Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season
|
|
- Rosamund McDonald
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season March 7, 2010 Prepared for The Pennsylvania Game Commission Board of Commissioners By John Eveland
2 RECOMMENDATIONS I. CONCURRENT SEASON A. ACTION: End it. Resume a two-week buck-only season followed by a three-day antlerless season. 1. The separate-sex deer hunting season is a successful time-tested scientific "optimum sustained yield" management technique. 2. Permitting sportsmen to hunt both sexes concurrently with two tags available to them creates an opportunity for a significant illegal and unreported antlerless harvest. 3. Until deer density is increased in some WMUs, fewer shots during a two-week buck-only season could result in increased, albeit temporary, hunter dissatisfaction regarding the low density of deer. II. ANTLER RESTRICTION A. ACTION: End it. Return to antlered deer with a 3"- minimum spike. 1. This action should increase the number of available legal buck and, thus, the buck harvest by 30-50%. 2. It will prevent the "shoot-first/count-later" approach by hunters that may currently result in a significant illegal harvest of yearling buck, and thus a waste of the resource. 3. There will be a decrease in the number of older and bigger buck in the population. 4. If intensive habitat manipulation is implemented as recommended (see III), such habitat enhancement will increase both vegetative and wildlife productivity, create a "healthier" forest ecosystem, increase carrying capacity for deer (as well as for many non-game species), and hence mitigate the effects incurred from eliminating antler restrictions by producing more, healthier, and larger yearling buck. III. HABITAT ENHANCEMENT A. ACTION: Announce a plan to enhance habitat on public lands for both game and non-game species. 1. Announcing such a plan will mitigate any concerns regarding the future effects of higher deer density on forest regeneration. 2. As Forest Management Units (FMUs) are created: Food and cover will be greatly improved throughout the forest, especially improving winter carry-over.
3 Ecosystem diversity will increase regarding forest stand type, vegetative biodiversity of both woody and herbaceous plants, and non-game species of birds (especially perching birds) and mammals. Carrying capacity for deer will dramatically increase. Carrying capacity for many other species of game animals, especially grouse, will dramatically increase. Carrying capacity for non-game animals (both birds (including ovenbirds ) and mammals as well as herptiles) will dramatically increase. 3. Regarding grouse, this FMU plan should rapidly return healthy populations to areas of the state where their numbers have dramatically declined or disappeared. 4. FMU habitat enhancement should significantly improve the health of deer, as might be representative of embryo-count surveys. 5. FMU habitat enhancement should significantly improve the health of the forest. 6. FMU habitat enhancement should significantly increase the health, body growth, antler growth, and density (number) of buck. 7. The current system of creating and maintaining food plots on public lands should be curtailed. IV. DMAP A. ACTION: End the "indiscriminate" use of DMAP. 1. Require detailed plans with adequate justification before approval of DMAP. 2. Define three parameters for approval: a. Requests based on Social Criteria b. Requests based on Biological Criteria c. Requests based on Commercial Criteria V. URBAN DEER MANAGEMENT A. ACTION: Announce increased concern over developing an effective deer management plan for urban areas. 1. Maintain current harvest methods (antlerless allocations and seasons) for urban areas. 2. Continue investigation of alternative methods for controlling deer density in urban WMUs. VI. DEER DENSITY AND CARRYING CAPACITY A. ACTION: Announce plans to determine the actual density of deer per square mile and thus the real number of deer comprising the population within each WMU.
4 1. This action will satisfy sportsmen who believe that determining real numbers of deer are vital to effective deer management. It is, in fact, true, and represents the basis of a scientific management plan. 2. Deer density per square mile within WMUs should be used to determine the size of the herd. 3. The carrying capacity (in deer per square mile) of each WMU should be investigated and determined, representing the maximum density of deer that can be maintained in each WMU. From this maximum carrying capacity a lower optimum carrying capacity should be calculated, and future allocations of anterless permits should be annually adjusted toward maintaining this optimum density of deer per WMU. VII. WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT UNITS A. ACTION: Reassess the WMU concept. 1. Do not micromanage WMUs based solely on biological criteria. Social criteria, especially hunter satisfaction and ease-of-understanding, should be a principal concern. 2. WMUs should be reassessed as to size, number, and geographic configuration. 3. Compromise should be made to follow county boundaries where possible, thus making the system more hunter-friendly, increasing hunter satisfaction, and enhancing understanding and compliance by hunters. VIII. WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY A. ACTION: Define PGC's wildlife management philosophy. 1. Regarding Game Management: The PGC shall manage game animals within the Commonwealth according to an "optimum sustained yield" philosophy. Sustained yield, herein, is defined as the continued production of game animals for recreation use by sportsmen that is achievable over an indefinite period of time without undue impairment to the forest and natural resources. Whereas the classic maximum sustained yield of game animals produced the greatest number of harvestable animals that were allowed while maintaining a sustainable supply over time ( thus possibly reaching or approaching the calculated carrying capacity of the land), optimum sustained yield considers the effects of other herbivores, the needs of nongame species, and the overall health of the forest ecosystem. Thus, the density of deer in maintaining an optimum sustained yield will be lower than traditional goals of maximum sustained yield. The forest will, therefore, be maintained in healthy balance, while providing an adequate harvest of deer for sportsmen. 2. Regarding Non-Game Management: The PGC shall manage non-game birds and mammals toward the overall health and balance of the forest and in the best interest of all citizens of the Commonwealth according to an "ecosystem management"
5 philosophy. Efforts will be directed toward the maximization of non-game species diversity and the optimization of specific non-game population densities. 3. Regarding Forest Management: The PGC shall manage public lands toward assuring forest health and diversity according to a "multiple use" philosophy. A silvicultural rotation will be maintained toward the continuous sustained yield of lumber and forest products. Portions of the forest will be removed from normal forest rotational cycles to mature as "old growth" forests. The remainder of the forest ecosystem will be manipulated toward enhancing the carrying capacity and diversity of wildlife. Note that the considerations toward determining the health of the forest should be: (a) sustainability the ability of the forest to restock and sustain itself, (b) diversity determined to be the number and type of plant and animal species that can be maintained under practical conditions, and (c) productivity not simply the desire to maximize forest understory density through the reduction of the principal forest herbivore, but toward maintaining the long-term balance of the ecosystem and its food chain. IX. GOAL OF THE PGC's DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM A. ACTION: Eliminate the three (or five) current goals of the deer management program and replace them with the following goal. Considering the above-defined wildlife management philosophies of the PGC, the goal of the deer management program shall be: To provide the optimum sustained yield of deer for sport hunting. Toward accomplishing this goal, the following criteria shall be met: forest habitat will be maintained at a sufficient level of productivity that will permit the designed maximum annual harvest with minimum winter starvation (i.e. while maintaining a healthy forest and healthy deer herd). habitat shall be manipulated toward increasing carrying capacity for deer as well as for other wildlife species, toward enhancing wildlife diversity, and toward increasing the overall health and productivity of the forest. X. ANTLERLESS DEER SEASON A. ACTION: End concurrent season, establish consistency in the duration of the season (number of days), and alter the annual allocation of antlerless licenses to adjust the size of the herd. 1. Create a separate antlerless season that is in addition to and following the two-week buck season. 2. Return the duration of the antlerless season to a socially acceptable number and configuration of days:
6 a. Maintain the season at three days following the annual buck season. b. Choose the first Monday and Tuesday following the buck season toward accommodating hunters with camps, and add the following Saturday as a third day that considers youth hunters who may find it difficult to take off school on weekdays. 3. The annual adjustment of the deer population, therefore, will not be a factor of the duration of the doe season, but will use only one tool to adjust the deer population the allocated numbers of doe permits per WMU. 4. The annual impact of anterless allocations upon herd density should be closely monitored and determined in real numbers, not simply as a trend. XI. ANTLERLESS LICENSE ALLOCATIONS FOR 2010 A. ACTION: Reduce antlerless allocations for 2010 and monitor the results. 1. Recommended 2010 antlerless license allocations are listed based on trends in PGCreported data from Parameters used per WMU to estimate projected 2010 antlerless allocations were: deer density estimates. antlered harvest per square mile. antlerless harvests. PGC population objectives. antlerless license allocations. human social considerations regarding each WMU. 2. The 2010 season should establish as many "fixed" parameters as possible if a new deer management philosophy is implemented a change from the current ecosystem management plan to a new optimum sustained yield objective. Toward maximizing the accuracy in meeting target population goals, ideally the number of allocated antlerless licenses would be the only variable that needs to be adjusted from year to year. 3. Based upon the qualitative metrics and highly variable efficacy of PGC's data, their system for deer population estimates, harvest calculations, and antlerless permit allocations appears to be more of an art than a science.
7 RECOMMENDED ANTLERLESS LICENSE ALLOCATIONS FOR RECOMMENDATION PGC 2008 Approximate Antlerless Population Change to Antlerless WMU Allocation Objective 2009 Allocation Allocation 1A 42,000 Stable ,000 1B 30,000 Stable ,000 2A 55,000 Stable ,000 2B 68,000 Decrease 0 68,000 2C 49,000 Stable ,000 2D 56,000 Stable ,000 2E 21,000 Stable ,000 2F 28,000 Stable ,000 2G 26,000 Stable A 26,000 Stable ,000 3B 43,000 Stable ,000 3C 27,000 Stable ,000 3D 37,000 Stable ,000 4A 29,000 Stable ,000 4B 23,000 Increase ,000 4C 35,000 Stable ,000 4D 40,000 Stable ,000 4E 30,000 Increase ,000 5A 19,000 Increase ,000 5B 51,000 Stable ,000 5C 113,000 Decrease ,000 5D 22,000 Unknown 0 22,000 Total 870, ,000
8 XII. RESEARCH AND MONITORING A. ACTION: The PGC should conduct, but not be limited to, the following research and monitoring programs. B. CONSIDERATIONS: 1. To maximize the scientific efficacy of deer management, a field research and monitoring programs should be established: a. To determine fawn production and survival to the fall hunting season. b. To determine per WMU the population density, age composition, and gender composition of the deer herd both pre-hunting season (late summer) and post-hunting season (mid-winter). c. To determine the extent of winter mortality. d. To assess the status of forest habitat (biomass productivity) and trends in the capacity of the forest to regenerate as well as to restock itself. 2. Indicators of change: a. Grouse populations should be monitored to establish baseline densities prior to habitat enhancement, and continued post-fmu implementation to monitor trends in the grouse population. b. A non-game animal (such as the ovenbird) should be monitored pre- and post-habitat enhancement as an indicator of population trends for non-game species, especially ground-dwelling animals and low-level nesting birds.
CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased
CHECKS AND BALANCES 5 OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased activity. BACKGROUND White Tailed Deer White-tailed deer have always been a part of the forest
More informationFull summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) implemented a public outreach and input process in 2013 and 2014 in management Zones A, B and C. The goal of this process was to present the
More informationDeer Management Unit 122
Deer Management Unit 122 Area Description DMU 122 is located in south Dickinson County and includes a small portion of west central Menominee County. It encompasses 163 sq. miles and has remained unchanged
More informationDMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit
DMU 8 Barry County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Barry County Deer Management Unit (DMU) 8 is in the Southwest Region and was once part of the Bellevue deer management unit 38. Bellevue DMU
More informationIntroduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management
Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management To anyone who has carefully studied the situation it is evident that
More informationDMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit
DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Midland County Deer Management Unit (DMU) 056 is in the Northern Lower Peninsula (NLP) Region. It has roughly 333, 440 acres and consists
More informationALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units
ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units Arizona Game and Fish Department April 4, 2006 Alternative Deer Management
More informationTHE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL
PRINTER'S NO. THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL No. 0 Session of 01 INTRODUCED BY MALONEY, HANNA, TOEPEL, ELLIS, SACCONE, BLOOM, READSHAW, D. COSTA, ORTITAY, McGINNIS, DIAMOND, GIBBONS, QUIGLEY,
More informationImplementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association
Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association QDMA Deer Population Trends 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000
More informationDMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit
DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit Area Description Antrim County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has roughly 74 square miles (47,451 acres) of public land
More informationDMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties
DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties Area Description The Fremont Deer Management Unit (DMU 361) was established in 2013. It lies within the Southwest Region and covers
More informationIN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development
BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS 217 IN PROGRESS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/departments/erd.html MOOSE HARVEST REPORT 217 Summary Each year, moose
More informationDMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit
DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Arenac County Deer Management Unit (DMU) 006 is in the Northern Lower Peninsula (NLP) Region. It has roughly 248,320 acres and consists of
More information021 Deer Management Unit
021 Deer Management Unit Geographic Location: Deer Management Unit (DMU) 021 is 1,464 square miles in size and is located in the central Upper Peninsula (UP). This DMU is dominated by publicly owned land
More informationDeer Management Unit 152
Deer Management Unit 152 Geographic Location: Deer Management Unit (DMU) 152 is 386 miles 2 in size and is primarily in southwestern Marquette County. This DMU falls within the moderate snowfall zone and
More informationDEER HUNT RESULTS ON ALABAMA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS ANNUAL REPORT, CHRISTOPHER W. COOK STUDY LEADER MAY, 2006
DEER HUNT RESULTS ON ALABAMA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS ANNUAL REPORT, 2005-2006 CHRISTOPHER W. COOK STUDY LEADER MAY, 2006 ALABAMA DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AND FRESHWATER FISHERIES Federal Aid Project funded
More informationDeer Management Unit 252
Deer Management Unit 252 Geographic Location: Deer Management Unit (DMU) 252 is 297 miles 2 in size and is primarily in southeastern Marquette, southwestern Alger and northwestern Delta County. This DMU
More informationMinnesota Deer Population Goals
Minnesota Deer Population Goals Superior Uplands Arrowhead Goal Block Minnesota DNR Section of Wildlife, 2015 Final Deer Population Goals Block 1: Superior Uplands Arrowhead The following pages provide
More informationDeer Management Unit 249
Deer Management Unit 249 Geographic Location: DMU 249 lies along the Lake Michigan shoreline and is comprised largely of Mackinac and Chippewa counties with a small portion of southeastern Luce County
More informationDMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit
Area Description DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit The Saginaw County Deer Management Unit (DMU 073) is located in the Southern Lower Peninsula in the Saginaw Bay region of Wildlife Division
More information2015 Deer Population Goal Setting
Deer advisory team recommendations Block 4: East Central Uplands The following pages represent deer population goals recommended by the 2015 deer advisory team for Block 4: East Central Uplands (permit
More informationDMU 038 Jackson County
DMU 038 Jackson County Area Description The Jackson Deer Management Unit (DMU), or DMU 038, lies in the Southern Lower Peninsula (SLP) region and covers Jackson County. The DMU consists of five percent
More informationDMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit
DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit Area Description Emmet County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has roughly 126 square miles (80,371 acres) of public land
More informationMinnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block
Minnesota Deer Population Goals East Central Uplands Goal Block Minnesota DNR Section of Wildlife, 2015 Final Deer Population Goals Block 4: East Central Uplands The following pages provide a description
More informationDeer Management Unit 349
Deer Management Unit 349 Geographic Location: DMU 349 lies along the lake Michigan shoreline and is largely comprised of western Mackinac county with small portions of southern Luce county and southeastern
More informationFISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
216 FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT www.gnb.ca/erd/naturalresources MOOSE HARVEST REPORT 216 Summary Each year, moose licence quotas are
More informationDMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit
DMU 43 Lake County Deer Management Unit Area Description Lake County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has approximately 2, acres of public land which is about half
More informationDeer Management Unit 127
Deer Management Unit 127 Area Description Deer Management Unit (DMU) 127 is 328 sq. miles in size and is found in far western Gogebic County surrounding Ironwood, Bessemer and adjacent rural communities.
More information5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit
5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Otsego County Deer Management Unit (DMU 069) is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has roughly 159 Square miles (101,800
More informationAN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47
AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47 Survey mailed: April 2010 Data analyzed: June 2010
More informationNEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS Draft Page 2 of 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS Schedule for formulating harvest management guidelines..............................................
More informationDMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit
DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit Area Description Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has roughly 99,000 acres of public land which is about
More informationDMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit
DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Wayne Deer Management Unit (DMU 082) lies in the Southeast Region and borders Lake Erie to the East and includes Celeron and Stony Islands
More informationMonitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group
Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota - 2014 Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group INTRODUCTION White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) represent one
More information2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK
2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK A collaborative survey by the Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group Report Prepared by: Karen Loveless, Montana Fish Wildlife
More informationARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE AND HUNTING SEASONS
ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE 2016-2017 AND 2017-2018 HUNTING SEASONS As proposed by the Arizona Game and Fish Commission 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Schedule for formulating 2016-2017 and
More information2010 Zone 3 Deer Season Recommendations
2010 Zone 3 Deer Season Recommendations Prepared by: Lou Cornicelli Big Game Program Coordinator Marrett D. Grund Farmland Deer Project Leader Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish
More information2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST
2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST Region 7 Region 7 is located in Central New York, occupying a nine-county area reaching from Lake Ontario to the Pennsylvania border. This region is comprised of two broad ecological
More informationDMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit
DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit Area Description Mason County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP) on the Lake Michigan coast. Only 17% of the land base is public
More informationLEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron
& LEAPS BOUNDS by Dan Bergeron Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t give much thought to how the deer population was managed or what went into setting hunting seasons every year. My mind
More informationBig Game Season Structure, Background and Context
To: Members of the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission From: Danielle Isenhart, Regulations Manager Date: April 16, 2018 Re: 2020-2024 Big Game Season Structure, Background and Context At the May Commission
More informationDMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit
DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit (DMU 040) is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP) (Figure 1). It has roughly 170,000 acres
More informationWhite-Tailed Deer Management FAQ
December 6 th, 217 Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ What are current white-tailed deer management objectives in the Kootenay
More informationDMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit
DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit Area Description Missaukee County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has over 100,000 acres of state land, just over
More informationDMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit
DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Leelanau County Deer Management Unit (DMU 045) is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has roughly 7,100 acres of State Forest
More informationManagement History of the Edwards Plateau
Management History of the Edwards Plateau Eco regions of Texas Edwards Plateau 24,000,000 acres About 15,000 years ago, the Edwards Plateau was much cooler and was more forested than today. Pollen counts
More informationDMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit
DMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit Area Description Roscommon County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has roughly 205,000 acres of public land which is
More informationTRINITY COUNTY. Board Item Request Form Phone
County Contract No. Department Board of Supervisors TRINITY COUNTY 3.04 Board Item Request Form 2014-01-28 Contact John Fenley Phone 623-1217 Requested Agenda Location Consent Requested Board Action: Adopt
More informationAnnual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.
Annual Report 2005 Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia. PROJECT INVESTIGATORS: Stephen S. Ditchkoff, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Forestry and Wildlife Sciences Bldg.,
More informationDeer Management Unit 255
Deer Management Unit 255 Area Description DMU 255 is located primarily in northern Menominee County, but also extends into a small portion of Dickinson, Marquette, and Delta counties. It has totaled 463
More informationDMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit
DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Lenawee Deer Management Unit (DMU), or DMU 046, lies in the Southeastern Lower Peninsula (SLP) region and covers Lenawee County. The majority
More informationKansas Deer Report Seasons
Kansas Deer Report 215-16 Seasons I. Current Harvest Hunter harvest of deer during the 215-16 seasons was estimated to be 95,813, 2.% more than the 93,94 deer taken in 214-15 (see table below for breakdown
More informationJob Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion
SPECIES: Goal: Manage the mountain lion population, its numbers and distribution, as an important part of Arizona s fauna and to provide mountain lion hunting recreation opportunity while maintaining existing
More informationMinnesota Deer Population Goals
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Minnesota Deer Population
More informationDMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit
DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Livingston Deer Management Unit (DMU) lies in the Southern Lower Peninsula (SLP) region and covers only Livingston County. Most public
More informationPROPOSED RULEMAKING GAME COMMISSION
PROPOSED RULEMAKING GAME COMMISSION [ 58 PA. CODE CH. 141 ] Hunting and Trapping; Prohibited Devices its October 5, 2010, meeting, proposed to add 141.68 (relating to prohibited devices) to specifically
More informationFindings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG
Findings of the Alaska Board of Game 2004-148-BOG Authorizing Predator Control in the Western Cook Inlet Area in Unit 16B with Airborne or Same Day Airborne Shooting March 10, 2004 Purpose This action
More informationWhite-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation
Population Estimate White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 21 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation White-tailed deer in BC were managed using a combination of General Open Season (GOS) and Limited Entry
More informationJob Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion
SPECIES: Goal: Manage the mountain lion population, its numbers and distribution, as an important part of Arizona s fauna and to provide mountain lion hunting recreation opportunity while maintaining existing
More informationJob Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion
Job Title:, Subsection B Goal: Manage the mountain lion population, its numbers and distribution, as an important part of Arizona s fauna and to provide mountain lion hunting recreation opportunity while
More informationDMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit
DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit Area Description The Greenleaf Deer Management Unit (DMU 332) lies in the Southeast Region of the Southern Lower Peninsula (SLP) and covers
More informationDMU 419 Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia, and Shiawassee Counties
DMU 419 Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia, and Shiawassee Counties Area Description Deer Management Unit (DMU) 419 is in the Southern Lower Peninsula Region (SLP). It consists of Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia,
More informationFindings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG
Purpose and Need Findings of the Alaska Board of Game 2004-150-BOG Authorizing Wolf Predation Control in the Unit 19(A) Portion of the Central Kuskokwim Wolf Predation Control Area With Airborne or Same
More informationcontents 2004 Big Game Statistics
2004 Big Game Statistics Introduction How to use this information... 2 Setting regulations... 3 How the information is collected... 4 How the management system works... 5 Making your points work for you...
More informationChagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F
Appendix F The following are excerpts from the Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture s Conservation Strategy (Working Draft v.6), Conserving the Eastern Brook Trout: Strategies for Action Found at: http://www.easternbrooktrout.org/constrategy.html
More informationmake people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,
Investing in Wisconsin s Whitetails 1 Over the last 60 years, the department has developed a deer herd monitoring and management system that seeks to use the best science and data possible. The deer monitoring
More informationQuality Deer Management and Prescribed Fire Natural Partners in Wildlife and Habitat Conservation
Quality Deer Management and Prescribed Fire Natural Partners in Wildlife and Habitat Conservation Brian Murphy CEO / Wildlife Biologist Quality Deer Management Association About the QDMA 22-year-old nonprofit
More informationCentral Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results
Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Table of Contents Public Surveys for Deer Goal Setting... 1 Methods... 1 Hunter Survey... 2 Demographics... 2 Population
More information2008 WMU 106 mule deer
2008 WMU 106 mule deer Section Authors: Mike Grue and Kim Morton Suggested citation: Grue, M. and K. Morton. 2009. WMU 106 mule deer. Pages 50 54. In: N. Webb and R. Anderson. Delegated aerial ungulate
More informationUS Army Corps of Engineers. Clearwater Lake. Little Rock District Clearwater Deer Hunt For the Non-ambulatory. Clearwater Lake Project Office
US Army Corps of Engineers Little Rock District Clearwater Lake 2017 Clearwater Deer Hunt For the Non-ambulatory 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Little Rock District Special Hunt Application Office Use Only
More informationDMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit
DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Core TB Zone Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP) and covers portions of Alcona, Alpena, Montmorency,
More informationcontents 2009 Big Game Statistics
2009 Big Game Statistics Introduction How to use this information... 2 Setting regulations... 3 How the information is collected... 4 How the management system works... 5 Making your points work for you...
More informationPREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE
PREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE BEN H. KOERTH, Institute for White-tailed Deer Management and Research, Box 6109, Arthur Temple College of Forestry, Stephen F. Austin State
More informationNorthwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results
Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Table of Contents Public Surveys for Deer Goal Setting... 1 Methods... 1 Hunter Survey... 2 Demographics... 2 Population
More informationCincinnati Parks Wildlife Management Report
Cincinnati Parks Wildlife Management Report Cincinnati Parks has been managing the deer herd in select parks for 7 years. During that time we have had new members join our Board, new City Council members,
More informationRANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast
RANCHING Wildlife Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast During most summers, I take a short break and head to Colorado, Wyoming, or somewhere out west to enjoy a respite from the hot South Texas
More informationReport to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife
Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife As Required by 12 Section 10107-A White-tailed Deer Population Management Written By: Wildlife Management Staff, Inland Fisheries
More informationAs the first cool front of the year arrived in the brush country of South Texas, a young
Whitetail University As the first cool front of the year arrived in the brush country of South Texas, a young college student ensconced in an elevated deer blind was living his dream. With the sudden drop
More informationMISSISSIPPI COMMISSION ON WILDLIFE, FISHERIES, AND PARKS MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES, AND PARKS
MISSISSIPPI COMMISSION ON WILDLIFE, FISHERIES, AND PARKS MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES, AND PARKS Title 40: Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks Part 2: Wildlife Part 2, Chapter 2: White-tailed
More informationUS Army Corps of Engineers. Clearwater Lake. Little Rock District Clearwater Wounded Warrior Deer Hunt. Clearwater Lake Project Office
US Army Corps of Engineers Little Rock District Clearwater Lake 2017 Clearwater Wounded Warrior Deer Hunt 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Little Rock District Special Hunt Application Office Use Only Application
More informationCariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions
Harvest Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions A number of questions and concerns have been expressed from resident hunters about the change in the mule deer hunting regulations
More informationTownship of Plainsboro Ordinance No County of Middlesex AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN ON CERTAIN PUBLIC PROPERTY
Township of Plainsboro Ordinance No. 18-10 County of Middlesex AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN ON CERTAIN PUBLIC PROPERTY WHEREAS, White-tailed deer populations have been increasing and
More informationCurrent Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes
Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes Jason Breeggemann Senior Fisheries Biologist Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Outline DNR fisheries
More informationNORTH TABLELANDS DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN
NORTH TABLELANDS DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN DATA ANALYSIS UNIT D-5 Game Management Units 87, 88, 89, 90, & 95 November 2007 Marty Stratman Colorado Division of Wildlife Terrestrial Biologist 122 E. Edison
More informationBIG GAME SEASON STRUCTURE
9/11/2014 2015-2019 BIG GAME SEASON STRUCTURE Approved By Parks and Wildlife Commission - September, 2014 I. DEER AND ELK SEASON STRUCTURE Deer and Elk Seasons listed below assume no change to the relative
More informationOREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL AND EFFECTS OF LETHAL CONTROL
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL ODFW is authorized to reduce human-cougar conflict, livestock depredation, and benefit native ungulate populations through the
More informationUSDA APHIS WILDLIFE SERVICES ACTIVITIES SUMMARY REPORT 2013 WHITE-TAILED DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TOWNSHIP OF UPPER ST. CLAIR (September 2013)
USDA APHIS WILDLIFE SERVICES ACTIVITIES SUMMARY REPORT 2013 WHITE-TAILED DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TOWNSHIP OF UPPER ST. CLAIR (September 2013) USDA APHIS Wildlife Services (WS) was requested by the Township
More informationWhite-tailed Deer Age Report from the Deer Harvest
White-tailed Deer Age Report from the 2016 Deer Harvest The Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department has made a concerted effort, beginning in 2015, to increase the amount of age data collected from harvested
More information2018 WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLAN
2018 WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Captain Daniel Wills Officer Dominic Wareham DATE: July 11, 2018 RE: 2018 Wildlife Management Plan CONTENTS I. 2017 Wildlife Management Report II. 2017
More informationCHARLES H. WILLEY PHOTO. 8 November/December 2006 WILDLIFE JOURNAL
CHARLES H. WILLEY PHOTO 8 November/December 2006 WILDLIFE JOURNAL The hunter harvest is a rich source of management information for wildlife biologists. BY KENT GUSTAFSON Each fall, hunters enjoy their
More informationMule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book
Mule Deer Dennis D. Austin Published by Utah State University Press Austin, D.. Mule Deer: A Handbook for Utah Hunters and Landowners. Logan: Utah State University Press, 2010. Project MUSE., https://muse.jhu.edu/.
More informationA SURVEY ON MOOSE MANAGEMENT IN CENTRAL ONTARIO
A SURVEY ON MOOSE MANAGEMENT IN CENTRAL ONTARIO Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters Mark Ryckman, M.Sc. Senior Wildlife Biologist 4601 Guthrie Drive Peterborough, ON K9J 8L5 T: 705.748.6324 x239
More informationNEW YORK STATE WHITETAIL MANAGEMENT COALITION, INC. PO Box 191,Grahamsville, New York
NEW YORK STATE WHITETAIL MANAGEMENT COALITION, INC. PO Box 191,Grahamsville, New York 12740 INFO@NYSWMC.com 646-216-9312 Yearling Buck Conservation With Antler Restrictions Is it working in New York? Assessment
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Michael J. Frank Alaska Bar No. 7410076 TRUSTEES FOR ALASKA 1026 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Phone: (907 276-4244 Fax: (907 276-7110 Valerie L. Brown Alaska Bar No. 9712099 LAW OFFICE
More informationBiologist s Answer: What are your goals? Deer Management. Define goals, objectives. Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes?
Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes? Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes? Biologist s Answer: What are your goals? How futile it is to passively follow a recipe without understanding
More information1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;
British Columbia Deer Status Report forthe 1987 Western ~ tates~cinces Deer workshop - 1. Attending Representative: Ian Hatter Wildlife Branch Ministry of Environment and Parks Victoria, British Columbia
More informationNORTH COVENTRY TOWNSHIP White-Tailed Deer
NORTH COVENTRY TOWNSHIP 2016-2017 White-Tailed Deer Regulated Archery Hunting Program RULES AND REGULATIONS North Coventry Township 845 S. Hanover St Pottstown, PA 19465 610-323-1694 1 SAFETY STATEMENT
More information2016 ANNUAL REPORT A CONSTITUTIONAL AGENCY FUNDED BY SPORTSMEN AND WOMEN THROUGH THEIR PURCHASE OF HUNTING AND FISHING LICENSES.
216 ANNUAL REPORT A CONSTITUTIONAL AGENCY FUNDED BY SPORTSMEN AND WOMEN THROUGH THEIR PURCHASE OF HUNTING AND FISHING LICENSES. WHO WE ARE The Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, or ODWC, is
More informationSUMMARY REPORT Managed Archery Program Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania. Submitted by Dr. Anthony J. DeNicola White Buffalo Inc.
SUMMARY REPORT 2016-2017 Managed Archery Program Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania Submitted by Dr. Anthony J. DeNicola White Buffalo Inc. INTRODUCTION The principal purpose for the continuation of this program
More informationCoyotes. The coyote, considered by many as a symbol of the Old West, now resides
Coyotes The coyote, considered by many as a symbol of the Old West, now resides throughout the continental USA. The eerie sounding howl of this reclusive predator is a welcomed sound to tourists, but to
More information