COMPARISON OF WIND LOAD STANDARDS. by SHRINIVAS KOLA, B.S.C.E.. A THESIS CIVIL ENGINEERING

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "COMPARISON OF WIND LOAD STANDARDS. by SHRINIVAS KOLA, B.S.C.E.. A THESIS CIVIL ENGINEERING"

Transcription

1

2 COMPARISON OF WIND LOAD STANDARDS by SHRINIVAS KOLA, B.S.C.E.. A THESIS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING Approved December, 1995

3 \\^ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee chairperson, Dr. Kishor C. Mehta, for his direction and support of this thesis. I also like to express my sincere thanks to Dr. James R. McDonald for his helpful suggestions. u

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii ABSTRACT vi LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF HGURES x CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. NATIONAL STANDARDS American Standard Australian Standard Simplified Procedure Detailed Procedure Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis British Standard Standard Method Directional Method Canadian Standard Summary 21 III. FORMULATION OF WIND LOAD PARAMETERS Reference Wind Speed Annual Probability American Standard Australian Standard British Standard Canadian Standard Terrain Factor American Standard 36 m

5 3.3.2 Ausualian Standard British Standard Canadian Standard Gust Effect Factor American Standard Australian Standard British Standard Canadian Standard Pressure Coefficients American Standard Australian Standard British Standard Canadian Standard Summary 52 IV. CASE STUDY Low Building 100 ft X 60 ft X 15 ft ft High Building 100 ft X 200 ft X 160 ft Use of Standards American Standard Australian Standard British Standard Canadian Standard Summary Low Building ft High Building 88 V. LIMIT STATE LOADING Low Building ft High Building 93 VI. CONCLUSIONS 94 IV

6 REFERENCES 96 APPENDICES A. CALCULATIONS USING AMERICAN STANDARD 98 B. CALCULATIONS USING AUSTRALIAN STANDARD 112 C. CALCULATIONS USING BRITISH STANDARD 128 D. CALCULATIONS USING CANADIAN STANDARD 144

7 ABSTRACT The objective of this thesis is to compare major recognized national standards of wind loads and to determine the correlation among them. The four national standards compared are American Society of Civil Engineering Standard, ASCE 795 (ASCE 795), Australian standard, SAA Loading Code, Part 2: Wind Loads, AS (SAA, 1989), British standard, Part 2, Code of Practice for Wind Loads, BS 6399, 1994 (BS 1994), and National Building Code of Canada, 1990 (NRCC 1990). The objective was accomplished by calculating wind loads on two buildings: a low building with dimensions of 100 ft x 60 ft x 15 ft and a 160 ft high building with a plan dimensions of 200 ft x 100 ft. Limit state base shear and overturning moments for the two buildings were calculated and then compared. The study shows that the four national standards give similar limit state base shear for the two specific buildings selected for the study. It is also seen that the overturning moment depends largely on the roof uplift. The roof uplift force obtained from using the four national standards vary significantly which indicates that a thorough parametric study on roof uplift loads should be conducted to assess the real loads. The design pressures on components and claddings differ between the standards by as much as 200 percent. While accomplishing the objective it was observed that the comfurtability in using any standard depicts the format of the standard in some manner. The study shows that for that the format of the American and the Canadian standards are easy to follow, while the Australian and the British standard are more difficult to use to when determining the wind loads. VI

8 LIST OF TABLES 2.1. Parameters and their terminology Levels of approach Equations used in the American standard Probability of exceeding the reference wind speed during the reference period for various values of annual probability Exposure categories used in the four standards Gradient heights and the exponential coefficients used in the American standard Roughness lengths used by the Australian standard Roughness lengths used by the British standard Exponential coefficients used by the Canadian standard Wind load parameters used in the calculations of low building Base shear, overturning moment and roof uplift for low building Wind load parameters used in the calculations of 160 ft building Baseshear, overturning moment and roof uplift for 160 ft building Limit state base shear, overturning moments and roof uplift for low buildings Limit state base shear, overturning moments and roof uplift for highrise buildings 92 A. 1 Design wind pressures and extemal pressure coefficient values for CASE A 101 vu

9 A.2 Design wind pressures and extemal pressure coefficient values for CASE B 102 A.3 External pressure coefficients for components and claddings 104 A.4 Design wind pressures for components and claddings 104 A.5 Velocity pressure exposure coefficients and velocity pressures 105 A.6 Design wind pressures for wind parallel and normal to 100 ft side 107 A.7 Extemal pressure coefficients for components and claddings HO A.8 Design pressures for zone l(roof middle surface), zone 2 (roof edges), and zone 3(roof corners) A.9 Design pressures for zone 4(wall middle surface) and zone 5 wall edges) HI Ill B.l Design pressures for roof 116 B.2 External pressure coefficients for components and claddings 118 B.3 Design wind pressures for components and claddings 118 B.4 Values of terrain and structure height multiplier M(z,cat). design gust wind speed Vz and velocity pressure qz 120 B.5 Design windward wall pressures 122 B.6 External pressure coefficients for components and claddings 125 B.7 Design pressures for zone l(roof middle surface), zone 2 (roof edges), and zone 3(roof comers) 126 B.8 Design pressures for zone 4(wall middle surface) and zone 5 wall edges) 126 C.l External pressure coefficients for components and claddings 133 C.2 Design pressures for components and claddings 133 C.3 External pressure coefficients for components and claddings 137 viii

10 C.4 Design pressures for zone l(roof middle surface), zone 2 (roof edges), and zone 3(roof corners) 138 C.5 Design pressures for zone 4(wall middle surface) and zone 5 wall edges) 138 C.6 External pressure coefficients for components and claddings 141 C.7 Design pressures for zone l(roof middle surface), zone 2 (roof edges), and zone 3(roof corners) 143 C.8 Design pressures for zone 4(wall middle surface) and zone 5 wall edges) 143 D. 1 External peak pressure coefficients and design pressures on the main windforce resisting system for wind perpendicular to ridge 147 D.2 External peak pressure coefficients and design pressures on the main windforce resisting system for wind parallel to ridge 148 D.3 Extemal peak pressure coefficients for components and claddings 150 D.4 Design pressures on components and claddings 150 D.5 Exposure factors and design pressures on the windward wall 152 D.6 External pressure coefficients for components and claddings 155 D.7 Design pressures for zone l(roof middle surface), zone 2 (roof edges), and zone 3(roof corners) 156 D.8 Design pressures for zone 4(wall middle surface) and zone 5 wall edges) 156 IX

11 LIST OF FIGURES 3.1 Mean wind speed vector V and turbulent wind speed vector V(t) Ratio of probable maximum speed averaged over period t to that averaged over one hour (Simiu, 1986) Wind speed profile Typical pressure record Low building ft building Stmctural system for low building Design pressures on the main windforce resisting system Design pressures for wall grits and roof purlins (tributary area 100 sqft) Design pressures for fasteners (tributary area 5 sqft) Stmctural system for 160 ft building Design pressures for the main windforce resisting system, based on American standard Design pressures for the main windforce resisting system based on Australian standard Design pressures for the main windforce resisting system based on British standard Design pressures for the main windforce resisting system based on Canadian standard Design pressures for components Design pressures for claddings 83 X

12 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Wind has major effects on mankind, both favorable and unfavorable. Property losses in windstorms and increased concem for human comfort have resulted in a discipline called wind engineering. "Wind engineering is best described as the rational treatment of interaction between wind in the atmospheric boundary layer and man and his works on the surface of the earth" (Cermak, 1975, p. 9). When wind interacts with a building, it produces pressures on both intemal and extemal surfaces. The magnitude of developed pressures on building surfaces depend on the characteristics of the approaching wind and the geometry of the building. These effects are incorporated into a standard in some manner, to form the wind load standard. A wind load standard guides an engineer to use proper wind load for design of a building that is exposed to the action of wind during its anticipated life. Various countries develop their own national standards for wind loads. It is recognized that wind climate in countries can be different resulting in different wind loads. However, windstmcture phenomena is invariant, hence wind loads resulting from different national standards should be the same for a given reference wind speed. The objective of this thesis is to compare major recognized national standards of wind loads and to determine the correlation among them. The four national standards selected for comparison are: (1) American Society of Civil Engineering Standard, ASCE 795 (ASCE 795),

13 (2) Australian Standard, SAA Loading Code, Part 2: Wind Loads, AS (SAA 1989), (3) British Standard, Part 2, Code of Practice for Wind Loads, BS 6399, 1994 (BS 1994), (4) National Building Code of Canada, 1990 (NRCC 1990). The American and British standards are in the development process; latest available drafts are used for this thesis work. Since, only the four national standards are used in this thesis, specific references to each standard are not given wherever the standards are mentioned. A comparative study of the earlier editions of these four national standards was conducted by Das (1985). Since 1985, the four national standards have been significantly revised in the methodologies of calculating wind loads. The new editions of standards bring up to date the considerable advances in wind engineering. The latest American standard has adopted a 3second gust reference wind speed (earlier edition used fastest mile wind speed) and has included a topography factor. The latest Australian standard specifies wind speed for the serviceability limit state, ultimate limit state and permissible stress design. The basic wind speed in the new British standard is a mean hourly wind speed, while the previous edition used a 3second gust wind speed. These significant changes in reference wind speeds affect the approach to calculation of wind loads. The provisions in the four national standards use different terminology for similar parameters. The descriptions such as "openings in one wall" and "one wall permeable" are difficult to distinguish and interpret. The provisions of the four national standards

14 have to be interpreted correctly. In this thesis, the provisions are interpreted by the author to the best of his ability. No responsibihty is assumed by the author or the advising committee in interpretation of the provisions. Chapter II of the thesis deals with the description of wind load equations and parameters used by each standard in determining the design wind pressures. In describing the four national standards no effort is made to explain the equations or background of the provisions; it is beyond the scope of this thesis. The parameters which affect the design wind pressure are reference wind speed, annual probability of wind speed, height and terrain factor, gust effect factor and pressure coefficients. The four national standards consider all of these parameters. However the methods to consider these parameters to compute the design wind pressures are different. The methods and the formulation of each parameter for each of the standard are discussed in chapter HI. Since the methods are different in the four standards, it is meaningless to compare magnitudes of the parameters in the standards. The four national standards can be compared by calculating wind loads on specific buildings. In order to compare the four national standards, wind loads are calculated on two buildings: a low building with dimensions of 100 ft x 60 ft x 15 ft and a 160 ft high building with a plan dimensions of 200 ft x 100 ft. The design pressure are compared in chapter IV. The buildings are assumed to be located in a suburban area in the United States, where the 3second gust wind speed is 110 mph (49 m/s). The reference wind speeds of the British and Canadian standards are made consistent with the reference wind speed of the American standard. Since the Australian standard uses the 3second gust speed, no conversion is necessary to the reference wind

15 speed. The appendices contain the actual wind load calculations. Chapter V deals with the application of load factors in limit state design and compares the base shear, overtuming moment and roof uplift for the two buildings. Conclusions drawn from this study are presented in Chapter VI.

16 CHAPTER II NATIONAL STANDARDS "Wind load standards and codes govern design of buildings and structures to resist wind induced loads" (Mehta, 1980, p. 1305). A majority of stmctures can be designed using the prevailing standards. Wind tunnel tests are recommended for unusual structures to determine the specific wind loads. "A standard is a documentation of the stateofknowledge" (Mehta, 1980, p. 1306). Generally, consensus groups, professional societies or govemmental agencies develop the standards. The standard is used by engineers to design building frames and building components to resist wind effects. This chapter highlights equations and parameters used by the four national standards in determining the design wind pressures. The parameters which are used by the four standards for calculation of wind loads are: (1) reference wind speed, (2) a factor which accounts for variation of terrain roughness and height, (3) a factor which accounts for increase in wind speed due to local topography, (4) a factor which modifies wind speed based on the building classification category, (5) a factor which accounts for shielding effect, (6) a factor which accounts for additional loading due to wind gusts and, (7) pressure coefficients. The standards compared in the study address the above mentioned parameters. However, the methods of consideration of these parameters are different in each of the standard. These differences are examined in chapter HI. The parameters used by the four national standards and their terminology is shown in Table 2.1.

17 Table 2.1. Parameters and their terminology PARAMETER AMERICAN AUSTRALIAN BRITISH CANADL\N STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD Reference wind speed at standard height in open terrain 3second gust speed at 10 m height above ground in open 3second gust speed at 10 m height in open terrain mean hourly wind speed at 10 m above ground in mean hourly wind speed at 10 m above ground in open terrain open terrain terrain terrain roughness and height factor Kz, velocity pressure coefficient M(z,cat), terrain and structure height multiplier Sb, terrain and building factor Cc, exposure factor topography factor Kzt, topography Mt, topography multiplier None None factor importance I, importance Mi, structure Sp, probability reference wind factor factor importance factor pressures multiplier based on mean recurrence interval shielding factor None Ms, shielding None None multiplier gust effect G, gust effect None None Cg, gust effect factor factor factor pressure Cp, extemal C C C c C C ' coefficient and internal extemal and extemal and extemal and pressure intemal intemal intemal coefficients pressure pressure pressure coefficients coefficients coefficients

18 The four national standards divide buildings and stmctures into rigid structures and flexible stmctures. Each standard formulates conditions for which a specific structure is analyzed for static or dynamic loading. The standards use different levels of approach; simple procedures, detailed procedures, and wind tunnel tests in attaining the design wind pressures. Lowrise buildings and all rigid stmctures are analyzed using a simplified procedure. Detailed procedures are used where wind loads govem the economics of structural design. Flexible buildings are analyzed using detailed procedures, which provide the designer with more accurate wind loads. Wind tunnel tests are performed on buildings and stmctures which have complex shapes. Wind tunnel tests are also recommended for monumental stmctures, where the additional design expenses are justified. Apart from the above mentioned procedures, the British standard uses a directional method to evaluate the design wind pressures on a rigid stmcture. Various levels of approaches used by the four national standards are as shown in Table American Standard American standard ASCE 795 classifies buildings and other structures into rigid stmctures and flexible or dynamically sensitive stmctures. Rigid stmctures are further categorized into partially enclosed, special lowrise buildings and open buildings. Rexible structures are divided into buildings and other stmctures. The equations used for the calculation of design wind pressures p (psf), and forces F (lb) for each category are listed in Table 2.3. The general and simplified equation for evaluating design wind pressures P (pso is

19 Table 2.2. Levels of approach LEVELS OF AMERICAN AUSTRALIAN BRITISH CANADIAN APPROACH STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD CODE Simple yes yes yes yes procedure Detailed yes yes none yes procedure wind tunnel test yes yes none yes 8

20 Table 2.3. Equations used in the American Standard RIGID STRUCTURES BUILDING TYPE Partially enclosed building Special lowrise buildings Open buildings and stmctures EQUATION p = qgcp qh(gcpi) p = qh [(GCpf) (GCpi)] F = qzgcfaf FLEXIBLE STRUCTURES BUILDING TYPE Building Other stmctures EQUATION p = qgfcp F = qzgfcfaf

21 where q: velocity pressure, P = qgcp (2.1) G: gust effect factor, Cp: pressure coefficient. The velocity pressure q is given by the equation q = KzKztV'l (2.2) where Kz: velocity pressure exposure coefficient, Kzt: topography factor, V: basic wind speed, I: importance factor. The constant represents air mass density for a standard atmosphere of slugs/ft and constants required to convert wind speed from miles per hour to feet per second. The basic wind speed, V, is a 3second gust speed at 10 m height above ground in open terrain. Basic wind speed is associated with an annual probabihty of occurrence of 0.02 (mean recurrence interval of 50 years). The velocity pressure exposure coefficient Kz accounts for the variations of wind speed with height above ground and terrain roughness. The American standard define four exposure categories: Exposure A for a large city center. Exposure B for urban or suburban areas as well as heavily wooded areas, Exposure C for open, airport terrain, and Exposure D for wind flowing over large bodies of water. The topography factor Kzt accounts for significant variations of wind speed over an isolated hill or escarpment. Significant variations can occur due to the sudden or abrupt changes in topography surrounding the site. The topography factor is 10

22 applied to buildings and structures which are situated in the upper part of a hill or near the edges of escarpments. The basic wind speed map of ASCE 795 is based on the annual probability of occurrence of To modify the basic wind speed to other probabilities, an importance factor I is used. The importance factors are based on the building and stmctural classification categories. Each building and stmctural category is associated with an unique importance factor. The gust effect factor G, accounts for the loading effect due to wind turbulence. Gust effect factors for rigid structures are 0.8 for exposure A and B, and 0.85 for exposure C and D. For flexible buildings the Commentary in the American Standard provides a rational method for calculating gust effect factors Gf. Pressure coefficients account for the variation in wind pressure on surfaces of buildings and structures. Pressure coefficients are basically divided into two categories, buildings of all height and special lowrise buildings. Combined values of pressure coefficients and gust effect factors for special lowrise building and components and claddings, are tabulated. Appropriate pressure coefficients must be used to calculate the design wind pressures. For suiictures, force coefficients Cf are provided for a limited number of shapes. 2.2 Australian Standard The Australian Standard, SAA Loading Code part 2: Wind Loads, describes two procedures, a simplified procedure and a detailed procedure, to calculate the design wind pressures. 11

23 2.2.1 Simphfied Procedure This procedure is applicable to buildings, which consist of a combination of rectangles in plan, with height and gross area of roof plan less than 15 m and 1000 m^, respectively. The applicability of this procedure is further restricted to buildings with roof slopes less than 30 and ratio of building height to minimum plan dimension less than 5. The design wind pressure p (kpa) is given by p = p'bib2b3b4 (2.3) where p : net basic wind pressure, B1: regional multiplying factor, B2: terrain and height multiplying factor, B3: topography multiplying factor, B4: reduction factor for roofs. The net basic wind pressure p' is obtained by combining the intemal and extemal basic pressures. Values of extemal basic wind pressure p* (standard's nomenclature for net and basic pressures) are tabulated for roofs and walls. Values of p^ are also tabulated for intemal pressures. The factor Bi depends on the geographical region in which the building is located. Four regional factors are specified in the standard: normal, intermediate, tropical cyclone, and severe tropical cyclone. The terrain and height multipher B2 accounts for the changes in height and terrain surrounding the building. The factor B3 is a topographic multiplier applied to buildings siuiated along the upper half of a hill or near the edge of a escarpment. The roof reduction factor B4 is used to reduce the wind forces on roof supporting structures with tributary area greater than 10 m^. 12

24 2.2.2 Detailed Procedure This procedure evaluates design wind pressures using two methods based on the sensitivity of the stmcture to wind Static Analysis. Static analysis is applied to buildings and stmctures which are not sensitive to wind action. The height or length to breadth ratio and the first mode of vibration to qualify a building for static analysis should be less than 5 and greater than 1 Hz, respectively. The design pressure p (kpa), for static analysis is given by the equation p = Cp.KaK,Kpqz (2.4) where Cpe: extemal pressure coefficient, Ka: Ki: Kp: qz: area reduction factor for roofs and side walls, local pressure factors for claddings, reduction factor for porous claddings, velocity pressure. The extemal pressure coefficient Cpc accounts for the variation of pressure at various locations on the building surface. Area reduction factors for roofs and side walls are a correction to the peak loads produced on large tributary areas. The local pressure factor accounts for pressures developed on small areas on various locations on the building locations. The standard recommends application of the reduction factor to porous claddings, and to the local negative pressures, when the porosity of the claddings exceeds but is less than The velocity pressure is given by the equation qz = 0.6 X 10'(M(z.ca.)MMM.V)' (2.5) 13

25 The constant 0.6 is one half the air mass density of 1.2 kg/m\ The basic wind speed V is a 3second gust wind speed at 10 m height in an open terrain. The Australian Standard divides the basic wind speed in different regions as serviceabihty limit state wind speed V^, permissible stress gust wind speed Vp and ultimate limit state gust wind speed Vu. The ultimate limit state gust wind speed and the serviceability limit state wind speeds are associated with an annual probability of occurrence of (1000 year mean recurrence interval) and 0.05 (20 year mean recurrence interval), respectively. The permissible stress gust wind speed is associated with an annual probability of occurrence of 0.02 (50 year mean recuitence interval). The terrain and stmcture height multiplier M(z,cat) modifies the basic wind speed to account for the variation of terrain and height. Wind speed is retarded considerably due to shielding from adjacent buildings. To account for the reduction in wind speed due to obstmctions, a shielding multiplier is used. The shielding multiplier depends on the average height, breadth and distance between the buildings surrounding the site. The topographic multiplier Mt, modifies the basic wind speed for sudden changes occurring in the topography. The structure importance multiplier Mi modifies the basic wind speed based on the structural classification. The values of Mi are tabulated according to the structural classification which is, in tum, based on the importance of the stmcture, and its impact on humans in case of failure. The multiplying factors M(z.cat), Ms, Mt, and Mi, which modify the basic wind speed are the same for static and dynamic analysis. The Australian standard does not use gust effect factor in the calculation of wind loads. 14

26 Dynamic Analysis. Dynamic analysis is applied to buildings and suiictures which are sensitive to wind action. The conditions for the applicabihty of dynamic analysis are (i) Height or length to breadth ratio should be greater than 5 (ii) Structures should have the firstmode of frequency of vibration less than 1 Hz. In the dynamic analysis Ausualian standard calculates the net horizontal force and design peak base overtuming moment. The horizontal force acting on a building or stmcture at height z is calculated from the equation Fz=ZCpcqzAz (2.6) where Cpe: extemal pressure coefficient q^: Az: hourly mean velocity pressure the area of the structure at height z The hourly mean velocity pressure is similar to the velocity pressure discussed in static analysis, the only difference is that the basic wind speed used in the dynamic analysis is hourly mean wind speed instead of 3second gust speed used in static analysis. The summation of moments resulting from the horizontal forces gives the mean overtuming moment Ma. The design peak base overtuming moment is then calculated using the equation M, =GM3 (2.7) where M^: mean overtuming moment G: gust effect factor 15

27 2.3 British Standard The Part 2. Code of Practice for Wind Loads of British Standard BS6399, describes two methods for calculating the design wind pressures: a standard method and a directional method. The standard method is used to obtain a standard wind speed (standard's nomenclature), without considering wind direction. The standard effective wind speed (standard nomenclature) with standard pressure coefficients is used to evaluate the wind load for winds parallel and wind normal to the faces of the building. In the directional method the effective wind speed and direction pressure coefficients are used for different wind directions to check the critical wind loads. Velocity pressure in the standard includes windstmcture interaction parameters which makes it difficult to explain use of each of the parameter Standard Method The wind pressure p (pa) acting on the surface of a building is given by the equation p = qcpca (2.8) where q: velocity pressure, Ca: size effect factor different for extemal and internal pressures, Cp: Cpe for extemal pressure coefficient, : Cpi for internal pressure coefficient. 16

28 2.3.2 Directional Method The wind pressure on the extemal and intemal surface of the building is given by the equation P = qcp (2.9) where q: velocity pressure, Cp: Cpe for external pressure coefficient, : Cpi for internal pressure coefficient, the velocity pressure q is given by the equation q = 0.613(SaSbSdS..SpVb)' (2.10) where Vb: the basic wind speed, Sa: Sd: Ss: Sp: Sb: altitude factor (elevation above sea level), directional factor, seasonal factor, probabihty factor, terrain and building factor. The constant is one half the air mass density of kg/m^ The basic wind speed Vb used here is a hourly mean wind speed at height 10 m above flat terrain with uniform roughness at sea level. Basic wind speed is associated with an annual probability The factors Sj, Ss, and Sp, are same for standard and directional methods. The factor Sa is employed to harmonize the basic wind speed with the elevation of site above sea level. The computation of Sa differs based on the topography considerations. For the simple procedure, if topography is considered, then Sa is taken as the larger of 17

29 Sa= As or (2.11) Sa = 1 + O.OOIAT + 1.2\ /es (2.12) where A.s: site altitude. AT: altitude of the base of significant topography, \ /e: effective slope, s: topographic location factor, if topography is not significant then Sa= As. (2.13) For the directional method, if topography is considered, Sa= 1+O.OOIAT, (2.14) and, if topography is not considered Sa = 1 + O.OOlAs. (2.15) The basic wind speed is modified by the directional factor Sd to wind speeds with same risk of exceedence in any wind direction. The east wind is taken as a wind direction < ) = 90. Directional factors for wind directions from <) = 0 to (j) = 330 are tabulated with 30 intervals. If the building position is unknown or ignored the directional factor is taken equal to 1.0 for all directions. The probabihty factor Sp is used to modify basic wind speed for probability of occurrence other than The seasonal factor Ss is used to modify basic wind speed to wind speeds that a building experiences for a specific period, i.e., temporary works and buildings during construction. Ss is taken equal to 1.0 for permanent structures and structures exposed to wind for a period of more than six months. Sb is the terrain and building factor which accounts for the effective height, the 18

30 distance of the site from the sea and the site terrain category. Sb is calculated differently for standard method and directional method. In the directional method, a gust peak factor gt is introduced in the calculation of terrain and building factors, which give the appropriate gust speed for structure or its component that produce the maximum loading. Ca is the size effect factor, which accounts for the influence of the wind gusts operating at different time intervals across an extemal surface and for the response of intemal pressures. The size effect factor used in the standard method is determined assuming a gust peak factor gt = The factor C, depends on the exposure of the site and the diagonal dimension of the loaded area. Pressure coefficients, which account for the shape and form of the building, depend on the method used to calculate wind loads. It is evident from the above discussion that the British standard is difficult to describe and is just as difficult to interpret. 2.4 Canadian Standard In the Canadian standard the design wind pressure p (kpa) is given by the equation: p = qcecgcp (2.16) where q = reference velocity pressure, Cc = exposure factor, Cg = gust effect factor, Cp = external pressure coefficient. The National Building Code of Canada refers to three different procedures for calculating wind loads on buildings and stmctures. The first procedure is a simplified 19

31 procedure used for low and medium rise buildings. The second method is a detailed procedure, which is apphcable to tall buildings and slender suiictures. The third procedure is an experimental method or wind tunnel test used for complex shaped buildings, where the details of dynamic response of the stmcture are essential. The reference wind pressure, q, is given by q = 0.5pV^ where V is the reference wind speed and p is the air density. The reference wind speed is a mean houriy wind speed at 10 m above ground in open terrain. The air mass density p is taken as kg/m^ The Canadian standard tabulates reference wind pressure q, for three annual probabilities of 0.1,0.033, and 0.01 for specific Canadian locations. The exposure factor Ce accounts for changes in wind speed and height. The exposure factor also takes into account the variations in terrain roughness and topography. In the simple procedure, there is only one value of exposure factor for one reference height and for any terrain roughness. For lowrise buildings reference height is taken as the mean height of the roof or 6m, whichever is greater. For windward walls of tall buildings, the reference height is taken as the total height of the building and for leeward wall the reference height is taken as half the height of the building. In the detailed procedure three exposure categories are specified, which depend on the terrain roughness. The gust effect factor, Cg accounts for the additional load due to the wind gusts and the dynamic properties of the structure. In the simple procedure, Cg is taken as 2.5 for cladding elements and 2.0 for the entire building system. Gust effect factor for the detailed procedure of flexible buildings is evaluated using a technique given in the "Supplement to the National Building Code of Canada, 1990" (NRCC, supplement 1990). The pressure 20

32 coefficient Cp, accounts for the pressure variations on the surface due to the variation of in shape, direction of wind and wind velocity profile. Values of pressure coefficients for various building shapes are tabulated in the "Supplement to the National Building Code of Canada, 1990" (NRCC, supplement 1990). 2.5 Summary For calculating wind loads the four standards compared in the study consider the parameters reference wind speed, terrain roughness, height above ground, topography factor, gust effect factor and pressure coefficients. In addition to these parameters, Australian standard uses a shielding factor. The American, Australian and Canadian standards specify provisions to obtain wind loads for rigid and flexible buildings. The British standard provides procedures to analyze rigid buildings only. The design pressure equation (2.4) indicates that the Australian standard uses area reduction factor K,, local pressure factor Ki and reduction factor for porous claddings Kp. In order to apply these factors effectively the designer should know the details of the component tributary areas and the porosity of the cladding elements. For calculating the terrain and stmcture height multiplier, the designer should know the terrain conditions within a 2500 m radius from the site, and the wind speed with respect to each direction (northeast, east, southeast, etc.). In addition, for calculating the shielding multiplier Ms the designer should know the average height, breadth, and distance between the buildings surrounding the site. The interpretation and application of these factors is a time consuming process. 21

33 From the description of British standard (section 2.3), it is evident that the standard includes a windstmcture interaction parameter (factor accounting for elevation of site above sea level) in the velocity pressure. The determination of altitude factor requires the knowledge of the topography surrounding the site. 22

34 CHAPTER III FORMULATION OF WIND LOAD PARAMETERS The study of the equations and parameters involved in determining the wind pressures in Chapter II indicates that all standards take into account the surrounding terrain, the variation of pressure coefficients at different locations on the building surface, and the effect of sudden changes in topography. It is also seen in Chapter II that the reference wind speed used by the American and Australian standards is a 3second gust wind speed while the reference wind speed used by the British and Canadian standards is a mean hourly wind speed. Even though the American standard uses 3second gust speed the standard applies a gust effect factor (see section 3.4.1) and though the British standard uses mean hourly wind speed the standard does not use gust effect factor (see section 3.4.3). One more parameter worth mentioning is the use of importance factor. The American standard and British standard change wind speeds to probabilities of occurrence other than the common annual probability of 0.02 (50 year mean recurrence interval) by using importance factor and probability factor, respectively. However Canadian standard does not use an importance factor; it specifies wind speeds associated with different annual probabilities of occurrence. The stmctural importance multiplier of the Austrahan standard does not change the annual probabilities of occurrence, since the basic wind speed is itself formulated to account for specific annual probabilities, depending on the designing method. To understand these differences, it is important to review the formulation of these wind load parameters. In the following sections the critical 23

35 parameters used in the four standards are reviewed. Detail study of each of the parameter is beyond the scope of this thesis. The common parameters which are used in four standards are 1. reference wind speed, 2. probability of occurrence associated with the reference wind speed, 3. height and terrain factor, 4. gust effect factor, 5. pressure coefficients. In addition to these parameters, the Australian standard uses a factor known as shielding factor. As the name implies it accounts for the reduction in wind speed caused by upwind buildings. The shielding factor depends on the height, number of buildings, and the spacing between the buildings in the 45 sector of radius 20h (h is the height of the building being shielded) upwind of the building being shielded. 3.1 Reference Wind Speed Wind speed is measured at an established base plane of reference. The plane of reference for the four standards is wind speed measured at 10 m height above ground in an open terrain. A typical record of the horizontal wind speed measured by a wind measuring instrument is shown in Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1 describes the wind speed at a given point as a function of time. The wind speed recorded can be considered as having a mean component and a fluctuating component. 24

36 o o oo o o o 6 o o o IT) o 6 o ^ E c E D r; r5 >^ ~D 'J c ;/. N; D o o ro O 6 o N o 6 o»" o d r.4_, c TJ ^^ ^. rs 'J H ^ C". u Ui CO (JU paods puim p.^.^ils pul/^ 25

37 The American and the Australian standards use 3second wind speed as the reference wind speed. The 3second gust wind speed, which is the peak wind speed is assumed to be averaged over a period of 3seconds, because of the limitations of the response of the anemometer. The 3second gust wind speed is assumed to include the fluctuating component of wind speed. The Canadian standard and the British standard use mean hourly wind speed as the reference wind speed. Mean hourly wind speed is defined as the wind speed averaged over one hour. Mean wind speed is the value of a wind speed recorded over some time interval, hence mean wind speed depends on the averaging time. Mean wind speed increases with the decrease in length of averaging interval. For open terrain conditions Durst (1960), proposed a curve (Figure 3.2) based on the statistical studies, which permits the transformation of wind speed from one averaging time to another. The curve in Figure 3.2 relates the ratio of wind speed (Vt) averaged over t seconds to mean hourly wind speed (V) versus the averaging time (t). 3.2 Annual Probability Basic wind speed is defined as the wind speed corresponding to a specified mean recurrence interval of the cumulative distribution function. The cumulative distribution function of annual maxima, when fitted to Fisher Tippett Type I extreme value disu"ibutions, gives a relationship between wind speed and annual probability of being exceeded. The relationship is V = X + [ln[ln(lpj]] (3.3) a^ 26

38 1.7 I I II!I]I 1 I I lll l 1 I I lllll 1 I I I Mil > > I I 1 iiini 1 i I mill I I I mil / (sec) llahi Figure 3.2. Ratio of probable maximum speed averaged over period t to that averaged over one hour (Simiu, 1986). Note: V,: Wind speed averaged over l.seconds V: Mean hourly wind speed t: averaging lime 27

39 where V: wind speed, X: mode. Pa: annual probabihty, : dispersion, a The four standards use the Fisher Tippett Type I distribution to model the wind speeds. Let Pa be the annual probability of the extreme wind speed V at some given location. Then the probability p that the wind speed V will not occur once in n years ( n trials) is (1 Pa)". The probabihty that the wind speed V will occur once in n trials is Pn=l(1Pa)". (3.4) If the random variable N represents the number of years in which the wind speed V occurs for the first time, then the expected value or the mean recurrence interval of N is equal to 1 / Pa. Hence a wind speed with an annual probability of 0.01 corresponds to mean recurrence interval of 100 years. The value of probability Pn exceeding the reference wind speed are tabulated in Table 3.1 with respect to reference periods. A reference period is the period of time the stmcture is exposed to wind. Table 3.1 indicates that the probability that a wind speed of given magnitude will be equaled or exceeded increases with increase in reference period. The annual probabihties used by the four standards are discussed below. 28

40 Table 3.1. Probability of Exceeding the Reference Wind Speed During the Reference Period for Various Values of Annual Probabihty Annual Reference Periods, Years Probability Pa

41 American Standard The basic wind speed map of the American standard gives 3second gust wind speeds associated with an annual probability of To modify the wind speed to other annual probability of occurrences, consistent with the building classification category, an importance factor I is used. The American standard modifies wind speed to mean recurrence intervals other than 50 years based on building and stmcture classification categories. For normal stmctures like the buildings associated with the Case Study, mean recurrence interval of 50 years is used. A mean recurrence interval of 100 years is used for important buildings and stmctures which have special postdisaster functions. For unoccupied buildings mean recurrence interval of 25 years may be used Australian Standard The Australian standard provides the designer with the ultimate hmit state gust speed, Vu, permissible stress gust wind speed, Vp and serviceabihty hmit state wind speed, Vs through the basic wind speed map. The ultimate limit state gust wind speed Vu has 0.05 probabihty of being exceeded in a 50 year reference period, which correspond to annual probability of occurrence of (1000 year mean recurrence interval). The serviceabihty hmit state wind speed Vs is associated with an annual probability of 0.05 ( 20 year mean recurrence interval). The permissible stress gust wind speed Vp is similar to the basic wind speed used by American standard and is associated with an annual probability of 0.02 (50 year mean recurrence interval). Unlike the American standard, the Australian standard does not modify the basic wind speed based on suuctural classification category. 30

42 British Standard The British standard also gives basic wind speeds associated with an annual probability of exceedence of To change the basic wind speed to other annual probabilities, the basic wind speed Vb is multiplied by a probabihty factor Sp. Probability factor is obtained by using the following expression ^ [5ln[ln(lQ)]] ' ^[5ln[ln(0.98)]] ^^'^^ where Q is the desired annual probability of occurrence. The above equation is deduced from the FisherTipett Type I model for dynamic pressures that has mode / dispersion ratio equal to 5. The probability factor modifies the basic wind speed to account for the design method (limit state or working suess) used. For ultimate limit state a probabihty factor of Sp = 1.18 (annual probability of 5.7 x 10"^) corresponding to mean recurrence interval of 1754 years is used. Bridges and nuclear installations are designed with annual probabilities of (120 year mean recurrence interval) and 10"* (10000 year mean recurrence interval), respectively. For standard design, a probability factor of 1.0 is used Canadian Standard The Canadian standard specifies velocity pressures based on annual probabilities of 0.1, and For the design of components and cladding the standard requires velocity pressures with an annual probability of occurrence of 0.1 (10 year mean recurrence interval). The design of building structural members are based on an annual probabihty of occurrence of (30 year mean recurrence interval). Important structures such as 31

43 buildings which have special postdisaster functions, are designed with an annual probability of 0.01 (100 year mean recurrence interval). The Canadian standard does not provide an importance factor like the American and British standards for changing the velocity pressures to an altemate annual probabihty of occurrence. 3.3 Terrain Factor The wind moving over the ground surface experiences retarding forces due to the ground surface roughness. The layer of air experiencing retardation is referred to as the boundary layer. The wind speed increases from zero at the ground surface to its maximum value, at the gradient height Zg of the boundary layer. The depth or height of the boundary layer depends on the wind intensity, roughness of terrain, and angle of latitude. The wind speed at the top of the boundary layer is referred to as the gradient speed. Above the gradient height the effect of ground roughness is negligible. When determining the wind loads, the frictional force retarding the wind speed near the ground surface is accounted by an exposure coefficient. The change in wind speed due to large natural features of earth such as hills and valleys is accounted for by a topography factor. All four standards define exposure categories based on the surface roughness. The exposure coefficients used in the four standards are defined as the velocity pressure coefficient in the American standard Kz, the terrain and stmcture height multiplier M(z.cat) in the Australian standard, the terrain and building factor Sb in the British standard and the exposure factor Cc in the Canadian standard. The exposure categories used in the four standards are tabulated in Table

44 Table 3.2. Exposure categories used in the four standards Exposure Description large city centers American Standard Exposure A Australian Standard Category 4 British Standard Town Terrain Canadian Standard Exposure C urban and suburban areas Exposure B Category 3 Town Terrain Exposure B open terrain Exposure C Category 2 Country Terrain Exposure A wind flowing over water Exposure D Category 1 Sea bodies 33

45 The variation in wind speed with height, known as a wind speed profile (Figure 3.3 ), can be represented by the logarithmic law or the power law equation. Logarithmic law: 1 z V, =UJn k z (3.6) where Vz: wind speed at height z, Z(,: roughness length, U*: frictional velocity. constant. Power law: V = V * zl ^ i2 _ 2 _ or (3.7) z zg 7^ Z (3.8) where V zg gradient wind speed, height above ground, ^g a Vz gradient height, wind speed at any height Z, exponential coefficient. Meteorologists consider the logarithmic law as the superior representation of wind profiles in the lower atmosphere (Simiu, 1986), but for engineering purposes the power law is used without significant eitor. Davenport (1965) assumed that the power law holds 34

46 Wind speed Figure 3.3. Wind speed profile 35

47 with constant exponent a up to the gradient height Zg. The gradient height and the exponential coefficient depend on terrain roughness. Reference wind speeds are usually measured at the airport locations in open terrain. This exposure category is taken as the reference exposure category. The reference exposure categories in the four standards are Exposure C (American standard). Category 2 (Australian standard). Country Terrain (British standard) and Exposure A (Canadian standard). The wind speed at any height and for any exposure category can be determined using equations (3.6), (3.7), or (3.8) American Standard The velocity pressure exposure coefficient Kz in the American standard is based on the power law. f^, V r ( 900^19.5 ^ v33y V^sy K:Z = V^33y = 2.01 ^Z^ vz.y for 15 ft <Z<Zc /^N0.21 I for open exposure (a = 7) U3. (3.9) K, = 2.01 for Z < 15 ft (3.10) The values of gradient height Zg and the exponential coefficient a used by the American standard are tabulated in Table

48 Table 3.3. Gradient heights and the exponential coefficients used in the American standard Terrain Description Exposure Exponential Gradient Category coefficient, a height, Zg (m) large city centers A urban and suburban areas B open terrain C wind flowing over water bodies D

UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG LIBRARY. Hong Kong Collection

UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG LIBRARY. Hong Kong Collection UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG LIBRARY Hong Kong Collection CODE OF PRACTICE ON WIND EFFECTS HONG KONG-1983 BUILDING DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HONG KONG PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRINTER, HONG KONG

More information

Design wind pressures and forces are determined per equations given in section : q Gf Cp - qi GCpi : at height z above ground Resisting System

Design wind pressures and forces are determined per equations given in section : q Gf Cp - qi GCpi : at height z above ground Resisting System Design Wind Pressure, p, Equation 6-19 (ASCE 7-05) Design wind pressures and forces are determined per equations given in section 6.5.12 System Type Structure Type Equation p : q Gf Cp - qi GCpi Main Wind-Force

More information

STRUCTURAL DESIGN FIGURE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 288aR

STRUCTURAL DESIGN FIGURE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 288aR FIGURE 1609.1 288aR 288bR 1609.1.4.1 Building with openings. Where glazing is assumed to be an opening in accordance with Section 1609.1.4, the building shall be evaluated to determine if the openings

More information

Critical Gust Pressures on Tall Building Frames-Review of Codal Provisions

Critical Gust Pressures on Tall Building Frames-Review of Codal Provisions Dr. B.Dean Kumar Dept. of Civil Engineering JNTUH College of Engineering Hyderabad, INDIA bdeankumar@gmail.com Dr. B.L.P Swami Dept. of Civil Engineering Vasavi College of Engineering Hyderabad, INDIA

More information

Wind Loading Code for Building Design in Thailand

Wind Loading Code for Building Design in Thailand Wind Loading Code for Building Design in Thailand Virote Boonyapinyo a, Panitan Lukkunaprasit b Pennung Warnitchai c and Phoonsak Pheinsusom d a Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Thammasat

More information

Evaluating the Design Safety of Highway Structural Supports

Evaluating the Design Safety of Highway Structural Supports Evaluating the Design Safety of Highway Structural Supports by Fouad H. Fouad and Elizabeth A. Calvert Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham,

More information

ASCE D Wind Loading

ASCE D Wind Loading ASCE 7-10 3D Wind Loading 1 All information in this document is subject to modification without prior notice. No part or this manual may be reproduced, stored in a database or retrieval system or published,

More information

External Pressure Coefficients on Saw-tooth and Mono-sloped Roofs

External Pressure Coefficients on Saw-tooth and Mono-sloped Roofs External Pressure Coefficients on Saw-tooth and Mono-sloped Roofs Authors: Bo Cui, Ph.D. Candidate, Clemson University, 109 Lowry Hall, Clemson, SC 9634-0911, boc@clemson.edu David O. Prevatt, Assistant

More information

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF WIND PRESSURES ON IRREGULAR- PLAN SHAPE BUILDINGS

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF WIND PRESSURES ON IRREGULAR- PLAN SHAPE BUILDINGS BBAA VI International Colloquium on: Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics & Applications Milano, Italy, July, 2-24 8 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF WIND PRESSURES ON IRREGULAR- PLAN SHAPE BUILDINGS J. A. Amin and A. K. Ahuja

More information

Wind and Fastener Calculation Report for property located at

Wind and Fastener Calculation Report for property located at Martinez Antonio Wind and Fastener Calculation Report for property located at Martinez Antonio Universal Engineering, Inc 12828 Buckland St., Wellington FL 33414 Tel: 561-204-5000, Fax:561-204-1050 e-mail:

More information

Effects of directionality on wind load and response predictions

Effects of directionality on wind load and response predictions Effects of directionality on wind load and response predictions Seifu A. Bekele 1), John D. Holmes 2) 1) Global Wind Technology Services, 205B, 434 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia, seifu@gwts.com.au

More information

EFFECTS OF SIDEWALL OPENINGS ON THE WIND LOADS ON PIPE-FRAMED GREENHOUSES

EFFECTS OF SIDEWALL OPENINGS ON THE WIND LOADS ON PIPE-FRAMED GREENHOUSES The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-12, 29, Taipei, Taiwan EFFECTS OF SIDEWALL OPENINGS ON THE WIND LOADS ON PIPE-FRAMED GREENHOUSES Yasushi Uematsu 1, Koichi Nakahara 2,

More information

Wind Flow Validation Summary

Wind Flow Validation Summary IBHS Research Center Validation of Wind Capabilities The Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS) Research Center full-scale test facility provides opportunities to simulate natural wind conditions

More information

Basis of Structural Design

Basis of Structural Design Basis of Structural Design Course 10 Actions on structures: Wind loads Other loads Course notes are available for download at http://www.ct.upt.ro/users/aurelstratan/ Wind loading: normative references

More information

CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design

CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design Loading for most of the structures are obtained from the relevant British Standards, the manufacturers data and similar sources. CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design CHAPTER 2 Loading and Load Combinations

More information

Effects of wind incidence angle on wind pressure distribution on square plan tall buildings

Effects of wind incidence angle on wind pressure distribution on square plan tall buildings J. Acad. Indus. Res. Vol. 1(12) May 2013 747 RESEARCH ARTICLE ISSN: 2278-5213 Effects of wind incidence angle on wind pressure distribution on square plan tall buildings S.K. Verma 1, A.K. Ahuja 2* and

More information

Wind effects on tall building frames-influence of dynamic parameters

Wind effects on tall building frames-influence of dynamic parameters Indian Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 3 No. 5 (May 21) ISSN: 974-6846 583 Wind effects on tall building frames-influence of dynamic parameters B. Dean Kumar 1 and B.L.P. Swami 2 1 Department of

More information

E. Agu, M. Kasperski Ruhr-University Bochum Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Sciences

E. Agu, M. Kasperski Ruhr-University Bochum Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Sciences EACWE 5 Florence, Italy 19 th 23 rd July 29 Flying Sphere image Museo Ideale L. Da Vinci Chasing gust fronts - wind measurements at the airport Munich, Germany E. Agu, M. Kasperski Ruhr-University Bochum

More information

Loads on Structures. Dead Load / Fixed Load Live Load / Imposed Load Earthquake Load Wind Load Snow Load

Loads on Structures. Dead Load / Fixed Load Live Load / Imposed Load Earthquake Load Wind Load Snow Load Loads on Structures Dead Load / Fixed Load Live Load / Imposed Load Earthquake Load Wind Load Snow Load Characteristics of Wind Load Depends upon - velocity and density of the air height above ground level

More information

Impact of New ANSI/TIA-222-H Standard on Broadcast NAB * ERI Breakfast * Apr 11, 2018 James Ruedlinger, P.E

Impact of New ANSI/TIA-222-H Standard on Broadcast NAB * ERI Breakfast * Apr 11, 2018 James Ruedlinger, P.E Impact of New ANSI/TIA-222-H Standard on Broadcast 2018 NAB * ERI Breakfast * Apr 11, 2018 James Ruedlinger, P.E Adoption ANSI/TIA-222 REV H: Current industry consensus standard Effective January 1, 2018

More information

2013 Wall of Wind (WoW) Contest Informational Workshop

2013 Wall of Wind (WoW) Contest Informational Workshop 2013 Wall of Wind (WoW) Contest Informational Workshop Presented By: Ioannis Zisis February 22, 2013 With Contributions By: Dr. Girma Bitsuamlak, Roy Liu, Walter Conklin, Dr. Arindam Chowdhury, Jimmy Erwin,

More information

Wind Directional Effect on a Single Storey House Using Educational Wind Tunnel

Wind Directional Effect on a Single Storey House Using Educational Wind Tunnel Wind Directional Effect on a Single Storey House Using Educational Wind Tunnel S S Zaini 1, N Rossli 1, T A Majid 1, S N C Deraman 1 and N A Razak 2 1 Disaster Research Nexus, School of Civil Engineering,

More information

Analysis and Design of Elevated Intze Watertank and its Comparative Study in Different Wind Zones - using SAP2000

Analysis and Design of Elevated Intze Watertank and its Comparative Study in Different Wind Zones - using SAP2000 IJSTE - International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering Volume 2 Issue 2 August 2015 ISSN (online): 2349-784X Analysis and Design of Elevated Intze Watertank and its Comparative Study in Different

More information

SUBPART C - STRUCTURE

SUBPART C - STRUCTURE SUBPART C - STRUCTURE GENERAL CS 23.301 Loads (a) Strength requirements are specified in terms of limit loads (the maximum loads to be expected in service) and ultimate loads (limit loads multiplied by

More information

Comparison on Wind Load Prediction of Transmission Line between Chinese New Code and Other Standards

Comparison on Wind Load Prediction of Transmission Line between Chinese New Code and Other Standards Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Engineering 14 (011) 1799 1806 The Twelfth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Comparison on Wind Load Prediction

More information

Determination of the wind pressure distribution on the facade of the triangularly shaped high-rise building structure

Determination of the wind pressure distribution on the facade of the triangularly shaped high-rise building structure Determination of the wind pressure distribution on the facade of the triangularly shaped high-rise building structure Norbert Jendzelovsky 1,*, Roland Antal 1 and Lenka Konecna 1 1 STU in Bratislava, Faculty

More information

Wind Regimes 1. 1 Wind Regimes

Wind Regimes 1. 1 Wind Regimes Wind Regimes 1 1 Wind Regimes The proper design of a wind turbine for a site requires an accurate characterization of the wind at the site where it will operate. This requires an understanding of the sources

More information

A Study on the Distribution of the Peak Wind Pressure Coefficient for the Wind Resistant Design of Rooftop Hoardings in High-rise Buildings

A Study on the Distribution of the Peak Wind Pressure Coefficient for the Wind Resistant Design of Rooftop Hoardings in High-rise Buildings International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. ISSN 0974-3154 Volume 11, Number 10 (2018), pp. 1583-1594 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com A Study on the Distribution

More information

Numerical Analysis of Wind loads on Tapered Shape Tall Buildings

Numerical Analysis of Wind loads on Tapered Shape Tall Buildings IJSTE - International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering Volume 1 Issue 11 May 2015 ISSN (online): 2349-784X Numerical Analysis of Wind loads on Tapered Shape Tall Buildings Ashwin G Hansora Assistant

More information

Along and Across Wind Loads Acting on Tall Buildings

Along and Across Wind Loads Acting on Tall Buildings Along and Across Wind Loads Acting on Tall Buildings Aiswaria G. R* and Dr Jisha S. V** *M Tech student, Structural Engineering, Mar Baselios College of Engineering and Technology, Kerala aiswariagr@gmail.com

More information

Wind Pressure Distribution on Rectangular Plan Buildings with Multiple Domes

Wind Pressure Distribution on Rectangular Plan Buildings with Multiple Domes Wind Pressure Distribution on Rectangular Plan Buildings with Multiple Domes Astha Verma, Ashok K. Ahuja Abstract Present paper describes detailed information of the experimental study carried out on the

More information

Wind tunnel test and numerical simulation of wind pressure on a high-rise building

Wind tunnel test and numerical simulation of wind pressure on a high-rise building Journal of Chongqing University (English Edition) [ISSN 1671-8224] Vol. 9 No. 1 March 2010 Article ID: 1671-8224(2010)01-0047-07 To cite this article: AL ZOUBI Feras, LI Zheng-liang, WEI Qi-ke, SUN Yi.

More information

A Wind-Tunnel Study of a Cubic Rooftop AC Unit on a Low Building

A Wind-Tunnel Study of a Cubic Rooftop AC Unit on a Low Building A Wind-Tunnel Study of a Cubic Rooftop AC Unit on a Low Building Noriaki Hosoya, 1 Jack E. Cermak, 2 and Chris Steele 3 Abstract A wind-tunnel test was conducted to determine gust wind loads on simple

More information

Effect of Wind Pressure on R.C Tall Buildings using Gust Factor Method

Effect of Wind Pressure on R.C Tall Buildings using Gust Factor Method Effect of Wind Pressure on R.C Tall Buildings using Gust Factor Method Ranjitha K. P 1 PG Student, Department of Civil Engineering Ghousia College of Engineering Ramanagar-562159 Dr. N.S. Kumar 3 Professor

More information

WIND EFFECTS ON MONOSLOPED AND SAWTOOTH ROOFS

WIND EFFECTS ON MONOSLOPED AND SAWTOOTH ROOFS Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 8007 WIND EFFECTS ON MONOSLOPED AND SAWTOOTH ROOFS Bo Cui Clemson University, boc@clemson.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations

More information

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 161 (2016 )

Available online at  ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 161 (2016 ) Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Engineering 161 (216 ) 1845 1851 World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium 216, WMCAUS 216 Experimental

More information

2001 AASHTO Training Manual

2001 AASHTO Training Manual 2001 AASHTO Training Manual December 2004 MSC4014 12/04 Table of Contents I. 2001 AASHTO General Overview 1 General Overview 2 II. Wind and Allowable Stress Design 3 Three Second Gust vs. Fastest Mile

More information

JAR-23 Normal, Utility, Aerobatic, and Commuter Category Aeroplanes \ Issued 11 March 1994 \ Section 1- Requirements \ Subpart C - Structure \ General

JAR-23 Normal, Utility, Aerobatic, and Commuter Category Aeroplanes \ Issued 11 March 1994 \ Section 1- Requirements \ Subpart C - Structure \ General JAR 23.301 Loads \ JAR 23.301 Loads (a) Strength requirements are specified in terms of limit loads (the maximum loads to be expected in service) and ultimate loads (limit loads multiplied by prescribed

More information

Wind tunnel tests of a non-typical stadium roof

Wind tunnel tests of a non-typical stadium roof Wind tunnel tests of a non-typical stadium roof G. Bosak 1, A. Flaga 1, R. Kłaput 1 and Ł. Flaga 1 1 Wind Engineering Laboratory, Cracow University of Technology, 31-864 Cracow, Poland. liwpk@windlab.pl

More information

FLOW CONSIDERATIONS IN INDUSTRIAL SILENCER DESIGN

FLOW CONSIDERATIONS IN INDUSTRIAL SILENCER DESIGN FLOW CONSIDERATIONS IN INDUSTRIAL SILENCER DESIGN George Feng, Kinetics Noise Control, Inc., 3570 Nashua Drive, Mississauga, Ontario Vadim Akishin, Kinetics Noise Control, Inc., 3570 Nashua Drive, Mississauga,

More information

Quantification of the Effects of Turbulence in Wind on the Flutter Stability of Suspension Bridges

Quantification of the Effects of Turbulence in Wind on the Flutter Stability of Suspension Bridges Quantification of the Effects of Turbulence in Wind on the Flutter Stability of Suspension Bridges T. Abbas 1 and G. Morgenthal 2 1 PhD candidate, Graduate College 1462, Department of Civil Engineering,

More information

Generation of an Annual Typical Daily Wind Speed for Heights Equal and Less than 10 meters for Urban Armidale NSW, Australia

Generation of an Annual Typical Daily Wind Speed for Heights Equal and Less than 10 meters for Urban Armidale NSW, Australia IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN) ISSN (e): 2250-3021, ISSN (p): 2278-8719 Vol. 04, Issue 08 (August. 2014), VX PP 31-42 www.iosrjen.org Generation of an Annual Typical Daily Wind Speed for Heights

More information

Pressure coefficient on flat roofs of rectangular buildings

Pressure coefficient on flat roofs of rectangular buildings Pressure coefficient on flat roofs of rectangular buildings T. Lipecki 1 1 Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, Poland. t.lipecki@pollub.pl Abstract The paper

More information

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016 RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016 CASE STUDIES ON THE IMPACT OF SURROUNDING BUILDINGS ON WIND-INDUCED RESPONSE John Kilpatrick Rowan Williams Davies and Irwin, Guelph, Ontario, Canada ABSTRACT In

More information

Wind shear and its effect on wind turbine noise assessment Report by David McLaughlin MIOA, of SgurrEnergy

Wind shear and its effect on wind turbine noise assessment Report by David McLaughlin MIOA, of SgurrEnergy Wind shear and its effect on wind turbine noise assessment Report by David McLaughlin MIOA, of SgurrEnergy Motivation Wind shear is widely misunderstood in the context of noise assessments. Bowdler et

More information

WIND FAILURES. Avoiding a Roof Failure Requires an Understanding of Many Factors Other Than Wind Speed. m-m. CatWOrl

WIND FAILURES. Avoiding a Roof Failure Requires an Understanding of Many Factors Other Than Wind Speed. m-m. CatWOrl WND FALURES Avoiding a Roof Failure Requires an Understanding of Many Factors Other Than Wind Speed Br DEREK A. HODGW, P.E., RRO C an your roof withstand a wind of 110 miles per hour? How do you know?

More information

International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology E-ISSN

International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology E-ISSN Research Article PERFORMANCE OF ELEVATED WATER TANKS SUJECTED TO WIND FORCES Dr. Hirde Suchita K. 1, ajare Asmita A. 2, Hedaoo Manoj N. 3 Address for Correspondence 1 Professor in Applied Mechanics, Govt.

More information

THE INFLUENCE OF WINDWARD PARAPETS ON THE HEIGHT OF LEEWARD SNOW DRIFTS AT ROOF STEPS CHRISTOPHER BRANDON GOODALE. B.S., Kansas State University, 2016

THE INFLUENCE OF WINDWARD PARAPETS ON THE HEIGHT OF LEEWARD SNOW DRIFTS AT ROOF STEPS CHRISTOPHER BRANDON GOODALE. B.S., Kansas State University, 2016 THE INFLUENCE OF WINDWARD PARAPETS ON THE HEIGHT OF LEEWARD SNOW DRIFTS AT ROOF STEPS by CHRISTOPHER BRANDON GOODALE B.S., Kansas State University, 2016 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the

More information

Internal pressures in a building with roof opening

Internal pressures in a building with roof opening The Eighth Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, December 10 14, 2013, Chennai, India Internal pressures in a building with roof opening Shouying Li 1,Shouke Li 2, Zhengqing Chen 3. 1 Asociate Professor

More information

Anemometry. Anemometry. Wind Conventions and Characteristics. Anemometry. Wind Variability. Anemometry. Function of an anemometer:

Anemometry. Anemometry. Wind Conventions and Characteristics. Anemometry. Wind Variability. Anemometry. Function of an anemometer: Anemometry Anemometry Function of an anemometer: Measure some or all of the components of the wind vector In homogeneous terrain, vertical component is small express wind as -D horizontal vector For some

More information

ESTIMATION OF THE DESIGN WIND SPEED BASED ON

ESTIMATION OF THE DESIGN WIND SPEED BASED ON The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-12, 2009, Taipei, Taiwan ESTIMATION OF THE DESIGN WIND SPEED BASED ON UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS OF THE WIND CLIMATE Michael Kasperski 1 1

More information

Forest Winds in Complex Terrain

Forest Winds in Complex Terrain Forest Winds in Complex Terrain Ilda Albuquerque 1 Contents Project Description Motivation Forest Complex Terrain Forested Complex Terrain 2 Project Description WAUDIT (Wind Resource Assessment Audit and

More information

Dear Mr. Nicolini: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment Montreal Road, Ottawa GWE File No.: DTPLW

Dear Mr. Nicolini: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment Montreal Road, Ottawa GWE File No.: DTPLW August 17, 2015 Anthony Nicolini 2068358 Ontario Inc. (Darwin Group) 183 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 0M3 Dear Mr. Nicolini: Re: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment 807-825 Montreal

More information

Aerodynamic Analysis of a Symmetric Aerofoil

Aerodynamic Analysis of a Symmetric Aerofoil 214 IJEDR Volume 2, Issue 4 ISSN: 2321-9939 Aerodynamic Analysis of a Symmetric Aerofoil Narayan U Rathod Department of Mechanical Engineering, BMS college of Engineering, Bangalore, India Abstract - The

More information

Full scale measurements and simulations of the wind speed in the close proximity of the building skin

Full scale measurements and simulations of the wind speed in the close proximity of the building skin Full scale measurements and simulations of the wind speed in the close proximity of the building skin Radoslav Ponechal 1,* and Peter Juras 1 1 University of Zilina, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department

More information

The tensile capacity of suction caissons in sand under rapid loading

The tensile capacity of suction caissons in sand under rapid loading Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics: ISFOG 25 Gourvenec & Cassidy (eds) 25 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 415 3963 X The tensile capacity of suction caissons in sand under rapid loading Guy T. Houlsby,

More information

1700 Webster Street Oakland, CA. Final Report. Pedestrian Wind Conditions Consultation Wind Tunnel Tests RWDI # July 16, 2015

1700 Webster Street Oakland, CA. Final Report. Pedestrian Wind Conditions Consultation Wind Tunnel Tests RWDI # July 16, 2015 Tel: 519.823.1311 Fax: 519.823.1316 Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc. 650 Woodlawn Road West Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1K 1B8 1700 Webster Street Oakland, CA Final Report Pedestrian Wind Conditions Consultation

More information

computed using Equation 3-18 by setting the 2nd term equal to 0 and K A equal to K o and using the pressure distribution as shown in Figure 3-23.

computed using Equation 3-18 by setting the 2nd term equal to 0 and K A equal to K o and using the pressure distribution as shown in Figure 3-23. computed using Equation 3-18 by setting the 2nd term equal to 0 and K A equal to K o and using the pressure distribution as shown in Figure 3-23. (2) For the resisting side, passive pressure theory indicates

More information

Determination of the Characteristics of High Winds in Istanbul

Determination of the Characteristics of High Winds in Istanbul International Journal of Sciences: Basic andappliedresearch (IJSBAR) ISSN 2307-4531 (Print & Online) http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=journalofbasicandapplied --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

COURSE NUMBER: ME 321 Fluid Mechanics I Fluid statics. Course teacher Dr. M. Mahbubur Razzaque Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering BUET

COURSE NUMBER: ME 321 Fluid Mechanics I Fluid statics. Course teacher Dr. M. Mahbubur Razzaque Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering BUET COURSE NUMBER: ME 321 Fluid Mechanics I Fluid statics Course teacher Dr. M. Mahbubur Razzaque Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering BUET 1 Fluid statics Fluid statics is the study of fluids in

More information

Site Summary. Wind Resource Summary. Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser

Site Summary. Wind Resource Summary. Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser Site Summary Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser Station ID: 2857 Latitude: 55 7 45.8 N Longitude: 162 16 10.6 W Tower Type: 30 m NRG Tall

More information

Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared by: Mia Devine

Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared by: Mia Devine 813 W. Northern Lights Blvd. Anchorage, AK 99503 Phone: 907-269-3000 Fax: 907-269-3044 www.aidea.org/wind.htm Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared

More information

INTERFERENCE EFFECTS OF TWO BUILDINGS ON PEAK WIND PRESSURES

INTERFERENCE EFFECTS OF TWO BUILDINGS ON PEAK WIND PRESSURES The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-, 9, Taipei, Taiwan INTERFERENCE EFFECTS OF TWO BUILDINGS ON PEAK WIND PRESSURES Wonsul Kim, Yukio Tamura and Akihito Yoshida 3 Ph.D.

More information

Keywords: Wind Averaging Conversion, WMO guidelines, Gust Factor, Statistical Approach.

Keywords: Wind Averaging Conversion, WMO guidelines, Gust Factor, Statistical Approach. www.semargroup.org, www.ijsetr.com ISSN 239-8885 Vol.03,Issue.0 May-204, Pages:2070-2076 Comparison of Wind Averaging Conversions between Gust Factor and Statistical Approaches TIN NILAR TUN, AYE AYE THANT

More information

Scales of Atmospheric Motion Scale Length Scale (m) Time Scale (sec) Systems/Importance Molecular (neglected)

Scales of Atmospheric Motion Scale Length Scale (m) Time Scale (sec) Systems/Importance Molecular (neglected) Supplement Wind, Fetch and Waves Scales of Atmospheric Motion Scale Length Scale (m) Time Scale (sec) Systems/Importance Molecular 10-7 - 10-2 10-1 (neglected) Coriolis not important Turbulent 10-2 10

More information

Wind Tunnel Study on the Structural Stability of a Container Crane According to the Boom Shape

Wind Tunnel Study on the Structural Stability of a Container Crane According to the Boom Shape Proceedings of the 4th WSEAS International Conference on Fluid Mechanics, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, January 17-19, 2007 64 Wind Tunnel Study on the Structural Stability of a Container Crane According

More information

Aerodynamic Terms. Angle of attack is the angle between the relative wind and the wing chord line. [Figure 2-2] Leading edge. Upper camber.

Aerodynamic Terms. Angle of attack is the angle between the relative wind and the wing chord line. [Figure 2-2] Leading edge. Upper camber. Chapters 2 and 3 of the Pilot s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge (FAA-H-8083-25) apply to powered parachutes and are a prerequisite to reading this book. This chapter will focus on the aerodynamic fundamentals

More information

PHSC 3033: Meteorology Air Forces

PHSC 3033: Meteorology Air Forces PHSC 3033: Meteorology Air Forces Pressure Gradient P/ d = Pressure Gradient (Change in Pressure/Distance) Horizontal Pressure Gradient Force (PGF): Force due to pressure differences, and the cause of

More information

Surrounding buildings and wind pressure distribution on a high rise building

Surrounding buildings and wind pressure distribution on a high rise building Surrounding buildings and wind pressure distribution on a high rise building Conference or Workshop Item Accepted Version Luo, Z. (2008) Surrounding buildings and wind pressure distribution on a high rise

More information

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay M. Fossati, D. Bellón, E. Lorenzo & I. Piedra-Cueva Fluid Mechanics and Environmental Engineering Institute (IMFIA), School of Engineering, Research

More information

IS: 875(Part3): Wind Loads on Buildings and Structures -Proposed Draft & Commentary

IS: 875(Part3): Wind Loads on Buildings and Structures -Proposed Draft & Commentary Document No. :: IITK-GSDMA-Wind02-V5.0 :: IITK-GSDMA-Wind04-V3.0 Final Report :: B - Wind Codes IITK-GSDMA Project on Building Codes IS: 875(Part3): Wind Loads on Buildings and Structures -Proposed Draft

More information

HH Gregg Building Northgate Mall Cincinnati, Ohio May 14, 2014

HH Gregg Building Northgate Mall Cincinnati, Ohio May 14, 2014 FREDERICK J. SAMBOR, P.E. 1390 Hanbury Court Gahanna, OH 43230 Business: (614) 563-7349 e-mail: fredsambor@hotmail.com HH Gregg Building Northgate Mall Cincinnati, Ohio May 14, 2014 Structural Reinforcement

More information

Field Measurement for Aerodynamic Mitigation of Wind Pressure on Gable-roofed Low-rise Building

Field Measurement for Aerodynamic Mitigation of Wind Pressure on Gable-roofed Low-rise Building The Eighth Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, December 10 14, 2013, Chennai, India Field Measurement for Aerodynamic Mitigation of Wind Pressure on Gable-roofed Low-rise Building Peng Huang 1,

More information

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok 813 W. Northern Lights Blvd. Anchorage, AK 99503 Phone: 907-269-3000 Fax: 907-269-3044 www.akenergyauthority.org SITE SUMMARY Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified:

More information

FINAL REPORT. Wind Assessment for: NEW OFFICE BUILDING AT ESSENDON FIELDS Essendon, Victoria, Australia

FINAL REPORT. Wind Assessment for: NEW OFFICE BUILDING AT ESSENDON FIELDS Essendon, Victoria, Australia FINAL REPORT Wind Assessment for: NEW OFFICE BUILDING AT ESSENDON FIELDS Essendon, Victoria, Australia Prepared for: Essendon Fields Pty Ltd Essendon Fields House Level 2, 7 English Street Essendon Fields

More information

COMPARISONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS AND

COMPARISONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS AND The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-12, 2009, Taipei, Taiwan COMPARISONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS AND WIND TUNNEL EXPERIMENTS FOR PEDESTRIAN WIND ENVIRONMENTS Chin-Hsien

More information

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF STATIC INTERFERENCE EFFECTS FOR SINGLE BUILDINGS GROUP

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF STATIC INTERFERENCE EFFECTS FOR SINGLE BUILDINGS GROUP NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF STATIC INTERFERENCE EFFECTS FOR SINGLE BUILDINGS GROUP Xing-qian Peng, Chun-hui Zhang 2 and Chang-gui Qiao 2 Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou,

More information

PHASE 1 WIND STUDIES REPORT

PHASE 1 WIND STUDIES REPORT PHASE 1 WIND STUDIES REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR A SUICIDE DETERRENT SYSTEM Contract 2006-B-17 24 MAY 2007 Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District Introduction

More information

Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar

Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar Peter Argyle, Simon Watson CREST, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom p.argyle@lboro.ac.uk INTRODUCTION Wind farm construction projects

More information

Wind tunnel acoustic testing of wind generated noise on building facade elements

Wind tunnel acoustic testing of wind generated noise on building facade elements See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307638896 Wind tunnel acoustic testing of wind generated noise on building facade elements

More information

6.6 Gradually Varied Flow

6.6 Gradually Varied Flow 6.6 Gradually Varied Flow Non-uniform flow is a flow for which the depth of flow is varied. This varied flow can be either Gradually varied flow (GVF) or Rapidly varied flow (RVF). uch situations occur

More information

An Overview of Wind Engineering Where Climate Meets Design

An Overview of Wind Engineering Where Climate Meets Design An Overview of Wind Engineering Where Climate Meets Design Presented by Derek Kelly, M.Eng., P.Eng. Principal/Project Manager www.rwdi.com RWDI Leadership & Consulting Expertise RWDI Consulting Engineers

More information

The Coriolis force, geostrophy, Rossby waves and the westward intensification

The Coriolis force, geostrophy, Rossby waves and the westward intensification Chapter 3 The Coriolis force, geostrophy, Rossby waves and the westward intensification The oceanic circulation is the result of a certain balance of forces. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics shows that a very

More information

WIND-INDUCED PRESSURES ON CANOPIES ATTACHED TO THE WALLS OF LOW-RISE BUILDINGS

WIND-INDUCED PRESSURES ON CANOPIES ATTACHED TO THE WALLS OF LOW-RISE BUILDINGS WIND-INDUCED PRESSURES ON CANOPIES ATTACHED TO THE WALLS OF LOW-RISE BUILDINGS José Daniel Candelario Suárez A Thesis In The Department Of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering Presented in Partial

More information

TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS)

TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) No. 00(A)-9 TEST PROCEDURE FOR WIND AND WIND DRIVEN RAIN RESISTANCE AND/OR INCREASED WINDSPEED RESISTANCE OF SOFFIT VENTILATION STRIP AND CONTINUOUS OR INTERMITTENT VENTILATION

More information

Wind Flow Model of Area Surrounding the Case Western Reserve University Wind Turbine

Wind Flow Model of Area Surrounding the Case Western Reserve University Wind Turbine Wind Flow Model of Area Surrounding the Case Western Reserve University Wind Turbine Matheus C. Fernandes 1, David H. Matthiesen PhD *2 1 Case Western Reserve University Dept. of Mechanical Engineering,

More information

Investigation on 3-D Wing of commercial Aeroplane with Aerofoil NACA 2415 Using CFD Fluent

Investigation on 3-D Wing of commercial Aeroplane with Aerofoil NACA 2415 Using CFD Fluent Investigation on 3-D of commercial Aeroplane with Aerofoil NACA 2415 Using CFD Fluent Rohit Jain 1, Mr. Sandeep Jain 2, Mr. Lokesh Bajpai 3 1PG Student, 2 Associate Professor, 3 Professor & Head 1 2 3

More information

Use of Equivalent Building Dimensions (EBD) to Characterize Upwind Terrain Wake Effects for AERMOD

Use of Equivalent Building Dimensions (EBD) to Characterize Upwind Terrain Wake Effects for AERMOD Use of Equivalent Building Dimensions (EBD) to Characterize Upwind Terrain Wake Effects for AERMOD Paper # 425 100 th Annual Meeting of the Air & Waste Management Association June 2007 Ronald Petersen

More information

Vibration of floors and footfall analysis

Vibration of floors and footfall analysis Webinar Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 20/04/2016 Vibration of floors and footfall analysis Artur Kosakowski Rafał Gawęda Webinar summary In this webinar we will focus on the theoretical

More information

OPTIMIZATION OF SINGLE STAGE AXIAL FLOW COMPRESSOR FOR DIFFERENT ROTATIONAL SPEED USING CFD

OPTIMIZATION OF SINGLE STAGE AXIAL FLOW COMPRESSOR FOR DIFFERENT ROTATIONAL SPEED USING CFD http:// OPTIMIZATION OF SINGLE STAGE AXIAL FLOW COMPRESSOR FOR DIFFERENT ROTATIONAL SPEED USING CFD Anand Kumar S malipatil 1, Anantharaja M.H 2 1,2 Department of Thermal Power Engineering, VTU-RO Gulbarga,

More information

SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FLUCTUATING WIND LOADS ON A SEPARATE TWIN-BOX DECK WITH CENTRAL SLOT

SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FLUCTUATING WIND LOADS ON A SEPARATE TWIN-BOX DECK WITH CENTRAL SLOT The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-, 009, Taipei, Taiwan SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FLUCTUATING WIND LOADS ON A SEPARATE TWIN-BOX DEC WITH CENTRAL SLOT Le-Dong Zhu, Shui-Bing

More information

Energy from wind and water extracted by Horizontal Axis Turbine

Energy from wind and water extracted by Horizontal Axis Turbine Energy from wind and water extracted by Horizontal Axis Turbine Wind turbines in complex terrain (NREL) Instream MHK turbines in complex bathymetry (VP East channel NewYork) Common features? 1) horizontal

More information

Background physics concepts (again)

Background physics concepts (again) Background physics concepts (again) position coordinate for location, say x (1-D) velocity changing position over time (magnitude and ) acceleration changing velocity v = x t = x 2 x 1 t 2 t 1 a = v t

More information

The Seventh International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Applications (BBAA7) Shanghai, China; September 2-6, 2012 Wind tunnel measurements

The Seventh International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Applications (BBAA7) Shanghai, China; September 2-6, 2012 Wind tunnel measurements The Seventh International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Applications (BBAA7) Shanghai, China; September 2-6, 2012 Wind tunnel measurements of aeroelastic guyed mast models a, Tomasz Lipecki

More information

Building Planning PART. Chapter 3. Chapter 3. Building Planning. Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria C

Building Planning PART. Chapter 3. Chapter 3. Building Planning. Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria C PART 2 Building Planning Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Building Planning TA B L E R 3 0 1. 2 ( 1 ) Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria C hapter 3 includes the bulk of the nonstructural provisions, including

More information

WIND CONDITIONS MODELING FOR SMALL WIND TURBINES

WIND CONDITIONS MODELING FOR SMALL WIND TURBINES U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series C, Vol. 77, Iss. 2, 2015 ISSN 2286-3540 WIND CONDITIONS MODELING FOR SMALL WIND TURBINES Viorel URSU 1, Sandor BARTHA 2 Wind energy systems are a solution which became cost effective

More information

The Usage of Propeller Tunnels For Higher Efficiency and Lower Vibration. M. Burak Şamşul

The Usage of Propeller Tunnels For Higher Efficiency and Lower Vibration. M. Burak Şamşul The Usage of Propeller Tunnels For Higher Efficiency and Lower Vibration M. Burak Şamşul ITU AYOC 2014 - Milper Pervane Teknolojileri Company Profile MILPER is established in 2011 as a Research and Development

More information

Advanced Hydraulics Prof. Dr. Suresh A. Kartha Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

Advanced Hydraulics Prof. Dr. Suresh A. Kartha Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Advanced Hydraulics Prof. Dr. Suresh A. Kartha Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Module - 4 Hydraulic Jumps Lecture - 1 Rapidly Varied Flow- Introduction Welcome

More information

Energy Output. Outline. Characterizing Wind Variability. Characterizing Wind Variability 3/7/2015. for Wind Power Management

Energy Output. Outline. Characterizing Wind Variability. Characterizing Wind Variability 3/7/2015. for Wind Power Management Energy Output for Wind Power Management Spring 215 Variability in wind Distribution plotting Mean power of the wind Betz' law Power density Power curves The power coefficient Calculator guide The power

More information

CHAPTER 5: VACUUM TEST WITH VERTICAL DRAINS

CHAPTER 5: VACUUM TEST WITH VERTICAL DRAINS CHAPTER 5: VACUUM TEST WITH VERTICAL DRAINS 5.1 Introduction Using surcharging as the sole soil consolidation mean can take a long time to reach the desired soil settlement. Soil consolidation using prefabricated

More information