United States Bottom longline, Handline

Transcription

1 Black grouper, Gag grouper, Red grouper, Snowy grouper, Yellowedge grouper, Warsaw grouper Mycteroperca bonaci, Mycteroperca microlepis, Epinephelus morio, Epinephelus niveatus, Epinephelus flavolimbatus, Epinephelus nigritus Image Diane Rome Peebles United States Bottom longline, Handline May 22, 2014 (original report) Updated June 30, 2016 (Gag South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico ONLY) Lisa Max, Seafood Watch staff Disclaimer: Seafood Watch strives to have all Seafood Reports reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science and aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch program or its recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch is solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report.

2 2 Table of Contents About Seafood Watch... 3 Guiding Principles... 4 Executive Summary... 6 Introduction Assessment Criterion 1: Impacts on the Species Under Assessment Criterion 2: Impacts on other retained and bycatch stocks Criterion 3: Management effectiveness Criterion 4: Impacts on the Habitat and Ecosystem Acknowledgements References

3 3 About Seafood Watch The Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the North American marketplace. Seafood Watch defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. The program s mission is to engage and empower consumers and businesses to purchase environmentally responsible seafood fished or farmed in ways that minimize their impact on the environment or are in a credible improvement project with the same goal. Each sustainability recommendation is supported by a seafood report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program s sustainability criteria to arrive at a recommendation of Best Choice, Good Alternative, or Avoid. In producing the seafood reports, Seafood Watch utilizes research published in academic, peer reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of information include government technical publications, fishery management plans and supporting documents, and other scientific reviews of ecological sustainability. Seafood Watch research analysts also communicate with ecologists, fisheries and aquaculture scientists, and members of industry and conservation organizations, when evaluating fisheries and aquaculture practices. Capture fisheries and aquaculture practices are highly dynamic; as the scientific information on each species changes, Seafood Watch s sustainability recommendations and the underlying seafood reports will be updated to reflect these changes. Both the detailed evaluation methodology and the scientific reports are available on seafoodwatch.org. For more information about Seafood Watch and seafood reports, please contact the Seafood Watch program at Monterey Bay Aquarium by calling or visit online at seafoodwatch.org.

4 4 Guiding Principles Seafood Watch defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether fished 1 or farmed, that can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. The following guiding principles illustrate the qualities that capture fisheries must possess to be considered sustainable by the Seafood Watch program: Stocks are healthy and abundant. Fishing mortality does not threaten populations or impede the ecological role of any marine life. The fishery minimizes bycatch. The fishery is managed to sustain long-term productivity of all impacted species. The fishery is conducted such that impacts on the seafloor are minimized and the ecological and functional roles of seafloor habitats are maintained. Fishing activities should not seriously reduce ecosystem services provided by any fished species or result in harmful changes such as trophic cascades, phase shifts, or reduction of genetic diversity. Based on these guiding principles, Seafood Watch has developed a set of four sustainability criteria to evaluate capture fisheries for the purpose of developing a seafood recommendation for consumers and businesses. These criteria are: 1. Impacts on the species under assessment 2. Impacts on other species 3. Effectiveness of management 4. Habitat and ecosystem impacts Each criterion includes: Factors to evaluate and score Evaluation guidelines to synthesize these factors and to produce a numerical score A resulting numerical score and rating for that criterion Once a score and rating has been assigned to each criterion, an overall seafood recommendation is developed on additional evaluation guidelines. Criteria ratings and the overall recommendation are color-coded to correspond to the categories on the Seafood Watch pocket guide: 1 Fish is used throughout this document to refer to finfish, shellfish and other invertebrates.

5 5 Best Choice/Green: Are well managed and caught or farmed in ways that cause little harm to habitats or other wildlife. Good Alternative/Yellow: Buy, but be aware there are concerns with how they re caught or farmed. Avoid/Red: Take a pass on these for now. These items are overfished or caught or farmed in ways that harm other marine life or the environment.

6 6 Executive Summary This report provides analyses and recommendations for six grouper species fished in the reef fish fishery in the US Gulf of Mexico and the snapper-grouper fishery in the US South Atlantic. These species include three shallow water groupers: gag (Mycteroperca microlepis), red grouper (Epinephelus morio) and black grouper (Mycteroperca bonaci) (found at shallower depths than the other shallow water groupers), and three deep water groupers: snowy grouper (Epinephelus niveatus), yellowedge grouper (Epinephelus flavolimbatus), and Warsaw grouper (Epinephelus nigritus). For these species, US stocks are divided into the US Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic stocks, except for black grouper, which is considered to be one stock across both regions. In both regions, groupers are fished with vertical gear (handline or bandit, also considered as handline) and bottom longline gear, with some caught using rod and reel. Across both regions, the majority of US commercially caught grouper is landed from the Gulf of Mexico, with 3511 metric tons (MT) or 92% coming from the Gulf in 2012, and 296 MT or 8% coming from the South Atlantic region that year. Of the grouper landed commercially in the US, the overwhelming majority (72%) is red grouper from the Gulf, with 2727 MT landed in Groupers have a low resiliency to fishing pressure, with all the species assessed in this report (except gag) listed on International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) s list of threatened species: Warsaw grouper (critically endangered) yellowedge grouper (vulnerable), snowy grouper (vulnerable), black grouper (near threatened) and red grouper (near threatened). The species addressed here are long lived, having maximum ages between 29 (red grouper) and 85 (yellowedge grouper) years. Stock assessments, regularly conducted by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (GMFMC) and the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (SAFMC) for their respective stocks, in conjunction with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) as part of the Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR) process, indicate that some of these species are overfished (snowy grouper in the South Atlantic and possibly gag in the Gulf of Mexico) and/or experiencing overfishing (Warsaw grouper in the South Atlantic). Several species are in the midst of rebuilding plans as part of their management (red and snowy groupers in the South Atlantic). Red grouper in the Gulf of Mexico is the one species that has been successfully rebuilt in either region. Warsaw grouper harvest or possession is banned in the South Atlantic. Retained and bycatch species analyzed in this assessment were selected based on the number caught in either regional fishery status or their conservation status (endangered, threatened, overfished, etc.). Gears used for grouper fishing target a range of snapper and grouper species, and also catch other species, resulting in large amounts of regulatory discards (groupers and snapper that are undersized, during a closed season or overages for a given quota) as well as incidental catch. Species retained or caught as bycatch include Atlantic sharpnose shark (Rhizoprionodon terraenovae), black sea bass (Centropristis striata), blacknose shark (Carcharhinus acronotus) blueline tilefish (Caulolatilus microps), dusky smoothhound (smooth dogfish) (Mustelus canis), giant snake eel (Ophichthus rex), golden tilefish (Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps), gray triggerfish (Balistes capriscus), greater amberjack (Seriola dumerili), red porgy (Pagrus pagrus), red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus), scamp (Mycteroperca

7 7 phenax), speckled hind (Epinephelus drummondhayi), vermilion snapper (Rhomboplites aurorubens) and yellowtail snapper (Ocyurus chrysurus). Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta), an endangered sea turtle species, was caught in unacceptable numbers on Gulf of Mexico bottom longline gear, but this has been remedied by reducing the amount of longline gear deployed in this region and is monitored by fisheries observers. A body of research exists on discard mortality for grouper species, and there are management measures required in the fishery to reduce mortality, including use of circle hooks, dehooking devices and venting tools. The assessed grouper species are increasingly subject to more stringent management, particularly in the Gulf of Mexico where their catch is regulated by a real time Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) system, with the majority of grouper landed (red grouper from the Gulf) commercially in the US ranking as a Sea Food Watch (SFW) good alternative. All South Atlantic species ranked as "avoid" except for gag, red and black groupers caught with handlines, which rank as "good alternative." In the Gulf of Mexico, all species rank as avoid except black and red groupers caught by handline or longline, and gag grouper caught with handlines, which rank as "good alternative." All assessed fisheries have "high impacts" on nontarget species as well as "moderately effective" management strategies, but the Gulf has a better management score than the South Atlantic due to ongoing observer programs in the Gulf, which are non-existent in the South Atlantic. Over both regions, ecosystem impacts to fish habitat are "low" for handline fisheries due to lack of or minimal gear contact with the seafloor and are "moderate" for bottom longline fisheries which may or may not contact the seafloor. Factoring into the overall ecosystem impacts score, ecosystem based management is of "low concern" in the Gulf of Mexico and the South Atlantic due to the establishment of several fishing restricted areas. Table of Conservation s and Overall Recommendations Stock / Fishery Impacts on the Stock Impacts on other Spp. Red grouper Green (3.83) Red (0.95) United States Gulf of Mexico - Handline Red grouper Green (3.83) Red (0.95) United States South Atlantic - Handline Red grouper Green (3.83) Red (0.75) United States Gulf of Mexico - Longline, Bottom Gag grouper Yellow Red (0.95) United States Gulf of Mexico (3.318) - Handline Gag grouper Green (3.83) Red (0.95) United States South Atlantic - Handline Management Habitat and Overall Ecosystem Recommendation Yellow (3.00) Green (4.12) Good Alternative (2.590) Yellow (2.45) Green (4.12) Good Alternative (2.462) Yellow (3.00) Yellow (3.16) Good Alternative (2.285) Yellow (3.00) Green (4.12) Good Alternative (2.502) Yellow (2.45) Green (4.12) Good Alternative (2.462)

8 8 Gag grouper Yellow Red (0.75) Yellow (3.00) Yellow (3.16) Avoid (2.204) United States Gulf of Mexico (3.318) - Longline, Bottom Yellowedge grouper Red (2.16) Red (0.95) Yellow (2.45) Green (4.12) Avoid (2.133) United States South Atlantic - Handline Yellowedge grouper Yellow Red (0.75) Yellow (3.00) Yellow (3.16) Avoid (2.083) United States Gulf of Mexico (2.64) - Longline, Bottom Yellowedge grouper United States South Atlantic - Longline, Bottom Red (2.16) Red (0.75) Yellow (2.45) Yellow (3.16) Avoid (1.882) Black grouper Green (4.47) Red (2.05) Yellow (3.00) Green (4.12) Good Alternative United States Gulf of Mexico (3.264) - Handline Black grouper United States South Atlantic Green (4.47) Red (2.12) Yellow (2.45) Green (4.12) Good Alternative (3.129) - Handline Black grouper Green (4.47) Red (1.06) Yellow (3.00) Yellow (3.16) Good Alternative United States Gulf of Mexico (2.590) - Longline, Bottom Snowy grouper Red (2.16) Red (0.95) Yellow (3.00) Green (4.12) Avoid (2.244) United States Gulf of Mexico - Handline Snowy grouper Red (2.16) Red (0.95) Yellow (2.45) Green (4.12) Avoid (2.133) United States South Atlantic - Handline Snowy grouper Red (2.16) Red (0.75) Yellow (3.00) Yellow (3.16) Avoid (1.980) United States Gulf of Mexico - Longline, Bottom Snowy grouper Red (2.16) Red (0.75) Yellow (2.45) Yellow (3.16) Avoid (1.882) United States South Atlantic - Longline, Bottom Warsaw grouper Red (1.00) Red (2.05) Yellow (3.00) Green (4.12) Avoid (2.244) United States Gulf of Mexico - Handline Warsaw grouper Red (1.00) Red (1.06) Yellow (3.00) Yellow (3.16) Avoid (1.781) United States Gulf of Mexico - Longline, Bottom

9 9 Scoring Guide Scores range from zero to five where zero indicates very poor performance and five indicates the fishing operations have no significant impact. Final Score = geometric mean of the four Scores (Criterion 1, Criterion 2, Criterion 3, Criterion 4). Best Choice/Green = Final Score >3.2, and no Red Criteria, and no Critical scores Good Alternative/Yellow = Final score >2.2, and neither Harvest Strategy (Factor 3.1) nor Bycatch Management Strategy (Factor 3.2) are Very High 2, and no more than one Red Criterion, and no Critical scores, and does not meet the criteria for Best Choice (above) Avoid/Red = Final Score <=2.2, or either Harvest Strategy (Factor 3.1) or Bycatch Management Strategy (Factor 3.2) is Very High, or two or more Red Criteria, or one or more Critical scores. 2 Because effective management is an essential component of sustainable fisheries, Seafood Watch issues an Avoid recommendation for any fishery scored as a Very High for either factor under Management (Criterion 3).

10 10 Introduction Scope of the analysis and ensuing recommendation This report addresses US handline and longline fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico and the South Atlantic for six grouper species. The species covered are: red grouper (Epinephelus morio), gag (Mycteroperca microlepis), black grouper (Mycteroperca bonaci), yellowedge grouper (Epinephelus flavolimbatus), snowy grouper (Epinephelus niveatus) and Warsaw grouper (Epinephelus nigritus). Overview of the species and management bodies The groupers covered within this report are generally long lived, large bodied, protogynous (individuals function first as females then some portion of the population transforms into males), and reach sexual maturity between three and nine years of age (Fitzhugh et al. 2006b) (Parker & Mays 1998) (SAFMC 2012). The maximum age of these groupers range from 29 years for red grouper (Lombardi-Carlson et al. 2008) to 85 years for yellowedge grouper (Cook et al. 2009). They range in maximum size from 18.6 kg for yellowedge grouper to 263 kg for Warsaw grouper. Though fecundity is unknown for most grouper species, studies have shown some species are prolific spawners, producing over one million eggs per spawn (SEDAR 2013d) (Sedberry et al. 2006) (Wyanski et al. 2000) (SEDAR 2006) (SEDAR 2010a) (SEDAR 2011). However, many grouper species have a slow population doubling time, ranging from years (SEDAR 2013d) (Sedberry et al. 2006) (Wyanski et al. 2000) (SEDAR 2006 )(SEDAR 2010a) (SEDAR 2011). Furthermore, many grouper species are relatively sedentary, making seasonal migrations to specific spawning sites where they form spawning aggregations, significantly increasing their susceptibility to fishing pressure. Grouper species vary in their spawning periods (SEDAR 2013d) (Sedberry et al. 2006) (Wyanski et al. 2000) (SEDAR 2006) (SEDAR 2010a) (SEDAR 2011). Of the groupers covered in this Seafood Watch report, black grouper are generally found from 10 to 20 meters, red and gag from 20 to 50 meters, Warsaw from 70 to 110 meters, snowy and yellowedge from 100 to 200 meters (SAFMC 2012). Additional information for the assessed grouper species can be found in the following summary table: Table 1: Grouper species life history information. Species Home Spawning Peak Mean Maximum Maximum Maximum Age at Size at range or period spawning depth age length weight maturity maturity migration period caught (cm) (kg) (cm) Gag Large Jan - May Mar - April Red Small Feb - June April

11 11 Black Small Jan - April Feb - April unknown 5 83 Snowy Unknown Jan - Oct May - Aug Warsaw Unknown May May unknown unknown Yellowedge Unknown Feb - Nov Mar - Sept In the Gulf of Mexico, the six groupers covered in this report are managed under the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan (FMP) along with 25 other species (other groupers, snappers, tilefishes, jacks, a wrasse and a trigger fish) managed by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (GMFMC). Whereas in the South Atlantic, they are managed under the Snapper-Grouper FMP along with 54 other species with a wider variety of life history traits (other groupers, snappers, tilefishes, jacks, triggerfish, sea basses, porgies, grunts and a wrasse) managed by the South Atlantic Fisheries Management Council (SAFMC). Gulf of Mexico black grouper is now managed as a combined Gulf of Mexico/South Atlantic stock under the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish and Snapper-Grouper FMP (NMFS 2013). Under Amendment 29 to the Reef Fish FMP (as of 1/1/2010), the GMFMC manages Gulf grouper and tilefish under an Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) program with 5 shared categories with strict reporting requirements (gag grouper, red grouper, other shallow water groupers, deep water groupers and tilefish). The total quota for each species is determined by annual catch limits allocated between commercial and recreational fisherman. Black grouper is included in the "other shallow water grouper" category, and snowy, yellowedge and Warsaw are included in the "deep water grouper" category. Other management measures for the Gulf reef fish fishery include gear and fishing location restrictions to reduce bycatch, minimum size limits to protect immature fish and commercial and recreational area closures to protect spawning groupers. The SAFMC manages the snapper-grouper complex via a limited access fishery including transferable and non-transferable permits with overall species quotas determined by annual catch limits. Other management measures for the snapper-grouper fishery include minimum size limits to prevent harvest of immature fish, gear restrictions to reduce bycatch and protect habitat, seasonal closures to protect shallow water grouper during their spawning season and eight marine protected areas closed to fishing or possession of snapper and grouper, to protect the population and habitat of long-lived deep water snapper-grouper species. Production Statistics US grouper commercial production is dominated by the Gulf of Mexico, and to a lesser extent the South Atlantic region (See Figures 1-3). In 2011, the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish fishery landed more than nine times the amount of grouper biomass landed in the South Atlantic snapper-grouper fishery, largely due

12 12 to the high landings of red grouper in the Gulf. While red grouper, and to a lesser extent yellowedge grouper, are the predominant species caught in the Gulf, gag is the predominant species caught in the South Atlantic. In both regions, catches of shallow water grouper exceed those of deep water species, with deep water grouper catch dominated by snowy grouper in the South Atlantic and yellowedge in the Gulf of Mexico. In both regions, recreational landings of grouper species are high, and in some cases may exceed commercial landings, as is the case with gag grouper landings in the Gulf of Mexico. Seafood Watch (SFW) does not assess the sustainability of recreational fisheries, but does factor recreational fishing into Criteria 1 assessment of fish stocks and their corresponding fishing mortality. Figure 1: Total South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico grouper catch (combined catch of gag, black, red, Warsaw, snowy and yellowedge), from NMFS, Annual Commercial Landing Statistics, downloaded May 2014

13 13 Figure 2: Gulf of Mexico grouper catch by species , from NMFS, Annual Commercial Landing Statistics, downloaded May 2014 Figure 3: South Atlantic grouper catch by species , from NMFS, Annual Commercial Landing Statistics, downloaded May 2014

14 14 Internationally, grouper production is increasing (see Figure 4). Whether this is a real effect or an effect of an increasing number of countries reporting production to FAO is unknown. We do note that the total US grouper production reported in FAO is lower than reported by NMFS. Figure 4: Global Grouper Production (From FAO) For the species covered in this report, global production information is variable, though all of these species occur in US waters, south through the Caribbean into Brazilian waters. According to the FAO, large red grouper fisheries existed in Brazil and Cuba (with a small fishery in the Dominican Republic), but as of 2005, production of red grouper in these countries fell to zero. FAO reports only US fisheries for gag, black grouper, snowy grouper, Warsaw grouper and yellowedge, but reports much lower tonnage than NMFS reports for most of these species (FAO 2013). Importance to the US/North American market The largest importer of grouper to the US is Mexico, with 2011 imports exceeding those from other countries (namely Panama and Costa Rica) by at least a factor of 12 (NMFS 2013d)(See Figures 5 and 6). Also in 2011, grouper imports from Mexico exceeded the combined production of the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico for the species covered in this report. While the species composition of the Mexican catch is not reported in NMFS commercial fishery statistics database (nor does FAO list Mexican caught grouper by species), it is higly likely that species caught include those caught by the US in the Gulf of

15 15 Mexico (those included in this report), as their range extends through Mexican waters. Figure 5: Total grouper imports to the US from 1991 to Downloaded in April 2013 from NMFS Foreign Trade database

16 16 Figure 6: Grouper imports to the US from the top 10 grouper exporting countries (Mexico, Panama, Brazil, Columbia, India, Ecuador, Indonesia, Nicaragua, China, Costa Rica) from 1991 to Downloaded in April 2013 from NMFS Foreign Trade database Common and market names Mycteroperca microlepis (gag grouper): market names are gag, grouper; vernacular names are velvet rockfish, small-scaled rockfish, charcoal belly Epinephelus morio (red grouper): market name is grouper; vernacular name is cherna americana, negre, Mycteroperca bonaci (black grouper): market name is grouper; vernacular names are rockfish, marbled rockfish, runner, springer, blackfin grouper Hyporthodus flavolimbatus (yellowedge grouper): market name is grouper; vernacular name is yellowfinned grouper Epinephelus niveatus (snowy grouper): market name is grouper; vernacular name is spotted grouper, snowflake Epinephelus nigritus (Warsaw grouper): market name is grouper; vernacular names are black jewfish, black grouper (FDA 2012) Primary product forms Grouper are sold both as whole fish and fillets in fresh and frozen forms.

17 17 Assessment This section assesses the sustainability of the fishery(s) relative to the Seafood Watch Criteria for Fisheries, available at Criterion 1: Impacts on the Species Under Assessment This criterion evaluates the impact of fishing mortality on the species, given its current abundance. The inherent vulnerability to fishing rating influences how abundance is scored when abundance is unknown. The final Criterion 1 score is determined by taking the geometric mean of the abundance and fishing mortality scores. The Criterion 1 rating is determined as follows: Score >3.2=Green or Low Score >2.2 and <=3.2=Yellow or Score <=2.2=Red or High Rating is Critical if Factor 1.3 (Fishing Mortality) is Critical. Criterion 1 Summary BLACK GROUPER Region / Method United States Gulf of Mexico Handline United States Gulf of Mexico Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic Handline Inherent Vulnerability 1.00:High 1.00:High 1.00:High Stock Status 4.00:Low 4.00:Low 4.00:Low Fishing Subscore Mortality 5.00:Very Low Green (4.472) 5.00:Very Low Green (4.472) 5.00:Very Low Green (4.472) GAG GROUPER Region / Method United States Gulf of Mexico Handline United States Gulf of Mexico Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic Handline Inherent Vulnerability 1.00:High 1.00:High 1.00:High Stock Status Fishing Mortality 3.00: 3.67:Low 3.00: 3.67:Low 4.00:Low 3.67:Low Subscore Yellow (3.318) Yellow (3.318) Green (3.831)

18 18 RED GROUPER Region / Method United States Gulf of Mexico Handline United States Gulf of Mexico Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic Handline Inherent Vulnerability 1.00:High 1.00:High 1.00:High Stock Status 4.00:Low 4.00:Low 4.00:Low Fishing Mortality 3.67:Low 3.67:Low 3.67:Low Subscore Green (3.831) Green (3.831) Green (3.831) SNOWY GROUPER Region / Method United States Gulf of Mexico Handline United States Gulf of Mexico Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic Handline United States South Atlantic Longline, Bottom Inherent Vulnerability 1.00:High 1.00:High 1.00:High 1.00:High Stock Status 2.00:High 2.00:High 2.00:High 2.00:High Fishing Subscore Mortality Red (2.159) Red (2.159) Red (2.159) Red (2.159) WARSAW GROUPER Region / Method United States Gulf of Mexico Handline United States Gulf of Mexico Longline, Bottom Inherent Vulnerability 1.00:High 1.00:High Stock Status Fishing Mortality 1.00:Very High 1.00:High 1.00:Very High 1.00:High Subscore Red (1.000) Red (1.000) YELLOWEDGE GROUPER Region / Method United States Gulf of Mexico Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic Handline United States South Atlantic Longline, Bottom Inherent Vulnerability 1.00:High 1.00:High 1.00:High Stock Status Fishing Mortality Subscore 3.00: Yellow (2.644) 2.00:High Red (2.159) 2.00:High Red (2.159)

19 19 Criterion 1 Assessment Factor 1.1 Inherent Vulnerability Scoring guidelines Low The FishBase vulnerability score for species is 0-35, OR species exhibits life history characteristics that make it resilient to fishing (e.g., early maturing (<5 years), short lived (< 10 years), small maximum size, and low on food chain). Medium The FishBase vulnerability score for species is 36-55, OR species exhibits life history characteristics that make it neither particularly vulnerable nor resilient to fishing (e.g., moderate age at sexual maturity (5-15 years), moderate maximum age (10-25 years), moderate maximum size, and middle of food chain). High The FishBase vulnerability score for species is , OR species exhibits life history characteristics that make is particularly vulnerable to fishing (e.g., long lived (>25 years), late maturing (>15 years), low reproduction rate, large body size, and top predator). Note: The FishBase vulnerability scores is an index of the inherent vulnerability of marine fishes to fishing based on life history parameters: maximum length, age at first maturity, longevity, growth rate, natural mortality rate, fecundity, spatial behaviors (e.g., schooling, aggregating for breeding, or consistently returning to the same sites for feeding or reproduction) and geographic range. Factor 1.2 Abundance Scoring guidelines 5 (Very Low ) Strong evidence exists that the population is above target abundance level (e.g., biomass at maximum sustainable yield (BMSY)) or near virgin biomass. 4 (Low ) Population may be below target abundance level, but it is considered not overfished. 3 ( ) Abundance level is unknown and the species has a low or medium inherent vulnerability to fishing. 2 (High ) Population is overfished, depleted, or a species of concern, OR abundance is unknown and the species has a high inherent vulnerability to fishing. 1 (Very High ) Population is listed as threatened or endangered. Factor Fishing Mortality Scoring guidelines 5 (Very Low ) Highly likely that fishing mortality is below a sustainable level (e.g., below fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, (FMSY)), OR fishery does not target species and its contribution to the mortality of species is negligible ( 5% of a sustainable level of fishing mortality) (Low ) Probable (>50%) chance that fishing mortality is at or below a sustainable level, but some uncertainty exists, OR fishery does not target species and does not adversely affect

20 20 species, but its contribution to mortality is not negligible, OR fishing mortality is unknown, but the population is healthy and the species has a low susceptibility to the fishery (low chance of being caught) ( ) Fishing mortality is fluctuating around sustainable levels, OR fishing mortality is unknown and species has a moderate-high susceptibility to the fishery and, if species is depleted, reasonable management is in place. 1 (High ) Overfishing is occurring, but management is in place to curtail overfishing, OR fishing mortality is unknown, species is depleted, and no management is in place. 0 (Critical) Overfishing is known to be occurring and no reasonable management is in place to curtail overfishing. BLACK GROUPER Factor 1.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States GULF OF MEXICO, Handline United States GULF OF MEXICO, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High The FishBase Inherent Vulnerability score for black grouper is 63 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005), corresponding to a SFW score of "high" inherent vulnerability. Black grouper is a slow growing, large bodied predatory species, known to live over 30 years. It is a "protogynous hermaphrodite" (shifting from male to female) (SAFMC 2012). Factor 1.2 Abundance United States GULF OF MEXICO, Handline United States GULF OF MEXICO, Longline, Bottom 4.00 Low According to the 2010 stock assessment (which factored in the effects of commerical and recreational fishing on the stock), black grouper is not considered overfished in the South Atlantic and/or the Gulf of Mexico. This assessment uses a biomass proxy of SSB 2008 /SSB F30%SPR = 1.40 (SSB = spawning stock biomass) (SEDAR 2010a) for its model (see Figure 7). There is an update stock assessment for the Florida Gulf and Atlantic stocks scheduled for 2014, but no larger regional assessments are currently scheduled

21 21 (SEDAR 2013). Although IUCN lists black grouper as "near threatened" (Ferreira et al. 2008), SFW scores this species as "low concern" because the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico stock assessment (which is more recent) found that it is not overfished. Rationale: Figure 7: Proxies for B/B MSY and F/F MSY for the black grouper stock (South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico) through 2008 based on model results presented in the 2010 stock assessment (SEDAR 19). Black grouper in the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico are now considered one stock, though they will be managed regionally (with each region having its own catch levels under the Snapper-Grouper Fishery Management Plan (FMP) in the South Atlantic and the Reef Fish FMP in the Gulf of Mexico). The US black grouper stock occurs primarily in the Florida Keys (the northern portion of their range) (SEDAR 2010a), with a large portion of the US population protected by the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary s Tortugas Ecological Reserves and Dry Tortugas National Park s Research Natural Area.

22 22 Factor Fishing Mortality United States GULF OF MEXICO, Handline United States GULF OF MEXICO, Longline, Bottom 5.00 Very Low According to the 2010 stock assessment and the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS) current stock status information, black grouper in the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico is not currently experiencing overfishing (SEDAR 2010a). This determination is based on the most recent stock assessment (2010) which factored in the effects of both commercial and recreational fishing on the stock. The stock assessment found an exploitation status (F current /MFMT) (MFMT = Maximum Fishing Mortality Threshold) of Because maximum sustainable yield (MSY) is unknown, F 30%SPR (F = fishing mortality, SPR = spawning potential ratio) was used as a proxy for MFMT (or F MSY ) in the assessment model (see Figure 8) (SEDAR 2010a). The majority of black grouper's fishing mortality occurs in South Florida, particularly in the Florida Keys (SEDAR 2010a) where a large portion of the stock is protected by the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary s Tortugas Ecological Reserves and Dry Tortugas National Park s Research Natural Area. Data from the 2010 stock assessment show that black grouper's fishing mortality is dominated by the recreational fishery, with commerical handline and longline fisheries responsible for only 9% of the total fishing mortality on this species in 2008 (see Figure 8) (SEDAR 2010a). We note that the stock assessment accounted for historical errors in catch data from the 1980s and 1990s, when gag was often landed as black grouper. Black grouper fishing mortality scores as "very low concern" because the proxy is below the reference point and because a large proportion of its habitat is protected from fishing.

23 23 Rationale Figure 8: Black Grouper fishing mortality. This figure is taken from the 2010 SEDAR stock assessment. GAG GROUPER Factor 1.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High The FishBase inherent vulnerability score for gag grouper is 68 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005), corresponding to a SFW score of "high" inherent vulnerability. Gag is a slow growing, large bodied "protogynous hermaphrodite" species (shifting from females to males at approximately 11 years of age) and lives up to 30 years. It forms spawning aggregations, with females spawning multiple times per year, releasing 60,000 and 1.7 million eggs per spawn. (NMFS 2014a)

24 24 Factor 1.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom Low The last stock assessment for gag grouper in the South Atlantic region was conducted in 2006 and updated in The 2014 update includes data through Abundance of gag grouper declined until the mid-1980's and has since been relatively stable, fluctuating around the minimum standing stock threshold (MSST) reference point, with an upturn in abundance in recent years. The assessment indicates that it is highly likely that the 2012 spawning stock biomass (the amount of fish capable of reproducing) is above MSST, indicating the population is not depleted/overfished. Spawning stock biomass is estimated to be near the target level, the biomass at maximum sustainable yield (B MSY ), but it is uncertain if it is above the target level. Spawning stock biomass is expected to decline after 2012, due to poor recruitment (amount of new fish entering the fishery) during 2010 and 2011 {SEDAR 2014b}. Since it is uncertain if abundance is above the target level and abundance is expected to decline, we have awarded a low concern score. Factor Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 3.67 Low In the Gulf of Mexico, recreational fishing is responsible for the majority of gag fishing mortality (GMFMC 2011b). According to NMFS st Quarter Status of US Fisheries report, gag grouper in the Gulf of Mexico is experiencing overfishing (NMFS 2013) and has been since the 2009 update stock assessment that indicated a fishing mortality ratio, F CURRENT /MFMT (F/F MSY proxy) of 2.47 (SEDAR 2012). However, according to the 2014 SEDAR assessment (completed prior to the release of st Quarter status update), the Gulf of Mexico gag stock is no longer experiencing overfishing (see Figure 10), with a F CURRENT /MFMT ( ) of 0.77 for the preferred population model and a F CURRENT /MFMT of 0.32 for the alternative model (SEDAR 2014). This change in status is attributed to the rebuilding plan's lowered gag quotas (begun in 2009) and the commercial and recreational IFQ system (begun in 2010). Due to information in the new stock assessment that indicates an end to overfishing, fishing mortality scores as

25 25 "low concern." Rationale Figure 10: Predicted fishing mortality rate and associated 95% asymptotic intervals. Horizontal lines represent F SPR30% (orange line) and F MSY (red line) benchmarks for SSB-combined (the preferred stock assessment model). Taken from SEDAR 33: Gulf of Mexico Gag 2014 stock assessment. Due to overfishing, NMFS reduced the 2009 gag quota by 41%. This reduction was insufficient to end overfishing, so in 2011 interim measures were set which further reduced the commercial quota and reduced the recreational gag season (GMFMC 2011b). Also in 2011, Amendment 32 to the Reef Fish FMP was approved. Effective in 2012, Amendment 32 implemented a 10 year rebuilding plan for gag, reduced the gag size limit to lower the amount of regulatory discard mortality, adjusted the commercial gag and shallow-water grouper quota to account for incidental dead gag discards when fishing for other shallow water groupers, set recreational bag limits and closed seasons, adjusted multi-use IFQ shares in the grouper Individual Fishing Quota program and set other management measures (GMFMC 2011a).

26 Low The 2014 stock assessment for South Atlantic gag grouper indicated that the average fishing mortality for the years exceeded the target level of fishing at maximum sustainable yield (F/F MSY = 1.23), indicating that overfishing was occurring (SEDAR 2014b). However, The South Atlantic Council s Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) noted that the fishing mortality rate for 2012, and the projected fishing mortality rate in 2013 based on the actual landings, suggested that overfishing did not occur in 2012 and Additionally, following the 2014 assessment managers took action to revise the annual catch limit for gag grouper for the fishing years to ensure that overfishing does not occur in the future (80 FR 31880). NOAA Fisheries currently considers gag grouper in the South Atlantic to no longer be experiencing overfishing (NMFS 2015), but a new assessment has yet to be completed. Gag grouper are commonly targeted by commercial fishers using vertical lines, as well as by divers, and by headboat and private recreational fishers using vertical lines. 380,252 lbs of gag grouper were caught in the commercial fishery and 177,606 lbs were caught in the recreational fishery in the South Atlantic in 2014 (NMFS 2015a) (NMFS 2015b). Due to recent suggestion that overfishing on South Atlantic gag grouper is no longer occurring, we have rated this factor a "low concern". RED GROUPER Factor 1.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High The FishBase Inherent Vulnerability score for red grouper is 63 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005), corresponding to a SFW score of "high" inherent vulnerability. Red grouper is a slow growing, large bodied top predator species that lives up to 29 years, reaching maturity between four and six years of age. It is "protogynous hermaphrodite", shifting from female to male between the ages of seven and 15. Red grouper spawn frequently throughout their reproductive season, which is estimated at almost 26 times per year. (NMFS 2014b) Factor 1.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline

27 27 United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 4.00 Low Red grouper is listed as "near threatened" by IUCN. (Garcia-Moliner & Eklund 2004)(Froese and Pauly 2000). The 2009 Gulf of Mexico red grouper update stock assessment (based on commercial and recreational impacts to the stock) indicated that its stock had declined from 2005 levels, although the stock was not overfished. This decline was attributed to a 2005 episodic mortality event (most likely due to red tide) resulting in approximately 20% mortality, in addition to normal, natural and fishing mortalities (GMFMC 2011). According to the 2009 assessment, the ratio of spawning stock biomass to the spawning stock biomass at MSY (SSB/SSB MSY ) was 1.28, indicating that the stock was not overfished, and is slightly below the level needed to produce optimum yield in the fishery (SEDAR 2009). Previously, NMFS declared Gulf of Mexico red grouper overfished in a 1999 stock assessment (as of 1997) and again in the 2002 assessment. Due to this, NMFS implemented a Gulf of Mexico red grouper rebuilding plan in 2004, reducing landings by 9.4% (GMFMC 2008). A benchmark stock assessment is scheduled for Gulf of Mexico red grouper in 2014 (SEDAR 2013). Although red grouper is not overfished in the Gulf of Mexico, its stock status scores as "low concern" rather than "very low concern" due to the age of the stock assessment Low Red grouper is listed as "near threatened" by IUCN. (Garcia-Moliner & Eklund 2004)(Froese and Pauly 2000). According to the NMFS 4th Quarter 2013 Status of US Fisheries report, red grouper is not overfished (but is rebuidling, and in the 2nd year of a 10 year plan) in the South Atlantic with a B/B MSY proxy = The most recent South Atlantic red grouper stock assessment (2010) is out of date, describing the stock as overfished (SEDAR 2010). Red grouper's South Altantic stock status scores as "low concern" because the stock is not considered overfished, but an up-to-date stock assessment is lacking. To remedy the overfished state, the NMFS specified a species specific ACL for red grouper (previously there was a joint ACL for gag, red grouper and black grouper). A red grouper rebuilding plan was issued (SAFMC 2011) and finalized in June 2012 via Amendment 24 to the FMP for the South Atlantic snappergrouper fishery (77 FR 34254). NMFS states that this plan has an 81 percent probability of rebuilding the stock in 10years (NMFS-SERO 2012).

28 28 Factor Fishing Mortality 3.67 Low According to the 4th quarter NMFS Status of US Fisheries report, red grouper in the South Atlantic is in the second year of a 10 year rebuidling plan and is not experiencing overfishing (NMFS 2013). The most recent South Atlantic red grouper stock assessment (completed in 2010 and based on both commercial and recreational fishing data up to and including 2008) is out of date, and found the stock to be experiencing overfishing (F/F MSY = 1.35) (see Figure 11) (SEDAR 2010)(SAFMC 2011). Fishing mortality scores as "low concern" because the stock is not currently experiencing overfishing and the stock assessment is out of date. Rationale Figure 11: The overfishing ratio for red grouper from 1976 to 2008 for the South Atlantic. The stock is undergoing overfishing when the F/F MSY is greater than one (SAFMC 2011).

29 29 United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 3.67 Low The 2009 Gulf of Mexico red grouper update stock assessment (based on commercial and recreational fishing impacts to the stock) indicated that its stock had declined from 2005 levels, although the stock was neither overfished or undergoing overfishing. This decline was attributed to a 2005 episodic mortality event resulting in approximately 20% mortality, in addition to normal, natural, and fishing mortalities (GMFMC 2011). According to the 2009 assessment, overfishing was not occurring (F current /F MSY = 0.80) (SEDAR 2009). A benchmark Gulf of Mexico red grouper stock assessment is scheduled for 2014 (SEDAR 2013). According to the 2009 assessment, the breakdown of fishing mortality by gear type in 2008 was: commercial handline 0.052; commercial longline 0.097; and recreational (SEDAR 2009). For 2014, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission (FWC) eliminated seasonal closures for all shallow water groupers (except for gag) in Florida Gulf state waters. The GMFMC likewise eliminated the closed season within 20 fathoms. Red grouper do not migrate to spawn like other species in this management group and show a weak trend of increasing size with depth; thus this management action may likely result in increased fishing mortality from the recreational sector, which tends to fish shallower compared to the commercial sector (R. Ellis, pers. comm. 2014). Due to uncertainties created by this new legislation, red grouper fishing mortality for the Gulf of Mexico scores as "low concern" rather than "very low concern." Rationale: Previously, NMFS declared Gulf of Mexico red grouper overfished and experiencing overfishing in a 1999 stock assessment (as of 1997) and again in the 2002 assessment. Due to this, NMFS implemented a Gulf of Mexico red grouper rebuilding plan in 2004 (now completed), reducing landings by 9.4% (GMFMC 2008).

30 30 SNOWY GROUPER Factor 1.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High The FishBase inherent vulnerability score for snowy grouper is 64 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005), corresponding to a SFW score of "high" inherent vulnerability. Snowy grouper is a slow growing, long-lived species, with a maximum recorded age of 40 years. It is a "protogynous hermaphrodite" (shifting from female to male). Information on fecundity of this species is lacking. (SAFMC 2012) Factor 1.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 2.00 High Snowy grouper is listed as "vulnerable" by IUCN (Thierry et al. 2008)(Froese and Pauly 2000). According to NMFS, it is unknown if snowy grouper in the Gulf of Mexico are overfished or experiencing overfishing (NMFS 2013). There has been no Gulf of Mexico stock assessment for this species. Due to its IUCN status and its unknown overfished status, snowy grouper's stock status scores as "high concern." United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 2.00 High Snowy grouper is listed as "vulnerable" by IUCN (Thierry et al. 2008) (Froese and Pauly 2000).

31 31 According to the 2013 stock assessment (based on commercial and recreational fishery impacts), snowy grouper is overfished with an SSB below SSB at MSY (SSB 2012 /SSB MSY = 0.49) (SEDAR 2013d) (see Figures 12 and 13). The fishery is in its eigth year of a 34 year rebuilding plan (NMFS 2013). Due to its overfished status, snowy grouper's stock status in the South Atlantic scores as "high concern." Rationale Figure 12: Top panel: Estimated total biomass (metric tons) of snowy grouper in the South Atlantic at the start of each year. Horizontal dashed line indicates B MSY. Bottom panel: Estimated spawning stock (population fecundity) at time of peak spawning. Figure is from the 2013 SEDAR 36 stock assessment.

32 32 Figure 13: Estimated time series for the South Atlantic snowy grouper stock relative to benchmarks. Solid line indicates estimates from the stock assessment model base run (Beaufort Assessment Model); dashed lines represent median values; gray error bands indicate 5th and 95th percentiles. Top panel: spawning biomass relative to the minimum stock size threshold (MSST). Bottom panel: spawning biomass relative to SSB MSY.

33 33 Factor Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 2.33 According to NMFS, it is unknown if snowy grouper in the Gulf of Mexico is overfished or experiencing overfishing (NMFS 2013). There has been no Gulf of Mexico stock assessment for this species. Snowy grouper in the Gulf of Mexico are primarily fished using longlines and rod & reel. Of the 65.7 MT landed commercially in 2011, 38.2 MT were landed by longline and 14.1 MT were landed by rod and reel. Starting in 2010, snowy grouper in the Gulf of Mexico has been managed under the deep water grouper IFQ program. In 2010, snowy grouper landings represented 21.3% of all deep water grouper landed (59.4% of the total 2010 deep water grouper quota was met), and in 2011, it represented 18.6% of all deep water grouper landed (76.3% of the total deep water grouper quota was met) (GMFMC 2013a) (NMFS 2013b). Due to its unknown overfishing status and unknown effects of management strategies and regulations on this species, snowy grouper's fishing mortality in the Gulf of Mexico scores as "moderate concern." United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 2.33 According to the 2013 stock assessment (based on commercial and recreational fishing impacts), snowy grouper in the South Atlantic is no longer experiencing overfishing, with current fishing mortality (F ) below fishing mortality at MSY (F MSY ) (F /F MSY = 0.59) (SEDAR 2013d) (see Figure X9). There is significant uncertainty around this estimate; 76% of the model results support the not overfishing determination (SEDAR 2013d). The assessment states that the estimated fishing rate exceeded the maximum fishing mortality threshold (MFMT) (represented by F MSY ) in 2012 (when the recreational fleet exceeded its quota), but because the assessment is based on a three year geometric mean rather than the most recent year of data, the stock is considered not overfished (SEDAR 2013d). Based on the stock fluctuating below and above F MSY, fishing mortality scores as "moderate concern."

34 34 Rationale Figure 14: Estimated fishing mortality (F) relative to fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield (F MSY ) for the South Atlantic snowy grouper stock relative to benchmarks. Solid line indicates estimates from the stock assessment base model run (Beaufort Assessment Model); dashed lines represent median values; gray error bands indicate 5th and 95th percentiles. WARSAW GROUPER Factor 1.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High The FishBase inherent vulnerability score for Warsaw grouper is 68 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005), corresponding to a SFW score of "high" inherent vulnerability. Warsaw grouper is a slow growing, very large-bodied species, reaching the highest maximum age (41 years) and largest size of any of the groupers covered in this report (230 cm, 263 kg). Fecundity of this species is unknown. (SAFMC 2012)

35 35 Factor 1.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 1.00 Very High Warsaw grouper has been listed by IUCN as "critically endangered" since 2006 (IUCN 2006). Warsaw grouper has been on the candidate list for Endangered Species Act Listing since 1999 (64 FR 33466) and NMFS placed it on the Species of list in 2004 due to potential population decline and threats from fishing and bycatch (69 FR 19975). In 2010, a petition to list Warsaw grouper under Endangered Species Act (ESA) was denied (69 FR 59690) with the rationale that the "Warsaw grouper has always been too uncommonly captured in fisheries for data on landings or weight of fish landed to be a reliable indicator of population status and trends." Warsaw grouper's overfished status in the Gulf of Mexico is unknown because no stock assessments have been conducted (NMFS 2013). Due to to its IUCN status and its unknown overfished status, Warsaw grouper's stock status in the Gulf of Mexico scores as "very high concern." Factor Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High NMFS listed Warsaw grouper's overfishing status in the Gulf of Mexico as unknown, the stock has not been assessed (NMFS 2013). Starting in 2010, Warsaw grouper in the Gulf of Mexico has been managed under the deep water grouper IFQ program. Due to flexibility measures built into the IFQ program, Warsaw grouper (and speckled hind) can be landed under the shallow water grouper IFQ once a fisherman's deep water IFQ allocation has been reached (NMFS 2013a). In 2010, Warsaw grouper landings represented 9.8% of all deep water grouper landed (59.4% of the total 2010 deep water grouper quota was met) and, in 2011, it represented 5.8% of all deep water grouper landed (76.3% of the total deep water grouper quota was met) (NMFS 2013a)(NMFS 2013b). We note that of the deepwater groupers, Warsaw grouper is in least demand (GMFMC 2012) so is likely not as highly targeted as other species. According to the Federal Register notice rejecting ESA listing for this species, management actions have

36 36 significantly reduced landings for Warsaw grouper in the Gulf of Mexico (69 FR 59690). In the IFQ program's first year (2010), landings for this species reached a low point, and have increased in subsequent years (2010: 28.6 MT, 2011: 33.7 MT 2012: 47.5 MT)(NMFS 2014d). Although fishing effort is managed, SFW rates fishing mortality for Warsaw grouper as "high concern" because this species is listed as "critically endangered" by IUCN, fishing mortality is unknown, and it is unknown if management to curtail overfishing is effective. YELLOWEDGE GROUPER Factor 1.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High The FishBase inherent vulnerability score for yellowedge grouper is 66 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005), corresponding to a SFW score of "high" inherent vulnerability. Yellowedge grouper is a slow-growing long-lived species (with maximum age recorded at 85 years). It is a "protogynous hermaphrodite" (shifting from female to male). Information on fecundity is lacking for this species. (SAFMC 2012) Factor 1.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 3.00 Yellowedge grouper is listed as "vulnerable" by IUCN (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Ferreira & Peres 2008). Stock assessments for Gulf of Mexico yellowedge grouper were carried out in 2002 (determined inconclusive) and in The 2011 assessment (based on commercial and recreational impacts to the stock) concluded that the stock was not overfished. According to the stock assessment, the most realistic range estimate for B/B MSY (using a SPR of 30% as a proxy for MSY and based on spawning stock biomass in 2009 relative to the minimum stock size threshold) was 0.96 to 1.36 (SEDAR 2011). There were high degrees of uncertainty among the numerous model outputs in the stock assessment, with results indicating that the stock could be close to overfished (SEDAR 2011). For the preferred outcome (which resulted in the stock not being overfished), the stock assessment modeled biomass

37 37 with the less conservative SPR 30% as a proxy for MSY rather than the more conservative SPR 40%. Choosing SPR 40% would have led to an "overfished" determination. Due to the very high vulnerability of this species to fishing mortality, SPR 40% may have been a more appropriate MSY proxy. Independent reviews of the stock assessment discussed the choice of SPR percentage as a management decision, such that setting SPR at the more conservative 40% assumes a lower biological risk that the stock will be overfished (Cook 2011)(Medley 2011)(Sparholt 2011). The next stock assessment is tentatively scheduled for 2015 (SEDAR 2013). Yellowedge grouper's stock status in the Gulf of Mexico scores as "moderate concern" rather than "low" or "very low concern" because of uncertainties over the overfished status and the use of the less conservative SPR 30% as an MSY proxy in the stock assessment. United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 2.00 High Yellowedge grouper is listed as "vulnerable" by IUCN (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Ferreira & Peres 2008).According to the NMFS 4th Quarter Status of US Fisheries Report, the South Atlantic yellowedge grouper stock's overfished status is unknown (NMFS 2013). The last stock assessment that included yellowedge grouper (SEDAR 4) is out of date, and was completed in 2004 based on data through It used a static SPR value of 48% based on age data from the Gulf of Mexico population and size-based reproductive data from the South Atlantic (SEDAR 2004). There are no plans to conduct future stock assessments of yellowedge grouper in the South Atlantic region (SEDAR 2013). Due to yellowedge grouper's IUCN status and an unknown overfished status, stock status scores as "high concern." Factor Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 2.33 Stock assessments for Gulf of Mexico yellowedge grouper were carried out in 2002 (determined inconclusive) and in The 2011 assessment (based on commercial and recreational impacts to the stock), concluded that the stock was not experiencing overfishing. According to the stock assessment,

38 38 the most realistic range estimate for F/F MSY (using a SPR of 30% as a proxy for MSY based on the average fishing mortality between 2007 and 2009 relative to the MFMT) was 0.78 to (SEDAR 2011) However, there were high degrees of uncertainty among the numerous model outputs, with results indicating that the stock could be experiencing overfishing (SEDAR 2011). For the preferred outcome (which resulted in overfishing not occurring), the stock assessment modeled fishing mortality with both the less conservative SPR 30% as a proxy for MSY rather than the more conservative SPR 40%. Choosing SPR 40% would have led to an overfishing determination. Due to the high vulnerability of this species to fishing mortality, SPR 40% may have been a more appropriate MSY proxy. Independent reviews of the stock assessment discussed the choice of SPR percentage as a management decision, such that setting SPR at the more conservative 40% assumes a lower biological risk for overfishing the stock (Cook 2011)(Medley 2011)(Sparholt 2011). The next stock assessment is tentatively scheduled for 2015 (SEDAR 2013). Due to uncertainty in the F/F MSY estimation and the choice of SPR 30% rather than SPR 40% as an MSY proxy, fishing mortality scores as "moderate concern" rather than "low concern" or "very low concern." As of 2010, commercial (but not recreational) fishing mortality to the yellowedge grouper stock is managed under a multi-species deepwater grouper IFQ program which currently also includes Warsaw, snowy and speckled hind (GMFMC 2012). Recreational mortality to the yellowedge grouper stock is considered to be low (SEDAR 2011). United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 2.33 According to NMFS, the yellowedge grouper stock in the South Atlantic region is not experiencing overfishing but F is unestimated (NMFS 2013). The last stock assessment that included yellowedge grouper is out of date (SEDAR 4) and was completed in 2004 based on data through 2002 (SEDAR 2004). There are no future plans to assess the South Atlantic stock of this species (SEDAR 2013). Commercial catches of yellowedge grouper in the South Atlantic region are currently low, with 0.2 MT handline landings and 0.1 MT rod and reel landings in 2011 and no longline landings in 2010 or 2011 (NMFS 2013b) due to Amendment 17B, which prohibited deepwater grouper harvest at depths exceeding 240 ft. (73 m) in order to decrease the fishing mortality of Warsaw grouper and speckled hind. In May 2012, NMFS removed this deepwater prohibition of yellowedge grouper catch. NMFS does not expect much of an increase in yellowedge grouper deep longline catch as a result of this management action (77 FR 27375).

39 Yellowedge grouper fishing mortality in the South Atlantic scores as "moderate concern" because, although this stock may be depleted (overfished status is unknown), fishing mortality is low. 39

40 40 Criterion 2: Impacts on other retained and bycatch stocks All main retained and bycatch species in the fishery are evaluated in the same way as the species under assessment were evaluated in Criterion 1. Seafood Watch defines bycatch as all fisheries-related mortality or injury to species other than the retained catch. Examples include discards, endangered or threatened species catch, and ghost fishing. To determine the final Criterion 2 score, the score for the lowest scoring retained/bycatch species is multiplied by the discard rate score (ranges from 0 to 1), which evaluates the amount of non-retained catch (discards) and bait use relative to the retained catch. The Criterion 2 rating is determined as follows: Subscore >3.2=Green or Low Subscore >2.2 and <=3.2=Yellow or Subscore <=2.2=Red or High Rating is Critical if Factor 2.3 (Fishing Mortality) is Critical. Criterion 2 Summary Only the lowest scoring main species is/are listed in the table and text in this Criterion 2 section. Black Grouper: United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.95 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status RED PORGY 1.00: High 2.00: High SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High SCAMP 2.00: Medium 3.00: GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: GRAY TRIGGERFISH 3.00: Low 2.00: High RED SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 2.00: High Fishing Mortality 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low Subscore

41 41 GREATER AMBERJACK 2.00: Medium 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low BLACK GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low VERMILION SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low YELLOWTAIL SNAPPER 1.00: High 5.00: Very Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low Black Grouper: United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.75 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status BLACKNOSE SHARK 1.00: High 2.00: High LOGGERHEAD TURTLE 1.00: High 1.00: Very High SPECKLED HIND 1.00: High 1.00: Very High DUSKY SMOOTHHOUND (SMOOTH 1.00: High 2.00: High DOGFISH) GIANT SNAKE EEL 1.00: High 2.00: High SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High BLUELINE TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 3.00: YELLOWEDGE GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low Fishing Mortality 1.00: High 3.67: Low 3.67: Low Subscore

42 42 BLACK GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low GOLDEN TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low Black Grouper: Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.95 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low GRAY TRIGGERFISH 3.00: Low 3.00: RED PORGY 1.00: High 2.00: High SCAMP 2.00: Medium 3.00: BLACK SEA BASS 3.00: Low 4.00: Low RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARK 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low BLACK GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low VERMILION SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 4.00: Low YELLOWTAIL SNAPPER 1.00: High 5.00: Very Low Fishing Mortality 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.0: Very Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low Subscore Gag Grouper: United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.95 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very High RED PORGY 1.00: High 2.00: High Fishing Mortality 1.00: High Subscore

43 43 SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High SCAMP 2.00: Medium 3.00: GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: GRAY TRIGGERFISH 3.00: Low 2.00: High RED SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 2.00: High GREATER AMBERJACK 2.00: Medium 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low VERMILION SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low YELLOWTAIL SNAPPER 1.00: High 5.00: Very Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low Gag Grouper: United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.75 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status Fishing Mortality WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very 1.00: High High BLACKNOSE SHARK 1.00: High 2.00: High 1.00: High LOGGERHEAD TURTLE 1.00: High 1.00: Very High SPECKLED HIND 1.00: High 1.00: Very High DUSKY SMOOTHHOUND (SMOOTH 1.00: High 2.00: High DOGFISH) GIANT SNAKE EEL 1.00: High 2.00: High Subscore

44 44 SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High BLUELINE TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 3.00: YELLOWEDGE GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARK 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low GOLDEN TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low Gag Grouper: Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.95 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very High GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High YELLOWEDGE GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High GRAY TRIGGERFISH 3.00: Low 3.00: RED PORGY 1.00: High 2.00: High SCAMP 2.00: Medium 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARK 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low Fishing Mortality 1.00: High 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low Subscore

45 45 BLACK SEA BASS 3.00: Low 4.00: Low VERMILION SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 4.00: Low YELLOWTAIL SNAPPER 1.00: High 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low Red Grouper: United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.95 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very High RED PORGY 1.00: High 2.00: High SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High SCAMP 2.00: Medium 3.00: GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: GRAY TRIGGERFISH 3.00: Low 2.00: High RED SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 2.00: High GREATER AMBERJACK 2.00: Medium 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low VERMILION SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low YELLOWTAIL SNAPPER 1.00: High 5.00: Very Low Fishing Mortality 1.00: High 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low Subscore

46 46 Red Rrouper: United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.75 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status Fishing Mortality WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very 1.00: High High BLACKNOSE SHARK 1.00: High 2.00: High 1.00: High LOGGERHEAD TURTLE 1.00: High 1.00: Very High SPECKLED HIND 1.00: High 1.00: Very High DUSKY SMOOTHHOUND (SMOOTH 1.00: High 2.00: High DOGFISH) GIANT SNAKE EEL 1.00: High 2.00: High SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High BLUELINE TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 3.00: YELLOWEDGE GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARK 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low GOLDEN TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low Subscore

47 47 Red Grouper: Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.95 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very High GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High YELLOWEDGE GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High GRAY TRIGGERFISH 3.00: Low 3.00: RED PORGY 1.00: High 2.00: High SCAMP 2.00: Medium 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARK 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low BLACK SEA BASS 3.00: Low 4.00: Low VERMILION SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 4.00: Low YELLOWTAIL SNAPPER 1.00: High 5.00: Very Low Fishing Mortality 1.00: High 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low Subscore Snowy Grouper: United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.95 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very High RED PORGY 1.00: High 2.00: High Fishing Mortality 1.00: High Subscore

48 48 SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High SCAMP 2.00: Medium 3.00: GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: GRAY TRIGGERFISH 3.00: Low 2.00: High RED SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 2.00: High GREATER AMBERJACK 2.00: Medium 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low VERMILION SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low YELLOWTAIL SNAPPER 1.00: High 5.00: Very Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low Snowy Grouper: United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.75 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status Fishing Mortality WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very 1.00: High High BLACKNOSE SHARK 1.00: High 2.00: High 1.00: High LOGGERHEAD TURTLE 1.00: High 1.00: Very High SPECKLED HIND 1.00: High 1.00: Very High DUSKY SMOOTHHOUND (SMOOTH 1.00: High 2.00: High DOGFISH) GIANT SNAKE EEL 1.00: High 2.00: High Subscore

49 49 SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High BLUELINE TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 3.00: YELLOWEDGE GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARK 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low GOLDEN TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low Snowy Grouper: Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.95 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status Fishing Mortality WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very 1.00: High High GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low 3.67: Low SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High YELLOWEDGE GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High GRAY TRIGGERFISH 3.00: Low 3.00: RED PORGY 1.00: High 2.00: High 3.67: Low SCAMP 2.00: Medium 3.00: Medium 3.67: Low RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low 3.67: Low ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARK 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low 3.67: Low Subscore

50 50 BLACK SEA BASS 3.00: Low 4.00: Low VERMILION SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 4.00: Low YELLOWTAIL SNAPPER 1.00: High 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low Snowy Grouper: United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.75 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status SPECKLED HIND 1.00: High 1.00: Very High WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very High BLACKNOSE SHARK 1.00: High 2.00: High SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High YELLOWEDGE GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High BLUELINE TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 3.00: ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARK 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low GOLDEN TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low Fishing Mortality 1.00: High 1.00: High 1.00: High 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low Subscore Warsaw Grouper: United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.95 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very High RED PORGY 1.00: High 2.00: High SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High Fishing Mortality 1.00: High Subscore

51 51 SCAMP 2.00: Medium 3.00: GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: GRAY TRIGGERFISH 3.00: Low 2.00: High RED SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 2.00: High GREATER AMBERJACK 2.00: Medium 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low VERMILION SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low YELLOWTAIL SNAPPER 1.00: High 5.00: Very Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low Warsaw Grouper: United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.75 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status Fishing Mortality WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very 1.00: High High BLACKNOSE SHARK 1.00: High 2.00: High 1.00: High LOGGERHEAD TURTLE 1.00: High 1.00: Very High SPECKLED HIND 1.00: High 1.00: Very High DUSKY SMOOTHHOUND (SMOOTH 1.00: High 2.00: High DOGFISH) GIANT SNAKE EEL 1.00: High 2.00: High SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High Subscore

52 52 BLUELINE TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 3.00: YELLOWEDGE GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARK 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low GOLDEN TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low Yellowedge Grouper: United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.75 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status Fishing Mortality WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very 1.00: High High BLACKNOSE SHARK 1.00: High 2.00: High 1.00: High LOGGERHEAD TURTLE 1.00: High 1.00: Very High SPECKLED HIND 1.00: High 1.00: Very High DUSKY SMOOTHHOUND (SMOOTH 1.00: High 2.00: High DOGFISH) GIANT SNAKE EEL 1.00: High 2.00: High SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High BLUELINE TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 3.00: YELLOWEDGE GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: Subscore

53 53 GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARK 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low GOLDEN TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low Yellowedge Grouper: Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.95 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very High GAG GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High YELLOWEDGE GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High GRAY TRIGGERFISH 3.00: Low 3.00: RED PORGY 1.00: High 2.00: High SCAMP 2.00: Medium 3.00: RED GROUPER 1.00: High 4.00: Low ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARK 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low BLACK SEA BASS 3.00: Low 4.00: Low VERMILION SNAPPER 2.00: Medium 4.00: Low YELLOWTAIL SNAPPER 1.00: High 5.00: Very Low Fishing Mortality 1.00: High 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low 5.00: Very Low Subscore

54 54 Yellowedge Grouper: United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom Subscore:: Discard Rate: 0.75 C2 Rate: Species Inherent Vulnerability Stock Status SPECKLED HIND 1.00: High 1.00: Very High WARSAW GROUPER 1.00: High 1.00: Very High BLACKNOSE SHARK 1.00: High 2.00: High SNOWY GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High YELLOWEDGE GROUPER 1.00: High 2.00: High BLUELINE TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 3.00: ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARK 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low GOLDEN TILEFISH 2.00: Medium 5.00: Very Low Fishing Mortality 1.00: High 1.00: High 1.00: High 3.67: Low 5.00: Very Low Subscore Due to the way observer data are collected (the number of individual fish rather than the weight of bycatch is recorded while catch is recorded by weight), it is not possible to determine bycatch ratios for any of the fisheries under consideration, nor is it possible to quantitatively determine which bycatch species should be included in this section according to the SFW guidelines. However, observer data were used to qualitatively determine bycatch species for each region. Details on observer coverage are provided in the discussion for Criteria 3.2, Bycatch Management. Please note that black grouper in both regions is caught at shallower depths than the other 5 grouper species assessed in this report. The deeper water species, namely Warsaw grouper, are not included as bycatch for black grouper.

55 55 Criterion 2 Assessment ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARK Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.1 above) United States, Longline, Bottom United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 2.00 Medium Inherent Vulnerability = 48 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005) Factor 2.2 Abundance United States, Longline, Bottom United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 5.00 Very Low According to the 2013 stock assessment, Atlantic sharpnose shark is not overfished. The stock assessment uses a biomass proxy of spawning stock fecundity (SSF) and estimated SSF 2011 /SSF MSY as ranging from 1.01 to 2.88 (SEDAR 2013c). The assessment reports an 85% 99% probability that the stock is not overfished (SEDAR 2013c).

56 Fishing Mortality United States, Longline, Bottom United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 3.67 Low According to the 2013 stock assessment it is not clear if the Atlantic sharpnose shark stock (across the US Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean region) is experiencing overfishing with current fishing mortality (F 2011 ) compared to fishing mortality at MSY (F MSY ) ranging from F 2011 /F MSY =0.03 to 0.57 (SEDAR 2013c). The probability of overfishing not occurring in 2011 was >50% in three cases and ranged between 54 and 67% (SEDAR 2013c), justifying the fishing mortality score of "low concern." Bycatch is a significant source of mortality to Atlantic sharpnose shark, but the species is not overfished and is likely not experiencing overfishing (so current bycatch mortality of this species is considered acceptable). Between July 2006 and December 2009, reef fish observers covering 1,503 longline sets recorded 2142 individuals caught (20 were kept) on reef fish longline gear in this region (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). According to the 2013 Update to the US National Bycatch report, an estimated 25, individuals were caught in the Gulf of Mexico reef fish bottom longline fishery (NMFS 2013f). The report does not cite the data they based this estimate on. This estimate constitutes 40% of the total bycatch of Atlantic sharpnose shark across the Southeast region (spanning the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic) (NMFS 2013f) Low According to the 2013 stock assessment, it is not clear if the Atlantic sharpnose shark stock (across the US Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean region) is experiencing overfishing with current fishing mortality (F 2011 ) compared to FMSY ranging from F 2011 /F MSY =0.03 to 0.57 (SEDAR 2013c). The probability of overfishing not occurring in 2011 was >50% in three cases and ranged between 54 and 67% (SEDAR 2013c), justifying the fishing mortality score of "low concern." Bycatch is a significant source of mortality to Atlantic sharpnose shark, but the species is not overfished and is likely not experiencing overfishing (so current bycatch mortality of this species is considered acceptable). A pilot snapper-grouper fishery observer program over three fishing seasons (316 observer days over , , ) (representing a small subset of all fishing trips) recorded 506 individuals caught on handline gear in the South Atlantic (Helies and Jamison 2013). According to the 2013 Update to the National Bycatch report, an estimated 9,479 individuals were caught in the South

57 57 Atlantic snapper-grouper fishery between 2006 and 2010 (NMFS 2013f). The origin of these data (whether from observer or logbook data) is not cited in the report. United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 3.67 Low According to the 2013 stock assessment, it is not clear if the Atlantic sharpnose shark stock (across the US Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean region) is experiencing overfishing with current fishing mortality (F 2011 ) compared to FMSY ranging from F 2011 /F MSY =0.03 to 0.57 (SEDAR 2013c). The probability of overfishing not occurring in 2011 was >50% in three cases and ranged between 54 and 67% (SEDAR 2013c), justifying the fishing mortality score of "low concern." Bycatch is a significant source of mortality to Atlantic sharpnose shark, but the species is not overfished and is likely not experiencing overfishing (so current bycatch mortality of this species is considered acceptable). According to the 2013 National Bycatch report, an estimate of 3, individuals (with a coefficent of variation (CV) = 0.95) were caught in the South Altantic snapper-grouper bottom longline fishery based on data from 2006 to 2010 (NMFS 2013f). These data are likely based on logbook data (observer data on this fishery is not available (NMFS 2011), and the report does not specify what data sources were used to derive each estimate) (NMFS 2011) Low According to the 2013 stock assessment, it is not clear if the Atlantic sharpnose shark stock (across the US Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean region) is experiencing overfishing with current fishing mortality (F 2011 ) compared to FMSY ranging from F 2011 /F MSY =0.03 to 0.57 (SEDAR 2013c). The probability of overfishing not occurring in 2011 was >50% in three cases and ranged between 54 and 67% (SEDAR 2013c), justifying the fishing mortality score of "low concern." Bycatch is a significant source of mortality for Atlantic sharpnose shark, but the species is not overfished and is likely not experiencing overfishing (so current bycatch mortality of this species is considered acceptable). A pilot snapper-grouper fishery observer program over three fishing seasons (316 observer days over , , , representing a small subset of all fishing trips) recorded 506 individuals caught on handline gear in the South Atlantic (Helies and Jamison 2013). According to the 2013 Update to the National Bycatch report, an estimated 9,479 individuals were caught in the South Atlantic snapper-grouper fishery between 2006 and 2010 (NMFS 2013f). The origin of these data (whether from observer or logbook data) is not cited in the report.

58 58 Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States, Longline, Bottom United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 111%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 1,503 longline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011) % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 24%. This ratio is based on observer count data from 59 vertical line snapper-grouper fishery trips over 316 days, covering the region extending from southern North Carolina to northern Florida (Helies and Jamison 2013). United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The discards+bait/landings ratio cannot be calculated for the South Atlantic longline snapper-grouper fishery due to the low number of fishing vessels reporting (NMFS 2011). Given the similarities in gear and catch between this region and the Gulf of Mexico longline reef fishery, SFW uses the ratio calculated for the Gulf of Mexico (111%) as a substitute % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 24%. This ratio is based on observer count data from 59 vertical line snapper-grouper fishery trips over 316 days, covering the region extending from southern North Carolina to northern Florida (Helies and Jamison 2013).

59 59 BLACK GROUPER- See discussion in Criterion 1 BLACK SEA BASS Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.1 above) 3.00 Low Inherent Vulnerability = 31 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005) Factor 2.2 Abundance 4.00 Low The 2011 black sea bass assessment for the US South Atlantic population was updated in The spawning stock biomass (abundance of mature fish) is estimated to be 103% that needed to produce the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and 166% of MSST (minimum standing stock (spawning biomass) threshold), indicating the population had recovered and was no longer overfished. There was a high amount of uncertainty around this estimate based largely on the influence of high recruitment rates (fish entering the fishery) between 2008 and 2012, which may artificially inflate the biomass estimate (SEDAR 2013a). SFW has, therefore, awarded a low and not a very low concern score Fishing Mortality 3.67 Very Low The 2013 updated assessment indicates that overfishing of this black sea bass population occurred from , though there was a high degree of uncertainty around the fishing mortality estimates.

60 60 However, in recent years ( ), fishing mortality has fallen to below sustainable levels and is currently at 66% of the fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield (F MSY ). The assessment indicates that it is highly likely that current fishing levels on black sea bass are sustainable, with only a 7% chance that overfishing is still occurring. As well, the handline fishery only accounts for around 10% of the catches or fishing mortality {SEDAR 2013a}. We have therefore awarded a score of very low concern. A pilot snapper-grouper fishery observer study, which sampled a limited number of handline trips over 3 seasons recorded 1302 black sea bass caught (316 observer days over , and ; representing a small subset of all fishing trips) (Helies and Jamison 2013). Factor 2.4 Discard Rate % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 24%. This ratio is based on observer count data from 59 vertical line snapper-grouper fishery trips over 316 days, covering the region extending from southern North Carolina to northern Florida (Helies and Jamison 2013). BLACKNOSE SHARK Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.1 above) United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High Inherent Vulnerability = 70 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005).

61 61 Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 2.00 High NMFS lists the overfished status of blacknose shark in the Gulf of Mexico as unknown (NMFS 2013). The 2011 stock assessment for this region provided biomass refererence points based on spawning stock fecundity (SSF 2005 /SSF MSY = 0.48) and described the population as overfished (SEDAR 2011e). This species is listed as near threatened by IUCN (Morgan et al. 2009). United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 2.00 High NMFS lists blacknose shark in the South Atlantic as overfished with a (B/B MSY proxy: SSF 2005 /SSF MSY ranges from ) (SEDAR 2011a)(NMFS 2013). It is in the fourth year of an 18 year rebuilding plan (NMFS 2013). This species is listed as near threatened by IUCN (Morgan et al. 2009) Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High According to the NMFS, the overfishing status for blacknose shark in the Gulf of Mexico is unknown (NMFS 2013), however the 2011 stock assessment describes this population as experiencing overfishing with F 2005 /FMSY as 3.43 (SEDAR 2011e). Based on limited observer data on selected longline trips (n = 1,503 sets) between 2006 and 2009, 816 blacknose sharks were caught (with 6 kept) in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). The 2013 Update to the US National Bycatch Report estimated that 31, individuals (coefficient of variation (CV) = 2.97) were caught as bycatch in the Gulf of Mexico reef fish bottom longline fishery (NMFS 2013f), which constitutes 80% of the bycatch mortality of this species across the South Atlantic region (including the South Altantic and Gulf of Mexico). The report does not cite the data source used to generate these estimates.

62 62 United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High According to the NMFS, blacknose shark in the South Atlantic is experiencing overfishing, with the most recent stock assessment estimating fishing mortality of F2005/FMSY= (SEDAR 2011a). There is inadequate data to determine bycatch in the longline snapper-grouper fishery in this region (NMFS 2011). Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 111%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 1,503 longline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The discards+bait/landings ratio cannot be calculated for the South Atlantic longline snapper-grouper fishery due to the low number of fishing vessels reporting (NMFS 2011). Given the similarities in gear and catch between this region and the Gulf of Mexico longline reef fishery, we use the ratio calculated for the Gulf of Mexico (111%) as a substitute. BLUELINE TILEFISH Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.1 above) United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom

63 Medium The inherent vulnerability of blueline tilefish, Caulolatilus microps, was assessed based on seven productivity attributes (Table 2). Blueline tilefish scored an average of which corresponds to a moderate inherent vulnerability. Rationale: The vulnerability score was 58 out of 100 {Froese and Pauly 2000}{Cheung et al. 2005}. This represents high inherent vulnerability, however the life history attributes do not support this score, therefore a moderate score is used. Table 2: Inherent Vulnerability characteristics of blueline tilefish. Productivity attribute Blueline tilefish Score Source Average age at maturity 3 yrs 3 SEDAR 2013e Average maximum age 43 yrs 1 SEDAR 2013e Fecundity million eggs/yr N/A SEDAR 2013e Average size at maturity cm TL (females) 3 SEDAR 2013e Average maximum size 90 cm TL 3 SEDAR 2013e Reproductive strategy Broadcast Spawner 3 SEDAR 2013e Trophic Level 3.8 ± 0.6 SE 1 Froese and Pauly 2000 Average Score Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 3.00 There has been no stock assessment for blueline tilefish in the Gulf of Mexico and its overfished status is unknown. However, its stock was discussed in the golden tilefish assessment (it was determined that adequate data was unavailable for an assessment of this species), and annual catch per unit effort (CPUE) was provided through No trend in CPUE values was detected over time (SEDAR 2011c).

64 64 United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 3.00 There is no stock assessment for blueline tilefish in the South Atlantic region so its overfished status is unknown. However, there is a benchmark assessment underway in 2013 {SEDAR 2013}. Preliminary documents with CPUE data show that this metric has fluctuated, but overall has declined over time Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 2.33 There has been no stock assessment for blueline tilefish in the Gulf of Mexico and it is unknown whether this species is experiencing overfishing. However, its stock was discussed in the golden tilefish assessment, as these two species comprise the majority of landings for the Gulf tilefish quota (IFQ). Blueline tilefish catch (largely caught by longline) has fluctuated, but generally increased over time (SEDAR 2011c). A deepwater species, blueline tilefish is a major bycatch species of the yellowedge grouper fishery, with fisherman reporting 3,000 lbs. of blueline tilefish caught for every 10,000 lbs. of yellowedge grouper caught (SEDAR 2011c). Between July 2006 and December 2009, reef fish observers covering 1,503 longline sets recorded 3591 blueline tilefish as caught (1767 were kept) (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). According to limited logbook data, for the 13 longline trips reporting discards between 2002 and 2009, a total of 3498 blueline tilefish were discarded (SEDAR 2011c). Discarded blueline tilefish are assumed to have 100% mortality (SEDAR 2011c). United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 2.33 There is no stock assessment for blueline tilefish in the South Atlantic region so whether this species is experiencing overfishing is unknown. However, there is a benchmark assessment underway in There are inadequate data to determine bycatch in the longline snapper-grouper fishery in this region {NMFS 2011}.

65 65 Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 111%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 1,503 longline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The discards+bait/landings ratio cannot be calculated for the South Atlantic longline snapper-grouper fishery due to the low number of fishing vessels reporting (NMFS 2011). Given the similarities in gear and catch between this region and the Gulf of Mexico longline reef fishery, we use the ratio calculated for the Gulf of Mexico (111%) as a substitute. DUSKY SMOOTHHOUND (SMOOTH DOGFISH) Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.1 above) United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High Inherent Vulnerability = 87 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005). Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 2.00 High

66 66 There is no stock assessment for smooth dogfish so its overfished status is unknown. However, there is a benchmark assessment scheduled for 2014 (SEDAR 2013). This species is listed as "near threatened" by IUCN (Conrath 2005) Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 2.33 There is no stock assessment for smooth dogfish so it is unknown whether it is experiencing overfishing. A benchmark assessment is scheduled for 2014 (SEDAR 2013) Based on observer data from 1,503 reef fish longline sets in the Gulf of Mexico between July 2006 and December 2009, 1284 smooth dogfish were caught (only 1 was kept), 96% of those caught were classified as "normal," rather than "stressed" (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). Bycatch mortality studies are not available for this species. Due to moderate management aimed at reducing bycatch species, SFW rates this sub-criterion as moderate concern. Relevant management practices include mandatory use of circle hooks, dehooking devices, and venting tools (NMFS 2008). Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 111%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 1,503 longline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). GAG GROUPER- See discussion in Criterion 1

67 67 GIANT SNAKE EEL Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High Inherent Vulnerability = 74 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005) Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 2.00 High There is no stock assessment for giant/king snake eel in the Gulf of Mexico (nor is a future assessment scheduled), thus, the overfished status of this species is unknown. Factor 2.3 Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 2.33 There is no stock assessment for giant/king snake eel in the Gulf of Mexico (nor is a future assessment scheduled), thus, it is unknown if this species is experiencing overfishing. Based on observer data from 1,503 reef fish longline sets in the Gulf of Mexico between July 2006 and December 2009, 1573 giant/king snake eels were caught (only 2 were kept), and 88% of those caught were classified as "normal" rather than "stressed" (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). Due to moderate management aimed at reducing bycatch species, SFW rates this subcriterion as moderate concern. Relevant management practices include mandatory use of circle hooks, dehooking devices, and venting tools (NMFS 2008).

68 68 Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 111%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 1,503 longline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). GOLDEN TILEFISH Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 2.00 Medium The inherent vulnerability of golden tilefish, Lopholatilus chamaelonticeps, was assessed based on seven productivity attributes (Table 3). Golden tilefish scored an average of 2.0 which corresponds to a moderate inherent vulnerability. Rationale: The vulnerability score was 60 out of 100 {Froese and Pauly 2000}{Cheung et al. 2005}. This represents high inherent vulnerability, however the life history attributes do not support this score, therefore a moderate score is used. Table 3: Inherent Vulnerability characteristics for golden tilefish. Productivity attribute Golden Tilefish Score Source Average age at maturity 2-3 yrs 3 SEDAR 2013b/c Average maximum age 40 yrs 1 SEDAR 2013b/c Fecundity 2.3 million eggs/yr N/A Grimes et al Average size at maturity cm TL (females) 2 Grimes et al Average maximum size 112 cm TL 2 Nitschke 2006 Reproductive strategy Broadcast Spawner 3 Grimes et al Trophic Level 3.5 ± 0.4 SE 1 Froese and Pauly 2000 Average Score 2

69 69 Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 5.00 Very Low In the Gulf of Mexico, tilefish/golden tilefish is not overfished (B/B MSY proxy: SSB current /MSST ranges from 2.26 to 2.30) (SEDAR 2011c). United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 5.00 Very Low According to the most recent stock assessment and NMFS, golden tilefish in the South Atlantic is not overfished (B/B MSY proxy: SSBcurrent/MSST = 2.14 (SEDAR 2011b)(NMFS 2013). Factor 2.3 Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 5.00 Very Low In the Gulf of Mexico, tilefish/golden tilefish is not experiencing overfishing, with an F current /MFMT (F/F MSY proxy) of (SEDAR 2011c). Golden tilefish landings peaked in the late 1980s and have fluctuated ever since (SEDAR 2011c). Based on reef fish observer data on commercial longline vessels covering 1503 sets between July 2006 and December 2009, 2199 golden tilefish were caught (2130 were kept) (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). Limited commercial logbook data from 11 longline trips reporting discards between 2002 and 2009 reported 3509 golden tilefish discarded (SEDAR 2011c). Discarded golden tilefish are assumed to have 100% mortality (SEDAR 2011c). United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 5.00 Very Low According to the most recent stock assessment and NMFS stock status update, golden tilefish in the South Atlantic is not experiencing overfishing and has an F/F MSY of 0.36 (SEDAR 2011b)(NMFS 2013).

70 70 Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 111%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 1,503 longline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The discards+bait/landings ratio cannot be calculated for the South Atlantic longline snapper-grouper fishery due to the low number of fishing vessels reporting (NMFS 2011). Given the similarities in gear and catch between this region and the Gulf of Mexico longline reef fishery, SFW uses the ratio calculated for the Gulf of Mexico (111%) as a substitute. GRAY TRIGGERFISH Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 3.00 Low Inherent Vulnerability = 32 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005)

71 71 Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 2.00 High According to the 2011 update stock assessment (to the 2006 benchmark assessment, which found that gray triggerfish was overfished) gray triggerfish in the Gulf of Mexico is still overfished (B/B MSY proxy: SSB current /MSST = 0.53) (GMFMC 2012b). The NMFS th Quarter Stock Status update lists the B/B MSY proxy at a much lower value of 0.04 (NMFS 2013). It is in year six of a six year rebuilding plan (NMFS 2013). In recent years, gray triggerfish has had lower than normal recruitment (GMFMC 2012b) There is no stock assessment for gray triggerfish in the South Atlantic region, thus, its overfished status is unknown. However, there is a benchmark assessment underway in 2013 (SEDAR 2013). Preliminary documents with CPUE data show fluctuation over time, with a sharp increase in recent years ( ) (NMFS-SEFSC 2013a). Factor 2.3 Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 3.67 Low According to the NMFS 4th Quarter 2013 Stock Status update, gray triggerfish in the Gulf of Mexico is no longer experiencing overfishing in year 6 of a 6 year rebuilding plan (NMFS 2013) so fishing mortality scores as "low concern" for this species. The most recent overfishing ratio for this species is from the 2011 update stock assessment (an update to the 2006 benchmark assessment), which found that gray triggerfish in the Gulf of Mexico was experiencing overfishing with an F current /MFMT (F/F MSY proxy) of 1.04 (GMFMC 2012b). Reef fish observer data from vertical line trips covering 1116 sea days/7391 sets from July 2006 to December 2009, recorded 809 gray triggerfish caught (751 kept) (Scott-Denton et al. 2011).

72 There is no stock assessment for gray triggerfish in the South Atlantic region, but according to NMFS 4th Quarter Stock Status Update this stock is not experiencing overfishing. There is a benchmark assessment underway in 2014 (originally scheduled for 2013). Based on pilot observer data collected over three seasons (2007-8, , ) covering 316 observer days, 4936 gray triggerfish were recorded caught (4875 kept) (Helies and Jamison 2013). Gray triggerfish was the third most common species caught on these trips (Helies and Jamison 2013). Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 40%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 7,391 handline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011) % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 24%. This ratio is based on observer count data from 59 vertical line snapper-grouper fishery trips over 316 days covering the region extending from southern North Carolina to northern Florida (Helies and Jamison 2013).

73 73 GREATER AMBERJACK Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 2.00 Medium Inherent Vulnerability = 54 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005) Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 3.00 According to the results of 2014 stock assessment, greater amberjack in the Gulf of Mexico is slightly overfished, although the review panel did not agree on an overfished status for this stock due to concerns over the assessment models used (SEDAR 2014a). Estimates from all three stock assessment models for 2012 greater amberjack biomass relative to its biomass at MSY (B 2012 /B MSY ) (1.140, and 0.906) do not exceed the minimum stock size threshold (MSST) of 75% B MSY (i.e., do not indicate that the stock is overfished) (SEDAR 2014a). Stock status is scored as moderate concern due to concerns about the stock assessment raised by the review panel, as well as uncertainties in the underlying data on discards used in the stock assessment (SEDAR 2014a). Greater amberjack is in year 12 of a 10 year rebuilding plan in the Gulf of Mexico (NMFS 2014c). Factor 2.3 Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 3.67 Low According to the results of 2014 stock assessment, greater amberjack in the Gulf of Mexico is not likely experiencing overfishing, although the review panel did not agree on an overfishing status for this stock due to concerns over the assessment models used (SEDAR 2014a). The 2014 assessment found that fishing mortality has steadily decreased over the last several years. Estimates of current fishing

74 74 mortality relative to fishing mortality at MSY (F/F MSY ) range from , indicating that the stock is not likely experiencing overfishing (SEDAR 2014a). Reef fish observers on vertical-line trips covering 1116 sea days/7391 sets from July 2006 to December 2009, recorded 613 greater amberjack caught (171 kept) (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). Due to uncertainty over the overfishing status in the 2014 stock assessment, greater amberjack's fishing mortality scores as "low concern" rather than "very low concern." Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 40%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 7,391 handline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). LOGGERHEAD TURTLE Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High Inherent Vulnerability is automatically rated as high for all sea turtle species. Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 1.00 Very High Worldwide, loggerhead sea turtle populations are in decline. Under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA), loggerhead sea turtles are divided into distinct population segments (DPSs), five of which are

75 75 listed as endangered and four as threatened (NMFS 2013e). Loggerheads in the Gulf of Mexico are part of the Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS, which listed as threatened under ESA (NMFS 2013e). In the northern Gulf of Mexico, nest abundance (a measure of population health), declined by almost half from 1994 to 2010 (Lamont et al. 2012). In 2013, NMFS proposed that the Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS is critical habitat for loggerhead sea turtles (78 FR 43005). Factor 2.3 Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 2.33 Bottom longline gear is known to adversely affect sea turtles via hooking, entanglement, trailing line, and forced submergence. Captured sea turtles can be released alive or may be found dead upon retrieval of the gear as a result of forced submergence (NMFS 2009b). According to a 2009 NMFS report, loggerhead turtle take in the Gulf of Mexico bottom longline reef fishery exceeded the number authorized by a 2005 NMFS Biological Opinion (BO) issued under the ESA (85 loggerheads over 3 yrs). The fishery took an estimated 714 loggerheads between July 2006 and December 2008 (the 95 % confidence interval was ,720.5) (NMFS 2009a) (See Table 4). The 2009 BO provides an estimate of 519 takes with 314 of those as mortalities (See Table 1) (NMFS 2009b). These takes occurred despite the 2006 management measures to reduce sea turtle take established through Amendment 18A of the Gulf of Mexico Reef FMP (established due to the 2005 BO), which required reef fishery vessels to have sea turtle release gear and instructions for how to use it onboard (NMFS 2011). Due to the excessive take, NMFS formulated a new BO in 2009 (NMFS 2009b), and to reduce take to an acceptable level from the status quo (see table for anticipated future takes), NMFS instituted management strategies via Amendment 31 to the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fishery FMP in April This amendment includes several measures aimed at reducing turtle hooking and entanglements, including a prohibition on bottom longline gears within the 35-fathom contour in the Gulf of Mexico (east of Cape San Blas, FL), a reduction in vessels holding reef fish permits via an endorsement program for those vessels landing at least 40,000lbs (18.1 MT) of reef fish per annum and a limit of 1,000 hooks onboard reef fish longline vessels, with a maximum of 750 hooks rigged for fishing at any time (75 FR 21512). Preliminary data suggest that these actions have successfully reduced sea turtle takes in the reef fish fishery. For 2009, before the Amendment 31 restrictions were fully implemented, an estimated 48.5 loggerhead turtles were taken in the reef fish bottom longline fishery (95% CI ) (NMFS 2010). Total interaction estimates for 2011 and 2012 are not publically available, but are anticipated to be lower still. (J. Lee, pers. Comm.). Due to effective bycatch management in the longline reef fish fishery, specifically aimed at reducing loggerhead sea turtle take, fishing mortality for loggerheads is scored as "moderate concern."

76 76 Rationale: Table 4: Status Quo and Anticipated Annual Loggerhead Sea Turtle Captures on Reef Fish Bottom Longlines in the Gulf of Mexico under the Proposed Action in the 2009 NMFS BO. Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 111%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 1,503 longline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). RED GROUPER- see discussion in Criterion 1 RED PORGY Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 1.00 High Inherent Vulnerability = 66 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005)

77 77 Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 2.00 High There has been no stock assessment for red porgy in the Gulf of Mexico and its overfished status is unknown High Red porgy in the South Atlantic is overfished (SSB 2011 /SSB MSY = 0.47) (SEDAR 2012a). It is in year 13 of an 18 year rebuilding plan (NMFS 2013). Biomass estimates suggest that the stock is recovering, with SSB/SSB MSY increasing from 0.19 in 1998 to the most recent value of 0.47 (SEDAR 2012a). Factor 2.3 Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 2.33 There has been no stock assessment for red porgy in the Gulf of Mexico and it is unknown whether or not it is experiencing overfishing. Reef fish observers on vertical line trips covering 1116 sea days/7391 sets from July 2006 to December 2009, recorded 6120 red porgy caught (5971 kept) (Scott-Denton et al. 2011) Low Red porgy in the South Atlantic is not experiencing overfishing (F /F MSY = 0.64), but is rebuilding (SEDAR 2012a). Estimates suggest that the stock has generally been exploited below F MSY since the late

78 s (SEDAR 2012a). Pilot observer data from the vertical line fishery in this region, covering 316 sea days over 3 seasons (2007-8, , ) recorded red porgy as the second highest caught species, and the primary discard species, with 5705 caught (3452 kept) (Helies and Jamison 2013). Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 40%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 7,391 handline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011) % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 24%. This ratio is based on observer count data from 59 vertical line snapper-grouper fishery trips over 316 days covering the region extending from southern North Carolina to northern Florida (Helies and Jamison 2013). RED SNAPPER Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 2.00 Medium Inherent Vulnerability = 55 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005)

79 79 Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 2.00 High Red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico is overfished (SBB/MSST = 0.18) and is in year 13 of a 32 year rebuilding plan (NMFS 2013). The SBB/MSST value currently listed by NMFS is from the 2009 stock assessment. According to the model used in the most recent stock assessment (completed in June 2013), red snapper biomass and spawning biomass have been increasing since the late 1980s after decreasing from the 1880s to early 1900s and steeply decreasing from the 1940s through the 1970s (SEDAR 2013b). Factor 2.3 Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 3.67 Low Red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico is not experiencing overfishing, but is rebuilding (NMFS 2013). In the 2013 stock assessment all fishing mortality rates explored in the models resulted in nearly constant fishing mortality during the projection interval, none of which indicated overfishing (SEDAR 2013b). Reef fish observers on vertical line trips covering 1116 sea days/7391 sets from July 2006 to December 2009, recorded red snapper caught (17992 kept) (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). On these observer trips, red snapper had the highest catch rate as well as the highest discard rate of any species. Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 40%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 7,391 handline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011).

80 80 SCAMP Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 2.00 Medium Fishbase assigns a high vulnerability to fishing score (68/100) to scamp {Froese and Pauly 2000}{Cheung et al. 2005}. However, based on the life history attribute method, Scamp are only considered to have a medium vulnerability (see detailed rationale section). Scamp reach sexual maturity by 3 years of age and 16 in. (41 cm) in length. They have been recorded to live to an age of 21 years, and may live to as many as 30 years. They can grow to a length of 43 in. (110 cm). {SAFMC 2014c}. Scamp spawn thousands of pelagic eggs in offshore waters from April to May. They are high-level predators and will eat crabs, shrimp, and other fish whole {Froese and Pauly 2000}{SAFMC 2014}. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) considers scamp to be a species of "Least " {Rocha et al. 2008}. Because of this Least designation, we have rated vulnerability of Scamp based on the life history attribute method rather than the Fishbase score. The SFW method results in a score of 1.83, which corresponds to moderate inherent vulnerability. Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 3.00 There is no stock assessment for scamp in the Gulf of Mexico and it is unknown if it is overfished {NMFS 2014c} so it is rated as "moderate concern".

81 Scamp populations in the South Atlantic have not been formally assessed since 1998, but have recently been listed in a core group of species to be regularly assessed starting in 2015 {Carmichael 2013}. The National Marine Fisheries Service considers the status of scamp to be unknown {NMFS 2014c}. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) considers scamp to be a species of "Least " {Rocha et al. 2008}. Because the status of scamp is unknown and they have a medium vulnerability to fishing, we have rated this factor "moderate concern". Factor 2.3 Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 2.33 There is no stock assessment for scamp in the Gulf of Mexico and it is unknown if it is experiencing overfishing. Reef fish observers on vertical line trips covering 1116 sea days/7391 sets from July 2006 to December 2009, recorded 1002 scamp caught (898 kept) (Scott-Denton et al. 2011) Low There is no stock assessment for scamp in the South Atlantic, but scamp is not experiencing overfishing (no fishing mortality metric is available) (NMFS 2013). Pilot observer data from the vertical line fishery in this region, covering 316 sea days over 3 seasons (2007-8, , ) recorded scamp as the fourth highest caught species, and the third most discarded species with 2276 caught (1745 kept) (Helies and Jamison 2013).

82 82 Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 40%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 7,391 handline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011) % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 24%. This ratio is based on observer count data from 59 vertical line snapper-grouper fishery trips over 316 days covering the region extending from southern North Carolina to northern Florida (Helies and Jamison 2013). SNOWY GROUPER- See discussion in Criterion 1 SPECKLED HIND Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High Inherent Vulnerability = 60 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005).

83 83 Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 1.00 Very High There has been no stock assessment for speckled hind in the Gulf of Mexico, so it is unknown if this species is overfished in this region. Speckled hind is listed as "critically endangered" by IUCN (IUCN 2006), warranting a score of "very high concern" for this criterion. United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 1.00 Very High There was a stock assessment for speckled hind in the South Atlantic in According to NMFS it is unknown whether speckled hind is overfished in this region. (NMFS 2013) Speckled hind is listed as "critically endangered" by IUCN (IUCN 2006), warranting a score of "very high concern" for this criterion. Factor 2.3 Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 2.33 There has been no stock assessment for speckled hind in the Gulf of Mexico, so it is unknown if this species is experiencing overfishing in this region. Fishing for speckled hind is regulated as part of the deep water grouper IFQ program. However, speckled hind can also be landed under the shallow water grouper IFQ category when a shareholder's deep water grouper allocation has been used (GMFMC 2014). There are recreational fishing limits for speckled hind to limit fishing mortality of this species (one speckled hind is permitted per vessel as part of the four grouper bag limit) (GMFMC 2014). Based on reef fish observer data on commercial longline vessels covering 1503 sets between July 2006 and December 2009, 492 speckled hind were caught (453 were kept) (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). Fishing mortality for speckled hind in the Gulf of Mexico scores as "moderate concern" due to speckled

84 84 hind's uncertain population status and the unknown effectiveness of existing fishing regulations for this species (commercial and recreational). United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High There was a stock assessment for speckled hind in 2004 for the South Atlantic region. NMFS lists this species as experiencing overfishing in this region (NMFS 2013) and prohibits its harvest or possession in federal waters (SAFMC 2013). Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 111%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 1,503 longline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The discards+bait/landings ratio cannot be calculated for the South Atlantic longline snapper-grouper fishery due to the low number of fishing vessels reporting (NMFS 2011). Given the similarities in gear and catch between this region and the Gulf of Mexico longline reef fishery, we use the ratio calculated for the Gulf of Mexico (111%) as a substitute.

85 85 VERMILION SNAPPER Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 2.00 Medium Inherent Vulnerability = 50 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005) Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 5.00 Very Low Vermilion snapper in the Gulf of Mexico is not overfished (B/B MSY proxy: SSB 2010 /SSB SPR30% = 1.55) (SEDAR 2011d) Low Vermilion snapper in the South Atlantic is not overfished (SSB 2011 /MSST = 1.26 and SSB 2011 /SSB MSY = 0.98) according to the primary model used in the most recent stock assessment, the Beaufort Assessment Model (SEDAR 2012b). However, another of the stock assessment models based on a mixed Monte Carlo/Bootstrap procedure, resulted in an overfished condition on 25% of its runs (SEDAR 2012b). Results from the stock assessment suggest that the spawning stock has generally declined throughout the full assessment period ( ) with the 2011 spawning stock estimate being the lowest value in the time series, slightly below SSB MSY but above MSST (SEDAR 2012b). These trends show the stock decreasing over time, warranting a score of "low concern" rather than "very low concern" for this criterion.

86 86 Factor 2.3 Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 5.00 Very Low Vermilion snapper in the Gulf of Mexico is not experiencing overfishing (F 2010 /F SPR30% =0.61) (SEDAR 2011d). Reef fish observers on vertical line trips covering 1116 sea days/7391 sets from July 2006 to December 2009, recorded vermilion snapper caught (23240 kept) (Scott-Denton et al. 2011). On these trips, vermilion snapper was the second most frequently caught species Very Low Vermilion snapper in the South Atlantic is not experiencing overfishing (F /F MSY = 0.67) (SEDAR 2012b).As a result of the recent stock assessment, the SAFMC proposed increasing the total annual catch limit for vermilion snapper by 306,000 lbs. (whole weight) to 1,372,000 lbs. (ww) in 2013; eliminating the 4-month recreational seasonal closure originally implemented to help end overfishing; and reducing the vermilion trip limit in an effort to extend the split-season commercial fishery. Pilot observer data from the vertical line fishery in this region, covering 316 sea days over 3 seasons (2007-8, , ) recorded vermilion snapper as the primary species caught, and the second most discarded species with caught (15899 kept) (Helies and Jamison 2013). Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 40%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 7,391 handline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011).

87 % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 24%. This ratio is based on observer count data from 59 vertical line snapper-grouper fishery trips over 316 days covering the region extending from southern North Carolina to northern Florida (Helies and Jamison 2013). WARSAW GROUPER Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High The fishbase inherent vulnerability score for Warsaw grouper is 68 {Froese and Pauly 2000}{Cheung et al. 2005}, corresponding to a SFW score of "high" inherent vulnerability. Warsaw grouper is a slowgrowing, very large-bodied species, reaching the highest maximum age (41 years) and largest size of any of the groupers covered in this report (230 cm, 263 kg). Fecundity of this species is unknown. {SAFMC 2012} Factor 2.2 Abundance United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 1.00 Very High Warsaw grouper has been listed by IUCN as "critically endangered" since 2006 (IUCN 2006). Warsaw grouper has been on the candidate list for ESA listing since 1999 (64 FR 33466) and NMFS placed it on the "Species of " list in 2004 due to potential population decline and threats from fishing and bycatch (69 FR 19975). In 2010, a petition to list Warsaw grouper under ESA was denied (69 FR 59690) with the rationale that "Warsaw grouper has always been too uncommonly captured in fisheries for data on landings or weight of fish landed to be a reliable indicator of population status and trends." Warsaw grouper's overfished status is listed as "unknown" in the US South Atlantic region and B/B MSY has not been estimated (NMFS 2013). The most recent stock assessment that considered Warsaw

88 88 grouper was in 2004 (SEDAR 4). SEDAR 4 found that commercial and recreational data available were insufficient to proceed with a stock assessment for the species due to data limitations, and data were insufficient to calculate CPUE indices across fishery sectors (SEDAR 2004). Due to to its IUCN status and its unknown overfished status, Warsaw grouper's stock status in the Gulf of Mexico scores as "very high concern." Factor 2.3 Fishing Mortality United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 1.00 High NMFS lists Warsaw grouper in the US South Atlantic as undergoing overfishing (NMFS 2013). The fishery is closed to commercial harvest in state and federal waters and its possession is prohibited in federal waters (SAFMC 2013). Recreational bag limits exist in state waters for Warsaw grouper. Due to concerns about bycatch fishing mortality of Warsaw grouper in the South Atlantic while targeting other species, NMFS implemented Amendment 17B in 2010, prohibiting the harvest of Warsaw grouper and speckled hind in federal waters and prohibiting the harvest of snowy grouper, blueline tilefish, yellowedge grouper, misty grouper, queen snapper, and silk snapper beyond 240 ft depth (NMFS-SERO 2010). Due to data indicating that this closure did not significantly reduce bycatch (while causing significant socio-economic hardship), the 240 ft. restriction was removed in May 2012 (77 FR 27375). Currently under development, Amendment 17 proposes spatial closures in the South Atlantic aimed at reducing bycatch mortality for Warsaw grouper and speckled hind (NMFS-SERO 2012). According to the Federal Register notice rejecting the ESA listing for this species, management actions have significantly reduced landings for Warsaw grouper in the South Atlantic (69 FR 59690). Although commercial harvest is banned and possession in federal waters is prohibited, SFW rates fishing mortality for Warsaw grouper as "high concern" because this species is listed as "critically endangered" by IUCN, fishing mortality (as a result of bycatch) is unknown and it is unknown if management to curtail overfishing is effective.

89 89 Factor 2.4 Discard Rate % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 24%. This ratio is based on observer count data from 59 vertical line snapper-grouper fishery trips over 316 days covering the region extending from southern North Carolina to northern Florida (Helies and Jamison 2013). United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 0.75 > 100% The discards+bait/landings ratio cannot be calculated for the South Atlantic longline snapper-grouper fishery due to the low number of fishing vessels reporting (NMFS 2011). Given the similarities in gear and catch between this region and the Gulf of Mexico longline reef fishery, we use the ratio calculated for the Gulf of Mexico (111%) as a substitute. YELLOWEDGE GROUPER- See discussion in Criterion 1 YELLOWTAIL SNAPPER Factor 2.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 1.00 High Inherent Vulnerability = 65 (Froese and Pauly 2000)(Cheung et al. 2005)

90 90 Factor 2.2 Abundance United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 5.00 Very Low Yellowtail snapper in the South Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico is not overfished (B/B MSY = 2.70)(NMFS 2013). Factor 2.3 Fishing Mortality United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline 5.00 Very Low Assessed as one population by the state of Florida through the SEDAR stock assessment process, yellowtail snapper in the South Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico is not experiencing overfishing, with an F/F MSY of 0.76 (FWC 2012). According to the 2011 national bycatch report (based on commercial logbook data from ), an estimated 129, yellowtail snapper were caught as bycatch in the South Atlantic snapper-grouper handline fishery, and 280, in the Gulf of Mexico reef fish handline fishery (NMFS 2011).

91 91 Factor 2.4 Discard Rate United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 40%. This ratio is based on observer count data covering 7,391 handline sets from August 2006 to November 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico (Scott-Denton et al. 2011) % 40% The bait+discards/landings ratio is 24%. This ratio is based on observer count data from 59 vertical line snapper-grouper fishery trips over 316 days, covering the region extending from southern North Carolina to northern Florida (Helies and Jamison 2013).

92 92 Criterion 3: Management effectiveness Management is separated into management of retained species (harvest strategy) and management of non-retained species (bycatch strategy). The final score for this criterion is the geometric mean of the two scores. The Criterion 3 rating is determined as follows: Score>3.2 = Green or Low Score>2.2 and <=3.2 = Yellow or Score<=2.2 or either the Harvest Strategy (Factor 3.1) or Bycatch Management Strategy (Factor 3.2) is Very High = Red or High Rating is Critical if either or both of Harvest Strategy (Factor 3.1) and Bycatch Management Strategy (Factor 3.2) ratings are Critical Criterion 3 Summary Region / Method United States GULF OF MEXICO Handline United States GULF OF MEXICO Longline, Bottom United States Gulf of Mexico Handline United States Gulf of Mexico Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic Handline United States South Atlantic Longline, Bottom United States South Atlantic Handline Management of Retained Species Management of Non-Retained Species Overall Recommendation Yellow(3.000) Yellow(3.000) Yellow(3.000) Yellow(3.000) Yellow(2.449) Yellow(2.449) Yellow(2.449)

93 93 Factor 3.1: Harvest Strategy Scoring Guidelines Seven subfactors are evaluated: Management Strategy, Recovery of Species of, Scientific Research/Monitoring, Following of Scientific Advice, Enforcement of Regulations, Management Track Record, and Inclusion of Stakeholders. Each is rated as ineffective, moderately effective, or highly effective. 5 (Very Low ) Rated as highly effective for all seven subfactors considered. 4 (Low ) Management Strategy and Recovery of Species of rated highly effective and all other subfactors rated at least moderately effective. 3 ( ) All subfactors rated at least moderately effective. 2 (High ) At minimum, meets standards for moderately effective for Management Strategy and Recovery of Species of, but at least one other subfactor rated ineffective. 1 (Very High ) Management exists, but Management Strategy and/or Recovery of Species of rated ineffective. 0 (Critical) No management exists when there is a clear need for management (i.e., fishery catches threatened, endangered, or high concern species), OR there is a high level of Illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing occurring. Factor 3.1 Summary Factor 3.1: Management of fishing impacts on retained species Region / Method Strategy Recovery Research Advice Enforce Track Inclusion United States GULF OF ly ly ly Highly ly ly Highly MEXICO Handline Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective United States GULF OF ly ly ly Highly ly ly Highly MEXICO Longline, Bottom Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective United States Gulf of ly ly ly Highly ly ly Highly Mexico Handline Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective United States Gulf of ly ly ly Highly ly ly Highly Mexico Longline, Bottom Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective United States South ly ly ly Highly ly ly Highly Atlantic Handline Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective United States South ly ly ly Highly ly ly Highly Atlantic Longline, Bottom Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective United States South ly ly ly Highly ly ly Highly Atlantic Handline Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective

94 94 Factor 3.1 Assessment Subfactor Management Strategy and Implementation Considerations: What type of management measures are in place? Are there appropriate management goals, and is there evidence that management goals are being met? To achieve a highly effective rating, there must be appropriate management goals, and evidence that the measures in place have been successful at maintaining/rebuilding species. United States, Longline, Bottom United States Gulf of Mexico, Handline United States Gulf of Mexico, Longline, Bottom 2.00 ly Effective The GMFMC has conducted scientifically based stock assessments and continually amended the Reef Fish FMP (instituted in 1984) to end overfishing of the most commercially important species, namely the shallow water groupers: gag (which has been overfished on and off since the 1970s and maycurrently be overfished) and red grouper (which has rebuilt and is no longer overfished or experiencing overfishing). Management measures instituted by amendments have included rebuilding programs, annual catch limits allocated between commercial and recreational fisheries, gear restrictions, minimum size limits on shallow water grouper species (for example, red grouper's minimum size limit is set at 20 inches, the L 50 of maturity). Additional measures include area closures to protect spawning sites and, most recently, an IFQ system with a strict reporting program. There are no mimimum size limits for deep water grouper species due to the high likelihood of lethal barotrauma during capture (see Table 5). A concise summary of each amendment made to the FMP is given in a 2012 GMFMC document (GMFMC 2012a). Protected areas are part of the GMFMC's management strategy (see Figure 15 for a map of marine protected areas (MPAs) in the Gulf). The GMFMC designated essential fish habitat (EFH) in 2005, including seven Habitat Areas of Particular (HAPC), where either all fishing is prohibited (Tortugas, north and south), or certain gears, including longlines, are prohibited (McGrail Bank, Pulley Ridge, Stetson Bank, West and East Flower Garden Banks) (70 FR 76216). Problematic for rebuilding and maintaining grouper stocks is the infrequency of quantitative stock assessments, namely for the deep water groupers, plus the lack of information on regulatory discards of these species (and other bycatch) and the lack of accountability in the recreational fishery. The infrequent stock assessment of the deep water groupers is due partly to a lack of sufficient data, likely caused by low population size (pers. comm. R. Ellis). Due to these challenges, this criterion is scored as moderately effective.

95 95 Rationale Table 5: Commercial and recreational minimum size limits for grouper species in the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic (as of 10/16/2013) Figure 15: Protected Areas in the Gulf of Mexico

96 96 United States South Atlantic, Longline, Bottom 2.00 ly Effective The SAFMC has conducted scientifically based stock assessments and continually amended the Snapper- Grouper FMP (instituted in 1983) to end overfishing of grouper species (gag, red, black, snowy, Warsaw have all experienced overfishing). Management measures instituted by amendments have included rebuilding plans, annual catch limits (allocated between the commercial and recreational fisheries), minimum size limits (see Table 5 above), gear restrictions, seasonal closures to protect spawning aggregations, limits on the number of available commercial fishing permits and MPAs that are closed to or restrict fishing (see Figures 16 and 17 for maps of protected areas in this region). Red and snowy are overfished and currently in rebuilding plans, though Warsaw is experiencing overfishing and does not have a rebuilding plan. There is a concise summary of each amendment made to the FMP on the SAFMC website. (SAFMC 2013c) Currently (via Amendment 17 to the Snapper-Grouper FMP), the SAFMC is reevaluating the eight deep water MPAs designated in 2009 (via Amendment 14 to the Snapper-Grouper FMP) to protect deep water grouper and snapper. This process is investigating the addition of new MPAs and/or modifying the current set in order to decrease bycatch and end overfishing of Warsaw grouper and speckled hind both currently managed under a harvest prohibition as the current set has been criticised for lack of effectiveness protecting these species (Farmer & Karnauskas 2013). Warsaw grouper and speckled hind co-occur with other deep water groupers covered in this report (namely snowy and yellowedge) (Farmer et al. 2011), thus, it is possible that the current set of MPAs may not be well designed to protect these species either. Currently, the Oculina Bank Habitat of Particular (HAPC) and experimental closed area protects grouper habitat by restricting longline gear (and other bottom damaging gears) throughout the 300 mi 2 HAPC and by restricting all fishing in the 92 mi 2 closed area. (SAFMC 2013c) Coral HAPC areas are currently being expanded via Coral Amendment 8. Problematic for rebuilding and maintaining grouper stocks is the infrequency of quantitative stock assessments, the lack of information on regulatory discards of these species (and other bycatch) because observer coverage is lacking, and the lack of accountability in the recreational fishery. Due to these challenges, this criterion is scored as moderately effective.

97 97 Rationale Figure 16: Map of MPAs off the East Coast of Florida (under the jurisdiction of the SAFMC).

98 Figure 17: Map of MPAs off North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia (under the jurisdiction of the SAFMC). 98