DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION ON OPTIONS FOR THE CREATION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AREA IN THE SUGAR HOUSE NEIGHBORHOOD
|
|
- Adelia Clara Burke
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DATE: November 12, 2013 ITEM: 8.B. PROJECT AREA: N/A RE: PREPARED BY: DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION ON OPTIONS FOR THE CREATION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AREA IN THE SUGAR HOUSE NEIGHBORHOOD Edward Butterfield EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: At the 2012 RDA Board retreat, staff was requested to investigate options for the creation of a Community Development Area (CDA) in the Sugar House area. The discussion of creating a CDA was based on recent and future events that include the expiration of the Sugar House Urban Renewal Area in 2014, completion of Phase I of the streetcar and greenway, and the approval of the Phase II alignment. Three scenarios for the creation of a CDA are outlined below: First Scenario - create a CDA along the Phase I streetcar corridor and adjacent blocks from 500 East to McClelland Street. Second Scenario - create a CDA along the Phase II streetcar extension alignment from approximately Sugarmont Drive to 1700 South and Highland Drive. Third Scenario - combine the first and second scenarios into one CDA. Additional information on the various scenarios is included in the memo. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Pass a motion directing staff to pursue the first, second or third scenario as defined in the memo. 2. Pass a motion directing staff to pursue the first, second or third scenario with modifications. 3. Pass a motion to not recommend the creation of a CDA in Sugar House. 4. No action. ANALYSIS AND ISSUES: A description of the three scenarios is provided below. All revenue estimates assume 100% participation, over 25 years, by Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, and Salt Lake City School District.
2 First Scenario - Description: This scenario encompasses the blocks surrounding the recently completed phase one of the streetcar/greenway corridor and a portion of 2100 South business district. The boundaries are approximately from 500 East to McClelland (1050 East) and Hollywood Avenue to Strigham Avenue. Potential Projects: The potential use of tax increment proceeds from the CDA include assisting with double tracking Phase 1 of the streetcar, supporting transit-oriented development along the corridor especially at the 700 East and 900 East streetcar stops, and encouraging the redevelopment of the 2100 South business corridor from suburbanstyle strip malls to mixed-use urban scale developments. In addition, the CDA could be used to support the greenway. Issues: Pro - with the significant public investment in the streetcar/greenway and the rezoning of the area expected to be completed shortly, the Phase I corridor may be ready for considerable redevelopment activity that can be catalyzed through assistance provided from the CDA. Also, there are several large commercial properties near the corridor that present prime redevelopment opportunities. Con - large sections of the Phase 1 corridor reside in a historic district and are predominately composed of the single family residences. It is unlikely, based on current zoning efforts, that these areas will change uses in the foreseeable future. Also, a majority of the commercial properties are owned by a few individuals that do not have experience in development and their retail spaces are currently fully occupied. It may be several years before redevelopment plans at these commercial sites move forward. Tax Increment Projections: Based on a 25-year CDA starting in 2015, the total projected tax increment collected is $11 million. The first scenario consists of 106 acres composed of 41% residential, 47% commercial, and 12% tax-exempt uses. Second Scenario - Description: This scenario includes the Phase II streetcar alignment and encompasses the Sugar House Business District. The approximate boundaries are from McClelland (1050 East to 1200 East and 1700 South to I-80. Potential Projects: The primary project is the implementation of the Phase II alignment to 1700 South. The CDA would provide an additional funding mechanism for the extension. Issues: Pro - The use of tax increment to fund the construction of Phase II may reduce the timeline from planning to implementation. The CDA will also capitalize on future redevelopment projects planned for the Sugar House Business District.
3 Con - The Sugar House area has received significant amounts of tax increment proceeds through loans and other infrastructure investments from the Sugar House Urban Renewal Area that expires in It may be time to invest in other areas of Salt Lake City that are in need of infrastructure improvements and redevelopment activities. Tax Increment Projections: Based on a 25-year CDA starting in 2015, the total projected tax increment collected is $22 million. The second scenario consists of 103 acres composed of 17% residential, 74% commercial, and 9% tax-exempt uses. Third Scenario - Description: This scenario combines the first and second scenarios into one large "L" - shaped CDA. The Boundaries of the CDA would go from approximately 500 East to 1200 East and I-80 to 1700 South. Potential Projects: The projects are already identified in the first and second scenarios include double-tracking of Phase I streetcar, implementation of Phase II streetcar alignment, and ancillary economic and redevelopment activities. Issues: Pro - The RDA could provide additional funding for major infrastructure and redevelopment projects in the Sugar House area. Con - It may be challenging to receive support from taxing entities for such a large CDA that would encompass over 200 acres. Also, it would be challenging to limit redevelopment assistance to the Phase I streetcar corridor since large developments in the Sugar House Business District would still request assistance. Tax Increment Projections: Based on a 25-year CDA starting in 2015, the total projected tax increment collected is $33 million. The third scenario consists of 210 acres composed of 29% residential, 60% commercial, and 11% tax-exempt uses. BACKGROUND: The Sugar House Project area was created in 1987 and is composed of approximately 100 acres in the Sugar House Business District. The Project Area expires in 2014 when the 25 year timeline is complete. The RDA Board discussed opportunities to continue working in the Sugar House area through the creation of a CDA at the 2012 Board retreat. The RDA staff was directed to form several scenarios for creating a CDA and identify potential projects in need of additional funding. ATTACHMENT: A. Map of Scenario Boundaries B. Tax Increment Projection Sheet
4 WILMINGTON 2100 SOUTH 500 EAST 600 EAST LAKE ST. STRINGHAM AVE. HOLLYWOOD AVE. SUGARMONT DR. I EAST 700 EAST 900 EAST 1300 EAST 1700 SOUTH 1100 EAST 1200 EAST SUGARMONT AVE. SCENARIOS 1 & 2
5 LAKE ST. 900 EAST 2100 SOUTH 700 EAST 600 EAST HOLLYWOOD AVE. WILMINGTON AVE. 500 EAST SUGARMONT DR. SIMPSON AVE. STRINGHAM AVE. SCENARIO 1
6 1700 SOUTH 1100 EAST HOLLYWOOD AVE EAST 2100 SOUTH SUGARMONT DR EAST 1300 EAST I-80 SCENARIO 2
7 Sugar House Streetcar Corridor Community Development Area: 25-year ESTIMATED TAX INCREMENT PROJECTIONS* Base Year Total Taxable Value by Block Block 1 6,787,625 6,923,378 7,061,845 7,203,082 7,347,144 7,494,086 7,643,968 7,796,848 7,952,785 8,111,840 8,274,077 8,439,559 8,608,350 8,780,517 8,956,127 9,135,250 9,317,955 9,504,314 9,694,400 9,888,288 10,086,054 10,287,775 10,493,530 10,703,401 10,917,469 11,135,818 11,358,535 Block 2 13,950,870 14,229,887 14,514,485 14,804,775 15,100,870 15,402,888 15,710,946 16,025,164 16,345,668 16,672,581 17,006,033 17,346,153 17,693,076 18,046,938 18,407,877 18,776,034 19,151,555 19,534,586 19,925,278 20,323,783 20,730,259 21,144,864 21,567,761 21,999,117 22,439,099 22,887,881 23,345,639 Block 3 12,953,225 13,212,290 13,476,535 13,746,066 14,020,987 14,301,407 14,587,435 14,879,184 15,176,768 15,480,303 15,789,909 16,105,707 16,427,821 16,756,378 17,091,505 17,433,335 17,782,002 18,137,642 18,500,395 18,870,403 19,247,811 19,632,767 20,025,423 20,425,931 20,834,450 21,251,139 21,676,161 Block 4 9,654,955 9,848,054 10,045,015 10,245,915 10,450,834 10,659,850 10,873,047 11,090,508 11,312,319 11,538,565 11,769,336 12,004,723 12,244,817 12,489,714 12,739,508 12,994,298 13,254,184 13,519,268 13,789,653 14,065,446 14,346,755 14,633,690 14,926,364 15,224,891 15,529,389 15,839,977 16,156,777 Block 5 12,797,460 13,053,409 13,314,477 13,580,767 13,852,382 14,129,430 14,412,019 14,700,259 14,994,264 15,294,149 15,600,032 15,912,033 16,230,274 16,554,879 16,885,977 17,223,696 17,568,170 17,919,534 18,277,924 18,643,483 19,016,352 19,396,679 19,784,613 20,180,305 20,583,911 20,995,590 21,415,501 Block 6 15,110,700 15,412,914 15,721,172 16,035,596 16,356,308 16,683,434 17,017,102 17,357,445 17,704,593 18,058,685 18,419,859 18,788,256 19,164,021 19,547,302 19,938,248 20,337,013 20,743,753 21,158,628 21,581,801 22,013,437 22,453,705 22,902,779 23,360,835 23,828,052 24,304,613 24,790,705 25,286,519 Block 7 5,025,760 5,126,275 5,228,801 5,333,377 5,440,044 5,548,845 5,659,822 5,773,018 5,888,479 6,006,248 6,126,373 6,248,901 6,373,879 6,501,356 6,631,384 6,764,011 6,899,291 7,037,277 7,178,023 7,321,583 7,468,015 7,617,375 7,769,723 7,925,117 8,083,620 8,245,292 8,410,198 Block 8 20,106,115 20,508,237 20,918,402 21,336,770 21,763,505 22,198,776 22,642,751 23,095,606 23,557,518 24,028,669 24,509,242 24,999,427 25,499,415 26,009,404 26,529,592 27,060,184 27,601,387 28,153,415 28,716,483 29,290,813 29,876,629 30,474,162 31,083,645 31,705,318 32,339,424 32,986,213 33,645,937 Block 9 16,784,230 17,119,915 17,462,313 17,811,559 18,167,790 18,531,146 18,901,769 19,279,804 19,665,401 20,058,709 20,459,883 20,869,080 21,286,462 21,712,191 22,146,435 22,589,364 23,041,151 23,501,974 23,972,014 24,451,454 24,940,483 25,439,293 25,948,078 26,467,040 26,996,381 27,536,308 28,087,035 Block 10 8,428,645 8,597,218 8,769,162 8,944,546 9,123,436 9,305,905 9,492,023 9,681,864 9,875,501 10,073,011 10,274,471 10,479,961 10,689,560 10,903,351 11,121,418 11,343,846 11,570,723 11,802,138 12,038,181 12,278,944 12,524,523 12,775,014 13,030,514 13,291,124 13,556,947 13,828,086 14,104,647 Block 11 36,963,200 37,702,464 38,456,513 39,225,644 40,010,156 40,810,360 41,626,567 42,459,098 43,308,280 44,174,446 45,057,935 45,959,093 46,878,275 47,815,841 48,772,157 49,747,601 50,742,553 51,757,404 52,792,552 53,848,403 54,925,371 56,023,878 57,144,356 58,287,243 59,452,988 60,642,047 61,854,888 Block 12 80,626,280 82,238,806 83,883,582 85,561,253 87,272,478 89,017,928 90,798,287 92,614,252 94,466,537 96,355,868 98,282, ,248, ,253, ,298, ,384, ,512, ,682, ,896, ,154, ,457, ,806, ,202, ,646, ,139, ,682, ,275, ,921,477 Block 13 16,763,400 17,098,668 17,440,641 17,789,454 18,145,243 18,508,148 18,878,311 19,255,877 19,640,995 20,033,815 20,434,491 20,843,181 21,260,044 21,685,245 22,118,950 22,561,329 23,012,556 23,472,807 23,942,263 24,421,108 24,909,531 25,407,721 25,915,876 26,434,193 26,962,877 27,502,135 28,052,177 Block 14 32,298,670 32,944,643 33,603,536 34,275,607 34,961,119 35,660,342 36,373,548 37,101,019 37,843,040 38,599,900 39,371,899 40,159,336 40,962,523 41,781,774 42,617,409 43,469,757 44,339,152 45,225,936 46,130,454 47,053,063 47,994,125 48,954,007 49,933,087 50,931,749 51,950,384 52,989,392 54,049,179 Block 15 25,770,300 26,285,706 26,811,420 27,347,649 27,894,601 28,452,494 29,021,543 29,601,974 30,194,014 30,797,894 31,413,852 32,042,129 32,682,972 33,336,631 34,003,364 34,683,431 35,377,099 36,084,641 36,806,334 37,542,461 38,293,310 39,059,176 39,840,360 40,637,167 41,449,910 42,278,909 43,124,487 Block 16 11,526,620 11,757,152 11,992,295 12,232,141 12,476,784 12,726,320 12,980,846 13,240,463 13,505,272 13,775,378 14,050,885 14,331,903 14,618,541 14,910,912 15,209,130 15,513,313 15,823,579 16,140,051 16,462,852 16,792,109 17,127,951 17,470,510 17,819,920 18,176,319 18,539,845 18,910,642 19,288,855 Total 325,548, ,059, ,700, ,474, ,383, ,431, ,619, ,952, ,431, ,060, ,841, ,778, ,873, ,131, ,553, ,144, ,907, ,845, ,962, ,262, ,747, ,422, ,290, ,356, ,623, ,096, ,778,012 Base Year Total Increase in Taxable Value Minus Base YR Block 1 7,203, , , , , , ,758 1,070,995 1,236,477 1,405,268 1,577,435 1,753,045 1,932,168 2,114,873 2,301,232 2,491,318 2,685,206 2,882,972 3,084,693 3,290,448 3,500,319 3,714,387 3,932,736 4,155,453 4,382,623 Block 2 14,804, , , ,171 1,220,390 1,540,893 1,867,806 2,201,258 2,541,378 2,888,302 3,242,163 3,603,102 3,971,259 4,346,780 4,729,811 5,120,503 5,519,008 5,925,484 6,340,089 6,762,987 7,194,342 7,634,324 8,083,106 8,540,864 9,007,776 Block 3 13,746, , , ,369 1,133,118 1,430,702 1,734,237 2,043,843 2,359,641 2,681,755 3,010,312 3,345,439 3,687,269 4,035,936 4,391,576 4,754,329 5,124,337 5,501,745 5,886,701 6,279,357 6,679,865 7,088,384 7,505,073 7,930,095 8,363,619 Block 4 10,245, , , , ,593 1,066,403 1,292,649 1,523,421 1,758,808 1,998,902 2,243,798 2,493,593 2,748,383 3,008,269 3,273,352 3,543,738 3,819,531 4,100,840 4,387,775 4,680,449 4,978,976 5,283,474 5,594,062 5,910,861 6,233,997 Block 5 13,580, , , ,252 1,119,492 1,413,497 1,713,382 2,019,265 2,331,266 2,649,507 2,974,112 3,305,210 3,642,929 3,987,403 4,338,767 4,697,157 5,062,716 5,435,585 5,815,912 6,203,846 6,599,538 7,003,144 7,414,823 7,834,734 8,263,044 Block 6 16,035, , , ,507 1,321,849 1,668,998 2,023,090 2,384,263 2,752,660 3,128,426 3,511,706 3,902,652 4,301,417 4,708,157 5,123,032 5,546,205 5,977,841 6,418,110 6,867,184 7,325,239 7,792,456 8,269,017 8,755,109 9,250,923 9,756,654 Block 7 5,333, , , , , , , , ,524 1,040,502 1,167,980 1,298,007 1,430,635 1,565,915 1,703,901 1,844,646 1,988,207 2,134,638 2,283,999 2,436,346 2,591,741 2,750,243 2,911,915 3,076,821 3,245,025 Block 8 21,336, , ,006 1,305,981 1,758,836 2,220,748 2,691,899 3,172,472 3,662,657 4,162,645 4,672,634 5,192,822 5,723,413 6,264,617 6,816,645 7,379,713 7,954,043 8,539,859 9,137,392 9,746,875 10,368,548 11,002,654 11,649,443 12,309,167 12,982,086 Block 9 17,811, , ,587 1,090,210 1,468,245 1,853,841 2,247,149 2,648,324 3,057,521 3,474,903 3,900,632 4,334,876 4,777,805 5,229,592 5,690,415 6,160,454 6,639,895 7,128,924 7,627,733 8,136,519 8,655,481 9,184,822 9,724,749 10,275,475 10,837,216 Block 10 8,944, , , , , ,955 1,128,465 1,329,926 1,535,415 1,745,014 1,958,806 2,176,873 2,399,301 2,626,178 2,857,592 3,093,635 3,334,399 3,579,978 3,830,468 4,085,968 4,346,579 4,612,401 4,883,540 5,160,102 5,442,195 Block 11 39,225, ,513 1,584,716 2,400,923 3,233,455 4,082,636 4,948,802 5,832,291 6,733,450 7,652,632 8,590,197 9,546,514 10,521,957 11,516,909 12,531,760 13,566,908 14,622,759 15,699,727 16,798,235 17,918,712 19,061,599 20,227,344 21,416,404 22,629,245 23,866,343 Block 12 85,561,253 1,711,225 3,456,675 5,237,033 7,052,999 8,905,284 10,794,615 12,721,732 14,687,392 16,692,365 18,737,437 20,823,411 22,951,104 25,121,351 27,335,003 29,592,929 31,896,012 34,245,157 36,641,286 39,085,336 41,578,268 44,121,059 46,714,705 49,360,224 52,058,654 Block 13 17,789, , ,694 1,088,857 1,466,423 1,851,541 2,244,361 2,645,037 3,053,727 3,470,590 3,895,791 4,329,496 4,771,875 5,223,102 5,683,353 6,152,809 6,631,654 7,120,076 7,618,267 8,126,421 8,644,739 9,173,423 9,712,680 10,262,723 10,823,767 Block 14 34,275, ,512 1,384,735 2,097,941 2,825,412 3,567,433 4,324,294 5,096,292 5,883,729 6,686,916 7,506,167 8,341,802 9,194,150 10,063,545 10,950,329 11,854,847 12,777,456 13,718,518 14,678,400 15,657,480 16,656,142 17,674,777 18,713,785 19,773,572 20,854,556 Block 15 27,347, ,953 1,104,845 1,673,895 2,254,326 2,846,365 3,450,245 4,066,203 4,694,480 5,335,323 5,988,982 6,655,715 7,335,782 8,029,451 8,736,993 9,458,686 10,194,812 10,945,662 11,711,528 12,492,711 13,289,519 14,102,262 14,931,260 15,776,838 16,639,328 Block 16 12,232, , , ,705 1,008,322 1,273,131 1,543,237 1,818,744 2,099,762 2,386,400 2,678,771 2,976,989 3,281,172 3,591,438 3,907,909 4,230,710 4,559,967 4,895,810 5,238,369 5,587,779 5,944,177 6,307,704 6,678,501 7,056,713 7,442,490 Total 345,474,200 6,909,484 13,957,158 21,145,785 28,478,185 35,957,232 43,585,861 51,367,062 59,303,887 67,399,449 75,656,922 84,079,545 92,670, ,433, ,371, ,488, ,787, ,273, ,948, ,816, ,882, ,149, ,621, ,303, ,199,372 Total Increment Collected by Block Sugar House Streetcar Corridor Base Year Total Block 1 7,203,082 2,009 4,058 6,148 8,280 10,455 12,673 14,935 17,243 19,596 21,997 24,446 26,944 29,492 32,091 34,741 37,445 40,203 43,016 45,885 48,812 51,797 54,842 57,948 61, ,172 Block 2 14,804,775 4,129 8,341 12,637 17,018 21,488 26,047 30,697 35,440 40,277 45,212 50,245 55,379 60,616 65,957 71,405 76,963 82,631 88,413 94, , , , , ,613 1,451,424 Block 3 13,746,066 3,834 7,744 11,733 15,801 19,951 24,184 28,501 32,905 37,397 41,979 46,652 51,419 56,281 61,241 66,299 71,459 76,722 82,090 87,566 93,151 98, , , ,631 1,347,630 Block 4 10,245,915 2,858 5,772 8,745 11,778 14,871 18,026 21,244 24,527 27,875 31,290 34,773 38,326 41,950 45,647 49,417 53,263 57,186 61,188 65,269 69,432 73,678 78,009 82,427 86,933 1,004,484 Block 5 13,580,767 3,788 7,651 11,592 15,611 19,711 23,893 28,159 32,510 36,947 41,474 46,091 50,801 55,604 60,504 65,502 70,600 75,799 81,103 86,513 92,031 97, , , ,228 1,331,425 Block 6 16,035,596 4,472 9,034 13,687 18,433 23,274 28,212 33,249 38,386 43,626 48,971 54,422 59,983 65,655 71,441 77,342 83,361 89,501 95, , , , , , ,057 1,572,090 Block 7 5,333,377 1,487 3,005 4,552 6,131 7,741 9,383 11,058 12,767 14,510 16,287 18,101 19,950 21,837 23,761 25,724 27,726 29,768 31,850 33,975 36,142 38,352 40,607 42,906 45, ,871 Block 8 21,336,770 5,951 12,021 18,212 24,527 30,968 37,539 44,240 51,076 58,048 65,160 72,414 79,813 87,360 95, , , , , , , , , , ,035 2,091,804 Block 9 17,811,559 4,968 10,035 15,203 20,475 25,852 31,336 36,931 42,637 48,458 54,394 60,450 66,626 72,927 79,353 85,908 92,593 99, , , , , , , ,125 1,746,201 Block 10 8,944,546 2,495 5,039 7,635 10,282 12,982 15,736 18,546 21,411 24,334 27,316 30,356 33,458 36,622 39,849 43,141 46,498 49,923 53,416 56,979 60,613 64,320 68,101 71,958 75, ,901 Block 11 39,225,644 10,940 22,099 33,481 45,091 56,932 69,011 81,331 93, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,816 3,845,585 Block 12 85,561,253 23,863 48,203 73,030 98, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,958 8,388,214 Block 13 17,789,454 4,961 10,022 15,184 20,449 25,820 31,298 36,885 42,584 48,397 54,327 60,375 66,544 72,836 79,254 85,801 92,478 99, , , , , , , ,937 1,744,034 Block 14 34,275,607 9,559 19,310 29,256 39,400 49,748 60,302 71,068 82,049 93, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,817 3,360,296 Block 15 27,347,649 7,627 15,407 23,342 31,437 39,693 48,114 56,703 65,465 74,401 83,516 92, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,035 2,681,096 Block 16 12,232,141 3,412 6,891 10,441 14,061 17,754 21,520 25,362 29,281 33,278 37,355 41,514 45,756 50,083 54,496 58,997 63,589 68,272 73,049 77,922 82,892 87,961 93,132 98, ,786 1,199,209 Total 345,474,200 96, , , , , , , , ,885 1,055,036 1,172,489 1,292,292 1,414,490 1,539,133 1,666,268 1,795,946 1,928,218 2,063,135 2,200,751 2,341,119 2,484,294 2,630,332 2,779,292 2,931,230 33,869, Taxable Value 345,474, ,474, ,383, ,431, ,619, ,952, ,431, ,060, ,841, ,778, ,873, ,131, ,553, ,144, ,907, ,845, ,962, ,262, ,747, ,422, ,290, ,356, ,623, ,096, ,778,012 Growth Multiplier 0.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% New Project Value Annual Value 345,474, ,383, ,431, ,619, ,952, ,431, ,060, ,841, ,778, ,873, ,131, ,553, ,144, ,907, ,845, ,962, ,262, ,747, ,422, ,290, ,356, ,623, ,096, ,778, ,673,573 Increment Value 0 6,909,484 13,957,158 21,145,785 28,478,185 35,957,232 43,585,861 51,367,062 59,303,887 67,399,449 75,656,922 84,079,545 92,670, ,433, ,371, ,488, ,787, ,273, ,948, ,816, ,882, ,149, ,621, ,303, ,199,372 Tax Rate (2012) % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Tax Increment 0 96, , , , , , , , ,885 1,055,036 1,172,489 1,292,292 1,414,490 1,539,133 1,666,268 1,795,946 1,928,218 2,063,135 2,200,751 2,341,119 2,484,294 2,630,332 2,779,292 2,931,230 33,869,437 TOTAL INCREMENT 33,869,437 TOTAL 2012 Tax Rate % INCREMENT Scenario #1: Streetcar Phase 1 Scenario #2: Streetcar Extension Salt Lake School District % 10,968,403 Blocks: Base Value: Total TI (25 Yrs): Blocks: Base Value: Total TI (25 Yrs): Salt Lake School Basic % 3,728,188 1 to 9 120,097,907 11,774, to ,376,293 22,095,335 Salt Lake County % 6,958,475 Salt Lake City % 12,214,371 TOTAL % 33,869,437 1-Nov-13
Gina M. M. Thomas. HDR, Transit Engineer Seattle, WA
Tucson Streetcar: A Success Story How a streetcar project helped to re-establish a sense of place for the Tucson community Gina M. M. Thomas P.E., LEED A.P., ENV S.P. HDR, Transit Engineer Seattle, WA
More informationMount Dora Community Redevelopment Agency Annual Report
Mount Dora Community Redevelopment Agency 2013 Annual Report Prepared March 2014 2 CONTENTS About the Mount Dora CRA... 4 History Organization CRA Board CRA Advisory Committee Plan Amendment and Time Extension
More informationADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility
ADA Transition Plan FY19-FY28 Date: November 5, 2018 Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND The federal statute known as the Americans with Disabilities
More informationDALLAS MIDTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOCUS NORTH TEXAS Peer Chacko, AICP, Assistant Director, City of Dallas
DALLAS MIDTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOCUS NORTH TEXAS 2014 Peer Chacko, AICP, Assistant Director, City of Dallas Dallas Midtown: Strategic growth area Future transit node 2 Peterson Road Study Area Galleria
More informationAfeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown
East-West Bus Rapid Transit Feasibility Study Update and Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Summary City of Wauwatosa, Transportation Affairs Committee June 2016 Afeasibility study to evaluate
More informationCapital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives
Capital and Strategic Planning Committee Item III - B April 12, 2018 WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives Page 24 of 76 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information
More informationProject Narrative. Albuquerque, NM. July 31, 2015
Project Narrative Albuquerque, NM July 31, 2015 1 Project Identification As the first bus rapid transit (BRT) project in New Mexico, the Albuquerque Rapid Transit (ART) line will run through the heart
More informationintegrated action plan
public presentation. june 24, 2009. city of portsmouth, nh islington corridor integrated action plan richardson & associates, landscape architects evan haynes, public arts consultant Islington Street Corridor
More informationTitle. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT
Title Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, 2016 Evaluating the potential for Bus Rapid Transit and MnPASS Express Lanes in the southwest Metro Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT Background
More informationST. JOHNS GOLF CLUB PHASE II FINDINGS, PHASE III RECOMMENDATION, AND POTENTIAL PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITY
ST. JOHNS GOLF CLUB PHASE II FINDINGS, PHASE III RECOMMENDATION, AND POTENTIAL PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITY Board of County Commissioners January 16, 2018 Introduction St. Johns Golf Club: Opened in 1989.
More informationEvan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP
To: Copies: From: Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates Matt Muller, RTS Jesus Gomez, RTS Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP Date: January 14, 2014 Subject: Ridership Projections Gainesville Streetcar
More informationDRAFT CIRCULATION AND STREETSCAPE AMENITIES. Plan for the Sugar House Business District AUGUST 2012
CIRCULATION AND STREETSCAPE AMENITIES Plan for the Sugar House Business District Prepared for: Prepared by: AUGUST 2012 2180 South 1300 East, Suite 220 Salt Lake City, UT 84106 P (801) 463-7600 - Sugar
More informationExhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM
Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Project Name: Grand Junction Circulation Plan Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Applicant: City of Grand Junction Representative: David Thornton Address:
More informationUniversity of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description
University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference 1.0 Project Description The Campus Cycling Plan, a first for the University, will provide a comprehensive and coordinated approach to support
More informationPublic Event 1 Community Workshops
Public Event 1 Community Workshops Nov. 24 & Dec. 3, 2016 Welcome Workshop Purpose We re looking to you for ideas and insights to help guide future transportation infrastructure planning in the Park Lawn
More informationSWBRT Review. best value. specifically. informed
SWBRT Review February 26, 2013 To members of the Standing Committee on Infrastructure Renewal and Public Works; The objective is to ensure that Winnipeg selects the best route for the SWBRT that provides
More informationBroward Boulevard Gateway Implementation Project, Downtown Walkability Analysis, & Joint Development Initiative (JDI)
Broward Boulevard Gateway Implementation Project, Downtown Walkability Analysis, & Joint Development Initiative (JDI) City of Fort Lauderdale ~ Commission Conference July 10, 2012 Page 1 of 15 A Multi-Agency
More informationDraft Central District Plan
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Draft Central District Plan Submission_id: 31675 Date of Lodgment: 15 Dec 2017 Origin of Submission: Online Organisation name: Arkadia Property Services Organisation type:
More informationStanding Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities. Mount Pleasant Industrial Area Parking Strategy and Access Improvements
POLICY REPORT Report Date: April 23, 2018 Contact: Lon LaClaire Contact No.: 604.873.7722 RTS No.: 9944 VanRIMS No.: 08-2000-20 Meeting Date: May 16, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Standing Committee on Policy
More informationWEST CENTRAL DRAFT DISTRICT PLAN SUBMISSION 3 HASSAL ST WESTMEAD
Ref: OBF 170330 LGSC - DDP Sub 30 March 2017 Greater Sydney Commission PO Box 257 PARRAMATTA NSW 2124 Attention: District Commissioner - Professor Edward Blakely Dear Professor Ed Blakeley, WEST CENTRAL
More informationCIRCULATION AND STREETSCAPE AMENITIES. Plan for the Sugar House Business District DECEMBER with
CIRCULATION AND STREETSCAPE AMENITIES Plan for the Sugar House Business District DECEMBER 2012 Prepared for: Prepared by: 2180 South 1300 East, Suite 220 Salt Lake City, UT 84106 P (801) 463-7600 with
More informationINNER LOOP EAST. AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 TRANSFORMATION PROJECT. Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES
INNER LOOP EAST TRANSFORMATION PROJECT AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES Why? We are building a city that encourages walking, biking and enjoying the outdoor
More informationMetropolitan Council Transportation Committee
Nicollet-Central Transit Alternatives Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee August 2013 Project Purpose (approved by Policy Advisory Committee 10/25/2012) The purpose is to improve transit connectivity,
More informationCommitted to Service
Committed to Service Sherry R. Huber, President Rebecca W. Arnold, Vice President John S. Franden, Commissioner Carol A. McKee, Commissioner Sara M. Baker, Commissioner To: From: ACHD Commissioners, Director,
More informationBUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA
BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA AB 4087 May 1, 2006 Regular Business PEAK PROJECT UPDATE - CITY RELATED ISSUES Proposed Council Action: Receive update. No action required. DEPARTMENT
More informationFIRST AMENDMENT TO METRO NORTH CROSSING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
FIRST AMENDMENT TO METRO NORTH CROSSING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI TIF COMMISSION APPROVAL: 12/13/17 12-2-17 DATE RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: 2/1/18 180020 DATE ORDINANCE
More informationsummary of issues and opportunities
1 summary of issues and opportunities EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 2: HISTORY - 3: LAND USE This first chapter is an overview of lessons learned from analysis of the existing conditions on El Camino as well
More informationREDWOOD CITY STREETCAR - ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
REDWOOD CITY STREETCAR - ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS The purpose of this document is to ennumerate the analysis of alternatives for a streetcar along the Broadway Corriodor of Redwood City. The six alternatives
More informationThe Top Five Minor League Baseball Parks*
The Top Five Minor League Baseball Parks* International Economic Development Council January 23, 2003 * Limitations Number of quality minor league ballparks Necessary visit to each ballpark Commentary
More informationTransportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force
Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force Network Alternatives & Phasing Strategy February 2016 BACKGROUND Table of Contents BACKGROUND Purpose & Introduction 2 Linking the TMP to Key Council Approved
More informationORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND ESTABLISHING THE MALL REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Introduced: January 20, 2015 Passed: January 20, 2015 Published: January 23, 2015 ORDINANCE NO. 2015-2 AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND ESTABLISHING THE MALL REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, K.S.A.
More informationSACO RIVER AND CAMP ELLIS BEACH SACO, MAINE SECTION 111 SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION PROJECT APPENDIX F ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT
SACO RIVER AND CAMP ELLIS BEACH SACO, MAINE SECTION 111 SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION PROJECT APPENDIX F ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT Department of the Army New England District, Corps of Engineers 696 Virginia Road
More informationNew Park Avenue Corridor West Hartford
New Park Avenue Corridor West Hartford Current TOD Investment in the Corridor Mixed-use building currently under development by the Trout Brook Realty Advisors: a separate non-profit corporation, established
More informationJOINT PARTNERSHIPS: Working Together To Support Light Rail in Santa Monica
JOINT PARTNERSHIPS: Working Together To Support Light Rail in Santa Monica ITY OF ANTA MONICA RAIL-VOLUTION / OCTOBER 17, 2012 SARAH LEJEUNE, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, STRATEGIC + TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DIVISION
More informationEnvironment and Public Works Committee Presentation
Mixed Use Centers Complete Streets Guidelines Project Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation December 10, 2008 Project Objectives: Conduct an inter-departmental and agency process to study
More informationEvaluation of Alternatives and Final Screening Results November 20 and 21, 2013
Midtown Corridor Alternatives ti Analysis Evaluation of Alternatives and Final Screening Results November 20 and 21, 2013 Today s Agenda Alternatives background Process update Key evaluation factors cost
More informationWEST AND SOUTH WEST RING ROAD DOWNSTREAM TRAFFIC IMPACTS
Page 1 of 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Alberta Transportation ( AT ) is preparing to construct the final sections of the Calgary Ring Road. This includes the South West Ring Road ( SWRR ) (from Lott Creek Blvd
More informationSite Analysis and Parti Development
Site Analysis and Parti Development 32_43 06.11N, 117_09 25.15W Dean Sartain Assignment # 4 AR 650: Programming Instructor: Mirkovich 1. LOCATION within the city. - The site is located between A St & B
More informationScottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012
Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012 Study Location and Duration Primary Study Corridor (major focus of effort) Rural Road and Scottsdale
More informationWHAT S NEXT? SAN FRANCISCO S MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
WHAT S NEXT? SAN FRANCISCO S MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS By: Tiffany Bohee, Executive Director, Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure November 3, 2014 1 INNOVATION CORRIDOR
More informationImplementing Living Streets. Dena Belzer January 29, 2009
Implementing Living Streets Dena Belzer January 29, 2009 February 22, 2004 Starting with Some Definitions 1.Living Streets/Complete Streets 2.Corridor Revitalization 3.Shopping Mall Reuse Living/Complete
More informationMEETING Agenda. Introductions. Project Overview. Key Study Components. Alternative Station Concepts. Preferred Station Concept. Next Steps.
City GARLAND Council ROADVISION Briefing STUDY VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 1 1 MEETING Agenda Introductions Project Overview Key Study Components Alternative Station Concepts Preferred Station
More informationMetro Bike Program. Westside/Central Metro Service Council Meeting Wednesday, November 13, :00 7:00 pm
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro Bike Program Westside/Central Metro Service Council Meeting Wednesday, November 13, 2013 5:00 7:00 pm Tony Jusay Transportation Planning Manager
More informationRochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study
roc bike share Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study Executive Summary ~ January 2015 JANUARY 2015 8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 800 Silver Spring, MD 20910 3495 Winton Pl., Bldg E, Suite 110 Rochester,
More informationACTION TRANSMITTAL No
Transportation Advisory Board of the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities ACTION TRANSMITTAL No. 2016-15 DATE: January 14, 2016 TO: TAC Planning Committee PREPARED BY: Steven Elmer (651) 602-1756 SUBJECT:
More informationSafe Routes to School Grant Application Phase I March 2014
Safe Routes to School Grant Application Phase I March 2014 Page 1 The City of Mission is requesting grant funding to create a Safe Routes to School Plan which will encompass all of the existing elementary
More informationTraffic Study 30th Street Specific Area Plan
Prepared for HDR Engineering, Inc. River Quarry at Park Center 412 E. Parkcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Boise, ID 83706-6659 Prepared by 5561 N Glenwood Street, Suite B Boise, ID 83714-1336 208-898-0012 www.parametrix.com
More informationDraft Recommended List of Potential Projects
Draft Recommended List of Potential Projects To Pursue Using the GID Fund Recommendations are based on results of public outreach, City Council discussion, and staff evaluation of all project ideas identified
More informationFiscal Impact of SunTrust Park and The Battery Atlanta on Cobb County Executive Summary Sept. 18, 2018
Fiscal Impact of SunTrust Park and The Battery Atlanta on Cobb County Executive Summary Sept. 18, 2018 Overview Historically, professional sports stadiums were privately owned by the sports teams that
More informationSouth King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study
HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT CORRIDOR STUDY South King County Corridor South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study Corridor Report August 2014 South King County High Capacity Transit Corridor Report
More informationLand Use and Urban Design
35th ST 36th ST 37th ST 39th ST 40th ST 41st ST 34th ST 35th ST 36th ST 37th ST 38th ST 39th ST 40th ST Land Use and Urban Design Map 3: Corridors Land uses have evolved over many decades to accommodate
More informationIllustrated Principles of Good Planning
Illustrated Principles of Good Planning The Miami 21 Zoning Code incorporates time-tested planning principles into the zoning regulations of our City. These are principles that make for better neighborhoods,
More informationTo Shape or Serve: Transit & Land Use Forum Tina M. Votaw, Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS)
To Shape or Serve: Transit & Land Use Forum Tina M. Votaw, Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS) What s the Strategy? Balanced Approach: Invest in both Streets and Transit First to shape, i.e. manage growth
More informationWestgate/Belvedere Homes Community Redevelopment Agency. Belvedere Heights. Streetlights & Sidewalks Improvements Project.
Westgate/Belvedere Homes Community Redevelopment Agency Belvedere Heights Streetlights & Sidewalks Improvements Project Phase II TPA 2018 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) BTPAC Presentation Thursday,
More informationMetro Nashville Sidewalk Requirements. Section (Provision of sidewalks) Effective July 1, 2017
Metro Nashville Sidewalk Requirements Section 17.20.120 (Provision of sidewalks) Effective July 1, 2017 Why are sidewalks a critical priority? Lack of requirements from 1950s to 1990s NashvilleNext, nmotion,
More informationLiz Smith, P.E., PMP Manager of Long-Range Planning Strategic Planning & Analysis SEPTA. Norristown High Speed Line Extension Draft EIS
Liz Smith, P.E., PMP Manager of Long-Range Planning Strategic Planning & Analysis SEPTA Norristown High Speed Line Extension Draft EIS Project Schedule We are 2013 Here 2017 2018 2020 2023 Alternatives
More informationCity of Atlanta-MARTA Sales Tax Referendum Draft Project List. Atlanta City Council Work Session May 19, 2016
1 City of Atlanta-MARTA Sales Tax Referendum Draft Project List Atlanta City Council Work Session May 19, 2016 2 SB 369 - MARTA Sales tax for up to 0.50% is allowed in the City of Atlanta for MARTA Purpose
More informationPrivate-Public Partnership. Presentation to Metropolitan Council October 2, 2017
Private-Public Partnership Presentation to Metropolitan Council October 2, 2017 THE FAIRGROUNDS NASHVILLE 160 unique events annually drawing more than 1.4 million attendees Christmas Village 2 FAIRGROUNDS
More informationSan Jose Transportation Policy
San Jose Transportation Policy Protected Intersections in LOS Policies to Support Smart Growth Presented by: Manuel Pineda City of San Jose Department of Transportation Bay Area Map San Francisco Oakland
More information2 BOLTON COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE FEASIBILITY STUDY
2 BOLTON COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE FEASIBILITY STUDY The Planning and Economic Development Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendations contained in the following report dated April 15, 2011 from
More informationMETRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. May 25-26, 2011
METRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN May 25-26, 2011 WHAT IS THE TRANSIT MASTER PLAN? A twenty-year plan for METRO RTA What will METRO look like in 2031? 1 TRANSIT TECHNOLOGIES 2 TRANSIT TECHNOLOGIES Transit
More informationHennepin/First Transportation Study
CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Hennepin/First Transportation Study NIEBNA Board Meeting November 10, 2016 11/10/2016 1 Study Overview Evaluate transportation system and alternatives Coordinate with County, Metro
More informationLinking Transportation and Health in Nashville & Middle Tennessee
Linking Transportation and Health in Nashville & Middle Tennessee Fit Nation New Orleans CPPW Mentoring Grant Built Environment Program May 14, 2011 Local Transportation Planning Framework Federal U.S.
More informationCherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary
Cherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary I. LEAD-IN TO SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION, POLLING AND STEERING COMMITTEE/TECHNICAL TASK FORCE DISCUSSION The meeting began
More informationMEMORANDUM - CITY OF PASADENA Department Of Transportation DATE: OCTOBER 21, 2008 TO: ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMISSION FROM: ~ FRED C. DOCK, DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION SUBJECT: UPDATE ON DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationTransportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations
Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations Route 4 Corridor Study: Route 10 Corridor Study: Route 44 Corridor Study: Route 175 Corridor Study: Route 5/15 Corridor Study: Rentschler Field
More informationCommunity Engagement Process
Community Engagement Process PHASE ONE PURPOSE + NEED STATEMENT IDEAS DESTINATIONS TRAVEL PATTERNS PHASE TWO MODE SELECTION INPUT PHASE THREE LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE SELECTION OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
More informationExecutive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan
Route Corridor Master Plan Project Overview The Route Corridor Master Plan is a coordinated multimodal transportation and land use plan for the entire stretch of Route through East Whiteland Township,
More informationBICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR EXISTING AND PLANNED SECTIONS OF US 19
BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR EXISTING AND PLANNED SECTIONS OF US 19 Project Advisory Committee Meeting January 27, 2016 A JOINT EFFORT OF THE PINELLAS METROPOLITAN PLANNING
More informationArterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave
Arterial Transitway Corridors Study Ave January 2012 Arterial Transitway Corridors Study Overview Corridor Features and Demographics 11 study corridors, 95 route miles 86,000 daily rides and half of existing
More informationAnn Arbor Downtown Street Plan
1 Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan Public Workshop #1 We know that. 2 Public right-of-way (streets, sidewalks, and alleys) make up 30% of the total District area of downtown. Streets need to provide mobility
More informationCHILDREN S HOSPITAL MIMP
CHILDREN S HOSITAL MIM April 15, 2008 Citizen s Advisory Committee Meeting Overview of Alternative 7 Agenda Updates Laurelon Terrace Alternative rojects under current MIM CAC Sub-Committee Workshop March
More information162 RESIDENTS ATTENDED 2 DAYS OF WORKSHOPS 15 TABLE DISCUSSIONS WHAT WE HEARD. Oakridge Municipal Town Centre Workshops PLANNING PROGRAM
OAKRIDGE MTC WORKSHOP 2017 CAMBIE CORRIDOR Phase 3 STEP 3: 3: October June 2017 CAMBIE CORRIDOR PLANNING PROGRAM 2 DAYS OF WORKSHOPS 15 TABLE DISCUSSIONS 162 RESIDENTS ATTENDED WHAT WE HEARD Oakridge Municipal
More informationROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE April, 2012 1 INTRODUCTION The need for transit service improvements in the Routes 42/55/676 corridor was identified during the Southern
More informationRegional Alternatives Analysis. Downtown Corridor Tier 2 Evaluation
Regional Alternatives Analysis Downtown Corridor Tier 2 Evaluation September 19, 2011 EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW OF EVALUATION PROCESS Tier 1: Screen Seven Alignment Options into a Short List Tier 2: Evaluate
More informationBus Rapid Transit Plans
Twin Cities Region Bus Rapid Transit Plans ULI Minnesota Workshop Connecting Bus Rapid Transit to the Community December 15, 2009 John Levin Director of Service Development Metro Transit Metropolitan Area
More informationTHIRD&GRAND. Public Workshop #1. Transportation Hub Area Plan. June 12, 2013
Transportation Hub Area Plan Public Workshop #1 June 12, 2013 Agenda Study Background Who is Involved Process and Schedule Planning Area and Project Site The Opportunity Site Analysis Land Use/Zoning Transportation
More informationRoute 79/Davol Street Corridor Study
Route 79/Davol Street Corridor Study Fall River, MA Public Information Meeting #2 November 21, 2013 Fall River Heritage State Park Fall River, MA Agenda Welcome and Introductions Overview of Study Process
More informationSouthwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.
Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary 2011 January 19 1 of 19 Introduction This executive summary presents the results of the Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW
More informationDRAFT. Lecompton. Table of Contents. Background
Lecompton Table of Contents Existing Infrastructure 98 Funding 100 Policy and Program Recommendations 102 Infrastructure Recommendations 104 Conclusion 109 Douglas County Lecompton Background Located at
More informationCITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION
CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION June 2015 CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION Introduction The Alpharetta Downtown Master Plan was developed in the fall
More informationACTION TRANSMITTAL No
Transportation Advisory Board of the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities ACTION TRANSMITTAL No. 2016-15 DATE: January 14, 2016 TO: FROM: TAC TAC Planning PREPARED BY: Steven Elmer (651) 602-1756 SUBJECT:
More informationBalment Park User Impact Review
COUNCIL REPORT FILE NO. 0890.07 Regular Council - 25 Feb 2019 TITLE: PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT: PURPOSE: RECOMMENDED BY: Balment Park User Impact Review Chris New CAO's Office To provide Council with additional
More informationThesis Presentation. Moorhead City Walk: A Master Plan to Reimage Moorhead, Minnesota s Urban Core. Brad Garcia Advisors: Jason Kost & Dominic Fischer
Thesis Presentation Moorhead City Walk: A Master Plan to Reimage Moorhead, Minnesota s Urban Core Brad Garcia Advisors: Jason Kost & Dominic Fischer MOORHEAD, MN Red River Center Ave 8 TH St N FARGO, ND
More informationTown of Bethlehem. Planning Assessment. Bethlehem Town Board
Town of Bethlehem US 9W Corridor Transportation Planning Assessment Presented e to: Bethlehem Town Board June 2009 Overview Study Background Route 9W Corridor Conditions and Improvements Selkirk Bypass
More informationRoad Alterations - Wellington Street East, Church Street, and Front Street Intersection
REPORT FOR ACTION Road Alterations - Wellington Street, Church Street, and Front Street Intersection Date: November 1, 2016 To: Toronto and York Community Council From: Director, Public Realm Section,
More informationDOING IT RIGHT! Select the Right Location for Ballpark Adjacent to Downtown Catalyst for Development Existing Infrastructure
DOING IT RIGHT! Select the Right Location for Ballpark Adjacent to Downtown Catalyst for Development Existing Infrastructure Cap City s Expenditures Team Assumes Construction Cost Overruns Team Assumes
More informationBICYCLE FACILITIES FULL BUILD PLAN
KIMBALL RD ROCKY RD CYPRESS DR CITY PARK AVE S SHIELDS ST CONSTITUTION AVE S TAFT HILL RD S OVERLAND TRL HILLCREST DR SKYLINE DR MOBY DR CRAGMORE DR CASTLEROCK DR MEADOWBROOK DR S BRYAN AVE BICYCLE FACILITIES
More informationVermont Rail conversion/feasibility Study
Vermont Rail conversion/feasibility Study Stakeholder Meetings May 2018 Welcome https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcg3cjutk80 Purpose of Tonight s Meeting > Provide a study overview > Solicit feedback and
More informationCITY OF SEATTLE RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) led the Seattle
SDOT SR0 Design Refinements RES August, 0 Version #D 0 CITY OF SEATTLE RESOLUTION..title A RESOLUTION relating to the State Route 0, Interstate to Medina Bridge Replacement and High Occupancy Vehicle Project;
More informationAPPENDIX D: SACRAMENTO URBAN AREA TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES
1 County County County County 2 Yolo Arterial Roadway Collector Roadway Urban Residential Street Rural Residential Roadway I-80 / U.S. 50 Bus/Carpool Lanes in both directions Richards Blvd PM Yol 80 0.237
More informationSPRINGFIELD REVITALIZATION REPORT
SPRINGFIELD REVITALIZATION REPORT August 2015 Homewood Suites Springfield Town Center Promenade 2 SPRINGFIELD OVERVIEW This report covers recent development activity in the Springfield Commercial Revitalization
More informationFirst and Last Mile Plan. April 2016
First and Last Mile Plan April 2016 1 First and Last Mile refers to the portion of a transit trip between a transit stop and one s destination, and can include walking, biking, carpooling, rolling or driving,
More informationBasalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations
Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations Introduction The Basalt Creek transportation planning effort analyzed future transportation conditions and evaluated alternative strategies for
More informationStanding Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities
POLICY REPORT Report Date: January 15, 2019 Contact: Steve Brown Contact No.: 604.873.9733 RTS No.: 12955 VanRIMS No.: 08-2000-20 Meeting Date: January 30, 2019 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Standing Committee on
More informationD O W N T O W N B A S E B A L L
D O W N T O W N B A S E B A L L 1 Urban THREE GENERATIONS 2 Multipurpose 3 Revitalized Urban Bring out the best of San Jose 4 4 th GENERATION BUILDING A CITY PETCO Park San Diego, California THE BEST URBAN
More informationWyldewood Estates. Pre-Application Public Engagement Summary of Issues and Responses
Wyldewood Estates Pre-Application Public Engagement Summary of Issues and Responses March 2016 Executive Summary Morguard Residential Properties has been thoughtfully planning the redevelopment of Wyldewood
More informationMAKING THE CONNECTION: TOD A BLUEPRINT FOR SUCCESS
MAKING THE CONNECTION: TOD A BLUEPRINT FOR SUCCESS NJ TRANSIT s s PERSPECTIVE NYU Wagner Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management Presented by Rich Roberts, NJ TRANSIT November 14, 2008 Key
More informationNapa County Fairgrounds Opportunity Analysis. RCH Group A. Plescia & Co. Fair & Exposition Planning Consultants. September 8, 2016.
Napa County Fairgrounds Opportunity Analysis September 8, 2016 Prepared by: RCH Group A. Plescia & Co. Fair & Exposition Planning Consultants Our Goal / Objective Goal Our primary objective is to evaluate
More information2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update
2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Program Overview H-GAC s Special Districts Program aims to provide strategic investments in pedestrian
More information