Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy. Prepared for: Ketchikan Visitors Bureau

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy. Prepared for: Ketchikan Visitors Bureau"

Transcription

1 Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy Prepared for: Ketchikan Visitors Bureau February 2010

2 Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy Prepared for: Ketchikan Visitors Bureau PREPARED BY: Juneau Anchorage February 2010

3 Table of Contents Key Findings... 1 Introduction and Methodology... 3 Introduction... 3 Methodology... 3 Ketchikan Visitor Market Overview... 5 Visitor Volume and Spending... 5 Visitor Industry Employment and Payroll... 5 Ketchikan Sportfishing Visitor Profile... 6 Nonresident Sportfishing Industry Profile... 8 Guided Sportfishing Industry... 9 Unguided Sportfishing Sportfishing Industry Direct Employment and Payroll Direct Spending Ketchikan Nonresident Sportfishing Spending Total Direct Spending Industry Spending Patterns Prince of Wales Island Nonresident Sportfishing-Related Spending Economic Impacts Sportfishing Industry Appendix Statewide Harvest Area A and B maps... 24

4 Key Findings The purpose of this study is to measure the direct and indirect economic impacts of nonresident sportfishing visitors on the Ketchikan economy in In addition to guided and unguided visitors who fished out of Ketchikan, this study also includes Ketchikan spending and employment impacts from sportfishing-related businesses that operated on Prince of Wales Island (POW), as well as the impacts of POW nonresident sportfishing visitors passing through Ketchikan. Data was gathered from multiple sources including previous McDowell Group studies, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and a series of interviews with Ketchikan and Prince of Wales Island sportfishing business owner/operators. The Ketchikan nonresident sportfishing industry, while seasonal in nature, is a significant contributor to the Ketchikan economy. Based on the results of this study and a review of the Economic Impacts of the Visitor Industry in Ketchikan, Summer 2006 the study team estimated that nonresident sportfishing-related direct spending accounted for roughly 8 to 10 percent of all visitor industry spending in Direct spending by the nonresident sportfishing market impacts many Ketchikan business sectors including guided fishing operations, transportation (especially floatplane operations), accommodations, restaurants and lounges, and a variety of retailers including those selling fuel, fishing gear, gifts, souvenirs, and clothing. Statistics show that the industry contracted somewhat from 2007 to 2008, and based on industry interviews, suffered more significant declines in Owner/operators expressed guarded optimism that business volume would stabilize in 2010, but as of the date of this report, no conclusions could be drawn from reservation volume to date. Key findings from the study are presented below. All figures are for 2008 unless otherwise noted. Size of the Industry Ketchikan hosted an estimated 30,400 nonresident sportfishermen, of which two-thirds used the services of a registered guide. An estimated 3,300 unguided nonresident sportfishermen either stayed at a lodge/resort or rented a boat in Ketchikan. There were 87 sportfishing guide businesses with 141 vessels active in the Ketchikan area and 76 businesses with 184 vessels active on POW. There were nearly 21,000 half-day and 6,700 full-day Ketchikan guided nonresident sportfishing trips. Ketchikan ranks fourth among major saltwater fishing areas around the state based on the number of active vessels in The Cook Inlet area (Kenai/Homer), Sitka, and Prince of Wales Island are the top three areas. 1 The most recent estimate of the overall impacts of Ketchikan s visitor industry was in Economic Impacts of the Visitor Industry in Ketchikan, Summer 2006, McDowell Group. The rough estimates are based on a comparison of 2006 study results with the results of this study. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 1

5 Direct Economic Impacts Direct spending in Ketchikan related to the nonresident sportfishing industry was estimated at $15.6 million. Estimated direct spending for guided sportfishing in Ketchikan (combined half-day and full-day) was about $7.3 million and accounted for 46 percent of nonresident sportfish-related spending in Ketchikan. The Ketchikan unguided, nonresident sportfishing sector, which included lodges that feature unguided fishing and businesses that rent boats, accounted for 30 percent of estimated spending at $4.6 million. An additional $3.7 million in Ketchikan spending (24 percent) was generated by POW sportfishing visitors and the businesses that served them. Total direct nonresident sportfishing-related employment was estimated at 340 (mostly seasonal) jobs with direct payroll of $5.2 million. Ketchikan sportfishing industry businesses reported a local hire rate of 87 percent and a local business-related spending rate of 85 percent. POW sportfishing businesses had direct spending of at least $3.5 million in Ketchikan, including $1.1 million for floatplane services, $861,000 for fuel, and $480,000 in payroll. POW sportfishing visitors spent at least $200,000 while passing through Ketchikan on their way to or from their POW guided fishing trips. Total Economic Impacts The total (direct, indirect, and induced) economic impact of nonresident sportfishing was estimated at $20 million. This included direct spending of $15.5 million with nearly $4.5 million in indirect and induced impacts. Included in the total spending impacts was sportfishing industry-related direct payroll of $5.2 million, which resulted in an additional $1.5 million in indirect and induced wages. Total (direct, indirect, and induced) employment was estimated at slightly more than 400 (mostly seasonal) jobs. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 2

6 Introduction and Methodology Introduction The purpose of this study is to measure the impact of nonresident sportfishing visitors on the Ketchikan economy. Research for this study was conducted in the fourth quarter of 2009, a time when sportfishing industry participants were more available to provide information than during their busy season. The most recent data on license sales and guided sportfishing activity available from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) was for Therefore, the primary focus of this study is on the 2008 sportfishing season. To illustrate year-to-year changes, trend data comparing 2007 and 2008 was included where possible. Over the course of the study, it became clear that most sportfishing industry businesses had suffered a decline in visitor volume and revenue from 2008 to 2009 due to difficulties in the national economy, as well as new sportfishing bag limits. Due to the significant shift in the business climate, several questions concerning the 2009 season were included in the sportfishing business owner/operator interviews. A brief review of comments pertaining to the 2009 season is included at the end of this report. In addition to guided and unguided visitors who fished Ketchikan s waters, this study also includes Ketchikan spending and employment impacts from sportfishing-related businesses that operated on Prince of Wales Island (POW) in 2008, as well as the impacts of POW nonresident sportfishing visitors passing through Ketchikan. Methodology Because of the complexity of the sportfishing industry in the Ketchikan area, McDowell Group utilized multiple sources of information in the development of this report. First, previous McDowell Group visitor studies were summarized to establish an overview of the visitor industry in Ketchikan. The most recent studies available were the Alaska Travelers Survey, Ketchikan Visitor Profile, 2006 and 2008, and Economic Impacts of the Visitor Industry in Ketchikan, Summer The 2008 Ketchikan Visitor Profile included a sample of 230 air visitors who sportfished in the Ketchikan or POW areas. Sources of quantifiable data included ADF&G and the Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DOLWD). Beginning in 1998, ADF&G required all fresh and saltwater guides to be registered and to collect information via logbooks on sportfishing participation, effort and harvest by clients. The Division of Sport Fish Research and Technical Services compiles the data. Records from fishing license sales in Ketchikan and on POW were acquired from the ADF&G Licensing Division. A review of DOLWD 2007 and 2008 employment data was conducted to assist in estimating employment. The McDowell Group study team conducted telephone interviews with 20 Ketchikan business owner/operators that offered guided and/or unguided sportfishing. They represented a mix of business sizes and types. The operations represented 52 percent of the 141 active charter vessels and a sizable majority of boat rentals in the Ketchikan area in Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 3

7 Telephone interviews were also conducted with 10 POW sportfishing businesses. The businesses represent 50 charter vessels (27 percent of the POW fleet) that hosted 3,900 guided and 600 unguided nonresident sportfishermen (representing about half of the estimated 9,100 nonresidents who sportfished on POW in 2008). Multipliers used in estimating total economic impacts were derived from a widely used input/output model, IMPLAN 2, along with McDowell Group s project experience and analysis. IMPLAN multipliers were modified, in some cases based on McDowell Group experience in measuring multipliers in Alaska rural and urban economies. 2 Minnesota IMPLAN Group, Inc., IMPLAN Professional version 2.0 Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 4

8 Ketchikan Visitor Market Overview Before describing nonresident sportfishing impacts, the following section presents a brief review of the most recent McDowell Group studies on Ketchikan s visitor industry. This review is intended to provide the reader with a greater context in which to view the nonresident sportfishing industry. Visitor Volume and Spending The vast majority of Ketchikan s visitor industry volume is comprised of cruise ship passengers. According to Cruise Line Agencies of Alaska, Ketchikan received 937,400 cruise passengers in 2009, just slightly below the 2008 total of 941,900. The most recent estimate of Ketchikan air visitors was 34,880 in summer 2006 and ferry visitors were estimated at 15,733 for the same year (these figures do not include business travelers). In summer 2006, per trip visitor spending in Ketchikan was estimated at $159 per person among cruise passengers; $408 per person among air visitors; and $278 per person among ferry passengers. The table below shows total spending by market. In total, visitors spent nearly $150 million in Ketchikan in summer Ketchikan Visitor Volume and Spending, Summer 2006 Total Volume Total Spending Cruise passengers 780,158 $124.0 million Air visitors 34, million Ferry visitors 15, million Total visitor volume and spending 830,811 $143.6 million Cruise ship crew members 22, million Total visitor/crew volume and spending 853,134 $149.3 million Source: Economic Impacts of the Visitor Industry in Ketchikan, Summer 2006, McDowell Group. Visitor Industry Employment and Payroll The visitor industry accounted for 1,150 direct jobs and a total of 1,500 (direct and indirect) jobs in summer In terms of payroll, the industry accounted for $40 million in direct payroll and $50 million in total payroll in summer In the context of the overall economy, these total figures represented 14 percent of all Ketchikan employment, and 12 percent of all Ketchikan payroll in calendar year Visitor Industry Employment and Labor Income in Ketchikan, Summer 2006 Direct Total % of Ketchikan Total Employment 1 1,150 1,500 14% Labor Income $40 million $50 million 12 Source: Economic Impacts of the Visitor Industry in Ketchikan, Summer 2006, McDowell Group. 1 Annual average employment, which includes full-time and part-time employment. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 5

9 Ketchikan Sportfishing Visitor Profile In summer 2008 McDowell Group conducted the Alaska Travelers Survey, Ketchikan Visitors Profile which targeted visitors departing via the Ketchikan International Airport. The airport surveys focused on two groups of visitors: sportfishing visitors and other pleasure-related visitors. Sportfishing visitors may have fished in the immediate Ketchikan area or in an outlying area such as Prince of Wales Island. Using statistical sampling procedures to randomly select flights and passengers throughout the season, McDowell Group surveyors intercepted a total of 444 visitors departing Ketchikan by air. The sample included 230 who were traveling primarily for sportfishing and 214 who were traveling for other pleasure-related purposes. (Alaska residents and business-only travelers were excluded from the sample.) The maximum margin of error for the sportfishing sample is ±6.4 percent, at the 95 percent confidence level. Visitors were asked where they lived, their trip purpose, travel party size, household income, and if they overnighted in Ketchikan. Gender was also recorded. The following tables profile Ketchikan s sportfishing visitors. Sportfishing visitors were overwhelmingly from Western states with California and Washington the top two states. International visitors accounted for just 3 percent of sportfishing participants. Ketchikan Sportfishing Air Visitors Origin Origin % of Sportfishing Visitors West 71% California 23 Washington 15 Other Western States 33 South 14 Midwest 8 East 5 International 3 Sportfishing visitors reported an average party size of 4.7 people. Nearly one-quarter of these visitors were traveling in parties of six or more. Party Size Ketchikan Air Visitors % of Sportfishing Visitors One 15% Two 24 Three 10 Four 18 Five 10 Six or more 23 Average party size 4.7 people Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 6

10 Nearly nine out of ten sportfishing visitors were male. The average age was 51 years old. Gender and Age of Sportfishing Party Members Ketchikan Air Visitors % of Sportfishing Visitors Gender Male 87% Female 13 Age Under 18 5% 18 to to to to to and over 7 Average age 51.3 years Sportfishing visitors reported high incomes, with 38 percent above $150,000 and another 27 percent falling between $95,000 and $150,000. Household Income Ketchikan Air Visitors % of Sportfishing Visitors Under $65,000 10% $65,001 to $80,000 5 $80,001 to $95,000 5 $95,001 to $110, $110,001 to $125,000 9 $125,001 to $150,000 8 Over $150, Don t know 1 Refused 12 Average $130,000 Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 7

11 Nonresident Sportfishing Industry Profile This section profiles Ketchikan s sportfishing industry in terms of types of businesses, market segments, and employment, and visitor participation rates. Business Models There is a diverse variety of business models that comprise the Ketchikan sportfishing industry. The list below provides examples of some of the businesses models typical in the industry. A single owner/operator with one boat who manages reservations and accounting, guides the guests, and cleans the fish. Single owner/operator who runs one boat, but manages multiple boats as one business. A family operation with one spouse or family member who manages the reservations and accounting while the other takes care of the vessel and guiding. Operations that work exclusively or partially through brokers who wholesale fishing trips to cruise passengers and other visitors. Operations that cater almost exclusively to the half-day cruise passenger market, while others offer full-day charters. Operators that may provide only fishing, leaving the visitor responsible for finding their own accommodations and meals. Businesses that offer sportfishing packages that include accommodations, meals, and fish processing. Larger, more complex operations that offer guided or unguided fishing packages that may include accommodations, meals, bait, tackle, fuel and fish processing. Additional activities may include RV park rentals and sundry sales. All of these services are also available individually for visitors who chose to rent their own boats. Businesses that provide services to local residents such as sales of fuel, bait, moorage, meals, and the occasional guided or unguided fishing trip. Markets There are four major market segments that contribute to the impacts of the Ketchikan sportfishing industry: guided sportfishing (fresh and saltwater), unguided sportfishing, POW sportfishing businesses that have staff and make purchases in Ketchikan, and POW sportfishing visitors who pass through Ketchikan. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 8

12 Guided Sportfishing Industry The following analysis of guided nonresident sportfishermen was extracted from data provided by ADF&G Division of Sport Fish Research and Technical Services. Information concerning businesses, vessels, and trips, is segmented by Statewide Harvest Survey (SWHS) areas. The Ketchikan and Prince of Wales areas (A and B) are further segmented by nonresidents participation and trip length in the next section of this report Number of Active Saltwater Businesses, Vessels and Trips by SWHS Area, 2008 SWHS Area Description # of Active Businesses # of Active Vessels # of Trips P Cook Inlet (Kenai/Homer) ,332 D Sitka ,399 B Prince of Wales Island ,086 A Ketchikan ,220 Q Kodiak ,357 E Juneau ,942 J Prince William Sound (Valdez/Cordova) ,375 C Kake/Petersburg/Wrangell ,333 Of the areas reviewed, Prince of Wales Island and Ketchikan were the third and fourth largest based on the number of active vessels. Ketchikan had half the number of vessels as Cook Inlet area P and about two-thirds the number of vessels active in Sitka area D. Area A Ketchikan is comprised of all Alaska waters in the Ketchikan area, including drainages from Portland Inlet to, but not including, Ernest Sound. Area A also includes Duke, Annette, and Gravina Islands. Area B Prince of Wales Island, includes all Alaska waters and drainages from Cape Chacon to Sumner Strait, and from Clarence Island westward, including Forester Island. Maps of area A and B provided by ADF&G are included in the Appendix of this report. A list of nonresident license sales by vendor was obtained from the ADF&G Licensing Division and was grouped by Ketchikan and POW businesses. These lists were used to estimate the total number of nonresident licenses sold in each area. These estimates were used as a proxy for the total number of nonresident sportfishermen in each area. Even though a few visitors may have purchased multiple licenses, duplicate licenses, or may have purchased their license elsewhere in the state before they arrived in area A or B, this methodology provides a reasonably accurate count of the total number of nonresident sportfishermen. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 9

13 Saltwater Businesses and Vessels ADF&G data shows there were 87 fishing guide businesses operating 141 boats in the Ketchikan area in This represented a decline of 4 percent in businesses and 8 percent in vessels from the previous year. POW businesses and boats were relatively stable from 2007 to 2008 with a 1 percent decline in businesses and a 1 percent increase in vessels. Sportfishing Guide Businesses and Vessels % Change Ketchikan Businesses % Vessels Prince of Wales Island Businesses % Vessels Source: Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish Research and Technical Services. Note: The Ketchikan area is defined as Statewide Harvest Area (SWHA) area A, and POW is area B. Counts are based on ports of offloading and are unduplicated. Estimated Nonresident Sportfishing Volume According to ADF&G sportfish license vendor data, there were an estimated 30,400 nonresident licenses sold in Ketchikan and 9,500 sold on POW in These estimates include all license types as well as guided and unguided fishermen. Using guide logbook data, ADF&G estimates the unduplicated number of nonresident guided sport fishermen was about 20,000 in Ketchikan and about 9,100 on POW in This data suggests the vast majority of nonresidents who purchased sportfishing licenses on POW fished with a guide, and two-thirds of nonresidents who purchased a license in Ketchikan fished with a guide, in For further analysis ADF&G logbook data was segmented by guided half-day and full-day saltwater trips, and guided freshwater trips. Ketchikan and POW License Sales and Guided Sportfishermen, 2008 POW Ketchikan Estimated total nonresident license sales 9,500 30,400 Estimated nonresident guided sportfishermen 9,100 20,000 Source: Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish Research and Technical Services and Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Licensing Division. Guided Saltwater Fishing Trips HALF-DAY GUIDED TRIPS Half-day Ketchikan guided trips declined by 8 percent between 2007 and 2008, from 5,710 trips to 5,244 trips. The number of nonresidents on those trips declined by 10 percent, from 23,357 to 20,972. There were an average of four guests per trip in A majority of these half-day trips were taken by cruise visitors. POW half-day trips declined by 10 percent, from 2,769 trips to 2,479 trips. The number of nonresidents on Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 10

14 those trips declined by 12 percent, from 9,801 to 8,596. There were an average of 3.5 guests per trip in Most of the half-day trips by visitors to POW were likely taken by package visitors on the first or last day of their visit. Guided Nonresident, Half-Day Saltwater Fishing Trips, Ketchikan area % Change Half-day trips 5,710 5,244-8% Nonresidents 23,357 20, Prince of Wales Island Half-day trips 2,769 2,479-10% Nonresidents 9,801 8, Source: Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish Research and Technical Services. The Ketchikan area is defined as Statewide Harvest Area (SWHA) area A, and POW is area B. Counts are based on ports of offloading and are unduplicated. Note: Half-day trips were defined as trips with a duration of less than five hours. Counts are based on ports of offloading and are unduplicated. FULL-DAY GUIDED TRIPS Ketchikan area full-day guided fishing trips declined by 11 percent from 2007 to 2008, from 2,215 to 1,976. There were 11 percent fewer nonresident anglers in There were 3.2 guests per trip in Full-day guided trips on POW increased by 3 percent over the same time period, from 5,455 to 5,607. The number of nonresidents on those trips declined by 2 percent, from 20,185 to 19,824. The were an average of 3.5 guests per trip in Guided Nonresident, Full-Day Saltwater Fishing Trips, % Change Ketchikan area Full-day trips 2,215 1,976-11% Nonresidents 7,528 6, Prince of Wales Island Full-day trips 5,455 5,607 +3% Nonresidents 20,185 19,824-2 Source: Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish Research and Technical Services. The Ketchikan area is defined as Statewide Harvest Area (SWHA) area A, and POW is area B. Counts are based on ports of offloading and are unduplicated. Note: Full-day trips were defined as trips with a duration of five hours or more. Counts are based on ports of offloading and are unduplicated. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 11

15 Guided Freshwater Fishing When compared to the volume of guided saltwater trips, the number of guided freshwater trips taken by nonresidents was small. In 2007, 931 nonresidents participated in 251 guided trips. In 2008, the number of trips declined by 31 percent to 173, and participants declined by 41 percent to 548. There were an average of 3.2 guests per trip in Ketchikan Area Guided Freshwater Fishing, % change Businesses 6 6 -% Trips Nonresident participants Source: Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish Research and Technical Services. The number of trips and nonresident visitors participating in local guided freshwater fishing on the Ketchikan road system increased slightly in The number of fly-out trips declined by 78 percent from 2007 to Guided fly-out trips are relatively expensive due to the cost of chartering an airplane on top of paying for guide services. One freshwater guide stated that the economy was becoming an issue in 2008 and highend trips were the first to go. Ketchikan Area Guided Freshwater Fishing Trips, % Change Local trips* % Fly-out trips Total trips % Source: Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish Research and Technical Services. *Ward Cove Creek, Ward Lake, and White River are all accessible from the Ketchikan road system. Overall, the volume of guided freshwater fishing trips on POW was more than double that reported in area A. While the number of businesses engaging in freshwater fishing on POW increased from 13 to 16 between 2007 and 2008, the number of trips declined 13 percent and the number of nonresident participants declined by 19 percent. There were an average of 2.9 guests per trip in POW Guided Freshwater Fishing, % Change Businesses % Trips Nonresident participants 1,542 1, Source: Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish Research and Technical Services. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 12

16 Unguided Sportfishing Quantifying the impacts of all nonresidents who participated in unguided sporfishing in the Ketchikan area is beyond the scope of this study. However, the study team was able to estimate the impacts of two segments of unguided fishermen that contribute significantly to the Ketchikan economy: those who visit lodges and other accommodation providers that feature unguided fishing packages, and those who rent boats for selfguided fishing ( bare-boat rentals). It is likely that these two market segments represent a majority of spending by unguided, nonresident sportfishing. There are typically two types of unguided boats: 14- to 18-foot open skiffs and 20- to 23-foot covered boats with center steering consoles and larger engines. Five Ketchikan area businesses that either rented bare-boats or offered unguided packages were interviewed for this study, including the three largest businesses in this market segment. The study team feels that these interviews represent a sizeable majority of unguided fishing package sales and bare-boat rentals in Ketchikan, and are representative of this segment of the market. In order to preserve the confidentially of individual businesses, this study examines the unguided lodge/package and bare-boat rental segments as a whole. Combined, the business owner/operators interviewed represented a total of 92 unguided boats in 2008 and provided about 1,650 boat-use days to nonresident anglers. For purposes of this study, it is assumed an average of two people per boat; therefore these boat-use days represent an estimated 3,300 nonresident anglers. Unguided sportfishermen spent an average of about 4.5 nights while in Ketchikan. Sportfishing Industry Direct Employment and Payroll Employment There were an estimated 340 direct jobs related to the nonresident sportfishing industry in Ketchikan in For the most part these jobs were seasonal; they include a mix of part-time and full-time employment. As stated earlier in this report, there are a variety of business types in the sportfishing industry. Some businesses are operated by a single person, while others may also employ staff for administrative support, sales and marketing, meal preparation, housekeeping, maintenance, and fish processing. Due to the complexity of business types and because not every sportfish industry business was interviewed for this study, a ratio was developed to identify the level of employment per vessel for those businesses interviewed. The ratio was based on data from multiple business types and sizes and is considered reasonably representative of the industry as a whole. In 2008, there was an average of 1.7 employees per guided vessel during peak season (May-September). With 141 guided vessels in the Ketchikan area, this results in direct employment of about 240 full-time and part-time people. Based on owner/operator interview data, there were also at least an additional 45 people employed with businesses that cater to unguided fishermen. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 13

17 There were 20 Ketchikan-based jobs related to POW sportfishing operations in Several remote POW operations are based out of Ketchikan. These operations employ administrative, sales and marketing, and maintenance personnel. Some staff were based in Ketchikan in the off-season and on POW during the fishing season. Using an estimated average of 15 jobs per million dollars in sales 3 for retail businesses, the study team estimates that total direct retail spending of about $2.5 million 4 by nonresident sportfishing participants accounted for about 35 retail sector jobs in Ketchikan in Estimated Sportfishing-Related Ketchikan Employment, 2008 Guided sportfishing employment 240 Unguided sportfishing employment 45 POW businesses Ketchikan-based employees 20 Retail sector employment 35 Total 340 Source: Ketchikan and POW business owner/operator interviews and McDowell Group estimates. Note: figures have been rounded During the interviews, business owner/operators were asked about their level of local employment. Owner/operators reported an average Ketchikan resident hire rate of 87 percent. In general, smaller operations reported higher rates of local hire than larger operations. Payroll Businesses owners were asked how much they spent on payroll in In some cases, the owner s wages are the profit left over at the end of the season rather than a regular paycheck. Payroll averaged about $15,250 per Ketchikan employee (combined average for year-round and seasonal employees). In addition to payroll, many sportfishing industry participants receive significant income in the form of cash tips. The vast majority of employees in this industry work a four to five month season. Wages for those employed in the industry year-round are likely to be much higher. Multiplying employment and average wage results in an estimated payroll of $5.2 million for Ketchikan-based sportfishing industry employees. Estimated Payroll for Ketchikan-Based Employment, 2008 Estimated Employment Average Payroll Estimated Total Payroll 340 $15,250 $5,185,000 Source: Ketchikan and POW business owner/operator interviews and McDowell Group estimates. Note: figures have been rounded 3 IMPLAN estimate. 4 The $2.5 million is the amount of total direct nonresident sportfishing-related spending that was allocated to the retail sector. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 14

18 Direct Spending Ketchikan Nonresident Sportfishing Spending Data Sources In order to identify nonresident spending related to sportfishing, the study team reviewed several sources of data. An initial review of Ketchikan Gateway Borough (KGB) gross sales and tax collection summary statements yielded inconclusive data. When filing sales tax returns, Ketchikan businesses decide under which North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code they report sales. There are four categories in the KGB records (transportation marine/charters, fishing lodges, hotels, and retail) related to nonresident spending that are also related to sportfishing. While each of these categories contains sales related to the sportfishing industry, none solely reflects nonresident sportfishing spending. Due to the seasonal nature of Ketchikan s sportfishing industry many businesses participate in different types of activities in the off-season. For example, a company may offer guided sportfishing in the summer and provide snow removal services in the winter. However, sales and taxes collected are filed under one NAICS code, making it difficult to identify sales and taxes related to each business type. Due to confidentiality restrictions, the KGB is unable to reveal gross sales or taxes collected by business, nor provide the names of businesses reporting sales in each category. The study team therefore decided the best methodology to identify direct spending by nonresident sportfishermen was to estimate the number of participants, length of stay, and average expenditures. The next section of this report estimates total Ketchikan area spending related to nonresident sportfishing and summarizes the estimated impacts of each market segment. This report excludes nonresident expenditures for sportfish licenses or King salmon stamps. It is beyond the scope of this project to determine which combination of licenses and King salmon stamps visitors purchased. Nonresident license costs range from $20 to $145 and King salmon stamps from $10 to $100. However, assuming that each of the estimated 30,400 visitors purchased the minimum one day fishing license would indicate license sales of $608,000. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 15

19 Total Direct Spending Total direct nonresident sportfishing-related spending in Ketchikan is estimated at $15.6 million for The majority of expenditures ($11.9 million) were made by visitors who sportfished in the Ketchikan area. An additional $3.7 million in Ketchikan spending was generated by POW sportfishing visitors and the businesses that served them. Total Sportfishing-Related Ketchikan Expenditures, 2008 Type of Expenditure Spending Ketchikan sportfishing $11,893,000 POW sportfishing-related 3,732,000 Total $15,632,000 Source: Ketchikan business owner/operator interviews and McDowell Group estimates. Note: figures have been rounded Ketchikan Nonresident Sportfishermen The study team was able to estimate spending for all Ketchikan guided sportfishermen and for a significant portion of unguided fishermen. This study includes only spending related to the days nonresidents actually engaged in sportfishing. An example would be a visitor who spent 14 days in Alaska, seven of the days in Ketchikan. They participated in guided fishing for three full days and one half-day. The estimates in this study would only include spending for the three and one-half days the participant was engaged in sportfishing. In order to protect the confidentially of the businesses that generously provided information for this study, business types have been grouped, and average spending per participant is reflective of the group rather than any specific business type. The table below does not include spending estimates for unguided nonresidents who did not purchase a fishing package or rent a boat. This group would include nonresidents who fished from the shores of lakes, rivers, or the ocean, and those fishing with friends and relatives. While visitors in these two categories may engage in spending for transportation, fishing tackle, bait, accommodations, meals, beverages, gifts, clothing, and souvenirs, the level of overall spending is likely small compared to spending for other market segments. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 16

20 This analysis estimates that nonresidents who participated in sportfishing in Ketchikan had direct expenditures of at least $11.9 million in The methodology for estimating spending for each sector is described in the text following the table. Type of Fishing Estimated Nonresident Sportfishing Spending in Ketchikan, 2008 Average Daily Spending per Participant # of Participant Days Estimated Spending % of Estimated Spending Unguided (lodges and bare-boat rentals) $310 14,850 $4,631,000 39% Half-day guided saltwater ,972 3,565, Full-day guided saltwater 530 6,669 3,535, Guided freshwater ,000 1 Total $11,893, % Source: Ketchikan business owner/operator interviews and McDowell Group estimates. Note: figures have been rounded. UNGUIDED FISHING Unguided fishermen represented the highest percentage of estimated spending for nonresident sportfishing at $4.6 million, 39 percent of total spending. This group includes lodges and resorts that offer unguided sportfishing and operations that rent bare-boats. The average rate of $310 per person, per day reflects spending for accommodations, boats, fuel, tackle, bait, meals, beverages, transportation, gifts, clothing and souvenirs. Estimates were based on two people per room, and per boat. Generally, operators such as lodges that offer unguided fishing provide the boat, fuel, tackle, bait, accommodations, meals, and sometimes fish processing for a package price. Bare-boat rentals generally include normal operating and safety equipment and one tank of fuel. The renter must provide all fishing-related gear (as well as their own accommodations and meals). The estimated 14,850 participation days was derived from an estimated 3,300 fishermen staying an average of 4.5 nights each. HALF-DAY GUIDED SALTWATER FISHING Estimated average spending for cruise and non-cruise half-day fishermen combined was $170 per day. With 20,972 half-day trips in 2008, spending in this category was estimated at nearly $3.6 million. Expenditures for half-day guided fishing trips included cruise passengers who engaged in sportfishing. Spending for this group was limited to the value of the half-day fishing excursion. Other spending by these visitors while in port such as meals, gifts, clothing, souvenirs, tours, and attractions were not included because these expenditures were not directly related to sportfishing. Also included in this category were overnight visitors who chose to take a half-day fishing excursion as well as a significant number of resort/lodge package fishermen who fished at least one half-day as part of a package (their full days are counted in the next category). Per day spending for noncruise half-day fishermen reflects expenditures for accommodations, fishing, meals, beverages, transportation, gifts, clothing, and souvenirs. For reasons of confidentiality, average spending rates for the two groups were combined. This resulted in an estimated average spending per person, per day of $170. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 17

21 FULL-DAY GUIDED SALTWATER FISHING Based on published rates and interviews conducted for this study, the average rate for a full day of guided sportfishing in 2008 was estimated at about $320 per person. This market segment was estimated to spend approximately $80 per person, per day for accommodations (double occupancy) and an additional $130 per person, per day on meals, beverages, transportation, gifts, clothing, souvenirs, bait, fish boxes, fish processing, and tips. In total, spending was estimated at $530 per person, per day, for full-day fishermen. This estimate was applied to all full-day fishermen whether they were on an all-inclusive package trip or purchased charter fishing separately from accommodations, meals, etc. With 6,669 full-day fishermen, total expenditures for this group are estimated at slightly more than $3.5 million. GUIDED FRESHWATER FISHING Guided freshwater fishing represented a small portion of overall sportfishing-related spending at $162,000. The average daily rate reflects those who fished on guided tours to local streams (on the road system) and those who participated in more expensive fly-out trips. A total of 548 participants (full and half day) spent an average of just under $300 per trip, per day. Industry Spending Patterns Ketchikan-Based Sportfishing Business Expenditures Ketchikan sportfishing-related business owner/operators were asked to estimate the percentage of their total spending on goods, services, and labor that was spent locally. Responses were tallied and weighted based on business size (client volume). Overall, business owner/operators reported that 85 percent of their spending occurred in Ketchikan. Nearly one-third of Ketchikan expenditures were for payroll, 29 percent for boats and equipment, 24 percent for fuel, and 15 percent for other business-related expenses. Ketchikan Sportfishing Business Expenditures by Percentage, 2008 % of Total Expenditures Payroll 32% Boats and equipment 29 Fuel 24 Other spending 15 Total 100% Source: Ketchikan business owner/operator interviews and McDowell Group estimates. Note: figures have been rounded. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 18

22 Prince of Wales Island Nonresident Sportfishing-Related Spending Telephone interviews were conducted with 10 Prince of Wales Island sportfishing businesses (including the three largest operations on the Island). The businesses represent 50 charter vessels (27 percent of the POW fleet) that hosted 3,900 guided and 600 unguided nonresident sportfishermen in 2008 (representing about half of the estimated 9,100 nonresidents who sportfished on POW that year). The POW owner/operator interviews revealed that POW sportfishing-related spending in Ketchikan totaled nearly $3.8 million in This report includes only the estimated Ketchikan spending and employment for those POW businesses that were interviewed for this study; therefore, the $3.7 million in spending is a conservative estimate of POW sportfishing-related business spending in Ketchikan. Most of the operations that were not interviewed are small and likely spent more locally (on POW) than larger operations with Ketchikan offices. The most likely items that these smaller businesses would purchase in Ketchikan would include floatplane services, groceries, equipment, and supplies. Total POW Sportfishing-Related Ketchikan Expenditures, 2008 Spending POW businesses $3,533,000 Visitor spending 199,000 Total $3,732,000 Source: POW business owner/operator interviews. Note: figures have been rounded. POW BUSINESS SPENDING IN KETCHIKAN The POW businesses interviewed reported total direct spending in Ketchikan of $3.5 million in The most significant expenditures were for floatplanes at $1.1 million, followed by fuel at $861,000. Combined, the 10 operations employed approximately 200 people in About 10 percent were Ketchikan residents who received payroll and benefits valued at nearly $500,000. Other expenditures included goods and services such as groceries, parts and equipment, hardware, tools, tackle, and beverages. POW Sportfishing Businesses Ketchikan Expenditures, 2008 Floatplanes $1,121,000 Fuel 861,000 Payroll 480,000 Other expenditures 1,071,000 Total $3,533,000 Source: POW business owner/operator interviews and McDowell Group estimates. Note: figures have been rounded. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 19

23 POW SPORTFISHING VISITOR SPENDING IN KETCHIKAN Of the 4,500 nonresident fishermen represented by the business interviews, about 40 percent spent at least one night in Ketchikan either on their way to or from POW. These POW sportfishing visitors spent approximately $200,000 while passing through Ketchikan in Based on double occupancy, this represented about 900 room nights in Ketchikan in At an average 2008 summer rate of about $161, these POW visitors had direct spending of about $145,000 for Ketchikan accommodations. It was estimated that this group also spent $30 per person for transportation, meals, beverages, gifts, clothing, and souvenirs while in Ketchikan. Not included in this study are expenditures by POW sportfishermen who passed through Ketchikan International Airport (KIA) but did not spend a night in Ketchikan. It is likely that most of the estimated 9,500 nonresidents who sportfished on POW passed through the airport and made some expenditures while there. POW Sportfishing Visitor Estimated Ketchikan Expenditures, 2008 Average per Person Spending # of Visitors Total Spending Accommodations (double occupancy) $80 1,800 $145,000 Other expenditures 30 1,800 54,000 Total $199,000 Source: POW business owner/operator interviews and McDowell Group estimates. Note: figures have been rounded. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 20

24 Economic Impacts There are three types of economic impacts from nonresident sportfishing-related spending: Direct impacts: Include nonresident spending for fishing packages, boat rental, tackle, accommodations, meals, beverages, transportation, gifts, clothing and souvenirs. Also included are POW business expenditures in Ketchikan in direct support of nonresident sporfishing on the Island. These include expenditures for fuel, floatplanes, payroll for Ketchikan based staff, groceries, parts, and equipment, as well as other goods and services. Indirect impacts: Jobs and income in businesses providing goods and services to the Ketchikan sportfishing industry. For example, vendors who conduct business with a charter operator in turn buy fuel and other supplies, rent office space, and purchase services from other local providers in support of their day-to-day business operations. This spending creates additional jobs and income in the Ketchikan Gateway Borough. Induced impacts: Jobs and income created as a result of industry employees spending their payroll dollars in the local economy. Indirect and induced economic impacts, often described as multiplier effects, are important components of the overall economic impact of the sportfishing industry in Ketchikan. In general, however, multiplier effects for Alaska are limited, as few goods are actually produced in the state. A model was constructed using IMPLAN multipliers for the following sectors: charter fishing boat operations, hotel/motel, other accommodations, food and drinking establishments, miscellaneous retail businesses, and other amusements and recreation. Multipliers were weighted based on estimated expenditures for each sector. Spending Impacts The total estimated economic impact of nonresident sportfishing-related spending in the Ketchikan Gateway borough was $20 million in 2008, with total estimated seasonal-equivalent employment of slightly more than 400 jobs and total estimated payroll of $6.7 million. Economic Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing-Related Spending in Ketchikan Gateway Borough, FY 2008 Direct Indirect & Induced Total Impact Employment Labor income (payroll & benefits) $5,180,000 $1,534,000 $6,714,000 Total spending impact (includes labor income) $15,632,000 $4,446,000 $19,908,000 Source: McDowell Group estimates. Readers are cautioned to keep in mind that the 410 jobs are for the most part seasonal in nature, and the indirect and induced impacts would reflect the seasonal nature of this industry. While the study did not Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 21

25 gather data on seasonal versus year-round employment, it is estimated that perhaps 5 to 15 percent of industry employment is year-round. Estimated Spending on Accommodations The accommodations segment of the visitor industry benefits significantly from the nonresident sportfishing industry. These visitors spent an estimated 23,867 nights in Ketchikan in Assuming double occupancy, this represents approximately 11,935 room nights. Based on an average 2008 accommodation rate of about $161 for double occupancy, nonresident sportfishing visitors generated an estimated $1.9 million in accommodations revenue. Estimated Sportfishing Visitor Expenditures for Ketchikan Accommodations, 2008 Visitor Type Visitor Nights Room nights* Total Spending Unguided visitors 14,850 7,425 $1,195,000 Full-day guided visitors 7,217 3, ,000 POW sportfishing visitors 1, ,000 Total 23,867 11,935 $1,922,000 Source: Ketchikan business owner/operator interviews and McDowell Group estimates. Note: figures have been rounded. *Based on double occupancy. Taxes Sportfishing-related spending may be subject to the City s 4 percent sales tax, the Borough s 2 percent sales tax, or both. Spending on accommodations may be subject to the City s 3 percent bed tax, the Borough s 4 percent bed tax, or both. It was not possible to calculate precisely total sales and bed tax revenue collected from nonresident sportfishing because some of the spending may have been subject to Borough taxes only, and sales by location is unknown. However, total sales taxes collected from nonresident sportfishermen were likely in the range of one-half million to $1 million and bed taxes collected in the range of $75,000 to $125,000. Ketchikan Sales and Bed Tax Rates, 2008 City Borough Sales tax 6% 2% Bed tax 7 4 Source: Ketchikan Gateway Borough. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 22

26 Sportfishing Industry 2009 Business owners and operators were asked if their 2009 visitor volume and total revenues were higher, lower, or about the same as Responses were tallied and weighted based on market share. Ketchikan Nearly all owners reported a decline in client volume in 2009, with an average decline of 19 percent, while revenues were down an average of 15 percent. All but one business reported serving fewer clients in Ketchikan Sportfishing Business Revenue and Clients, 2009 Avg. % Change 2008 to 2009 Revenue -15% Guests -19 Source: Ketchikan business owner/operator interviews. Those who reported declines were asked what they thought were the main reasons. Almost unanimously owners stated that the severe downturn in the national economy was the most significant factor and that visitor concerns over sportfish bag limits were also a factor. When referring to the difficult economic conditions one owner stated We have had a group of 18 coming to our facility for 10 years; they called and said they just could not afford it in They are construction workers from California and they stated they were basically unemployed. For the most part, bag limit issues did not affect the unguided nonresident market or the half-day cruise market as much as the full-day guided markets. In general, these businesses reported smaller declines than operations offering full-day guided services. Prince of Wales Island Sportfishing businesses on POW reported much greater declines than Ketchikan businesses. Owners reported an average decline of 30 percent in guests and 32 percent in revenue. As a group, the larger operations on the Island reported greater declines than smaller operations. Owners stated that the severe downturn in the national economy was the most significant factor. According to one lodge operator, Even people who had money were reluctant to spend it in Owner/operators also stated that visitor concerns over sportfish bag limits had resulted in cancellations. One owner mentioned that he has delayed the opening date of his season because of bag limit issues: I used to open in early June, last year I opened June 24. In early June, my guests can only keep one king, one halibut, and one ling. They just don t see the cost of a package in early June as a value anymore. POW Sportfishing Business Revenue and Clients, 2009 Avg. % Change 2008 to 2009 Revenue -32% Guests -30 Source: POW business owner/operator interviews. Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy McDowell Group, Inc. Page 23

The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI. Prepared by:

The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI. Prepared by: The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI Prepared by: Southwick Associates, Inc. PO Box 6435 Fernandina Beach, FL 32035 Ph (904) 277-9765 Fax (904) 261-1145 Email:

More information

The University of Georgia

The University of Georgia The University of Georgia Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Economic Impacts of Alabama Quail Hunting Prepared by: Archie Flanders and

More information

ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SPORTFISHING IN ALASKA

ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SPORTFISHING IN ALASKA ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SPORTFISHING IN ALASKA 2 0 0 7 R E P O R T A Message from the Director CHARLIE SWANTON, DIRECTOR ADF&G, DIVISION OF SPORT FISH Alaska supports arguably some of the

More information

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in TEXAS. Prepared by:

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in TEXAS. Prepared by: The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in TEXAS Prepared by: Southwick Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 6435 Fernandina Beach, FL 32035 Ph (904) 277-9765 Fax (904) 261-1145 Email:

More information

Economic Analysis of Marine Recreational Fishing at NOAA Fisheries

Economic Analysis of Marine Recreational Fishing at NOAA Fisheries Economic Analysis of Marine Recreational Fishing at NOAA Fisheries Office of Science & Technology Sabrina Lovell Recreational Fisheries Economist March 8, 2017 Presented at EAA Seminar: Sustainable fisheries

More information

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in NORTH CAROLINA. Prepared by:

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in NORTH CAROLINA. Prepared by: The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in NORTH CAROLINA Prepared by: Southwick Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 6435 Fernandina Beach, FL 32035 Ph (904) 277-9765 Fax (904) 261-1145

More information

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota, Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 507-S January 2003 Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota, 2001-2002 Dean A. Bangsund and F. Larry Leistritz*

More information

Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing for Bonefish, Permit and Tarpon in Belize for 2007

Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing for Bonefish, Permit and Tarpon in Belize for 2007 Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing for Bonefish, Permit and Tarpon in Belize for 2007 Prepared by: Anthony J. Fedler, Ph.D. Human Dimensions Consulting 9707 SW 55 th Road Gainesville, Florida 32608

More information

Testing a Methodology for Estimating the Economic Significance of Saltwater Charter Fishing in Southeast Alaska

Testing a Methodology for Estimating the Economic Significance of Saltwater Charter Fishing in Southeast Alaska Testing a Methodology for Estimating the Economic Significance of Saltwater Charter Fishing in Southeast Alaska by Ginny Fay 2 Darcy Dugan 1 Ian Fay-Hiltner 2 Meghan Wilson 1 Steve Colt 1 Institute of

More information

Independent Economic Analysis Board. Review of the Estimated Economic Impacts of Salmon Fishing in Idaho. Task Number 99

Independent Economic Analysis Board. Review of the Estimated Economic Impacts of Salmon Fishing in Idaho. Task Number 99 IEAB Independent Economic Analysis Board Roger Mann, Chair Noelwah R. Netusil, Vice-Chair Kenneth L. Casavant Daniel D. Huppert Joel R. Hamilton Lon L. Peters Susan S. Hanna Hans Radtke Review of the Estimated

More information

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the Matagorda Bay System

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the Matagorda Bay System The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the Matagorda Bay System Prepared by Andrew Ropicki 1 Daniel Hanselka 2 Rebekka Dudensing 3 Rhonda Cummins 4 Bill Balboa 5 December 12, 2016 1 Assistant

More information

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the San Antonio Bay System

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the San Antonio Bay System The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the San Antonio Bay System Prepared by Andrew Ropicki 1 Daniel Hanselka 2 Rebekka Dudensing 3 Rhonda Cummins 4 December 12, 2016 1 Assistant Professor and

More information

The Economic Impact of Colonial Downs in Virginia

The Economic Impact of Colonial Downs in Virginia The Economic Impact of Colonial Downs in Virginia Prepared for Revolutionary Racing January 31, 2018 1309 E Cary Street, Richmond, VA 23219 1025 Huron Road East, Cleveland, OH 44115 chmuraecon.com Table

More information

The 2010 Economic Contribution of Tourism to the Meadowlands Liberty Region

The 2010 Economic Contribution of Tourism to the Meadowlands Liberty Region The 2010 Economic Contribution of Tourism to the Meadowlands Liberty Region Key Metrics & Evaluation 93 MAIN STREET :: ANNAPOLIS, MD 21401 WWW.VANTAGESTRATEGY.COM :: 202-449- 9708 1 Vantage Strategy ::.

More information

Recreational Saltwater Fishing Industry Trends and Economic Impact January 2007

Recreational Saltwater Fishing Industry Trends and Economic Impact January 2007 Document was created exclusively for RISAA and the information contained herein is not to be disclosed without their expressed permission Recreational Saltwater Fishing Industry Trends and Economic Impact

More information

15, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

15, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Economic Contribution, Impacts, and Economic Benefits of Deer, Waterfowl and Upland Game Bird Hunting in North and South Dakota: Relationship to CRP Lands Dr. John Loomis and Dr. Michelle Haefele in cooperation

More information

The Power of Outdoor Recreation Spending in Pennsylvania:

The Power of Outdoor Recreation Spending in Pennsylvania: The Power of Outdoor Recreation Spending in Pennsylvania: How hunting, fishing, and outdoor activities help support a healthy state economy November, 2018 Prepared for the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation

More information

Economic Contribution of the 2018 Recreational Red Snapper Season in the South Atlantic

Economic Contribution of the 2018 Recreational Red Snapper Season in the South Atlantic Economic Contribution of the 2018 Recreational Red Snapper Season in the South Atlantic Produced for the: American Sportfishing Association (ASA) PO Box 6435 Fernandina Beach, FL 32035 Office (904) 277-9765

More information

THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION FROM HORSES

THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION FROM HORSES THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION FROM HORSES ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION FROM HORSES HIGHLIGHTS The horse industry contributes more than $19 billion annually to the Canadian economy On-farm activities with horses generate

More information

Economic Impact Analysis BOONE DOCKS RESORT AND MARINA, LLC

Economic Impact Analysis BOONE DOCKS RESORT AND MARINA, LLC Economic Impact Analysis BOONE DOCKS RESORT AND MARINA, LLC Analysis conducted using the on-line Boating Economic Impact Model developed by Drs. Ed Mahoney (mahoneye@msu.edu), Dan Stynes (stynes@msu.edu)

More information

Final Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users

Final Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users Socioeconomic Study of Reefs in Southeast Florida - Executive Summary By Hazen and Sawyer in association with Florida State University and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, October 19, 2001

More information

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL SALTWATER FISHING ON THE LOUISIANA ECONOMY

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL SALTWATER FISHING ON THE LOUISIANA ECONOMY THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL SALTWATER FISHING ON THE LOUISIANA ECONOMY By Loren C. Scott & Associates, Inc. 743 Woodview Court Baton Rouge, LA 70810 225-751-1707 lorencscott@aol.com for The Coastal

More information

DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME

DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Sean Parnell, GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME November 4, 2011 DIVISION OF SPORT FISH 3298 Douglas Place Homer, AA 99603-8027 PHONE: (907) 235-8191 FAX: (907) 235-2448 and Douglas Island Center Bldg

More information

The Economic Impacts of Carolina Beach Inlet Navigability

The Economic Impacts of Carolina Beach Inlet Navigability The Economic s of Carolina Beach Inlet Navigability June 27, 2014 By: Chris Dumas, Ph.D. Department of Economics and Finance Cameron School of Business UNC-Wilmington 601 South College Road Wilmington,

More information

Seafood Industry. The 2012 Juneau and Southeast Alaska Economic Indicators 11/1/12 Page 60

Seafood Industry. The 2012 Juneau and Southeast Alaska Economic Indicators 11/1/12 Page 60 Seafood Industry In 2011, fishermen in Southeast landed 395,628,268 pounds of fish with an ex vessel value of $391,091,684. This harvest resulted in 272.6 million pounds of product, with a wholesale value

More information

Angling in Manitoba (2000)

Angling in Manitoba (2000) Angling in Manitoba (2000) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Angler Profile 2 Angling Effort 7 Catch and Harvest 10 Angling Expenditures 13 Bait Use 16 Nonresident Trip Characteristics 18 Angling in

More information

Angling in Manitoba Survey of Recreational Angling

Angling in Manitoba Survey of Recreational Angling Angling in Manitoba 2005 Survey of Recreational Angling TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Angler Profile 2 Angling Effort 6 Catch and Harvest 9 Angling Expenditures 11 Bait Use 14 Canadian and Nonresident

More information

Discussion Paper: Consideration of a Registration for Self-Guided Halibut Rental Boats

Discussion Paper: Consideration of a Registration for Self-Guided Halibut Rental Boats Discussion Paper: Consideration of a Registration for Self-Guided Halibut Rental Boats December 2017 1 1 Introduction... 1 2 Description of the Problem... 1 2.1 Definition of self-guided halibut rental

More information

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You Special Publication - 06-16 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TOURISM ON COLORADO RIVER COMMUNITIES INCLUDING: LAUGHLIN BULLHEAD CITY FORT MOHAVE MOHAVE VALLEY GOLDEN

More information

Final 2010 Sport Halibut Harvest Estimates Alaska Department of Fish and Game

Final 2010 Sport Halibut Harvest Estimates Alaska Department of Fish and Game Final 2010 Sport Halibut Harvest Estimates Alaska Department of Fish and Game 1. Area 2C Harvest: Table 1.1. Area 2C sport halibut harvest estimates by harvest survey area, 2010. Non- Area Avg. Wt (lb)

More information

OR DUNGENESS CRAB FISHERY:

OR DUNGENESS CRAB FISHERY: E 55 OR DUNGENESS CRAB FISHERY: an economic analysis of productivity and profitability David S. Liao Joe B. Stevens OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY SEA GRANT COLLEGE PROGRAM Publication no. ORESU-T-75-005 AGRICULTURAL

More information

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Oregon

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Oregon Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Oregon For: Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association By: Southwick Associates October 2013 PO Box 6435 Fernandina Beach, FL32035 Tel

More information

The Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in the Everglades Region

The Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in the Everglades Region The Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in the Everglades Region Prepared for: The Everglades Foundation Prepared by: Tony Fedler, Ph.D. For the Bonefish and Tarpon Trust December 2009 Table of Contents

More information

Lower Fryingpan River and Ruedi Reservoir Economic Impact Study

Lower Fryingpan River and Ruedi Reservoir Economic Impact Study Lower Fryingpan River and Ruedi Reservoir Economic Impact Study July, 2015 Martin Shields, Colorado State University Martin.Shields@colostate.edu John Loomis, Colorado State University Rebecca Hill, Colorado

More information

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Washington

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Washington Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Washington For: Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association By: Southwick Associates Released June 2015 PO Box 6435 Fernandina Beach,

More information

JUNEAU SECOND CHANNEL CROSSING WATERWAY USER SURVEY RESULTS

JUNEAU SECOND CHANNEL CROSSING WATERWAY USER SURVEY RESULTS JUNEAU SECOND CHANNEL CROSSING WATERWAY USER SURVEY RESULTS PREPARED FOR: HDR Alaska, Inc. PREPARED BY: Juneau Anchorage December 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...1 Introduction and Methodology...2

More information

Final 2012 Sport Halibut Harvest Estimates Alaska Department of Fish and Game

Final 2012 Sport Halibut Harvest Estimates Alaska Department of Fish and Game Final 2012 Sport Halibut Harvest Estimates Alaska Department of Fish and Game 1. Area 2C Harvest: Table 1.1. Area 2C sport halibut harvest estimates by sector and subarea, 2012. Non- Subarea Avg. Wt. (lb)

More information

The Economic Impact of Golf In South Carolina

The Economic Impact of Golf In South Carolina The Economic Impact of Golf In South Carolina By Dudley Jackson Research Director South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism For South Carolina Golf Course Owners Association April 2016

More information

Economic Impact of the Recreational Fisheries on Local County Economies in California s National Marine Sanctuaries 2010, 2011 and 2012

Economic Impact of the Recreational Fisheries on Local County Economies in California s National Marine Sanctuaries 2010, 2011 and 2012 Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series ONMS 2015-07 Economic Impact of the Recreational Fisheries on Local County Economies in California s National Marine Sanctuaries 2010, 2011 and 2012 U.S. Department

More information

2013 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF FLATS FISHING IN BELIZE

2013 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF FLATS FISHING IN BELIZE 2013 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF FLATS FISHING IN BELIZE Prepared for: Bonefish and Tarpon Trust P.O. Box 644257 Vero Beach, FL 32964 Prepared by: Anthony J. Fedler, Ph.D. Human Dimensions Consulting 9707 SW 55th

More information

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015 For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation University of Wyoming, Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke 1 February

More information

Angler Spending on Fishing-related Durable Goods: Results from the 2014 Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey

Angler Spending on Fishing-related Durable Goods: Results from the 2014 Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Angler Spending on Fishing-related Durable Goods: Results from the 2014 Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Sabrina Lovell1, James Hilger2, and Scott Steinback3 NAAFE 2015 Ketchikan, AK 1US

More information

Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015 Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015 1 For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation University of Wyoming, Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics AAAAddd David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

More information

Methodology for ISER Surveys of Alaska Halibut Fishermen

Methodology for ISER Surveys of Alaska Halibut Fishermen Methodology for ISER Surveys of Alaska Halibut Fishermen by Gunnar Knapp Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99508 907-786-7710

More information

Prince William Sound Aquaculture Corporation Economic Impact Update for 2010

Prince William Sound Aquaculture Corporation Economic Impact Update for 2010 Prince William Sound Aquaculture Corporation Economic Impact Update for 2010 PWSAC has a Significant Impact on Alaska Salmon Fisheries During the past four seasons, salmon reared and released by the Prince

More information

The Economic Benefits of Hunting and Fishing Activities in Alberta in 2008

The Economic Benefits of Hunting and Fishing Activities in Alberta in 2008 The Economic Benefits of Hunting and Fishing Activities in Alberta in 2008 Submitted to Hunting For Tomorrow Foundation Submitted by May, 2009 Introduction Hunting and Fishing related expenditures by Alberta

More information

State and National Economic Effects of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Related Recreation on U.S. Forest Service-Managed Lands

State and National Economic Effects of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Related Recreation on U.S. Forest Service-Managed Lands State and National Economic Effects of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Related Recreation on U.S. Forest Service-Managed Lands Prepared by the: American Sportfishing Association for the: Wildlife, Fish and

More information

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015 Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015 For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation University of Wyoming, Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke September,

More information

Department of Fish and Game

Department of Fish and Game MEMORANDUM TO: THRU: Kevin Duffy Deputy Commissioner Juneau Rob Bentz Deputy Director Division of Sport Fish Juneau State Of Alaska Department of Fish and Game DATE: September 21, 21 TELEPHONE NO: 465-6187

More information

Yukon Outfitters. Socio-Economic Profile and Situational Analysis. and Vector Research. April 2016

Yukon Outfitters. Socio-Economic Profile and Situational Analysis. and Vector Research. April 2016 Yukon Outfitters Socio-Economic Profile and Situational Analysis April 2016 Prepared for Yukon Government Economic Development Department Prepared by and Vector Research Yukon Outfitters Socio-Economic

More information

A study prepared for: Presented by:

A study prepared for: Presented by: Economic Impact of the Coachella Valley Golf Industry A study prepared for: Presented by: Acknowledgements The Hi-Lo Desert Golf Course Superintendents Association would like to acknowledge the California

More information

Big Blue Adventure Event Analysis UTC Tourism Center October 2016

Big Blue Adventure Event Analysis UTC Tourism Center October 2016 A report summarizing Big Blue Adventure events economic impact on the Lake Tahoe region as well as participants assessments of their event experience Big Blue Adventure Event Analysis UTC Tourism Center

More information

A Threatened Bay: Challenges to the Future of the Penobscot Bay Region and its Communities

A Threatened Bay: Challenges to the Future of the Penobscot Bay Region and its Communities A Threatened Bay: Challenges to the Future of the Penobscot Bay Region and its Communities 1 A A Threatened Bay: Challenges to the Future of the Penobscot Bay Region and its Communities In 1996 the Island

More information

Discussion Paper: Unguided Rental Boat Registration

Discussion Paper: Unguided Rental Boat Registration Discussion Paper: Unguided Rental Boat Registration April 2018 1 1 Introduction... 1 2 Purpose and Need... 1 3 Description of the Problem... 2 3.1 Definition of guided and unguided anglers... 2 3.2 Unguided

More information

Marine Recreational and Commercial Industries and Activities in Lee and Charlotte Counties: Economic Consequences and Impacts

Marine Recreational and Commercial Industries and Activities in Lee and Charlotte Counties: Economic Consequences and Impacts Marine Recreational and Commercial Industries and Activities in Lee and Charlotte Counties: Economic Consequences and Impacts Betty Staugler Florida Sea Grant Extension Marine Agent & Chuck Adams Florida

More information

Economic Contribution of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation in Colorado July 2009

Economic Contribution of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation in Colorado July 2009 Colorado Off-Highway Vehicle Coalition Economic Contribution of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation in Colorado July 2009 www.cohvco.org THE Louis Berger Group, INC. 12596 W. Bayaud Ave. Suite 201 Lakewood,

More information

THE ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY OF SALMON

THE ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY OF SALMON THE ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY OF SALMON A conceptual framework and preliminary characterization of the spatial distribution of economic values associated with salmon in the Mat-Su Basin, Alaska Davin Holen, Principal,

More information

APPENDIX 3: EAGLECREST MASTER PLAN PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS

APPENDIX 3: EAGLECREST MASTER PLAN PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS APPENDIX 3: EAGLECREST MASTER PLAN PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS Eaglecrest Master Plan Public Opinion Surveys Prepared for Eaglecrest Ski Area Board of Directors Prepared by McDowell Group Inc. Eaglecrest Master

More information

Economic Impact of Mountain Biking in the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests

Economic Impact of Mountain Biking in the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests Economic Impact of Mountain Biking in the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests JAMES N. MAPLES, Ph D MICHAEL J. BRADLEY, Ph D Report submitted to Outdoor Alliance on August 5, 2017 Study funded by Outdoor

More information

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2011

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2011 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2011 Addendum to the 2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated

More information

British Columbia's Fisheries & Aquaculture Sector May 2001

British Columbia's Fisheries & Aquaculture Sector May 2001 British Columbia's Fisheries & Aquaculture Sector May 2001 Ministry of Finance and Corporate Relations Table of Contents Introduction... 1 What s new in this report?... 1 Highlights... 3 1. Defining the

More information

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SKI AREAS ON THE ECONOMY OF NORTH CAROLINA SEASON. Final Report

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SKI AREAS ON THE ECONOMY OF NORTH CAROLINA SEASON. Final Report THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SKI AREAS ON THE ECONOMY OF NORTH CAROLINA 2002-2003 SEASON Final Report Prepared for the North Carolina Ski Areas Association By Dr. Steven W. Millsaps Dr. Peter

More information

RESEARCH Massachusetts Recreational Boater Survey. Project Summary

RESEARCH Massachusetts Recreational Boater Survey. Project Summary Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning RESEARCH Project Summary 2010 Massachusetts Recreational Boater Survey The 2010 Massachusetts Recreational Boater Survey gathered spatial and economic data relating

More information

ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF MIDDLE FORK OF THE SALMON FLOATER SPENDING ON LOCAL ECONOMIES

ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF MIDDLE FORK OF THE SALMON FLOATER SPENDING ON LOCAL ECONOMIES ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF MIDDLE FORK OF THE SALMON FLOATER SPENDING ON LOCAL ECONOMIES Chris Neher Resource Economist April 2016 INTRODUCTION The Middle Fork of the Salmon River is world renown for offering

More information

Prepared by: McDowell Group, Inc. Andy Wink CAP Meeting

Prepared by: McDowell Group, Inc. Andy Wink CAP Meeting Prepared by: McDowell Group, Inc. Andy Wink CAP Meeting 7.28.15 Alaska Seafood Overview Fishery & Market Update Key Issues Ketchikan Seafood Industry Who and What is Alaska Seafood? About 60,000 fishermen,

More information

Angler Use, Harvest and Economic Assessment on Trout Stocked Streams in Pennsylvania

Angler Use, Harvest and Economic Assessment on Trout Stocked Streams in Pennsylvania Angler Use, Harvest and Economic Assessment on Trout Stocked Streams in Pennsylvania R. Greene 1, R. Weber 1, R. Carline 2, D. Diefenbach 2 and M. Shields 3 1 Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission Fisheries

More information

Economic Impact of the Michigan Equine Industry, 2006

Economic Impact of the Michigan Equine Industry, 2006 Economic Impact of the Michigan Equine Industry, 2006 Summary Animals and operations 155,000 equine animals housed in Michigan on June 1, 2007-86,000 at private residences - 21,000 at breeding farms -

More information

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT Background The Economic Development Element considers labor force and labor force characteristics, employment by place of work and residence, and analysis of the community

More information

The Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey

The Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey The Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey April 2016 Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey 1 CONTENTS 30TABOUT THE SPONSORS30T... 2 30TEXECUTIVE SUMMARY30T... 3 30TSURVEY OVERVIEW30T... 5 30TECONOMIC

More information

The Economics of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species For-Hire Fishing Trips July - November 2013 Clifford Hutt and George Silva

The Economics of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species For-Hire Fishing Trips July - November 2013 Clifford Hutt and George Silva The Economics of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species For-Hire Fishing Trips July - November 2013 Clifford Hutt and George Silva U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

More information

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015 Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015 Contents Executive Summary 3 Key Findings: 2015 Survey 8 Comparison between 2014 and 2015 Findings 27 Methodology Appendix 41 2 Executive Summary and Key Observations

More information

The Economic Gains from Reallocating Specific Saltwater Fisheries

The Economic Gains from Reallocating Specific Saltwater Fisheries The Economic Gains from Reallocating Specific Saltwater Fisheries Produced for the: American Sportfishing Association By: Southwick Associates May 12, 2015 Executive Summary Allocation arrangements between

More information

Golfers in Colorado: The Role of Golf in Recreational and Tourism Lifestyles and Expenditures

Golfers in Colorado: The Role of Golf in Recreational and Tourism Lifestyles and Expenditures Golfers in Colorado: The Role of Golf in Recreational and Tourism Lifestyles and Expenditures by Josh Wilson, Phil Watson, Dawn Thilmany and Steve Davies Graduate Research Assistants, Associate Professor

More information

Appendix 22 Sea angling from a private or chartered boat

Appendix 22 Sea angling from a private or chartered boat Appendix 22 Sea angling from a private or chartered boat LUC SMRTS2015 Final Report 359 March 2016 Appendix 22 Sea angling from a private or chartered boat Table A22.1: Summary of sample confidence levels

More information

Nevada County Population Projections 2013 to 2032 Based On The Last Estimate Year of 2012

Nevada County Population Projections 2013 to 2032 Based On The Last Estimate Year of 2012 Nevada County Population Projections 2013 to 2032 Based On The Last Estimate Year of 2012 Prepared By: The Nevada State Demographer s Office Jeff Hardcastle, AICP NV State Demographer University of NV

More information

TARANAKI VISITOR STATISTICS SEPTEMBER 2017

TARANAKI VISITOR STATISTICS SEPTEMBER 2017 TARANAKI VISITOR STATISTICS SEPTEMBER 217 Taranaki Visitor Statistics At a Glance: Year ending September 217 For the 12 months ending September 217 there were 38,288 visitors who stayed in commercial accommodation

More information

Economic Contribution of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation in Colorado. Executive Summary Season. A joint cooperation report

Economic Contribution of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation in Colorado. Executive Summary Season. A joint cooperation report Economic Contribution of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation in Colorado Executive Summary 2014-2015 Season A joint cooperation report Page intentionally left blank to accommodate double-sided printing December

More information

Montauk Beach Restoration Project. Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County, Long Island, New York January 2013

Montauk Beach Restoration Project. Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County, Long Island, New York January 2013 Montauk Beach Restoration Project Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County, Long Island, New York January 2013 1 Montauk Montauk is the easternmost hamlet on Long Island Only 20 square miles, Montauk boasts

More information

Appendix G Coastal Demographic and Economic Trends Additional Figures

Appendix G Coastal Demographic and Economic Trends Additional Figures Appendix G Coastal Demographic and Economic Trends Additional Figures Figure 1. Unemployment Rate in 1970-2004 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990

More information

Department of Fish and Game

Department of Fish and Game Department of Fish and Game DIVISION OF SPORT FISH 3298 Douglas Place Homer, AK 99603 Main: 907-235-8191 Fax: 907-235-2448 P.O. Box 110024 Juneau, AK 99811-0024 Main: 907-465-4270 Fax: 907-465-2034 October

More information

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2006

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2006 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2006 Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated

More information

Port Graham: Holdings of Limited Entry Permits, Sablefish Quota Shares, and Halibut Quota Shares Through 1998 and Data On Fishery Gross Earnings

Port Graham: Holdings of Limited Entry Permits, Sablefish Quota Shares, and Halibut Quota Shares Through 1998 and Data On Fishery Gross Earnings Port Graham: Holdings of Limited Entry Permits, Sablefish Quota Shares, and Halibut Quota Shares Through 1998 and Data On Fishery Earnings CFEC Report 99-Port Graham-SN Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry

More information

A Social and Economic Analysis of the Recreational Fisheries in Mississippi Flood Control Reservoirs

A Social and Economic Analysis of the Recreational Fisheries in Mississippi Flood Control Reservoirs A Social and Economic Analysis of the Recreational Fisheries in Mississippi Flood Control Reservoirs Final Report Federal Assistance in Sport Fish Restoration Grant F-138 Jan. 1, 2006 June 30, 2008 Kevin

More information

Economic Contributions and Impacts of Salmonid Resources in Southeast Alaska

Economic Contributions and Impacts of Salmonid Resources in Southeast Alaska Economic Contributions and Impacts of Salmonid Resources in Southeast Alaska FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Trout Unlimited Alaska Program 419 Sixth Street, Suite 200 Juneau, Alaska 99801 Contact: Mark Kaelke

More information

A Measure of the Economic Impact of Keeneland Racing and Sales on Lexington-Fayette County. Prepared by the Center for Business and Economic Research

A Measure of the Economic Impact of Keeneland Racing and Sales on Lexington-Fayette County. Prepared by the Center for Business and Economic Research A Measure of the Economic Impact of Keeneland Racing and Sales on Lexington-Fayette County Prepared by the Gatton College of Business and Economics April 20, 2015 Gatton College of Business and Economics

More information

Socioeconomic Values of Reefs in Monroe County

Socioeconomic Values of Reefs in Monroe County Chapter 6: Socioeconomic Values of Reefs in Monroe County This chapter describes the Socioeconomic Value of Artificial and Natural Reefs in Monroe County to residents and visitors. Monroe County includes

More information

Appendix 21 Sea angling from the shore

Appendix 21 Sea angling from the shore Appendix 21 Sea angling from the shore LUC SMRTS2015 Final Report 342 March 2016 Appendix 21 Sea angling from the shore Table A21.1: Summary of sample confidence levels Responses Spatial data Questionnaire

More information

San Patricio County Guided Fishing Market Research

San Patricio County Guided Fishing Market Research Guided Fishing Market Research San Patricio County, TX Miles Philips, Extension Specialist Texas A&M Agrilife Extension College Station, TX T: 979-845-1023 E: mdphillips@ag.tamu.edu http://fishing.tamu.edu

More information

DRBC RFAC Meeting Lake Wallenpaupack Environmental Learning Center - Hawley, PA. December 3, 2015

DRBC RFAC Meeting Lake Wallenpaupack Environmental Learning Center - Hawley, PA. December 3, 2015 DRBC RFAC Meeting Lake Wallenpaupack Environmental Learning Center - Hawley, PA. December 3, 2015 Upper Delaware Cold Water Fishing & Boating Industry Economic Impact Study Cooperators and Funders Delaware

More information

Fishing Industry in Prince Edward Island January 2009

Fishing Industry in Prince Edward Island January 2009 Fishing Industry in Prince Edward Island January 2009 INDUSTRY HIGHLIGHTS Did you know??? There are two lobster seasons in PEI: the Spring season and the Fall fishery. There were 22.9 million pounds of

More information

Oregon 2011 Regional Visitor Report Mt. Hood Columbia River Gorge

Oregon 2011 Regional Visitor Report Mt. Hood Columbia River Gorge Oregon 2011 Regional Visitor Report Mt. Hood Columbia River Gorge Introduction Longwoods International began tracking American travelers in 1985, and has conducted large-scale syndicated visitor research

More information

Oakmont: Who are we?

Oakmont: Who are we? Oakmont: Who are we? A Snapshot of our community from the April 2010 US Census Contents Age and Gender... 1 Marital Status... 2 Home Ownership and Tenure... 3 Past Demographic Characteristics... 5 Income

More information

SPORTING HERITAGE. Fueling the American Economy 2018 EDITION

SPORTING HERITAGE. Fueling the American Economy 2018 EDITION AMERICA S SPORTING HERITAGE Fueling the American Economy 2018 EDITION INTRODUCTION One of the greatest benefits all Americans share is their access to the great outdoors. Whether fishing in a suburban

More information

Economic Impact of Hunting Expenditures on Southern U.S

Economic Impact of Hunting Expenditures on Southern U.S Economic Impact of Hunting Expenditures on Southern U.S Jagdish Poudel (Corresponding author) Graduate Research Assistant Forest and Wildlife Research Center College of Forest Resource Mississippi State

More information

Celebrating the Economic Impact of a Priceless Jewel

Celebrating the Economic Impact of a Priceless Jewel Celebrating the Economic Impact of a Priceless Jewel The Economic Impact of Trout Angling in the Driftless Area What many may not realize is that the Driftless Area is home to one of the country s most

More information

Michigan Golf Tourists - Economic Impacts 1

Michigan Golf Tourists - Economic Impacts 1 2000 MI Golf Economic Impact Study Page 1 Michigan Golf Tourists - Economic Impacts 1 Daniel J. Stynes, Ya-Yen Sun and Daniel R. Talhelm Department of Park, Recreation and Tourism Resources Michigan State

More information

Analysis of Management Options for the Area 2C and 3A Charter Halibut Fisheries for 2019

Analysis of Management Options for the Area 2C and 3A Charter Halibut Fisheries for 2019 Analysis of Management Options for the Area 2C and 3A Charter Halibut Fisheries for 2019 A Report to the North Pacific Fishery Management Council Sarah Webster, Robert Powers Alaska Department of Fish

More information

Economic Contributions of the Yellowstone River to Park County, Montana

Economic Contributions of the Yellowstone River to Park County, Montana University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research Publications Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research 9-20- Economic Contributions of the

More information

HIGH YIELD ANGLERS IN RTO13: A SITUATION ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

HIGH YIELD ANGLERS IN RTO13: A SITUATION ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HIGH YIELD ANGLERS IN RTO13: A SITUATION ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PREPARED FOR TOURISM NORTHERN ONTARIO BY Research Resolutions & Consulting Ltd. MARCH 2013 2 INTRODUCTION As one of the ways to increase

More information