Protected Resources Presentation to PSMFC

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Protected Resources Presentation to PSMFC"

Pierce Copeland
5 years ago
Views:

1 Protected Resources Presentation to PSMFC Jim Lecky Director, NMFS Office of Protected Resources September 8, 2010

2 NOAA Fisheries Service Office of Protected Resources Structure and Function 2

3 Agency Responsibilities ESA Provide a program for the conservation of threatened and endangered species Provide a means whereby the ecosystems upon which endangered and threatened species depend may be conserved 3

4 Tools for Conservation Listing Enforce Prohibition on Take Interagency Consultation Manage exemptions Implement Regulations Recovery Plans/Take Reduction Plans State cooperation 4

5 Standard Petition and 90 Day Finding Reasonable person test Information contained in the petition or easily accessible in files Petitioners generally developing thorough petitions 5

6 Status Review Lead Region/Center Risk Assessment Expert Panel (BRT) Defines risk of extinction Relates risk to factors for listing Risk Management (PECE) Recommendation 6

7 ESA Listing / Delisting Petition (or self-initiated) 90-day finding Status review and peer review 12-month finding/proposed rule Public comment and peer review Final rule Critical habitat designation 4(d) if warranted 7

8 Listing / delisting Listing If warranted Notice and comment rule making Delisting Recovered New information Extinct 8

9 Prioritization of Resources Mandates Petition Management Interagency Consultation Court Orders Affect our ability to prioritize 9

10 Prioritization of Resources Delegations Regional Leads HQ Leads Considerations Availability of Resources Magnitude of Risk/Effect Scope of Project Acceptability of delay 10

11 Status Reviews Underway Ring Seals Bearded Seals Hawaii False Killer Whale Corals Bumphead Parrot Fish Humpback whale Blue Fin Tuna (West Atlantic) 11

12 Recent Listings Cook Inlet Beluga whale E Black Abalone E Eulachon Southern DPS T Rock Fish (Puget Sound Georgia Basin DPS ) Boccacio E Canary T Yellow eye T Loggerhead Turtles (9 DPSs) P 12

13 Critical Habitat Cook Inlet Beluga Whale Leatherback Turtle 13

14 Critical Habitat Hawaiian Monk seal Eulachon Rock Fish 14

15 Interagency Challenges Water Fisheries Pesticides 15

16 Climate Change 16

17 Climate Change Do we have to consult on green house emissions? Bush rule Obama review FWS Polar Bear Rule 17

18 NMFS workshops Review case studies Identify best practices A word on Climate Change Adaptation Collaboration with Climate office Modeling future conditions Characterize resiliency 18

commensurate with sound policies of resource management (OSP)

19 MMPA Agency Responsibilities [marine mammals] should be encouraged to develop to the greatest extent feasible commensurate with sound policies of resource management (OSP) The primary objective to maintain the health and stability of the marine ecosystem 19

20 Tools for Conservation Enforce Moratorium on Take Trade restrictions Manage PBR/TRT Permits and Authorization Public Display Health and Stranding Response 20

21 Hot Topics Ocean Noise Energy False Killer Whale TRT 21

22 THE END Thank you 22

23 Protected Resources Program FY2010 Enacted ($ 283.7M) Marine Mammals ($52.0M; 17.5%) Sea Turtles ($14.6M; 5.1%) Atlantic Salmon ($8.5M; 3.0%) Other ESA Species ($8.3M; 3.0%) Research and Management: ($39.8M; 14.0% Species Recovery Grants ($15.7M; 5.5% ) Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund ($79.9M; 28.1%) Pacific Salmon ($64.9M; 22.9%) 23

24 24

25 Fisheries Observers Authority MSFCMA Federal Fisheries MMPA All Fisheries 118 ESA 7 Federal Fisheries 10 State Fisheres 25

26 Fisheries Observers Statistics (2008): 41 fisheries observed Over 64,000 days at sea 800 observers deployed Coverage < 1% to 100% 26

27 Data Collected Multi-purpose programs Species composition Biological sampling Age and length Fishing effort, fishing gear Tag recapture information Habitat and environmental conditions 27

Take Reduction Teams Development of mitigation

28 Data Uses Assessing impact of incidental take Monitoring levels on incidental take Informing Take Reduction Teams Development of mitigation measures Assessing effectiveness of mitigation measures 28

29 Data Reliability Reliability Observers are well trained Data reviewed and quality controlled Limitations Small sample sizes Low coverage = extrapolation Monitors could increase coverage 29

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Lunch & Learn March 15, 2016 Joshua Kindred, AOGA Environmental Counsel 1 ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT What is it? How does it work? Why should you care? 2 THE PITBULL OF ENVIRONMENTAL