacity of the vehicular traffic system. Bus and fixed rail capacity for each corridor was determined based on the number of transit vehicles per hour and the person-trip capacity of each transit vehicle. This information was obtained directly from Increment II of the Downtown Miami Area-wide DRI. Page 1

15 One Brickell Traffic Study Page 11 Count Total Total Total Total Corridor Source/ Raw PM Peak PM Peak Dir Max Bus Bus Metrorail Metrorail Metromover Metromover Transit Transit Existing Period Peak Period Season Period Service Ridership Capacity Ridership Capacity Ridership Capacity Ridership Capacity From To Dir Lanes Volume Factor Volume Volume [1] [2] [2] [2] [2] [2] [2] [2] [2] Brickell Avenue / Biscayne Boulevard NE 1st Street SE 1st Street NB 4 LD Traffic Survey- PM SB 4 LD Traffic Survey- PM SE 7th Street SE 8th Street Exhibit 4 Existing Corridor and Transit Conditions Roadway Conditions (vehicles) Transit Conditions (persons) SE 1st Street SE 2nd Street NB 4 LD Traffic Survey- PM SB 4 LD Traffic Survey- PM SE 2nd Street SE 4th Street NB 2 LD Traffic Survey- PM Biscayne Blvd SE 2nd Avenue EB 3 LD Traffic Survey- PM SE 4th Street SE 8th Street NB 3 LD Traffic Survey- PM SB 3 LD Traffic Survey- PM Brickell Avenue SW 1st Avenue WB 3 LU Traffic Survey- PM Brickell Avenue S Miami Ave EB 3 LU Traffic Survey- PM Notes: [1] Peak Hour Directional Maximum Service Volumes are obtained from FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook and Adjusted as follows: - Biscayne Boulevard : Class II Arterial Divided ( 3,42 vph); - Biscayne Boulevard : Class II Arterial Undivided -25% for Multilane Undivided and (1.2) for One-Way facility adjstment (256vph *.75*1.2 = 2,34vph); - SE 4 Street/US-41 : Class II Arterial Undivided - 5% for exclusive left turn lanes and (1.2) for One-Way facility adjustment (256 vph *.95*1.2 = 2,918 vph); - Brickell Avenue : Class II Arterial Undivided (2,56 vph); - SE 7 Street : Class II Arterial Undivided -25% for No exclusive left turn lanes or right turns and (1.2) for One-Way facility adjustment (256 vph *.75 * 1.2 = 2,34vph); - SE 8 Street: Class II Arterial - -5% for Exclusive Left Turns and (1.2) for One-Way facility adjustment(256 vph *.95 * 1.2= 2,918 vph); [2] Transit information obtained from Downtown Miami DRI Increment II

16 One Brickell Traffic Study Available Person-Trip Capacity The available person-trip capacity for each corridor is shown in Exhibit 5 based on the following: Person-trip capacity Person-trip volume = Available Person-trip capacity. A general level of service designation is provided for each study corridor based on the calculated available person-trip capacity. A person-trip level of service look-up table was developed based on the ratios derived from the FDOT s 213 Quality/Level of Service Handbook (see Appendix D). Based upon the person-trip evaluation for existing traffic conditions, all of the study corridors currently operate within the person-trip level of service standards. 2.3 Intersection Capacity Analysis The intersection capacity analysis was performed using vehicular volumes and the Synchro Software, based on the procedures of the 21 Highway Capacity Manual. Exhibit 6 shows the resulting LOS for existing conditions at the intersections under study, analysis worksheets are included in Appendix E. The analysis indicates that the overall operations of all intersections analyzed currently operate within the LOS E standard establish in the city of Miami Comprehensive Plan. It should be noted that the software used for the analysis does not allow an exclusive turn lane adjacent to a shared right/left turn/through lane. The Brickell Avenue and SE 8 th Street intersection exiting lane configuration for the westbound approach is one exclusive right turn lane, one shared right/left/through lane, and one exclusive left turn lane. Since the predominent movement is westbound right, the shared right/left/through lane was modeled as an exclusive right. Therefore the modeled westbound lane configuration was one exclusive left, and two right turn lanes to allow for analysis. Due to the reduction in right turn lanes, westbound right turn volumes were reduce accordingly. Page 12

17 One Brickell Traffic Study Page 13 Exhibit 5 Person-Trip Volume and Capacity Existing Conditions Matrix Roadway Mode Transit Mode (l) Segment Person Trip (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) Roadway Pers-Trip Roadway Pers-Trip Excess Total Total Pers-Trip Segment Segment Pers-Trip Corridor Dir Vehicular Capacity Vehicular Volume Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Excess Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Excess Capacity Capacity Volume Capacity Capacity Volume Capacity v/c LOS From To (a) * 1.6 (c) * 1.4 (b) - (d) (f)-(g) (b)+(f) (d)+(g) (i)-(j) (j)/(i) [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Brickell Avenue / Biscayne Boulevard NE 1st Street SE 1st Street NB 3,42 5,472 1,541 2,158 3,314 4,874 1,18 3,694 1,346 3,338 7,8.32 C SB 3,42 5, ,241 4,231 1, ,65 7,218 1,382 5, C SE 1st Street SE 2nd Street NB 3,42 5,472 1,315 1,841 3,631 2, ,927 7,692 2,134 5, C SB 3,42 5, ,372 4,1 1,4 73 1,327 6,872 1,445 5, C SE 2nd Street SE 4th Street NB 2,34 3,686 1,68 2,251 1,435 3, ,262 7,346 2,649 4, C Biscayne Blvd SE 2nd Avenue EB 2,918 4,669 1,522 2,131 2,538 2, ,339 7,455 2,578 4, C SE 4th Street SE 8th Street NB 2,56 4,96 1,323 1,852 2,244 2, ,777 6,42 2,381 4,21.37 C SB 2,56 4,96 1,295 1,813 2,283 2, ,11 6,582 2,288 4, C SE 7th Street Brickell Avenue SW 1st Avenue WB 2,34 3, ,4 2, ,962 1,28 2, C SE 8th Street Brickell Avenue S Miami Ave EB 2,918 4, ,121 3, ,945 1,321 3, C Notes: [1] The Roadway Vehicular Capacity is obtained from Exhibit 4. [2] Person-Trip capacity is derived by applying a 1.6 vehicle occupancy to the vehicular capacity. [3]) The Roadway Vehicular Volume is obtained from Exhibit 4. [4] Person-Trip Volume is derived by applying a 1.4 vehicle occupancy to the vehicular capacity. [5] The Total Transit Person-Trip Capacity is obtained by adding bus, metrorail and metromover capacities (see Exhibit 4). [6] The Total Transit Person-Trip Volume is obtained by adding bus and metromover volumes (see Exhibit 4). [7] The Person Trip LOS is provided consistent with the FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook (see Appendix D). Segment Total

18 One Brickell Traffic Study Exhibit 6 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions Intersection Signalized/ Unsignalized Direction PM Peak LOS Brickell Avenue / SE 4 th Street (S Biscayne Boulevard) Brickell Avenue / SE 5 th Street Brickell Avenue / SE 7 th Street Brickell Avenue / SE 8 th Street S S S S NB SB Overall NB SB EB WB Overall NB SB WB Overall NB SB EB WB Overall B A A A A E D B C C D C C B C A C Source: David Plummer & Associates Page 14

19 One Brickell Traffic Study 3. PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The 213 Miami-Dade County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the 235 Miami-Dade Long Range Transportation Plan, were reviewed to identify any programmed or planned projects within the limits of the study area established. These documents show no officially programmed or planned capacity improvement projects within the study area prior to completion of the proposed project. Page 15

20 One Brickell Traffic Study 4. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 4.1 Background Traffic and Committed Development A review of the FDOT count database was done to determine historic growth in the area. The analysis indicated that the annual growth rate is 1.7%. Historic growth rate documentation is included in Appendix C. For a conservative analysis, a 2% growth factor was applied to existing traffic. The city was consulted to determine any committed development in the vicinity of the project site. Two committed developments were considered for estimating future traffic volumes in this study: Brickell CitiCentre and Brickell Bayview Center. Traffic associated with these projects were added to the background traffic. A summary of the trips associated with these developments is provided in Exhibit 7. Committed development information is included in Appendix F. Exhibit 7 Committed Development Trip Generation Development (1) Brickell CitiCentre Brickell Bayview Center Intensity 35 DUs Condominium (LU232) 12, SF Shopping Center (LU82) 42 DUs High Rise Apartments(LU 222) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Source: David Plummer & Associates (1) Trip assignments for both Brickell CitiCentre and Brickell CitiCentre North were included (see Appendix D) Page 16

21 One Brickell Traffic Study 4.2 Project Traffic Project Trip Generation Project trip generation is based on the calculation of person-trips consistent with the City of Miami Comprehensive Plan. Person-trips generated by the project were established using the following procedures consistent with the Increment II of the Downtown DRI and the approved methodology: The gross vehicular trip generation for each land use was determined using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation 9 th Edition rates or formulas. Gross vehicular trips were reduced by 16% based upon the use of the ITE trip rates (City of Miami s 1.4 vs. ITE s 1.2 pers/veh). Gross vehicular trips were reduced by 14.9% to reflect transit usage and 1% to reflect other modes of transportation (pedestrians/bikes). The net external vehicle trips were converted to person-trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. The vehicular trips assigned to transit were converted back to person-trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. The net external person-trips were obtained by adding together the project net external person-trips for the vehicle and transit modes. Page 17

22 One Brickell Traffic Study A trip generation summary for the project is provided below in Exhibit 8. Exhibit 8 Project Trip Generation Summary Daily PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS ITE Land Proposed ITE Land Use UNITS Two-Way IN OUT TOTAL Use Code Volume % Trips % Trips Trips 1,4 62% 35 38% High-Rise Residential Condominium DU T=.34 (X) (1) Hotel Specialty Retail Center 25 51% 78 49% Rooms Rate=.6 trips/room (1) 24,463 44% 29 56% SF GLA Rate= 2.71 trips/1 SF GLA (1) GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS % % Internalization 3.8% 5% 2 5% 2 4 EXTERNAL TRIPS 58% 41 42% Vehicle Occupancy 16.% of Gross External Trips (2) 58% 66 42% Transit Trip 14.9% of Gross External Trips (3) 58% 61 42% Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip 1.% of Gross External Trips (4) 58% 41 42% 3 71 NET EXTERNAL NET NEW VEHICLE TRIPS (1) 58% % Net External Person Trips in 1.4 Persons/ Vehicle 58% % Net External Person Trips using 1.4 Persons/ Vehicle 58% 86 42% Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 58% % Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.4 Persons/ Vehicle 58% 58 42% Notes (1) ITE trip genration rate and/or equation. (2) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (3) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (4) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II Page 18

23 One Brickell Traffic Study Exhibit 8 Continued Daily PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS ITE Land Existing ITE Land Use UNITS Two-Way IN OUT TOTAL Use Code Volume % Trips % Trips Trips 342,978 17% 79 83% Office SF GLA T=1.12(X) GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS % 79 83% Internalization % 5% 5% EXTERNAL TRIPS 17% 79 83% Vehicle Occupancy 16.% of Gross External Trips (2) 17% 13 83% Transit Trip 14.9% of Gross External Trips (3) 17% 12 83% Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip 1.% of Gross External Trips (4) 17% 8 83% NET EXTERNAL NET NEW VEHICLE TRIPS (1) 17% 47 83% Net External Person Trips in 1.4 Persons/ Vehicle 17% 65 83% Net External Person Trips using 1.4 Persons/ Vehicle 17% 16 83% 8 97 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 17% 82 83% Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.4 Persons/ Vehicle 17% 11 83% Notes (1) ITE trip genration rate and/or equation. (2) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (3) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (4) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II Vehicle Trips (Person Trips) PM Peak Hour Trips In Out Total Proposed Uses 242 (424) 172 (34) 415 (728) Existing Uses 47 (82) 227(398) 274 (48) Net External Trips 195 (342) -55 (-94) 141 (248) Page 19

24 One Brickell Traffic Study Project Trip Assignment Project traffic was distributed and assigned to the study area using the Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 568 shown in Exhibit 9. The Cardinal Distribution gives a generalized distribution of trips from a TAZ to other parts of Miami-Dade County. Exhibit 9 Cardinal Distribution of Trips TAZ 568 DIRECTION NNE 13.83% 14.85% 14.27% ENE 7.83% 5.63% 6.88% ESE 1.5% 1.2% 1.29% SSE 3.33% 1.84% 2.68% SSW 6.51% 7.34% 6.87% WSW 23.25% 21.43% 22.46% WNW 19.87% 24.34% 21.81% NNW 23.9% 23.55% 23.75% For estimating the trip distribution for the project location, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. Exhibit 1 shows the project vehicular trip distribution to the impacted roadway segments and intersections. 4.3 Future Corridor Capacity Analysis The existing person-trip volumes were combined with background growth and net external project person-trips to obtain the total year 218 person-trip volume with project. The future person-trips volumes are compared to the future person-trips capacities to determine future level of service. The results are summarized in Exhibit 11. All roadways analyzed are projected to operate within the existing LOS standard. Page 2

25

26 One Brickell Traffic Study Page 22 Exhibit 11 Person-Trip Volume and Capacity Future Conditions Matrix Without Project With Project (a) (k) Future with Proj (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) Existing Future Committed Future Projected Future Future w/out Proj Project Total Future Pers-Trip Bkg. Development Pers-Trip Transit Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Dir Corridor Volumes Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Volumes Capacity Capacity v/c LOS Volume Volumes Capacity v/c LOS 2% From To 4 (b)+(c) (d)/(f) (d)+(h) (i)/(j) [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [4] [5] Brickell Avenue / Biscayne Boulevard NE 1st Street SE 1st Street NB 3,338 3, ,787 1,866 12, C 94 3,881 12, C SB 1,382 1, , ,76.21 C 98 1,733 7,76.22 C SE 1st Street SE 2nd Street NB 2,134 2, ,484 1,932 9, C 94 2,578 9, C SB 1,445 1, , , C 98 1,83 7, C SE 2nd Street SE 4th Street NB 2,649 2, , ,36.37 C 343 3,399 8,36.41 C Biscayne Blvd SE 2nd Avenue EB 2,578 2, , , C 14 3,132 7, C SE 4th Street SE 8th Street NB 2,381 2, ,793 1,448 7,85.36 C 23 2,997 7,85.38 C SB 2,288 2, , , C 249 2,968 6, C SE 7th Street Brickell Avenue SW 1st Avenue WB 1,28 1, , , C 15 1,656 3, C SE 8th Street Brickell Avenue S Miami Ave EB 1,321 1, , , C 21 1,736 4, C Notes: [1] The Existing Person Trip Volume is obtained from Exhibit 5, column (j) [2] Year 218 Background Person Trip Volume is derived by applying a 2% annual growth factor to the existing person-trip volume [3] Projected Transit Capacity was obtained from the Peoples Transportation Act to provide maximum 15 minute headways on metrobus routes (per Miami Dade Transit Authority) [4] The Total Future Peak Hour Person Trip Capacity is obtained by adding all modes of transportation (Exhibit 5, column (i)) [5] The Person Trip LOS is provided consistent with the FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook (see Appendix D) [6] Project Person Trip Volumes are derived from Trip Generation Analysis (Net External Person Trips (Vehicles + Transit))

27 One Brickell Traffic Study 4.4 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis Project traffic and background growth were added to the adjusted existing traffic to obtain the total year 218 vehicular traffic with the project on the study intersections. Exhibit 12 shows the total (with project) PM peak vehicular volumes at the intersections under study. Results of the future intersection analysis indicate that the overall operations of all intersections analyzed are projected to operate within the LOS E standard establish in the city of Miami Comprehensive Plan. However, the major approach at the Brickell Avenue / NE 7 th Street intersection and minor approach at the Brickell Avenue / NE 5 th Street intersection are projected to operate at low levels of service. It should be noted that some of the projected traffic at these intersections is associated with the committed developments. With signal timing improvements these intersections will operate within the city s LOS standard. Exhibit 13 shows the resulting LOS at the intersections under study. Intersection capacity analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix E. 4.5 Site Access Inbound/outbound access to the site will be provided via two two-way driveways accessing SE 5 th Street. Un-signalized Synchro analysis results show adequate operations at all driveways. The analysis worksheets are included in Appendix E. Page 23

28

29 One Brickell Traffic Study Exhibit 13 Future with Project Intersection Capacity Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions Intersection Signalized/ Unsignalized Direction *PM Peak LOS Brickell Avenue / SE 4 th Street (S Biscayne Boulevard) S NB SB Overall C A B Brickell Avenue / SE 5 th Street S NB SB EB WB Overall B C D D C Brickell Avenue / SE 7 th Street S NB SB WB Overall E C D D Brickell Avenue / SE 8 th Street S NB SB EB WB Overall C B C A C NE 5 th Avenue / Project Driveway (East) U SB B NE 5 th Avenue / Project Driveway (West) U SB B Source: David Plummer & Associates *PM Peak LOS with signal timing improvement for Brickell Avenue / SE 7 th Street and Brickell Avenue / SE 5 th Street Page 25

30 One Brickell Traffic Study 5. CONCLUSIONS An assessment of the PM peak hour traffic associated with the One Brickell development was performed in accordance with the approved methodology submitted to the city. Analysis of existing (214 ) and future (2 18) traffic conditions with the project during the PM peak hour shows that the City of Miami s adopted Level of Service standards will not be exceeded. Adequate capacity during the PM peak hour is available to accommodate the proposed project trips within the study area at the intersections and on the transportation corridor segments analyzed. Results of the future intersection analysis show that the following intersections are projected to operate within the LOS E standard adopted by the city: Brickell Avenue /SE 4 th Street, Brickell Avenue /SE 5 th Street, Brickell Avenue /SE 7 th Street, Brickell Avenue /SE 8 th Street. However, the major approach at the Brickell Avenue / NE 7 th Street intersection and minor approach at the Brickell Avenue / NE 5 th Street intersection are projected to operate at low levels of service. With signal timing improvements these intersections will operate within the city s LOS standard. The Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan consist of strategies that increase over-all system efficiency by encouraging a shift from single-occupant vehicle (SOV) trips to non-sov modes, or shifting auto trips out of peak periods. This plan seeks to reduce auto trips by increasing travel options, by providing incentives and information to encourage and help individuals modify their travel behavior, or by reducing the physical need to travel through transportation-efficient lands uses. Implementation of the TDM plan could result in a potential ten percent (1%) reduction of peak hour vehicle trips. The proposed TDM plan for the project is included in Appendix G. Page 26

31 Appendix A Site Plan

32

33 Appendix B Approved Transportation Methodology

34 TRAFFIC STUDY METHODOLOGY One Brickell November 1, 214 PROJECT LOCATION The project will be located at 4 Brickell Avenue in Miami, Florida. The project proposes 1,4 residential units, a 25-room hotel, and retail space. The existing building will be removed from the site. Access to the site will be via a two-way driveway on SE 5 th Street. A second two-way driveway is proposed also accessing SE 5 th Street. PURPOSE This methodology will provide the details of the Traffic Impact Analysis proposed for this development. This methodology is based on the requirements from the city of Miami. Confirmation of this methodology will be requested from the city prior to performing the study. METHODOLOGY This methodology proposes completion of the required analysis as follows: The study limits are defined as NE 1 st Street to the north, SE 8 th Street to the south, Brickell Avenue to the east, and SW 1 st Avenue to the west. The site is located within the limits of the Downtown Areawide DRI. Turning movement traffic counts will be collected during the PM (4:-6:) peak period at four major intersections in the immediate project vicinity. 1. Brickell Avenue / SE 4 th Street (S Biscayne Boulevard) 2. Brickell Avenue / SE 5 th Street 3. Brickell Avenue / SE 7 th Street 4. Brickell Avenue / SE 8 th Street In addition to these intersections, we will analyze the project driveways. Segment traffic volumes will be collected as 24-hour machine counts at the following locations: 1. Brickell Avenue / Biscayne Blvd between NE 1 st Street and SE 8 th Street 2. SE 7 th Street between Brickell Avenue and SW 1 st Avenue 3. SE 8 th Street between Brickell Avenue and S Miami Avenue Available Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) counts will be consulted where appropriate. Raw traffic counts will be adjusted to peak season (for the peak hour period). The signal timing and phasing at the study signalized intersections will be obtained from Miami-Dade County. 1 P a g e

35 Existing and future traffic conditions for the project area will be established using the person-trip method. The methodology for this method is outlined in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. Corridor capacity will be estimated using generalized vehicular capacities (converted to person-trips) from the Downtown DRI, FDOT LOS Manual, or other acceptable equivalent. Project Traffic Project trip generation will be based on the calculation of person-trips consistent with the city of Miami Comprehensive Plan. Person-trips generated by the project will be established using the following procedure: 1. Determine the gross vehicular trip generation for each land use using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation rates or formulas. 2. Reduce gross vehicular trips by a vehicle occupancy adjustment based upon the use of the ITE trip rates (City of Miami s 1.4 vs. ITE s 1.2 pers/veh). 3. Reduce gross vehicular trips by a transit reduction based on projected modal splits from Increment II of the Downtown DRI or other acceptable equivalent. 4. Reduce gross vehicular trips by a pedestrian/bicycle reduction based on estimates from Increment II of the Downtown DRI or other acceptable equivalent. 5. Establish the net external vehicle trips. 6. Convert the net external vehicle trips to person-trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. 7. Convert the vehicular trips assigned to transit back to person-trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. 8. Add together the project net external person-trips for the vehicle and transit modes. Background Traffic - A growth factor consistent with historical annual growth in the area will be applied to the existing traffic volumes. Committed Developments - Will be based on the list of relevant projects included in the City s web based application or as provided by city staff. Committed development trips will also be converted to person-trips based on the methodology described above. Synchro software or the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) based on the 21 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) will be used for existing and future intersection capacity analysis. Project and committed development net external vehicle trips (adjusted for transit, pedestrian and occupancy as described above) will be used for the intersection capacity analysis. Intersection capacity analyses will be performed at the study intersections and the proposed project driveways. Trip Assignment - Net new external project traffic will be assigned to the adjacent street network using the appropriate cardinal distribution from the Miami-Dade Long Range Transportation Plan, published by the Metropolitan Planning Organization. Normal traffic patterns will also be considered when assigning project trips. Site Access and Circulation Analysis for large vehicles will be done using Auto Turn software to assess site access and circulation maneuverability. A Transportation Control Measure Plan will be included in the report If you have any questions you can contact me at (35) w:\14\1428\traffic study methodology.docx 2 P a g e

36 Appendix C Traffic Counts Historic Background Growth FDOT Adjustment Factors Signal Timings

37 Traffic Counts

38 DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Project Name: One Brickell Project Number: 1428 Location: Brickell Avenue / SE 8th Street Count Date: 11/25/214 Observer: Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Day of Week: Tuesday Brickell Avenue SE 8th Street TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L 83 R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTAL 4: PM 4:15 PM :15 PM 4:3 PM :3 PM 4:45 PM :45 PM 5: PM : PM 5:15 PM :15 PM 5:3 PM :3 PM 5:45 PM :45 PM 6: PM PM PEAK PERIOD TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Brickell Avenue SE 8th Street TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTAL 4: PM 6: PM ,241 PEAK HOUR FACTOR Note: 213 FDOT Peak Season Conversion Factor = 1.1 Brickell Avenue & SE 8th Street

39 DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Project Name: One Brickell Project Number: 1428 Location: Brickell Avenue / SE 7th Street Count Date: 11/25/214 Observer: Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Day of Week: Tuesday Brickell Avenue SE 7th Street TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTAL 4: PM 4:15 PM :15 PM 4:3 PM :3 PM 4:45 PM :45 PM 5: PM : PM 5:15 PM :15 PM 5:3 PM :3 PM 5:45 PM :45 PM 6: PM PM PEAK PERIOD TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Brickell Avenue SE 7th Street TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTAL 4: PM 6: PM ,71 PEAK HOUR FACTOR NA Note: 213 FDOT Peak Season Coversion Factor = 1.1 Brickell Avenue & SE 7th Street

40 DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Project Name: One Brickell Project Number: 1428 Location: Brickell Avenue / SE 5th Street Count Date: 11/25/214 Observer: Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Day of Week: Tuesday Brickell Avenue SE 5th Street TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTAL 4: PM 4:15 PM :15 PM 4:3 PM :3 PM 4:45 PM :45 PM 5: PM : PM 5:15 PM :15 PM 5:3 PM :3 PM 5:45 PM :45 PM 6: PM PM PEAK PERIOD TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Brickell Avenue SE 5th Street TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTAL 4: PM 6: PM ,54 PEAK HOUR FACTOR Note: 213 FDOT Peak Season Coversion Factor = 1.1 Brickell Avenue & SE 5th Street

41 DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Project Name: One Brickell Project Number: 1428 Location: Brickell Avenue / SE 4th Street (S Biscayne Blvd) Count Date: 11/25/214 Observer: Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Day of Week: Tuesday Brickell Avenue SE 4th Street (S Biscayne Boulevard) TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTAL 4: PM 4:15 PM :15 PM 4:3 PM :3 PM 4:45 PM :45 PM 5: PM : PM 5:15 PM :15 PM 5:3 PM :3 PM 5:45 PM :45 PM 6: PM PM PEAK PERIOD TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Brickell Avenue SE 4th Street (S Biscayne Boulevard) TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTAL 4: PM 6: PM ,83 PEAK HOUR FACTOR NA NA.9 Note: 213 FDOT Peak Season Coversion Factor = 1.1 Brickell Avenue & SE 4th Street (S Biscayne Boulevard)

42 DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 24-HOUR COUNTS Project Name: Location: Observer: One Brickell Biscayne Blvd Between NE 1st St and SE 1st St Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Project No.: 1428 Count Date: 12/1/14 Day of Week: Wednesday BEGIN NORTHBOUND BEGIN SOUTHBOUND TWO-WAY TIME 1st 1/4 2nd 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL TIME 1st 1/4 2nd 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL TOTAL 12: AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM ,332 8: AM : AM ,48 2,39 9: AM : AM ,858 1: AM ,162 1: AM ,883 11: AM ,19 11: AM ,876 12: PM ,227 12: PM ,948 1: PM ,182 1: PM ,948 2: PM ,16 2: PM ,924 3: PM ,259 3: PM ,26 4: PM ,279 4: PM ,13 5: PM ,656 5: PM ,52 6: PM ,529 6: PM ,315 7: PM ,114 7: PM ,775 8: PM : PM ,547 9: PM : PM ,486 1: PM : PM ,327 11: PM : PM ,1 24-HOUR TOTAL 2,61 24-HOUR TOTAL 13,327 33,388 AM Peak Hour: PM Peak Hour: PEAK PERIOD AVERAGE ANNUAL CONDITIONS SUMMARY Seasonal Factor: 1.5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TWO-WAY Volume: ,77 Volume: 1, ,427 24hrs -Brickell Avenue Biscayne Blvd Between NE 1st and SE 1st

43 DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 24-HOUR COUNTS Project Name: Location: Observer: One Brickell Biscayne Blvd Between SE 4th St and SE 3rd St Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Project No.: 1428 Count Date: 12/1/14 Day of Week: Wednesday BEGIN NORTHBOUND BEGIN SOUTHBOUND TWO-WAY TIME 1st 1/4 2nd 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL TIME 1st 1/4 2nd 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL TOTAL 12: AM : AM 318 1: AM : AM 184 2: AM : AM 113 3: AM : AM 73 4: AM : AM 86 5: AM : AM 177 6: AM : AM 351 7: AM : AM 726 8: AM ,1 8: AM 1,1 9: AM : AM 81 1: AM : AM : AM : AM : PM ,6 12: PM 1,6 1: PM : PM 98 2: PM : PM 972 3: PM ,143 3: PM 1,143 4: PM ,273 4: PM 1,273 5: PM ,789 5: PM 1,789 6: PM ,581 6: PM 1,581 7: PM ,148 7: PM 1,148 8: PM : PM 927 9: PM : PM 927 1: PM : PM : PM : PM HOUR TOTAL 18, HOUR TOTAL 18,835 AM Peak Hour: PM Peak Hour: PEAK PERIOD AVERAGE ANNUAL CONDITIONS SUMMARY Seasonal Factor: 1.5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TWO-WAY Volume: Volume: 1,68 1,68 24hrs -Brickell Avenue Biscayne Blvd Between SE 4 st and SE 3 st

44 DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 24-HOUR COUNTS Project Name: Location: Observer: One Brickell Biscayne Blvd Between SE 1st St and SE 2nd St Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Project No.: 1428 Count Date: 12/1/14 Day of Week: Wednesday BEGIN NORTHBOUND BEGIN SOUTHBOUND TWO-WAY TIME 1st 1/4 2nd 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL TIME 1st 1/4 2nd 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL TOTAL 12: AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM : AM ,176 8: AM : AM ,24 1,872 9: AM : AM ,585 1: AM : AM ,7 11: AM : AM ,667 12: PM ,3 12: PM ,794 1: PM : PM ,758 2: PM : PM ,778 3: PM ,54 3: PM ,86 4: PM ,93 4: PM ,98 5: PM ,412 5: PM ,392 6: PM ,326 6: PM ,188 7: PM : PM ,79 8: PM : PM ,485 9: PM : PM ,477 1: PM : PM ,316 11: PM : PM HOUR TOTAL 17, HOUR TOTAL 13,811 31, AM Peak Hour: PM Peak Hour: PEAK PERIOD AVERAGE ANNUAL CONDITIONS SUMMARY Seasonal Factor: 1.5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TWO-WAY Volume: ,6 Volume: 1, ,295 24hrs -Brickell Avenue Biscayne Blvd Between SE 1st and SE 2 st

45 SE 4TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: TRINI ESPADA SIGNALlZED ar=ff i a a,171rav vu! vvf q^a. vpvvre i.l i cts< Tn. 524 Gardenia Terrace nal y:\/ Paa^h F1 nri d Phone (561) ALL VEHICLES site code : oor4249 start Date: 7L/25/L4 File I.D. : 4ST_BRIC Page : 1 BRICKELL AVENUE From NorLh I r.rom EasE I BRICKELL AVENUE From West I I UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right ] UTurn Left Thru Rlght UTurn Left Thru Right Total Date ll/25/14-16: 16:15 15: a o 276 o :458i27131 i 77 Hr Total l 1188 l ol 265s o o o ol o o o ol o ol 17: L7:L :3 a l 17:45 A '/3 36 l 232) 378 l o 38 o 32s I Hr Totaf A ol 1315 o o o o ol 84 l?58 o o ol 2895 *TOTAL* l ol 555

46 SE 4TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: TRINI ESPADA S IGNALI ZED TrAff i - qrrrrrf\/ qna- i: l i ere Tn. 624 Gardenia Terrace ffl rav RpA.h f- o-i da Phone (561) ALL VEHICLES SiEe Code : Start Date: LL/25/14 File 1.D. : 4ST_BRIC Page : 2 BRICKELL AVENUE From North JE lan DIKEE] From East BRICKELL AVENUE from 5uEn t--- I t rom west UTurn Left Thru Righc UTurn Left. Thru Rjght I UTurn Left Thru Right UTurn Left Thru Right Total Dace 11,/25/74. Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Peri,od: 16: to 18: on 1,7/25/14 Peak start 17: 17: 17; 17: I Volume O l o o 1?1q I Percent g 15? 85? rl or o8 t g g t * loor t? t 8 I Pk total 158 lo I HighesE a7:45 16, 17:3 16: I Volume Hl total I PHF.9L.8'/. I ol o o o o lo.o BRICKELL AVENUE 1?4? 237 n <4 < 237 lttl ll I I -6n _, ll ll 1.58 I I. ALL VEHICLES I *-r vrrr:lrlljtid i lo o L,552 L 'r r:. o O I rnt.ersection Total I zlt, 2,895 1,552 1,315 r,31s ll tl l- se 4rH I J _ a a=o _ t v J o 'TREET t<t5 LTJLJ - 1,31 -l?4? 1,31 BRICKEL AVENUE

47 SE 4TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: TRINI ESPADA SIGNALIZED T-.ffi- e,,rval/ qna-i.liciq Tn. 624 Gardenia Terrace npl ral/ RF^.h Fl.ti da Phone (561) B ] CYCLES Site Code : Start Date: 1,7/25/14 File I.D. : 4ST_BRIC Page : 1 BRICKELL AVENUE From North Fr^m F.af I BRICKELL AVENUE Fr^m q^rrfh t---- I r.rom wesr,l Lefr Thru Right BIKE I Left Thru Right. BIKE I Left Thru Right BIKE I Left Thru Right BIKE DaLe 1-L/25/r4.- ToEal 15: 16:15 16:3 Hr Tolal 17: 17:15 17:3 77 : o o 1 o o o 3l o o o 4l o o l o o o o o l o o o l o o ol o o o 31 o 1l 3l 3 o o ol 1l o 4 Hr Total o o ol o cl 1 l 15 ol ol *TOTALT 21 el ol 31

48 SE 4TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COTINTED BY: TRINI ESPADA SIGNALIZED Tr:ffi- c,,/116\, q^a.i^l ictq Tn. 524 Gardenia Terrace nalrav RF^rh Fl^r'ida Phone (561) PEDESTRlANS Site Code : Start Date: 1L/25/14 File I.D. : 4ST_BRIC Page : 1 BRICKELL AVENUE From North >E +tn JfKEEf From East IBRICKE],L AVENUE!rom soutn l----- I from wesc Left Thru Right Peds DaLe rr/25/14 Lefr Thru Right Peds I Left. Thru Right Peds I Left. Thru Right. Peds I Total 16: 4 16: :3 O 4 o o o o 1 i el 17 1 r7 l o o 27 1 o o 33 o :45 3 I 16 l Hr Total 14 I o 52 o 15 17: I7;I5 17:3 1 17:45 o 11 l o 22 a I 26 I 24 1 HrToLal 1l 83 I o o o o o 23 o o 43 o o o 36 o o o 32 1 o o 134 l ol r72 o o l 35 o o ol 65 o o o ol 62 ol s6 o l 21 8 *TOTAL* ol

49 t, $ t, t!/ Mila-ru.,i rtrbrdcl No'feu\V*r zf >D 14- lt"-n bl', Luit?al,ortr.-i,r4o EiEn oj' z,el

50 SE 5TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: RALPH ESPADA S IGNALl ZED Traffic Survey specialises, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace nclrev Feach. Florida Phone (561) ALL VEHICLES sit,e code : Start Date: L1'/25/1'4 FilaTnCqTEPTa Page : 1 BRICKELL AVENUE From North IDE 5fn JTKEET Fr^m F:aF I BRICKELL AVENUE l from sourn t^n-r,! IDE f,in I t rom wese. Dr[EEl UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right. I UTurn Left I Thru RighL ] UTurn Left Thru Right DaEe rr/25/74 'IOtal 16: 16:15 15: I Hr Total I l- 32 2rr )a L t l-7: l7:15 17: , t I \r I I 831 1s : I I2 Hr Total *TOTAL* C I e4 144 I

51 SE 5TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: RALPH ESPADA SIGNALI ZED avaffit c,,^'a\r cha.i>1i<fc Tn. 624 Gardenia Terrace nfl raw RFech Fl ^ri ria Phone (561) ALL VEHICLES site code ; o StarL Date: l)-/25/1-4 File I.D. : 5ST_BRIC Page : 2 BRICKELL AVENUE From North I JE f 1n D IKEEi I r,rom Eas r I BRICKELL AVENUE!rom Sourn! rom wesr I I I UTurn Left. Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru RighL Total DaLe ll/25/14 '- - - Peak Hour Analvsis Bv Entire Intersectj-on for the Perj-od: 16: to 18: on II/25/14 Peak start 17: volume 15 \ Percent 1t 9t 789 L2Z Pk total 1388 H j-ghest. I7 :45 Volume Hi total 39 PHF.89 17: o t 37t 19t 44* 2 17: : I ,11 r72 3t 1t 79t 8t I :15 I I 17: t 54t 6t 39t r O 28621, 55 SE 5TH STREET L L I -l ll r64 BRICKELL AVENUE 1,8 r , r64 1, 8 ]-44 I I 4 I ' <XX Jvv ALL VEHICL :" 163 t..aersection 1 m^f IULAf -'l ' 16r 266 ll l l I 2,629 74ll ,8 64 r,288 1 A1A f, T!v -----] 1, 111 1,12 r,278 r87 1, 111 II2 3B 74 SE 5TH STREET <x 74 t_ LT2 BRICKEL AVENUE

52 SE 5TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COIJNTED BY: RALPH ESPADA S IGNALI ZED Traffie Srrrvev Snecial ists, lnc. 624 cardeni-a Terrace nfl r:v PFe-h F1 ori da Phone (551) B I CYCLES Slte Code t A74Q249 start DaLe: II/25/14 Fl1e I.D. : 5ST_BRIC Page : 1 BRICKELL AVENUE From North Fr^m F:cts I BRTCKELT. AVENUE I ts rom soue.n l Hrom wesr I LefL Thru RighL BIKE Left Thru Righr BIKE Left Thru Rlght BIKE I Left Thru Right BIKE Date rr/25/ '1t41 16: 3 L 16:15 3 ol 16:3 5 ol 16:4\ O O 1 O O O 7 O O O 1 Hr Total o 18 i 1l 17 r 17:15 17:3 rl rl 3l 5l 8l ol ol ol rl 12 l L 8 I I4 17:45 o O I O Hr Total 3 a 22) 1l l 2l sl el *TOTAL* 4 4 I 2 3

53 SE 5TH STREET & BRICKEI,L AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: RALPH ESPADA SlGNALIZED ar=ffit c,,trtalr cna.i^l i cf< Tn. 624 Gardenia Terrace nclrav Reaeh. Florida Phone (561) PEDESTRIANS site code : start Date: \L/25/14 Fil6TnqqTRPTC Page : 1 BRICKELL AVENUE From North CF <TP ETAFFT L Fr^m F:ct I BRICKELL AVENUE I cf ETU CTDFFT I from wesr Left Thru Right I peds I Lert Thru Right Peds I Left. Thru Right Peds I Left Thru Right Peds Total DaLe 11/25/74 16: 1-5:15 l-6:3 16:45 o4r o26 2^ 1R I ao I o O O O 31 O O O 25 O O I o o o o o 1 75 o o 1 66 Hr'total 77 o 1231 o 87 o 57 :+e 33 l o 34 l 38 l o o 14 o o o 22 1 o o o 1sl o o 13 17: o2r I'7 :75 23 oo28]l7 17: I 8 L7:45 O 2I I 2I 15 I 7 Hr Total 89 a 126 o o *TOTAL* 249 1q] 687

54 Ss + :F - =s> i l( I lrlrt Jlql lt,tr lll tl l, Jftt 6t\t fv \'rot.wi rfbr,c\al{o/eur"ke( zs,lo t/t.l^-n tc3'. Ll^ls Po.\srvtl^o si$no-tg-ej

55 SE 7TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: S. SALVO & M. GOMEZ SIGNALIZED Tr.ff i- Jur c,,rrrar/ vut uyeer e^a-i : l r -F- 524 Gardenia Terrace nal ra\r RFa.h Fl nri da Phone (561) ALL VEHICLES Si-Le Code Start Date: 1'I/25/14 Fi-]e I.D. r 7ST_BRIC Page : 1 DaLe 77/25/14 - BRICKELL AVENUE From North PARKING GARAGE Frnm Facf lbrrcker.r, AVENUE Fr^n q^rrfh I ce?mu CTDFFT I t rom west I l1 UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left. Thru Right. UTurn Left Thru RlghE I ToEal L5; o 77 l5: r o o I tot 15r3 7 ro o A5 sl o o :4s I o o o o o o I 742 Hr Toral r5 O 2! 11 1OO J : ]-2385 o o I s98 L7 :1,5 '7 7 24s 52 I o o o : L4 o o o l esz L7: o o l sz+ Hr Tocal s4 I o o ol *TOTAL* 93 18?3 426 I s4 l ol 681

56 SE 7TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLOR]DA COUNTED BY: S. SALVO & M. GOMEZ SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Special.ists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace nflrav F\each. Florida Pnone (5brl ztz 5z>a ALL VEHICLES Site Code : QI4o249 start Date: L:/25/1,4 File I.D. : 7ST_BRIC Page : 2 BRICKELL AVENUE From North PARKING GARAGE I From EasL BRICKELL AVENUE I JE / rn DfKSEI From WesC Peak stare 17: Volume I7 Percent 1t 4e Pk total 7235 Highest 17:45 I UTurn Left. Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left. Thru Right I UTurn LefE Thru RighE DaEe 77/25/L4 -- peak Hour Analysis By Entire Incersectj-on for Che Period: 16:!o 18: on II/25/74 17: 17: 42 * 11t g t t t Vol ume 5 ZZ Zat O/ Hi t.ot.al 35r PHF : I 17: * 42+ t 19t 78t 2* 1577 I rz: ts o J s3 a I 4ql I.87 16:. Total BRICKELL AVENUE 2II 9s3 77 n L,234 ]-54 21,r 9s3 77 SE 7TH STREET 313 r L --l tr 1 12tr la 2,623 ' I -r. ALL,*L! VEHTCLES V,'''IL,,IiD r- llroo leo+46'tl I a I rnlersection Total I l l I 3'17' rl ' I *'. t L54 L PARKING GARAGE L I U * r, L,234 BR]CKEL AVENUE

57 SE 7TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: S. SALVO & M. GOMEZ SIGNALIZED traffio q,,rrrfv uur Yet qhp.ial eyee*e i efe Tnc 624 Gardenia Terrace nelrav Reanh Florida Phone (561) BICYCI,ES Site Code Start Datei IL/25/14 File I.D. : 7ST_BRIC Page : 1 BRICKELL AVENUE From North I PARKING GARAGE! rom Easr LBRICKELL AVENUE From SouEh I ^- -hrr -mn-nm I re / fn D 1^EEf From West I LefL Thru Right BIKE I Left Thru Right BIKE Left Thru Right BIKE I Left Thru Right BIKE DaLe II/25/I : 1l 4 o o o oj o 16:15 ol 2 o o o o o o l l-6:3 ol 1 o o o I o 4l 16:45 o o o 2 o o 5 o o o o L o o o 2 l Hr Total 3l o L2 o o l o o 5l 17; 17:15 17:3 l7 :45 1l ol ol 2l 2l o o 4l o o 11 o o 4l Hr Total 3l o 21 o o o ol o o l o o I ol ol 1l 'totat 4 o o o ol o o I2 o o l 3l 9 o l 4l I 3 *TOTAL* 6 ol LO

58 SE 7TH STREET & BRICKELL AVEMJE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: S. SALVO & M. GOMEZ SlGNALIZED avaffit crrrrrarr qnf.ial iete Tn. 624 Gardenia Terrace Dolr:rr Reach Florida Phone (561) PEDESTRIANS Site code : L4249 Start Dat.e: 77/25/14 Fi-1e I.D. : 7ST_BRIC Page : 1 BRICKELL AVENUE From NorEh I PARKING GARAGE IBRICKELL AVENUE! rom Souc.n SE 7TH STREET I From West Left Thru Right DaEe tr/25/ D6dd I T.afts I I Peds I Lefr Thru Right Dadc 1 T.af ts rhrrl Di ^hts Peds 'IOtaI 16: 1! : L4?q 73 16; Jf 64 15:45 o o o 12 I o o o 24 o o o Hr Toca1 o32 82 t'r7 J o 3e 1 I 29 17: 23 o o r 74 I7 :1,5 o 1? o o ]-7:3 o 13 o o o 27 1 o 8L s1 I 99 L7:45 o o o 1s I o o o 26 o o o s I o o Hr'1taa u o 68 I o 19 o 33 o *TOTAL* 1nn I rel I 72 3s I

59 $ Il) lt, I ol s6?sf {+ t I 4'' I Rrcfrv"q Qara.!e. N \ \c- <v C. + f. _> -1fuu, ol El 3 gl J irlr lli +l!t 'ltllll Mca-\u,Fbr.do, lio*l cwt(o{x' >,b-, } o t4 ('elov\ by,'. t-u"ig Pa\ot.\i f itncl-taej AO

60 SE 8TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAIV1I, FI,ORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & R. MARTINEZ SIGNALIZED arzffir c,,r\fa\/ qnc^ir'l i ef e Tn. 624 Gardenia Terrace nflr:v Rpach F]orida Phone (561) ALL VEHICLES Site Code SbarE Date: LI/25/14 File LD. : BST_BRIC Page : 1 BRICKELL AVENUE From North UTurn Left. Thru Right DaLe 17/25/ I af arh From East qrpeft IBRICKELL AVENUE I Fr^m a^,ttsh I se 8TH STREET!rom wesr tl uturn Left. Thru Right I uturn Left Thru Rj-ght I uturn Left Thru Righl Total 15: 16:15 16:45 Hr rocal r r u fo> zz r7227 o ' L96 ol o 56 o r29 o o o ol ol o L6i o so8 o s : 17:15 1?:3 r r I 'r I 1C7 77:45 O I Hr Total Aq I 1l ol ol 1 L or r I 164 nl 8s I 7ao ). o 52 6L o L o o I *TOTAL* 463 r499 1l ,A1 6418

61 SE 8TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & R. MARTINEZ SlGNAI,I ZED ar)ffi- errrrral, Cna-i:licFa T Gardenia Terrace T)pl rav Reaeh. Fl ori da Phone (561) ALL VEHICLES site code I oa\4249 Start Date: 7I/25/L4 File I.D. : 8ST_BRIC Page : 2 BRICKE],], AVENUE From North SE 8TH STREET From East i BRICKELL AVENUE r.rom joutn I se BTH STREET From West UTurn Left Thru RighL UTurn Left Thru Rj-ght. UTurn LefE Thru Right ] UTurn Left Thru RighL I 't otaa Date ll/25/l4 -- Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 15: to 18: on 17/25/L4 Peak start 17: 17: 17: l-7: Volume I 1 o o l-33 Percent t 24$ 76t * t 26+ ot 73t t t 89t 1t g r-6t Pk total r 81s 839 Highest 17:15 I7 :3 tz, rs I7:L5 volume s 2 rs7 2r 23 L Hi total PHF BRICKELL AVENUE 't SE 8TH STREET J /O ll I I. ALL VEHICLES I rn4 7 'r 839 fntersection Tot.al 3,289 ll L69 ' r,8'72.1 R1( 729.l r SE 8TH STREET I,5'7 129 BRICKELL AVENUE

62 2l SE 8TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & R. MARTINEZ SIGNALIZED Tr:fFi n q,,rlrav qna.i.l i atsa Th- 624 Gardenia Terrace nfl ral/ Pa^.h Fl ^ri da Phone (551) BI CYCI,ES site code : oq74249 Start Date: II/25/14 F11e I.D. : 8ST_BRIC Page : 1 BRICKELL AVENUE IBRTCKELL AVENUE From North!rom Easr!rom sourn I From West ll r^fr rhn, pidhr PIKE I Left Thru Right BIKE I Left Thru Right BIKE I LefL Thru Right BIKE DaLe II/25/74 16: 16:15 15:3 Hr Total 17: L7:L5 17:3 1 I EF ETH qtptrft 2l 2l 4l 4l 12 l 77:45 1 Hr Total sl l ol 2l 2l 6l r 6l 2l l 1l l 1l 2l 1 1 1l 2l 4l 1l 8l o o ol o o 1l o o 3l 5l o o el *TOTAL* 7l 4 r7 l 64

63 o SE 8TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & R. MARTINEZ SIGNALlZED at^ffi. Jur qrrrrra\/ vuy uyeuf qna.i >l r ^F- 524 Gardeni-a Terrace na l rav qaa.h Fl ^ri.la Phone (561) PEDESTRIANS Slte Code L4249 Start Date: 7I/25/14 File I.D. : 8ST_BRIC Page : 1 BRICKEI,I, AVENUE From North t^forii IDE Oin DfKEEi I rrom Easr I BRICKELL AVENUE From South I ef arh!rom wesr erpfft DaLe Ll/25/ I r.aff Thrrr Fidht DAda I t.afi Thrrr Pidhf pfdc r.af i Thr,, Pi dhf PF.ie I T,Ff r I Thru Right Peds I Total 16: 9 16: :3 5 16:45 O O '7 I I Hr Total o o 23 I 17: 17:15 L7 r3o 4l o o 2rl o o el R 8 I o ] ' I r47 o r42 o Er ToEal 48 I I nq I 67 *TOTAL* 7l 422?qq i

64 $ g ctf sf 5l \A t,.lh{+lt +1+ \- *.f,r -s> - _> rl v I {tavt4.r ttrbf)dotfjo{ev4b-ef z5 tzo \4 J na.^r ttf la g', Lr,," i s?n\owt ivro 6itio-UrteA { f +r[

65 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace De1ray Beach, Florida Phone (561) Vol-ume Report wilh 24 Hour Totals Page 1 ***Jr*trrr**********rr****rr**Jr**************Jr*****************rr****Jrrr*************** Data File DL2L2. PRN St at. ion : Identification 584f136 Interval Start. date : Dec 1, L4 Start time Stop date T-)an'1 n 14 'v t v Ql-nn evy t- i ma /- vrul i t- rr /'Ttat.ta I LvvvLL. Mi ami, F'l! f ori v- * da ltanrrnfrr Location : Biscayne Bl-vd North of Flagler St.reet ******************************************************************************* Dec 1 Northbound Volume for Lane 1 End Time l '7 46 ;; ;;;;i -,;z ;,; End Time 12 r-f z t> Hr Total 122' > Z / z+ zv L2 LZ z>v ^nn zo t162 rrbu 4 5 zz AA z+ fo BO II2 l-33 L42 tjj >+ z5l +ot L] 18 Z>3 -J U-' 4I r9 49 4r LZa> LZ I v 4L1, 34r r()5b rszy 24 Hour Total : 251 AM na:lr hnrrr ]-raai na. 1 n. nn AIvl peak volume z LL62 PM peak hour begins : 17: PM peak volume : 1656 ******************************************************** Dec 1 Southbound Volume for Lane 2 Eno I1me ---i; *- -:- -.- Hr'1 ot,al Eno trme ---r;--- nn *_-_-.--- Hr '1 ta_l 7 5L :^: zz5 I2 - ::: Lt) L ;;; tzl L L73 1,75 l I L9L ' s6 53 1, L4 z6> L )lu ;,i ;re II 228 I97 2I ;;; ;;; ;;Z 24 Hour Total z L332'7 AIvl peak hour begins : 8:15 AM peak volume 189 PM neak horrr hecri ns. 1?. I. no VL PM peak volume : 864 ' ******************************************************** 15 minutes : 24: Dade 7 8 L BB L r , r3 26'7 L ' r 258 2' r5 941, LI62 1_ L I7O I L 183 ]-28 t Peak hour factor :.87 Peak hour factor :.99 ************** Jr*** ** *** LO L J_OO l-o:/ L7 r42 1(q 1AA I54 L62 7-^ O O J- OZ* -L 9 l- 11 ;:; ;:- -::: zal _L6J r8' I 183 L'7'7 I _9 >!t tzl 16' L4 I J-5J LZ6 148 L ] I ' Peak hour factor :.93 Peak hour factor :.94 ***************** rr* *** *

66 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida Phone (56f) Vo]ume Report willn 24 Hour Totals Page 2 ***********************************************************************tr******** IJATA F'].IC Statron Identification Start date Qfnn v9vi/ rlaio Ci 1. rr/tr-rr^rn elvl I Location **************** Dec 1 End Time I] IOO L52 L2 *- -: ::: Hr totat 5/L rjno t]-me Lz ---i;--- -i;i Hiltotal. r9+a DL2LO2O. PRN L Dec 1, L4 Dec 1, L4 Mi am'i, F r +v-*s\ l ori da Intervaf Start trme Qt- nn l-'i mo /aa"r{-tr uvurrly Biscayne Blvd North of Flagler Street Total Volume for A11 Lanes 15 mrnutes : 24:OO Dade * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * t( * * * * * * * * * * * * * * rr * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * r L948 1, ;: --;; 5> Z I ' , >5 5J_u r rO3 n - Aa U] UO --;; -i;, 71, /5b s ' ' BB 1 1l 5r' ' L L876 L B5B L9 2 2L L 4LI 361 3s I 4LI I L7'7 5 1, l Hour Tota] AM peak hour begins 8:15 AM peak volume 2LL Peak hour factor.97 PM peak hour begins : 17: PM peak volume : 252 Peak hour factor :.98 *******************************************************************************

67 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida Phone (561) Vol-ume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 ***********************t(tr****r(*****************rr******************************** uata t.]-te Statron Identification Start date Qfnn dafa f-i l- rrl'l'nr^rn I 'vrrzl LocaLron **************** Dec 1 uu ---i;--- --;; E;no lrme Hr Total 38 IJno ]].me rz ---i;--- -;,; Hr Total- 13 DL2LOO18. PRN L252L27 Dec 1, L4 Dec 1, L4 Miami, Florida Interval Start time v Qfnn vvt/ /larrnl_rr evs4rul l- i mo 15 mi-nutes : 24: Dade Biscavne Blvd Bet. SE 1 St & SE 2 SL * * * * * *i * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Northbound Vol-ume for Lane L32 13 L LO 2L '7L ;; ZU L :. --^: ro zo L z zo I L t-93 L' L4L2 L L4 131 L LL z)o zv6 zu+ zzz z.* A 1 I ^ L L -^ I Z -;;i -;;; L LB L94 L L L L57 22'7 L L L82 TB7 T " Hour Total L7LB9 AM peak hour begins 1: AIvl peak volume 989 Peak hour fact.or.84 PM peak hour begins : 17: PM peak volume : L4I2 Peak hour factor :.93 ************************************************Jr****************************** Dec 1 Southbound Volume for Lane 2 1 o4 5 5 'r 8 9 l 11 -E;no l ame ---i; *- -:- -.-.Hr'1 tar 6l_ 5B zz+ End Time L :--- -;:; If, IIJJ 3 L \o Hr Total '/ 64 zl Y3 13 zzv zu6 L87 zu3 _;;, UZ - -:- zo 25 aa 16 >+ --ii 11 L7 ll 5U L4 1, L Hour Total :13811 AM peak hour begins 8:15 PM peak hour begins : 17: B zl> 26 zzt I ********************************************************)k********************** r3 LO'l 211 I' z5l z z zv> - a;; AM peak vo1ume 159 PM peak vo1ume : r r ' LO24 19 zvo zl Bl L 19 ] , _ t57 21,2 248 I l_ '7LL a^ 1^ A LOZ LZ+ 1, ' Peak hour factor :.95 Peak hour factor :.98

68 Tref f i r- Srrrrrer.z Sner-i a'l i sf s - TnC. 624 Gardenia TerraCe De1ray Beach, Florida Phone (561) Volume Reoort wllh 24 Hour Totals Page 2 ******************************************************************************** Data File D]-21,18. PRN Station ].289 Identification 1r Interval St.art date Dec 1, 14 Start time Qfan dai.a ci irz /'Fnr^rn vr e-) T]an 1n 1A u Ql-nn evy lanr rn l- rr l- i ma 15 minutes : 242 Dade Lv t Mi ami F'l ori da,! 5v!+s! Location Biscavne Blvd Bet. SE 1 St & SE 2 St ******************************************************************************* Dec 1 Total Volume for All- Lanes!.;no t]-me uu ---';--- -i;i 3 L4L 45 r45 85 Hr Total- 532.uno 1r-me r2 ---i;--- -;;, Hr Total L794 1 IZ ot a1 6 z to A1 =I _::; zzo 13 L4 +b5 +JU dn A^^ J:7U +ZZ L'778 z+ Houilr'otal. 31 AM peak hour begins 8:15 PM peak hour begins : 17: - -;; 5l 23 LZO o4,l tj 3l 5> 3B r5z _ 186 t-98 *********Jr****************Jr****************Jr****Jr****************************** 5 5b ::-- z9l L] L' L2 z5>z L r r ,1,7 6 zl66 AM peak volume 199 PM peak vol-ume : , r l _ 284 L L r L ' I L Peak hour factor :.95 Peak hour factor :.97

69 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida Phone (561) Volume Reoort wilhr 24 Hour Total-s Page 1 ******************************************************************************** uata I,r Le DI2IOO19. PRN Station ]-287 Identification Interval 15 minutes Start date Dec 1, 14 Start time : Qt-nn dal- a Dec 1, 14 Qfnn f i ma 24: f-i,t- vt v rrltar^rn -I r Miami, Fl-orida t/aarrnl-rr uvurru/ Dade Location Blscavne Blvd Between SE 4 St & SE 3 St ******************************************************************************* Dec 1 Northbound Vo]ume End Time l-f, >L r *- -: : -- Hr'1 ocat Jl.u^.E;no 1].me rz ---i; -- -;;; r Hr Total :: -- az Jb ^- 37 L ] L4 z+o L>> L Hour Tota] :18835 AM peak hour begins 8:15 PM peak hour begins : 17: O :_ --: z5 lb L6 26 L4 19 ' l r r L273 ****************************************************rktr*******************)k***** 5 6 z+ 3t LO L'71 3 5l L '7L 4L r L AM peak vol-ume : 1-L2 PM peak volume z ] B LO> 256 r L r L z5l+ 9 t- 11 :;: '24 ::: '29'2 : 23I 233 L LB L '/ ZZU L8 23 2L >z I >z I zz ;tt - z5 r;; 195 L L49 L23 L82 ' Peak hour factor z.94 Peak hour factor :.95

70 Traffic Survey Specialist.s, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, F]or j-da Phone (561) Vol-ume Report with 24 Hour Total-s ******************************************************************************** uata F rte Stat. ion Identification Interval- Start dat,e Ql-nn dai-o Ci l- rr/'l-nr^rn Location *:k************** Dec 1 End Time *- -: ^- ^. Hr'1 Otal- 3{J4 End Time 12 l_f, zll Hr Total 942 DL2LO24. PRN L Dec 1, L4 Dec 1, L4 Mi ami F'l nri da, r!v!f s! St.art. time u Qi-nn uv}/ t/lnrrnfrr vvurrlj I i ma 15 mlnutes : 24 : Dade SE 4 Street East of SE 3 Avenue * * * * * * * * * * * * rr * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * Eastbound Volume :.- --;: f,i JO 35 L l- /b rt-+ 13 zz6 zzi L vl_b z1 HOUr 1t4l- : AIUI peak hour begins : PM peak hour begins i ********************** I4 l_c' 248 zv+ 24r 6 tv ;: --:. 26 _LO l-8 2L "r 2" ;; --:- zz lo l_5 66 L2 L , ,6 r6841, 8:3 AM peak vol-ume : PM peak vol-ume : l-335 * ****************r.*rr************** 1 8 l_ou z5 t r r 287 '7 L t_ ,9' '7 ' s 293 2r9 2'7L 2LL 2I7 237 L L4 26L 9' L I I ,32 r' I r3 526 Peak hour factor :.94 Peak hour factor :.93,r**********************

71 Historic Background Growth

72 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 213 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 87 - MIAMI-DADE SITE: SR 5/US-1, 1' S FLAGLER ST YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR C N 24 S C N 23 S C N 175 S C N 18 S C N 195 S C N 17 S C N 19 S C N 175 S F N 255 S C N 22 S C N 24 S C N 215 S C N 23 S C N 275 S C N 23 S C N 215 S AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; F = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 211 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K3 VALUES

73 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 213 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 87 - MIAMI-DADE SITE: SR 5/US-1/NB, 2' E SE 2 AV ON SE 4 ST YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR C N C N C N C N C N F C N C N C N C N C N C N C N C N C N C N AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; F = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 211 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K3 VALUES

74 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 213 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 87 - MIAMI-DADE SITE: 55 - SR 5/US-1, 2' S MIAMI RIVER BRIDG YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR C N 175 S C N 175 S C N 175 S C N 18 S C N 155 S C N 16 S C N 16 S C N 145 S C N 16 S C N 175 S C N 145 S C N 175 S C N 175 S C N 18 S C N 155 S C N 185 S AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; F = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 211 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K3 VALUES

75 One Brickell Background Growth Rate Station Location SR 5/US-1/NB, 2' E ofse 2 Av 18, 16, 18, 17, 17, 17,5 547 SR 5/US-1, 1' S Flager St 36, 36, 35, 36, 36, 38,5 55 SR 5/US-1/NB, 2' S Miami River Bridge 31,5 31,5 36,5 36,5 34, 36,5 Total Yearly Growth Growth Trend 85,5 83,5 89,5 89,5 87, 92,5-2.3% 7.2%.% -2.8% 6.3% 1.7%

76 FDOT Adjustment Factors

77

78 Signal Timings

79 Print Date: for 3448: US 1&SE 7 St Print Time: 1/31/214 8:6 AM Asset Intersection 3448 US 1&SE 7 St DOW-6 N/A Max N/A Splits TOD Schedule Op Mode PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PH 7 PH 8 NBL SBT - WBT SBL NBT - - TOD Schedule Report Plan # Cycle Offset TOD Setting Active PhaseBank Active Maximum Active Phase Bank: Phase Bank 1 Phase Walk Don't Walk Min Initial Veh Ext Max Limit Max 2 Phase Bank Yellow 1 NBL SBT WBT SBL NBT Red Last In Service Date: Permitted Phases Default External Permit External Permit 1 External Permit 2 unknown

80 Green Time Current TOD Schedule Plan Cycle 1 NBL 2 SBT 3-4 WBT 5 SBL 6 NBT Ring Offset Offset Local TOD Schedule Time Plan DOW 17 Su M T W Th F S 115 Free Su S 23 Flash M T W Th F 53 2 M T W Th F 6 Free Su S 7 4 M T W Th F 8 18 Su S 93 6 M T W Th F Su S 14 2 Su S M T W Th F M T W Th F Su S 2 15 M T W Th F M T W Th F Su S Current Time of Day Function Local Time of Day Function * Settings Time Function Settings * Day of Week TOD OUTPUTS SuM T W ThF S 73 VEH MAX RECALL M T W ThF 93 VEH MAX RECALL M T W ThF 163 VEH MAX RECALL M T W ThF 183 VEH MAX RECALL M T W ThF Time Function Settings * Day of Week TOD OUTPUTS SuM T W ThF S VEH MAX RECALL M T W ThF VEH MAX RECALL M T W ThF VEH MAX RECALL M T W ThF VEH MAX RECALL M T W ThF Blank - FREE - Phase Bank 1, Max 1 Blank - Plan - Phase Bank 1, Max Phase Bank 2, Max Phase Bank 2, Max Phase Bank 3, Max Phase Bank 3, Max EXTERNAL PERMIT EXTERNAL PERMIT X-PED OMIT 8 - TBA No Calendar Defined/Enabled Page 2 of 2

81 TOD Schedule Report Print Date: for 4579: US 1&SE 5 St Print Time: 11/2/214 9:59 AM Asset Intersection 4579 US 1&SE 5 St DOW-5 N/A Max N/A Splits TOD Schedule Op Mode PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PH 7 PH 8 SBL NBT - EBT NBL SBT - WBT Plan # Cycle Offset TOD Setting Active PhaseBank Active Maximum Active Phase Bank: Phase Bank 1 Phase Walk Don't Walk Min Initial Veh Ext Max Limit Max 2 Phase Bank Yellow 1 SBL NBT EBT NBL SBT WBT Red Last In Service Date: Permitted Phases Default External Permit External Permit 1 External Permit 2 unknown Page 1 of 2

82 TOD Schedule Report Print Date: for 4579: US 1&SE 5 St Print Time: 11/2/214 9:59 AM Green Time Current TOD Schedule Plan Cycle 1 SBL 2 NBT 3-4 EBT 5 NBL 6 SBT 7-8 WBT Ring Offset Offset Local TOD Schedule Time Plan DOW 17 Su M T W Th F S 115 Free Su S 23 Flash M T W Th F 53 2 M T W Th F 6 Free Su S 7 4 M T W Th F 8 18 Su S 93 6 M T W Th F Su S 14 2 Su S M T W Th F M T W Th F Su S 2 15 M T W Th F M T W Th F Su S Current Time of Day Function Local Time of Day Function * Settings Time Function Settings * Day of Week TOD OUTPUTS SuM T W ThF S Time Function Settings * Day of Week TOD OUTPUTS SuM T W ThF S Blank - FREE - Phase Bank 1, Max 1 Blank - Plan - Phase Bank 1, Max Phase Bank 2, Max Phase Bank 2, Max Phase Bank 3, Max Phase Bank 3, Max EXTERNAL PERMIT EXTERNAL PERMIT X-PED OMIT 8 - TBA No Calendar Defined/Enabled Page 2 of 2

83 TOD Schedule Report Print Date: for 4214: SE 2 Av&SE 4 St Print Time: 11/2/214 9:48 AM Asset Intersection 4214 SE 2 Av&SE 4 St DOW-5 N/A Max N/A Splits TOD Schedule Op Mode PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PH 7 PH 8 - NR+SL NBR SBL Plan # Cycle Offset TOD Setting Active PhaseBank Active Maximum Active Phase Bank: Phase Bank 1 Phase Walk Don't Walk Min Initial Veh Ext Max Limit Max 2 Phase Bank Yellow NR NBR SBL Red Last In Service Date: Permitted Phases Default External Permit External Permit 1 External Permit 2 unknown Green Time Current TOD Schedule Plan Cycle 1-2 NR+S 3 NBR 4 SBL Ring Offset Offset Local TOD Schedule Time Plan DOW Free Su M T W Th F S 1 Flash M T W Th F 2 Free Su S 6 9 Su M T W Th F S M T W Th F 73 1 M T W Th F 93 9 M T W Th F M T W Th F M T W Th F 19 9 M T W Th F Page 1 of 2

84 TOD Schedule Report Print Date: for 4214: SE 2 Av&SE 4 St Print Time: 11/2/214 9:48 AM Current Time of Day Function Local Time of Day Function * Settings Time Function Settings * Day of Week TOD OUTPUTS SuM T W ThF S Time Function Settings * Day of Week TOD OUTPUTS SuM T W ThF S Blank - FREE - Phase Bank 1, Max 1 Blank - Plan - Phase Bank 1, Max Phase Bank 2, Max Phase Bank 2, Max Phase Bank 3, Max Phase Bank 3, Max EXTERNAL PERMIT EXTERNAL PERMIT X-PED OMIT 8 - TBA No Calendar Defined/Enabled Page 2 of 2

85 Print Date: for 2243: US 1&SE 8 St Print Time: 1/31/214 8:4 AM Asset Intersection 2243 US 1&SE 8 St DOW-6 N/A Max N/A Splits TOD Schedule Op Mode PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PH 7 PH 8 - SBT EBT WBT SBL NBT PED - TOD Schedule Report Plan # Cycle Offset TOD Setting Active PhaseBank Active Maximum Active Phase Bank: Phase Bank 1 Phase Walk Don't Walk Min Initial Veh Ext Max Limit Max 2 Phase Bank Yellow SBT EBT WBT SBL NBT PED Red Last In Service Date: Permitted Phases Default External Permit External Permit 1 External Permit 2 3/8/21 13:

86 Green Time Current TOD Schedule Plan Cycle 1-2 SBT 3 EBT 4 WBT 5 SBL 6 NBT 7 PED 8 - Ring Offset Offset Local TOD Schedule Time Plan DOW 17 Su M T W Th F S 115 Free Su S 23 Free M T W Th F 53 2 M T W Th F 6 Free Su S 7 4 M T W Th F 8 18 Su S 93 6 M T W Th F Su S 14 2 Su S M T W Th F M T W Th F Su S 2 15 M T W Th F M T W Th F Su S Current Time of Day Function Local Time of Day Function * Settings Time Function Settings * Day of Week TOD OUTPUTS SuM T W ThF S Time Function Settings * Day of Week TOD OUTPUTS SuM T W ThF S Blank - FREE - Phase Bank 1, Max 1 Blank - Plan - Phase Bank 1, Max Phase Bank 2, Max Phase Bank 2, Max Phase Bank 3, Max Phase Bank 3, Max EXTERNAL PERMIT EXTERNAL PERMIT X-PED OMIT 8 - TBA No Calendar Defined/Enabled Page 2 of 2

87 Appendix D FDOT s Quality/LOS Handbook-Generalized Tables LOS Table Downtown Miami DRI Increment II Transit Ridership

88 TABLE 7 Generalized Peak Hour Directional Urbanized Areas 1 12/18/12 INTERRUPTED FLOW FACILITIES STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS Class I Class II Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments Median & Turn Lane Adjustments One-Way Facility Adjustment BICYCLE MODE 2 PEDESTRIAN MODE 2 BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) 3 UNINTERRUPTED FLOW FACILITIES FREEWAYS Freeway Adjustments UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Source: 212 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLES

89 LEVEL OF SERVICE TABLE CLASSIFICATION TYPE FDOT'S 213 QUALITY / LEVEL OF SERVICE [1] PERSON TRIP LEVEL OF SERVICE A B C D E A B C D E 1LU wo LT LU wo LT lanes CLASS II ARTERIAL with 2LU w LT lanes Adjustment 2LU w LT lanes LU w LT lanes (Non-State) LD w LT lanes Source: FDOT's 213 Quality/Level of Service Handbook NOTES: [1] THE PERSON TRIP LEVEL OF SERVICE IS DERIVED BY DIVIDING THE FDOT'S 213 LEVEL OF SERVICE BY THE LOS D (FOR CLASS I) AND LOS E (FOR CLASS II)

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108 Appendix E Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets

109 Existing Conditions

110 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1428 Existing PM 7: SE 4th Street & Brickell Avenue 1/12/215 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type custom Prot NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) 5. Vehicle Extension (s) 3. Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot c.35 c v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service B C A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS A B A Intersection Summary HCM 2 Control Delay 9.3 HCM 2 Level of Service A HCM 2 Volume to Capacity ratio.56 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 87.3 Sum of lost time (s) 1. Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Existing 11/24/ Existing PM Synchro 9 Report DPA Page 1

111 HCM 21 Signalized Intersection Summary 1428 Existing PM 9: SE 8th Street & Brickell Avenue 1/12/215 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Number Initial Q (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Adj No. of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile BackOfQ(5%),veh/ln LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS C C C C C C A Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS C C B Timer Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i1), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s Intersection Summary HCM 21 Ctrl Delay 22.3 HCM 21 LOS C Existing 11/24/ Existing PM Synchro 9 Report DPA Page 1

112 Timings 1428 Existing PM 9: SE 8th Street & Brickell Avenue 1/12/215 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBR NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Turn Type Split NA Prot Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 3.4% 3.4% 27.% 27.% 26.4% 16.2% 42.6% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None Max None Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 148 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 85 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Splits and Phases: 9: SE 8th Street & Brickell Avenue Existing 11/24/ Existing PM Synchro 9 Report DPA Page 1

113 Timings 1428 Existing PM 1: Brickell Avenue & SE 7th Street 1/12/215 Lane Group WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR ø3 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Turn Type NA Prot NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 2.6% 23.9% 66.7% 12.8% 55.6% 55.6% 21% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Min None Max None Max Max Min Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D F B B C A Approach Delay Approach LOS D C C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 18 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 7 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio:.8 Intersection Signal Delay: 3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.% Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Brickell Avenue & SE 7th Street Intersection LOS: C ICU Level of Service B Splits and Phases: 1: Brickell Avenue & SE 7th Street Existing 11/24/ Existing PM Synchro 9 Report DPA Page 1

114 Timings 11: Brickell Avenue & SE 5th Street 12/3/214 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 12.2% 64.4% 12.2% 64.4% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Max None Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS F B F B B A A A Approach Delay Approach LOS E D A A Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 18 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 6 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio:.73 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service B Splits and Phases: 11: Brickell Avenue & SE 5th Street Existing 11/24/ Existing PM Synchro 9 Report DPA Page 1

115 Future with Project

116 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1428 Future with Project PM 7: SE 4th Street & Brickell Avenue 1/12/215 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type custom Prot NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) 5. Vehicle Extension (s) 3. Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot c c.36 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service C B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS A C A Intersection Summary HCM 2 Control Delay 11.7 HCM 2 Level of Service B HCM 2 Volume to Capacity ratio.61 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.1 Sum of lost time (s) 1. Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group One Brickell 11/24/ Future with Project PM Synchro 9 Report DPA Page 1

117 HCM 21 Signalized Intersection Summary 1428 Future with Project PM 9: SE 8th Street & Brickell Avenue 1/12/215 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Number Initial Q (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Adj No. of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile BackOfQ(5%),veh/ln LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS C C C C C C B Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS C C B Timer Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i1), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s Intersection Summary HCM 21 Ctrl Delay 25.2 HCM 21 LOS C One Brickell 11/24/ Future with Project PM Synchro 9 Report DPA Page 1

118 Timings 1428 Future with Project PM 1: Brickell Avenue & SE 7th Street 1/12/215 Lane Group WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR ø3 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Turn Type NA Prot NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 2.6% 23.9% 66.7% 12.8% 55.6% 55.6% 21% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Min None Max None Max Max Min Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D F A A D B Approach Delay Approach LOS D E C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 18 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio:.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 43.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.3% Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Brickell Avenue & SE 7th Street Intersection LOS: D ICU Level of Service C Splits and Phases: 1: Brickell Avenue & SE 7th Street One Brickell 11/24/ Future with Project PM Synchro 9 Report DPA Page 1

119 Timings 1428 Future with Project PM with IMP 1: Brickell Avenue & SE 7th Street 1/12/215 Lane Group WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR ø3 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Turn Type NA Prot NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 2.6% 3.6% 66.7% 12.8% 48.9% 48.9% 21% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Min None Max None Max Max Min Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D E A A D B Approach Delay Approach LOS D E C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 18 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio:.82 Intersection Signal Delay: 41.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.3% Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Brickell Avenue & SE 7th Street Intersection LOS: D ICU Level of Service C Splits and Phases: 1: Brickell Avenue & SE 7th Street One Brickell 11/24/ Future with Project PM with IMP Synchro 9 Report DPA Page 1

120 Timings 1428 Future with Project PM 11: Brickell Avenue & SE 5th Street 1/12/215 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 12.2% 64.4% 12.2% 64.4% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Max None Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS F B F B E B B B Approach Delay Approach LOS E D B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 18 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 7 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio:.87 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: C ICU Level of Service C Splits and Phases: 11: Brickell Avenue & SE 5th Street One Brickell 11/24/ Future with Project PM Synchro 9 Report DPA Page 1

121 Timings 1428 Future with Project PM with IMP 11: Brickell Avenue & SE 5th Street 1/12/215 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 24.4% 52.2% 14.4% 42.2% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Max None Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS E A E B D B B C Approach Delay Approach LOS D D B C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 18 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 7 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio:.74 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: C ICU Level of Service C Splits and Phases: 11: Brickell Avenue & SE 5th Street One Brickell 11/24/ Future with Project PM with IMP Synchro 9 Report DPA Page 1

122 Project Driveway

123 HCM 21 TWSC 1428 Future with Project PM 24: SE 5th Street & Project Driveway 1 1/16/215 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All Stage Stage Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg Critical Hdwy Stg Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage Stage Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage Stage Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) One Brickell 11/24/ Future with Project PM Synchro 9 Report DPA Page 1

124 HCM 21 TWSC 1428 Future with Project PM 22: SE 5th Street & Project Driveway 2 1/16/215 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All Stage Stage Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg Critical Hdwy Stg Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage Stage Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage Stage Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) One Brickell 11/24/ Future with Project PM Synchro 9 Report DPA Page 1

125 Appendix F Committed Development Documentation

126 Special Area Plan Traffic Impact Analysis for Submittal to the City of Miami Brickell CityCentre North 2 Miami, Florida 212 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. December

127 Traffic Impact Analysis Future Land Use (ITE Code) High-Rise Residential (232) Shopping Center (82) Sub-Total Table 1: Proposed Trip Generation A.M.(P.M.) Peak Hour Driveway Volume Entering Scale 35 du 12 ksf ITE/Miami vehicular occupancy adjustment (16% reduction) (vehicles per hour) Person-Trip Conversion (1.4 persons per vehicle) (person-trips) Net External Trips Proposed Development 94 (54) 94 (517) 188 (571) Net New Trips 158 (48) 221 (672) Exiting % Trips % Trips 19% (62%) 61% (49%) 7 (43) 66 (251) 73 (294) 61 (247) 85 (346) 81% (38%) 39% (51%) 87 (11) 28 (266) 115 (277) 97 (233) 136 (326) K:\FTL_TPTO\4342-Brickell CitiCentre North 2\Report\BCC TIA-1112.docx Page - 26 December 212

128 Legend Study Roadway Study Intersection N NOT TO SCALE Project Driveways 453 Project Trip Volume 13 'Int13'! 4 'Int4'! 6 'Int6'! SE 5th Street SW 1st Avenue 12 'Int12'! SW 6th Street Retail D/W 'Int14'! Residential D/W 5 'Int5'! 'Int7'! 1 'Int1'! 2 'Int2'! 'Int3'! 8 'Int8'! 'Int9'! 1 'Int1'! 11 'Int11'! SE 1st Avenue SW 7th Street 13 4 S Miami Avenue 3 SW 8th Street SE 8th Street SW 1st Avenue 14 ###### SE 1st Avenue/ Brickell Plaza Brickell Avenue 212 Figure 9 Project Trip Assignment A.M. Peak Hour Brickell CityCentre North 2

129 Legend Study Roadway Study Intersection N NOT TO SCALE Project Driveways 453 Project Trip Volume 13 'Int13'! 4 'Int4'! 6 'Int6'! SE 5th Street SW 1st Avenue 12 'Int12'! SW 6th Street 1 'Int1'! 2 'Int2'! Retail D/W 'Int14'! Residential D/W 'Int5'! 2 7 'Int7'! SE 1st Avenue 'Int3'! SW 7th Street 'Int8'! 'Int9'! 1 'Int1'! 11 'Int11'! S Miami Avenue SW 8th Street SE 8th Street SW 1st Avenue 14 ###### SE 1st Avenue/ Brickell Plaza Brickell Avenue Figure 1 Project Trip Assignment P.M. Peak Hour Brickell CityCentre North 2

130 12 'Int12'! SE 4th Street (EB) Legend Study Roadway N NOT TO SCALE In Out #VALUE! #VALUE! SW 4th Street SW 5th Street connection (to EB SE 4th Street ) 13 'Int13'! Right-out only Driveway SW 5th Street 1,694 Study Intersection Project Driveways Project Person-Trips 453 Project Trips 15 'Int15'! Hotel SW 7th Street SW 3rd Avenue SW 2nd Avenue SW 1st Avenue 1 'Int1'! 2 'Int2'! 3 'Int3'! 4 'Int4'! 'Int16'! 5 'Int5'! 6 'Int6'! 7 'Int7'! 8 'Int8'! 9 'Int9'! 1 'Int1'! 11 'Int11'! SW 8th Street SW 7th Street Driveway # 1 Driveway # 7 Driveway # 4 S Miami Avenue Driveway # Driveway # 8 72 Driveway # Driveway # 3 Driveway # SW 3rd Avenue SW 2nd Avenue SW 1st Avenue SW 9th Street 'Int14'! SE 1st Avenue/ Brickell Plaza 1 Brickell Avenue 8 Figure 9 Project Trip Assignment A.M. Peak Hour Brickell CitiCentre

131 ### 'Int12'! SE 4th Street (EB) Legend Study Roadway N NOT TO SCALE In Out #VALUE! #VALUE! SW 4th Street SW 5th Street connection (to EB SE 4th Street ) ### 'Int13'! Right-out only Driveway SW 5th Street 1,694 Study Intersection Project Driveways Project Person-Trips 453 Project Trips ### 'Int15'! Hotel 12 SW 7th Street SW 3rd Avenue SW 2nd Avenue SW 1st Avenue ### 'Int1'! ### 'Int2'! ## 'Int3'! ### 'Int4'! ### 'Int16'! ### 'Int5'! ### 'Int6'! ### 'Int7'! ### 'Int8'! ### 'Int9'! ## 'Int1'! ### 'Int11'! SW 8th Street SW 7th Street Driveway # 1 Driveway # 7 Driveway # , S Miami Avenue Driveway # 2 59 Driveway # Driveway # Driveway # 3 Driveway # SW 3rd Avenue SW 2nd Avenue SW 1st Avenue 1,322 ### 'Int14'! SW 9th Street 66 SE 1st Avenue/ Brickell Plaza Brickell Avenue Figure 1 Project Trip Assignment P.M. Peak Hour Brickell CitiCentre

132 Traffic Impact Analysis for Submittal to the City of Miami Brickell Bayview Center Miami, Florida ã213 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. November

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study 5858 N COLLEGE, LLC nue Traffic Impact Study August 22, 2016 Contents Traffic Impact Study Page Preparer Qualifications... 1 Introduction... 2 Existing Roadway Conditions... 5 Existing Traffic Conditions...

More information

Traffic Impact Statement

Traffic Impact Statement Traffic Impact Statement Mixed Use Development, US 41 and Old Trail Drive aka Tide-Starbucks 4900 9 th Street North General Development Site Plan (GDSP) Collier County, FL 10/6/2015 Prepared for: Prepared

More information

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc. OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 9402209 Canada Inc. December 15, 2015 115-625 Report_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation

More information

Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12)

Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12) Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12) traffic study prepared for: Cymbal Development OCtober 2012 Traf Tech October 1, 2012 Mr. Asi Cymbal - President Cymbal Development 3470 North Miami Avenue Upper Suite Miami,

More information

MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: 2434984 Ontario Inc. 13-5510 Canotek Road Ottawa, Ontario K1J 9J5 June 4, 2015 115-613 Report_2.doc D. J.

More information

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for: OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: The Ottawa Train Yards Inc. 223 Colonnade Road South, Suite 212 Nepean, Ontario K2E 7K3 January 17, 2012

More information

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio December 12, 2012 Prepared for: The City of Huron 417 Main Huron, OH 44839 Providing Practical Experience Technical Excellence and Client

More information

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9 MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9 December 18, 2012 112-566 Brief_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates

More information

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY GA SR 25 Spur at Canal Road Transportation Impact Analysis PREPARED FOR GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA 1725 Reynolds Street, Suite 300 Brunswick, Georgia 31520 PREPARED BY 217 Arrowhead Boulevard Suite 26 Jonesboro,

More information

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc. INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED Prepared for: 7849648 Canada Inc. Octiober 1, 2015 114-598 Overview_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting

More information

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development Zoning Case: Z145-3 Traffic Impact Analysis Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development Dallas, TX October 26 th, 216 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #644827 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic

More information

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM July 2014 FINAL (SR 43) Project Development and Environment Study From State Road 60 (Adamo Drive) to I-4 (SR 400) Hillsborough County, Florida Work Program Item

More information

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Bona Building & Management Co. Ltd. Place Vanier, 333 North River Road Vanier, Ontario K1L 8B9 August 12,

More information

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Momentum Planning & Communications 1165 Greenlawn Crescent Ottawa, ON K1L 6C2 June 29, 2015 115-618 Brief_1.doc

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to identify conformance with the original traffic impact study for the proposed retail development on Lot 5 of Riverdale Retail Filing No. 1 located on the

More information

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota Walmart (Store #4865-00) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota Prepared for: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ã2013 Kimley-Horn

More information

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace Abington Township, Montgomery County, PA Sandy A. Koza, P.E., PTOE PA PE License Number PE059911 Prepared by McMahon Associates, Inc. 425 Commerce Drive,

More information

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Bona Building & Management Co. Ltd. Place Vanier, 333 North River Road Vanier, Ontario K1L 8B9 October

More information

Harrah s Station Square Casino

Harrah s Station Square Casino Transportation Analysis Harrah s Station Square Casino Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Submitted To: City of Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board Prepared By: DKS Associates GAI Consultants December

More information

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2 URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2 February 27, 2014 113-584 Overview_1.doc D. J. Halpenny

More information

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Simluc Contractors Limited 2550 Blackwell Street, Ottawa K1B 5R1 October 18, 2013 113-584 Overview_1.doc D. J.

More information

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Magnolia Place Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: City of San Mateo Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Updated January 4, 2010 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1 2. Existing Conditions...6

More information

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: DECEMBER 2007 Glenn Avenue Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION Transportation Consultants, LLC 1101 17 TH AVENUE SOUTH NASHVILLE, TN 37212

More information

Gateway Transportation Study

Gateway Transportation Study Gateway Transportation Study Amherst, Massachusetts SUBMITTED TO University of Massachusetts Amherst Town of Amherst SUBMITTED BY Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Watertown, Massachusetts March 213 Back of

More information

The preliminary study area was defined as the geographic area bounded by the following:

The preliminary study area was defined as the geographic area bounded by the following: QUESTION 21 TRANSPORTATION See State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (11); POLICY (2) GOAL (12); POLICIES (3),(4) GOAL (16); POLICIES (1) GOAL (18); POLICIES (1),(3)(4),(6) GOAL (20); POLICIES

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS...

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS... TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS... IX 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Project Overview... 1 1.2 Analysis Scenarios...

More information

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum State Road 7 Extension PD&E Study Design Traffic Technical Memorandum Palm Beach County, FL October 2010 State Road 7 Extension PD&E Study Design Traffic Technical Memorandum Palm Beach County, FL Prepared

More information

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016 Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 216 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE WestBranch Residential Development LOCATED IN DAVIDSON, NC Prepared For: Lennar Carolinas, LLC

More information

The proposed development is located within 800m of an existing Transit Station where infill developments and intensification are encouraged.

The proposed development is located within 800m of an existing Transit Station where infill developments and intensification are encouraged. Stantec Consulting Ltd. 1331 Clyde Avenue, Suite 4 Ottawa ON K2C 3G4 Tel: (613) 722-442 Fax: (613) 722-2799 May 14, 213 File: 1638823 Robinson Park Development Corp. 5699 Power Road Ottawa, ON, K1G 3N4

More information

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections... List of Attachments Exhibits Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections... Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls... Existing

More information

6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas

6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas April 30, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #063238300 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic

More information

Paul VI Redevelopment. Traffic Impact Study

Paul VI Redevelopment. Traffic Impact Study ATTACHMENT 5 Paul VI Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study April 18, 2017 PAUL VI REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA Prepared for: IDI GROUP COMPANIES Prepared by: Wells + Associates,

More information

TABLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS

TABLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS 4.11 TRANSPORTATION The potential traffic impacts of the proposed project are evaluated in the Buena Park Beach/Orangethorpe Mixed Use Project Traffic Analysis (Traffic Analysis) by Austin-Foust Associates

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1. Location and Study Area... 1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Access... 2 1.3. Adjacent Land Uses... 2 1.4. Existing ways...

More information

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station Appendix C NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station Prepared for: Regional Transportation Department and URS Corporation as part of the North Metro EIS David Evans and Associates,

More information

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Existing Traffic Conditions PREPARED FOR: ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION ORLANDO, FLORIDA PREPARED WITH: INWOOD CONSULTING ENGINEERS

More information

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 901.3.A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION The following information is required from all applicants directly or indirectly accessing any collector or arterial road or as otherwise

More information

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: 2294170 Ontario Inc. February 2, 2017 117-652 Report_1.doc

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE CHAMPAIGN UNIT#4 SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL (SPALDING PARK SITE) IN THE CITY OF CHAMPAIGN Final Report Champaign Urbana Urbanized Area Transportation Study 6/24/2014

More information

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc. Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio June 5, 2017 Prepared for: Westlake City Schools - Board of Education 27200 Hilliard Boulevard Westlake, OH 44145 TRAFFIC

More information

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis PURPOSE The traffic analysis component of the K-68 Corridor Management Plan incorporates information on the existing transportation network, such as traffic volumes and intersection

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY, OHIO Nantucket Circle and Montgomery Road () Prepared for: ODLE

More information

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: City of Thornton And Colorado Department of Transportation Prepared by: 11 Blake Street, Suite 2 Denver, Colorado 822 Contact: Brian Bern, PE, PTOE

More information

Road Conversion Study Plumas Street

Road Conversion Study Plumas Street Plumas Street Phase I Submitted to The Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County Submitted by Zong Tian, Ph.D., P.E. Saeedeh Farivar Haiyuan Li, Ph.D. Center for Advanced Transportation Education

More information

APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 1161 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 1161 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for: APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 1161 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: 1649362 Ontario Inc. c/o Manor Park Management 231 Brittany Drive, Suite D Ottawa ON K1K 0R8 July

More information

Atlanta Braves Stadium and Mixed- Use Development

Atlanta Braves Stadium and Mixed- Use Development Transportation Analysis Atlanta Braves Stadium and Mixed- Use Development DRI #2381 Cobb County, Georgia Prepared for: BRED Co., LLC Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 817 West Peachtree Street

More information

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007 Technical Memorandum May 2007 Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council Edwards and Kelcey with Wallace Roberts and Todd Alta Planning and Design CONTENTS SECTION ONE- INTRODUCTION...1 SECTION TWO-

More information

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh) Chapter 5 Traffic Analysis 5.1 SUMMARY US /West 6 th Street assumes a unique role in the Lawrence Douglas County transportation system. This principal arterial street currently conveys commuter traffic

More information

Traffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning

Traffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning F i s c h b a c h Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning Traffic Impact Study Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN Prepared March 2016 Ms. Gillian L. Fischbach, P.E.,

More information

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Division Prepared by: HNTB North Carolina, PC 343

More information

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias, Bill Cisco Abstract As part of evaluating the feasibility of a road diet on Orange Grove Boulevard in Pasadena,

More information

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING Final Report August 3, 216 #31, 316 5th Avenue NE Calgary, AB T2A 6K4 Phone: 43.273.91 Fax: 43.273.344 wattconsultinggroup.com Dunbow Road Functional Planning Final Report

More information

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Quickie Convenience Stores Larny Holdings Ltd. c/o PBC Group April 15, 2015 115-615 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny

More information

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer Date: April 16 th, 2015 To: From: Re: Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer Darian Nagle-Gamm, Traffic Engineering Planner Highway 6 (2 nd Street) /

More information

9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd.

9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd. TIA GUIDELINES CHECKLIST Report Context Municipal Address Comment: Section 1.1 Location relative to major

More information

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis MEMORANDUM Transportation Bill Troe, AICP Jason Carbee, AICP 12120 Shamrock Plaza Suite 300 Omaha, NE 68154 (402) 334-8181 (402) 334-1984 (Fax) To: Project File Date: Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade

More information

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Dundas MEP Developments Inc. City of Toronto 219 and 231 Dundas Street East, Proposed Mixed-Use Development TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY 9782/2 April 216 LEA Consulting Ltd. Consulting Engineers & Planners

More information

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA February 13, 2015 Mr. Meran Dadgostar P.E., R.S. Town of Highland Park 4700 Drexel Dr. Highland Park, Texas 75205 Re: Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest

More information

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis. Texas Odyssey TIA Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. May 23, 2018

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis. Texas Odyssey TIA Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. May 23, 2018 Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Texas Odyssey TIA Dallas, Texas May 23, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064529800 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis Texas Odyssey

More information

CITY OF OAKLAND. 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design. Final Report (v3) March 23, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

CITY OF OAKLAND. 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design. Final Report (v3) March 23, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CITY OF OAKLAND 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design Final Report (v3) March 23, 2007 PREPARED BY: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. 27 th Street/Bay Place Corridor

More information

Bridge Street Corridor Study Report

Bridge Street Corridor Study Report Bridge Street Corridor Study Report Prepared for: Prepared by: BRIDGE STREET CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT PREPARED FOR: CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 EAST BRANCH STREET ARROYO GRANDE,

More information

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: JANUARY 2007 Donahue Drive Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background

More information

Table of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

Table of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: 151714A Table of Contents Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 III. 215 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS... 6

More information

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation City of Hillsdale, Hillsdale County, Michigan June 16, 2016 Final Report Prepared for City of Hillsdale 97 North Broad

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CANYON HILLS PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION This traffic analysis has been conducted to identify and evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed Canyon Hills

More information

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY King Soopers #116, a grocery marketplace anchored commercial development, is proposed

More information

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING 1.1 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS 1.1.1 Roadway Functional Classification The Multnomah County Comprehensive Framework Plan s Policy 34: Trafficways and the Functional Classification

More information

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A A1. Functional Classification Table A-1 illustrates the Metropolitan Council s detailed criteria established for the functional classification of roadways within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Table

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 1.1. Site Location and Study Area...1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access...2 1.3.

More information

BLUE SEA VILLAGE MER BLEUE 2159 MER BLEUE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for: Ontario Limited.

BLUE SEA VILLAGE MER BLEUE 2159 MER BLEUE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for: Ontario Limited. BLUE SEA VILLAGE MER BLEUE 2159 MER BLEUE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared for: 2534189 Ontario Limited April 6, 2018 117-668 TIA Report_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates

More information

Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document

Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document Existing Conditions Report - Appendix Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document This document defines the methodology and assumptions that will be used in the traffic forecasting

More information

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS REPORT. Pacheco Boulevard Alignment Study and Alternatives Analysis

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS REPORT. Pacheco Boulevard Alignment Study and Alternatives Analysis TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS REPORT Pacheco Boulevard Alignment Study and Alternatives Analysis PREPARED FOR: CITY OF MARTINEZ AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY OCTOBER 2016 FINAL REPORT Prepared By: under contract

More information

NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS

NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS 3. 23 NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS This section addresses the operations of the transportation system and details how it would be expected to function under year 23 No Build conditions with the projected

More information

2. Existing Conditions

2. Existing Conditions 2. Existing Conditions The existing traffic and parking conditions on the site and the surrounding area were reviewed based on the study methodology in Section 1.2. 2.1 Existing Land Use The portion of

More information

REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For Wendy s Parker, Colorado January 215 Prepared for: Sterling Design Associates, LLC 29 W. Littleton Boulevard #3 Littleton, Colorado 812 Prepared by: 1233 Airport

More information

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County Executive Summary March 2015 Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

More information

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Richmond, Virginia August 14, 2013 Prepared For City of Richmond Department of Public Works Prepared By 1001 Boulders Pkwy Suite 300, Richmond, VA

More information

5.3 TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND PARKING

5.3 TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND PARKING 5.3 TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND PARKING This section is based upon the Downtown Lancaster Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (April 2, 2008) and the Downtown Lancaster Specific Plan Parking Analysis (May

More information

3.2.2 Proposed Road Network within Phase 1B Lands

3.2.2 Proposed Road Network within Phase 1B Lands 3.2.2 Proposed Road Network within Phase 1B Lands Figure 3.1 also shows the proposed road network within the Premier Gateway Phase 1B Employment Area lands, which features two collector roads providing

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for: TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For Creekside Thornton, Colorado August 215 November 215 Revised: August 216 Prepared for: Jansen Strawn Consulting Engineers 45 West 2 nd Avenue Denver, Colorado 8223 Prepared by:

More information

3.9 - Transportation and Traffic

3.9 - Transportation and Traffic Transportation and Traffic 3.9 - Transportation and Traffic This section describes the potential transportation and traffic effects of project implementation on the project site and its surrounding area.

More information

VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER 2012 READ, VOORHEES & ASSOCIATES TORONTO, ONTARIO Read, Voorhees & Associates

More information

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies Revision Submitted on: November, 0 Author: Adriana Rodriguez, E.I Assistant Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff 0 South Orange Avenue, Suite 00 Orlando,

More information

Traffic Impact Study. Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain Brook, Alabama. Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. Birmingham, Alabama.

Traffic Impact Study. Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain Brook, Alabama. Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. Birmingham, Alabama. Traffic Impact Study Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain Brook, Alabama Prepared for: Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. Birmingham, Alabama September 214 Revision 1 October 214 Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain

More information

TAKOMA METRO STATION

TAKOMA METRO STATION TKOM METRO STTION Traffic nalysis Technical Memorandum Station Planning in Support of Joint evelopment Job No. 13-FQ165-LN-2 November 213 WSHINGTON METROPOLITN RE TRNSIT UTHORITY (WMT) Takoma Metro Station

More information

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 4.9.1 INTRODUCTION The following section addresses the Proposed Project s impact on transportation and traffic based on the Traffic Study

More information

Project Description Form 8EE

Project Description Form 8EE Project Description Form 8EE Basic Project Information Submitting Jurisdiction/Agency: Town of Dumfries Project Title: Route 1 (Fraley Blvd) Widening: Brady's Hill Road to Dumfries Road Project Location:

More information

Patuxent Green Golf Course

Patuxent Green Golf Course Patuxent Green Golf Course Laurel, Maryland February 23, 2018 Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: ADC Builders Alan Cohen 2701 Tower Oaks Boulevard, Suite 200 Rockville, Maryland 20852 TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

ORLEANS GARDENS SHOPPING CENTRE 1615 ORLEANS BOULEVARD CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

ORLEANS GARDENS SHOPPING CENTRE 1615 ORLEANS BOULEVARD CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for: ORLEANS GARDENS SHOPPING CENTRE 1615 ORLEANS BOULEVARD CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: Orleans Gardens Shopping Centre Inc. 2851 John Street, Suite 1 Markham, ON K3R 5R7

More information

Chapter 16: Traffic and Parking A. INTRODUCTION

Chapter 16: Traffic and Parking A. INTRODUCTION Chapter 6: Traffic and Parking A. ITRODUCTIO This chapter examines the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed Fresh Kills Park roads. The analysis of transit and pedestrians is presented

More information

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY in City of Frostburg, Maryland January 2013 3566 Teays Valley Road Hurricane, WV Office: (304) 397-5508 www.denniscorporation.com Alley 24 Traffic Study January 2013 Frostburg, Maryland

More information

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for: NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: Solidex Holdings Limited & Investissement Maurice Lemieux Investments Attn: Mr. Anthony

More information

DRAFT Davidson Elementary School Expansion Transportation Impact Analysis

DRAFT Davidson Elementary School Expansion Transportation Impact Analysis DRAFT Davidson Elementary School Expansion Transportation Impact Analysis Prepared for: Town of Davidson 216 S. Main Street Davidson, NC 28036 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2127 Ayrsley

More information

Troutbeck Farm Development

Troutbeck Farm Development Troutbeck Farm Development Willistown Township, Chester County PA For Submission To: Willistown Township Last Revised: October, 4 TPD# INLM.A. 5 E. High Street Suite 65 Pottstown, PA 9464 6.36.3 TPD@TrafficPD.com

More information

APPENDIX E: Transportation Technical Report

APPENDIX E: Transportation Technical Report New Jersey Pennsylvania Lackawanna Cut-Off Passenger Rail Service Reston Project Environmental Assessment APPENDIX E: Transportation Technical Report E.1 Introduction As part of the overall environmental

More information

2136 And 2148 Trafalgar Road Townhouse Development Traffic Brief. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

2136 And 2148 Trafalgar Road Townhouse Development Traffic Brief. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited 2136 And 2148 Trafalgar Road Townhouse Development Traffic Brief Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited March 217 March 217 Project: 1627 Diana Vlasic, M.C.I.P., R.P.P Metropolitan Consulting 445 Paletta

More information

The current document is revised based on the comments received on:

The current document is revised based on the comments received on: General Overview 1 Introduction Over the last several years, the Waterford Lakes area has experienced increased congestion due to a substantial increase in residential and commercial development. The current

More information

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report ROUTE 7 (HARRY BYRD HIGHWAY) WESTBOUND FROM WEST MARKET STREET TO ROUTE 9 (CHARLES TOWN PIKE) Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report Project No. 6007-053-133, P 101 Ι UPC No. 58599 Prepared by:

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA Chapter 6 - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA 6.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 6.1.1. Purpose: The purpose of this document is to outline a standard format for preparing a traffic impact study in the City of Steamboat

More information