Use of a low power, airgun sound source to accurately determine sound. Transmission Loss characteristics at the proposed Robin Rigg. Windfarm site.
|
|
- Kellie Black
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Submitted to: Submitted by: The Scottish Executive On behalf of: Mr M J Swanwick Mr S J Parvin EON-UK Subacoustech Ltd Westwood Way Chase Mill Westwood Business Park Winchester Road Coventry Bishop s Waltham CV4 8LG SO32 1AH Tel: + 44 (0) Tel: +44 (0) Fax: + 44 (0) Fax: +44 (0) matthew.swanwick@eon-uk.com steve.parvin@subacoustech.com website: Use of a low power, airgun sound source to accurately determine sound Transmission Loss characteristics at the proposed Robin Rigg Windfarm site. Document Reference: 663 R 0102 by S. J. Parvin 23/05/05 Approved for release: Dr J R Nedwell
2 Contents Section Page 1 Introduction Objective Test Plan Date Duration Location Measurement Technique Sound Source Number of Signals Environmental impact of a low volume, low pressure, airgun Mitigation for use of a low volume, low pressure airgun source Risk / Benefit Risk Physical Injury Behavioural Response Benefit References...7 Appendix: Definitions and symbols used in this document...8 Subacoustech Ltd -i-
3 1 Introduction. This document has been prepared by Subacoustech Ltd., and is submitted to the Scottish Executive on behalf of E.ON UK Renewables Developments Ltd. It outlines a proposal to use a single low volume, low power, air gun as a sound source to measure the underwater sound Transmission Loss characteristics at the proposed Robin Rigg windfarm site. This will allow more accurate prediction of the range at which the proposed piling operation could have an impact on significant marine species in the region. The measurements are being conducted as part of the mitigation for underwater noise impact prior to the piling operation [1]. Transmission of sound in the underwater environment is highly variable from region to region and as a consequence, considerable errors can occur if local factors that can influence sound propagation are not taken into account. Acoustical models attempt to quantify these variables, but whenever possible the Transmission Loss characteristics for the region should be measured. The ideal approach is to back up initial acoustic modelling with a series of sound Transmission Loss measurements for the region, and then use this data to refine the model. Transmission Loss is measured by undertaking a series of sound and range measurements at incremental range from a consistent sound source, and then determining the sound level decay with range. Where the noise being modelled is impulsive (as is the case for piling) then it is preferable if the sound source used to replicate the noise is a similar, but lower level impulsive source. The impact of underwater sound on marine species will vary depending upon their ability to perceive different frequency components of the noise. As underwater noise propagates, different frequency components decay at different rates depending upon the local environment. For example, the propagation of low frequency sound is inefficient in shallow water since it typically travels in combined modes involving the simultaneous motion of the water and the seabed, in which losses can readily occur. By comparison, high frequency sound may propagate in the same environment with relatively low losses. Consequently, at range a species with good high frequency hearing (typically marine mammals) will perceive the same incident sound at a very much high level than a species with low frequency hearing sensitivity (typically fish). From the sound and range measurements the species dependent (db ht (species)) technique [2] will be used to confirm, or more accurately predict, the behavioural impact range for significant marine species in the Solway Firth region. This metric presents noise and range data in a biologically significant format, and may be used to estimate behavioural response. Where an activity is likely to generate high levels of underwater noise, and may therefore have a behavioural impact over long range, the Transmission Loss characteristics of the local environment can have a considerable influence on the species impact range. In these cases, Subacoustech believe it is best practice to measure the overall and species specific Transmission Loss characteristics and thereby accurately predict the impact range for species of significance. Subacoustech Ltd -1-
4 2 Objective. The purpose of this study is to measure the overall and species specific sound Transmission Loss characteristics at the proposed Robin Rigg windfarm site in the Solway Firth. This will provide data to confirm, or more accurately predict, the behavioural impact range for significant marine species from the underwater noise generated during the piling that is required to construct the wind turbine site. Subacoustech Ltd -2-
5 3 Test Plan 3.1 Date The measurements will be undertaken on a single day in late May or early June depending on boat and personnel availability, and local tide and weather conditions. Date to be advised. 3.2 Duration The measurements will be undertaken over a period of up to 6 hours during hours of daylight. 3.3 Location The sound source will be lowered beneath a vessel, at a fixed location, at a point within the proposed Robin Rigg windfarm site, Solway Firth. The site is bounded by the following points (WGS 84 datum); N, W N, W N, W N, W N, W N, W N, W N, W 3.4 Measurement Technique The measurements will be taken along transect lines which extend radially from the noise source. The measurements will extend to a sufficient range that the noise has fallen below the level of background noise, or to sufficient range that the Transmission Loss can be accurately determined. Suggested transect lines and approximate locations for the measurements will be determined based on local conditions. As underwater noise varies significantly with distance, measurements will be made at regular incremental ranges, typically, 100 m, 200 m, 400 m, 800 m, 1600 m and so on. Measurements will be taken at two depths below the surface to elucidate any variations with depth in the water column. These will be selected based upon the depth of the water in which the activity is being undertaken. 3.5 Sound Source The sound source will be a bolt sleeve air gun, fitted with a low volume (20 cu. inch.) fire chamber. The airgun will be operated at low pressure (50 bar) to reduce the peak pressure and sound spectrum levels produced by the source. Recent tests in a freshwater lake with this particular airgun have indicated that when operated in this mode the airgun produces a peak Source Sound Pressure Level of 222 db re. 1 1 m. The sound level measurements for the airgun are summarised in Table 3-1. Subacoustech Ltd -3-
6 Range from Source (m) Sound Pressure Level (db re. 1 µpa) Predicted Source (1 m) 222 Table 3-1 Peak Sound Pressure Level measurements and predicted Source Level (1 m) for the bolt sleeve airgun operated on low volume (20 cu. inch) and low pressure (50 bar) mode. 3.6 Number of Signals The airgun will be operated for a maximum of 200 discharges. 4 Environmental impact of a low volume, low pressure, airgun. Use of the airgun will introduce a loud anthropogenic (man-made) noise source into the marine environment. Underwater noise at high levels can cause physical injury to marine species and a behavioural response (Species avoiding feeding grounds or being displaced from migration routes or breeding grounds) over long range and large volumes of waterspace. The author is familiar with the levels of Peak Pressure and Impulse that can cause physical injury in marine species, and has prepared documents reviewing this data for the UK MOD [3] and US Navy [4]. The Source Level Peak Pressure of 222 db re. 1 µpa (126, 000 Pa or 126 kpa) is in the region where the injury potential is summarised as unlikely to cause injury. At ranges greater than 1 m from the source the potential for any injury to marine species diminishes rapidly. It is therefore anticipated that use of this sound source will not cause physical injury to marine animals. Airguns typically produce underwater sound energy over a low frequency range from 1 Hz to 500 Hz. Peak hearing sensitivity for marine mammal species is at very much higher frequencies than this (typically above 10 khz), however, what little evidence exists [4] indicates that marine mammals have some hearing capability at low frequency. By comparison, hearing in fish occurs almost exclusively at low frequency and it would be expected that low frequency impulse noise would be audible to fish species over a considerable range. Table 3-1 presents a species dependent analysis [2] of the low volume airgun noise in terms of the range from the airgun source. For ranges to 10 m the data indicates that the airgun noise will produce a strong avoidance response (based on levels exceeding 90 db ht (species)) for both marine mammals and fish. The data for the typical marine mammal (the common seal) indicates that an avoidance response in some individuals is likely to occur to a range of 50 m (based on the range at which the airgun noise falls below 75 db ht (species)). Fish, being low frequency hearers [4], perceive the airgun noise at a much higher level and are likely to have a strong avoidance reaction to the airgun noise at ranges beyond the 40 m range for which the data is presented in Subacoustech Ltd -4-
7 Figure 3-1. By extrapolating this data, it is likely that fish species are likely have a strong avoidance reaction to the low volume airgun at ranges to approximately 100 m, with some individuals avoiding the airgun to ranges of 500 m. Range (m) SPL (db re. 1 µpa) Common Seal db ht (Phoca vitulina) Cod db ht (Gadus morhua) Herring db ht (Clupea harengus) Source Table 3-1 Summary of measured and predicted (Source) perceived loudness levels for typical marine species from the low volume airgun. 4.1 Mitigation for use of a low volume, low pressure airgun source. A soft start procedure will be used during the initial three airgun discharges of each series of measurements. The peak level being built up over a period of one minute. The company possesses and regularly deploys Acoustic Harassment Devices to remove marine mammals from areas where high power acoustic sources are to be used. In view of the comparatively low level sound being generated in this study, it is not proposed that these devices are required. 5 Risk / Benefit 5.1 Risk Physical Injury There is a small risk of physical injury to marine species that approach within 1 m of the airgun during discharge. Considering the small volume of waterspace within which this effect can occur it is considered extremely unlikely that any marine animals will be injured as a consequence of this study Behavioural Response The analysis conducted in section 4 of this document has indicated that the low volume airgun noise is likely to cause a behavioural avoidance to marine mammals over a range of approximately 50 m and in fish to a range of 500 m. The airgun is being used in open water and is therefore unlikely to restrict marine mammal or fish movement to feeding or breeding grounds. The source is being used for a limited period of 6 hours after which it is anticipated that any displaced animals would return to the area. 5.2 Benefit The source level noise from piling at the Robin Rigg site has been predicted [1] to be at a Sound Pressure Level of 262 db re. 1 1 m. The low volume airgun source proposed for these measurements produces Peak Sound Pressure Levels at 222 db re. 1 µpa. As the decibel scale is logarithmic sound energy from the airgun is substantially lower than the sound energy from the proposed piling operation. The data that is obtained, and the small numbers of marine animals effected during this study, will allow more accurate predictions of site specific sound power transmission loss. This will provide confirmation of the transmission loss assumed for the Robin Subacoustech Ltd -5-
8 Rigg site to date and will provide greater confidence in the mitigation measures proposed to be implemented during the Robin Rigg piling operation. It is considered that the benefit of conducting this study in terms of improved protection to marine animals during the Robin Rigg piling operation far outweighs the minimal risk to small numbers of marine animals during this study. Subacoustech Ltd -6-
9 6 References 1. The impact of construction noise from the Robin Rigg Offshore Windfarm Development on the Marine Mammal populations of the Solway Firth. Centre for Marine and Coastal Studies report CMACS/J3018v1.1, April Nedwell, J R and Turnpenny, A. W. H. The use of a generic weighted frequency scale in estimating environmental effect. Proceedings of the Workshop on Seismics and Marine Mammals, 23rd-25th June 1998, London. UK, Parvin S J and Cudahy E A. The effects of underwater blast on divers. QinetiQ report QINETIQ/CHS/PPD/TR010054/1.0, December Cudahy E A and Parvin S J. The effects of underwater blast on divers. Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory report 1218, February Nedwell, J. R., Edwards B., Turnpenny A. W. H., Gordon J. Fish and Marine Mammal Audiograms: A summary of available information. Subacoustech Report ref: 534R0214, Subacoustech Ltd -7-
10 Appendix: Definitions and symbols used in this document Units of sound measurement. The fundamental unit of sound pressure is the Newton per square metre, or Pascal. However, in quantifying underwater acoustic phenomena it is convenient to express the sound pressure (either peak or Root Mean Square (RMS)) as a Sound Pressure Level (SPL) through the use of a logarithmic scale. There are three reasons for this: 1. There is a very wide range of sound pressures measured underwater, from around Pascal in quiet sea to say Pascal for an explosive blast. The use of a logarithmic scale compresses the range so that it can be easily described (in this example, from 0 db to 260 db re 1 µpa). 2. Many of the mechanisms affecting sound underwater cause loss of sound at a constant rate when it is expressed on the db scale. 3. The effects of noise tend to increase in proportion to the SPL rather than the linear level. For instance, a given increase in effect will occur each time the sound is doubled, rather than each time it increases by a given unit of pressure. The Sound Pressure Level, or SPL, is defined as P SPL = 20log P ref where P is the sound pressure to be expressed on the scale and P ref is the reference pressure, which for underwater applications is 1 µpa. dbht(species) weighted level The dbht(species) weighted level is the calculated Sound Pressure Level after the pressure time history has been passed through a filter which has a similar sensitivity to the species' auditory function. A level of above 75 dbht may cause behavioural response and above 90 dbht there is the potential for a strong avoidance reaction. More information on this can be found on the Subacoustech website [ Measurement of sound using electronic recording equipment provides an overall linear level of that sound. The level that is obtained depends upon the recording bandwidth and sensitivity of the equipment used. This, however, does not provide an indication of the impact that the sound will have upon a particular fish or marine mammal species. This is of fundamental importance when considering the behavioural impact of underwater sound, as this is associated with the perceived loudness of the sound by the species. Therefore, the same underwater sound will effect marine species in a different manner depending upon the hearing sensitivity of that species. The perceived species sound level (db ht ) incorporates the concept of loudness for a species. The metric incorporates hearing ability by referencing the sound to the species hearing threshold, and hence evaluates the level of sound a species can perceive. Experimental evidence indicates that the scale provides an objective rating of the effects of underwater noise on marine animals Since any given sound will be perceived differently by different species (since they have differing hearing abilities) the species name must be appended when specifying a level. For instance, the same sound might have a level of 70 db ht (Gaddus morhua) for a cod and 110 db ht (Phoca vitulina) for a seal. The perceived noise levels of sources measured in db ht (species) are usually much lower than the unweighted (linear) levels, both because the sound will contain frequency components that the species cannot detect, and also because most marine species have high thresholds of perception to (are relatively insensitive to) sound. If the level of sound is sufficiently high on the db ht (species) scale it is likely that an avoidance reaction will occur. The response from a species will be probabilistic in nature (e.g. at 75 db ht (species) one individual from a species may react, whereas another individual may not), and may also vary depending upon the type of signal. For unusual, man-made noise a response may occur with a level as low as 30 db ht (species). A level of 0 db ht (species) represents a sound that is at the hearing threshold Subacoustech Ltd -8-
11 for that species and is therefore at a level at which sound will start to be heard. At this, and lower perceived sound levels no response occurs as the receptor cannot hear the sound. Currently, on the basis of measurements of fish avoidance of noise it is proposed that levels of 90 db ht (species) and above will cause significant avoidance reaction by most individuals, with nearly 100% avoidance at 100 db ht (species). Milder avoidance reaction occurs in a majority of individuals at levels above 75 db ht (species). The Transect method; Source Level and Transmission Loss. To assess the impact with range from an underwater sound source there are two critical parameters that need to be determined, the Source Level and the Transmission Loss. These factors are defined as: 1. The Source Level (SL); this is a measure of the level of sound generated at the noise source, and may be considered to be the sound level at a nominal 1 metre from the source. 2. The Transmission Loss (TL): this is the rate at which sound from the source is attenuated as it propagates through the water. Both of these factors can be determined by undertaking a series of underwater sound measurements using the Transect method. This method requires many repetitive measurements to be taken at a range of distances from a noise source, allowing the variation of the sound level with distance to be assessed. If a given sound can be represented in terms of these two parameters it allows the sound level at all distances to be specified. Both are specified using a decibel scale, which can for instance be the peak to peak Sound Pressure Level, the Impulse Level, or the db ht level. It should be noted, however, that the values of SL and TL will depend on which unit is being modelled. Usually the decrease in Sound Pressure Level (SPL) with range is due to geometric losses (i.e. the sound mainly reduces as a result of being spread over an increasing area). Under these circumstances the SPL is modelled as: SPL = SL N log R, where SL is the noise Source Level at 1 metre, in db re. 1 µpa, N is the attenuation constant and R is the distance from the source in metres. In shallow coastal waters N is typically between 20 and 25. Where high levels of bottom and surface reflection occur the value of N may be lower than this indicating that sound is able to propagate to longer range before falling below background levels. Subacoustech Ltd -9-
Underwater noise and offshore windfarms
Underwater noise and offshore windfarms Dr Jeremy Nedwell, Mr John Langworthy and Mr Daren Howell BWEA Conference 4/3/04 Subacoustech reference: 544R0503, COWRIE Copyright. Aim of study To evaluate the
More informationBenefit of ESTCP/SERDP Research Program on Underwater Explosive Safety
Benefit of ESTCP/SERDP Research Program on Underwater Explosive Safety Timothy W. Shelton, PE Supervisory Research Hydraulic Engineer ERDC CHL Oct 2017 DoD has very few options for disposing UXO recovered
More informationA review of measurements of underwater man-made noise carried out by Subacoustech Ltd,
Submitted to: Submitted by: Peter Oliver ChevronTexaco Ltd. Ian Buchanan TotalFinaElf Exploration UK PLC Dr J Nedwell Subacoustech Ltd Chase Mill Winchester Road Bishop s Waltham Hampshire SO32 1AH Graham
More informationAppendix H. Modelling and Measurement of Underwater Noise (Subacoustech, 2008)
Appendix H Modelling and Measurement of Underwater Noise (Subacoustech, 2008) Submitted to: Associated British Ports Ocean Gate Atlantic Way Southampton S014 3QN Submitted by: David Lambert Chase Mill
More informationTel: +44 (0) Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)
Submitted to: Submitted by: Cathryn Hooper Jeremy Nedwell The Crown Estates Office Subacoustech Ltd 16 Carlton House Terrace Chase Mill London Winchester Road SW1Y 5AH Bishops Waltham Southampton Hants
More informationThe broadband acoustic output of marine seismic airgun sources"
Title Slide Underwater Noise Measurement, Impact and Mitigation, 14-15 Oct 2008, Southampton................................................................................... The broadband acoustic output
More informationMeasurements of underwater noise in the Arun River during piling at County Wharf, Littlehampton
Submitted to: Submitted by: Mr Chris Moore Dr J Nedwell David Wilson Homes Ltd Subacoustech Ltd 15 Horsham Court Long Barn City Business Centre Mandalay Farm Brighton Road Forester Road Horsham Soberton
More informationEnerginet.dk. Horns Rev 3 Offshore Wind Farm. Technical report no. 21 UNDERWATER NOISE MODELLINIG
Energinet.dk Horns Rev 3 Offshore Wind Farm Technical report no. 21 UNDERWATER NOISE MODELLINIG APRIL 2014 Energinet.dk Horns Rev 3 Offshore Wind Farm UNDERWATER NOISE MODELLING Client Consultant Sub-consultants
More informationCOWRIE Ltd, 2008 Published by COWRIE Ltd.
COWRIE SEAGEN-07-07 Measurement and assessment of background underwater noise and its comparison with noise from pin pile drilling operations during installation of the SeaGen tidal turbine device, Strangford
More informationAssessment of cumulative Sound Exposure Levels (SEL) for marine piling events
Assessment of cumulative Sound Exposure Levels (SEL) for marine piling events P A Lepper 1, S P Robinson 2, M A Ainslie 3, P D Theobald 2, C A F de Jong 4 1 Loughborough University, Leicestershire, U K,
More informationJanek LAANEARU and Aleksander KLAUSON Department of Mechanics, Tallinn University of Technology
seminar in Tallinn, 5.01.013 PRINCIPAL UNDERWATER NOISE SOURCES IN BALTIC SEA AND METRICS USED IN NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT Janek LAANEARU and Aleksander KLAUSON Department of Mechanics, Tallinn University
More informationSEISMIC SURVEY GREENLAND 2014 Underwater sound propagation for North East Greenland offshore seismic survey
TGS February 2014 SEISMIC SURVEY GREENLAND 2014 Underwater sound propagation for North East Greenland offshore seismic survey Appendix: NEG14 modelling results Mark Mikaelsen PROJECT Seismic Survey Greenland
More informationEffect on Marine Life by Noise of Offshore Wind Farm S.JIANG 1 & J.P. HOU 1
5th International Conference on Advanced Design and Manufacturing Engineering (ICADME 2015) Effect on Marine Life by Noise of Offshore Wind Farm S.JIANG 1 & J.P. HOU 1 1 Third Institute of Oceangraphy,SOA,Xiamen,Fujian,China
More informationModelling of subsea noise during the proposed piling operations at the Dudgeon Wind Farm
Submitted to: Frank Fortune Royal Haskoning DHV Submitted by: Tim Mason Unit 9, Claylands Park Claylands Road Bishop s Waltham Hampshire SO32 1QD Tel: +44 (0) 131 561 2295 Tel: +44 (0)1489 892 881 Fax:
More informationChapter 20.0 Marine Noise and Vibration
Chapter 20.0 Marine Noise and Vibration www.tidallagoonswanseabay.com www.tidallagooncardiff.com 20.0 Marine Noise and Vibration 20.1 Overview of existing situation 20.1.0.1 Estuaries by their nature (relatively
More informationCaltrans compendium of underwater sound data from pile driving 2014 update
Caltrans compendium of underwater sound data from pile driving 2014 update Richard RODKIN 1 ; Keith POMMERENCK 2 1 Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., United States 2 Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., United States
More informationAppendix G: Underwater Acoustics
Appendix G: Underwater Acoustics Appendix G.1: Underwater Noise Modelling Submitted to: Jonathan Ashburner Affric Limited Lochview Office Loch Duntelchaig Farr Inverness IV2 6AW Submitted by: Sam East
More informationPRINCIPAL UNDERWATER NOISE SOURCES IN BALTIC SEA AND METRICS USED IN NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT
Tallinn meeting 25.01.2013 PRINCIPAL UNDERWATER NOISE SOURCES IN BALTIC SEA AND METRICS USED IN NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT Janek LAANEARU and Aleksander KLAUSON Department of Mechanics, Tallinn University
More informationSpecies and Area Protection with Regards to Offshore Wind Farms. Dr. Folchert R. van Dijken
Species and Area Protection with Regards to Offshore Wind Farms Dr. Folchert R. van Dijken 25 January 2012 2 Economic activities on the NL Continental shelf Shipping - 260,000 movements - Seaport like
More informationDescription of Underwater Noise Attenuation System Design Unit 2. New NY Bridge Project
New NY Bridge Project Description of Underwater Noise Attenuation System (NAS) Design Unit 2 Description of Underwater Noise Attenuation System Design Unit 2 for the New NY Bridge Project Revision 1 May
More informationIntroduction to Underwater Acoustics Simulator. Poul Kronborg Product Area Owner, Marine MIKE Software Products DHI
Introduction to Underwater Acoustics Simulator Poul Kronborg Product Area Owner, Marine MIKE Software Products DHI pok@dhigroup.com Module Overview for Marine MIKE Software: Release 2014 Hydrodynamics
More informationMonitoring Factsheet: Underwater Noise
Monitoring Factsheet: Underwater Noise October 2015 1. Subject: Underwater Noise Underwater noise refers to anthropogenic sound that has the potential to cause negative impacts on the marine environment,
More informationFinal Report: Measurements of Pile Driving Noise from Control Piles and Noise-Reduced Piles at the Vashon Island Ferry Dock
Final Report: Measurements of Pile Driving Noise from Control Piles and Noise-Reduced Piles at the Vashon Island Ferry Dock By Peter H. Dahl, Jim Laughlin, and David R. Dall Osto Executive Summary Underwater
More informationSTOPPING THE UNDERWATER DIVER THREAT
STOPPING THE UNDERWATER DIVER THREAT Dr. Robert F. De La Croix and Mr. Juergen G. Keil A non-lethal, scalable deterrent solution Updated from original article published in Maritime Technology Reporter,
More informationCentre for Marine Science and Technology
Centre for Marine Science and Technology Prediction of underwater noise associated with the operation of a drilling rig in the Great Australian Bight Prepared for: BP Developments Australia Pty Ltd Prepared
More informationAPPENDIX 9.8-A. Construction and Terminal Activity Underwater Noise Modelling Study Technical Report
APPENDIX 9.8-A Construction and Terminal Activity Underwater Noise Modelling Study Technical Report PORT METRO VANCOUVER Roberts Bank Terminal 2 This page is intentionally left blank ROBERTS BANK TERMINAL
More informationThe Impact of Offshore Wind Turbines on Underwater Ambient Noise Levels. Stewart Glegg Center for Acoustics and Vibration Florida Atlantic University
The Impact of Offshore Wind Turbines on Underwater Ambient Noise Levels Stewart Glegg Center for Acoustics and Vibration Florida Atlantic University Why is Offshore WT Noise a Concern? 1. With the current
More informationObserving the behavioral response of herring exposed to mid-frequency sonar signals
Observing the behavioral response of herring exposed to mid-frequency sonar signals Handegard 1, Nils Olav and Doksaeter 1, Lise and Godoe 1, Olav Rune and Kvadsheim 2, Petter H. 1 Institute of Marine
More informationMeasurements of underwater noise during piling at the Red Funnel Terminal, Southampton, and observations of its effect on caged fish.
Submitted to: Submitted by: Mr. Tom Docherty Dr J Nedwell Red Funnel Subacoustech Ltd 12 Bugle Street Chase Mill Southampton Winchester Road Hants. SO14 2JY Bishop s Waltham Hants. SO32 1AH Tel: +44 (0)
More informationMinimal influence of wind and tidal height on underwater noise in Haro Strait
Minimal influence of wind and tidal height on underwater noise in Haro Strait Introduction Scott Veirs, Beam Reach Val Veirs, Colorado College December 2, 2007 Assessing the effect of wind and currents
More informationChs. 16 and 17 Mechanical Waves
Chs. 16 and 17 Mechanical Waves The nature of waves A wave is a traveling disturbance that carries energy from one place to another, and even though matter may be disturbed as a wave travels through a
More informationUnderwater Noise Modelling Technical Report
Annex A Underwater Noise Modelling Technical Report 10-1 Submitted to: Bronagh Byrne SSE Renewables One Waterloo Street Glasgow G2 6AY Submitted by: Tim Mason Subacoustech Environmental Ltd Unit 9, Claylands
More informationUnderwater Sound Level Report: I-90 Keechelus Lake Avalanche Bridge Blasting
I-90 SNOQUALMIE PASS EAST Underwater Sound Level Report: I-90 Keechelus Lake Avalanche Bridge Blasting Prepared by: Jim Laughlin Washington State Department of Transportation Office of Air Quality and
More informationUNDERWATER SOUND LEVELS ASSOCIATED WITH PILE DRIVING AT THE CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT BOAT LAUNCH FACILITY, WAVE BARRIER PROJECT
WASHINGTON STATE PARKS CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT WAVE BARRIER PROJECT UNDERWATER SOUND LEVELS ASSOCIATED WITH PILE DRIVING AT THE CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT BOAT LAUNCH FACILITY, WAVE BARRIER PROJECT Prepared by: Jim
More informationARA PROJECT Prepared by: Peter T. Dzwilewski Applied Research Associates, Inc Shaffer Parkway Littleton, Colorado 80127
ARA PROJECT 001974 WATER SHOCK PREDICTION FOR EXPLOSIVE REMOVAL OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES: UNDERWATER CALCULATOR (UWC) VERSION 2.0 UPDATE BASED UPON FIELD DATA Prepared by: Peter T. Dzwilewski Applied Research
More informationBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY JOINT STATEMENT OF EXPERTS IN THE FIELD OF MARINE MAMMALS
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY IN THE MATTER of the Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Act 2012 AND IN THE MATTER of an Application for Marine D u m p
More informationThe operational phase will result in noise from operational vessel movements.
13B Port Study Area Underwater Noise Scoping Report 13B.1 Introduction Direct impacts to fish and marine mammals may occur as a result of construction noise and vibration. Noise and vibration will occur
More informationIncreased streamer depth for dual-sensor acquisition Challenges and solutions Marina Lesnes*, Anthony Day, Martin Widmaier, PGS
Increased streamer depth for dual-sensor acquisition Challenges and solutions Marina Lesnes*, Anthony Day, Martin Widmaier, PGS Summary The towing depth applicable to dual-sensor streamer acquisition has
More informationMEASUREMENT OF LONG-TERM AMBIENT NOISE AND TIDAL TURBINE LEVELS IN THE BAY OF FUNDY
MEASUREMENT OF LONG-TERM AMBIENT NOISE AND TIDAL TURBINE LEVELS IN THE BAY OF FUNDY 11 th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, 3 July 2012 Bruce Martin 1, Andrew Gerber 2, Christopher Whitt 1,
More informationClient Report : Air Overpressure from Le Maitre Flash Report Effects
Client Report : Air Overpressure from Le Maitre Flash Report Effects Clients : Le Maitre Author : Dr R.Farnfield, Technical Services Manager Date : 27 h April 2007 1. Preamble. This report summarises the
More informationBathymetric and Seasonal Effects on the Propagation of Airgun Signals to Long Distances in the Ocean
Bathymetric and Seasonal Effects on the Propagation of Airgun Signals to Long Distances in the Ocean Tron Vedul Tronstad Acoustics SINTEF ICT Trondheim, Norway tronvedul.tronstad@sintef.no Jens M. Hovem
More informationSR 411, Lexington Bridge Underwater Noise Monitoring Results
Northwest Region 157 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 3331 Seattle, WA 98133-971 Washington State Department of Transportation Douglas B. MacDonald Secretary of Transportation September 21, 26 (26) 44-4 TTY:
More information# Post Consultation and Submissions Resource Consent Conditions for Surfing Impact Mitigation August 2016
# Post Consultation and Submissions Resource Consent Conditions for Surfing Impact Mitigation August 2016 Surf Mitigation Management Plan 1 1 Not less than 6 months prior to the commencement of the construction
More informationAPPENDIX D OVERVIEW OF AIRBORNE AND UNDERWATER ACOUSTICS
APPENDIX D OVERVIEW OF AIRBORNE AND UNDERWATER ACOUSTICS APPENDIX D OVERVIEW OF AIRBORNE AND UNDERWATER ACOUSTICS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE D.1 INTRODUCTION...D-1 D.2 AIRBORNE NOISE CHARACTERISTICS...D-1
More informationDECEMBER 15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA. Douglas H. Cato. Defence Science and Technology Organisation PO Box 44, Pyrmont, NSW, 2009, Australia
FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON SOUND AND VIBRATION DECEMBER 15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA AMBIENT SEA NOISE IN AUSTRALIAN WATERS Douglas H. Cato Defence Science and Technology Organisation PO
More information~ A Behavioral Response Study in 2007 &2008 (BRS 07/08) was conducted in the Bahamas to
Biological and Behavioral Response Studies in the Bahamas in 27 28 (BRS 7/8) ~ Project Summary ~ ~ A Behavioral Response Study in 27 &28 (BRS 7/8) was conducted in the Bahamas to study diving behavior
More informationMarine noise inputs Technical Note on Underwater Noise Statoil ASA
Marine noise inputs Technical Note on Underwater Noise Statoil ASA Assignment Number: Document Number: A100142-S20 A-100142-S20-TECH-001 Xodus Group Ltd. Kenneth Dibben House Enterprise Road, Southampton
More informationMeasurement of underwater noise arising from marine aggregate operations
Loughborough University Institutional Repository Measurement of underwater noise arising from marine aggregate operations This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional Repository by
More informationReview of new information on pollution, underwater sound and disturbance: Military, including munitions
ASCOBANS 14 th Advisory Committee Meeting Document AC14/Doc. 27(O) San Sebastián, Spain, 19 21 April 2007 Dist. 19 April 2007 Agenda Item 6.5.2: Review of new information on pollution, underwater sound
More informationfrom ocean to cloud PARAMETRIC SUB-BOTTOM PROFILER, A NEW APPROACH FOR AN OLD PROBLEM
PARAMETRIC SUB-BOTTOM PROFILER, A NEW APPROACH FOR AN OLD PROBLEM Geoff Holland, Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks Geoff.holland@alcatel-lucent.com Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks Ltd, Christchurch Way,
More informationMeasured broadband reverberation characteristics in Deep Ocean. [E.Mail: ]
Measured broadband reverberation characteristics in Deep Ocean Baiju M Nair, M Padmanabham and M P Ajaikumar Naval Physical and Oceanographic Laboratory, Kochi-682 021, India [E.Mail: ] Received ; revised
More informationDistribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Analysis and Modeling of Acoustic and Environmental Measurements from Underwater Detonation Training Events on the Pu`uloa
More informationStatus: Rev: Comments Date: Author: Reviewer:
MT EMERALD WIND FARM REVISED A-WEIGHTED NOISE ASSESSMENT Rp 002 R01 2015545ML 30 January 2017 6 Gipps Street Collingwood VIC 3066 Australia T: +613 9416 1855 ABN: 53 470 077 191 www.marshallday.com Project:
More informationFinal Report Alaska Department of Fish and Game State Wildlife Grant T July 1, 2003 June 30, 2006:
Final Report Alaska Department of Fish and Game State Wildlife Grant T-1-6-4 July 1, 2003 June 30, 2006: Acoustic Monitoring for Killer Whales in the Bering Sea John Hildebrand and Erin Oleson Marine Physical
More informationinter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE
Copyright SFA - InterNoise 2000 1 inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering 27-30 August 2000, Nice, FRANCE I-INCE Classification: 4.5 THE PROPAGATION
More informationWhite Rose Extension Project
White Rose Extension Project Underwater Sound Propagation June 2012 Underwater Sound Propagation Assessment for the Environmental Assessment of the White Rose Extension Project Submitted to: Stantec Inc.
More informationChapter Pipette service & maintenance. Pipette specifications according to ISO Repair in the lab or return for service?
Pipette specifications according to ISO 8655 Chapter 5 5.1 The ISO 8655 standard gives the accuracy and precision limits as both absolute and relative values. Specifications will depend on the technique
More informationPhysics 101 Lecture 20 Waves & Sound
Physics 101 Lecture 20 Waves & Sound Recall we ve talked about transverse & longitudinal waves: - transverse waves: medium motion is to wave motion - longitudinal (pressure) waves: medium motion is to
More informationDO NOT PRINT THIS PAGE
DO NOT PRINT THIS PAGE 17 Noise 371 17.1 Introduction 371 17.2 Baseline Environment 371 17.3 Potential Effects 380 17.4 Sensitivity of receptors 385 17.5 Potential Significance of Effects 389 17.6 Likelihood
More informationIntroduction. o 2. ! "#$ % & ' (" 4 Watt/m 2. Major
07, 08 9 07%, 8 Abstract Killer whale pods sometimes hunt herring by corralling the fish into a tight ball near the ocean surface and stunning them with underwater tail slaps before eating them. I asked
More informationEXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE HYDRODYNAMIC BEHAVIORS OF TWO CONCENTRIC CYLINDERS
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE HYDRODYNAMIC BEHAVIORS OF TWO CONCENTRIC CYLINDERS *Jeong-Rok Kim 1), Hyeok-Jun Koh ), Won-Sun Ruy 3) and Il-Hyoung Cho ) 1), 3), ) Department of Ocean System Engineering, Jeju
More informationMarine Mammal Mitigation Systems
Marine Mammal Mitigation Systems Seiche Measurements Limited (Seiche) designs and manufactures underwater sound measurement and marine mammal monitoring equipment for the oil and gas and renewables sectors.
More informationCore Concept. PowerPoint Lectures Physical Science, 8e. Chapter 5 Wave Motions and Sound. New Symbols for this Chapter 2/20/2011
PowerPoint Lectures Physical Science, 8e Chapter 5 Wave Motions and Sound New Symbols for this Chapter T-Period f-frequency v-wave speed λ-wavelength A-Amplitude Sound is transmitted as increased and decreased
More informationControl of Nuclear Gloveboxes and Enclosures Using the No- Moving-Part Vortex Amplifier (VXA)
Control of Nuclear Gloveboxes and Enclosures Using the No- Moving-Part Vortex Amplifier (VXA) ABSTRACT M.J. Crossley AEA Technology ES. Inc. 1100 Jadwin Ave, Richland, WA 99352, USA This paper describes
More informationAnthropogenic Noise and the Marine Environment
Anthropogenic Noise and the Marine Environment R. Hillson and H.-J. Shyu Information Technology Division Introduction: The impact of anthropogenic noise on the marine environment is a subject of increasing
More informationWESTHAVEN MARINA EXTENSION ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT Rp December 2017
WESTHAVEN MARINA EXTENSION ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT Rp 001 20170963 22 December 2017 84 Symonds Street PO Box 5811 Wellesley Street Auckland 1141 New Zealand T: +64 9 379 7822 F: +64 9 309 3540 www.marshallday.com
More informationUSE OF THE EXCEEDANCE CURVE APPROACH IN OCCUPIED BUILDING RISK ASSESSMENT
USE OF THE EXCEEDANCE CURVE APPROACH IN OCCUPIED BUILDING RISK ASSESSMENT Kieran J Glynn, Advisor Major Accident Risk, BP, UK The exceedance curve approach was developed following the issue of the 2003
More informationUnderwater sound in relation to dredging
CEDA Underwater sound in relation to dredging Dr. Frank Thomsen DHI Group Underwater sound and dredging http://www.dredging.org/, special thanks to Anna Csiti 23 4 2013 2 Outline Sound and marine life
More informationAnalysis of Pressure Rise During Internal Arc Faults in Switchgear
Analysis of Pressure Rise During Internal Arc Faults in Switchgear ASANUMA, Gaku ONCHI, Toshiyuki TOYAMA, Kentaro ABSTRACT Switchgear include devices that play an important role in operations such as electric
More informationExamples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling
Naval Research Laboratory Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-5004 NRL/MR/7182--08-9100 Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling J. Paquin Fabre Acoustic Simulation, Measurements,
More informationMarine Renewables Industry Association. Marine Renewables Industry: Requirements for Oceanographic Measurements, Data Processing and Modelling
Marine Renewables Industry Association Marine Renewables Industry: Requirements for Oceanographic Measurements, Data Processing and Modelling October 2009 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Measurements
More informationGUIDANCE NOTE FOR NOISE MEASUREMENT OF EQUIPMENT TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MHSC MILESTONES
MINING INDUSTRY OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH GUIDANCE NOTE FOR NOISE MEASUREMENT OF EQUIPMENT TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MHSC MILESTONES FACT SHEET 2016 BACKGROUND The Mine Health and Safety Council (MHSC)
More informationNext Generation Quartz Pressure Gauges
Next Generation Quartz Pressure Gauges Rick Puccio, Ph.D. Senior Scientist Quartzdyne Houston, TX March 2, 2016 Outline Quartz Pressure Gauge Introduction Gauge Size Reduction Long Term Pressure Drift
More informationLecture Outline Chapter 14. Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Lecture Outline Chapter 14 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker Chapter 14 Waves and Sound Units of Chapter 14 Types of Waves Waves on a String Harmonic Wave Functions Sound Waves Sound Intensity The
More informationAn underwater explosion is an explosion where the point of detonation is below the surface of the water.
Underwater Explosion 1 Introduction An underwater explosion is an explosion where the point of detonation is below the surface of the water. Underwater explosion are categorized in accordance with their
More informationCarondelet High School Athletic Fields. Walnut Creek, CA
Attachment 9 Walnut Creek, CA 29 September 2016 Prepared for: Jason White BKF Engineers 1646 North California Boulevard, Suite 400 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Email: jwhite@bkf.com Prepared by: Charles M. Salter
More informationInfluence of wind direction on noise emission and propagation from wind turbines
Influence of wind direction on noise emission and propagation from wind turbines Tom Evans and Jonathan Cooper Resonate Acoustics, 97 Carrington Street, Adelaide, South Australia 5000 ABSTRACT Noise predictions
More informationfrom ocean to cloud HEAVY DUTY PLOUGH PERFORMANCE IN VERY SOFT COHESIVE SEDIMENTS
HEAVY DUTY PLOUGH PERFORMANCE IN VERY SOFT COHESIVE SEDIMENTS Geoff Holland, Sarah Dzinbal (Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks) Email: geoff.holland@alcatel-lucent.com Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks
More informationWODA Technical Guidance on Underwater Sound in Relation to Dredging
WODA Technical Guidance on Underwater Sound in Relation to Dredging Frank Thomsen, Fabrizio Borsani, Pim de Wit, Douglas Clarke, Christ de Jong, Frederik Goethals, Martine Holtkamp, Gerard van Raalte,
More informationEvidence of Anton van Helden in the matter of the applications by Trans Tasman Resources Limited for marine and discharge consents to recover iron
Evidence of Anton van Helden in the matter of the applications by Trans Tasman Resources Limited for marine and discharge consents to recover iron sand in the South Taranaki Bight Qualifications of Anton
More informationBlue cod 5 (BCO5) pot mesh size review
Blue cod 5 (BCO5) pot mesh size review Discussion Document MPI Discussion Paper No: 2017/01 Prepared for public consultation by the Ministry for Primary Industries ISBN No: 978-1-77665-454-3 (o) ISSN No:
More informationDETERMINATION OF SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY- RELATED PROTECTION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS - IEC 61508
DETERMINATION OF SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY- RELATED PROTECTION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS - IEC 61508 Simon J Brown Technology Division, Health & Safety Executive, Bootle, Merseyside L20 3QZ, UK Crown Copyright
More informationunder: the Resource Management Act 1991
Before Hearing Commissioners at Christchurch under: the Resource Management Act 1991 in the matter of: applications CRC175507, CRC176030, CRC175508, CRC175509, CRC175510 to reclaim land and construct a
More informationMERCHANT SHIPPING (DIVING SAFETY) REGULATIONS 2005 BR 1 / 2005 MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT : 35 MERCHANT SHIPPING (DIVING SAFETY) REGULATIONS 2005
BR 1 / 2005 MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT 2002 2002 : 35 MERCHANT SHIPPING (DIVING SAFETY) REGULATIONS 2005 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS 1 Citation 2 Interpretation 3 Application 4 Duty to ensure compliance with
More informationPUBLISHED PROJECT REPORT PPR850. Optimisation of water flow depth for SCRIM. S Brittain, P Sanders and H Viner
PUBLISHED PROJECT REPORT PPR850 Optimisation of water flow depth for SCRIM S Brittain, P Sanders and H Viner Report details Report prepared for: Project/customer reference: Copyright: Highways England,
More informationAn Assessment of Quality in Underwater Archaeological Surveys Using Tape Measurements
An Assessment of Quality in Underwater Archaeological Surveys Using Tape Measurements Peter Holt 3H Consulting Ltd, 6 Honcray, Oreston, Plymouth, Devon, PL9 9XB The quality of a typical underwater archaeological
More information2012 COMPARISON OF UNDERWATER BACKGROUND NOISE DURING SPRING AND NEAP TIDE IN A HIGH TIDAL CURRENT SITE: RAMSEY SOUND
2012 COMPARISON OF UNDERWATER BACKGROUND NOISE DURING SPRING AND NEAP TIDE IN A HIGH TIDAL CURRENT SITE: RAMSEY SOUND M. Broudic* 1, T. N. Croft 1, M.R. Willis 1, Masters 1, S-H. Cheong *Author: m.broudic@swansea.ac.uk/merinb@hotmail.fr
More informationBoherkill gravel pit restoration project
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Boherkill gravel pit restoration project FITZSIMONS WALSH ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITED Noise Impact Assessment Report prepared by Oliver Fitzsimons MSc. BSc. Noise Impact Assessment 2
More informationCMST Project 1504, Report , Date Prepared: 18-May-2017
Centre for Marine Science and Technology, Curtin University, Assessment of: A. Predicted underwater sound impacts on marine mammals in sand mining area and recommendations B. Review of modelling of underwater
More informationCALGARY SOUTHEAST STONEY TRAIL Detailed Design 17th Avenue SE to Macleod Trail South (Hwy 2A) Calgary, Alberta
CALGARY SOUTHEAST STONEY TRAIL Detailed Design 17th Avenue SE to Macleod Trail South (Hwy 2A) Calgary, Alberta NOISE REPORT Prepared for: Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation 2 nd Floor, Twin Atria
More informationLecture 8. Sound Waves Superposition and Standing Waves
Lecture 8 Sound Waves Superposition and Standing Waves Sound Waves Speed of Sound Waves Intensity of Periodic Sound Waves The Doppler Effect Sound Waves are the most common example of longitudinal waves.
More informationTaking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Operation of
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/12/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-29553, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 3510-22-P DEPARTMENT OF
More informationWind shear and its effect on wind turbine noise assessment Report by David McLaughlin MIOA, of SgurrEnergy
Wind shear and its effect on wind turbine noise assessment Report by David McLaughlin MIOA, of SgurrEnergy Motivation Wind shear is widely misunderstood in the context of noise assessments. Bowdler et
More informationUnderwater noise The other pollution
Rebecca Schneider Dept. Natural Resources, Cornell Univ. Underwater noise The other pollution https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ikwqx31mans/maxresdefault.jpg Light decreases with depth in lakes http://academic.keystone.edu/jskinner/limnology/light_in_lakes_lecturenotes.htm
More informationAdmiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project FERC No Appendix C. Derelict Gear Monitoring Plan
Appendix C Derelict Gear Monitoring Plan ADMIRALTY INLET PILOT TIDAL PROJECT FERC PROJECT NO. 12690 DERELICT GEAR MONITORING PLAN (submitted with the Final Application for a New Pilot Project License)
More informationGuidelines for fishing for sharks posing an imminent threat to public safety
Guidelines for fishing for sharks posing an imminent threat to public safety Background Following five fatal shark attacks in Western Australia over the twelve months to September 2012, the Government
More informationProject Context. Legend. Jacky. Project Boundary. Fixed Platform/Structure Existing Demonstrator Turbine. Scottish Territorial Waters Boundary
3 0'0"W Legend C A Jacky B Project Boundary Fixed Platform/Structure Existing Demonstrator Turbine Scottish Territorial Waters Boundary 58 0'0"N British Crown and SeaZone Solutions Limited. All rights
More informationJIP Aversion Modeling Final Report. Adam S. Frankel, Ph.D. William T. Ellison, Ph.D. Andrew W. White, Ph.D. Kathleen J. Vigness Raposa, Ph.D.
JIP Aversion Modeling Final Report Adam S. Frankel, Ph.D. William T. Ellison, Ph.D. Andrew W. White, Ph.D. Kathleen J. Vigness Raposa, Ph.D. Marine Acoustics, Inc. MAI 947 31 July 2016 TN 16 015 Table
More informationCalibration Summary of Test Report No.: Sample
Calibration Summary of Test Report No.:30043 Rion Type: NL52/EX Serial no: 00732122 Customer: Scantek, Inc. Address: 6430 Dobbin Rd., Suite C, Columbia MD, 21045 Contact Person: Mariana Buzduga Phone No.:
More informationITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines
Page 1 of 6 Table of Contents 1. PURPOSE...2 2. PARAMETERS...2 2.1 General Considerations...2 3 DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE...2 3.1 Model Design and Construction...2 3.2 Measurements...3 3.5 Execution of
More information