UPM A Virtual Wellbore Modelling System to Prevent and Enhance the Detection of Well Control Events in Deepwater Drilling

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UPM A Virtual Wellbore Modelling System to Prevent and Enhance the Detection of Well Control Events in Deepwater Drilling"

Transcription

1 UPM A Virtual Wellbore Modelling System to Prevent and Enhance the Detection of Well Control Events in Deepwater Drilling Brian Piccolo, Austin Johnson, Scott Petrie, Henry Pinkstone, Christian Leuchtenberg Abstract As drilling continuously progresses into deeper ocean environments and through fractured carbonate formations, the margins between formation pore and fracture pressure have become narrower and less predictable. As a consequence, the industry has seen an increase in events resulting in large influx volumes in the wellbore, uncontrolled gas breakout in the riser, and significant lost mud returns. Such events pose safety, environmental, and project completion risks as well as increase the cost and non-productive time associated with drilling a well. It s worth noting that while the deepwater environment poses a unique set of challenges, kick and loss events are also a concern on land projects. To address the above challenges, Managed Pressure Operations (MPO) has developed a virtual wellbore modelling system that can pinpoint deviations between actual and anticipated wellbore pressure, temperature, and flow rate behavior to alarm the driller of the onset or increased risk of a hazardous event. The virtual wellbore modelling system integrates conventional drilling data feeds from the rig s Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition(SCADA) system with advanced sensor technology placed throughout the rig, riser, and wellbore to accurately analyze the well for abnormalities that represent a kick or loss in real-time. This technology is also used to proactively protect the wellbore by analyzing pressure and flow rate feedback for symptoms of an unsafe change in drilling margins in advance of a significant well control event occurring. Once an alarm is raised, the driller can proactively adjust wellbore pressure to prevent a hazardous kick or loss event from happening in the first place. As such, MPO s use of virtual wellbore modelling is intended to rapidly detect the onset of a hazardous event as well as prevent such an event from occurring. The end benefit is improved safety and reduced costs for deepwater drilling projects. Furthermore, the challenges described in this paper also highlight why the development of a subsea metering system that could be deployed beneath the telescopic slip joint would provide a step change for drilling safety. Uncertain and Narrowing Drilling Margins. In order to successfully drill a well with a conventional drilling program, the pressure throughout the wellbore, known as the wellbore pressure gradient, must remain above the pore pressure gradient and below the fracture pressure gradient. Pore and fracture pressure gradients can collectively be referred to as formation pressure gradients. The term pore pressure gradient refers to the pressure of formation fluid (water, oil, gas) while residing within the formation pores. The term fracture pressure gradient refers to the pressure required to initiate a fracture in the wellbore. If wellbore pressure drops below pore pressure, an uncontrolled flow of hydrocarbons can enter the wellbore and ultimately flow to surface resulting in a significant risk to people, the environment, the installation, and the overall success of a drilling project. An unscheduled flow of hydrocarbons into the wellbore is called a kick or influx. Contrastingly, if wellbore pressure exceeds fracture pressure, wellbore fluids which often consist of drilling mud, can be lost to the formation resulting in a drop in wellbore hydrostatic pressure which can eventually lead to an influx from another part of the formation with a higher pore pressure. In practice, there are additional wellbore pressure control boundaries that are followed to maintain wellbore stability, enhance rate of penetration, reduce the risks of an influx on pump shutdown and also maintain adequate kick tolerance. This paper will only discuss kick tolerance briefly. Depending on whether conventional drilling or managed pressure drilling operations are being conducted, the options available to control wellbore pressure can vary. In conventional drilling, wellbore pressure is controlled by the managing the hydrostatic pressure of the drilling mud and circulating friction by managing drilling fluid rheology and the mud pump injection rate. In a form of drilling known as managed pressure drilling (MPD), the top of a wellbore is sealed around drillpipe allowing drilling returns to be diverted to a choke where applied surface back pressure (ASBP) can also be used to control wellbore pressure. By controlling hydrostatic pressure and circulating friction in drilling (and Copyright 2016, Letton Hall Group. This paper was developed for the UPM Forum, February 2016, Houston, Texas, U.S.A., and is subject to correction by the author(s). The contents of the paper may not necessarily reflect the views of the UPM Forum sponsors or administrator. Reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of the Letton Hall Group is prohibited. Non-commercial reproduction or distribution may be permitted, provided conspicuous acknowledgment of the UPM Forum and the author(s) is made. For more information, see

2 ASBP if applicable), a driller can work to ensure wellbore pressure optimized and within the formation pressure gradients as described above. While the objective of keeping wellbore pressure within formation pressure gradients appears straight forward, the complication arises from the fact that pore and fracture pressure gradients are not always certain. A common challenge experienced offshore are fractured carbonate regions which are highly unpredictable. The brittle nature of these formations can result in small fractures which can ultimately contain abnormally high pressured zones that are not easily detected with seismic. Contrastingly, fractures or cavernous sections can cause a sudden low fracture pressure gradient that can result in a significant or total loss of drilling mud. While fractured carbonates represent some of the most challenging hole sections in current offshore drilling, there is uncertainty associated with drilling any hole section. Herein lies one reason why Exploration is a suitable term for drilling operations. In addition to predictability, formation pressure gradients become narrower as drilling progresses into deeper offshore environments. Narrow formation pressure gradients require precise pressure control drilling methods in order to keep a safe wellbore pressure and ensure no kicks or losses. Such wells can ends up with kicks or losses simply by turning the muds pumps on or off. Furthermore narrow drilling margins have a lower kick tolerance requiring kicks to be detected in stopped within relatively small volumes in order to ensure that they can be safely circulated out of the wellbore. A kick volume that exceeds kick tolerance cannot be safely circulated out of the wellbore. This event will lead to an underground blowout where there is a continuous exchange of drilling mud lost to the formation while formation fluid enters the wellbore even after the SSBOP has been closed. Drilling margins become narrower as seawater depth increases because deepwater wells have less overburden stress than shallow water wells. Put another terms, a deepwater well with the same total depth as a shallow water well will have a lower fracture gradient at a given depth because the formation is under a comparatively lower vertical stress from the layers of dense rock above. In this simplified example, pore pressure increases at the same rate in a shallow and deepwater wells because vertical communication with the surface is assumed. Figure 1: Visual depiction describing the comparatively lower overburden stress in a deepwater well versus a shallow water well Drilling Margin Estimation and Validation. As mentioned before, when wellbore pressure exceeds drilling margins, the onset of a well control event can occur in the form of an influx or loss. Well control events of a significant size can harm people and impact the environment, and equipment, and the success of drilling project. The estimation of drilling margins is performed during well planning. Well design engineers can benefit from assumptions made by seismic surveys, empirical correlations, and logging data from nearby wells if available. While a significant amount of effort is put forth to estimate drilling margins, the end results are always based on varying degrees of confidence. For example, exploration wells, which are planned with limited data, will have lower confidence estimates. Similarly, even though development wells are planned with the benefit of data from nearby wells, these drilling projects are not free from uncertainty either as there is not always full visibility to the geologic conditions between wells. While the drilling contractor does take steps to validate fracture pressure and proceed cautiously with drilling margin estimates, there are inherent limitations. For example, a leak off test or formation integrity test is performed at the start of each hole section to confirm if the exposed formation below the casing shoe is strong enough to hold the planned wellbore pressure for the section. While this test works for the top of a hole section, the procedure does not account for the fact that the weakest formation section could be deeper and not yet exposed. In these circumstances, a weaker than expected fracture gradient is determined only when significant losses are sustained. In conventional drilling with a hydrostatically Upstream Production Measurement Forum

3 overbalanced wellbore, pore pressure is often not verified at all as drilling progresses. Instead, an analysis of certain drilling parameters and cuttings can suggest the possibility of entering a high pressure zone. However, there is no conventional process in place for real-time pore pressure validation while drilling. As a result, an inaccurate pore pressure estimate may not be recognized until after an influx as occurred. As seen thus far, the deepwater drilling industry is taxed with the complexity of drilling through uncertain and narrow drilling margins. This leads to two major challenges. First, the existence of an inaccurate drilling margin estimate often does not manifest itself until after a well control event occurs. Secondly, there is a higher risk of exceeding kick tolerance when an influx is taken in narrow margin drilling projects which can result in a hazardous well control event that cannot be controlled by conventional means. Both cases justify the use of technology to prevent or at least rapidly detect the onset of a well control event. Conventional Well Control Event Detection This section will discuss the complications associated with well control event detection offshore and the limitations of conventional event detection equipment which remains the standard for offshore drilling projects. Factors that Complicate Well Control Event Detection Practices Offshore. Due to vessel motion, the deepwater drilling industry is also challenged with well control event detection. As with land drilling, deepwater drilling projects rely on unexpected changes in mud return flow rate and active pit volumes to determine if a kick or loss has occurred. For example, an increase in flow rate and trip tank/pit volumes is an indicator of an influx. Likewise, a drop in flow rate and pit volume represents lost returns. Based on this well control event detection philosophy, there is an assumption that flow rates and pit volumes are always constant when there is no well control event. However such a statement is rarely true in deepwater drilling and only partially true during land operations. The challenge with this event detection approach in deepwater drilling is that mud return flow rates and pit levels are always changing due to the expansion and contraction of the telescopic slip joint which allows for vessel motion while attached the riser. As such, when the slip joint extends, return flow rate drops and the active pit level drops resulting in similar symptoms to lost returns. Alternatively, when the slip joint contracts, return flow rate and the active pit volume increases offering similar symptoms to an influx. One should also note that heavy crane activity on an offshore drilling vessel can also cause the vessel to roll resulting in the liquid level dipping on side of trip tank and increasing on another side of the trip tank. Depending on the positioning of level sensors, this level change could give the appearance of a kick or loss. When conducting a static flow check, there are additional wellbore behaviors in drilling that also complicate the effort. A static flow check involves suspending drilling and shutting down all mud pumps so that one can determine if the well is still flowing when all drilling mud should be static. At a basic level, a well that flows with the mud pumps off implies the presence of a kick. However, a static flow check can be complicated by the presence of ballooning. Ballooning refers to a wellbore behavior in which the formation returns a small amount of drilling mud back to the wellbore due the wellbore pressure drop associated with turning off the mud pumps. This behavior is deciphered from an influx because it only lasts for a short while and has a tapering flow rate while an influx will continue at an increasing flow rate until the well is secured. In a conventional drilling operations, the rig crew does not know the difference between ballooning or an influx immediately, requiring additional time to diagnose the cause and ultimately shut-in the BOP. As such, kick volumes increase further. Additionally, a pump shut-down causes a drain back of mud volume into the active pits which can appear to be unintentional flow for a brief while further complicating event detection. Finally, drilling riser temperature can also cause fluid expansion or contraction which can mask small kick volumes further requiring additional time for a driller to positively detect an influx. When the mud pumps are shut down, riser volume cools and contracts. When the pumps are running, riser volume is warmer and can expand. Drilling projects without continuous circulation systems can be subject to these temperature changes on every drillpipe connection. As such, changes in trip tank/active pit volumes and flow rate offshore due to vessel motion, ballooning, and temperature changes must be deciphered from changes in the same indicators due to a well control event. The ambiguity and time required to decipher between whether a well control event is occurring or not often results in much larger kicks in the offshore environment. The severity of this issue is further compounded by a reduction in kick tolerance in deepwater environments which reduces the maximum influx volume which can be safely removed from the well by conventional means as described earlier. Upstream Production Measurement Forum

4 Conventional Well Control Event Detection Equipment. Current well control event detection methods do not inform the rig crew as to what the flow rate in and out of the wellbore and the trip tank/active pit volume should precisely be at all times so that an anomalous event such as a kick or loss can be quickly identified. Existing event detection equipment also limit the precision required to detect small gains. to a choke manifold. A conventional drilling operation has no choke or RCD. Instead, drilling returns are directed up through the slip joint and through the main flowline instead. To begin, conventional event detection equipment has inherent inaccuracies. The current industry standard for event detection is a paddle flow meter and two trip tank/active mud pit level sensors; one from the rig and one from the mud logger. Small movements in the paddle flow meter which are often considered noise, can mask small changes in flow rate ultimately causing the driller to wait for larger flow rate changes to diagnose a kick or loss. Furthermore, the two level sensors can have different readings if one loses calibration or due to vessel motion which also increases the amount of time for the driller to confirm with confidence that a kick or loss has occurred. Finally, changes in pump efficiency can impact the mud pump rate into the wellbore which impact the expected flow rate out of the wellbore. Currently, pump flow rate is measured with a stroke counter. Even with improvements in flow metering precision, a rig crew still lacks the capability to know exactly what the flow rate should be at all times. As examples, vessel motion, pump rate, temperature changes, and wellbore ballooning can all have an impact on flow rate and level measurement. To compensate for this, the driller will accept a certain amount of variation in kick/loss indicators while drilling operations progress based on her own experience over time. As a consequence to this, changes in flow rate and trip tank/active pit volume must exceed a certain tolerance before being recognized as a well control event, leading to larger than necessary kick and losses off shore. Real-time Drilling Margin Validation to Prevent the Onset of a Well Control Event In 2014, Managed Pressure Operations (MPO) field tested a software system designed to detect the onset of an unsafe and unexpected deviation from expected formation pressure gradients while drilling. With this warning, the driller can proactively adjust wellbore pressure to prevent a pending well control event from occurring. The system is designed to be utilized in a MPD configuration in which the top of the riser is sealed with a rotating control head and drilling mud returns are diverted Figure 2: Deepwater drilling configuration for MPD is shown. Based on operator defined parameters, the PDS software ultimately oscillates the opening size of a choke in a slow and controlled fashion between two preprogrammed positions while taking mud returns. In doing so, wellbore pressure and flow out of the riser will increase and decrease in a repeatable fashion as a function of wellbore compressibility in order to establish a reliable finger print over time. The flow out of the riser is tracked by an indicator called Flow Out which measured by a coriolis meter upstream of the choke. Wellbore pressure changes are inferred by tracking ASBP. However, bottom hole pressure can be used as well if available. While this occurs, the software analyzes the peaks and troughs of ASBP and Flow Out wave profiles to seek brief symptoms of a kick or loss thereby confirming an unexpected and unsafe change in a formation pressure gradient. It should be noted that since the peaks and troughs of the waveforms exists for only a brief moment, kick or loss volumes are negligible and the average wellbore pressure remains within drilling margins over time. Upstream Production Measurement Forum

5 The software also draws data live rig data from WITS in order to ensure that changes in mud return flow rate and wellbore pressure over time due to drilling margin detection are differentiated from other rig activities which can also impact the same indicators. For example, changes in mud rheology, drill string rotation, mud pump injection rate, and intended adjustments in average choke pressure are all accounted for. As such, the expected wellbore pressure and flow out finger print is continuously validated. Once an unsafe drilling margin is detected, the rig crew can proactively respond by adjusting average wellbore by which ever means desired resulting in the prevention of a recordable well control event from occurring in the first place. The PDS approach is in stark contrast to the conventional methods which do not continuously ascertain formation gradient estimates while drilling resulting in the increased risk of a recordable well control event. The PDS testing was conducted in a live offshore drilling environment in The test results showed that the PDS could detect the presence of a weakening fracture gradient that had degraded to 20 psi above average wellbore pressure with only a half a barrels of lost returns. While the test was conducted under live drilling conditions (ie open hole of a side tracked well, medium depth wellbore, drill string rotating and reciprocating, oil based mud, and mud pumps at 300 gpm) the weakening fracture gradient was simulated by cracking open a ½ bleed off line upstream of the choke system. This simulated configuration was chosen for safety because this was the first offshore test. The process flow and equipment block diagram is shown in Figure 3. The testing was conducted during a tender assist drilling operation on a moored platform. Under this configuration a rotating control devices seals the riser around drill pipe and diverts riser flow to a topside coriolis meter and choke manifold. To conduct testing, one of the chokes was left in a fixed, partially open position while the other choke was oscillated as per the user inputs described earlier in this section. Figure 3: Process flow block diagram for formation pressure determination system offshore on a moored platform with a tender assist drilling operation. Additionally, the block diagram in Figure 3 represents a shallow water configuration with a high pressure riser that allows the blowout preventer to be at the riser top. This is different than the deepwater configuration in Figure 2. In either case, the wellbore pressure control principles are the same. Two tests were conducted offshore to validate the capability of the PDS. The first test was a signal reliability test that was intended to prove that the PDS could create a repeatable Flow Out and ASBP over time in order to enhance the reliability of detected changes. The second test simulated the sensitivity of the system to detect a weakening fracture gradient by diverting flow away from the choke and coriolis meter by opening a 1/2 bleed line upstream of both of those components. The signal reliability test results were successful. Figure 4 shows that ASBP applied by the choke and Flow Out behaved in a repeatable fashion. This was also further justified by showing that the choke position behaved exactly as intended throughout each oscillation. The results of this data demonstrate the capability of the PDS to establish expected Flow Out and ASBP beviours. Figure 4 Signal reliability test results from offshore testing Upstream Production Measurement Forum

6 Figure 5 depicts zoomed view of Flow Out over time during signal reliability testing. This data shows that even small Flow Out changes due to compressibility, which appear to be noise in Figure 4 are also repeatable. Furthermore, the driller can be in the position to proactively adjust wellbore pressure to prevent a significant well control event from occurring. Some actions that the driller may take could include reducing average ASBP, reducing pump rate, rotating slower, or changing mud rheology. Figure 5 Flow out compressibility tracked during offshore testing Figure 6 from the signal reliability testing compares ASBP data with pressure while drilling (PWD) data to validate that changes in ASBP are proliferated throughout the entire wellbore as expected. A PWD is located at the base of the drillstring on the bottom hole assembly. Figure 6: ASBP and PWD pressure tracked during offshore testing. The second test was intended to simulate the detection of a weaker than expected fracture gradient. In order to do so, an operator on the rig manually opened a 1/2 bleed valve as the software system was reducing choke opening size in order to simulate a condition where a weakening formation gradient suddenly could not contain the intended wellbore pressure increase. The result was a brief and transient drop in flow out and the inability to increase choke pressure as high as intended. Figure 7 depicts the test results. Note the sudden deformation of pressure and flow out waves when the weakening fracture margin was detected on the right half of the image. The left half of the image represents the condition where the fracture gradient had not yet weakened to an unsafe value and thus, the PDS indicators were behaving as expected. The simulated fracture gradient detection test results show the ability to detect a fracture gradient that has weakened to only 20 psi above average wellbore pressure with only a ½ barrel of lost fluid. Since the average wellbore pressure remained within formation gradients the whole time, the driller has not incurred a significant well control event. Figure 7: Results of simulation fracture margin detection test done offshore in a live drilling environment The results of PDS testing suggest that unsafe and unexpected changes in formation pressure gradients can be detected and responded to prior to incurring a significant well control event. This capability directly addresses the concern discussed earlier that conventional drilling practices do not validate pore and fracture pressure margin estimates while drilling. For future testing, the PDS will be utilized to detect live pore and fracture pressure gradients. One should also note that the impacts of vessel heave are isolated from deepwater MPD operations because Flow Out is routed through fixed length lines back to surface instead of through a telescopic slip joint which continuously expands and contracts. That being said, the next system to be discussed will address the complexity of changing mud return rates due to vessel motion. Rapid Kick Detection in Deepwater To address the transient nature of flow rates and pit volumes in offshore drilling and the challenges this creates when trying to apply conventional well control event detection practices, MPO has deployed a full scale prototype of the Deepwater Kick Detection (DKD) system in Brazil in The DKD system has been designed to calculate expected flow out and pit volumes in real time to allow the driller to more rapidly differentiate between the onset of a well control event and the transience of Flow Out and trip tank/active pit levels due to the offshore environment and typical drilling operational factors. The DKD system also analyses drilling parameters, pressure, and temperatures to further validate event detection. The DKD system can be utilized during conventional drilling operations or managed pressure drilling. Much of the focus going forward will be on the conventional Upstream Production Measurement Forum

7 drilling implementation of DKD. In terms of hardware, the DKD system consists of 6 equivalent flow area coriolis flow meters on the suction side of each mud pump and a 14 coriolis meter manifold that is tied into the flowline. The 14 coriolis meter manifold contains 14 equivalent flow area coriolis meter, a filter screen upstream of the flow meter, and interlocked isolation valves to direct flow through the meter or through the conventional return path if there is a blockage. Level sensors are placed on the telescopic slip joint to account for the change in riser volume on Flow Out and trip tank/ active pit volumes. An additional level sensor is placed on the trip tank and active mud pit so that 2 out of 3 voting is available for both. Finally, a level sensor and level switch are placed in the flow line to protect against blockage and automatically bypass. Figure 8 is a block process flow diagram describing the DKD system layout on the rig. available, than a single coriolis meter could be placed downstream of all mud pumps on the standpipe. Coriolis meters have been chosen due to their high turn down ratio and capability to measure density. The Flow In to the wellbore is a key factor in determining what the Flow Out should be at any point in time. Furthermore, density measurement is a critical factor in predicting expected return fluid density, calculating bottoms up time, and measuring sweep effectiveness. See Figure 9 below for the configuration deployed in Brazil. Monitoring Flow In density is also especially important to bring about awareness to any miscommunication or error when transferring mud between tanks. Figure 8: DKD process flow block diagram The DKD system also pulls rig data from WITS including stand pipe pressure, hook load measurement, block position measurement, total gas, PWD, and subsea pressure and temperature from the depth of the Subsea Blowout Preventer (SSBOP) and the bottom hole assembly. Mud Pump Injection (Flow In) Measurement. DKD begins with measuring the Flow In which is the flow rate injected into the wellbore from the rig mud pumps. The flow rate injected directly into the riser from the riser booster pump is also included. Traditionally, the flow rate is calculated by tracking pump strokes and assuming a volumetric efficiency per stroke. However, volumetric efficiency can vary over time due to operational wear causing changes in the actual amount of mud being injected into the well for a given stroke rating. The injection side flow measurement is done with 6 equivalent flow area coriolis meters upstream of each mud pump. The reason for this configuration is that coriolis meters do not have the pressure rating be installed downstream of the pump system. If the appropriate pressure rating was Figure 9: 6 coriolis meter installed upstream of each mud pump Mud Return Measurement on the Flowline (Flow Out). With regards to measuring Flow Out, the DKD system utilizes a 14 coriolis flow meter manifold which is tied into the flowline to measure drilling mud returns. The core of the system is a 14 equivalent flow area coriolis meter. This system also includes a solids strainer on the return flow line which prevents large diameter solids from entering and plugging the coriolis meter. The coriolis meter tie-in also includes two interlocking remote diversion valves to divert flow back through flowline (conventional path) if plugging occurs or to divert flow to the coriolis meter under normal operating conditions. When diverting flow to the main flow line, a secondary benefit is that the solids strainer is flushed. Additionally, a back-up sparging/jetting line is connected to the return coriolis manifold to flush the meter in the event of solids build up past the strainer. Upstream Production Measurement Forum

8 Figure 10: 14 equivalent flow area coriolis meter to measure flow out. Flow Line Coriolis Meter Installation Strategy. When installing the coriolis meter on the flowline, attention must be paid to ensure there is adequate hydrostatic head between the diverter outlet and the coriolis meter so that circulating friction from flow through the coriolis meter is overcome and there is no fluid flow back-up in the flow line. Additional head upstream of the meter also increases flow velocity which reduces the risk of solids and debris settling in the meter. Additionally, the coriolis meter outlet should be should exposed to some back pressure downstream of the meter to ensure the meter measures accurately. Figure 12: Photograph of flowline coriolis meter installed in Brazil 2014 Finally, two level sensors consisting of a tuning fork switch and a radar sensor monitor the flow line level upstream of the strainer. In the event of a solids build up or plugging, the sensors will detect an unsafe level and command the interlocked diversion valves on the 14 coriolis meter manifold to divert flow back through the flowline. These sensors are shown in Figure 13 and Figure 14. MPO installs the coriolis meter as close to the gumbo box as possible ensuring that the maximum hydrostatic pressure is acting on the upstream side of the meter. The outlet of the coriolis meter is tied into a shaker header box so that there is some back pressure on the outlet side of the meter to ensure measurement accuracy. A sketch of this installation is shown in Figure 11 and an actually photograph is shown in Figure 12. Figure 13 Tuning fork level switch which is used to detect an unsafe level changes in the flowline. Figure 11: Qualitiative sketch of coriolis installation and tie-in to flow line Figure 14: Radar level sensor to monitor flowline level Correcting Flow Out for Rig Heave. With the capability to measure Flow Out and Flow In, the DKD system also utilizes radar and laser sensors to monitor slip joint displacement and calculate an expected Flow Out based on rig heave. To Upstream Production Measurement Forum

9 perform this calculation, the DKD system tracks the rate of volume change of the slip joint while the rig is heaving and adds this rate differential to the Flow In rate measurement from the rig mud pumps. With all other circumstances remaining the same, the Flow Out measured by the flowline coriolis meter should remain equal to this calculated flow rate unless a kick or loss is occurring. The radar and laser sensor is mounted to the traveling barrel of the telescopic slip joint while the targets are mounted to the fixed barrel. The two sensors are shown in Figure 15. Figure 15: Laser level sensor (left) and radar level sensor (right) mounted on the slip joint to monitor for slip joint displacement Trip Tank and Active Mud Pit Level Measurement. Currently, trip tanks and active mud pits have two level sensors; one from the shipyard and one from the mud logger. A loss of calibration or failure can cause each of these sensors to have different readings resulting in additional time lost to detect with confidence a level change that is associated with a kick or loss. To account for this issue, MPO adds a third sensor to the trip tank and active mud pit so that 2 out of 3 voting is possible. Furthermore, in the event of failure of one of the volume sensors, there is still two level sensors available on such a critical safety measurement. Figure 16: MPO places 3 rd radar based, level sensor on trip tanks and mud pits Vessel Roll Due to Crane Movement. Operation of a rig crane while moving heavy objects can cause the vessel to roll resulting in the trip tank and active pit level sensors to detect an increase or decrease volume. However, in reality there is no additional volume in these tanks. Instead, the vessel roll has caused the fluid on one side of the tank to dip while the other side increases. By combining awareness of the crane activity with expected Flow Out and trip tank/active mud pit values over time, the DKD system can be used to differentiate a level change from crane operation to a level change from the occurrence of an actual well control event. Riser Density Measurement. The DKD system also tracks changes in riser fluid density to monitor planned changes in drilling mud properties, ensure the hole is kept full while tripping, and track the presence of hydrocarbons in the riser. The riser density measurements are made by utilizing pressure transducer data from the SSBOP. A sudden decrease in riser pressure could indicate that the hole is not being kept full during tripping or that lighter fluid is in the riser, possibly from an influx. The influx may consist of free gas or it may be gas that is dissolved into oil based mud which is often not detected until the gas breaks out about 2000 below the rig floor. One manner of distinguishing between the two is to use the Flow In density measurement to determine if the riser density change was in fact planned. Contrastingly, a sudden increase in riser pressure would generally be attributed to an increase in drilling mud density entering the riser or an increased ROP causing a higher cuttings concentration in the riser. In order to distinguish the cause, the DKD system pulls data from WITS such as ROP as well as tracks Flow In density. Changes in riser density can also be confirmed with Flow Out measurements. For example, connection gas in the riser is reflected by a pressure drop in the SSBOP sensors and later confirmed by a drop in density recorded at the Flow Out coriolis meter. Trends that reflect an increase in connection gas from previous connections could also be used to caution the driller that the differential between pore pressure and wellbore pressure is being reduced which can increase the risk of a kick. Monitoring Temperature in the Wellbore and Riser. Temperature can also be used to track the onset of an influx in the wellbore or riser. Temperature transducers are available on the suction side of the mud pumps, flowline, SSBOP, and bottom hole assembly (BHA). Monitoring the wellbore for temperature changes at the BHA can be used to determine if an influx has been taken. Furthermore, monitoring the riser for heating and cooling when circulation starts or stops can be used to validate any increase or decrease in trip tank or active pit volumes as opposed to the onset of a well control event. Additional use of WITS Data. The pressure difference in the wellbore can be analysed with PWD data. The PWD can be used to assess any pressure changes from surge and swab Upstream Production Measurement Forum

10 while the drillpipe is set in slips during a connection that may increase the risk of a well control event. Tripping speed can also be monitored to alarm the driller if speeds becomes excessive. In either case, the DKD system draws awareness to rig activity which may increase the risk of a kick or loss due to surge/swab. This data can be used to validate the detection of a well control event. Furthermore, an influx detection can also be supported with an increase in drillstring weight and/or a sudden increase in ROP, referred to as a drilling break. Considering these factors alongside changes in Flow Out and trip tank/active pit volumes can allow the driller too quickly and with confidence to determine the onset of a well control event. Managed Pressure Drilling Configuration of DKD. During MPD, the Flow Out measurement is taken by a 10 coriolis meter that is adjoined to the MPD choke manifold as installed in Brazil The coriolis meter is installed upstream of the choke manifold to reduce the impact of an inaccuracy caused by the increasing gas fraction often recognized downstream of the choke. The flowline coriolis is not used during MPD because the RCD on the riser diverts flow directly to the MPD choke and not up the slip joint to the conventional flowline. Another difference is that riser temperature and pressure at the depth of the RCD is also available. Vertically, displaced pressure transducers on the RCD can also inform the driller of a riser fluid density change at the depth of the RCD. Another benefit to the MPD configuration is that riser return flow is directed to the MPD choke manifold via flexible, high flow rate hoses. As a result, the drilling operation becomes isolated from the expansion and contraction of the slip joint effectively eliminating the impacts of rig heave on Flow Out and trip tank/active pit volumes. MPO still recommends installing the DKD flowline coriolis meter and slip joint displacement sensors so that the rig may be protected during periods where the rig is drilling conventionally and MPD equipment is not in use. Deepwater Kick Detection Challenges. Several challenges still exist pertaining to deepwater kick detection. The largest challenge to overcome is that flow measurement equipment must operate over a wide range of flow rates, gpm. Additionally, the drilling mud return flow can contain gas (intentionally or unintentionally) as well as liquid creating the potential for multiphase flow. Furthermore, pressure drops through the flow line meter must be minimized so that there is no flow line back-up. Ideally, one meter would be placed downstream of all mud pumps instead of one meter upstream of each mud pump to reduce costs and foot print. However, when considering a coriolis meter, there is no existing options with the 5,000 to 10,000 psi rating that is needed to be downstream of the mud pumps. Furthermore, it would be ideal to have a flow meter on the riser beneath the telescopic slip joint which can detect flow out without the complication of rig heave. MPO efforts in this space have been subject to trade-offs. The single phase coriolis meter has the benefit of a wide turn down ratio with the downsides of producing erroneous readings when exposed to a small amount of gas and a low pressure rating. Contrastingly, pressure differential meters can have a high pressure rating and function with a larger gas cut. However, when designing these meters for a wide turndown ratio, these meters can have a high pressure drop. Non-intrusive sonar meters can work reliably when calibrated and have no additional pressure drop, but do not work well at slow flow rates and need to be re-calibrated for density changes. Regardless, of which option chosen, none of the meters seem to cover the flow rate range of gpm well. To combat this, MPO has considered alternative options. For example, at low flow rates, flow could be diverted to a smaller flow meter. Another option would be to utilize the stroke counter to calculate flow rates at a low flow rate based on a volumetric efficiency that is continuously updated by the DKD system while flow meter is measuring flow rates within its optimal range. With all of the above taken into consideration, there does not seem to be a single flow meter option on the market to address the full range of needs for kick detection at this time. Conclusions 1. Conventional methods of well control event detection assume that Flow Out and trip tank/active put volume is constant which is only partially true for land operations and not valid for deepwater operations. Rig heave as an example can cause these indicators to continuously fluctuate offshore. 2. Existing efforts to validate pore pressure and fracture pressure gradient estimates while drilling are limited. As a result, the actual formation pressure environment while drilling is often not ascertained unless a recordable event has occurred. 3. A pressure determination system has been developed which systematically checks for an unsafe and unexpected change in pore or fracture pressure gradients while drilling. This can alert the driller to adjust well bore pressure in order to prevent a pending well control event from occurring. In doing so, the PDS can ascertain pore and fracture pressure gradients while drilling. Upstream Production Measurement Forum

11 4. A deepwater kick detection system has been developed which takes into account vessel motion, pressure, and temperature, and mud pump injection rate to determine exactly what Flow Out and trip tank/active pit volumes should be at any point in time. Density measurments are also taken at each flow meter and in the riser to determine the presence of hydrocarbons and ensure the hole is kept full during tripping. In doing so, deviations from expected can more rapidly be diagnosed as a well control event. 5. At this point in time, there does not seem to be a single flow meter solution that covers the full requirements of deepwater kick detection in terms of having a turndown ratio to cover gpm, low pressure drop, accuracy with significant gas cut, and a high pressure rating. 6. Vessel heave can continuously vary flow out and trip tank/active pit volumes while drilling. An advancement in kick detection technology would be the availability of a flow meter below the slip joint that would not be subject to rig heave. References 1. Johnson, A., Leuchtenberg, C., Petrie, S., & Cunningham, D. (2014, March 4). Advancing Deepwater Kick Detection. IADC/SPE MS 2. Leuchtenberg, C. (2013). Patent No. WO 2013/ A2. World Intellectual Property Organization. 3. Piccolo, B., Leuchtenberg, C. (2015, April 13-14). Physical Concept Validation Testing Performed for a Pore and Fracture Pressure Margin Prediction System During Offshore MPD Operations. SPE/IADC MS 4. Piccolo, B., Savage, P., Pinkstone, H., & Leuchtenberg, C. (2014, April 8). Verification of Pore and Fracture Pressure Margins during Managed Pressure Drilling. IADC/SPE MS 5. Bourgoyne, Adam T. Applied Drilling Engineering. Richardson, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers, Print. Upstream Production Measurement Forum

Drilling Efficiency Utilizing Coriolis Flow Technology

Drilling Efficiency Utilizing Coriolis Flow Technology Session 12: Drilling Efficiency Utilizing Coriolis Flow Technology Clement Cabanayan Emerson Process Management Abstract Continuous, accurate and reliable measurement of drilling fluid volumes and densities

More information

Dilution-Based Dual Gradient Well Control. Presented at the 2011 IADC Dual Gradient Workshop, 5 May 2011 by Paul Boudreau, Dual Gradient Systems LLC

Dilution-Based Dual Gradient Well Control. Presented at the 2011 IADC Dual Gradient Workshop, 5 May 2011 by Paul Boudreau, Dual Gradient Systems LLC Dilution-Based Dual Gradient Well Control Presented at the 2011 IADC Dual Gradient Workshop, 5 May 2011 by Paul Boudreau, Dual Gradient Systems LLC In this very short presentation, we will Review Dilution-based

More information

Study Guide IADC WellSharp Driller and Supervisor

Study Guide IADC WellSharp Driller and Supervisor Times to Flow Check: Before pulling out of the hole Before pulling BHA into the BOP When bit is pulled into the casing Increase in cuttings at shakers with same ROP On connections Upon abnormal trip tank

More information

August 21, Deepwater MPD / PMCD

August 21, Deepwater MPD / PMCD August 21, 2011 Deepwater MPD / PMCD Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) Pressure held on top of riser while drilling. Drill in overbalance condition Pressurized Mud Cap Drilling (PMCD) Pressure of mud column

More information

1. The well has been shut in on a kick and the kill operation has not started.

1. The well has been shut in on a kick and the kill operation has not started. Well Control Methods Day 2 1. The well has been shut in on a kick and the kill operation has not started. Shut in drill pipe pressure Shut in casing pressure 500 psi 700 psi After stabilization, both pressures

More information

Offshore Managed Pressure Drilling Experiences in Asia Pacific. SPE paper

Offshore Managed Pressure Drilling Experiences in Asia Pacific. SPE paper Offshore Managed Pressure Drilling Experiences in Asia Pacific SPE paper 119875 Authors: Steve Nas, Shaun Toralde, Chad Wuest, SPE, Weatherford Solutions Sdn Bhd, SPE, Weatherford Indonesia SPE, Weatherford

More information

SPE The paper gives a brief description and the experience gained with WRIPS applied to water injection wells. The main

SPE The paper gives a brief description and the experience gained with WRIPS applied to water injection wells. The main SPE 102831 Online Water-Injection Optimization and Prevention of Reservoir Damage Bjørn Øyvind Bringedal, Svein Arne Morud, Nicolas Alexander Hall, ABB; Gary Huseman, Shell Copyright 2006, Society of Petroleum

More information

DAY ONE. 2. Referring to the last question, what mud weight would be required to BALANCE normal formation pressure?

DAY ONE. 2. Referring to the last question, what mud weight would be required to BALANCE normal formation pressure? DAY ONE 1. Normal formation pressure gradient is generally assumed to be: A..496 psi/ft B..564 psi/ft C..376 psi/ft D..465 psi/ft 2. Referring to the last question, what mud weight would be required to

More information

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L PRESSURE BASICS AND CONCEPTS

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L PRESSURE BASICS AND CONCEPTS PRESSURE BASICS AND CONCEPTS Pressure Basics and Concepts Learning Objectives You will be familiarized with the following basic pressure concepts: Defining pressure Hydrostatic pressure Pressure gradient

More information

Well Control Modeling Software Comparisons with Single Bubble Techniques in a Vertical Well

Well Control Modeling Software Comparisons with Single Bubble Techniques in a Vertical Well Well Control Modeling Software Comparisons with Single Bubble Techniques in a Vertical Well Jace R. Larrison, P.E. Blowout Engineers, LLC Recent advances in well control modeling simulators have incorporated

More information

Chapter 4 Key Findings. 4 Key Findings

Chapter 4 Key Findings. 4 Key Findings Chapter 4 Key Findings 211 4 Key Findings 212 Chapter 4 Key Findings This summarizes the key findings of the investigation team based on its extensive review of available information concerning the Macondo

More information

The Diagnosis of Well Control Complications during Managed Pressure Drilling

The Diagnosis of Well Control Complications during Managed Pressure Drilling Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 213 The Diagnosis of Well Control Complications during Managed Pressure Drilling Brian Piccolo Louisiana State University

More information

WILD WELL CONTROL WARNING SIGNS OF KICKS

WILD WELL CONTROL WARNING SIGNS OF KICKS WARNING SIGNS OF KICKS Warning Signs of Kicks Learning Objectives You will learn the warning signs that indicate the well may be kicking: Warning signs of kicks False kick indicators You will also learn

More information

IWCF Equipment Sample Questions (Surface Stack)

IWCF Equipment Sample Questions (Surface Stack) IWCF Equipment Sample Questions (Surface Stack) 1. During a well control operation 4000 psi was shut in below the middle pipe rams. Ram type BOP data: Model: Cameron U type Rated Working Pressure: 15000

More information

A New and Simplified Method for Determination of Conductor Surface Casing Setting Depths in Shallow Marine Sediments (SMS)

A New and Simplified Method for Determination of Conductor Surface Casing Setting Depths in Shallow Marine Sediments (SMS) AADE-07-NTCE-41 A New and Simplified Method for Determination of Conductor Surface Casing Setting Depths in Shallow Marine Sediments (SMS) Paknejad, A., Texas A&M University; Schubert, J., Texas A&M University

More information

AADE 2009NTCE-04-04: PRACTICAL ASPECTS AND VALUE OF AUTOMATED MPD IN HPHT WELLS

AADE 2009NTCE-04-04: PRACTICAL ASPECTS AND VALUE OF AUTOMATED MPD IN HPHT WELLS sudden appearance of permeable sequences abnormally pressured to higher than anticipated levels in an already narrow margin. 2009 NATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION, NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA AADE

More information

IWCF Equipment Sample Questions (Combination of Surface and Subsea Stack)

IWCF Equipment Sample Questions (Combination of Surface and Subsea Stack) IWCF Equipment Sample Questions (Combination of Surface and Subsea Stack) 1. Given the volumes below, how much hydraulic fluid will be required to carry out the following operations (no safety margin)?

More information

Well Control Drill Guide Example Only. Drill Guide is the list of drills, questions and attributes that are in DrillPad.

Well Control Drill Guide Example Only. Drill Guide is the list of drills, questions and attributes that are in DrillPad. Well Control Drill Guide Example Only Drill Guide is the list of drills, questions and attributes that are in DrillPad. This Well Control Drill Guide will be used in conjunction with the rig-specific well

More information

Along-string pressure, temperature measurements hold revolutionary promise for downhole management

Along-string pressure, temperature measurements hold revolutionary promise for downhole management Along-string pressure, temperature measurements hold revolutionary promise for downhole management IT S WIDELY KNOWN that the majority of stuck pipe incidents occur while pulling out of hole. If we can

More information

Low Pressure AutoChoke Console Precise wellbore pressure control for your underbalanced and managed-pressure drilling operations

Low Pressure AutoChoke Console Precise wellbore pressure control for your underbalanced and managed-pressure drilling operations Low Pressure AutoChoke Console Precise wellbore pressure control for your underbalanced and managed-pressure drilling operations High resolution pressure control at your fingertips, during your UBD and

More information

International Well Control Forum. IWCF Drilling Well Control Syllabus Level 3 and 4 March 2017 Version 7.0

International Well Control Forum. IWCF Drilling Well Control Syllabus Level 3 and 4 March 2017 Version 7.0 International Well Control Forum IWCF Drilling Well Control Syllabus and 4 March 2017 Version 7.0 IWCF Drilling Well Control Syllabus and 4 Contents Guidance Notes... 5 1.1. Introduction... 5 1.2. Who

More information

Hard or Soft Shut-in : Which is the Best Approach?

Hard or Soft Shut-in : Which is the Best Approach? HARD - SOFT shut-in? Hard or Soft Shut-in : Which is the Best Approach? March '93 INTRODUCTION There is now reasonable acceptance through-out the industry for the use of a hard shut-in procedure following

More information

Worked Questions and Answers

Worked Questions and Answers Worked Questions and Answers A Learning Document for prospective Candidates For the Rotary Drilling Well Control Test Programme Copyright, IWCF June 2000 Revision No.1, November 2000 IWCF 2000 page 1 of

More information

Step-Rate Formation Integrity Test Method for Geothermal Wells

Step-Rate Formation Integrity Test Method for Geothermal Wells GRC Transactions, Vol. 41, 2017 Step-Rate Formation Integrity Test Method for Geothermal Wells William M. Rickard, Ozgur Balamir and Ernesto Rivas Geothermal Resource Group, Inc. services@geothermalresourcegroup.com

More information

ECD Reduction Tool. R. K. Bansal, Brian Grayson, Jim Stanley Control Pressure Drilling & Testing

ECD Reduction Tool. R. K. Bansal, Brian Grayson, Jim Stanley Control Pressure Drilling & Testing ECD Reduction Tool R. K. Bansal, Brian Grayson, Jim Stanley Control Pressure Drilling & Testing Drilling Engineering Association, Fourth Quarter Meeting November 20, 2008 1 Presentation outline Description

More information

The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe

The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe Primary funding is provided by The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe The Society is grateful to those companies that allow their professionals to serve as

More information

Deepwater Horizon Incident Internal Investigation

Deepwater Horizon Incident Internal Investigation Not all Information has been verified or corroborated. Subject to review based on additional information or analysis. Deepwater Horizon Incident Internal Investigation 1 Areas of Discussion Investigation

More information

Blowout during Workover Operation A case study Narration by: Tarsem Singh & Arvind Jain, OISD

Blowout during Workover Operation A case study Narration by: Tarsem Singh & Arvind Jain, OISD 1. Introduction An incident of gas leakage from a well took place during workover operations. Subsequently, the gas caught fire on the fourth day in which twelve persons were injured. Two contract workers,

More information

Understanding pressure and pressure

Understanding pressure and pressure CHAPTER 1 1-1 PRESSURE BASICS Remember to think downhole. The concepts provided in this section cover the foundations for good well control. Understanding pressure and pressure relationships is important

More information

SHELL FLAGS INSPECTION CASE STUDY

SHELL FLAGS INSPECTION CASE STUDY SHELL FLAGS INSPECTION CASE STUDY J. Nonemaker, Solution Engineer, ROSEN T. Steinvoorte, Business Development, ROSEN R. Subramanian, Pipelines & Subsea Technical Support Engineer, Shell U.K. Limited Introduction

More information

WellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM

WellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM WellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM DRILLING OPERATIONS CORE CURRICULUM AND RELATED JOB SKILLS FORM WCT-02DS SUPERVISORY LEVEL The purpose of the core curriculum is to identify a body of knowledge

More information

DRILLSCENE PROACTIVE DRILLING DECISIONS

DRILLSCENE PROACTIVE DRILLING DECISIONS DRILLSCENE PROACTIVE DRILLING DECISIONS RISE TO THE CHALLENGE OF REAL-TIME DRILLING CONTROL Today s oil and gas drilling operations present significant technical challenges in remote locations and increasingly

More information

Extended leak off testing

Extended leak off testing Extended leak off testing Rev: 1.0 03/01/01 Purpose To ensure minimal operational time and risk exposure to personnel, process, production and equipment. The following extended leak off test procedures

More information

R.K. Bansal, Weatherford; P.A. Bern, BP Exploration; Rick Todd, Weatherford; R.V. Baker, BP America; Tom Bailey, Weatherford

R.K. Bansal, Weatherford; P.A. Bern, BP Exploration; Rick Todd, Weatherford; R.V. Baker, BP America; Tom Bailey, Weatherford AADE-07-NTCE-69 A Downhole Tool for Reducing ECD R.K. Bansal, Weatherford; P.A. Bern, BP Exploration; Rick Todd, Weatherford; R.V. Baker, BP America; Tom Bailey, Weatherford Copyright 2007, AADE This paper

More information

VOLUMETRIC METHODS and STRIPPING OPERATIONS

VOLUMETRIC METHODS and STRIPPING OPERATIONS VOLUMETRIC METHODS and STRIPPING OPERATIONS WELL CONTROL SCHOOL Muscat, Oman Training Center VOLUMETRIC METHODS and STRIPPING OPERATIONS The material contained here, is based on the best sources available

More information

ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE WELL CONTROL METHODS FOR DUAL DENSITY DEEPWATER DRILLING

ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE WELL CONTROL METHODS FOR DUAL DENSITY DEEPWATER DRILLING ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE WELL CONTROL METHODS FOR DUAL DENSITY DEEPWATER DRILLING A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in

More information

Safety and Risk Analysis of Deepwater Drilling using Managed Pressure Drilling Technology

Safety and Risk Analysis of Deepwater Drilling using Managed Pressure Drilling Technology Safety and Risk Analysis of Deepwater Drilling using Managed Pressure Drilling Technology Jyoti Bhandari 1, Faisal Khan* 1, and Vikram Garaniya 1 1.Offshore Safety and Risk Management Group, Australian

More information

Well Control Institute (WCI) Core Curriculum and Related Learning Outcomes: Supervisory Level

Well Control Institute (WCI) Core Curriculum and Related Learning Outcomes: Supervisory Level Well Control nstitute (WC) Core Curriculum and Related Learning Outcomes: Level Revision 4B ay 14, 2014 Prepared by Black & Veatch Corp. DRAFT WORK PRODUCT FOR NDUSTRY COENT Well Control nstitute (WC)

More information

Why Do Not Disturb Is a Safety Message for Well Integrity

Why Do Not Disturb Is a Safety Message for Well Integrity Why Do Not Disturb Is a Safety Message for Well Integrity Presented at the Practical Well Integrity Conference 9-10 December, 2014 in Houston By Ron Sweatman, Principal Advisor, Reservoir Development Services,

More information

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L FLUIDS

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L FLUIDS FLUIDS Fluids Learning Objectives You will learn about different fluids that can be used in well control. You will become familiar with the characteristics and limitations of fluids. You will learn general

More information

Dynamic Positioning Control Augmentation for Jack-up Vessels

Dynamic Positioning Control Augmentation for Jack-up Vessels DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE October 9-10, 2012 Design and Control Session Dynamic Positioning Control Augmentation for Jack-up Vessels By Bradley Deghuee L-3 Communications 1 Introduction Specialized

More information

The benefits of the extended diagnostics feature. Compact, well-proven, and flexible

The benefits of the extended diagnostics feature. Compact, well-proven, and flexible ABB MEASUREMENT & ANALYTICS TECHNICAL INFORMATION PositionMaster EDP300 Extended Diagnostics Compact, well-proven, and flexible The benefits of the extended diagnostics feature The PositionMaster EDP300

More information

OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY This case study discusses the sizing of a coalescer filter and demonstrates its fouling life cycle analysis using a Flownex model which implements two new pressure loss components: - A rated pressure loss

More information

OIL SUPPLY SYSTEMS ABOVE 45kW OUTPUT 4.1 Oil Supply

OIL SUPPLY SYSTEMS ABOVE 45kW OUTPUT 4.1 Oil Supply OIL SUPPLY SYSTEMS ABOVE 45kW OUTPUT 4.1 Oil Supply 4.1.1 General The primary function of a system for handling fuel oil is to transfer oil from the storage tank to the oil burner at specified conditions

More information

Solid Expandable Tubular Technology: The Value of Planned Installation vs. Contingency

Solid Expandable Tubular Technology: The Value of Planned Installation vs. Contingency Solid Expandable Tubular Technology: The Value of Planned Installation vs. Contingency Chris Carstens Unocal Corporation 14141 Southwest Freeway Sugar Land, Texas 77478 Mike Breaux Unocal Corporation 14141

More information

PIG MOTION AND DYNAMICS IN COMPLEX GAS NETWORKS. Dr Aidan O Donoghue, Pipeline Research Limited, Glasgow

PIG MOTION AND DYNAMICS IN COMPLEX GAS NETWORKS. Dr Aidan O Donoghue, Pipeline Research Limited, Glasgow PIG MOTION AND DYNAMICS IN COMPLEX GAS NETWORKS Dr Aidan O Donoghue, Pipeline Research Limited, Glasgow A model to examine pigging and inspection of gas networks with multiple pipelines, connections and

More information

Valve Replacement: Using Non-Intrusive Isolation Technology to Minimize Production Downtime

Valve Replacement: Using Non-Intrusive Isolation Technology to Minimize Production Downtime CASE STUDY CS15-02 >> Valve Replacement: Using Non-Intrusive Isolation Technology to Minimize Production Downtime What s Inside:» Explore Double Block & Monitor» Increase Operational Safety» Achieve Double

More information

EVALUATION OF LIQUID LIFT APPROACH TO DUAL GRADIENT DRILLING

EVALUATION OF LIQUID LIFT APPROACH TO DUAL GRADIENT DRILLING EVALUATION OF LIQUID LIFT APPROACH TO DUAL GRADIENT DRILLING A Thesis by UGOCHUKWU NNAMDI OKAFOR Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements

More information

PositionMaster EDP300 Extended Diagnostics. Compact, well-proven, and flexible

PositionMaster EDP300 Extended Diagnostics. Compact, well-proven, and flexible Change from one to two columns Technical Information TI/EDP300_ED-EN Rev. A PositionMaster EDP300 Extended Diagnostics Compact, well-proven, and flexible The benefits of the extended diagnostics feature

More information

Well Control for Drilling Operations Personnel Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives

Well Control for Drilling Operations Personnel Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives Well Control for Drilling Operations Personnel Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives Form WSP-02-DO-D Second Edition, Revision 1 19 June 2015 ADC 2015 COPYRGHT PROTECTED DOCUENT All rights reserved.

More information

DRILLING MANAGED PRESSURE REGIONAL OUTLOOK: EAST AFRICA REDUCED EMISSION COMPLETIONS SHALE TECHNOLOGY REVIEW

DRILLING MANAGED PRESSURE REGIONAL OUTLOOK: EAST AFRICA REDUCED EMISSION COMPLETIONS SHALE TECHNOLOGY REVIEW MARCH 2014 / DEFINING TECHNOLOGY FOR EXPLORATION, DRILLING AND PRODUCTION / WorldOil.com MANAGED PRESSURE DRILLING How automated MPD enables drilling of an impossible well in Mexico REGIONAL OUTLOOK: EAST

More information

Every things under control High-Integrity Pressure Protection System (HIPPS)

Every things under control High-Integrity Pressure Protection System (HIPPS) Every things under control www.adico.co info@adico.co Table Of Contents 1. Introduction... 2 2. Standards... 3 3. HIPPS vs Emergency Shut Down... 4 4. Safety Requirement Specification... 4 5. Device Integrity

More information

Courses of Instruction: Controlling and Monitoring of Pipelines

Courses of Instruction: Controlling and Monitoring of Pipelines Courses of Instruction: Controlling and Monitoring of Pipelines Date December 2010 Dr. Peter Eschenbacher Partner Angergraben 4 85250 Altomünster Germany Tel. +49-(0)8254 / 99 69 57 Fax +49-(0)8254 / 99

More information

Air Eliminators and Combination Air Eliminators Strainers

Air Eliminators and Combination Air Eliminators Strainers Description Air Eliminators and Combination Air Eliminator Strainers are designed to provide separation, elimination and prevention of air in piping systems for a variety of installations and conditions.

More information

RPSEA UDW Forum June 22 & 23, Secure Energy for America

RPSEA UDW Forum June 22 & 23, Secure Energy for America RPSEA UDW Forum June 22 & 23, 2010 Secure Energy for America PROJECT TEAM RPSEA Operator Advisory Committee Anadarko Chevron Shell ConocoPhillips Subcontractors IntecSea NOV CTES General Marine Contractors

More information

Water Weir Flow Controller. Introduction. Safety Precautions. Mounting the Hardware

Water Weir Flow Controller. Introduction. Safety Precautions. Mounting the Hardware 57007-88 Introduction Safety Precautions This instruction sheet describes how to set up and use the Hach (Figure 1). A water weir is a device that raises or diverts water to regulate the flow. Hach s water

More information

Well Control for Supervisors for Drilling Operations Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives

Well Control for Supervisors for Drilling Operations Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives Well Control for Supervisors for Drilling Operations Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives Form WSP-02-DO-S Second Edition Revision 1 19 June 2015 ADC 2015 COPYRGHT PROTECTED DOCUENT All rights

More information

BANDAR PANJI-1 WELL CONTROL INCIDENT REPORT

BANDAR PANJI-1 WELL CONTROL INCIDENT REPORT BANDAR PANJI-1 WELL CONTROL INCIDENT REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I was requested by management to review the Banjar Panji-1 drilling operations from the conception of the Integrated Drilling Management approach

More information

Tutorial. BOSfluids. Relief valve

Tutorial. BOSfluids. Relief valve Tutorial Relief valve The Relief valve tutorial describes the theory and modeling process of a pressure relief valve or safety valve. It covers the algorithm BOSfluids uses to model the valve and a worked

More information

my SYSTEM A guide to common applications in water distribution systems

my SYSTEM A guide to common applications in water distribution systems my SYSTEM A guide to common applications in water distribution systems WWW.SINGERVALVE.COM INDEX This short guide is intended to offer guidance on some of the common problems, applications and questions

More information

SUBSEA KILL SHEET EXERCISE No. 5

SUBSEA KILL SHEET EXERCISE No. 5 Subsea Kill Sheet Exercise No. 5 SUBSEA KILL SHEET EXERCISE No. 5 Name: Date: Complete the Subsea vertical kill sheet provided on pages 2 and 3. Then answer questions 1 to 12. Please round calculations

More information

OLGA. The Dynamic Three Phase Flow Simulator. Input. Output. Mass transfer Momentum transfer Energy transfer. 9 Conservation equations

OLGA. The Dynamic Three Phase Flow Simulator. Input. Output. Mass transfer Momentum transfer Energy transfer. 9 Conservation equations 서유택 Flow Assurance The Dynamic Three Phase Flow Simulator 9 Conservation equations Mass (5) Momentum (3) Energy (1) Mass transfer Momentum transfer Energy transfer Input Boundary and initial conditions

More information

APPENDIX A1 - Drilling and completion work programme

APPENDIX A1 - Drilling and completion work programme APPENDIX A1 - Drilling and completion work programme Information about the well and drilling To the extent possible, the international system of units (SI) should be adhered to, and the drilling programme

More information

Impact of imperfect sealing on the flow measurement of natural gas by orifice plates

Impact of imperfect sealing on the flow measurement of natural gas by orifice plates Impact of imperfect sealing on the flow measurement of natural gas by orifice plates Rubens Silva Telles 1, Kazuto Kawakita 2 1 IPT Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas, São Paulo, Brazil, rtelles@ipt.br

More information

Chapter 8: Reservoir Mechanics

Chapter 8: Reservoir Mechanics PTRT 1472: Petroleum Data Management II Chapter 8: Reservoir Mechanics - Reservoir drives Types of Natural Gas Reservoir Fluids Natural gas is petroleum in a gaseous state, so it is always accompanied

More information

Torque & Drag & Buckling

Torque & Drag & Buckling Torque & Drag & Buckling Soft-string vs Stiff-string Models The aim of this presentation is to show the main differences between the 2 types of model used for Torque & Drag & Buckling analysis in the drilling

More information

COGCC OPERATOR GUIDANCE MECHANICAL INTEGRITY TEST GUIDANCE: PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

COGCC OPERATOR GUIDANCE MECHANICAL INTEGRITY TEST GUIDANCE: PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES COGCC OPERATOR GUIDANCE MECHANICAL INTEGRITY TEST GUIDANCE: PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES DOCUMENT CONTROL: Created Date: May 06, 2013 Last Updated Date: September 15, 2015 Last Updated By: Stuart Ellsworth

More information

Oil And Gas Office Houston Fax Test Separator / Off-Shore Metering

Oil And Gas Office Houston Fax Test Separator / Off-Shore Metering Oil And Gas Office Houston 281 361 0708 Fax 201 361 0708 Test Separator / Off-Shore Metering Prepared By : Mr. Phil Lawrence A. M. Inst Mech E. Sales Manager (Oil and Gas Industry) 2.0 Philosophy for Test

More information

APPLYING VARIABLE SPEED PRESSURE LIMITING CONTROL DRIVER FIRE PUMPS. SEC Project No

APPLYING VARIABLE SPEED PRESSURE LIMITING CONTROL DRIVER FIRE PUMPS. SEC Project No APPLYING VARIABLE SPEED PRESSURE LIMITING CONTROL DRIVER FIRE PUMPS SEC Project No. 1803007-000 November 20, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ABSTRACT...1 II. INTRODUCTION...1 III. HISTORY...2 IV. VARIABLE SPEED

More information

Vibration and Pulsation Analysis and Solutions

Vibration and Pulsation Analysis and Solutions 1 Vibration and Pulsation Analysis and Solutions Brian Howes, M.Sc., P.Eng. Beta Machinery Analysis Ltd. Problems created by excessive vibration in machinery can have serious economic impact. Frequently

More information

DIVERLESS SUBSEA HOT TAPPING OF PRODUCTION PIPELINES

DIVERLESS SUBSEA HOT TAPPING OF PRODUCTION PIPELINES DIVERLESS SUBSEA HOT TAPPING OF PRODUCTION PIPELINES Dale Calkins Senior Project Engineer, TD Williamson Inc Biography Dale Calkins joined TD Williamson Inc in November of 1999 after working as a consulting

More information

OPTIMUM SELECTION OF WELL CONTROL METHODS

OPTIMUM SELECTION OF WELL CONTROL METHODS OPTIMUM SELECTION OF WELL CONTROL METHODS Md AHAMMAD SHARIF Assistant professor, Department of Petroleum Engineering, GIET College of Engineering, Rajahmundry. Dr. S. SRIGOWRI REDDY Professor, GIET College

More information

Gerald D. Anderson. Education Technical Specialist

Gerald D. Anderson. Education Technical Specialist Gerald D. Anderson Education Technical Specialist The factors which influence selection of equipment for a liquid level control loop interact significantly. Analyses of these factors and their interactions

More information

Vehicle- or rack-mounted liquefied gas meters, pump supplied

Vehicle- or rack-mounted liquefied gas meters, pump supplied Purpose This inspection procedure outline (IPO) defines the minimum tests which must be performed to ensure that basic volumetric measuring devices comply with the legislation. Application Rack/fixed metering

More information

Application of Simulation Technology to Mitsubishi Air Lubrication System

Application of Simulation Technology to Mitsubishi Air Lubrication System 50 Application of Simulation Technology to Mitsubishi Air Lubrication System CHIHARU KAWAKITA *1 SHINSUKE SATO *2 TAKAHIRO OKIMOTO *2 For the development and design of the Mitsubishi Air Lubrication System

More information

BERMAD Fire Protection Hydraulic Control Valves

BERMAD Fire Protection Hydraulic Control Valves BERMAD Fire Protection Hydraulic Control Valves Control Solutions with the Power to Protect BERMAD - The Company Since its foundation in 1965, BERMAD has focused its efforts on innovation, quality and

More information

OCEAN DRILLING PROGRAM

OCEAN DRILLING PROGRAM BIH OCEAN DRILLING PROGRAM www.oceandrilling.org Scientifi c Application Packers A packer is an inflatable rubber element that inflates to seal the annular space between the drill string and the borehole

More information

PowerDrive X6. Rotary Steerable System for high-performance drilling and accurate wellbore placement

PowerDrive X6. Rotary Steerable System for high-performance drilling and accurate wellbore placement Rotary Steerable System for high-performance drilling and accurate wellbore placement The PowerDrive X6 RSS maintains control under the most difficult conditions, bringing the benefits of rotary steerable

More information

Vehicle-mounted meters, pump supplied

Vehicle-mounted meters, pump supplied Purpose This inspection procedure outline (IPO) defines the minimum tests which must be performed to ensure that basic volumetric measuring devices comply with the legislation. Application Vehicle-mounted

More information

API MPMS Chapter 17.6 Guidelines for Determining the Fullness of Pipelines between Vessels and Shore Tanks

API MPMS Chapter 17.6 Guidelines for Determining the Fullness of Pipelines between Vessels and Shore Tanks API MPMS Chapter 17.6 Guidelines for Determining the Fullness of Pipelines between Vessels and Shore Tanks 1. Scope This document describes procedures for determining or confirming the fill condition of

More information

Simulation study evaluating alternative initial responses to formation fluid influx during managed pressure drilling

Simulation study evaluating alternative initial responses to formation fluid influx during managed pressure drilling Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2007 Simulation study evaluating alternative initial responses to formation fluid influx during managed pressure drilling

More information

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L COMPLICATIONS

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L COMPLICATIONS COMPLICATIONS Complications Learning Objectives You will learn to detect changes that deviate from established trends. You will learn how to respond to problems such as: Pump problems String problems Hole

More information

Unit 24: Applications of Pneumatics and Hydraulics

Unit 24: Applications of Pneumatics and Hydraulics Unit 24: Applications of Pneumatics and Hydraulics Unit code: J/601/1496 QCF level: 4 Credit value: 15 OUTCOME 2 TUTORIAL 9 ACCUMULATORS The material needed for outcome 2 is very extensive so there are

More information

2600T Series Pressure Transmitters Plugged Impulse Line Detection Diagnostic. Pressure Measurement Engineered solutions for all applications

2600T Series Pressure Transmitters Plugged Impulse Line Detection Diagnostic. Pressure Measurement Engineered solutions for all applications Application Description AG/266PILD-EN Rev. C 2600T Series Pressure Transmitters Plugged Impulse Line Detection Diagnostic Pressure Measurement Engineered solutions for all applications Increase plant productivity

More information

Journal of Applied Fluid Transients, Vol 1-1, April 2014 (3-1)

Journal of Applied Fluid Transients, Vol 1-1, April 2014 (3-1) Modeling and Field Verification Study of Air Slam Conditions on kalanit Pipeline System By Yiftach Brunner & Sathish Kumar ir valves are integral part of long water transmission mains and are essential

More information

Rig Math. Page 1.

Rig Math. Page 1. Page 1 The Calculator and Main Keyboard Display Numerical 10-key pad used for entering numerical values Trigonometric Functions These keys will be used where wellbore angle is an issue These are the keys

More information

Learn more at

Learn more at IBP1833_06 COST EFFICIENT ARTIFICIAL BUOYANT SEABED DRILLING SOLUTION Dan Moutrey 1, Frank Lim 2 Copyright 2006, Instituto Brasileiro de Petróleo e Gás - IBP This Technical Paper was prepared for presentation

More information

Next Generation Quartz Pressure Gauges

Next Generation Quartz Pressure Gauges Next Generation Quartz Pressure Gauges Rick Puccio, Ph.D. Senior Scientist Quartzdyne Houston, TX March 2, 2016 Outline Quartz Pressure Gauge Introduction Gauge Size Reduction Long Term Pressure Drift

More information

Improving distillation tower operation

Improving distillation tower operation Improving distillation tower operation Measuring differential pressure across long sections of distillation columns has always been challenging, but purpose-built sensor systems provide a solution Fast

More information

Marine Technology Society

Marine Technology Society Marine Technology Society Dynamic Positioning Conference 21-22 October, 1997 Session I Review of DP Applications, Consequences and Cost of Failures Drilling Fundamentals-DP Operations-Drilling with Riser

More information

HydroPull. Extended-Reach Tool. Applications

HydroPull. Extended-Reach Tool. Applications Extended-Reach Tool HydroPull This tool incorporates a cycling valve that momentarily interrupts the flow to create water-hammer pressure pulses inside coiled or jointed tubing used in horizontal well

More information

TECHNICAL BENEFITS OF CJS / RAISE HSP. Technical Advantages

TECHNICAL BENEFITS OF CJS / RAISE HSP. Technical Advantages TECHNICAL BENEFITS OF CJS / RAISE HSP Technical Advantages The HSP is designed for low- to mid- volume applications at flow rates of 1 cubic meter to 30 c. m per day. The benefits are in the details. The

More information

Transient Analyses In Relief Systems

Transient Analyses In Relief Systems Transient Analyses In Relief Systems Dirk Deboer, Brady Haneman and Quoc-Khanh Tran Kaiser Engineers Pty Ltd ABSTRACT Analyses of pressure relief systems are concerned with transient process disturbances

More information

Validation of Custody Transfer Metering Skid at Site After Laboratory Proving

Validation of Custody Transfer Metering Skid at Site After Laboratory Proving flotek.g 2017- Innovative Solutions in Flow Measurement and Control - Oil, Water and Gas August 28-30, 2017, FCRI, Palakkad, Kerala, India Validation of Custody Transfer Metering Skid at Site After Laboratory

More information

553 Series.

553 Series. 38467.03 www.caleffi.com Pre-adjustable filling units Copyright 01 Caleffi 3 Series Function The automatic filling valve is a device consisting of a pressure reducing valve with compensating seat, visual

More information

Fisher DVI Desuperheater Venturi Inline

Fisher DVI Desuperheater Venturi Inline Instruction Manual DVI Desuperheater Fisher DVI Desuperheater Venturi Inline Contents Introduction... 1 Scope of Manual... 1 Description... 1 Principle of Operation... 2 Installation... 3 Operating Instructions...

More information

TEST PROTOCOL VERIFICATION OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF A MECHANICAL COMPRESSION COUPLING DURING SETTLEMENT

TEST PROTOCOL VERIFICATION OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF A MECHANICAL COMPRESSION COUPLING DURING SETTLEMENT TEST PROTOCOL VERIFICATION OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF A MECHANICAL COMPRESSION COUPLING DURING SETTLEMENT Nova Siria factory, Roletto, April 6, 2011 Introduction Mechanical steel compression couplings (CC) are

More information

Fail Operational Controls for an Independent Metering Valve

Fail Operational Controls for an Independent Metering Valve Group 14 - System Intergration and Safety Paper 14-3 465 Fail Operational Controls for an Independent Metering Valve Michael Rannow Eaton Corporation, 7945 Wallace Rd., Eden Prairie, MN, 55347, email:

More information

OPERATING MANUAL DOUBLE ACTING DRILLING INTENSIFIER HYDRAULIC TYPE

OPERATING MANUAL DOUBLE ACTING DRILLING INTENSIFIER HYDRAULIC TYPE Page 1 of 8 OPERATING MANUAL DOUBLE ACTING DRILLING INTENSIFIER HYDRAULIC TYPE Size Series 6.50" 478 Reviewed And Approved By: Signature: Initials: Date: Page 2 of 8 Section OPERATING MANUAL DOUBLE ACTING

More information

SPE/IADC Abstract. Introduction

SPE/IADC Abstract. Introduction SPE/IADC 156888 Demonstrating the Value of Integrating FPWD Measurements With Managed Pressure Drilling To Safely Drill Narrow Mud Weight Windows in HP/HT Environment L. Umar, I. Azian, N. Azree, A.R.M.

More information