Travel Behaviour Study of Commuters: Results from the 2010 Dalhousie University Sustainability Survey

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Travel Behaviour Study of Commuters: Results from the 2010 Dalhousie University Sustainability Survey"

Transcription

1 Travel Behaviour Study of Commuters: Results from the 2010 Dalhousie University Sustainability Survey Technical Report Prepared by: M.A. Habib, K.D. Leckovic & D. Richardson Prepared for: Office of Sustainability, Dalhousie University Dalhousie Transportation Collaboratory Sexton House, Room 205 Dalhousie University 5410 Spring Garden Road B3H 4R2, Halifax, NS, Canada

2 Contents Contents Survey Context Methods and Procedures Data Preparation Data and Spatial Analysis Survey Results Characteristics of Survey Respondents Age Gender Income Respondent Group Primary Campus Residential Location Travel Behaviour of Dalhousie Commuters Modal Split Commute Time Commute Distance Arrival and Departure Time Attitudes Towards Travel Demand Management Measures Attitudes Towards Carshare Program Attitudes Towards Carpool Program Attitudes Towards Bike-Share Program Attitudes Towards Bus Pass Program Willingness to Use Carpool /2010 Comparative Analysis /2010 Comparison of Survey Respondent Characteristics Age Technical Report Page 2

3 4.1.2 Gender Travel Behaviour of Dalhousie Commuters by Year, 2009/ Comparison of Modal Split by Year, 2009/ Comparison of Commute Time by Year, 2009/ Comparison of Commute Distance by Year, 2009/ Comparison of Inter-Campus Travel Requirements by Year, 2009/ Attitudes Toward Travel Demand Management Measures by year, 2009/ Comparison of Willingness to Use Carpool by Year, 2009/ Survey Design Survey Design Conclusion Appendix A-Survey Data Key Appendix B-Sustainability Survey Data Results Appendix C-2010 and 2011 Survey Design Technical Report Page 3

4 Figures Figure 1 Age distribution, Figure 2 Gender distribution, Figure 3 Income distribution, Figure 4 Respondents group, Figure 5 Respondents' primary campus Figure 6 Spatial distribution of 2010 survey respondents' residential location by respondent group Figure 7 Spatial distribution of 2010 survey respondents' residential location by primary campus Figure 8 Spatial distribution of 2010 survey respondents residential location Figure 9 Modal split for Dalhousie commuters (a), students (b) and faculty/staff (c), Figure 10 Spatial distribution of Dalhousie commuters by car, Figure 11 Spatial distribution of Dalhousie commuters by transit, Figure 12 Spatial distribution of Dalhousie commuters by carpool, Figure 13 Spatial distribution of Dalhousie commuters by bicycle, Figure 14 Spatial distribution of Dalhousie commuters by walking, Figure 15 Commute time by students and faculty/staff, Figure 16 Commute distance by students and faculty/staff, Figure 17 Arrival time (a) and departure time (b) of students and faculty/staff, Figure 18 Attitudes towards Carshare Program by students and faculty/staff, Figure 19 Attitudes towards carpool program by students and faculty/staff, Figure 20 Attitudes towards Bike-Share Program by students and faculty/staff, Figure 21 Attitudes towards Summer Bus Pass Program by students and faculty/staff, Figure 22 Willingness to use carpool by students and faculty/staff, Figure 23 Age of survey respondents for 2009 and Figure 24 Gender of survey respondents for 2009 and Figure 25 Modal split by year for 2009 and Technical Report Page 4

5 Figure 26 Commute time comparison for 2009 and Figure 27 Commute distance comparison for 2009 and Figure 28 Inter-campus travel requirements comparison for 2009 and Figure 29 Willingness to use carpool comparison for 2009 and Technical Report Page 5

6 1. Survey Context In 2010, the Office of Sustainability at Dalhousie University conducted an online sustainability survey between October 28 and November 20, The survey was sent via to all faculty, staff, and students of Dalhousie University. The survey included 41 questions, with 12 transportation related questions. The survey also collected socioeconomic data from respondents including age, gender, income, residential location (by postal code) and primary campus. The transportation related questions will be the focus of analysis within this technical report. The purpose of this technical report is to conduct an analysis of the transportation related questions, provide a comparison between the 2010 Sustainability Survey results and the 2009 Transportation Survey results, and provide recommendations for the design of a transportation survey to be conducted annually by the Office of Sustainability. Technical Report Page 6

7 2. Methods and Procedures This technical report included data preparation, data analysis and spatial analysis of the 2010 Dalhousie Sustainability Survey. Data preparation involved identification of the issues and limitations found within the socioeconomic and transportation related data. Improvements to the data set are outlined in Section 2.1. The primary objective of the data and spatial analysis is to provide a comprehensive characterization and spatial representation of the socioeconomic and Dalhousie commuter travel behaviour results. The final stage of analysis, outlined in Section 4, involves a comparison of the results from the 2009 Transportation Survey and the 2010 Sustainability Survey. 2.1 Data Preparation The following issues and limitations were found in the 2010 survey data: 1. Question titles were not coded within the dataset. 2. Fields were left blank when respondents did not answer a question. Time fields were set to 0 when respondents did not answer a question. 3. Residential locations, entered as postal code, often had inconsistent formatting. This made it difficult to geocode for use in ArcGIS. Residential locations were not spatially appropriate. For example, several residential locations were outside of Nova Scotia. 4. Times were frequently entered incorrectly and were not consistent with 24-hour notation. 5. The survey did not include all transit modes, assuming that the only transit option available was bus. 6. The primary and secondary modal choice of each respondent did not separate driver and passenger options, making it difficult to determine single occupancy vehicle or high occupancy vehicle usage. 7. The carpool modal choice option was not clearly defined. For example, carpool can be interpreted as commute with coworkers or peers, or incorrectly as commute with family. 8. The survey asked respondents to provide a secondary modal choice option, which was identical to their primary modal choice. For example, some respondents indicated car as their primary and secondary modal choice. 9. Off campus Dalhousie related travel options were inconsistent between the primary and secondary modal choice options. 10. The survey asked respondents to provide arrival and departure times to campus, which does not accommodate individuals who reside on campus. 11. The quantity and values of income range options were not distributed evenly. Technical Report Page 7

8 The following improvements have been made to the dataset to allow for analysis and use with ArcGIS: 1. Field results are made consistent from one question to another. Field codes are recorded onto a key. 2. Questions titles are given eight-letter codes and are included in the key. 3. Qualitative text is removed from fields that only require a numerical response. 4. Non responses are coded as Not Answered. 5. Inconsistent postal codes for residential locations require significant post-processing. The results can be geocoded but must be in a consistent format. For example, postal codes must be entered as X#X#X#. Incorrect respondent input errors were corrected or removed from the dataset. Values are converted into coordinates using an online tool called batchgeo ( 6. Inconsistent arrival and departure time responses not conforming to 24-hour notation were corrected or removed from the dataset. 7. To compare 2009 and 2010 survey results common categories were established and data was coded accordingly. It is assumed that primary commute mode by bus incorporates all transit modes and has therefore been categorized as transit within this report. It is also assumed that commute mode is the respondents primary commute mode. Secondary commute mode will not be analyzed within this report due to the quality and aforementioned issues with the secondary commute mode data. Although it is not analyzed, secondary commute mode data is available in Appendix. 2.2 Data and Spatial Analysis The objective of the data and spatial analysis, found within Section 3, is to provide visual representation of the survey results. The data analysis involved calculation of the relative frequency and corresponding percentages of coded survey results. Frequency calculations did not include survey respondent answers of Not Answered, Not Sure, Not Applicable and Don t Know. Spatial analysis provides spatial representation of respondents residential location and modal choice. To conduct spatial analysis, postal codes were converted into latitude and longitude coordinates using an online tool accessed through batchgeo ( The respondents residential location coordinates were then input into ArcGIS and converted into a shapefile Survey Results After removing inconsistencies from the data, as outlined in Section 2.1, the remaining total sample size of students, faculty and staff was 751 respondents which included 315 students and 436 faculty/staff. A table of 2010 and 2009 survey results has been provided in Appendix B. Technical Report Page 8

9 3.1 Characteristics of Survey Respondents Respondent characteristics within the 2010 Dalhousie Sustainability Survey include age, gender, income, respondent group (i.e. student or faculty/staff), primary Dalhousie campus (i.e. Studley, Sexton or Carleton campus) and residential location Age The year old age cohort represented the greatest percentage of survey respondents at 29 percent (Figure 1). There were no respondents in the 65 years old and over cohort and the 55 to 64 age cohort represented the smallest percentage of survey respondents at 9 percent Gender Figure 1. Age distribution, 2010 The gender distribution indicated that the majority of the survey respondents were female. Figure 2 shows the gender distribution of survey respondents. Technical Report Page 9

10 28% Male Female 72% Figure 2 Gender distribution, Income The majority of survey respondents had an annual household income greater than $60,000. Less than 40 percent of survey respondents reported annual household incomes less than $60,000. Figure 3 shows the income distribution of survey respondents Respondent Group Figure 3 Income distribution, 2010 A greater percentage of the survey respondents were faculty/staff. This distribution is shown in Figure 4 and represented spatially in Figure 6. Technical Report Page 10

11 Figure 4 Respondents group, Primary Campus The majority of survey respondents indicated that they commute primarily to Studley campus. Sexton and Carleton campuses each represent 13 percent of the survey respondents. The distribution of respondents primary campus is represented graphically in Figure 6 and spatially in Figure 5. Figure 5 Respondents' primary campus Technical Report Page 11

12 Figure 6 Spatial distribution of 2010 survey respondents' residential location by respondent group Technical Report Page 12

13 Figure 7 Spatial distribution of 2010 survey respondents' residential location by primary campus Technical Report Page 13

14 3.1.6 Residential Location Figure 8 displays the spatial distribution of survey respondents which were input into a GIS using respondents postal codes as a spatial reference. Figure 8 Spatial distribution of 2010 survey respondents residential location Technical Report Page 14

15 3.2 Travel Behaviour of Dalhousie Commuters Modal Split Figure 9(a) shows the modal split for survey respondents in The majority of Dalhousie commuters, 34 percent, use a car to commute to campus. Active transportation modes, including walking and biking, account for 40 percent of the modal split. Transit accounts for 21 percent of the modal split. Figures 9(b) and 9(c) represent the modal split by students and faculty/staff. Faculty/staff commute by car 13 percent more than students, whereas 11 percent more students walk to Dalhousie. For both cohorts transit represents the third greatest percentage, at approximately 20 percent of the modal split. Carpool and bike use account for the two smallest percentages of modal split for both cohorts. The spatial distribution of modal split indicates a concentration of walking, biking and transit use on the Halifax Peninsula. The majority of commuters travelling from locations off the Peninsula use car to commute to campus, while a low concentration use the other four surveyed modes. Figures 10 through 14 display the spatial distribution of modal split by car, transit, carpool, walking and bicycling. (a) (b) (c) Figure 9 Modal split for Dalhousie commuters (a), students (b) and faculty/staff (c), 2010 Technical Report Page 15

16 Figure 10 Spatial distribution of Dalhousie commuters by car, 2010 Technical Report Page 16

17 Figure 11 Spatial distribution of Dalhousie commuters by transit, 2010 Technical Report Page 17

18 Figure 12 Spatial distribution of Dalhousie commuters by carpool, 2010 Technical Report Page 18

19 Figure 13 Spatial distribution of Dalhousie commuters by bicycle, 2010 Technical Report Page 19

20 Figure 14 Spatial distribution of Dalhousie commuters by walking, 2010 Technical Report Page 20

21 3.2.2 Commute Time Figure 15 shows the commute time by students and faculty/staff. Commute time for students and faculty/staff was greatest between 11 and 20 minutes, with approximately 70 percent of commutes less than 30 minutes. Less than 10 percent of respondents commuted greater than 60 minutes Commute Distance Figure 15 Commute time by students and faculty/staff, 2010 Commute distance was determined by calculating the distance between respondents residential location (postal code) and campus centroids. Figure 16 represents the commute distance by student and faculty/staff. Greater than 40 percent of students and faculty/staff commute less than 2 kilometers to their primary campus. Approximately 10 percent of the population commutes greater than 20 kilometres to their primary campus. Technical Report Page 21

22 3.2.4 Arrival and Departure Time Figure 16 Commute distance by students and faculty/staff, 2010 The majority of Dalhousie commuters arrive to campus between the hours of 800 and 1000 as shown in Figure 17 (a). Approximately 9 percent of commuters arrive later than Approximately 40 percent of faculty/staff commuters arrive on campus between 600 and 800 whereas 25 percent of students arrive on campus during the same period. The majority of Dalhousie commuters leave campus between the hours of 1600 and 1800 as shown in Figure 17 (b). Approximately 6 percent of commuters leave before Approximately 78 percent of faculty/staff commuters leave campus between 1600 and 1800 whereas 60 percent of students leave campus during the same period. Technical Report Page 22

23 (a) (b) Figure 17 Arrival time (a) and departure time (b) of students and faculty/staff, 2010 Technical Report Page 23

24 3.3 Attitudes Towards Travel Demand Management Measures This section presents the results of respondents attitudes towards sustainable transportation options on campus including Carshare, Carpool, BikeShare and Summer Bus Pass Programs Attitudes Towards Carshare Program Both students and faculty/staff feel that a Carshare Program would motivate more sustainable transportation to campus (see Figure 18). Figure 18 Attitudes towards Carshare Program by students and faculty/staff, Attitudes Towards Carpool Program Figure 19 indicates that students and faculty/staff think that a Carpool Program would promote sustainable transportation to campus. Technical Report Page 24

25 Figure 19 Attitudes towards carpool program by students and faculty/staff, Attitudes Towards Bike-Share Program Over 60 percent of respondents think that a BikeShare Program would motivate more sustainable transportation to campus as shown in Figure 20. Figure 20 Attitudes towards Bike-Share Program by students and faculty/staff, 2010 Technical Report Page 25

26 3.3.4 Attitudes Towards Bus Pass Program Approximately 90 percent of respondents think that a summer Bus Pass Program would increase sustainable transportation to Dalhousie Campus (see Figure 21). Compared with the Carpool, Carshare and Bike-Share Programs, the summer Bus Pass Program received the highest percentage of supportive respondents. Figure 21 Attitudes towards Summer Bus Pass Program by students and faculty/staff, Willingness to Use Carpool Figure 22 shows that the majority of students would not be willing to use carpool, whereas the majority of faculty/staff would be willing to use carpool. Although students are in support of a Carpool Program (see Section 3.3.2), they are less willing to use carpool. This differentiation was not consistent in the faculty/staff results. Technical Report Page 26

27 Figure 22 Willingness to use carpool by students and faculty/staff, /2010 Comparative Analysis This section includes a comparison of the results from the 2009 Transportation Survey and the 2010 Sustainability Survey. The objective of this comparison is to identify the similarities and differences between the results. As described in Section 2.1, common categories between the 2009 and 2010 surveys were established and data was coded accordingly /2010 Comparison of Survey Respondent Characteristics Age Figure 23 compares the age of survey respondents between the 2009 and 2010 surveys. There was a decrease in the percentage of respondents under the age of 35, while there was an increase in the percentage of respondents aged 35 and over. Technical Report Page 27

28 Figure 23 Age of survey respondents for 2009 and Gender There were a greater percentage of female respondents in 2010 as compared to 2009 (see Figure 24). Figure 24 Gender of survey respondents for 2009 and 2010 Technical Report Page 28

29 4.2 Travel Behaviour of Dalhousie Commuters by Year, 2009/2010 This section compares survey results related to transportation for 2009 and Results from both 2009 and 2010 were grouped into common categories to facilitate analysis. A table of 2009 and 2010 survey results has been provided in Appendix B Comparison of Modal Split by Year, 2009/2010 Figure 25 shows the modal split for commuters by survey year. Walking was the most common commute mode in 2009 at 42 percent whereas car has the highest percentage of reported use in 2010 with 34 percent. Transit usage showed little change between 2009 and 2010 at approximately 20 percent of all commute trips. Carpool usage decreased by approximately 6 percent between 2009 and Commutes by bike increased approximately 2 percent. Figure 25 Modal split by year for 2009 and Comparison of Commute Time by Year, 2009/2010 The comparison of commute time is shown in Figure 26 and reveals that the highest percentage of commuters for both 2009 and 2010, at 30 percent, commute between 11 and 20 minutes. Approximately 68 percent of commuters travelled 30 minutes or less to Dalhousie in both 2009 and There was an increase in commute trips greater than 60 minutes between 2009 and 2010 of approximately 5 percent while commute trips between 51 and 60 minutes decreased 6 percent in the same period. Technical Report Page 29

30 Figure 26 Commute time comparison for 2009 and Comparison of Commute Distance by Year, 2009/2010 Figure 27 illustrates the comparison of commute distance between 2009 and The greatest change in commute distance between the two survey years was seen in commute trips that were 2 kilometers or less. Little change was seen between 2 kilometers and 20 kilometers from 2009 to Commute trips more than 20 kilometers showed the greatest percentage difference, with a decrease of approximately 8 percent. Figure 27 Commute distance comparison for 2009 and 2010 Technical Report Page 30

31 4.2.4 Comparison of Inter-Campus Travel Requirements by Year, 2009/2010 Travel between Dalhousie campuses decreased by 6 percent between 2009 and 2010 as represented in Figure 28. Figure 28 Inter-campus travel requirements comparison for 2009 and Attitudes Toward Travel Demand Management Measures by year, 2009/2010 This section presents a comparison of 2009 and 2010 data of students and faculty/staff s attitudes towards travel demand management measures Comparison of Willingness to Use Carpool by Year, 2009/2010 Figure 29 shows a comparison between 2009 and 2010 of the willingness of survey respondents to carpool to Dalhousie. There was an 11 percent increase in commuters who are willing to carpool to Dalhousie between 2009 and Technical Report Page 31

32 Figure 29 Willingness to use carpool comparison for 2009 and 2010 Technical Report Page 32

33 5. Survey Design Based on the issues found within the 2010 survey (Section 2.1), several changes have been made to the 2011 survey, including revisions to several questions and answer choices to improve the quality of data in the future. In some cases, response ranges have been altered to improve consistency and better reflect data trends. Section 5.1 provides the proposed survey design for the 2011 Dalhousie Transportation Survey. A survey data key and comparative table of the 2010 survey and 2011 proposed survey design have been provided in Appendix A and C Survey Design 1. What is your age? i ii iii iv v vi. 65 and above 2. What is your gender? I. Male ii. Female iii. Transgender iv. Prefer not to say 3. What is your annual household income? i. Less than $20,000 ii. $20,001-40,000 iii. $40,001-$60,000 iv. $60,000-$80,000 v. $80,000-$100,000 vi. Above $100,000 v. Prefer not to say 4. In which of these groups do you currently belong? i. Students ii. iii. Faculty Staff Technical Report Page 33

34 5. What is the postal code of your home (i.e. from which you commute daily to Dalhousie)? Please provide it in six digit format without a space (i.e. B3H1B9) (in XXXXXX) 6. What is your primary campus? i. Studley Campus ii. iii. Sexton Campus Carleton Campus 7. What is your primary mode of transportation for your daily commute to Dalhousie throughout the year? i. Auto Drive Alone ii. Auto Passenger iii. Public Transit iv. Bicycle v. Walking vi. Other: 8. What is your secondary mode of transportation for your daily commute to Dalhousie throughout the year? i. Not Applicable always used the primary mode ii. Auto Drive Alone iii. Auto Passenger iv. Public Transit v. Bicycle vi. Walking vii. Other: 10. Do you carpool for your daily commute to Dalhousie? (Carpooling in this context means two or more people in a car coming to the Institutional area - hospitals, Dalhousie (all three campuses), Saint Mary s (summer street/university ave/morris st/robie from commons to SMU ) i. Never ii. Occasionally iii. Always iv. No response 10. How many minutes, on average, does it take to get from your home to Dalhousie, when you use your primary mode of transportation?? i. Minutes 11. At what time, on average, do you arrive at Dalhousie? Please identify the time in four-digit 24-hour cycle (i.e. 7 am = 0700; 2 pm = 1400) i. (in 0000 format) Technical Report Page 34

35 12. At what time, on average, do you leave Dalhousie? Please identify the time in four-digit 24-hour cycle (i.e. 7 am = 0700; 2 pm = 1400) i. (in 0000 format) 13. Do you think the following measures will motivate more sustainable transportation activity on campus? Enhanced Car-Pool Program (Dalhousie currently has a Ride Share Program and promotes HRM s ride matching system for Dalhousie students and employees) Enhanced Car-Share Program (Dalhousie currently has two car share cars on campus) Bike-share Program Summer Student Bus Passes Yes No Not Sure Faculty/Staff Bus Passes University shuttle service 14. If you travel alone by automobile to Dalhousie, would you be interested in a carpooling initiative? i. Yes ii. No iii. Not Sure iv. Not Applicable If so, what beyond the current Dalhousie Ride Share Program would you like? 15. Do you travel from one campus to another? i. Daily ii. Four times a week iii. Three times a week iv. Twice a week v. Once a week vi. Never vii. No response 16. What is your primary means of travel between campuses? i. Walk ii. Bicycle iii. Bus iv. Car v. Other: vi. Not applicable Technical Report Page 35

36 17. Do you own or have access to a car? i. I own a car ii. I am a member of a car-sharing service iii. I can borrow a car or get a ride most times I need it iv. I do not own or have access to a car v. No response 18. Do you own or have access to a bicycle? i. I own a bicycle ii. I can use or borrow a bicycle most times I need it iii. I do not own or have access to a bicycle iv. No response 19. Would you use a bike-share program on campus? i. Yes ii. iii. No Not Sure 20. Would you be interested in an expanded car-share program on campus? i. Yes ii. iii. iv. No Not Sure Not Applicable 21. How much do you spend on a monthly basis for transportation purposes? (in Canadian dollars) 22. Please answer the following questions about LONG DISTANCE TRAVEL (where your destination was more than 100 kilometers away from the campus) over the past twelve months How many ROUND TRIPS did you make using this form of transportation How many kilometers did you travel using this form of transportation for LONG distance travel Airplane Car Train Bus Boat Technical Report Page 36

37 6. Conclusion The focus of this report is transportation and travel behaviour data obtained from the 2010 Dalhousie Sustainability Survey, and provides data analysis, spatial analysis, and a comparison of results by respondent groups. Furthermore, the 2010 survey data was compared to the 2009 survey. Through this analysis, deficiencies in the survey design and resulting data were identified, leading to the creation of a proposed 2011 Dalhousie Transportation Survey. This proposed survey design will improve the data collection process, and will facilitate the analysis of transportation data in the future to improve the application of results for planning effective transportation demand management measures. In addition to the analyses, the report provides a comprehensive method for processing and analyzing transportation survey data, which will facilitate processing and analysis of future survey data. Technical Report Page 37

38 Appendix A-Survey Data Key RESPID Long name Respondent identification number AGE Long name Age Description What is your age? Codeset and over GENDER Long name Gender Description What is your gender? Codeset 1 Male 2 Female 3 Other 4 Prefer not to say INCOME Long name Household income Description What is your annual household income? Codeset 1 Less than $20,000 2 $20,001-40,000 3 $40,001-$60,000 4 Above $60,000 RESPGRP Long name Respondent type Description In which of these groups do you currently belong? Codeset 1 Students 2 Staff and Faculty PRCAMP Long name Primary campus Description What is your primary campus? Codeset 1 Studley Campus 2 Sexton Campus 3 Carleton Campus PRMODE Long name Primary mode Description My primary mode of transportation to Dalhousie throughout the year is: Technical Report Page 38

39 Codeset 1 Drive Alone 2 Carpool 3 Bike 4 Walk 5 Transit 6 Other SCMODE Long name Secondary mode Description My secondary mode of transportation to Dalhousie throughout the year is: Codeset 1 Drive Alone 2 Carpool 3 Bike 4 Walk 5 Transit 6 Other VKM Long name Vehicle kilometers travelled Description Commute vehicle kilometers travelled Codeset 1 2km or less 2 2km-5km 3 6km-10km 4 11km-20km 5 21km-30km 6 greater than 30km TRIPTIM Long name Door to door trip time Description On average, how many minutes does it take you to get to Dalhousie (door to door)? Codeset 1 Less than Greater than 60 TMARRIVE Long name Arrival time Description At what time, on average, do you arrive at Dalhousie University? Codeset Technical Report Page 39

40 TMLEAVE Long name Description Departure time At what time, on average, do you leave Dalhousie University? Codeset MCARSHA Long name Car-share program Description Do you think a car-share program will motivate more sustainable transportation activity to campus? Codeset 1 Yes 2 No 3 Not Sure 4 Not Applicable MCARPL Long name Car-pool program Description Do you think a car-pool program will motivate more sustainable transportation activity to campus? Codeset 1 Yes 2 No 3 Not Sure 4 Not Applicable MBKSHR Long name Bike-share program Description Do you think a bike-share program will motivate more sustainable transportation activity to campus? Codeset 1 Yes 2 No 3 Not Sure 4 Not Applicable SUMBUS Long name Summer bus program Technical Report Page 40

41 Description Do you think a summer bus pass program will motivate more sustainable transportation activity to campus? Codeset 1 Yes 2 No 3 Not Sure 4 Not Applicable CARPOOL Long name Car-pool program interest Description If you travel alone by automobile to Dalhousie University, would you be interested in a carpooling initiative? Codeset 1 Yes 2 No 3 Not Sure 4 Not Applicable INTCAMP Long name Inter-campus travel Description Are you required to travel from one campus to another? Codeset 1 Yes 2 No BIKESH Long name On campus bike-share program Description Would you use a bike-share program on campus? Codeset 1 Yes 2 No 3 Not Sure Technical Report Page 41

42 Appendix B-Sustainability Survey Data Results CODE NAME Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff CODE Label n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) AGE and over GENDER 1 Male Female Other INCOME 1 Less than $20, $20,001-40, $40,001-$60, Above $60, Technical Report Page 42

43 CODE NAME Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff CODE Label n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) RESPGRP 1 Student Faculty/Staff PRCAMP 1 Studley Sexton Carleton PRMODE 1 Car Transit Carpool Bicycle Walking SCMODE 1 Car Transit Carpool Bicycle Technical Report Page 43

44 CODE NAME Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff CODE Label n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) 4 Walking VKM 1 2 or less All Campus' Over VKM 1 2 or less Studley Over VKM 1 2 or less Sexton Technical Report Page 44

45 CODE NAME Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff CODE Label n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) Over VKM 1 2 or less Carleton Over TRIPTIM 1 Less than Over Technical Report Page 45

46 CODE NAME Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff CODE Label n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) TMARRIVE TMLEAVE Technical Report Page 46

47 CODE NAME Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff CODE Label n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) MCARSHA 1 Yes No MCARPL 1 Yes No MBKSHR 1 Yes No SUMBUS 1 Yes No CARPOOL 1 Yes No Technical Report Page 47

48 CODE NAME Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff Dalhousie Commuters Student Faculty/Staff CODE Label n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) INTCAMP 1 Yes No BIKESH 1 Yes No Technical Report Page 48

49 Appendix C-2010 and 2011 Survey Design AGE 2010 Survey 2011 Survey Long name Age Age Description What is your age? What is your age? Codeset GENDER and over 6 65 and above Long name Gender Gender Description What is your gender? What is your gender? Codeset 1 Male 1 Male POSTCODE Long name 2 Female 2 Female 3 Other 3 Transgender 4 Prefer not to say 4 Prefer not to say Home Postal Code Description What is the postal code of your home (i.e. from which you commute daily to Dalhousie)? Please provide it in six digit format without a space (i.e. B3H1B9) Codeset 1 Postal Code (in XXXXXX) INCOME Long name Household income Household income Description What is your annual household income? What is your annual household income? Codeset 1 Less than $20,000 1 Less than $20,000 2 $20,001-40,000 2 $20,001-40,000 3 $40,001-$60,000 3 $40,001-$60,000 Technical Report Page 49

50 2010 Survey 2011 Survey 4 Above $60,000 4 $60,000-$80,000 5 $80,000-$100,000 6 Above $100,000 7 Prefer not to say RESPGRP Long name Respondent type Respondent type Description In which of these groups do you currently belong? In which of these groups do you currently belong? Codeset 1 Students 1 Students PRCAMP 2 Staff and Faculty 2 Faculty 3 Staff Long name Primary campus Primary campus Description What is your primary campus? What is your primary campus? Codeset 1 Studley Campus 1 Studley Campus PRMODE 2 Sexton Campus 2 Sexton Campus 3 Carleton Campus 3 Carleton Campus Long name Primary mode Primary mode Description My primary mode of transportation to Dalhousie throughout the year is: What is your primary mode of transportation for your daily commute to Dalhousie throughout the year? Codeset 1 Drive Alone 1 Auto Drive Alone 2 Carpool 2 Auto Passenger 3 Bike 3 Public Transit 4 Walk 4 Bicycle 5 Transit 5 Walking 6 Other 6 Other: Technical Report Page 50

51 SCMODE 2010 Survey 2011 Survey Long name Secondary mode Secondary mode Description My secondary mode of transportation to Dalhousie throughout the year is: What is your secondary mode of transportation to Dalhousie University? Codeset 1 Drive Alone 1 Auto Drive Alone CARPOOL Long Name 2 Carpool 2 Auto Passenger 3 Bike 3 Public Transit 4 Walk 4 Bicycle 5 Transit 5 Walking 6 Other 6 Other: 7 Auto Drive Alone Description Do you carpool for your daily commute to Dalhousie? (Carpooling in this context means two or more people in a car coming to the Institutional area - hospitals, Dalhousie (all three campuses), Saint Mary s (summer street/university Avenue/Morris Street/Robie Street from commons to SMU ) Codeset 1 Never 2 Occasionally 3 Always 4 No response Carpool VKM Long name Vehicle kilometers travelled Description Commute vehicle kilometers travelled Codeset 1 2km or less 2 2km-5km 3 6km-10km Technical Report Page 51

52 TRIPTIM 2010 Survey 2011 Survey 4 11km-20km 5 21km-30km 6 greater than 30km Long name Door to door trip time Door to door trip time Description On average, how many minutes does it take you to get to Dalhousie (door to door)? Codeset 1 Less than 10 1 (Minutes) TMARRIVE Greater than 60 Long name Arrival time Arrival time How many minutes, on average, does it take to get from your home to Dalhousie, when you use your primary mode of transportation? Description At what time, on average, do you arrive at Dalhousie At what time, on average, do you arrive at Dalhousie? Please identify the time in four-digit 24-hour cycle (i.e. 7 am = 0700; 2 pm = 1400) University? Codeset Time (0000 format) TMLEAVE Long name Departure time Departure time Description At what time, on average, do you leave Dalhousie University? At what time, on average, do you leave Dalhousie? Please identify the time in four-digit 24-hour cycle (i.e. 7 am = 0700; 2 pm = 1400) Technical Report Page 52

53 2010 Survey 2011 Survey Codeset Time (0000 format) MCARSHA Long name Car-share program Car-share program Description Do you think a car-share program will motivate more sustainable transportation activity to campus? Codeset 1 Yes 1 Yes MCARPL 2 No 2 No 3 Not Sure 3 Not Sure 4 Not Applicable Long name Car-pool program Car-pool program Do you think the following measures will motivate more sustainable transportation activity on campus? Enhanced Car-Share Program (Dalhousie currently has two car share cars on campus) Description Do you think a car-pool program will motivate more sustainable transportation activity to campus? Do you think the following measures will motivate more sustainable transportation activity on campus? Enhanced Car-Pool Program (Dalhousie currently has a Ride Share Program and promotes HRM s ride matching system for Dalhousie students and employees) Codeset 1 Yes 1 Yes 2 No 2 No 3 Not Sure 3 Not Sure 4 Not Applicable Technical Report Page 53

54 MBKSHR 2010 Survey 2011 Survey Long name Bike-share program Bike-share program Description Do you think a bike-share program will motivate more sustainable transportation activity to campus? Do you think the following measures will motivate more sustainable transportation activity on campus? Bike-share Program Codeset 1 Yes 1 Yes MSUMBUS 2 No 2 No 3 Not Sure 3 Not Sure 4 Not Applicable Long name Summer bus program Summer student bus program Description Which of the following sustainable transportation initiatives would you use? Do you think the following measures will motivate more sustainable transportation activity on campus? Summer Student Bus Passes Codeset 1 Yes 1 Yes 2 No 2 No 3 Not Sure 3 Not Sure 4 Not Applicable MFACBUS Long name Description Codeset 1 Yes Faculty/Staff Bus Passes Do you think the following measures will motivate more sustainable transportation activity on campus? Faculty/Staff Bus Passes 2 No 3 Not Sure Technical Report Page 54

55 MUSHUT Long name Description 2010 Survey 2011 Survey Codeset 1 Yes University shuttle service Do you think the following measures will motivate more sustainable transportation activity on campus? University shuttle service 2 No 3 Not Sure ICARPOOL Long name Car-pool program interest Car-pool program interest Description If you travel alone by automobile to Dalhousie University, would you be interested in a carpooling initiative? Codeset 1 Yes 1 Yes INTCAMP 2 No 2 No 3 Not Sure 3 Not Sure 4 Not Applicable 4 Not Applicable Long name Inter-campus travel Inter-campus travel If you travel alone by automobile to Dalhousie, would you be interested in a carpooling initiative? Free Text - If so, what beyond the current Dalhousie Ride Share Program would you like? Description Are you required to travel from one campus to another? Do you travel from one campus to another? Codeset 1 Yes 1 Daily 2 No 2 Four times a week 3 Three times a week 4 Twice a week 5 Once a week Technical Report Page 55

56 INTCMODE Long name Description 2010 Survey 2011 Survey 6 Never Codeset 1 ICARSHAR Long name 7 No response Inter Campus Travel Mode What is your primary means of travel between campuses? Walk Bicycle Bus Car Other: Not applicable Interest in Car Share Description Would you be interested in an expanded car-share program on campus? Codeset 1 Yes 2 No 3 Not Sure 4 Not Applicable BIKESH Long name On campus bike-share program On campus bike-share program Description Would you use a bike-share program on campus? Would you use a bike-share program on campus? Codeset 1 Yes 1 Yes CARACC Long name Description 2 No 2 No 3 Not Sure 3 Not Sure Access to Automobile Do you own or have access to a car? Technical Report Page 56

57 2010 Survey 2011 Survey Codeset 1 I own a car BIKEACC Long name Description Codeset 1 TRANCOST Long name Description 2 I am a member of a car-sharing service 3 I can borrow a car or get a ride most times I need it 4 I do not own or have access to a car 5 No response Access to Bicycle Do you own or have access to a bicycle? I own a bicycle I can use or borrow a bicycle most times I need it I do not own or have access to a bicycle No response Transportation Expenditures Codeset 1 (Dollars) LDTRIPS Long name Description Codeset 1 How much do you spend on a monthly basis for transportation purposes? Long Distance Travel Round Trips Please answer the following questions about LONG DISTANCE TRAVEL (where your destination was more than 100 kilometers away from the campus) over the past twelve months Airplane (Count) Car (Count) Train (Count) Bus (Count) Boat (Count) Technical Report Page 57

58 LDKMS Long name Description 2010 Survey 2011 Survey Codeset 1 Long Distance Travel Kilometres travelled Please answer the following questions about LONG DISTANCE TRAVEL (where your destination was more than 100 kilometers away from the campus) over the past twelve months Airplane (Km) Car (Km) Train (Km) Bus (Km) Boat (Km) Technical Report Page 58

Dalhousie University Commuter Study

Dalhousie University Commuter Study Dalhousie University Commuter Study 2015-2016 Prepared by: S.J. Campbell and M.A. Habib Prepared for: Office of Sustainability, Dalhousie University Technical Report 2016-000 April 2016 Dalhousie Transportation

More information

Dalhousie University Commuter Study 2017

Dalhousie University Commuter Study 2017 Dalhousie University Commuter Study 217 Prepared by: S.J. Campbell, S. McCarthy and M.A. Habib Prepared for: Office of Sustainability, Dalhousie University Technical Report 217- August 217 Dalhousie Transportation

More information

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey SACOG-00-009 1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey June 2000 Sacramento Area Council of Governments 1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey June 2000 Table of Contents

More information

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share 2011 Metro Vancouver Regional Trip Diary Survey Briefing Paper #1 An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share Introduction The 2011 Metro Vancouver Regional Trip Diary Survey is the latest survey conducted

More information

WELCOME. City of Greater Sudbury. Transportation Demand Management Plan

WELCOME. City of Greater Sudbury. Transportation Demand Management Plan WELCOME City of Greater Sudbury Transportation Demand Management Plan Public Consultation Session St. Andrew s Place, Activity Hall 111 Larch Street Wednesday September 13, 2017 6:00 to 8:00 pm Welcome

More information

The State of Active Transportation in Nova Scotia

The State of Active Transportation in Nova Scotia The State of Active Transportation in Nova Scotia August 2014 Prepared for: Bicycle Nova Scotia Prepared by: Levi Megenbir (MPLAN), Naznin Daisy (PhD, Civil), Justin Forbes (MPS), Irin Shamsad (MSC), Cara

More information

Transportation-Demand Management Community Presentation

Transportation-Demand Management Community Presentation Transportation-Demand Management Community Presentation American University Office of Risk, Safety and Transportation programs Thursday, June 7, 2018 Program Objectives Improve transportation options for

More information

Camosun College Modal Split

Camosun College Modal Split 2010 Camosun College Modal Split How Does the College Community Get to Campus? Shannon Craig & Julie Higginson Camosun College 1/21/2011 Contents Introduction... 3 Methodology... 3 Results... 6 Mode Share

More information

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report 2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report Prepared by: LDA Consulting Washington, DC 20015 (202) 548-0205 February 24, 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview This report presents the results of the November

More information

Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009

Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009 Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009 May 2010 Prepared for the City of Boulder by National Research Center, Inc. 3005 30th Street Boulder, CO 80301 (303) 444-7863 www.n-r-c.com Table of Contents

More information

Life Transitions and Travel Behaviour Study. Job changes and home moves disrupt established commuting patterns

Life Transitions and Travel Behaviour Study. Job changes and home moves disrupt established commuting patterns Life Transitions and Travel Behaviour Study Evidence Summary 2 Drivers of change to commuting mode Job changes and home moves disrupt established commuting patterns This leaflet summarises new analysis

More information

Bicycle Helmet Use Among Winnipeg Cyclists January 2012

Bicycle Helmet Use Among Winnipeg Cyclists January 2012 Bicycle Helmet Use Among Winnipeg Cyclists January 2012 By: IMPACT, the injury prevention program Winnipeg Regional Health Authority 2 nd Floor, 490 Hargrave Street Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 0X7 TEL: 204-940-8300

More information

Travel Plan Monitoring Report. Bourton View, Wellingborough - Residential

Travel Plan Monitoring Report. Bourton View, Wellingborough - Residential Travel Plan Monitoring Report Bourton View, Wellingborough - Residential Prepared by: Developer Eyes Property and Estate Management, Broughton Grange Business Centre, Headlands, Kettering, Northants, NN15

More information

2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile

2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile TRANS Committee 2011 Origin-Destination Survey National Capital Region December 2012 TRANS Committee Members: City of Ottawa, including OC Transpo Ville de Gatineau Société de transport de l Outaouais

More information

CPC Parking Lot Riverside Drive. Transportation Rationale

CPC Parking Lot Riverside Drive. Transportation Rationale CPC Parking Lot Transportation Rationale Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 September 2015 Novatech File: 114093 Ref: R-2015-153 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

More information

Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary

Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary Prepared by: LDA Consulting Washington, DC 20015 (202) 548-0205 June 14, 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview This report presents the results of the 2012

More information

Travel Patterns and Characteristics

Travel Patterns and Characteristics DRAFT 2006 Transportation Fact Book SECTION 4 Travel Patterns and Characteristics 43 2006 Transportation Fact Book DRAFT 44 DRAFT 2006 Transportation Fact Book Why do we conduct travel surveys? The main

More information

Assessment of socio economic benefits of non-motorized transport (NMT) integration with public transit (PT)

Assessment of socio economic benefits of non-motorized transport (NMT) integration with public transit (PT) Assessment of socio economic benefits of non-motorized transport (NMT) integration with public transit (PT) Case study of Bike share (BS) system in Pune, India Parvesh Kumar Sharawat Department of Policy

More information

Cabrillo College Transportation Study

Cabrillo College Transportation Study Cabrillo College Transportation Study Planning and Research Office Terrence Willett, Research Analyst, Principle Author Jing Luan, Director of Planning and Research Judy Cassada, Research Specialist Shirley

More information

KLB Travel to School Survey - Summary Report

KLB Travel to School Survey - Summary Report 1 KLB Travel to School Survey - Summary Report 1. How do you usually travel to school? The most common mode of transport used by responders travelling to school was the public/school bus with 44.8% (250

More information

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of: 3 COMMUNITY INPUT Community input is an essential part of corridor studies. For the SR 87 corridor study, VTA staff conducted an extensive online survey of people living and commuting along the corridor.

More information

UWA Commuting Survey 2013

UWA Commuting Survey 2013 UWA Commuting Survey 2013 September 2013 Project: UWA/10 UWA Commuting Survey 2013 September 2013 Client: University of Western Australia Project: UWA/10 Consultants: Donna Hill Petra Roberts Jennifer

More information

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030 Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues Regional Transportation Plan 2030 23 Regional Transportation Plan 2030 24 Travel Characteristics Why Do People Travel? Over one-half of trips taken in Dane

More information

Appendix 22 Sea angling from a private or chartered boat

Appendix 22 Sea angling from a private or chartered boat Appendix 22 Sea angling from a private or chartered boat LUC SMRTS2015 Final Report 359 March 2016 Appendix 22 Sea angling from a private or chartered boat Table A22.1: Summary of sample confidence levels

More information

PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS

PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS ROGUE VALLEY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS Date: December 12, 2018 Project #: 21289 To: Paige West, RVTD From: Susan Wright, PE; Molly McCormick; (Kittelson & Associates, Inc.) Subject:

More information

January Project No

January Project No January 13 2015 Project No. 5070.05 Neil Connelly, Director University of Victoria, Campus Planning and Sustainability PO Box 1700 STN CSC Victoria, BC V8P 5C2 Dear Neil: Re: UVic 2014 Traffic Final Report

More information

Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin

Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin *Manuscript Click here to view linked References 1 Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin Brian Caulfield 1, Elaine Brick 2, Orla Thérèse McCarthy 1 1 Department of Civil,

More information

Roads and Vehicular Traffic Design Principles. Roads and Vehicular Traffic Recommendations

Roads and Vehicular Traffic Design Principles. Roads and Vehicular Traffic Recommendations CIRCULATION AND PARKING roads and vehicular traffic The Campus Master Plan updates the campus transportation network through a multi-modal approach that encourages walking and biking while improving vehicular

More information

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS Transit Station Access Planning Tool Instructions Page C-1 Revised Final Report September 2011 TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

More information

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report 2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report Prepared by: LDA Consulting Washington, DC 20015 (202) 548-0205 February 24, 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview This report presents the results of the November

More information

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016 December 216 I. OVERVIEW & OUTREACH SUMMARY Introduction Washington County evaluated long-term transportation investments and strategies as part of the Transportation Futures Study. The purpose of the

More information

2011 Transportation Tomorrow Survey. Data Presentation

2011 Transportation Tomorrow Survey. Data Presentation 2011 Transportation Tomorrow Survey Data Presentation Participating Agencies Conduct of the Survey Supporting Agencies of TTS Agency 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 Mininstry of Transportation, Ontario Y

More information

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY Pedestrian Survey Findings Survey Main Findings: Transit and walking are the main two modes used by both visitors and residents of the area, regardless

More information

15% Survey on Smart Commuting. Factsheet: University of Twente. 435 out of invited employees. This is a response rate of

15% Survey on Smart Commuting. Factsheet: University of Twente. 435 out of invited employees. This is a response rate of Survey on Smart Commuting Factsheet: University of Twente Tiago Fioreze, University of Twente - 27 October 2016 435 out of 2.900 invited employees. This is a response rate of SURVEY ON SMART COMMUTING

More information

Appendix 9 SCUBA diving in the sea

Appendix 9 SCUBA diving in the sea Appendix 9 SCUBA diving in the sea Firth of Clyde Forum SMRTS2015 Final Report 195 March 2016 Appendix 9 SCUBA diving in the sea Table A9.1: Summary of sample confidence levels Responses Spatial data Questionnaire

More information

RE-CYCLING A CITY: EXAMINING THE GROWTH OF CYCLING IN DUBLIN

RE-CYCLING A CITY: EXAMINING THE GROWTH OF CYCLING IN DUBLIN Proceedings ITRN2013 5-6th September, Caulfield: Re-cycling a city: Examining the growth of cycling in Dublin RE-CYCLING A CITY: EXAMINING THE GROWTH OF CYCLING IN DUBLIN Brian Caulfield Abstract In the

More information

Appendix 21 Sea angling from the shore

Appendix 21 Sea angling from the shore Appendix 21 Sea angling from the shore LUC SMRTS2015 Final Report 342 March 2016 Appendix 21 Sea angling from the shore Table A21.1: Summary of sample confidence levels Responses Spatial data Questionnaire

More information

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey Traditionally Underserved Populations helping organizations make better decisions since 1982 2018 Submitted to the AAMPO By: ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier

More information

How are your travelling? Travel Diary in Cork

How are your travelling? Travel Diary in Cork Measures to Influence transport Demand to Achieve Sustainability POLIS Working Group Environment and Health 14 th October 2008 - Paris How are your travelling? Travel Diary in Cork Cork County Council

More information

TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY

TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY Clause No. 15 in Report No. 7 of was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on April 17, 2014. 15 2011 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY recommends

More information

Final Plan 20 December 2016

Final Plan 20 December 2016 Final Plan 20 December 2016 Introduction Aims of the Travel Plan How do we travel? Understanding travel behaviours? The University Master Plan and its implications Galway City sustainable transport policies

More information

Introduction. Using the Checklist. TDM Measures Checklist Version 1.0 (30 June 2017) City of Ottawa

Introduction. Using the Checklist. TDM Measures Checklist Version 1.0 (30 June 2017) City of Ottawa Introduction The s Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) Guidelines (specifically Module 4.3 Transportation Demand Management) requires proponents of qualifying developments to assess the context, need

More information

Cobb Community Transit

Cobb Community Transit Cobb Community Transit Ridership Survey January 2014 1 Methodology Paper survey of 315 CCT riders 165 on local routes (margin of sampling error: ± 7.6%) 150 on express routes (margin of sampling error:

More information

Understanding Transit Demand. E. Beimborn, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Understanding Transit Demand. E. Beimborn, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Understanding Transit Demand E. Beimborn, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 1 Purpose To provide a basic understanding of transit ridership and some common misunderstandings. To explain concepts of choice

More information

Sustainable Transportation Plan Draft 4/24/2012

Sustainable Transportation Plan Draft 4/24/2012 Sustainable Transportation Plan 2011-2012 Draft 4/24/2012 Contents I. Purpose... 3 II. Background... 3 III. Recent Accomplishments... 6 IV. Anticipated Changes... 8 V. Planning Process... 8 VI. Priorities...

More information

Student Travel Survey 2012 results

Student Travel Survey 2012 results Student Travel Survey 2012 results Survey overview Number of respondents: 1525 Expected number of respondents: 7775 Response rate: 19.6% Launch date: 12 Nov 2012 Close date: 15 Mar 2013 Section A: About

More information

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference 1.0 Project Description The Campus Cycling Plan, a first for the University, will provide a comprehensive and coordinated approach to support

More information

Camosun College Modal Split

Camosun College Modal Split 2012 Camosun College Modal Split Biannual Count of How the College Community Gets to Campus Cindy Drover-Davidson & Maria Bremner Office of Environmental Sustainability 3/27/2013 Executive Summary Camosun

More information

WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results

WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results Wilmington Area Planning Council WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results Prepared by: 2955 Valmont Road, Suite 300 Boulder, Colorado 80301 t: 303-444-7863 f: 303-444-1145 www.n-r-c.com Table

More information

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study U.S. Bicycling Participation Study Report of findings from the 2016 survey Conducted by Corona Insights Commissioned by PeopleForBikes Released July 2017 Table of Contents Background and Objectives 3 Research

More information

APPENDIX B. TDM Existing Conditions

APPENDIX B. TDM Existing Conditions APPENDIX B TDM Existing Conditions SCARBOROUGH CENTRE TMP TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION Scarborough Centre has grown into a mixed-use hub for population, transportation, and employment

More information

Investment in Active Transport Survey

Investment in Active Transport Survey Investment in Active Transport Survey KEY FINDINGS 3 METHODOLOGY 7 CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE 8 Riding a bike 9 Reasons for riding a bike 9 Mainly ride on 10 Comfortable riding on 10 Rating of cycling infrastructure

More information

2012 Transit Study Randolph County

2012 Transit Study Randolph County 2012 Transit Study Randolph County Appendix B Technical Memorandum 2011 Transportation Survey Prepared for: Randolph County Housing Authority Country Roads Transit Submitted by: July 1, 2012 Table of Contents

More information

Exceeding expectations: The growth of walking in Vancouver and creating a more walkable city in the future through EcoDensity

Exceeding expectations: The growth of walking in Vancouver and creating a more walkable city in the future through EcoDensity Exceeding expectations: The growth of walking in Vancouver and creating a more walkable city in the future through EcoDensity Melina Scholefield, P. Eng. Manager, Sustainability Group, City of Vancouver

More information

A MULTI-MODAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT SOLUTION FOR MALE, MALDIVES

A MULTI-MODAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT SOLUTION FOR MALE, MALDIVES A MULTI-MODAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT SOLUTION FOR MALE, MALDIVES 11 TH CONFERENCE ON COMPETITION AND OWNERSHIP IN LAND PASSENGER TRANSPORT Delft University of Technology (The Netherlands) 20-25 September 2009

More information

LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY. Transport Strategy

LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY. Transport Strategy LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Transport Strategy 2016-2021 2 3 Contents 1. Introduction 1. Introduction...3 Scope of the Document...3 Vision...3 Key Successes...3 2. Our Travel Behaviour...4 Staff and Student

More information

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan Connect-our-County Online Transportation User Survey Preliminary Results June 24, 2010 Years of Residence 2. How many years have you LIVED HERE?

More information

Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings

Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings Highlights 67% of urban New Zealanders, 18 years of age or more own or have access to a bicycle that is in

More information

1.0 FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION CURRENT TRENDS IN TRAVEL FUTURE TRENDS IN TRAVEL...

1.0 FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION CURRENT TRENDS IN TRAVEL FUTURE TRENDS IN TRAVEL... Sustainable Travel Plan 2008-2012 1 Contents Page Number 1.0 FOREWORD... 3 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 3.0 INTRODUCTION... 4 4.0 CURRENT TRENDS IN TRAVEL... 4 5.0 FUTURE TRENDS IN TRAVEL... 7 6.0 TRAVEL

More information

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report JUNE 2018 SEPTA Table of Contents Executive Summary...7 What if transit gave us more freedom?... 8 What is this report?... 8 The main conclusions... 9 What is happening

More information

Transportation 2040 Update: Eudora Public Input As of June 1, 2017

Transportation 2040 Update: Eudora Public Input As of June 1, 2017 Transportation 2040 Update: Eudora Public Input As of June 1, 2017 Overview... 1 Survey Responses... 2 Overview The Lawrence Douglas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is updating our long

More information

THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF BICYCLE IN SÃO PAULO May 2018

THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF BICYCLE IN SÃO PAULO May 2018 THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF BICYCLE IN SÃO PAULO May 2018 d d d d d Objective To estimate the impact of bicycle use in the city of in three areas: Environment, Health and Economy Area Dimensions Indexes Analyze

More information

Qualitative research into motivations and barriers to cycling Russell Greig Department of Transport, Western Australia.

Qualitative research into motivations and barriers to cycling Russell Greig Department of Transport, Western Australia. Qualitative research into motivations and barriers to cycling Russell Greig Department of Transport, Western Australia. Abstract In 2010 the Department of Transport s (DoT) Bikewest branch commissioned

More information

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary Prepared by: February 28, 2011 Why Plan? Encouraging healthy, active lifestyles through pathway and sidewalk connectivity has been a focus

More information

Active Travel Towns Funding Scheme Project Proposal. Sligo. Sligo Local Authorities

Active Travel Towns Funding Scheme Project Proposal. Sligo. Sligo Local Authorities Active Travel Towns Funding Scheme 2014-2016 Project Proposal for Sligo by Sligo Local Authorities Introduction Over the last two years, Sligo Local Authorities have implemented years 1 & 2 of their 5

More information

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES 82 EAST BENCH MASTER PLAN 07 Introduction The East Bench transportation system is a collection of slow moving, treelined residential streets and major arteries that are the

More information

SACRAMENTO AREA TRAVEL SURVEY: BEFORE BIKE SHARE

SACRAMENTO AREA TRAVEL SURVEY: BEFORE BIKE SHARE SACRAMENTO AREA TRAVEL SURVEY: BEFORE BIKE SHARE August 2017 A Research Report from the National Center for Sustainable Transportation Susan Handy, University of California, Davis Drew Heckathorn, University

More information

2014 Bike to Work Day: Survey Report Denver Regional Council of Governments

2014 Bike to Work Day: Survey Report Denver Regional Council of Governments 2014 Bike to Work Day: Survey Report Denver Regional Council of Governments Prepared By: Corona Insights CoronaInsights.com CONTENTS Introduction... 3 Summary of Findings... 4 Bike to Work Day Participation...

More information

Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9.

Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9. Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9 Prepared By: URS Canada Inc. 4 th Floor, 30 Leek Crescent Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B

More information

Bicycle Parking Analysis: California State University, Fullerton

Bicycle Parking Analysis: California State University, Fullerton Bicycle Parking Analysis: California State University, Fullerton Fall 2006 Bicycle Parking Analysis: California State University, Fullerton Fall 2006 Report Author: John Carroll Department of Geography,

More information

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN ATTACHMENT 2 CITY OF SANTA MONICA PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN CITY OF SANTA MONICA PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN This page intentionally left blank EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Setting the Stage

More information

Loughborough University Travel Planning

Loughborough University Travel Planning Document Ti tle Client Name Loughborough University Travel Planning Loughborough University Travel Plan Executive Summary 2015-2020 23 December 2015 Loughborough University Travel Planning Project no:

More information

Sandwell General Hospital Travel Plan 2014

Sandwell General Hospital Travel Plan 2014 Sandwell General Hospital Travel Plan 2014 Travel Plan Survey Dated 24 th June 2013 Travel plan finalised March 2014 Prepared by Michael Raynor, JMP Consultants Ltd Site Address Lyndon, West Bromwich,

More information

2012 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

2012 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report 2012 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report Prepared by: LDA Consulting Washington, DC 20015 (202) 548-0205 May 22, 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview This report presents the results of the November 2012

More information

Paper submitted to the Scottish Transport Studies Group (STSG) April 2004

Paper submitted to the Scottish Transport Studies Group (STSG) April 2004 A SURVEY OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR IN EDINBURGH Paper submitted to the Scottish Transport Studies Group (STSG) April 2004 Tim Ryley Research Fellow Transport Research Institute Napier University 1. Introduction

More information

Dartmouth College Parking, Traffic, & Pedestrian Circulation. Master Plan 2001

Dartmouth College Parking, Traffic, & Pedestrian Circulation. Master Plan 2001 Dartmouth College Parking, Traffic, & Pedestrian Circulation Master Plan 2001 Goals & Objectives of the Study Identify Existing and Projected Parking Demand & Supply Identify Existing Pedestrian & Traffic

More information

Building Community Partnerships for Mobility:

Building Community Partnerships for Mobility: Building Community Partnerships for Mobility: San Francisco 2008 Presented by: Cynthia Hoyle, AICP Transportation Planning Consultant Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Background The Heartland Champaign-Urbana,

More information

Current Travel Needs and Operating Conditions (See pages 4 9 of the Discussion Guide)

Current Travel Needs and Operating Conditions (See pages 4 9 of the Discussion Guide) Phase 1 Consultation: Understanding the Need Feedback Form Thank you for participating in this phase of planning for the George Massey Tunnel Replacement. Your feedback is important to us. Input received

More information

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study Chirantan Kansara, P.E. Engineering Construction Design Planning 2018 ITE Northeastern District Annual Meeting Lake George,

More information

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014) Chapter 14 PARLIER This chapter describes the current status and future plans for biking and walking in the City of Parlier. RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES The Parlier General Plan is the primary

More information

BICYCLE SHARING SYSTEM: A PROPOSAL FOR SURAT CITY

BICYCLE SHARING SYSTEM: A PROPOSAL FOR SURAT CITY BICYCLE SHARING SYSTEM: A PROPOSAL FOR SURAT CITY Vishal D. Patel 1, Himanshu J. Padhya 2 M.E Student, Civil Engineering Department, Sarvajanik College of Engineering and Technology, Surat, Gujarat, India

More information

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Project Name: Grand Junction Circulation Plan Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Applicant: City of Grand Junction Representative: David Thornton Address:

More information

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04 TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04 SUBJECT: FINANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC

More information

Engagement Summary: Round 1

Engagement Summary: Round 1 Engagement Summary: Round 1 June 21, 2018 REPORT FOR: City of Courtenay 830 Cliff Avenue Courtenay, BC V9N 2J7 PREPARED BY: Urban Systems Ltd. 550 1090 Home Street Vancouver, BC V6B 2W9 ALONG WITH: Kathleen

More information

cyclingincities opinion survey ABOUT THE STUDY WHO DID WE ASK? WHAT DID WE DO?

cyclingincities opinion survey ABOUT THE STUDY WHO DID WE ASK? WHAT DID WE DO? cyclingincities opinion survey ABOUT THE STUDY Using a bicycle for transportation is good for the environment, and it also offers personal health benefits. Cycling is also feasible, since more than 80%

More information

Free Ride Transit System 2014 On Board Passenger Survey

Free Ride Transit System 2014 On Board Passenger Survey Free Ride Transit System 2014 On Board Passenger Survey March 28, 2014 INTRODUCTION The last on-board passenger survey was conducted by the Breckenridge Free Ride on March 30, 2012. The 2012 survey had

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW... 1-1 1.1 Study Scope... 1-1 1.2 Study Area... 1-1 1.3 Study Objectives... 1-3 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 2-1 2.1 Existing Freeway Conditions... 2-4 2.1.1

More information

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

Measuring and Communicating Mobility: Measuring and Communicating Mobility: The District Mobility Project Stephanie Dock, District Department of Transportation TRB Transportation Issues in Major Cities Committee May 2, 2017 Deconstructing

More information

2017 Cycling Survey Report

2017 Cycling Survey Report Contents Introduction & background... 2 Aims & objectives... 2 Methodology... 3 Analysis & results... 3 Key Findings... 6 Conclusions... 15 Appendix 1- Dataset... 16 Appendix 2 - Survey design: List of

More information

Making Dublin More Accessible: The dublinbikes Scheme. Martin Rogers Colm Keenan 13th November 2012

Making Dublin More Accessible: The dublinbikes Scheme. Martin Rogers Colm Keenan 13th November 2012 : The dublinbikes Scheme Martin Rogers Colm Keenan 13th November 2012 Modal Splits for Dublin 2001-2011 Dublin Mode Share Summary - Persons Crossing Canal Cordon 07.00-10.00 Year Total All PT % Car % Walk

More information

Travel Plan Monitoring Report. Buttercross Park, Whittlesey - Residential

Travel Plan Monitoring Report. Buttercross Park, Whittlesey - Residential Travel Plan Monitoring Report Buttercross Park, Whittlesey - Residential Prepared by: Developer Eyes Property and Estate Management Limited Headlands, Kettering, Northants NN15 6XA Company Registration

More information

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5 SUMMARY PURPOSE AND NEED Chapel Hill Transit ridership has increased Buses operate every 4 minutes and have standing room only Exceeding seated capacity by 12% Corridor Need 1 by more than 20 percent between

More information

Smart City, Sustainable Mobility, Home-Work Mobility:Data Analysis and Actions

Smart City, Sustainable Mobility, Home-Work Mobility:Data Analysis and Actions International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ 15) La Coruña (Spain), 25 th to 27 th March, 2015 Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal (RE&PQJ) ISSN 2172-038 X, No.13, April

More information

Dear City Council Members,

Dear City Council Members, From: Bob Kenyon [mailto: ] Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 10:20 AM To: City Clerk Subject: Please prioritize Caltrain and a complete transit network Thank you for prioritizing bringing BART to San Jose

More information

Peterborough Council on Aging

Peterborough Council on Aging Peterborough Council on Aging Discussion paper series #4, 2015 Transportation Transportation, including accessible and affordable public transport is a key factor influencing active aging. in particular,

More information

Appendix E: Bike Crash Analysis ( )

Appendix E: Bike Crash Analysis ( ) Appendix E: Bike Crash Analysis (2009-2012) Davis Bicycle Crashes Analysis 2009-2012 December 2013 Ride Walk Davis Active Transportation Program City of Davis December 2013 Prepared by: Jimmy Fong Active

More information

When composing the study, our primary source for content analysis was a study

When composing the study, our primary source for content analysis was a study Denise Arriaga Ibarra Natalie Garcia Vincente Velasco Victor Estrada Jonathan Marin Ignacio Alcaraz Cal Poly Pomona Cyclist Population When composing the study, our primary source for content analysis

More information

Transport attitudes, residential preferences, and urban form effects on cycling and car use.

Transport attitudes, residential preferences, and urban form effects on cycling and car use. Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Mar 10, 2019 Transport attitudes, residential preferences, and urban form effects on cycling and car use. Nielsen, Thomas Alexander Sick; Olafsson, Anton Stahl; Carstensen,

More information

Service Business Plan

Service Business Plan Service Business Plan Service Name Transportation Planning Service Type Public Service Owner Name Kaylan Edgcumbe Budget Year 2019 Service Owner Title Service Description Manager of Transportation Planning

More information

Thursday 18 th January Cambridgeshire Travel Survey Presentation to the Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly

Thursday 18 th January Cambridgeshire Travel Survey Presentation to the Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly Thursday 18 th January 2018 Cambridgeshire Travel Survey Presentation to the Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly Contents 1. Study Background 2. Methodology 3. Key Findings An opportunity for

More information