Arlington Public Schools Abingdon Elementary School Site Evaluation Preliminary Transportation Findings

Transcription

1 Arlington Public Schools Abingdon Elementary School Site Evaluation Preliminary Transportation Findings Arlington County Public Facilities Review Committee (PFRC) November 19, 2014 SAN ANTONIO-BEXAR COUNTY PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ACTION PLAN

2 INTRODUCTION

3 Key Questions: How does the transportation system currently operate on and surrounding the Abingdon ES site? What is the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) potential for Abingdon ES? How might the transportation system operate when the expansion is completed?

4 Multimodal Transportation Study Existing Conditions Walking, bicycling, carpooling, transit use, bus use Crash data Parking supply and demand Stakeholder input on key transportation issues and opportunities Existing infrastructure (focus on pedestrian and bicycle access) Traffic Study (current trip distribution and intersection level of service)

5 Multimodal Transportation Study Existing Conditions Walking, bicycling, carpooling, transit use, bus use Crash data Parking supply and demand Stakeholder input on key transportation issues and opportunities Existing infrastructure (focus on pedestrian and bicycle access) Traffic Study (current trip distribution and intersection level of service) Future Analysis Future Traffic Study (scenarios for future trip distribution and intersection/congestion impacts) Projected parking needs Infrastructure needs (focus on pedestrian and bicycle access) Site design and access/circulation

6 Multimodal Transportation Study Existing Conditions Walking, bicycling, carpooling, transit use, bus use Crash data Parking supply and demand Stakeholder input on key transportation issues and opportunities Existing infrastructure (focus on pedestrian and bicycle access) Traffic Study (current trip distribution and intersection level of service) Future Analysis Future Traffic Study (scenarios for future trip distribution and intersection/congestion impacts) Projected parking needs Infrastructure needs (focus on pedestrian and bicycle access) Site design and access/circulation } Sept Dec 2014

7 Multimodal Transportation Study Existing Conditions Walking, bicycling, carpooling, transit use, bus use Crash data Parking supply and demand Stakeholder input on key transportation issues and opportunities Existing infrastructure (focus on pedestrian and bicycle access) Traffic Study (current trip distribution and intersection level of service) Future Analysis Future Traffic Study (scenarios for future trip distribution and intersection/congestion impacts) Projected parking needs Infrastructure needs (focus on pedestrian and bicycle access) Site design and access/circulation } } Sept Dec 2014 Jan June 2015

8 HOW DOES THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CURRENTLY OPERATE AT AND AROUND ABINGDON ES? >> Existing Infrastructure

9 Key Themes: Public Input Need to focus on improved walking and bicycling conditions Concerns about vehicle speeds on S Abingdon Street Concerns about congestion at S Abingdon Street and 29 th Street Difficult intersections S Abingdon Street and 29 th Street / 30 th Street 28 th Street and S Abingdon Street Limited parking; Existing parking spaces are too narrow 8.5 ft. x 15 ft. Concerns crossing S Walter Reed Drive from Windgate Village Lighting on trail in Fort Reynolds Park Limited bicycle parking available With expansion, provision of new parking and new entrances to school Limited connectivity to S Fairlington

10

11

12

13 Route 7A 7C 7F 7Y Stops on roads 31 st Street S, Abingdon Street 29 th Street S Walter Reed and Arlington Mill 31 st Street S, Abingdon Street 29 th Street S 31 st Street S, Abingdon Street 29 th Street S Hours, Monday to Friday 4:45 am to 11:22 pm 6:05 am to 8:47 am 5:34 am to 11:38 pm 5:09 am to 9:42 pm Headways between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. Every 8 minutes Every 20 minutes Every 50 minutes Every 9 minutes

14

15 78 spaces in school lot 30 spaces in tennis court lot Over 650 spaces on streets surrounding Abingdon campus

16 HOW DOES THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CURRENTLY OPERATE AT AND AROUND ABINGDON ES? >> Transportation System Use

17 To School From School 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% Walk Bike School Bus Family Vehicle Carpool Transit Other 0% Walk Bike School Bus Family Vehicle Carpool Transit Other Student Travel Tally Parent Survey Student Travel Tally Source: 2014 Parent Survey (202 respondents) and Student Travel Tally (275 respondents) Parent Survey

18 Walk Bike School Bus Personal Vehicle Carpool Transit Other APS Neighborhood Schools (average) 24% 1% 45% 28% 1% 0% 0% APS Neighborhood Schools (range) 7% - 44% 0% - 5% 29% - 63% 18% - 38% 0% - 2% 0% - 1% 0% - 1% Abingdon Elementary (neighborhood school) 23% 0% 52% 24% 1% 0% 0% Source: 2014 Abingdon Parent Survey (202 respondents) and 2013 APS GO! Parent Survey of All APS Neighborhood Elementary Schools (except schools with fewer than 100 responses)

19 1% 1% 7% Walk Drive alone in private car Drive (APS vehicle) 91% Carpool Source: 2014 Staff Survey, 99 respondents

20 Observation & Mode Counts Intersection Counts Speed/Class/Volume Counts Abingdon Elementary School

21 Source: Manual Counts, Sept 2014

22 Source: Manual Counts, Sept 2014

23 Source: Intersection Counts, Sept 2014 and Field Observations, Nov 2014

24 Source: Manual Counts, Sept 2014

25 Source: Manual Counts, Sept 2014

26 Source: Field Observations, Nov 2014

27 29 th Street S primarily consists of school-related traffic S Abingdon Street experiences typical commuter peaks During school arrival and dismissal, 29 th Street S has similar volumes to S Abingdon Street During all other times, S Abingdon St has higher traffic volumes Traffic volumes on S Abingdon Street do not vary significantly between the data collection locations

28 Overall 85 th percentile speeds do not significantly exceed the speed limit 85 th percentile speeds during arrival exceed the school zone speed limit S Abingdon Street Speed Data Overall Speed Limit: 25 MPH 85 th Percentile Speed: 24 MPH During Arrival and Dismissal School Zone Speed Limit: 20 MPH 85 th Percentile Speed: 26 MPH/22 MPH (AM/PM)

29 During arrival, motorists may experience slight delay: Traveling west 28 th Rd at Abingdon Rd Intersection of Abingdon Rd & 29th St Traveling east on 30 th St at Abingdon Rd Intersection of Abingdon St & 31 st St During dismissal, motorists experience less delay compared with arrival due to less commuter traffic and fewer trips associated with the school

30 78 spaces in school lot 30 spaces in tennis court lot Over 650 spaces on streets surrounding Abingdon campus

31 *Shows parking after arrival (~8:20AM) on a typical day

32 *Shows parking before dismissal (~1:50PM) on a typical day

33 *Shows parking during a school event: Back to School Night (~7:15PM)

34 Three years of crash data Crash data doesn t capture near misses or close calls Eight total crashes Four crashes involved one moving vehicle and parked vehicles One crash involved car braking behind school bus No pedestrian or bicycle crashes Source: Arlington County Department of Environmental Services ( )

35 WHAT IS THE POTENTIAL FOR TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) AT ABINGDON ES?

36 Opportunities Neighborhood school site (compact walk zone) Generally complete sidewalk network Proximity to regional trails Available transit service (bus, Capital Bikeshare) Existing percentage of students walking Engaged and enthusiastic staff (e.g. success of Safety Patrol) Challenges Topography (hilly) Existing staff travel modes Intersection deficiencies

37 Child's Age Distance Safety of intersections and crossings Lack of adults to walk or bike with Concerns about bullying, violence, or crime Speed of traffic along route Amount of traffic along route Darkness Lack of crossing guards Weather or climate Other transportation options are more convenient Lack of adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities Afterschool activities Hills Heavy/bulky items to carry Lack of adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities at school School is on the way to another destination Before school activities Lack of bicycle Source: 2014 Parent Survey Very Important 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Somewhat Important

38 20% 27% 23% 12% Less than 1/4 mile 1/4 mile up to 1/2 mile 1/2 mile up to 1 mile 1 mile up to 1 1/2 miles 1 1/2 miles or more 18%

39 Trip distance Trip duration Heavy or bulky items to carry Weather or climate Convenience Hills Comfort Lack of showers or lockers Need car for travel during work Lack of sidewalks or pathways Difficult road crossings Concern about violence or crime 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Source: 2014 Staff Survey Very Important Important

40 Heavy or bulky items to carry Weather or climate Trip distance Lack of showers or lockers Convenience Lack of comfortable places to bike Trip duration Comfort Difficult crossings Lack of covered bicycle parking Don't own a bicycle or bikeshare membership Lack of secure bicycle parking Need car for travel during work Don't know safe route Bikeshare stations too far away Concern about violence or crime on route Don't know how to ride a bicycle 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Source: 2014 Staff Survey Very Important Somewhat Important

41 Convenience to other destinations (e.g., home, errands) Weather or climate Heavy/bulky items to carry Convenience to APS work location Trip duration Reliability Trip distance Stops/stations too far away Comfort Frequency Cost Operating hours Need car for travel during work 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Source: 2014 Staff Survey Very Important Somewhat Important

42 HOW WILL THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM OPERATE WHEN THE EXPANSION IS COMPLETE?

43 Site design components impact circulation, access and mode choice School driveway locations Location and design of pick up/drop off and bus loop Degree of separation of travel modes Parking Minimize and mitigate on-site conflicts between users Balancing parking demand with other site needs (e.g. green space) Address key facility gaps/issues for bike and pedestrian access

44 Finalize existing traffic analysis Conduct infrastructure assessment Coordinate with design team on site layout Finalize existing conditions report Continue SRTS Team and community engagement Assess future impacts of school expansion on transportation network Evaluate future parking demand