45,

Transcription

1 PASA s approach to developing student enrollment projections takes into consideration past rates of growth, but relies primarily on forward looking analyses, including: projected new housing trends; amount of regeneration of older housing with younger families; economic and employment trends in the local area and nationally; the continued enrollment growth in private schools; the changing distribution of students geographically throughout the District; and the effect of the aging of the student population through the school system PASA has developed three scenarios of growth for Klein I.S.D. These scenarios are termed the Low Growth, the Moderate Growth and the High Growth scenarios. All three take a conservative stance, in that PASA would rather the District under build than over build. These scenarios are shown on the graph below, and are discussed at length later in this Chapter. 65,000 60,000 55,000 50,000 45, Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

2 Unique Characteristics of K.I.S.D. that Impact Growth In order to derive the three scenarios of growth, PASA needed to understand not only when and where new development might occur, but also the factors which are unique to the District, and which might either accelerate or retard the potential development of new housing. These factors must be accounted for in the modeling of projected students, as specific economic, quality of life, and other factors will impact the viability of development and the potential for future changes in student populations. In the case of Klein I.S.D., it is important to note the following: The District has a low percent of free/reduced lunch students especially as compared to other large districts in the metro area at 42.92%. For the last date at which data was available (2014), the District has a high median annual income at over $72,000. The District has a high STAAR passage rate ranking 8 th relative to other districts larger than 20,000 students in the metro area. The District has a high proportion of students relative to total population. About 21% of the entire population is now represented by students attending K.I.S.D. schools. The District will continue to add higher density housing as a greater proportion of its land use, because, as the District builds out, there is a greater density in those final developments. As noted above, the District is increasing significantly in the percent of housing that is multifamily (48.7% of all added housing for the next decade will be multi family). Klein I.S.D. is near one of the three large hubs of office and commercial development, thus attracting a significant proportion of new jobs to the area, and a continued cadre of new students, particularly over the coming five years. The District has high educational levels (37% with college degrees). Therefore, unemployment rates could remain lower than average, and job stability will remain higher than average, pulling proportionately more jobs into the District. Travel times to work for Klein I.S.D. are a relatively short 32.4 minutes one way for work purposes. This bodes well, relative to other, larger suburban districts, such as Katy at 35 minutes, Humble with 33.4 minutes, and Cy Fair tied with Klein at 32.4 minutes. Only Conroe is shorter, with 31.5 minutes, due to their large increased work epicenters near major residential hubs. Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

3 The District s chief predictor of younger students moving into K.I.S.D. is the availability of single family housing. Based on the stationary number in Kindergarten students this, the younger homebuyers opportunities to purchase may be becoming more limited, given the higher average prices of homes within Klein I.S.D. In existing, built out subdivisions, the District lost 228 students this past year, almost all in upper grades (166 in high school grades (7 th 12 th ) and 62 in grades PK 5 th ). Last year, there was an increase of 235 students in existing, older subdivisions, with 252 in upper grades and a loss of 17 in grades PK 5 th so it is likely that the older students are aging out and replacement younger families are not moving in at a strong rate overall in these older neighborhoods. The last two years overall ratio was 0.62 students per single family home. This year, the ratio of students per home is This Demographic Update represents a look ten years forward. The ratios may continue to stay fairly stable, but nearing the end of the projection period, it should start to decline, due to the aging out of students, while their parents remain in the District and do not sell their homes to younger families. Klein I.S.D. is a big producer of new apartments this school year and continuing into the coming school year. However, many of those MF developments not now actively developing will not be undertaken (as estimated by PASA) for another two to three years. An increase of 1,728 newly occupied units is projected by PASA for the next 12 months and a total of 11,333 units are projected over the coming ten years significantly adding to the proportion of young families and young students in K.I.S.D. This school year, the proportion of elementary students is 47%, and will continue to dip downward slightly each year to 2021, based on PASA s projections, and then begin inching upward. Also, the proportion of new Elementary students coming into the District is only 20% (estimated) of the total added enrollment this year, and should be 28% this coming year, the latter due partially to the large number of apartments under construction, or yet to be occupied. The multi year growth in Kindergarten students has been the key to successive years of higher growth, since KN grew at 3%, 4% and 5% for the past three years. But, this year, KN declined, which then influences the next 12 years of growth in grades 1 st through 12 th. It also reduces, in particular, the students added over the near term to elementary grades. But, by the, 2022, there is a flip flop, in that the percent growth of elementary students becomes the largest of all grade groups and continues basically through the 2025 projection period (see the Moderate Growth Scenario table). It should be emphasized that the aging of the last three years growth in early grades is very impactful, in that the highest percent growth by grade group over the next six years is in either the middle school grades or the high school grades, followed by the elementary grades at the end of the projection period. Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

4 The Model for Developing Student Projections New housing construction is the most significant contributor to new student growth in this model, based on data gathered from numerous interviews (see Chapter 2). Short term new housing is projected based on preliminary and final plats, developers plans, and other information gathered from numerous sources. This model for student projections also incorporates some aspects of the recent trend of students moving into and out of existing homes that are resold. This year there were many built out neighborhoods that gained students, while others lost students. Part of the model includes the projection that new petrochemical workers will rent and buy homes in the older, established neighborhoods in the District. This regeneration of existing homes with younger heads of household in some areas, while other areas are becoming more empty nest oriented, is an important trend in Klein I.S.D. that affects enrollment at specific schools very differently. The aging of the existing student population contributes significantly to the projected population. The current Kindergarten class is very small, and if subsequent Kindergarten classes are of similar sizes, it will impact the aging of the student population and the distribution of students by grade group. For each Planning Unit, the students are aged forward such that local anomalies in the population are taken into account. Moderate Scenario of Growth The Moderate Growth projections series shows a projected annual increase of an average 1,039 students per year over the next five years, with an additional increase of an average 1,012 students projected annually in the last five years of the projection period. Therefore, by, 2020, Klein I.S.D. could have a projected enrollment of 55,735 students, and by 2025, a total of 60,796 students. Annual growth rates could range from 1.54% to 2.12%. It is almost certain that all multi family units are not accounted for, as tracts with no known plans can easily develop within a year s time or parcels zoned for commercial uses can easily flip to become multi family land uses, based on city approvals and demand. The Moderate Growth Scenario assumes the following: The perception of the District remains the same or becomes slightly more positive relative to other surrounding districts; A greater proportion of young students will reside in the District particularly over the last four years of the coming decade; After apartments now in the pipeline are completed, then there will be some delays in further apartments due to the oil price plunge, but still ~two new complexes a year can be expected and up to four per year later in the projection period; Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

5 The growth of new housing (due to the Grand Parkway and the ExxonMobil and other energy firms) will proceed as families continue to move to nearby subdivisions; New housing becomes virtually built out this coming decade; The ratios of students per home will remain stable overall; Unemployment rates remain at roughly 3.9% to 4.2% in the Klein area over the next decade; Immigrants entering the Houston region will remain stable (with student aged immigration below 2014 rates); Interest rates increase by more than 2% over current levels for the next five years; and Iranian, Iraqi, Afghan, and other global concerns do not accelerate. Low Scenario of Growth It is critical to consider the lowest projection scenario in making fiscal planning decisions, given new normal recovery experienced by Texas school districts and the continued uncertainty about State funding. Under the Low Growth Scenario, the District would add 3,499 students in the first five years, and would add 2,603 students in the last five years of this projection period. Therefore, under the Low Growth Scenario, by the, 2020, Klein I.S.D. could have 54,037 students, and by the, 2025, 56,640 students could be enrolled under this Low Growth Scenario. Annual growth rates could begin at 1.44% and slowly taper off to.66% at the end of the projection period. A Low Growth Scenario would assume the following: Elementary enrollment will increase at less than one percent per year, due to a lack of momentum in homebuying and the fact that the District is rapidly building out; The slower housing starts of new homes and slower apartment startups cause student population growth to be lower than expected; The unemployment rate continues to rise to 5% in the Klein I.S.D. catchment area, and does not drop below 5% unemployment for 4 to 5 years or beyond; Older home regeneration will be slow, with only light interest in relocating to existing, builtout subdivisions in K.I.S.D.; Stock prices start dropping or remain stationery in the next 3 5 years; Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

6 Consumer confidence also remains stationary or again declines, with a possible renewed recession; Increased terrorist activity within the U.S.; and Long term Iranian, Afghan, or other geo political war effort intensifies. High Scenario of Growth Under the High Growth Scenario, the District could gain 7,196 students in the first five years, and an additional 8,419 students would be expected in the last five years of the projection period. Thus, under these high growth assumptions, Klein I.S.D. could contain 57,734 students by 2020 and 66,153 students by Student enrollment in Kindergarten begins to accelerate again next year and continues to be approximately 3% throughout the projection period; Older students accelerate in growth due to simply aging them forward and also due to the demand for non entry level new homes; Student population continues to increase at a higher rate due to greater demand for both existing, older homes and for existing apartments; Assuming oil prices rise, student population continues to accelerate because of the demand for new housing in K.I.S.D. dependent on better availability of mortgages, lowered mortgage rates, and the statistically higher credit scores among younger homebuyers to meet the new credit demands for a home purchase; Klein area unemployment rates begin to retreat annually and return to 3.5% within 2 3 years; Immigration rates will again rise significantly, further encouraging further out migration from the urban core to suburban districts like Klein I.S.D.; Interest rates do not rise more than 2% in the next 5 years; The U.S. has short term deployment in Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries and no other global wars, and no increase in terrorist activity within the country. Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

7 Projected Resident Students by Planning Unit Presented in this chapter are charts showing the number of students projected to live in each Planning Unit each year under the Moderate Growth Scenario. These charts can be utilized by the District in assessing and making decisions about future utilization of each campus. Projected Resident Students by Attendance Zone Also presented in this chapter are charts and maps showing the number of students projected to live in the current attendance zones, for each year under the Moderate Growth Scenario. These charts and maps can be utilized by the District in assessing and making decisions about future utilization of each campus. The Importance of Transfers It is important to remember that these student projections include only the projected resident students, exclusive of inter and intra District transfers. All transfers would also need to be analyzed when assessing facility utilization, including both voluntary transfers for personal reasons, as well as transfers for special programs. Transfers will change from year to year, and are thus useful for analysis for only a short period. The current transfers are included next in this chapter, and show the students who are attending school outside the zones in which they are residing. These transfers can be for any reason. Elementary Attendance Zones The first map in the chapter shows the projected geo coded students by attendance zone. The data is shown for grades EE 5 th for the schools north of FM 1960, while the KN 5 th grade students are shown for the schools south of FM 1960, as the PK students in the far southern end of the District attend another facility. Kuehnle, Metzler, Mueller, Schultz and Zwink are all projected to need relief by the end of the projection period. The District is planning to open several schools in the northern portion of the District in the next 10 years, and PASA will be working with K.I.S.D. to assess future facilities plans, after the opening of Mahaffey Elementary in the, Intermediate School Attendance Zones The next map and chart show the projected students by intermediate attendance zone. Schindewolf is expected to exceed its capacity by more than 120% of capacity by the, 2016, but only by a small amount. The District is planning to open an intermediate school in the northern portion of the District in the, By that time, Krimmel and Hildebrandt are also expected to need relief. The site for this new school is in the northern portion of the District, and should be able to relieve all three of these schools. The District will still need additional Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

8 intermediate space, however, by the end of the projection period, as these projections show a need for space for 2,771 additional intermediate students. High School Attendance Zones The projections by current high school attendance zone are also shown in this chapter. The next high school is planned to open in the, 2017, in the western portion of the District. Even after the opening of this school, it is likely that the District will need additional high school capacity by the end of the projection period. The District has an additional high school site in the northern portion of the District, and this site should be able to relieve several of the schools when it opens. Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

9 Most-Likely Growth Scenario (Series II Projection Series) by Grade and Grade Group: Historical Enrollment Proj'ed PEIMS PEIMS PEIMS PEIMS 12 Sep PEIMS Average Growth, Retention & Attrition Projected Enrollment at PEIMS Snapshot Date Added Students (Based on Last 2 Yrs.) Added Students EE PK 1,209 1,117 1,153 1,072 1,139 1,145 1,179 1,201 1,224 1,249 1,273 1,299 1,325 1,351 1,378 1, KN 3,148 3,280 3,363 3,528 3,352 3,378 3,453 3,517 3,587 3,658 3,730 3,804 3,881 3,951 4,022 4, ,306 3,325 3,495 3,560 3,789 3, ,577 3,651 3,727 3,801 3,875 3,953 4,032 4,113 4,187 4, ,363 3,427 3,461 3,625 3,652 3, ,938 3,703 3,788 3,867 3,943 4,022 4,102 4,185 4,268 4, ,398 3,447 3,574 3,625 3,812 3, ,779 4,058 3,824 3,912 3,992 4,073 4,154 4,238 4,322 4, ,369 3,499 3,537 3,704 3,773 3, ,921 3,871 4,166 3,926 4,015 4,100 4,182 4,266 4,352 4, ,437 3,415 3,630 3,683 3,834 3, ,869 4,007 3,965 4,267 4,021 4,114 4,201 4,285 4,371 4, ,600 3,648 3,553 3,741 3,824 3, ,011 4,053 4,208 4,163 4,480 4,223 4,321 4,412 4,500 4, ,510 3,750 3,773 3,724 3,824 3, ,953 4,150 4,202 4,362 4,316 4,646 4,379 4,481 4,575 4, ,408 3,599 3,844 3,901 3,818 3, ,936 4,039 4,249 4,303 4,466 4,420 4,758 4,485 4,589 4, ,175 4,021 4,176 4,320 4,407 4, ,481 4,589 4,719 4,964 5,026 5,219 5,166 5,561 5,241 5, ,429 3,684 3,629 3,749 3,948 3, ,911 3,985 4,091 4,206 4,424 4,481 4,654 4,606 4,957 4, ,354 3,387 3,543 3,517 3,677 3, ,852 3,799 3,880 3,982 4,094 4,308 4,364 4,532 4,485 4, ,147 3,186 3,302 3,433 3,414 3, ,512 3,694 3,652 3,730 3,827 3,937 4,143 4,196 4,357 4, TOTAL: 46,002 47,045 48,253 49,402 50,395 50,538 51,610 52,557 53,526 54,638 55,735 56,854 57,923 58,924 59,872 60,796 5,197 5,061 PCT. INC Actual Inc.: 692 1,043 1,208 1, ,136 1, ,112 1,097 1,119 1,069 1, ment by Grade Enrollment by Grade Group TOTAL (EE 5th 21,379 21,770 22,433 23,017 23,483 23,635 23,954 24,248 24,525 24,927 25,101 25,620 26,138 26,652 27,168 27,680 TOTAL (6th 8th 10,518 10,997 11,170 11,366 11,466 11,495 11,900 12,242 12,659 12,828 13,262 13,289 13,458 13,378 13,664 13,941 TOTAL (9th 12 14,105 14,278 14,650 15,019 15,446 15,408 15,756 16,067 16,342 16,883 17,372 17,945 18,327 18,894 19,040 19,175 nge by Grade % Change by Grade Group % CHG (EE 5th) % CHG (6th 8th) % CHG (9th 12th) ts in each Gra % Students in each Grade Group % EE 5th % 6th 8th % 9th 12th udents by Gra Added Students by Grade Group ADDED EE 5th ,483 23, ADDED 6th 8th ,466 11, ADDED 9th 12th ,446 15, tudents by Gr % Added Students by Grade Group RATIO OF ADDED EE 5th RATIO OF ADDED 6th 8th RATIO OF ADDED 9th 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

10 Low Growth Scenario (Series II Projection Series) by Grade and Grade Group: Proj'ed PEIMS PEIMS PEIMS PEIMS 12 Sep PEIMS Average Growth, Retention & Attrition Projected Enrollment at PEIMS Snapshot Date (Based on Last 2 Yrs.) Added Students Added Students EE PK 1,209 1,117 1,153 1,072 1,139 1,145 1,165 1,176 1,188 1,200 1,212 1,224 1,236 1,249 1,261 1, KN 3,148 3,280 3,363 3,528 3,352 3,378 3,411 3,446 3,480 3,515 3,550 3,585 3,621 3,650 3,679 3, ,306 3,325 3,495 3,560 3,789 3, ,551 3,594 3,633 3,670 3,706 3,744 3,781 3,819 3,849 3, ,363 3,427 3,461 3,625 3,652 3, ,909 3,663 3,711 3,752 3,789 3,827 3,865 3,904 3,943 3, ,398 3,447 3,574 3,625 3,812 3, ,751 4,014 3,764 3,814 3,856 3,894 3,933 3,972 4,012 4, ,369 3,499 3,537 3,704 3,773 3, ,892 3,829 4,101 3,846 3,897 3,939 3,979 4,019 4,059 4, ,437 3,415 3,630 3,683 3,834 3, ,841 3,964 3,903 4,181 3,921 3,972 4,016 4,056 4,097 4, ,600 3,648 3,553 3,741 3,824 3, ,981 4,008 4,141 4,077 4,367 4,096 4,149 4,195 4,237 4, ,510 3,750 3,773 3,724 3,824 3, ,923 4,103 4,135 4,272 4,207 4,506 4,226 4,281 4,328 4, ,408 3,599 3,844 3,901 3,818 3, ,906 3,994 4,181 4,214 4,353 4,287 4,591 4,306 4,363 4, ,175 4,021 4,176 4,320 4,407 4, ,448 4,539 4,645 4,863 4,901 5,063 4,986 5,340 5,009 5, ,429 3,684 3,629 3,749 3,948 3, ,882 3,942 4,027 4,121 4,314 4,348 4,492 4,423 4,737 4, ,354 3,387 3,543 3,517 3,677 3, ,823 3,757 3,820 3,901 3,993 4,180 4,213 4,352 4,286 4, ,147 3,186 3,302 3,433 3,414 3, ,487 3,654 3,595 3,654 3,732 3,819 3,999 4,030 4,163 4, TOTAL: 46,002 47,045 48,253 49,402 50,395 50,538 51,206 51,918 52,561 53,318 54,037 54,726 55,329 55,839 56,267 56,640 3,499 2,603 PCT. INC Actual Inc.: 692 1,043 1,208 1, , Enrollment by Grade Group Enrollment by Grade Group TOTAL (EE 5th) 21,379 21,770 22,433 23,017 23,483 23,635 23,754 23,920 24,018 24,215 24,170 24,427 24,674 24,912 25,145 25,372 TOTAL (6th 8th) 10,518 10,997 11,170 11,366 11,466 11,495 11,811 12,105 12,457 12,563 12,927 12,888 12,966 12,782 12,927 13,061 TOTAL (9th 12th) 14,105 14,278 14,650 15,019 15,446 15,408 15,641 15,893 16,086 16,539 16,940 17,411 17,689 18,145 18,195 18,207 % Change by Grade Group % Change by Grade Group % CHG (EE 5th) % CHG (6th 8th) % CHG (9th 12th) % Students in each Grade Group % Students in each Grade Group % EE 5th % 6th 8th % 9th 12th Added Students by Grade Group Added Students by Grade Group ADDED EE 5th ,483 23, ADDED 6th 8th ,466 11, ADDED 9th 12th ,446 15, % Added Students by Grade Group % Added Students by Grade Group RATIO OF ADDED EE 5th RATIO OF ADDED 6th 8th RATIO OF ADDED 9th 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

11 High Growth Scenario (Series II Projection Series) by Grade and Grade Group: Proj'ed PEIMS PEIMS PEIMS PEIMS 12 Sep PEIMS Average Growth, Retention & Attrition Projected Enrollment at PEIMS Snapshot Date (Based on Last 2 Yrs.) Added Students Added Students EE PK 1,209 1,117 1,153 1,072 1,139 1,145 1,188 1,223 1,260 1,298 1,337 1,377 1,418 1,460 1,504 1, KN 3,148 3,280 3,363 3,528 3,352 3,378 3,513 3,625 3,741 3,861 3,984 4,112 4,244 4,379 4,519 4, ,306 3,325 3,495 3,560 3,789 3, ,587 3,738 3,861 3,985 4,112 4,244 4,380 4,520 4,665 4, ,363 3,427 3,461 3,625 3,652 3, ,949 3,737 3,898 4,027 4,156 4,289 4,426 4,568 4,714 4, ,398 3,447 3,574 3,625 3,812 3, ,789 4,095 3,879 4,047 4,180 4,314 4,452 4,595 4,742 4, ,369 3,499 3,537 3,704 3,773 3, ,932 3,907 4,226 4,004 4,176 4,314 4,452 4,595 4,742 4, ,437 3,415 3,630 3,683 3,834 3, ,879 4,044 4,023 4,351 4,122 4,300 4,442 4,584 4,731 4, ,600 3,648 3,553 3,741 3,824 3, ,021 4,089 4,267 4,244 4,591 4,349 4,537 4,687 4,837 4, ,510 3,750 3,773 3,724 3,824 3, ,963 4,186 4,261 4,447 4,423 4,785 4,533 4,728 4,884 5, ,408 3,599 3,844 3,901 3,818 3, ,946 4,075 4,309 4,386 4,577 4,553 4,925 4,666 4,867 5, ,175 4,021 4,176 4,320 4,407 4, ,493 4,631 4,787 5,062 5,153 5,377 5,348 5,786 5,481 5, ,429 3,684 3,629 3,749 3,948 3, ,921 4,022 4,149 4,289 4,536 4,617 4,818 4,792 5,184 4, ,354 3,387 3,543 3,517 3,677 3, ,862 3,834 3,936 4,061 4,198 4,439 4,519 4,715 4,690 5, ,147 3,186 3,302 3,433 3,414 3, ,522 3,728 3,704 3,803 3,924 4,056 4,289 4,366 4,556 4, TOTAL: 46,002 47,045 48,253 49,402 50,395 50,538 51,803 53,178 54,554 56,123 57,734 59,396 61,060 62,725 64,407 66,153 7,196 8,419 PCT. INC Actual Inc.: 692 1,043 1,208 1, ,136 1,264 1,376 1,376 1,569 1,611 1,663 1,663 1,665 1,682 1,746 Enrollment by Grade Group TOTAL (EE 5th) 21,379 21,770 22,433 23,017 23,483 23,635 24,074 24,613 25,140 25,830 26,332 27,221 28,092 28,986 29,908 30,860 TOTAL (6th 8th) 10,518 10,997 11,170 11,366 11,466 11,495 11,930 12,350 12,837 13,077 13,591 13,687 13,995 14,080 14,588 15,060 TOTAL (9th 12th) 14,105 14,278 14,650 15,019 15,446 15,408 15,798 16,215 16,577 17,216 17,810 18,489 18,974 19,659 19,911 20,233 % Change by Grade Group Enrollment by Grade Group % Change by Grade Group % CHG (EE 5th) % CHG (6th 8th) % CHG (9th 12th) % Students in each Grade Group % Students in each Grade Group % EE 5th % 6th 8th % 9th 12th Added Students by Grade Group Added Students by Grade Group ADDED EE 5th ,483 23, ADDED 6th 8th ,466 11, ADDED 9th 12th ,446 15, % Added Students by Grade Group % Added Students by Grade Group RATIO OF ADDED EE 5th RATIO OF ADDED 6th 8th RATIO OF ADDED 9th 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

12 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Planning EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Unit A B C D E F G H I A B C D E F A B C D E F G H I A B C D E F G H I J K L Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

13 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Planning EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Unit A B C D E F G A B A B A B C D E F G H I J A B C A B C A B A B C D E F G H Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

14 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Planning EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Unit I J K A B C D A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B A B A B A B C D E A B C D E F G A Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

15 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Planning EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Unit B C D E F A B A B C D A B A B A B A B A B C D A B A B A B A B C D A Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

16 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Planning EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Unit B A B A B A B C A B C A B Total: Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

17 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F 1G 1H 1I 2 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 4F 4G 4H 4I 5A 5B 5C 5D 5E 5F 5G 5H 5I 5J 5K 5L Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

18 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 6G 7A 7B 8A 8B 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 9G 9H 9I 9J 10 11A 11B 11C 12A 12B 12C 13A 13B 14 15A 15B 15C 15D 15E 15F 15G 15H Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

19 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 15I 15J 15K A 18B 18C 18D 19A 19B 19C 20A 20B 20C 21A 21B 21C 22 23A 23B 23C 24A 24B 24C A 27B 28A 28B 29A 29B 30A 30B 30C 30D 30E 31A 31B 31C 31D 31E 31F 31G 32A Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

20 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 32B 32C 32D 32E 32F 33A 33B 34A 34B 34C 34D 35A 35B 36 37A 37B 38A 38B A 41B 42 43A 43B 43C 43D 44A 44B A 52B 53 54A 54B 55A 55B 55C 55D 56A Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

21 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 56B 57A 57B 58A 58B A 62B 62C 63A 63B 63C A 67B Total: Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

22 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F 1G 1H 1I 2 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 4F 4G 4H 4I 5A 5B 5C 5D 5E 5F 5G 5H 5I 5J 5K 5L Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

23 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 6G 7A 7B 8A 8B 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 9G 9H 9I 9J 10 11A 11B 11C 12A 12B 12C 13A 13B 14 15A 15B 15C 15D 15E 15F 15G 15H Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

24 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 15I 15J 15K A 18B 18C 18D 19A 19B 19C 20A 20B 20C 21A 21B 21C 22 23A 23B 23C 24A 24B 24C A 27B 28A 28B 29A 29B 30A 30B 30C 30D 30E 31A 31B 31C 31D 31E 31F 31G 32A Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

25 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 32B 32C 32D 32E 32F 33A 33B 34A 34B 34C 34D 35A 35B 36 37A 37B 38A 38B A 41B 42 43A 43B 43C 43D 44A 44B A 52B 53 54A 54B 55A 55B 55C 55D 56A Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

26 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 56B 57A 57B 58A 58B A 62B 62C 63A 63B 63C A 67B Total: Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

27 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F 1G 1H 1I 2 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 4F 4G 4H 4I 5A 5B 5C 5D 5E 5F 5G 5H 5I 5J 5K 5L Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

28 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 6G 7A 7B 8A 8B 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 9G 9H 9I 9J 10 11A 11B 11C 12A 12B 12C 13A 13B 14 15A 15B 15C 15D 15E 15F 15G 15H Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

29 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 15I 15J 15K A 18B 18C 18D 19A 19B 19C 20A 20B 20C 21A 21B 21C 22 23A 23B 23C 24A 24B 24C A 27B 28A 28B 29A 29B 30A 30B 30C 30D 30E 31A 31B 31C 31D 31E 31F 31G 32A Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

30 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 32B 32C 32D 32E 32F 33A 33B 34A 34B 34C 34D 35A 35B 36 37A 37B 38A 38B A 41B 42 43A 43B 43C 43D 44A 44B A 52B 53 54A 54B 55A 55B 55C 55D 56A Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

31 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 56B 57A 57B 58A 58B A 62B 62C 63A 63B 63C A 67B Total: Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

32 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F 1G 1H 1I 2 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 4F 4G 4H 4I 5A 5B 5C 5D 5E 5F 5G 5H 5I 5J 5K 5L Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

33 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 6G 7A 7B 8A 8B 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 9G 9H 9I 9J 10 11A 11B 11C 12A 12B 12C 13A 13B 14 15A 15B 15C 15D 15E 15F 15G 15H Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

34 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 15I 15J 15K A 18B 18C 18D 19A 19B 19C 20A 20B 20C 21A 21B 21C 22 23A 23B 23C 24A 24B 24C A 27B 28A 28B 29A 29B 30A 30B 30C 30D 30E 31A 31B 31C 31D 31E 31F 31G 32A Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

35 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 32B 32C 32D 32E 32F 33A 33B 34A 34B 34C 34D 35A 35B 36 37A 37B 38A 38B A 41B 42 43A 43B 43C 43D 44A 44B A 52B 53 54A 54B 55A 55B 55C 55D 56A Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

36 Most-Likely Projection Series Total Projected Students by Planning Unit:, 2016 through, 2025 Planning Unit 56B 57A 57B 58A 58B A 62B 62C 63A 63B 63C A 67B Total: Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th EE 5th 6th 8th 9th 12th EE 12th Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

37 Klein I.S.D. Elementary School Transfers Attends Benfer Benignus Bernshausen Blackshear Brill Ehrhardt Eiland Epps Island Frank French Greenwood Forest Hassler Haude Kaiser Klenk Kohrville Krahn Kreinhop Kuehnle Benfer Benignus Bernshausen Blackshear Brill Ehrhardt Eiland Epps Island Frank French Greenwood Forest Hassler Haude Kaiser Klenk Kohrville Krahn Kreinhop Kuehnle Lemm McDougle Metzler Mittelstadt Mueller Nitsch Northampton Roth Schultz Theiss Zwink (blank) Resides In & Attends Transfers In Attends Resides In Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

38 Attends Benfer Benignus Bernshausen Blackshear Brill Ehrhardt Eiland Epps Island Frank French Greenwood Forest Hassler Haude Kaiser Klenk Kohrville Krahn Kreinhop Kuehnle Lemm McDougle Metzler Mittelstadt Mueller Nitsch Northampton Roth Schultz Theiss Zwink (blank) Resides In & Attends Transfers In Attends Klein I.S.D. Elementary School Transfers Resides In Transfers Out Net Transfers Resides In Lemm McDougle Metzler Mittelstadt Mueller Nitsch Northampton Roth Schultz Theiss Zwink England ECC Klein Annex , , Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

39 GOSLING Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D Current Elementary School Attendance Zones KUYKENDAHL HUFSMITH FM 2920 MAHAFFEY Bernshausen 2016: : : 1162 NORTHPOINTE Kohrville 2016: : : 683 Blackshear 2016: : : 1164 Schultz 2016: : : 1245 Frank 2016: : : 664 LOUETTA CHAMPION FOREST Metzler 2016: : : 1137 DOWDELL BOUDREAUX RAYFORD FM 2920 Hassler 2016: : : 949 Theiss 2016: : : 536 Krahn 2016: : : 885 Brill 2016: : : 886 ROOT SQUYRES RAYFORD Northampton 2016: : : 743 PINELAKES T C JESTER ROOT Mueller 2016: : : 1696 Benignus 2016: : : 826 Ehrhardt 2016: : : 701 Mittelstadt 2016: : : 1047 French 2016: : : 1186 LOUETTA FM 2920 Kuehnle 2016: : : 1371 Zwink 2016: : : 1562 SPRING CYPRESS Benfer 2016: : : 680 KUYKENDAHL CYPRESSWOOD Greenwood Forest 2016: : : 731 ELLA FM 2920 Roth 2016: : : 892 Kreinhop 2016: : : 762 Haude 2016: : : 806 ELLA Lemm 2016: : : 796 Mittelstadt 2016: : : 969 Klenk 2016: : : 802 McDougle 2016: : : 587 Benfer 2016: : : 640 Greenwood Forest 2016: : : 682 Epps Island 2016: : : 675 Kaiser 2016: : : 653 Haude 2016: : : 777 Eiland 2016: : : 501 Nitsch 2016: : : 837 Geo-Coded EE-5th for Northern Schools Geo-Coded KN-5th for Southern Schools

40 Projected EE-5th Grade Students by Current Attendance Zones (Schools North of FM 1960) Practical Capacity Projected Geo-Coded Elementary Students (EE-5th Grade) Benfer Benignus Bernshausen Blackshear Brill Ehrhardt Frank French Hassler Haude Kohrville Krahn Kreinhop Kuehnle Lemm Metzler Mittelstadt Mueller Northampton Roth Schultz Theiss Zwink Totals: 20,337 18,368 18,800 19,178 19,670 19,988 20,475 20,965 21,451 21,922 22,379 Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

41 Projected EE-5th Grade Students by Current Attendance Zones (Schools North of FM 1960) Practical Capacity Student Margin Benfer Benignus Bernshausen Blackshear Brill Ehrhardt Frank French Hassler Haude Kohrville Krahn Kreinhop Kuehnle Lemm Metzler Mittelstadt Mueller Northampton Roth Schultz Theiss Zwink Totals: 20,337 1,969 1,537 1, ,114-1,585-2,042 Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

42 Projected EE-5th Grade Students by Current Attendance Zones (Schools North of FM 1960) Practical Capacity 2016 Percent Utilization of Facilities Benfer % 86% 82% 79% 75% 75% 75% 76% 76% 77% Benignus % 111% 103% 105% 100% 101% 101% 101% 102% 103% Bernshausen % 94% 97% 100% 104% 107% 109% 112% 114% 116% Blackshear % 100% 104% 107% 108% 110% 112% 113% 114% 115% Brill % 84% 89% 93% 98% 98% 99% 100% 101% 103% Ehrhardt % 78% 80% 83% 81% 81% 82% 83% 84% 84% Frank % 72% 73% 73% 73% 74% 75% 76% 76% 76% French % 75% 88% 95% 101% 107% 113% 115% 117% 119% Hassler % 76% 78% 82% 86% 94% 99% 104% 109% 114% Haude % 116% 114% 115% 115% 115% 116% 117% 118% 119% Kohrville % 74% 72% 71% 71% 71% 72% 73% 74% 75% Krahn % 79% 77% 77% 78% 78% 79% 79% 79% 80% Kreinhop % 78% 78% 79% 77% 78% 79% 80% 80% 81% Kuehnle % 129% 136% 141% 143% 147% 152% 157% 162% 166% Lemm % 103% 102% 103% 104% 106% 108% 109% 110% 111% Metzler % 95% 97% 102% 103% 107% 112% 117% 123% 126% Mittelstadt % 100% 103% 104% 105% 107% 109% 111% 113% 114% Mueller % 121% 130% 140% 149% 156% 162% 169% 176% 183% Northampton % 72% 72% 73% 77% 79% 81% 84% 88% 92% Roth % 90% 92% 97% 99% 101% 102% 103% 104% 106% Schultz % 113% 120% 124% 126% 129% 132% 134% 136% 138% Theiss % 77% 74% 71% 69% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% Zwink % 110% 113% 116% 118% 123% 131% 139% 149% 158% Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

43 Projected KN-5th Grade Students by Current Attendance Zones Projected Geo Coded Elementary Students (EE 5th Grade) Practical Capacity Eiland Epps Island Greenwood Forest Kaiser Klenk McDougle Nitsch Totals: 5,230 5,034 4,896 4,789 4,703 4,562 4,584 4,610 4,642 4,680 4,737 Student Margin Practical Capacity Eiland Epps Island Greenwood Forest Kaiser Klenk McDougle Nitsch Totals: 5, Percent Utilization of Facilities Practical Capacity Eiland % 95% 92% 91% 85% 86% 86% 87% 87% 89% Epps Island % 83% 84% 83% 81% 82% 82% 82% 82% 83% Greenwood Forest % 110% 107% 106% 101% 102% 102% 103% 103% 105% Kaiser % 82% 78% 75% 72% 72% 73% 74% 75% 76% Klenk % 101% 99% 95% 91% 92% 93% 94% 96% 98% McDougle % 80% 78% 76% 74% 74% 75% 75% 75% 76% Nitsch % 109% 108% 110% 110% 110% 110% 111% 112% 112% Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

44 Klein I.S.D. Intermediate School Transfers Attends Doerre Hildebrandt Kleb Klein Krimmel Schindewolf Strack Ulrich Wunderlich Klein Annex Doerre Hildebrandt Kleb Klein Krimmel Schindewolf Strack Ulrich Wunderlich (blank) Resides In & Attends 1,125 1,205 1,333 1,098 1,239 1,317 1,178 1,142 1,524 Transfers In Attends 1,147 1,221 1,377 1,110 1,284 1,360 1,221 1,152 1, Resides In Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

45 Klein I.S.D. Intermediate School Transfers Attends Resides In Transfers Out Net Transfers Doerre Hildebrandt Kleb Klein Krimmel Schindewolf Strack Ulrich Wunderlich (blank) Resides In Resides In & Attends Transfers In Attends Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

46 Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D C Current Intermediate School Attendance Zones 4A 4F 4E 3C 5D 3D 5I 3B 5K Ulrich 2016: : : D 4G 4H 4I 21A 21B 5C 3A 3E 5A 5L 4B 20A 21C 2 Krimmel 2016: : : E 5F 3F Doerre 2016: : : B 5B 19A 19B 23A 20C 6D 5G 23C 23B 6A 5H 18A 18B 19C 22 44A 1A 1C 6F 6G 1H 15J 6B 15K 18C 18D 17 7A 25 6C 15C 16 Kleb 2016: : : B 1F 1G 24A 24B 24C 43B 1E Hildebrandt 2016: : : G 30E 1I 7B 42 43A 15D 1B 30A 43D 45 8A 15I 8B 15A 41A 1D 9J 15F 9B 9G 41B 9E Wunderlich 2016: : : I 15H 15B 15E 30C 27A 27B 30D 29A 26 28A28B29B F 9D 9H 13A 9A Schindewolf 2016: : : B 14 38A 9C 13B Strack 2016: : : B 11B 37B A 11A 11C 12C 32D 31G 32A 12B 31E 31D 32B 31A 31F 32E 31B 31C 34A 32F 35A34B 34C 33B 34D C Kleb Strack 2016: : : : : : A 43D 45 33A B 58B B 55A B 54A Wunderlich 2016: : : D 58A B 53 62C 62A 61 57A 57B 69 63C 56A 56B 63A 38B Klein 2016: : : B 52A 67A 63B Geo-Coded 6th-8th Grade Students by Attendance Zone

47 Projected Geo-Coded 6th-8th Grade Students by Current Intermediate School Attendance Zones Doerre Average Practical Capacity: 1,243 1,243 1,243 1,243 1,243 1,243 1,243 1,243 1,243 1,243 Students Projected: Percent Utilization: 100% 103% 108% 109% 111% 113% 115% 116% 119% 122% Student Margin: Hildebrandt Average Practical Capacity: 1,321 1,321 1,321 1,321 1,321 1,321 1,321 1,321 1,321 1,321 Students Projected: Percent Utilization: 105% 113% 123% 132% 139% 142% 147% 150% 156% 161% Student Margin: Kleb Klein Average Practical Capacity: 1,238 1,238 1,238 1,238 1,238 1,238 1,238 1,238 1,238 1,238 Students Projected: Percent Utilization: 108% 103% 102% 99% 101% 100% 100% 98% 100% 101% Student Margin: Average Practical Capacity: 1,196 1,196 1,196 1,196 1,196 1,196 1,196 1,196 1,196 1,196 Students Projected: Percent Utilization: 98% 105% 109% 109% 110% 109% 108% 106% 107% 108% Student Margin: Krimmel Schindewolf Average Practical Capacity: 1,102 1,102 1,102 1,102 1,102 1,102 1,102 1,102 1,102 1,102 Students Projected: Percent Utilization: 116% 117% 125% 128% 137% 138% 139% 138% 140% 142% Student Margin: Average Practical Capacity: 1,133 1,133 1,133 1,133 1,133 1,133 1,133 1,133 1,133 1,133 Students Projected: Percent Utilization: 122% 122% 122% 120% 126% 126% 129% 130% 135% 141% Student Margin: Strack Ulrich Average Practical Capacity: 1,314 1,314 1,314 1,314 1,314 1,314 1,314 1,314 1,314 1,314 Students Projected: Percent Utilization: 100% 105% 107% 104% 106% 105% 105% 103% 105% 106% Student Margin: Average Practical Capacity: 1,188 1,188 1,188 1,188 1,188 1,188 1,188 1,188 1,188 1,188 Students Projected: Percent Utilization: 102% 106% 112% 118% 124% 124% 125% 124% 126% 128% Student Margin: Wunderlich Average Practical Capacity: 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 Students Projected: Percent Utilization: 110% 113% 114% 116% 117% 116% 117% 115% 117% 118% Student Margin: Total: Average Practical Capacity: 11,165 11,165 11,165 11,165 11,165 11,165 11,165 11,165 11,165 11,165 Students Projected: 11,898 12,239 12,661 12,821 13,260 13,286 13,458 13,380 13,658 13,941 Student Margin: ,074-1,496-1,656-2,095-2,121-2,293-2,215-2,493-2,776 Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

48 Klein I.S.D. High School Transfers Attends Resides In Transfers Out Net Transfers Klein Klein Collins Klein Forest Klein Oak Klein Annex Klein Klein Collins Klein Forest Klein Oak (blank) Resides In & Attends 3,898 3,599 3,688 3,850 Transfers In Attends 3,973 3,651 3,723 4, Resides In Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D

49 Population and Survey Analysts - October, 2015 Klein I.S.D Current High School Attendance Zones Future H.S. Future HS Klein Oak 2016: : : 6138 Klein 2016: : : 4462 Klein Oak High Klein High Klein Forest 2016: : : 4057 Klein Collins 2016: : : 4516 Klein High Klein 2016: : : 4462 Klein Forest High Vistas Klein Forest 2016: : : 4057 Geo-Coded 9th-12th Grade Students by Attendance Zone