STABLE DYNAMIC BEACH MODELLING FRAMEWORK
|
|
- Reginald Blake
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GEOMORPHIC SOLUTIONS 141 Brunel Road Mississauga, ON L4Z 1X3 T F STABLE DYNAMIC BEACH MODELLING FRAMEWORK Geomorphic & Environmental Sciences Hazard Land Assessment Creek Rehabilitation Water Resources Management Prepared for: International Joint Commission as part of the International Upper Great Lakes Study February
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS... i LIST OF FIGURES... ii LIST OF TABLES... iii 1. INTRODUCTION SITE SELECTION MODELLING CONDITIONS CROSS-SHORE PROFILES Burley Beach Wasaga Beach Thunder Beach OFFSHORE BATHMETRY WATER LEVELS Burley Beach Thunder Beach and Wasaga Beach Coastal Zone TWG Regulation Plan Water Levels STORM SURGES WAVES Burley Beach Wasaga Beach Thunder Beach SEDIMENT Grain Size Sediment Transport Parameters SBEACH MODELLING MODEL DURATION MODEL SCENARIOS REFERENCES i
3 LIST OF FIGURES PAGE Figure 1. Location of Study Sites... 2 Figure 2. Burley Beach onshore profile... 3 Figure 3. Wasaga Beach onshore profile... 4 Figure 4. Thunder Beach onshore profile... 5 Figure 5. Burley Beach offshore profile... 6 Figure 6. Wasaga Beach offshore profile... 7 Figure 7. Thunder Beach offshore profile... 7 Figure 8. Goderich monthly mean water levels (192-27)... 8 Figure 9. Histogram and normal distribution of Goderich monthly mean water levels (192 27)... 9 Figure 1. Collingwood monthly mean water levels ( )... 1 Figure 11. Histogram and normal distribution of Collingwood monthly mean water levels ( )... 1 Figure 12. Coastal Zone TWG regulation plan water level scenarios Figure 13 Histograms and normal distributions of the Coastal Zone TWG regulation plan water level scenarios Figure 14. Extreme value analysis for significant wave height at hindcast site LH49 ( ) Figure 15. Significant wave height and wave period for the largest storm event in the 32 year record at Hindcast site LH Figure 16. Significant wave height and wave period for the largest storm event in the 34 year record at Hindcast site GB Figure 17. Significant wave height and wave period for the largest storm event in the 34.9 year record at Hindcast site GB ii
4 LIST OF TABLES PAGE Table 1. Water levels for modelling Table 2. Surge Frequencies - MNR Table 3. Surge Frequencies - Baird Table 4. Extreme value analysis for wave heights at Hindcast site LH Table 5. Extreme value analysis for wave heights at Hindcast site GB Table 6. Extreme value analysis for wave height at Hindcast site GB Table 7. Grain Sizes for modelling scenarios Table 8. Modelling scenarios for Burley Beach Table 9. Modelling scenarios for Wasaga Beach Table 1. Modelling scenarios for Thunder Beach iii
5 1. INTRODUCTION This report has been completed in support of the International Joint Commission s (IJC) International Upper Great Lakes Study (IUGLS). As discussed in the Introduction to Stable Dynamic Beach Assessment report (Geomorphic Solutions, 21) and the Erosion Theme Report (Baird, 21b), part of the IUGLS mandate is to determine the potential impacts of alternative water level scenarios as a result of regulating the outflow of Lake Superior. The future water level scenarios could be outside of historical ranges and impact private property or infrastructure close to the current limit of cutback on stable dynamic beaches. The report follows the Introduction to Stable Dynamic Beach Assessment Report (Geomorphic Solutions, 21). The aim is to summarize the Storm-induced BEAch CHange Model (SBEACH) modelling approach, which was used to determine the potential impacts upon the shoreline given the proposed water level scenarios under a variety of storm events. For more information on the SBEACH model, please refer to Scoping exercise to review available predictive models for cohesive and sandy shoreline erosion on the upper Great Lakes along with their associated uncertainties Report (Geomorphic Solutions, 29) and Geomorphic Solutions (21). 1.1 SITE SELECTION In 21, Baird & Associates, in conjunction with the Coastal Zone Technical Working Group (Coastal Zone TWG) compiled a list of potential study sites along the shoreline of the Great Lakes based on a selection criteria. Criteria included sensitivity to water level fluctuations, availability of data and the site s ability to represent lakewide conditions. Sites along the east (Canadian) coast of Lake Huron and Georgian Bay included Central Bruce, Simcoe, Lambton and Huron Counties, Saginaw Bay, Muskoka Municipality and Parry Sound Districts (Baird, 21a). Three sandy stable dynamic beach sites along the east coast of Lake Huron were selected for this study. Of the three sites, two (Wasaga and Thunder Beach) are located along the shores of Simcoe County, southeastern Georgian Bay and one (Burley Beach, Pinery Provincial Park) along the shores of Lambton County, southern Lake Huron (Figure 1). In general, the three sites are sandy beaches, which respond to fluctuations in water levels, yet do not experience long term erosion. The sites were selected based on data availability and the fact that they represent a range of conditions. Wasaga Beach was chosen as an example of a dissipative beach. Dissipative beaches have gently sloping nearshores where waves break over a wide area and one or more bars are usually present. Burley and Thunder beaches are more reflective. Reflective beaches have steep nearshores and waves break directly on the beach face. Wave energy varies among the sites with the highest occurring at Burley Beach. 1
6 Figure 1: Location of study sites. 2
7 2. MODELLING CONDITIONS Six key datasets required to complete the stable dynamic beach modelling include: cross-shore profiles, offshore bathymetric profiles, monthly mean water level scenarios, storm surge, wave climate and sediment size. These datasets are described in detail below. 2.1 CROSS-SHORE PROFILES Cross-shore profiles were derived from a number of sources. This section will outline the methods used to compile the overall dataset for model input. Profile section breaks denote the source. All profiles were merged using linear interpolation to fill in the profile gap. Note the vertical scale of the profile is exaggerated. New surveys were not made at all the sites. This was unnecessary given that only a generic profile was required for each site which represented the general form of the beach Burley Beach Pinery 8 Dr. Chris Houser (Texas A&M University) kindly provided beach cross-shore profiles of Burley Beach (Houser & Greenwood, 25a; 25b). During September and October of 21, six crosssections of the beach and dune at Burley Beach, Pinery Provincial Park were surveyed. Of the six cross-sections, the beach profile of profile # 3 was selected for modelling purposes as the most information was available for this site. The backdune and foredune profile was provided by Dr. Mary-Louise Byrne (Wilfred-Laurier University). During May 27, 25 Burley Beach was surveyed using a Leica dual frequency, differential, real-time kinematic GPS. The final cross-shore profile was created from an amalgamation of C. Houser and M-L. Byrne data (Figure 2). 6 Elevation (m, CD) 4 2 M-L Byrne Level Survey C. Houser Level Survey Distance (m) Figure 2: Burley Beach profile (Elevations relative to Chart Datum: 176.m above IGLD85). 3
8 2.1.2 Wasaga Beach 6 The beach face, backshore, foredune and backdune were determined by combining a photographic interpretation from a site reconnaissance carried out by Geomorphic Solutions on July 22 nd, 21 and surveys provided by A. Crowe (Environment Canada). This approach was necessary due to access issues. Nearshore profiles were surveyed by Dr. Robin Arnott-Davidson (University of Guelph) in June, Profile # O was selected for modelling purposes as it best represented a typical nearshore profile of a dissipative beach. The final cross-shore profile was created by amalgamating the profile components (Figure 3). 5 4 Elevation (m, CD) R. Davidson-Arnott Level Survey -1 Estimated Profile Distance (m) Figure 3: Wasaga Beach profile (Elevations relative to Chart Datum: 176.m above IGLD85) Thunder Beach The surf zone, beach face and foredune were surveyed by Geomorphic Solutions on July 22 nd, 21. The backdune was determined through photographic interpretation from the site visit. Cross sectional nearshore profiles were surveyed by R. Davidson-Arnott in May, Profile # K was selected for modelling purposes as it best represented a typical reflective nearshore profile of a dissipative beach. The final profile was created from an amalgamation of Geomorphic Solutions and R. Davidson Arnott measurements (Figure 4). 4
9 5 Level Survey 3 Estimated Dune Elevation (m, CD) Distance (m) Figure 4: Thunder Beach profile (Elevations relative to Chart Datum: 176.m above IGLD85). 5
10 2.2 OFFSHORE BATHYMETRY The bathymetry for the study was based on the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) GEODAS for the Great Lakes (NOAA, 21a). Bathymetric depths are shown as metres below Chart Datum (International Great Lakes Datum IGLD85). Lake Huron Chart Datum is 176. m IGLD85. Three offshore profiles, corresponding to the location of the shoreline profiles were extracted perpendicular to the shoreline, from the bathymetry. The profiles extend from a depth of m below chart datum to approximately 45 m below chart datum. All bathymetry profiles were merged with the nearshore / onshore profiles using linear interpolation to fill in the profile gap. A comparison of the offshore profiles is shown in Figures 5, 6 and 7. Note that the vertical scale of the profile is exaggerated NOAA - GEODAS Bathymetry -5 Elevation (m, CD) Figure 5: Distance (m) Burley Beach offshore profile (Elevations relative to Chart Datum: 176.m above IGLD85). 6
11 5 NOAA - GEODAS Bathymetry Elevation (m, CD) Distance (m) Figure 6: Wasaga Beach offshore profile (Elevations relative to Chart Datum: 176.m above IGLD85) NOAA - GEODAS Bathymetry Elevation (m, CD) R. Davidson-Arnott Echo Soundings Distance (m) Figure 7: Thunder Beach offshore profile (Elevations relative to Chart Datum: 176.m above IGLD85). 2.3 WATER LEVELS An overall review of the long-term water levels as shown in Figures 8 and 1, demonstrates that water levels in Lake Huron have varied significantly. The recorded high and low monthly water levels reached m in October 1986 and m in March 1964 respectively (NOAA, 21b). 7
12 2.3.1 Burley Beach Approximately 87 years of monthly mean water levels were obtained from Goderich (Station gauge ID # 1186, 43 o N, 81 o W) on Lake Huron (nearest gauge located approximately 55 km north of Pinery Provincial Park) for the period (Figure 8 and 9) Goderich Monthly Means Mean Water Level Elevation (m, IGLD'85) Time Figure 8: Goderich monthly mean water levels (192-27) (NOAA, 21b) 8
13 Goderich Measured Water Levels 12 Mean = s.d -1 s.d +1 s.d +2 s.d 8 Frequency Elevation (m, IGLD'85) Figure 9: Histogram and normal distribution of Goderich monthly mean water levels (192-27) (NOAA, 21b) Thunder and Wasaga Beach Approximately 91 years of monthly mean water levels were obtained from Collingwood (Station gauge ID # 115, 44 o 31. N, 8 o W) on Lake Huron (nearest gauge located approximately 15 km west of Wasaga Beach and 35 km southwest of Thunder Beach) for the period (Figure 1 and 11). 9
14 Collingwood Monthly Means Mean Water Level Elevation (m, IGLD'85) Figure 1: Collingwood monthly mean water levels ( ) (NOAA, 21b) Time Collingwood Measured Water Levels Mean = s.d -1 s.d +1 s.d +2 s.d 8 Frequency Elevation (m, IGLD'85) Figure 11: Histogram and normal distribution of Collingwood monthly mean water levels ( ) (NOAA, 21b) 1
15 2.3.3 Coastal Zone TWG Regulation Plan Water Levels As discussed in Geomorphic Solutions (21) and Baird, (21a), part of the IUGLS mandate is to determine the potential impacts of various water level scenarios as a result of regulating the outflow of Lake Superior. The IJC provided static monthly mean water levels for the upper Great Lakes which were modelled for a 17 year period starting from 19 and ending in 26. The modelled scenarios correspond to the following: P77A = Plan 1977A. This is the current regulation strategy for the flow control structures on the St. Mary s River. P122 = Plan 122. P55 = 55ModRule49. MH = Superior for Lake Michigan Huron. The release of water from Lake Superior into Lake Michigan-Huron is optimised in an attempt to mitigate the fluctuation of water levels in Lake Michigan-Huron. This fence post plan disregards impacts on Lake Superior and connecting channels. S4S = Superior for Superior. Monthly mean lake levels on Lake Michigan-Huron based on an attempt to sustain Lake Superior s water levels close to the measured monthly long term averages. Similar to MH, this fencepost plan does not consider downstream impacts, since the average water levels on Lake Superior are maintained. Q1887 = PreProject. The water level of Lake Michigan-Huron is determined by the outflow equation for Lake Superior. This outflow equation was developed in the 188 s prior to the construction and modification of flow due to control structures. Figure 12 shows the six 17 year monthly means for Lake Michigan-Huron. Water levels for S4S, Q1887, P122 and P55 scenarios ranged between and m with a mean of ~ m. 11
16 Elevation (m, IGLD'85) MH P55 P77A P122 Q1887 S4S Time Figure 12: Coastal Zone TWG regulation plan water level scenarios. A histogram and normal distribution was computed to assess the mean and standard deviations for each scenario (Figures 13). Based on the mean, standard deviation and frequency of occurrence of water levels, a range of high water levels was determined for modelling input (Table 1). 12
17 a) b) Modelled MH Mean = Modelled P55 Mean = s.d +1 s.d -1 s.d +1 s.d -2 s.d +2 s.d -2 s.d +2 s.d Frequency Frequency Elevation (m, IGLD'85) Elevation (m, IGLD'85) c) d) Modelled P77A 16 Mean = Modelled P122 Mean = s.d +1 s.d -1 s.d +1 s.d -2 s.d +2 s.d -2 s.d +2 s.d Frequency 8 Frequency Elevation (m, IGLD'85) Elevation (m, IGLD'85) 13
18 e) f) Modelled Q1887 Modelled S4S 16 Mean = Mean = s.d +1 s.d -1 s.d +1 s.d -2 s.d +2 s.d -2 s.d +2 s.d Frequency 8 Frequency Elevation (m, IGLD'85) Elevation (m, IGLD'85) Figures 13: Histograms and normal distributions of the Coastal Zone TWG regulation plan water level scenarios. The water levels which will be used for modelling for all storm conditions range between 177 to 178 m (IGLD 85). These values selected are within and above the historical and Coastal Zone TWG modelled monthly means. Table 1: Water levels for modelling m, CD m, IGLD 85 m, CD m, IGLD STORM SURGES Water levels on Lake Huron vary both in the long-term and seasonally in response to climatic conditions. They also vary in the short term due to the passing of storms. The passing of storms typically create storm surges, and occur when there is a local increase in the water level caused by high wind stresses applied to the water surface, drops in atmospheric pressure and movement of pressure systems (Danard et al., 23). Since the short-term storm surge and the longer term and seasonal lake level variations have different driving mechanisms, it is important to assess the storm surge and the mean water level independently. The storm surge and mean water levels can then be amalgamated to create the worst-case scenarios. Note that set up due to waves is determined by the SBEACH Model. Storm surge used in the modelling was derived from the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) Great Lakes System Flood Levels guideline (MNR, 1989). The MNR guideline provides a calibrated record of the 14
19 flooding frequencies over a 2 to 2 year return period for the Great Lakes based on the SURGE model operated by Environment Canada. Table 2 shows the expected height of surge events over the 1, 25, 5, 1 and 2 year return periods at sites proximal to Burley, Wasaga and Thunder Beach. Table 2: Surge events (MNR, 1989) Location/ Return Period (yr) Collingwood (44 o N, 8 o W) Wasaga and Thunder Beach Kettle Point (43 o N, 82 o 48. W) Burley Beach Surge (m) Surge analysis within the Great Lakes was carried out recently by Baird (21c) using 48 years of hourly water levels. The data for Collingwood (Station gauge ID # 115, 44 o 31. N, 8 o W), which is proximal to Wasaga and Thunder Beach, are shown in Table 3. Table 3: Surge events (Baird, 21c) Location / Return Period (yr) Collingwood # 115 -Wasaga & Thunder Beach Surge (m) Surge values obtained from MNR (1989) for the 1 and 1 year return periods are.15 m and.26 m (respectively) higher than those recorded by Baird (21c). Since the aim of this study is to assess the potential impact of the shoreline due to a worst-case storm scenario, the higher surge values were used in the model. 2.5 WAVES 32 and 34.9 years of hindcast records were obtained from USACE (21) and Philpotts (1988) respectively. This section will outline the methods used to determine the wave period and significant wave height return periods used in the modelling. The wave direction for all storms is set to approach the shoreline at 9 o (perpendicular to the shoreline), since the modelling is employing a worst-case scenario approach. In reality this would not be the case and waves would be generated in all directions depending on the local wind direction. Assuming all waves are directed towards the test sites generates the highest potential wave energy at the shoreline for the given storm event. 15
20 2.5.1 Burley Beach 32 years ( ) of hindcast data for Southern Lake Huron (Hindcast site # LH49, 43 o 3 N, 81 o W) was obtained from the Wave Information Studies (WIS), generated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE, 21). LH49 is located approximately 25 km offshore in a north-westerly direction from Burley Beach. In order to calculate the significant wave height (H sig ) for various return periods, a Weibull Distribution was fitted to the data, shown in Figure 14, and Table 4. 9% C.I. 9% C.I. Figure 14: Table 4: Extreme value analysis for significant wave height at Hindcast site LH49 Southern Lake Huron ( ) (USACE, 21). Extreme value analysis for wave heights at Hindcast site LH49, Southern Lake Huron (USACE, 21). Return Period (yr) Significant wave height (H sig, m)
21 The largest storm within the 32-year hindcast record occurred during March 29 th 31 st, Significant wave height reached a peak of 8 m, with a peak period (T p ) of 11. This, in accordance to the Extreme Value Analysis carried out suggests that this storm had a return period of 52 years (Figure 15). In order to simulate the significant wave height distribution of both the 5 and 1 year storms, the hindcast of this storm was extracted from the dataset. The distribution of wave heights over this storm was used for the 5 and 1-year storms by adjusting to match the peak significant wave heights for each return period. The wave period remains unadjusted Largest storm in 32 - year record T p (52 - year return period) Largest storm in 32 - year record H sig (52 - year return period) Projected 5 - year H sig Projected 1 - year H sig 12 1 Significant Wave Height (m) Significant Wave Period (sec) /29/84 3/3/84 3/31/84 Time Figure 15: Significant wave height and wave period for the largest storm event in the 32 year record at Hindcast site LH49, and modifications to generate 5 and 1- year storms. Southern Lake Huron (USACE, 21), Wasaga Beach 34.9 years ( ) of wave hindcast data for Collingwood Georgian Bay (Hindcast site # GB4, 44 o 3 6 N, 8 o 2 3 W) was generated by the MNR (Philpotts, 1988). GB4 is located approximately 15 km offshore in a north-westerly direction from Wasaga Beach. The significant wave height return period (Table 5) was calculated by Philpotts (1988) using the Weibull Distribution. 17
22 Table 5: Extreme value analysis for wave heights at Hindcast site GB4, Collingwood (Philpotts, 1988). Return Period (yr) Significant wave height (H sig, m) The largest storm within the 34-year record occurred during November 3 rd 5 th, Significant wave heights reached a peak of 6 m, with a peak wave period of In order to simulate the significant wave height distribution over both the 5 and 1 year storms at Wasaga Beach, the wave hindcast of the November 1965 storm was extracted from the dataset. The significant wave height of the hindcast storm was adjusted to match the peak significant wave heights of the 5 and 1-year storms. The wave period remains unadjusted (Figure 16) Largest storm in 34 - year record T p Largest storm in 34 - year record H sig Projected 5 - year H sig Projected 1 - year H sig 1 Significant Wave Height (m) Significant Wave Period (sec) /3/65 11/4/65 11/5/65 Time Figure 16: Significant wave height and wave period for the largest storm event in the 34 year record at Hindcast site GB4, and modifications to generate 5 and 1- year storms, Collingwood (Philpotts, 1988). 18
23 2.5.3 Thunder Beach The same approach was used for Wasaga Beach years ( ) of hindcast data for 12 Mile Bay Georgian Bay (Hindcast # GB6, 45 o N, 8 o 3 32 W) was obtained from Philpotts (1988). GB6 is located approximately 43 km offshore in a north-north-westerly direction from Thunder Beach. The wave height return period was calculated by Philpotts (1988) using the Weibull Distribution. Table 6: Extreme value analysis for wave heights at Hindcast site GB6, Twelve Mile Bay. (Philpotts, 1988). Return Period (yr) Significant wave height (Hsig, m) The largest storm within the 34.9-year record occurred during November 3 rd 5 th, Wave heights reached a peak of 5.7 m, with a peak wave period of 1.8 seconds. In order to simulate the distribution of significant wave heights for both the 5 and 1 year storms at Thunder Beach, the wave hindcast of the November 1965 storm was extracted from the dataset. The significant wave height of the hindcast storm was adjusted to match the peak significant wave heights of the 5 and 1-year storms. The wave period remains unadjusted (Figure 17). 19
24 Largest storm in 34 - year record T p Largest storm in 34 - year record H sig Projected 5 - year H sig Projected 1 - year H sig 1 5 Significant Wave Height (m) Significant Wave Period (sec) /3/65 11/4/65 11/5/65 Time Figure 17: Significant wave height and wave period for the largest storm event in the 34.9 year record at Hindcast site GB6, and modifications to generate 5 and 1- year storm events, Twelve Mile Bay (Philpotts, 1988). 2.6 SEDIMENT Grain Size The grain size for Burley Beach was obtained from Houser & Greenwood (25a, 25b) and corresponds to profile # 3 surveyed in October 21. The upper shoreface and beach was composed of fine sand with a mean grain size (D 5 ) of.19 mm (Houser & Greenwood, 25a, 25b) (Table 7). The grain size for Wasaga Beach was obtained from Davidson- Arnott (1981) and corresponds to profile # O surveyed in June The beach was composed of fine to very fine sand with a D 5 of.9 mm (Table 7). It was noted that this sample was taken at the beach face and that there was a gradual fining of grain sizes with increasing distance to the nearshore zone. The grain size for Thunder Beach was obtained from Davidson- Arnott (1977) and corresponds to profile # K surveyed in May 1977 (Table 7). The beach was composed of medium to fine sand with a D 5 of.16 mm. Variations of grain size were incorporated into the modelling to investigate the impact of grain size on shoreline erosion. This will provide insight into the applicability of the model results to other locations. For each test site, the field measured D 5 and two other D 5 will be used. The following grain sizes were used at each site (Table 7). 2
25 Table 7: Grain sizes for modelling scenarios Site / Grain Size Field measured D5 (mm) Coarser scenario D5 (mm) Medium scenario D5 (mm) Finer scenario D5 (mm) Burley Beach Wasaga Beach Thunder Beach Sediment Transport Parameters As discussed in Geomorphic Solutions (21), the transport of sediment within the nearshore, surf zone and swash zones are highly dependent on the interaction of waves and currents. The SBEACH model requires a number of calibration parameters for sediment transport calculations as discussed by Larson et al. (199), Larson (1992) and Rosati et al. (1993). The following outlines the parameters used in the modelling based on trial simulations. The results are discussed in Geomorphic Solutions (211). Transport rate coefficient (K). Typical transport rate K values range between.5 x 1-6 to 2.5 x 1-6 m 4 /N for sandy beaches (Larson & Kraus, 1989). A value of.5 x 1-6 m 4 /N was used. Coefficient for slope dependent term (ε). Typical ε values range between.1 to.5 m 2 /s. The median value of.2 m 2 /s was used. Transport rate decay coefficient multiplier. This is the sediment transport rate between the breaker zone and the wave restructuring point to the next breaking point. Sediment transport rates decay according to this parameter ranges between.1 and.5. The smaller the values of the parameter will result in a lower amount of decay. A value of.5 was used. Water temperature. The settling velocity of sediment depends on water temperature, due to density. Since the majority of storms occur during the Fall, the average October temperature of 9.6 o C was used. For more additional details on the deterministic calculation of sediment transport parameters, please refer to Larson et al. (199), Larson (1992) and Rosati et al. (1993). For more information on the Sensitivity Analysis which determined the model input parameters, please refer to Geomorphic Solutions (211). 21
26 3. SBEACH MODELLING Following the sensitivity analysis, SBEACH was used to estimate the profile change at the +1 to 2 m, CD water levels and the largest in 32 - year for Burley Beach, the largest in 34 year for Thunder and Wasaga Beach, the 5 year and the 1 year wave conditions for all three study sites. 3.1 MODEL DURATION Two different lengths of model simulation were used; a 2 day (48 hours) and a 4 day (96 hours) storm event. The 48 hour time period was selected to provide sufficient time for the simulation of one complete storm event. The 96 hour duration was simulated using two consecutive 48 hour storm events to determine the state of equilibrium. 3.2 MODEL SCENARIOS A number of storm conditions were generated based on the Coastal Zone TWG modelled water levels, and data collated and analysed by Geomorphic Solutions. The following tables (Tables 8 1) outline the modelling conditions for each site. 22
27 Table 8: Modelling Scenarios for Burley Beach varying water level scenarios and wave characteristics (Elevations relative to Chart Datum: 176. m above IGLD85). Run # Storm Event Water Level (m, CD) Peak Surge (m) Burley Beach WL + Peak Surge (m, CD) Peak H sig (m) Peak T p (s) Sediment Size D 5 (mm) B B B B B Largest in 32 yr Hindcast B record (L32) B B B B B B B B B B B17 5 yr Storm (S5) B B B B B B B B B B B28 1 yr Storm (S1) B B B B B B B B B B Largest in 32 yr Hindcast B record (L32) B B B B B B B B B B B5 5 yr Storm (S5) B B B B B B B B B B B61 1 yr Storm (S1) B B B B B B67 Largest in 32 yr Hindcast B68 record (L32) B yr Storm (S5) B B71 1 yr Storm (S1) B Duration (hrs) Geomorphic Solutions 176 Stable Dynamic Beach Modelling Results 23
28 Table 9: Modelling Scenarios for Wasaga Beach varying water level scenarios and wave characteristics (Elevations relative to Chart Datum: 176. m above IGLD85). Wasaga Beach Run # Storm Event Water Level (m, CD) Peak Surge Level (m) WL + Peak Surge Level (m, CD) Peak H sig (m) Peak T p (s) Sediment Size D 5 (mm) Duration (hrs) W W W W W Largest in 34 yr Hindcast W record (L34) W W W W W W W W W W W17 5 yr Storm (S5) W W W W W W W W W W W28 1 yr Storm (S1) W W W W W W W W W W Largest in 34 yr Hindcast W record (L34) W W W W W W W W W W W5 5 yr Storm (S5) W W W W W W W W W W W61 1 yr Storm (S1) W W W W W W67 Largest in 34 yr Hindcast W68 record (L34) W yr Storm (S5) W W71 1 yr Storm (S1) W Geomorphic Solutions 176 Stable Dynamic Beach Modelling Results 24
29 Table 1: Modelling Scenarios for Thunder Beach varying water level scenarios and wave characteristics (Elevations relative to Chart Datum: 176. m above IGLD85). Run # Storm Event Water Level (m, CD) Peak Surge Level (m) Thunder Beach WL + Peak Surge Level (m, CD) Peak H sig (m) Peak T p (s) Sediment Size D 5 (mm) T T T T T Largest in 34.9 yr Hindcast T record (L34) T T T T T T T T T T T17 5 yr Storm (S5) T T T T T T T T T T T28 1 yr Storm (S1) T T T T T T T T T T Largest in 34.9 yr Hindcast T record (L34) T T T T T T T T T T T5 5 yr Storm (S5) T T T T T T T T T T T61 1 yr Storm (S1) T T T T T T67 Largest in 34.9 yr Hindcast T68 record (L34) T yr Storm (S5) T T71 1 yr Storm (S1) T Duration (hrs) Geomorphic Solutions 176 Stable Dynamic Beach Modelling Results 25
30 4. REFERENCES Baird, 21a. Coastal Zone Technical Working Group Study Site Selection Final Report. Prepared for the International Joint Commission, Coastal Zone Technical Working Group. Baird, 21b. Erosion Theme Final Report, Prepared for the International Joint Commission, Coastal Zone Technical Working Group. Baird, 21c. Upper Great Lakes Study Flooding Evaluation, Return Period Analysis for Alternative Regulation Plans, Draft Report Appendix C. Distributions of fit to independent variables. Prepared for the International Joint Commission, Coastal Zone Technical Working Group. Danard, M., Munro. A., Murty, T. 23. Storm Surge Hazard in Canada. Natural Hazards, 28: Davidson-Arnott, R.G.D Thunder Beach field notes, May Davidson-Arnott, R.G.D. and Pember, G.F Morphology and sedimentology of multiple parallel bar systems, southern Georgian Bay, Ontario. The Coastline of Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, 8 1: Davidson- Arnott, R.G.D Wasaga Beach paper # 2 field notes, June Geomorphic Solutions, 29. Scoping exercise to review available predictive models for cohesive and sandy shoreline erosion on the upper Great Lakes along with their associated uncertainties. Prepared for the International Joint Commission. Geomorphic Solutions, 21. Introduction to Stable Dynamic Beach Assessment, Final Report. Prepared for the International Joint Commission as part of the International Upper Great Lakes Study. Geomorphic Solutions, 211. Stable Dynamic Beach Modelling Results. Prepared for the International Joint Commission as part of the International Upper Great Lakes Study Houser, C. and Greenwood, B. 25a. Profile of a lacustrine multiple barred near shore to a sequence of storm events. Geomorphology, 69: Houser, C. and Greenwood, B. 25b. Hydrodynamics and sediment transport within the inner surf zone of a lacustrine multiple-barred near shore. Marine Geology, 218: Larson, M., Kraus, N.C. and Byrnes, M SBEACH: Numerical model for simulating storm-induced beach change. Report 2: Numerical formulation and model test. Technical Report CERC-89-9, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Vicksburg, MS. Larson, M Enhancement to a beach profile change model, Final Report. Prepared for The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Vicksburg, MS. MNR, Great Lakes System Flood Levels and Water Related Hazards. Conservation Authorities and Water Management Branch. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. NOAA, 21a. GEODAS Bathymetric Grid Translator Great Lakes (gkey_123) National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration. [online] Available at URL: [cited June 8 th, 21]. 26
31 NOAA, 21b. Recorded Monthly mean water levels for stations in the Great Lakes, provided to Environment Canada by Mr. John Herron. Philpotts, Wave hindcast dataset for Onatio s Great Lakes Lake Huron / Georgian Bay. Prepared for the Ministry of Natural Resources. Part 4, Georgian Bay Wave Statistics. Rosati, J. D., Wise, R. A., Kraus, N. C., and Larson, M. (1993). SBEACH: Numerical model for simulating storm-induced beach change; Report 3: User s Manual. Instruction Report CERC-93-2, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Vicksburg, MS. USACE, 21. Great Lakes, Wave Information Studies, Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory. United States Army Corps of Engineers. [online] Available at URL: ftp://ftp.erdc.usace.army.mil/pub/perm/wisftp/greatlakes [cited May 26 th, 21] 27
Appendix E Cat Island Borrow Area Analysis
Appendix E Cat Island Borrow Area Analysis ERDC/CHL Letter Report 1 Cat Island Borrow Area Analysis Multiple borrow area configurations were considered for Cat Island restoration. Borrow area CI1 is located
More informationTechnical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis Island Harbour Club, Gananoque, Ontario
Technical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis RIGGS ENGINEERING LTD. 1240 Commissioners Road West Suite 205 London, Ontario N6K 1C7 October 31, 2014 Table of Contents Section Page Table of Contents... i List
More informationTechnical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis 129 South Street, Gananoque
Technical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis 129 South Street, Gananoque RIGGS ENGINEERING LTD. 1240 Commissioners Road West Suite 205 London, Ontario N6K 1C7 June 12, 2013 Table of Contents Section Page Table
More informationCROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES
The University of the West Indies Organization of American States PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME: COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE A COURSE IN COASTAL DEFENSE SYSTEMS I CHAPTER
More informationHURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING
HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING Rev. 18 Feb 2015 1 SBEACH Modeling 1.0 Introduction Following the methodology
More informationBILLY BISHOP TORONTO CITY AIRPORT PRELIMINARY RUNWAY DESIGN COASTAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Bâtiment Infrastructures municipales Transport Industriel Énergie Environnement BILLY BISHOP TORONTO CITY AIRPORT PRELIMINARY RUNWAY DESIGN COASTAL ENGINEERING STUDY N. Guillemette 1, C. Glodowski 1, P.
More informationIMPACTS OF COASTAL PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON THE COASTS OF CRETE: NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS
IMPACTS OF COASTAL PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON THE COASTS OF CRETE: NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS Tsanis, I.K., Saied, U.M., Valavanis V. Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania,
More informationThe History of Coastal Flood Hazard Assessments in the Great Lakes
The History of Coastal Flood Hazard Assessments in the Great Lakes Brian A. Caufield, P.E., CFM June 23, 2016 2 The Great Lakes Some Statistics Courtesy of Great Lakes Information Network One-fifth of
More informationModeling Sediment Transport Along the Upper Texas Coast
Modeling Sediment Transport Along the Upper Texas Coast David B. King Jr. Jeffery P. Waters William R. Curtis Highway 87 roadbed, Jefferson County Galveston District Corps Sabine Pass to San Luis Pass
More informationA Preliminary Review of Beach Profile and Hardbottom Interactions
A Preliminary Review of Beach Profile and Hardbottom Interactions Douglas W. Mann, P.E., D.CE. CB&I A World of Solutions Presentation Goal Lead to a better understanding of the challenges regarding the
More informationHARBOUR SEDIMENTATION - COMPARISON WITH MODEL
HARBOUR SEDIMENTATION - COMPARISON WITH MODEL ABSTRACT A mobile-bed model study of Pointe Sapin Harbour, in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, resulted in construction of a detached breakwater and sand trap to
More informationFEMA Region V. Great Lakes Coastal Flood Study. Pilot Study Webinar. Berrien County, Michigan. February 26, 2014
FEMA Region V Great Lakes Coastal Flood Study Pilot Study Webinar Berrien County, Michigan February 26, 2014 2 Pilot Study Webinar Agenda Great Lakes Coastal Flood Study Background Demonstration Project
More informationNearshore Morphodynamics. Bars and Nearshore Bathymetry. Sediment packages parallel to shore, that store beach sediment
Nearshore Morphodynamics http://coastal.er.usgs.gov/bier/images/chandeleur-xbeach-lg.jpg Bars and Nearshore Bathymetry Sediment packages parallel to shore, that store beach sediment Can be up to 50 km
More informationCMS Modeling of the North Coast of Puerto Rico
CMS Modeling of the North Coast of Puerto Rico PRESENTED BY: Dr. Kelly Rankin Legault, Ph.D., P.E. 1 Dr. Alfredo Torruella, Ph.D. 2 1 USACE Jacksonville District 2 University of Puerto Rico October 2016
More informationTechnical Note AN EMPIRICAL. METHOD FOR DESIGN OF BREAKWATERS AS SHORE PROTECTION STRUCTURES
CETN III-23 (Rev 3/95) Coastal Engineering Technical Note AN EMPIRICAL. METHOD FOR DESIGN OF BREAKWATERS AS SHORE PROTECTION STRUCTURES PURPOSE: To present an empirical method that can be used for preliminary
More informationChapter 4 EM THE COASTAL ENGINEERING MANUAL (Part I) 1 August 2008 (Change 2) Table of Contents. Page. I-4-1. Background...
Chapter 4 EM 1110-2-1100 THE COASTAL ENGINEERING MANUAL (Part I) 1 August 2008 (Change 2) Table of Contents I-4-1. Background... Page I-4-1 a. Shore Protection Planning and Design, TR 4... I-4-1 b. Shore
More informationDUXBURY WAVE MODELING STUDY
DUXBURY WAVE MODELING STUDY 2008 Status Report Duncan M. FitzGerald Peter S. Rosen Boston University Northeaster University Boston, MA 02215 Boston, MA 02115 Submitted to: DUXBURY BEACH RESERVATION November
More informationCross-shore sediment transports on a cut profile for large scale land reclamations
Cross-shore sediment transports on a cut profile for large scale land reclamations Martijn Onderwater 1 Dano Roelvink Jan van de Graaff 3 Abstract When building a large scale land reclamation, the safest
More informationBeach Profiles. Topics. Module 9b Beach Profiles and Crossshore Sediment Transport 3/23/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering
Beach Profiles AND CROSS-SHORE TRANSPORT Orson P. Smith, PE, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus Topics Features of beach and nearshore profiles Equilibrium profiles Cross-shore transport References Text (Sorensen)
More informationINTRODUCTION TO COASTAL ENGINEERING
The University of the West Indies Organization of American States PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME: COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE A COURSE IN COASTAL DEFENSE SYSTEMS I CHAPTER
More informationWind Blow-out Hollow Generated in Fukiage Dune Field, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan
R. Nishi Wind Blow-out Hollow Generated in Fukiage Dune Field, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan Ryuichiro Nishi, Li Elikson and Myokhin PREFACE A sand dune is vulnerable to severe waves and wind. Therefore,
More informationCOASTAL MORPHODYNAMICS
COASTAL MORPHODYNAMICS PATRICIA CHARDÓN-MALDONADO, PHD, EIT Miguel Canals, Jack A. Puleo, Alec Torres-Freyermuth & Jens Figlus March 9, 2017 OUTLINE INTRODUCTION Meteorological Phenomena Forcing Conditions
More informationWave Energy Research and Applications
Wave Energy Research and Applications Shoreline and Shallows conference East Lansing, MI March 7, 2019 Photo: Dave Sanford Waves Background 1. Types of Waves 2. Good and Bad Waves 3. Restoration Impacts
More informationUndertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores
Nearshore Circulation Undertow and Rip Cells Undertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores In the wave breaking process, the landward transfer of water, associated with bore and surface roller decay
More informationFigure 4, Photo mosaic taken on February 14 about an hour before sunset near low tide.
The Impact on Great South Bay of the Breach at Old Inlet Charles N. Flagg and Roger Flood School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University Since the last report was issued on January 31
More informationUndertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores
Lecture 22 Nearshore Circulation Undertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores In the wave breaking process, the landward transfer of water, associated with bore and surface roller decay within the
More informationPreliminary Wake Wash Impact Analysis Redwood City Ferry Terminal, Redwood City, CA
Technical Memorandum Preliminary Wake Wash Impact Analysis Redwood City Ferry Terminal, Redwood City, CA 1. Introduction The following preliminary wake wash impact analysis was initiated by the Port of
More informationAppendix M: Durras Lake Tailwater Conditions
Appendix M: Durras Lake Tailwater Conditions M.1 Preamble WRL has completed a tailwater condition assessment for the entrance to Durras Lake, to be used as an ocean boundary condition for a future flood
More informationApril 7, Prepared for: The Caribbean Disaster Emergency Response Agency Prepared by: CEAC Solutions Co. Ltd.
April 7, 2006 Prepared for: The Caribbean Disaster Emergency Response Agency Prepared by: Introduction CEAC Solutions Co. Ltd was commissioned in May 2005 to prepare coastal beach erosion hazard maps for
More informationINTRODUCTION TO COASTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering Volume 16 INTRODUCTION TO COASTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT J. William Kamphuis Queen's University, Canada World Scientific Singapore New Jersey London Hong Kong Contents
More informationEvaluation of June 9, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study for Town of Weymouth, Norfolk, Co, MA
Evaluation of June 9, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study for Town of Weymouth, Norfolk, Co, MA Prepared For: Woodard & Curran 95 Cedar Street, Suite 100 Providence, RI 02903
More informationCoastal and Hydraulics Laboratory
Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory ERDC/CHL TR-12-X Lake Michigan: Prediction of Sand Beach and Dune Erosion for Flood Hazard Assessment Bradley D. Johnson DRAFT April 2012 Great Lakes Coastal Flood Study,
More informationPhysical Modeling of Nearshore Placed Dredged Material Rusty Permenter, Ernie Smith, Michael C. Mohr, Shanon Chader
Physical Modeling of Nearshore Placed Dredged Material Rusty Permenter, Ernie Smith, Michael C. Mohr, Shanon Chader Research Hydraulic Engineer ERDC-Coastal Hydraulics Laboratory October 25,2012 Study
More informationMODELING OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON COASTAL STRUCTURES - CONTRIBUTION TO THEIR RE-DESIGN
Proceedings of the 14 th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology Rhodes, Greece, 3-5 September 2015 MODELING OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON COASTAL STRUCTURES - CONTRIBUTION TO THEIR
More informationTHE WAVE CLIMATE IN THE BELGIAN COASTAL ZONE
THE WAVE CLIMATE IN THE BELGIAN COASTAL ZONE Toon Verwaest, Flanders Hydraulics Research, toon.verwaest@mow.vlaanderen.be Sarah Doorme, IMDC, sarah.doorme@imdc.be Kristof Verelst, Flanders Hydraulics Research,
More information2016 NC Coastal Local Governments Annual Meeting
2016 NC Coastal Local Governments Annual Meeting Coastal Flood Study Modeling and Mapping 101 April 21, 2016 Tom Langan, PE, CFM Engineering Supervisor NCEM Floodplain Mapping Program FEMA Coastal Flood
More informationNearshore Placed Mound Physical Model Experiment
Nearshore Placed Mound Physical Model Experiment PURPOSE: This technical note describes the migration and dispersion of a nearshore mound subjected to waves in a physical model. The summary includes recommendations
More informationCOASTAL EROSION: INVESTIGATIONS IN THE SOUTHWEST COAST OF SRI LANKA
COASTAL EROSION: INVESTIGATIONS IN THE SOUTHWEST COAST OF SRI LANKA Wijayawardane I.S.K. 1, Ansaf K.M.M. 2, Ratnasooriya A.H.R. 3, Samarawickrama S.P. 4 1,2 Postgraduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering,
More informationSELECTION OF THE PREFERRED MANAGEMENT OPTION FOR STOCKTON BEACH APPLICATION OF 2D COASTAL PROCESSES MODELLING
SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED MANAGEMENT OPTION FOR STOCKTON BEACH APPLICATION OF 2D COASTAL PROCESSES MODELLING C Allery 1 1 DHI Water and Environment, Sydney, NSW Abstract This paper presents an approach
More informationNorthwest Hydraulic Consultants (NHC) is pleased to submit this assessment of the wave climate at Lazo Road, Comox.
405 495 Dunsmuir Street Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 6B9 250.754.6425 www.nhcweb.com NHC Ref. No. 03000276 21 November 2014 Wedler Engineering LLP #211-2459 Cousins Avenue Courtenay, BC V9N 3N6 Attention: Andrew
More informationCALCASIEU SALINITY STRUCTURES. HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING (To Support Design of Salinity Barriers)
CALCASIEU SALINITY STRUCTURES HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING (To Support Design of Salinity Barriers) Presentation Overview 1 2 3 4 5 Project Overview and CEA Circulation Modeling Vessel Hydrodynamics Modeling
More informationBay County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. May 14, 2018
Bay County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting May 14, 2018 Agenda Introductions Coastal Flood Risk Study and Mapping Program Current Status Technical Overview of Study and Mapping Floodplain
More informationMONITORING SEDIMENT TRANSPORT PROCESSES AT MANAVGAT RIVER MOUTH, ANTALYA TURKEY
COPEDEC VI, 2003 in Colombo, Sri Lanka MONITORING SEDIMENT TRANSPORT PROCESSES AT MANAVGAT RIVER MOUTH, ANTALYA TURKEY Isikhan GULER 1, Aysen ERGIN 2, Ahmet Cevdet YALCINER 3 ABSTRACT Manavgat River, where
More informationEffect of Hydrodynamics on Sediment Transport near a Coastal Inlet
ICHE 2014, Hamburg - Lehfeldt & Kopmann (eds) - 2014 Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau ISBN 978-3-939230-32-8 Effect of Hydrodynamics on Sediment Transport near a Coastal Inlet H. Li, M. Brown, J. Rosati & Z.
More informationBayfield & Ashland Counties, WI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. June 05, 2018
Bayfield & Ashland Counties, WI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting June 05, 2018 Agenda Introductions Coastal Flood Risk Study and Mapping Program Current Status Technical Overview of Study
More informationEROSION CRITERION APPLIED TO A SHORELINE ADJACENT TO A COASTAL INLET
EROSION CRITERION APPLIED TO A SHORELINE ADJACENT TO A COASTAL INLET By Brian Batten and Henry Bokuniewicz Marine Sciences Research Center State University of New York Stony Brook, New York 11794-5000
More informationDoor County, WI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. August 21, 2017
Door County, WI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting August 21, 2017 Agenda Introductions Coastal Flood Risk Study and Mapping Program Current Status Technical Overview of Study and Mapping
More informationSea State Analysis. Topics. Module 7 Sea State Analysis 2/22/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering Orson P. Smith, PE, Ph.D.
Sea State Analysis Module 7 Orson P. Smith, PE, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus Module 7 Sea State Analysis Topics Wave height distribution Wave energy spectra Wind wave generation Directional spectra Hindcasting
More informationBob Battalio, PE Chief Engineer, ESA September 8, 2016
RELATING FUTURE COASTAL CONDITIONS TO EXISTING FEMA FLOOD HAZARD MAPS Technical Methods Manual Bob Battalio, PE Chief Engineer, ESA September 8, 2016 FMA 2016 Sacramento, California DWR-OST-SIO PILOTING
More informationRegional Analysis of Extremal Wave Height Variability Oregon Coast, USA. Heidi P. Moritz and Hans R. Moritz
Regional Analysis of Extremal Wave Height Variability Oregon Coast, USA Heidi P. Moritz and Hans R. Moritz U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District Portland, Oregon, USA 1. INTRODUCTION This extremal
More informationSt. Louis County, MN Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. May 2, 2018
St. Louis County, MN Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting May 2, 2018 Agenda Introductions Coastal Flood Risk Study and Mapping Program Current Status Technical Overview of Study and Mapping
More informationPathways Interns: Annika O Dea, Ian Conery, Andrea Albright
1 REMOTE SENSING OF COASTAL MORPHODYNAMICS 237 237 237 217 217 217 2 2 2 8 119 27 252 174.59 255 255 255 163 163 163 131 132 122 239 65 53 11 135 12 112 92 56 62 12 13 12 56 48 13 12 111 Kate Brodie Brittany
More informationWhat are we adapting to? David Provis Senior Principal, Oceanography, Cardno Member, Victorian Coastal Council
What are we adapting to? David Provis Senior Principal, Oceanography, Cardno Member, Victorian Coastal Council Sea-level -NOAA Sea-level - NOAA 90% probability ranges Sea-level - NOAA Sea-level Port Phillip
More informationAssateague Island National Seashore North End Restoration Project Timeline
Assateague Island National Seashore North End Restoration Project Timeline Date Event Some information provided in the Project Introduction document. Detailed events are available in a timeline compiled
More informationBeach Nourishment Impact on Beach Safety and Surfing in the North Reach of Brevard County, Florida
Beach Nourishment Impact on Beach Safety and Surfing in the North Reach of Brevard County, Florida Prepared by John Hearin, Ph.D. Coastal Engineering Vice Chairman Cocoa Beach Chapter Port Canaveral Patrick
More informationWave Breaking. Wave Breaking
Wave Breaking The release of energy derived from the wind, along a narrow coastal zone - geomorphic work done by wind, really, translated through medium of water. Wave Breaking Wave breaking is responsible
More informationAppendix D: SWAN Wave Modelling
Appendix D: SWAN Wave Modelling D.1 Preamble The Eurobodalla Shire Council area is subject to extreme waves originating from offshore storms. When swell waves approach the coast, they are modified by the
More informationMIAMI BEACH 32ND STREET HOT SPOT: NUMERICAL MODELING AND DESIGN OPTIMIZATION. Adam Shah - Coastal Engineer Harvey Sasso P.E.
ABSTRACT MIAMI BEACH 32ND STREET HOT SPOT: NUMERICAL MODELING AND DESIGN OPTIMIZATION Adam Shah - Coastal Engineer Harvey Sasso P.E. - Principal Coastal Systems International, Inc. 464 South Dixie Highway
More informationLongshore sediment transport
and Orson P. Smith, PE, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus Longshore transport Waves breaking at an angle to shore Sediment under breakers lifted by saltation Drops back to sea bed a little down drift Swash (runup)
More informationTRANSPORT OF NEARSHORE DREDGE MATERIAL BERMS
Proceedings of the 6 th International Conference on the Application of Physical Modelling in Coastal and Port Engineering and Science (Coastlab16) Ottawa, Canada, May 10-13, 2016 Copyright : Creative Commons
More informationG. Meadows, H. Purcell and L. Meadows University of Michigan
www.coj.net/departments/fire+and+rescue/emergency+preparedness/rip+current.htm G. Meadows, H. Purcell and L. Meadows Over 80% of all surf related rescues are attributable to Rip Currents According to the
More informationInlet Management Study for Pass-A-Grille and Bunces Pass, Pinellas County, Florida
Inlet Management Study for Pass-A-Grille and Bunces Pass, Pinellas County, Florida Final Report Submitted By Ping Wang, Ph.D., Jun Cheng Ph.D., Zachary Westfall, and Mathieu Vallee Coastal Research Laboratory
More information2. Water levels and wave conditions. 2.1 Introduction
18 2. Water levels and wave conditions 2.1 Introduction This Overtopping Manual has a focus on the aspects of wave run-up and wave overtopping only. It is not a design manual, giving the whole design process
More informationRISK AND STANDARDS BASED APPROACH TO RIP RAP DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR GRAHAMSTOWN DAM STAGE 2 AUGMENTATION
RISK AND STANDARDS BASED APPROACH TO RIP RAP DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR GRAHAMSTOWN DAM STAGE 2 AUGMENTATION M. B. Barker 1 and D. Holroyde 2 ABSTRACT. A detailed study was completed for the Stage 2 works
More informationAPPENDIX A Hydrodynamic Model Qualicum Beach Waterfront Master Plan
Page 1 of 21 CLIENT: Town of Qualicum Beach PROJECT: SIGNATURE DATE CONTRIBUTORS : M. Marti Lopez REVIEWED BY : P. St-Germain, EIT APPROVED BY: J. Readshaw, P.Eng ISSUE/REVISION INDEX Issue Details Code
More informationBeach Wizard: Development of an Operational Nowcast, Short-Term Forecast System for Nearshore Hydrodynamics and Bathymetric Evolution
Beach Wizard: Development of an Operational Nowcast, Short-Term Forecast System for Nearshore Hydrodynamics and Bathymetric Evolution Ad Reniers Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology
More informationInvestigation of the Impact of Beach Raking on Beach Accretion/Erosion: West End Beaches of Galveston Island, Texas 2007/ 2008
Investigation of the Impact of Beach Raking on Beach Accretion/Erosion: West End Beaches of Galveston Island, Texas 2007/ 2008 By Robert Webster 1, Timothy Dellepenna Ph.D. 1, 1 Texas A&M at Galveston
More informationAnalysis of Extreme Wave Climates in Rhode Island Waters South of Block Island
8. Analysis of Extreme Wave Climates in Rhode Island Waters South of Block Island By Annette R. Grilli, Taylor G. Asher, Stephan T. Grilli and Malcolm L. Spaulding Ocean Engineering University of Rhode
More informationCompiled by Uwe Dornbusch. Edited by Cherith Moses
REPORT ON WAVE AND TIDE MEASUREMENTS Compiled by Uwe Dornbusch. Edited by Cherith Moses 1 Aims...1 2 Summary...1 3 Introduction...1 4 Site selection...1 5 Wave recorder settings...2 6 Results...2 6.1 Water
More informationPlan B Dam Breach Assessment
Plan B Dam Breach Assessment Introduction In support of the Local Sponsor permit applications to the states of Minnesota and North Dakota, a dam breach analysis for the Plan B alignment of the Fargo-Moorhead
More informationCoastal Wave Energy Dissipation: Observations and Modeling
Coastal Wave Energy Dissipation: Observations and Modeling Jeffrey L Hanson US Army Corps of Engineers Field Research Facility USACE Field Research Facility Kent K. Hathaway US Army Corps of Engineers
More informationCOFFS HARBOUR SEDIMENT MODELLING AND INVESTIGATION
COFFS HARBOUR SEDIMENT MODELLING AND INVESTIGATION Luke McAvoy Undergraduate Engineer (Civil) Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia Daniel Rodger Senior Engineer Water
More informationSACO RIVER AND CAMP ELLIS BEACH SACO, MAINE SECTION 111 SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION PROJECT APPENDIX F ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT
SACO RIVER AND CAMP ELLIS BEACH SACO, MAINE SECTION 111 SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION PROJECT APPENDIX F ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT Department of the Army New England District, Corps of Engineers 696 Virginia Road
More informationSHORE PROTECTION AND HABITAT CREATION AT SHAMROCK ISLAND, TEXAS ABSTRACT
SHORE PROTECTION AND HABITAT CREATION AT SHAMROCK ISLAND, TEXAS M. Cameron Perry, P.E., and Daniel J. Heilman, P.E. Coastal Engineer Shiner Moseley & Associates., Inc. 555 N. Carancahua Corpus Christi,
More informationCoastal Sediment Transport Modeling Ocean Beach & San Francisco Bight, CA
1 Coastal Sediment Transport Modeling Ocean Beach & San Francisco Bight, CA Honghai Li and Lihwa Lin Engineering Research and Development Center U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Frank Wu, Lisa Andes, and James
More information4/20/17. #30 - Coastlines - General Principles Coastlines - Overview
Writing Assignment Due one week from today by 11:59 pm See main class web pages for detailed instructions Essays will be submitted in Illinois Compass (instructions later) Pick one: Earthquakes, tsunamis,
More informationUPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED
ASSESSMENT OF SAND VOLUME LOSS at the TOWNSHIP of UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED to the LANDFALL OF HURRICANE SANDY - PURSUANT TO NJ-DR 4086 This assessment is in response to Hurricane Sandy
More informationPassage Key Inlet, Florida; CMS Modeling and Borrow Site Impact Analysis
Passage Key Inlet, Florida; CMS Modeling and Borrow Site Impact Analysis by Kelly R. Legault and Sirisha Rayaprolu PURPOSE: This Coastal and Hydraulics Engineering Technical Note (CHETN) describes the
More informationNearshore Dredged Material Placement Pilot Study at Noyo Harbor, CA
1 Nearshore Dredged Material Placement Pilot Study at Noyo Harbor, CA Noyo Cove N 2011 National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology 9-11, February 2011 Lihwa Lin, Honghai Li, Mitchell Brown US
More informationSensitivity of storm waves in Montevideo (Uruguay) to a hypothetical climate change
Vol. 9: 81-85,1997 1 CLIMATE RESEARCH Clim Res I Published December 29 Sensitivity of storm waves in Montevideo (Uruguay) to a hypothetical climate change Eugenio Lorenzo*, Luis Teixeira Instituto de Mecanica
More informationImpact of Dredging the Lower Narrow River on Circulation and Flushing
Impact of Dredging the Lower Narrow River on Circulation and Flushing Craig Swanson Ph.D. Swanson Environmental Alex Shaw Ocean Engineering, URI Prof. Malcolm L. Spaulding Ocean Engineering, URI 29 January
More informationSimulation of hydraulic regime and sediment transport in the Mekong delta coast
Simulation of hydraulic regime and sediment transport in the Mekong delta coast 1. Introduction Coastal erosion in the Mekong Delta has been recorded in recent years and the erosion rate has been increasing
More informationCoastal Inundation. An Overview for TCDC
Coastal Inundation An Overview for TCDC Rick Liefting Team Leader Regional Hazards and Environmental Compliance Integrated Catchment Management Waikato Regional Council Photo: Sugar Loaf Wharf, Coromandel.
More informationf'i. JOSE E. SANCHEZ, PE, SES
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, CORPS OF ENGINEERS COASTAL AND HYDRAULICS LABORATORY WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION, 3909 HALLS FERRY ROAD VICKSBURG, MISSISSIPPI 39180-6199
More informationLOCALLY CONCENTRATED SEVERE BEACH EROSION ON SEISHO COAST CAUSED BY TYPHOON T0709
F-4 Fourth International Conference on Scour and Erosion 2008 LOCALLY CONCENTRATED SEVERE BEACH EROSION ON SEISHO COAST CAUSED BY TYPHOON T0709 Yoshimitsu TAJIMA 1 and Shinji SATO 2 1 Member of JSCE, Associate
More informationNew Orleans Municipal Yacht Harbor
New Orleans Municipal Yacht Harbor Marina Schematic Design Update 601 Poydras St., Suite 1860 New Orleans, LA, 70130 504-648-3560 Post-Katrina Municipal Yacht Harbor: Introduction The MYH was an approximate
More informationNorth Half Moon Bay Shoreline Improvement Project, Pillar Point Harbor, CA Coastal Engineering Appendix
Engineer Research & Development Center / San Francisco District U. S. Army Corps of Engineers North Half Moon Bay Shoreline Improvement Project, Pillar Point Harbor, CA Coastal Engineering Appendix Photograph
More informationInventory of coastal sandy areas protection of infrastructure and planned retreat
2018-02-28 Inventory of coastal sandy areas protection of infrastructure and planned retreat Johanna Birgander, Thorbjörn Nilsson, Pär Persson Summary To estimate the natural protection around the coast
More informationPREDICTION OF ERODED VERSUS ACCRETED BEACHES
CETN-II-2 6/88 PREDICTION OF ERODED VERSUS ACCRETED BEACHES PURPOSE: To present revised procedures for predicting whether a beach profile of a specified sand size will tend to erode or accrete under incident
More informationTown of Duck, North Carolina
Tracking No. 00.00.2010 Erosion Mitigation And Shoreline Management Feasibility Study Town of Duck, North Carolina Coastal Planning & Engineering of North Carolina August 15, 2012 Tom Jarrett Robert Neal
More informationAn IOOS Operational Wave Observation Plan Supported by NOAA IOOS Program & USACE
An IOOS Operational Wave Observation Plan Supported by NOAA IOOS Program & USACE R.E. Jensen, W.A. Birkemeier and W. Burnett JCOMM-Workshop on Wave Measurements from Buoys Wave Information to Application
More informationUnsteady Wave-Driven Circulation Cells Relevant to Rip Currents and Coastal Engineering
Unsteady Wave-Driven Circulation Cells Relevant to Rip Currents and Coastal Engineering Andrew Kennedy Dept of Civil and Coastal Engineering 365 Weil Hall University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611 phone:
More informationPier 8 Wave Overtopping Analysis (65 Guise Street East) Our File:
Shoreplan Engineering Limited 55 Eglinton Avenue E., Suite 800 Toronto, ON Canada M4P 1G8 T) 416.487.4756 F) 416.487.5129 E) mail@shoreplan.com March 31, 2016 Mr. Ed English Senior Project Manager Waterfront
More informationAvailable online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 116 (2015 )
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Engineering 116 (2015 ) 320 325 8th International Conference on Asian and Pacific Coasts (APAC 2015) Department of Ocean Engineering, IIT
More informationTaranaki Tsunami Inundation Analysis. Prepared for Taranaki Civil Defence Emergency Management Group. Final Version
Taranaki Tsunami Inundation Analysis Prepared for Taranaki Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Final Version June 2012 AM 12/07 HBRC Plan Number 4362 Asset Management Group Technical Report Prepared
More informationBaraga County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. July 12, 2018
Baraga County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting July 12, 2018 Agenda Introductions Coastal Flood Risk Study and Mapping Program Current Status Technical Overview of Study and Mapping
More informationDirectional Wave Spectra from Video Images Data and SWAN Model. Keywords: Directional wave spectra; SWAN; video images; pixels
Jurnal Teknologi Full paper Directional Wave Spectra from Video Images Data and SWAN Model Muhammad Zikra a*, Noriaki Hashimoto b, Masaru Yamashiro b, Kojiro Suzuki c a Department of Ocean Engineering,
More informationChapter 15 SEASONAL CHANGES IN BEACHES OP THE NORTH ATLANTIC COAST OF THE UNITED STATES
Chapter 15 SEASONAL CHANGES IN BEACHES OP THE NORTH ATLANTIC COAST OF THE UNITED STATES By John M. Darling Hydraulic Engineer, Research Division U. S. Army Coastal Engineering Research Center Corps of
More informationDeep-water orbital waves
What happens when waves approach shore? Deep-water orbital waves Fig. 9.16, p. 211 Wave motion is influenced by water depth and shape of the shoreline wave buildup zone surf zone beach Wave base deepwater
More informationWave energy converter effects on wave and sediment circulation
Wave energy converter effects on wave and sediment circulation Grace Chang and Craig Jones Integral Consulting Inc. cjones@integral-corp.com; gchang@integral-corp.com Jesse Roberts, Kelley Ruehl, and Chris
More information