Corporate Report. Recommendation

Transcription

1 Deferred by General Committee, August 25, 2014, Item 3.4 Corporate Report Report from Transportation and Environmental Services, Operations Date of Report: August 7, 2014 Date of Meeting: September 8, 2014 Report Number: TES File: Subject: Traffic Calming Program Recommendation That Council approve the Traffic Calming Policy for the installation of traffic calming measures on City of St. Catharines jurisdictional roadways, as outlined in Appendix 2; and That Council approve the consideration of funding the incorporation of the Traffic Calming Program, at an estimated cost of $70,000 a year, from the proposed 2015 Operating Budget during the 2015 Budget process; and That Council direct the City Solicitor to amend the Delegation By-Law to include the Director of Transportation and Environmental Services for traffic calming approvals. FORTHWITH Background The speed of motorists and the volume of traffic using local streets is a common complaint received by Council and staff. While Council has supported the use conventional traffic controls to slow and calm traffic in the past, traffic calming measures, such as speed humps, have never been implemented as the City lacks a formal policy in this regard. A report recommending the development of a traffic calming policy was presented to Council on August 23, 2010, where Council endorsed the idea of traffic calming in principle and requested that staff develop a policy to address how traffic calming can be implemented in the City. No budget allocation for the implementation of traffic calming measures was approved. The implementation of a traffic calming program is in keeping with the Garden City Official Plan, Section General Policies, that states "The City shall consider various traffic calming and transportation demand management measures to reduce the negative impacts of traffic, and to promote safer streets and the concept of complete streets." This report also relates to seven outstanding staff directions as follows: Report Page 1 of 9

2 At the June 23, 2014 City Council meeting, Councillor Stack for Councilor Harris requested a report on traffic calming measures and possible school crossing guard/pedestrian crosswalk at Welstead and Rykert Streets. The review for a possible school crossing guard/pedestrian crosswalk at Welstead and Rykert Street has been addressed in the School Crossing Guard Review report that went to the August 11, 2014 Council meeting. The request for traffic calming on Welstead Drive between Maria Street and Rykert Street will be addressed in this report. At the April 28, 2014 City Council meeting, Councillor Harris requested a report on the feasibility of installation of an All-Way Stop at Riverview Blvd. and Rivercrest Drive This staff direction relates to the speeding concern referenced in the staff direction below, which staff is planning to review as part of the Traffic Calming Program. At the April 14, 2014 City Council meeting, Councillor Harris requested a report on speeding on Riverview Blvd At the November 18, 2013 City Council meeting, Councillor Washuta requested a report on traffic concerns on Winnifred Street and Grantham Avenue. At the September 9, 2013 City Council meeting, Councillor Secord requested a report investigating what other municipalities are doing to mitigate speeding on residential streets and (Clr Siscoe) requested staff to consider Avenue Road in Toronto as an example in their investigation. At the October 15, 2012 City Council meeting, Councillor Stevens requested a coordinated report from TES and PDS on the option of closing Plymouth Avenue at Grantham Avenue. This staff direction relates to concerns about the volume and speed of traffic on Plymouth Avenue, which staff is planning to review as part of the Traffic Calming Program. At the July 9, 2012 City Council meeting, Councillor Burch deferred to later date to allow for consultation with area residents (original report requested Apr 11/11 by Clr Burch: Report providing alternative traffic calming measures for Arlington Avenue/Marmora Street) In addition, staff has also received recent requests from local residents for traffic calming on the following streets: Parnell Road between Geneva Street and Bunting Road; and Russell Avenue between Geneva Street and Niagara Street; and Roehampton Avenue between Carlton Street and Bunting Road. Report Page 2 of 9

3 Should Council approve the proposed Traffic Calming Policy, staff will review the above outstanding staff directions and resident requests using the methodology outlined within the policy, as well as any future requests for traffic calming. For the staff directions and recent requests noted above, staff will not require the signatures from a total of five households on the street in question in order to conduct the preliminary assessment. Report Neighbourhood traffic issues such as high traffic volumes, short-cutting, and speeding are a growing concern for municipalities across the country. Traffic calming is used by many municipalities, in conjunction with police enforcement, to help address these growing concerns. Traffic calming is defined as the combination of mainly physical measures that reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behaviour and improve conditions for non-motorized street users. as identified in the TAC/ITE Canadian Guide to Neighbourhood Traffic Calming. Traffic calming measures can be effective in addressing issues related to vehicle speed, excessive traffic volume and overall neighbourhood safety. Transportation Services staff receive numerous traffic calming requests throughout the City. These requests primarily relate to speed concerns. When a speeding issue is raised, a minimum three day speed study is undertaken in order to determine if a speeding problem exists. The results of the study are analyzed in order to determine if any further action is necessary. If it is determined that there is excessive speeding on a street, staff contact the Niagara Regional Police Service and request targeted police enforcement. The primary measure used to determine the operating speed on a street is the 85 th percentile speed (the speed at which 85% of traffic is travelling at or below). If the 85 th percentile speed is significantly higher than the speed limit (i.e. greater than 10 km/h over the posted speed limit) than the street is deemed to have a speeding issue. Although targeted police enforcement increases driver awareness it is typically only effective while the officer is present (temporary/short-term benefits without regular enforcement). Therefore a longer term solution is required through the use of traffic calming measures. It is however important to note that there are some advantages and disadvantages of traffic calming measures, as outlined below: Advantages of traffic calming may include: Reduce motor vehicle speeds; Reduce traffic volume; Discourage through traffic; Improve neighbourhood safety and livability; and Reduce conflicts between roadway users. Disadvantages of traffic calming may include: Potential increase in emergency vehicle response time; Reduce ease of access in and out of neighbourhoods; Relatively expensive solutions (time and resources); Shift or diversion of traffic onto neighbouring roadways; Increased maintenance difficulties (e.g. snow clearing); and The implementation of measures some may consider visually unattractive. Report Page 3 of 9

4 It is therefore crucial that traffic calming requests be assessed objectively in order to ensure that traffic calming is implemented appropriately and consistently across the city. Types of Traffic Calming Measures There are various traffic calming techniques used, including vertical and horizontal deflections in the roadway as well as obstructions and traffic regulations.the TAC/ITE Canadian Guide to Neighbourhood Traffic Calming provides a detailed list of traffic calming measures, including a brief description, as well as the potential benefits and disadvantages of each technique, which are included in Appendix 1. However, the Guide notes that not all measures that have been used for traffic calming purposes are appropriate as traffic calming measures. This includes stop signs, which should only be installed where warranted based on traffic volumes, collision history or sightline concerns. Motorists tend to ignore unwarranted stop signs, leading to potential safety hazards for pedestrians and drivers alike. Unwarranted stop sign installations are therefore not recommended for use as a traffic calming technique in St. Catharines. Some traffic calming measures may be considered for both local and collector roadways, whereas others should be used only on one type of roadway. Other factors affecting the applicability of traffic calming measures in St. Catharines include access for emergency vehicles, transit service, and ongoing maintenance of roadways. All of these factors need to be considered when determining the appropriate traffic calming measure. A common measure used is speed cushions, which are small speed humps designed to slow passenger vehicles, but are typically designed so that the wheel base of emergency vehicles straddle the speed cushion. The wider wheelbase on emergency vehicles allows them to pass over the speed cushion without slowing down. Another technique is to use a split speed hump design with knock-down post in the middle (Figure 1). The separation between speed cushions is designed with enough space for emergency vehicles to avoid touching the speed cushions and thus not having to slow down. Figure 1 - Speed Cushions with 'Knock-Down' Post in Middle Report Page 4 of 9

5 Another common measure is curb extensions (intersection and/or midblock), which improve pedestrian safety by: reducing the distance that pedestrians must travel to cross a roadway; improving the visibility of pedestrians for approaching motorists; and improving the visibility of approaching vehicles for pedestrians. Curb extensions (Figure 2) are sometimes referred to as narrowings or bulb-outs. They can be used at intersections and at midblock locations and can be used alone or in combination with a median island. In addition to their pedestrian safety benefits, curb extensions on one or both sides of the roadway also help to reduce vehicle speeds. Figure 2 - Curb Extension Raised median islands (Figure 3) are another common measure, which are constructed on a two-way roadway to reduce the overall width of the adjacent travel lanes. These measures can also act as a pedestrian refuge and can be installed in combination with curb extensions, similar to Avenue Road in Toronto. An important consideration when determining the feasibility of a raised median is adequate road width, including adequate travel lane width on either side of the median island to accommodate snow clearing efforts, as well as ensuring adequate sightlines can be maintained should vegetation be planted in the raised median. There are also ongoing operating costs associated with sustaining vegetation in the raised median islands. Figure 3 - Raised Median Report Page 5 of 9

6 In addition, on-street parking is a practical way of decreasing vehicle speeds due to the narrowed travel space (horizontal deflection) by allowing vehicles to park adjacent and parallel to the road edge. Upon approval of a Traffic Calming Program, new and innovative methods of traffic calming will continue to be investigated, considered and used where feasible. Proposed Traffic Calming Policy A Traffic Calming Policy is attached in Appendix 2. The purpose of this policy is to provide a process for evaluating requests for the installation of traffic calming measures to address concerns related to speeding and excessive volume in a fair, consistent and efficient manner. This policy applies to local and collector urban roads within primarily residential neighbourhoods under the City of St Catharines jurisdiction.the policy does not apply to arterial roadways. Although arterial roads have similar traffic related issues, their primary function is to move traffic efficiently. Therefore, traffic calming measure(s) that may be appropriate for use on local or collector roadways may not be suitable for use on arterial roadways. The objectives of the policy is to reduce the negative impacts of traffic such as speeding and excessive volume on local and collector roadways in order to increase the safety and livability of neighbourhoods, as well as to restore streets to their intended local or collector function. Through application of this policy and by applying good engineering judgment, traffic calming measures, when installed, will be done so in a manner which will ensure that they provide effective solutions while continuing to support the intended function of the roadway. The primary function of local roadways is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local streets are not intended for use as through routes or as important links to move traffic within an area s overall road network. Collector roadways balance access to adjacent properties with the need to collect and distribute residential traffic travelling into and out of a neighbourhood. Collectors carry traffic between local roadways and other collectors and arterial roadways. A review of various municipal traffic calming policies was conducted and considered in the creation of the proposed policy. In addition, the Traffic Calming Policy was circulated to the Niagara Regional Policy Service, Niagara Region, St. Catharines Transit Commission and Niagara Regional Health Services, as well as various internal Departments, including the Fire Services, and the comments received have been taken into consideration in the Traffic Calming Policy. The policy includes the following key steps to the process, as outlined below: 1) Process Initiation Once a written request to investigate traffic calming is received with signatures from a total of five households on the street in question, staff will conduct a brief preliminary assessment to determine if the requested roadway meets the initial screening criteria. Report Page 6 of 9

7 This initial screening criteria must be met before staff will continue with the traffic calming process in order to ensure that the roadway is appropriate for traffic calming measures (see Appendix 2 for screening criteria). 2) Resident Survey After it has been determined that the requested location meets the initial screening criteria, staff will survey the street in question to determine if there is neighbourhood support to implement traffic calming measures to address the identified concern(s) on the requested roadway. In order for staff to proceed, an indication of support from at least 51% of the total households with direct frontage, or flankage, onto the section of roadway that has been identified as the location for the potential implementation of traffic calming measures is required. Each household is represented by one survey. This step in the process is crucial in determining the level of concern from the residents. Failure to meet the 51% support level will result in termination of the investigation; meeting the required 51% support level will trigger the commencement of a traffic calming investigation. 3) Traffic Calming Warrant If the requested location meets the initial screening criteria and survey results indicate that there is at least 51% support, staff will commence collecting the necessary data, including conducting the required traffic studies to quantify and qualify the traffic concerns within a neighbourhood. Once collected and summarized, the data will be run through the traffic calming warrant to determine the need for traffic calming. In order to determine if traffic calming measures are warranted a minimum of three of the six (3/6) traffic calming warrant criteria, as outlined below, must be satisfied. If warrant criteria seven has been met then no other warrant criteria needs to be satisfied. 1) The 85 th percentile speed must be greater than 9km/h over the speed limit. 2) More than 5% of the total traffic on the street must be travelling more than 15km/h over the speed limit. 3) The average daily traffic volume (over 24 hours) must be at least: 1,500 vehicles/day for a local street 4,500 vehicles/day for a collector street 4) Through traffic must be more than: 20% of the total volume of traffic on a local street 40% of the total volume of traffic on a collector street 5) Pedestrian or cyclist generators (playground, school, multi-use pathway crossing, official cycle route, transit hub, seniors residence, etc.) exist on street, or in the immediate area, that creates higher than average pedestrian/cyclist activity. 6) No continuous sidewalk on the street in question. 7) If the 85 th percentile speed is 15km/h or more over the speed limit no other warrant needs to be met. Report Page 7 of 9

8 4) Traffic Calming Plan When a street meets the traffic calming warrant criteria, staff will then undertake a detailed review to determine which traffic calming measure(s) will best address the residents' concerns. This review will take into consideration the data collected, historical information, future maintenance and construction plans, as well as impacts to residents and other stakeholders. The proposed traffic calming measure(s) will be in accordance with the design guidelines outlined in the Canadian Guide to Neighbourhood Traffic Calming and the engineering judgement and experience of staff. Staff will then update the Ward Councillors, residents and other stakeholders indicating that traffic calming is warranted and advising of staff s recommended traffic calming plan, as well as the date, time and location of public information centre (PIC) that the recommended plan will be presented at. The public meeting will provide residents with an opportunity to become involved in the process, learn more about the proposed traffic calming measure(s) and to provide their feedback. Using technical data, community feedback, and in keeping with the objectives set out in the policy, staff will finalize the traffic calming plan 5) Approval and Implementation The recommended traffic calming plan will be approved under Delegated Authority and all residents that were invited to the PIC, as well as the Ward Councilors, will be notified before the traffic calming plan is implemented. Prior to installing the traffic calming measure(s), staff will determine if sufficient funding is available to implement the traffic calming project. If adequate funding is not available and there is at least one other warranted traffic calming project that is also waiting for funding then each project will be ranked using a weighted point system (see Appendix 2 for weighted point system). The traffic calming project with the highest point assessment will be given priority for implementation. Although staff do not intend to remove traffic calming measures, traffic calming devices may be removed at the request of residents provided that at least 75% of the total households on the street in question agree to the removal via a resident petition. The traffic calming measures must be installed for at least 2 years before acquiring the necessary signatures on the resident petition in order to ensure sufficient time has passed for traffic patterns to settle and for residents to have a solid understanding of the effects of the traffic calming measures. If traffic calming devices are removed, the subject street must wait at least five years before requesting a new traffic calming plan; at this point the approval process would start over. Financial Implications Although traffic calming measures can help control the speed and volume of traffic, an ongoing financial commitment is required in order to be effective. Without this consistent funding the traffic calming program will result in greater public frustration when approved plans are continually deferred due to limited funding. As such, staff will Report Page 8 of 9

9 request a budget of $70,000 for traffic calming measures and associated traffic studies in the 2015 Operating Budget, subject to Council approval of the Traffic Calming Policy, and will be adjusted as required in future budget requests. Conclusion There is a need to establish a Traffic Calming Program within the City of St. Catharines to evaluate requests for the installation of traffic calming measures in order to address concerns related to speeding and excessive volume. This Traffic Calming Policy will provide staff and City Council with an effective, fair and consistent process for dealing with traffic calming requests, while recognizing the importance of public involvement during the traffic calming review process. In order to conduct the necessary traffic studies and install the resulting traffic calming measures, when warranted, a budget of $70,000 will be requested as part of the 2015 Current Budget process, subject to Council approval of the Traffic Calming Policy, which will be adjusted as required in future budget requests. Notification James Taylor, Niagara Regional Police Service, 68 Church Street, St. Catharines, ON, L2R 3C6 Nick Palomba, Niagara Region, 2201 St. David s Road, P.O.Box 1042, Thorold, ON, L2V 4T7 Melissa Whyte, Niagara Region Health Services, P.O. Box 1052, Station Main, Thorold, ON L2V 0A2 Dave Sherlock, St. Catharines Transit Commission, 2012 First Street Louth, RR3, St. Catharines ON, L2S 3V9 Prepared and Submitted by: Chris Day, C.E.T. Manager of Transportation Services Approved by: Dan Dillon, P.Eng. Director of Transportation and Environmental Services Report Page 9 of 9

10 Appendix 1 TAC/ITE Canadian Guide to Neighbourhood Traffic Calming Reference Tables Transportation Association of Canada (TAC), Canadian Guide to Neighbourhood Traffic Calming, Ottawa, ON, 1998.

11 Appendix 1 TAC/ITE Canadian Guide to Neighbourhood Traffic Calming Reference Tables Transportation Association of Canada (TAC), Canadian Guide to Neighbourhood Traffic Calming, Ottawa, ON, 1998.

12 Appendix 1 TAC/ITE Canadian Guide to Neighbourhood Traffic Calming Reference Tables Transportation Association of Canada (TAC), Canadian Guide to Neighbourhood Traffic Calming, Ottawa, ON, 1998.

13 Appendix 2 Purpose: Transportation and Environmental Services Subject: Traffic Calming Policy Policy #: Created by: Chris Day, Manager of Transportation Services Approved by: Dan Dillon, Director of Transportation and Environmental Services Issue Date: August 26, 2014 Revision Date: Review Date: Page: 1 of 4 The purpose of this policy is to provide a process for evaluating requests for the installation of traffic calming measures to address concerns related to speeding and excessive volume in a fair, consistent and efficient manner. Scope: This policy applies to local and collector urban roads within primarily residential neighbourhoods under the City of St Catharines jurisdiction. The policy does not apply to arterial roadways. Although arterial roads have similar traffic related issues, their primary function is to move traffic efficiently. Therefore, traffic calming measure(s) that may be appropriate for use on local or collector roadways may not be suitable for use on arterial roadways. This policy does not prevent the Manager of Transportation Services, or his designate, from responding to and addressing an identified significant traffic concern which requires immediate attention. Policy: Traffic calming requests received by the City will be reviewed using the process outlined within this policy. This formal process for investigating roads provides efficiency, consistency and equality in the determination of traffic calming. The objectives of the policy is to reduce the negative impacts of traffic such as speeding and excessive volume on local and collector roadways in order to increase the safety and livability of neighbourhoods, as well as to restore streets to their intended local or collector function. Process Initiation Residents with traffic related concerns are instructed to submit their request to investigate traffic calming within their neighbourhood to the City in writing, along with signatures from at least four other households on the street in question who support the request. This initial resident contact will enable staff to identify the concern(s), which need to be addressed through the installation of traffic calming measures and the street(s), or section of street(s), to be reviewed. The City will then conduct a brief preliminary assessment to determine if the requested roadway meets the following initial screening criteria, which must be met before staff will continue with the traffic calming process: 1) Must be a local or a collector urban roadway; and 2) Roadway must be assumed and maintained by the City of St Catharines; and 3) Zoning should be primarily residential in nature; and 4) Requested street, or section of street, must be a minimum of 250m long and have at least one road segment with a spacing between traffic control devices of more than 250m; and

14 Transportation and Environmental Services Subject: Traffic Calming Policy Policy #: Created by: Chris Day, Manager of Transportation Services Approved by: Dan Dillon, Director of Transportation and Environmental Services Issue Date: August 26, 2014 Revision Date: Review Date: Page: 2 of 4 5) The road grade must be less than 8% and also have no major horizontal curvature in the area of concern; and 6) The posted speed limit shall not be greater than 50 km/h; and 7) Traffic calming measures have not been installed on the street within the past five years. Staff will update the Ward Councillors accordingly and notify the resident of the results of the initial screening. Should the initial screening criteria not be met the Niagara Regional Police Service will be notified of the concern received for enforcement purposes. The street in question will also not be reevaluated for a minimum of at least three years from the date the evaluation was completed. Resident Survey After it has been determined that the requested location meets the initial screening criteria, staff will survey the street in question to determine if there is neighbourhood support to implement traffic calming measures to address the identified concern(s) on the requested roadway. In order for staff to proceed, an indication of support from at least 51% of the total households with direct frontage, or flankage, onto the section of roadway that has been identified as the location for the potential implementation of traffic calming measures, as defined by Transportation Services staff, is required. Each household is represented by one survey. This step in the process is crucial in determining the level of concern from the residents. Failure to meet the 51% support level will result in termination of the investigation; meeting the required 51% support level will trigger the commencement of a traffic calming investigation. Should the resident survey not be met then staff will update the Ward Councillors accordingly and notify the residents. Traffic Calming Warrant If the requested location meets the initial screening criteria and survey results indicate that there is at least 51% support, data collection will commence. The collection of traffic data, as deemed necessary by Transportation Services staff, will serve to provide a better understanding of the current traffic conditions and to prioritize locations for traffic calming, if warranted. The data collected will pertain to vehicle volume, vehicle speed (85th percentile 1 ), collisions, origin/destination study if request relates to shortcutting traffic, and site-specific information. Once collected and summarized, the data will be run through the traffic calming warrant to determine the need for traffic calming. In order to determine if traffic calming measures are warranted a minimum of three of the six (3/6) traffic calming warrant criteria, as outlined below, must be satisfied. If warrant criteria seven has been met then no other warrant criteria needs to be satisfied. 1 The 85th percentile speed is the speed at which 85 percent of traffic is travelling at or below.

15 Transportation and Environmental Services Subject: Traffic Calming Policy Policy #: Created by: Chris Day, Manager of Transportation Services Approved by: Dan Dillon, Director of Transportation and Environmental Services Issue Date: August 26, 2014 Revision Date: Review Date: Page: 3 of 4 1) The 85 th percentile speed must be greater than 9km/h over the speed limit. 2) More than 5% of the total traffic on the street must be travelling more than 15km/h over the speed limit. 3) The average daily traffic volume (over 24 hours) must be at least: 1,500 vehicles/day for a local street 4,500 vehicles/day for a collector street 4) Through traffic must be more than: 20% of the total volume of traffic on a local street 40% of the total volume of traffic on a collector street 5) Pedestrian or cyclist generators (playground, school, multi-use pathway crossing, official cycle route, transit hub, etc.) exist on street, or in the immediate area, that creates higher than average pedestrian/cyclist activity. 6) No continuous sidewalk on the street in question. 7) If the 85 th percentile speed is 15km/h or more over the speed limit no other warrant needs to be met. Should a location fail to meet the warrant requirements, residents will be notified in writing and the Ward Councillors will be copied on that letter. The investigation for traffic calming measures will discontinue and staff will not re-evaluate the street in question for a minimum of at least three years from the date the evaluation was completed. Traffic Calming Plan When a street meets the traffic calming warrant criteria, staff will then undertake a detailed review to determine which traffic calming measure(s) will best address the residents' concerns. This review will take into consideration the data collected, historical information, future maintenance and construction plans, as well as impacts to residents and other stakeholders. The proposed traffic calming measure(s) will be in accordance with the design guidelines outlined in the Canadian Guide to Neighbourhood Traffic Calming and the engineering judgement and experience of staff. Staff will then update the Ward Councillors, residents and other stakeholders indicating that traffic calming is warranted and advising of staff s recommended traffic calming plan, as well as the date, time and location of public information centre (PIC) that the recommended plan will be presented at. Effected residents with direct frontage on the street in question, in addition to each property whose side yard abuts the subject roadway section, will be invited to the PIC. Households that do not directly front the subject roadway, but who have no other option but to use the section of roadway where traffic calming is being proposed will also receive a PIC notice delivered to their homes. Due to potential impacts to surrounding roadways the notification area may be extended. The public meeting will provide residents with an opportunity to become involved in the process, learn more about the proposed traffic calming measure(s) and to provide their feedback.

16 Transportation and Environmental Services Subject: Traffic Calming Policy Policy #: Created by: Chris Day, Manager of Transportation Services Approved by: Dan Dillon, Director of Transportation and Environmental Services Issue Date: August 26, 2014 Revision Date: Review Date: Page: 4 of 4 Using technical data, community feedback, and in keeping with the objectives set out in this policy, staff will finalize the traffic calming plan. Approval and Implementation The recommended traffic calming plan will be approved under Delegated Authority and all residents that were invited to the PIC, as well as the ward Councilors, will be notified before the traffic calming plan is implemented. Prior to installing the traffic calming measure(s), staff will determine if funding is available to implement the traffic calming project. If adequate funding is available the city will implement the approved traffic calming plan as resources permits. If adequate funding is not available and there is at least one other warranted traffic calming project that is also waiting for funding then each project will be ranked using the following weighted point system: 1) Speed Warrant - 3 points will be awarded for every km/h the 85 th percentile speed is above the speed limit. 2) Volume Warrant - 2 points will be awarded for every 100 vehicles of daily traffic for local roads and 2 points for every 250 vehicles of daily traffic on collector roadways. 3) Pedestrian/Cyclist Warrant - 10 points will be awarded for every major pedestrian generator (ie. school, playground, seniors residence, multi-use pathway crossing, official cycle route, transit hub, etc.) on the street in question. 4) Collision Warrant - 15 points will be awarded for every reported preventable collision in the past 3 years on the street in question. 5) Sidewalk - 10 points will be awarded if there is no continuous sidewalk on the street in question. The traffic calming project with the highest point assessment will be given priority for implementation. Removal of Traffic Calming Measures Traffic calming devices may be removed at the request of residents provided that a minimum of 75% of the total households on the street in question agree to the removal via a resident petition. The number of total households would be the same residents as was initially surveyed to gauge support for traffic calming. The traffic calming measures must be installed for at least two years before acquiring the necessary signatures on the resident petition. If traffic calming devices are removed, the subject street must wait at least five years before requesting a new traffic calming plan; at this point the traffic calming review process would start over. The City reserves the right to remove traffic calming measures if it determines that they are ineffective or unsafe, or if they have created a negative impact that cannot be corrected. Should this occur, the City will mail out notifications to the effected residents informing of its decision to remove the traffic calming measure(s).