Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities does not discriminate

Transcription

1 P of 31 Page 38 of 80 Date Submitted 4/27/2013 Section 1 Chapter Appendix F Affects HVHZ Yes TAC Recommendation No Affirmative Recommendation with a Second Commission Action Pending Review Proponent Attachments Jack Glenn Yes Related Modifications Summary of Modification Re-consideration of the adoption of the Florida Specific Amendment to the Florida Building Code - that provides uniform guidelines for the installation of irrigation systems. Rationale This is a Florida Specific Amendment that was not submitted during the regular code cycle and is helpful for uniform enforcement around the state by those local jurisdiction who wish to use the guidelines. Fiscal Impact Statement Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code No fiscal impact Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code none Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code none Requirements Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public provides for standardization of irrigation code Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction provides for standardization of irrigation code Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities does not discriminate Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code does not degrade the code Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version? YES The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code? NO The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed amendment applies to the state? NO The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the Florida Building Code amendment process? NO (a.) Conflicts within the updated code; (b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter 633; X (c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the model code; (d.) Equivalency of standards; (e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law; (f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public health, safety, and welfare. 1 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 38 of 80

2 2 of 31 Page 39 of 80 Page: 1 2 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 39 of 80

3 3 of 31 Page 40 of 80 Page: 2 3 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 40 of 80

4 4 of 31 Page 41 of 80 Page: 3 4 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 41 of 80

5 5 of 31 Page 42 of 80 Page: 4 5 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 42 of 80

6 6 of 31 Page 43 of 80 Page: 5 6 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 43 of 80

7 7 of 31 Page 44 of 80 Page: 6 7 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 44 of 80

8 8 of 31 Page 45 of 80 Page: 7 8 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 45 of 80

9 9 of 31 Page 46 of 80 Page: 8 9 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 46 of 80

10 10 of 31 Page 47 of 80 Page: 9 10 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 47 of 80

11 11 of 31 Page 48 of 80 Page: of 31 27/06/2013 Page 48 of 80

12 12 of 31 Page 49 of 80 Page: of 31 27/06/2013 Page 49 of 80

13 13 of 31 Page 50 of 80 Page: of 31 27/06/2013 Page 50 of 80

14 14 of 31 Page 51 of 80 Page: of 31 27/06/2013 Page 51 of 80

15 15 of 31 Page 52 of 80 Page: of 31 27/06/2013 Page 52 of 80

16 16 of 31 Page 53 of 80 Page: of 31 27/06/2013 Page 53 of 80

17 17 of 31 Page 54 of 80 Page: of 31 27/06/2013 Page 54 of 80

18 18 of 31 Page 55 of 80 Page: of 31 27/06/2013 Page 55 of 80

19 19 of 31 Page 56 of 80 APPENDIX F_1.png Page: 1 19 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 56 of 80

20 20 of 31 Page 57 of 80 APPENDIX F_2.png Page: 2 20 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 57 of 80

21 21 of 31 Page 58 of 80 APPENDIX F_3.png Page: 3 21 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 58 of 80

22 22 of 31 Page 59 of 80 APPENDIX F_4.png Page: 4 22 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 59 of 80

23 23 of 31 Page 60 of 80 APPENDIX F_5.png Page: 5 23 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 60 of 80

24 24 of 31 Page 61 of 80 APPENDIX F_6.png Page: 6 24 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 61 of 80

25 25 of 31 Page 62 of 80 APPENDIX F_7.png Page: 7 25 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 62 of 80

26 26 of 31 Page 63 of 80 APPENDIX F_8.png Page: 8 26 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 63 of 80

27 27 of 31 Page 64 of 80 APPENDIX F_9.png Page: 9 27 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 64 of 80

28 28 of 31 Page 65 of 80 APPENDIX F_10.png Page: of 31 27/06/2013 Page 65 of 80

29 P6231 Date Submitted Chapter TAC Recommendation Commission Action 4/27/2013 Appendix F Withdrawn Pending Review Section 1 Affects HVHZ Yes Proponent Attachments Jack Glenn Related Modifications 6228 Summary of Modification Modify Appendix F Irrigation to be consistent with what is currently used by the jurisdiction that has adopted the Appendix Rationale This change is only needed if Mod # 6228 is approved. This change was recommended by the state irrigation association to be consistent when normal practice. Fiscal Impact Statement Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code None Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code None Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code None Requirements Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public Yes Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction Yes Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities Does not discriminate Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code Does not degrade the code but enhances it by providing guidelines for irrigation system installation Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version? No No 29 of 31 Page 71 of 80 (a.) Conflicts within the updated code; (b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter 633; X (c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the model code; (d.) Equivalency of standards; (e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law; (f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public health, safety, and welfare. 29 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 71 of 80

30 P6231 Text Modification 30 of 31 Page 72 of 80 Page: 1 30 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 72 of 80

31 P6231 Text Modification 31 of 31 Page 73 of 80 Page: 2 31 of 31 27/06/2013 Page 73 of 80