Idea-66: Westbound I-66 Inside the Beltway
|
|
- Randall Allen
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Southeastern Institute of Research Idea-66: Westbound I-66 Inside the Beltway Stakeholder Telephone Survey Pulsar Advertising December 22, 2004 G 1
2 Agenda I. Objectives II. Methodology III. Key Findings IV. Conclusions & Implications 2
3 Research Objectives Provide input to aid in formulating a contextsensitive solution to managing congestion in the I-66 Westbound Corridor: Describe and document trips Westbound along the I-66 Corridor Identify and assess stakeholder perception of traffic congestion in the Westbound I-66 Corridor Explore the relative appeal of 4 concepts 3
4 Research Objectives (con t.) Assess relative appeal of 4 initial concept categories that the Governor identified (as stated in Governor Warner s letter dated September 4, 2003): 1. Bus or rail transit improvements 2. Changing the requirements for HOV and/or adding toll lanes 3. Roadway widening 4. Do nothing 4
5 Study Methodology A random telephone survey was conducted among residents along the I-66 corridor In order to qualify for the survey, respondents had to live within a 10-mile long / 1-mile wide corridor along I-66. Some respondents lived inside the Beltway, and others lived outside the Beltway. Outside the Beltway, the eligible area was defined by zip codes Inside the Beltway, it was defined by carrier routes 5
6 Map of Study Area I-66 Inside The Beltway I-66 6
7 Map of Study Area- I-66 Outside of Beltway I-66 7
8 Methodology (con t.) All respondents traveled Westbound at least 3 times per week, using either I-66, Metro or other roads running parallel to I interviews were completed 300 with residents inside the Beltway 201 with residents outside the Beltway These sample sizes were established in advance to ensure that sufficient numbers of these two groups were included in the total for individual analysis A sample of 501 has a margin of error of 4.4% at the 95% confidence level. 8
9 Stakeholder View Of I-66 Westbound Corridor Traffic 9
10 Commuters Believe that Westbound Traffic Is Becoming More Congested Easy to travel with very little congestion 5% Easy to travel with some congestion 17% Harder and harder to travel with growing congestion Very hard to travel with significant congestion 32% 45% 77% Don't know 1% Unweighted data 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Question: How would you describe the traffic issues you encounter when driving either I-66 West or the other westbound roads running parallel to I-66? Would you say I-66 or the other roads are? (Read answers.) 10
11 Residents Both Inside and Outside the Beltway Believe that Westbound Traffic Is Congested Easy to travel with very little congestion Easy to travel with some congestion 6% 3% 8% 23% 69% inside and 88% outside the Beltway believe Westbound traffic is congested. Harder and harder to travel with growing congestion Very hard to travel with significant congestion 22% 47% 42% 46% Don't know 3% 1% Inside the Beltway Outside the Beltway Unweighted data 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Question: How would you describe the traffic issues you encounter when driving either I-66 West or the other westbound roads running parallel to I-66? Would you say I-66 or the other roads are? (Read answers.) 11
12 Question: What do you see as the cause of the congestion you re experiencing on either I-66 West or the other westbound roads running parallel to it? Only most frequent mentions are shown. Commuters Believe the Congestion Is the Result of Too Many Cars and Not Enough Lanes for Westbound Traffic Total Inside of Beltway Outside of Beltway % % % Too many cars Not enough lanes/ not wide enough Expanding population Too much development Poor drivers / accidents Bad merges / ramps Poor infrastructure Unweighted data Inadequate public transportation
13 What Do Commuters Believe The Solution Should Be? 13
14 SIR s Assessment Approach Possible Solutions: Bus or rail transit improvements Changing the requirements for HOV and/or adding toll lanes Roadway widening Do nothing 3 Ways To Assess Solutions: 1. Open-ended question Answer to What do you believe could be done to lessen congestion? 2. Ranking of the concept 3. Calculation of a Concept Performance Index 14
15 Assessment #1. Open-ended question Answer to What do you believe could be done to lessen congestion? 15
16 Question: What do you believe could be done to lessen the congestion along I-66 West and/or the I-66 Corridor to improve its efficiency for your use? Note: The 4 options were not mentioned. Only most frequent top of mind mentions are shown. Commuters Propose Widen/Add Lanes and Improve Public Transportation to Resolve Traffic Congestion (Chart shows most popular commuter suggestions before hearing 4 alternative solutions) Total Inside of Beltway Outside of Beltway % % % Widen/add lanes Improve public transportation/expand Metro Build more roads Extend Metro to Dulles Improve HOV Don t know/refused Unweighted data 16
17 Assessment #2. Ranking Question: Of all of these options, which would you choose first; which one second, which one third and which one fourth? (Rotate options to avoid order bias) 17
18 Graph reports the proportion selecting each option as first choice. Of Four Concept Categories Tested, Making Bus and/or Rail Transit Improvements Is the First Choice of Westbound Commuters to Reduce Westbound I-66 Congestion Bus and/or rail transit improvements 47% Roadway widening 37% Change the requirements for HOV and/or add toll lanes 12% Do nothing 4% Unweighted data 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Question: Of all of these options, which would you choose first; which one second, which one third and which one fourth? 18
19 Graph reports the proportion selecting each option as first choice. Those Who Live Inside the Beltway and Those Outside the Beltway Do Not Differ Significantly in Terms of Their First Choice Solutions to Reduce Westbound Congestion Bus and/or rail transit improvements 49% 45% Roadway widening Change the requirements for HOV and/or add toll lanes 12% 13% 34% 40% Inside of Beltway Outside of Beltway Do nothing 5% 2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Unweighted data Question: Of all of these options, which would you choose first; which one second, which one third and which one fourth? 19
20 Graph reports the proportion selecting each option as first choice. Those Who Drive Alone or Carpool Prefer Either Improvements to Bus or Rail Transit or Widening the Roadway to Reduce Congestion. Those Who Use Some Other Form of Transportation Prefer Making Improvements to Bus or Rail Transit. Bus and/or rail transit improvements 42% 39% 58% Roadway widening 27% 42% 45% Change the requirements for HOV and/or add toll lanes Do nothing 12% 10% 13% 3% 6% 2% Drive alone (n=306) Carpool (n=31) Vanpool/Metrorail/Bus/Telework (n=62) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Unweighted data Question: Of all of these options, which would you choose first; which one second, which one third and which one fourth? 20
21 Graph reports the proportion selecting each option as first choice. Those Who Believe The Congestion on Westbound I-66 Is Lighter and That It Is Easy to Travel on I-66 Prefer Bus and/or Rail Transit Improvements. Those Who Believe Westbound I-66 Is Getting More Congested and Harder to Travel Prefer Either Bus and Rail Improvements or Roadway Widening. Bus and/or rail transit improvements 46% 51% Roadway widening 23% 40% Change the requirements for HOV and/or add toll lanes 11% 13% Easy to travel on I-66 (n=107) Do nothing 1% 14% Harder to travel on I-66 (n=383) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Unweighted data Question: Of all of these options, which would you choose first; which one second, which one third and which one fourth? 21
22 Graph reports the proportion selecting each option as fourth (last) choice. The Majority Selected Do Nothing As The Least Most Popular Option Percent who selected Do Nothing as their last choice (option) All Residents 57% Outside of Beltway 66% Inside of Beltway 52% Unweighted data 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Question: Of all of these options, which would you choose first; which one second, which one third and which one fourth? 22
23 Assessment #3. Concept Performance Index Assigning 3 points for each first place choice, 2 points for each second place, 1 point for each third place and 0 points for each fourth place choice. 23
24 Concept Performance Index Respondents ranked the four congestion reduction options according to their first choice, second choice, third choice and fourth choice. In order to assess how well the four options performed across all of these ratings, a Concept Performance Index was calculated. This index was calculated by assigning 3 points for each first place choice, 2 points for each second place, 1 point for each third place and 0 points for each fourth place choice. The total points for each option were totaled. And, the grand total for all options was calculated. The proportions reported for the index represent each option s share of the grand total of points. 24
25 There Is No Clear Cut Winner. Making Bus and/or Rail Improvements Performs Best on the Concept Performance Index. Doing Nothing Indexes Least Favorably. Bus and/or rail transit improvements Roadway widening Change the requirements for HOV and/or add toll lanes However, widening the road and changing HOV requirements or adding toll lanes perform reasonably well, also. Do nothing 10 Unweighted data Question: Of all of these options, which would you choose first; which one second, which one third and which one fourth? 25
26 The Four Options Tested Index About the Same For Inside and Outside the Beltway Residents Bus and/or rail transit improvements Roadway widening Change the requirements for HOV and/or add toll lanes Inside of Beltway Outside of Beltway Do nothing 12 8 Unweighted data Question: Of all of these options, which would you choose first; which one second, which one third and which one fourth? 26
27 Only most frequent mentions are shown. Some concern for environment Question: Why do you choose bus and/or rail transit improvements as your first option for improving the efficiency of traffic flow along the I-66 Corridor? Rail Transit and/or Bus Improvements Are Rated Favorably Because They Are Viewed as Decreasing the Number of Cars and Reducing Congestion; and, Because They Would Move More People Total Inside of Beltway Outside of Beltway % % % Fewer cars / less congestion Environmental reasons Bus or rail needs to be extended Move more people People would use it Easiest / best option Widening road would not solve More convenient / less stress Least disruptive Like the idea It s needed Don t know Unweighted data 27
28 Only most frequent mentions are shown. Respondents Support Widening the Roadway Because They Believe It Would Move More Cars and Increase Traffic Flow Total Inside of Beltway Outside of Beltway % % % More cars increase traffic flow Easiest / best option It s needed People / I prefer to use car More people / development needs to keep up Other Don t know 2-5 Unweighted data Question: Why do you choose roadway widening as your first option for improving the efficiency of traffic flow along the I-66 Corridor? 28
29 Conclusion Transit and Roadway Widening Are The Most Popular Possible Solutions Bus or rail transit improvements Assessment #1 Assessment #2 Assessment #3 Open-ended Ranking CPI Changing the requirements for HOV and/or adding toll lanes Roadway widening Do nothing NA
30 Key Conclusions & Implications 30
31 #1. The Vast Majority of All Stakeholders (Inside And Outside The Beltway) Believe I-66 Westbound Is Becoming More Congested Conclusion: Stakeholders believe that Westbound traffic in the I-66 Corridor is becoming more congested. They blame that congestion on the number of cars on the road, not having enough lanes on the road and population growth and development. Implication: Stakeholders are sensitive to the growing congestion along the I-66 Corridor. They are ready to hear about plans for its management. 31
32 #2. Of Four Alternative Concepts Tested, Making Bus and/or Rail Transit Improvements and Roadway Widening are the Most Appealing Overall Conclusion: Nearly one-half (47%) of commuters rated bus and/or rail transit option as their first choice as a way of reducing congestion. And, one-third (33%) said (without interviewer prompting) as an openended question) that the public transportation and Metro should be improved and expanded to lessen congestion in the I-66 Corridor. On a Concept Performance Index, bus and rail improvements also scored highest, indexing at 36%. Widening the roadway is also a popular choice with commuters. Over one-half (52%) of respondents suggested this solution in an open-ended question. Over one-third (37%) rated this option first. It scored well on a Concept Performance Index as well (29%). Implication: From the perspective of stakeholders, making bus and/or rail improvements should be adopted as a plan or at least as part of a plan to reduce traffic congestion on Westbound I-66. Widening the roadway is also a strong contender and should be included as part of a plan that is responsive to the needs and preferences of stakeholders. Ideally, a plan that involves both bus and rail improvements and widening the roadway would be a context-sensitive solution. 32
33 #3. To Do Nothing About The Traffic Congestion In The Westbound I-66 Corridor Is Simply Not Acceptable Conclusion: For nearly 6 out of 10 (57%) commuters, doing nothing is their last choice for how to deal with the traffic congestion. Those who live outside the Beltway are particularly likely to say that doing nothing is not an option. Two-thirds of this group (66%) or nearly 7 out of 10 rated doing nothing as their last choice. Implication: Stakeholders are receptive and ready for action to be taken regarding Westbound congestion on I
Public Opinion about Transportation Issues in Northern Virginia
Public Opinion about Transportation Issues in Northern Virginia Research and Strategy Presented to: The Northern Virginia Transportation Authority July 28, 2005 Research Objectives 1. Travel Patterns*
More information2011 Countywide Attitudinal and Awareness Survey Results
2011 Countywide Attitudinal and Awareness Survey Results Purpose of Study Establish baseline for measuring future performance Identify perceptions about transportation system, issues, priorities Assess
More informationWashington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing
Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing November 5, 2015 Renée Hamilton, VDOT, Deputy District Administrator I-66 Outside the Beltway Improvement Area Project Location Virginia 2 Purpose and Need
More informationWILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results
Wilmington Area Planning Council WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results Prepared by: 2955 Valmont Road, Suite 300 Boulder, Colorado 80301 t: 303-444-7863 f: 303-444-1145 www.n-r-c.com Table
More informationTransportation Issues Poll for New York City
2016-17 Transportation Issues Poll for New York City 82% support Vision Zero and reducing traffic deaths 72% on average, support more street space for children to play, protected bike lanes and other safety
More informationAAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey
AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey Traditionally Underserved Populations helping organizations make better decisions since 1982 2018 Submitted to the AAMPO By: ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier
More informationTulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Indian Nations Council of Governments August 2005 CONTACTING INCOG In developing the Destination 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan, INCOG s Transportation
More informationCommuter Connections Regional TDM Marketing Group Meeting
Item #6 Commuter Connections Regional TDM Marketing Group Meeting September 19, 2017 Michelle T. Holland, Megaprojects Communications Manager Virginia Department of Transportation Program Area Map 2 Program
More informationPublic Opinion about Transportation Issues in Northern Virginia A Report Prepared for the:
Public Opinion about Transportation Issues in Northern Virginia A Report Prepared for the: Northern Virginia Transportation Authority By QSA Research & Strategy October 13, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
More informationInterstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement. Cooperating and Participating Agencies Meeting March 19, 2012
Interstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement Cooperating and Participating Agencies Meeting March 19, 2012 Chris Collins Virginia Department of Transportation, Environmental Division Meeting Agenda
More information92% COMMUTING IN THE METRO. Congested Roadways Mode Share. Roadway Congestion & Mode Share
COMMUTING IN THE METRO Roadway Congestion & Mode Share The majority of major roadways in Greater Des Moines are without congestion and have underutilized capacity. This surplus capacity could be used for
More informationProviding an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System
Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System Welcome and Introductions The Plan Process Transportation Overview Workshop Discussions Report Out and Next Steps AGENDA Comprehensive Plan
More informationBaseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings
Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings Highlights 67% of urban New Zealanders, 18 years of age or more own or have access to a bicycle that is in
More informationAmong the key specific findings from the survey are the following:
TO: FROM: RE: Interested Parties David Metz and Greg Lewis Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates Seattle Voter Attitudes on Bicycling and the So-!"##$%&'(")&*+&!"),- DATE: January 17, 2013 Fairbank,
More informationTransportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force
Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force Network Alternatives & Phasing Strategy February 2016 BACKGROUND Table of Contents BACKGROUND Purpose & Introduction 2 Linking the TMP to Key Council Approved
More informationKey objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:
3 COMMUNITY INPUT Community input is an essential part of corridor studies. For the SR 87 corridor study, VTA staff conducted an extensive online survey of people living and commuting along the corridor.
More informationAmong the key specific findings from the survey are the following:
TO: FROM: RE: Interested Parties David Metz and Greg Lewis Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates Seattle Voter Attitudes on Bicycling and the So-Called War on Cars DATE: January 17, 2013 Fairbank,
More informationRegional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin
Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin #118274 May 24, 2006 1 Introduction The Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) is the official areawide planning agency
More informationPublic Information and Participation Comments
Two public meetings were held in December. The first meeting was December 6, 2011 at Mary Ellen Henderson Middle School and had 36 public attendees. The second meeting was on December 14, 2011 at the Arlington
More information1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey
SACOG-00-009 1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey June 2000 Sacramento Area Council of Governments 1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey June 2000 Table of Contents
More informationPreliminary Transportation Analysis
Preliminary Transportation Analysis Goals of a Robust, Multimodal Transportation Network Safe Accessible/Connected Efficient Comfortable Context-Sensitive Motor Vehicle: Continue to analyze the data to
More informationOnline Open House Survey Report. December 2016
December 216 I. OVERVIEW & OUTREACH SUMMARY Introduction Washington County evaluated long-term transportation investments and strategies as part of the Transportation Futures Study. The purpose of the
More informationTriMet Attitude & Awareness Survey. November 2016
TriMet Attitude & Awareness Survey November 2016 Methodology Telephone survey of 800 residents in TriMet service district Clackamas County N=183 Multnomah County N=369 Washington County N=248 Conducted
More informationMeasuring the Distribution and Costs of Congestion. Tim Lomax Texas Transportation Institute
Measuring the Distribution and Costs of Congestion Tim Lomax Texas Transportation Institute http://mobility.tamu.edu The Congestion Measurement Story Travel time, variations, compare to goals WHAT? WHY?
More informationInterstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
WELCOME Welcome to the second Citizen Information Meeting for the Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). As an integral part in the environmental study process, the study team is seeking your comments
More informationGIVING GEORGIANS A CHOICE TO KEEP MOVING
GIVING GEORGIANS A CHOICE TO KEEP MOVING I-85 Express Lanes Annual Performance Report FISCAL YEAR 2014 (JULY 1, 2013 JUNE 30, 2014) EEP OVING VISION AND MISSION Enhancing mobility in Georgia by providing
More informationRoad to the future What road users want from Highways England s Route Strategies Summary report November 2016
Road to the future What road users want from Highways England s 2020-25 Route Strategies Summary report November 2016 Road to the future Summary report Foreword Guy Dangerfield Transport Focus aims to
More informationI-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Crystal City Civic Association September 21, 2016
I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Crystal City Civic Association September 21, 2016 Mike Snare, PE, Project Manager Virginia Department of Transportation GEC Michelle Holland, Megaprojects
More informationI-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Public Hearings
I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Public Hearings Susan Shaw, PE, Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation Amanda Baxter, Special Projects Manager Virginia Department of
More information122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road
: 107 Street to Fort Road November 24, 2015 4:30 8:00 p.m. Meeting Purpose Summarize project work completed to date Share results of public input from Phase 1 Share the draft concept plan and proposed
More informationMobility 2040 Results of 2 nd Survey
Mobility 2040 Results of 2 nd Survey November 2015 1 1. Which of the following would most benefit you as you travel on the region s roadways? A. A handful of large-scale improvements to the region s most
More informationDKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey
PREPARED FOR: DKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey April 2013 PREPARED BY: DHM RESEARCH (503) 220-0575 239 NW 13 th Ave., #205, Portland, OR 97209 www.dhmresearch.com 1 INTRODUCTION
More informationInstitute for Real Estate Management Chapter (IREM) 77 VDOT Northern Virginia Megaprojects September 13, 2017
Institute for Real Estate Management Chapter (IREM) 77 VDOT Northern Virginia Megaprojects September 13, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation Northern Virginia
More informationImproving Mobility Without Building More Lanes
Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes By Mike Salisbury and Will Toor July 2017 Copyright 2017 by Southwest Energy Efficiency Project. All rights reserved. Photo: Courtesy of the Denver Post Anyone
More informationFitting Light Rail through Well-established Communities
Fitting Light Rail through Well-established Communities San Francisco 2008 Michael D. Madden Chief, Project Development, Maryland Transit Administration Project Setting Located inside the Capital Beltway
More informationEverett Transit Action Plan. Community Open House November 16, 2015
Everett Transit Action Plan Community Open House Everett has a great location, but getting around the city and into surrounding communities is a problem for all ages Many Voices, One Future: The Everett
More informationMnPASS System Today and the Future
MnPASS System Today and the Future April 2010 By Nick Thompson Minnesota Department of Transportation Topics Minnesota s Current and Future MnPASS High Occupancy Toll Systems Overview of the MnPASS System
More informationCity of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan
City of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan City Commission Public Hearing Monday, November 25, 2013 7:30 pm Norman Cox, PLA, ASLA The Greenway Collaborative, Inc. Ann Arbor, Michigan The
More informationEl Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan
El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan Connect-our-County Online Transportation User Survey Preliminary Results June 24, 2010 Years of Residence 2. How many years have you LIVED HERE?
More information3 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION
Report No. 8 of the Transportation Services Committee Regional Council Meeting of October 20, 2011 3 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION The Transportation Services Committee recommends:
More informationVISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016
VISION 2040 Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop February 10, 2016 Vision 2040 Key Milestones UNDERSTAND THE NEED IDENTIFY A RANGE OF OPTIONS EVALUATE COMMUNITY OPTIONS DEFINE PROJECTS & PLANS Vision
More informationMaryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon
Maryland State Highway Mobility Report Morteza Tadayon Background Mobility is a Key Performance Area (KPA) in the SHA Business Plan SHA adopts a performance based approach Monitors Highway System to identify
More information2010 Nashville Area Regional Transportation Study
2010 Nashville Area Regional Transportation Study FINAL Survey Report Conducted for The Nashville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization By ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Circle Olathe, Kansas 66061 (913)
More informationThe specific activities consisted of:
Mount Olive Development Corporation (MODCO) Speak Up Broward Program for Empowering People Dates of program: May 2014 August 2014 Communities Served: 33311, 33313, and 33301 Zip Code Areas Target Audience:
More informationKingwood Area Mobility Study. Lake Houston Redevelopment Authority (TIRZ #10)
Kingwood Area Mobility Study Lake Houston Redevelopment Authority (TIRZ #10) Steering Committee Meeting #3 Date: May 27, 2014 Introductions/Remarks Steering Committee Project/Consultant Team GOALS & MOE
More informationOperational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies
Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies Revision Submitted on: November, 0 Author: Adriana Rodriguez, E.I Assistant Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff 0 South Orange Avenue, Suite 00 Orlando,
More informationCongestion Management Report
Congestion Management Report F.E. EVERETT TURNPIKE (NORTH), MERRIMACK Segment Length: 7.0 miles Daily Traffic Volumes: 60,000-69,000 Analysis Period: May 2015 Number of Traffic Signals: 0 Number of travel
More informationWELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017
Langstaff Road Weston Road to Highway 7 Class Environmental Assessment Study WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017 Please sign in and join our mailing list Purpose of Open House #1 & Study Area York
More informationMore than 1,750,000 Persons Surveyed for more than 500 cities in 48 States
City of Rolla 2013 DirectionFinder Survey Findings Presented db by ETC Institute May 2013 1 ETC Institute AN National lleader in Market tresearch for Local Governmental Organizations helping city and county
More informationPUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES
PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES National Association of REALTORS The key findings from a national survey of 1,000 adults conducted October 5, 7, 9-10, 2007. 07574 Methodology Public Opinion Strategies is pleased
More informationPUBLIC COMMENT SUMMARY REPORT Public Information Meetings
PUBLIC COMMENT SUMMARY REPORT 2015 Public Information Meetings I-66 Outside the Beltway Project Between U.S. Route 15 in Haymarket and I-495/Capital Beltway in Fairfax County State Project: 0066-96A-297,P101
More informationBETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY
DRAFT PLAN City Council Meeting August 14, 2017 STUDY AREA Sedgwick Corridor State Route 160, principal arterial with Class 3 access management designation, commuter and freight route, connection to SR
More informationNorth Coast Corridor:
North Coast Corridor: Connecting People, Transportation & Environment Legislative Hearing: 11.8.10 1 North Coast Corridor Region s Lifeline A Regional Strategy Mobility, Economy & Environment North Coast
More informationWelcome and Introductions Overview of the Study to Date Community Involvement Intersection Improvement Concepts Bike-Ped Recommendations ITS
Welcome and Introductions Overview of the Study to Date Community Involvement Intersection Improvement Concepts Bike-Ped Recommendations ITS Recommendations Transit Recommendations Next Steps Inventoried
More informationAPPENDIX 3: EAGLECREST MASTER PLAN PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS
APPENDIX 3: EAGLECREST MASTER PLAN PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS Eaglecrest Master Plan Public Opinion Surveys Prepared for Eaglecrest Ski Area Board of Directors Prepared by McDowell Group Inc. Eaglecrest Master
More informationDULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director
DULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, 2015 Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director I-66 Corridor Conditions Steady population growth Employment growth in activity centers Congestion
More informationIH 85 EXPRESS LANES ATLANTA, GA USDOT Congestion Reduction Demonstration Program Grant ($110M)
IH 85 EXPRESS LANES ATLANTA, GA USDOT Congestion Reduction Demonstration Program Grant ($110M) HOV to HOT: 15 miles Convert from 2+ HOV to managed (3+ free) Project includes Express Lane component, new
More informationHighway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report
Highway 217 Corridor Study Phase I Overview Report November 3, 24 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW Study purpose The Highway 217 Corridor Study is developing multi-modal transportation solutions for traffic problems
More informationCITY OF ABBOTSFORD TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT MASTER PLAN
CITY OF ABBOTSFORD TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MONDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2017 TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT AGENDA 1. Plan Overview 2. Shaping Influences 3. Existing Conditions and What
More informationMeeting Summary Public Information Meeting #1 Warren County Pathway Corridor Project September 27, 2018
Meeting Summary Public Information Meeting #1 Warren County Pathway Corridor Project September 27, 2018 The first public information meeting for the Warren County Pathway Corridor Project was held on Thursday,
More informationI-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Fairlington Citizens Association September 12, 2016
I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Fairlington Citizens Association September 12, 2016 Susan Shaw, PE, Megaprojects Director, Virginia Department of Transportation Amanda Baxter, Special Projects
More informationMemorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:
Memorandum Date: November 20, 2017 To: Transportation Authority Board From: Eric Cordoba Deputy Director Capital Projects Subject: 12/5/17 Board Meeting: San Francisco Freeway Corridor Management Study
More informationDetermining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin
*Manuscript Click here to view linked References 1 Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin Brian Caulfield 1, Elaine Brick 2, Orla Thérèse McCarthy 1 1 Department of Civil,
More informationNo-car lanes in Tyneside results from modelling and stakeholder analysis
No-car lanes in Tyneside results from modelling and stakeholder analysis Dr Corinne Mulley, Newcastle University Dr Jessica Anderson, JMP Consulting Vilnius, September 2007 Belfast Brighton Glasgow Leeds
More informationPublic Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package
Public Consultation Centre For Transportation Master Plan Update Information Package Date Location Hours Tuesday, September 12, 2017 Wednesday, September 13, 2017 Tuesday, September 19, 2017 Cambridge
More informationBay Area Council 2016 Report of Survey Results Regarding Transportation
Bay Area Council Report of Survey Results Regarding Transportation Methodology Web survey of San Francisco Bay Area residents The survey was available in English, Chinese, and Spanish Report includes analysis
More information395 Express Lanes Extension
395 Express Lanes Extension January 2016 Building a network of Express Lanes Project overview Add capacity on I-395 with addition of a third HOV lane and active traffic management Generate guaranteed transit
More informationFreeway Improvement Project
CapCity Corridor History and Milestones CapCity Partners CapCity Origin and Destination analysis Origins and Destinations Destinations based on Origins North of I-80 8% O & D data prepared by SACOG Origins
More information# Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan
#70421 Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan Public Information Meetings and Hearings May June 2002 1 Reason for Freeway System Study 270-mile
More informationWelcome to the McKenzie Interchange Project Open House!
Welcome to the McKenzie Interchange Project Open House! Purpose of Open House To provide you with information regarding the project and for you to have the opportunity to share your input on design concepts.
More informationData Analysis February to March Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns.
Welcome! Thank you for participating in today s Valencia Bikeway Improvements workshop. Data Analysis February to March Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns. Initial
More informationI-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Arlington County Board October 18, 2016
I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Arlington County Board October 18, 2016 Susan Shaw, PE, Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation Amanda Baxter, Special Projects Manager
More informationCorporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: June 26, 2006 NO: C012 COUNCIL-IN-COMMITTEE. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: June 22, 2006
Corporate NO: C012 Report COUNCIL DATE: June 26, 2006 COUNCIL-IN-COMMITTEE TO: Mayor & Council DATE: June 22, 2006 FROM: General Manager, Engineering FILE: 0410-20(MoT/Gate) SUBJECT: Surrey Response on
More informationRider Satisfaction Survey Total Market 2006
Rider Satisfaction Survey Total Market 2006 Prepared For: Valley Metro Fall 2006 2702 North 44 th Street Suite 100-A. Phoenix, Arizona 85008 602-707-0050 www.westgroupresearch.com Valley Metro 2006 Rider
More informationDepartment of Transportation
Department of Transportation I. Internal Scan The number of older drivers in the United States will double over the next 30 years. By 2030 one in five Americans will be age 65 or older. On a licensed-driver
More informationWhat if YOU could help plan Northern Virginia s transportation future?
What if YOU could help plan Northern Virginia s transportation future? Photo credits: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority And improve the quality of life in your community -- for yourself, your
More informationHighway Transitway Corridor Study
Highway Transitway Corridor Study CTS Research Conference May 21, 2014 1 2030 Transportation Policy Plan Transitway modes on highways: Highway bus rapid transit (BRT), plan identified 6 total Highway BRT
More informationExhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM
Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Project Name: Grand Junction Circulation Plan Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Applicant: City of Grand Junction Representative: David Thornton Address:
More informationUS 1 Express Lanes Public Kick-Off Meeting
US 1 Express Lanes Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study Public Kick-Off Meeting September 7 & 8, 2011 Miami Dade County, Florida 1 Presentation Agenda Introduction to MDX Background to PD&E studies
More informationGovernor s Transportation Vision Panel
Office of Governor Kate Brown Governor s Transportation Vision Panel JLA Public Involvement Project Overview The is a yearlong effort to develop a series of recommendations for the Governor that address
More informationPERFORMANCE ANALYSIS of The Draft 2015 CLRP
Item 9 PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS of The Draft CLRP Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board September 16, CLRP Performance Analysis 1 What is the Long-Range Transportation Plan (CLRP)? The CLRP identifies
More informationSELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS
CHAPTERFOUR SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS 4.1 SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS Introduction Capacity analysis was performed on six selected roadways within the Dearborn County study area using the
More informationSpring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E
Coon Rapids Blaine Spring Lake Park Mounds View rth Oaks In 2011, Metro Transit embarked on the Arterial 494 Minnetonka Maple Grove Plymouth Hopkins Brooklyn Park New Hope Golden Valley Louis Park Edina
More informationMASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
VILLAGE OF NORTHBROOK MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN DRAFT PLAN OPEN HOUSE May 2, 2018 AGENDA 1. Community Engagement 2. Vision and Goals 3. General Structure of Plan 4. Recommendations Overview 5.
More informationVDOT I-66 Inside the Beltway Eastbound Widening Environmental Assessment. Staff Recommendations
VDOT I-66 Inside the Beltway Eastbound Widening Environmental Assessment Staff Recommendations Department of Environmental Services Transportation January 28, 2017 Timeline of Transform66 June 2012: I-66
More informationSpeed Limits Study and Proposal. Public Input Session: 8/14/13
Speed Limits Study and Proposal Public Input Session: 8/14/13 Why is Decatur a unique place for this project? First Community Transportation Plan in the nation with a Health Impact Assessment. Strong sense
More informationFrequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Frequently Asked s (FAQ) Study Process... 2 Rapid Transit Service and Operations... 5 Public Consultation... 8 Business Impacts... 8 Design and Property Impacts... 9 Construction Impacts...12 Traffic,
More informationBroadway Complete Streets Project
Broadway Complete Streets Project Megan Johnson, P.E. Associate Civil Engineer James Pangburn, P.E. Consultant Project Manager After the construction of the highway system, Broadway was cut off
More informationSummary of Comments Public Meeting: Marietta Street Resurfacing Project Atlanta Contemporary August 29, 2017 / 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm
Renew Atlanta hosted a public meeting to discuss the Marietta Street Resurfacing project at. Councilmember Cleta Winslow attended the public meeting, where over seventy (70) citizens to include representatives
More information2018 Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by:
Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by: Overview Methodology Systemwide results Strengths/Weaknesses by mode Importance of possible improvements Conclusions Methodology 500 Chittenden County residents
More informationTHE NEW YORK OLYMPIC GAMES 2012?
October 13, 2003 (Release 144-8) CONTACT: PATRICK MURRAY or CLIFF ZUKIN (732) 932-9384 We ask users to properly attribute this copyrighted information to The Star-Ledger/Eagleton-Rutgers Poll. THE NEW
More informationTransform 66 Project February 4, 2016 Partnering Conference Michigan Department of Transportation American Council of Engineering Companies
Transform 66 Project February 4, 2016 Partnering Conference Michigan Department of Transportation American Council of Engineering Companies Susan Shaw, PE, CCM, DBIA Megaprojects Director Northern Virginia
More informationThe DC Pedestrian Master Plan
The DC Pedestrian Master Plan September 28, 2010 George Branyan Pedestrian Program Coordinator District Department of Transportation Presentation Agenda Scope of the Plan Methodology Recommendations Implementation
More informationMcKenzie Interchange Project Fall 2015 Engagement. Appendix 2: Engagement Materials and Feedback Form
Fall 2015 Engagement Appendix 2: Engagement Materials and Feedback Form Welcome to the McKenzie Interchange Project Open House! Purpose of Open House To provide you with information regarding the project
More informationSketch Level Assessment. of Traffic Issues. for the Fluor Daniel I-495 HOT Lane Proposal. Ronald F. Kirby
Sketch Level Assessment of Traffic Issues for the Fluor Daniel I-495 HOT Lane Proposal Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB) Metropolitan
More informationDulles Area Transportation Association. October 11, Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation
Dulles Area Transportation Association October 11, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation Transform 66: Outside the Beltway 2 Project Overview Multimodal improvements
More informationI-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)
I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS) Metro Streets and Freeways Subcommittee March 21, 2019 Gary Hamrick Cambridge Systematics, Inc. I-105 CSS Project History & Background Funded by Caltrans Sustainable
More informationToday s Agenda. Welcome & Introductions. I-526 Lowcountry Corridor Update. Table Discussions. Next Steps / Conclusion
SCDOT Turns 100! SCDOT Turns 100! Today s Agenda Welcome & Introductions I-526 Lowcountry Corridor Update Table Discussions Next Steps / Conclusion Project Limits I-526 Lowcountry Corridor Project Description
More informationTerwillegar Drive Expressway Draft Concept Plan
Terwillegar Drive Expressway Draft Concept Plan Anthony Henday Drive to Whitemud Drive November 28 5:00-8:00 p.m. December 1 10:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. Let s Talk Today you can: Learn about the new direction
More informationInvestment in Active Transport Survey
Investment in Active Transport Survey KEY FINDINGS 3 METHODOLOGY 7 CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE 8 Riding a bike 9 Reasons for riding a bike 9 Mainly ride on 10 Comfortable riding on 10 Rating of cycling infrastructure
More information