PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina"

Transcription

1 PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina Prepared for Longbranch Development Prepared by January 13, 219

2

3 ii Table of Contents Subject Page Signature Page... i Table of Contents... ii List of Figures... iii List of Appendices... iii List of Tables... iv Executive Summary...1 Introduction...2 Purpose of Study...2 Existing Conditions...3 No Build Traffic...4 Proposed Site...9 Build Traffic...1 Need for Turn Lanes...17 Traffic Operations...18 Turn Lane Storage...27 Conclusions and Recommendations...29 Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

4 iii List of Figures Figure Page Figure Existing Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes... 5 Figure Existing Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic Volumes... 6 Figure No Build Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes... 7 Figure No Build Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic Volumes... 8 Figure 5 Morning Peak Hour Site Trips Figure 6 Afternoon Peak Hour Site Trips Figure Build Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure Build Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 9 Roe Road/South End Circle/Roe Center Court Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Existing Geometry Figure 1 Roe Road/South End Circle/Roe Center Court Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Existing Geometry Figure E-1 US 25/Roe Road/Little Texas Road Afternoon Peak Hour Volumes... Appendix E List of Appendices Subject Appendix Conceptual Site Plan Roe Road Roe Center to US 25 Aerial... A Existing Traffic Counts... B Turn Lane Guideline Graphs... C Capacity Analysis and Queue Report Printouts... D US 25/Roe Road/Little Texas Road 221 Apartments Only Operations... E Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

5 iv List of Tables Table Page Table 1 Historical SCDOT Traffic Counts... 4 Table 2 Trip Generation... 1 Table 3 Intersection Level of Service Criteria Table 4 Capacity Analyses Results Signalized Intersection Existing Geometry US 25/State Park Road Table 5 Capacity Analyses Results Signalized Intersection Existing Geometry State Park Road/Benton Road... 2 Table 6 Capacity Analyses Results Signalized Intersection Existing Geometry US 25/Roe Road/Little Texas Road Table 7 Capacity Analyses Results Signalized Intersection Existing Geometry US 276/Roe Road Table 8 Capacity Analyses Results Unsignalized Intersection Existing Geometry Little Texas Road/Benton Road/Krieger Drive Table 9 Capacity Analyses Results Unsignalized Intersection Existing Geometry State Park Road/Tubbs Mountain Road Extension/Commercial Driveway Table 1 Capacity Analyses Results Unsignalized Intersection Existing Geometry State Park Road/South End Circle Table 11 Capacity Analyses Results Unsignalized Intersection Roe Road/South End Circle Table 12 Capacity Analyses Results Unsignalized Intersection - Realignment Roe Road/Roe Center Court Table 13 Capacity Analyses Results Unsignalized Intersection Roe Road/South End Circle/Roe Center Court Table 14 Capacity Analyses Results Unsignalized Intersection 224 Build Volumes Site Accesses Table 15 Queue and Storage Lengths in Feet Table 16 Queue and Storage Lengths in Feet Roe Road/Roe Center Court/South End Circle as Two Intersections Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

6 PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina January 13, 219 Executive Summary Pinestone is a mixed-use development located west of US 25 between State Park Road and Roe Road in Travelers Rest. Plans include 25 apartments, 1 single family attached and detached units, and 77, square feet of commercial uses. Of the 77, square feet, up to 37, will be available to retail uses with the remaining available for non-retail uses such as office. As shown in the conceptual site plan in Appendix A, the development is currently proposed with access on Roe Road and South End Circle. Build out of the apartments is planned by 22 with build out of the single-family units and the commercial properties by 223. The development is being proposed as a planned development with a statement of intent and development plan which will be part of the zoning of the property. There is a potential for the City Hall site with access directly to State Park Road to be included in this development. However, the necessary property transaction has not been completed. Therefore, that parcel is not part of the planned development submittal and is not part of the site plan upon which this study is based. Inclusion of the City Hall site will result in additional trip generation but also in an additional State Park Road access. In this study US 25, Benton Road, South End Circle (except at Circle site access 1), Tubbs Mountain Road Extension/commercial driveway, Roe site access, and U 276 are considered north-south. State Park Road, Roe Road/Little Texas Road, and Circle accesses 2-4 are considered east-west. The findings of this study are: - No mitigation is required at these intersections to accommodate Pinestone site traffic: o US 25/State Park Road o State Park Road/Benton Road o US 276/Roe Road o Little Texas Road/Benton Road/Krieger Drive o State Park Road/Tubbs Mountain Road Extension/Commercial Driveway o State Park Road/South End Circle - US 25/Roe Road/Little Texas Road - During the afternoon peak hour, the intersection currently operates at LOS C and will continue to do so with 224 no build volumes. The LOS will go to D with 224 build volumes which is usually considered acceptable. Because South End Circle may be taken over by the City, the SCDOT mitigation trigger of a change in LOS from C to D was also considered. Addition of an eastbound right turn lane would allow operation at LOS C during the afternoon peak hour. The need for this lane addition with 221 volumes with apartments only was also checked, and the intersection can operate at LOS C during the afternoon peak hour with the estimated 95 th percentile turn queues being accommodated in the available turn lane storage. A commercial driveway is located on Roe Road west of US 25. If an eastbound right turn lane on Roe at US 25 is provided, a shorter than usual storage length and taper may be appropriate. Because the intersection can operate at LOS D with existing geometry and because the commercial driveway interferes with provision of a standard right turn lane, the addition of the right turn lane may not be required. Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

7 Introduction - Roe Road/South End Circle and Roe Road/Roe Center Court as individual intersections The left turn lane warrants checked in this study support realigning South End Circle to provide left turn lanes onto Roe Center and South End with 224 volumes. With 221 volumes (completion of only the apartments), however, the existing left turn lane could be reversed to provide a left turn lane onto Roe Center as an interim measure. These intersections currently operate acceptably, and acceptable operation (from a level of service standpoint) can continue with 221 volumes with either existing geometry or reversal of the left turn lane. - Roe Road/South End Circle/Roe Center Court This is the intersection which would be formed by the realignment of South End Circle to intersect Roe Road across from Roe Center Court. All movements can operate acceptably with 224 no build volumes. With 224 build volumes the side street lefts will operate at LOS D/E during the afternoon peak hour. These LOS are not unreasonable for a side street during a peak hour and are preferable to having no left turn lane for Roe Center Court. - Site Accesses The site access intersections will operate acceptably with existing geometry and 224 build volumes. Pinestone is a mixed-use development located west of US 25 between State Park Road and Roe Road in Travelers Rest. Plans include 25 apartments, 1 single family attached and detached units, and 77, square feet of commercial uses. Of the 77, square feet, up to 37, will be available to retail uses with the remaining available for non-retail uses such as office. As shown in the conceptual site plan in Appendix A, the development is currently proposed with access on Roe Road and South End Circle. Build out of the apartments is planned by 22 with build out of the single-family units and the commercial properties by 223. The development is being proposed as a planned development with a statement of intent and other regulatory elements. There is a potential for the City Hall site with access directly to State Park Road to be included in this development. However, the necessary property transaction has not been completed. Therefore, that parcel is not part of the planned development submittal and is not part of the site plan upon which this study is based. Inclusion of the City Hall site will result in additional trip generation but also in an additional State Park Road access. In this study US 25, Benton Road, South End Circle (except at Circle site access 1), Tubbs Mountain Road Extension/commercial driveway, Roe site access, and Main street are considered north-south. State Park Road, Roe Road/Little Texas Road, and Circle accesses 2-4 are considered east-west. Purpose of Study The purpose of this study is to meet the requirements of the City of Travelers Rest in the development approval process. Although South End Circle may be taken over for maintenance by the City of Travelers Rest, SCDOT guidelines were also checked for information because South End is currently a SCDOT roadway. The study intersections are listed below: - US 25/State Park Road (S-22) - State Park Road/Benton Road 2 Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

8 3 - US 25/Roe Road/Little Texas Road (S-563) - US 276/Roe Road - Little Texas Road/Benton Road/Krieger Drive (S-1127) - State Park Road/Tubbs Mountain Road Extension (S-527)/Commercial Driveway - State Park Road/South End Circle (S-527) - Roe Road/South End Circle - Roe Road/Roe Center Court - Roe Road/South End Circle/Roe Center Court - Site Accesses The study periods are the traditional morning and afternoon peak periods. SCDOT requested that counts also be conducted during the 2:-4: p.m. period. In all cases except one, the peak hour during the 4:-6: p.m. period was higher than the peak hour during the 2:-4: p.m. period. Therefore, the traditional afternoon peak hour was studied because the sum of existing and site traffic will be higher during that hour than in the peak hour 2:-4: p.m. The one exception was the intersection of Roe/South End/Roe Center at which volumes for some movements were slightly higher during the mid-afternoon. For the 221 build volumes (looking at volumes with just the apartments) at this intersection the mid-afternoon volumes were examined. The study year is build out plus one year. Build out is planned by 223. Therefore, the study year is 224. As noted previously, volumes at the Roe Road/South End Circle/Roe Center Court were also examined with only the completion of the apartments. For that examination, a study year of 221 was used (apartment build out of 22 plus one year). Existing Conditions US 25 is a divided four-lane road. At its signalized intersections with State Park and Roe/Little Texas, left turn lanes are provided as are right turn lanes northbound and southbound at State Park and northbound at Little Texas. Roe/Little Texas and State Park are generally three lane roads. Along State Park left turn lanes are provided at Tubbs Mountain, South End, US 25, and westbound at Benton. Right turn lanes are provided westbound at US 25 and eastbound at Benton. The State Park/Benton intersection is signalized. Along Roe, left turn lanes are provided westbound at Main, at the Roe site access, at South End, at US 25 and at Benton/Kreiger. Right turn lanes are provided westbound at US 25 and at Benton. In the study area US 276 is a three-lane roadway with left turn lanes provided at its signalized intersection with Roe. Speed limits are 45 miles per hour on US 25, 35 miles per hour on South End, State Park, and Roe/Little Texas, 3 miles per hour on Tubbs Mountain and US 276, and 25 miles per hour on Benton. No speed limit is posted on Roe Center, and that speed limit was assumed to be 3 miles per hour. Turning movement counts were conducted at the study intersections in December 218 while public schools were in regular session and before exams at Furman. The counts were conducted during the time periods of 7: 9: a.m. and 2: 6: p.m. and are included in Appendix B. SCDOT requested the additional counts hours of 2:-4: p.m. period. In all cases except one, the peak hour during the 4:-6: p.m. period was higher than the peak hour during the 2:-4: p.m. period. Therefore, the traditional afternoon peak hour was studied because the sum of existing and site traffic will be higher during that hour than in the peak hour 2:-4: p.m. The one exception was the intersection of Roe/South End/Roe Center at which volumes for some movements were slightly higher during the mid-afternoon. For the 221 build volumes (looking at volumes with just the apartments) at this intersection the mid-afternoon volumes were examined. Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

9 4 The 218 existing peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figures 1-2 for the morning and afternoon peak hours, respectively. The 218 existing morning peak hour volumes at Roe/South End/Roe Center are also shown in Figure 9, and the mid-afternoon peak hour volumes at that intersection are shown in Figure 1. No Build Traffic No build traffic is the traffic that would be at the study intersections in the future without the proposed development. No build traffic is made up of existing traffic and any increase or decrease in volumes which might occur from general growth trends in the surrounding area or from nearby specific developments. One way to estimate background traffic growth is to examine historical SCDOT traffic volumes. As shown in Table 1, SCDOT has annual traffic count stations at three locations near the study intersections. Between 29 and 217, traffic volumes went up and down as did volumes at many stations across South Carolina due to the economic downturn at the beginning of this period. It is reasonable to use the growth that occurred between 211 and 217 as representative of recent traffic volume growth. During that period traffic volumes on US 25 grew at two percent per year, and volumes on State Park grew at one percent per year. As would be expected from the recent development in downtown Travelers Rest, growth on US 276 during that period was higher four percent per year. Reflecting that most of the study area has experienced one to two percent traffic growth per year but that some higher growth has been experienced downtown, a growth rate of 2.5 percent per year was used for this study. 218 existing peak hour traffic volumes were increased by 2.5 percent per year for six years, and the 224 no build peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figures 3 and 4 for morning and afternoon peak hours, respectively. 218 existing peak hour traffic volumes at Roe/South End/Roe Center were increased by 2.5 percent for three years, and the 221 no build peak hour traffic volumes at that intersections are shown in Figures 9 and 1 respectively. Because there is a recognition that a realignment of Roe is likely to be necessary with full buildout of the project, the no build volumes are shown with that realignment so that no build and build operations could be compared directly. Table 1 HISTORICAL SCDOT TRAFFIC COUNTS Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Location (Station #) US 25 N of State Park (#115) 22,8 24,5 22, 2,8 19,1 21,7 19,9 21, 2,4 State Park E of Benton (#383) 6,3 7,1 7, 5,6 5,4 5,9 5,8 5,5 5,6 US 276 N of Roe (#162) 15,9 14,7 15, 13,8 12,3 13,8 12,7 12,8 12,3 It must be noted that there is potential for additional development on Roe Center Court that could result in growth of the turns into and out of that street that is greater than 2.5 percent per year. While there is not enough firm information available at this time to quantify that additional growth, it will be considered in the analyses conducted for this study. Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

10

11

12

13

14 9 Proposed Site Trip Generation All trip generation information was taken from the 1 th Edition of Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers. The apartments are planned with three stories and more than four units per building. Therefore, the land use for these units is multifamily housing (mid-rise). Some of the single-family units will be attached and will likely have lower trip generation than detached single family. However, Trip Generation no longer has an attached single-family unit trip generation. Because there are not at least four units per building, the attached units do not qualify as low-rise multifamily. Therefore, the single-family land use code will be used and likely will overstate trips. As for the commercial portion of the site, up to 77, square feet is allowed, and only up to 37, feet of that can be retail. The site plan in Appendix B shows a majority of the commercial as office indicating that this is the likely market for this site. Because these are low square footages and constants in the trip generation equations for shopping center are high, using rates is more appropriate for this site. Assuming the maximum retail is used, the commercial will be 48 percent retail. Given the site plan, the remainder was assumed to be office. Apportioning the morning trip rates (.94 for shopping center with 62 percent entering and 38 percent exiting and 1.16 for general office with 86 percent entering and 14 percent exiting) a blended rate of 1.5 trips per 1, square feet with 75 percent entering and 25 percent exiting was used. For the afternoon peak hour the blended rate of 2.42 trips per 1, square feet with 31 percent entering and 69 percent exiting was used (3.81 for shopping center with 48 percent entering and 52 percent exiting and 1.14 for general office with 16 percent entering and 84 percent exiting). These are reasonable rates for this location, but to be sure that the site trips are not understated no pass by or internal trip deductions will be taken in this study. - Apartments (Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise)-Land Use Code 221) independent variable is dwelling units o Morning Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic: LnT=.98LnX-.98 = 84-26% enter = 22, 74% exit = 62 o Afternoon Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic: LnT=.96LnX-.63 = 17 61% enter = 65, 39% exit = 42 - Single-Family Detached Housing (Land Use Code 21) independent variable is dwelling unit o Morning Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic: T=.71X+4.8 = 76-25% enter = 19, 75% exit = 57 o Afternoon Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic: LnT=.96LnX+.2 = 12-63% enter = 64, 37% exit = 38 - Commercial independent variable is 1 square feet o Morning Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic: T=1.5X = 81-75% enter = 61, 25% exit = 2 o Afternoon Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic: T=2.42X = % enter = 58, 69% exit = 128 All residential trips will be new to the street network, but some of the commercial trips will go to the site while passing by and some will occur between the residential and the commercial. As discussed above, using blended rates for commercial trip generation, all commercial trips will also be considered new to the street network. The trip generation for this site is shown in Table 2. Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

15 1 Table 2 TRIP GENERATION Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Use Size Morning Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Multifamily (Mid Rise) 25 units Single Family Detached Housing 1 units Commercial 77, square feet Total Trip Distribution Roe Center Court serves a mix of uses, and counts of peak hour turns into and out of it at Roe were taken because that is a study intersection. Additional counts were taken at Roe Center/US 276 and are also included in Appendix B. The peak hour volumes at the two intersections indicate trip distribution of 45 percent to/from the east on Roe, 24 percent to/from the north on US 276, and 31 percent to/from the south on US 276. These percentages were rounded to the following trip distribution which was used for this site: - 25 percent to/from the north via US percent to/from the south via US percent to/from the east via Roe Recognizing the employment opportunities to the south, this 45 percent was split 25 percent to/from the north and 75 percent to/from the south at US 25. Trip Assignment - Peak hour site trips were assigned to the study intersections using the distribution above and are shown in Figures 5 and 6 for the morning and afternoon peak hours, respectively. Because a final encroachment permit drawing of the accesses along South End Circle has not been produced for all accesses, the access in the site plan were combined into four access points along South End Circle. Trip Generation also offers a distribution of multifamily mid-rise trips throughout the day. It indicates that between 2:45-3:45 seven percent of trips occur. Between 4:-5: nine percent of trips occur. Therefore, the trips between 2:45-3:45 are 79 percent of the 4:-5: trips shown in Figure 6. That percentage of afternoon peak hour apartment trips were assigned to the Roe/South End/Roe Center Court intersections as shown in Figure 1 for the 221 examination of this intersection. All morning peak hour apartment trips were used in Figure 9. Build Traffic Peak hour site trips were added to the 224 no build peak hour traffic volumes to obtain the 224 build peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figures 7-8 for the morning and afternoon peak hours, respectively, for the full build out study year. The apartment trips were added to the 221 no build peak hour traffic volumes to obtain the 221 build peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figures 9-1 for the morning and mid-afternoon peak hours, respectively. Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

16

17

18

19

20

21

22 17 Need for Turn Lanes In general, it is desirable to have a left turn lane on the major street at a driveway or side street so that vehicles stopped to turn left have a place to store outside the through lane. This arrangement reduces the potential for rear end collisions. The provision of a right turn lane eliminates the delay that can result for through vehicles as the right turn vehicles slow to make the turn. Right turn lanes also reduce the potential for rear end collisions. The disadvantages of the additional lanes besides the construction cost are the right-of-way requirements, maintenance costs, the additional run-off caused by a paved surface, and longer distances for pedestrian crossings as well as the accident potential during construction. Because there are both advantages and disadvantages to the additional lanes, the lanes should be installed where the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. The SCDOT Highway Design Manual, 217 offers guidelines for a two-lane highway with a speed of 4 miles per hour (lowest speed for which a graph is available): Figure 9.5G - Volume Guidelines for Left-Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections on Two-Lane Highways (4 MPH). This graph can be used as a guideline in this case and is included in Appendix C. The 224 build volumes at the South End site accesses are obviously below the threshold for a left turn lane, and there is already a left turn lane available at the Roe site access. Therefore, no further left turn improvements are needed at these site access. One of the issues raised by the City in the initial reviews of the site is the short negative offset of the Roe Center and South End intersections on Roe Road. This short offset precludes having left turn lane for both streets, can cause turns from the side streets to be unable to stop in time for vehicles turning into and out of the other side street, and can cause queues at one intersection to block the other. One way to check the degree of difficulty this offset causes is to determine if a left turn lane is warranted on Roe onto Roe Center. The current pavement markings provide a left turn lane onto South End Circle. The offset can be eliminated by realigning South End Circle, but this is a significant project. The developer would like to accommodate that realignment with the site layout but not implement it until the apartments are in place. Therefore, both 224 and 221 build volumes were plotted on the left turn lane graph and indicated that: - With 221 build volumes, a left turn lane is warranted onto Roe Center but not onto South End Circle. - With 224 build volumes, a left turn lane is warranted onto Roe Center and is very close to being warranted onto South End. As a reminder, there is potential for additional development on Roe Center Court which will increase the volume of traffic at these intersections. These left turn lane warrants support realigning South End Circle to provide left turn lanes onto Roe Center and South End with 224 volumes. With 221 volumes, however, the existing left turn lane could be reversed to provide a left turn lane onto Roe Center as an interim measure. The SCDOT Design Manual also offers Figure 9.5A Guidelines for Right-Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections on Two-Lane Highways, and that graph is also included in Appendix C. The lowest hourly right turn volume that can meet this warrant is 4. None of the South Circle or Roe accesses have 4 right turns per hour. However, the right turns onto South End Circle are influenced by site trips and at least one hourly right turn volume exceeds 4 at each end of the street. The 224 build right turn volumes onto South End Circle from eastbound State Park and westbound Roe were plotted on the graph, and neither location meets the warrant for a right turn lane. Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

23 18 Traffic Operations Synchro 9.1 is the software used for the traffic operations analyses in this study. The methodology used for assessing the quality of traffic flow is the methodology described in the 21 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), Transportation Research Board. In general, the HCM expresses quality of flow in terms of Level of Service (LOS). The types of transportation facilities which were examined in this study are the signalized and unsignalized intersections. The criteria for intersection LOS are shown in Table 3. The variable used is control delay. This is the delay attributed to traffic control measures and includes deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Usually, LOS D is considered acceptable. Although South End Circle may be taken over for maintenance by the City of Travelers Rest, SCDOT guidelines were checked because South End is currently a SCDOT roadway. SCDOT uses a guideline of roadway LOS C or no change in LOS if the baseline LOS is below C as not requiring mitigation. It is not unusual for an individual movement, especially on a side street at an unsignalized intersection, to experience LOS E or F during the peak hour. Table 3 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Level of Service Control Delay Range (seconds/vehicle) Unsignalized Intersection Signalized Intersection A <1 <1 B >1 and <15 >1 and <2 C >15 and <25 >2 and <35 D >25 and <35 >35 and <55 E >35 and <5 >55 and <8 F >5 >8 All study intersections were analyzed for morning and afternoon peak hours with existing, 224 no build, and 224 build traffic volumes. Percentages of heavy vehicles, peak hour factors, pedestrians, and bikes were taken from existing counts. Lane widths, storage lengths, and grades were measured on aerials. Signal timings were optimized with adjustments to allow at least 15 seconds per phase. US 276/Roe is the only intersection in the study area that is in a signal system. Capacity analysis printouts are included in Appendix D. Because there are several references to the section of Roe Road between Roe Center Court and US 25 in this section of the report, an aerial photograph of that section of roadway is included in Appendix A. Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

24 US 25/State Park Road - As shown in Table 4, this intersection currently operates acceptably during the morning peak hour and will continue to do so with 224 no build and 224 build volumes. The afternoon peak hour LOS goes from C to D with 224 no build volumes, but the LOS does not change with 224 build volumes. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. Table 4 CAPACITY ALYSES RESULTS SIGLIZED INTERSECTION EXISTING GEOMETRY US 25/STATE PARK ROAD Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Level of Service/Delay (seconds/vehicle) Movement Existing 224 No Build 224 Build Mitigation Morning Peak Hour Eastbound - Left C/23 C/23 C/23 Through/right C/32 C/33 C/33 Westbound - Left C/22 C/22 C/22 No Through C/22 C/22 C/22 Mitigation Right C/21 C/21 C/21 Required Northbound - Left B/16 B/18 B/18 Through B/2 C/23 C/24 Right B/17 B/19 B/19 Southbound- Left B/14 B/16 B/16 Through C/24 C/32 C/33 Right B/15 B/17 B/17 Overall C/22 C/27 C/27 Afternoon Peak Hour Eastbound - Left C/29 C/3 C/3 Through/right F/87 F/147 F/147 Westbound - Left C/34 D/43 D/43 No Through C/33 D/37 D/37 Right C/31 C/34 C/34 Northbound - Left B/19 C/21 C/21 Through C/32 D/48 D/52 Right C/22 C/24 C/24 Southbound- Left C/25 D/4 D/42 Through C/25 C/29 C/29 Right B/16 B/17 B/17 Overall C/35 D/48 D/5 Notes: - State Park is east-west. US 25 is north-south. Mitigation Required 19 Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

25 2 State Park Road/Benton Road - As shown in Table 5, this intersection currently operates acceptably and will continue to do so with 224 no build and 224 build volumes. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. Table 5 CAPACITY ALYSES RESULTS SIGLIZED INTERSECTION EXISTING GEOMETRY STATE PARK ROAD/BENTON ROAD Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Level of Service/Delay (seconds/vehicle) Movement Existing 224 No Build 224 Build Mitigation Morning Peak Hour Eastbound - Through A/4 A/4 A/4 Right A/4 A/4 A/4 Westbound - Left A/4 A/5 A/5 No Through A/4 A/4 A/4 Mitigation Northbound - Left B/18 B/19 B/19 Required Right B/15 B/15 B/15 Overall A/6 A/7 A/7 Afternoon Peak Hour Eastbound - Through A/9 B/11 B/11 Right A/9 B/1 B/1 Westbound - Left B/12 B/17 B/17 No Through A/8 A/9 A/9 Northbound - Left C/29 C/29 C/29 Right C/23 C/23 C/23 Overall B/15 B/16 B/16 Notes: - State Park is east-west. Benton is north-south. Mitigation Required Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

26 US 25/Roe Road/Little Texas Road - As shown in Table 6, this intersection currently operates at LOS C during the morning peak hour. With 224 no build volumes, the LOS will go to D and will not change with 224 build volumes. During the afternoon peak hour, the intersection currently operates at LOS C and will continue to do so with 224 no build volumes. The LOS will go to D with 224 build volumes which is usually considered acceptable. Even though South End Circle may be taken over by the City, the SCDOT mitigation trigger of a change in LOS from C to D was also considered. The addition of a southbound right turn lane was considered but did not allow operation at LOS C. Addition of an eastbound right turn lane would allow operation at LOS C during the afternoon peak hour. The need for this lane addition with 221 volumes with apartments only was also checked. As shown in Appendix E the intersection can operate at LOS C during the afternoon peak hour, and the estimated 95 th percentile turn queues can be accommodated in the available turn lane storage. A commercial driveway is located on Roe Road west of US 25. If an eastbound right turn lane on Roe at US 25 is provided, a shorter than usual storage length and taper may be appropriate. Because the intersection can operate at LOS D with existing geometry and because the commercial driveway interferes with provision of a standard right turn lane, the addition of the right turn lane may not be required. Table 6 CAPACITY ALYSES RESULTS SIGLIZED INTERSECTION EXISTING GEOMETRY US 25/ROE ROAD/LITTLE TEXAS ROAD Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Level of Service/Delay (seconds/vehicle) Movement Existing 224 No Build 224 Build Add EB RTL Morning Peak Hour Eastbound - Left B/2 C/2 B/2 Through/right C/26 C/27 C/28 Westbound - Left B/2 B/2 B/2 No Through C/22 C/22 C/21 Mitigation Right C/21 C/21 C/21 Required Northbound - Left B/13 B/15 B/17 Through B/16 B/19 C/2 Right B/14 B/16 B/17 Southbound- Left B/12 B/13 B/15 Through/right C/31 E/58 F/81 Overall C/23 D/36 D/46 Afternoon Peak Hour Eastbound - Left C/28 C/28 C/27 C/29 Through/right D/4 D/44 E/64 D/37 Right C/3 Westbound - Left C/33 D/46 E/7 D/4 Through C/33 D/35 D/35 D/39 Right C/31 C/31 C/32 C/33 Northbound - Left B/16 B/19 C/24 C/21 Through C/24 C/31 C/33 C/28 Right B/19 C/22 C/23 C/21 Southbound- Left B/16 B/2 C/22 B/19 Through/right C/26 C/35 D/46 D/38 Overall C/26 C/33 D/41 C/32 Notes: - Roe/Little Texas is east-west. US 25 is north-south. Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13,

27 22 US 276/Roe Road - As shown in Table 7, this intersection currently operates acceptably and will continue to do so with 224 no build and 224 build volumes. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. Table 7 CAPACITY ALYSES RESULTS SIGLIZED INTERSECTION EXISTING GEOMETRY US 276/ROE ROAD Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Level of Service/Delay (seconds/vehicle) Movement Existing 224 No Build 224 Build Mitigation Morning Peak Hour Eastbound- Left/thru/right C/28 C/27 C/26 Westbound - Left C/26 C/26 C/26 Through/right C/32 C/31 C/3 No Northbound - Left A/6 A/7 A/7 Mitigation Through/right A/9 B/1 B/11 Required Southbound- Left A/5 A/6 A/6 Through/right A/4 A/5 A/6 Overall A/9 B/1 B/11 Afternoon Peak Hour Eastbound- Left/thru/right C/29 C/28 C/28 Westbound - Left C/25 C/24 C/26 Through/right C/29 C/28 C/28 No Northbound - Left A/9 B/11 B/12 Through/right B/15 C/23 C/31 Southbound- Left A/9 B/14 B/18 Through/right A/7 A/9 A/9 Overall B/14 B/18 C/22 Notes: - Roe is east-west. US 276 is north-south. Mitigation Required Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

28 Little Texas Road/Benton Road/Krieger Drive As shown in Table 8, this intersection currently operates acceptably during the morning peak hour and will continue to do so with 224 no build and 224 build volumes. During the afternoon peak hour, one side street already operates at LOS F. Delay will increase with 224 no build volumes but will not change further with 224 build volumes. Another form of traffic control should be considered at this intersection, but Pinestone does not cause the delay which makes this consideration necessary. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. Table 8 CAPACITY ALYSES RESULTS UNSIGLIZED INTERSECTION EXISTING GEOMETRY LITTLE TEXAS ROAD/BENTON ROAD/KRIEGER DRIVE Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Level of Service/Delay (seconds/vehicle) Movement Existing 224 No Build 224 Build Mitigation Morning Peak Hour Eastbound - Left A/8 A/8 A/8 Westbound - Left A/8 A/8 A/8 Northbound - Left C/18 C/21 C/21 No Through/right B/14 C/16 C/16 Mitigation Southbound - Left B/14 C/16 C/16 Required Through/right A/1 B/1 B/1 1Afternoon Peak Hour Eastbound - Left A/8 A/8 A/8 Westbound - Left A/7 A/7 A/7 Northbound - Left F/11 F/358 F/358 No Through/right E/43 F/95 F/95 Southbound - Left E/44 F/139 F/139 Through/right C/2 E/38 E/38 Notes: - Little Texas is east-west. Benton/Krieger is north-south. Mitigation Required 23 Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

29 State Park Road/Tubbs Mountain Road Extension/Commercial Driveway As shown in Table 9, this intersection currently operates acceptably and will continue to do so with 224 no build and 224 build volumes. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. Table 9 CAPACITY ALYSES RESULTS UNSIGLIZED INTERSECTION EXISTING GEOMETRY STATE PARK ROAD/TUBBS MOUNTAIN ROAD EXTENSION/COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Level of Service/Delay (seconds/vehicle) Movement Existing 224 No Build 224 Build Mitigation Morning Peak Hour Eastbound - Left A/8 A/8 A/8 Westbound - Left A/8 A/8 A/8 No Northbound - Lft/thru/rght A/9 A/9 A/9 Mitigation Southbound- Lft/thru/rght B/11 B/12 B/12 Required Afternoon Peak Hour Eastbound - Left A/8 A/8 A/8 Westbound - Left A/ A/ A/ No Northbound - Lft/thru/rght B/12 B/12 B/13 Southbound- Lft/thru/rght C/17 C/2 C/23 Notes: - State Park is east-west. Tubbs Mountain/commercial driveway is north-south. Mitigation Required State Park Road/South End Circle As shown in Table 1, this intersection currently operates acceptably and will continue to do so with 224 no build and 224 build volumes. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. Table 1 CAPACITY ALYSES RESULTS UNSIGLIZED INTERSECTION EXISTING GEOMETRY STATE PARK ROAD/SOUTH END CIRCLE Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Level of Service/Delay (seconds/vehicle) Movement Existing 224 No Build 224 Build Mitigation Morning Peak Hour Westbound - Left A/8 A/8 A/8 No Mitigation Northbound - Left/right B/13 B/14 B/15 Required Afternoon Peak Hour Westbound - Left A/ A/ A/ No Mitigation Northbound - Left/right B/13 B/14 C/21 Required Notes: - State Park is east-west. South End is north-south. 24 Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

30 Roe Road/South End Circle and Roe Road/Roe Center Court as individual intersections The left turn lane warrants checked in this study support realigning South End Circle to provide left turn lanes onto Roe Center and South End with 224 volumes. With 221 volumes (completion of only the apartments), however, the existing left turn lane could be reversed to provide a left turn lane onto Roe Center as an interim measure. As shown in Tables 11 and 12, these intersections currently operate acceptably, and acceptable operation (from a level of service standpoint) can continue with 221 volumes with either existing geometry or reversal of the left turn lane. Table 11 CAPACITY ALYSES RESULTS UNSIGLIZED INTERSECTION ROE ROAD/SOUTH END CIRCLE Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Level of Service/Delay (seconds/vehicle) Movement Existing 221 Build Exist Geo Exist Geo Reverse LTL Mitigation Morning Peak Hour Eastbound - Left A/8 A/8 A/8 Lane reversal Southbound - Left/right A/1 B/11 B/11 is mitigation Afternoon Peak Hour Eastbound - Left A/8 A/8 A/8 Lane reversal Southbound - Left/right B/11 B/12 B/12 is mitigation Notes: - Roe is east-west. South End is north-south. Table 12 CAPACITY ALYSES RESULTS UNSIGLIZED INTERSECTION ROE ROAD/ROE CENTER COURT Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Level of Service/Delay (seconds/vehicle) Movement Existing 221 Build Exist Geo Exist Geo Reverse LTL Mitigation Morning Peak Hour Westbound - Left A/8 A/8 A/8 Lane reversal Northbound - Left B/1 B/11 B/1 is mitigation Right A/9 A/9 A/1 Afternoon Peak Hour Westbound - Left A/8 A/8 A/8 Lane reversal Northbound - Left B/13 B/14 B/14 is mitigation Right B/1 B/11 B/11 Notes: - Roe is east-west. Roe Center is north-south. 25 Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

31 Roe Road/South End Circle/Roe Center Court This is the intersection which would be formed by the realignment of South End Circle to intersect Roe Road across from Roe Center Court. As shown in Table 13, all movements can operate acceptably with 224 no build volumes. With 224 build volumes the side street lefts will operate at LOS D/E during the afternoon peak hour. These LOS are not unreasonable for a side street during a peak hour and are preferable to having no left turn lane for Roe Center Court. It must be noted that there is potential for additional development on Roe Center Court. Table 13 CAPACITY ALYSES RESULTS UNSIGLIZED INTERSECTION - REALIGNMENT ROE ROAD/SOUTH END CIRCLE/ROE CENTER COURT Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Level of Service/Delay (seconds/vehicle) Movement Existing 224 No Build 224 Build Mitigation Morning Peak Hour Eastbound - Left - A/8 A/8 Westbound - Left - A/8 A/8 Northbound - Left - B/12 B/14 Realignment is Through/right - A/9 A/1 Mitigation Southbound - Left - B/12 C/15 Through/right - B/1 B/1 Afternoon Peak Hour Eastbound - Left - A/8 A/8 Westbound - Left - A/8 A/8 Northbound - Left - C/19 D/28 Realignment is Through/right - B/11 B/12 Mitigation Southbound - Left - C/2 E/41 Through/right - B/13 B/12 Notes: - Roe is east-west. South End/Roe Center is north-south. 26 Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

32 27 Site Accesses As shown in Table 14, the site access intersections will operate acceptably with existing geometry and 224 build volumes. Table 14 CAPACITY ALYSIS RESULTS UNSIGLIZED INTERSECTION 224 BUILD VOLUMES SITE ACCESSES Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Movement Level of Service/Delay (seconds/vehicle) Morning Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Hour Roe Road/Roe Site Access Eastbound Left A/8 A/8 Southbound Left/right B/11 B/12 South End Circle/Circle Site Access 1/Bojangles Combined Driveway Eastbound - Left A/7 A/8 Westbound - Left A/8 A/ Northbound - Left/through/right A/1 B/11 Southbound - Left/through/right A/9 A/1 South End Circle/Circle Site Access 2 Southbound - Left A/7 A/8 Westbound Left/right A/9 B/1 South End Circle/Circle Site Access 3 Northbound - Left A/7 A/8 Eastbound Left/right A/9 A/9 South End Circle/Circle Site Access 4 Northbound - Left A/7 A/7 Southbound - Left A/7 A/7 Eastbound Left/through/right A/9 A/9 Westbound Left/through/right A/9 B/1 Notes: - South End and Roe site access are north-south. Roe and Circle site accesses are east-west. The only exception is at Circle site access 1 where South End is east-west and Circle site access/bojangles is northsouth. Turn Lane Storage While the LOS at an intersection can describe the basic operation of traffic, other factors influence that operation. For instance, if turn queues extend past their storage, they can interrupt traffic flow. SIMTRAFFIC was run for existing, 224 no build, and 224 build volumes along with 221 build volumes at Roe/Roe Center/South End. The printouts are included in Appendix D. The turn storage needs are shown in Table 15. The results in Table 15 indicate the storage lengths needed for new turn lanes and that: - All existing storage either accommodates projected queues, is within one vehicle length of projected queues, or the queues with 224 no build volumes exceed existing storage and will change little with 224 build volumes. With 221 build volumes, a left turn lane is warranted onto Roe Center but not onto South End Circle. - If the eastbound right turn lane is provided on Roe at US 25, the storage for the eastbound left is sufficient. If the eastbound right is not provided, the storage for the eastbound left needs to be extended from 19 feet to 26 feet. Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

33 28 Table 15 QUEUE AND STORAGE LENGTHS IN FEET Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina Intersection Turn SimTraffic 95 th Percentile Queue Existing Morning Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Hour Storage Exist Exist NB Build NB Build Comments US 25/State Park Road State Park Road/ Benton Road US 25/Roe Road/ Little Texas Road EB Left (1) WB Left OK WB Right (1) NB Left OK NB Right (1) SB Left (1) SB Right OK EB Right OK WB Left OK NB Left (1) EB Left / (4) EB Right /115 Potential (5) WB Left /24 27 OK WB Right /63 2 OK NB Left /181 2 OK NB Right / (1) SB Left / OK US 276/Roe Road WB Left OK NB Left OK SB Left OK Little Texas EB Left OK Road/Benton WB Left OK Road/Krieger Road WB Right OK NB Left OK SB Left OK State Park/T Mnt EB Left OK State Park/S End WB Left OK Roe Road/South End Circle/Roe Center Court EB Left New Provide 1 WB Left New Provide 15 NB Left OK SB Left New Provide 1 Roe/Roe Access EB Left OK Notes: (1) Queue with 224 no build volumes will exceed the existing storage and will change little with 224 build volumes (2) OK indicates that the estimated queue is less than or within one vehicle length of the existing storage. (3) xxx/xxx = existing geometry/add right turn lane eastbound on Roe at US 25 (4) Provide 26 feet if eastbound right turn lane is not provided. If that lane is provided, existing storage for this lane is OK. (5) A commercial driveway is located on Roe Road west of US 25. If an eastbound right turn lane on Roe at US 25 is provided, a shorter than usual storage length and taper may be appropriate. Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

34 Should the option of reversing the turn lane on Roe between South End and Roe Center be pursued, the ability of the lane to accommodate the 221 apartments only queues was checked. As shown in Table 16, the queue for either left off of Roe Road can be accommodated in the middle lane between the intersections. Table 16 QUEUE AND STORAGE LENGTHS IN FEET ROE ROAD/ROE CENTER COURT/SOUTH END CIRCLE AS TWO INTERSECTIONS Pinestone Traffic Impact Study Travelers Rest, South Carolina 29 Intersection Turn SimTraffic 95 th Percentile Queue Existing Morning Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Hour Storage Exist 221 Build Exist 221 Build Exist Rev Exist Rev TL TL Comments Roe Road/S End EB Left of storage Roe Road/Roe WB Left New accommodates Center Court either queue NB Left OK Conclusions and Recommendations - US 25/State Park Road - This intersection currently operates acceptably during the morning peak hour and will continue to do so with 224 no build and 224 build volumes. The afternoon peak hour LOS goes from C to D with 224 no build volumes, but the LOS does not change with 224 build volumes. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. - State Park Road/Benton Road - This intersection currently operates acceptably and will continue to do so with 224 no build and 224 build volumes. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. - US 25/Roe Road/Little Texas Road - This intersection currently operates at LOS C during the morning peak hour. With 224 no build volumes, the LOS will go to D and will not change further with 224 build volumes. During the afternoon peak hour, the intersection currently operates at LOS C and will continue to do so with 224 no build volumes. The LOS will go to D with 224 build volumes which is usually considered acceptable. Although South End Circle may be taken over by the City, the SCDOT mitigation trigger of a change in LOS from C to D was also considered. The addition of a southbound right turn lane was considered but did not allow operation at LOS C. Addition of an eastbound right turn lane would allow operation at LOS C during the afternoon peak hour. The need for this lane addition with 221 volumes with apartments only was also checked. As shown in Appendix E the intersection can operate at LOS C during the afternoon peak hour, and the estimated 95 th percentile turn queues can be accommodated in the available turn lane storage. A commercial driveway is located on Roe Road west of US 25. If an eastbound right turn lane on Roe at US 25 is provided, a shorter than usual storage length and taper may be appropriate. Because the intersection can operate at LOS D with existing geometry and because the commercial driveway interferes with provision of a standard right turn lane, the addition of the right turn lane may not be required. Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

35 - US 276/Roe Road - This intersection currently operates acceptably and will continue to do so with 224 no build and 224 build volumes. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. - Little Texas Road/Benton Road/Krieger Drive This intersection currently operates acceptably during the morning peak hour and will continue to do so with 224 no build and 224 build volumes. During the afternoon peak hour, one side street already operates at LOS F. Delay will increase with 224 no build volumes but will not change further with 224 build volumes. Another form of traffic control should be considered at this intersection, but Pinestone does not cause the delay which makes this consideration necessary. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. - State Park Road/Tubbs Mountain Road Extension/Commercial Driveway This intersection currently operates acceptably and will continue to do so with 224 no build and 224 build volumes. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. - State Park Road/South End Circle This intersection currently operates acceptably and will continue to do so with 224 no build and 224 build volumes. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. - Roe Road/South End Circle and Roe Road/Roe Center Court as individual intersections The left turn lane warrants checked in this study support realigning South End Circle to provide left turn lanes onto Roe Center and South End with 224 volumes. With 221 volumes (completion of only the apartments), however, the existing left turn lane could be reversed to provide a left turn lane onto Roe Center as an interim measure. These intersections currently operate acceptably, and acceptable operation (from a level of service standpoint) can continue with 221 volumes with either existing geometry or reversal of the left turn lane. - Roe Road/South End Circle/Roe Center Court This is the intersection which would be formed by the realignment of South End Circle to intersect Roe Road across from Roe Center Court. All movements can operate acceptably with 224 no build volumes. With 224 build volumes the side street lefts will operate at LOS D/E during the afternoon peak hour. These LOS are not unreasonable for a side street during a peak hour and are preferable to having no left turn lane for Roe Center Court. - Site Accesses The site access intersections will operate acceptably with existing geometry and 224 build volumes. 3 Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

36 Appendix A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND ROE ROAD ROE CENTER TO US 25 AERIAL (Source for aerial: Greenville County GIS) Pinestone Traffic Impact Study January 13, 219

37 2.2 COMMUNITY PATTERNS Site Plan

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY, OHIO Nantucket Circle and Montgomery Road () Prepared for: ODLE

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 1.1. Site Location and Study Area...1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access...2 1.3.

More information

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016 Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 216 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE WestBranch Residential Development LOCATED IN DAVIDSON, NC Prepared For: Lennar Carolinas, LLC

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1. Location and Study Area... 1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Access... 2 1.3. Adjacent Land Uses... 2 1.4. Existing ways...

More information

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study 5858 N COLLEGE, LLC nue Traffic Impact Study August 22, 2016 Contents Traffic Impact Study Page Preparer Qualifications... 1 Introduction... 2 Existing Roadway Conditions... 5 Existing Traffic Conditions...

More information

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation City of Hillsdale, Hillsdale County, Michigan June 16, 2016 Final Report Prepared for City of Hillsdale 97 North Broad

More information

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA February 13, 2015 Mr. Meran Dadgostar P.E., R.S. Town of Highland Park 4700 Drexel Dr. Highland Park, Texas 75205 Re: Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest

More information

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development Zoning Case: Z145-3 Traffic Impact Analysis Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development Dallas, TX October 26 th, 216 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #644827 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic

More information

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: DECEMBER 2007 Glenn Avenue Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background

More information

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015 Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Data Collection... 1 3 Existing Roadway Network... 2 4 Traffic Volume Development... 2 5 Warrant Analysis... 3 6 Traffic Control Alternative

More information

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017 Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North arolina June 2017 N. Little Egypt Road DQ\ QDQFLQJ VDOHV RU RWKHU SHUIRUPDQFH EDVHG FULWHULD Proposed Site Driveways Site Driveway 1 TRAFFI

More information

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department 9/1/2009 Introduction Traffic studies are used to help the city determine potential impacts to the operation of the surrounding roadway network. Two

More information

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 901.3.A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION The following information is required from all applicants directly or indirectly accessing any collector or arterial road or as otherwise

More information

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Simluc Contractors Limited 2550 Blackwell Street, Ottawa K1B 5R1 October 18, 2013 113-584 Overview_1.doc D. J.

More information

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc. INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED Prepared for: 7849648 Canada Inc. Octiober 1, 2015 114-598 Overview_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting

More information

MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: 2434984 Ontario Inc. 13-5510 Canotek Road Ottawa, Ontario K1J 9J5 June 4, 2015 115-613 Report_2.doc D. J.

More information

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc. OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 9402209 Canada Inc. December 15, 2015 115-625 Report_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation

More information

Troutbeck Farm Development

Troutbeck Farm Development Troutbeck Farm Development Willistown Township, Chester County PA For Submission To: Willistown Township Last Revised: October, 4 TPD# INLM.A. 5 E. High Street Suite 65 Pottstown, PA 9464 6.36.3 TPD@TrafficPD.com

More information

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections... List of Attachments Exhibits Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections... Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls... Existing

More information

Harrah s Station Square Casino

Harrah s Station Square Casino Transportation Analysis Harrah s Station Square Casino Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Submitted To: City of Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board Prepared By: DKS Associates GAI Consultants December

More information

Gateway Transportation Study

Gateway Transportation Study Gateway Transportation Study Amherst, Massachusetts SUBMITTED TO University of Massachusetts Amherst Town of Amherst SUBMITTED BY Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Watertown, Massachusetts March 213 Back of

More information

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Quickie Convenience Stores Larny Holdings Ltd. c/o PBC Group April 15, 2015 115-615 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny

More information

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY GA SR 25 Spur at Canal Road Transportation Impact Analysis PREPARED FOR GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA 1725 Reynolds Street, Suite 300 Brunswick, Georgia 31520 PREPARED BY 217 Arrowhead Boulevard Suite 26 Jonesboro,

More information

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for: NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: Solidex Holdings Limited & Investissement Maurice Lemieux Investments Attn: Mr. Anthony

More information

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for: OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: The Ottawa Train Yards Inc. 223 Colonnade Road South, Suite 212 Nepean, Ontario K2E 7K3 January 17, 2012

More information

2016 Church Street Access Study. 100 Clinton Square 126 North Salina Street, Suite 100 Syracuse, NY

2016 Church Street Access Study. 100 Clinton Square 126 North Salina Street, Suite 100 Syracuse, NY 2016 Church Street Access Study 100 Clinton Square 126 North Salina Street, Suite 100 Syracuse, NY 13202 www.smtcmpo.org Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council Final Report February 23, 2016 This

More information

Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12)

Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12) Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12) traffic study prepared for: Cymbal Development OCtober 2012 Traf Tech October 1, 2012 Mr. Asi Cymbal - President Cymbal Development 3470 North Miami Avenue Upper Suite Miami,

More information

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: 2294170 Ontario Inc. February 2, 2017 117-652 Report_1.doc

More information

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: JANUARY 2007 Donahue Drive Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background

More information

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota Walmart (Store #4865-00) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota Prepared for: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ã2013 Kimley-Horn

More information

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: City of Thornton And Colorado Department of Transportation Prepared by: 11 Blake Street, Suite 2 Denver, Colorado 822 Contact: Brian Bern, PE, PTOE

More information

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA May 5, 2016 Mr. Anthony Beach, P.E. BSP Engineers 4800 Lakewood Drive, Suite 4 Waco, Texas 76710 Re: Intersection and Access Analysis along Business 190 in Copperas Cove

More information

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace Abington Township, Montgomery County, PA Sandy A. Koza, P.E., PTOE PA PE License Number PE059911 Prepared by McMahon Associates, Inc. 425 Commerce Drive,

More information

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Bona Building & Management Co. Ltd. Place Vanier, 333 North River Road Vanier, Ontario K1L 8B9 October

More information

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc. Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio June 5, 2017 Prepared for: Westlake City Schools - Board of Education 27200 Hilliard Boulevard Westlake, OH 44145 TRAFFIC

More information

TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado

TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado Submitted by: Fehr & Peers 621 17th Street, Ste. 231 Denver, CO 8293 (33) 296-43 December, 21 App. M-2 Traffic Assessment River Edge Colorado December 21 TABLE OF

More information

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Division Prepared by: HNTB North Carolina, PC 343

More information

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9 MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9 December 18, 2012 112-566 Brief_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION Transportation Consultants, LLC 1101 17 TH AVENUE SOUTH NASHVILLE, TN 37212

More information

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report ROUTE 7 (HARRY BYRD HIGHWAY) WESTBOUND FROM WEST MARKET STREET TO ROUTE 9 (CHARLES TOWN PIKE) Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report Project No. 6007-053-133, P 101 Ι UPC No. 58599 Prepared by:

More information

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2 URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2 February 27, 2014 113-584 Overview_1.doc D. J. Halpenny

More information

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: First Bay Properties Inc. 311 Richmond Road, Suite 203 Ottawa, ON K1Z 6X3 August 8, 2017 117-663 Brief_1.doc

More information

DRAFT Davidson Elementary School Expansion Transportation Impact Analysis

DRAFT Davidson Elementary School Expansion Transportation Impact Analysis DRAFT Davidson Elementary School Expansion Transportation Impact Analysis Prepared for: Town of Davidson 216 S. Main Street Davidson, NC 28036 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2127 Ayrsley

More information

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Momentum Planning & Communications 1165 Greenlawn Crescent Ottawa, ON K1L 6C2 June 29, 2015 115-618 Brief_1.doc

More information

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio December 12, 2012 Prepared for: The City of Huron 417 Main Huron, OH 44839 Providing Practical Experience Technical Excellence and Client

More information

Traffic Study North Shore School District 112

Traffic Study North Shore School District 112 Traffic Study North Shore School District 112 Proposed Expansion of Northwood Junior High School Prepared By: May 1, 2015 1. Introduction Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) has been retained

More information

Patuxent Green Golf Course

Patuxent Green Golf Course Patuxent Green Golf Course Laurel, Maryland February 23, 2018 Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: ADC Builders Alan Cohen 2701 Tower Oaks Boulevard, Suite 200 Rockville, Maryland 20852 TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY PROPOSED RIVERFRONT 47 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY PROPOSED RIVERFRONT 47 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT November 2016 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY PROPOSED RIVERFRONT 47 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT & Aspinwall Borough, Sharpsburg Borough & O Hara Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Prepared for: Riverfront

More information

APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 1161 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 1161 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for: APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 1161 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: 1649362 Ontario Inc. c/o Manor Park Management 231 Brittany Drive, Suite D Ottawa ON K1K 0R8 July

More information

Draft Report. Traffic Impact Study. Superstore, Wal-Mart, and Kent Development. Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. Prepared for

Draft Report. Traffic Impact Study. Superstore, Wal-Mart, and Kent Development. Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. Prepared for oad & Traffic Management Road & Traffic Management R Atlantic Traffic Engineering Specialists Draft Report Traffic Impact Study Superstore, Wal-Mart, and Kent Development Yarmouth, Nova Scotia Prepared

More information

Traffic Impact and Access Study PROPOSED DURKEE FARM ESTATES. Foster Street Littleton, Massachusetts. Prepared for: Grimes Road, LLC.

Traffic Impact and Access Study PROPOSED DURKEE FARM ESTATES. Foster Street Littleton, Massachusetts. Prepared for: Grimes Road, LLC. Traffic Impact and Access Study PROPOSED DURKEE FARM ESTATES Foster Street Littleton, Massachusetts Prepared for: Grimes Road, LLC. Westford, MA Prepared by: MDM Transportation Consultants, Inc. 28 Lord

More information

Route 28 (South Orleans Road)/Route 39 (Harwich Road)/Quanset Road Intersection

Route 28 (South Orleans Road)/Route 39 (Harwich Road)/Quanset Road Intersection TRAFFIC FEASIBILITY STUDY Route 28 (South Orleans Road)/Route 39 (Harwich Road)/Quanset Road Intersection Orleans, Massachusetts Prepared for: Town of Orleans Prepared by: Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, LLC

More information

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis PURPOSE The traffic analysis component of the K-68 Corridor Management Plan incorporates information on the existing transportation network, such as traffic volumes and intersection

More information

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Bona Building & Management Co. Ltd. Place Vanier, 333 North River Road Vanier, Ontario K1L 8B9 August 12,

More information

Meadowlake Ranch Traffic Impact Analysis (LSC #184600) August 27, 2018

Meadowlake Ranch Traffic Impact Analysis (LSC #184600) August 27, 2018 LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 545 East Pikes Peak Avenue, Suite 210 Colorado Springs, CO 80903 (719) 633-2868 FAX (719) 633-5430 E-mail: lsc@lsctrans.com Website: http://www.lsctrans.com Traffic

More information

The proposed development is located within 800m of an existing Transit Station where infill developments and intensification are encouraged.

The proposed development is located within 800m of an existing Transit Station where infill developments and intensification are encouraged. Stantec Consulting Ltd. 1331 Clyde Avenue, Suite 4 Ottawa ON K2C 3G4 Tel: (613) 722-442 Fax: (613) 722-2799 May 14, 213 File: 1638823 Robinson Park Development Corp. 5699 Power Road Ottawa, ON, K1G 3N4

More information

MEMORANDUM. Matt Folden, AICP, MNCPPC Rebecca Torma, MCDOT. Nancy Randall, AICP, PTP Barbara Mosier, P.E., PTOE Kevin Berger

MEMORANDUM. Matt Folden, AICP, MNCPPC Rebecca Torma, MCDOT. Nancy Randall, AICP, PTP Barbara Mosier, P.E., PTOE Kevin Berger To: From: Matt Folden, AICP, MNCPPC Rebecca Torma, MCDOT Nancy Randall, AICP, PTP Barbara Mosier, P.E., PTOE Kevin Berger 1110 Bonifant Street Suite 210, Silver Spring, MD 20910 301-448-1333 WellsandAssociates.com

More information

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis Prepared for: Arlington County Department of Environmental Services 2100 Clarendon Boulevard,

More information

Date: September 7, Project #: Re: Spaulding Youth Center Northfield, NH Property. Traffic Impact Study

Date: September 7, Project #: Re: Spaulding Youth Center Northfield, NH Property. Traffic Impact Study To: Ms. Susan C. Ryan Spaulding Youth Center 72 Spaulding Road Northfield, NH 03276 Date: September 7, 2017 Project #: 52455.00 From: Robin Bousa Director of Transportation Systems Re: Spaulding Youth

More information

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Richmond, Virginia August 14, 2013 Prepared For City of Richmond Department of Public Works Prepared By 1001 Boulders Pkwy Suite 300, Richmond, VA

More information

Traffic Impact Statement

Traffic Impact Statement Traffic Impact Statement Mixed Use Development, US 41 and Old Trail Drive aka Tide-Starbucks 4900 9 th Street North General Development Site Plan (GDSP) Collier County, FL 10/6/2015 Prepared for: Prepared

More information

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh) Chapter 5 Traffic Analysis 5.1 SUMMARY US /West 6 th Street assumes a unique role in the Lawrence Douglas County transportation system. This principal arterial street currently conveys commuter traffic

More information

REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For Wendy s Parker, Colorado January 215 Prepared for: Sterling Design Associates, LLC 29 W. Littleton Boulevard #3 Littleton, Colorado 812 Prepared by: 1233 Airport

More information

Table of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

Table of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: 151714A Table of Contents Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 III. 215 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS... 6

More information

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING Final Report August 3, 216 #31, 316 5th Avenue NE Calgary, AB T2A 6K4 Phone: 43.273.91 Fax: 43.273.344 wattconsultinggroup.com Dunbow Road Functional Planning Final Report

More information

ORLEANS GARDENS SHOPPING CENTRE 1615 ORLEANS BOULEVARD CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

ORLEANS GARDENS SHOPPING CENTRE 1615 ORLEANS BOULEVARD CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for: ORLEANS GARDENS SHOPPING CENTRE 1615 ORLEANS BOULEVARD CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: Orleans Gardens Shopping Centre Inc. 2851 John Street, Suite 1 Markham, ON K3R 5R7

More information

MEMORANDUM. Our project study area included the following locations:

MEMORANDUM. Our project study area included the following locations: MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Subject: Najib O. Habesch Nick M. Fomenko, PE, PTOE Bushnell Park North Traffic Assessment BETA Project #: 4461 As part of our contract to undertake the design of the Bushnell

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Process and Procedures Manual. September 2017

Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Process and Procedures Manual. September 2017 Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Process and Procedures Manual Post Office Box 664 101 Huntersville-Concord Road Huntersville, NC 28070 Phone 704-766-2220 Fax 704-992-5528 www.huntersville.org (c) 2017, Town

More information

6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas

6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas April 30, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #063238300 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to identify conformance with the original traffic impact study for the proposed retail development on Lot 5 of Riverdale Retail Filing No. 1 located on the

More information

DIMARCO CANANDAIGUA PROPERTIES HOUSING PROJECT CANANDAIGUA, ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK

DIMARCO CANANDAIGUA PROPERTIES HOUSING PROJECT CANANDAIGUA, ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE DIMARCO CANANDAIGUA PROPERTIES HOUSING PROJECT CANANDAIGUA, ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK MARCH 14, 2017 PREPARED FOR: 1950 Brighton Henrietta Town Line Rd Rochester, NY 14623 PREPARED

More information

Highway 111 Corridor Study

Highway 111 Corridor Study Highway 111 Corridor Study June, 2009 LINCOLN CO. HWY 111 CORRIDOR STUDY Draft Study Tea, South Dakota Prepared for City of Tea Sioux Falls Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by HDR Engineering,

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for: TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For Creekside Thornton, Colorado August 215 November 215 Revised: August 216 Prepared for: Jansen Strawn Consulting Engineers 45 West 2 nd Avenue Denver, Colorado 8223 Prepared by:

More information

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY in City of Frostburg, Maryland January 2013 3566 Teays Valley Road Hurricane, WV Office: (304) 397-5508 www.denniscorporation.com Alley 24 Traffic Study January 2013 Frostburg, Maryland

More information

Bistro 6. City of Barrie. Traffic Impact Study for Pratt Hansen Group Inc. Type of Document: Final Report. Project Number: JDE 1748

Bistro 6. City of Barrie. Traffic Impact Study for Pratt Hansen Group Inc. Type of Document: Final Report. Project Number: JDE 1748 City of Barrie Traffic Impact Study for Pratt Hansen Group Inc. Type of Document: Final Report Project Number: JDE 1748 Date Submitted: June 12 th, 2017 06/12/17 John Northcote, P.Eng. Professional License

More information

Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, North Carolina

Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, North Carolina 9. CONCLUSIONS This Traffic Impact Analysis Update was conducted to determine the potential traffic impacts of the proposed Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club residential development, located east

More information

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner MEMORANDUM Date: Updated August 22, 2017 To: Organization: Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner Boston Transportation Department From: Jason DeGray, P.E., PTOE, Regional Director of Engineering

More information

Queensgate Drive Corridor Traffic Study

Queensgate Drive Corridor Traffic Study January 2015 Prepared for: City of Richland Prepared by: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 2810 W. Clearwater Avenue, Suite 201 Kennewick, Washington 99336 Table of Contents Introduction and Background... 1 Existing

More information

Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum

Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum To From Gwen Pipkin Bill Howell Date June 18, 2013 Subject Roundabout Feasibility Study SR 29 PD&E Study From Oil Well Road to SR 82 Collier County, FL FPID 417540-1-22-01

More information

MEMORANDUM. DATE March 1, 2012 TO Town of Milton Mark Abbott, Seth Asante, and Efi Pagitsas Boston Region MPO Staff

MEMORANDUM. DATE March 1, 2012 TO Town of Milton Mark Abbott, Seth Asante, and Efi Pagitsas Boston Region MPO Staff MEMORANDUM DATE March 1, 212 TO Town of Milton FROM RE Mark Abbott, Seth Asante, and Efi Pagitsas Boston Region MPO Staff FFY 211 Safety and Operations Analyses at Selected Boston Region MPO Intersections:

More information

Capital Region Council of Governments

Capital Region Council of Governments March 23, 2018 Capital Region Council of Governments PROJECT CONCEPT REPORT Realignment of Swamp and Northfield Road s approaches to Route 44 (Boston Turnpike) Town of Coventry SUMMARY: The Town of Coventry

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY for the GLEN ELLEN COUNTRY CLUB SENIOR RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT 84 Millis, Massachusetts Prepared by: McMahon Associates, Inc. Prepared for: Toll Brothers, Inc. August 216 DRAFT

More information

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM July 2014 FINAL (SR 43) Project Development and Environment Study From State Road 60 (Adamo Drive) to I-4 (SR 400) Hillsborough County, Florida Work Program Item

More information

Transportation Advisory Board

Transportation Advisory Board C I T Y O F WEATHERFORD Transportation Advisory Board AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: October 15,2015 Staff Contact: Manny Palacios Jr. Phone: E-mail: 817-598-4296 mpalacios@weatherfordtx.gov SUBJECT: Discuss

More information

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY King Soopers #116, a grocery marketplace anchored commercial development, is proposed

More information

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis. Texas Odyssey TIA Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. May 23, 2018

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis. Texas Odyssey TIA Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. May 23, 2018 Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Texas Odyssey TIA Dallas, Texas May 23, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064529800 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis Texas Odyssey

More information

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL 1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Division Prepared by: HNTB North Carolina, PC 343 East Six Forks Road

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA Chapter 6 - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA 6.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 6.1.1. Purpose: The purpose of this document is to outline a standard format for preparing a traffic impact study in the City of Steamboat

More information

THE LANDMARK AT TALBOT PARK

THE LANDMARK AT TALBOT PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE LANDMARK AT TALBOT PARK IN NORFOLK, VA INTERMODAL ENGINEERING, P.C. OCTOBER, 200 The Landmark at Talbot Park is a proposed redevelopment of the existing apartments along the

More information

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer Date: April 16 th, 2015 To: From: Re: Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer Darian Nagle-Gamm, Traffic Engineering Planner Highway 6 (2 nd Street) /

More information

EAST AND SOUTH STREET CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA

EAST AND SOUTH STREET CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A LY S I S EAST AND SOUTH STREET CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA April 217 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A LY S I S EAST AND SOUTH STREET CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Submitted

More information

Traffic Impact Study for Rolling Ridge Redevelopment

Traffic Impact Study for Rolling Ridge Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study for Rolling Ridge Redevelopment Webster Groves, Missouri October 19, 2018 Prepared For: Gershman Commercial Real Estate 150 North Meramec Avenue Suite 500 St. Louis, Missouri 63105

More information

Atlanta Braves Stadium and Mixed- Use Development

Atlanta Braves Stadium and Mixed- Use Development Transportation Analysis Atlanta Braves Stadium and Mixed- Use Development DRI #2381 Cobb County, Georgia Prepared for: BRED Co., LLC Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 817 West Peachtree Street

More information

Traffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning

Traffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning F i s c h b a c h Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning Traffic Impact Study Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN Prepared March 2016 Ms. Gillian L. Fischbach, P.E.,

More information

I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report

I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report July 2018 Prepared by: Prepared for: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction... 1 Study Area Limits... 1 Purpose and Need of the Study... 1 Safety

More information

Grant Avenue Streetscape

Grant Avenue Streetscape REPORT TYPE GOES HERE Grant Avenue Streetscape PREPARED FOR City of Manassas 9027 Center Street Manassas, VA 20110 PREPARED BY 8300 Boone Boulevard Suite 700 Vienna, Virginia 22182 571.389.8121 July 31,

More information

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners DRAFT Corridor study Honeysuckle Road October 2017 Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I... 1 STUDY SUMMARY... 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 CONCLUSIONS... 5 SECTION II... 7

More information

Traffic Impact Study. Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain Brook, Alabama. Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. Birmingham, Alabama.

Traffic Impact Study. Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain Brook, Alabama. Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. Birmingham, Alabama. Traffic Impact Study Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain Brook, Alabama Prepared for: Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. Birmingham, Alabama September 214 Revision 1 October 214 Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain

More information

Simons Run Corridor Study

Simons Run Corridor Study Simons Run Corridor Study Campbell County & City of Lynchburg, Virginia Prepared on: September 30, 2014 Prepared for: Central Virginia Metropolitan Planning Organization 277 Bendix Road, Suite 500 Virginia

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE CHAMPAIGN UNIT#4 SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL (SPALDING PARK SITE) IN THE CITY OF CHAMPAIGN Final Report Champaign Urbana Urbanized Area Transportation Study 6/24/2014

More information