Size: px
Start display at page:

Download ""

Transcription

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48 Dam Modification Report Stingy Run Fly Ash Reservoir Appendix E Spillway System Design Calculations E1: Spillway/Energy Dissipater Design for 100-year Event CHE September 4, 2014

49 Written by: CJW Date: 04/17/2013 (intro revised 6/18/2014 by ACV) Reviewed by: MRB Date: 04/26/2013 Client: AEP Project: FAR Closure Project No.: CHE8273 Task No.: APPENDIX E1: SPILLWAY/ENERGY DISSIPATOR DESIGN FOR 100-YEAR EVENT PROJECT OVERVIEW The Stingy Run Fly Ash Reservoir (FAR) is proposed to be closed by draining the reservoir, lowering the existing top of dam, and constructing a cover system. The Final Cover Stormwater Management Plan (Cover Plan), drafted by Geosyntec in 2013, presented the design details of the final cover stormwater management system. The Cover Plan included a hydrologic analysis to determine peak flows at specific locations within the FAR and a hydraulic analysis of the proposed conveyance channels up to the proposed top of dam and spillway. The Cover Plan is included in this Dam Modification Report as Appendix D. As presented in the Cover Plan, the three main conveyance channels on the proposed cover will converge and the combined flow will be conveyed within a single channel to the modified dam and proposed spillway. The proposed cover conveyance swales consist of a two stage channel design. The low flow channel has been designed to convey the 2 year 24 hour storm event, which was selected due to the frequency of this potential flow. The second stage was designed to safely convey the 100 year 24 hour storm event to protect the adjacent cover system. The intent is to minimize flow across the cover cap by concentrating the flows within stabilized channels that will safely convey the 100 year design storm directly to the proposed spillway over the modified dam. The design for the cover system presented in the Cover Plan extends to the downstream end of the proposed spillway. This calculation package picks up where the Cover Plan left off, detailing the conveyance system downstream of the spillway. Per the hydrologic calculations shown in the Cover Plan, flows in the spillway during the 100 year 24 hour storm event will reach approximately 1,963 cfs. Conveying these flows from the base of the spillway to Stingy Creek in a safe and efficient manner will require significant energy dissipation. This calculation package focuses on the design of the conveyance system, including energy dissipation measures, immediately downstream of the redesigned dam and spillway, between the base of the dam and Stingy Creek Road. This calculation package describes the design of the conveyance system (spillway over dam, energy dissipator at toe of dam, channel downstream of energy dissipator) for the 100-year flood event. Subsequent to development of this design, Ohio DNR indicated that the dam spillway component of the system should be designed for the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF). Other parts of the conveyance system described in this chapter (energy dissipator, channel downstream of the energy dissipator) will remain sized for the 100-year event. In addition, the PMF spillway was developed by designing an additional overbank spillway area centered on the 100-year concrete spillway described in this section. Therefore, the design analysis presented in this section remains current for the 100-year event, and this design documentation remains the same as presented in Appendix E2 describes the hydrologic/hydraulic analysis and design modifications for the PMF spillway. 1

50 Written by: CJW Date: 04/17/2013 (intro revised 6/18/2014 by ACV) Reviewed by: MRB Date: 04/26/2013 Client: AEP Project: FAR Closure Project No.: CHE8273 Task No.: DESIGN METHODOLOGY With 100 year peak flows reaching nearly 2,000 cfs in the proposed spillway, and a spillway slope of 12.5%, supercritical flow conditions within the spillway requires the need for energy dissipation measures to be used at the base of the spillway to protect the downstream channel and surrounding area from significant erosion potential. Downstream of this energy dissipator, an elevation drop of approximately 30 feet occurs before flows reach Stingy Creek at Stingy Creek Road. This sharp elevation drop causes the dissipated flows to once again reach supercritical conditions if no tail water condition is assumed, thereby enhancing the complexity of the conveyance system design. As a result of these project conditions, the design of both an efficient energy dissipating system as well as a protected downstream channel needed to be analyzed as one complete system. The energy dissipation design was carried out in accordance with design guidance from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR, 1987) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE, 1990). Based on the spillway flow having a calculated velocity of 54.3 ft/sec and a Froude number of 9.33 immediately upstream of the energy dissipator, a stilling basin was designed in accordance with the Type III Basin characteristics recommended by the USBR (USBR, 1987). See Attachment B for a schematic of this basin design. This type of energy dissipator is known as a stilling basin. Dimensions and design parameters from the final design are described in detail in the Hydraulic Analysis Results section below. The downstream channel design was first carried out based on topographical conditions and necessary hydraulic capacity. A trapezoidal channel design with 3H:1V side slopes was assumed. Scour protection was analyzed in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration s (FHA) guidance set forth in Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 11 (FHA, 1989), as well as a more recent article published by Craig Fischenich at the Ecosystem Management & Restoration Research Program (Fischenich, 2001). Both of these specifications were in agreement on suggesting channel stability measures based on flow velocities and scour potential. Details of this design can be found in Hydraulic Analysis Results below. See Attachment C for excerpts from the Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 11 paper that was used for the selection of rip-rap armament. HYDRAULIC METHOD OF ANALYSIS Due to the need to analyze the stilling basin and reinforced channel as a single system, and the many dependent variables involved in the analysis, computer modeling using advanced software was the method of choice to perform the primary hydraulic analysis. This analysis was carried out using the computer program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Hydrologic Engineering Center-River Analysis System V4.1.0 (HEC-RAS). HEC-RAS is a state-of-the-practice software package that allows for the analysis of one-dimensional steady flow through complex open channel systems. The software is capable of analyzing mixed flow regimes as well as situations where the water surface profile is rapidly varied, such as hydraulic jumps. This allows for the software to be efficiently used in the analysis of spillways, energy dissipators, and open channels. Output from HEC-RAS includes detailed analytical parameters such as depth of flow, flow velocity, hydraulic depth, and whether the flow is sub-critical or super-critical. All of these parameters are essential to the efficient design of the conveyance system downstream of the spillway. 2

51 Written by: CJW Date: 04/17/2013 (intro revised 6/18/2014 by ACV) Reviewed by: MRB Date: 04/26/2013 Client: AEP Project: FAR Closure Project No.: CHE8273 Task No.: HYDRAULIC ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS Hydrologic calculations used in this package are detailed in the Cover Plan (Geosyntec Consultants, 2013). The peak 100 year 24 hour event flow as determined through the hydrologic analysis was 1,963 cfs. Since this storm was used as the basis of design for the proposed conveyance system upstream of the dam, the same design flow was analyzed in this package, conservatively rounded to 2,000 cfs. The 2-year 24 hour event flow, estimated in the Cover Plan as 450 cfs, was also simulated in order to analyze the system performance under more typical circumstances, and to analyze the design and performance of a downstream culvert at Stingy Creek Road. As stated above, the stilling basin was designed in accordance with the Type III Basin characteristics recommended by the USBR (USBR, 1987). A summary of the final design parameters is detailed in the Hydraulic Analysis Results section below. The basin was initially assumed to have a rectangular shape with a bottom width equivalent to the total width of the spillway (55 ft). The depth, length, and other design parameters of the basin were adjusted in the model until desirable results were achieved. The sill height at the downstream end of the stilling basin was also adjusted between model runs until an appropriate sill height was reached that created the desired hydraulic jump while keeping the exit elevation reasonably low. This was desirable as it allowed the reinforced channel to have a smaller slope, thus reducing the erosion potential downstream of the stilling basin. The entrance to the stilling basin was designed to be setback a horizontal distance of 20 ft from the base of the dam for added safety. This will require the extension of the spillway at a slope of 8H:1V. From the end of the extended spillway, the transition to the base of the stilling basin was designed with a bottom slope of 1H:1V, with side walls tapering to vertical at the basin. The stilling basin was assumed to be constructed of concrete with a Manning s roughness coefficient of and with a flat bottom. The downstream reinforced channel following the stilling basin was assumed to be trapezoidal with 3H:1V side slopes. Consistent channel geometry was a target of the design to simplify constructability. The bottom slope of this channel was assumed to be constant from the end of the stilling basin to the downstream culvert at the maintenance drive. The resulting slope is approximately 3.9% and was modeled as such. The channel was assumed to have a gradual curve from the end of the stilling basin to maintenance drive (See Drawing 3 of the Modified Fly Ash Dam Plan Set). The excavated depth of the channel was dependent on the surrounding topography and the depth of flow determined to occur in the channel. Downstream of the proposed improvements near the property limits, Stingy Creek passes through an existing double box culvert at Stingy Creek Road. The existing double box culvert has the hydraulic capacity to only convey a flow equivalent to the 2 year 24 hour storm event. The proposed box culvert for the maintenance drive was designed to have a similar capacity to the Stingy Creek Road crossing. The proposed box culvert is designed as a 60 foot, double concrete box with each opening as 5 (H) x 6 (W). Downstream of the culvert, the proposed designed conveyance system will transition to the existing creek. The details of these structures were determined by performing numerous iterations in HEC-RAS, altering parameters as required until an efficient, feasible design was achieved. The model simulated 3,650 ft of channel, from approximately 1,000 ft upstream of the spillway, where the Type 1 Channel is planned to be constructed, to approximately 1,400 ft beyond the 5 x 6 double box culvert, where Stingy Creek flows adjacent to Stingy Creek Road before turning south. The distance from the bottom of the designed spillway to the double box culvert at Stingy Creek Road was approximately 650 ft. This was assumed to be the total length of the conveyance system designed as part of this package. 3

52 Written by: CJW Date: 04/17/2013 (intro revised 6/18/2014 by ACV) Reviewed by: MRB Date: 04/26/2013 Client: AEP Project: FAR Closure Project No.: CHE8273 Task No.: Input and output summaries from the HEC-RAS model can be found in Table 1 and Table 2. Additionally, Attachment A presents cross-sections and model schematics for both model runs. HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS RESULTS A written summary of the results of the hydraulic analysis using HEC-RAS are summarized below. Results are presented based on notable transitions within the conveyance system, beginning at the upstream end of the system and working downstream. Table 2 presents tabulated results from both the 100 year and 2 year storm event model simulations. Other supporting figures, tables, and attachments are noted. Spillway Extension: The downstream end of the spillway was designed to extend an additional 20 ft away from the dam, continuing at a slope of 8H:1V with the same channel dimensions (25 ft base width; 4H:1V side slopes). This will allow the stilling basin to be placed adequately far from the immediate base of the dam. The spillway extension will end at an elevation of approximately ft. Spillway Transition: From the end of the 8H:1V trapezoidal spillway, the entry transition to the stilling basin will consist of a 1H:1V sloped concrete channel. This channel will be approximately 16.8 ft in length, extending from elevation ft to ft at a 1H:1V slope. The transition will have a base width of 25 ft at the top to match the spillway and will taper to a width of 55 ft at the bottom. The sidewalls will also match the trapezoidal spillway dimensions at the top, but will transition to vertical walls by the bottom. The top of the sidewalls will be constructed at a steady elevation of ft. Chute blocks measuring 1.25 ft high by 1.25 ft wide will be equally spaced across the bottom of the transition channel, where the transition meets the stilling basin. The chute blocks will be spaced equidistantly by 1.25 ft. A total of 22 chute blocks will be constructed along the base of the spillway transition. See Attachment B for a schematic showing a general design of the chute blocks. Stilling Basin: The stilling basin was designed in accordance with the Type III Basin characteristics recommended by the USBR (USBR, 1987). See Attachment B for a schematic. The concrete basin will be 55 ft wide and will extend away from the dam and spillway with a flat bottom. The bottom will be located at an elevation of ft, giving the basin a total depth of approximately 18.1 ft. The sidewalls will be vertical and will extend to an elevation of ft. Baffle blocks will be constructed 12.5 ft from the beginning of the stilling basin. The baffle blocks will be 2.0 ft wide and 2.7 ft high with a vertical face. The tops of the blocks will be 0.55 ft long. The downstream side of the blocks will have a 1H:1V sloped face. The blocks will be spaced by 2 ft from edge to edge. A total of 14 blocks will be constructed in place. At the downstream end of the basin, a 2H:1V sloped sill will be constructed. The bottom of the sill will begin 33 ft from the beginning of the stilling basin, and will slope upwards for a vertical height of 5 ft to an elevation of ft. The total length of the basin will be 43 ft from the entry transition to the end of the sill. The downstream side of the sill will drop vertically 1 ft to the basin exit transition channel at an elevation of ft. A summary of design parameters for the stilling basin is shown in Table 1B. Basin Exit Transition: From the base of the sill at an elevation of ft, the conveyance system will be graded and built to slope downward at a steady slope of approximately 4% until the channel reaches the rebuilt double box culvert at Stingy Creek Road. Exiting the stilling basin, a 50 ft long concrete transition channel will be built to transition the conveyance system from the stilling basin to the reinforced channel. The channel bottom will be 55 ft wide at the base of the stilling basin exit sill and will taper to a 25 ft 4

53 Written by: CJW Date: 04/17/2013 (intro revised 6/18/2014 by ACV) Reviewed by: MRB Date: 04/26/2013 Client: AEP Project: FAR Closure Project No.: CHE8273 Task No.: bottom width 50 ft downstream, to an elevation of ft. The side slopes will also taper over this transition, from vertical side walls at the stilling basin exit sill to 3H:1V sloped walls 50 ft downstream. The depth of the channel will be determined by the grading in the surrounding area, but at no point should the minimum channel depth be less than 10 ft over this transition. A gabion check structure will be built at the end of this 50 ft transition. A summary of design parameters for the basin exit transition is shown in Table 1C. Gabion Check Structure: A gabion basket check structure (or similarly constructed check structure) will be constructed at the downstream end of the exit transition channel, beginning 50 ft downstream of the sill. The check structure will extend across the entire width of the channel with a 2 ft height above the bottom of the channel until it matches the 3H:1V sloped sidewalls of the channel. The top upstream end of the gabion basket will be constructed to an elevation of ft. The gabion basket will be keyed (or notched) into its position by a depth of 1 ft on the bottom, so that the total height of the basket will be 3 ft; it will also be notched into place on the channel sidewalls, extending 6 ft (horizontally) on each side into the channel sidewalls. The total length of the gabion basket check structure will therefore be approximately 37 ft. The check structure will have a top width of 4 ft in the direction of flow. All specifications for the gabion check structure will be in conformance with Supplemental Specification 838 from the Ohio Department of Transportation (Ohio DOT, 2005). See Attachment D. On the downstream side of the check structure, rip-rap will be stacked at a slope of approximately 4H:1V to transition back to the channel floor. Rip-rap shall be AASHTO one ton rip-rap with a D 50 of at least 2.85 ft. A summary of design parameters for the gabion check structure is shown in Table 1D. Reinforced Channel: From the downstream side of the gabion basket check structure, a trapezoidal channel will be constructed at a consistent bed slope to Stingy Creek Road and the newly designed double box culvert. The invert culvert elevation (upstream side) at this point will be approximately 579 ft, based on current topographic data. The channel will have a 25 ft wide base with 3H:1V side slopes. The depth of the channel will be dependent on the surrounding grading, but at no point shall the depth be less than 6 ft. The channel will be reinforced with hard armoring for its entire length to prevent scour and erosion damage due to the steep slope and high Froude number (supercritical flow) produced in the channel during the 100 year event. Rip-rap 1 will be used to armor the entire bottom of the channel as well as the sidewalls to a depth of 3 ft. Above a depth of 3 ft, armoring of the channel is not necessary. For the first 25 ft of channel immediately downstream of the check structure, AASHTO one ton rip-rap (D 50 = 2.85 ft) will be used for armoring; for the rest of the channel, AASHTO half ton rip-rap (D 50 = 2.25 ft) will be used 2. A summary of design parameters for the reinforced channel is shown in Table 1E. See Attachment C for relevant excerpts from the FHA Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 11 (FHA, 1989). 1 A cost analysis has not been conducted to decide on the most cost-effective means of armoring. It should be noted that alternative armoring mechanisms may be selected as long as those mechanisms provide sufficient scour protection in the channel to withstand the velocities and shear stresses calculated in this analysis. Alternatives may include grouted rip-rap, high performance turf reinforcement mat (e.g., Pyramat or Armormax), or articulated concrete block (e.g., Armorflex). 2 Rip-rap size was selected in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation FHA Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 11 (FHA, 1989) based on analyzed shear stresses and velocities in the channel. The D 50 sizes presented represent the minimum D 50 measurements that may be used; other rip-rap specifications may be used as long as these minimum D 50 standards are met. 5

54 Written by: CJW Date: 04/17/2013 (intro revised 6/18/2014 by ACV) Reviewed by: MRB Date: 04/26/2013 Client: AEP Project: FAR Closure Project No.: CHE8273 Task No.: Double Box Culvert: A concrete double box culvert will be constructed at the first channel undercrossing of Stingy Creek Road. The double box culvert will extend under the entirety of the road, which was estimated to be 60 ft in length in the HEC-RAS model. The culvert was modeled as a 5 (H) x 6 (W) double concrete box. This culvert can sufficiently handle the 2-year storm event. The upstream invert of the culvert was estimated to exist at an elevation of 579 ft; the downstream end at an elevation of 577 ft. It is recognized that these elevations may change based on field surveys and grading constraints. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS A conveyance system downstream of the Stingy Run FAR spillway was designed to handle flows from the 100 year 24 hour storm event. To convey these flows from the base of the spillway to Stingy Creek in a safe and efficient manner, a stilling basin and reinforced channel was designed using HEC-RAS. The stilling basin was designed in accordance with U.S. Bureau of Reclamation standards (USBR, 1987), complete with chute blocks at the entrance, baffle blocks, and a 5 ft exit sill to create a hydraulic jump within the basin. The downstream conveyance channel, which will be unusually steep due to the topography of the site, was designed with hard armoring to protect the channel from scour and erosion. A gabion check structure was also included in the design to slow velocities out of the stilling basin. Additionally, a double reinforced concrete box culvert was designed at the first creek crossing of Stingy Creek Road to effectively convey the 2 year 24 hour storm event under the road. REFERENCES Fischenich, Craig. Stability Thresholds for Stream Restoration Materials, EMRRP Technical Notes Collection (ERDC TN-EMRRP-SR-29), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS. May Geosyntec Consultants. Final_Cover_Stormwater_ pdf. March 18, State of Ohio Department of Transportation (Ohio DOT). Supplemental Specification 838 Gabions, April 15, United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Hydraulic Design of Spillways, Engineer Manual , Jan 16, USACE, Hydrologic Engineering Center- River Analysis System, Version Davis, CA. United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), Design of Small Dams, 3 rd ed., Denver, CO, United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FHA), Design of Riprap Revetment, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 11, Publication No. FHWA-IP McLean, VA, Mar

55 Written by: CJW Date: 04/17/2013 Reviewed by: MRB Date: 04/26/2013 Client: AEP Project: FAR Closure Project No.: CHE8273 Task No.: TABLES AND ATTACHMENTS Table Table 1A Model Inputs/Results from Previous Sources and Studies Table 1B Model Inputs/Results for Stilling Basin Table 1C Model Inputs/Results for Stilling Basin Exit Transition Table 1D Model Inputs/Results for Gabion Check Structure Table 1E Model Inputs/Results for Reinforced Channel Table 2A Summary of HEC-RAS Output for 100-yr Storm Table 2B Summary of HEC-RAS Output for 2-yr Storm Attachments A HEC-RAS Outputs and Cross Sections for 2-yr and 100-yr Storms B Stilling Basin Type III Design Schematic, USBR, 1987 C Excerpts from HEC-11 Rip-Rap Sizing Guidance D Gabion Basket Specification, Ohio DOT G:\CWP\CHE Stingy Run FAR Closure\5.0 Technical File\5.4 Engineering Work File\ Final Design and PTI\5.4.6 Task 7 Dam Design\Calc Package\Draft_Dissipator Design_Narrative_ docx

56 Written by: CJW Date: 04/17/2013 Reviewed by: MRB Date: 04/26/2013 Client: AEP Project: FAR Closure Project No.: CHE8273 Task No.: TABLES G:\CWP\CHE Stingy Run FAR Closure\5.0 Technical File\5.4 Engineering Work File\ Final Design and PTI\5.4.6 Task 7 Dam Design\Calc Package\Draft_Dissipator Design_Narrative_ docx

57 Table 1A JOB CHE8273-FAR Closure 1420 Kensington Road, Suite 103 SHEET NO. OF Oak Brook, IL CALCULATED BY Scott Mansell DATE 4/9/2013 TELEPHONE (630) CHECKED BY Chris Wessel DATE 4/9/2013 FAX (630) DESCRIPTION Stilling Basin and Conveyance Channel Sizing Summary Inputs from Previous Sources and Analyses Inputs taken from previous sources Distance between spillway begin and edge of dam Distance between edge of dam and tie in to natural channel Elevation/slopes/lengths/cross sections of upstream channels and spillway Sump elevation at tie in to natural channel X-sections of natural channel Length, exit slope, n of downstream channel Manning's n (Riprap d50=2.25') Manning's n (Riprap d50=2.85') Manning's n (Earthen) Manning's n (Turf protection grass) Manning's n (Concrete) Flow Rate from spillway Depth of flow in spillway Velocity in spillway Froude number in spillway Value Units 350 ft 630 ft Various ft Various - Various cfs 1.23 ft ft/sec Source Scaled off of Figure 2 of downstream analysis Scaled off of Figure 2 of downstream analysis Figure (Details of Dam Configuration) and (Details- Cover System) Taken from Figure 3 of downstream analysis Taken from Figure 3 and 4 of downstream analysis and estimated from topography where necessary Taken from SWMM analysis of downstream analysis From HEC-11 equation 20 n=0.0395*d^0.167 From HEC-11 equation 20 n=0.0395*d^0.167 From SWMM model for natural area From cover swale design From cover swale design From Cover swale design spreadsheet and given by Matt Bardol From spreadsheet used for sizing spillway From spreadsheet used for sizing spillway From spreadsheet used for sizing spillway and checked by calculation

58 Table 1B JOB CHE8273-FAR Closure 1420 Kensington Road, Suite 103 SHEET NO. OF Oak Brook, IL CALCULATED BY Scott Mansell DATE 4/9/2013 TELEPHONE (630) CHECKED BY Chris Wessel DATE 4/9/2013 FAX (630) DESCRIPTION Stilling Basin and Conveyance Channel Sizing Summary Stilling Basin Design Stilling Basin Design Max allowable velocity Value Units 60 ft/sec USBR, 1987 Source Horizontal offset from bottom of spillway to transition to stilling basin. Continue spillway slope of 12.5% Slope of transition from spillway to stilling basin Elevation drop from bottom of extended spillway to bottom of basin Width of basin = Width of Spillway Depth of hydraulic jump (and depth of stilling basin), d2 Length of basin, L Chute block height and width, and space between chute blocks Distance to row of baffles Baffle height (h3) Baffle width and space between baffles Baffle top length Baffle length Sill height (h4) Elevation drop to channel 20 ft 1:1 H:V 12 ft 55 ft 15.6 ft 43 ft 1.25 ft 12.5 ft 2.7 ft 2 ft 0.5 ft 2.7 ft 5 ft 1 ft Set design parameter USBR, 1987 Design parameter Design parameter d2=d1*0.5*((1+8*fr^2)^0.5-1) Read from chart in Fig 9-41 (L/d2=2.75, d2=15.6) From diagram (d1) From diagram (0.8*d2) From chart in Fig 9-41 (h3/d1=2.2) From diagram (0.75*h3) From diagram (0.2*h3) From diagram 1:1 Analyzed Parameter Based on riprap d50=2', USACE energy dissipator manual recommends 0.25=0.5 of d100. Assume d100 is about 3', so 1' is between 0.25'-0.5' Flare width after basin End sill slope Notes: Stilling Basin Material: concrete Stilling basin side walls are vertical Using Type III stilling basin design see figure, From USBR, ft 2:1 H:V USACE energy dissipator manual recommends minimum of 5' flare width USBR, 1987

59 Table 1C JOB CHE8273-FAR Closure 1420 Kensington Road, Suite 103 SHEET NO. OF Oak Brook, IL CALCULATED BY Scott Mansell DATE 4/9/2013 TELEPHONE (630) CHECKED BY Chris Wessel DATE 4/9/2013 FAX (630) DESCRIPTION Stilling Basin and Conveyance Channel Sizing Summary Stilling Basin Exit Transition Stilling Basin Exit Transition Flare width after basin, each side Transition apron length Transition apron top width at sill Transition apron bottom width at sill Transition apron bottom width at gabion check structure (downstream end) Side slopes at downstream end Transition Apron Shape Transition apron material Note: Value :1 Trapezoidal Concrete Units ft ft ft ft ft H:V This area gradually and continuously transitions to a 25ft bottom width trapezoidal channel with 3:1 side slopes at the downstream check structure.

60 Table 1D JOB CHE8273-FAR Closure 1420 Kensington Road, Suite 103 SHEET NO. OF Oak Brook, IL CALCULATED BY Scott Mansell DATE 4/9/2013 TELEPHONE (630) CHECKED BY Chris Wessel DATE 4/9/2013 FAX (630) DESCRIPTION Stilling Basin and Conveyance Channel Sizing Summary Gabion Check Structure Gabion Check Structure Value Gabion basket height above channel bottom 2 Gabion basket top width 4 Notes: Gabion basket must meet specifications of Ohio DOT Supplemental Specification 838 (April 15, 2005) Units ft ft Gabion basket check structure placed at end of exit transition, in natural channel. Could be other material if desirable. Extends across width of channel; keyed in 1 ft to natural channel

61 Table 1E JOB CHE8273-FAR Closure 1420 Kensington Road, Suite 103 SHEET NO. OF Oak Brook, IL CALCULATED BY Scott Mansell DATE 4/9/2013 TELEPHONE (630) CHECKED BY Chris Wessel DATE 4/9/2013 FAX (630) DESCRIPTION Stilling Basin and Conveyance Channel Sizing Summary Reinforced Channel Riprap Exit Channel Design Channel bottom width Channel side slope Max velocity in channel after gabion Max hydrualic depth in channel after gabion Max shear stress in channel after gabion Shield's equation constant, tc* Max allowable shear stress based on Shield's equation for 2.25' d50 (1/2 ton) Max allowable shear stress based on Shield's equation for 2.85' d50 (1 ton) Half ton riprap d50 One ton riprap d50 Notes: Value Units 25 ft 3:1 H:V 15.8 ft/sec 3.1 ft 12.1 lb/sq ft lb/sq ft 15.8 lb/sq ft 2.25 ft 2.85 ft Source Design Parameter Assumed HEC-RAS Output HEC-RAS Output HEC-RAS Output From Fischenrich, 2001 Shield's equation Shield's equation From HEC-11 table 3 (AASHTO gradations) From HEC-11 table 3 (AASHTO gradations) Riprap provides higher roughness than concrete to help with velocity, and size is set to protect against scour Trapezoidal channel from check structure to culvert, at gradual, constant slope and gradual curve, as necessary to match downstream conditions

62 Table 2A JOB CHE8273-FAR Closure 1420 Kensington Road, Suite 103 SHEET NO. OF Oak Brook, IL CALCULATED BY Scott Mansell DATE 4/9/2013 TELEPHONE (630) CHECKED BY Chris Wessel DATE 4/9/2013 FAX (630) SCALE DESCRIPTION HEC-RAS Outputs, 100-yr Flow Station Description River Sta Profile Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Crit W.S. E.G. Elev E.G. Slope Vel Chnl Hydr Depth Flow Area Top Width Froude # Chl Mannings Chnl Mannings Banks Shear (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/ft) (ft/s) (ft) (sq ft) (ft) (lb/sq ft) Begin Type I Channel year Transition Channel year Transition Spillway year Transition year Spillway + 20' year ' Down Spillway * 100 year ' Down Spillway * 100 year ' Down Spillway * 100 year Begin Transition to Stilling Basin year Front of Chute Block year Back of Chute Block year Stilling Basin * 100 year Baffles year Top of Baffles year Stilling Basin year End Baffles year Stilling Basin * 100 year Stilling Basin * 100 year Front Edge of Sill year Sill * 100 year End Sill, Begin Conrete Channel year ' Down Concrete Channel * 100 year End Concrete Channel, Gabion year Top of Gabion year Gabion * 100 year End Gabion year Bottom of Gabion year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year ' Down Exit Channel * 100 year Within Transition 30.26* 100 year Within Transition 10.52* 100 year Within Transition 5.82* 100 year Begin Natural Channel year Xsec 2 in Natural Channel year Xsec 1 in Natural Channel year Outlet year

63 Table 2B JOB CHE8273-FAR Closure 1420 Kensington Road, Suite 103 SHEET NO. OF Oak Brook, IL CALCULATED BY Scott Mansell DATE 4/9/2013 TELEPHONE (630) CHECKED BY Chris Wessel DATE 4/9/2013 FAX (630) SCALE DESCRIPTION HEC-RAS Outputs, 2-yr Flow River River Sta Profile Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Crit W.S. E.G. Elev E.G. Slope Vel Chnl Hydr Depth Flow Area Top Width Froude # Chl Mann Chnl Mann Banks Shear (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/ft) (ft/s) (ft) (sq ft) (ft) (lb/sq ft) Begin Type I Channel year Transition Channel year Transition Spillway year Transition year Spillway + 20' year ' Down Spillway * 2 year ' Down Spillway * 2 year ' Down Spillway * 2 year Begin Transition to Stilling Basin year Front of Chute Block year Back of Chute Block year Stilling Basin * 2 year Baffles year Top of Baffles year Stilling Basin year End Baffles year Stilling Basin * 2 year Stilling Basin * 2 year Front Edge of Sill year Sill * 2 year End Sill, Begin Conrete Channel year ' Down Concrete Channel * 2 year End Concrete Channel, Gabion year Top of Gabion year Gabion * 2 year End Gabion year Bottom of Gabion year ' Down Exit Channel * 2 year ' Down Exit Channel * 2 year ' Down Exit Channel * 2 year ' Down Exit Channel * 2 year ' Down Exit Channel * 2 year ' Down Exit Channel * 2 year ' Down Exit Channel * 2 year ' Down Exit Channel * 2 year Just Before Culvert 50 2 year Begin Culvert Culvert End Culvert year Begin Natural Channel * 2 year Xsec 2 in Natural Channel 2 2 year Xsec 1 in Natural Channel 1 2 year Outlet 0 2 year

64 Written by: CJW Date: 04/17/2013 Reviewed by: MRB Date: 04/26/2013 Client: AEP Project: FAR Closure Project No.: CHE8273 Task No.: ATTACHMENT A HEC-RAS Outputs and Cross Sections for 2-yr and 100-yr Storms G:\CWP\CHE Stingy Run FAR Closure\5.0 Technical File\5.4 Engineering Work File\ Final Design and PTI\5.4.6 Task 7 Dam Design\Calc Package\Draft_Dissipator Design_Narrative_ docx

65 2 yr profile 680 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 WS 2 year Main Channel Distance (ft) XYZ view of stilling basin and gabion (2-yr) Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 WS 2 year * * * Ineff Levee * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

66 XYZ of culvert (2-yr) Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 WS 2 year Ineff Levee yr profile 680 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton 4/8/2013 WS 100 year Main Channel Distance (ft)

67 XYZ of stilling basin and gabion Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton 4/8/2013 WS 100 year Levee * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

68 2-Year Cross Sections

69 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Type 1 Channel Begin Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Type 1 Channel Begin Transition WS 2 year 668 WS 2 year Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Begin Transition Spillway Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Transition to Spillway WS 2 year 663 WS 2 year Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Begin Spillway Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 End Spillway, Begin Transition to Stilling Basin WS 2 year 610 WS 2 year

70 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Front of chute blocks Top back of chute blocks WS 2 year 610 WS 2 year Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Bottom Back of chute block Bottom front of baffles WS 2 year 610 WS 2 year Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Top front of baffles top back of baffles WS 2 year 610 WS 2 year

71 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 back of baffles Front edge of sill WS 2 year 610 WS 2 year Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 top of sill End sill, begin transition exit channel WS 2 year 610 WS 2 year Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Bottom of first gabion, end of conrete transition, begin gravel Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 top of first gabion WS 2 year WS 2 year

72 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 top back of first gabion Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 bottom back of first gabion WS 2 year WS 2 year Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 bottom back of first gabion Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 bottom back of first gabion WS 2 year 604 WS 2 year Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/ WS 2 year 592 WS 2 year

73 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/ Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Front of culvert WS 2 year 586 WS 2 year Ineff Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/ WS 2 year 586 WS 2 year Ineff Ineff Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 End of culvert, begin transition to natural Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 X-sec just after curve in natural channel-~1000' upstream of ter WS 2 year 586 WS 2 year 584 Ineff

74 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: Final-oneton-culvert 4/9/2013 Final x-sec.just upstream of last culvert WS 2 year WS 2 year 590 Levee

75 100-Year Cross Sections

76 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: 1) Final-oneton 4/8/2013 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: 1) Final-oneton 4/8/2013 Type 1 Channel Begin Type 1 Channel Begin Transition WS 100 year 668 WS 100 year Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: 1) Final-oneton 4/8/2013 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: 1) Final-oneton 4/8/2013 Begin Transition Spillway Transition to Spillway WS 100 year 663 WS 100 year Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: 1) Final-oneton 4/8/2013 Begin Spillway Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: 1) Final-oneton 4/8/2013 End Spillway, Begin Transition to Stilling Basin.013 WS 100 year WS 100 year

77 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: 1) Final-oneton 4/8/2013 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: 1) Final-oneton 4/8/2013 Front of chute blocks Top back of chute blocks WS 100 year 610 WS 100 year Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: 1) Final-oneton 4/8/2013 Bottom Back of chute block Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: 1) Final-oneton 4/8/2013 Bottom front of baffles WS 100 year 610 WS 100 year Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: 1) Final-oneton 4/8/2013 Spillway-Stilling-ExitChannel Plan: 1) Final-oneton 4/8/2013 Top front of baffles top back of baffles WS 100 year 610 WS 100 year

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY J-1 Technical Report on Airport Drainage, Northern Sector Airport and Ordinance Creek Watershed / Preliminary Creek Constructed Natural Channel Culvert J-2 Preliminary

More information

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011 APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011 [NOTE: Could use a better photo more clearly showing the emergency spillway in the context of the dam.] SECTION C-1: DESCRIPTION OF PRACTICE

More information

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis DATE: November 3, 2011 Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis TO: FROM: RE: Jim Reiser, P.E. Project Manager Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. Kurt Killian, P.E., CFM Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. Design

More information

Plan B Dam Breach Assessment

Plan B Dam Breach Assessment Plan B Dam Breach Assessment Introduction In support of the Local Sponsor permit applications to the states of Minnesota and North Dakota, a dam breach analysis for the Plan B alignment of the Fargo-Moorhead

More information

HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, Federal Highway Administration.

HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, Federal Highway Administration. HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, 2012 Federal Highway Administration http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/software/hy8/index.cfm SIMPLE Simple to use Use for simple culverts and bridges

More information

CHAPTER 4 SPALDING COUNTY, GEORGIA 4.0 CULVERT DESIGN

CHAPTER 4 SPALDING COUNTY, GEORGIA 4.0 CULVERT DESIGN SPALDING COUNTY, GEORGIA CHAPTER 4 4.0 CULVERT DESIGN... 4-1 4.1 INTRODUCTION... 4-1 4.2 SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS... 4-1 4.3 ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA... 4-2 4.3.1 FREQUENCY FLOOD... 4-2 4.3.2 VELOCITY

More information

General Information for Culvert Design

General Information for Culvert Design Design Manual Chapter 2 - Stormwater 2E - Culvert Design 2E-1 General Information for Culvert Design A. Introduction A culvert is a conduit under an embankment that transports stormwater from one side

More information

MEMORANDUM. TNC Fisher Slough Final Design and Permitting Subject: DRAFT Technical Memorandum: Levee Emergency Spillway Design

MEMORANDUM. TNC Fisher Slough Final Design and Permitting Subject: DRAFT Technical Memorandum: Levee Emergency Spillway Design MEMORANUM TNC Fisher Slough Final esign and Permitting Subject: RAFT Technical Memorandum: Levee Emergency Spillway esign To: From: Internal Memorandum For Record Yen Hsu Chen (Tetra Tech) avid Cline (Tetra

More information

Rock Ramp Design Guidelines. David Mooney MS Chris Holmquist-Johnson MS Drew Baird Ph.D. P.E. Kent Collins P.E.

Rock Ramp Design Guidelines. David Mooney MS Chris Holmquist-Johnson MS Drew Baird Ph.D. P.E. Kent Collins P.E. Rock Ramp Design Guidelines David Mooney MS Chris Holmquist-Johnson MS Drew Baird Ph.D. P.E. Kent Collins P.E. Rock Ramp Design Guidelines OUTLINE Local and System Interactions with Rock Ramps Ramp Geometry

More information

HEC 26 Aquatic Organism Passage Design Manual Evolution & Application

HEC 26 Aquatic Organism Passage Design Manual Evolution & Application HEC 26 Aquatic Organism Passage Design Manual Evolution & Application Sven Leon, P.E., Hydraulics Engineer Federal Highway Administration 2015 Alaska Fish Passage Meeting October 13 14, 2015 VTRC, Juneau,

More information

Exercise (3): Open Channel Flow Rapidly Varied Flow

Exercise (3): Open Channel Flow Rapidly Varied Flow Exercise (3): Open Channel Flow Rapidly Varied Flow 1) A hydraulic jump exists in a trapezoidal channel having a bed width of 7 m and side slope of 1:1. The flowing discharge is 25 m 3 /sec. Construct

More information

ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS IN THE NOTES AUTUMN 2018

ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS IN THE NOTES AUTUMN 2018 ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS IN THE NOTES AUTUMN 2018 Section 1.2 Example. The discharge in a channel with bottom width 3 m is 12 m 3 s 1. If Manning s n is 0.013 m -1/3 s and the streamwise slope is 1 in 200,

More information

PENNDRAIN.rep. HEC-RAS Version May 2005 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street Davis, California

PENNDRAIN.rep. HEC-RAS Version May 2005 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street Davis, California HEC-RAS Version 3.1.3 May 2005 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street Davis, California X X XXXXXX XXXX XXXX XX XXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXX XXXX

More information

OPEN CHANNEL FLOW WORKSHEET 3 WATER SURFACE PROFILES

OPEN CHANNEL FLOW WORKSHEET 3 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Learning Objectives OPEN CHANNEL FLOW WORKSHEET 3 WATER SURFACE PROFILES 1. Learn about gradually varied flow and rapidly varying flow 2. Discuss different types of water surface profiles 3. Discuss the

More information

19.1 Problem: Maximum Discharge

19.1 Problem: Maximum Discharge 19.1 Problem: Maximum Discharge In partially full channel having an equilateral triangular cross section, the rate of discharge is Q = KAR/3 in which K is a constant, A flow area, R is the hydraulic mean

More information

The Hydraulic Design of an Arced Labyrinth Weir at Isabella Dam

The Hydraulic Design of an Arced Labyrinth Weir at Isabella Dam Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures Jun 28th, 1:30 PM The Hydraulic Design of an Arced Labyrinth Weir at Isabella Dam E. A. Thompson Sacramento District

More information

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 11 APPENDIX B TIDEROUT 2 USERS MANUAL

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 11 APPENDIX B TIDEROUT 2 USERS MANUAL OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 11 APPENDIX B TIDEROUT 2 USERS MANUAL APRIL 2011 APRIL 2011 Page 1 Preface TIDEROUT 2, Build 1.22 dated June 29, 2006 is the current

More information

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest Overview Culvert Design Considerations Hydraulic Terms Culvert Impacts Low

More information

Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan

Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan Table E1 Bridge Types and Locations Table E2 Flow Conditions For River Sections Figure E1 Bridge Abutment Protection Figure E2 Bridge Pier Protection Figure E3 Central

More information

EXAMPLES (OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW) AUTUMN 2018

EXAMPLES (OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW) AUTUMN 2018 EXAMPLES (OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW) AUTUMN 2018 Normal and Critical Depths Q1. If the discharge in a channel of width 5 m is 20 m 3 s 1 and Manning s n is 0.02 m 1/3 s, find: (a) the normal depth and Froude number

More information

Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8

Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8 Seventeenth Statewide Conference on Local Bridges Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8 Tuesday, October 25, 2011 Training Session: Culvert Design, Analysis - talk 2 Presented

More information

APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERTS

APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERTS OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 11, EVALUATING SCOUR AT BRIDGES APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERTS APRIL 2011 APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN

More information

APPENDIX B HYDRAULIC DESIGN DATA FOR CULVERTS

APPENDIX B HYDRAULIC DESIGN DATA FOR CULVERTS TM 5-820-4/AFM 88-5, Chap 4 APPENDIX B HYDRAULIC DESIGN DATA FOR CULVERTS B-1. General. a. This appendix presents diagrams, charts, coefficients and related information useful in design of culverts. The

More information

Indiana LTAP Road Scholar Core Course #10 Culvert Drainage. Presented by Thomas T. Burke, Jr., PhD, PE Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd.

Indiana LTAP Road Scholar Core Course #10 Culvert Drainage. Presented by Thomas T. Burke, Jr., PhD, PE Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. Indiana LTAP Road Scholar Core Course #10 Culvert Drainage Presented by Thomas T. Burke, Jr., PhD, PE Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. Objectives Review culvert shapes, end sections, and materials

More information

USING A LABYRINTH WEIR TO INCREASE HYDRAULIC CAPACITY. Dustin Mortensen, P.E. 1 Jake Eckersley, P.E. 1

USING A LABYRINTH WEIR TO INCREASE HYDRAULIC CAPACITY. Dustin Mortensen, P.E. 1 Jake Eckersley, P.E. 1 USING A LABYRINTH WEIR TO INCREASE HYDRAULIC CAPACITY Dustin Mortensen, P.E. 1 Jake Eckersley, P.E. 1 Plum Creek Floodwater Retarding Structure No. 6 is located in an area of Kyle, Texas, that is currently

More information

The Basics of Culvert and Inlet Design

The Basics of Culvert and Inlet Design PDHonline Course C619 (8 PDH) The Basics of Culvert and Inlet Design Jerry D. Morrow, PE 2013 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030 6658 Phone & Fax: 703 988 0088 www.pdhonline.org

More information

Sediment Basin 7E-12. Design Manual Chapter 7 - Erosion and Sediment Control 7E - Design Information for ESC Measures BENEFITS.

Sediment Basin 7E-12. Design Manual Chapter 7 - Erosion and Sediment Control 7E - Design Information for ESC Measures BENEFITS. 7E-12 Design Manual Chapter 7 - Erosion and Sediment Control 7E - Design Information for ESC Measures Sediment Basin BENEFITS Flow Control Erosion Control Sediment Control Runoff Reduction Flow Diversion

More information

HYDRAULIC JUMP AND WEIR FLOW

HYDRAULIC JUMP AND WEIR FLOW HYDRAULIC JUMP AND WEIR FLOW 1 Condition for formation of hydraulic jump When depth of flow is forced to change from a supercritical depth to a subcritical depth Or Froude number decreases from greater

More information

Effect of Fluid Density and Temperature on Discharge Coefficient of Ogee Spillways Using Physical Models

Effect of Fluid Density and Temperature on Discharge Coefficient of Ogee Spillways Using Physical Models RESEARCH ARTICLE Effect of Fluid Density and Temperature on Discharge Coefficient of Ogee Spillways Using Physical Models M. SREENIVASULU REDDY 1 DR Y. RAMALINGA REDDY 2 Assistant Professor, School of

More information

REVETMENTS. Purposes and Operational Constraints. Purposes Erosion control o o. Revetment Design 4/5/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering

REVETMENTS. Purposes and Operational Constraints. Purposes Erosion control o o. Revetment Design 4/5/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering REVETMENTS Ijsseldam, the Netherlands Orson P. Smith, PE, Ph.D. Instructor Purposes and Operational Constraints Purposes Erosion control o o Embankment Toe protection for a seawall, retaining wall or other

More information

2O-2 Open Channel Flow

2O-2 Open Channel Flow Iowa Stormwater Management Manual O- O- Open Channel Flow A. Introduction The beginning of any channel design or modification is to understand the hydraulics of the stream. The procedures for performing

More information

APPENDIX A STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS AND RATING CURVES

APPENDIX A STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS AND RATING CURVES 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 3 APPENDIX A STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS AND RATING CURVES Kissimmee River Vol December 005 Version Draft 4 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 3 3 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 4 4 43

More information

Spillway Design for Small Dams

Spillway Design for Small Dams Spillway Design for Small Dams by David E. Fantina, PE Introduction: This course presents an overview of the features that go into the design of spillways for small dams. Small dams in this course refer

More information

Suitable Applications Check dams may be appropriate in the following situations: To promote sedimentation behind the dam.

Suitable Applications Check dams may be appropriate in the following situations: To promote sedimentation behind the dam. Categories EC Erosion Control SE Sediment Control TC Tracking Control WE Wind Erosion Control Non-Stormwater NS Management Control Waste Management and WM Materials Pollution Control Legend: Primary Category

More information

WMS 8.4 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HY-8 Modeling Wizard Learn how to model a culvert using HY-8 and WMS

WMS 8.4 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HY-8 Modeling Wizard Learn how to model a culvert using HY-8 and WMS v. 8.4 WMS 8.4 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HY-8 Modeling Wizard Learn how to model a culvert using HY-8 and WMS Objectives Define a conceptual schematic of the roadway, invert, and downstream

More information

VIRGINIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BOARD GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON DAM BREAK INUNDATION ZONE AND INCREMENTAL DAMAGE ANALYSIS AND MAPPING PROCEDURES

VIRGINIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BOARD GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON DAM BREAK INUNDATION ZONE AND INCREMENTAL DAMAGE ANALYSIS AND MAPPING PROCEDURES (Approved XXXXX, 2010) Working Draft Version January 14, 2010 VIRGINIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BOARD GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON DAM BREAK INUNDATION ZONE AND INCREMENTAL DAMAGE ANALYSIS AND MAPPING PROCEDURES

More information

Advanced Hydraulics Prof. Dr. Suresh A. Kartha Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

Advanced Hydraulics Prof. Dr. Suresh A. Kartha Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Advanced Hydraulics Prof. Dr. Suresh A. Kartha Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Module - 4 Hydraulics Jumps Lecture - 4 Features of Hydraulic Jumps (Refer Slide

More information

Summary of HEC 18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges FHWA NHI Should really follow HEC 18, but this summary will get you the main points.

Summary of HEC 18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges FHWA NHI Should really follow HEC 18, but this summary will get you the main points. Summary of HEC 18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges FHWA NHI 01-001 Should really follow HEC 18, but this summary will get you the main points. 1: Determine scour analysis variables 2: Analyze long-term bed

More information

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT CFR 257.73(d) Fly Ash Reservoir II Cardinal Plant Brilliant, Ohio October, 2016 Prepared for: Cardinal Operating Company Cardinal Plant Brilliant, Ohio Prepared by: Geotechnical

More information

Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings CHUCK KEEPORTS FOREST HYDROLOGIST ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA

Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings CHUCK KEEPORTS FOREST HYDROLOGIST ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings CHUCK KEEPORTS FOREST HYDROLOGIST ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA TOPICS COVERED Aquatic Organism Passage (AOP) Benefits of AOP Crossings

More information

COST EFFECTIVE STORAGE CAPACITY INCREASE FOR ALUMINA TAILINGS DISPOSAL AREA THROUGH SPILLWAY OPTIMISATION

COST EFFECTIVE STORAGE CAPACITY INCREASE FOR ALUMINA TAILINGS DISPOSAL AREA THROUGH SPILLWAY OPTIMISATION COST EFFECTIVE STORAGE CAPACITY INCREASE FOR ALUMINA TAILINGS DISPOSAL AREA THROUGH SPILLWAY OPTIMISATION Abstract Lonie I * Tailings and Dams, GHD Brisbane, QLD, Australia Queensland Alumina Limited operates

More information

Stormwater Level of Service Study - Phase 2 Flooding Adjacent to Rock Creek

Stormwater Level of Service Study - Phase 2 Flooding Adjacent to Rock Creek Stormwater Level of Service Study - Phase 2 Flooding Adjacent to Rock Creek City of Fairway, Kansas Fairway Stormwater Level of Service Study - Phase 2 Project No. 108200 Revision 1 12/6/2018 Stormwater

More information

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL PLAN

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL PLAN INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL PLAN CFR 257.82 Fly Ash Reservoir II Cardinal Plant Brilliant, Ohio September, 26 Prepared for: Cardinal Operating Company Cardinal Plant Brilliant, Ohio Prepared by: Geotechnical

More information

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design Yes No N/A Design Requirements I. GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges A. Culvert design is in accordance with the Culverts chapter of Volume 2 of the UDFCD Manual for additional

More information

Culvert Design Basics

Culvert Design Basics PDHonline Course C287 (4 PDH) Culvert Design Basics Instructor: George E. Thomas, PE 2012 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-6658 Phone & Fax: 703-988-0088 www.pdhonline.org

More information

CALIFORNIA SALMONID STREAM HABITAT RESTORATION MANUAL APPENDIX IX-A CULVERT CRITERIA FOR FISH PASSAGE INTRODUCTION

CALIFORNIA SALMONID STREAM HABITAT RESTORATION MANUAL APPENDIX IX-A CULVERT CRITERIA FOR FISH PASSAGE INTRODUCTION APPENDIX IX-A STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CULVERT CRITERIA FOR FISH PASSAGE For habitat protection, ecological connectivity should be a goal of stream-road crossing

More information

Ermenek Dam and HEPP: Spillway Test & 3D Numeric-Hydraulic Analysis of Jet Collision

Ermenek Dam and HEPP: Spillway Test & 3D Numeric-Hydraulic Analysis of Jet Collision Ermenek Dam and HEPP: Spillway Test & 3D Numeric-Hydraulic Analysis of Jet Collision J.Linortner & R.Faber Pöyry Energy GmbH, Turkey-Austria E.Üzücek & T.Dinçergök General Directorate of State Hydraulic

More information

Designing Labyrinth Spillways for Less than Ideal Conditions Real World Application of Laboratory Design Methods

Designing Labyrinth Spillways for Less than Ideal Conditions Real World Application of Laboratory Design Methods Designing Labyrinth Spillways for Less than Ideal Conditions Real World Application of Laboratory Design Methods Gregory Richards, P.E., CFM, Gannett Fleming, Inc. Blake Tullis, Ph.D., Utah Water Research

More information

Hydraulic Modeling of Stream Enhancement Methods

Hydraulic Modeling of Stream Enhancement Methods Hydraulic Modeling of Stream Enhancement Methods Matthew J. Curry John J. Levitsky Abstract Development within watersheds increases the amounts of runoff causing stream erosion and degradation of stream

More information

Exercise (4): Open Channel Flow - Gradually Varied Flow

Exercise (4): Open Channel Flow - Gradually Varied Flow Exercise (4): Open Channel Flow - Gradually Varied Flow 1) A wide channel consists of three long reaches and has two gates located midway of the first and last reaches. The bed slopes for the three reaches

More information

Stormwater Management Pond Design Brief. Greely Village Centre - Commercial Phase - Ultimate Conditions - - City of Ottawa -

Stormwater Management Pond Design Brief. Greely Village Centre - Commercial Phase - Ultimate Conditions - - City of Ottawa - Stormwater Management Pond Design Brief Greely Village Centre - Commercial Phase - Ultimate Conditions - - City of Ottawa - December 2008 Ref: 647-07 J.F. Sabourin and Associates Inc. Water Resources and

More information

CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN

CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN HYDRAULICS OF CULVERTS There are two major types of culvert flow: 1) flow with inlet control, and 2) flow with outlet control. For each type, different factors and formulas are

More information

Chutes Part 2: Synthetic linings

Chutes Part 2: Synthetic linings s Part 2: Synthetic linings DRAINAGE CONTROL TECHNIQUE Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control [1] Soil Treatment Permanent [2] [1] s can

More information

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT PROPOSED CULVERT STRUCTURES SR 194, SECTION 10

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT PROPOSED CULVERT STRUCTURES SR 194, SECTION 10 HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT PROPOSED CULVERT STRUCTURES SR 194, SECTION 10 RACETRACK ROAD CULVERT OVER THE SPRING RUN & GREEN SPRINGS ROAD CULVERT OVER AN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO SPRING RUN BERWICK TOWNSHIP

More information

Presented by Fred Halterman, URS Jennie Agerton, URS

Presented by Fred Halterman, URS Jennie Agerton, URS Presented by Fred Halterman, URS Jennie Agerton, URS What is Eco Friendly Culvert Design? Culvert design that: Maintains connectivity for aquatic organism migration Maintains connectivity for gene flow

More information

STRUCTURE S-65 PURPOSE SPILLWAY OPERATION

STRUCTURE S-65 PURPOSE SPILLWAY OPERATION STRUCTURE S-65 This structure is a reinforced concrete, gated spillway with discharge controlled by three cable operated, vertical lift gates, and a reinforced concrete lock structure with two pairs of

More information

ADA Training Standard Plans

ADA Training Standard Plans ADA Training Standard Plans SCREEN READABLE VERSION IS IN THE MAKING AND WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE SOON 2018 MnDOT 2 Standard Plans 2017 Overview Overview PROWAG and Curb Ramp Basics Curb Ramp Types ADA Curb

More information

RISK AND STANDARDS BASED APPROACH TO RIP RAP DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR GRAHAMSTOWN DAM STAGE 2 AUGMENTATION

RISK AND STANDARDS BASED APPROACH TO RIP RAP DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR GRAHAMSTOWN DAM STAGE 2 AUGMENTATION RISK AND STANDARDS BASED APPROACH TO RIP RAP DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR GRAHAMSTOWN DAM STAGE 2 AUGMENTATION M. B. Barker 1 and D. Holroyde 2 ABSTRACT. A detailed study was completed for the Stage 2 works

More information

Appendix G. Alternative Solutions Details. Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Project PROJECT FILE REPORT CITY OF PICKERING

Appendix G. Alternative Solutions Details. Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Project PROJECT FILE REPORT CITY OF PICKERING Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Project PROJECT FILE REPORT CITY OF PICKERING Appendix G Alternative Solutions Details TMIG THE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LTD Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Project PROJECT

More information

STRUCTURE 65-B PURPOSE SPILLWAY OPERATION

STRUCTURE 65-B PURPOSE SPILLWAY OPERATION STRUCTURE 65-B This structure is a reinforced concrete, gated spillway with discharge controlled by three cable operated vertical lift gates and a reinforced concrete lock structure with two pairs of sector

More information

Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1]

Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1] Check Dams DRAINAGE CONTROL TECHNIQUE Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1] [1] Though not generally considered

More information

JACKTOWN ACRES FLOOD MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS ANALYSIS

JACKTOWN ACRES FLOOD MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS ANALYSIS JACKTOWN ACRES FLOOD MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS ANALYSIS SITUATE IN: NORTH HUNTINGDON TOWNSHIP WESTMORELAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA PREPARED FOR: North Huntingdon Township 11279 Center Highway North Huntingdon,

More information

TDLP INC. The Dam & Levee Professionals. Kevin Chancey Sarah Edens. Monica Murie Jason Unruh

TDLP INC. The Dam & Levee Professionals. Kevin Chancey Sarah Edens. Monica Murie Jason Unruh TDLP INC The Dam & Levee Professionals Kevin Chancey Sarah Edens Monica Murie Jason Unruh The Dam & Levee Professionals Prevention and Protection of Floodwall Overtopping Scour The Dam & Levee Professionals

More information

Advanced Hydraulics Prof. Dr. Suresh A. Kartha Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

Advanced Hydraulics Prof. Dr. Suresh A. Kartha Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Advanced Hydraulics Prof. Dr. Suresh A. Kartha Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Module - 4 Hydraulic Jumps Lecture - 1 Rapidly Varied Flow- Introduction Welcome

More information

Evaluation of June 9, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study for Town of Weymouth, Norfolk, Co, MA

Evaluation of June 9, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study for Town of Weymouth, Norfolk, Co, MA Evaluation of June 9, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study for Town of Weymouth, Norfolk, Co, MA Prepared For: Woodard & Curran 95 Cedar Street, Suite 100 Providence, RI 02903

More information

FINAL REPORT. Yonkers Creek Migration Barrier Removal Project Wonderstump Road Del Norte County. Submitted By:

FINAL REPORT. Yonkers Creek Migration Barrier Removal Project Wonderstump Road Del Norte County. Submitted By: FINAL REPORT Yonkers Creek Migration Barrier Removal Project Wonderstump Road Del Norte County Submitted By: Del Norte County Community Development Department Yonkers Creek Migration Barrier Removal Project

More information

APPENDIX C. Fluvial and Tidal Hydraulics Report

APPENDIX C. Fluvial and Tidal Hydraulics Report APPENDIX C Fluvial and Tidal Hydraulics Report BUENA VISTA LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT FLUVIAL AND TIDAL HYDRAULICS ANALYSES Prepared for: SANDAG 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92101 Contact:

More information

Washington State Fish Passage Barrier Removal Projects. Casey Kramer, PE WSDOT State Hydraulics Engineer

Washington State Fish Passage Barrier Removal Projects. Casey Kramer, PE WSDOT State Hydraulics Engineer Washington State Fish Passage Barrier Removal Projects Casey Kramer, PE WSDOT State Hydraulics Engineer 2014 National Hydraulic Engineering Conference Iowa City, IA August 20 th, 2014 WSDOT Fish Passage

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 SLI Doc. No. 505573-3001-4HER-0001 00 12-Sept-2012 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 INTRODUCTION... 3 2 OBJECTIVES... 5 3 WIND DATA... 6 3.1 Wind Rose... 7 4 SOCIÉTÉ D ÉNERGIE DE LA BAIE

More information

SUBMERGED VENTURI FLUME. Tom Gill 1 Robert Einhellig 2 ABSTRACT

SUBMERGED VENTURI FLUME. Tom Gill 1 Robert Einhellig 2 ABSTRACT SUBMERGED VENTURI FLUME Tom Gill 1 Robert Einhellig 2 ABSTRACT Improvement in canal operating efficiency begins with establishing the ability to measure flow at key points in the delivery system. The lack

More information

Fremont Weir Fish Passage Proof of Concept. Final Engineering Report

Fremont Weir Fish Passage Proof of Concept. Final Engineering Report Department of Water Resources FloodSAFE Environmental Stewardship and Statewide Resources Office Fish Passage Improvement Program Fremont Weir Fish Passage Proof of Concept Final Engineering Report This

More information

3. GRADUALLY-VARIED FLOW (GVF) AUTUMN 2018

3. GRADUALLY-VARIED FLOW (GVF) AUTUMN 2018 3. GRADUALLY-VARIED FLOW (GVF) AUTUMN 2018 3.1 Normal Flow vs Gradually-Varied Flow V 2 /2g EGL (energy grade line) Friction slope S f h Geometric slope S 0 In flow the downslope component of weight balances

More information

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011 OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011 APRIL 2011 Chapter 13 Culverts Table of Contents Foreword.3 13.1 Introduction.. 4 13.2 Policy 6 13.3 Passage

More information

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b) ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS ASBURY POWER PLANT 21133 Uphill Lane Asbury, Missouri 64832 January 18, 2017 EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY Prepared by: Rachel

More information

Project 184 Preferred Canal Drainage Structure and Release Point Plan

Project 184 Preferred Canal Drainage Structure and Release Point Plan Project 184 Preferred Canal Drainage Structure and Release Point Plan September 2011 Version 5.0 REVISION HISTORY Page Description Date 7 Added Section 5.1 Plan Modifications 09/08/11 9 Modified Table

More information

Section 5: Pond Outlets

Section 5: Pond Outlets Section : Pond Outlets Defining and calculating pond outlet devices 8 Minutes Press Space, PageDown, or Click to advance. Press PageUp to reverse. Esc to exit. Right-Click for other options. Outlets Introduction

More information

Evaluating Surge Potential in CSO Tunnels

Evaluating Surge Potential in CSO Tunnels 14 Evaluating Surge Potential in CSO Tunnels Karen E. Ridgway Tunnels are being proposed to control combined sewer overflow (CSO) in numerous cities in the United States and Canada. The tunnels are intended

More information

BC Ministry of Forests. March Fish Stream Crossing Guidebook. Forest Practices Code of British Columbia.

BC Ministry of Forests. March Fish Stream Crossing Guidebook. Forest Practices Code of British Columbia. FRST 557 Lecture 7c Bridges and Culverts: Water Velocity and Discharge Lesson Background and Overview: The previous two lessons presented methods for estimating water volume flow at a particular site and

More information

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING Rev. 18 Feb 2015 1 SBEACH Modeling 1.0 Introduction Following the methodology

More information

Discussion on the Selection of the Recommended Fish Passage Design Discharge

Discussion on the Selection of the Recommended Fish Passage Design Discharge Discussion on the Selection of the Recommended Fish Passage Design Discharge Introduction The provision of fish passage is a requirement for most proposed culvert and bridge installations in Alberta, depending

More information

DESIGN OF BELL-MOUTH SPILLWAY AT BARVI DAM

DESIGN OF BELL-MOUTH SPILLWAY AT BARVI DAM DESIGN OF BELL-MOUTH SPILLWAY AT BARVI DAM Akshay Haldankar 1, Mahesh Bhadra 2, Rahul Harad 3, Darpan Kapre 4, Dipali Patil 5 1,2,3,4 Under graduate,dept. of Civil Engineering, DRIEMS Neral. 5Assistant

More information

Transitional Steps Zone in Steeply Sloping Stepped Spillways

Transitional Steps Zone in Steeply Sloping Stepped Spillways Transitional Steps Zone in Steeply Sloping Stepped Spillways Jalal Attari 1 and Mohammad Sarfaraz 2 1- Assistant Professor, Power and Water University of Technology, Iran 2- Graduate Student, Department

More information

Greenup Lock Filling and Emptying System Study

Greenup Lock Filling and Emptying System Study Fourth LACCEI International Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCET 2006) Breaking Frontiers and Barriers in Engineering: Education, Research and Practice 21-23 June

More information

NUMERICAL AND PHYSICAL MODELING

NUMERICAL AND PHYSICAL MODELING POINTE DU BOIS GENERATING STATION SPILLWAY REPLACEMENT PROJECT NUMERICAL AND PHYSICAL MODELING Kara Hurtig, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, North Vancouver, BC, Canada David S. Brown, KGS Group, Winnipeg,

More information

Driveway Design Criteria

Driveway Design Criteria Design Manual Chapter 5 - Roadway Design 5L - Access Management 5L-4 Driveway Design Criteria A. General For efficient and safe operations, access drives and minor public street intersections can be improved

More information

Fish Passage Assessment of Private Stream Crossings on Lower Stonybrook Creek

Fish Passage Assessment of Private Stream Crossings on Lower Stonybrook Creek Fish Passage Assessment of Private Stream Crossings on Lower Stonybrook Creek Prepared by: Michael Love & Associates In cooperation with: Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration Funded by: Coastal

More information

Water surface slope extending up to 20 channel widths up and downstream of crossing.

Water surface slope extending up to 20 channel widths up and downstream of crossing. Site Evaluations Site Information Site Location: Mt ood NF, Forest Road 7 Year Installed: Pre-987 Lat/Long: 8 W Watershed rea (mi ): N Stream Slope (ft/ft) : Channel Type: Step-pool ankfull Width (ft):

More information

Scale Factor Study for 1:30 Local Scour Model

Scale Factor Study for 1:30 Local Scour Model Scale Factor Study for 1:30 Local Scour Model by Jeremy A. Sharp, Ronald E. Heath, Howard E. Park, and Tate O. McAlpin PURPOSE: This Coastal and Hydraulics Engineering Technical Note (CHETN) contains a

More information

+)) Lower Churchill Project RIPRAP DESIGN FOR WIND-GENERATED WAVES SNC LAVALIN. SLI Document No HER

+)) Lower Churchill Project RIPRAP DESIGN FOR WIND-GENERATED WAVES SNC LAVALIN. SLI Document No HER +)) SNC LAVALIN Lower Churchill Project RIPRAP DESIGN FOR SLI Document No. 505573-3001-4HER-0011-00 Nalcor Reference No. MFA-SN-CD-0000-CV-RP-0006-01 Rev. 81 Date: 07 -Dec-2012 Prepared by: Checked by:

More information

Sussex County, DE Preliminary Study Overview

Sussex County, DE Preliminary Study Overview Sussex County, DE Preliminary Study Overview Coastal study scope: 102 miles of entire County shoreline Revised 102 panels for coastal study Riverine study scope: 14 streams, 67.1 miles, within the Nanticoke

More information

Figure 1: Graphical definitions of superelevation in terms for a two lane roadway.

Figure 1: Graphical definitions of superelevation in terms for a two lane roadway. Iowa Department of Transportation Office of Design Superelevation 2A-2 Design Manual Chapter 2 Alignments Originally Issued: 12-31-97 Revised: 12-10-10 Superelevation is the banking of the roadway along

More information

FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT Road Improvements (MP 0.6)

FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT Road Improvements (MP 0.6) FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT 17-03109 45.5 Road Improvements (MP 0.6) Prepared for: Prepared by: Mesa County Engineering Department 200 S. Spruce Street Grand Junction, CO 81501 DOWL 222 South Park Avenue Montrose,

More information

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN OF COASTAL STRUCTURES

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN OF COASTAL STRUCTURES The University of the West Indies Organization of American States PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME: COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE A COURSE IN COASTAL DEFENSE SYSTEMS I CHAPTER

More information

Memorandum. Dr. Wilbert Odem, Dr. Paul Trotta, and Mr. Justin Ramsey. From: Timothy Mahon, Patrick Belsheim, and Ali Alrayyes.

Memorandum. Dr. Wilbert Odem, Dr. Paul Trotta, and Mr. Justin Ramsey. From: Timothy Mahon, Patrick Belsheim, and Ali Alrayyes. Memorandum To: Dr. Wilbert Odem, Dr. Paul Trotta, and Mr. Justin Ramsey From: Timothy Mahon, Patrick Belsheim, and Ali Alrayyes Date: 10/17/2013 Re: Routes Decision Matrix Decision Matrix Methodology The

More information

MEMO. Schedule 'B' Class Environmental Assessment and Preliminary Design Lakeview Boulevard Improvements Culvert Assessment.

MEMO. Schedule 'B' Class Environmental Assessment and Preliminary Design Lakeview Boulevard Improvements Culvert Assessment. MEMO Schedule 'B' Class Environmental Assessment and Preliminary Design Lakeview Boulevard Improvements Culvert Assessment February 15, 2017 As per the preferred Lakeview Boulevard alignment provided by

More information

Dam Breach Inundation Analysis

Dam Breach Inundation Analysis Dam Breach Inundation Analysis Using HEC-RAS And GIS TWO CASE STUDIES IN BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA Canadian Dam Association 2014 Conference - Banff Alberta Presenters 2 Dwayne Meredith, P.Ag. KWL Vernon

More information

Broadly speaking, there are four different types of structures, each with its own particular function:

Broadly speaking, there are four different types of structures, each with its own particular function: 3 The selection of structures 3.1 Introduction In selecting a suitable structure to measure or regulate the flow rate in open channels, all demands that will be made upon the structure should be listed.

More information

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b) ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS ASBURY POWER PLANT 21133 Uphill Lane Asbury, Missouri 64832 January 18, 2019 LIBERTY UTILITIES Empire District Prepared by: Rachel

More information

Hydrologic, Hydraulic and Geomorphic Technical Memorandum

Hydrologic, Hydraulic and Geomorphic Technical Memorandum Appendix A Hydrologic, Hydraulic and Geomorphic Technical Memorandum 01054/8410233/14/Rohner_Alt_Analysis_Report Rohner Creek Flood Control, Habitat and Seismic Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis

More information

Hydraulic Engineering

Hydraulic Engineering PDHonline Course H146 (4 PDH) Hydraulic Engineering Instructor: Mohamed Elsanabary, Ph.D., Prov. Lic. Engineering. 2013 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-6658 Phone & Fax:

More information