BLUETT TRAFFIC CALMING ON-SITE MEETING #2 DISCUSSION SUMMARY
|
|
- Brice Owens
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BLUETT TRAFFIC CALMING ON-SITE MEETING #2 DISCUSSION SUMMARY Date: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 Time: 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Location: Clague Middle School parking lot Attendees: Public Present: 42 Council Member Present: 1; Councilmember Kirk Westphal Ann Arbor Public School Present (AAPS): Liz Margolis City Staff Present: 3; Kayla Coleman (Systems Planning), Luke Liu (Engineering), and Andrea Wright (Engineering). Meeting Notes The following is not a direct transcript of the meeting discussion. This summary has been developed from notes taken during the meeting; comments are paraphrased. Questions and comments from residents are marked with a Q, answers/ responses from Staff are marked with an A. Where clarifications or responses have been added after the meeting, these are denoted as post-meeting notes. Traffic Calming Process A brief overview of the Traffic Calming process was provided. Refer to the Traffic Calming Guidebook available at a2gov.org/trafficcalming for additional information on the Traffic Calming process. We are currently at step #9, Second Survey, in the process. Refinements to the concept plan were made from feedback received from residents during On-Site meeting #1 and On-Site meeting #2. A Final Concept Plan was determined based on feedback from the on-site meetings. The second survey to determine support for the Final Concept Plan will be mailed to addresses in the project area. If the second survey responses indicate sufficient support for all or part of the final plan then council resolution will determine whether to move forward with construction of the proposed devices. Q: Have there been any accidents on Bluett between Nixon and Bunker Hill, in front of Clague Middle School? A: Post Meeting Note: There were two reported crashes on Bluett between Nixon and Bunker Hill within the past five years. One crash involved one vehicle on westbound Bluett, passing another vehicle in the same direction. The second crash was a rear-end crash involving three vehicles. Q: If every device is installed what is the estimated cost of the entire project? A: Project cost for Bluett traffic calming has not yet been estimated. Once a preferred project plan is determined from neighborhood feedback, a project cost will be estimated. Generally each traffic calming device costs a few thousand dollars. If sufficient neighborhood support is achieved to move forward with traffic calming installation in the Bluett project area, we anticipate that construction will need to span over multiple fiscal years due to the number of devices being considered for this project area. Q: Where is the data supporting the need for School Safety improvements at the intersection of Antietam and Bluett? Why did we go around the public regarding this intersection? Page 1 of 11
2 A. Unfortunately we cannot discuss the potential school safety improvements at this meeting tonight. We need to stay focused on discussion of the items included in the Bluett Traffic Calming project so that we can get the neighborhood feedback required to move this project to the next step. The Traffic Calming Program is based largely on resident feedback received we heard neighborhood response at the February 28 Orientation Meeting that there was not support for a traffic calming device at Antietam, therefore it was not included in future plans for the potential Traffic Calming project on Bluett. City staff also realized that this earlier request should not be mixed into the Traffic Calming Program. Requests centering around school safety are typically routed through Ann Arbor Public Schools (AAPS). Staff may pursue installation of a curb bump out at Antietam as a school safety improvement. Further public engagement will be undertaken before any changes are made to this intersection. Q: How does Step 9 of the Traffic Calming program work? Further explanation regarding how the 60% of 60% work? A: Addresses within the project area include parcels referred to as homeowner occupied i.e. the same person owns and lives in the property. Rental properties are also included in the project area, this includes renters and landlords. All addresses in the project area (homeowner occupied, renters and landlords) receive a final survey card in Step 9. Response rate is evaluated first: 60% of homeowner occupied parcels in the project area must send back their survey card, regardless of whether they are for or against the project. This helps ensure that neighbors are engaged in the discussion and aware of the decision being made. Next, of all of the survey cards that are returned (including those from homeowner occupied, renters and landlords) at least 60% of the returned survey cards must support all or part of the project. Q: What are the dimensions of a speed table? What are the dimensions of a raised crosswalk? What are the dimensions of a speed hump? A: Speed tables are constructed to a maximum height of approximately 3 inches. Total width is typically 22 feet, generally including a 10 foot wide center platform and slopes tapering down on each side. The center platform width is variable and can be customized to the location. A raised crosswalk also has a maximum height of 3 inches, a total width 18 feet including a 6 foot wide center platform, marked with crosswalk striping, and slopes tapering down on each side. Speed humps are 3 inches high and 12 feet in total width. Speed humps have a parabolic shape and do not include a flat center platform at the top. Due to the emergency response access that this street serves, and the potential impact to emergency response vehicles, speed humps are not recommended along Bluett. Traffic calming device dimensions are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) guidance; they are designed in a way that it should be comfortable for vehicles traveling at 25mph, and that those driving at speeds that exceed 25mph will feel discomfort. Some vehicles will need to travel even slower than 25 mph to pass over devices such as speed humps, speed tables and raised crosswalks with comfort. Q: Speed limit signs are not placed on Bluett, they need to be installed first. A. Speed limit signs have been found to rarely affect the 85th percentile speeds. It is understood that the general public knows that residential areas have a speed limit of 25 mph. Those who choose to ignore this and exceed the legal speed limit are generally not going to be motivated to change behavior based on the presence of a speed limit sign. Page 2 of 11
3 Q: How many tickets have been issued on Bluett? A. We do not have that information readily available. Device #1 Two options proposed: Option 1A: between Nixon and Renfrew Option 1B: between Renfrew and Prairie, closer to Renfrew then Prairie Q: How does the school plan impact device #1 location? A: AAPS plans to reconfigure the Clague Middle School parking lot and change the location of their driveway. The previous location of device #1 (as discussed at the March 14 meeting) would be in conflict with the driveway location. The City of Ann Arbor would like to work in coordination with AAPS, and does not want to install a traffic calming device at a location that would need to be removed within a short timeframe. Q: Is the speed table level on top? A: Yes, speed tables generally include a 10 foot wide center platform. Q: Is there a speed table located on King George? A: The traffic calming device on King George Blvd at the intersection with Esch Ave is not a speed table. It is a raised intersection. Q: Where in the city is a speed table located? A: The City of Ann Arbor or neighboring public agencies have not installed any speed tables. Q: Is there a way for the public to have the plan proposed by OHM s reconfiguring the parking lot? Can the public have the data collected during the development of this plan? A: AAPS Response The public schools have just received the OHM plan and would like to have some time to review it internally before it is shared publically. The plan will be made publically available in the future, and can be distributed to the Bluett Traffic Calming project distribution list at that time. Q: There are 25 mph signs near Nixon. A: Speed limit signs at this location were installed when concern about speed was raised by residents during the 2017 construction season when this neighborhood was impacted. Q: Will the city be deciding which device option is chosen? Which device would the city choose? A: Either option is acceptable to the City. We are seeking neighborhood feedback to make the decision. Q: Why is option 1A location better? Why is option 1B location better? A: The advantage to option 1A is that it is spaced further from the area where the school is evaluating driveway changes. The additional spacing will help ensure there aren t any conflicts with the plan implemented by AAPS. Page 3 of 11
4 Q: Would like to abstain from voting because of the uncertainty behind the schools possible site changes. Q: Would like Option 1A placed as close as possible to Nixon on Bluett. Q: With regard to the final survey, do all neighbors who live here get to vote? Who votes? A: The final survey is provided to all addresses within the project area. The Traffic Calming Program defines project area as all addresses with frontage on the street and addresses 100 feet back on interior cross streets. The limits of the project area (in this case, Nixon to Yellowstone) are defined by the resident submitted petition. Device #2 Raised Crosswalk - due to potential conflict with the schools proposed site changes this device will not be included on the Bluett Traffic Calming Final Concept Plan Q: If we vote in favor of this device, can it be placed at a later date? Can the device be installed as part of the schools site plan development? A: Staff would like to poll the meeting participants about the potential device at location #2 so that the community feedback can be used in future discussions with AAPS about a device in this general area. The device location will be dependent on the final plan from AAPS, and where the crosswalk is ultimately placed. Q: Why is there no devices just past Clague going east? A: There is a proposed raised crosswalk going east, that is device location #3, which will be discussed next. Q: Can we table Bluett because of school plan? A: Staff is proposing to avoid making any decisions that would conflict with the school s plan. That is why we are suggesting to gather feedback about device location #2, for consideration in a future decision about this location. We are suggesting that device location #2 not be included in the Bluett Concept Plan because decisions about this location will need to be made in coordination with the school driveway plan. Q: Could the school put the raised crosswalk in? A: The raised crosswalk in the area of location #2 would need to be coordinated with the school. It is not yet determined whether that installation would be completed by the City of Ann Arbor or Ann Arbor Public Schools. Q: Will there be drainage issues with raised crosswalks? A: Raised crosswalks are tapered at the curb to maintain existing drainage. Drainage has been accounted for on other raised crosswalk installations in the City of Ann Arbor, and would be accounted for in any future installations. Neighbors should not expect any change in drainage pattern due to traffic calming device installation. Q: Could the ramp be relocated west of the utility pole instead of its current location of device #3? A: Moving to the west of the utility pole would require both receiving ramps to be adjusted. Staff are hoping to minimize construction costs by moving only one of the crosswalk receiving ramps. Page 4 of 11
5 Q: This device is located on top of a hill. Will drainage be a problem? A: Neighbors should not expect any change in drainage pattern due to traffic calming device installation. Being on top of a hill should actually help drainage. Q: What is the height of a curb? A: Standard curb height is 6 inches at the face of curb. Q: Since device #4 is located at an all-way stop, why is the bump out needed? A: The bumpout can provide pedestrian crossing improvements (shorter crossing distance) in addition to bringing the stop sign closer to the field of vision. Q: The bump out takes away space for turning at this intersection. Q: It is already tight at this intersection, this is not needed. Q: Concerned at this intersection relating to ice in winter. Q: Is there a way to suspend an all-way stop hanging over intersection? A: Post meeting note: Federal guidelines require that a STOP sign be installed on the right side of the approach to which it applies. Placing a suspended all-way STOP sign would be inconsistent with engineering best practices for the intersection of two local streets without reported crash history related to intersection control in the last 5 years. Q: The way the device #4 is proposed did not maximize the use of the bump out placement. A: Thank you for pointing this out, there is actually an error in the way the device was drawn on the street. It should have been extended further west incorporating the cross walk ramp on the west side of Bunker Hill going across Bluett. Q: This intersection is too narrow and device #4 makes it worse. Q: Fire chief does not like the bump outs according to resident. A: Post meeting note: staff contacted the Fire Marshal for clarification. Feedback received from the Fire Marshal state the following: In regards to the citizen s understanding of my feedback, I did not state that I was opposed to curb bump outs. I do not recall being asked specifically about them, but I did respond to questions about the speed bumps My position was and still is, that curb bump outs may not be in an area around the hydrant (which requires 26 minimum road width clearance for 20, split 10 to either side). Also, that the road width must accommodate the turning radius for the largest fire truck for the City of Ann Arbor Fire Department. Q: Where is the data regarding the effectiveness of bump outs? A: Post meeting note: Previous study results have been compiled by the Federal Highway Administration as the Traffic Calming eprimer ( This document shows wide ranges of speed results for each device. As site conditions vary, it is not feasible to predict the effectiveness of devices at a particular site. A general trend observed in the Federal summary is that speed humps may be more effective than raised crosswalks, and raised crosswalks may be more effective than speed tables in controlling travel speeds. In terms of reducing cut through Page 5 of 11
6 traffic, a series of vertical devices is typically associated with a 20% reduction, while bump outs have little effect on traffic volumes. Q: Most people do not stop here. Q: Can a stop ahead sign before Bunker Hill going west? A: When visibility to the STOP sign is restricted, a Stop Ahead sign shall be installed in advance of the STOP sign. Staff will evaluate if sight distance to the STOP sign and look into the need for Stop Ahead sign. Q: Can video enforcement be used? A: No, the State of Michigan currently prohibits the use of video enforcement. Q: Bump outs are obnoxious and a distraction to drivers. Q: Bump outs are in the way. They should not be allowed. Q: What are the dimensions of the speed table for device #6? A: Speed tables are constructed to a maximum height of approximately 3 inches. The total width of the speed table at this location is 18 feet, including a 6 foot wide center platform and slopes tapering down on each side. This modified speed table is suggested in order to move the device as close to the curve as possible, while avoiding driveway conflicts and adhering to safety and engineering best practices. Q: Is this the closest we can get to the curve? A: Yes. Q: Similar dimensions to raised crosswalk? A: Yes, but without the crosswalk marking on top. Q: Where did the accidents happen near proposed device #7? A: Neighbors shared their experiences with accidents in this location. Q: How many accidents happened here? A: Neighbors cited multiple incidents that they have observed in this area. Q: Were the accidents in the winter? A: Neighbors cited that accidents have generally occurred in the winter, but they have seen many very close calls at all times of the year. Q: How do you make the curb for device #7 pedestrian island visual to drivers? Will this be visual in the winter? A: The curb at device #7 would have the same visibility as all curb edges along the street. Staff are exploring the potential to plant a tree(s) in the space between the curb and the sidewalk which could also improve visibility. Q: Can plants, trees or vegetation be placed in the pedestrian crossing? Similar to Georgetown and Bluett intersection pedestrian islands? Page 6 of 11
7 A: Staff are exploring the opportunity for this. Post meeting note: Staff believe vegetation planting in the space between the curb and the sidewalk to be feasible, and are pursuing options. Q: Is device #7 the proposed pedestrian island safe? A: The pedestrian island is intended to improve safety by providing a refuge space for pedestrians choosing to use the existing crosswalk. Q: What is the legal distance for parking near crosswalk? A: Parking is prohibited within 20 feet of a crosswalk. Parking is prohibited within 15 feet of the intersection of property lines at an intersection of streets or highways. Q: Can a centerline be placed? A: Painting a centerline on the Bluett curve is considered a long line pavement marking. Long line pavement markings are outside the scope of the Traffic Calming Program which emphasizes engineering retrofits to create physical obstructions to slow traffic. Long line pavement markings are not typically used on local streets. Staff are unclear whether the requested pavement marking would achieve the desired benefit for the neighborhood; if roadway users are not adhering to the posted advisory speed at the curve location, they are also unlikely to observe a pavement marking. Q: Will the curb follow the road? A: Yes, the curb edge would follow the curve of the road. Q: What is the estimated cost for device #7? A: A cost estimate has not yet been prepared. Q: Concerned device #7 would create more accidents. Q: Will there be sewage back-up if device # 7 is installed and the structure is raised? A: The installation of device #7 would not have any effect on the potential for a sewage back-up. Q: Is it illegal to park along a curve? A: It is not illegal to park along a curve as long as other traffic laws are not violated. Q: What will the curb look like for device #7? Rolled or hard? A: This design detail is still being evaluated. Q: For device #7 Pedestrian Island refuge, is the plan to take out the existing asphalt to create the proposed device or will the island be created on the existing asphalt? How would this effect vegetation if it was able to be incorporated? Can this be determined before final survey? A: If it is determined that trees can be placed in the space between the sidewalk and the curb could be planted and accommodation will be made to ensure adequate growing conditions. Q: Safety should come first. Q: Why can t the proposed raised crosswalk for device #8 be as large as a speed table? Page 7 of 11
8 A: The width of this device can t be increased because it would create a conflict with the intersection on the north side and would encroach beyond a safe distance from the curve on the south side. Q: Does the raised crosswalk for device #9 help calm traffic on Bluett? A: Yes, the raised crosswalk would impact vehicles traveling along Bluett and also those turning off of Burbank on to Bluett. Q: Most people turn on Burbank. Q: Assume people will turn out in front at the intersection of Bluett and Burbank. Q: Requesting traffic circle to be considered at device #10 location. Q: The bump out would make this turn more difficult. Q: Would the bump outs proposed at device #10A impact fire? A: The bump out concept at this location has been designed taking fire access needs into consideration. The design for the devices would take into consideration the turning radius and needs of the Fire Department, Solid Waste, Snow plow, moving trucks, etc. Q: Will device #11 conflict with the driveway at home 3382 since it was approved by the city for expansion? A: This would not be in conflict. Device #12 Option 12A Raised Crosswalk along Bluett at Yellowstone Option 12B Traffic Circle at the intersection of Bluett and Yellowstone Q: Why doesn t the circle impact Yellowstone? A: The traffic circle would impact vehicles moving straight along Yellowstone, but would also provide a benefit to slow vehicles turning onto Bluett. Q: Traffic circle is dangerous. A: This device is within the toolbox that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) supports to slow traffic and improve safety. Q: Can Yellowstone be added to the project area? A: Yellowstone would need to submit a petition. This is a resident initiated process. Q: How does traffic circle work? A: Traffic circles are raised circular islands located most commonly at four-legged intersections. The traffic circle slows traffic using the intersection and can also provide an attractive gateway to a neighborhood. Stop or Yield signage can be applied in combination with traffic circle. Left turning traffic may go around the traffic circle, or if needed for vehicles with larger turning radius, complete turning movement from the left side of a traffic circle. Q: How high is a traffic circle? Page 8 of 11
9 A: For the intersection of Bluett and Yellowstone, the intent was to design the traffic circle to be mountable to service all turning movements. The height would be around 3 inches. Q: Why is a raised crosswalk being proposed at a stop sign? A: Vertical devices are not preferred treatments for multi-way stop controlled intersections. At these locations it is expected that all vehicles are stopping. However at this location it is not a multi-way stop. Vehicles turning onto Bluett off of Yellowstone are not stopping before making their turn. The raised crosswalk could help to slow cars turning onto Bluett. Q: Will the manhole be raised for the traffic circle? A: Yes, the manhole would need to be raised for the traffic circle. Q: What is the schedule for refreshing pavement markings? How does it work? A: There is a routine schedule for refreshing pavement marking throughout the City. Post meeting note: Staff has requested that this location be added to list. The actual refresh of pavement marking may take a while, as this year s pavement marking program has not started and field crew will likely optimize groups of locations for increased efficiency. Q: Was Ann Arbor Public Schools, Ann Arbor Fire Department, Ann Arbor Police Department and Public Works consulted before the traffic circle was proposed? A: This idea was recently developed in response to the resident feedback received at previous public meetings for the project area. Staff have been discussions with some of the impacted parties, but further discussion would be needed if there is community support for a traffic circle at this location. Q: When can an evaluation be done about a three-way stop here at Yellowstone and Bluett? A: Engineering staff will schedule traffic counts and conduct evaluation of All-Way STOP control at Bluett and Yellowstone. Q: Could this be a three-way stop? A: There are warrants that must be met to install a stop-sign. Refer to page 4 of the traffic calming guidebook for additional information about why stop signs are not used at traffic calming devices. Device polling Meeting attendees were asked to participate in an informal polling (raise of hands) to determine support for devices at each location. Staff emphasized that final decisions about device installation are not being made through the on-site meeting. The polling during this meeting was used to finalize the concept plan for the second survey to determine which devices to continue discussing at on-site meeting #2, and which need to be changed or removed. Meeting attendees were asked to raise their hand for the option that most closely represented their views: 1. Are you in favor of keeping this device at this location for the final concept plan and Survey? 2. Are you opposed to this device at this location and do not want it shown on the final concept plan and survey card? 3. Are you abstaining from the poll because you because you do not have enough information to make a decision or otherwise choose note to participate in the poll? Page 9 of 11
10 Device #1: Speed Table (Two options 1A and 1B were presented to residents in the field) 1. Option 1A (between Nixon and Renfrew) Yes: Option 1B (between Renfrew and Prairie, closer to Renfrew then Prairie) Yes: No Device: 7 4. Abstained: 5 Device #2: Raised Crosswalk (As explained at the onsite meeting, this device will not be included in the Traffic Calming Plan because there are potential conflicts with the AAPS proposed site changes. Decisions about a device at this location will be dependent on the AAPS final site plan. Community feedback received at the April 11 meeting will help inform future discussion with AAPS) 1. Yes: No: 6 3. Abstained: 4 Device #3: Raised Crosswalk 1. Yes: No: 1 3. Abstained: 3 Device #4: Bump out (This device will not be shown on the final survey due to lack of support by residents at the meeting) 1. Yes: 6 2. No: Abstained: 2 Device #5: Speed Table 1. Yes: No: 7 3. Abstained: 3 Device #6: Speed Table 1. Yes: No: 2 3. Abstained: 4 Device #7: Pedestrian Refuge Island 1. Yes: No: Abstained: 1 Device #8: Raised Crosswalk 1. Yes: No: 3 3. Abstained: 3 Device #9: Raised Crosswalk Page 10 of 11
11 1. Yes: No: 9 3. Abstained: 0 Device #10: Bump out and Pedestrian Refuge Island (Three options 10A, 10B and 10C (resident proposed at April 11 meeting) were presented in the field to residents) 1. Option 10A (Bump out and larger Pedestrian Refuge Island) Yes: 0 2. Option 10B (Only pedestrian Island aligning with the existing curb edge, no bump out) Yes: Option 10C (Traffic Circle) Yes: 1 4. No Device: 0 5. Abstained: 0 Device #11: Raised Crosswalk 1. Yes: No Device: 2 3. Abstained: 2 Device #12: Raised Crosswalk or Traffic Circle (Two options 1A Raised Crosswalk or 1B Traffic Circle were presented to residents in the field) 1. Option 12A (Raised Crosswalk along Bluett) Yes: Option 12B (Traffic Circle at the intersection of Bluett and Yellowstone) Yes: 0 3. No Device: 6 4. Abstained: 0 Page 11 of 11
12 Appendix A: Sign-In Sheet
13
14
Re: Invitation to Participate -- Traffic Calming on Bluett between Nixon and Yellowstone
CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN Public Services Area / Engineering 301 E. Huron Street, P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48107 Phone (734) 794-6410 Fax (734) 994-1744 Web: www.a2gov.org February 8, 2018 Re:
More informationCITY OF ANN ARBOR TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM PROCESS OVERVIEW. Petitioner defines the project area limits and gathers petition signatures.
CITY OF ANN ARBOR TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM PROCESS OVERVIEW Step 1: Petition Petitioner defines the project area limits and gathers petition signatures. 50% of addresses within the project area must sign
More informationTown of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy
Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy Adopted January 6, 2014 Town of Mooresville Development Services Department TOWN OF MOORESVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
More informationTOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL
TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL APPROVED BY THE PAYSON TOWN COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 6, 2007 TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY 1.0 Introduction Traffic Calming involves retrofitting physical devices
More informationTraffic Calming Program Update
Traffic Calming Program Update Background Proposed Traffic Calming Program update Objectives Engagement process Project qualification criteria Device toolbox Other updates and considerations BACKGROUND
More informationTRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION
TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION 2016 TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction
More informationCity of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual
City of Margate, Florida Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual Table of Contents Page No. I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. TRAFFIC CALMING REQUEST AND PROCESSING PROCEDURES... 2 1. COMPLETE AND SUBMIT PROJECT
More informationAppendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX
Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX PHASE I...2 Do Not Enter Sign...3 One-Way Sign...4 Turn Prohibition...5 Pavement Markings...6 Speed Monitoring Trailer...7 Neighborhood Speed Watch...8 Police
More informationGranger Ave from State to Packard Pilot On Street Parking and Pavement Marking Discussion Summary and Feedback Reponses
Date: Tuesday, July 25, 2018 Time: 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Location: Ann Arbor Senior Center (1320 Baldwin Ave) Attendees: Public present: 13; refer to Appendix B for sign in sheet Council members present:
More informationBorough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines
Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines Adopted by Borough Council on 1 INTRODUCTION Speeding Traffic is a major concern in the Borough of Danville because of its detrimental impacts
More informationResidential Traffic Calming Program Guide. Town of Ashland, Virginia
Residential Traffic Calming Program Guide Town of Ashland, Virginia August 1, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION... 1 B. GOALS... 1 C. CRITERIA... 1 D. IDENTIFYING NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CONCERNS...
More information$ 12" $#&%$ 86.) *1! *1 /3 )00, , (1* Neighborhood Traffic Calming Part 3 Solutions Bradley William Yarger, P.E.
$ 12" $#&%$ 86.)3+5+2 714 *1! *1 /3 )00,12 3.+ -0127 1, (1* Neighborhood Traffic Calming Part 3 Solutions by Bradley William Yarger, P.E. It is extremely tempting to jump to this step of the process thinking
More informationVILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY
INTRODUCTION There is increasing interest across the country in developing new strategies to reduce the speed and amount of traffic in residential neighborhoods. Measurement of speeds, traffic volumes,
More informationBroad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines
Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines Building from the strategies introduced in the 2013 Bicycle Transportation Plan and community input received thus far, City Transportation Staff have identified
More informationTRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX
TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX Traffic control devices are those official signs and striping placed in the public right-of-way and recognized by the public such as STOP signs, curve warning signs, centerline
More informationChapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit
Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit The Washtenaw County Access Management Plan was developed based on the analysis of existing
More informationTRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX. For the residents of the City of Decatur, Georgia
TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX For the residents of the City of Decatur, Georgia 2 City of Decatur Traffic Calming Toolbox Public Works Department 2635 Talley Street Decatur, GA 30030 404.377.5571 3 Welcome to
More informationTonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.
Strathcona Neighbourhood Renewal Draft Concept Design Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas. What is Neighbourhood Renewal? Creating a design with you for your neighbourhood.
More informationA Residential Guide to Neighborhood Speed Enforcement
A Residential Guide to Neighborhood Speed Enforcement City of Delaware, Ohio A Residential Guide to Neighborhood Speed Enforcement Introduction: The perception of speeding on local streets is probably
More informationCity of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox
City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox June 1, 2013 Final Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Non-Physical Devices... 3 High-Visibility Crosswalk... 3 In Pavement Lighted Crosswalk... 4 Rapid Flashing
More informationCounty of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program
County of Greenville South Carolina Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program (rev) August 2008 I. PURPOSE The potential negative impacts from vehicular traffic
More informationTRAFFIC CALMING POLICY NEWTOWN TOWNSHIP DELAWARE COUNTY, PA
TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY NEWTOWN TOWNSHIP DELAWARE COUNTY, PA September 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 PURPOSE AND GOALS... 3 DEFINITIONS... 4 APPLICABILITY... 5 ELIGIBLE STREETS... 5 LOCATION
More informationCITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program A Policy for Use of Traffic Calming on Local (Residential) Streets
CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program A Policy for Use of Traffic Calming on Local (Residential) Streets I. Statement of Purpose: This program provides a process and a
More information3.1 TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESS SUMMARY
SECTION 3 3.0 TRAFFIC CALMING 3.1 TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESS SUMMARY Traffic calming is a means in which to reduce speeds and minimize vehicular traffic on local neighborhood streets. Citizen involvement
More informationCity of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines I. Purpose: The City of Elizabeth City is committed to ensure the overall safety and livability of residential neighborhoods. One
More informationCity of Ann Arbor Pedestrian Safety & Access Task Force
City of Ann Arbor Pedestrian Safety & Access Task Force Community Wide Meeting #2 Wednesday, March 25 th 6:30 to 8:30 PM Multi-purpose Room, Downtown Library The Greenway Collaborative, Inc. www.greenwaycollab.com
More informationCURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN
5 CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN This chapter provides design guidance for separated bike lanes adjacent to curbside activities including parking, loading and bus stops. Typical configurations are presented
More informationAgenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN
PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN May 28, 2008 Agenda Welcome and introductions Project overview and issue identification Planning context and strengths Design challenges and initial recommendations
More informationMilitary Road Safety Improvements
Military Road Safety Improvements 26 th Road North to 31 st Street North SUMMARY OF DATA REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS Prepared for: Department of Environmental Services Traffic Engineering and
More informationNeighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ARROYO GRANDE BY RESOLUTION NO. 2016-4718 ON APRIL 12, 2016 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 300 East Branch
More informationCity of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets
City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets PURPOSE: The purpose of the Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets is to address safety concerns related to vehicular traffic
More informationCitizens Handbook for Requesting Traffic Calming Devices
Citizens Handbook for Requesting Traffic Calming Devices January 19, 2015 Table of Contents 1. PURPOSE... - 1-2. DEFINITIONS... - 2-3. GENERAL INFORMATION... - 3-3.1. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS... - 3-3.2.
More informationTOWN OF HALTON HILLS TRAFFIC CALMING PROTOCOL. Page 1 of 25
TOWN OF HALTON HILLS TRAFFIC CALMING PROTOCOL Page 1 of 25 PROCESS FOR INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES The Process for Installation of Traffic Calming Devices has been prepared to provide an objective
More informationPRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN
PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN May 28, 2008 Agenda Welcome and introductions Project overview and issue identification Planning context and strengths Design challenges and initial recommendations
More informationBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CLAY COUNTY
- 1 - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Stephanie C. Kopelousos County Manager And Clerk of the Board www.claycountygov.com CLAY COUNTY Public Works Traffic Control Division 5 Esplanade Ave. Green Cove Springs,
More informationNeighborhood Traffic Calming Program
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Adopted by Town Council on: October 23 rd, 2007 Resolution #: 2007-124 PROPOSED REVISIONS February 8, 2012 pg. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...3 2.0 PROGRAM
More informationNEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY Traffic Calming is the combination of physical measures that reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behavior and improve conditions for both
More informationROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES
GENERAL 1. Description This standard identifies minimum requirements that shall be met for Roundabouts and Neighborhood Traffic Circles in the design and construction of elements for Arlington County Horizontal
More informationTRANSPORTATION STANDARDS
INTRODUCTION LOCAL STREETS ON-STREET PARKING SIDEWALKS STREET LIGHTING STREET FURNISHINGS TRAFFIC CALMING STREET TREES MEDIAN PLANTING BOULEVARD LOCATIONS VILLAGE CENTER STREET LOCATIONS RESIDENTIAL STREET
More informationNEIGHBOURHOOD TRAFFIC COMMITTEE POLICY AND PROCEDURE
The City of Vaughan 2141 Major Mackenzie Drive Vaughan, Ontario Canada L6A 1T1 Tel (905) 832-2281 NEIGHBOURHOOD TRAFFIC COMMITTEE POLICY AND PROCEDURE REVISED JUNE 2010 APPLICABILITY The Neighbourhood
More informationCITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY
CITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY VERSION: 1.0 April 10, 2012 Pedestrians, Cyclists and Motorists Sharing Street Spaces CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 POLICY GOAL... 3 POLICY OBJECTIVES... 3 GUIDING
More informationWater Street Promenade Engineering and Design Services
Preliminary Design Presentation Parking & Traffic Safety Committee Water Street Promenade Engineering and Design Services July 16,2014 November 3, 2016 Education / Infrastructure / Innovation 1 Project
More informationRESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY JENKINTOWN BOROUGH MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA
RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY JENKINTOWN BOROUGH MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA Prepared for: JENKINTOWN BOROUGH 700 Summit Avenue Jenkintown, PA 19046 September 2010 JENK 020002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...1
More informationOff-road Trails. Guidance
Off-road Trails Off-road trails are shared use paths located on an independent alignment that provide two-way travel for people walking, bicycling, and other non-motorized users. Trails specifically along
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Carroll County, Maryland
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Carroll County, Maryland Prepared by the Bureau of Engineering 225 North Center Street, Room 221, Westminster, MD 21157 (410) 386-2157 e-mail: trafficcalming@ccg.carr.org http://ccgovernment.carr.org/trafficcalming
More informationINDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX
Acceleration lane, see Lanes, Acceleration Access, 8.1 Access Management and Functional Classification 8.2 Access Management by Design Classification 8.3 Access Configuration 8.4 Building Set-Back Guidelines
More informationTraffic Calming Policy Manual
Traffic Calming Policy Manual What is Traffic Calming? Speeding and unsafe driving habits are a major concern throughout communities in the United States. The Town of Summerville is no exception with neighborhoods
More informationA Sample Report of TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES REVIEW
A Sample Report of TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES REVIEW Introduction We performed a peer review of traffic control devices at selected locations on the City s street system. As the result of our review, we have
More informationTRAFFIC CALMING POLICY & PROCEDURES
TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY & PROCEDURES AS ADOPTED BY MONTCLAIR TOWNSHIP COUNCIL AUGUST 4, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 2 Purpose... 2 Traffic Calming Definition... 2 Statement Of Township Council
More informationNEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY I. PURPOSE The City of Kent continually strives to strengthen and protect its neighborhoods by improving the quality of life in residential areas. Traffic conditions
More informationWater Street Promenade. Engineering and Design Services. Public Information Meeting No. 2. Education / Infrastructure / Innovation. Maplewood Avenue &
Public Information Meeting No. 2 Water Street Promenade Maplewood Avenue & Engineering and Design Services Adjacent Areas July 16,2014Portsmouth, NH May 10, 2016 Education / Infrastructure / Innovation
More informationPrepared By: Town of Waxhaw Traffic Calming Policy
Policy For Resolutions for Town Meetings Prepared By: Town Manager Michael McLaurin Director Greg Mahar CPD Waxhaw N.C. Community Planning &Development Administrative Department Department: Date Approved
More informationSouthview Blvd & 3 rd Avenue Improvement Project. Public Open House December 4, to 7pm
Southview Blvd & 3 rd Avenue Improvement Project Public Open House December 4, 2014 5 to 7pm Southview Blvd & 3 rd Avenue Public Information Meeting Agenda Presentation 5:30 to 6:15 pm Purpose of Project
More informationNeighborhood Pedestrian Safety and Traffic Calming Study
Neighborhood Pedestrian Safety and Traffic Calming Study for the area bounded by Foster Avenue, Bedford Avenue, Farragut Road and Ocean Avenue Flatbush, Brooklyn, New York prepared by Michael King, miking@trafficcalmer.com
More informationCITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING
CITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING I. Introduction: The City of Coconut Creek recognizes that the conditions of residential streets can greatly affect neighborhood livability;
More informationCity of Port St. Lucie Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy City of Port St. Lucie Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy Adopted June 26, 2017
City of Port St. Lucie Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy Adopted June 26, 2017 INTRODUCTION The City of Port St. Lucie is committed to ensuring the overall safety and livability of residential neighborhoods.
More informationCommunity Transportation Plan
Community Transportation Plan Appendix A: Traffic Calming CITY OF DECATUR COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN Appendix A: City of Decatur City-wide Residential Traffic Calming Program Process & Procedures The
More information10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE
10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE Road Engineering Design Guidelines Version 1.0 March 2017 City of Toronto, Transportation Services City of Toronto Page 0 Background In early 2014, Transportation Services
More informationNeighborhood Traffic Calming Policy & Guidelines
Policy & Guidelines Town of Lantana 500 Greynolds Circle Lantana, FL 33462-4594 Index Topic Page Introduction 3 Definitions 4 Objectives 5 Policies 5 Process 6 Phases of Traffic Calming Study 7 Rating
More informationPOLICY: TRAFFIC CALMING
2006 MAY REFERENCE: COUNCIL APPROVED BY COUNCIL MAY 23, 2006 CITY OPERATIONS - NO. 608 POLICY: TRAFFIC CALMING A. All requests for traffic calming within the City shall be considered in accordance with
More informationCounty of Spartanburg South Carolina
County of Spartanburg South Carolina Traffic Calming Program June 2012 (Revised/Program on Hold) PURPOSE The potential negative impacts from vehicular traffic on residential roads have been a longstanding
More informationChapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT
Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT OVERVIEW This chapter describes a cohesive set of strategies to create a bicycle boulevard, namely to make streets safer and more efficient for bicycle
More informationCity of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A
A1. Functional Classification Table A-1 illustrates the Metropolitan Council s detailed criteria established for the functional classification of roadways within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Table
More informationNEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM. Policy and Procedure. Roswell Department of Transportation (770)
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM Policy and Procedure Roswell Department of Transportation (770) 594 6420 Approved by M&CC on December 19, 2011 Table of Contents 1. Application and Intent 2. Program
More informationRESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM
RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, KENTUCKY Prepared For: Safety & Public Works Departments 1 Table of Contents CITY OF ALEXANDRIA... 3 RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM... 3 INTRODUCTION...
More informationCity of Charlottesville Traffic Calming Handbook
City of Charlottesville Traffic Calming Handbook July 2008 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Telephone: (434)970-3182 Fax: (434) 970-3359 Introduction The City of Charlottesville
More informationCITY OF TRACY TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM
CITY OF TRACY TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM September 2009 ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 1 ST, 2009 RESO # 2009-159 Prepared by Development & Engineering Services Department Traffic Division Table of
More informationWhy Zone In on Speed Reduction?
Learn it. Do it. Live it! SPEED REDUCTION IN THE ZONE Why Zone In on Speed Reduction? Speeding is a serious issue that plays a major role in the risk of serious injury and pedestrian fatality in a crash.
More informationRevised Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
Revised Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Adopted by Town Council on: May 15, 2012 Resolution #: 2012-31 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...3 2.0 PROGRAM MISSION STATEMENT AND OBJECTIVES...3 3.0 POLICIES...3
More informationTOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES
TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES (Adopted by the Town Council on June 30, 2004) (Revised December 6, 2010) (Revised February 8, 2016) POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC
More informationCity of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY
4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY PURPOSE: Pedestrian crosswalks are an integral part of our transportation infrastructure. To be effective and promote safety, marked crosswalks must be installed after
More informationCorporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998
R1500 : Traffic Safety at 25 Avenue and 128 Street Intersection Corporate NO: R1500 Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 REGULAR COUNCIL TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998 FROM: General Manager, Engineering
More informationPOLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING
POLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING I. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This policy provides a procedure for the consideration, evaluation and implementation of requests for traffic calming measures. II. DEFINITIONS
More informationAttachment No. 4 Approved by National Committee Council
Attachment No. 4 Approved by National Committee Council The Signals Technical Committee distributed a technical committee recommendation to sponsors concerning pedestrian hybrid beacons following the January
More informationSAGINAW CHARTER TOWNSHIP - NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM
SAGINAW CHARTER TOWNSHIP - NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM Section 1.0 Statement of Purpose Traffic conditions on residential streets can greatly affect neighborhood livability. When streets are safe
More informationCity of Ann Arbor Pedestrian Safety & Access Task Force
City of Ann Arbor Pedestrian Safety & Access Task Force (PSATF) Community Wide Meeting Wednesday, July 8th 6:30 to 8:30 PM Multi purpose Room, Downtown Library www.a2gov.org/pedsafety The Greenway Collaborative,
More informationMalvern Borough Local Traffic Calming
Malvern Borough Local Traffic Calming Purpose: To address speeding and high volume cut-through traffic on Malvern Borough owned residential streets. Traffic Calming Measures: Traffic Calming Measures (TCM)
More informationSTANDARD PROCEDURE FOR MANAGING SPEED ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS
STANDARD PROCEDURE FOR MANAGING SPEED ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS In response to frequent complaints about speeding on residential streets, the Public Works Agency and the Environmental and Transportation Advisory
More informationAccess requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:
13.1 GENERAL APPLICATION PROCESS Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods: A. Planned Developments may set general locations for access points.
More informationNO PARKING ZONE, YELLOW CURB (OPTIONAL) Z 8 20 MIN. 8 Z (SEE SHEET 2) 4" WHITE "X" (TYP.),(OPTIONAL) TYPE I NO PARKING ZONE, YELLOW CURB (OPTIONAL) Z 8 20 20 ALL SPACES 22 MIN., 26 MAX. EACH Z TYPE II
More informationImprove the livability of our streets by
Pedestrian and Traffic Calming Policy March 2018 2 of 6 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy The City of Aspen continually strives to protect multimodal function while maintaining a high standard of safety.
More informationCHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES
CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES OBJECTIVES 1) Functions and Limitations 2) Standardization of Application 3) Materials 4) Colors 5) Widths and Patterns of Longitudinal Pavement Marking Lines 6) General Principles
More informationCity of Rocky Mount Residential Traffic Management Policy
City of Rocky Mount Residential Traffic Management Policy PURPOSE To set forth the policy of the City with respect to addressing concerns regarding speeding, cut-thorough traffic, and neighborhood traffic
More informationCity of Edinburg Department of Public Works 415 W. University Dr. Edinburg, TX (956) SPEED HUMPS INSTALLATION POLICY
City of Edinburg Department of Public Works 415 W. University Dr. Edinburg, TX 78541 (956) 388-8210 SPEED HUMPS INSTALLATION POLICY A. GENERAL Speed humps are an effective and appropriate device for safely
More informationTraffic Calming Review. Max Becker Drive. Thursday, November 30, 2017 Presentation at 7:00 p.m. WT Townshend Public School
Traffic Calming Review Max Becker Drive Thursday, November 30, 2017 Presentation at 7:00 p.m. WT Townshend Public School Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Traffic Calming Review Process 3. Study Area & Existing
More informationComplete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia
Complete Streets Designing Streets for Everyone Sarnia Complete Streets ~ Sarnia ~ 2018 Introduction Our City is made up of a network of streets that we use to go for a walk, cycle to work, drive to the
More informationTraffic Calming Policy
City of Friendswood Traffic Calming Policy May 2012 Community Development Department Table of Contents Title Page Table of contents... 1 Background and History... 2 Purpose and Goals... 2 City Procedure
More informationBETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY
DRAFT PLAN City Council Meeting August 14, 2017 STUDY AREA Sedgwick Corridor State Route 160, principal arterial with Class 3 access management designation, commuter and freight route, connection to SR
More informationNeighborhood Slow Zone Program Application
Neighborhood Slow Zone Program Application 2018-2019 Promoting traffic safety on neighborhood streets Applications due by Friday, January 18, 2019 Jointly led by Managing Director s Office of Transportation,
More informationTown of Southwest Ranches Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
Town of Southwest Ranches The provides residents an opportunity to present a concern for traffic safety with respect to observed volume and speeds on neighborhood streets and a formal method to study and
More informationCaltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns
Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns Revised: May 10, 2016 The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is planning various
More informationMARTIN LUTHER KING JR. WAY
OCTOBER 2011 40 Vision and Goals The Martin Luther King, Jr. Way Illustrative Master Plan that follows has been developed through a process of community involvement. It expresses a long term vision for
More informationPublic Information Centre
WELCOME Public Information Centre Father Tobin Road Lougheed Middle School - Library Wednesday November 7, 2012 7:00 p.m.to 9:00 p.m. Please sign in Neighbourhood Traffic Calming Guide Background The City
More informationPine Point Study Committee. Report and Recommendations to Scarborough Town Council. December 10, 2009
The Delphi Group, Inc Results through Alignment: Linking Direction, Capability & Commitment Pine Point Study Committee Report and Recommendations to Scarborough Town Council December 10, 2009 Committee
More informationOwl Canyon Corridor Project Overview and Summary
Owl Canyon Corridor Project Overview and Summary December 22, 2008 The Owl Canyon corridor (generally the connection between the I-25 / Larimer County Road 70 interchange and the US 287 / Larimer County
More informationNeighborhood Traffic Management Program Adopted July 9, 2012
Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Adopted July 9, 2012 Public Works 2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville, MN 55113-1899 phone (651) 792-7003 fax (651) 792-7040 1.0 Introduction Concerns about traffic
More informationCONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 ISSUES AND PURPOSE OF THE ANALYSIS 2 1.1 Background 2 1.2 Analysis Area 2 1.3 Issues and Observations 3 1.4 Project and Public Meetings 3 2 LIST OF PREFERRED
More informationAppendix A: Crosswalk Policy
Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy Introduction This citywide Crosswalk Policy is aimed at improving pedestrian safety and enhancing pedestrian mobility by providing a framework
More informationTRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO
TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO Draft January 2017 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 The Traffic Forum Process... 5 Neighborhood Traffic Issues... 7 Neighborhood Recommendations
More informationCITY OF DUNWOODY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY OF DUNWOODY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY Version: Final I. Introduction Because of increased congestion on the City s arterial and collector road network, combined with driver s
More information