AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47"

Transcription

1 AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47 Survey mailed: April 2010 Data analyzed: June 2010 Report issued: August 2010 Division of Fish and Wildlife David Chanda, Director Larry Herrighty, Assistant Director Bureau of Wildlife Management Patrick C. Carr, Supervising Wildlife Biologist by Deer Research Project Carole Kandoth, Principal Wildlife Biologist Joe Leskie, Senior Wildlife Biologist Dan Roberts, Senior Wildlife Biologist Jodi Powers, Senior Wildlife Biologist Andrew Riviello, Seasonal Wildlife Technician

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The use of Antler Point Restrictions (APR) in deer management has become a popular management strategy for state agencies and hunters throughout the United States. APR is a component of Quality Deer Management (QDM), which establishes appropriate harvest restrictions for bucks, usually protecting younger age class bucks by setting the minimum number of antler points for a legal antlered deer. QDM is a management philosophy or practice that unites landowners, hunters and managers in a common goal of producing biologically and socially balanced deer herds within existing environmental, social and legal constraints. The use of APR in New Jersey is primarily a social hunting issue, where hunters prefer to protect the majority of young antlered bucks from the harvest each year in the hopes that additional larger-antlered bucks will be available for harvest in following years. The New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) believes that APR has no biological or management consequences in most of the State, but would not support its implementation where the habitat does not provide for healthy annual antler growth or where human population densities make a lowered buck harvest undesirable. DFW and the Fish and Game Council (Council) implemented an experimental Antler Point Restriction program in 2000 for Deer Management Zones (DMZ) 3, 6, 9, 13, 27, 29, 35 and 63. Hunters in these DMZs are required to harvest only those antlered bucks having at least one antler with 3 or more points on one side. Based on hunter dissatisfaction with APR in DMZ 6, the Council deleted this DMZ from the APR program in Recent data analysis of existing southern zones with APR regulations (DMZs 27, 29, 35 and 63) showed the combined average harvest before APR was 1,876 bucks per year. After the institution of APR, the combined average harvest was 1,289 bucks per year. This 31% decline in the antlered harvest due to APR regulations was not unexpected by DFW biologists. APR is an impediment to the harvest of an antlered deer. Because APR makes a substantial number of yearling bucks illegal, a large percentage of that age class elude harvest resulting in a decline in that segment of the antlered harvest. The 2.5 yr old and 3.5+ yr old segments show an increase as a percentage of total antlered harvest. It should be noted that the percentage of older age class bucks harvested increases purely as a response to the decline in the yearling segment of the harvest, even if the actual number of older age class bucks harvested does not increase. Recently, the Council received a request to add five southern New Jersey DMZs, 28, 30, 31, 34 and 47, to the APR program. Because Council sets seasons, bag limits and manner of take based on scientific evidence presented to it by DFW, DFW biologists conducted a scientific survey to determine the opinion of hunters who hunt deer within the five proposed DMZs. Prior to the mailing of the survey package, three public seminars were held to provide actual data to allow hunters to form an opinion, and to answer any questions from hunters. Postcards about the scheduled seminars were sent out to all hunters who purchased a deer permit from at least one of the proposed DMZs. DFW biologists presented harvest data from APR DMZs already existing in southern NJ and harvest data and projections for the five proposed DMZs. Over 3,200 postcards were sent out; attendance at all three seminars totaled only about 120 people. The survey was conducted in April 2010 to determine the opinion of deer hunters on the inclusion of the proposed DMZs into APR regulations. The survey was mailed to 3,231 hunters who purchased a deer Page 2 of 57

3 hunting permit from at least one of the five proposed APR DMZs during the season. Hunters returned 1,351 completed surveys and 128 surveys came back as undeliverable. The survey return rate was (44%) indicating a strong interest in this subject. DFW biologists have determined the following conclusions from the survey: The majority (66%) of respondents had hunted during at least one of the bow seasons. The majority (78%) of respondents had hunted during at least one of the gun seasons. The majority (91%) of respondents had hunted during the 6-day firearm season. The majority of respondents (73%) were 40 years or older, An overwhelming majority of the respondents (97%) were male. The majority of respondents (81%) were affiliated with some sort of hunting organization (QDMA, NJSFSC, UBNJ, deer hunting club or other hunting organization) The majority of respondents (64%) hunted private land and the majority of those properties were less than 100 acres (64%). The majority of respondents (83%) hunted deer from an elevated stand. The majority of respondents (80%) hunted deer over bait. 33% of respondents stated that they were a member of a hunting club that actively drives deer during the deer season. The majority of respondents (61%) harvested NO antlered bucks. A slight majority of respondents (54%) harvested NO antlerless deer. Less than half of respondents were satisfied with deer hunting, both in total and by DMZ. Only about one-quarter of respondents were satisfied with buck hunting; respondents from DMZ 28 (36%) were more satisfied than respondents from the other DMZs. More than 2/3 of respondents were in favor of APR Regulations, both in total and by DMZ. The majority of respondents (60%) would be willing to harvest more antlerless deer and see an increase in the antlerless harvest. The majority of respondents (69%) would give up the chance of shooting small-antlered deer and shoot more does in exchange for the increased chance of shooting a large-antlered buck in later years. The majority of respondents (84%) chose to harvest fewer bucks if those bucks were older, had more mass and more antler points as opposed to harvesting more bucks that were younger, with fewer points and less mass. A slight majority of respondents (56%) would be willing to accept a 4-point Antler Point Restriction in DMZs with high quality browse and food availability. Page 3 of 57

4 In all DMZs, the majority of respondents who harvested NO bucks in 2008 felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested. The percentages varied by DMZ. In all DMZs, about 1/3 of respondents who harvested 1 buck in 2008 felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested. The percentages varied by DMZ. In all DMZs, about 10% of respondents who harvested 2 bucks in 2008 felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested. The percentages varied by DMZ. In all DMZs, less than 5% of respondents who harvested 3 or more bucks in 2008 felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested. The percentages varied by DMZ. Concerning the current buck bag limit in New Jersey per hunting year, respondents were evenly split between keeping the buck bag limit where it is now at six antlered deer (51%) and changing it to less than six antlered deer (49%). This even split occurred in the overall survey and by DMZ. When respondents chose to harvest less bucks than what currently is allowed, the majority of those respondents chose to harvest 2 bucks or less. The percentages varied by DMZ. When asked about the difficulty in identifying legal bucks while driving deer with the APR restrictions, the majority of respondents (69%) agreed that it would be difficult to identify legal bucks while driving deer. Less than half of respondents (44%) stated that they would give up driving deer because it may be harder to identify legal antler points if APR regulations were enacted. DMZ 28: 73% of Deer Club member respondents are IN favor of APR regulations for DMZ 28 DMZ 30: 71% of Deer Club member respondents are IN favor of APR regulations for DMZ 30 DMZ 31: 69% of Deer Club member respondents are IN favor of APR regulations for DMZ 31 DMZ 34: 65% of Deer Club member respondents are IN favor of APR regulations for DMZ 34 DMZ 47: 69% of Deer Club member respondents are IN favor of APR regulations for DMZ 47 DMZ 28: 71% of Deer Club member respondents who DRIVE deer are IN favor of APR regulations. DMZ 30: 72% of Deer Club member respondents who DRIVE deer are IN favor of APR regulations. DMZ 31: 70% of Deer Club member respondents who DRIVE deer are IN favor of APR regulations. DMZ 34: 62% of Deer Club member respondents who DRIVE deer are IN favor of APR regulations. DMZ 47: 70% of Deer Club member respondents who DRIVE deer are IN favor of APR regulations. The results of the 2010 Antler Point Restriction Survey were compared to similar results from a 2006 New Jersey Deer Hunter Satisfaction survey conducted for the New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife by Responsive Management. Deer hunters were asked to share their opinions about Quality Deer Management efforts. In the 2006 survey, deer hunters were willing to accept the proposed restrictions. Seventy-six percent of respondents were willing to give up the chance to shoot small-antlered bucks and shoot more does in exchange for an increased chance to shoot large-antlered bucks in later years. In the 2010 survey, sixty-nine percent of deer hunters in all the proposed APR zones were willing to give up the chance to shoot small-antlered bucks and shoot more does in exchange for an increased chance to shoot large-antlered bucks in later years to increase the overall quality of the herd. Also, hunters who hunted deer over bait have increased greatly from the 2006 survey (41%), compared to the 2010 survey in which (80%) of respondents hunted deer over bait. Page 4 of 57

5 Introduction and Methodology A mail survey was sent to 3,231 deer hunting permit holders from five southern New Jersey Deer Management Zones (DMZ) proposed for inclusion in Antler Point Restrictions (APR). Questions were constructed to solicit opinions from hunters about adding DMZs 28, 30, 31, 34 and 47. Permit purchasers were identified through the Electronic Licensing System (ELS), which has collected data on license and permit holders since its implementation in Due to time constraints imposed by the Fish and Game Council s timeline to vote on amendments for the 2011 Game Code by August 2010, survey participants were drawn from the ELS database of all deer permits sold in the proposed DMZs from the hunting season. The survey package, mailed out in April 2010, consisted of an introductory letter from the New Jersey Division of Fish & Wildlife s Deer Research Project, a twenty-one question survey, and an addressed, stamped return envelope. Instructions were to return the survey no later than May 12, Survey acceptance was cut off on May 17, All data was processed and entered by May 28, Hunters returned 1,351 completed surveys and 128 surveys came back as undeliverable. The survey return rate was (44%) indicating a strong interest in this subject. DFW biologists mailed survey packages to 100% of the permit buyers due to small permit sale numbers in some of the targeted DMZs. Statistically, sampling these DMZs with a small number of permit buyers would have resulted in a confidence interval of less than 95% with a sampling error greater than 5%. DFW biologists also determined that permit buyers purchased permits for more than one of the five targeted DMZs, as allowed in the deer hunting regulations. Permit buyers returned 1,351 surveys. The total number of responses by DMZ totals 1,647 because respondents answered survey questions for more than one of the targeted DMZs. Because of this multiple DMZ permit buying, there were 500 respondents for DMZ 28; 259 for DMZ 30; 230 for DMZ 31; 453 for DMZ 34 and 205 respondents for DMZ 47. Also note that some results may not sum exactly to 100% due to rounding or multiple answers by respondents. DFW biologists have determined the following conclusions from the survey: PARTICIPATION IN DEER HUNTING The majority (66%) of respondents had hunted during at least one of the bow seasons. Also, the majority (78%) of respondents had hunted during at least one of the gun seasons. The majority (91%) of respondents had hunted during the 6-day firearm season. DMZ 28: 72% respondents had hunted during at least one of the bow seasons. Also, 80% of respondents had hunted during at least one of the gun seasons. 91% of respondents had hunted during the 6-day firearm season. DMZ 30: 67% of respondents had hunted during at least one of the bow seasons. Also, 81% of respondents had hunted during at least one of the gun seasons. 91% of respondents had hunted during the 6-day firearm season. DMZ 31: 74% of respondents had hunted during at least one of the bow seasons. Also, 81% of respondents had hunted during at least one of the gun seasons. 92% of respondents had hunted during the 6-day firearm season. Page 5 of 57

6 DMZ 34: 66% of respondents had hunted during at least one of the bow seasons. Also, 75% of respondents had hunted during at least one of the gun seasons. 91% of respondents had hunted during the 6-day firearm season. DMZ 47: 63% of respondents had hunted during at least one of the bow seasons. Also, 80% of respondents had hunted during at least one of the gun seasons. 90% of respondents had hunted during the 6-day firearm season. LEVEL OF DEER HUNTING AND BUCK HUNTING SATISFACTION BY ZONE DMZ 28: 49% of respondents were satisfied with deer hunting, with 26% being dissatisfied with deer hunting. Also, 36% of respondents were satisfied with buck hunting, with 40% being dissatisfied with buck hunting. DMZ 30: 41% of respondents were satisfied with deer hunting, with 31% being dissatisfied with deer hunting. Also, 28% of respondents were satisfied with buck hunting, with 43% being dissatisfied with buck hunting. DMZ 31: 36% of respondents were satisfied with deer hunting, with 36% being dissatisfied with deer hunting. Also, 26% of respondents were satisfied with buck hunting, with 45% being dissatisfied with buck hunting. DMZ 34: 34% of respondents were satisfied with deer hunting, with 44% being dissatisfied with deer hunting. Also, 24% of respondents were satisfied with buck hunting, with 53% being dissatisfied with buck hunting. DMZ 47: 40% of respondents were satisfied with deer hunting, with 33% being dissatisfied with deer hunting. Also, 24% of respondents were satisfied with buck hunting, with 46% being dissatisfied with buck hunting. HARVEST OF BOTH ANTLERLESS AND ANTLERED DEER The majority of respondents (61%) harvested NO antlered bucks. A slight majority of respondents (54%) harvested NO antlerless deer. DMZ 28: The majority of respondents (73%) harvested 1 antlerless deer or less; the majority of respondents (84%) harvested 1 antlered buck or less. DMZ 30: The majority of respondents (76%) harvested 1 antlerless deer or less; the majority of Zone 30 respondents (89%) harvested 1 antlered buck or less. DMZ 31: The majority of respondents (67%) harvested 1 antlerless deer or less; the majority of respondents (89%) harvested 1 antlered buck or less. Page 6 of 57

7 DMZ 34: The majority of respondents (89%) harvested 1 antlerless deer or less; the majority of respondents (89%) harvested 1 antlered buck or less. DMZ 47: The majority of respondents (80%) harvested 1 antlerless deer or less; the majority of respondents (88%) harvested 1 antlered buck or less. HUNTERS WILLING TO HARVEST MORE ANTLERLESS DEER AND INCREASE ANTLELRESS HARVESTS The majority of respondents (60%) would be willing to harvest more antlerless deer and see an increase in the antlerless harvest. DMZ 28: 61% of respondents would be willing to harvest more antlerless deer and see an increase in the antlerless harvest. DMZ 30: 55% of respondents would be willing to harvest more antlerless deer and see an increase in the antlerless harvest. DMZ 31: 53% of respondents would be willing to harvest more antlerless deer and see an increase in the antlerless harvest. DMZ 34: 61% of respondents would be willing to harvest more antlerless deer and see an increase in the antlerless harvest. DMZ 47: 67% of respondents would be willing to harvest more antlerless deer and see an increase in the antlerless harvest. HUNTERS WILLING TO GIVE UP A CHANCE TO SHOOT SMALL ANTLERED BUCKS AND SHOOT MORE DOES IN EXCHANGE FOR AN INCREASED CHANCE TO SHOOT LARGE- ANTLERED DEER The majority of respondents (69%) would give up the chance of shooting small-antlered deer and shoot more does in exchange for the increased chance of shooting a large-antlered buck in later years. DMZ 28: 69% of respondents would give up the chance of shooting small-antlered deer and shoot more does in exchange for the increased chance of shooting a large-antlered buck in later years. DMZ 30: 71% of respondents would give up the chance of shooting small-antlered deer and shoot more does in exchange for the increased chance of shooting a large-antlered buck in later years. DMZ 31: 69% of respondents would give up the chance of shooting small-antlered deer and shoot more does in exchange for the increased chance of shooting a large-antlered buck in later years. DMZ 34: 66% of respondents would give up the chance of shooting small-antlered deer and shoot more does in exchange for the increased chance of shooting a large-antlered buck in later years. DMZ 47: 74% of respondents would give up the chance of shooting small-antlered deer and shoot more does in exchange for the increased chance of shooting a large-antlered buck in later years. Page 7 of 57

8 ZONES WITH HIGH QUALITY DEER BROWSE AND FOOD AVAILABILITY, WOULD A 4 POINT ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION BE ACCEPTABLE A slight majority of respondents (56%) would be willing to accept a 4-point Antler Point Restriction in zones with high quality browse and food availability. DMZ 28: 57% of respondents would be willing to accept a 4-point Antler Point Restriction in zones with high quality browse and food availability. DMZ 30: 54% of respondents would be willing to accept a 4-point Antler Point Restriction in zones with high quality browse and food availability. DMZ 31: 53% of respondents would be willing to accept a 4-point Antler Point Restriction in zones with high quality browse and food availability. DMZ 34: 57% of respondents would be willing to accept a 4-point Antler Point Restriction in zones with high quality browse and food availability. DMZ 47: 60% of respondents would be willing to accept a 4-point Antler Point Restriction in zones with high quality browse and food availability. IN FAVOR OF APR REGULATIONS BY ZONE DMZ 28: 73% of respondents were in favor of APR Regulations. DMZ 30: 73% of respondents were in favor of APR Regulations. DMZ 31: 72% of respondents were in favor of APR Regulations. DMZ 34: 69% of respondents were in favor of APR Regulations. DMZ 47: 69% of respondents were in favor of APR Regulations. NEW JERSEY DEER HARVEST COMPRISED The majority of respondents (84%) chose to harvest fewer bucks that are older, have more mass and more antler points as opposed to harvesting more bucks that are younger, with fewer points and less mass. DMZ 28: 85% of respondents chose to harvest fewer bucks that are older, have more mass and more antler points. DMZ 30: 84% of respondents chose to harvest fewer bucks that are older, have more mass and more antler points. DMZ 31: 85% of respondents chose to harvest fewer bucks that are older, have more mass and more antler points. Page 8 of 57

9 DMZ 34: 81% of respondents chose to harvest fewer bucks that are older, have more mass and more antler points. DMZ 47: 82% of respondents chose to harvest fewer bucks that are older, have more mass and more antler points. HUNTERS WHO FELT IT WAS ACCEPTABLE FOR LESS OLDER AGE CLASS BUCKS TO BE HARVESTED COMPARED TO THE NUMBER OF BUCKS THEY ACTUALLY HARVESTED IN In all DMZs, the majority of respondents who harvested NO bucks in 2008 felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested. The percentages varied by DMZ. In all DMZs, about 1/3 of respondents who harvested 1 buck in 2008 felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested. The percentages varied by DMZ. In all DMZs, about 10% of respondents who harvested 2 bucks in 2008 felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested. The percentages varied by DMZ. In all DMZs, less than 5% of respondents who harvested 3 or more bucks in 2008 felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested. The percentages varied by DMZ. DMZ 28: -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (NO) bucks in 2008 was 52%. Of that 52%, 88% were in favor of APR. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (1) buck in 2008 was 32%. Of that 32%, 92% were in favor of APR. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (2) bucks in 2008 was 13%. Of that 13%, 91% were in favor of APR. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (3+) bucks in 2008 was 3%. Of that 3%, 100% were in favor of APR. DMZ 30: -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (NO) bucks in 2008 was 62%. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (1) buck in 2008 was 27%. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (2) bucks in 2008 was 10%. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (3+) bucks in 2008 was 2%. DMZ 31: -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (NO) bucks in 2008 was 50%. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (1) buck in 2008 was 39%. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (2) bucks in 2008 was 9%. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (3+) bucks in 2008 was 3%. Page 9 of 57

10 DMZ 34: -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (NO) bucks in 2008 was 61%. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (1) buck in 2008 was 29%. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (2) bucks in 2008 was 9%. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (3+) bucks in 2008 was 1%. DMZ 47: -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (NO) bucks in 2008 was 67%. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (1) buck in 2008 was 23%. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (2) bucks in 2008 was 7%. -The percentage of hunters that felt that it's acceptable for less "older" age class bucks to be harvested and who harvested (3+) bucks in 2008 was 3%. NEW JERSEY TOTAL BUCK BAG LIMIT In regards to the current buck bag limit in New Jersey per hunting season, the response was relatively even for keeping the buck bag limit where it is now at six antlered deer and changing it to less than six antlered deer per hunting year. When respondents chose to harvest less bucks than what currently is allowed, however, the majority of those respondents chose to harvest 2 bucks or less. The following is a breakdown of the respondents who chose to harvest 2 bucks or less per hunting season: DMZ 28: 66% of respondents would choose to harvest 2 bucks or less during a hunting season. DMZ 30: 70% of respondents would choose to harvest 2 bucks or less during a hunting season. DMZ 31: 63% of respondents would choose to harvest 2 bucks or less during a hunting season. DMZ 34: 72% of respondents would choose to harvest 2 bucks or less during a hunting season. DMZ 47: 68% of respondents would choose to harvest 2 bucks or less during a hunting season. LAND TYPE HUNTED AND PROPERTY SIZE The majority of respondents hunted private land (64%) and the majority of those properties were less than 100 acres (64%). DMZ 28: 77% of respondents hunted private property with 65% of the properties being under 100 acres. DMZ 30: 64% of respondents hunted private property with 60% of the properties being under 100 acres. Page 10 of 57

11 DMZ 31: 56% of respondents hunted private property with 65% of the properties being less than 100 acres. DMZ 34: 47% of respondents hunted private property with 62% of the properties being less than 100 acres. DMZ 47: 69% of respondents hunted private property with 72% of the properties being less than 100 acres. PRIMARY METHOD OF DEER HUNTING The majority of all respondents (83%) hunted deer from an elevated stand. DMZ 28: 90% of respondents hunted from an elevated stand. DMZ 30: 83% of respondents hunted from an elevated stand. DMZ 31: 87% of respondents hunted from an elevated stand. DMZ 34: 77% of respondents hunted from an elevated stand. DMZ 47: 83% of respondents hunted from an elevated stand. MEMBER OF A DEER HUNTING CLUB THAT ACTIVELY DRIVE DEER 33% of all respondents stated that they were a member of a hunting club that actively drives deer during the deer season. DMZ 28: 30% of respondents stated that they were a member of a hunting club that actively drive deer during the deer season. DMZ 30: 31% of respondents stated that they were a member of a hunting club that actively drive deer during the deer season. DMZ 31: 38% of respondents stated that they were a member of a hunting club that actively drive deer during the deer season. DMZ 34: 35% of respondents stated that they were a member of a hunting club that actively drive deer during the deer season. DMZ 28: 42% of respondents stated that they were a member of a hunting club that actively drive deer during the deer season. DEER DRIVE DIFFICULTY IN IDENTIFYING LEGAL BUCKS WITH THE APR RESTRICTIONS When asked about the difficulty in identifying legal bucks while driving deer within APR restriction zones, the majority of respondents (69%) agreed to some extent, that it would be difficult to identify legal bucks while driving deer. Page 11 of 57

12 DMZ 28: 71% of respondents agreed, to some extent, that it would be difficult to identify legal bucks while driving deer. DMZ 30: 66% of respondents agreed, to some extent, that it would be difficult to identify legal bucks while driving deer. DMZ 31: 67% of respondents agreed, to some extent, that it would be difficult to identify legal bucks while driving deer. DMZ 34: 66% of respondents agreed, to some extent, that it would be difficult to identify legal bucks while driving deer. DMZ 47: 67% of respondents agreed, to some extent, that it would be difficult to identify legal bucks while driving deer. HUNTING DEER OVER BAIT The majority of respondents (80%) hunted deer over bait. DMZ 28: 75% of respondents hunted deer over bait. DMZ 30: 75% of respondents hunted deer over bait. DMZ 31: 80% of respondents hunted deer over bait. DMZ 34: 86% of respondents hunted deer over bait. DMZ 47: 87% of respondents hunted deer over bait. AFFILIATION The majority of respondents (81%) were affiliated with some sort of hunting organization (QDMA, NJSFSC, UBNJ, deer hunting club or other hunting organization) DMZ 28: 77% of respondents had some sort of affiliation with a hunting organization, with 39% affiliated specifically with a deer hunting club. DMZ 30: 65% of respondents had some sort of affiliation with a hunting organization, with 39% affiliated specifically with a deer hunting club. DMZ 31: 80% of respondents had some sort of affiliation with a hunting organization, with 44% affiliated specifically with a deer hunting club. DMZ 34: 74% of respondents had some sort of affiliation with a hunting organization, with 47% affiliated specifically with a deer hunting club. DMZ 47: 99% of respondents had some sort of affiliation with a hunting organization, with 52% affiliated specifically with a deer hunting club. Page 12 of 57

13 AGE AND GENDER The majority of respondents (73%) were 40 years or older with an overwhelming majority of the respondents (97%) being male. DMZ 28: 70% were 40 years or older and 97% were male. DMZ 30: 71%, were 40 years or older and 95% were male. DMZ 31: 71%, were 40 years or older and 99% were male. DMZ 34: 72% were 40 years or older and 96% were male. DMZ 47: 74% were 40 years or older and 98% were male. DEER CLUB MEMBER RESPONDENTS IN FAVOR OF APR REGULATIONS PER ZONE. DMZ 28: 73% of Deer Club member respondents are IN favor of APR regulations for Zone 28 DMZ 30: 71% of Deer Club member respondents are IN favor of APR regulations for Zone 30 DMZ 31: 69% of Deer Club member respondents are IN favor of APR regulations for Zone 31 DMZ 34: 65% of Deer Club member respondents are IN favor of APR regulations for Zone 34 DMZ 47: 69% of Deer Club member respondents are IN favor of APR regulations for Zone 47 RESPONDENTS THAT BELONG TO A DEER HUNTING CLUB, THAT DRIVE DEER AND THEIR APR PREFERENCE PER ZONE. DMZ 28: 71% of Deer Club member respondents who DRIVE deer are IN favor of APR regulations for Zone 28. DMZ 30: 72% of Deer Club member respondents who DRIVE deer are IN favor of APR regulations for Zone 30. DMZ 31: 70% of Deer Club member respondents who DRIVE deer are IN favor of APR regulations for Zone 31. DMZ 34: 62% of Deer Club member respondents who DRIVE deer are IN favor of APR regulations for Zone 34. DMZ 47: 70% of Deer Club member respondents who DRIVE deer are IN favor of APR regulations for Zone 47. Page 13 of 57

14 Q1. What deer season(s) do you hunt? Fall Bow Permit Bow Winter Bow All Respondents (n = 1351) Sampling size +/- 3% 58% 68% 73% 6-Day Firearm 91% Permit Muzzleloader 81% Permit Shotgun 62% Fall Bow Permit Bow Winter Bow ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 500) Sampling size +/- 4% 62% 79% 75% 6-Day Firearm 91% Permit Muzzleloader Permit Shotgun 71% 78% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 259) Sampling error +/- 6% Fall Bow Permit Bow 69% 74% Winter Bow 58% 6-Day Firearm Permit Muzzleloader 85% 91% Permit Shotgun 66% Page 14 of 57

15 Q1. What deer season(s) do you hunt? (continued) Fall Bow Permit Bow Winter Bow 6-Day Firearm Permit Muzzleloader Permit Shotgun ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 230) 66% 67% 75% 82% 84% 92% Fall Bow Permit Bow Winter Bow 6-Day Firearm Permit Muzzleloader Permit Shotgun ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 453) Sampling error +/- 5% 48% 60% 66% 72% 86% 91% Fall Bow Permit Bow Winter Bow 6-Day Firearm Permit Muzzleloader Permit Shotgun ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 205) 55% 65% 71% 70% 81% 90% Page 15 of 57

16 Q2. What is your level of deer hunting and buck harvest satisfaction in the deer zone(s) you hunt? (Please rate your level of satisfaction below, using the following rating scale: 1 = Very Satisfied 2 = Somewhat satisfied 3 = Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 4 = Somewhat dissatisfied 5 = Very dissatisfied 6 = opinion ALL RESPONDENTS (n= 500) Sampling error +/-4% DMZ: 28 Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Neither satisfied/dis. Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied opinion Answer 2% 4% 5% 2% 15% 18% 21% 17% 20% 21% 16% 19% 10% 31% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Total Buck hunting satisfaction Total Deer hunting satisfaction Page 16 of 57

17 Q2. What is your level of deer hunting and buck harvest satisfaction in the deer zone(s) you hunt? (Please rate your level of satisfaction below, using the following rating scale: 1 = Very Satisfied 2 = Somewhat satisfied 3 = Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 4 = Somewhat dissatisfied 5 = Very dissatisfied 6 = opinion ALL RESPONDENTS (n= 259) Sampling error +/- 6% DMZ: 30 Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Neither satisfied/dis. Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied opinion Answer 1% 1% 3% 8% 10% 20% 19% 23% 20% 17% 23% 14% 9% 31% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Total Buck hunting satisfaction Total Deer hunting satisfaction Page 17 of 57

18 Q2. What is your level of deer hunting and buck harvest satisfaction in the deer zone(s) you hunt? (Please rate your level of satisfaction below, using the following rating scale: 1 = Very Satisfied 2 = Somewhat satisfied 3 = Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 4 = Somewhat dissatisfied 5 = Very dissatisfied 6 = opinion ALL RESPONDENTS (n= 230) Sampling error +/- 6% DMZ: 31 Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Neither satisfied/dis. Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied opinion Answer 2% 2% 5% 2% 11% 10% 15% 26% 22% 25% 20% 22% 25% 14% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Total Buck hunting satisfaction Total Deer hunting satisfaction Page 18 of 57

19 Q2. What is your level of deer hunting and buck harvest satisfaction in the deer zone(s) you hunt? (Please rate your level of satisfaction below, using the following rating scale: 1 = Very Satisfied 2 = Somewhat satisfied 3 = Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 4 = Somewhat dissatisfied 5 = Very dissatisfied 6 = opinion ALL RESPONDENTS (n= 453) Sampling error +/- 5% DMZ: 34 Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Neither satisfied/dis. Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied opinion Answer 10% 9% 14% 25% 17% 20% 21% 27% 32% 17% 1% 1% 6% 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Total Buck hunting satisfaction Total Deer hunting satisfaction Page 19 of 57

20 Q2. What is your level of deer hunting and buck harvest satisfaction in the deer zone(s) you hunt? (Please rate your level of satisfaction below, using the following rating scale: 1 = Very Satisfied 2 = Somewhat satisfied 3 = Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 4 = Somewhat dissatisfied 5 = Very dissatisfied 6 = opinion ALL RESPONDENTS (n= 205) DMZ: 47 Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Neither satisfied/dis. Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied opinion Answer 5% 12% 10% 3% 4% 8% 3% 19% 28% 19% 20% 20% 23% 26% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Total Buck hunting satisfaction Total Deer hunting satisfaction Page 20 of 57

21 Q3. Did you harvest antlerless deer and if so, how many did you harvest this past season ( )? All Respondents (n = 1344) Sampling error +/- 3% ne 54% One 26% Two Three or more 9% 11% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 498) Sampling error +/- 4% ne 45% One 28% Two Three or more 13% 14% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Zone 30: Respondents (n = 257) Sampling error +/- 6% ne 53% One 23% Two 16% Three or more 8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Page 21 of 57

22 Q3. Did you harvest antlerless deer and if so, how many did you harvest this past season ( )? (continued) ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 228) ne 44% One 23% Two Three or more 14% 18% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 451) Sampling error +/- 5% ne 61% One 28% Two 8% Three or more 3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 203) ne 57% One 23% Two Three or more 10% 10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Page 22 of 57

23 Q4. Did you harvest antlered bucks and if so, how many did you harvest this past season ( )? All Respondents (n = 1346) Sampling error +/- 3% ne 61% One 27% Two 10% Three or more 2% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 259) Sampling error +/- 6% ne 64% One 25% Two 9% Three or more 1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 259) Sampling error +/- 6% ne 64% One 25% Two 9% Three or more 1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Page 23 of 57

24 Q4. Did you harvest antlered bucks and if so, how many did you harvest this past season ( )? (continued) ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 230) ne 56% One 33% Two 9% Three or more 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 451) Sampling error +/- 5% ne 63% One 26% Two 9% Three or more 2% ZONE 47: Respondents (n=203) ne 64% One 24% Two 9% Three or more 3% Page 24 of 57

25 Q5. If APR(Antler Point Restriction) is adopted, are you willing to harvest more antlerless deer and see an increase in the antlerless harvest? All Respondents (n = 1334) Sampling error +/- 3% 60% 30% Opinion 9% ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 491) Sampling error +/- 4% 61% 28% Opinion 11% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 257) Sampling error +/- 6% 55% 35% Opinion 11% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Page 25 of 57

26 Q5. If APR(Antler Point Restriction) is adopted, are you willing to harvest more antlerless deer and see an increase in the antlerless harvest? (continued) ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 226) 53% 37% Opinion 10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 450) Sampling error +/- 5% 61% 32% Opinion 7% ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 203) 67% 25% Opinion 8% Page 26 of 57

27 Q6. Management of deer populations to produce older or more mature bucks, often called Quality Deer Management, requires that young, small-antlered bucks be protected and that more does be killed. Are you willing to give up the chance to shoot small-antlered bucks (for instance a buck with 6 points) and shoot more does in exchange for an increased chance to shoot large-antlered bucks in later years? All Respondents (n = 1326) Sampling error +/- 3% 69% 26% Opinion 5% ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 489) Sampling error +/- 4% 69% 26% Opinion 5% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 257) Sampling error +/- 6% 71% 23% Opinion 6% Page 27 of 57

28 Q6. Management of deer populations to produce older or more mature bucks, often called Quality Deer Management, requires that young, small-antlered bucks be protected and that more does be killed. Are you willing to give up the chance to shoot small-antlered bucks (for instance a buck with 6 points) and shoot more does in exchange for an increased chance to shoot large-antlered bucks in later years? (continued) ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 226) 69% 26% Opinion 5% ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 443) Sampling error +/- 5% 66% 29% Opinion 5% ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 202) 74% 23% Opinion 3% Page 28 of 57

29 Q7. Research on the current 3-point Antler Point Restrictions in zones 3, 6, 9, 13, 27, 29, 35 and 63 from 2001 through 2005 in New Jersey has shown that on average, 11 yearling bucks saved from the harvest due to Antler Point Restrictions are missing from the older age class harvest. In other words, the number of older age class bucks harvested is considerably less than the number of yearlings saved due to APR. Do you find this acceptable? ALL Respondents (n = 1317) Sampling error +/- 3% 51% 28% Opinion 21% Zone 28: Respondents (n = 484) Sampling error +/- 5% 52% 28% Opinion 20% Zone 30: Respondents (n = 251) Sampling error +/- 6% 47% 32% Opinion 21% Page 29 of 57

30 Q7. Research on the current 3-point Antler Point Restrictions in zones 3, 6, 9, 13, 27, 29, 35 and 63 from 2001 through 2005 in New Jersey has shown that on average, 11 yearling bucks saved from the harvest due to Antler Point Restrictions are missing from the older age class harvest. In other words, the number of older age class bucks harvested is considerably less than the number of yearlings saved due to APR. Do you find this acceptable? (continued) Zone 31: Respondents (n = 225) 52% 27% Opinion 21% Zone 34: Respondents (n = 444) Sampling error +/- 5% 50% 29% Opinion 21% Zone 47: Respondents (n = 203) 56% 25% Opinion 20% Page 30 of 57

31 Q8. In deer management zones with high quality deer browse and food availability, would a 4-point Antler Point Restriction be acceptable to you? ALL Respondents (n = 1337) Sampling error +/- 3% 56% 38% Opinion 6% ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 493) Sampling error +/- 4% 57% 39% Opinion 4% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 257) Sampling error +/- 6% 54% 40% Opinion 6% Page 31 of 57

32 Q8. In deer management zones with high quality deer browse and food availability, would a 4-point Antler Point Restriction be acceptable to you? (continued) ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 228) 53% 42% Opinion 5% ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 450) Sampling error +/- 5% 57% 37% Opinion 6% ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 203) 60% 35% Opinion 5% Page 32 of 57

33 Q9. Would you like to see APR (3 Points or more on one side) regulations in the following zones: All Respondents DMZ Selected Respondents ZONE: 28 (n=1201) 62% ZONE: 28 (n=489) 73% Sampling error +/- 3% 19% Sampling error +/- 4% 26% opinion 19% opinion 1% ZONE: 30 (n=1181) Sampling error +/- 3% 17% 57% ZONE: 30 (n=256) Sampling error +/- 6% 24% 73% opinion 26% opinion 2% ZONE: 31 (n=1174) Sampling error +/- 3% 16% 56% ZONE: 31 (n=225) Sampling error +/- 7% 25% 72% opinion 28% opinion 3% ZONE: 34 (n=1227) 61% ZONE: 34 (n=450) 69% Sampling error +/- 3% 18% Sampling error +/- 5% 29% opinion 21% opinion 2% ZONE: 47 (n=1177) 57% ZONE: 47 (n=201) 69% Sampling error +/- 3% 17 % Sampling error +/- 7% 28% NJDFW opinion APR Survey Results 26% opinion 3% August 2010 Page 33 of 57 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

34 Q10. Please choose how you would like to see New Jersey s deer harvest comprised? Option 1: Fewer bucks harvested, but those bucks are older, have more mass and more antler points. Option 2: More bucks harvested, but those bucks are younger, have less mass and fewer antler points. All Respondents (n = 1263) Sampling error +/- 3% Fewer Bucks w/more mass & points 84% More Bucks w/less mass & points 16% 90% 100% ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 464) Sampling error +/- 5% Fewer Bucks w/more mass & points 85% More Bucks w/less mass & points 15% 90% 100% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 242) Sampling error +/- 6% Fewer Bucks w/more mass & points 84% More Bucks w/less mass & points 16% 90% 100 % Page 34 of 57

35 Q10. Please choose how you would like to see New Jersey s deer harvest comprised? Option 1: Fewer bucks harvested, but those bucks are older, have more mass and more antler points. Option 2: More bucks harvested, but those bucks are younger, have less mass and fewer antler points. (continued) ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 212) Sampling error +/-7% Fewer Bucks w/more mass & points 85% More Bucks w/less mass & points 15% 90% 100 % ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 425) Sampling error +/- 5% Fewer Bucks w/more mass & points 81% More Bucks w/less mass & points 19% 90% 100 % ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 194) Fewer Bucks w/more mass & points 82% More Bucks w/less mass & points 18% 90% 100 % Page 35 of 57

36 Q11. Currently in New Jersey, the total buck bag limit for all seasons combined is 6 per Fall/Winter hunting year. New Jersey hunters generally harvest 3 bucks or less over all seasons combined in a Fall/Winter hunting year. During the deer hunting season, 99.2% of successful buck hunters harvested 3 bucks or less. Would like to see less bucks per hunter allowed for harvest? If yes to #11, how many bucks per year would like to see allowed per hunter for harvest? All Respondents (n = 1301) Sampling error +/- 3% 49% 51% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 478) Sampling error +/- 5% ZONE 28: # Bucks Allowed for Harvest (n = 195) 46% % 48% 3 24% 54% 4 5 6% 5% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 251) Sampling error +/- 6% ZONE 30: # Bucks Allowed for Harvest (n = 114) Sampling error +/- 9% 49% % 54% 3 24% 51% 4 5 0% 6% Page 36 of 57

37 Q11. Currently in New Jersey, the total buck bag limit for all seasons combined is 6 per Fall/Winter hunting year. New Jersey hunters generally harvest 3 bucks or less over all seasons combined in a Fall/Winter hunting year. During the deer hunting season, 99.2% of successful buck hunters harvested 3 bucks or less. Would like to see less bucks per hunter allowed for harvest? If yes to #11, how many bucks per year would like to see allowed per hunter for harvest? ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 214) ZONE 31: # Bucks Allowed for Harvest (n = 97) Sampling error +/- 10% 49% % 47% 3 25% 51% 4 5 1% 11% ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 438) Sampling error +/- 5% ZONE 34: # Bucks Allowed for Harvest (n = 202) 51% % 55% 3 21% 49% 4 5 1% 6% ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 198) ZONE 47: # Bucks Allowed for Harvest (n = 90) Sampling error +/- 10% 52% % 42% 3 19% 48% 4 5 2% 11% Page 37 of 57

38 Q12. What type of land do you primarily hunt? All Respondents (n = 1261) Sampling error +/- 3% Private 64% Public 36% ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 458) Sampling error +/- 5% Private 77% Public 23% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 239) Sampling error +/- 6% Private 64% Public 36% Page 38 of 57

39 Q12. What type of land do you primarily hunt? (continued) ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 208) Private 56% Public 44% ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 423) Sampling error +/- 5% Private 47% Public 53% ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 195) Private 69% Public 31% Page 39 of 57

40 Q13. If you hunt private land, how many acres is the property where you hunt? All Respondents (n = 1034) Sampling error +/- 3% % Over % 27% Don't Know 8% ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 433) Sampling error +/- 5% % % Over % Don't Know 5% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 199) % Over 100 Don't Know 14% 23% 27% Page 40 of 57

41 Q13. If you hunt private land, how many acres is the property where you hunt? (continued) ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 171) Sampling error +/- 8% % Over 100 Don't Know 13% 19% 22% ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 294) Sampling error +/- 6% % % Over % Don't Know 11% ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 165) Sampling error +/- 8% % Over % 22% Don't Know 6% Page 41 of 57

42 Q14. What is your primary method of deer hunting? All Respondents (n = 1223) Sampling error +/- 3% Elevated stand 83% Ground blind Deer driving Still hunting 6% 3% 8% ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 448) Sampling error +/- 5% Elevated stand 90% Ground blind Deer driving Still hunting 5% 4% 2% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 234) Sampling error +/- 6% Elevated stand 83% Ground blind Deer driving Still hunting 4% 3% 10% Page 42 of 57

43 Q14. What is your primary method of deer hunting? (continued) ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 202) Elevated stand 87% Ground blind Deer driving Still hunting 1% 6% 5% ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 408) Sampling error +/- 5% Elevated stand 77% Ground blind Deer driving Still hunting 4% 11% 8% ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 185) Elevated stand 83% Ground blind Deer driving Still hunting 2% 9% 6% Page 43 of 57

44 Q15. Are you a member of a hunting club that actively drives deer during the deer season? All Respondents (n = 1316) Sampling error +/- 3% 33% 67% ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 482) Sampling error +/- 5% 30% 70% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 254) Sampling error +/- 6% 31% 69% Page 44 of 57

45 Q15. Are you a member of a hunting club that actively drives deer during the deer season? (continued) ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 218) 38% 62% ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 443) Sampling error +/- 5% 35% 65% ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 200) 42% 58% Page 45 of 57

46 Q16. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: If deer hunters drive deer, it is difficult to identify legal bucks with the APR restrictions. Strongly agree Moderately agree Neither agree nor disagree Moderately disagree Strongly disagree Don't know 3% 7% All Respondents (n = 1316) Sampling error +/- 3% 10% 11% 22% 47% Strongly agree Moderately agree Neither agree nor disagree Moderately disagree Strongly disagree Don't know ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 484) Sampling error +/- 5% 2% 7% 10% 10% 26% 45% Strongly agree Moderately agree Neither agree nor disagree Moderately disagree Strongly disagree Don't know ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 254) Sampling error +/- 6% 8% 9% 6% 11% 18% 48% Page 46 of 57

47 Q16. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: If deer hunters drive deer, it is difficult to identify legal bucks with the APR restrictions. (continued) ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 217) Strongly agree Moderately agree Neither agree nor disagree Moderately disagree Strongly disagree Don't know 17% 6% 11% 13% 3% 50% Strongly agree Moderately agree Neither agree nor disagree Moderately disagree Strongly disagree Don't know ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 444) Sampling error +/- 5% 3% 7% 10% 14% 20% 46% Strongly agree Moderately agree Neither agree nor disagree Moderately disagree Strongly disagree Don't know ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 199) 5% 4% 10% 15% 23% 44% Page 47 of 57

48 Q17. Would you give up driving deer because it may be harder to identify legal antler points, to allow for 3 point rule regulations in your area? All Respondents (n = 1326) Sampling error +/- 3% 44% 37% Opinion 19% ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 492) Sampling error +/- 4% 44% 37% Opinion 19% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 249) Sampling error +/- 6% 51% 30% Opinion 19% Page 48 of 57

49 Q17. Would you give up driving deer because it may be harder to identify legal antler points, to allow for 3 point rule regulations in your area? (continued) ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 227) 49% 32% Opinion 19% ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 447) Sampling error +/- 5% 43% 39% Opinion 18% ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 201) 37% 41% Opinion 22% Page 49 of 57

50 Q18. Do you hunt deer over bait? All Respondents (n = 1328) Sampling error +/- 3% 80% 20% ZONE 28: Respondents (n = 491) Sampling error +/- 4% 75% 25% ZONE 30: Respondents (n = 254) Sampling error +/- 6% 75% 25% Page 50 of 57

51 Q18. Do you hunt deer over bait? (continued) ZONE 31: Respondents (n = 226) 80% 20% ZONE 34: Respondents (n = 447) Sampling error +/- 5% 86% 14% ZONE 47: Respondents (n = 202) 87% 13% Page 51 of 57

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY RESIDENT HUNTER OPINION ON CROSSBOW USE

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY RESIDENT HUNTER OPINION ON CROSSBOW USE AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY RESIDENT HUNTER OPINION ON CROSSBOW USE Survey mailed: December 2007 Data analyzed: January 2008 Division of Fish and Wildlife David Chanda, Director Larry Herrighty, Assistant

More information

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Table of Contents Public Surveys for Deer Goal Setting... 1 Methods... 1 Hunter Survey... 2 Demographics... 2 Population

More information

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Table of Contents Public Surveys for Deer Goal Setting... 1 Methods... 1 Hunter Survey... 2 Demographics... 2 Population

More information

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units Arizona Game and Fish Department April 4, 2006 Alternative Deer Management

More information

Deer Management Unit 122

Deer Management Unit 122 Deer Management Unit 122 Area Description DMU 122 is located in south Dickinson County and includes a small portion of west central Menominee County. It encompasses 163 sq. miles and has remained unchanged

More information

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) implemented a public outreach and input process in 2013 and 2014 in management Zones A, B and C. The goal of this process was to present the

More information

ARE WHITE-TAILED DEER VERMIN?

ARE WHITE-TAILED DEER VERMIN? ARE WHITE-TAILED DEER VERMIN? By E. W. Grimes, Former Director/President, Maryland State Chapter of the Quality Deer Management Association I ve tried in the past when writing articles to be positive with

More information

2010 Zone 3 Deer Season Recommendations

2010 Zone 3 Deer Season Recommendations 2010 Zone 3 Deer Season Recommendations Prepared by: Lou Cornicelli Big Game Program Coordinator Marrett D. Grund Farmland Deer Project Leader Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish

More information

DEER HUNT RESULTS ON ALABAMA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS ANNUAL REPORT, CHRISTOPHER W. COOK STUDY LEADER MAY, 2006

DEER HUNT RESULTS ON ALABAMA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS ANNUAL REPORT, CHRISTOPHER W. COOK STUDY LEADER MAY, 2006 DEER HUNT RESULTS ON ALABAMA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS ANNUAL REPORT, 2005-2006 CHRISTOPHER W. COOK STUDY LEADER MAY, 2006 ALABAMA DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AND FRESHWATER FISHERIES Federal Aid Project funded

More information

Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association

Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association QDMA Deer Population Trends 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000

More information

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT 216 FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT www.gnb.ca/erd/naturalresources MOOSE HARVEST REPORT 216 Summary Each year, moose licence quotas are

More information

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS 217 IN PROGRESS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/departments/erd.html MOOSE HARVEST REPORT 217 Summary Each year, moose

More information

Deer Management Unit 249

Deer Management Unit 249 Deer Management Unit 249 Geographic Location: DMU 249 lies along the Lake Michigan shoreline and is comprised largely of Mackinac and Chippewa counties with a small portion of southeastern Luce County

More information

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit DMU 8 Barry County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Barry County Deer Management Unit (DMU) 8 is in the Southwest Region and was once part of the Bellevue deer management unit 38. Bellevue DMU

More information

ALABAMA HUNTING SURVEY

ALABAMA HUNTING SURVEY ALABAMA HUNTING SURVEY 2010-2011 SEASON Randy Liles STUDY LEADER Federal Assistance Project funded by your purchase of hunting licenses and equipment. ALABAMA DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AND FRESHWATER FISHERIES

More information

Deer Management Unit 349

Deer Management Unit 349 Deer Management Unit 349 Geographic Location: DMU 349 lies along the lake Michigan shoreline and is largely comprised of western Mackinac county with small portions of southern Luce county and southeastern

More information

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season March 7, 2010 Prepared for The Pennsylvania Game Commission Board of Commissioners By John Eveland RECOMMENDATIONS

More information

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties Area Description The Fremont Deer Management Unit (DMU 361) was established in 2013. It lies within the Southwest Region and covers

More information

2018 Season Waterfowl Hunter Survey Summary. Presented by Josh Richardson, Sr. Biologist Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation

2018 Season Waterfowl Hunter Survey Summary. Presented by Josh Richardson, Sr. Biologist Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation 2018 Season Waterfowl Hunter Survey Summary Presented by Josh Richardson, Sr. Biologist Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation Background Waterfowl hunting season and limits are determined by both

More information

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015 Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015 Contents Executive Summary 3 Key Findings: 2015 Survey 8 Comparison between 2014 and 2015 Findings 27 Methodology Appendix 41 2 Executive Summary and Key Observations

More information

WATERFOWL HUNTING IN MINNESOTA. A study of people who hunted for waterfowl in Minnesota from 2000 through Final Report

WATERFOWL HUNTING IN MINNESOTA. A study of people who hunted for waterfowl in Minnesota from 2000 through Final Report WATERFOWL HUNTING IN MINNESOTA A study of people who hunted for waterfowl in Minnesota from 2000 through 2004 Final Report A cooperative study conducted by: Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research

More information

Deer Management Unit 152

Deer Management Unit 152 Deer Management Unit 152 Geographic Location: Deer Management Unit (DMU) 152 is 386 miles 2 in size and is primarily in southwestern Marquette County. This DMU falls within the moderate snowfall zone and

More information

Deer Management Unit 127

Deer Management Unit 127 Deer Management Unit 127 Area Description Deer Management Unit (DMU) 127 is 328 sq. miles in size and is found in far western Gogebic County surrounding Ironwood, Bessemer and adjacent rural communities.

More information

HUNTERS OPINIONS ON SHOOTING DEER OVER SUPPLEMENTAL FEED OR CORN

HUNTERS OPINIONS ON SHOOTING DEER OVER SUPPLEMENTAL FEED OR CORN HUNTERS OPINIONS ON SHOOTING DEER OVER SUPPLEMENTAL FEED OR CORN Conducted for the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks by Responsive Management 5 HUNTERS OPINIONS ON SHOOTING DEER

More information

2012 Emiquon Duck Hunting

2012 Emiquon Duck Hunting 2012 Emiquon Duck Hunting Evaluation Survey Report Wildlife Harvest and Human Dimensions Research Program Prepared by Craig A. Miller Ph.D., Erin E. Harper and Meghan E. McCleary Illinois Natural History

More information

Kansas Deer Report Seasons

Kansas Deer Report Seasons Kansas Deer Report 215-16 Seasons I. Current Harvest Hunter harvest of deer during the 215-16 seasons was estimated to be 95,813, 2.% more than the 93,94 deer taken in 214-15 (see table below for breakdown

More information

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Leelanau County Deer Management Unit (DMU 045) is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has roughly 7,100 acres of State Forest

More information

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Midland County Deer Management Unit (DMU) 056 is in the Northern Lower Peninsula (NLP) Region. It has roughly 333, 440 acres and consists

More information

Deer Management Unit 252

Deer Management Unit 252 Deer Management Unit 252 Geographic Location: Deer Management Unit (DMU) 252 is 297 miles 2 in size and is primarily in southeastern Marquette, southwestern Alger and northwestern Delta County. This DMU

More information

Deer Management Unit 255

Deer Management Unit 255 Deer Management Unit 255 Area Description DMU 255 is located primarily in northern Menominee County, but also extends into a small portion of Dickinson, Marquette, and Delta counties. It has totaled 463

More information

MARYLAND RESIDENTS, LANDOWNERS, AND HUNTERS ATTITUDES TOWARD DEER HUNTING AND DEER MANAGEMENT

MARYLAND RESIDENTS, LANDOWNERS, AND HUNTERS ATTITUDES TOWARD DEER HUNTING AND DEER MANAGEMENT MARYLAND RESIDENTS, LANDOWNERS, AND HUNTERS ATTITUDES TOWARD DEER HUNTING AND DEER MANAGEMENT Prepared for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources in cooperation with the University of Delaware by

More information

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Arenac County Deer Management Unit (DMU) 006 is in the Northern Lower Peninsula (NLP) Region. It has roughly 248,320 acres and consists of

More information

DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit

DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit (DMU 040) is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP) (Figure 1). It has roughly 170,000 acres

More information

2001 Illinois Light Goose Conservation Action Survey Report

2001 Illinois Light Goose Conservation Action Survey Report HumanDimensions R e s e a r c h P r o g r a m 2001 Illinois Light Goose Conservation Action Survey Report Federal Aid Project Number W-112-R-10 Job Number 101.6 Wildlife Restoration Brent Manning, Director

More information

MANAGED LANDS DEER PERMITS WHITE-TAILED DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION General Information

MANAGED LANDS DEER PERMITS WHITE-TAILED DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION General Information MANAGED LANDS DEER PERMITS WHITE-TAILED DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION 2011-2012 General Information The Managed Lands Deer Permit (MLDP) program allows landowners involved in a formal management program to

More information

Archery Gun Muzzleloader Total Bull Cow Bull Cow Bull Cow Bull Cow

Archery Gun Muzzleloader Total Bull Cow Bull Cow Bull Cow Bull Cow DAVE MCGOWEN/RPS2017 In 2016-17, elk harvest totaled 315 bulls and cows, an increase of five over the previous year. ELK Elk seasons on private lands ran concurrently with established deer seasons, except

More information

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion Job Title:, Subsection B Goal: Manage the mountain lion population, its numbers and distribution, as an important part of Arizona s fauna and to provide mountain lion hunting recreation opportunity while

More information

Analyzing your Buck s Antler Characteristics (For Antler Restrictions)

Analyzing your Buck s Antler Characteristics (For Antler Restrictions) Analyzing your Buck s Antler Characteristics (For Antler Restrictions) I want to review how to analyze the antler characteristics of your Buck population for the possible implementation of antler restrictions.

More information

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Livingston Deer Management Unit (DMU) lies in the Southern Lower Peninsula (SLP) region and covers only Livingston County. Most public

More information

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit Area Description The Greenleaf Deer Management Unit (DMU 332) lies in the Southeast Region of the Southern Lower Peninsula (SLP) and covers

More information

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion SPECIES: Goal: Manage the mountain lion population, its numbers and distribution, as an important part of Arizona s fauna and to provide mountain lion hunting recreation opportunity while maintaining existing

More information

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Wayne Deer Management Unit (DMU 082) lies in the Southeast Region and borders Lake Erie to the East and includes Celeron and Stony Islands

More information

NEW YORK STATE WHITETAIL MANAGEMENT COALITION, INC. PO Box 191,Grahamsville, New York

NEW YORK STATE WHITETAIL MANAGEMENT COALITION, INC. PO Box 191,Grahamsville, New York NEW YORK STATE WHITETAIL MANAGEMENT COALITION, INC. PO Box 191,Grahamsville, New York 12740 INFO@NYSWMC.com 646-216-9312 Yearling Buck Conservation With Antler Restrictions Is it working in New York? Assessment

More information

DMU 038 Jackson County

DMU 038 Jackson County DMU 038 Jackson County Area Description The Jackson Deer Management Unit (DMU), or DMU 038, lies in the Southern Lower Peninsula (SLP) region and covers Jackson County. The DMU consists of five percent

More information

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Minnesota Deer Population Goals Minnesota Deer Population Goals Superior Uplands Arrowhead Goal Block Minnesota DNR Section of Wildlife, 2015 Final Deer Population Goals Block 1: Superior Uplands Arrowhead The following pages provide

More information

The Greater Sage-Grouse:

The Greater Sage-Grouse: The Greater Sage-Grouse: Hunter opinions regarding potential conservation strategies in eleven western states For: National Wildlife Federation October 30, 2014 PO Box 6435 Fernandina Beach, FL 32035 Tel

More information

TOWN OF ISLESBORO DEER REDUCTION COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CONDUCT A SPECIAL HUNT INTRODUCTION

TOWN OF ISLESBORO DEER REDUCTION COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CONDUCT A SPECIAL HUNT INTRODUCTION March 9, 2012 TOWN OF ISLESBORO DEER REDUCTION COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CONDUCT A SPECIAL HUNT INTRODUCTION The Deer Reduction Committee of the Town of Islesboro (DRC) requests authorization

More information

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit Area Description Antrim County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has roughly 74 square miles (47,451 acres) of public land

More information

Indiana Deer Hunter Survey 2006

Indiana Deer Hunter Survey 2006 Indiana Deer Hunter Survey 2006 Final Report October 2006 Presented to Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife by Daniel J. Witter, Ph.D., and Cortney Lamprecht D.J. Case

More information

DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Core TB Zone Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP) and covers portions of Alcona, Alpena, Montmorency,

More information

Hunter Perceptions of Chronic Wasting Disease in Illinois

Hunter Perceptions of Chronic Wasting Disease in Illinois HumanDimensions R e s e a r c h P r o g r a m Hunter Perceptions of Chronic Wasting Disease in Illinois Joel Brunsvold, Director Illinois Department of Natural Resources Paul Vehlow Federal Aid Coordinator

More information

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit DMU 43 Lake County Deer Management Unit Area Description Lake County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has approximately 2, acres of public land which is about half

More information

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota, Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 507-S January 2003 Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota, 2001-2002 Dean A. Bangsund and F. Larry Leistritz*

More information

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron & LEAPS BOUNDS by Dan Bergeron Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t give much thought to how the deer population was managed or what went into setting hunting seasons every year. My mind

More information

Tennessee Black Bear Public Opinion Survey

Tennessee Black Bear Public Opinion Survey Tennessee Black Bear Public Opinion Survey Executive Summary 2012 Survey TWRA Technical Report 12 02 This electronic publication was developed by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency s Division of Wildlife

More information

New Jersey Trapper Harvest, Recreational and Economic Survey

New Jersey Trapper Harvest, Recreational and Economic Survey Summary Mail questionnaires were sent to 509 trappers requesting harvest, recreational and socioeconomic information for the 2003-04 trapping season. Survey results indicate that resident trappers are

More information

FWC DEER HARVEST SURVEY: FINAL REPORT

FWC DEER HARVEST SURVEY: FINAL REPORT FWC 2007-2008 DEER HARVEST SURVEY: FINAL REPORT Prepared for: FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION Prepared by: VAI November 3, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS...

More information

FWC DEER HARVEST SURVEY: FINAL REPORT

FWC DEER HARVEST SURVEY: FINAL REPORT FWC 2010-2011 DEER HARVEST SURVEY: FINAL REPORT Prepared for: FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION Prepared by: THE RESEARCH STAFF DRAFT REPORT 1.1 October 11, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...

More information

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion SPECIES: Goal: Manage the mountain lion population, its numbers and distribution, as an important part of Arizona s fauna and to provide mountain lion hunting recreation opportunity while maintaining existing

More information

City of Galena 2017 Deer Hunting Survey

City of Galena 2017 Deer Hunting Survey City of Galena 2017 Deer Hunting Survey The City of Galena is collecting information from private property owners about hunting whitetail deer. The survey is intended for owners of agricultural property

More information

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651) TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN 55155-4020 (651) 259-5207 289 290 2010 TRAPPER HARVEST SURVEY Margaret Dexter, Wildlife Research Unit

More information

December 18, Dear Sir/Madam,

December 18, Dear Sir/Madam, December 18, 2000 Dear Sir/Madam, We are writing to bring you up-to-date on our efforts to develop fish community objectives for the St. Lawrence River. First of all, we want to thank you for participating

More information

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management To anyone who has carefully studied the situation it is evident that

More information

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit Area Description Emmet County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has roughly 126 square miles (80,371 acres) of public land

More information

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit Area Description Missaukee County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has over 100,000 acres of state land, just over

More information

Quality Deer Management and Prescribed Fire Natural Partners in Wildlife and Habitat Conservation

Quality Deer Management and Prescribed Fire Natural Partners in Wildlife and Habitat Conservation Quality Deer Management and Prescribed Fire Natural Partners in Wildlife and Habitat Conservation Brian Murphy CEO / Wildlife Biologist Quality Deer Management Association About the QDMA 22-year-old nonprofit

More information

Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.

Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records. July 26, 2018 YO Ranchlands Landowner Association 1323 Whispering Pines Houston, TX 77055 To the Wildlife Committee: Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that

More information

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

Management History of the Edwards Plateau Management History of the Edwards Plateau Eco regions of Texas Edwards Plateau 24,000,000 acres About 15,000 years ago, the Edwards Plateau was much cooler and was more forested than today. Pollen counts

More information

1. Deer hunting structure around your property Please tick the appropriate box in each block.

1. Deer hunting structure around your property Please tick the appropriate box in each block. Appendix 1 Landowner questionnaire Deer hunting structures 1. Deer hunting structure around your property Please tick the appropriate box in each block. 1a Yes No If you tick no you will go directly to

More information

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block Minnesota Deer Population Goals East Central Uplands Goal Block Minnesota DNR Section of Wildlife, 2015 Final Deer Population Goals Block 4: East Central Uplands The following pages provide a description

More information

Lead Ammunition Survey Summary

Lead Ammunition Survey Summary Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Lead Ammunition Survey Summary Concern and scrutiny over the use of lead ammunition in regards to human health and wildlife has increased in recent years. California

More information

2018 MINNESOTA PRAIRIE-CHICKEN HARVEST SURVEY

2018 MINNESOTA PRAIRIE-CHICKEN HARVEST SURVEY 2018 MINNESOTA PRAIRIE-CHICKEN HARVEST SURVEY Charlotte Roy Forest Wildlife Populations and Research Group Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Grand Rapids, Minnesota 14 December 2018 SUMMARY OF

More information

Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies

Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies www.garesearch.com Conducted for: Humane Society of the United States October 2007 Contact: Patrick Gonzales 410-974-4669 Methodology Patrick E. Gonzales graduated

More information

A SURVEY OF 1997 COLORADO ANGLERS AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO PAY INCREASED LICENSE FEES

A SURVEY OF 1997 COLORADO ANGLERS AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO PAY INCREASED LICENSE FEES Executive Summary of research titled A SURVEY OF 1997 COLORADO ANGLERS AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO PAY INCREASED LICENSE FEES Conducted by USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Fort Collins,

More information

DRAFT ARIKAREE DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN

DRAFT ARIKAREE DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT ARIKAREE DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN DATA ANALYSIS UNIT D-55 Game Management Units 101 & 102 June 2017 Marty Stratman Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife Terrestrial Biologist 122 E. Edison St. Brush,

More information

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY WRITTEN BY: SHANE KIEFER, CWB SARAH KAHLICH, AWB PLATEAU LAND & WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AUGUST 1, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

More information

Deer Hunting Frequently Asked Questions 2017 Deer Hunting Rules September 22, 2017

Deer Hunting Frequently Asked Questions 2017 Deer Hunting Rules September 22, 2017 What to Know for 2017 Season Structure Licenses and tags Bonus antlerless tags Crossbow regulations Public and private lands tags Tagging deer Harvest Registration Transportation of deer Chronic wasting

More information

White-tailed Deer Age Report from the Deer Harvest

White-tailed Deer Age Report from the Deer Harvest White-tailed Deer Age Report from the 2016 Deer Harvest The Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department has made a concerted effort, beginning in 2015, to increase the amount of age data collected from harvested

More information

Special Area Deer Hunting Season Information ONE

Special Area Deer Hunting Season Information ONE Special Areas County and State Parks Atlantic County Park System (Zone 61): Hunters wishing to hunt Atlantic County Park System will need to apply for a Zone 61 permit through the mail. Please use the

More information

On Eve of Newtown Recommendations, Most Back New Gun Control Measures

On Eve of Newtown Recommendations, Most Back New Gun Control Measures ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: Gun Control EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 5 p.m. Monday, Jan. 14, 2013 On Eve of Newtown Recommendations, Most Back New Gun Control Measures Majorities of Americans favor gun

More information

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit Area Description DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit The Saginaw County Deer Management Unit (DMU 073) is located in the Southern Lower Peninsula in the Saginaw Bay region of Wildlife Division

More information

CRACIUN RESEARCH. June 20, 2011 A M A R K E T R E S E A R C H S T CHA

CRACIUN RESEARCH. June 20, 2011 A M A R K E T R E S E A R C H S T CHA CRACIUN RESEARCH A M A R K E T R E S E A R C H S T U D Y CHA June 20, 2011 Craciun Research Anchorage. Seattle. Washington, DC 907.279.3982 www.craciunresearch.com 2011 Craciun Research. All rights reserved.

More information

US Army Corps of Engineers. Clearwater Lake. Little Rock District Clearwater Deer Hunt For the Non-ambulatory. Clearwater Lake Project Office

US Army Corps of Engineers. Clearwater Lake. Little Rock District Clearwater Deer Hunt For the Non-ambulatory. Clearwater Lake Project Office US Army Corps of Engineers Little Rock District Clearwater Lake 2017 Clearwater Deer Hunt For the Non-ambulatory 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Little Rock District Special Hunt Application Office Use Only

More information

RULES AND REGULATIONS Title 58 RECREATION

RULES AND REGULATIONS Title 58 RECREATION RULES AND REGULATIONS Title 58 RECREATION GAME COMMISSION [58 PA. CODE CH. 141] Hunting and Trapping To effectively manage the wildlife resources of this Commonwealth, the Game Commission (Commission),

More information

Illinois Hunter Harvest Report

Illinois Hunter Harvest Report HumanDimensions R e s e a r c h P r o g r a m 2012-2013 Illinois Hunter Harvest Report Illinois Natural History Survey Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Federal Aid

More information

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651) TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN 55155-4020 (651) 259-5207 265 266 2014 TRAPPER HARVEST SURVEY INTRODUCTION Margaret Dexter, Wildlife

More information

Public Input to St. Lawrence River Fisheries Community Objectives

Public Input to St. Lawrence River Fisheries Community Objectives Public Input to St. Lawrence River Fisheries Community Objectives Tommy L. Brown, Human Dimensions Research Unit, Cornell University Steven R. LaPan, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,

More information

DMU 419 Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia, and Shiawassee Counties

DMU 419 Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia, and Shiawassee Counties DMU 419 Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia, and Shiawassee Counties Area Description Deer Management Unit (DMU) 419 is in the Southern Lower Peninsula Region (SLP). It consists of Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia,

More information

New Jersey Trapper Harvest, Recreational and Economic Survey

New Jersey Trapper Harvest, Recreational and Economic Survey Summary A 2009-10 New Jersey Trapper Harvest Survey was mailed to 987 licensed requesting harvest, recreational and socio-economic information for the 2009-10 trapping season. The mean age of licensed

More information

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife As Required by 12 Section 10107-A White-tailed Deer Population Management Written By: Wildlife Management Staff, Inland Fisheries

More information

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS Draft Page 2 of 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS Schedule for formulating harvest management guidelines..............................................

More information

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651) TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN 55155-4020 (651) 259-5207 265 266 2007 TRAPPER HARVEST SURVEY Margaret Dexter, Wildlife Research Unit

More information

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE AND HUNTING SEASONS

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE AND HUNTING SEASONS ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE 2016-2017 AND 2017-2018 HUNTING SEASONS As proposed by the Arizona Game and Fish Commission 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Schedule for formulating 2016-2017 and

More information

Deer Management Unit (DMU) Public Outreach and Interaction Final Report

Deer Management Unit (DMU) Public Outreach and Interaction Final Report Deer Management Unit (DMU) Public Outreach and Interaction Final Report Zone D DMUs 10 and 11 Prepared For Cory R. Morea Deer Management Program Coordinator Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

More information

A SURVEY ON FIREARMS LEGISLATION IN CANADA

A SURVEY ON FIREARMS LEGISLATION IN CANADA A SURVEY ON FIREARMS LEGISLATION IN CANADA Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters 4601 Guthrie Drive Peterborough, ON K9J 8L5 T: 705.748.6324 W: www.ofah.org A SURVEY ON FIREARMS LEGISLATION The federal

More information

The 2005 Waterfowl Hunting Season in Minnesota: A Study of Hunters Opinions and Activities. White-winged scoter. Final Report

The 2005 Waterfowl Hunting Season in Minnesota: A Study of Hunters Opinions and Activities. White-winged scoter. Final Report This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp The 2005 Waterfowl

More information

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book. Accessed 3 May :46 GMT

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book. Accessed 3 May :46 GMT Mule Deer Dennis D. Austin Published by Utah State University Press Austin, D.. Mule Deer: A Handbook for Utah Hunters and Landowners. Logan: Utah State University Press, 2010. Project MUSE., https://muse.jhu.edu/.

More information

HUNTER EFFORT SURVEY 2015

HUNTER EFFORT SURVEY 2015 HUNTER EFFORT SURVEY 2015 BISON Findings and summary report of the 2015 Hunter Effort Survey for bison seal holders. Prepared by Lisa Kanary and Shylo Sawatzky, Yukon Bureau of Statistics. For more information,

More information

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Minnesota Deer Population Goals This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Minnesota Deer Population

More information

DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit Area Description Deer Management Unit (DMU) 487 is a multi-county DMU created to address bovine tuberculosis (btb) in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region

More information