MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION AREA DESCRIPTION. DATE: December 8, 2017
|
|
- Christian George
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 7719 SOUTH MAIN STREET MIDVALE, UT P MEMORANDUM DATE: December 8, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: Keith Ludwig, P.E. Midvale City Lesley Burns, Midvale City Charles Allen, P.E., PTOE, Parametrix Kai Tohinaka, Parametrix Center Street Pedestrian Crossing Analysis Center Street Pedestrian Crossing Analysis INTRODUCTION Midvale City requested the assistance of Parametrix to evaluate the pedestrian crossing conditions on Center Street between I-15 and State Street. In light of concerns about pedestrian safety and ongoing development near the TRAX station, Midvale City desires to identify the short-term and long-term vision for corridor pedestrian treatments. The following scope and budget outlines the Parametrix proposal to aid in this effort. AREA DESCRIPTION Midvale Center Street between I-15 and State Street is a 5-lane facility with a 35 MPH speed limit. Sidewalks which run the full length of each side are connected by four pedestrian crossings at 425 West, 300 West, Grant Street, and Center Square. Figure 1 provides an overview of the corridor and Table 1 below shows the characteristics of each of the pedestrian crossings. Figure 1: Study Area Detail
2 Table 1: Crossing Detail Crossing Length Crosswalk Makings 1 Advanced Warning School Zone Major Generators 425 West 68 ft Longitudinal Yes Yes 2 Club, Midvale Park, Residential Midvale Elementary/Middle, Boys & Girls 300 West 68 ft Transverse Yes Yes Midvale Middle, Midvale Park, Residential Grant Street 72 ft Transverse No No Residential, Zions Bank Center Midvale Center Station, TOD Residential, Square 66 ft Transverse No No Strip-Mall Commercial 1 See Figure 14 for examples. 2 Reduced speed school zone with crossing guard Data Collection Pedestrian and vehicle counts were collected on September 28, The pedestrian counts were collected at five minute intervals at each of the four crossing locations for a 12 hour period starting at 7:00 AM. The vehicle counts were collected at the intersection of 300 West and Center Street also for 12 hours in five minute intervals beginning at 7:00 AM. 425 West The 425 West crossing is in a reduced speed school zone, with overhead school zone flashers and a crossing guard. It uses a high visibility longitudinal marking pattern with school crossing signs on either end. It has advanced crossing signs and pavement markings at approximately 400 feet to the east and west. It connects the northeast corner of 425 West to 40 feet west of the southwest corner of Chapel Street. Figures 2 shows the 425 West crossing and its treatments. The crossing connects Midvale Park, Midvale Boys & Girls Club, and residences north of Center street to Midvale Elementary School, Midvale Middle School, and residences to the south of Center Street. The catchment boundaries of both Midvale Elementary and Midvale Middle School cross Center Street to the north. Additionally the Midvale Boys & Girls Club draws from Midvale Elementary, and staff walk children across Center Street on a daily basis. This is the most heavily trafficked crossing by a wide margin, with 373 daily crossings. A majority of this traffic is during the 1:00-4:00 period during school out-load and Boys & Girls Club afterschool activities. It has a pedestrian peak-hour flow of 135 people. Figure 3 below shows the 425 West crossing pedestrian flow. Figure 2: Crosswalk at 425 West Center Street Pedestrian Crossing Analysis 2 December 8, 2017
3 Figure 3: 425 West Pedestrian Flow 300 West The 300 West crossing is in a school crosswalk zone, but unlike at 425 West it is not a reduced speed zone and does not have a crossing guard. And while it is in a school zone, it does not have the longitudinal crossing markings required by the Utah MUTCD, but rather has a simple transverse configuration with school crosswalk signs on either side. It has advanced school crossing pavement markings and signs at approximately 400 feet to the east and west. Figures 4 and 5 show the crossing at 300 West and it accompanying advanced warnings. The crossing connects the northwest corner of 300 West to approximately 55 feet east of the southwest corner of Pioneer Street. It provides connections between residences and Midvale Park to the north to residences to the south. It has 48 daily crossings with a peak-hour flow of 23 people. Figure 6 below shows the 300 West crossing pedestrian flow. Figure 4: Crosswalk at 300 West Figure 5: Advanced Warnings for 300 West Crosswalk Center Street Pedestrian Crossing Analysis 3 December 8, 2017
4 Figure 6: 300 West Pedestrian Flow Grant Street The Grant Street crossing a simple transverse configuration with crosswalk signs on either side. This crossing has no advanced warning signs. Figure 7 shows the crossing at Grant Street. This crossing primary connects residential areas to the north and south. It has 54 daily crossings with a peak-hour flow of 15 people. Figure 8 below shows the Grant Street crossing pedestrian flow. Figure 7: Crosswalk at Grant Street Figure 8: Grant Street Pedestrian Flow Center Street Pedestrian Crossing Analysis 4 December 8, 2017
5 Center Square The Center Square crossing has a transverse marking pattern with crosswalk signs on either side. The crossing connects the northeast corner of Center Square to 75 feet west of the southwest corner of Roosevelt Street. Figure 9 shows the crossing at Center Square. Its primary traffic generators are the Midvale Center TRAX station, the new TOD Apartment Complex, strip-mall commercial and single family residences. It has 52 daily crossings with a peak-hour flow of nine people. It important to note that pedestrian volume data does not likely include the full traffic generation of the new apartment complex. Partial occupation of the apartments only began near the time of data collection. Figure 10 below shows the Grant Street crossing pedestrian flow. Figure 9: Crosswalk at Center Square Figure 10: Center Square Pedestrian Flow SAFETY DATA Parametrix gathered historic crash data for Center Street (I-15 to State Street) from the UDOT Traffic & Safety Division. The data included crashes from 2014 through During this three-year time period, there were 56 recorded crashes along Center Street. The most common crash type was rear-end, with 21 crashes. The prevalence of unique roadway characteristics, which cause temporary stoppages along Center Street, including four crosswalks, the 20 MPH school zone and a rail crossing, may contribute to the high prevalence of rear-end crashes on this un-signalized stretch of road. The second most common crash type was angle crashes, with 18 crashes. Twelve of the crashes were single vehicle, including two bicycle and one pedestrian collisions. Additionally, there were three sideswipe and two head on crashes. Figures 11 and 12 show crashes by manner of collision. Center Street Pedestrian Crossing Analysis 5 December 8, 2017
6 Figure 11: Crash locations by Manner of Collision ( ) Figure 12: Crashes by Manner of Collision ( ) Single Vehicle Angle Sideswipe Same Direction Front to Rear Head On (front-to-front) Twenty-one of the crashes occurred within 100 feet of a pedestrian crossing. Three were within 100 feet of the 425 West crossing, with two single vehicle and one angle crash. One of the two single vehicle crashes involved a pedestrian. Six were within the 300 West crossing, with four single vehicle, one rear end and one angle. Two of these single vehicle crashes involved bicycles. Nine crashes were within 100 feet of the Grant Street crossing, including four rear end, two angle, one head on, one sideswipe and one single vehicle. Three of the crashes were within 100 feet of the Center Square crossing, with two rear end and one angle. Table 2 shows the crossing area crashes by manner of collision. Additionally, one pedestrian crash occurred this year (outside of data collection series) at the Grant Street crossing Table 2: Crashes within 100 Feet of Crossings Angle Single Vehicle Rear End Sideswipe Head On 425 West West Grant Street Center Square Center Street Pedestrian Crossing Analysis 6 December 8, 2017
7 CROSSING ANALYSIS There are numerous at-grade crossing treatments and amenities and it is important to find the right treatment for the right location. An improperly designed treatment will result in low driver and pedestrian compliance and create new safety hazards for the surrounding transportation network. For example, a painted crosswalk on a 10- lane interstate will achieve virtually no driver compliance because of the high travel speeds and because drivers do not expect to see pedestrians on a freeway. This situation would create an extreme hazard for both pedestrians and drivers. On the other extreme, installing a traffic signal to control pedestrian crossings on a residential cul-de-sac will achieve no pedestrian compliance because pedestrians feel comfortable crossing a quiet street without assistance and do not want to wait for a pedestrian walk signal when there are likely to be no oncoming vehicles. Finding the right combination of crossing treatments is critical to making a crossing effective. Data documented in National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 562, Improving Pedestrian Safety at Signalized Crossings confirms that the safest and most effective crossings often use strategic traffic control devices or design elements to meet the information and control needs of both motorists and pedestrians. NCHRP Report 562 states that when considering a treatment, it is important to consider desirable characteristics such as: 1. Making the street crossing task simple and convenient for pedestrians 2. Making sure crossing pedestrians have excellent visibility 3. Making sure vehicle speeds are slowed or controlled in the area of the pedestrian crossing 4. Making sure drivers are more aware of the presence of the crosswalk 5. Making sure drivers yield the right-of-way to legally crossing pedestrians To evaluate the appropriateness of existing pedestrian amenities on Center Street, Parametrix applied guidelines within NCHRP Report 562. The guidelines provide thresholds for pedestrian amenity treatments based on a number of different criteria including pedestrian volumes, road volume, road width and speed limit. There are several potential categories of treatments: Enhanced: High-Visibly Signs and Markings, Median Refuge Islands, In-Street Pedestrian Crossing Signs Active: flashing Amber Beacons, Pedestrian Crossing Flags, In-Roadway Warning Lights Red: Pedestrian Crosswalk Signal, Half Signal, HAWK, Pedestrian Beacon Signal Enhanced treatments include devices that are active in the crossing at all times, such as static signage, and pavement markings. Active treatments are devices that activate a warning when pedestrians are present or crossing a street, such as flashers or pedestrian flags. The Red category includes signals or beacons that display a circular red signal to motorists when activated by pedestrians. This includes HAWK, PELICAN, or TOUCAN signals. The Signal category includes conventional traffic signals which are administered by guidelines in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Finally, each category can be further sub-divided as being HC High Compliance, or LC Low Compliance. NCHRP Report 562 contains guideline plots to aid in identifying the appropriate pedestrian treatment for various roadway scenarios. Parametrix applied the roadway, traffic and pedestrian parameters for the Center Street crossings to the plot best representing site conditions. Figure 13 shows the guideline plot and Table 3 summarizes the roadway and pedestrian characteristics used to select and populate the plot. Center Street Pedestrian Crossing Analysis 7 December 8, 2017
8 Figure 13: Pedestrian Amenity Treatment Guideline Plot Source: Figure A-16, NCHRP Report 562 Table 3: At-grade Crossing Evaluation Inputs Input 425 West 300 West Grant Street Center Square Peak Hour of Ped Crossings 1:15 2:15 PM 2:50 3:50 PM 2:20-3:15 PM 12:00-1:00 PM Roadway Width 68 ft 68 ft 72 ft 66 ft Vehicle Speed 35 mph 35 mph 35 mph 35 mph Walking Speed 3.5 ft/sec 3.5 ft/sec 3.5 ft/sec 3.5 ft/sec Major Road Volume 944 veh/hr 1,256 veh/hr 1,115 veh/hr 940 veh/hr Pedestrian Crossing Volume 135 ped/hr 23 ped/hr 15 ped/hr 9 ped/hr Examining Figure 13, the plotted points indicate the appropriate treatment type for each crossing. If there are fewer than 20 pedestrian crossings during the peak hour, as such is the case for Center Square and Grants Street marked in blue, than no signs, signals, or markings are recommended. Instead, NCHRP Report 562 suggests exploring geometric changes such as median refuge islands or curb extensions, which would alter the roadway characteristic. If there more than 20 pedestrian crossings then some form of treatment is recommended depending upon the magnitude of the pedestrian movement and vehicle traffic. Both 425 West and 300 West, marked in red, meet this threshold and a Red category treatment is recommended. Center Street Pedestrian Crossing Analysis 8 December 8, 2017
9 SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS The crossings at 425 West and 300 West both have sufficient pedestrian traffic to validate a red type crossing treatment, per NCHRP Report 562. While they do meet the threshold, both crossings are in a school zone, and so are required to meet the Utah MUTCD standards for school zone crossings. 425 West is in a reduced speed school zone, and warrants overhead school speed zone assembly and an adult crossing guard. The crossing guard is effectively a red treatment during peak conditions. No additional treatments are needed at this crosswalk, and none would likely be allowed per the Utah MUTCD. The crossing at 300 West, while also falling within the recommendation for a red style treatment, is not serviced by a crossing guard. While conditions would warrant a crossing guard here for an elementary school, this school zone is for Midvale Middle School and per the Utah MUTCD a crossing is not required. The proximity to 425 West also makes any red treatments here undesirable, and so an active treatment type would be best for this crossing. Additionally, the Utah MUTCD states that Longitudinal crosswalk markings shall be used for all school crosswalks within School Crosswalk Zones and Reduced Speed School Zones. The crossing at 300 West currently has simple transverse markings. Incorporating longitudinal crosswalk markings would not only bring the crossing into compliance with the Utah MUTCD, but would also increase visibility, encouraging better compliance from vehicles. Figure 14 shows three styles of crosswalk markings. Additional active treatments, such as pedestrian flags, could also be deployed here to increase vehicle compliance. Figure 14: Crosswalk Pavement Markings Source: Utah MUTCD For the remaining two crossings at Grant Street and Center Square, guidance from NCHRP Report 562 would call for their removal, because the roadway characteristics are not conducive to a crosswalk alone and the pedestrian volume is not great enough to justify a more invasive crosswalk treatment. However, while justifiable, the closing of the Grant Street and Center Square crosswalks may not be desirable as it would disrupt pedestrian street connectivity and the walkability of the area. Thus, if the two crossings are to be kept, it is recommended that Center Street Pedestrian Crossing Analysis 9 December 8, 2017
10 measures are taken to increase their visibility, thereby improving vehicle compliance. Two simple measures to be taken would be to add advanced warning signage and utilize a high-visibility diagonal crossing pattern. It is also important to take into account low pedestrian volumes at the Center Square crosswalk may be subject to change due to high vacancy at the new apartment complex. At the time of data collection only partial occupation of the apartments was beginning to occur, and at the time of this report, half of the development is still under construction. This is a transit oriented development aimed at catering to individuals who are likely to utilize nearby transit facilities, namely the nearby TRAX station. This means that once fully occupied with a stable resident population, there would be an expected increase in pedestrian traffic at the Center Square crossing, which is the direct route from the apartments to the TRAX station. That being said, the Center Square crossing could easily fall within the recommendations for a Red signal in the near future. Midvale City should continue to monitor pedestrian conditions as development progresses. If a Red signal becomes justifiable at the Center Square crossing, it may also be necessary to consider relocating this crossing. A signal at the current location may result in queuing back onto the rail crossing. This could be prevented by relocating the crossing directly adjacent to the rail crossing (See Figure 15). Local examples of this configuration exist in Midvale at the Bingham Junction TRAX crossing and in Sandy at the 9400 South TRAX crossing. Figure 16 shows the Bingham Junction crossing. Figure 15: Center Square Crossing and Potential Relocation Figure 16: Bingham Junction Pedestrian Crossing Center Street Pedestrian Crossing Analysis 10 December 8, 2017
11 Table 4 shows the short-term recommendations for the Center Street crossings. As shown in the crossing analysis above, Center Street is not appropriate for simple transverse crosswalks. The NCHRP Report 562 recommends a simple crosswalk for this type of road only when the road volume is less than 600 vehicles per hour. During peak pedestrian traffic conditions Center Street does not see less than 800 vehicles per hour, and so, at a minimum, some crossing treatments should be advanced to improve vehicle compliance. Table 4: Short-Term Recommendations Crosswalk Recommended Action 425 West No Action 300 West Longitudinal school zone pavement markings, with active treatments such as pedestrian flags. Grant Street Upgrade pavement markings to high-visibility diagonal, implement advance warning signage. Center Square Upgrade pavement markings to high-visibility diagonal, implement advance warning signage. Red signal when needed, with possible relocation. Though part of the Enhanced pedestrian amenity category, geometric changes such as bulb-outs, curb extensions and center refuge islands would also be helpful at these crossings, but the layout of the existing roadway and the location of cross streets don t allow for these types of improvements. There is no significant shoulder for the creation of bulb-outs and curb extensions, and center refuge islands would restrict left-turn movements at cross streets. LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS The conditions at the 425 West and 300 West crossings are likely stable, with little development potential and established land uses in the area. Additionally, they are both in school zones and under the guidance of the Utah MUTCD. The changes recommended above will likely meet the needs at these crossings long-term. The Grant Street and Center Square crossings are more subject to future development, and in particular, the Center Square crossing is right in the middle of ongoing transit oriented development. It is important that the city be proactive to increased pedestrian traffic produced by new development and upgrade these crossings accordingly. At vehicle peak hour (see Figure 17), the suggested treatment for a pedestrian crosswalk across Center Street is either no treatment or Red depending upon pedestrian volumes. This leaves few options in the future when additional development may generate more pedestrian traffic. In this scenario, upgrading the two crossings at Grant Street and Center Square to red treatments is not desirable because having two red crosswalks and a crossing guard within a ½ mile stretch of road may be problematic. Another tactic would be to consolidate the crossings at Grant Street and Center Square. This would limit the number of reds along the corridor and still provide a way for pedestrians to cross the road safely. The issue here would be a disruption of the pedestrian grid, a detriment to walkability. Finally, the most pedestrian-focused approach would be to reduce the roadway to a 3-lane configuration. Fully embracing a transit-oriented philosophy, this strategy would allow for shorter crossing distances and better vehicle compliance. In this scenario, less impactful crossing treatments would be adequate for the vehicle peak hour. For example, Figure 18 illustrates the pedestrian-amenity guidelines for a street with 34 feet of pavement roughly equivalent to a 3-lane road. As can be seen in Figure 18, enhanced/active treatments are suitable for pedestrian volumes up to 100 pedestrian crossings per hour. Further study would determine if a lane reduction would be feasible given the vehicle demand on the corridor, but the 3-lane configuration could be of lesser impact on vehicle movement than having several red crossing treatments along the corridor. Center Street Pedestrian Crossing Analysis 11 December 8, 2017
12 Figure 17: Existing Roadway Guidelines Plot, Vehicle Peak Hour Figure 18: 3-lane Roadway Guidelines Plot, Vehicle Peak Hour Center Street Pedestrian Crossing Analysis 12 December 8, 2017
IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS. Guidelines for Marked Crosswalks
IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS Presented by Nazir Lalani P.E. Traffex Engineers Inc. N_lalani@hotmail.com Guidelines for Marked Crosswalks Source: FHWA, Safety Effects of Marked
More informationCity of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY
4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY PURPOSE: Pedestrian crosswalks are an integral part of our transportation infrastructure. To be effective and promote safety, marked crosswalks must be installed after
More informationAppendix A: Crosswalk Policy
Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy Introduction This citywide Crosswalk Policy is aimed at improving pedestrian safety and enhancing pedestrian mobility by providing a framework
More informationCaltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns
Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns Revised: May 10, 2016 The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is planning various
More informationMEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy
MEMORANDUM Date: 9/13/2016 Re: Citywide Crosswalk Policy Foreword Through the s Circulation Element and Complete Streets Policy, it is the City s goal to promote walking trips and provide safe facilities
More informationTOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES
TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES (Adopted by the Town Council on June 30, 2004) (Revised December 6, 2010) (Revised February 8, 2016) POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC
More informationImproving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Shawn Turner, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings Shawn Turner, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute Overview of Presentation What are the issues/problems? Framework for crossing treatments Marked
More informationUNCONTROLLED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES
City and County of Denver UNCONTROLLED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES Prepared for: Prepared by: Adopted September 2016 This page is intentionally left blank. Contents for Denver Uncontrolled Pedestrian
More informationDesigning for Pedestrian Safety. Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016
Designing for Pedestrian Safety Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016 1 Designing for Pedestrians Marking Crosswalks at Signalized intersections High Visibility Markings
More informationPEDESTRIAN CROSSING SOLUTIONS ANDREA HARTH, PE, PTOE TEC ENGINEERING, INC.
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SOLUTIONS ANDREA HARTH, PE, PTOE TEC ENGINEERING, INC. Pedestrian Safety 2017 Pedestrian Crashes in Ohio Crash Severity Number % Fatal Crash 141 4.9% Injury Crash 2546 89.1% Property
More informationVision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods
N D. Focus Area II Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods Transit Road Focus Area II is located in the Hamlet
More informationAddendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines
Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug 2017 Crosswalk Guidelines Warrants for Uncontrolled Crosswalk Locations Crosswalks at Midblock Locations
More informationCity of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox
City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox June 1, 2013 Final Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Non-Physical Devices... 3 High-Visibility Crosswalk... 3 In Pavement Lighted Crosswalk... 4 Rapid Flashing
More informationPEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS Traffic Safety Engineering Division Updated: April 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NDOT Traffic Safety Engineering Division developed
More informationTRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY 5 th STREET & ENCHANTED PINES DRIVE JANUARY 2013 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTERSECTION LOCATION MAP ii INTRODUCTION
More informationDEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space
DEFINITIONS Activity Area - that part of a TTC zone activity area where the work actually takes place. It consists of the work space, traffic space and one or more buffer spaces. Advance Warning Area -
More informationMEMORANDUM. Discussion of the planned crosswalk improvement on Mount Vernon Road near Stratham Drive
MEMORANDUM To: From: Mayor and City Council Michael Smith, Public Works Director Date: August 24, 2015 Subject: Discussion of the Mount Vernon Road Crosswalk Improvement ITEM DESCRIPTION Discussion of
More informationAccess Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians
Design Manual Chapter 5 - Roadway Design 5L - Access Management 5L-3 Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians This section addresses access location, spacing, turn lane and median needs, including
More informationGuidance for Installation of Pedestrian Crosswalks on Michigan State Trunkline Highways
Guidance for Installation of Pedestrian Crosswalks on Michigan State Trunkline Highways Michigan Department of Transportation July 7, 2014 Engineering Manual Preamble This manual provides guidance to administrative,
More informationSCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA
CITY OF MADISON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA January 2016 Adopted as Policy on August 31, 1976, by Common Council by Amended Resolution #29,540 Amended on September 14, 1976,
More informationAppendix A. Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines. Appendix A: Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines Knox to Oak Ridge Greenway Master Plan
Appendix A Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines 75 Overview: Adequate signing and marking are essential on shared-use paths, especially to alert bicyclists to potential conflicts and to convey regulatory
More informationFundamentals of Traffic Control Devices
Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices Traffic Engineering & Operations October 8, 2014 Raj Ponnaluri, Angela Wilhelm, and Christopher Lewis Agenda Agenda Signs Pavement Markings Signals Traffic Operations
More informationGeometric Design Tables
Design Manual Chapter 5 - Roadway Design 5C - Geometric Design Criteria 5C-1 Geometric Design Tables A. General The following sections present two sets of design criteria tables - Preferred Roadway Elements
More informationTown of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy
Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy Adopted January 6, 2014 Town of Mooresville Development Services Department TOWN OF MOORESVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
More informationALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY
ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY in City of Frostburg, Maryland January 2013 3566 Teays Valley Road Hurricane, WV Office: (304) 397-5508 www.denniscorporation.com Alley 24 Traffic Study January 2013 Frostburg, Maryland
More informationCity of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A
A1. Functional Classification Table A-1 illustrates the Metropolitan Council s detailed criteria established for the functional classification of roadways within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Table
More informationTRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY
Level 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic > 7 km/h (4 mph)? Yes No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of
More informationIn response to your request for information on mid-block pedestrian crossing policies and guidelines, the following information is enclosed:
August 18, 2016 City of Brentwood, Tennessee Mr. Kirk Bednar City Manager 5211 Maryland Way P. O. Box 788 Brentwood, Tennessee 37024 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Dear Mr. Bednar: In response to your request for
More informationContents. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Stop Placement Guidelines
Contents Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Introduction... 1 Stop Spacing... 2 Rural... 2 Low Density Suburban... 2 General Urban... 2 Urban Core... 2 Operational Safety... 3 Stop Placement... 4 Nearside
More informationAgenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN
PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN May 28, 2008 Agenda Welcome and introductions Project overview and issue identification Planning context and strengths Design challenges and initial recommendations
More informationPEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN
ATTACHMENT 2 CITY OF SANTA MONICA PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN CITY OF SANTA MONICA PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN This page intentionally left blank EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Setting the Stage
More informationDesigning for Pedestrian Safety
Designing for Pedestrian Safety Treatments at Unsignalized Pedestrian Crossings Presented by: Charlie Zegeer PBIC Director August 17, 2010 Crossing Crashes Part 1: General Principles 3 2 Why do people
More informationCitywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs
Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs Council Meeting October 20, 2015 Presented by Rita Hu and Jamal Mahmoud Program Goals Implement the City s comprehensive plan. Provide pedestrian with safe walking
More informationAbstract. Background. protected/permissive operation. Source: Google Streetview, Fairview/Orchard intersection
ITE 2015 Western District Annual Meeting Ada County Highway District s Flashing Yellow Arrow Initiative Primary Author: Tim Curns, PE Ada County Highway District Traffic Engineer Author: Andrew Cibor,
More informationMEMORANDUM. Nantasket Road at Kingsley Road Kingsley Road at Sumner Street Kingsley Road at Revere Street Kingsley Road at Kenberma Street
MEMORANDUM Date: June 28, 2012 To: From: Subject: Mr. Joseph Stigliani, Director of Public Works Kenneth J. Petraglia, P.E., PTOE Greg E. Lucas, P.E., PTOE Kingsley Road Stop Sign Warrant Analysis BETA
More informationSouthside Road. Prepared for: City of St. John s Police & Traffic Committee. Prepared by: City of St. John s Traffic Division
Southside Road Prepared for: City of St. John s Police & Traffic Committee Prepared by: City of St. John s Traffic Division January 2007 Southside Road - Traffic Report Page 1 of 9 BACKGROUND: th At the
More informationCITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX
CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX This toolbox is to be used to guide pedestrian crossing improvements within the City of Saratoga Springs. Details for each crossing type are provided.
More informationTemporary Traffic Control for Highway Work Zones
Temporary Traffic Control for Highway Work Zones MONTHLY DELMARVA MISS UTILITY MEMBER MEETING MARCH 20, 2014 PRESENTED BY: Adam Weiser, P.E. PTOE Safety Programs Manager Delaware Department of Transportation
More informationChapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit
Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit The Washtenaw County Access Management Plan was developed based on the analysis of existing
More informationM-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016
M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Prepared for CITY OF BELTON By May 2016 Introduction Missouri State Highway 58 (M-58 Highway) is a major commercial corridor in the City of Belton. As development has
More informationSchool Zone Traffic Control Policy
School Zone Traffic Control Policy I. GE ERAL CITY OF BILLINGS SCHOOL ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL POLICY (Approved by Traffic Control Board 10/27/99) (Approved by Billings City Council on 6/25/01) This policy
More informationREGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES November 16, 2011 Deb Humphreys North Central Texas Council of Governments Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Snapshot of the Guide 1. Introduction
More informationBorough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines
Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines Adopted by Borough Council on 1 INTRODUCTION Speeding Traffic is a major concern in the Borough of Danville because of its detrimental impacts
More informationInstallation of Traffic Signals and Pedestrian Crossings
SER-009-021 Strathcona County Municipal Policy Handbook Installation of Traffic Signals and Pedestrian Crossings Date of Approval by Council: 04/16/91; 06/12/2007 Resolution No. 325/91; 526/2007 Lead Role:
More informationPEDESTRIAN CROSSING TREATMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TREATMENTS BEST PRACTICES Presented by: Doug Enderson, P.E., PTOE Cody Salo, P.E. 1 PRESENTER INTRODUCTIONS Doug Enderson, P.E., PTOE Ped Crossing Experience: ADA Design-Build ADA Inventory
More informationNJDOT Complete Streets Checklist
Background The New Jersey Department of Transportation s Complete Streets Policy promotes a comprehensive, integrated, connected multi-modal network by providing connections to bicycling and walking trip
More informationCITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY
ORIGIN/AUTHORITY Clause 1, Report No. 1-1980 and Clause 4, Report No. 22-1990 of the Works and Utilities Committee; Clause 6, Report No. 17-2004 of the Planning and Operations Committee; and Clause D5,
More informationSCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA
CITY OF MADISON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA AUGUST 1990 Adopted as Policy on August 31, 1976, by Common Council by Amended Resolution #29,540 Amended on September 14, 1976,
More informationProject Team. Refined Pedestrian Crossing Toolbox. Problem Statement. Aerial of Study Corridor. Crossing Accommodations and Pedestrian Fatalities
Project Team Refined Pedestrian Crossing Toolbox Treatments on Wide, High Speed Urban Roadways Developed as Part of the Springfield Main Street (OR 126) Safety Study Consultants Scott Mansur, P.E., P.T.O.E.
More informationC. Best Practice Pedestrian Treatment Toolbox
C. Best Practice Pedestrian Toolbox The Best Practice Pedestrian Toolbox presents the recommended tools in striping, signalization, signage, geometry and other categories for improving both uncontrolled
More informationAcknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division
Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division Acknowledgements Mr. David Nicol Director, FHWA Office of Safety FHWA Office of Safety http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/provencountermeasures/
More information2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?
2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians Lifesaver National Conference March 17, 2015 Revised June 2014 1 What is the Handbook? 1998 1st Edition 2001 2nd Edition
More informationCity of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets
City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets PURPOSE: The purpose of the Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets is to address safety concerns related to vehicular traffic
More informationActive Transportation Facility Glossary
Active Transportation Facility Glossary This document defines different active transportation facilities and suggests appropriate corridor types. Click on a facility type to jump to its definition. Bike
More informationBroadway Street Pedestrian Safety Study Cass Street to 700 Feet North of Randall Avenue
Broadway Street Pedestrian Safety Study Cass Street to 700 Feet North of Randall Avenue Prepared for: City of De Pere, Wisconsin Prepared by: June, 2017 Broadway Street Pedestrian Safety Study Cass Street
More information133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas
133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS Overland Park, Kansas September 1, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. LITERATURE REVIEW... 1 3. CONCEPT
More informationCROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT
CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT Many factors contribute to the need for a Crossing Guard. General federal guidance, provided by the FHWA MUTCD, states that adult crossing guards
More informationHennepin County Pedestrian Plan Public Comment Report
Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan Public Comment Report On May 31, 2013, the draft Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan was released for a 45-day public comment period ending July 15, 2013. The county received
More informationResidential Traffic Calming Program Guide. Town of Ashland, Virginia
Residential Traffic Calming Program Guide Town of Ashland, Virginia August 1, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION... 1 B. GOALS... 1 C. CRITERIA... 1 D. IDENTIFYING NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CONCERNS...
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE CHAMPAIGN UNIT#4 SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL (SPALDING PARK SITE) IN THE CITY OF CHAMPAIGN Final Report Champaign Urbana Urbanized Area Transportation Study 6/24/2014
More informationMUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities
MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities 6G.01 Typical Applications Each temporary traffic control (TTC) zone is different. Many variables, such as location of work, highway type,
More informationWEST AVENUE AND NEW ROAD TRAFFIC STUDY PART III WEST AVENUE CLOSURE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
WEST AVENUE AND NEW ROAD TRAFFIC STUDY PART III WEST AVENUE CLOSURE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS CITY OF LINWOOD ATLANTIC COUNTY, NEW JERSEY March 30, 2006 PREPARED FOR: City of Linwood 400 Poplar Avenue Linwood,
More informationWashington St. Corridor Study
FIGURE 7.17 Bridge Alternatives - Cross Sections 86 Discarded Alternative: Short-Term Bridge Repair Short-term repairs and west bridge span replacement were considered during analysis. Short-term repairs
More informationTown of Windsor Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines
Town of Windsor Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines Prepared for: Town of Windsor Engineering Department 301 Walnut Street Windsor, Colorado 80550 For More Information, please contact: Engineering Department
More informationBroad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines
Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines Building from the strategies introduced in the 2013 Bicycle Transportation Plan and community input received thus far, City Transportation Staff have identified
More informationWhy Zone In on Speed Reduction?
Learn it. Do it. Live it! SPEED REDUCTION IN THE ZONE Why Zone In on Speed Reduction? Speeding is a serious issue that plays a major role in the risk of serious injury and pedestrian fatality in a crash.
More informationPedestrian Crosswalk Audit
1200, Scotia Place, Tower 1 10060 Jasper Avenue Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3R8 edmonton.ca/auditor Pedestrian Crosswalk Audit June 19, 2017 The conducted this project in accordance with the International Standards
More informationCHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES
CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES OBJECTIVES 1) Functions and Limitations 2) Standardization of Application 3) Materials 4) Colors 5) Widths and Patterns of Longitudinal Pavement Marking Lines 6) General Principles
More informationC/CAG. Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit. San Mateo-Foster City School District JUNE 2013
Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit JUNE 2013 San Mateo-Foster City School District C/CAG City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County SUNNYBRAE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WALKING
More informationCURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN
5 CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN This chapter provides design guidance for separated bike lanes adjacent to curbside activities including parking, loading and bus stops. Typical configurations are presented
More informationPedestrian Hybrid Beacon Guide Recommendations and Case Study. FHWA Safety Program.
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Guide ecommendations and Case Study FHWA Safety Program http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov A pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB) is a traffic control device similar to a European pedestrian
More informationAurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers
Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers I. Purpose These standards will be applied to create a safe, comfortable, pleasant and pedestrian-friendly multi-modal
More informationChapter 4 Traffic Analysis
Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis PURPOSE The traffic analysis component of the K-68 Corridor Management Plan incorporates information on the existing transportation network, such as traffic volumes and intersection
More informationOregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR
Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Adopted July 2005 by OAR 734-020-0005 2003 Edition Oregon Supplement to the MUTCD Page 2 INTRODUCTION Traffic control devices installed
More informationRAMP CROSSWALK TREATMENT FOR SAN DIEGO AIRPORT, TERMINAL ONE
RAMP CROSSWALK TREATMENT FOR SAN DIEGO AIRPORT, TERMINAL ONE AUTHORS Faisal Hamood, P.Eng, M.Eng. Scott O. Kuznicki, P.E. Leonard Perry, Ph.D. SUBMITTAL DATE Friday, May 12 th, 2017 SUBMITTED FOR THE Annual
More informationHAWK Signal. Pedestrian Safety. Illinois Traffic Engineering & Safety Conference Thursday, October 21, 2010
HAWK Signal Pedestrian Safety Illinois Traffic Engineering & Safety Conference Thursday, October 21, 2010 Background Information High-intensity Activated crosswalk Developed by the City of Tuscon, AZ First
More informationTransportation Planning Division
Transportation Planning Division Presentation Outline Study Tasks Recap of Previous Meetings Data Collected Focus Areas within Study Limits Design Principles Tool Box Recommended Concepts Schedule Moving
More informationTRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ON EDGEWATER BOULEVARD AT PORT ROYAL AVENUE (NORTH)
Attachment 2 DATE: August 6, 2012 TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council James C. Hardy, City Manager Ramon Towne, Director of Public Works Leah Edwards, Assistant Engineer TRAFFIC
More informationWhat Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety
What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration 360-619-7751 Adam.Larsen@DOT.GOV Adam Larsen TTP Safety Engineer
More informationAppendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD
Appendix T CCMP 3.3.4 TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD 3.3.4 Trail Traffic and Transportation Design Multi-use trails have certain design standards, which vary depending on the agency that
More informationTRANSPORTATION FACILITY PLANNING Waugh Chapel Road Maytime Drive to New Market Lane
July 24, 2018 TRANSPORTATION FACILITY PLANNING Waugh Chapel Road Maytime Drive to New Market Lane DPWandYOU.com Making a difference, together Meeting Agenda Purpose of the project Overview of work conducted
More informationBicycle Boulevards and Neighborhood Greenways
Bicycle Boulevards and Neighborhood Greenways Traffic Safety is Improving for Everyone 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 PORTLAND: TOTAL TRAFFIC FATALITIES 1986-2008 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
More information2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Tori Brinkly, PE Highway Safety Engineer WFL-FHWA April 20, 2010 Paragraphs are numbered. Standard Statements are bolded. Guidance statements are italicized.
More informationADA PRESENTATION (CURB RAMPS)
ADA PRESENTATION (CURB RAMPS) ACECNJ/NJDOT/FHWA DESIGN SUMMIT Warren Howard New Jersey Department of Transportation May 21, 2013 ADA Curb Ramps NJDOT wants curb ramps to be designed & constructed properly
More informationDesigning for Pedestrian Safety in Washington, DC
Designing for Pedestrian Safety in Washington, DC February 25, 2014 George Branyan Pedestrian Program Coordinator District Department of Transportation DC Journey to work mode split: 2012 Means of Transportation
More informationToolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer
8 Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their to Make Intersections Safer Introduction Studies included in the NCHRP 17-18 (3), Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan, as well
More informationMilitary Road Safety Improvements
Military Road Safety Improvements 26 th Road North to 31 st Street North SUMMARY OF DATA REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS Prepared for: Department of Environmental Services Traffic Engineering and
More informationCorporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998
R1500 : Traffic Safety at 25 Avenue and 128 Street Intersection Corporate NO: R1500 Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 REGULAR COUNCIL TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998 FROM: General Manager, Engineering
More information5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES
5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES These guidelines should be considered collectively when making runningway decisions. A runningway is the linear component of the transit system that forms the right-of-way reserved
More informationHighway Safety Improvement
Highway Safety Improvement Tracy Turpin, PE. Highway Safety Improvement Program Manager Virginia Department of Transportation Presented at Chesapeake and Virginia Chapters of ATSSA Meeting October 13 th,2016
More informationTRAFFIC STUDY. Birch Bluff Road / Pleasant Avenue 01/15/2018. City of Tonka Bay 4901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN WSB PROJECT NO.
TRAFFIC STUDY Birch Bluff Road / Pleasant Avenue 01/15/2018 City of Tonka Bay 4901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN 55331 WSB PROJECT NO. 10805-000 Birch Bluff Road/ Pleasant Avenue Traffic Study For: City of
More informationMUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control
MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control OMUTCD English units are preferred. OHIO MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1. GENERAL Chapter
More informationExecutive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan
Route Corridor Master Plan Project Overview The Route Corridor Master Plan is a coordinated multimodal transportation and land use plan for the entire stretch of Route through East Whiteland Township,
More informationAPPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016
APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016 Complete Streets Checklist MetroPlan Orlando s Complete Streets Checklist is an internal planning tool for staff to further implementation of
More informationOmaha s Complete Streets Policy
Omaha s Complete Streets Policy (Adopted August 2015) VISION To create great places and enhance our quality of life, the City of Omaha will provide safe, accessible streets for all users. Complete Streets
More informationPedestrian Crossing Guidelines 2016
Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines 2016 Engineering Services 1.0 Introduction and Background The City of Kingston s first Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines were approved by Council in 2008 in order to provide
More informationChapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL
Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL Jan 2006 SIGHT DISTANCE 28(i) Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE Table of Contents Section Page 28-1 STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE
More informationTonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.
Strathcona Neighbourhood Renewal Draft Concept Design Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas. What is Neighbourhood Renewal? Creating a design with you for your neighbourhood.
More informationThe DC Pedestrian Master Plan
The DC Pedestrian Master Plan September 28, 2010 George Branyan Pedestrian Program Coordinator District Department of Transportation Presentation Agenda Scope of the Plan Methodology Recommendations Implementation
More informationSection 3A.04 Colors. Section 3B.10 Approach Markings for Obstructions
Section 3A.04 Colors Markings shall be yellow, white, red, or blue, or purple. The colors for markings shall conform to the standard highway colors. Black in conjunction with one of the above colors shall
More information