Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017"

Transcription

1 TMS Engineers, Inc. Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio June 5, 2017 Prepared for: Westlake City Schools - Board of Education Hilliard Boulevard Westlake, OH 44145

2 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio June 5, 2017 Prepared For: Westlake City Schools Board of Education Hilliard Boulevard Westlake, Ohio Prepared By: TMS Engineers, Inc Case Parkway S. Unit #7 Twinsburg, Ohio 44087

3 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Table of Contents Executive Summary... vi ix Chapter 1 Introduction Purpose of the Report Study Objectives... 4 Chapter 2 Area Conditions Transportation Network Study Area Traffic Chapter 3 Projected Traffic Conditions Site Traffic Non Site Traffic Future Traffic Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis Capacity and LOS at Study Area Intersections Capacity and LOS at Development Access Intersections Auxiliary Turning Lane Warrant Analysis Turn Lane Length Analysis Alternate Scenario Analysis Improvements to Accommodate Study Area Traffic Chapter 5 Conclusions June 5, 2017 Page i TMS Engineers, Inc.

4 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendices Appendix A Traffic Count Data Appendix B Trip Generation Data Appendix C Existing Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2017 Appendix D No Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2019 Appendix E No Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 Appendix F No Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 w/ Improvements Appendix G Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2019 Appendix H Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2019 w/ Improvements Appendix I Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Appendix J Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 Appendix K Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 w/ Improvements Appendix L Access Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2019 Appendix M Access Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 Appendix N ODOT Turn Lane Warrant Graphs Appendix O ODOT Turn Lane Design Criteria Appendix P Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 Alternate Scenario Appendix Q Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 Alternate Scenario w/ Improvements Appendix R ODOT Channelizing Island Design Criteria June 5, 2017 Page ii TMS Engineers, Inc.

5 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio List of Figures Figure 1.1 Location Map... 2 Figure 1.2 Site Plan... 3 Figure 2.1 Functional Classification... 6 Figure 2.2 Aerial View... 9 Figure 2.3 Existing Lane Use & Traffic Control Figure 2.4 Existing Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 3.1 Generated Traffic Distribution Passenger Vehicles Figure 3.2 Generated Traffic Distribution School Buses Figure 3.3 Generated Traffic Passenger Vehicles Figure 3.4 Generated Traffic School Buses Figure No Build Weekday Traffic Volumes Figure No Build Weekday Traffic Volumes Figure Build Weekday Traffic Volumes Figure Build Weekday Traffic Volumes Figure 4.1 Alternate Scenario Generated Traffic Passenger Vehicles Figure 4.2 Alternate Scenario 2039 Build Weekday Traffic Volumes Figure 4.3 Recommended Lane Use and Traffic Control Site Plan Figure 4.4 Recommended Lane Use and Traffic Control Interior Traffic Control Figure 4.5 Recommended Lane Use and Traffic Control Alternate Scenario June 5, 2017 Page iii TMS Engineers, Inc.

6 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio List of Tables Table 2.1 Functional Classification... 5 Table 2.2 Roadway Characteristics... 7 Table 3.1 ITE Land Use Codes Table 3.2 New Trip Generation Table 3.3 AM Trip Origins & Destinations Table 3.4 PM Trip Origins & Destinations Table 3.5 Growth Rates & Factors Table 3.6 DHV Factor Calculations Table 4.1 Intersection LOS Table Levels of Service (Existing Conditions) Table Levels of Service (No Build Conditions) Table Levels of Service (No Build Conditions) Table Levels of Service (No Build Conditions Recommended Improvements) Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions) Table No Build vs Build Scenario (AM Peak Hour Comparison Table) Table No Build vs Build Scenario (PM Peak Hour Comparison Table) Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions Recommended Improvements) Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions) Table No Build vs Build Scenario (AM Peak Hour Comparison Table) Table No Build vs Build Scenario (PM Peak Hour Comparison Table) Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions Recommended Improvements) Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions Access Locations) Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions Access Locations) June 5, 2017 Page iv TMS Engineers, Inc.

7 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Table 4.16 Turning Lane Warrants Center Ridge Road & Proposed East Access Table 4.17 Turn Lane Length Analysis Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road Table 4.18 Turn Lane Length Analysis Center Ridge Road & Proposed West Access Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions Alternate Scenario) Table Levels of Service (Alternate Scenario Recommended Improvements) Table Site Plan vs Alternate Scenario (AM Peak Hour Comparison Table) Table Site Plan vs Alternate Scenario (PM Peak Hour Comparison Table AMS) Table 4.24 Turn Lane Length Analysis Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road Table 4.25 Turn Lane Length Analysis Center Ridge Road & Glenmore Drive/West Access June 5, 2017 Page v TMS Engineers, Inc.

8 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Executive Summary This traffic impact study has been prepared at the request of the Westlake City Schools for a proposed elementary school. The project site is located in the City of Westlake, Cuyahoga County, Ohio along the south side of Center Ridge Road (US Route 20) between Glenmore Drive to the west and Dover Center Road to the east. The proposed elementary school is expected to have a student population of 1,450 students with 120 staff for grades pre kindergarten through fourth grade. Figure 1.2 shows the proposed site plan for the elementary school. The development is proposed with two access driveways along the south side of Center Ridge Road and one access driveway along the north side of Westown Boulevard. The year 2019 was analyzed for the opening year conditions, and the year 2039 was analyzed as the design year for the twenty year conditions analysis. The elementary school day begins at 7:50 AM and ends at 2:20 PM, therefore the report analyzed the hours of 7:30 to 8:30 AM and 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM. The 7:30 to 8:30 AM hour was referred to as the weekday AM peak hour for the purpose of this report. The 2:00 to 3:00 PM hour was referred to as the PM peak hour for the purpose of this report. These periods were analyzed since they reflect the period of the highest volume of traffic flow for the proposed school. The elementary school was assumed to generate a total of 30 entering and 30 exiting trips for school buses. These volumes are included in the total generation volumes calculated for this analysis. The proposed elementary school is expected to generate the following average hourly traffic during the AM and PM peak periods: ITE TRIP GENERATION TRIP ENDS ITE Code Land Use Description SIZE (Staff) AM Peak Hour of Generator PM Peak Hour of Generator (Enter/Exit) (Enter/Exit) 520 Elementary School TOTAL NEW GENERATED TRIPS June 5, 2017 Page vi TMS Engineers, Inc.

9 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Recommended Improvements to Serve Existing Conditions The existing study area intersections were determined to be operating with acceptable levels of service during the peak hours under study. It should be noted that a westbound right turn lane at intersection of Center Ridge Road and Dover Center Road has been previously recommended in other reports prepared for the City of Westlake. This recommendation was based on an analysis of the roadway peak hours. The elementary school analysis is based on the peak hour of the school traffic volumes which does not coincide with the peak hour of traffic for the roadway (i.e the school peaks in the afternoon from 2:00 to 3:00 PM while the roadway peaks from 5:00 to 6:00 PM). Recommended Improvements to Serve Future Conditions without the Development The study area intersections and approaches are expected to operate with acceptable levels of service under the expected 2019 No Build conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. The following improvements were recommended to accommodate the Year 2039 No Build traffic at the study area intersections that do not provide access to the proposed elementary school. Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road # Construct a westbound right turn lane. # Construct a northbound right turn lane. No additional intersection improvements were found to be necessary to accommodate the Year 2039 No Build traffic at the remaining study area intersections. The remaining study intersections are anticipated to operate with acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. Recommended Improvements to Mitigate the Traffic Associated with the Development The following lane use and traffic control are recommended to accommodate the 2019 and 2039 site generated (Build) traffic based on the development site plan shown in Figure 1.2: Center Ridge Road & Glenmore Drive (2039) # Construct a southbound left turn lane. Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road # Construct a westbound right turn lane. (2019) # Construct a southbound right turn lane. (2039) June 5, 2017 Page vii TMS Engineers, Inc.

10 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Dover Center Road & Westown Boulevard (2019) # Re stripe the eastbound approach for one ingress lane and two egress lanes consisting of a right turn lane and left turn lane. The following lane use and traffic control are recommended to accommodate the 2039 site generated (Build) traffic based on the Alternate Scenario detailed in Section 4.5: Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road # Construct a southbound right turn lane. Dover Center Road & Westown Boulevard # Install traffic signal control. # Re stripe the eastbound approach for one ingress lane and two egress lanes consisting of a right turn lane and left turn lane. Development Access Recommendations The following lane use and traffic control are recommended to accommodate the 2019 and 2039 site generated (Build) traffic based on the development site plan shown in Figure 1.2: Center Ridge Road & Proposed West Access (2019) # Install traffic signal control. # Construct the proposed development roadway with one egress lane and two ingress lanes. # The egress lanes should consist of an exclusive left turn lane and an exclusive right turn lane. # Construct an exclusive westbound left turn lane. # Include the church access drive as part of intersection and traffic signal control. Center Ridge Road & Proposed East Access (2019) # Construct the proposed development roadway with one egress lane and one ingress lane. # Restrict the access driveway to right turns in and right turns out of the site only through the use of a channelizing island. # The egress drive should be constructed per the recommendations and guidelines found in the ODOT Access Management Manual for channelizing islands (See Appendix R). # Install stop sign control on the northbound approach. June 5, 2017 Page viii TMS Engineers, Inc.

11 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio The following lane use and traffic control are recommended to accommodate the 2039 site generated (Build) traffic based on the Alternate Scenario detailed in Section 4.5: Center Ridge Road & Proposed West Access/Glenmore Drive # Construct the development West Access directly across from Glenmore Drive. # Install traffic signal control. # Construct the proposed development roadway with one egress lane and two ingress lanes. # The egress lanes should consist of an exclusive left turn lane and a shared through and right turn lane. # Construct an exclusive westbound left turn lane. # Construct an exclusive eastbound left turn lane. Center Ridge Road & Proposed East Access # Construct the proposed development roadway with one egress lane and one ingress lane. # Restrict the access driveway to right turns in and right turns out of the site only through the use of a channelizing island. # The egress drive should be constructed per the recommendations and guidelines found in the ODOT Access Management Manual for channelizing islands (See Appendix R). # Install stop sign control on the northbound approach. Conclusion Based upon the results of the analysis in this study and the corresponding recommendations, it can be seen that the site generated traffic can be accommodated without adversely impacting the area roadway network under each scenario. June 5, 2017 Page ix TMS Engineers, Inc.

12 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of Report This traffic impact study has been prepared at the request of the Westlake City Schools for a proposed elementary school. The project site is located in the City of Westlake, Cuyahoga County, Ohio along the south side of Center Ridge Road (US Route 20) between Glenmore Drive to the west and Dover Center Road to the east. Figure 1.1, Page 2 shows the proposed location of the development. The proposed elementary school is expected to have a student population of 1,450 students with 120 staff for grades pre kindergarten through fourth grade. Figure 1.2, Page 3 shows the proposed site plan for the elementary school. The development is proposed with two access driveways along the south side of Center Ridge Road and one access driveway along the north side of Westown Boulevard. The proposed location of the development roadways can be seen in Figure 1.2, Page 3. The Westown Boulevard access is proposed for school bus traffic only. All passenger vehicles are proposed to use the access locations along Center Ridge Road. The current development schedule expects the school to open in the Fall of Therefore, 2019 will be analyzed for the opening year conditions, and the year 2039 will be analyzed as the design year for the twenty year conditions analysis. June 5, 2017 Page 1 TMS Engineers, Inc.

13 NOT TO SCALE DEVELOPMENT SITE Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study Location Map Figure 1.1 Page 2

14 NOT TO SCALE Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study Site Plan Figure 1.2 Page 3

15 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio 1.2 Study Objectives This study is structured for the following purposes; # to adequately assess the traffic impacts associated with the proposed elementary school identify the level of off site access and traffic, # to provide a comprehensive study which evaluates and documents the traffic impacts and off site improvements, where warranted, # and to provide a technically sound basis to identify mitigation requirements to off site traffic impacts. This study documents the methodologies, findings and conclusions of the analysis, including the basis for all assumptions, traffic parameters utilized and conclusions reached. The traffic impacts will be determined by comparing the existing intersection levels of service before the development of the proposed elementary school to the anticipated levels of service after the elementary school is completed. Levels of service for the study area and access driveway intersections will be calculated using the computerized version of the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual 6 TH Edition, HCM6E (HCS7, Release 7.2). The justification for any changes to the intersection traffic control will be determined by comparing data collected of the existing traffic conditions to the criteria established by the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and professional engineering judgment from an on site field review. The Auxiliary Lane Graphs found in Section of the Location and Design Manual, Volume 1 will be used to determine the need for auxiliary turn lanes at unsignalized intersections as recommended in the Location and Design Manual, Volume 1 and the Access Management Manual. Intersection geometric design criteria will be based in the information and procedures found in the Ohio Department of Transportation s Location & Design Manual, Volume 1. June 5, 2017 Page 4 TMS Engineers, Inc.

16 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Chapter 2 Area Conditions 2.1 Transportation Network Study Area The Ohio Department of Transportation functionally classifies roadways to help define a roadway s characteristics as well as identify roadways that are eligible for federal funds. Functional classification is the grouping of roads, streets, and highways in a hierarchy based on the type of highway service they provide. Generally, streets and highways perform two types of service. They provide either traffic mobility or land access and can be ranked in terms of the proportion of service they provide. The ODOT functional classification of the roadways in the study area can be seen on ODOT s website. The following table lists the study roadways that have an assigned functional classification as determined by ODOT and local government entities. Roadways that are not listed as having a functional classification can be assigned into one of two categories. The first category is a local roadway and the second category is that of an access drive. Table 2.1 Functional Classification ROADWAY AREA FC # CLASSIFICATION Center Ridge Road (US Route 20) Urban 3 Principal Arterial Dover Center Road Urban 5 Major Collector Glenmore Drive Urban 7 Local Roadway Westown Boulevard Urban 7 Local Roadway Figure 2.1, Page 6 details the section of the functional classification map for the study area. The classification maps can currently be found online at the following ODOT web address: June 5, 2017 Page 5 TMS Engineers, Inc.

17 NOT TO SCALE DEVELOPMENT SITE Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study Functional Classification Figure 2.1 Page 6

18 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio The following table details the primary characteristics of the study area roadways: Table 2.2 Roadway Characteristics ROADWAY # OF LANES ORIENTATION SPEED LIMIT (MPH) ADT* (VPD) Center Ridge Road (US 20) 4 East West 35 18,280 Dover Center Road 2 North South 35 14,060 Glenmore Drive 2 North South Westown Boulevard 2 East West 25 1,320 * Traffic data collected in 2017 for this report/rounded to nearest 10 TH The following sections detail the lane use, traffic control, and average daily traffic at each location under study for this report. CENTER RIDGE ROAD (US 20) & DOVER CENTER ROAD Center Ridge Road West Approach Center Ridge Road East Approach 1 Exclusive Left Turn Lane 1 Exclusive Left Turn Lane 1 Through Lane 1 Through Lane 1 Shared Through & Right Turn Lane 1 Shared Through & Right Turn Lane Dover Center Road North Approach Dover Center Road South Approach 1 Exclusive Left Turn Lane 1 Exclusive Left Turn Lane 1 Shared Through & Right Turn Lane 1 Shared Through & Right Turn Lane The intersection is controlled by a traffic signal. The intersection operates with an 8 phase operation that allows permissive and protected left turns on all approaches. The left turn movements from all approaches can be made when the left turn arrow allows the movement (protected movement) or during the green ball indication when there is a gap in the opposing through traffic (permissive movement). June 5, 2017 Page 7 TMS Engineers, Inc.

19 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio CENTER RIDGE ROAD (US20) & GLENMORE DRIVE Center Ridge Road West Approach Center Ridge Road East Approach 1 Shared Through & Left Turn Lane 1 Through Lane 1 Through Lane 1 Shared Through & Right Turn Lane Glenmore Drive North Approach 1 Shared Left & Right Turn Lane The intersection is controlled by a stop sign on the Glenmore Drive approach. The Center Ridge Road approaches operate under free flow conditions with the westbound left turn movement yielding to the eastbound movements. DOVER CENTER ROAD & WESTOWN BOULEVARD Dover Center Road North Approach Dover Center Road South Approach 1 Shared Through & Right Turn Lane 1 Shared Through Lane & Left Turn Lane Westown Boulevard West Approach 1 Shared Left & Right Turn Lane The intersection is controlled by a stop sign on the Westown Boulevard approach. The Dover Center Road approaches operate under free flow conditions with the northbound left turn movement yielding to the southbound movements. Figure 2.2, Page 9 shows an aerial view of the study area. Figure 2.3, Page 10 shows the existing lane use and traffic control conditions in the study area. These will be considered the existing base conditions for this report. June 5, 2017 Page 8 TMS Engineers, Inc.

20 NOT TO SCALE Dover Center Road Glenmore Drive DEVELOPMENT SITE Westown Boulevard Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study Aerial View Figure 2.2 Page 9

21 Center Ridge Road NOT TO SCALE LEGEND STOP STOP Existing Lane Use Existing Stop Sign Existing Signal Glenmore Drive Proposed Access Westown Boulevard Proposed West Access PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Proposed South Access Proposed East Access Dover Center Road STOP Dover Center Road Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study Center Ridge Road Existing Lane Use & Traffic Control Figure 2.3 Page 10

22 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio 2.2 Traffic Weekday nine hour turning movement counts were performed at the following locations: 1. Center Ridge Road (US 20) & Dover Center Road 2. Center Ridge Road (US 20) & Glenmore Drive 3. Dover Center Road & Westown Boulevard The traffic counts were performed on Tuesday, May 9, The weekday traffic counts were conducted in fifteen (15) minute intervals between the hours of 7 AM 10 AM, 11 AM 1 PM, and 2 PM 6 PM, then hourly totals were calculated. A copy of the intersection turn movement counts are included in Appendix A. Average daily traffic was calculated for the roadways using expansion factors to account for daily and seasonal variations according to the recommendations and latest data from the Ohio Department of Transportation. The elementary school day begins at 7:50 AM and ends at 2:20 PM, therefore the report will analyze the hours of 7:30 to 8:30 AM and 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM. The 7:30 to 8:30 AM hour will be referred to as the weekday AM peak hour for the purpose of this report. The 2:00 to 3:00 PM hour will be referred to as the PM peak hour for the purpose of this report. These periods will be analyzed since they reflect the period of the highest volume of traffic flow for the proposed school. The existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2.4, Page 12. June 5, 2017 Page 11 TMS Engineers, Inc.

23 NOT TO SCALE XX (XX) LEGEND AM Peak Hour Traffic PM Peak Hour Traffic 6 (3) 878 (507) Center Ridge Road 9 (11) 25 (11) 24 (11) 483 (592) Glenmore Drive Westown Boulevard Proposed West Access PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Proposed South Access Proposed East Access Dover Center Road 62 (35) 22 (18) 25 (20) 334 (390) 176 (106) 631 (368) 55 (81) 75 (106) 275 (258) 150 (105) 8 (13) 478 (454) Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study 106 (133) 328 (271) 116 (84) Center Ridge Road 233 (92) 350 (367) 82 (76) Existing Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Dover Center Road Figure 2.4 Page 12

24 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Chapter 3 Projected Traffic Conditions 3.1 Site Traffic Trip Generation Calculating future total driveway trips requires an estimate of the traffic generated by the proposed development. The most widely accepted method of determining the amount of traffic that the proposed development will generate is to compare the proposed land use with existing facilities of the same use. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) has prepared a manual titled Trip Generation Manual, which is a compilation of similar traffic generation studies to aide in making such a comparison. The most recent update of this manual is the 9 TH edition and was utilized for this study. The proposed development is expected to consist of a pre kindergarten through fourth grade elementary school. The school is expected to have a student population of 1,450 students and 120 staff. The following table details the development land use from the site plan (Figure 1.2) and the corresponding ITE land use that will be used to forecast the site generated traffic volumes for the Build conditions: Table 3.1 ITE Land Use Codes SITE PLAN LAND USE ITE ITE DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION PK 4 School Institutional 520 Elementary School June 5, 2017 Page 13 TMS Engineers, Inc.

25 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio The following tables detail the development generated traffic volumes based on the previously described methods as outlined in the (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook. Calculations were prepared based on the number of students and the number of staff. The volume of site generated trips was higher using the number of staff for the school and will therefore be used in the analysis. Copies of the trip generation worksheets can be seen in Appendix B. Table 3.3 Net Trip Generation ITE TRIP GENERATION TRIP ENDS ITE Code Land Use Description SIZE (Staff) AM Peak Hour of Generator PM Peak Hour of Generator (Enter/Exit) (Enter/Exit) 520 Elementary School TOTAL NEW GENERATED TRIPS Distribution of Generated Traffic The directional distribution for the new generated traffic is a function of the prevailing operating conditions on the existing roadways. The distribution pattern that was assumed is shown in the tables that follow and are based upon the existing traffic volumes at the intersection of Center Ridge Road and Dover Center Road during the AM and PM analysis hours shown in Figure 2.4. Table 3.4 AM Trip Origins and Destinations ORIGIN/ DESTINATION ROUTE FROM % TOTAL NEW TRIPS TO % TOTAL NEW TRIPS North Dover Center % % 105 South Dover Center % % 59 East Center Ridge % % 128 West Center Ridge % % 76 TOTALS % % 368 June 5, 2017 Page 14 TMS Engineers, Inc.

26 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Table 3.5 PM Trip Origins and Destinations ORIGIN/ DESTINATION ROUTE FROM % TOTAL NEW TRIPS TO % TOTAL NEW TRIPS North Dover Center % % 51 South Dover Center % % 46 East Center Ridge % % 61 West Center Ridge % % 67 TOTALS % % 225 The directional distribution for the new AM and PM peak hour generated traffic passenger vehicle trips are shown graphically in Figure 3.1, Page 16. The directional distribution for the new AM and PM peak hour generated school bus trips are shown graphically in Figure 3.2, Page 17. Assignment of Generated Traffic Based upon the distribution patterns shown in Figures 3.1 & 3.2, the new AM and PM peak generated traffic were assigned to the study intersections. The assignments of the estimated new generated passenger vehicle traffic for the proposed elementary school are shown graphically in Figure 3.3, Page 18. The assignments of the estimated new generated school bus traffic for the proposed elementary school are shown graphically in Figure 3.4, Page 19. June 5, 2017 Page 15 TMS Engineers, Inc.

27 NOT TO SCALE XX (XX) LEGEND AM Peak Hour Distribution PM Peak Hour Distribution 34% (27%) Center Ridge Road RED = Entering Volumes GREEN = Exiting Volumes Glenmore Drive 20% (30%) Westown Boulevard Proposed West Access 34% (27%) PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 20% (30%) 66% (73%) Proposed South Access Proposed East Access 80% (70%) 66% (73%) Dover Center Road 16% (20%) 29% (23%) 35% (27%) 16% (20%) 19% (23%) 21% (24%) Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study 21% (24%) Center Ridge Road 26% (26%) New Generated Traffic Distribution Dover Center Road Figure 3.1 Page 16

28 NOT TO SCALE XX (XX) LEGEND AM Peak Hour Distribution PM Peak Hour Distribution 34% (27%) Center Ridge Road RED = Entering Volumes GREEN = Exiting Volumes Glenmore Drive Dover Center Road 21% (24%) Westown Boulevard 84% (80%) 16% (20%) 100% (100%) 100% (100%) 79% (76%) Proposed West Access PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Proposed South Access Proposed East Access Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study 20% (30%) 29% (23%) 35% (27%) Center Ridge Road 34% (27%) 34% (27%) 34% (27%) 20% (30%) 20% (30%) 20% (30%) 26% (26%) 19% (23%) New Generated Traffic Distribution School Buses Dover Center Road Figure 3.2 Page 17

29 NOT TO SCALE LEGEND XX AM Peak Hour Trips (XX) PM Peak Hour Trips RED = Entering Volumes GREEN = Exiting Volumes NEW GENERATED TRAFFIC TOTAL TRIPS ENTER EXIT AM PM (40) Center Ridge Road 69 (58) Glenmore Drive Westown Boulevard Proposed West Access 134 (40) PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 69 (58) 267 (106) Proposed South Access Proposed East Access 269 (137) 267 (106) Dover Center Road 54 (39) 97 (45) 118 (53) 54 (39) 78 (33) 86 (35) 86 (35) Center Ridge Road 103 (38) Dover Center Road Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study New Generated Traffic Passenger Vehicles Figure 3.3 Page 18

30 NOT TO SCALE Dover Center Road 6 (7) Westown Boulevard 25 (24) 5 (6) LEGEND XX AM Peak Hour Trips (XX) PM Peak Hour Trips RED = Entering Volumes GREEN = Exiting Volumes 30 (30) 30 (30) 24 (23) Proposed West Access PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Proposed South Access NEW GENERATED TRAFFIC TOTAL TRIPS ENTER EXIT Proposed East Access AM PM (9) 9 (7) 10 (8) 10 (8) 10 (8) 10 (8) 10 (8) Center Ridge Road 6 (9) 6 (9) 6 (9) 8 (8) 6 (7) Glenmore Drive Dover Center Road Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study Center Ridge Road New Generated Traffic School Buses Figure 3.4 Page 19

31 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio 3.2 Non Site Traffic Background Traffic Growth Usually the design of new roadways or improvements to existing roadways should not be based on current traffic volumes alone, but should consider future traffic volumes expected to make use of the facilities. Roadways should be designed to accommodate the traffic volume that is likely to occur within the design life of the facility. In a practical sense, this design volume should be a value that can be estimated with reasonable accuracy. It is believed that the maximum design period is in the range of 15 to 24 years. Therefore, a period of twenty years is widely used as a basis for design. Traffic cannot usually be forecasted accurately beyond this period on a specific facility because of probable changes in the general regional economy, population, and land development along the roadway. The ODOT Access Management Manual requires that opening year and twenty year design hour traffic volumes be analyzed for a proposed development. Roadways, like those found in the study area, carry a significant amount of through traffic due to their functional characteristics. This through traffic component generally increases as regional growth occurs. Therefore, it is anticipated that existing traffic on the study area roadways will increase in future years. Any recommended improvements for these intersections should adequately handle the transportation needs of the intersections for twenty years from the opening of the project based upon sound engineering practice and the likelihood of traffic growth due to the functional characteristics of the roadways. The elementary school is expected to be open in the Fall of The years 2019 and 2039 will be analyzed for the proposed elementary school. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate historical growth rates in order to establish the future traffic on the study area roadways due to non site related conditions. The ODOT Traffic Monitoring Management System (TMMS) was consulted to determine past historical trends on the study area roadways. The ODOT Traffic Monitoring Management System (TMMS) can be currently accessed at the following web address: June 5, 2017 Page 20 TMS Engineers, Inc.

32 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio The TMMS provided data at the following location that was used to determine the study area growth rates: 1. Center Ridge Road (US 20) East of Canterbury Location ID Center Ridge Road (US 20) East of Bradley Location ID Dover Center Road North of Lorain Location Dover Center Road North of Hilliard Location The intersection of Center Ridge Road and Dover Center Road had also been previously counted by TMS Engineers, Inc. in the years 2007, 2012, 2014, and 2016 Based on the collected historical traffic data, a linear growth rate of 1.00% per year will be used to determine the anticipated study area volumes under the 2019 and 2039 No Build conditions for Center Ridge Road (US 20) and Dover Center Road. No growth rate will be applied to the local roadways, local access driveways, and turning movements at the intersections. A linear growth rate was utilized to estimate non site related traffic growth. These growth rates will be applied to the existing traffic volumes (Figure 2.4). The growth rate and factors for the study area roadways can be seen in the following table: Table 3.5 Growth Rates & Factors ROADWAY GROWTH RATE (Annual Growth) 2019 GROWTH FACTOR 2039 GROWTH FACTOR Center Ridge Road (US 20) 1.00% Dover Center Road 1.00% June 5, 2017 Page 21 TMS Engineers, Inc.

33 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Design Hour Traffic The traffic patterns on any roadway typically show considerable variation in the traffic volumes experienced during the various hours of the day and in the hourly volumes experienced throughout the year. A key decision in the design process involves determining which of these hourly traffic volumes should be used as the basis for the design. It would be wasteful to predicate a design on the maximum peak hour traffic that occurs during the year and the use of the average hourly traffic would result in an inadequate design. The hourly traffic volumes used in a design should not be exceeded very often or by very much. On the other side of the spectrum, the hourly traffic volumes should not be so high that traffic would rarely be sufficient to make full use of the designed facility. Normal design policy in the State of Ohio is based upon a review of curves that depict the variation in hourly traffic volumes during the year. The Ohio Department of Transportation recommends using the 30 TH highest hour as a design control for urban streets. There is typically very little difference between the volumes in this range. The Ohio Department of Transportation provides factors or a methodology to determine factors that are applied to counted daily traffic volumes to determine appropriate design hour traffic volumes. Following guidelines set forth in the ODOT Access Management Manual, all analyses are required to examine the design hour volume for the adjacent roadway and peak hour traffic volume of the proposed development. The ODOT Certified Traffic Manual provides the methods for estimating design hour volumes. The preferred method is to compute the ratio of the peak hour volume against the daily traffic volume for the study area roadways. A K factor is then selected from available ODOT data for routes with the same functional classification and a similar ADT. The selected K factor is then divided by the ratio to determine the DHV factor that will be used to compute the design hour volumes. For roadways without comparable site specific data, the design hour factor is determined using the ODOT Peak Hour to Design Hour charts. These charts are based on the functional classification of the roadway, the day of the week and the month that the traffic data was collected. K factors were determined using site specific data available on the ODOT Traffic Monitoring June 5, 2017 Page 22 TMS Engineers, Inc.

34 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Management System (TMMS). The ODOT TMMS can currently be found at the following web address: For Center Ridge Road (US 20), data was available at Location ID The location is east of Dover Center Road. The location had an AADT of 12,944 vehicles per day in 2016 with a DHV 30 of 1,275 vehicles. The available data yields a K factor of For Dover Center Road, data was available at Location ID The location is south of Center Ridge Road. The location had an AADT of 13,509 vehicles per day in 2016 with a DHV 30 of 1,389 vehicles. The available data yields a K factor of The following table details the calculation of the design hour factors for Center Ridge Road and Dover Center Road: Table 3.6 DHV Factor Calculations LOCATION PEAK HOUR VOLUME ADT RATIO K FACTOR DHV FACTOR * Center Ridge Road (US 20) 1,691 18, Dover Center Road 1,322 14, * If the resultant value is less than 1.00, the peak hour volumes should be used as the design hour volumes making the DHV factor The remaining roadways in the study area were determined to lack comparable site specific data as compared to the available data and the ODOT K & D Reports in order to use the preferred method of using site specific data. The ODOT Peak Hour to Design Hour charts will be used to determine the design hour factors for the study area roadways. Glenmore Drive and Westown Boulevard are urban local roadways that were counted on a Tuesday in May. The roadways have a design hour factor of June 5, 2017 Page 23 TMS Engineers, Inc.

35 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio 3.3 Future Traffic No Build Condition In order to estimate the future traffic considering non project traffic conditions, the previously discussed calculation of design hour factors and growth rates for each movement were applied to the existing 2017 traffic volumes shown in Figure 2.4. The estimated 2019 and 2039 No Build traffic volumes for the study area are shown graphically in Figures 3.5 and 3.6, Pages 25 and 26. This traffic is the expected traffic if the proposed elementary school is not constructed, the No Build condition. The No Build traffic volumes have been rounded to the nearest 10 to adhere to preferred ODOT practices. Build Condition In order to estimate the future traffic considering project traffic conditions, the sum of the 2019 and 2039 No Build volumes, shown in Figures 3.5 and 3.6, were added to the new generated traffic to equal the future Build analysis hour volumes. The estimated 2019 and 2039 Build traffic volumes for the study area are shown graphically in Figures 3.7 and 3.8, Pages 27 and 28 for the proposed elementary school. These traffic volumes are the expected volumes if the proposed elementary school is constructed, or the Build condition. June 5, 2017 Page 24 TMS Engineers, Inc.

36 NOT TO SCALE XX (XX) LEGEND AM Peak Hour Traffic PM Peak Hour Traffic 10 (10) 950 (550) Center Ridge Road 10 (10) 30 (10) 30 (10) 520 (640) Glenmore Drive Westown Boulevard Proposed West Access PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Proposed South Access Proposed East Access Dover Center Road 70 (40) 30 (20) 30 (20) 370 (430) 190 (120) 680 (440) 60 (90) 80 (120) 310 (290) 170 (120) 10 (10) 530 (510) Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study 120 (150) 370 (300) 130 (90) Center Ridge Road 250 (100) 380 (400) 90 (80) 2019 No Build Weekday Traffic Volumes Dover Center Road Figure 3.5 Page 25

37 NOT TO SCALE XX (XX) LEGEND AM Peak Hour Traffic PM Peak Hour Traffic 10 (10) 1140 (660) Center Ridge Road 10 (10) 30 (10) 30 (10) 630 (770) Glenmore Drive Westown Boulevard Proposed West Access PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Proposed South Access Proposed East Access Dover Center Road 70 (40) 30 (20) 30 (20) 440 (520) 230 (140) 820 (480) 70 (110) 100 (140) 370 (340) 200 (140) 10 (10) 640 (600) Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study 140 (180) 440 (360) 150 (110) Center Ridge Road 300 (120) 450 (480) 110 (100) 2039 No Build Weekday Traffic Volumes Dover Center Road Figure 3.6 Page 26

38 NOT TO SCALE 10 (10) 1094 (598) Center Ridge Road 10 (10) 30 (10) 30 (10) 595 (707) Glenmore Drive Westown Boulevard Proposed West Access 990 (568) 134 (40) 0 (0) 100 (60) 0 (0) 30 (30) PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 69 (58) 0 (0) 556 (659) 267 (106) 30 (30) 40 (30) Proposed South Access Proposed East Access 269 (137) 990 (568) 0 (0) 823 (765) Dover Center Road 95 (64) 35 (26) 54 (43) 424 (469) 287 (165) 798 (453) 124 (137) 158 (153) 316 (297) 170 (120) 16 (17) 616 (545) Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study 212 (194) 379 (307) 140 (98) Center Ridge Road 250 (100) 483 (438) 98 (88) 2019 Build Weekday Traffic Dover Center Road Figure 3.7 Page 27

39 NOT TO SCALE 10 (10) 1284 (708) Center Ridge Road 10 (10) 30 (10) 30 (10) 705 (837) Glenmore Drive Westown Boulevard Proposed West Access 1180 (678) 134 (40) 0 (0) 100 (60) 0 (0) 30 (30) PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 69 (58) 0 (0) 666 (789) 267 (106) 30 (30) 40 (30) Proposed South Access Proposed East Access 269 (137) 1180 (678) 0 (0) 933 (895) Dover Center Road 95 (64) 35 (26) 54 (43) 494 (559) 327 (185) 938 (533) 134 (157) 178 (173) 376 (347) 200 (140) 16 (17) 726 (635) Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study 232 (224) 449 (367) 150 (118) Center Ridge Road 300 (120) 553 (518) 118 (108) 2039 Build Weekday Traffic Dover Center Road Figure 3.8 Page 28

40 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis 4.1 Capacity and LOS at Study Area Intersections Intersection capacity analyses were performed at the study intersection using the procedures outlined in the computerized version of the Transportation Research Board s Highway Capacity Manual 6 TH Edition, HCM6E (HCS7, Release 7.2). The capacity analyses were performed in order to estimate the maximum amount of traffic that can be accommodated by a roadway facility while maintaining recommended operational qualities. Existing, No Build, and Build analysis hour traffic volumes were analyzed to determine the level of service (LOS) at the study area intersections. The capacity analysis procedures provide a calculated average vehicle delay, which is based on traffic volumes, number of lanes, type of traffic control, channelization, grade, and percentage of large vehicles in the traffic stream at each intersection. The average delay calculated at an intersection is then assigned a grade or level of service (LOS) ranging from LOS A, the best, to LOS F, the worst based upon driver expectation. The intersection LOS grades as defined by the Transportation Research Board are as follows: Table 4.1 Intersection LOS LOS UNSIGNALIZED AVERAGE DELAY PER VEHICLE (sec) SIGNALIZED AVERAGE DELAY PER VEHICLE (sec) A # 10.0 # 10.0 B 10.1 to to 20.0 C 15.1 to to 35.0 D 25.1 to to 55.0 E 35.1 to to 80.0 F > 50 > 80 The capacity analysis procedures and the resulting level of service grades and delays are a recognized traffic engineering standard for measuring the efficiency of intersection operations by such organizations as the Institute of Transportation Engineers, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, and the Ohio Department of Transportation. June 5, 2017 Page 29 TMS Engineers, Inc.

41 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Existing Conditions 2017 Capacity Analysis Analyses were performed for the existing 2017 conditions. All analyses will assume that the signal timing would be optimized to balance critical lane delays at the signalized intersection. The traffic volumes used in the analysis can be seen in Figure 2.4. Copies of the capacity worksheets are included in Appendix C. The results of the Year 2017 Existing Conditions analysis are shown in the following table: Table Levels of Service (Existing Conditions) LOCATION TRAFFIC CONTROL MOVEMENT AM PEAK LOS (DELAY) PM PEAK LOS (DELAY) Center Ridge & Dover Center Traffic Signal Intersection C (31.6) C (27.7) Eastbound C (33.3) C (27.7) Westbound C (32.0) C (28.3) Northbound C (32.3) C (27.0) Southbound C (27.5) C (27.6) Center Ridge & Glenmore Stop Sign Eastbound Left A (8.6) A (8.9) Southbound C (19.9) C (15.2) Dover Center & Westown Stop Sign Eastbound C (18.8) C (17.5) Northbound Left A (8.1) A (8.3) (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The study area intersections and approaches are operating with acceptable levels of service under the 2017 existing conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. June 5, 2017 Page 30 TMS Engineers, Inc.

42 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio No Build Conditions 2019 Capacity Analysis Analyses were performed for the projected 2019 opening day conditions under the No Build scenario. These analyses will be used to compare to the conditions expected under the Build scenario. All analyses will assume that the signal timing would be optimized to balance critical lane delays at the signalized intersection. The traffic volumes used in the analysis can be seen in Figure 3.5. Copies of the capacity worksheets are included in Appendix D. The results of the Year 2019 No Build analysis are shown in the following table: Table Levels of Service (No Build Conditions) LOCATION TRAFFIC CONTROL MOVEMENT AM PEAK LOS (DELAY) PM PEAK LOS (DELAY) Center Ridge & Dover Center Traffic Signal Intersection D (35.5) C (29.1) Eastbound D (38.8) C (29.2) Westbound D (35.2) C (29.9) Northbound D (35.7) C (27.9) Southbound C (30.4) C (29.1) Center Ridge & Glenmore Stop Sign Eastbound Left A (8.8) A (9.0) Southbound C (23.4) C (16.5) Dover Center & Westown Stop Sign Eastbound C (22.3) C (19.9) Northbound Left A (8.3) A (8.4) (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The study area intersections and approaches are expected to operate with acceptable levels of service under the expected 2019 No Build conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. June 5, 2017 Page 31 TMS Engineers, Inc.

43 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio No Build Conditions 2039 Capacity Analysis Analyses were performed for the projected 2039 design year conditions under the No Build scenario. These analyses will be used to compare to the conditions expected under the Build scenario. All analyses will assume that the signal timing would be optimized to balance critical lane delays at the signalized intersection. The traffic volumes used in the analysis can be seen in Figure 3.6. Copies of the capacity worksheets are included in Appendix E. The results of the Year 2039 No Build analysis are shown in the following table: Table Levels of Service (No Build Conditions) LOCATION TRAFFIC CONTROL MOVEMENT AM PEAK LOS (DELAY) PM PEAK LOS (DELAY) Center Ridge & Dover Center Traffic Signal Intersection E (57.0) C (33.2) Eastbound E (61.4) C (32.9) Westbound E (60.8) C (33.7) Northbound E (59.3) C (33.6) Southbound D (42.5) C (32.7) Center Ridge & Glenmore Stop Sign Eastbound Left A (9.2) A (9.6) Southbound D (32.5) C (20.1) Dover Center & Westown Stop Sign Eastbound D (30.6) D (25.6) Northbound Left A (8.5) A (8.7) (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The intersection of Center Ridge Road and Dover Center Road was determined to be operating with poor levels of service and high delay under the expected 2039 No Build conditions during the AM peak hour. The remaining intersections were determined to be operating with acceptable levels of service under the expected 2039 No Build conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. June 5, 2017 Page 32 TMS Engineers, Inc.

44 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio In order to determine what mitigation would be necessary to improve the levels of service at the intersection of Center Ridge Road and Dover Center Road, certain improvements were tested with further capacity analyses. The following improvements are recommended to mitigate the anticipated poor levels of service under the 2039 No Build conditions: # Construct a westbound right turn lane. # Construct a northbound right turn lane. The following table shows the capacity analysis results of implementing the proposed improvements. Copies of the capacity worksheets for the improved intersection are in included in Appendix F. Table Levels of Service (No Build Conditions Recommended Improvements) LOCATION TRAFFIC CONTROL MOVEMENT AM PEAK LOS (DELAY) PM PEAK LOS (DELAY) Center Ridge & Dover Center Traffic Signal Intersection C (34.2) C (29.9) Eastbound C (39.0) C (32.9) Westbound C (26.4) C (28.4) Northbound C (30.8) C (26.2) Southbound D (39.8) C (31.8) (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle June 5, 2017 Page 33 TMS Engineers, Inc.

45 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Build Condition 2019 Capacity Analysis Analyses were performed for the projected 2019 opening day Build conditions. The analyses will be used to determine the future levels of service at the study intersections under the anticipated Build conditions. All analyses will assume that the signal timing would be optimized to balance critical lane delays at the signalized intersection. The intersections analyzed in this section only include the intersections that do not provide direct access to the development site. The traffic volumes used in the analysis can be seen in Figure 3.7. Copies of the capacity worksheets are included in Appendix G. The results of the 2019 Build analyses are shown in the following tables: Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions) LOCATION TRAFFIC CONTROL MOVEMENT AM PEAK LOS (DELAY) PM PEAK LOS (DELAY) Center Ridge & Dover Center Traffic Signal Intersection D (52.4) C (31.6) Eastbound D (49.5) C (32.3) Westbound D (53.1) C (31.5) Northbound E (56.0) C (30.5) Southbound D (52.8) C (31.8) Center Ridge & Glenmore Stop Sign Eastbound Left A (9.0) A (9.3) Southbound D (29.4) C (18.1) Dover Center & Westown Stop Sign Eastbound E (46.9) D (34.1) Northbound Left A (9.1) A (9.4) (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The northbound approach at the intersection of Center Ridge Road and Dover Center is expected to operate with a poor level of service during the AM peak hour under the expected 2019 Build conditions. The eastbound approach at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard is expected to operate with a poor level of service during the AM peak hour under the expected 2019 Build conditions. June 5, 2017 Page 34 TMS Engineers, Inc.

46 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio A comparison was performed to show the incremental effects on the capacity of the study area intersections due to the development of the proposed elementary school and to identify where improvements may be necessary to accommodate Build traffic. The following tables show a side by side comparison of the Build versus No Build conditions for the 2019 AM and PM peak hours. Table No Build vs Build Scenario AM Peak Hour Comparison Table LOCATION (TRAFFIC CONTROL) MOVEMENT NO BUILD LOS (DELAY) BUILD LOS (DELAY) DIFFERENCE + / Center Ridge & Dover Center Intersection D (35.5) D (52.4) (Traffic Signal) Eastbound D (38.8) D (49.5) Westbound D (35.2) D (53.1) Northbound D (35.7) E (56.0) Southbound C (30.4) D (52.8) Center Ridge & Glenmore Eastbound Left A (8.8) A (9.0) +0.2 (Stop Sign) Southbound C (23.4) D (29.4) +6.0 Dover Center & Westown Eastbound C (22.3) E (46.9) (Stop Sign) Northbound Left A (8.3) A (9.1) +0.8 (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The 2019 AM peak hour comparison tables indicate the approach and intersection delays are impacted with the addition of the development generated traffic under the 2019 AM peak hour conditions. The intersection of Center Ridge Road and Dover Center Road experiences increased delay in excess of 20 seconds for the northbound and southbound approaches. The northbound approach is also expected to degrade to level of service E. The eastbound approach at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard is expected to degrade to a level of service E under the expected Build conditions during the AM peak hour. The poor level of service can be attributed to the lack of adequate gaps in the north south through traffic stream and the site generated school bus traffic on the Westown Boulevard approach. June 5, 2017 Page 35 TMS Engineers, Inc.

47 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Table No Build vs Build Scenario PM Peak Hour Comparison Table LOCATION (TRAFFIC CONTROL) MOVEMENT NO BUILD LOS (DELAY) BUILD LOS (DELAY) DIFFERENCE + / Center Ridge & Dover Center Intersection C (29.1) C (31.6) +2.5 (Traffic Signal) Eastbound C (29.2) C (32.3) +3.1 Westbound C (29.9) C (31.5) +1.6 Northbound C (27.9) C (30.5) +2.6 Southbound C (29.1) C (31.8) +2.7 Center Ridge & Glenmore Eastbound Left A (9.0) A (9.3) +0.3 (Stop Sign) Southbound C (16.5) C (18.1) +1.6 Dover Center & Westown Eastbound C (19.9) D (34.1) (Stop Sign) Northbound Left A (8.4) A (9.4) +1.0 (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The 2019 PM peak hour comparison tables indicate the approach and intersection delays are only minimally impacted with the addition of the development generated traffic under the 2019 PM peak hour conditions. The intersection and approach levels of service remain unchanged from the No Build to Build conditions with the exception of the eastbound approach at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard. The level of service is expected to degrade from an LOS C to and LOS D. Based on these results improvements are necessary to the intersections of Dover Center Road at Center Ridge Road and Westown Boulevard with the site generated traffic under the 2019 opening year conditions. In order to determine what mitigation would be necessary to improve the delay experienced and the levels of service at these intersections, certain improvements were tested with further capacity analyses. The following improvements were determined to mitigate the anticipated poor levels ofservice and/or lessen the delay experienced under the 2019 Build conditions: Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road # Construct a westbound right turn lane. June 5, 2017 Page 36 TMS Engineers, Inc.

48 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Dover Center Road & Westown Boulevard # Stripe the eastbound approach for separate left and right turn lanes. OR # Install a roundabout. OR # Install traffic signal control. The existing width of Westown Boulevard at Dover Center Road is approximately 36 feet wide. The roadway could be striped for three 12 foot lanes. The lanes would consist of one westbound ingress lane, one eastbound left turn lane, and one eastbound right turn lane. It should be noted that the addition of a second lane may create a situation where side by side turning vehicles stopped on Westown Boulevard may block the other vehicles view of oncoming traffic along Dover Center Road. The construction of a roundabout at the intersection would likely require road widening on Dover Center Road to accommodate the diameter of the roundabout and the splitter islands on the north and south approaches. These improvements would likely require the replacement of the bridge on the south approach to accommodate the widening. The construction of a roundabout and the replacement of the bridge would result in this being a high cost improvement. The following table shows the capacity analysis results of implementing the proposed improvements. Copies of the capacity worksheets for the improved intersections are in included in Appendix H. June 5, 2017 Page 37 TMS Engineers, Inc.

49 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions Recommended Improvements) LOCATION TRAFFIC CONTROL MOVEMENT AM PEAK LOS (DELAY) PM PEAK LOS (DELAY) Center Ridge & Dover Center Traffic Signal Intersection D (43.3) C (30.4) Eastbound D (49.4) C (32.0) Westbound C (27.7) C (27.3) Northbound D (49.8) C (30.5) Southbound D (44.6) C (31.8) Dover Center & Westown Stop Sign Eastbound Left E (49.0) E (37.6) (EB RTL & LTL) Eastbound Right C (22.3) B (12.6) Eastbound E (41.8) D (30.4) Northbound A (9.1) A (9.4) Dover Center & Westown Roundabout Intersection A (8.8) A (8.0) Eastbound A (7.7) A (8.0) Northbound B (10.5) A (8.6) Southbound A (7.0) A (7.4) Dover Center & Westown Traffic Signal Intersection C (20.4) C (20.3) Eastbound C (22.0) C (20.7) Northbound C (21.9) C (20.7) Southbound B (18.0) B (19.7) (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The installation of a roundabout or traffic signal control at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard is expected to allow the intersection to operate with level of service C or better. The striping of the eastbound approach for separate left and right turn lanes is still expected to result in level of service E, however the overall delay has been reduced and with the exclusive left turn lane the right turn vehicles will not be blocked by a vehicle waiting to make a left turn. June 5, 2017 Page 38 TMS Engineers, Inc.

50 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Dover Center Road & Westown Boulevard 2019 Build Conditions The anticipated 2019 Build traffic conditions at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard were analyzed and compared to the criteria established by the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and professional engineering judgement to determine if traffic signal control is warranted at the intersection. All of the data collected and determined for this study was analyzed and compared to the thresholds established by the criteria from the OMUTCD. Warrants 1 9 were evaluated for this analysis of the expected 2019 Build conditions. In order to determine if the 2019 anticipated build conditions are expected to meet one of these warrants, the existing hourly volumes were multiplied by the previously discussed growth rate to determine the future 2019 Build conditions. The site generated traffic was added to the peak hours. No additional traffic was added to the remaining hours. It should be noted that the design hour factors have not been included in the signal warrant volume calculations. Based upon the evaluation of the warrants established by the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, we conclude that a traffic signal is not justified at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard as required by the Ohio Revised Code based upon the expected 2019 Build conditions. Copies of the traffic signal warrant analysis worksheets can be found in Appendix I. June 5, 2017 Page 39 TMS Engineers, Inc.

51 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Build Condition 2039 Capacity Analysis Analyses were performed for the projected 2039 design year Build conditions under the Site Plan scenario. The analyses will be used to determine the future levels of service at the study intersections under the anticipated build conditions. All analyses will assume that the signal timing would be optimized to balance critical lane delays at the signalized intersection. The intersections analyzed in this section only include the intersections that do not provide access to the development. The traffic volumes used in the analysis can be seen in Figure 3.8. Copies of the capacity worksheets are included in Appendix J. The results of the 2039 Build analyses are shown in the following table: Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions) LOCATION TRAFFIC CONTROL MOVEMENT AM PEAK LOS (DELAY) PM PEAK LOS (DELAY) Center Ridge & Dover Center Traffic Signal Intersection E (61.1) D (35.1) Eastbound F (85.0) D (40.9) Westbound C (32.5) C (31.0) Northbound D (44.7) C (29.2) Southbound E (71.6) D (38.4) Center Ridge & Glenmore Stop Sign Eastbound Left A (9.5) A (9.9) Southbound E (42.8) C (22.4) Dover Center & Westown Stop Sign Eastbound F (87.3) F (50.3) Northbound Left A (9.4) A (9.7) (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The study area intersections are expected to operate with acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours under the expected 2039 Build conditions. June 5, 2017 Page 40 TMS Engineers, Inc.

52 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio A comparison was performed to show the incremental effects on the capacity of the study area intersections due to the development of the proposed development and to identify where improvements may be necessary to accommodate Build traffic. The following tables show a side by side comparison of the Build versus No Build conditions for the 2039 AM and PM peak hours. Table No Build vs Build Scenario AM Peak Hour Comparison Table LOCATION (TRAFFIC CONTROL) MOVEMENT NO BUILD LOS (DELAY) BUILD LOS (DELAY) DIFFERENCE + / Center Ridge & Dover Center Intersection C (34.2) E (61.1) (Traffic Signal) Eastbound C (39.0) F (85.0) Westbound C (26.4) C (32.5) +6.1 Northbound C (30.8) D (44.7) Southbound D (39.8) E (71.6) Center Ridge & Glenmore Eastbound Left A (9.2) A (9.5) +0.3 (Stop Sign) Southbound D (32.5) E (42.8) Dover Center & Westown Eastbound D (25.4) F (87.3) (Stop Sign) Northbound Left A (8.5) A (9.4) +0.9 (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The 2039 AM peak hour comparison table indicates that the approach and intersection delays are impacted with the addition of the development generated traffic under the 2039 peak hour conditions. The intersection of Center Ridge Road and Dover Center Road experiences increased delay in excess of 20 seconds for the eastbound and southbound approaches. The eastbound approach at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard is expected to degrade to a level of service F under the expected Build conditions during the AM peak hour. The poor level of service can be attributed to the lack of adequate gaps in the north south through traffic stream and the site generated school bus traffic on the Westown Boulevard approach. June 5, 2017 Page 41 TMS Engineers, Inc.

53 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Table No Build vs Build Scenario PM Peak Hour Comparison Table LOCATION (TRAFFIC CONTROL) MOVEMENT NO BUILD LOS (DELAY) BUILD LOS (DELAY) DIFFERENCE + / Center Ridge & Dover Center Intersection C (29.9) D (35.1) +5.2 (Traffic Signal) Eastbound C (32.9) D (40.9) +8.0 Westbound C (28.4) C (31.0) +2.4 Northbound C (26.2) C (29.2) +3.0 Southbound C (31.8) D (38.4) +6.6 Center Ridge & Glenmore Eastbound Left A (9.6) A (9.9) +0.3 (Stop Sign) Southbound C (20.1) C (22.4) +2.3 Dover Center & Westown Eastbound C (21.4) F (50.3) (Stop Sign) Northbound Left A (8.7) A (9.7) +1.0 (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The 2039 PM peak hour comparison tables indicate the approach and intersection delays are only minimally impacted with the addition of the development generated traffic under the 2019 PM peak hour conditions with the exception of the eastbound approach at the Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard intersection. Based on these results improvements are necessary to all three study area intersections due to the site generated traffic under the 2039 opening year conditions. In order to determine what mitigation would be necessary to improve the levels of service at these intersections, certain improvements were tested with further capacity analyses. The following improvements are recommended to mitigate the anticipated poor levels of service under the 2039 Build conditions: Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road # Construct a southbound right turn lane. June 5, 2017 Page 42 TMS Engineers, Inc.

54 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Center Ridge Road & Glenmore Drive # Construct an exclusive southbound left turn lane. The addition of a separate left turn lane is still expected to result in a poor level of service, however the overall delay will be reduced and with the exclusive left turn lane the right turn vehicles will not be blocked by a vehicle waiting to make a left turn. It should be noted that the addition of a second lane may create a situation where side by side turning vehicles may block the other vehicles view of oncoming traffic. The intersection is not expected to meet the minimum side street volume thresholds for the OMUTCD traffic signal warrant criteria. Glenmore Drive has a peak volume of 50 vehicles in the 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM hour. The minimum side street volume for Warrant 1 (8 Hour Vehicular Volume) is 150 vehicles for Condition A and 75 vehicles for Condition. The minimum side street volume for Warrant 2 (4 Hour Vehicular Volume) is 80 vehicles. Dover Center Road & Westown Boulevard # Stripe the eastbound approach for separate left and right turn lanes. OR # Install a roundabout. OR # Install traffic signal control. The existing width of Westown Boulevard at Dover Center Road is approximately 36 feet wide. The roadway could be striped for three 12 foot lanes. The lanes would consist of one westbound ingress lane, one eastbound left turn lane, and one eastbound right turn lane. The striping of the eastbound approach for separate left and right turn lanes is still expected to result in a poor level of service, however the overall delay will be reduced and with the exclusive left turn lane the right turn vehicles will not be blocked by a vehicle waiting to make a left turn. The construction of a roundabout at the intersection would likely require road widening on Dover Center Road to accommodate the diameter of the roundabout and the splitter islands on the north and south approaches. These improvements would likely require the replacement of the bridge on the south approach to accommodate the widening. The construction of a roundabout and the replacement of the bridge would result in this being a high cost improvement. The following table shows the capacity analysis results of implementing the proposed improvements. Copies of the capacity worksheets for the improved intersections are in included in Appendix K. June 5, 2017 Page 43 TMS Engineers, Inc.

55 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions Recommended Improvements) LOCATION TRAFFIC CONTROL MOVEMENT AM PEAK LOS (DELAY) PM PEAK LOS (DELAY) Center Ridge & Dover Center Traffic Signal Intersection D (40.7) C (28.2) Eastbound D (50.3) C (29.9) Westbound C (27.6) C (25.0) Northbound D (42.6) C (30.0) Southbound D (37.6) C (27.4) Center Ridge & Glenmore Stop Sign Eastbound A (9.5) A (9.9) Southbound Left F (51.2) D (32.0) Southbound Right B (11.1) B (11.7) Southbound E (41.2) C (21.9) Dover Center & Westown Stop Sign Eastbound Left F (87.9) F (55.2) (EB RTL & LTL) Eastbound Right D (29.5) D (26.7) Eastbound F (72.1) E (47.0) Northbound A (9.4) A (9.7) Dover Center & Westown Roundabout Intersection B (10.7) A (9.3) Eastbound A (8.5) A (9.1) Northbound B (13.3) B (10.1) Southbound A (7.8) A (8.5) Dover Center & Westown Traffic Signal Intersection C (20.8) C (20.9) Eastbound C (22.8) C (21.2) Northbound C (23.0) C (21.4) Southbound B (17.2) C (20.3) (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle June 5, 2017 Page 44 TMS Engineers, Inc.

56 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Dover Center Road & Westown Boulevard 2039 Build Conditions The anticipated 2039 Build traffic conditions at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard were analyzed and compared to the criteria established by the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and professional engineering judgement to determine if traffic signal control is warranted at the intersection. All of the data collected and determined for this study was analyzed and compared to the thresholds established by the criteria from the OMUTCD. Warrants 1 9 were evaluated for this analysis of the expected 2039 Build conditions. In order to determine if the 2039 anticipated build conditions are expected to meet one of these warrants, the existing hourly volumes were multiplied by the previously discussed growth rate to determine the future 2039 Build conditions. The site generated traffic was added to the peak hours. No additional traffic was added to the remaining hours. It should be noted that the design hour factors have not been included on the signal warrant volume calculations. Based upon the evaluation of the warrants established by the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, we conclude that a traffic signal is not justified at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard as required by the Ohio Revised Code based upon the expected 2039 Build conditions. Copies of the traffic signal warrant analysis worksheets can be found in Appendix I. June 5, 2017 Page 45 TMS Engineers, Inc.

57 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio 4.2 Capacity & LOS at Development Access Intersections Capacity analyses were performed for the intersections located along Center Ridge Road that provide access to the proposed elementary school site using the procedures outlined in the computerized version of the Transportation Research Board s Highway Capacity Manual 6 TH Edition, HCM6E (HCS7, Release 7.2). The initial operating conditions for the proposed intersections will include traffic signal control at the west access location and a stop sign controlled restricted access driveway at the east access location. Build Condition 2019 Capacity Analysis Analyses were performed for the projected 2019 opening day conditions under the Build scenario to determine the future level of service at the intersections where access is available to the elementary school along Center Ridge Road. The results of the 2019 Build analyses are shown in the following table. Copies of the capacity worksheets are included in Appendix L. Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions Access Locations) LOCATION TRAFFIC CONTROL MOVEMENT AM PEAK LOS (DELAY) PM PEAK LOS (DELAY) Center Ridge & West Access Traffic Signal Intersection C (27.0) C (23.1) Eastbound C (33.5) C (28.4) Westbound B (17.9) B (18.7) Northbound C (26.8) C (22.5) Southbound C (33.8) C (28.4) Center Ridge & East Access Stop Sign Northbound C (22.7) B (11.7) (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The intersections where access to the development is available along Center Ridge Road are expected to operate with acceptable levels of service under the 2019 Build conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. The analyses determined that an exclusive westbound left turn lane at the proposed West Access intersection would be necessary to accommodate the expected site generated traffic volumes. June 5, 2017 Page 46 TMS Engineers, Inc.

58 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Center Ridge Road & West Access 2019 Build Conditions The anticipated 2019 Build traffic conditions at the intersection of Center Ridge Road and the proposed West Access driveway were analyzed and compared to the criteria established by the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and professional engineering judgement to determine if traffic signal control is warranted at the intersection. All of the data collected and determined for this study was analyzed and compared to the thresholds established by the criteria from the OMUTCD. Warrant 3 was evaluated for this analysis of the expected 2019 Build conditions. In order to determine if the 2019 anticipated build conditions are expected to meet one of these warrants, the existing hourly volumes were multiplied by the previously discussed growth rate to determine the future 2019 Build conditions. The site generated traffic was added to the peak hours. It should be noted that the design hour factors have not been included on the signal warrant volume calculations. Based upon the evaluation of the warrants established by the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, we conclude that a traffic signal is justified at the intersection of Center Ridge Road and the proposed West Access driveway as required by the Ohio Revised Code based upon the expected 2019 Build conditions. Copies of the traffic signal warrant analysis worksheets can be found in Appendix I. June 5, 2017 Page 47 TMS Engineers, Inc.

59 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Build Condition 2039 Capacity Analysis Analyses were performed for the projected 2039 design year conditions under the Build scenario to determine the future level of service at the intersections where access is available to the elementary school along Center Ridge Road. The results of the 2039 Build analyses are shown in the following table. Copies of the capacity worksheets are included in Appendix M. Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions Access Locations) LOCATION TRAFFIC CONTROL MOVEMENT AM PEAK LOS (DELAY) PM PEAK LOS (DELAY) Center Ridge & West Access Traffic Signal Intersection C (28.7) C (21.7) Eastbound D (36.7) C (26.8) Westbound B (17.0) B (17.4) Northbound C (30.1) C (20.5) Southbound D (37.5) C (26.9) Center Ridge & East Access Stop Sign Northbound D (31.2) B (12.5) (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The intersections where access to the development is available along Center Ridge Road are expected to operate with acceptable levels of service under the 2039 Build conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. June 5, 2017 Page 48 TMS Engineers, Inc.

60 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio 4.3 Auxiliary Turning Lane Warrant Analysis The ODOT Location and Design Manual, Volume 1 and the Access Management Manual recommend that the need for auxiliary turn lanes at unsignalized intersections be determined by using the Auxiliary Lane Graphs found in Section of the Location and Design Manual, Volume 1. This recommendation is made for the free flow approaches at unsignalized intersections. Section of the ODOT Location and Design Manual states that: To determine the number and use of right and left turn lanes, intersection capacity analysis procedures of the current edition of the Highway Capacity Manual should be used. For unsignalized intersections, right and left turn lanes may also be needed if they meet warrants provided in Figures 401 6a, b, c and d. The warrants apply only to the free flow approach of the unsignalized intersection. It is the intent of this report to evaluate the need for an exclusive right turn lane on Center Ridge Road at the East Access. The need for an exclusive turn lane at the intersection was based on a four lane roadway with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour for Center Ridge Road. The following table shows the results of the analysis of the need for an exclusive right turn lane at Center Ridge Road and the proposed East Access driveway. Copies of the ODOT turn lane warrant graphs can be seen in Appendix N. Table 4.16 Turning Lane Warrant Analysis Center Ridge Road & Proposed East Access TURN LANE & LOCATION AM PEAK PM PEAK AM PEAK PM PEAK EB Right Turn Proposed East Access NO NO NO NO The results of the turn lane warrant analysis indicate that an exclusive eastbound right turn lane was shown to not be warranted on Center Ridge Road at the proposed East Access under the expected 2019 and 2039 Build conditions. June 5, 2017 Page 49 TMS Engineers, Inc.

61 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio 4.4 Turn Lane Length Analysis An analysis was performed to determine the necessary turn lane storage length in order to accommodate the recommended turn lanes under the Year 2039 peak hour Build conditions. The analysis was performed in accordance with the procedure recommended by the Ohio Department of Transportation in their Location and Design Manual, Volume 1, Section 401. The ODOT criteria and procedures are furnished in Appendix O. The recommended maximum left turn lane length is 600 feet and the right turn lane length is 800 feet, however if the calculated turn lane length is lower than these values the maximum length will not be applicable. The following tables show the results of the analysis based upon the highest anticipated movement volumes at the intersections. Table 4.17 Turn Lane Length Analysis Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road Fig Movement Direction DHV No. of Lanes Cycles / Hour Average Veh/ Cycle/ Lane Design Speed (mph) Fig Storage Length (ft) Condition A* B* C* Backup Length (ft) Turn Lane Length* (ft) WB RT * WB T NB RT * NB T SB RT * SB T * Includes 50' taper June 5, 2017 Page 50 TMS Engineers, Inc.

62 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Table 4.18 Turn Lane Length Analysis Center Ridge Road & Proposed West Access Fig Movement Direction DHV No. of Lanes Cycles / Hour Average Veh/ Cycle/ Lane Design Speed (mph) Fig Storage Length (ft) Condition A* B* C* Backup Length (ft) Turn Lane Length* (ft) WB LT * WB T/RT * Includes 50' taper June 5, 2017 Page 51 TMS Engineers, Inc.

63 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio 4.5 Alternative Scenario Analysis The previous analyses indicated that the intersection of Center Ridge Road and Dover Center Road was expected to require several improvements in order to mitigate the impact of the site generated traffic. The intersections of Center Ridge Road/Glenmore Drive and Dover Center Road/Westown Boulevard were determined to operate with poor levels of service as a result of the site generated traffic and were not able to be fully mitigated without unwarranted improvements or high cost improvements. For these stated reasons an alternative scenario was developed to determine the impact on the adjacent study area intersections as compared to the proposed scenario detailed on the site plan (Figure 1.2). The analysis of this scenario will be based on the 2039 twenty year design traffic volumes. The site generated school bus traffic will continue to use a bus only access drive along Westown Boulevard as detailed on the site plan (Figure 1.2). There will be no changes to the school bus volumes or distribution throughout the street network as detailed in Figure 3.4. The proposed West Access drive will be relocated to the west so that it aligns directly across from Glenmore Drive. The West access drive would then be extended to the cul de sac at the west of end of Westown Boulevard. The intent would be to allow the vehicles coming from the south along Dover Center Road to access the site without having to make a northbound left turn at the Center Ridge Road and Dover Center Road intersection. Vehicles exiting the site to the south along Dover Center Road would then also be able to avoid the intersection of Center Ridge Road and Dover Center Road as well. The proposed signal would also be able to serve the Glenmore Drive traffic and the Westlake United Methodist Church would be able to access the traffic signal via their access drives along Glenmore Drive. The proposed East access drive will remain as detailed on the site plan as a restricted access driveway. June 5, 2017 Page 52 TMS Engineers, Inc.

64 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio The assignments of the estimated new generated passenger vehicle traffic for the proposed elementary school are shown graphically in Figure 4.1, Page 54. The assignments of the estimated new generated school bus traffic for the proposed elementary school was shown graphically in Figure 3.4, Page 19, as the school bus distribution has not been altered in this scenario. In order to estimate the future traffic considering the described alternative conditions, the sum of the 2039 No Build volumes, shown in Figure 3.6, were added to the new generated traffic (Figures 3.4 & 4.1) to equal the future Build peak hour volumes. The estimated 2039 Build traffic volumes for the alternative scenario are shown graphically in Figure 4.2, Page 55 for the proposed elementary school. June 5, 2017 Page 53 TMS Engineers, Inc.

65 Westown Boulevard 134 (40) Center Ridge Road 54 (39) Proposed West Access 69 (58) Glenmore Drive Dover Center Road 86 (35) NOT TO SCALE 54 (39) 54 (39) 86 (35) 86 (35) NEW GENERATED TRAFFIC TOTAL TRIPS ENTER EXIT PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Proposed South Access AM PM Proposed East Access LEGEND XX AM Peak Hour Trips (XX) PM Peak Hour Trips RED = Entering Volumes GREEN = Exiting Volumes 215 (98) 97 (45) 118 (53) Center Ridge Road 181 (71) 181 (71) 103 (38) 78 (33) Dover Center Road Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study New Generated Traffic Passenger Vehicles Alternate Scenario Figure 4.1 Page 54

66 0 (0) 100 (60) Westown Boulevard 0 (0) 54 (39) Proposed West Access 10 (10) 1150 (668) 134 (40) Center Ridge Road 10 (10) 0 (0) 30 (10) 86 (35) 40 (30) 69 (58) 0 (0) 0 (0) 30 (10) 636 (779) 181 (71) Glenmore Drive 0 (0) 154 (99) 0 (0) 30 (30) PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 30 (30) 126 (65) Proposed South Access Proposed East Access 215 (98) 1180 (678) 0 (0) 847 (860) Dover Center Road 95 (64) 69 (65) 54 (43) 440 (520) 327 (185) 938 (533) 80 (118) 178 (173) 376 (347) 200 (140) 102 (52) 640 (600) NOT TO SCALE Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study 146 (189) 449 (367) 150 (118) Center Ridge Road 300 (120) 553 (518) 118 (108) 2039 Build Weekday Traffic Dover Center Road Figure 4.2 Page 55

67 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Analyses were performed for the projected 2039 design year Build conditions under the alternative scenario. This analysis will be used to determine the future levels of service at the study intersections under the anticipated build conditions. All analysis will assume that the signal timing would be optimized to balance critical lane delays at the signalized intersection. The traffic volumes used in this analysis can be seen in Figure 4.1. Copies of the capacity worksheets are included in Appendix P. The results of the 2039 Build analyses are shown in the following tables: Table Levels of Service (Build Conditions Alternative Scenario) LOCATION TRAFFIC CONTROL MOVEMENT AM PEAK LOS (DELAY) PM PEAK LOS (DELAY) Center Ridge & Dover Center Traffic Signal Intersection D (36.8) C (27.4) Eastbound D (44.6) C (29.4) Westbound C (29.3) C (25.2) Northbound D (36.1) C (28.4) Southbound C (33.1) C (26.4) Center Ridge & Glenmore/West Traffic Signal Intersection C (22.9) B (18.6) Eastbound C (28,2) C (22.9) Westbound B (14.1) B (14.6) Northbound C (27.8) C (22.4) Southbound C (26.0) C (21.3) Center Ridge & East Access Stop Sign Northbound Right C (24.0) B (11.9) Dover Center & Westown Stop Sign Eastbound Left F (123.8) F (61.8) Eastbound Right B (12.6) B (13.5) Eastbound F (76.9) E (37.5) Northbound B (12.6) A (9.2) (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The study area intersections are expected to operate with acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours under the expected 2039 Alternate Scenario Build conditions with the exception of the Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard intersection. June 5, 2017 Page 56 TMS Engineers, Inc.

68 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Based on these results improvements are necessary at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard under the 2039 Alternate Scenario Build conditions. In order to determine what mitigation would be necessary to improve the levels of service at this intersection, certain improvements were tested with further capacity analyses. The following improvements are recommended to mitigate the anticipated poor levels of service under the 2039 Alternate Scenario Build conditions: Dover Center Road & Westown Boulevard # Stripe the eastbound approach for separate left and right turn lanes. # Install traffic signal control. The following table shows the capacity analysis results of implementing the proposed improvements. Copies of the capacity worksheets for the improved intersection are in included in Appendix Q. Table Levels of Service (Alternative Scenario Recommended Improvements) LOCATION TRAFFIC CONTROL MOVEMENT AM PEAK LOS (DELAY) PM PEAK LOS (DELAY) Dover Center & Westown Traffic Signal Intersection C (22.2) B (19.8) Eastbound C (27.2) C (21.7) Northbound C (27.6) C (21.7) Southbound B (12.3) B (16.4) (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle June 5, 2017 Page 57 TMS Engineers, Inc.

69 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Dover Center Road & Westown Boulevard 2039 Alternate Conditions The anticipated 2039 Alternate Scenario Build traffic conditions at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard were analyzed and compared to the criteria established by the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and professional engineering judgement to determine if traffic signal control is warranted at the intersection. All of the data collected and determined for this study was analyzed and compared to the thresholds established by the criteria from the OMUTCD. Warrant 3 was evaluated for this analysis of the expected 2039 Alternate Scenario Build conditions. In order to determine if the 2039 anticipated build conditions are expected to meet one of these warrants, the existing hourly volumes multiplied by the previously discussed growth rate to determine the future 2039 Build conditions. The site generated traffic was added to the peak hours. It should be noted that the design hour factors have not been included on the signal warrant volume calculations. Based upon the evaluation of the warrants established by the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, we conclude that a traffic signal is justified at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard as required by the Ohio Revised Code based upon the expected 2039 Alternate Scenario Build conditions. Copies of the traffic signal warrant analysis worksheets can be found in Appendix I. June 5, 2017 Page 58 TMS Engineers, Inc.

70 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio A comparison was performed to show the incremental effects on the capacity of the study area intersections due to the alternate scenario as compared to the site plan conditions shown in Figure 1.2. The following tables show a side by side comparison of the site plan versus the alternate scenario conditions for the 2039 AM and PM peak hours. Table Site Plan vs. Alternate Scenario AM Peak Hour Comparison Table LOCATION (TRAFFIC CONTROL) MOVEMENT SITE PLAN LOS (DELAY) ALTERNATE LOS (DELAY) DIFFERENCE + / Center Ridge & Dover Center Intersection D (40.7) D (36.8) 3.9 (Traffic Signal) Eastbound D (50.3) D (44.6) 5.7 Westbound C (27.6) C (29.3) +1.7 Northbound D (42.6) D (36.1) 6.5 Southbound D (37.6) C (33.1) 4.5 Center Ridge & East Access (Stop Sign) Northbound Right D (31.2) C (24.0) 7.2 Dover Center & Westown Intersection C (20.8) C (22.2) +1.4 (Traffic Signal) Eastbound C (22.8) C (27.2) +4.4 Northbound C (23.0) C (21.7) 1.3 Southbound B (17.2) B (12.3) 4.9 (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The 2039 AM peak hour comparison table indicates that the intersection delays are lowered under the Alternate Scenario at the Center Ridge Road intersections. The 2039 AM peak hour comparison table indicates the approach and intersection delays at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard are only minimally impacted by the proposed conditions of the Alternate Scenario. June 5, 2017 Page 59 TMS Engineers, Inc.

71 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Table Site Plan vs. Alternate Scenario PM Peak Hour Comparison Table LOCATION (TRAFFIC CONTROL) MOVEMENT NO BUILD LOS (DELAY) BUILD LOS (DELAY) DIFFERENCE + / Center Ridge & Dover Center Intersection C (28.2) C (27.4) 0.8 (Traffic Signal) Eastbound C (29.9) C (29.4) 0.5 Westbound C (25.0) C (25.2) 0.2 Northbound C (30.0) C (28.4) 1.6 Southbound C (27.4) C (26.4) 1.0 Center Ridge & East Access (Stop Sign) Northbound Right B (12.5) B (11.9) 0.6 Dover Center & Westown Intersection C (20.9) B (19.8) 1.1 (Traffic Signal) Eastbound C (21.2) C (21.7) +0.5 Northbound C (21.4) C (21.7) +0.3 Southbound C (20.3) B (16.4) 3.9 (XX.X) = Average vehicle delay in seconds per vehicle The 2039 PM peak hour comparison table indicates that the intersection delays are lowered under the Alternate Scenario at the Center Ridge Road intersections. The 2039 PM peak hour comparison table indicates the approach and intersection delays at the intersection of Dover Center Road and Westown Boulevard are only minimally impacted by the proposed conditions of the Alternate Scenario. June 5, 2017 Page 60 TMS Engineers, Inc.

72 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio An analysis was performed to determine the necessary turn lane storage length in order to accommodate the recommended turn lanes under the Year 2039 peak hour Build conditions for the Alternate Scenario. The following tables show the results of the analysis based upon the highest anticipated movement volumes at the intersections. Table 4.26 Turn Lane Length Analysis Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road Fig Movement Direction DHV No. of Lanes Cycles / Hour Average Veh/ Cycle/ Lane Design Speed (mph) Fig Storage Length (ft) Condition A* B* C* Backup Length (ft) Turn Lane Length* (ft) WB RT * WB T NB RT * NB T SB RT * SB T * Includes 50' taper Table 4.27 Turn Lane Length Analysis Center Ridge Road & Glenmore Drive/Proposed West Access Fig Movement Direction DHV No. of Lanes Cycles / Hour Average Veh/ Cycle/ Lane Design Speed (mph) Fig Storage Length (ft) Condition A* B* C* Backup Length (ft) Turn Lane Length* (ft) EB LT * EB T/RT WB LT * WB T/RT * Includes 50' taper June 5, 2017 Page 61 TMS Engineers, Inc.

73 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio 4.6 Improvements to Accommodate Study Area Traffic No intersection improvements were found to be necessary to accommodate the 2017 existing traffic conditions at the study area intersections. It should be noted that a westbound right turn lane at intersection of Center Ridge Road and Dover Center Road has been previously recommended in other reports prepared for the City of Westlake. This recommendation was based on an analysis of the roadway peak hours. The elementary school analysis is based on the peak hour of the school traffic volumes which does not coincide with the peak hour of traffic for the roadway (i.e the school peaks in the afternoon from 2:00 to 3:00 PM while the roadway peaks from 5:00 to 6:00 PM). No intersection improvements were found to be necessary to accommodate the Year 2019 No Build traffic at the study area intersections. The following improvements were recommended to accommodate the Year 2039 No Build traffic at the study area intersections that do not provide access to the proposed development. Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road # Construct a westbound right turn lane. # Construct a northbound right turn lane. No additional intersection improvements were found to be necessary to accommodate the Year 2039 No Build traffic at the remaining study area intersections. The remaining study intersections are anticipated to operate with acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. The following lane use and traffic control are recommended to accommodate the 2019 and 2039 site generated (Build) traffic based on the development site plan shown in Figure 1.2: Center Ridge Road & Glenmore Drive # Construct a southbound left turn lane. (2039) The addition of a separate left turn lane is still expected to result in a poor level of service under the 2039 Build conditions, however the overall delay will be reduced and with the exclusive left turn lane the right turn vehicles will not be blocked by a vehicle waiting to make a left turn. It should be noted that the addition of a second lane may create a situation where side by side turning vehicles may block the other vehicles view of oncoming traffic. June 5, 2017 Page 62 TMS Engineers, Inc.

74 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Center Ridge Road & Proposed West Access (2019) # Install traffic signal control. # Construct the proposed development roadway with one egress lane and two ingress lanes. # The egress lanes should consist of an exclusive left turn lane and an exclusive right turn lane. # Construct an exclusive westbound left turn lane. # Include the church access drive as part of intersection and traffic signal control. Center Ridge Road & Proposed East Access (2019) # Construct the proposed development roadway with one egress lane and one ingress lane. # Restrict the access driveway to right turns in and right turns out of the site only through the use of a channelizing island. # The egress drive should be constructed per the recommendations and guidelines found in the ODOT Access Management Manual for channelizing islands (See Appendix R). # Install stop sign control on the northbound approach. Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road # Construct a westbound right turn lane. (2019) # Construct a southbound right turn lane. (2039) Dover Center Road & Westown Boulevard (2019) # Re stripe the eastbound approach for one ingress lane and two egress lanes consisting of a right turn lane and left turn lane. Traffic signal control and a roundabout were analyzed as potential improvements for the intersection. Traffic signal control is not expected to be warranted at the intersection based on the traffic signal warrants found in the OMUTCD. The construction of roundabout at the intersection was determined to be unlikely due to the bridge located on the south approach and the high cost of including it in the construction of the roundabout. The recommended lane use and traffic control for the study area to accommodate the proposed development based on the site plan in Figure 1.2 can be seen in Figure 4.3, Page 64. June 5, 2017 Page 63 TMS Engineers, Inc.

75 NOT TO SCALE STOP LEGEND Existing Lane Use Existing Stop Sign Center Ridge Road Existing Signal STOP 2039 BUILD Proposed Access Proposed Lane Use Glenmore Drive STOP Proposed Stop Sign Proposed Signal Westown Boulevard Proposed West Access 2019 BUILD 2019 BUILD STOP PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Proposed South Access Proposed East Access 2019 BUILD STOP Dover Center Road 2019 BUILD STOP 2039 BUILD 2039 NO BUILD Center Ridge Road 2039 NO BUILD 2019 BUILD Dover Center Road Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study Recommended Lane Use and Traffic Control Site Plan Figure 4.3 Page 64

76 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio The following lane use and traffic control are recommended to accommodate the 2039 site generated (Build) traffic based on the Alternate Scenario detailed in Section 4.5: Center Ridge Road & Proposed West Access/Glenmore Drive # Construct the development West Access directly across from Glenmore Drive. # Install traffic signal control. # Construct the proposed development roadway with one egress lane and two ingress lanes. # The egress lanes should consist of an exclusive left turn lane and a shared through and right turn lane. # Construct an exclusive westbound left turn lane. # Construct an exclusive eastbound left turn lane. Center Ridge Road & Proposed East Access # Construct the proposed development roadway with one egress lane and one ingress lane. # Restrict the access driveway to right turns in and right turns out of the site only through the use of a channelizing island. # The egress drive should be constructed per the recommendations and guidelines found in the ODOT Access Management Manual for channelizing islands (See Appendix R). # Install stop sign control on the northbound approach. Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road # Construct a southbound right turn lane. Dover Center Road & Westown Boulevard # Install traffic signal control. # Re stripe the eastbound approach for one ingress lane and two egress lanes consisting of a right turn lane and left turn lane. The recommended traffic control within the site to accommodate the Alternate Scenario can be seen in Figure 4.4, Page 66. The recommended lane use and traffic control for the study area to accommodate the proposed development based on the Alternate Scenario described in Section 4.5 can be seen in Figure 4.5, Page 67. June 5, 2017 Page 65 TMS Engineers, Inc.

77 NOT TO SCALE LEGEND Proposed Stop Sign Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study Interior Traffic Control Alternate Scenario Figure 4.4 Page 66

78 Westown Boulevard Center Ridge Road STOP Proposed West Access Glenmore Drive PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STOP Proposed South Access Proposed East Access STOP LEGEND Dover Center Road STOP STOP Existing Lane Use Existing Stop Sign Existing Signal NOT TO SCALE STOP Proposed Access Proposed Lane Use Proposed Stop Sign Proposed Signal 2039 NO BUILD Center Ridge Road 2039 NO BUILD Dover Center Road Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Traffic Impact Study Recommended Lane Use and Traffic Control Alternate Figure 4.5 Page 66

79 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Chapter 5 Conclusions Based on the results of the analyses, we offer the following conclusions and recommendations: 5.1 This traffic impact study has been prepared at the request of the Westlake City Schools for a proposed elementary school. The project site is located in the City of Westlake, Cuyahoga County, Ohio along the south side of Center Ridge Road (US Route 20) between Glenmore Drive to the west and Dover Center Road to the east. 5.2 The proposed elementary school is expected to have a student population of 1,450 students with 120 staff for grades pre kindergarten through fourth grade. Figure 1.2 shows the proposed site plan for the elementary school. 5.3 The development is proposed with two access driveways along the south side of Center Ridge Road and one access driveway along the north side of Westown Boulevard. 5.4 The year 2019 was analyzed for the opening year conditions, and the year 2039 was analyzed as the design year for the twenty year conditions analysis. 5.5 The elementary school day begins at 7:50 AM and ends at 2:20 PM, therefore the report analyzed the hours of 7:30 to 8:30 AM and 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM. The 7:30 to 8:30 AM hour was referred to as the weekday AM peak hour for the purpose of this report. The 2:00 to 3:00 PM hour was referred to as the PM peak hour for the purpose of this report. These periods were analyzed since they reflect the period of the highest volume of traffic flow for the proposed school. 5.6 The elementary school was assumed to generate a total of 30 entering and 30 exiting trips for school buses. These volumes are included in the total generation volumes calculated for this analysis. June 5, 2017 Page 68 TMS Engineers, Inc.

80 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio 5.7 The proposed elementary school is expected to generate the following average hourly traffic during the AM and PM peak periods: ITE TRIP GENERATION TRIP ENDS ITE Code Land Use Description SIZE (Staff) AM Peak Hour of Generator PM Peak Hour of Generator (Enter/Exit) (Enter/Exit) 520 Elementary School TOTAL NEW GENERATED TRIPS No intersection improvements were found to be necessary to accommodate the 2017 existing traffic conditions at the study area intersections. 5.9 No intersection improvements were found to be necessary to accommodate the Year 2019 No Build traffic at the study area intersections The following improvements were recommended to accommodate the Year 2039 No Build traffic at the study area intersections that do not provide access to the proposed elementary school. Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road # Construct a westbound right turn lane. # Construct a northbound right turn lane. No additional intersection improvements were found to be necessary to accommodate the Year 2039 No Build traffic at the remaining study area intersections. The remaining study intersections are anticipated to operate with acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. June 5, 2017 Page 69 TMS Engineers, Inc.

81 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio 5.11 The following lane use and traffic control are recommended to accommodate the 2019 and 2039 site generated (Build) traffic based on the development site plan shown in Figure 1.2: Center Ridge Road & Glenmore Drive (2039) # Construct a southbound left turn lane. Center Ridge Road & Proposed West Access (2019) # Install traffic signal control. # Construct the proposed development roadway with one egress lane and two ingress lanes. # The egress lanes should consist of an exclusive left turn lane and an exclusive right turn lane. # Construct an exclusive westbound left turn lane. # Include the church access drive as part of intersection and traffic signal control. Center Ridge Road & Proposed East Access (2019) # Construct the proposed development roadway with one egress lane and one ingress lane. # Restrict the access driveway to right turns in and right turns out of the site only through the use of a channelizing island. # The egress drive should be constructed per the recommendations and guidelines found in the ODOT Access Management Manual for channelizing islands (See Appendix X). # Install stop sign control on the northbound approach. Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road # Construct a westbound right turn lane. (2019) # Construct a southbound right turn lane. (2039) Dover Center Road & Westown Boulevard (2019) # Re stripe the eastbound approach for one ingress lane and two egress lanes consisting of a right turn lane and left turn lane. June 5, 2017 Page 70 TMS Engineers, Inc.

82 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio 5.12 The following lane use and traffic control are recommended to accommodate the 2039 site generated (Build) traffic based on the Alternate Scenario detailed in Section 4.5: Center Ridge Road & Proposed West Access/Glenmore Drive # Construct the development West Access directly across from Glenmore Drive. # Install traffic signal control. # Construct the proposed development roadway with one egress lane and two ingress lanes. # The egress lanes should consist of an exclusive left turn lane and a shared through and right turn lane. # Construct an exclusive westbound left turn lane. # Construct an exclusive eastbound left turn lane. Center Ridge Road & Proposed East Access # Construct the proposed development roadway with one egress lane and one ingress lane. # Restrict the access driveway to right turns in and right turns out of the site only through the use of a channelizing island. # The egress drive should be constructed per the recommendations and guidelines found in the ODOT Access Management Manual for channelizing islands (See Appendix X). # Install stop sign control on the northbound approach. Center Ridge Road & Dover Center Road # Construct a southbound right turn lane. Dover Center Road & Westown Boulevard # Install traffic signal control. # Re stripe the eastbound approach for one ingress lane and two egress lanes consisting of a right turn lane and left turn lane Based upon the results of the analysis in this study and the corresponding recommendations, it can be seen that the site generated traffic can be accommodated without adversely impacting the area roadway network under each scenario. June 5, 2017 Page 71 TMS Engineers, Inc.

83 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix A Traffic Count Data June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

84 06:00 07: : : :00 11: : : : : : :00 7:00 8:00 9:00 TOTALS Municipality: At Intersection of and Date: Day: Comments: Project: Weather: Clear Recorder(s): GFA & PMB Data entry by: JJO Date entered: May. 10, 2017 TIME BEGINS Dover Center Rd. TOTAL PEAK HOUR FACTOR EAST WEST Dover Center Rd. TOTAL Center Ridge Rd. Center Ridge Rd. TOTAL FROM NORTH FROM SOUTH NORTH FROM EAST FROM WEST ALL SOUTH DIREC. Lef t Thru Right Total Trk Bus Lef t Thru Right Total Trk Bus Lef t Thru Right Total Trk Bus Lef t Thru Right Total Trk Bus North South East West :00 ADT % % % % HOURLY FACTOR: 1.68 MONTHLY FACTOR: 0.91 COMBINED FACTOR: 1.53 TMS ENGINEERS, INC Case Parkway South # 7 Twinsburg, Ohio (330) FAX: (330)

85 06:00 07: : : :00 11: : : : : : :00 7:00 8:00 9:00 TOTALS Municipality: At Intersection of and Date: Day: Comments: Project: Weather: Clear Recorder(s): DJS Data entry by: JJO Date entered: May. 10, 2017 TIME BEGINS Glenmore Dr. TOTAL PEAK HOUR FACTOR EAST WEST TOTAL Center Ridge Rd. Center Ridge Rd. TOTAL FROM NORTH FROM SOUTH NORTH FROM EAST FROM WEST ALL SOUTH DIREC. Lef t Thru Right Total Trk Bus Lef t Thru Right Total Trk Bus Lef t Thru Right Total Trk Bus Lef t Thru Right Total Trk Bus North South East West :00 ADT % % % HOURLY FACTOR: 1.68 MONTHLY FACTOR: 0.91 COMBINED FACTOR: 1.53 TMS ENGINEERS, INC Case Parkway South # 7 Twinsburg, Ohio (330) FAX: (330)

86 06:00 07: : : :00 11: : : : : : :00 7:00 8:00 9:00 TOTALS Municipality: At Intersection of and Date: Day: Comments: Project: Weather: Clear Recorder(s): SLC Data entry by: JJO Date entered: May. 10, 2017 TIME BEGINS Dover Center Rd. TOTAL PEAK HOUR FACTOR ALL DIREC. Dover Center Rd. TOTAL Westown Blvd. TOTAL FROM NORTH FROM SOUTH NORTH FROM EAST FROM WEST EAST SOUTH WEST Lef t Thru Right Total Trk Bus Lef t Thru Right Total Trk Bus Lef t Thru Right Total Trk Bus Lef t Thru Right Total Trk Bus North South East West 1:00 ADT % % % HOURLY FACTOR: 1.68 MONTHLY FACTOR: 0.91 COMBINED FACTOR: 1.53 TMS ENGINEERS, INC Case Parkway South # 7 Twinsburg, Ohio (330) FAX: (330)

87 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix B Trip Generation Data June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

88 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ITE CODE = 520 PK 4 Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Date: 5/15/2017 Trip Generation based on: Size of Analysis Area: 120 Employees Number of Employees Average Rate Standard Deviation Adjustment factor Driveway Volume Average Weekday 2 way Volume Generator AM Peak Hour Enter Generator AM Peak Hour Exit Generator AM Peak Hour Total Generator PM Peak Hour Enter Generator PM Peak Hour Exit Generator PM Peak Hour Total Saturday 2 way Volume Saturday Peak Hour Enter Saturday Peak Hour Exit Saturday Peak Hour Total ENTER EXIT Average Weekday 2 way Volume T X % 50% Generator AM Peak Hour Total T 7.65 X % 46% Generator PM Peak Hour Total T 3.29 X % 56% Saturday 2 way Volume NO AVAILABE DATA Saturday Peak Hour Volume NO AVAILABLE DATA Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generartion, 9th Edition, 2012.

89 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ITE CODE = 520 PK 4 Elementary School Westlake, Ohio Date: 5/15/2017 Trip Generation based on: Size of Analysis Area: 1450 Students Number of Students Average Rate Standard Deviation Adjustment factor Driveway Volume Average Weekday 2 way Volume Generator AM Peak Hour Enter Generator AM Peak Hour Exit Generator AM Peak Hour Total Generator PM Peak Hour Enter Generator PM Peak Hour Exit Generator PM Peak Hour Total Saturday 2 way Volume Saturday Peak Hour Enter Saturday Peak Hour Exit Saturday Peak Hour Total ENTER EXIT Average Weekday 2 way Volume EQUATION NOT GIVEN 50% 50% Generator AM Peak Hour Total EQUATION NOT GIVEN 55% 45% Generator PM Peak Hour Total EQUATION NOT GIVEN 45% 55% Saturday 2 way Volume NO AVAILABE DATA Saturday Peak Hour Volume NO AVAILABLE DATA Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generartion, 9th Edition, 2012.

90 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix C Existing Capacity Analyses Worksheets 2017 June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

91 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2017 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name AM EX CenterDover.xus Project Description Existing Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C D C C C C D C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 33.3 C 32.0 C 32.3 C 27.5 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 31.6 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.3 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.3 A 1.1 A 1.5 A 1.4 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 2:48:55 PM

92 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & Glenmore Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street Glenmore Drive Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Existing Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration LT T T TR LR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 7 37 Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS C Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 2:58:41 PM TWSC1.xtw

93 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Existing Conditions Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration LR LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 91 9 Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS C A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS C Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:02:08 PM AM EX Westown.xtw

94 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2017 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name PM EX CenterDover.xus Project Description Existing Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C C C C C C C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 27.7 C 28.3 C 27.0 C 27.6 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 27.7 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.3 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.0 A 1.0 A 1.4 A 1.3 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:02:36 PM

95 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & Glenmore Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street Glenmore Drive Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Existing Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration LT T T TR LR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 3 24 Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS C Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:05:51 PM AM EX Glenmore.xtw

96 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Existing Conditions Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration LR LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS B A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS B Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:07:20 PM PM EX Westown.xtw

97 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix D No Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2019 June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

98 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2019 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name AM 19NB CenterDover.xus Project Description No-Build Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) D D D C D D C D C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 38.8 D 35.2 D 35.7 D 30.4 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 35.5 D Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.3 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.3 A 1.1 A 1.6 B 1.5 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:13:30 PM

99 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & Glenmore Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street Glenmore Drive Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes No-Build Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration LT T T TR LR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS C Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:13:12 PM AM 19NB Glenmore.xtw

100 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes No-Build Conditions Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration LR LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS C A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS C Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:14:36 PM AM 19NB Westown.xtw

101 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2019 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name PM 19NB CenterDover.xus Project Description No-Build Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C C C C C C C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 29.2 C 29.9 C 27.9 C 29.1 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 29.1 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.3 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.0 A 1.0 A 1.5 A 1.4 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:14:54 PM

102 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & Glenmore Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street Glenmore Drive Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes No-Build Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration LT T T TR LR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS C Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:17:34 PM PM 19NB Glenmore.xtw

103 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes No-Build Conditions Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration LR LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS C A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS C Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:18:25 PM PM 19NB Westown.xtw

104 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix E No Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

105 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name AM 39NB CenterDover.xus Project Description No-Build Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) E E E C E E C F E C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 61.4 E 60.8 E 59.3 E 42.5 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 57.0 E Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.3 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.5 A 1.3 A 1.8 B 1.7 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:21:46 PM

106 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & Glenmore Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Glenmore Drive Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes No-Build Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration LT T T TR LR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS A D Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS D Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:34:51 PM AM 39NB Glenmore.xtw

107 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes No-Build Conditions Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration LR LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS D A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS D Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version Generated: 5/31/ :33:56 AM AM 39NB Westown.xtw

108 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name PM 39NB CenterDover.xus Project Description No-Build Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C D C D D C C C D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 32.9 C 33.7 C 33.6 C 32.7 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 33.2 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.3 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.1 A 1.1 A 1.7 B 1.6 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:39:12 PM

109 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & Glenmore Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Glenmore Drive Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes No-Build Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration LT T T TR LR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS C Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/23/2017 3:38:54 PM PM 19NB Glenmore.xtw

110 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes No-Build Conditions Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration LR LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS D A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS D Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version Generated: 5/31/ :34:29 AM PM 39NB Westown.xtw

111 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix F No Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 w/ Improvements June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

112 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name AM 39NB CenterDover-WBNB RTL.xus Project Description WB & NB RTL Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C D D C C C C D B D D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 39.0 D 26.4 C 30.8 C 39.8 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 34.2 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.4 B 2.3 B 2.9 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.5 A 1.3 A 1.8 B 1.7 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 5/31/ :20:50 AM

113 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name PM 39NB CenterDover-WBNB RTL.xus Project Description WB & NB RTL Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C D C C C C C B B D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 32.9 C 28.4 C 26.2 C 31.8 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 29.9 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.4 B 2.3 B 2.9 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.1 A 1.1 A 1.7 B 1.6 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 5/31/ :21:34 AM

114 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix G Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2019 June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

115 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2019 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name AM 19 CenterDover.xus Project Description Build Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) E D D C E E D E E D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 49.5 D 53.1 D 56.0 E 52.8 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 52.4 D Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.3 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.6 B 1.2 A 1.8 B 1.6 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 6:35:37 AM

116 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & Glenmore Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street Glenmore Drive Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Build Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration LT T T TR LR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS A D Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS D Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 6:58:12 AM AM 19 Glenmore.xtw

117 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Build Conditions Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration LR LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS E A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS E Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 7:00:36 AM AM 19 Westown.xtw

118 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2019 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name PM 19 CenterDover.xus Project Description No-Build Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C C C C C C C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 32.3 C 31.5 C 30.5 C 31.8 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 31.6 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.3 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.2 A 1.0 A 1.6 B 1.5 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 7:01:09 AM

119 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & Glenmore Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street Glenmore Drive Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Build Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration LT T T TR LR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS C Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 7:22:53 AM PM 19 Glenmore.xtw

120 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Build Conditions Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration LR LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS D A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS D Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 7:24:26 AM PM 19 Westown.xtw

121 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix H Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2019 w/ Improvements June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

122 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2019 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name AM 19 CenterDover-IMP2.xus Project Description WB RTL Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) D D D C C C D D D D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 49.4 D 27.7 C 49.8 D 44.6 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 43.3 D Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.3 B 2.9 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.6 B 1.2 A 1.8 B 1.6 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 7:08:43 AM

123 HCS7 Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency or Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. E/W Street Name Westown Boulevard Date Performed 5/19/2017 N/S Street Name Dover Center Road Analysis Year 2019 Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Roundabout Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N) Lane Assignment LR LT TR Volume (V), veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles, % Flow Rate (vpce), pc/h Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes Pedestrians Crossing, p/h Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway (s) Follow-Up Headway (s) Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h Entry Volume veh/h Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h Capacity (cpce), pc/h Capacity (c), veh/h v/c Ratio (x) Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh Lane LOS A B A 95% Queue, veh Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS A B A Intersection Delay, s/veh LOS 8.8 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Roundabouts Version 7.2 5/30/ :50:01 AM AM 19 Westown-RDAB.xro

124 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Dover Analysis Year 2019 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Westown File Name AM 19 Westown-TS.xus Project Description Traffic Signal Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 9.0 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C B Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 22.0 C C 18.0 B Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 20.4 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.1 B 2.1 B 1.9 B 1.4 A Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.7 A 1.6 B 1.3 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/ :53:54 AM

125 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2019 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name PM 19 CenterDover-WB RTL.xus Project Description WB RTL Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C C C C C C C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 32.0 C 27.3 C 30.5 C 31.8 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 30.4 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.3 B 2.9 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.2 A 1.0 A 1.6 B 1.5 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 7:21:31 AM

126 HCS7 Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency or Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. E/W Street Name Westown Boulevard Date Performed 5/19/2017 N/S Street Name Dover Center Road Analysis Year 2019 Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Roundabout Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N) Lane Assignment LR LT TR Volume (V), veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles, % Flow Rate (vpce), pc/h Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes Pedestrians Crossing, p/h Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway (s) Follow-Up Headway (s) Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h Entry Volume veh/h Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h Capacity (cpce), pc/h Capacity (c), veh/h v/c Ratio (x) Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh Lane LOS A A A 95% Queue, veh Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS A A A Intersection Delay, s/veh LOS 8.0 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Roundabouts Version 7.2 5/30/ :52:43 AM PM 19 Westown-RDAB.xro

127 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Dover Analysis Year 2019 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Westown File Name PM 19 Westown-TS.xus Project Description Traffic Signal Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 7.2 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C B Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 20.7 C C 19.7 B Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 20.3 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.1 B 2.1 B 1.9 B 1.4 A Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.6 A 1.5 A 1.4 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/ :53:54 AM

128 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix I Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

129 2019 BUILD CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Form TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - 07/99 Page 1 of 5 City: County: Westlake Cuyahoga Engineer: Date: ABC May 19, 2017 Major Street: Dover Center Road Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: Minor Street: Westown Boulevard Lanes: 1 35 Volume Level Criteria 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic > 70 km/h (40 mph)? Yes No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? Yes No If Question 1 or 2 above is answered "Yes", then use "70%" volume level 70% 100% WARRANT 1 - EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Applicable: Yes No Warrant 1 is satisfied if Condition A or Condition B is "100%" satisfied. Satisfied: Yes No Warrant is also satisfied if both Condition A and Condition B are "80%" satisfied. Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume 100% Satisfied: Yes No 80% Satisfied: Yes No (volumes in veh/hr) Approach Lanes Minimum Requirements (80% Shown in Brackets) 1 2 or more 7:30 AM - Volume Level 100% 70% 100% 70% Both Approaches on Major Street (400) (280) (480) ,050 1,119 1,175 Highest Approach on Minor Street (120) (084) (160) Record 8 highest hours and the corresponding volumes in boxes provided. Condition is 100% satisfied if the minimum volumes are met for eight hours. Condition is 80% satisfied if parenthetical volumes are met for eight hours. Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic Applicable: Yes No Condition B is intended for application where the traffic volume is Excessive Delay: Yes No so heavy that traffic on the minor street suffers excessive delay. 100% Satisfied: Yes No 80% Satisfied: Yes No Eight Highest Hours Minimum Requirements (volumes in veh/hr) (80% Shown in Brackets) Approach Lanes 1 2 or more Volume Level 100% 70% 100% 70% Both Approaches on Major Street (600) (420) (720) ,050 1,119 1,175 Highest Approach on Minor Street (60) (042) (80) Record 8 highest hours and the corresponding volumes in boxes provided. Condition is 100% satisfied if the minimum volumes are met for eight hours. Condition is 80% satisfied if parenthetical volumes are met for eight hours. 8:30 AM 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM 11:00 AM - 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM Eight Highest Hours 12:00 PM 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM 3:00 PM - 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM 4:00 PM 4:00 PM - 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 5:00 PM - 5:00 PM 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 6:00 PM Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457

130 2019 BUILD CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Form TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - 07/99 Page 2 of 5 City: County: Westlake Cuyahoga Engineer: Date: ABC May 19, 2017 Major Street: Dover Center Road Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: Minor Street: Westown Boulevard Lanes: 1 35 Volume Level Criteria 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic > 70 km/h (40 mph)? Yes No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? Yes No If Question 1 or 2 above is answered "Yes", then use "70%" volume level 70% 100% WARRANT 2 - FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Applicable: Yes No If all four points lie above the appropriate line, then the warrant is satisfied. Satisfied: Yes No Plot four volume combinations on the applicable figure below. 700 FIGURE 4C-1: Criteria for "100%" Volume Level Four Volumes Highest Major Minor Hours Street Street 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM :00 AM - 10:00 AM :00 PM - 1:00 PM :00 PM - 3:00 PM MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE & 1 LANE 100 *115 * MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH * Note: 115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. 400 FIGURE 4C-2: Criteria for "70%" Volume Level (Community Less than 10,000 population or above 70 km/hr (40 mph) on Major Street) MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE & 1 LANE *80 * MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH * Note: 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 60 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457

131 2019 BUILD CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Form TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - 07/99 Page 3 of 5 City: County: Westlake Cuyahoga Engineer: Date: ABC May 19, 2017 Major Street: Dover Center Road Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: Minor Street: Westown Boulevard Lanes: 1 35 Volume Level Criteria 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic > 70 km/h (40 mph)? Yes No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? Yes No If Question 1 or 2 above is answered "Yes", then use "70%" volume level 70% 100% WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR Applicable: Yes No If all three criteria are fullfilled or the plotted point lies above the appropriate line, Satisfied: Yes No then the warrant is satisfed. Plot volume combination on the applicable figure below. Unusual condition justifying use of warrant: 600 FIGURE 4C-3: Criteria for "100%" Volume Level School Bus Traffic Record hour when criteria are fulfilled and the corresponding delay or volume in boxes provided. Peak Hour AM Criteria 1. Delay on Minor Approach *(vehicle-hours) Approach Lanes 1 2 Delay Criteria* Delay* 1.2 Fulfilled?: Yes No 2. Volume on Minor Approach *(vehicles per hour) Approach Lanes 1 2 Volume Criteria* Volume* 119 Fulfilled?: Yes No 3. Total Entering Volume *(vehicles per hour) No. of Approaches 3 4 Volume Criteria* Volume* 1,087 Fulfilled?: Yes No MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH 1 LANE & 1 LANE * Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH FIGURE 4C-4: Criteria for "70%" Volume Level (Community Less than 10,000 population or above 70 km/hr (40 mph) on Major Street) 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE & 1 LANE MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH * Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. *150 *100 *100 *75 Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457

132 2019 BUILD CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Form TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - 07/99 Page 4 of 5 City: County: Westlake Cuyahoga Engineer: Date: ABC May 19, 2017 Major Street: Dover Center Road Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: 35 Minor Street: Westown Boulevard Lanes: 1 WARRANT 4 - PEDESTRIAN VOLUME Applicable: Yes No Record hours where criteria are fulfilled and the corresponding volume or gap Satisfied: Yes No frequency in the boxes provided. The warrant is satisfied if condition 1 or 2 is fulfilled and condition 3 is fulfilled. Pedestrian Pedestrian Fulfilled? Criteria Hour Volume Gaps Yes No 1. Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 7:00 8:00 AM ped/hr or more for each of any four hours 8:00-9:00 AM 0 and there are less than 60 gaps per hour in the 4:00-5:00 PM 0 major street traffic stream of adequate length. 2. Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 5:00-6:00 PM ped/hr or more for any one hour and there are less than 60 gaps per hour in the major street traffic stream of adequate length The nearest traffic signal along the major street is located more than 90 m (300 ft) away, or the nearest signal is within 90 m (300 ft) but the proposed traffic signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. WARRANT 5 - SCHOOL CROSSING Applicable: Yes No Record hours where criteria are fulfilled and the corresponding volume or gap Satisfied: Yes No frequency in the boxes provided. The warrant is satisfied if all three of the criteria are fulfilled. Criteria 1. There are a minimum of 20 students crossing the major street Students: Hour: during the highest crossing hour. 2. There are fewer adequate gaps in the major street traffic stream during the period Minutes: Gaps: when the children are using the crossing than the number of minutes in the same period. 3. The nearest traffic signal along the major street is located more than 90 m (300 ft) away, or the nearest signal is within 90 m (300 ft) but the proposed traffic signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. Fulfilled? Yes No WARRANT 6 - COORDINATED SIGNAL SYSTEM Applicable: Yes No Indicate if the criteria are fulfilled in the boxes provided. The warrant is Satisfied: Yes No satisfied if either criterion is fulfilled. This warrant should not be applied when the resulting signal spacing would be less than 300 m (1,000 ft). Criteria 1. On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominately in one direction, the adjacent signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicle platooning. 2. On a two-way street, adjacent signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning, and the proposed and adjacent signals will collectively provide a progressive operation. Fulfilled? Yes No Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457

133 2019 BUILD CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Form TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - 07/99 Page 5 of 5 City: County: Westlake Cuyahoga Engineer: Date: ABC May 19, 2017 Major Street: Dover Center Road Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: 35 Minor Street: Westown Boulevard Lanes: 1 WARRANT 7 - CRASH EXPERIENCE Applicable: Yes No Record hours where criteria are fulfilled, the corresponding volume, and other Satisfied: Yes No information in the boxes provided. The warrant is satisfied if all three of the criteria are fulfilled. 1. One of the Warrant 1, Condition A (80% satisfied) warrants Warrant 1, Condition B (80% satisfied) to the right is met. Criteria Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume at 80% of volume requirements: 80 ped/hr for four (4) hours or Hour Volume 152 ped/hr for one (1) hour 2. Adequate trial of other remedial measure has failed to reduce crash frequency. Measure tried: UNKNOWN 3. Five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by signal, have occurred within a 12-mo. period. Number of crashes per 12 months: Met? Yes No 2 Fulfilled? Yes No WARRANT 8 - ROADWAY NETWORK Applicable: Yes No Record hours where criteria are fulfilled, and the corresponding volume or other Satisfied: Yes No information in the boxes provided. The warrant is satisfied if at least one of the criteria is fulfilled and if all intersecting routes have one or more of the characteristics listed. Criteria 1. Both of a. Total entering volume of at least 1,000 veh/hr Entering Volume: the criteria during a typical weekday peak hour. to the right b. Five-year projected volumes that satisfy Warrant: are met. one or more of Warrants 1, 2, or 3. Satisfied?: 2. Total entering volume at least 1,000 veh/hr for each of any 5 hrs of a non-normal business day (Sat. or Sun.) Met? Yes No Hour Volume Fulfilled? Yes No 1. Part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow. 2. Rural or suburban highway outside of, entering, or traversing a city. 3. Appears as a major route on an official plan. Characteristics of Major Routes Major Street: Minor Street: Major Street: Minor Street: Major Street: Minor Street: Met? Fulfilled? Yes No Yes No CONCLUSIONS Warrants Satisfied: Remarks: Warrant #9 NOT APPLICABLE due to no at grade railroad crossing. INTERSECTION DOES NOT MEET WARRANT CRITERIA UNDER 2019 BUILD CONDITIONS Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457

134 2039 BUILD CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Form TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - 07/99 Page 1 of 5 City: County: Westlake Cuyahoga Engineer: Date: ABC May 19, 2017 Major Street: Dover Center Road Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: Minor Street: Westown Boulevard Lanes: 1 35 Volume Level Criteria 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic > 70 km/h (40 mph)? Yes No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? Yes No If Question 1 or 2 above is answered "Yes", then use "70%" volume level 70% 100% WARRANT 1 - EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Applicable: Yes No Warrant 1 is satisfied if Condition A or Condition B is "100%" satisfied. Satisfied: Yes No Warrant is also satisfied if both Condition A and Condition B are "80%" satisfied. Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume 100% Satisfied: Yes No 80% Satisfied: Yes No (volumes in veh/hr) Approach Lanes Volume Level Both Approaches on Major Street Highest Approach on Minor Street Minimum Requirements (80% Shown in Brackets) 1 2 or more 100% 70% 100% 70% (400) (280) (480) (120) (084) (160) 7:30 AM - 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM 1, ,039 1,021 Record 8 highest hours and the corresponding volumes in boxes provided. Condition is 100% satisfied if the minimum volumes are met for eight hours. Condition is 80% satisfied if parenthetical volumes are met for eight hours. Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic Applicable: Yes No Condition B is intended for application where the traffic volume is Excessive Delay: Yes No so heavy that traffic on the minor street suffers excessive delay. 100% Satisfied: Yes No 80% Satisfied: Yes No Eight Highest Hours Minimum Requirements (volumes in veh/hr) (80% Shown in Brackets) Approach Lanes 1 2 or more Volume Level 100% 70% 100% 70% Both Approaches on Major Street (600) (420) (720) 1, ,039 1,021 1,104 1,255 1,338 Highest Approach on Minor Street (60) (042) (80) Record 8 highest hours and the corresponding volumes in boxes provided. Condition is 100% satisfied if the minimum volumes are met for eight hours. Condition is 80% satisfied if parenthetical volumes are met for eight hours. 8:30 AM :00 AM - 12:00 PM 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM 2:00 PM - 44 Eight Highest Hours 51 3:00 PM 83 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM 1,104 1,255 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 40 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 1,338 1,405 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 5:00 PM :00 PM 1, Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457

135 2039 BUILD CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Form TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - 07/99 Page 2 of 5 City: County: Westlake Cuyahoga Engineer: Date: ABC May 19, 2017 Major Street: Dover Center Road Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: Minor Street: Westown Boulevard Lanes: 1 35 Volume Level Criteria 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic > 70 km/h (40 mph)? Yes No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? Yes No If Question 1 or 2 above is answered "Yes", then use "70%" volume level 70% 100% WARRANT 2 - FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Applicable: Yes No If all four points lie above the appropriate line, then the warrant is satisfied. Satisfied: Yes No Plot four volume combinations on the applicable figure below. 700 FIGURE 4C-1: Criteria for "100%" Volume Level Four Volumes Highest Major Minor Hours Street Street 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 1, :00 AM - 10:00 AM :00 PM - 1:00 PM 1, :00 PM - 3:00 PM 1, MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE & 1 LANE MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH * Note: 115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. 400 FIGURE 4C-2: Criteria for "70%" Volume Level (Community Less than 10,000 population or above 70 km/hr (40 mph) on Major Street) *115 *80 MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE & 1 LANE *80 * MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH * Note: 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 60 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457

136 2039 BUILD CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Form TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - 07/99 Page 3 of 5 City: County: Westlake Cuyahoga Engineer: Date: ABC May 19, 2017 Major Street: Dover Center Road Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: Minor Street: Westown Boulevard Lanes: 1 35 Volume Level Criteria 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic > 70 km/h (40 mph)? Yes No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? Yes No If Question 1 or 2 above is answered "Yes", then use "70%" volume level 70% 100% WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR Applicable: Yes No If all three criteria are fullfilled or the plotted point lies above the appropriate line, Satisfied: Yes No then the warrant is satisfed. Plot volume combination on the applicable figure below. Unusual condition justifying use of warrant: 600 FIGURE 4C-3: Criteria for "100%" Volume Level School Bus Traffic Record hour when criteria are fulfilled and the corresponding delay or volume in boxes provided. Peak Hour AM Criteria 1. Delay on Minor Approach *(vehicle-hours) Approach Lanes 1 2 Delay Criteria* Delay* 2.8 Fulfilled?: Yes No 2. Volume on Minor Approach *(vehicles per hour) Approach Lanes 1 2 Volume Criteria* Volume* 119 Fulfilled?: Yes No 3. Total Entering Volume *(vehicles per hour) No. of Approaches 3 4 Volume Criteria* Volume* 1,420 Fulfilled?: Yes No MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH 1 LANE & 1 LANE * Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH FIGURE 4C-4: Criteria for "70%" Volume Level (Community Less than 10,000 population or above 70 km/hr (40 mph) on Major Street) 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE & 1 LANE MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH * Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. *150 *100 *100 *75 Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457

137 2039 BUILD CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Form TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - 07/99 Page 4 of 5 City: County: Westlake Cuyahoga Engineer: Date: ABC May 19, 2017 Major Street: Dover Center Road Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: 35 Minor Street: Westown Boulevard Lanes: 1 WARRANT 4 - PEDESTRIAN VOLUME Applicable: Yes No Record hours where criteria are fulfilled and the corresponding volume or gap Satisfied: Yes No frequency in the boxes provided. The warrant is satisfied if condition 1 or 2 is fulfilled and condition 3 is fulfilled. Pedestrian Pedestrian Fulfilled? Criteria Hour Volume Gaps Yes No 1. Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 7:00 8:00 AM ped/hr or more for each of any four hours 8:00-9:00 AM 0 and there are less than 60 gaps per hour in the 4:00-5:00 PM 0 major street traffic stream of adequate length. 2. Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 5:00-6:00 PM ped/hr or more for any one hour and there are less than 60 gaps per hour in the major street traffic stream of adequate length The nearest traffic signal along the major street is located more than 90 m (300 ft) away, or the nearest signal is within 90 m (300 ft) but the proposed traffic signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. WARRANT 5 - SCHOOL CROSSING Applicable: Yes No Record hours where criteria are fulfilled and the corresponding volume or gap Satisfied: Yes No frequency in the boxes provided. The warrant is satisfied if all three of the criteria are fulfilled. Criteria 1. There are a minimum of 20 students crossing the major street Students: Hour: during the highest crossing hour. 2. There are fewer adequate gaps in the major street traffic stream during the period Minutes: Gaps: when the children are using the crossing than the number of minutes in the same period. 3. The nearest traffic signal along the major street is located more than 90 m (300 ft) away, or the nearest signal is within 90 m (300 ft) but the proposed traffic signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. Fulfilled? Yes No WARRANT 6 - COORDINATED SIGNAL SYSTEM Applicable: Yes No Indicate if the criteria are fulfilled in the boxes provided. The warrant is Satisfied: Yes No satisfied if either criterion is fulfilled. This warrant should not be applied when the resulting signal spacing would be less than 300 m (1,000 ft). Criteria 1. On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominately in one direction, the adjacent signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicle platooning. 2. On a two-way street, adjacent signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning, and the proposed and adjacent signals will collectively provide a progressive operation. Fulfilled? Yes No Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457

138 2039 BUILD CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Form TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - 07/99 Page 5 of 5 City: County: Westlake Cuyahoga Engineer: Date: ABC May 19, 2017 Major Street: Dover Center Road Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: 35 Minor Street: Westown Boulevard Lanes: 1 WARRANT 7 - CRASH EXPERIENCE Applicable: Yes No Record hours where criteria are fulfilled, the corresponding volume, and other Satisfied: Yes No information in the boxes provided. The warrant is satisfied if all three of the criteria are fulfilled. 1. One of the Warrant 1, Condition A (80% satisfied) warrants Warrant 1, Condition B (80% satisfied) to the right is met. Criteria Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume at 80% of volume requirements: 80 ped/hr for four (4) hours or Hour Volume 152 ped/hr for one (1) hour 2. Adequate trial of other remedial measure has failed to reduce crash frequency. Measure tried: UNKNOWN 3. Five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by signal, have occurred within a 12-mo. period. Number of crashes per 12 months: Met? Yes No 2 Fulfilled? Yes No WARRANT 8 - ROADWAY NETWORK Applicable: Yes No Record hours where criteria are fulfilled, and the corresponding volume or other Satisfied: Yes No information in the boxes provided. The warrant is satisfied if at least one of the criteria is fulfilled and if all intersecting routes have one or more of the characteristics listed. Criteria 1. Both of a. Total entering volume of at least 1,000 veh/hr Entering Volume: the criteria during a typical weekday peak hour. to the right b. Five-year projected volumes that satisfy Warrant: are met. one or more of Warrants 1, 2, or 3. Satisfied?: 2. Total entering volume at least 1,000 veh/hr for each of any 5 hrs of a non-normal business day (Sat. or Sun.) Met? Yes No Hour Volume Fulfilled? Yes No 1. Part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow. 2. Rural or suburban highway outside of, entering, or traversing a city. 3. Appears as a major route on an official plan. Characteristics of Major Routes Major Street: Minor Street: Major Street: Minor Street: Major Street: Minor Street: Met? Fulfilled? Yes No Yes No CONCLUSIONS Warrants Satisfied: Remarks: Warrant #9 NOT APPLICABLE due to no at grade railroad crossing. INTERSECTION DOES NOT MEET WARRANT CRITERIA UNDER 2039 BUILD CONDITIONS Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457

139 2039 ALTERNATE SCENARIO BUILD CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Form TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - 07/99 Page 3 of 5 City: County: Westlake Cuyahoga Engineer: Date: ABC May 19, 2017 Major Street: Dover Center Road Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: Minor Street: Westown Boulevard Lanes: 1 35 Volume Level Criteria 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic > 70 km/h (40 mph)? Yes No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? Yes No If Question 1 or 2 above is answered "Yes", then use "70%" volume level 70% 100% WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR Applicable: Yes No If all three criteria are fullfilled or the plotted point lies above the appropriate line, Satisfied: Yes No then the warrant is satisfed. Plot volume combination on the applicable figure below. Unusual condition justifying use of warrant: 600 FIGURE 4C-3: Criteria for "100%" Volume Level School Bus Traffic Record hour when criteria are fulfilled and the corresponding delay or volume in boxes provided. Peak Hour AM Criteria 1. Delay on Minor Approach *(vehicle-hours) Approach Lanes 1 2 Delay Criteria* Delay* 2.8 Fulfilled?: Yes No 2. Volume on Minor Approach *(vehicles per hour) Approach Lanes 1 2 Volume Criteria* Volume* 119 Fulfilled?: Yes No 3. Total Entering Volume *(vehicles per hour) No. of Approaches 3 4 Volume Criteria* Volume* 1,420 Fulfilled?: Yes No MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH 1 LANE & 1 LANE * Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH FIGURE 4C-4: Criteria for "70%" Volume Level (Community Less than 10,000 population or above 70 km/hr (40 mph) on Major Street) 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE & 1 LANE MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH * Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. *150 *100 *100 *75 Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457

140 2019 BUILD CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Form TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - 07/99 Page 3 of 5 City: County: Westlake Cuyahoga Engineer: Date: ABC May 19, 2017 Major Street: Center Ridge Road Lanes: 2 Critical Approach Speed: Minor Street: Proposed West Access Lanes: 1 35 Volume Level Criteria 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic > 70 km/h (40 mph)? Yes No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? Yes No If Question 1 or 2 above is answered "Yes", then use "70%" volume level 70% 100% WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR Applicable: Yes No If all three criteria are fullfilled or the plotted point lies above the appropriate line, Satisfied: Yes No then the warrant is satisfed. Plot volume combination on the applicable figure below. Unusual condition justifying use of warrant: 600 FIGURE 4C-3: Criteria for "100%" Volume Level School Bus Traffic Record hour when criteria are fulfilled and the corresponding delay or volume in boxes provided. Peak Hour AM Criteria 1. Delay on Minor Approach *(vehicle-hours) Approach Lanes 1 2 Delay Criteria* Delay* Fulfilled?: Yes No 2. Volume on Minor Approach *(vehicles per hour) Approach Lanes 1 2 Volume Criteria* Volume* 267 Fulfilled?: Yes No 3. Total Entering Volume *(vehicles per hour) No. of Approaches 3 4 Volume Criteria* Volume* 1,333 Fulfilled?: Yes No MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH 1 LANE & 1 LANE * Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH FIGURE 4C-4: Criteria for "70%" Volume Level (Community Less than 10,000 population or above 70 km/hr (40 mph) on Major Street) 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE & 1 LANE MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH * Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. *150 *100 *100 *75 Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457

141 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix J Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

142 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name AM 39 CenterDover-WBNB RTL.xus Project Description Build Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) F F F C C C F C B C F Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 85.0 F 32.5 C 44.7 D 71.6 E Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 61.1 E Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.4 B 2.3 B 2.9 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.7 B 1.4 A 2.0 B 1.8 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 5/31/ :02:34 PM

143 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & Glenmore Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Glenmore Drive Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Build Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration LT T T TR LR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS A E Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS E Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/31/2017 7:01:25 AM AM 39 Glenmore.xtw

144 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Build Conditions Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: North-South Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration LR LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS F A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS F Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version Generated: 5/31/2017 1:07:45 PM AM 39 Westown.xtw

145 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name PM 39 CenterDover-WBNB RTL.xus Project Description Build Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C D D C C C D C B B D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 40.9 D 31.0 C 29.2 C 38.4 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 35.1 D Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.4 B 2.3 B 2.9 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.3 A 1.2 A 1.8 B 1.7 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 5/31/ :16:26 PM

146 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & Glenmore Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Glenmore Drive Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Build Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration LT T T TR LR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS C Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/31/2017 7:02:02 AM PM 39 Glenmore.xtw

147 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Build Conditions Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration LR LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS F A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS F Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version Generated: 5/31/2017 1:07:05 PM PM 39 Westown.xtw

148 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix K Build Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 w/ Improvements June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

149 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name AM 39 CenterDover-SB TL.xus Project Description SB RTL Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) D D D C C C D D C D D C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 50.3 D 27.6 C 42.6 D 37.6 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 40.7 D Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.4 B 2.4 B 3.0 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.7 B 1.4 A 2.0 B 1.8 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 5/31/ :35:38 PM

150 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & Glenmore Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Glenmore Drive Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes SB RTL & LTL Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration LT T T TR L R Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS A F B Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS E Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version Generated: 5/31/2017 2:11:57 PM AM 39 Glenmore-SB TL.xtw

151 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes EB RTL & LTL Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration L R LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS F D A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS F Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version Generated: 5/31/2017 1:02:28 PM AM 39 Westown-EB TL.xtw

152 HCS7 Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency or Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. E/W Street Name Westown Boulevard Date Performed 5/19/2017 N/S Street Name Dover Center Road Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Roundabout Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N) Lane Assignment LR LT TR Volume (V), veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles, % Flow Rate (vpce), pc/h Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes Pedestrians Crossing, p/h Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway (s) Follow-Up Headway (s) Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h Entry Volume veh/h Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h Capacity (cpce), pc/h Capacity (c), veh/h v/c Ratio (x) Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh Lane LOS A B A 95% Queue, veh Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS A B A Intersection Delay, s/veh LOS 10.7 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Roundabouts Version 7.2 5/31/2017 7:12:07 AM AM 39 Westown-RDAB.xro

153 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Dover Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Westown File Name AM 39 Westown-TS.xus Project Description Traffic Signal Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 6.0 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C B Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 22.8 C C 17.2 B Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 20.8 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.1 B 2.1 B 0.7 A 1.7 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS F 1.8 B 1.5 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 6/1/ :43:34 AM

154 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name PM 39 CenterDover-SB RTL.xus Project Description SB RTL Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C C C B C C C C C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 29.9 C 25.0 C 30.0 C 27.4 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 28.2 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.4 B 2.4 B 2.9 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.3 A 1.2 A 1.8 B 1.7 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 5/31/ :40:35 PM

155 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & Glenmore Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Glenmore Drive Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes SB RTL & LTL Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration LT T T TR L R Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS A D B Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS C Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version Generated: 5/31/2017 2:13:32 PM PM 39 Glenmore-SB TL.xtw

156 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes EB RTL & LTL Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration LR LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS E A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS E Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version Generated: 5/31/2017 1:03:56 PM PM 39 Westown-EB TL.xtw

157 HCS7 Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency or Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. E/W Street Name Westown Boulevard Date Performed 5/19/2017 N/S Street Name Dover Center Road Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Roundabout Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N) Lane Assignment LR LT TR Volume (V), veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles, % Flow Rate (vpce), pc/h Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes Pedestrians Crossing, p/h Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway (s) Follow-Up Headway (s) Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h Entry Volume veh/h Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h Capacity (cpce), pc/h Capacity (c), veh/h v/c Ratio (x) Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh Lane LOS A B A 95% Queue, veh Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS A B A Intersection Delay, s/veh LOS 9.3 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Roundabouts Version 7.2 5/31/2017 7:13:08 AM PM 39 Westown-RDAB.xro

158 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Dover Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Westown File Name PM 39 Westown-TS.xus Project Description Traffic Signal Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 4.6 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 21.2 C C 20.3 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 20.9 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.1 B 2.1 B 0.7 A 1.7 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS F 1.7 B 1.6 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 6/1/ :47:07 AM

159 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix L Access Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2019 June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

160 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2019 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 West Access File Name AM 19 West.xus Project Description Build Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) B C C C B B C C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 33.5 C 17.9 B 26.8 C 33.8 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 27.0 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.1 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.5 B 1.2 A 0.6 A 0.5 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 4:41:06 PM

161 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & East Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street East Access Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Build Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration T TR T R Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.90 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec) 3.30 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 292 Capacity, c (veh/h) 488 v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 3.9 Control Delay (s/veh) 22.7 Level of Service, LOS C Approach Delay (s/veh) 22.7 Approach LOS C Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 4:32:31 PM AM 19 East.xtw

162 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2019 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 West Access File Name PM 19 West.xus Project Description Build Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C B B B C B C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 28.4 C 18.7 B 22.5 C 28.4 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 23.1 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.1 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.0 A 1.2 A 0.6 A 0.5 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/ :31:09 PM

163 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & East Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street East Access Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Build Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration T TR T R Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.90 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec) 3.30 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 149 Capacity, c (veh/h) 688 v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 0.8 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.7 Level of Service, LOS B Approach Delay (s/veh) 11.7 Approach LOS B Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 4:33:54 PM PM 19 East.xtw

164 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix M Access Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

165 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 West Access File Name AM 39 West.xus Project Description Build Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) B D D D A A C C D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 36.7 D 17.0 B 30.1 C 37.5 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 28.7 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.1 B 2.8 C 2.9 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.7 B 1.3 A 0.6 A 0.5 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 4:40:22 PM

166 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & East Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street East Access Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Build Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration T TR T R Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 292 Capacity, c (veh/h) 419 v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 5.2 Control Delay (s/veh) 31.2 Level of Service, LOS D Approach Delay (s/veh) 31.2 Approach LOS D Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 4:47:11 PM AM 19 East.xtw

167 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2019 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 West Access File Name PM 39 West.xus Project Description Build Conditions Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C B B B C B C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 26.8 C 17.4 B 20.5 C 26.9 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 21.7 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.1 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.1 A 1.3 A 0.6 A 0.5 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 4:48:06 PM

168 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & East Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street East Access Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Build Conditions Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration T TR T R Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 149 Capacity, c (veh/h) 629 v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 0.9 Control Delay (s/veh) 12.5 Level of Service, LOS B Approach Delay (s/veh) 12.5 Approach LOS B Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version 7.2 Generated: 5/30/2017 4:50:21 PM PM 19 East.xtw

169 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix N ODOT Turn Lane Warrant Graphs June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

170 CENTER RIDGE ROAD & EAST ACCESS 2019 Build WARRANT IS MET AM Advancing Volume = 1000 vph PM Advancing Volume = 578 vph AM Right Turn Volume = 10 vph PM Right Turn Volume = 10 vph WARRANT IS NOT MET WARRANT IS NOT MET

171 CENTER RIDGE ROAD & EAST ACCESS 2039 Build WARRANT IS MET AM Advancing Volume = 1190 vph PM Advancing Volume = 688 vph AM Right Turn Volume = 10 vph PM Right Turn Volume = 10 vph WARRANT IS NOT MET WARRANT IS NOT MET

172 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix O ODOT Turn Lane Design Criteria June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

173

174

175

176 Example - Turn Lane Design Using Figures and Problem Calculate the length of an exclusive left-turn lane on a signalized intersection approach of a rural arterial highway (Design Speed - 55 mph). The intersection approach has three comprised on an exclusive left turn lane and two through lanes with 200 left turning vehicles and 680 through vehicles, respectively. The traffic signal has a 90 second cycle length. Determine Lane Length Refer to the matrix in Figure First, using the given design speed of 55 mph, enter the column with the design speed 50-60". Next, determine if the left turn demand volume is high or low. Low is considered 10% or less of the approach traffic flow. The demand is 200/( ) = 22.7%. Therefore, the left turn demand is considered high. Based on a signalized intersection, the matrix indicates that Method B or C (whichever is greater) should be used to calculate the length of the left turn lane. Method B, for the 55 mph design speed, requires a left turn lane length of 285 ft. Method C is calculated by adding the 164 ft. (for the 55 mph design speed) to the storage length determined from Figure To determine the storage length, first, calculate the number of cycles/hour (3,600 seconds/hour x 1 cycle/90 seconds = 40 cycles/hour). Next, divide the hourly left turn approach volume by the number of cycles/hour (200 left turning vehicles divided by 40 cycles/hour = 5). Using Figure , the required storage length is 200 ft. Adding the 200 ft. storage length to the 164 ft. (moderate speed deceleration length) noted above equals 364 ft. A comparison of the values from Method B and Method C yields 285 ft. and 364 ft., respectively. Therefore, use the greater value of 364 ft. Check Length for Backup Next, check to determine if backups from the through movements will block left turning vehicles from entering the left turn lane. Figure is also used for this purpose. Using the value of 40 cycles/hour (determined above), calculate the average number of through vehicles per cycle (680/40 = 17). Based on Figure , this will result in backups of 600 ft. in a single lane. However, since the through traffic volume is in two through lanes, the backup of through vehicles is only one-half the 600 ft., or 300 ft. Therefore, the through vehicle backup of 300 ft. per lane will not block left turning vehicles desiring to enter the left turn lane which extends back 364 ft. October 2004

177 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix P Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 Alternate Scenario June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

178 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name AM 39ALT CenterDover-SB RTL.xus Project Description Alternate Scenario Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) D D D C C C C D C D C B Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 44.6 D 29.3 C 36.1 D 33.1 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 36.8 D Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.4 B 2.4 B 3.0 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.7 B 1.4 A 1.8 B 1.8 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 6/1/2017 9:29:04 AM

179 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Glenmore/West Access File Name AM 39ALT Glenmore.xus Project Description Alternate Scenario Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) B C C C B B C C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 28.2 C 14.1 B 27.8 C 26.0 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 22.9 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.1 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.6 B 1.2 A 0.6 A 0.6 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 6/1/2017 9:38:58 AM

180 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & East Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street East Access Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Alternate Scenario Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration T TR T R Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 234 Capacity, c (veh/h) 419 v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 3.3 Control Delay (s/veh) 24.0 Level of Service, LOS C Approach Delay (s/veh) 24.0 Approach LOS C Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version Generated: 6/1/2017 9:52:15 AM AM 39Alt East.xtw

181 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Alternate Scenario Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration L R LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS F B A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS F Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version Generated: 6/1/2017 9:57:13 AM AM 39ALT Westown.xtw

182 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Dover Center File Name PM 39ALT CenterDover-SB RTL.xus Project Description Alternate Scenario Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C C C B C C C C C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 29.4 C 25.2 C 28.4 C 26.4 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 27.4 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.4 B 2.4 B 2.9 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.2 A 1.2 A 1.7 B 1.7 B Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 6/1/2017 9:36:29 AM

183 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Glenmore/West Access File Name PM 39ALT Glenmore.xus Project Description Alternate Scenario Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) B C C B B B C C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 22.9 C 14.6 B 22.4 C 21.3 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 18.6 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.1 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.1 A 1.3 A 0.6 A 0.5 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 6/1/2017 9:38:58 AM

184 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Center Ridge & East Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Center Ridge Road Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street East Access Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Alternate Scenario Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U U Number of Lanes Configuration T TR T R Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.90 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec) 3.30 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 107 Capacity, c (veh/h) 629 v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 0.6 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.9 Level of Service, LOS B Approach Delay (s/veh) 11.9 Approach LOS B Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version Generated: 6/1/2017 9:51:51 AM PM 39Alt East.xtw

185 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst ABC Intersection Dover Center & Westown Agency/Co. TMS Engineers, Inc. Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Date Performed 5/19/2017 East/West Street Westown Boulevard Analysis Year 2039 North/South Street Dover Center Road Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes Alternate Scenario Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority U U Number of Lanes Configuration L R LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Critical and Follow-up Headways Undivided Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio % Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS F B A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS E Copyright 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7 TWSC Version Generated: 6/1/2017 9:59:53 AM PM 39ALT Westown.xtw

186 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix Q Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2039 Alternate Scenario w/ Imp. June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

187 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Dover Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Westown File Name AM 39ALT Westown-TS.xus Project Description Alternate Access Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 7.6 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C B Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 27.2 C C 12.3 B Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 22.2 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.1 B 2.1 B 0.7 A 1.7 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS F 1.8 B 1.4 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 6/1/ :14:57 AM

188 HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency TMS Engineers, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 Analyst ABC Analysis Date May 19, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Westlake, OH Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92 Urban Street Dover Analysis Year 2039 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Westown File Name PM 39ALT Westown-TS.xus Project Description Alternate Scenariol Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 5.7 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 85 th percentile) Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 85 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 85 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C B Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 21.7 C C 16.4 B Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 19.8 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.1 B 2.1 B 0.7 A 1.7 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS F 1.7 B 1.3 A Copyright 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7 Streets Version Generated: 6/1/ :12:55 AM

189 Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School, Westlake, Ohio Appendix R ODOT Channelizing Island Design Criteria June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc.

190

191

192

193

194 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio June 5, 2017 Prepared For: Westlake City Schools Board of Education Hilliard Boulevard Westlake, Ohio Prepared By: TMS Engineers, Inc Case Parkway South Unit #7 Twinsburg, Ohio REGISTERED ENGINEER NO. E56982 CERTIFICATION NO This document was prepared consistent with local agency requirements and/or applicable guidelines contained in this report.

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio December 12, 2012 Prepared for: The City of Huron 417 Main Huron, OH 44839 Providing Practical Experience Technical Excellence and Client

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1. Location and Study Area... 1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Access... 2 1.3. Adjacent Land Uses... 2 1.4. Existing ways...

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 1.1. Site Location and Study Area...1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access...2 1.3.

More information

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016 Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 216 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE WestBranch Residential Development LOCATED IN DAVIDSON, NC Prepared For: Lennar Carolinas, LLC

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY, OHIO Nantucket Circle and Montgomery Road () Prepared for: ODLE

More information

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace Abington Township, Montgomery County, PA Sandy A. Koza, P.E., PTOE PA PE License Number PE059911 Prepared by McMahon Associates, Inc. 425 Commerce Drive,

More information

Table of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

Table of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: 151714A Table of Contents Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 III. 215 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS... 6

More information

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017 Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North arolina June 2017 N. Little Egypt Road DQ\ QDQFLQJ VDOHV RU RWKHU SHUIRUPDQFH EDVHG FULWHULD Proposed Site Driveways Site Driveway 1 TRAFFI

More information

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM July 2014 FINAL (SR 43) Project Development and Environment Study From State Road 60 (Adamo Drive) to I-4 (SR 400) Hillsborough County, Florida Work Program Item

More information

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh) Chapter 5 Traffic Analysis 5.1 SUMMARY US /West 6 th Street assumes a unique role in the Lawrence Douglas County transportation system. This principal arterial street currently conveys commuter traffic

More information

Technical Memorandum TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. RIDLEY ROAD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, VA. Prepared for: Mr. David Williams.

Technical Memorandum TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. RIDLEY ROAD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, VA. Prepared for: Mr. David Williams. Technical Memorandum TRFFIC IMPCT STUDY RIDLEY ROD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, V Prepared for: Mr. David Williams By: Charles Smith, P.E., PTOE EPR Charlottesville, V July 2014 1 TBLE OF CONTENTS

More information

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: DECEMBER 2007 Glenn Avenue Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background

More information

Highway 111 Corridor Study

Highway 111 Corridor Study Highway 111 Corridor Study June, 2009 LINCOLN CO. HWY 111 CORRIDOR STUDY Draft Study Tea, South Dakota Prepared for City of Tea Sioux Falls Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by HDR Engineering,

More information

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study 5858 N COLLEGE, LLC nue Traffic Impact Study August 22, 2016 Contents Traffic Impact Study Page Preparer Qualifications... 1 Introduction... 2 Existing Roadway Conditions... 5 Existing Traffic Conditions...

More information

Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, North Carolina

Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, North Carolina 9. CONCLUSIONS This Traffic Impact Analysis Update was conducted to determine the potential traffic impacts of the proposed Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club residential development, located east

More information

Traffic Impact Statement

Traffic Impact Statement Traffic Impact Statement Mixed Use Development, US 41 and Old Trail Drive aka Tide-Starbucks 4900 9 th Street North General Development Site Plan (GDSP) Collier County, FL 10/6/2015 Prepared for: Prepared

More information

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: JANUARY 2007 Donahue Drive Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background

More information

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer Date: April 16 th, 2015 To: From: Re: Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer Darian Nagle-Gamm, Traffic Engineering Planner Highway 6 (2 nd Street) /

More information

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department 9/1/2009 Introduction Traffic studies are used to help the city determine potential impacts to the operation of the surrounding roadway network. Two

More information

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 901.3.A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION The following information is required from all applicants directly or indirectly accessing any collector or arterial road or as otherwise

More information

Traffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning

Traffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning F i s c h b a c h Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning Traffic Impact Study Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN Prepared March 2016 Ms. Gillian L. Fischbach, P.E.,

More information

INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY State Route 57 / Seville Road

INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY State Route 57 / Seville Road INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY State Route 57 / Seville Road City of Wadsworth, Medina County, Ohio Prepared For: City of Wadsworth Engineering Department 120 Maple Street Wadsworth, OH 44281 Prepared By: GPD

More information

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015 Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Data Collection... 1 3 Existing Roadway Network... 2 4 Traffic Volume Development... 2 5 Warrant Analysis... 3 6 Traffic Control Alternative

More information

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report ROUTE 7 (HARRY BYRD HIGHWAY) WESTBOUND FROM WEST MARKET STREET TO ROUTE 9 (CHARLES TOWN PIKE) Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report Project No. 6007-053-133, P 101 Ι UPC No. 58599 Prepared by:

More information

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis PURPOSE The traffic analysis component of the K-68 Corridor Management Plan incorporates information on the existing transportation network, such as traffic volumes and intersection

More information

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections... List of Attachments Exhibits Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections... Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls... Existing

More information

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY GA SR 25 Spur at Canal Road Transportation Impact Analysis PREPARED FOR GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA 1725 Reynolds Street, Suite 300 Brunswick, Georgia 31520 PREPARED BY 217 Arrowhead Boulevard Suite 26 Jonesboro,

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Process and Procedures Manual. September 2017

Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Process and Procedures Manual. September 2017 Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Process and Procedures Manual Post Office Box 664 101 Huntersville-Concord Road Huntersville, NC 28070 Phone 704-766-2220 Fax 704-992-5528 www.huntersville.org (c) 2017, Town

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for: TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For Creekside Thornton, Colorado August 215 November 215 Revised: August 216 Prepared for: Jansen Strawn Consulting Engineers 45 West 2 nd Avenue Denver, Colorado 8223 Prepared by:

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CANYON HILLS PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION This traffic analysis has been conducted to identify and evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed Canyon Hills

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE CHAMPAIGN UNIT#4 SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL (SPALDING PARK SITE) IN THE CITY OF CHAMPAIGN Final Report Champaign Urbana Urbanized Area Transportation Study 6/24/2014

More information

CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 4.1 Introduction... 4-1 4.1.1 General... 4-1 4.1.2 Applicant Responsibility... 4-1 4.1.3 Capacity and Safety Issues... 4-1 A.

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY for the GLEN ELLEN COUNTRY CLUB SENIOR RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT 84 Millis, Massachusetts Prepared by: McMahon Associates, Inc. Prepared for: Toll Brothers, Inc. August 216 DRAFT

More information

DIMARCO CANANDAIGUA PROPERTIES HOUSING PROJECT CANANDAIGUA, ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK

DIMARCO CANANDAIGUA PROPERTIES HOUSING PROJECT CANANDAIGUA, ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE DIMARCO CANANDAIGUA PROPERTIES HOUSING PROJECT CANANDAIGUA, ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK MARCH 14, 2017 PREPARED FOR: 1950 Brighton Henrietta Town Line Rd Rochester, NY 14623 PREPARED

More information

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station Appendix C NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station Prepared for: Regional Transportation Department and URS Corporation as part of the North Metro EIS David Evans and Associates,

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION Transportation Consultants, LLC 1101 17 TH AVENUE SOUTH NASHVILLE, TN 37212

More information

EAST AND SOUTH STREET CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA

EAST AND SOUTH STREET CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A LY S I S EAST AND SOUTH STREET CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA April 217 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A LY S I S EAST AND SOUTH STREET CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Submitted

More information

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for: OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: The Ottawa Train Yards Inc. 223 Colonnade Road South, Suite 212 Nepean, Ontario K2E 7K3 January 17, 2012

More information

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc. INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED Prepared for: 7849648 Canada Inc. Octiober 1, 2015 114-598 Overview_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting

More information

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development Zoning Case: Z145-3 Traffic Impact Analysis Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development Dallas, TX October 26 th, 216 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #644827 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic

More information

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Existing Traffic Conditions PREPARED FOR: ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION ORLANDO, FLORIDA PREPARED WITH: INWOOD CONSULTING ENGINEERS

More information

Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document

Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document Existing Conditions Report - Appendix Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document This document defines the methodology and assumptions that will be used in the traffic forecasting

More information

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis MEMORANDUM Transportation Bill Troe, AICP Jason Carbee, AICP 12120 Shamrock Plaza Suite 300 Omaha, NE 68154 (402) 334-8181 (402) 334-1984 (Fax) To: Project File Date: Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade

More information

USA Parkway Traffic Operations Analysis, Roundabout Option. Pedro Rodriguez, NDOT; Bryan Gant, Jacobs; Randy Travis, NDOT

USA Parkway Traffic Operations Analysis, Roundabout Option. Pedro Rodriguez, NDOT; Bryan Gant, Jacobs; Randy Travis, NDOT Technical Memorandum TO: Hoang Hong, NDOT DATE: September 21, 2012 FROM: SUBJECT: COPIES: John Karachepone, Jacobs USA Parkway Traffic Operations Analysis, Pedro Rodriguez, NDOT; Bryan Gant, Jacobs; Randy

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA Chapter 6 - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA 6.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 6.1.1. Purpose: The purpose of this document is to outline a standard format for preparing a traffic impact study in the City of Steamboat

More information

4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES SECTION 4 4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES 4.1 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REQUIREMENTS The City has established Traffic Impact Study (TIS) requirements for the purpose of ensuring that both the quantitative and qualitative

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS...

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS... TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS... IX 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Project Overview... 1 1.2 Analysis Scenarios...

More information

6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas

6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas April 30, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #063238300 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic

More information

FINAL Albertville Business Park AUAR Update Traffic Study

FINAL Albertville Business Park AUAR Update Traffic Study FINAL Albertville Business Park AUAR Update Traffic Study Prepared for City of Albertville, MN July 20, 2017 SRF No. 10060.00 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Existing Conditions... 1 Data Collection...

More information

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY King Soopers #116, a grocery marketplace anchored commercial development, is proposed

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to identify conformance with the original traffic impact study for the proposed retail development on Lot 5 of Riverdale Retail Filing No. 1 located on the

More information

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota Walmart (Store #4865-00) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota Prepared for: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ã2013 Kimley-Horn

More information

Gene Dillon Elementary School Traffic Study Division Street Site

Gene Dillon Elementary School Traffic Study Division Street Site To: From: Dr. James Hess, Superintendent Jordan Schwarze, PE, Senior Engineer Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Date: March 30, 2016 Subject: Gene Dillon Elementary School Traffic Study reet Site Memorandum

More information

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Division Prepared by: HNTB North Carolina, PC 343

More information

REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For Wendy s Parker, Colorado January 215 Prepared for: Sterling Design Associates, LLC 29 W. Littleton Boulevard #3 Littleton, Colorado 812 Prepared by: 1233 Airport

More information

Design of Turn Lane Guidelines

Design of Turn Lane Guidelines Design of Turn Lane Guidelines CTS Transportation Research Conference May 24, 2012 Howard Preston, PE Minnesota Department of Transportation Research Services Office of Policy Analysis, Research & Innovation

More information

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY PROPOSED RIVERFRONT 47 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY PROPOSED RIVERFRONT 47 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT November 2016 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY PROPOSED RIVERFRONT 47 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT & Aspinwall Borough, Sharpsburg Borough & O Hara Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Prepared for: Riverfront

More information

TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado

TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado Submitted by: Fehr & Peers 621 17th Street, Ste. 231 Denver, CO 8293 (33) 296-43 December, 21 App. M-2 Traffic Assessment River Edge Colorado December 21 TABLE OF

More information

Road Conversion Study Plumas Street

Road Conversion Study Plumas Street Plumas Street Phase I Submitted to The Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County Submitted by Zong Tian, Ph.D., P.E. Saeedeh Farivar Haiyuan Li, Ph.D. Center for Advanced Transportation Education

More information

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY in City of Frostburg, Maryland January 2013 3566 Teays Valley Road Hurricane, WV Office: (304) 397-5508 www.denniscorporation.com Alley 24 Traffic Study January 2013 Frostburg, Maryland

More information

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Quickie Convenience Stores Larny Holdings Ltd. c/o PBC Group April 15, 2015 115-615 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny

More information

Realignment & Intersection Improvement Alternatives for the Intersection of Lorain Road & Brookpark Road

Realignment & Intersection Improvement Alternatives for the Intersection of Lorain Road & Brookpark Road Realignment & Intersection Improvement Alternatives for the Intersection of Lorain Road & Brookpark Road City of North Olmsted, Ohio September 2011 Prepared By noaca.org 5854t 2 5854t 3 1) Title & Subtitle:

More information

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES (Adopted by the Town Council on June 30, 2004) (Revised December 6, 2010) (Revised February 8, 2016) POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC

More information

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum State Road 7 Extension PD&E Study Design Traffic Technical Memorandum Palm Beach County, FL October 2010 State Road 7 Extension PD&E Study Design Traffic Technical Memorandum Palm Beach County, FL Prepared

More information

Troutbeck Farm Development

Troutbeck Farm Development Troutbeck Farm Development Willistown Township, Chester County PA For Submission To: Willistown Township Last Revised: October, 4 TPD# INLM.A. 5 E. High Street Suite 65 Pottstown, PA 9464 6.36.3 TPD@TrafficPD.com

More information

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report Preparedby: ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS Final Report Prepared for Maricopa County Department of Transportation Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1

More information

CarMax Auto Superstore/ Reconditioning Center #6002 Murrieta, California

CarMax Auto Superstore/ Reconditioning Center #6002 Murrieta, California CarMax Auto Superstore/ Reconditioning Center #6002 Murrieta, California TUSTIN 17782 17th Street Suite 200 Tustin, CA 92780-1947 714.665.4500 Fax: 714.665.4501 LOS ANGELES 145 S. Spring Street Suite 120

More information

3.9 - Transportation and Traffic

3.9 - Transportation and Traffic Transportation and Traffic 3.9 - Transportation and Traffic This section describes the potential transportation and traffic effects of project implementation on the project site and its surrounding area.

More information

PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina

PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina Prepared for Longbranch Development Prepared by January 13, 219 ii Table of Contents Subject Page Signature Page... i Table of Contents...

More information

APPENDIXB. Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum

APPENDIXB. Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum APPENDIXB Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum Environmental Assessment - Lincoln County, SD 85 th Street: Sundowner Avenue to Louise Avenue November 2017 MEMORANDUM Transportation Jim Kollbaum, PE

More information

Meadowlake Ranch Traffic Impact Analysis (LSC #184600) August 27, 2018

Meadowlake Ranch Traffic Impact Analysis (LSC #184600) August 27, 2018 LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 545 East Pikes Peak Avenue, Suite 210 Colorado Springs, CO 80903 (719) 633-2868 FAX (719) 633-5430 E-mail: lsc@lsctrans.com Website: http://www.lsctrans.com Traffic

More information

May 5, 2009 File:

May 5, 2009 File: MMM Group Limited Suite 600 1455 West Georgia Street Vancouver, BC V6G 2T3 t: 604-685-9381 f: 604-683-8655 www.mmm.ca May 5, 2009 File: 50-09001-007 1420 1055 West Hastings Street Vancouver, BC V6E 2E9

More information

NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS

NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS 3. 23 NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS This section addresses the operations of the transportation system and details how it would be expected to function under year 23 No Build conditions with the projected

More information

2. Existing Conditions

2. Existing Conditions 2. Existing Conditions The existing traffic and parking conditions on the site and the surrounding area were reviewed based on the study methodology in Section 1.2. 2.1 Existing Land Use The portion of

More information

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Magnolia Place Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: City of San Mateo Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Updated January 4, 2010 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1 2. Existing Conditions...6

More information

Turn Lane Warrants: Concepts, Standards, Application in Review

Turn Lane Warrants: Concepts, Standards, Application in Review Turn Lane Warrants: Concepts, Standards, Application in Review David J. DeBaie P.E., P.T.O.E. 2004 ITE, District 1 Annual Meeting Burlington, Vermont Introduction Turning lanes at intersections reduce

More information

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc. OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 9402209 Canada Inc. December 15, 2015 115-625 Report_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation

More information

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA February 13, 2015 Mr. Meran Dadgostar P.E., R.S. Town of Highland Park 4700 Drexel Dr. Highland Park, Texas 75205 Re: Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest

More information

Capital Region Council of Governments

Capital Region Council of Governments March 23, 2018 Capital Region Council of Governments PROJECT CONCEPT REPORT Realignment of Swamp and Northfield Road s approaches to Route 44 (Boston Turnpike) Town of Coventry SUMMARY: The Town of Coventry

More information

Harrah s Station Square Casino

Harrah s Station Square Casino Transportation Analysis Harrah s Station Square Casino Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Submitted To: City of Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board Prepared By: DKS Associates GAI Consultants December

More information

Cricket Valley Energy Project Dover, NY Updated Traffic Impact Study

Cricket Valley Energy Project Dover, NY Updated Traffic Impact Study Updated Traffic Impact Study Community Resources 6.3A Traffic and Transportation Amended This amended Traffic Study incorporates comments from NYSDOT, provided after their review of the original Traffic

More information

Traffic Signal Redesign 50% Design Report

Traffic Signal Redesign 50% Design Report Traffic Signal Redesign 50% Design Report Joseph Davis, Jace Elkins, Jordan Weyrauch and Zach Crimmins CENE 486 Capstone J3Z Engineering March 10 th, 2016 Table of Contents 1.0 Project Description...1

More information

THE BERKLEY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BERKLEY, MI

THE BERKLEY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BERKLEY, MI TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR PROPOSED THE BERKLEY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BERKLEY, MI Prepared for BERKLEY-COOLIDGE, LLC West Bloomfield, MI By GIFFELS WEBSTER Washington Township, MI August 1, 2017 Project

More information

Policy Number: Effective: 07/11/14 Responsible Division: Planning Date: 07/11/2014 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AMENDMENT POLICY

Policy Number: Effective: 07/11/14 Responsible Division: Planning Date: 07/11/2014 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AMENDMENT POLICY Policy Number: 2014-025 Effective: 07/11/14 Responsible Division: Planning Date: 07/11/2014 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AMENDMENT POLICY POLICY STATEMENT: The Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency

More information

Cheyenne Metropolitan Planning Organization

Cheyenne Metropolitan Planning Organization Dell Range Boulevard Corridor Study PHASE II SECTION 20 DRAFT Prepared for: Cheyenne Metropolitan Planning Organization November 20, 2015 (Section 20 is bordered by Powderhouse Road on the west, Storey

More information

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study CSAH 9 at CSAH 60 (185th Avenue) Prepared For: Dakota County Transportation Department Western Service Center 14955 Galaxie Avenue, 3rd Floor Apple Valley,

More information

Traffic Study North Shore School District 112

Traffic Study North Shore School District 112 Traffic Study North Shore School District 112 Proposed Expansion of Northwood Junior High School Prepared By: May 1, 2015 1. Introduction Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) has been retained

More information

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A A1. Functional Classification Table A-1 illustrates the Metropolitan Council s detailed criteria established for the functional classification of roadways within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Table

More information

The current document is revised based on the comments received on:

The current document is revised based on the comments received on: General Overview 1 Introduction Over the last several years, the Waterford Lakes area has experienced increased congestion due to a substantial increase in residential and commercial development. The current

More information

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Richmond, Virginia August 14, 2013 Prepared For City of Richmond Department of Public Works Prepared By 1001 Boulders Pkwy Suite 300, Richmond, VA

More information

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners DRAFT Corridor study Honeysuckle Road October 2017 Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I... 1 STUDY SUMMARY... 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 CONCLUSIONS... 5 SECTION II... 7

More information

Appendix B. Environmental Resource Technical Memorandum. Assessment on Travel Pattern and Access Impacts

Appendix B. Environmental Resource Technical Memorandum. Assessment on Travel Pattern and Access Impacts Appendix B Environmental Resource Technical Memorandum Assessment on Travel Pattern and Access Impacts TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ENVIRONMENTAL RE-EVALUATION FOR UNION STATION TO OAK CLIFF DALLAS STREETCAR To:

More information

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Bona Building & Management Co. Ltd. Place Vanier, 333 North River Road Vanier, Ontario K1L 8B9 October

More information

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis Prepared for: Arlington County Department of Environmental Services 2100 Clarendon Boulevard,

More information

US 81 CORRIDOR STUDY FROM NORTH OF UNION CITY SOUTH TO SH 19 SOUTH OF CHICKASHA CANADIAN AND GRADY COUNTIES, OKLAHOMA JULY 2007

US 81 CORRIDOR STUDY FROM NORTH OF UNION CITY SOUTH TO SH 19 SOUTH OF CHICKASHA CANADIAN AND GRADY COUNTIES, OKLAHOMA JULY 2007 US 81 CORRIDOR STUDY FROM NORTH OF UNION CITY SOUTH TO SH 19 SOUTH OF CHICKASHA CANADIAN AND GRADY COUNTIES, OKLAHOMA JULY 2007 PREPARED BY THE RESEARCH AND PLANNING DIVISION OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

More information

Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12)

Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12) Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12) traffic study prepared for: Cymbal Development OCtober 2012 Traf Tech October 1, 2012 Mr. Asi Cymbal - President Cymbal Development 3470 North Miami Avenue Upper Suite Miami,

More information

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Over the last several years, the Waterford Lakes area has experienced increased congestion due to a substantial increase in residential and commercial development. The current Existing and Future Conditions

More information

List of Exhibits...ii

List of Exhibits...ii One Brickell Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Exhibits...ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 1. INTRODUCTION...2 1.1 Study Area...2 1.2 Study Objective...5 2. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS...6 2.1 Data Collection...6

More information

APPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA

APPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA APPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA Environmental and Planning Consultants 440 Park Avenue South 7th Floor New York, NY 10016 tel: 212 696-0670 fax: 212 213-3191 www.akrf.com Draft Memorandum To: Michael

More information

Chapter 16: Traffic and Parking A. INTRODUCTION

Chapter 16: Traffic and Parking A. INTRODUCTION Chapter 6: Traffic and Parking A. ITRODUCTIO This chapter examines the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed Fresh Kills Park roads. The analysis of transit and pedestrians is presented

More information