Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Fairhaven Creek 2000
|
|
- Camron Marsh
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Minnesota F-29-R(P)-17 Area 340 Study 3 April 2001 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries Stream Survey Report Fairhaven Creek 2000 By Eric R. Altena Fisheries Management Specialist Montrose Area Fisheries Office Funded under Federal Aid by the Sport Fish Restoration Act, F-29-R(P)-17
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES... 3 LIST OF FIGURES... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 5 STUDY AREA... 6 METHODS... 6 RESULTS... 7 DISCUSSION Management implications REFERENCES ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
3 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Fairhaven Creek (M-71-5) watershed estimated land use Fairhaven Creek reach profiles recorded with GPS during fall Results of Rosgen classification sites for Fairhaven Creek fall Fairhaven Creek Temperature monitor mean, minimum, and maximum hourly values ( 0 C) recorded from three locations between June and October Number of measured fish per 10-mm group from electrofishing at all stations, Fairhaven Creek, October 2000 and October Electrofishing station information and catch rates for brook trout from sampling Fairhaven Creek during fall Length at capture (mm), standard errors and survival estimates for brook trout sampled from Fairhaven Creek during fall Population estimates derived for all brook trout and for brook trout over 200 mm from three stations on Fairhaven Creek during fall
4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Location of Fairhaven Creek, Minnesota Estimated 1991 land use within the Fairhaven Creek (M-71-5) major watershed Location of temperature monitors and Rosgen classification sites on Fairhaven Creek during Reach location and number on Fairhaven Creek during fall Rock dam located at the top of reach 1 in Fairhaven Creek, during fall Road crossing (Erosion site) within reach 3 on Fairhaven Creek during fall Typical barrier within reach 6 found on Fairhaven Creek during fall Erosion site found in reach 7 on Fairhaven Creek during fall Typical stream channel found within reach 9 on Fairhaven Creek during fall Erosion, access and bottom composition locations observed on Fairhaven Creek during fall Mean daily temperatures ( C) recorded by three automated temperature monitors located on Fairhaven Creek from June through October Location and catch per unit of effort (CPUE) from electrofishing stations for brook trout larger than 200 mm observed on Fairhaven Creek during fall
5 Executive Summary Fairhaven Creek is a designated trout stream with a headwater located approximately 2 miles northwest of the town of Fairhaven in Stearns County, Minnesota, and flows 3.6 miles to the confluence with Lake Marie on the Clearwater River. During 2000, a follow up survey to the 1994 assessment including mapping of major physical features using a global positioning system (GPS), Rosgen classification, temperature monitoring, and electrofishing was completed to update fisheries and physical feature information. Fairhaven Creek s watershed land use was largely represented by agricultural practices, forest, and grassland shrub with the entire watershed encompassing 1800 acres. Slightly more than 2% of the estimated land use was in residential plots, while wetland, gravel pits and lakes were all less than 1%. Temperature monitors collected hourly temperatures between June 1 and October 1, Values found indicate there are favorable conditions for brook trout survival with less than 8% of the hourly readings over 20 C. Sampling the streamline revealed a mean sinuosity of 5.52, approximately 1600 deadfalls per mile, 339 rifles per mile, and a mean gradient of 35 feet per mile. Rosgen classification conducted at three sites indicated the stream is an E5 type upstream of County road 44 and near the mouth, while it is best represented by the E4 or C4 type channel just below County Road 44. Electrofishing revealed 8 species of fish: brook trout, black nose dace, central mud minnow, hybrid sunfish, Johnny darter, largemouth bass, northern red-belly dace, and white sucker, however, only trout and black nose dace were found upstream of the rock dam located at near the mouth of Fairhaven Creek. The average length of brook trout sampled was 126 mm, and catch per unit of effort ranged from 123/h to 632/h, from all first pass stations. Mean length at capture estimated from scales showed that brook trout reach 221 mm by Age 2 and 264 mm by Age 4. Survival estimates derived from linear regression of the aged fish revealed 0.08, 0.11, 0.39, and 0.20 for ages 0 through 3, respectively. Population estimates were conducted at three stations: 1, 4, and 5, with 98, 221 and 234 brook trout, respectively, while the estimate for adults (>200 mm) was 4, 10 and 17, respectively. Overall, the brook trout population appears relatively stable from 1994 to 2000, despite continued impacts from upstream erosion and agricultural land use within the watershed. The population was dominated by young-of-the-year brook trout indicating good spawning and recruitment conditions. The apparent decrease in larger size brook trout may be related to density dependant mortality and a decrease in available deep pools. An effort should be made to remove cattle from riparian corridors, and reestablish communication with all landowners along Fairhaven Creek to offer an option for a DNR fishing easement. Future consideration should be made to acquire an easement along the entire stretch of Fairhaven Creek from 140 th street to the confluence with the Clearwater River. 5
6 STUDY AREA Fairhaven Creek is a designated trout stream with a headwater located approximately 2 miles northwest of the town of Fairhaven in Stearns County, Minnesota, and flows 3.6 miles to the confluence with Lake Marie on the Clearwater River (Figure 1). Fairhaven Creek has a gradient that ranged between 25 and 53 feet per mile and a sinuosity of 5.52 between Lake Marie and 140 th street northwest of the town of Fairhaven. The stream has a watershed of 1800 acres (Figure 2) with estimated land use of 49% agricultural, 26% forested, 22% grassland/shrub, and 2% residential (Table 1). Flows recorded at each of three cross section sites (Figure 3) during the sampling period in 2000 were 0.79, 0.72 and 0.44 cubic feet per second (CFS) from upstream to down stream. METHODS An initial survey of Fairhaven Creek was conducted in 1979, and follow up surveys in 1980, 1986, 1991 and 1994 compiled information on fish communities, physical and chemical characteristics and invertebrate species composition and abundance. During 2000, a follow up survey including mapping of major physical features using a global positioning system (GPS), Rosgen classification (Rosgen 1996), temperature monitoring, and electrofishing was completed to update fisheries and physical feature information. Fairhaven Creek was divided into 9 similar reaches for ease of describing features within each area and to correspond with data presented during Fairhaven Creek was mapped using a Corvallis Micro Technologies (CMT) GPS unit to mark locations of major barriers to fish movement, access points, erosion sites, tributaries, riffles and electrofishing start and end points, from the confluence with the Clearwater River on Lake Marie to the intersection with 140 th street northwest of the town of Fairhaven. Deadfalls (any tree or shrub extending one-third the width of the channel) and undercut banks (banks where significant depth for cover was overhung by the actual bank) were counted to give reference to available habitat within each reach. Analysis of land use and map production was performed using Arcview 3.1, and the 1991 international land use/land cover layer. Rosgen classification (Rosgen 1996) was performed by selecting three sample cross sections in the lower, middle, and upper areas of Fairhaven Creek (Figure 3) and elevations were recorded with the aid of a laser level. Stowaway Tidbit remote temperature monitors were placed in three locations (pools) in the 6
7 stream where flow was expected to be constant (Figure 3). Monitors were programmed to record temperature each hour and anchored to the streambed to evaluate minimum, maximum and daily fluctuation, and assess the response to rainfall events, between May and October. Fish sampling methods included a Smith Root BP-15D back pack electrofisher, using pulsed direct current, beginning at a downstream block net and proceeding upstream to an additional block net or major physical feature (barrier). All fish were counted and identified. Game fish were measured to the nearest mm and scales were collected from five representatives per 25-mm group. Survival estimates were derived from a length-age regression of aged fish and extrapolated to the entire sample using the Chpman-Robson equation assuming constant survival and recruitment. Catch per unit of effort (CPUE) was calculated for all (single pass) stations and for initial runs on population estimates. When population estimates were performed, a two-pass removal method was used. All fish from the first run were placed in a live car at the top of the station until the second run was completed. The Moran-Zippin method (Everhart and Young 1981) was used to derive population estimates with corresponding confidence intervals for all brook trout captured, and for brook trout over 200 mm in total length. Comparisons to the previous survey were made by selecting single pass electrofishing stations similar to those used in Catch data were combined across sampling stations for both years. RESULTS Overall, the entire length (1.75 miles) of Fairhaven Creek had a mean sinuosity of 5.52, and a gradient of feet/mile. The average number of deadfalls/100ft was 3.0, with the average number of riffles and undercut bank areas per reach at 4.44 and 5.00, respectively. All of the nine reaches sampled contained varying degrees of complexity, health and quality. Reach 1 (455 ft) (Figure 4) from the mouth at Lake Marie to an artificially created rock dam (Figure 5), had a moderate number of deadfalls (4.2/100 ft), 3 noticeable undercut banks, and only 1 riffle. Reach 1 was characterized by a low gradient and a relatively high sinuosity (4.33)(Table 2). Additionally, a Rosgen classification site (1) was within this reach, and data indicated that the area has a flood-prone width considerably higher than the upstream stations (Table 3). Reach 2 (233 ft) was represented by 2.6 deadfalls per 100 ft, 3 undercut bank areas, two riffles and a 7
8 sinuosity of This reach showed evidence of residential impact as houses and trails were near the stream banks. Reach 3 (343 ft)contained 2.9 deadfalls per 100 ft, 4 undercut banks and the first erosion site (a road or four-wheeler crossing) encountered on Fairhaven Creek (Figure 6). Reach 4 (519 ft) was typified by an increase in elevation as the number of riffles (7) was more than previous reaches. Deadfalls (2.3/100ft) were more common and the sinuosity increased to Reach 5 (756 ft) was a higher gradient stretch (6 riffles), had an average number of deadfalls (2.2/100 ft), with 3 undercut bank areas and a sinuosity of Reach six (1954 ft) contained a slightly higher number of deadfalls (2.8/100 ft) while also having a higher than average number of riffles (15). Reach 6 contained several barriers (5) that may limit migration of fish (Figure 7). Reach 7 contained the highest number of deadfalls (6.6/100 ft) and an increase in gradient with 5 riffles in a relatively short reach. This reach also contained the second Rosgen site with a bank full width of 18.3 ft, a flood prone width of 47 ft and the highest sinuosity (7.08). Reach 8 began above County Road 44 and continued upstream through several areas containing cattle induced erosion sites (5, Figure 8). This reach had a higher than average number of deadfalls (3.8/100 ft) and 5 riffles, with a sinuosity of Reach 9 contained the farthest upstream Rosgen site, which had a bank full width of 5.1 ft and a flood prone width of 50 ft, indicating a relatively high entrenchment ratio (Table 3). This reach was typified by overhanging reed canary grass (Figure 9) and silt bottom while having a relatively high sinuosity (5.85). Location of bridges (access sites) general bottom composition and erosion sites for all reaches can be found in Figure 10. Rosgen classification was performed at three locations along the length of the stream (Figure 3). Classification of these areas includes calculation of slope, sinuosity, entrenchment (flood prone width relative to stream channel width), and particle count within the sample area. The lower site was typical of a flood plain with a wide flood prone area (106 ft), high entrenchment (10.6), and a low width/depth ratio (8.29)(Table 3). The predominant substrate type was medium sand ( mm) with 63% of the particles as fines. The second Rosgen site located just downstream of County Road 44 revealed a relatively narrow flood prone width (47.1) a low entrenchment (2.57) and a moderate to low width/depth ratio (12.46). Percent fines (42%) were lower than the upstream and downstream stations; however, the D- 50 (median size) was still a fine gravel (4-8 mm). The third station was located above the cattle pasture area with five of the six erosion sites. The station displayed the impacts from downstream erosion by the 8
9 high width/depth ratio (39.03), and lowest sinuosity of all stations (3.99). The flood prone width of 50.1, a moderate entrenchment (9.82), and a D-50 of medium sand ( mm) signify the shallow channel undergoing down cutting in the area. Temperature monitors collected hourly temperatures between June 1 and October 1, All temperature monitors had relatively few readings over 18 C (8% and 4% in the lower and middle stations) and even fewer readings above 20 C (1% in the lower and middle stations). These values indicate there are favorable conditions for brook trout survival during most of the year. The upper station monitor had hourly values as low as C, with a high of C, and an average of C. The middle station located just down stream of County Road 44 had a minimum hourly of C, a maximum of C, and an average daily value of C. The lower station located in reach 1, had a minimum daily value of C, a maximum of C, and an average of C (Figure 11). Electrofishing sampled 8 species of fish (with numbers in parentheses): brook trout (1,130), black nose dace (20), central mud minnow (2), hybrid sunfish (1), Johnny darter (2), largemouth bass (1), northern red-belly dace (4), and white sucker (2), however, only trout and black nose dace were found upstream of the rock dam located at the start of reach 2. Electrofishing for 4.36 hours and more than 41% of available area potentially suitable for trout resulted in a catch of 1,130 brook trout, of which approximately 79% were young-of-the-year. Average length of trout sampled was 126 mm, and number of trout over 200 mm was 67. Catch per unit of effort ranged from 123/h (Station 6) to 632/h (Station 4), for the first pass on all stations. Catch per 100 ft also varied by station, as station 6 had a low of 9.42/100 ft and station 3 had the highest with 54.59/100 ft (Table 6). Catch per hour of electrofishing for brook trout larger than 200 mm varied between 4.79 (station 1) and per hour (station 6) for the first pass on all stations (Figure 12). Mean length at capture from scales showed that brook trout reach 221 mm by Age 2 and 264 mm by Age 4 (Table 7). Survival estimates derived from linear regression of the aged fish revealed 0.08, 0.11, 0.39, and 0.20 for ages 0 through 3, respectively. Population estimates were conducted at three stations: 1, 4, and 5, with 95, 215 and 219 brook trout, respectively. The estimate for adults (>200 mm) was 4, 10 and 13 for stations 1, 4 and 5, respectively (Table 8). The number of brook trout for Fairhaven Creek was estimated to be 1,756 brook trout per mile of all sizes, and 87 brook trout per mile over 200 mm. 9
10 DISCUSSION Land use practices within the Fairhaven Creek watershed are largely agricultural (49%), yet there is a corridor along the stream, which is mostly forested. A 100 m buffer was applied to the stream and the estimated land use within the buffer was calculated to be 59% forested, 30% grassland/shrub, 6% residential, and 5% agricultural. With this in mind, efforts to enroll the agricultural land outside of this buffer and within the watershed in Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) or Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) type of programs may prove essential for maintaining water quality and low temperatures in the future. A diversion, which had previously been described in the 1994 survey, has been corrected in reach 1 of Fairhaven Creek; however, one major rock dam still exists in the area where the initial diversion appeared to take place. This rock dam did not appear to affect downstream migration of brook trout, as 95 brook trout were captured downstream of this feature. Reaches 2-4 have been impacted by local land owners obtaining access through foot bridge construction, or recreational areas. Reach 5 and 6 represented the least impacted areas below County Road 44. These reaches had higher than average deadfall counts, with higher gradient than the other reaches. Reach 6 represented the best conditions for brook trout in Fairhaven Creek, with higher numbers of quality pools, deadfalls and a lack of erosion sites. This appeared to benefit trout abundance and the number of individuals over 200 mm. What was formerly described as a deep scour pool in reach 7 below County road 44 has now silted in, potentially due to erosion that occurred upstream in reach 8. Reach 8, located upstream of County Road 44 contained the most erosion sites, however, the brook trout population estimate for the area was higher than calculated for downstream estimates for all sizes captured, and for brook trout greater than 200 mm. The higher population estimate may be a function of the increased primary food production, due to cow fecal matter directly introduced in the stream in the area of the electrofishing station, although, catch per unit of effort for this station was second lowest for brook trout over 200 mm, and slightly less than the average CPUE for all sizes of fish. This may be attributed to the cattle causing increased bank erosion and silt loading of existing pools. The silt loading may have displaced fish to preferred downstream locations. Finally, a beaver dam found in reach 9 described during the 1994 survey, no longer exists, and the channel appears to have returned to a natural narrow profile with overhanging reed canary grass, although, it may be 10
11 affected by the downstream cattle erosion. Temperature profiles recorded during 2000 were favorable for brook trout with a low percentage of readings above 18 C. The highest reading recorded during 2000 was a maximum temperature of C, with 3 days of hourly readings above 20 C. This was similar to 1999 when a maximum temperature of C and a total of 6 days with hourly readings above 20 C were recorded for the same area. However, this was considerably different from what was found in 1996, where temperatures above 24 C were recorded. Air temperatures for the surrounding area were not substantially different for 1996 and 2000, which indicated the lack of weather influence on water temperature. Additionally, the temperatures in 1996 were recorded by a different style of monitor, which may have given slightly different results than readings from the monitors used in Slightly more brook trout were sampled in 1994 than in 2000, and maximum size was also larger in However, mean number of brook trout/100 ft has remained essentially unchanged with in 1994 and in Effort has varied considerably between stations and years on Fairhaven Creek and therefore may reflect individual electrofishing operator differences. Since Fairhaven Creek is relatively small, and efficiency of catching brook trout was observed to be high, comparisons based on length of stream sampled may be a more realistic representation of catch per effort changes over time. For brook trout greater than 200 mm CPUE appeared to decrease from 18.4/hour in 1994, to 15.4/ hour in 2000, however, number per 100 ft of sample area increased slightly from 1.51/100 ft in 1994 to 1.73/100 ft in Mean length at capture has remained unchanged since 1994, although the largest individual captured during 2000 (Age 4) was smaller than the mean length at annulus described for 1994 (300 mm). Management Implications Overall, the brook trout population appears relatively stable from 1994 to 2000, despite continued impacts from upstream erosion and agricultural land use within the watershed. The population was dominated by young-of-the-year brook trout, indicating good spawning and recruitment conditions. The apparent decrease in larger size brook trout may be related to density dependant mortality and a decrease in available deep pools. The 1994 report stated that the lack of sizeable brook trout might be impacted by 11
12 the abundant young-of-the-year in the system. Since 1994 little has appeared to change, as abundance of young-of-the-year is still high. The lack of adult type habitat was reflected during the GPS of the streamline and electrofishing with pools that appeared to have a thick layer of silt in the deepest areas. There is the potential to provide structures that can scour pools and deeper areas within the existing stream channel. This may provide better habitat for adult brook trout, however, there are currently no easements on Fairhaven creek that would allow the DNR to investigate some sort of habitat improvement. Landowners have been contacted in years prior to 2000, regarding land use and grazing within the stream corridor, but, with limited results. There appears to be a need to revert the overall watershed land use to lower impact activities that may lessen the erosion and silt loading that is occurring on Fairhaven Creek. It may be feasible to attempt restoration efforts in smaller watersheds, such as Fairhaven Creek, and efforts to gain local cooperators to achieve this goal should be made. Fisheries potential for the Fairhaven Creek exists throughout the entire reach; however, the opportunity for access may be a problem for anglers. An effort should be made to reestablish communication with all landowners along Fairhaven Creek to offer an option for a DNR fishing easement. Future consideration should be made to acquire an easement along the entire stretch of Fairhaven Creek from 140 th street to the confluence with the Clearwater River. If an easement appears unlikely, educational efforts should be undertaken to minimize negative impacts to the stream and promote the value of the resource. 12
13 Table 1. Fairhaven Creek (M 71-5) major watershed estimated land use by acres and percent (1991 data). Land Use Acres Percent Agricultural % Forest % Grassland/Shrub % Residential % Wetland % Gravel pits % Lakes % Total Table 2. Fairhaven Creek reach profiles recorded with GPS during fall Reach Deadfalls Undercuts Riffles Erosion Barrier Kilometer Mile Sinuosity Number N N N N N Table 3. Results of Rosgen classification sites for Fairhaven Creek fall Label Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Near Mouth Below CR 44 Above Cattle pen Bank Full Width (ft) Flood prone Width (ft) Entrenchment Mean BFD (ft) Width/Depth Ratio Slope Fall/Mile (ft) Sinuosity D 50 Medium Sand Fine Gravel Fine Sand Percent Fines 63% 42% 68% Stream Type E5 E4/C4 E5 13
14 Table 4. Fairhaven Creek Temperature monitor mean, minimum, and maximum hourly values ( 0 C) recorded from three locations between June and October Station Minimum Average Maximum N Readings N 1 > 18 0 C N 1 >20 0 C Upper Middle Lower Number of hourly observations recorded above 18 0 and 20 0 C, respectively. Table 5. Number of measured fish per 10-mm group from electrofishing at all stations Fairhaven Creek, October 2000 and October Length Group < SUM
15 Table 6. Electrofishing station information and catch rates for brook trout from sampling Fairhaven Creek during fall Station Length (m) Length (ft) Effort (seconds) BKT BKT >200 mm CPUE CPUE >200 BKT/100 ft BKT >200/100 ft EF1A EF EF EF4A EF5A EF Table 7. Length at capture (mm), standard errors and survival estimates for brook trout sampled from Fairhaven Creek during fall Age N Min Mean Max Std Error Survival Estimate Survival estimate (Chapman-Robson) based on assumption of constant recruitment and survival. Table 8. Population estimates derived for all brook trout and for brook trout, over 200 mm from three stations on Fairhaven Creek during fall All BKT P^ PE Variance CI PE-CI PE+CI N EF EF EF BKT>200mm EF EF EF
16 Figure 1. Location of Fairhaven Creek, Minnesota. 16
17 Figure 2. Estimated 1991 land use with in the Fairhaven Creek (M-71-5) major watershed. 17
18 Figure 3. Location of temperature monitors and Rosgen classification sites on Fairhaven Creek during
19 Figure 4. Reach location and number on Fairhaven Creek during fall
20 Figure 5. Rock dam located at the top of reach 1 in Fairhaven Creek, during fall Figure 8. Erosion site found in reach 7 on Fairhaven Creek during fall Figure 6. Road crossing (Erosion site) within reach 3 on Fairhaven Creek during fall Figure 9. Typical stream channel found within reach 9 on Fairhaven Creek during fall Figure 7. Typical barrier within reach 6 found on Fairhaven Creek during fall
21 Figure 10. Erosion, access and bottom composition locations observed on Fairhaven Creek during fall
22 20 18 Temperature (*C) Jun 8-Jun 15-Jun 22-Jun 29-Jun 6-Jul 13-Jul 20-Jul 27-Jul 3-Aug 10-Aug 17-Aug 24-Aug 31-Aug 7-Sep 14-Sep 21-Sep 28-Sep Date Lower Mid Upper Figure 11. Mean daily temperatures ( C) recorded by three automated Stowaway Tidbit monitors located on Fairhaven Creek from June through October
23 Figure 12. Location and catch per unit of effort (CPUE*) from electrofishing stations for brook trout, larger than 200 mm observed on Fairhaven Creek during fall * CPUE calculated from first run of population estimate stations. 23
24 REFERENCES Everhart W. H. and W. D. Youngs Principles of fishery science. Cornell University Press, Ithica, New York. 349 pages. Fairhaven Creek Survey Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Section of Fisheries, St Paul. Rosgen, D Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, Colorado. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank David Anderson, Mark Pelham, John Hiebert, Steve Bogie and Jay Striemer for their work in field collection. The author would also like to thank John Hiebert, David Anderson and Paul Diedrich for technical and logistical support. 24
25 Author Date Area Fisheries Supervisor Date Regional Fisheries Supervisor Date Copyright State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources. Reproduction of this material without the express written authorization of the Department of Natural Resources is prohibited 25
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Three Mile Creek 2011
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries Stream Survey Report Three Mile Creek 2011 By Joseph D. Stewig Montrose Area Fisheries Office TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationMinnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Luxemburg Creek.
Minnesota F-29-R(P)-24 Area 315 Study 3 March 2016 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries Stream Survey Report Luxemburg Creek 2015 Mark Pelham Sauk
More informationMinnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Cold Spring Creek.
Minnesota F-29-R(P)-24 Area 315 Study 3 March 2015 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries Stream Survey Report Cold Spring Creek 2014 Mark Pelham Montrose
More informationMinnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Cold Spring Creek.
Minnesota F-29-R(P)-24 Area 315 Study 3 March 2013 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries Stream Survey Report Cold Spring Creek 2012 Mark Pelham Montrose
More informationMinnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. St. Francis River 2004
Minnesota F-29-R(P)-17 Area 315 Study 3 April 2005 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries Stream Survey Report St. Francis River 2004 By Eric R. Altena
More informationMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. Gamefish Assessment Report
Minnesota DNR F-29-R(P) Area F312 February 1, 2013 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE Gamefish Assessment Report Spring Gamefish Assessment on the Mississippi
More informationRehabilitation of Grimes Creek, a Stream Impacted in the Past by Bucket-lined Dredge Gold Mining, Boise River Drainage, July 2008 to August 2011.
Rehabilitation of Grimes Creek, a Stream Impacted in the Past by Bucket-lined Dredge Gold Mining, Boise River Drainage, July 2008 to August 2011. Pam Harrington TU,1020 W. Main Street Suite 440, Boise,
More informationSTEELHEAD SURVEYS IN OMAK CREEK
STEELHEAD SURVEYS IN OMAK CREEK 2002 Annual Report Prepared by Chris Fisher John Arterburn Colville Confederated Tribes Fish and Wildlife Department P.O. Box 150 Nespelem, WA 99155 Prepared for Project
More informationMinnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries
Minnesota F-29-R(P)-27 Area 315 Study 3 May 20, 2009 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries Mississippi River Smallmouth Bass Regulation Evaluation
More informationStudy Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids
Study Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids Goals and Objectives Identify what anadromous salmonids use the tailrace slough by: Life Stage (Juvenile, migrating and spawning adults) Timing
More informationResults of the 2015 nontidal Potomac River watershed Smallmouth Bass Young of Year Survey
Results of the 2015 nontidal Potomac River watershed Smallmouth Bass Young of Year Survey Natural reproduction of smallmouth bass in the nontidal Potomac River mainstem has been assessed annually since
More informationMichigan Department of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1
Michigan Department of Natural Resources 2008-59 Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1 Bowens Manistee County, (T24N R16W Sec. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 24, and 30). Last surveyed 2008 Mark A. Tonello
More informationHydraulic Modeling of Stream Enhancement Methods
Hydraulic Modeling of Stream Enhancement Methods Matthew J. Curry John J. Levitsky Abstract Development within watersheds increases the amounts of runoff causing stream erosion and degradation of stream
More informationSTUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT
STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT State: Michigan Project No.: F-80-R-4 Study No.: 702 Title: Effects of sediment traps on Michigan river channels Period Covered: October 1, 2002 to September 30, 2003 Study Objectives:
More informationAbundance of Steelhead and Coho Salmon in the Lagunitas Creek Drainage, Marin County, California
scanned for KRIS Abundance of Steelhead and Coho Salmon in the Lagunitas Creek Drainage, Marin County, California Prepared for: Marin Municipal Water District 220 Nellen Drive Corte Madera, California
More informationCulvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest
Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest Overview Culvert Design Considerations Hydraulic Terms Culvert Impacts Low
More informationMinnesota Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division, Lake Superior Area
Minnesota F-9-R(P)- Study 4 Job 616 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division, Lake Superior Area Coaster Brook Trout Status in Minnesota-Lake Superior Tributaries Following Regulation
More informationManual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: with periodic updates. Chapter 22: Guidelines for Sampling Warmwater Rivers with Rotenone
Manual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: with periodic updates : Guidelines for Sampling Warmwater Rivers with Rotenone P. W. Seelbach, G. L. Towns, and D. D. Nelson Suggested citation: Seelbach, Paul W.,
More informationBiological Survey of Allagash Stream
F i"shery Interim Summary Report Series No. 07-04 Biological Survey of Allagash Stream By Forrest R. Bonney Caring for Maine's Outdoor Future September, 2007 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife
More informationMichigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1. Weber Lake Cheboygan County, T34N, R3W, Sec.
Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources 2012-143 Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1 Weber Lake Cheboygan County, T34N, R3W, Sec. 31 Neal Godby, Fisheries Biologist Environment Weber Lake is a 28.5-acre
More informationGamefish Assessment Report
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Gamefish Assessment Report Spring Gamefish Assessment on the Mississippi River from Little Falls to Brainerd, MN May 31 through June 4, 2013 River Miles 966 to
More informationJustification for Rainbow Trout stocking reduction in Lake Taneycomo. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation
Justification for Rainbow Trout stocking reduction in Lake Taneycomo Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation December 14, 2017 Lake Taneycomo was formed by the construction
More informationAlberta Conservation Association 2017/18 Project Summary Report
Alberta Conservation Association 2017/18 Project Summary Report Project Name: Abundance, Distribution, Spawning, and Thermal Habitat of Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout in the Stimson Creek Watershed
More informationBig Spring Creek Habitat Enhancement and Fishery Management Plans
Big Spring Creek Habitat Enhancement and Fishery Management Plans November 5, 2012 Big Spring Events and Activities Center Newville, PA Charlie McGarrell Regional Habitat Biologist Pennsylvania Fish and
More informationColumbia Lake Dam Removal Project
Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project The Columbia Lake dam located 1/4 mile upstream of the Paulins Kill River's confluence with the Delaware River in Knowlton Township, Warren County has been proposed for
More informationEcoLogic Memorandum. TO: Ben Brezell; EDR FROM: Mark Arrigo RE: Possible Impacts of Dredging Snooks Pond DATE: 6/4/07
EcoLogic Memorandum TO: Ben Brezell; EDR FROM: Mark Arrigo RE: Possible Impacts of Dredging Snooks Pond DATE: 6/4/07 Background EDR P.C. (EDR) has been contracted by a landowner to assess the feasibility
More informationFraser River. FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Jon Ewert - Aquatic Biologist (Hot Sulphur Springs)
Fraser River FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Jon Ewert - Aquatic Biologist (Hot Sulphur Springs) General Information: The Fraser River is a highly diverse river offering many transitions in habitat
More informationEastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Annual Report The Nature Conservancy 2013
Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Annual Report The Nature Conservancy 2013 2013 Annual Performance Report Enhancing Connectivity in the Ash-Black Rock Sub-basin of the West Branch Narraguagus River. Project
More informationStony Creek Creel Census
Stony Creek Creel Census conducted for Division of Fisheries Illinois Department of Conservation 600 North Grand Ave. West Springfield, IL 62706 by R. Weldon Larimore, Principal Investigator Jack A. Swanson,
More informationNEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F-20-49 2013 SQUAW CREEK RESERVOIR WESTERN REGION Contents NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION
More informationLewis River Bull Trout Habitat Restoration Project Identification Assessment
Lewis River Bull Trout Habitat Restoration Project Identification Assessment Jamie Lamperth 1, Bryce Michaelis 2, and Abi Groskopf 3 1 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Fish Ecology and Life
More informationMinnesota Department of Natural Resources Lanesboro Area Fisheries Office FAQ sheet
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Lanesboro Area Fisheries Office FAQ sheet 1) Can you fish with minnows in designated trout streams? Possessing live minnows or using them for bait on designated
More information* * * * * * * * * * * *
Excerpts from Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 2003 Fishery Management Report. Southwest Region Nampa 2003. Brian J. Flatter, Regional Fishery Biologist, Kurtis Plaster, Senior Fishery Technician, Jeff
More informationReport prepared for: Prepared by: January 2002 BEAK Ref
AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY KANATA WEST CONCEPT PLAN Report prepared for: ROBINSON CONSULTANTS Prepared by: BEAK INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED 14 Abacus Road Brampton, Ontario L6T 5B7 January 2002 BEAK Ref.
More informationNEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F-20-52 2016 Lake Tahoe Rainbow Trout Study WESTERN REGION NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION
More informationData Report : Russian River Basin Steelhead and Coho Salmon Monitoring Program Pilot Study
Data Report 1999-1: Russian River Basin Steelhead and Coho Salmon Monitoring Program Pilot Study Sonoma County Water Agency 215 West College Avenue Santa Rosa, California 951 Prepared by David Cook Senior
More informationWinter Drawdown Issues of Concern
Winter Drawdown Issues of Concern Wetland Connectivity Amphibians Fisheries Winter Drawdown Wetland Connectivity Wetland complex near Osprey Creek is not responsive to lake level Wetland at upper end of
More informationUnderstanding the Impacts of Culvert Performance on Stream Health
Understanding the Impacts of Culvert Performance on Stream Health Kristin Thomas Aquatic Ecologist Michigan Trout Unlimited Transportation and the Environment Conference 12/5/2018 Importance of adequately
More informationTrip Report: Eagle Creek, Arizona
Trip Report: Eagle Creek, Arizona 15-17 June 2009 Participants: Abraham Karam, Brian Kesner, and Mike Childs Native Fish Lab Marsh & Associates, LLC 5016 South Ash Avenue Suite 108 Tempe, Arizona 85282
More informationEXTENT OF OBSERVATION
scanned for KRIS THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA Department of Fish and Game STREAM SURVEY Date: May 25 and 31, 1977. NAME: Unnamed Stream (Tributary to Sonoma Creek) COUNTY: Sonoma. STREAM SECTION:
More informationCedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot
Cedar Lake- 2006 Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot ABSTRACT Cedar Lake is a 142 acre lake located in the southwest corner of Manitowoc County. It is a seepage lake
More informationFish Habitat Restoration and Monitoring in Southeast Washington. Andy Hill Eco Logical Research, Inc.
Fish Habitat Restoration and Monitoring in Southeast Washington Andy Hill Eco Logical Research, Inc. Fish Habitat Restoration and Monitoring in Southeast Washington Talk overview: Restoration projects
More informationSUMMARY OF MOVEMENT AND HABITAT USED BY TAGGED BROOK TROUT IN THE MAIN BRANCH AND NORTH BRANCH AU SABLE RIVER DURING SUMMER Data Submitted to:
SUMMARY OF MOVEMENT AND HABITAT USED BY TAGGED BROOK TROUT IN THE MAIN BRANCH AND NORTH BRANCH AU SABLE RIVER DURING SUMMER 2014 Data Submitted to: Anglers of the Au Sable Submitted by: Dr. Mark R. Luttenton
More informationJob 1. Title: Estimate abundance of juvenile trout and salmon.
STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT State: Michigan Project No.: F-53-R-13 Study No.: 461 Title: Population dynamics of juvenile rainbow trout and coho salmon in Lake Superior tributaries Period Covered: April 1,
More informationAssessment of Baseline Geomorphic Features at. Proposed Stream Crossings On The Proposed County Road 595. Marquette County, Michigan
Assessment of Baseline Geomorphic Features at Proposed Stream Crossings On The Proposed County Road 595 Marquette County, Michigan Prepared for: Kennecott Eagle Minerals Company Marquette, Michigan Prepared
More informationFinal Bull Trout Redd Monitoring Report for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project
Final for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project East Fork Wallowa River barrier to upstream fish migration, photo courtesy of Kendrick Moholt (FERC No. P-308) December 18, 2017 Prepared by: Jeremiah
More informationYale Reservoir Kokanee (Oncorhynchus nerka) Escapement Report 2016
Yale Reservoir Kokanee (Oncorhynchus nerka) Escapement Report 2016 North Fork Lewis River Hydroelectric Project Yale FERC No. 2071 Prepared by: Jeremiah Doyle, PacifiCorp April 4, 2017 1.0 INTRODUCTION
More informationChinook Salmon Spawning Study Russian River Fall 2005
Chinook Salmon Spawning Study Russian River Fall 2005 Sonoma County Water Agency 2150 West College Avenue Santa Rosa, California 95401 Prepared by David Cook - Senior Environmental Specialist March 27,
More informationMARTINDALE POND Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist
MARTINDALE POND Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist Fisheries Section Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife I.G.C.
More informationMichigan Department of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1
Michigan Department of Natural Resources 2007-33 Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1 Grand Sable Lake Alger County, T49N, R14W, Sec. Many Lake Superior watershed, last year surveyed 2004 James
More informationLAKE TANEYCOMO ANGLER CREEL SURVEY SUMMARY. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Southwest Region
LAKE TANEYCOMO 2008-2009 ANGLER CREEL SURVEY SUMMARY Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Southwest Region February 1, 2013 Introduction Lake Taneycomo was formed
More informationNEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F-2-52 216 CHIMNEY RESERVOIR WESTERN REGION NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION JOB PROGRESS
More informationFish Survey of Arctic Lake (ID # ), Scott County, Minnesota in 2012
Snapping Turtle from Arctic Lake, September 2012 Fish Survey of Arctic Lake (ID #70-0085), Scott County, Minnesota in 2012 Survey Dates: September 18-20, 2012 MnDNR Permit Number: 18362 Prepared for: Shakopee
More informationREC 6 FISHERIES HABITAT EVALUATION
REC 6 FISHERIES HABITAT EVALUATION 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Analysis of fisheries habitat for recreational angling opportunities was completed by reviewing the results of the CAWG 1, Characterize Stream and
More informationWarner Lakes Redband Trout
Warner Lakes Redband Trout Existing Populations Warner Valley is an endorheic basin that contains a complex series of interconnected lakes, marshes, sloughs, and potholes, all of which are remnants of
More informationStudy Update Fish Distribution and Species Composition
Study Update Fish Distribution and Species Composition Goals and Study Area Gain a better understanding of fish species composition and abundance in waters associated with the Packwood Lake Hydroelectric
More informationBlue Creek Chinook Outmigration Monitoring Technical Memorandum
Blue Creek Chinook Outmigration Monitoring 2012 Technical Memorandum Prepared by: Andrew Antonetti and Erika Partee Yurok Tribe Fisheries Program PO Box 1027 Klamath, California 95548 In Partnership with:
More informationLower Dolores River Corridor Planning Meeting Jim White Colorado Division of Wildlife
Lower Dolores River Corridor Planning Meeting Jim White Colorado Division of Wildlife Objectives Overview of cold and warm water fishes in the Dolores River including: Flow and Fish Management Distribution
More informationSTREAM SURVEY File form No..
scanned for KRIS THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA California Department of Fish and Game STREAM SURVEY File form No.. Date: September 4, 1969. NAME: North Fork Schooner Gulch Creek COUNTY: Mendocino.
More informationINLAND LAKE MANAGEMENT REPORT FY Spring 2008
INLAND LAKE MANAGEMENT REPORT FY 2008 Spring 2008 Prepared by Robert O. Andress District Fisheries Biologist E. Daniel Catchings District Fisheries Supervisor Kevin W. Baswell District Biologist Aide Department
More informationI. Project Title: Upper Yampa River northern pike management and monitoring
COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM FY 217 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT RECOVERY PROGRAM PROJECT NUMBER: 98b I. Project Title: Upper Yampa River northern pike management and monitoring II. Bureau of Reclamation Agreement
More informationIllinois State Water Survey
Illinois State Water Survey HYDROLOGY DIVISION SWS Contract Report 508 COMPARISON OF 1987 AND 1989 BED PROFILE SURVEYS OF THE LOWER CACHE RIVER by Richard Allgire Office of Sediment and Wetland Studies
More informationAlcona Dam Pond Alcona County (T25N, R5E, Sections various) Surveyed June 6-12 and September 16, 2003
Michigan Department of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report No. 2004-6, Year 2004 Alcona Dam Pond Alcona County (T25N, R5E, Sections various) Surveyed June 6-12 and September 16, 2003
More informationClimate Change Adaptation and Stream Restoration. Jack Williams;
Climate Change Adaptation and Stream Restoration Jack Williams; jwilliams@tu.org 1 Goals for this presentation Develop strategies for adapting streams to climate impacts by Thinking like a watershed Understanding
More information2013 Electrofishing Program Summary. Miramichi Salmon Association In collaboration with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
2013 Electrofishing Program Summary Miramichi Salmon Association In collaboration with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Prepared by: Alex Parker Biologist Miramichi Salmon Association 485, Route
More informationTrout Unlimited Comments on the Scope of Environmental Impact Statement for the Constitution Pipeline Project, Docket No. PF12-9
October 9, 2012 Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE, Room 1A Washington, DC 20426 RE: Trout Unlimited Comments on the Scope of Environmental Impact Statement
More informationLAKE TANEYCOMO 2011 ANNUAL LAKE REPORT
LAKE TANEYCOMO 211 ANNUAL LAKE REPORT Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Southwest Region March 1, 212 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lake Taneycomo was formed by the construction
More informationLIFE HISTORY DIVERSITY AND RESILIENCE
LIFE HISTORY DIVERSITY AND RESILIENCE SPRING CHINOOK IN THE WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Kirk Schroeder Brian Cannon Luke Whitman Paul Olmsted Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Corvallis Research Lab Thanks
More informationFISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP
FISHERIES A warming climate, by itself, substantially affects the hydrology of watersheds in the Blue Mountains. Among the key hydrologic changes projected under all scenarios for the 2040s and beyond
More informationLAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN
LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN Region Area DOW Number County DOW Lake Name Acreage 2 Duluth F213 69-0041 St. Louis Bassett DOW: 436 Plan: 442 Long Range Goal: Manage for walleye with a gillnet catch rate greater
More informationNEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F-20-50 2014 BILK CREEK RESERVOIR WESTERN REGION 1 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION JOB PROGRESS
More informationNechako white sturgeon are an Endangered Species
Nechako white sturgeon are an Endangered Species There are likely less than 350 Nechako white sturgeon, and historically there were over 5000 in the Nechako Watershed. Endangered as per the Species at
More informationAquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings CHUCK KEEPORTS FOREST HYDROLOGIST ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA
Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings CHUCK KEEPORTS FOREST HYDROLOGIST ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA TOPICS COVERED Aquatic Organism Passage (AOP) Benefits of AOP Crossings
More informationFinal Bull Trout Genetics Monitoring Plan for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project. (FERC No. P-308) June 2017
Final for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-308) June 2017 Prepared by: Jeremiah Doyle PacifiCorp 825 NE Multnomah Street Portland, OR 97232 June, 2017 Page 1 of 8 Table of Contents 1.0
More informationI Region I Area I DOW Number / County I DOW Lake Name I Acreage I
LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN 814 Bp I Region I Area I DOW Number / County I DOW Lake Name I Acreage I I I # I f 2 Duluth F213 690036 St Louis Salo DOW:149 Plan: 137 Long Range Goal: Manage for walleye with a gillnet
More informationCORRESPONDENCE/MEMORANDUM
CORRESPONDENCE/MEMORANDUM State of Wisconsin DATE: November 13, 2012 FILE REF: [Click here and type file ref.] TO: FROM: Mike Donofrio Harpt Lake File Steve Hogler SUBJECT: 2012 Harpt Lake Electrofishing
More information6TH PELLETIER BROOK LAKE T15 R9, Aroostook Co. U.S.G.S. Gardner Pond, Maine (7 1/2 )
6TH PELLETIER BROOK LAKE T15 R9, Aroostook Co. U.S.G.S. Gardner Pond, Maine (7 1/2 ) Fishes Brook trout Minnows Blacknose dace Pearl dace Physical Characteristics Area - 27 acres Average depth - 2 feet
More informationCOLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM RECOVERY PROGRAM FY 2015 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 160
COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM RECOVERY PROGRAM FY 215 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 16 I. Project Title: Assessment of Stocked Razorback Sucker Reproduction in the Lower Green and Lower Colorado
More informationHabitat Conditions, Design Strategies,
Habitat Conditions, Design Strategies, Coho on Cedar Ck. five years after analog-based stream restoration work. and Stream Classification In river work, computer modeling is an insidious procedure in which
More informationTABLE ROCK LAKE 2014 ANNUAL LAKE REPORT. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Southwest Region
TABLE ROCK LAKE 14 ANNUAL LAKE REPORT Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Southwest Region March 1, 15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table Rock Lake is a 43,1 acre reservoir
More informationCurrent Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes
Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes Jason Breeggemann Senior Fisheries Biologist Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Outline DNR fisheries
More informationNEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F-20-52 2016 REDBAND TROUT EASTERN REGION NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION ANNUAL JOB PROGRESS
More informationStudy No. 18. Mystic Lake, Montana. PPL Montana 45 Basin Creek Road Butte, Montana 59701
Study No. 18 Evaluation of the Current Fish Population and Habitat in West Rosebud Creek Downstream from Emerald Lake Mystic Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2301 Mystic Lake, Montana PPL Montana 45
More informationSteelhead Society of BC. Thompson River Watershed Restoration and Enhancement Project #4 Nicola River Bank Stabilization and Enhancement Project
Steelhead Society of BC Presents: Thompson River Watershed Restoration and Enhancement Project #4 Nicola River Bank Stabilization and Enhancement Project Application for Funding December 2013 1.0 BACKGROUND
More informationEcology of Columbia River redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri) in high desert streams
Ecology of Columbia River redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri) in high desert streams Dry Creek October 2012 Chris A. Walser Ph.D., Professor of Biology Department of Biology and Environmental
More informationTABLE 1. Riverscape surveys completed in the upper Chehalis River, Newaukum, and Satsop rivers.
RIVERSCAPE SURVEYS OF IN-STREAM FISH ASSEMBLAGES AND HABITAT IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER Mara Zimmerman and John Winkowski Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Fish Program EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction
More informationMonitoring of Downstream Fish Passage at Cougar Dam in the South Fork McKenzie River, Oregon February 8, By Greg A.
Monitoring of Downstream Fish Passage at Cougar Dam in the South Fork McKenzie River, Oregon 1998- February 8, 2 By Greg A. Taylor Oregon Dept. of Fish & Wildlife 315 E. Main Street Springfield, OR 97478
More informationRivers and Streams Investigations
Rivers and Streams Investigations Brian J. Flatter, Regional Fisheries Biologist Lance Hebdon, Regional Fisheries Biologist Jeff Dillon, Regional Fishery Manager ABSTRACT Three sections of the lower Boise
More informationNEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F EUREKA COUNTY Small Lakes and Reservoirs
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F-20-48 2012 EUREKA COUNTY Small Lakes and Reservoirs NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION ANNUAL
More informationOREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE ROGUE FISH DISTRICT REPORT
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE ROGUE FISH DISTRICT REPORT TITLE: Upper Rogue Smolt Trapping Project, 1999 STREAM: Big Butte, Little Butte, South Fork Big Butte, Slate and West Fork Evans Creeks
More informationGeomorphic Stream Classification A Classification of Natural Rivers, Rosgen, D.L.
Geomorphic Stream Classification A Classification of Natural Rivers, Rosgen, D.L. Why is Stream Classification Physical stream channel evolution Essential? Similar stream types manifest similar patterns
More information2014 Island Lake Survey June 13 th, 2014 Andrew Plauck District Fisheries Biologist Report Prepared 4 March 2015
2014 Island Lake Survey June 13 th, 2014 Andrew Plauck District Fisheries Biologist Report Prepared 4 March 2015 BACKGROUND - A fish survey was requested due to a moderately severe winterkill in Island
More informationSKIATOOK LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN
SKIATOOK LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN Background Skiatook Lake impounds Hominy Creek, 5 miles west of Skiatook in Osage County, Oklahoma (Figure 1). Skiatook Lake covers 10,540 surface acres and was constructed
More informationAmendment to a Biological Assessment/Evaluation completed for the Coon Creek Land Disposal completed December Grand Valley Ranger District
Amendment to a Biological Assessment/Evaluation completed for the Coon Creek Land Disposal completed December 2007 Grand Valley Ranger District Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forests Prepared
More informationUTAH RECLAMATION MITIGATION AND CONSERVATION COMMISSION [RC0ZCUPCA0, 155R0680R1, RR ]
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/07/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-16600, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UTAH RECLAMATION
More informationChadbourne Dam Repair and Fish Barrier
Chadbourne Dam Repair and Fish Barrier Final Report for the Western Native Trout Initiative Prepared by: Carol Endicott Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout Conservation Biologist Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
More information2010 Fishing Opener Prognosis. Central Region
2010 Fishing Opener Prognosis Central Region Hinckley PINE COUNTY Pokegama, Cross, Island, Oak and North and South Big Pine Lakes are typically the best lakes for targeting walleye in Pine County. They
More informationMIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist
MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist FISHERIES SECTION INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
More information2017 Lake Winnebago Bottom Trawling Assessment Report
217 Lake Winnebago Bottom Trawling Assessment Report Adam Nickel, Winnebago System Gamefish Biologist, March 218 There were several highlights from the 217 Lake Winnebago bottom trawling survey, including
More informationJadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078
Introduction: With the assistance of Lake Holiday staff and volunteers, we were able to conduct an AC electrofishing survey on May 8, 27. Water temperatures were 2.3 C (8.5 F) and water clarity was decent
More information