Marine Policy 35 (2011) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Marine Policy. journal homepage:
|
|
- Winifred Carroll
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Marine Policy 35 (2011) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Policy journal homepage: Fragmented governance: Reconciling legal strategies for shark conservation and management $ Erika J. Techera, Natalie Klein n Centre for International & Environmental Law, Macquarie Law School, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia article info Article history: Received 2 July 2010 Received in revised form 13 August 2010 Accepted 14 August 2010 Keywords: Sharks Environmental governance International law Marine conservation Ecosystem based fishery management abstract Sharks play a critical role in the ocean environment yet many species are under threat. Over the last ten years, the international community has taken significant steps to protect shark species and address the threats to them through the adoption and implementation of international laws, plans and programmes. Nevertheless, despite the attention given to this issue, many shark species continue to deteriorate in numbers. While the reasons for this decline are complex and varied, regulatory fragmentation is one contributing factor. Legal regulation is a critical element in achieving effective conservation and management of sharks. This article considers the international laws, plans and programmes that seek to conserve shark species, explores the current fragmented regime and outlines possible strategies to overcome this challenge and enhance shark protection in the future. & 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction There are at least 400 species in the class Chondrichthyes, which evolved 400 to 450 million years ago [1]. Shark 1 species are found almost everywhere in the world with a diverse array of habits and habitats. They may be highly migratory or have a narrow range and live in shallow or deep water, and may be pelagic or bottom dwelling. 2 Some are apex predators, 3 and others are themselves eaten. 4 Sharks are usually scavengers and therefore play an important part in consuming dead and weaker members of other species [2]. Deterioration of shark numbers affects the stability of the entire marine system [2,3], and in particular vulnerable ecosystems such as coral reefs. 5 $ A previous version of this paper was presented by the authors (as two presentations) at the Sharks International Conference in Cairns, Australia, in June It has not been previously published, or submitted elsewhere for consideration for publication. n Corresponding author. Tel: ; fax: addresses: erika.techera@mq.edu.au (E.J. Techera), natalie.klein@mq. edu.au (N. Klein). 1 Here the term shark is used to refer to the entire class of chondrichthyes and includes sharks, rays, skates and chimaera. 2 Examples of shallow water sharks are the grey nurse, the hammerhead, the sandbar, the great white and the tiger shark. Pelagic sharks include shortfin makos and whale sharks. Deep water sharks include catsharks, goblin sharks and megamouth sharks. 3 Such as the great white shark and shortfin mako. 4 Such as by whales, killer whales and larger sharks. 5 For example, sharks consume groupers which in turn feed on algae-grazing parrotfish. When shark numbers decrease the grouper numbers increase and There appears little doubt that many shark species are declining in numbers [5 7]. What is also clear is that data is incomplete for many species and their status is largely unknown [8]. Catch statistics have generally been inadequate to assist with the management of individual species [9 11]. Nevertheless, it is well known that shark species are particularly vulnerable to over-exploitation and are also susceptible to collapse because they tend to be slow growing and late maturing with low reproduction rates [12,13].This is particularly so for the larger species [14]. Sharks are impacted by the same environmental degradation that affects many species: habitat loss, ecosystem impacts, climate change. More particularly they are under threat from over-fishing as a target species (for meat and fins) or as a nontarget but commercially valuable harvest or as bycatch [15,16]. 6 The shark market has grown considerably in recent decades, particularly in relation to fins [13,14]. Regulatory efforts are one way to improve the conservation and management of sharks, and these have been pursued at the local, national, regional and international level. As this article will explain, this layered approach presents both problems as well as positive opportunities. For many years, the vulnerability of shark species was not addressed at the international level. However, particularly in the last 10 years, efforts have been made to put (footnote continued) consume more parrotfish. Without the parrotfish the growth in algae stresses coral reef areas [4]. 6 Bycatch is defined here to include situations where species are not targeted but when caught are either retained or discarded X/$ - see front matter & 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi: /j.marpol
2 74 E.J. Techera, N. Klein / Marine Policy 35 (2011) laws and plans into place for shark management. At the national level, on the one hand, there is an opportunity for states or communities to tailor conservation measures to respond to the particular behaviour and habitats of certain shark species, as well as cater to local fishing interests or cultural practices. On the other hand, in the absence of local or national action, the regional and international regimes have permitted gaps in regulation, resulting in poor implementation and hence inadequate conservation efforts. For an effective regulatory approach to shark conservation and management, there must be interaction between the different levels of law-making to create an appropriate blend of consistency and scope for targeted action where needed, while still ensuring that the measures put in place enhance efforts to conserve and manage shark species. Equally, the different management tools relied upon, such as protecting habitats, controlling catch quantity and trade measures, may further cause gaps or overlaps for shark protection. These efforts should also be harmonised. In this article, the international legal regime will be examined, with a focus on the international environmental laws and fisheries regulations relevant to shark conservation and management as well as the International Plan of Action adopted by the Food and Agriculture Organization (IPOA-Sharks), which has provided the impetus (or not) for regional and national plans of action. The synergies and voids that have occurred through shark management and conservation efforts at the different levels of law-making are then explored, and an analysis of the fragmentation that exists in the current governance regime is provided. From this understanding, preliminary recommendations are made in relation to areas in need of reform if regulatory responses are to be an effective tool in protecting sharks. 2. The international legal regime The international laws that protect and manage sharks can be divided into several categories: conservation approaches that include listing of specific species and requiring habitat protection, as well as fisheries regulations. Each of these is considered below Conservation listing of species There are two main international treaties that create mechanisms to protect certain endangered or threatened species on an inter-state level. The Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species and Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) provides a means for states parties to control or prohibit international trade in threatened or endangered species. 7 There is a constant tension in this regime between interests in trade with those of conservation, and there have been particular challenges in relation to exploitable marine species being listed because of the high commercial stakes involved. Parties to CITES decide whether species should be listed in one of three Appendices. Appendix I is reserved for species threatened with extinction and prohibits international trade in these species (including their body parts), 8 unless there are exceptional circumstances. 9 States are able to enter reservations to the listing of a species, but even in this situation, the trade of the species must be conducted 7 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora opened for signature 3 March 1973, 993 UNTS 243 (entered into force 1 July 1975) ( CITES ). 8 Article I refers to any readily recognizable part or derivative thereof. CITES, article I(b)(ii). 9 These circumstances required certification from a Scientific Authority of the State that any export is not detrimental to the survival of the species; the species was obtained lawfully; living specimens are transported so as to minimize risk of damage or injury; and an import permit was obtained. CITES, article III(2). consistently with the requirements of a species listed in Appendix II. 10 For species listed in Appendix II, there is a recognised need for trade regulation through the use of import and export permits in order to prevent the species from becoming threatened with extinction. Rather than prohibiting trade, the listing in Appendix II is intended to enable the tracking of trade. At present, three shark species are listed in Appendix II: the great white, basking and whale sharks. A small number of states have filed reservations to the listing of these shark species. 11 There is a further possibility of individual states opting to list a species on Appendix III, which may be done without the agreement of other state parties. This listing is a way to alert other states to a species of concern and open up the possibility of cooperation of other parties in the control of trade. 12 At the 2010 CITES Conference in Doha, proposals were submitted to list an additional eight species of sharks on Appendix II, 13 but these were unsuccessful. The same approach of listing species to enhance conservation and management is followed under the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). 14 Migratory species are listed in Appendix I to the CMS if they are endangered throughout all or a significant proportion of their range. 15 Once listed, states parties that are range states are prohibited from taking the species. Range states are defined in the CMS to include states that exercise jurisdiction over any part of the range of a migratory species, as well as states that have vessels registered to them that take migratory species on the high seas. 16 A listing in Appendix I of the CMS therefore has significant coverage, provided states with vessels engaged in taking the species are parties to the CMS and do not enter reservations to the listing. The three shark species protected under CITES are afforded Appendix I protection under CMS: the basking, great white and whale sharks. A listing under Appendix II of CMS requires range states to enter into agreements with each other for the benefit of the species. 17 Four shark species listed in Appendix II are: spiny dogfish, porbeagle, shortfin mako and longfin mako. Under the auspices of the CMS, states adopted in 2010 a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). 18 The fundamental principles in Section 3 of the MoU highlight the need for cooperation among governments, international organisations, non-governmental organisations and other stakeholders, as well as the role of states to take measures to improve the conservation status of sharks and the establishment of other management plans consistent with the MoU. Another fundamental principle of the MoU is the ecosystem and precautionary approach. Further sections of the MoU address the objectives of conserving and managing migratory sharks and outlines measures that may be taken to meet these objectives. A Conservation Plan is to be attached once it is finalised to the MoU as a separate annex. Although non-binding and with limited species coverage, 19 the 10 CITES, April , Effects of Reservations, Conference 4.25 [17]. 11 Iceland, Indonesia, Japan, Norway and South Korea have entered reservations for the basking shark; Iceland, Japan, Norway and Palau have reservations for the great white shark; and, Iceland, Indonesia, Japan, Norway, Palau and South Korea have reservations for the whale shark. 12 CITES, article II(3). 13 The species proposed for listing were: the porbeagle shark, white-tipped shark, scalloped hammerhead great hammerhead, smooth hammerhead, spiny dogfish, sandbar shark and dusky shark. 14 Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals opened for signature 23 June 1979, 1651 UNTS 356, (entered into force 1 November 1983). 15 CMS, article I, para 1(e); article III, para CMS, article I(1)(h). 17 CMS, article IV(3) and article V. 18 For an overview of the final negotiations and adoption of the MoU, see [18]. 19 The MoU only applies to the sharks listed in Appendices I and II of the CMS. Even then, there was some doubt during negotiations that the species included in Appendix II would be covered by the MoU [18].
3 E.J. Techera, N. Klein / Marine Policy 35 (2011) MoU serves to illustrate some of the measures that need to be in place to improve shark conservation and management. The CMS and CITES both provide important tools to improve shark protection at the international legal level in focusing conservation and management efforts for the limited shark species that are recognised as threatened with extinction or are endangered Conservation habitat protection Critical at the international level for habitat protection is the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), which envisages both in situ and ex situ conservation, including the establishment of protected areas. 20 The CBD takes a holistic ecosystem-based approach, incorporating integrated and adaptive management techniques and rigorous scientific methodologies. There is a large body of literature supporting the efficacy of a marine protected area (MPA) to conserve fish stocks [16,19,20]. It is suggested that this mechanism may be the most suitable in part because it is easier to restrict access than to control the size of catch [19], and this dimension would be particularly relevant to addressing bycatch issues [14]. The weakness of the CBD lies in the soft language utilised in pertinent provisions, which does not establish concrete obligations on the part of states. In relation to MPAs, it must be noted that almost all are limited to one jurisdictional zone. This administrative arrangement is not necessarily supported by science. Many highly migratory shark species cross different maritime zones. Even the less migratory are likely to move in and out of territorial waters and exclusive economic zones (EEZ). There is a clear need to integrate science and law in terms of the placement of MPAs, and in considering the placement of networks of MPAs (to account, for example, for different breeding grounds and nursery areas). As noted above, more species specific data is needed; studies in philopatry of particular species will assist in identifying critical habitats that should be afforded legal protection Fisheries regulation The starting point for fisheries regulation at the international level is the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), 21 and the 1995 Fish Stocks Agreement. 22 UNCLOS recognises coastal state sovereignty over fisheries up to 12 nautical miles from the coast, as well as the coastal state s sovereign rights to conserve, manage and exploit the living resources of the EEZ, a zone extending up to 200 nautical miles from the coast. Within the EEZ, coastal states are required to set a maximum sustainable yield in establishing the total allowable catch of any species and promote the objective of optimum utilisation. 23 In relation to straddling stocks and highly migratory species, UNCLOS imposes duties on states to cooperate either directly or through international organisations. 24 On the high seas, states are also to cooperate in the conservation and management of living resources in exercising authority over vessels that are flagged to them. These obligations apply to all fish species. 20 CBD, article United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, opened for signature 10 December 1982, 1833 UNTS 3 (entered into force 16 November 1994). 22 Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 Relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, opened for signature 5 December 1995, 34 ILM 1542 (entered into force 11 December 2001). 23 UNCLOS, article UNCLOS, articles 63 and 64. The 1995 Fish Stocks Agreement elaborates on the basic rights and obligations set forth in UNCLOS in relation to the fishing of highly migratory species on the high seas. Considerable emphasis is placed on the role of regional fisheries management organisations or arrangements, while accounting for the possibility that not every state party to the 1995 Fish Stocks Agreement will also be a member of a relevant regional organisation. It must be noted at the outset that there is no regional organisation that has been established to address shark conservation and management. Instead, some of the regional tuna fisheries organisations have considered shark regulation given that sharks constitute a significant byproduct of or bycatch in tuna fisheries. 25 Difficulties associated with these regional measures include limited species coverage, non-binding obligations, lack of clarity on finning practices and prohibiting targeted fishing operations against sharks but not addressing bycatch issues [21]. These issues are compounded by the gaps and inconsistencies across the different organisations in the steps they are each taking in relation to shark management International plan of action for sharks A vital complement to these conservation and management regimes established by treaty is the International Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks (IPOA-Sharks), which was adopted by the FAO Committee on Fisheries in The IPOA-Sharks is a voluntary international instrument. In essence, it calls upon states to develop national plans of action (NPOAs) for the conservation and management of sharks. It covers both target species and bycatch, 26 and applies to states whether sharks are caught in their waters or elsewhere by their nationals. The IPOA-Sharks comprises principles, objectives and implementation procedures to achieve this goal, and includes suggested contents for national shark plans and assessment reports. 27 The provisions draw together many existing mechanisms on biodiversity conservation and sustainable fisheries management: for example, the identification of vulnerable and threatened species, improved data collection, assessment and reporting, sustainable use of target species and full utilisation of dead sharks. 28 The IPOA-Sharks addresses shark conservation and management in a more comprehensive way than is achieved in the treaties previously discussed in this part. One of its core problems, from a legal perspective, is that it does not create binding rights and obligations on states, because it is not a treaty or hard law. Instead, it serves as a framework for regulatory action at the regional and national levels. The uptake at the national level has been slow, as is discussed further below, but notable developments are the adoption of a regional plan of action in the South Pacific, and a proposed plan of action to be adopted by the European Union. This interaction at international, regional and national levels contributes to the problem of fragmented governance, which is next addressed. 3. The fragmented governance regime It is clear from the above that the current regime for the protection of sharks has not evolved holistically. Its evolution has, to a great extent, been reactionary resulting in both horizontal and vertical fragmentation. In addition, each of the existing 25 For a summary of the measures, see [21]. 26 IPOA-Shark, paragraph IPOA-Shark, Appendices A and B, respectively. See also IPOA-Shark, paragraph IPOA-Shark, paragraph 22.
4 76 E.J. Techera, N. Klein / Marine Policy 35 (2011) international laws has weaknesses and gaps. These issues must be addressed if the international regulatory framework for shark conservation and management is to be effective. 29 Horizontal fragmentation has occurred because laws have been developed within both the environmental conservation and natural resource management areas. Essentially there is an underlying tension between conservation efforts in environmental laws and the utilisation focus of fisheries regulations. This fragmentation is compounded by the lack of uniformity at the national level. While some countries have implemented laws and policies to conserve and manage sharks these provide different approaches and levels of protection. This dissonance is problematic because it is known that many species travel through different state waters. 30 Therefore if one range state has weaker laws, this may undermine conservation and management efforts in another. Vertical fragmentation results from legal approaches that are divided between, and in some cases duplicated at, different levels of governance including the international, regional, national and local jurisdictions. International law provides a framework, albeit with weaknesses that are considered further below, that relies heavily on regional and national implementation. However, little assistance is provided for building capacity at the state level. For example, many countries struggle to implement international law in multi-jurisdictional or legally pluralist contexts. The international regime could provide much greater guidance and facilitate the sharing of best practice regulatory options to overcome these issues. Lastly, little attention is paid to the local level and those that rely upon marine species for food and livelihoods. Some community-based fisheries management projects have proven successful. 31 If these are to be scaled up to deal more effectively with marine management issues in the future, then they must be integrated with national and regional regimes. Furthermore, despite a number of pieces of international law, weaknesses and governance gaps remain. CMS and CITES provide the only hard law obligations in this area, but their scope of operation is limited and even those protections are only available to a very small number of shark species. The CBD sets out broad goals of conserving and sustainably using species but its wording is soft, permitting states a wide scope of action, or inaction. UNCLOS obligations are general only and the FAO IPOA-Sharks is voluntary. Gaps exist particularly in relation to high seas governance where state control is at its weakest. Furthermore, there is a lack of international law for habitat conservation of nonmigratory sharks. Finally, there are also loopholes associated with particularly destructive practices such as shark finning, which is not universally banned or even consistently regulated [15]. 4. The possibility of harmonisation From a legal perspective, this fragmentation does not appear to be inevitable. There are a number of common factors between the various regimes and different levels of governance that favour a more harmonised approach. First, both conservation and fisheries laws have an underlying goal of sustainability and this principle has been incorporated into various of the laws considered in Part Secondly, the actors and key stakeholders involved in the 29 The need for integration has been examined by Underdahl [22], and includes a call for horizontal and vertical consistency. See also [23]. 30 For example, the whale shark [24]. 31 For example, the Locally Managed Marine Area Network operating in the South Pacific [25]. 32 E.g. IPOA-Sharks, paragraph 16; CMS MoU, Section 3; 1995 Fish Stocks Agreement, article 6. various governance frameworks are the same. At the international and regional levels, the primary decision-makers are states. At the lower governance levels, non-state actors have greater input and their involvement in decision-making percolates up to influence the policy position of states. Increasingly, the views of scientists and conservation advocates are feeding directly into international and regional fora. Yet perhaps most importantly for this article, the legal tools utilised in each regulatory environment and at every level of governance are common. For example, both conservation and fisheries laws use geographically based management tools. In conservation terms, marine protected areas or reserves are designated with restrictions placed on the use that can be made of those sites. In the fisheries sector, zones restrict harvesting effort and distinctions may be drawn between, for example, commercial, recreational and indigenous fishing areas. A further example involves species restrictions that are used in all regimes. In conservation, species are identified as endangered and protected through a listing process. In fisheries, species may also be controlled by listing with controls being placed on the size and quantity that may be harvested. In addition technical measures are used to further restrict behaviour, equipment regulations and seasonal closures for example. None of these tools is novel; the challenge today is to identify the most effective mix of regulatory options for each country and species. 5. Addressing weaknesses in existing international law Most importantly, the tension between conservation and fisheries regimes must be addressed. A first step in this process is engagement with the issue, rather than attempts to maintain artificial silos, 33 and the identification of synergies between existing systems of governance. This involves ensuring that there is a forum for communication and cooperation between the various actors. In many cases, the specific bodies involved in these governance issues have been separate and worked apart from each other. For example, at the international level, the FAO is the UN body with responsibility for fishery issues. In terms of conservation, it has been UNEP that has taken a lead role complemented by the various treaty bodies. This has led some commentators to call for the establishment of an international commission for the conservation and management of sharks [26]. At the national level, fisheries management often falls under an entirely different ministry and departmental structure to environmental conservation. Therefore, in order to facilitate cooperation, spaces must be identified for these actors to come together. Such a forum must also provide for cross-disciplinary communication between, for example, scientists, law- and policymakers and economists all of whom are critical in ensuring the integration of environmental, socio-cultural and economic concerns. This leads to the second principal weakness, the lack of reliable and comprehensive data in relation to species, habitats, catch and trade of sharks. The lack of scientific information in relation to specific shark species hampers both sustainable fisheries and conservation efforts. It can be seen from the IUCN Red List [27] that there is little or no data for many species. 34 The FAO does 33 An example of this may be seen in the decision at the 2010 CITES conference to retain the question of northern bluefin tuna within the relevant regional fisheries management organisation. 34 For example the silver shark is listed as endangered but with the data needing updating. Many species are listed as unknown or data deficient. See also the publications by TRAFFIC. ohttp:// at 2 July 2010.
5 E.J. Techera, N. Klein / Marine Policy 35 (2011) collect data, which is available on the FAO Fishstat Capture Production Database [28]. But the information issue is compounded for sharks by the lack of specificity in the current reporting of harvesting and bycatch. 35 Furthermore, the reason for fluctuations from year to year is difficult to determine. 36 At all levels of governance, monitoring and enforcement of shark regulation remain significant issues, and pose similar problems vis-a-vis other commercial fisheries. Incentivising compliance is also an important issue and in this context research in relation to attitudes towards sharks is essential. Wherever possible, cultural drivers, local knowledge as well as governance options should be utilised. For example, ecotourism could be a means to increase awareness of the conservation status of sharks and provide alternatives to the harvesting of sharks. 6. Strengthening the IPOA-Sharks The IPOA-Sharks addresses the limited coverage of shark species under CITES and CMS. The strength of its approach is that it is comprehensive as it considers the multiple pressures placed upon sharks and in theory applies to all species. Three areas of weakness can be seen: it is only voluntary, its implementation is patchy and there is no consistency between the NPOAs that have been implemented by states [11]. To date only 14 countries have developed plans [29]. 37 While the IPOA-Sharks requires states to report on the progress of the assessment, development and implementation of shark plans 38 it is unclear whether this has been done. 39 To address these issues it may be possible to develop a legally binding compliance agreement. This approach was taken in relation to the voluntary Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries [32], which was subsequently followed by the FAO Compliance Agreement [33]. However, given that few countries have undertaken shark assessment reports and developed NPOAs, a first step will be to encourage broader compliance by states. One of the reasons for the poor uptake may be that the development of NPOAs is just too hard. In order to overcome this, the FAO could also consider drafting a model NPOA or a range of options from which states can choose that suit their particular circumstances. Again a similar approach was taken by the FAO in developing the Model Scheme on Port State Measures to facilitate compliance with the FAO International Plan of Action to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing [34]. In the longer term the FAO could establish an online database of NPOAs to facilitate the sharing of best practice Lack and Sant [12] report that only 20% of shark catch data reported to the FAO is on a species basis. The data that is available often simply indicates the gross shark catch in tonnages, which is of limited informational value in designing regulatory tools to conserve and manage individual species. See for example FAO Yearbook 2006, Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics, which reports under one category sharks, rays and chimaeras. 36 For example, if the total catch decreases, this could be because there is a decline in species numbers, deterioration of reporting, improvements in the identification of species, successful implementation of regulatory measures, or a combination of all of the above [12,13]. 37 However, this figure may be inaccurate. In 2009, it indicated that 50% of members had conducted assessment of the need for an NPOA for sharks and 90% of members had developed and implemented NPOAs [30]. Given that there are more than 170 members of FAO signed up to the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, it may be that other states have not passed on their NPOA to FAO and therefore it is not on the website. 38 IPOA-Sharks, paragraph Reporting is required to be done biennially as part of the reporting on the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. While the FAO includes annual progress reports on its website, none contain specific reference to the contents or effectiveness of NPOAs [31]. 40 Again this has been done in relation to illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing [35]. 7. Conclusion Legal regulation is a critical element in achieving effective conservation and management of sharks. In order to improve the governance regime it is necessary to overcome the fragmentation identified above. Top-down standard setting through international law remains important. But equally critical are mechanisms for local to global information exchange. A cooperative information exchange takes on considerable importance when it is recalled that reliable data is essential for the formulation of appropriate regulatory tools at all levels of governance. The absence of necessary data should not be the foundation for a failure to act [14]. Rather, precautionary approaches become appropriate and it is essential for regulatory mechanisms to be ecosystem-based. Any new or improved legal governance regime for sharks must be flexible. Regulatory mechanisms currently in place or developed in the future must be monitored on an ongoing basis. This practice is essential to determine whether the regulatory mix is achieving positive biodiversity outcomes. If not, then the measures must be reviewed. Furthermore, it is clear that much scientific research is being undertaken in relation to sharks, including work on species habitats, ranges and behaviour, as well as various human impacts upon sharks. As new information becomes available, this research must be taken into account and regulatory mechanisms such as marine protected areas and fishing restrictions, altered accordingly. Other disciplines remain relevant as well, including education and economics, in shaping a sustainable governance regime. It is acknowledged that multi-faceted approaches are needed but fragmented legal systems can lead to gaps, duplications in efforts, as well as overlapping regimes, which in turn result in conflicts. Coherent and comprehensive legal strategies are critical to ensure improved biodiversity outcomes and complement the efforts of all stakeholders in the sustainable conservation and management of shark species and their habitats. Undoubtedly much more research needs to be undertaken to explore the various legal options. Only by engaging with this need, and the issues articulated in this article, will the future of sharks be assured. References [1] CBD. Biodiversity loss it will make you sick. Available from; / cbd.int/doc/press/2008/pr life-en.pdfs [accessed 8 December 2009]. [2] Stevens JD, Bonfil R, Dulvy NK, Walker PA. The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2000;57: [3] Myers RA, Worm B. Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature 2003;423: [4] CBD Secretariat, Statement of Ahmed Djoghlaf Executive Secretary at the opening session of the ninth meeting of the conference of the parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Bonn, 19 May Available from; / [accessed 2 July 2010]. [5] Baum JK, Myers RA, Kehler DG, Worm B, Harley SJ, Doherty PA. Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the Northwest Atlantic. Science 2003;299(5605): [6] Myers RA, Baum JK, Shepherd TD, Powers SP, Peterson CH. Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science 2007;315: [7] Dulvy NK, Baum JK, Clarke S, et al. You can swim but you can t hide: the global status and conservation of oceanic pelagic sharks and rays. Aquatic Conservation 2008;18: [8] Ahonen H, Harcourt RG, Stow AJ. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA reveals isolation of imperilled grey nurse shark populations (Carcharias Taurus). Molecular Ecology 2009;18:4409. [9] Stevens JD, Bonfil R, Dulvy NK, Walker PA. The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2000;57:
6 78 E.J. Techera, N. Klein / Marine Policy 35 (2011) [10] Levesque JC. International fisheries agreement: review of the International commission for the conservation of Atlantic tunas case study shark management. Marine Policy 2008; at 531. [11] FAO Yearbook. Fishery and aquaculture statistics [12] Lack M, Sant G. Trends in global shark catch and recent developments in management. TRAFFIC International Available from; / species-reports/traffic_species_fish34.pdfs [accessed 20 November 2009]. [13] Abercrombie DL, Clarke SC, Shivji MS. Global-scale genetic identification of hammerhead sharks: application to assessment of the international fin trade and law enforcement. Conservation Genetics 2005;6: [14] Lewison RL, Crowder LB, Read AJ, Freeman SA. Understanding impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine megafauna. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution 2004;19(11): [15] Lack M, Sant G. Confronting shark conservation head on! TRAFFIC International Available from; / [accessed 2 July 2010]. [16] Musick JA, Berkeley SA, Cailliet GM, Camhi M, Huntsman G, Nammack M, et al. Protection of marine fish stocks at risk of extinction. AFS policy statement. Fisheries 2000;25(3):6 8. [17] Edwards H. When predators become prey: the need for International Shark Conservation. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal ;12: [18] Chiarolla C, Nyingi D, Sommerville M. Summary of the technical meeting for the elaboration of a conservation and management plan for migratory sharks and the third meeting on international cooperation on migratory sharks under the Convention on Migratory Species and Wild Animals: 8 12 February Earth Negotiations Bulletin 2010;18(40): / cms/sharks3/s [at 2 July 2010]. [19] Man A, Law R, Polunin NVC. Role of marine reserves in recruitment to reef fisheries: a metapopulation model. Biological Conservation 1995;71: [20] Banks SA, Skilleter GA. Implementing marine reserve networks: a comparison of approaches in New South Wales (Australia) and New Zealand. Marine Policy 2010;34: [21] Lack M, Sant G. Illegal, unreported and unregulated shark catch: a review of current knowledge and action. TRAFFIC April [22] Underdahl A. Integrated marine policy: what? why? how?marine Policy 1980;4(3): [23] Mossop J. The integration problem: challenges for international governance of oceans beyond national jurisdiction. In: Conference paper presented at 2010 annual meeting of the Australia and New Zealand Society of International Law. 25 June [24] Castro ALF, et al. Population genetic structure of Earth s largest fish, the whale shark (Rhincodon typus). Molecular Ecology 2007;16: [25] Techera EJ. Customary law and community based conservation of marine areas in Fiji. In: Pavlich D, editor. Managing environmental justice. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi Press; [26] Herndon A, Gallucci VF, DeMaster D, Burke W. The case for an international commission for the conservation and management of sharks (ICCMS). Marine Policy 2010;34: [27] IUCN Red List. Available from; / [accessed 2 July 2010]. [28] FAO Fishstat Capture Production Database. Available from; / org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstat/ens [accessed 2 July 2010]. [29] FAO, International plan of action for the conservation and management of sharks. Available from; / [accessed 2 July 2010]. [30] FAO COFI Progress in the Implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, related International Plans of Action and Strategy March 2009, COFI/2009/2. [31] FAO, Code of conduct for responsible fisheries, monitoring. Available from; / [accessed 2 July 2010]. [32] FAO, Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. Available from; / fao.org/docrep/005/v9878e/v9878e00.htms [accessed 2 July 2010]. [33] Agreement to promote compliance with international conservation and management measures by fishing vessels on the high seas. Available from; / [accessed 2 July 2010]. [34] Model scheme on port measures to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. Available from; / a0985t/a0985t00.htms [accessed 2 July 2010]. [35] FAO Database on Port State Measures. Available from; / fishery/psm/ens [accessed 2 July 2010].
Protecting the Deep Sea Under International Law. Legal Options for Addressing High Seas Bottom Trawling
Protecting the Deep Sea Under International Law Legal Options for Addressing High Seas Bottom Trawling Extract Only: Full Paper Full paper available at http://www.savethehighseas.org/publications.cfm or
More informationCONVENTION ON MIGRATORY SPECIES
CONVENTION ON MIGRATORY SPECIES 18 th MEETING OF THE SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL Bonn, Germany, 1-3 July 2014 Agenda Item 10.6 Distribution: General CMS UNEP/CMS/ScC18/Doc.10.6 15 May 2014 Original: English CONSERVATION
More informationRegional workshop on the implementation of the CITES shark and ray listings, Dakar, August 2014 Page 1
WE THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE SHARKS AND RAYS RANGE STATES OF BENIN, CABO VERDE, CÔTE D IVOIRE, THE GAMBIA, GHANA, GUINEA, GUINEA BISSAU, LIBERIA, MAURITANIA, NIGERIA, SENEGAL, SIERRA LEONE, TOGO: RECOGNIZING
More informationSustainable Fisheries and the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Introduction
Sustainable Fisheries and the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea UNITAR/DOALOS Briefing 17 October 2007 Liza Gall and Michael Shewchuk Introduction General character of the UN Convention on the Law
More informationRegional Plan of Action (RPOA) to Promote Responsible Fishing Practices including Combating IUU Fishing in the Region 1. Contents
Regional Plan of Action (RPOA) to Promote Responsible Fishing Practices including Combating IUU Fishing in the Region 1 Contents Current resource and management situation in the region...3 Implementation
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union L 248/17
22.9.2007 Official Journal of the European Union L 248/17 COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1100/2007 of 18 September 2007 establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel THE COUNCIL OF THE
More informationU.N. Gen. Ass. Doc. A/CONF.164/37 (8 September 1995) <http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n95/274/67/pdf/n pdf?openelement>.
Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Of 10 December 1982 Relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly
More informationMEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY BIRDS OF PREY IN AFRICA AND EURASIA
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY BIRDS OF PREY IN AFRICA AND EURASIA The Signatories Recalling that the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals,
More informationSuraji Presented on CITES Non-Detriment Findings (NDFs) Workshop Jakarta, July 26, 2016
Directorate of Conservation and Marine Biodiversity Directorate General of Marine Spatial Management Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Republic of Indonesia Suraji Presented on CITES Non-Detriment
More informationCartagena Convention and the Protocol Concerning Specially Protected Areas and Wildlife (SPAW)
Cartagena Convention and the Protocol Concerning Specially Protected Areas and Wildlife (SPAW) Caribbean Environment Programme, Cartagena Convention Secretariat Kingston, Jamaica 2 nd Meeting of the Advisory
More informationMain resolutions and recommendations relating to straddling species adopted by regional fisheries management organizations and implemented by Mexico
Main resolutions and recommendations relating to straddling species adopted by regional fisheries management organizations and implemented by Mexico International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic
More informationThe Extended Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna,
Resolution to Align CCSBT s Ecologically Related Species measures with those of other tuna RFMOs (Adopted at the Twenty Fifth Annual Meeting 18 October 2018) The Extended Commission for the Conservation
More informationEUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 23 May 2013 (OR. en) 2011/0364 (COD) PE-CONS 76/12 PECHE 549 ENV 952 CODEC 3067 OC 765
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 23 May 2013 (OR. en) 2011/0364 (COD) PE-CONS 76/12 PECHE 549 V 952 CODEC 3067 OC 765 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: REGULATION
More informationInter-RAC Conference Decision-making within a reformed Common Fisheries Policy (CFP)
Inter-RAC Conference Decision-making within a reformed Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Wider Environmental Perspective to Fisheries Management and the NEAFC model of regional cooperation Kjartan Hoydal,
More informationBriefing on the IWC s Conservation Committee
Briefing on the IWC s Conservation Committee 1 June 2005 Taking the IWC Conservation Committee forward At its 55 th Annual Meeting in 2003, the International Whaling Commission voted to establish a Conservation
More informationCertification Determination. Louisiana Blue Crab Commercial Fishery
15 th November 2016 Certification Determination For The Louisiana Blue Crab Commercial Fishery Following a meeting of a Global Trust Certification Committee on 20 th October 2016, a positive determination
More informationFisheries management in the Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction
Fisheries management in the Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction In recent years, fisheries management, including in areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ), has evolved to become a more holistic management
More informationSubmission on summary of the Draft Convention on Biological Diversity National Report
23 November 2018 Submission on summary of the Draft Convention on Biological Diversity National Report The New Zealand Marine Sciences Society (NZMSS) is a professional society affiliated to the Royal
More informationSummary of Preliminary Results of Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis, 2018
1 Western And Central Pacific Oceanic Fisheries Management Summary of Preliminary Results of Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis, 2018 Fact sheet for the Oceanic Fisheries Management Project (OFMP2). OFMP2
More informationFisheries Management Standard. Version 2.0
Enacted in Japanese: 2017.10.03 Effective in Japanese: 2018.02.01 Fisheries Management Standard Version 2.0 Marine Eco-Label Japan Council (2018) Introduction Marine Eco-Label Japan (MEL) Council have
More informationEXPERT CONSULTATION ON DEEP-SEA FISHERIES IN THE HIGH SEAS
FAO Fisheries Report No. 838 FIEP/R838 (En) ISSN 0429-9337 FAO/JAPAN GOVERNMENT COOPERATIVE PROGRAMME GCP/INT/942/JPN Report and documentation of the EXPERT CONSULTATION ON DEEP-SEA FISHERIES IN THE HIGH
More informationOriginal language: English CoP17 Doc CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA
Original language: English CoP17 Doc. 39.2 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South Africa),
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION. establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European Eel.
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 6.10.2005 COM(2005) 472 final 2005/0201 (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European Eel. (presented
More informationSCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE NINTH REGULAR SESSION August 2013 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE NINTH REGULAR SESSION 6-14 August 2013 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia ANNUAL REPORT TO THE COMMISSION PART 1: INFORMATION ON FISHERIES, RESEARCH, AND STATISTICS WCPFC-SC9-AR/CNM-35
More informationProgress Made by Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs)
Progress Made by Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs) Background Following the first joint meeting of the five tuna regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) in January 2007,
More informationall Participants are entitled to the baseline limit of 2,500 tonnes;
Addendum to WCPFC11-2014-DP05 (FFA Members Proposal to replace CMM for South Pacific Albacore) Explanatory note on the Tokelau Arrangement The final text of the Tokelau Arrangement was agreed at the 91
More informationMemorandum of Understanding concerning. Conservation, Restoration and Sustainable Use of the Saiga Antelope (Saiga tatarica tatarica)
Memorandum of Understanding concerning Conservation, Restoration and Sustainable Use of the Saiga Antelope (Saiga tatarica tatarica) Memorandum of Understanding concerning Conservation, Restoration and
More informationEXTINCTION RISK AND SPATIAL ECOLOGY OF SHARKS AND RAYS. Nov. 21/2017 Lindsay
EXTINCTION RISK AND SPATIAL ECOLOGY OF SHARKS AND RAYS Nov. 21/2017 Lindsay Davidson @LNKDee ldavidso@sfu.ca Biggest fish, shark, or ray in the WORLD! Whale shark 18 m 36 tonnes Second biggest fish, shark,
More information( ) Page: 1/5 PROPOSED DISCIPLINES ON PROHIBITIONS AND SPECIAL AND DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT FOR FISHERIES SUBSIDIES. Proposal from Indonesia
6 June 2017 (17-2986) Page: 1/5 Negotiating Group on Rules Original: English PROPOSED DISCIPLINES ON PROHIBITIONS AND SPECIAL AND DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT FOR FISHERIES SUBSIDIES Proposal from Indonesia
More informationPolicy Priorities for the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
Policy Priorities for the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission The Pew Charitable Trusts recommends that the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) takes several actions at its 21 st Session in Yogyakarta, Indonesia
More informationDraft Addendum V For Board Review. Coastal Sharks Management Board August 8, 2018
Draft Addendum V For Board Review Coastal Sharks Management Board August 8, 2018 Outline Overview Statement of the Problem Background Management Options Questions Overview May 2018: Board was presented
More informationCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds
EN COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of the wild birds THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and
More informationJapan s information on Sharks species that we believe require additional action to enhance their conservation and management
Japan p. 1 Japan s information on Sharks species that we believe require additional action to enhance their conservation and management In accordance with the recommendations made at the 25 th meeting
More informationScreening report Serbia
ORIGIN: COMMISSION WP ENLARGEMENT + COUNTRIES NEGOTIATING ACCESSION TO EU MD 103/15 20.05.15 Screening report Serbia Chapter 13 Fisheries Date of screening meetings: Explanatory meeting: 30 September 2014
More informationREC.CM-GFCM/40/2016/4
REC.CM-GFCM/40/2016/4 establishing a multiannual management plan for the fisheries exploiting European hake and deep-water rose shrimp in the Strait of Sicily (GSA 12 to 16) The General Fisheries Commission
More informationDate: 21 March General observations:
Proposal for a LDAC submission to the Commission on the minimum terms and condition for fisheries access within South West Indian Ocean Fisheries Commission (SWIOFC) member states jurisdiction. Date: 21
More informationLegislation. Lisa T. Ballance Marine Mammal Biology SIO 133 Spring 2013
Legislation Lisa T. Ballance Marine Mammal Biology SIO 133 Spring 2013 Really Quickly: Marine Mammal Legislation The big two: the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act International
More informationAGREEMENT ON PORT STATE MEASURES TO PREVENT, DETER AND ELIMINATE ILLEGAL, UNREPORTED AND UNREGULATED FISHING
AGREEMENT ON PORT STATE MEASURES TO PREVENT, DETER AND ELIMINATE ILLEGAL, UNREPORTED AND UNREGULATED FISHING 1 Responsible for yearly catches reaching tens of millions of tonnes and depriving the global
More informationMarine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) Common Implementation Strategy
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) Common Implementation Strategy Good Environmental Status Working Group on Descriptor 3 24-25 April 2012, Paris Title: Statement on the Definition of MSFD Descriptor
More informationManagement advisory for the Bay of Bengal hilsa fishery June 2012
Page1 Management advisory for the Bay of Bengal hilsa fishery June 2012 What is the BOBLME RFMAC The BOBLME Project is supporting countries to implement an ecosystem approach to fisheries management of
More informationCMM Conservation and Management Measure for the Management of New and Exploratory Fisheries in the SPRFMO Convention Area.
CMM 13-2016 1 Conservation and Management Measure for the Management of New and Exploratory Fisheries in the SPRFMO Convention Area. The Commission of the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation;
More informationADVERSE ANTHROPOGENIC MARINE/OCEAN NOISE IMPACTS ON CETACEANS AND OTHER BIOTA
CONVENTION ON MIGRATORY SPECIES NINTH MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Rome, 1-5 December 2008 Agenda Item 12.0, 13.0, 17.0, 26.0 Distr: General CMS UNEP/CMS/Resolution 9.19 15 October 2008 Original:
More informationTHE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT ACT. (No. 47 of 2013)
THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT ACT (No. 47 of 2013) IN EXERCISE of the powers conferred by section 109(4) (b) of the Wildlife Conservation and Management Act, 2013, the Cabinet Secretary for
More informationTime is running out for bluefin tuna, sharks and other great pelagic fish. Oceana Recommendations for the ICCAT Commission meeting November 2008
Time is running out for bluefin tuna, sharks and other great pelagic fish Oceana Recommendations for the ICCAT Commission meeting November 2008 Most of large pelagic species like tuna, sharks and swordfish
More informationNASCO Guidelines for the Management of Salmon Fisheries
NASCO Guidelines for the Management of Salmon Fisheries NASCO Guidelines for the Management of Salmon Fisheries Additional copies of these Guidelines can be obtained free of charge from: The Secretary
More informationTravis Aten. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Of Master of Marine Management at
The application of the ecosystem approach and future directions for the international management of migratory sharks in the Northwest Atlantic By Travis Aten Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More informationWHALE SHARK (Rhincodon typus) RECOVERY PLAN
WHALE SHARK (Rhincodon typus) RECOVERY PLAN 2004-2009 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Background The whale shark (Rhincodon typus) is the world s largest fish, and one of only 3 filter-feeding
More informationProposal for cooperation between GRASP and the CMS Gorilla Agreement
Proposal for cooperation between GRASP and the CMS Gorilla Agreement Background Great Apes Survival Partnership The Great Apes Survival Partnership (GRASP) was founded in 2001 at the World Summit on Sustainable
More informationICCAT s Unmanaged Shark Fisheries
ICCAT s Unmanaged Shark Fisheries Sharks are among the key species caught in ICCAT fisheries, representing more than 15% of all reported catches by weight in 2010 1. They are also among the most vulnerable
More informationOCEAN2012 Transforming European Fisheries
OCEAN2012 Transforming European Fisheries European fisheries in crisis healthy oceans with abundant fish and wildlife Decades of intensive fishing in European waters have led to dramatic declines in once
More informationPolicy Instruments for Fisheries Management and the Concept of Fisheries Refugia
REVERSING ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION TRENDS Policy Instruments for Fisheries Management and the Concept of Fisheries Refugia Christopher Paterson, UNEP/GEF South China Sea Project REVERSING ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationCONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA
Doc. 11.15.2 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA Eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties Gigiri (Kenya), 10-20 April 2000 Strategic and administrative
More informationFISHERIES CO-OPERATION ICELAND AND NORWAY WITH. Presented by Philip Rodgers ERINSHORE ECONOMICS
FISHERIES CO-OPERATION WITH ICELAND AND NORWAY Presented by Philip Rodgers 17/12/2013 Fisheries Cooperation with Norway and Iceland 1 Objective To consider the current situation in the fishery for highly
More informationSMOOTH HAMMERHEAD SHARK (HHS)
SMOOTH HAMMERHEAD SHARK (HHS) (Sphyrna zygaena) HHS1 1. FISHERY SUMMARY Smooth hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna zygaena) are not currently managed under the QMS. No assigned fishing allowances exist. However,
More informationWorld Oceans Day Does marine legislation actually protect the marine environment?
World Oceans Day Does marine legislation actually protect the marine environment? 7 June 2012 Marine Protected Areas What the science tells us For biodiversity protection we need to protect at least 20%
More informationRe: Request for Comments on the Proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership Trade Agreement, 74 Fed. Reg (December 16, 2009)
Via Electronic Filing Carmen Suro-Bredie Chairman, Trade Policy Staff Committee Office of the United States Trade Representative Washington, D.C. Re: Request for Comments on the Proposed Trans-Pacific
More informationSPAW SHARK PROPOSALS. for 5 shark and 3 ray species. Irene Kingma November 1 st 2016 / SPAW STAC meeting Miami Dutch Elasmobranch Society
SPAW SHARK PROPOSALS for 5 shark and 3 ray species Irene Kingma November 1 st 2016 / SPAW STAC meeting Miami Dutch Elasmobranch Society IPOA Sharks, FAO 2009 Objective ensure the conservation and management
More informationSustainable Fisheries for Future Generations The Fisheries White Paper
Sustainable Fisheries for Future Generations The Fisheries White Paper Key messages The Fisheries White Paper Sustainable Fisheries for Future Generations charts the course for a sustainable and profitable
More informationThe Maritime Law Association of Australia and New Zealand
The Maritime Law Association of Australia and New Zealand Protecting the Environment and Promoting Safe Navigation: Australia s System of Pilotage in the Torres Strait Adam McCarthy Assistant Secretary
More informationAREAS BEYOND NATIONAL JURISDICTION: INDIAN OCEAN DEVELOPING COASTAL STATES TUNA MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
AREAS BEYOND NATIONAL JURISDICTION: INDIAN OCEAN DEVELOPING COASTAL STATES TUNA MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP The goal of this workshop is to create a better understanding of among Indian Ocean Developing Coastal
More informationIFFO RS V2.0 FISHERY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TEMPLATE REPORT. Fishery Under Assessment. Date. Assessor
IFFO RS V2.0 FISHERY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TEMPLATE REPORT Fishery Under Assessment Date Assessor IFFO RS Ltd, Unit C, Printworks, 22 Amelia Street, London, SE17 3BZ, United Kingdom Application details
More informationDeclaration of Panama City
CFMC/OSPESCA/WECAFC/CRFM 1 Working Group on Queen Conch (QCWG) Panama City, Panama, 23 25 October 2012 Declaration of Panama City The Members of the CFMC/OSPESCA/WECAFC/CRFM Working Group on Queen Conch:
More informationINTERIM MEASURES ADOPTED BY PARTICIPANTS IN NEGOTIATIONS TO ESTABLISH SOUTH PACIFIC REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION
INTERIM MEASURES ADOPTED BY PARTICIPANTS IN NEGOTIATIONS TO ESTABLISH SOUTH PACIFIC REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION Participants in the negotiations to establish a South Pacific Regional Fisheries
More informationRisk Assessments in the Pacific Fisheries for BC & Yukon
Risk Assessments in the Pacific Fisheries for BC & Yukon MARCH, 2017 CONTENTS Introduction to Risk Assessments... 2 Q&As on the Risk Assessment Process... 3 Overview of the Risk Assessment Tool... 4 Example
More informationCombating ALDFG and Ghost Fishing Development of International Guidelines on the Marking of Fishing Gear
Combating ALDFG and Ghost Fishing Development of International Guidelines on the Marking of Fishing Gear Petri Suuronen Fishing Operations and Technology Branch Food and Agriculture Organization of the
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION. fixing for 2019 and 2020 the fishing opportunities for Union fishing vessels for certain deep-sea fish stocks
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.10.2018 COM(2018) 676 final 2018/0347 (NLE) Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION fixing for 2019 and 2020 the fishing opportunities for Union fishing vessels for certain deep-sea
More informationRecommendations to the 25 th Regular Meeting of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
tel. 902.429.2202 fax. 902.405.3716 2705 Fern Lane, Halifax, NS, B3K 4L3 Recommendations to the 25 th Regular Meeting of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) 14-22
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 31.8.2018 COM(2018) 608 final 2018/0320 (NLE) Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION fixing for 2019 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks
More informationComparison of EU and US Fishery management Systems Ernesto Penas Principal Adviser DG Mare
Comparison of EU and US Fishery management Systems Ernesto Penas Principal Adviser DG Mare Stock and Fisheries Status Seminar Brussels, 26 September 2017 Why comparing the EU and the US? Need to put the
More informationCMM Conservation and Management Measure for the Management of Bottom Fishing in the SPRFMO Convention Area
CMM 03-2018 1 Conservation and Management Measure for the Management of Bottom Fishing in the SPRFMO Convention Area The Commission of the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation; RECOGNISING
More informationSTATEMENT OF AMBASSADOR MARY BETH WEST DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE FOR OCEANS AND FISHERIES BEFORE THE U.S. COMMISSION ON OCEAN POLICY
INTRODUCTION STATEMENT OF AMBASSADOR MARY BETH WEST DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE FOR OCEANS AND FISHERIES BEFORE THE U.S. COMMISSION ON OCEAN POLICY MAY 13, 2002 HONOLULU, HAWAII I would like to
More informationCMM on Management of New and Exploratory Fisheries in the SPRFMO Convention Area
7 th Annual Meeting of the Commission 23-27 January, The Hague, The Netherlands COMM7-Prop11 Amend CMM 13-2016 on Management of New and Exploratory Fisheries in the SPRFMO Convention Area Submitted by:
More informationBiodiversity and Conservation Biology
11 Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Chapter Objectives This chapter will help you: Characterize the scope of biodiversity on Earth Contrast the background extinction rate with periods of mass extinction
More informationRio+20 and Agenda 21
Rio+20 and Agenda 21 The Known Bad News The Unknown Bad News Outcome of Rio+20 for fisheries stress the importance of the conservation and sustainable use of the oceans and seas urge all [LOS and Straddling
More informationREGIONAL TRAINING ON IDENTIFICATION OF SHARKS AND RAYS Species Visual ID and Design monitoring at Landing Site
REGIONAL TRAINING ON IDENTIFICATION OF SHARKS AND RAYS Species Visual ID and Design monitoring at Landing Site 25 th 27 th February 2019 Novotel Lombok Resort and Villas, Lombok-West Nusa Tenggara Background
More informationBy Product Fish Fishery Assessment Data Gathering Guidance Document
By Product Fish Fishery Assessment Data Gathering Guidance Document IFFO RS STANDARD FOR MARINE INGREDIENTS BY PRODUCT FISHERY MATERIAL Where fish are processed for human consumption, there are often substantial
More informationOther Relevant International Standards OIE Global Conference on Rabies Control 7-9 September 2011, Incheon, Korea
Other Relevant International Standards OIE Global Conference on Rabies Control 7-9 September 2011, Incheon, Korea Willam B. Karesh, DVM President, OIE Working Group on Wildife Diseaeses Executive Vice
More informationAPPENDIX 2.1 Lake Sturgeon - Mitigation and Enhancement
APPENDIX 2.1 Lake Sturgeon - Mitigation and This page is intentionally left blank. Lake Sturgeon Mitigation and As a provincial crown corporation providing electric energy and natural gas service, Manitoba
More informationImplementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act
Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act Discussion Paper Fisheries and Oceans Canada April 2013 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Managing Threats to Canada s Fisheries 3.
More informationJapan's National Plan of Action for Conservation and Management of Sharks. Revised Version
Japan's National Plan of Action for Conservation and Management of Sharks Revised Version March 2009 Fisheries Agency Government of Japan Japan's National Plan of Action for Conservation and Management
More informationR.P. Prabath K. JAYASINGHE National Aquatic Resources Research and Development Agency (NARA) Colombo 15 SRI LANKA
Experience and the special requirements of Sri Lanka in addressing the impacts of bottom fisheries on vulnerable marine ecosystems and the long-term sustainability of deep-sea fish stocks in particular
More informationTable: IUCN Red List Assessment Results
Table: IUCN Red List Assessment Results Extinction Risk & Conservation of the World s Sharks & Rays Species Group No. of Species Assessed under Red List TM Criteria No. of Species Classified as Threatened*
More informationMaintaining biodiversity in mixed-stock salmon fisheries in the Skeena watershed
Maintaining biodiversity in mixed-stock salmon fisheries in the Skeena watershed A 130-year history Chris C. Wood Principle: Mixed-stock transboundary fisheries impose special requirements on management
More informationArctic Fisheries and International Law
Arctic Fisheries and International Law Erik J. Molenaar Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea (NILOS), Utrecht University & Faculty of Law, University of Tromsø Arctic Summer College, 20 Aug. 2012
More informationOverfishing Atlantic Bluefin Tuna
Overfishing Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Brett Ducker FOR3202 April 9, 2016 A recently released report by the World Wildlife Fund found that more than 85% of the worlds fisheries are being illegally overfished
More informationCONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT MEASURE TO MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF FISHING FOR HIGHLY MIGRATORY FISH STOCKS ON SEABIRDS
COMMISSION FIFTEENTH REGULAR SESSION Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 10 14 December 2018 CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT MEASURE TO MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF FISHING FOR HIGHLY MIGRATORY FISH STOCKS ON SEABIRDS Conservation
More informationReview of Egypt s National Laws, Regulations, and Adequacy of Enforcement
Review of Egypt s National Laws, Regulations, and Adequacy of Enforcement Aim of the Legal Review Comprehensive summary of the currently existent laws and regulations that address bird hunting and trapping
More informationManagement advisory for the Bay of Bengal Indian mackerel fishery
Management advisory for the Bay of Bengal Indian mackerel fishery What is the BOBLME RFMAC The BOBLME Project is supporting countries to implement an ecosystem approach to fisheries management of shared
More informationSOMALIA National Report to the Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, 2015
SOMALIA National Report to the Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, 2015 Authors Ministry of Fisheries & Marine Resources Federal Republic of Somalia INFORMATION ON FISHERIES, RESEARCH
More informationConvention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals
Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals MEETING TO CONCLUDE THE AGREEMENT ON THE CONSERVATION OF THE ASIAN HOUBARA BUSTARD (Chlamydotis undulata macqueenii) Nairobi, Kenya,
More informationU.S. Atlantic Federal Shark Management. Karyl Brewster-Geisz Highly Migratory Species Management Division NMFS/NOAA May 2012
U.S. Atlantic Federal Shark Management Karyl Brewster-Geisz Highly Migratory Species Management Division NMFS/NOAA May 2012 Outline Federal Statutes and Management Structure International and State-Water
More informationFrank Meere. Sustainable Fisheries Management
Polices to combat IUU Fishing in the Asia-Pacific Region Frank Meere Sustainable Fisheries Management Background Global IUU problem UNGA, FAO, HSTF, EC and US High priority of APEC - Bali Plan of Action
More informationREQUEST FOR TENDERS. 1. Background
REQUEST FOR TENDERS File: AP_2/30/1 Date: 7 December, 2018 To: Interested suppliers From: Stuart Chape Acting Deputy Director General, Stategic Policy & Technical Programmes Subject: Request for tenders:
More informationCombating IUU: China and the European Market
Combating IUU: China and the European Market Tatjana Gerling Smart Fishing Global Initiative WWF International Light tower Tatjana Gerling/WWF International 22 nd September 2014 The European Parliament
More informationA reformed CFP needs to be based on sustainability, and use the principle of caution
Response from the North-Norwegian county councils of Troms and Nordland to the EU Commission s Green Paper on the Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Introduction Troms and Nordland are two coastal
More informationAtlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission DRAFT ADDENDUM V TO THE INTERSTATE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ATLANTIC COASTAL SHARKS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Vision: Sustainably Managing Atlantic Coastal Fisheries
More informationIOTC Agreement Article X. Report of Implementation for the year 2016
IOTC Agreement Article X Report of Implementation for the year 2016 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF THE REPORT 17 MARCH 2017 Reporting CPC: MALAYSIA Date of submission: 28/02/2017 Please NOTE: this document
More informationWHAT IS THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR RESPONSIBLE FISHERIES?
WHAT IS THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR RESPONSIBLE FISHERIES? Fisheries (which includes the management, catching, processing, marketing of fish stocks) and aquaculture (the farming of fish) provide an important
More informationA Forest Without Elephants: Can We Save One of Earth s Iconic Species?
Chapter 11: Preserving Biodiversity A Forest Without Elephants: Can We Save One of Earth s Iconic Species? Guiding Question 1: What are the major causes of species endangerment and extinction today? Start
More informationCOORDINATING WORKING PARTY ON FISHERY STATISTICS. Nineteenth Session. Noumea, New Caledonia, July 2001 AGENCY REPORT.
June 2001 CWP/19/SPC E COORDINATING WORKING PARTY ON FISHERY STATISTICS Nineteenth Session Noumea, New Caledonia, 10-13 July 2001 AGENCY REPORT Author: SPC W0000 3 AGENCY PROGRAMMES IN FISHERY STATISTICS:
More information