Impact of an Old Technology on Profitable Dairying in the 21 st Century

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Impact of an Old Technology on Profitable Dairying in the 21 st Century"

Transcription

1 Impact of an Old Technology on Profitable Dairying in the 21 st Century Bradley J. Heins University of Minnesota, St. Paul INTRODUCTION Crossbreeding is an old technology; however, when used in today s dairy systems, crossbreeding can produce profitable results for dairy producers. Interest in crossbreeding of dairy cattle has become a topic of great interest in the last five years and has developed in response to concerns dairy producers have about fertility, calving difficulty, and stillbirths in today s genetically improved Holstein cows. The commercial pig, beef cattle, and sheep production have relied on crossbreeding to improve mortality, fertility, growth, and disease resistance for 50 years! There have been many research studies documenting the role of crossbreeding in the dairy industry, but many are quite old and dated. Old research indicated heterosis is greatest for traits related to mortality, fertility, health, and survival. The first scientific trials using crossbred dairy cattle date back as early as 1906 in Denmark and used the Jersey and Danish Red breeds. In the 1930s and 40s, experiments with dairy cattle were conducted to determine heterosis for milk and fat production resulting from crossbreeding (Touchberry, 1992). Crossbreeding has not been studied in research herds in the U.S. for many years. Earlier studies with experimental herds indicated that crossbreds were at least as profitable as pure Holsteins at the University of Illinois (Touchberry, 1992) and Agriculture Canada (McAllister et al., 1994). A crossbreeding project involving the Holstein and Guernsey breeds was conducted at the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station from 1949 to 1969 (Touchberry, 1992). Heterosis for first-lactation milk and fat production was 4.3% and 4.1%, respectively; however, heterosis was considerably higher (12.0% for milk, 12.8% for fat) in second lactation. Heterosis for days open was 9.4%. When evaluating total performance of purebreds and crossbreds, Touchberry (1992) combined measures of survival, growth, production, and reproduction into an index to calculate the total income produced per cow per lactation and reported heterosis of 14.9% for total income produced per lactation. A Canadian study was conducted in five research herds during the 1970s and 1980s and heterosis of 16.5% was observed for lifetime milk production and 20% and 17.2% for lifetime fat and protein production, respectively. In the same crossbreeding study at Agriculture Canada, McAllister et al., (1994) reported greater than 20% heterosis for lifetime performance in crossbreds of Holstein and Ayrshire. This paper will report current results from studies of crossbreeding Holsteins with US Jersey and Brown Swiss sires, as well as sires from European dairy breeds. A recent crossbreeding study from New Zealand will also be discussed. THE CALIFORNIA EXPERIENCE The decline in fertility and survival of pure Holsteins led the managers of seven large dairies in California to mate Holstein heifers and cows with imported semen of the Normande and Montbeliarde breeds from France, as well as the Swedish Red (SRB) and Norwegian Red (NRF) breeds. Some cows continued to be bred to Holstein A.I. bulls for a period of time in these dairies. The Swedish Red and Norwegian Red breeds share similar ancestry and exchange sires of sons; therefore, the breeds were collectively regarded as Scandinavian Red for this study. 7

2 Production Crossbreds and pure Holsteins that calved for the first time from June 1, 2002 to January 31, 2005 were studied for production. A total of 1,447 cows calved for the first time during this period, and these cows were followed throughout their lifetimes to gauge production. Actual production (milk, fat, and protein) for 305-day lactations was calculated with the Best Prediction technique used by USDA for national genetic evaluations in the USA. Results for 305-day actual production during first lactation are in Table 1. Fat (lb) plus protein (lb) was used to gauge the overall production of the pure Holsteins versus crossbreds. The Scandinavian Red- Holstein crossbreds (-3%), Montbeliarde-Holstein crossbreds (-5%) and the Normande-Holstein crossbreds (-9%) were all significantly lower (statistically speaking) than the pure Holsteins for fat (lb) plus protein (lb). These results for first lactation production are slightly different than those reported earlier from this study (Heins et. al, 2006c), because all cows now had the opportunity to complete their 305-day lactations. Table 1. First lactation production (actual 305-day with 2X milking). Holstein Normande- Holstein Montbeliarde- Holstein Scandinavian Red-Holstein of cows Milk (lb) 21,801 18,926 ** 20,305 ** 20,499 ** Fat (lb) ** 743 ** 756 Protein (lb) ** 645 ** 655 ** Fat (lb) + Protein (lb) ** 1388 ** 1411 * % of Holstein -9% -5% -3% * Statistically significant difference from pure Holsteins (p<.05). ** Statistically significant difference from pure Holsteins (p<.01). Table 2 has results for production for second lactation. Production of the pure Holsteins climbed substantially from first to second lactation. The three crossbred groups also greatly increased in production from first to second lactation, but not at quite the rate of the pure Holsteins. Consequently, the pure Holsteins continued to have a statistically significant advantage for fat (lb) plus protein (lb) production, and the difference from pure Holsteins increased from 9% to 12% for the Normande-Holstein crossbreds, from 5% to 7% for the Montbeliarde-Holstein crossbreds, and from 3% to 6% for the Scandinavian Red-Holstein crossbreds. Table 2. Second lactation production (actual 305-day with 2X milking). Holstein Normande- Holstein Montbeliarde- Holstein Scandinavian Red-Holstein of cows Milk (lb) 26,194 21,863 ** 23,547 ** 23,683 ** Fat (lb) ** 885 ** 894 ** Protein (lb) ** 752 ** 762 ** Fat (lb) + Protein (lb) ** 1637 ** 1656 ** % of Holstein -12% -7% -6% ** Statistically significant difference from pure Holsteins (p<.01). 8

3 Average production of Swedish Red cows versus Swedish Holsteins in Sweden suggests that the production of Swedish Red-Holstein crossbreds should be very near the production of pure Holsteins if heterosis of 5% for production traits is assumed. Perhaps, less than 5% heterosis for production was realized is this study, because the Swedish Red and Holstein breeds share distant ancestry and because they were developed in the same general region of northern Europe. On the other hand, the Montbeliarde and Holstein breeds share little ancestry, even distantly; therefore, Montbeliarde-Holstein crossbreds might express a higher average level of heterosis than crosses strictly among dairy breeds of the plains or islands of northern Europe, which include Holstein Calving Difficulty and Stillbirths Results for calving ease and stillbirths are the same as previously reported (Heins et. al, 2006a). Calving difficulty was measured on a 1 to 5 scale, with 1 representing a quick and easy birth without assistance and 5 representing an extremely difficult birth that required a mechanical puller. Scores of 1 to 3 were combined and regarded as no calving difficulty, and scores of 4 and 5 were combined and represented calving difficulty. Stillbirths were recorded as alive or dead within 24 hours of birth. Calving difficulty and stillbirth are traits of both the sire and the dam. Table 3 provides the number of births, calving difficulty rate, and stillbirth rate by breed of sire for firstcalf pure Holstein dams. Inadequate numbers prevented the evaluation of Normande sires; however, some Brown Swiss semen was used by these dairies. Scandinavian Red sires had both significantly less calving difficulty and significantly less stillbirth than Holstein sires when dams of calves were first-calf pure Holsteins. Table 3. Calving difficulty and stillbirths for breed of sire for first-calf pure Holstein dams. Breed of sire of births Calving difficulty Stillbirth (%) Holstein Montbeliarde Brown Swiss ** 11.6 Scandinavian Red ** 7.7 ** ** Significant difference from Holstein sires (p<.01). To estimate differences in breed group of dam for calving difficulty and stillbirths, breeds of sire were limited to Brown Swiss, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red, because numbers of births by sires of other breeds were small and were not well distributed across breed group of dam. Table 4 has number of births, calving difficulty rate, and stillbirth rate for 1,572 first births of cows. All crossbred cow groups had significantly less calving difficulty than pure Holsteins (17.7%) at first calving. Stillbirth rates tended to follow the averages for calving difficulty respective to breed group of dam, and Montbeliarde-Holstein dams (6.2%) and Scandinavian Red-Holstein dams (5.1%) had significantly lower stillbirth rates than pure Holstein dams (14.0%). 9

4 Survival Table 4. Calving difficulty and stillbirths for breed group of dam at first calving. Breed of dam of births Calving difficulty Stillbirth (%) Holstein Normande-Holstein * 9.9 Montebeliarde-Holstein ** 6.2 ** Scandinavian Red-Holstein ** 5.1 ** * Significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.05). ** Significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.01). First-lactation cows that calved from June 2002 to May 2005 in six of the seven California dairies were compared for survival to 30 days, 150 days, and 305 days post-calving. Because one of the dairies participated in the whole-herd buy-out program (heifers were retained to continue dairying), cows from that dairy were removed from the analysis of survival. Table 5 has the survival rates for 724 pure Holsteins and 1,792 crossbreds. Pure Holsteins left these dairies sooner than all crossbreds groups, with 86% of pure Holsteins surviving 305 days post-calving compared to 93% to 96% of crossbreds. To put this in context, pure Holsteins were 3.5 times more likely to leave these dairies before 305 days after first calving than the Montbeliarde-Holstein crossbreds. Table 5. Survival rates during first lactation. Breed of cows 30 days 150 days 305 days (%) Holstein Normande-Holstein * 94 ** Montbeliarde-Holstein * 96 ** Scandinavian Red-Holstein ** * Statistically significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.05). ** Significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.01). Cows that had an opportunity to calve a second time (Table 6) were compared for three thresholds for calving interval by breed group within 14 months of first calving, within 17 months of first calving, and within 20 months of first calving. All crossbred groups had significantly higher percentages of cows calving a second time within the fixed windows of opportunity than the pure Holsteins. From 16% to 20% more crossbred cows calved a second time within 14 months of first calving compared to pure Holsteins. When cows were provided more time to calve a second time (20 months which is an ideal 12-month calving interval plus an additional 8 months), the difference of the crossbred groups from the pure Holsteins narrowed (10% to 16%); yet, the differences remained substantial and highly significant statistically. 10

5 Table 6. Percentage of cows that calved a second time after first calving within fixed windows of opportunity. Breed of cows 14 months 17 months 20 months (%) Holstein Normande-Holstein ** 76 ** 79 ** Montbeliarde-Holstein ** 78 ** 83 ** Scandinavian Red-Holstein ** 73 ** 77 ** ** Statistically significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.01). Fertility Fertility of the pure Holsteins and crossbreds was measured as actual days open for cows that had a subsequent calving or had pregnancy status confirmed by a veterinarian. To be included in the analysis, cows were required to have at least 250 days in milk, which meant the pure Holsteins had an advantage because they were a more highly-selected group compared to the crossbreds a smaller percentage of pure Holsteins than crossbreds survived to 250 days postpartum. Cows with more than 250 days open had days open set to 250. The 677 pure Holsteins in these dairies had average days open of 156 days (Table 7) during first lactation, and all of the crossbred groups had significantly fewer days open than the pure Holsteins. The difference from the pure Holsteins ranged from 14 days for the 529 Scandinavian Red-Holstein crossbreds to 23 days for the 421 Normande-Holstein crossbreds. These results agree with most other recent research on fertility of pure Holsteins versus F1 crossbreds involving Holstein, which have typically reported two to three weeks fewer days open of crossbreds versus pure Holsteins. Table 7. Days open during first lactation with a maximum of 250 days. Breed of cows of sires Days open Holstein Normande-Holstein ** Montbeliarde-Holstein ** Scandinavian Red-Holstein ** ** Statistically significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.01) 3-breed versus 2-breed crossbreds All first generation (F1) crossbreds in the seven California dairies are bred to bulls from a third breed; however, these dairies were no longer calving first-lactation pure Holsteins by the time the 3-breed crossbreds began to calve. Therefore, the comparison of 3-breed crossbreds versus contemporary pure Holsteins is not possible in these dairies. On the other hand, comparison of 2-breed and 3-breed crossbreds that calved during the same 4-month herd-year-seasons is possible. Table 8 has first lactation production for the 2-breed versus 3-breed crossbreds. The production of 2- breed and 3-breed crossbreds was very similar, and differences were not statistically significant. A reduced Holstein content might be expected to lower the production capability of 3-breed crossbreds (25% Holstein) versus 2-breed crossbreds (50% Holstein). However, preliminary results comparing 2-11

6 breed and 3-breed crossbreds in these seven dairies suggest the production of 3-breed crossbreds is extremely similar to the production of 2-breed crossbreds. Table 8. Actual 305-day production during first lactation of 3-breed and 2-breed crossbreds. Type of crossbred of cows of sires Milk Fat Protein Fat plus protein (lb) breed crossbreds , breed crossbreds , No differences were statistically significant. CROSSBREEDING WITH BROWN SWISS Researchers at Penn State compared Holstein, Brown Swiss, and crosses of Holstein with Brown Swiss for milk, fat, and protein production, somatic cell score, and days open. This study also estimated the effects of heterosis for these traits. Data from this study was collected from 19 herds that were using Dairy Comp 305 or PCDART as management software programs. The results from this study will be published in more detail in the Journal of Dairy Science in 2007 (Dechow et al, 2007). The total number of cows, average milk, fat and protein production, mature equivalent (ME) for milk, fat, and protein production, days open, and somatic cell score and heterosis for Holstein (HO), Brown Swiss (BS), and Brown Swiss-Holstein crossbreds (SH) across all lactation groups are in Table 9. Sires and maternal grandsires of cows were required to have NAAB-assigned sire codes. Pure Holsteins were not different from Brown Swiss-Holstein crossbreds for daily milk production, mature equivalent milk and fat production, and somatic cell score. The crossbreds had higher daily fat and protein production, as well as higher mature equivalent protein production. For fertility, the Brown Swiss-Holstein crossbreds had 11 fewer days open than pure Holsteins. Across lactations, heterosis estimates ranged from 6.7% to 10.4% for daily production traits. For mature equivalent production, heterosis was lower and ranged from 5.6% to 8.5%. For days open, heterosis was 7.3% and was lower than reported in earlier studies of Brown Swiss and Holstein crossbreds (Brandt et. al, 1974; McDowell and McDaniel, 1968) which found heterosis estimates for days open that ranged from 11.6% to 31%. Table 9. Total number of cows, daily and ME production, days open, and heterosis across lactation groups. N Milk (lb) Fat (lb) Protein (lb) MEM (lb) MEF (lb) MEP (lb) Days Open SCS HO , BS * 2.5 * 2.1 * 21,695 * 833 * 699 * SH * 2.3 * 24, * 145 * 2.57 HET 6.7% 10.4% 7.1% 5.6% 7.2% 8.5% 7.3% 7.8% * Statistically significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.05). Table modified from Dechow et. al (2007) 12

7 Table 10 has results and heterosis estimates for daily fat plus protein production and days open for Holstein, Brown Swiss, and Brown Swiss-Holstein crossbreds for first, second, and third lactation. Table 10. First, second, and third lactation results for combined daily fat plus protein production, and days open. Lactation number Fat + Protein (lb) HO BS 4.2 * 4.7 * 4.9 SH * Heterosis 4.4% 5.5% 13.4% Days Open HO BS SH 113 * Heterosis 15.0% 4.9% 1.4% * Statistically significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.05). Table modified from Dechow et. al (2007) The Brown Swiss-Holstein crossbreds were at the same level of fat plus protein production in first and second lactation; however, the Brown Swiss-Holstein crossbreds were higher in third lactation. Heterosis estimates for fat plus protein production were greater in third lactation (13.4%) versus first and second lactation (4.4% and 5.5%), respectively. The pure Holsteins in this study average days open of 130 days during first lactation and the Brown Swiss-Holstein crossbreds had 17 fewer days open than the pure Holsteins. The Brown Swiss-Holstein crossbreds had numerically fewer days open in second (12 days) and third lactation (6 days), respectively. Heterosis estimates for days open were significantly higher for first lactation (15%) compared to second and third lactations. The benefits of crossbreeding with Brown Swiss could be influenced by difficult calf management practices (Dechow et. al, 2007). The common complaint by dairy producers with Brown Swiss calves is their inability to drink from buckets. In spite of this, a crossbreeding system with Brown Swiss does have advantages in calving difficulty and stillbirths. In the California study, Brown Swiss-sired calves born from first-calf Holstein heifers had significantly less calving difficulty and numerically lower stillbirth rates than Holstein-sired calves (Heins et al, 2006a). The results from this Penn State study look promising for the Brown Swiss breed; however, further research should be done to determine if Brown Swiss is a feasible breed for crossbreeding systems. CROSSBREEDING OUTSIDE OF NORTH AMERICA Crossbreeding of Holstein and Jersey is common in New Zealand, where crossbreds comprise nearly one quarter of milk-recorded cows (Harris, 2000). Crossbreeding has grown substantially in popularity, and numerous studies have been performed to assess the benefits of crossbreeding in pastoral production systems. Ahlborn-Breier and Hohenboken (1991) analyzed New Zealand field data of Holstein, Jersey and various crosses for additive and nonadditive genetic effects for milk production, fat production, and fat percentage. Heterosis of 6.1% for milk production and 7.2% for fat production of crossbreds of Holstein and Jersey compared to the pure breeds was observed. 13

8 New research from New Zealand (Bryant et al., 2007) reports heterosis for milk, fat, and protein production. Production records from over 180,000 first-calf heifers were used in this analysis. The objective of this study was to determine if environmental conditions in New Zealand influenced the expression of heterosis. Figure 1 has heterosis levels for breed groups for milk, fat, and protein production by varying levels of fat plus protein production. Heterosis was highest for Holstein-New Zealand Jersey crossbreds for milk, fat, and protein production and ranged from 5.0% to 9.5%. The study also reports the largest effects of heterosis occur in herds with intermediate production levels. The study concluded that crossbreds of Jersey and Holstein had higher fat and protein production that pure Holsteins due to the expression of heterosis. Figure 1. Heterosis from Holstein-New Zealand Jersey crossbreds (blue ), New Zealand Jersey-New Zealand Holstein crossbreds (red ), and Holstein-New Zealand Holstein (green ) for milk, fat, and protein production in relation to production level of fat plus protein. Figures reproduced from Bryant et. al (2007) Crossbreeding with Jersey sires NEW RESEARCH AT UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Crossbreeding was initiated in 2000 with two research herds of Holsteins. The herds were the St. Paul campus herd and the herd at the West Central Research and Outreach Center at Morris. The cows at St. Paul are housed in a tie-stall barn and the herd at Morris is managed as a low input grazing system. From 2000 to 2002, one-half of pure Holsteins were bred to Holstein AI sires and one-half to Jersey AI sires. In 2003, the mating system was slightly changed. One-third of pure Holsteins were continued to be bred to Holstein sires and ⅔ were bred to Montbeliarde sires. The F 1 Jersey-Holstein crossbreds were bred to Montbeliarde sires as the third breed in the crossbreeding rotation. Jersey-Holstein crossbreds and pure Holsteins that calved for the first time from September, 2003 to May, 2005 were studied for production. A total of 149 cows calved for the first time and had production records during this period were compared for milk, fat, protein, fat plus protein production, and somatic cell score. Results for 305-day actual production for Jersey-Holstein crossbreds versus pure Holsteins during first lactation are in Table 11. Pure Holsteins produced 1230 more pounds of milk than the Jersey-Holstein crossbreds. There was no difference in fat production; however, the pure Holstein had more protein pounds than the Jersey-Holstein crossbreds. Fat (lb) plus protein (lb) was used to gauge the overall 14

9 production of the pure Holsteins versus crossbreds. The Jersey-Holstein crossbreds (-3%), were significantly lower than the pure Holsteins for fat (lb) plus protein (lb). There was no significant difference in somatic cell score, but the Jersey-Holstein crossbred had numerically higher somatic cell scores. Table 11. First lactation production (actual 305-day with 2X milking) of pure Holsteins versus Jersey-Holstein crossbreds. Holstein Jersey-Holstein Difference of cows Milk (lb) 16,986 15, ** Fat (lb) Protein (lb) ** Fat (lb) + Protein (lb) * Somatic cell score * Statistically significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.05). ** Statistically significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.01). Fertility of the pure Holsteins and Jersey-Holstein crossbreds was measured as first service conception rate and actual days open for cows that had a subsequent calving or had pregnancy status confirmed by a veterinarian. Only 145 cows were compared for fertility because two cows from each breed group were culled before they had an opportunity to be bred. First service conception rates between the pure Holsteins (41%) and Jersey-Holstein crossbreds (39%) were not different. The 71 pure Holsteins had average days open of 150 days (Table 12) during first lactation, and the Jersey-Holstein crossbreds had significantly fewer days open than the pure Holsteins. The difference from the pure Holsteins was 23 days. These results agree with most other recent research on fertility of pure Holsteins versus F1 crossbreds involving Holstein (Heins et al, 2006b), which have typically reported two to three weeks fewer days open of crossbreds versus pure Holsteins. Table 12. First service conception rate and days open during first lactation. Breed of cows First Service Conception Rate of cows Days Open Holstein 71 41% Jersey-Holstein 74 39% ** ** Statistically significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.01). Pure Holsteins and Jersey-Holstein crossbreds were also compared for percent pregnant by 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, and 250 days post calving (Table 13). There were no differences between breed groups for percent pregnant by 90 and 120 days; however, more Jersey/Holstein cows were pregnant by 150, 180, and 210 days. By 250 days postpartum, 13% more crossbreds were pregnant than pure Holsteins. Body measurements were also recorded on 145 first-calf heifers. Body weights, hip heights, and heart girths were recorded within 24 hours post-calving. Thurl with, foot angle and length, body condition score, udder clearance and front teat placement were measured within the first 150 days of lactation. Udder clearance was measured from the floor to the bottom on the udder and front teat placement was the distance between the front teats. Table 14 has results of body measurements of pure Holsteins compared to Jersey-Holstein crossbreds. 15

10 Table 13. Percentage of cows that were confirmed pregnant after first calving within fixed windows of time. Breed group of cows 90 days 120 days 150 days 180 days 210 days 250 days % Holstein Jersey-Holstein * 77* 79* 81 * Statistically significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.05). Table 14. Body and udder measurements for first-calf heifers. Holstein Jersey-Holstein Difference of cows Body weight (lb) ** Hip Height (in) ** Heart Girth (in) ** Thurl Width (in) ** Body Condition Score * Foot Angle * Foot Length (in) Udder Clearance (in) ** Front Teat Placement (in) ** * Statistically significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.05). ** Statistically significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.01). The pure Holsteins weighed 132 pounds more than Jersey-Holstein crossbreds immediately after calving. The Holsteins were also taller at the hips, had larger heart girths, and had more width between the thurls. The Jersey-Holstein crossbreds had significantly higher body condition scores, which may indicate why they became pregnant faster than the pure Holsteins. The crossbreds had lower foot angles, but there was no statistical difference in foot length between breed groups. For udder traits, the Jersey-Holstein crossbreds had 2.7 inches less in udder clearance, which indicates that they had more udder depth. The Jersey-Holstein crossbreds also had more distance (+0.7) between the front teats. Many dairy producers in the U.S. are breeding their Holstein virgin heifers to Jersey sires to capitalize on the reduction in calving difficulty and stillbirths. When using Jersey sires, calving difficulty almost disappears. The F1 Jersey-Holstein crossbreds are appreciated; however, in future generations the variation in cows size from the use of Jersey sires might not be very welcome. The current study indicates that the Jersey-Holstein crossbreds are 132 lbs. smaller and have less udder clearance than pure Holsteins; however, the Jersey-Holstein crossbreds had similar fat production to pure Holsteins, had 23 days fewer days open, and were confirmed pregnant quicker than pure Holsteins. Crossbreeding with Montbeliarde sires During the fall of 2005 (October to December), 15 Montbeliarde crossbreds and 12 pure Holstein calved for the first time in the campus herd in St. Paul of the University of Minnesota. Of the original 27 cows, 13 Montbeliarde crossbreds and 10 pure Holsteins have begun their second lactations from September 16

11 2006 to January One pure Holstein died and one Montbeliarde-Holstein crossbred was culled for reproduction in first lactation. One pure Holstein and one Montbeliarde-Holstein crossbred are currently dry and will calve again in May Twenty-three Montbeliarde crossbreds and 14 pure Holsteins calved for the first time during the fall of Of the 24 Montbeliarde crossbreds, 12 are F 1 crosses out of pure Holstein dams, and the other 11 are 3-breed crosses out of Jersey-Holstein crossbred dams. All pure Holsteins and all of the Montbeliarde/ (Jersey-Holstein) crossbreds are bred to Holstein A.I. sires. Also, all of the Montbeliarde- Holstein crossbreds are bred to Jersey A.I. sires Results for 305-day actual production during first lactation are in Table 15. The Montbeliarde-Holstein crossbreds had significantly lower milk, fat, and protein production than pure Holsteins. The Montbeliarde/(Jersey-Holstein) crossbreds were not different from pure Holsteins for production. The Montbeliarde-Holstein crossbreds (-6%) were significantly lower than the pure Holsteins for fat (lb) plus protein (lb); however, the differences were small for the Montbeliarde/(Jersey-Holstein) crossbreds (-2%) compared to the pure Holsteins. Table 15. First lactation production (actual 305-day with 2X milking). Holstein Montbeliarde-Holstein Montbeliarde/ (Jersey-Holstein) of cows Milk (lb) 20,871 19,341 ** 20,020 Fat (lb) * 722 Protein (lb) ** 633 Fat (lb) + Protein (lb) * 1355 % of Holstein -6% -2% * Statistically significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.05). ** Statistically significant difference of crossbreds from pure Holsteins (p<.01). Table 16 has results for production for second lactation. Not all cows in the original data file (Table 15) had an opportunity to calve a second time; consequently, these results are somewhat preliminary. Production of the pure Holsteins and crossbred groups greatly increased from first to second lactation. The difference from pure Holsteins decreased from 6% to 1% for the Montbeliarde-Holstein crossbreds, and increase from -2% to +1% for the Montbeliarde/(Jersey-Holstein) crossbreds. The pure Holsteins (3.05) had numerically higher lactation averages for somatic cell score, but did not differ from the Montbeliarde-Holstein (2.31) or Montbeliarde/(Jersey-Holstein) crossbreds (2.41), respectively. Pure Holsteins and Montbeliarde-Holstein crossbreds were compared for blood levels of circulating progesterone (P4) from the 27th to the 55th day after calving during first lactation (Table 17). The Montbeliarde-Holstein crossbreds tended to have fewer days to a critical level of 1 nanogram of P4, tended to have higher average levels of P4, and tended to have higher peak levels of P4. All of the differences for measures of circulating progesterone (indicating the formation of a corpus luteum) were substantial, but were not statistically significant possibly because of the small sample size. 17

12 Table 16. Second lactation production (actual 305-day with 2X milking). Holstein Montbeliarde-Holstein Montbeliarde/ (Jersey-Holstein) of cows Milk (lb) 23,684 22,815 22,936 Fat (lb) Protein (lb) Fat (lb) + Protein (lb) % of Holstein -1% +5% Table 17. Circulating progesterone (P4) of Holstein versus Montbeliarde-Holstein crossbreds during first lactation. Breed Of cows Days to 1 nanogram of P4 Average level of P4 Highest peak for P4 Holstein Montbeliarde-Holstein No differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Crossbreeding should be regarded as a mating system that complements genetic improvement within breeds. Continuous use of progeny-tested and highly-ranked A.I. bulls is critical to genetic improvement regardless of mating system (purebreeding or crossbreeding). Unfortunately, some dairy producers might interpret the merit of crossbreeding as justification to use natural service bulls rather than A.I. That would be an unfortunate consequence of dairy producers interest in crossbreeding. Heterosis is a bonus that dairy producers can expect in addition to the positive effects of individual genes obtained by using top A.I. bulls within breed. The bonus from heterosis is about 5% for production and at least 10% for mortality, fertility, health, and survival, and heterosis comes on top of the average genetic level of the two parent breeds. Therefore, the impact of heterosis on profit should be substantial for commercial milk production. However, some dairy producers might need to get beyond the notion that level of milk production is the only measure of profitability of dairy cows. For the study of seven dairies in California, production of the Montbeliarde-Holstein crossbreds and the Scandinavian Red-Holstein crossbreds was slightly reduced (about 5% for fat plus protein production across the first two lactations) compared to pure Holsteins. Mating Holsteins to Scandinavian Red, Montbeliarde, and Normande A.I. sires resulted in fewer stillborn calves, as well as cows with less calving difficulty, enhanced fertility, and improved survival compared to pure Holsteins. Crossbreeding systems that use Jersey or Brown Swiss have shown to have similar fat production to pure Holsteins; although milk volume is lower in the crossbreds compared to pure Holsteins. The fertility of Jersey or Brown Swiss-Holstein crossbreds demonstrates an advantage of 2 to 3 weeks fewer days open. Heterosis for production ranges from 2 to 15% and heterosis for days open is about 8%. Crossbreeding systems should make use of three breeds. Preliminary results in California and the University of Minnesota show no loss in production by adding a third breed into a crossbreeding system. 18

13 Individual dairy producers should carefully choose three breeds that are optimum for conditions unique to their dairy operations (facilities, climate, nutritional regime, reproductive status, level of management, and personal preferences). REFERENCES Ahlborn-Breier, G. and, W. D. Hohenboken Additive and nonadditive genetic effects on milk production in dairy cattle: evidence for major individual heterosis. J. Dairy Sci. 74: Brandt, G. W., C. C. Brannon, and W. E. Johnston Production of milk and milk constituents by Brown Swiss, Holsteins, and their crossbreds. J. Dairy Sci. 57: Bryant, J. R., N. Lopez-Villalobos, J. E. Pryce, C. W. Holmes, D. L. Johnson, and D. J. Garrick Short Communication: Effect of Environment on the Expression of Breed and Heterosis Effects for Production Traits. J. Dairy Sci. 90: Dechow, C. D., G. W. Rogers, J. B. Cooper, M. I. Phelps, and A. L. Mosholder Milk, fat, protein, somatic cell score, and days open among Holstein, Brown Swiss, and their crosses. J. Dairy Sci. (Accepted). Harris, B. L., and E. S. Kolver Review of Holsteinization on intensive pastoral dairy farming in New Zealand. J. Dairy Sci. 84(E. Suppl.):E56-E61. Heins, B. J., L. B. Hansen, A. J. Seykora. 2006a. Calving difficulty and stillbirths of Pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. J. Dairy Sci. 89: Heins, B. J., L. B. Hansen, A. J. Seykora. 2006b. Fertility and survival of Pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. J. Dairy Sci. 89: Heins, B. J., L. B. Hansen, A. J. Seykora. 2006c. Production of Pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. J. Dairy Sci. 89: McAllister, A. J., A. J. Lee, T. R. Batra, C. Y. Lin, G. L. Roy, J. A. Vesely, J. M. Wauthy, and K. A. Winter The influence of additive and nonadditive gene action on lifetime yields and profitability of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 77: McDowell, R. E., and B. T. McDaniel Interbreed matings in dairy cattle. I. Yield traits, feed efficiency, type and rate of milking. J. Dairy Sci. 51: Touchberry, R. W Crossbreeding effects in dairy cattle: The Illinois Experiment, 1949 to J. Dairy Sci. 75:

Production of Pure Holsteins Versus Crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red

Production of Pure Holsteins Versus Crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red J. Dairy Sci. 89:2799 2804 American Dairy Science Association, 2006. Production of Pure Holsteins Versus Crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red B. J. Heins, L. B. Hansen,

More information

USE OF RED BREEDS FOR CROSSBREEDING. Dr. Gary Rogers Geno Global Hamar, Norway

USE OF RED BREEDS FOR CROSSBREEDING. Dr. Gary Rogers Geno Global Hamar, Norway USE OF RED BREEDS FOR CROSSBREEDING Dr. Gary Rogers Geno Global Hamar, Norway grogers200@yahoo.com CROSSBREEDING IN DAIRY CATTLE Crossbreeding is growing by about ½ to 1% per year in many populations Why?

More information

Crossbreeding: A Dirty Word or an Opportunity?

Crossbreeding: A Dirty Word or an Opportunity? Crossbreeding: A Dirty Word or an Opportunity? Dr. Kent A. Weigel Associate Professor and Extension Genetics Specialist Department of Dairy Science University of Wisconsin Madison, WI 53706 USA Phone:

More information

State and national standardized lactation averages by breed for cows calving in 2013

State and national standardized lactation averages by breed for cows calving in 2013 State and national standardized lactation averages by breed for cows calving in 2013 H.D. Norman and L.M. Walton Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding 301-525-2006~ duane.norman@cdcb.us ~ https://cdcb.us NOTE:

More information

Alternative breeds and crossbreeding their role within organic and low input systems. Organic Producers Conference Conrad Ferris.

Alternative breeds and crossbreeding their role within organic and low input systems. Organic Producers Conference Conrad Ferris. Alternative breeds and crossbreeding their role within organic and low input systems Organic Producers Conference Conrad Ferris 27 November 2014 The Holstein-Friesian A breed with great type traits A breed

More information

Genetic Improvement for. Auxiliary Traits in Canada

Genetic Improvement for. Auxiliary Traits in Canada Genetic Improvement for Auxiliary Traits in Canada For obvious reasons, the main emphasis in dairy cattle improvement is placed on selection for increased levels of milk production and its components as

More information

Holsteins in Denmark. Who is doing what? By Keld Christensen, Executive Secretary, Danish Holstein Association

Holsteins in Denmark. Who is doing what? By Keld Christensen, Executive Secretary, Danish Holstein Association Holsteins in Denmark By Keld Christensen, Executive Secretary, Danish Holstein Association Danish Holstein Association The Danish Black and White Cattle Association was founded in 1949 when two major regional

More information

Bull Buyer s Guide. $3000 Purchase Price of New Bull Salvage Value of Old Bull (1900 lbs. X 1.10/lb.) $ 910 Net Cost of New Bull

Bull Buyer s Guide. $3000 Purchase Price of New Bull Salvage Value of Old Bull (1900 lbs. X 1.10/lb.) $ 910 Net Cost of New Bull Bull Buyer s Guide Revised by Ted G. Dyer and Ronnie Silcox, Extension Animal Scientists Original manuscript by Dan T. Brown and Ronnie E. Silcox, Extension Animal Scientists Never underestimate the power

More information

Unit A: Introduction to Cattle Management. Lesson 2: Exploring the Dairy Industry

Unit A: Introduction to Cattle Management. Lesson 2: Exploring the Dairy Industry Unit A: Introduction to Cattle Management Lesson 2: Exploring the Dairy Industry Student Learning Objectives: Instruction in this lesson should result in students achieving the following objectives: 1.

More information

Name: Address: Town: State: Zip Code: Name of 4-H Club. Club Leader:

Name: Address: Town: State: Zip Code: Name of 4-H Club. Club Leader: Name: Birthdate: Address: Town: State: Zip Code: Name of 4-H Club Club Leader: Years in 4-H: Years in Dairy Project: The 4-H Motto Targeting Life Skills My 4-H Story Usethe space below to write your 4-H

More information

Lesson 2: Exploring the Dairy Industry

Lesson 2: Exploring the Dairy Industry Lesson 2: Exploring the Dairy Industry 1 Terms Artificial Insemination (AI) Beef Butterfat Cattle by-products Crossbreeding Culling Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) Outcrossing Purebreeding Veal 2 How do I

More information

Introduction. Genetics. Young Sires. How A.I. Bulls are Proven. A.I. Studs. 897 Bulls in Stud

Introduction. Genetics. Young Sires. How A.I. Bulls are Proven. A.I. Studs. 897 Bulls in Stud Introduction Genetics Genetic gain in milk production through selection is approximately 150 lbs/yr Majority of the gain (0%) is through sire selection Artificial insemination and genetic improvement are

More information

JUVENILE GENETIC EVALUATION AND SELECTION FOR DAIRY GOATS

JUVENILE GENETIC EVALUATION AND SELECTION FOR DAIRY GOATS JUVENILE GENETIC EVALUATION AND SELECTION FOR DAIRY GOATS INTRODUCTION Traditional genetic improvement schemes for dairy animals involve progeny testing of sires. This traditional approach can give accurate

More information

Genetic Trend for Milk. U.S. dairy population and milk yield

Genetic Trend for Milk. U.S. dairy population and milk yield 52nd Florida Dairy Production Conference Opportunity Costs When Choosing Service Sires 2016 Florida Dairy Production Conference University of Florida April 6, 2016 Dr. Ole Meland Chairman of the Council

More information

SHOULD YOU CONSIDER CROSSBREEDING?

SHOULD YOU CONSIDER CROSSBREEDING? SHOULD YOU CONSIDER CROSSBREEDING? Bennet Cassell Extension Dairy Scientist, Genetics and Management Virginia Tech, Blacksburg In the years just prior to and following World War II, American agriculture

More information

Selecting Beef Bulls

Selecting Beef Bulls 1 of 7 7/23/2009 11:11 AM Selecting Beef Bulls Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida R.S. Sand Associate Professor and Extension Livestock Specialist J.W. Lemaster Program

More information

COMMERCIAL BEEF SIRE SELECTION

COMMERCIAL BEEF SIRE SELECTION COMMERCIAL BEEF SIRE SELECTION Ronnie Silcox The University of Georgia Roger McCraw North Carolina State University Bull selection is the foundation for building a profitable beef herd. In most commercial

More information

A Subsidiary of Cooperative Resources International. Understanding the HERD REPORT CARD

A Subsidiary of Cooperative Resources International. Understanding the HERD REPORT CARD AgSource Cooperative Services A Subsidiary of Cooperative Resources International Understanding the HERD REPORT CARD Understanding Your Herd Report Card The Herd Report Card provides AgSource members with

More information

Increasing Profits per Acre with Appropriate Genetics

Increasing Profits per Acre with Appropriate Genetics Increasing Profits per Acre with Appropriate Genetics Steven Lukefahr Lukefahr Ranch Kingsville, Texas Star cattle A composite of Red Angus, Senepol, and Tuli breeds Part I Development of STAR Cattle in

More information

Youth Dairy Project Record

Youth Dairy Project Record Youth Dairy Project Record Wallet Size Picture (Optional) Name: County: Date of Birth: Breed (s) (Specify): For Judging Use Only: Ayrshire Brown Swiss Guernsey Holstein Jersey Milking Shorthorn Red&White

More information

Salers 2015 Sire Summary Definitions

Salers 2015 Sire Summary Definitions Salers 2015 Sire Summary Definitions EPD Expected Progeny Difference Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) may be used to estimate how future progeny of the animal will perform relative to other animals

More information

CALF PERFORMANCE AND COW WEIGHT AND CONDITION FOR COWS SIRED BY HIGH AND LOW MILK EPD ANGUS AND POLLED HEREFORD BULLS

CALF PERFORMANCE AND COW WEIGHT AND CONDITION FOR COWS SIRED BY HIGH AND LOW MILK EPD ANGUS AND POLLED HEREFORD BULLS CALF PERFORMANCE AND COW WEIGHT AND CONDITION FOR COWS SIRED BY HIGH AND LOW MILK EPD ANGUS AND POLLED HEREFORD BULLS D.S. Buchanan 1, R. Gosz 2, E. Nesamvuni 2 and L. Knori 3 Story in Brief Calf birth

More information

Dual Purpose Breeding Strategy

Dual Purpose Breeding Strategy Dual Purpose Breeding Strategy Czech Fleckvieh Breeders Association Dr. Josef KUČERA Topics Dual purpose in figures Breeding programes /Genetic evaluation Photogalery Crossbreeding in dairy herds Future

More information

A Joint Nordic Animal Model for Milk Production Traits in Holsteins and Ayrshires

A Joint Nordic Animal Model for Milk Production Traits in Holsteins and Ayrshires A Joint Nordic Animal Model for Milk Production Traits in Holsteins and Ayrshires Jørn Pedersen 1 and Claus Langdahl 1, Jukka Pösö 2, Kjell Johansson 3, 1 The Danish Agricultural Advisory Centre, Udkaersvej

More information

Maryland 4-H Animal Science Dairy Project Record

Maryland 4-H Animal Science Dairy Project Record Maryland 4-H Animal Science Dairy Project Record Name 4-H Age Primary Club Name Years in 4-H Years in this Project I have completed this record and believe all information to be complete and accurate.

More information

A Comparison of Mating Systems Utilizing Duroc, Hampshire and Yorkshire Breeds for Swine Production. E. R. Wilson and R. K. Johnson.

A Comparison of Mating Systems Utilizing Duroc, Hampshire and Yorkshire Breeds for Swine Production. E. R. Wilson and R. K. Johnson. Swine BREEDING A Comparison of Mating Systems Utilizing Duroc, Hampshire and Yorkshire Breeds for Swine Production E. R. Wilson and R. K. Johnson Story in Brief This study utilized eight years of crossbreeding

More information

aaa: N/A Kappa Casein AA Beta Casein A1A1 ISU daughters 71% Rel. +273M +.12% +37F +.09% +26P +1.0 PL -0.6 SCS

aaa: N/A Kappa Casein AA Beta Casein A1A1 ISU daughters 71% Rel. +273M +.12% +37F +.09% +26P +1.0 PL -0.6 SCS 217MO7 JISCO JB aaa: 324165 Kappa Casein BB Beta Casein A2A2 ISU 133 0 daughters 72% Rel. +2M -.16% +9F +.06% +35P +0.7 PL +1.2 SCS 0.5 Daughter Fertility 93 Calving Index Legs Udders Body Capacity > 120

More information

Improving carcase and beef quality in Bos indicus through crossbreeding

Improving carcase and beef quality in Bos indicus through crossbreeding Improving carcase and beef quality in Bos indicus through crossbreeding Heather Burrow CRC for Cattle and Beef Quality, CSIRO Livestock Industries, PO Box 555, Rockhampton QLD 7 Ph: (7) 93 139 Fax: (7)

More information

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in Table 1 have been published

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in Table 1 have been published December 2015 INTERBULL breeding values calculated December 2015 This newsletter is primarily written for VikingGenetics staff and breeding advisors in Denmark, Sweden and Finland, but can also be of interest

More information

BELGIAN BLUE, THE CROSSBREEDING SPECIALIST BREED

BELGIAN BLUE, THE CROSSBREEDING SPECIALIST BREED BELGIAN BLUE, THE CROSSBREEDING SPECIALIST BREED CONTENTS BB: the best conformation within beef breeds BBG to export it : Belgian Blue Group The AI center A unique testing program R&D for the future BBG

More information

Contemporary Grouping for Beef Cattle Genetic Evaluation

Contemporary Grouping for Beef Cattle Genetic Evaluation Contemporary Grouping for Beef Cattle Genetic Evaluation Reprinted from the 8 th Edition of the Beef Improvement Federation Guidelines Every weight or measurement of an animal is an observation of its

More information

SWINE BREEDING SYSTEMS

SWINE BREEDING SYSTEMS Extension Bulletin E-3107 New August 2010 SWINE BREEDING SYSTEMS for Alternative Pork Chains: Breeding Programs Ronald O. Bates State Swine Specialist Michigan State University Introduction The pork industry

More information

Aim of breeding work

Aim of breeding work Breeding in Denmark registrations, indices and breeding scheme International Limousin Congress 2012, Technical Meeting Hotel Radisson, Denmark Wednesday 4 th July 2012 Anders Fogh Aim of breeding work

More information

Maximizing genetic progress in the new age of genomics

Maximizing genetic progress in the new age of genomics Veerkamp et al. Maximizing genetic progress in the new age of genomics R.H. Fourdraine AgSource Cooperative Services, 135 Enterprise Drive, Verona, WI 53593, United States Genetics have historically played

More information

Relationships of Hip Height Measurements with Growth and Carcass Traits of Crossbred and Angus Cattle

Relationships of Hip Height Measurements with Growth and Carcass Traits of Crossbred and Angus Cattle Relationships of Hip Height Measurements with Growth and Carcass Traits of Crossbred and Angus Cattle P.J. Zerbino) R.R. Frahm2 and J. W. Castree3 Story in Brief Hip heights were measured on 286 three-breed

More information

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in Table 1 have been published

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in Table 1 have been published April 2014 INTERBULL breeding values calculated April 2014 This newsletter is primarily written for VikingGenetics staff and breeding advisors in Denmark, Sweden and Finland, but can also be of interest

More information

In the past cattle were bred for three main reasons:

In the past cattle were bred for three main reasons: In the past cattle were bred for three main reasons: 1. To provide milk 2. To provide beef 3. To aid in farming pulling ploughs etc. The cattle breeds were then developed to perform one or more of the

More information

To VikingGenetics staff and breeding advisors in Denmark, Sweden and Finland

To VikingGenetics staff and breeding advisors in Denmark, Sweden and Finland To VikingGenetics staff and breeding advisors in Denmark, Sweden and Finland INTERBULL breeding values calculated August 2013 August 2013 International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in

More information

-- Results and Discussion

-- Results and Discussion Relationship of Beef Sire Birth Weight and Weaning Weight Expected Progeny Differences to Actual Performance of Crossbred Offspring SDSU M.B. Long1 and D.M. Marshall2 Department of Animal and Range Sciences

More information

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in Table 1 have been published

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in Table 1 have been published August 2015 INTERBULL breeding values calculated August 2015 This newsletter is primarily written for VikingGenetics staff and breeding advisors in Denmark, Sweden and Finland, but can also be of interest

More information

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in Table 1 have been published

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in Table 1 have been published December 2016 INTERBULL breeding values calculated December 2016 This newsletter is primarily written for VikingGenetics staff and breeding advisors in Denmark, Sweden and Finland, but can also be of interest

More information

Illinois 4-H Livestock (Beef, Sheep & Swine) Judging Contest

Illinois 4-H Livestock (Beef, Sheep & Swine) Judging Contest Illinois 4-H Livestock (Beef, Sheep & Swine) Judging Contest Coordinators: Dan Jennings, Extension Educator, Animal Systems Rich Knipe, Extension Educator, Animal Systems The Illinois 4-H Livestock Judging

More information

Crossbreeding Beef Cattle Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

Crossbreeding Beef Cattle Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech Crossbreeding Beef Cattle Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech The economic climate of today s beef business is challenging. Commercial cow-calf producers are faced with optimizing

More information

Value of Black Hereford Registration

Value of Black Hereford Registration Value of Black Hereford Registration Increase Marketability Whether one owns 10 or 500 Black Hereford cows, a registration certificate shows other producers that you are willing to take the time to document

More information

K.I.-SAMEN Grashoek NL Daughter Proven April 2018

K.I.-SAMEN Grashoek NL Daughter Proven April 2018 K.I.-SAMEN Grashoek NL Daughter Proven April 2018 Welcome to the April 2018 Red & White Holstein-Friesian daughter proven Sire line up which has been carefully selected by Cattle Genie Limited from our

More information

EXPECTED PROGENY DIFFERENCES

EXPECTED PROGENY DIFFERENCES EXPECTED PROGENY DIFFERENCES J. M. Rumph, Montana State University Physical features, such as structure and muscling, are important for animal selection and will be discussed further in another section

More information

Hoof Health Powered by VikingGenetics

Hoof Health Powered by VikingGenetics Elisabeth Hoof Health Powered by VikingGenetics Why Hoof Health matters? Lameness caused by hoof disorders is among the biggest challenges that face the dairy industry. Lameness is among the top three

More information

Distinguished Young Holstein Breeder Award Application

Distinguished Young Holstein Breeder Award Application 2019 Distinguished Young Holstein Breeder Award Application Eligibility Applicant(s) must be between the ages of 21 and 40 as of January 1 of the award year, and be a member in good standing of Holstein

More information

Value of Black Hereford Registration

Value of Black Hereford Registration Increase Marketability Value of Black Hereford Registration Whether one owns 1 or Black Hereford cows, a registration certificate shows other producers that you are willing to take the time to document

More information

Bull management. Growing bulls 116. Selecting the best bulls to use 117. Managing working bulls 118. Assessing bull performance 120

Bull management. Growing bulls 116. Selecting the best bulls to use 117. Managing working bulls 118. Assessing bull performance 120 12 Growing bulls 116 Selecting the best bulls to use 117 Can I skimp on feed for the bulls until the break comes? 117 Managing working bulls 118 Sometimes bulls can be really hard to handle on the farm.

More information

11 Keeping. 4-H Records

11 Keeping. 4-H Records 51 11 Keeping 4-H Records When you write down something that you did or that happened, you are keeping a record. Records help you remember important information. Records can prove what was done, who did

More information

CSA Genetic Evaluation

CSA Genetic Evaluation CSA Genetic Evaluation Contents Breed Average... 2 Percentiles... 2 For Canadian Users of Simmental Genetics... 3 Evaluation Highlights... 3 Trait Abbreviations... 4 Accuracy and Possible Change... 4 Genetic

More information

Planned. Hybrid. Vigour. mated.

Planned. Hybrid. Vigour. mated. TOOLS OF THE TRADE Cross Breeding Planned and well managed crossbreedi ing ss will deliver significant benefits to beef producers. The main benefits result from: 1) Higher performance than expected for

More information

Expected Progeny Difference (EPD) in Beef Cattle

Expected Progeny Difference (EPD) in Beef Cattle E-164 8-02 Expected Progeny Difference (EPD) in Beef Cattle Stephen P. Hammack and Joe C. Paschal* When evaluating prospective breeding animals, it is helpful to have an estimate of their genetic transmitting

More information

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in table 1 have been published

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in table 1 have been published April 2019 INTERBULL breeding values calculated April 2019 This newsletter is primarily written for VikingGenetics staff and breeding advisors in Denmark, Sweden and Finland, but can also be of interest

More information

Daughter proven bulls In the tables below, only sires that have breeding values based on daughter information is shown

Daughter proven bulls In the tables below, only sires that have breeding values based on daughter information is shown December 2017 INTERBULL breeding values calculated December 2017 This newsletter is primarily written for VikingGenetics staff and breeding advisors in Denmark, Sweden and Finland, but can also be of interest

More information

IOWA 4-H LIVESTOCK JUDGING CONTEST

IOWA 4-H LIVESTOCK JUDGING CONTEST IOWA 4-H LIVESTOCK JUDGING CONTEST Saturday, August 23, 2014 NEW LOCATION: Hansen Ag Student Learning Center, Ames Complete Details & Info. On-Line Entry: Due August 1 Click Here for online entry form

More information

ATC Agribusiness Roundtable

ATC Agribusiness Roundtable ATC Agribusiness Roundtable September 28, 2015 Jay Weiker Vice President National Association of Animal Breeders Certified Semen Services How Can Turkey Double Milk Production by 2013 1. Increase the total

More information

Feasibility of MACE for Longevity for Colored Breeds

Feasibility of MACE for Longevity for Colored Breeds Feasibility of MACE for Longevity for Colored Breeds J. H. Jakobsen 1, W. F. Fikse 1, and P. M. VanRaden 2 1 Interbull Centre, Box 7023, SE 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden 2 AIPL, Beltsville, MD,, 20705-2350 Abstract

More information

Daughter proven bulls In the tables below, only sires that have breeding values based on daughter information is shown

Daughter proven bulls In the tables below, only sires that have breeding values based on daughter information is shown April 2018 INTERBULL breeding values calculated April 2018 This newsletter is primarily written for VikingGenetics staff and breeding advisors in Denmark, Sweden and Finland, but can also be of interest

More information

Breeding values for beef sires based on beef dairy crossbred offspring

Breeding values for beef sires based on beef dairy crossbred offspring Breeding values for beef sires based on beef dairy crossbred offspring Synopsis Starting December 2018, NAV routinely estimates breeding values for beef sires, on the basis of data for beef dairy crossbred

More information

An Alternative, Sustainable System of Beef Production in

An Alternative, Sustainable System of Beef Production in An Alternative, Sustainable System of Beef Production in South Texas Part 2: Cattle Breeding Program by Steven Lukefahr PhD Editors note: This is the second of three articles that will be published in

More information

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in table 1 have been published

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in table 1 have been published August 2018 INTERBULL breeding values calculated August 2018 This newsletter is primarily written for VikingGenetics staff and breeding advisors in Denmark, Sweden and Finland, but can also be of interest

More information

Performance Data Reporting and Contemporary Grouping For Beef Cattle Genetic Evaluation

Performance Data Reporting and Contemporary Grouping For Beef Cattle Genetic Evaluation Performance Data Reporting and Contemporary Grouping For Beef Cattle Genetic Evaluation By Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, State Extension Specialist-Beef Genetics University of Missouri-Columbia

More information

Animal Science Info Series: AS-B-226 The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animal Science Info Series: AS-B-226 The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Animal Science Info Series: AS-B-226 The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Yearling Bull Management James B. Neel, Professor and Neal Schrick, Associate Professor Animal Science, University

More information

4-H DAIRY COW RECORD YEAR

4-H DAIRY COW RECORD YEAR -H DAIRY COW RECORD YEAR Your Name (please print) Address Age (as of Jan. of current year) Years in a Dairy Project Name of -H Club Member s Signature Parent s Signature Cover this space with a snapshot

More information

DEPARTMENT 2 DAIRY CATTLE

DEPARTMENT 2 DAIRY CATTLE DEPARTMENT 2 DAIRY CATTLE Superintendent - Ellis Dix Assistant Superintendents - Kathryn Dix - (570) 448-2824 David Jonas 1. The exhibitor is defined as the owner, or the name that appears on the registration

More information

Montbeliarde Sire Directory

Montbeliarde Sire Directory Montbeliarde Sire Directory Dam of No 1 Montbeliarde Genomic sire HARPER 2014 www.auzredxb.com.au TRAIT LEADERS 2014 OVERALL TYPE UDDERS FEET & LEGS CALG EASE CALF VITALITY Triomphe 126 Urbanitse 123 Triomphe

More information

Across-Herd Genetic Evaluation of Swine

Across-Herd Genetic Evaluation of Swine Across-Herd Genetic Evaluation of Swine Originally published as a National Swine Improvement Federation Factsheet. Introduction Authors Donna L. Lofgren, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN Cindy M. Wood,

More information

Hair Shedding Scores Relating to Maternal Traits and Productivity in Beef Cattle. An Undergraduate Honors Thesis in the. Animal Science Department

Hair Shedding Scores Relating to Maternal Traits and Productivity in Beef Cattle. An Undergraduate Honors Thesis in the. Animal Science Department Hair Shedding Scores Relating to Maternal Traits and Productivity in Beef Cattle An Undergraduate Honors Thesis in the Animal Science Department Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for

More information

The Science of Maryland Agriculture

The Science of Maryland Agriculture Edition 3 (2016) The Science of Maryland Agriculture GOAL STATEMENT: Students will differentiate between beef and dairy cattle (Bos tarus) and observe how each type evolved over time. OBJECTIVES: Students

More information

How To Read An Official Holstein Pedigree

How To Read An Official Holstein Pedigree State and national leader records for Milk, Fat and Protein production are labeled on the line below the outstanding record. This recognition is based on DHIR and TriStar Premier records. A trusted source

More information

Beeze ROZA 102 full sister of MAIKMAN and Beeze ROZA 48 Dam of Beeze MAIKMAN

Beeze ROZA 102 full sister of MAIKMAN and Beeze ROZA 48 Dam of Beeze MAIKMAN APRIL 2018 K.I.-SAMEN GRASHOEK Beeze ROZA 102 full sister of MAIKMAN and Beeze ROZA 48 Dam of Beeze MAIKMAN Welcome to the April 2018 edition of select future Sires from the bull stud of KI-SAMEN bv These

More information

Value of Classification

Value of Classification Holstein Friesian New Zealand Value of Classification Holstein Friesian New Zealand 23 Vialou Street, PO Box 9282, HAMILTON 3240 telephone 07 839 9957 facsimile 07 839 9958 www.nzholstein.org.nz Holstein

More information

Dr. David Lalman, Professor and Extension Beef Cattle Specialist Oklahoma State University

Dr. David Lalman, Professor and Extension Beef Cattle Specialist Oklahoma State University Dr. David Lalman, Professor and Extension Beef Cattle Specialist Oklahoma State University Forage availability Oklahoma = 3 acres per AU to 25 acres per AU Forage nutritive value Native tallgrass prairie

More information

CSA Genetic Evaluation

CSA Genetic Evaluation CSA Genetic Evaluation Contents Breed Average... 2 Percentiles... 2 For Canadian Users of Simmental Genetics... 3 Trait Abbreviations... 3 Growth Evaluation... 4 Key Points... 4 Genetic Parameters... 4

More information

2017 Beef Information Sheet

2017 Beef Information Sheet 2017 Beef Information Sheet Prepared by the 4-H State Fair Beef Show Committee and the Center for Youth Development This information sheet gives details on the rules for this year s Minnesota State Fair

More information

How To Read An Official Holstein Pedigree

How To Read An Official Holstein Pedigree Getting the most for your investment How To Read An Official Holstein Pedigree Holstein Association USA, Inc. 1 Holstein Place, PO Box 808 Brattleboro, vt 05302-0808 800.952.5200 www.holsteinusa.com A

More information

WEANING BEEF CALVES AT A LATER AGE TO INCREASE PRODUCTION

WEANING BEEF CALVES AT A LATER AGE TO INCREASE PRODUCTION WEANING BEEF CALVES AT A LATER AGE TO INCREASE PRODUCTION F. M. Pate and W. E. Kunkle December 1989 Circular S-328 Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University

More information

c o m e re a l s ine p ro d uctio n

c o m e re a l s ine p ro d uctio n UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE CIRCULAR 406 c ro ssbre d in o r c o m e re a l s ine p ro d uctio n Williams Hugh Area Swine Specialist CROSSBREEDING FOR COMMERCIAL SWINE PRODUCTION

More information

EBVS are LESSONS FROM THE ASBP / 2. EBVs of Bulls Entered in the ASBP have provided a reliable Prediction of the Performance of their Progeny

EBVS are LESSONS FROM THE ASBP / 2. EBVs of Bulls Entered in the ASBP have provided a reliable Prediction of the Performance of their Progeny EBVS are EBVs of Bulls Entered in the ASBP have provided a reliable Prediction of the Performance of their Progeny The Angus Sire Benchmarking Program (ASBP) has demonstrated that there is great potential

More information

An Official Holstein Pedigree

An Official Holstein Pedigree Getting the most for your investment How To Read TM An Official Holstein Pedigree Holstein Association USA, Inc. 1 Holstein Place. Brattleboro, VT 05302-0808 800.952.5200 www.holsteinusa.com Proof that

More information

Instruction Manual for the Dairy Analyzer Program and associated Dashboards.

Instruction Manual for the Dairy Analyzer Program and associated Dashboards. Instruction Manual for the Dairy Analyzer Program and associated Dashboards. URL: http://dgalligan.com/fieldservice/dap.html Logon: guest Password: guest 4/14/2014 Access: The Dairy Analyzer Program (DAP)

More information

CROSS BREEDING HARIANA CATTLE. ABORTIONS AND SECONDARY SEX RATIO

CROSS BREEDING HARIANA CATTLE. ABORTIONS AND SECONDARY SEX RATIO ANNALS OF ARID ZONE Vol. 12, No.1 & 2, March & June, 1973 CROSS BREEDING HARIANA CATTLE. ABORTIONS AND SECONDARY SEX RATIO S. S. TOMA.R AND NAIUNDBR SINGH. HARIANA AGRICULTRAL UNIVERSrry, HISSAR Received

More information

Red Dairy Breeds BYELORUSSIAN RED (Krasnyi belorusskii skot)

Red Dairy Breeds BYELORUSSIAN RED (Krasnyi belorusskii skot) 30 Red Dairy Breeds BYELORUSSIAN RED (Krasnyi belorusskii skot) In the course of their history Byelorussian Red cattle were repeatedly improved by infusion of the blood of the superior related red breeds.

More information

Department N: FFA Pre Entry is required, No exceptions:

Department N: FFA Pre Entry is required, No exceptions: Department N: FFA Contact person: Kevin Brown Southland High School VoAg. Department 507-582-3568 or cell 507-438-7332 Pre Entry is required, No exceptions: All FFA exhibitors must fill out and send in

More information

Enclosed is your bottle calf information. Please do not lose this information as you will need this for your fair entries.

Enclosed is your bottle calf information. Please do not lose this information as you will need this for your fair entries. Enclosed is your bottle calf information. Please do not lose this information as you will need this for your fair entries. The ID form needs to be completed by May 15 in the 4-H Online system. The three

More information

Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits of Charolais and Brahman Sired Three-Breed Cross Calves

Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits of Charolais and Brahman Sired Three-Breed Cross Calves Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits of Charolais and Brahman Sired Three-Breed Cross Calves S. H. Peterson, R. R. Frahm and L. E. Walters Story in Brief Feedlot performance and carcass

More information

NORMAL VS EARLY AND LATE WEANING: MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS TO ENHANCE PROFITABILITY DUE TO TIMING OF MARKETING

NORMAL VS EARLY AND LATE WEANING: MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS TO ENHANCE PROFITABILITY DUE TO TIMING OF MARKETING NORMAL VS EARLY AND LATE WEANING: MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS TO ENHANCE PROFITABILITY DUE TO TIMING OF MARKETING Findlay Pate and Tom Spreen University of Florida, IFAS, Agricultural Research and Education Center,

More information

Maximim Points. Box Breakdowns. 90+ Excellent (EX) Very Good (VG) Good Plus (GP) Good (G) Fair (F) Poor (P) 1st Calver

Maximim Points. Box Breakdowns. 90+ Excellent (EX) Very Good (VG) Good Plus (GP) Good (G) Fair (F) Poor (P) 1st Calver An Introduction to Type Classification The importance of breeding cows of good conformation has never been greater, as modern production systems impose stringent demands on the dairy cow. Both milk buyers

More information

Calving Season & Cow Efficiency

Calving Season & Cow Efficiency Calving Season & Cow Efficiency Workshop #6 Dr. David Lalman Animal Science Associate Professor 40 s and 50 s Era of Insanity 1953 Champion Angus Female Chicago International Exposition 1 60 s Recognition

More information

2018 NATIONAL PICTURE JUDGING CONTEST

2018 NATIONAL PICTURE JUDGING CONTEST Sponsored by the National Swine Registry 2018 NATIONAL PICTURE JUDGING CONTEST The data used in this contest is intended for educational purposes and is not the actual data for the pigs pictured. The figures

More information

COMPARISON OF EAST FRIESIAN-CROSSBRED AND LACAUNE-CROSSBRED EWE LAMBS FOR DAIRY SHEEP PRODUCTION FIRST-YEAR RESULTS FROM A MULTI-YEAR TRIAL

COMPARISON OF EAST FRIESIAN-CROSSBRED AND LACAUNE-CROSSBRED EWE LAMBS FOR DAIRY SHEEP PRODUCTION FIRST-YEAR RESULTS FROM A MULTI-YEAR TRIAL COMPARISON OF EAST FRIESIAN-CROSSBRED AND LACAUNE-CROSSBRED EWE LAMBS FOR DAIRY SHEEP PRODUCTION FIRST-YEAR RESULTS FROM A MULTI-YEAR TRIAL David L. Thomas 1, Yves M. Berger 2, Brett C. McKusick 1, and

More information

Welcome! Tonya Amen, Ph.D Cattle Genetics Specialist Pfizer Animal Genetics

Welcome! Tonya Amen, Ph.D Cattle Genetics Specialist Pfizer Animal Genetics Welcome! Tonya Amen, Ph.D Cattle Genetics Specialist Pfizer Animal Genetics GENOMICS: A New Era in Beef Cattle Selection and Breeding. Outline Why Genetics? Why now? Simply Inherited Traits Genetic Conditions

More information

SHEETED SOMERSET Project

SHEETED SOMERSET Project SHEETED SOMERSET Project The above picture taken from an original painting captures the famous old breed the Sheeted Somerset which unfortunately became extinct during the 20th century. Mr. Andrew Tanner

More information

DEPARTMENT 2 DAIRY CATTLE

DEPARTMENT 2 DAIRY CATTLE DEPARTMENT 2 DAIRY CATTLE Co-Chairperson: Rick Allen, 2418 Pittsburgh Road, Smock, PA 15480 (724-677-2589) Co-Chairperson: Danielle Angelo, 133 Allen Road, Smock, PA 15480 (724-677-4750) In State Dairy

More information

Auzred Xb June 2015 Newsletter

Auzred Xb June 2015 Newsletter Auzred Xb June 2015 Newsletter...Team 2015 Elite Aussie Reds Now Available...... Holsteins for Crossbreeding added to our list... Welcome to our May 2015 Update; Auzred Xb s Team 2015 Elite young sires

More information

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX December 11, 12 and 13, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX December 11, 12 and 13, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX December, 2 and 3, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado TE VALUE OF ETEROSIS IN COW ERDS: LESSONS FRO TE PAST TAT APPLY TO TODAY atthew L. Spangler Department of Agriculture

More information

Lasater Beefmaster Field Day and Sale Featuring 100 Two-Year-Old Bulls and 8 Retired Herd Sires Developed on Native Range September 15 & 16, 2009

Lasater Beefmaster Field Day and Sale Featuring 100 Two-Year-Old Bulls and 8 Retired Herd Sires Developed on Native Range September 15 & 16, 2009 LASATER "The Pedigree is in the Name" BEEFMASTERS FOUNDATION HERD OF THE BEEFMASTER BREED Dale Lasater or Andy Duffy Phone: 719.541.BULL www.lasaterranch.com e-mail: lasater@rmi.net DISPOSITION FERTILITY

More information

BEEFMASTER BREEDERS UNITED WINTER SIRE SUMMARY

BEEFMASTER BREEDERS UNITED WINTER SIRE SUMMARY 2016 BEEFMASTER BREEDERS UNITED WINTER SIRE SUMMARY 2016 Winter Sire Summary Without question, s are currently the most objective measures of genetic prediction. For decades, beef cattle producers have

More information