PROCEDURE DOCUMENTATION
|
|
- Marian Woods
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PROCEDURE DOCUMENTATION AIRAC: Procedure: ILS Runway 33 Aerodrome: Grøtneset Synopsis: Feasibility study for an aerodrome at Grøtneset Date: User ID: Completed: C OBrien Controlled: camkt Page 1 of 39
2 1 Table of contents 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DATASET SOFTWARE VALIDATION PROCEDURE DESIGN COMMENTS FLIGHT VALIDATION INITIAL APPROACH SEGMENT INTERMEDIATE APPROACH SEGMENT ILS SOC CALCULATION CURVATURE OF THE EARTH EQUIVALENT OBSTACLE VISUAL SEGMENT SURFACE MISSED APPROACH SEGMENT CALCULATIONS MISSED APPROACH SEGMENT (CAT A) MISSED APPROACH SEGMENT (CAT B) MISSED APPROACH SEGMENT (CAT C) CHANGELOG CHARTING DATA CONTROLLING OBSTACLES CONTROL CHECK VERSION HISTORY...38 Page 2 of 39
3 2 Dataset Procedure design software: GéoTITAN v / 3.01 Spot heights extending 50 NM around the design aerodrome have been incorporated in the software templates. Spot heights: Spot heights are imported from the digital dataset N50 created by Statens Kartverk and is available through the Norwegian digital terrain project Norge Digitalt A 50 meter post spacing, square grid digital terrain model has been incorporated in the software templates. The data source is the Norwegian mapping authority s N digital chart database and includes height information from lakes, height contours and spot heights in N50. N50 was digitised partly through scanning and vectorisation of analogue charts in scale 1: and partly through photogrammetric stereo construction or through a combination of these methods. Digital terrain model: The average horizontal accuracy is 25 meters, with a confidence level of 90%. The average vertical accuracy is 5-6 meters with a maximum error of 30 meters, with a confidence level of 90%. Certain areas containing very steep terrain, slopes steeper than 1:1, may exceed the maximum value. These areas are located in Troms and Finnmark and are identified here. Vertical resolution is 1 meter based on mean sea level and terrain with no addition for vegetation. The DTM was produced in with an integrity level better than 10-3 Originally the DTM was produced in USGS DEM format but has been converted to CGX format to function within GéoTITAN. Aerodrome data: All aerodrome data is directly imported from the ORBIT Database automatically upon site Page 3 of 39
4 creation. All RWY characteristics and associated landing aids such as localizers, landing DME stations, and instrument landing systems are automatically imported and later verified through the software validation process. Only post successful verification is the imported data used for procedure design. NAVAID data: All navigation facilities not associated with the aerodrome is automatically imported from the ORBIT database and later verified through the software validation process. Only post successful verification is the imported data used for procedure design. The Norwegian aeronautical obstacle database is run by Statens Kartverk and has the responsibility for maintaining an accurate and up to date database of all man made obstacles in Norway which is not owned by the aerodrome. NRL data: An aeronautical obstacle is by law defined as any building or construction, temporary or permanent, with a height above ground or water of 15 meters or more. Within populated areas the equivalent height is 30 meters. NRL data is imported on a monthly basis into the ORBIT database and is automatically imported into the GéoTITAN working site. The full law concerning NRL can be found at lovdata: Forskrift om rapportering og registrering av luftfartshindre (BSL E 2-1) AIP 2.10 obstacles: All obstacles listed in section 2.10 of the Norwegian AIP are defined as obstacles owned by the local aerodrome. The responsibility for accurately updating and maintaining this list of obstacles resides with the airport manager. These obstacles are currently not part of the ORBIT database and have to be manually entered into the working site. Future plans involve flagging these obstacles as Avinor owned obstructions within the database for automatic importation. Page 4 of 39
5 3 Software validation Validation of threshold coordinates THR: 15 Latitude Longitude AIP GéoTITAN 70 33'37.793"N '02.352"E THR: 33 Latitude Longitude AIP GéoTITAN 70 32'37.000"N '07.461"E Page 5 of 39
6 4 Procedure design comments Runway 33 was analysed for ILS feasibility. Initial investigations looked at the possibility of a straight forward 3 GP approach. A challenging ridge of terrain located around the necessary FAP location meant this was infeasible, both undertaking an OAS and CRM analysis and considering shadowing around the descent fix. OAS analysis for the 3 provided OCHs of greater than 2400ft and CRM could not produce minima due to the risk not reducing to the required level. CRM input parameters for this analysis are below: Figure 1 - CRM input 3 Page 6 of 39
7 Efforts were made to see if problem obstacles could be removed from the analysis by means of 15% shadowing at the FAF, though the controlling obstacle was not able to be removed, and the issue remained: Figure 2 - Shadowing area for 3 at the FAF By increasing the GP to 3.5, it has been possible, with the use of CRM, to derive usable minima for this approach. OAS derived OCHs for the 3.5 approach still exceed 2300ft and so were considered unusable, however the CRM analysis was able to provide reasonable minima. OCH % MA: A 156ft, B 165ft, C 178ft CRM input parameters for this analysis are below: Page 7 of 39
8 Figure CRM Analysis inputs The FAP has been located at 3300ft altitude, allowing for an obstacle clear, level intermediate segment. A basic conventional initial segment has been constructed to demonstrate that the intermediate segment is connectable. This has been based off the HMF VOR Page 8 of 39
9 Figure 4 - CRM output Cat A/B 3.5 Page 9 of 39
10 Figure 5 - CRM Output Cat C 3.5 Page 10 of 39
11 A straight missed approach has been considered for the proof of concept and extended 20-25NM beyond the end of the OAS to prove obstacle clearance over the remaining terrain. This is obstacle clear. Rough analysis shows that an aircraft would need to climb to ft before making a turn in order the clear terrain either side of the straight missed approach should a turning missed approach be required. Figure 6 - Final Straight Missed Approach 2.5% Page 11 of 39
12 Figure 7 - Zero penetrations of extended Z surface 2.5% Page 12 of 39
13 Figure 8 - Obstacles clearance for extended Z surface While the missed approach is obstacle clear, we were subsequently requested to see if the missed approach can reasonably clear the Melkøya restricted area situated north of the aerodrome, in the extended missed approach area. The closest point of the Melkøya restricted area to the threshold has the X coordinate m in the runway 33 coordinate system and has vertical extent to 2500ft AMSL. Analysis of the 2.5% missed approach from the 3.5 ILS shows that at the above x-coordinate the missed approach surface originating at the SOC for each category intersects the restricted area at approximately 1300ft and therefore does not clear it. 2.50% CRM OCH (ft) OCH (m) HL baro (ft) HL baro (m) OCH-HL (ft) OCH-HL (m) Min ht SOC (m) SOC End Z SOC to End Alt P.end (m) A B C Page 13 of 39
14 SOC to Mel Mel (m) Mel (ft) Increasing the missed approach climb gradient to 5% decreases the CRM generated Cat A/B OCHs. While raw calculation shows that these OCHs and MA CG allow the aircraft to clear the restricted area by a minimum of 25ft, a GeoTitan proven solution using surface analysis requires a small adjustment to the OCHs. The raw OCHs are: OCH 3.5 5% MA raw: A 135ft, B 142ft, C 178ft 5.00% CRM OCH (ft) OCH (m) HL baro (ft) HL baro (m) OCH-HL (ft) OCH-HL (m) Min ht SOC (m) SOC End Z SOC to End Alt P.end (m) A B C SOC to Mel Mel (m) Mel (ft) And adjusted: A 141ft, B 152ft, C 178ft The adjusted values place the aircraft at the end of the OAS at a minimum of 312m altitude, and the analysis below proves that this clears a nominal obstacle placed to represent the restricted area. The clearance is approximately 3ft. Page 14 of 39
15 Adjusted 5.00% CRM OCH (ft) OCH (m) HL baro (ft) HL baro (m) OCH-HL (ft) OCH-HL (m) Min ht SOC (m) SOC End Z SOC to End Alt P.end (m) A B C SOC to Mel Mel (m) Mel (ft) Figure 9 - CRM Analysis inputs 3.5 5% Page 15 of 39
16 Figure % MA CRM Analysis CAT A/B Page 16 of 39
17 Figure % MA CRM Analysis CAT C Page 17 of 39
18 Figure 12 - Extended Missed approach 5% Page 18 of 39
19 Figure 13 - Clearance of Melkøya Restricted area at 5% with adjusted OCHs Page 19 of 39
20 5 Flight validation Does the procedure design require flight validation? Yes or No No (Conceptual) The following changes always require flight validation; all new precision approaches all new performance based navigation procedures significant change to the final or missed approach segment significant change to an instrument flight departure other changes deemed significant/essential by the procedure designer Communication and coordination with the flight validation team is handled by the control flight coordinator. All control flight requests shall be sent to with a copy to the PANS-OPS coordinator. A draft of the instrument approach chart plus any required additional information must accompany the control flight request. Post completion of the control flight, the report shall be added to the procedure documentation, or if the flight validation yields a negative result, the design process returns to the collect and validate all data phase. Page 20 of 39
21 6 Initial approach segment THR elevation: 23 feet Obstacle #: O3 Obstacle type: t t or a Altitude: 678 m Vegetation: 15 m Area: p p or s Secondary MOC: m MOC 300 m SUM 993 m m OCA 3260 feet OCH 3237 feet Obstacle type codes: t Terrain a Artificial Enter the THR elevation, Obstacle #, Obstacle type, altitude, vegetation and area. If the obstacle resides in the secondary area, fill in the value for Secondary MOC. Page 21 of 39
22 7 Intermediate approach segment THR elevation: 23 feet Obstacle #: O2 Obstacle type: a t or a Altitude: 691 m Vegetation: m Area: p p or s Secondary MOC: m MOC 150 m SUM 841 m m OCA 2760 feet OCH 2737 feet Obstacle type codes: t Terrain a Artificial Enter the THR elevation, Obstacle type, altitude, vegetation and area. If the obstacle resides in the secondary area, fill in the value for Secondary MOC. Page 22 of 39
23 8 ILS SOC calculation THR elevation: 23 feet GP angle: 3.5 RDH: 49.2 feet CAT: C A,B,C or D OCH value: 178 feet Calculate SOCx: -900 meter SOC: meter Enter THR Elevation, GP angle, RDH, aircraft category and the corresponding OCH (height!) value for ILS SOC calculation. Page 23 of 39
24 9 Curvature of the earth THR elevation: 23 feet RDH 49.2 feet GP 3.5 Distance from THR: NM Cote effect: feet Calculate Altitude feet including curvature Height feet including curvature Altitude feet Height feet Enter THR elevation, RDH, GP angle and distance from THR in NM for calculation of altitude including earth curvature Page 24 of 39
25 10 Equivalent obstacle THR elevation: feet Climb gradient: % Glide path: Obstacle height: Vegetation: X value: meter meter meter Calculate Enter THR elevation, missed approach climb gradient, glide path angle, obstacle height, vegetation and the distance from the obstacle to the threshold to calculate the equivalent obstacle. Page 25 of 39
26 11 Visual Segment Surface OCH 178 feet VPA 3.5 Calculate VSS VSS extension meter VSS Comments: There are no obstacles in the VSS area. Page 26 of 39
27 12 Missed approach segment calculations AD elevation 23 feet Turn parameters CAT A CAT B CAT C CAT D IAS kt Turning altitude feet MAPt location dme SOC Turn data SOC (d+x) calculations are based on AD elevation and max IAS allowed on final with a tailwind component of 10 KT as specified in ICAO DOC 8168 VOL II b) Page 27 of 39
28 13 Missed approach segment (CAT A) THR elevation: 23 feet Initial Intermediate Final(1) Final(2) Obstacle #: O4 Obstacle type: t t or a Altitude: 303 m Vegetation: 15 m Area: p p or s Secondary MOC: m SUM 368 m MOC 50 m Height gain distance m Height gain 2.5 % m Height gain 4 % m Height gain 5 % m OCA 2.5 % #NUM! feet OCH 2.5 % #NUM! feet OCA 4 % #NUM! feet OCH 4 % #NUM! feet OCA 5 % #NUM! feet OCH 5 % #NUM! feet Gradient 1: 2.5 % Gradient 2: 4 % Gradient 3: 5 % Enter the THR elevation, Obstacle #, Obstacle type, altitude, vegetation and area. If the obstacle resides in the secondary area, fill in the value for Secondary MOC. If the obstacle is located after the MAPt, enter the height gain distance found in GéoTITAN. Page 28 of 39
29 14 Missed approach segment (CAT B) THR elevation: 23 feet Initial Intermediate Final(1) Final(2) Obstacle #: O4 Obstacle type: t t or a Altitude: 303 m Vegetation: 15 m Area: p p or s Secondary MOC: m SUM 368 m MOC 50 m Height gain distance m Height gain 2.5 % m Height gain 4 % m Height gain 5 % m OCA 2.5 % #NUM! feet OCH 2.5 % #NUM! feet OCA 4 % #NUM! feet OCH 4 % #NUM! feet OCA 5 % #NUM! feet OCH 5 % #NUM! feet Gradient 1: 2.5 % Gradient 2: 4 % Gradient 3: 5 % Enter the THR elevation, Obstacle #, Obstacle type, altitude, vegetation and area. If the obstacle resides in the secondary area, fill in the value for Secondary MOC. If the obstacle is located after the MAPt, enter the height gain distance found in GéoTITAN. Page 29 of 39
30 15 Missed approach segment (CAT C) THR elevation: 23 feet Initial Intermediate Final(1) Final(2) Obstacle #: O4 Obstacle type: t t or a Altitude: 303 m Vegetation: 15 m Area: p p or s Secondary MOC: m SUM 368 m MOC 50 m Height gain distance m Height gain 2.5 % m Height gain 4 % m Height gain 5 % m OCA 2.5 % #NUM! feet OCH 2.5 % #NUM! feet OCA 4 % #NUM! feet OCH 4 % #NUM! feet OCA 5 % #NUM! feet OCH 5 % #NUM! feet Gradient 1: 2.5 % Gradient 2: 4 % Gradient 3: 5 % Enter the THR elevation, Obstacle #, Obstacle type, altitude, vegetation and area. If the obstacle resides in the secondary area, fill in the value for Secondary MOC. If the obstacle is located after the MAPt, enter the height gain distance found in GéoTITAN. Page 30 of 39
31 16 Changelog New information: Name: RMK Withdrawn information: NIL Airspace: Page 31 of 39
32 17 Charting data Procedure name ILS/DME 33 THR elevation: 23 feet Starting altitude: 3300 feet RDH 15 feet GP 3.5 Distance FAP to THR: NM Distance THR to DME NM DME distance to calculate FM 0 NM Calculate Note: Distance THR to DME should be positive if the DME is located behind the THR Distance: Altitude: Height: 0 NM feet including curvature -1 NM feet including curvature -2 NM feet including curvature -3 NM feet including curvature -4 NM feet including curvature -5 NM feet including curvature -6 NM feet including curvature -7 NM feet including curvature -8 NM feet including curvature -9 NM feet including curvature Step-down fixes: NM NM including curvature including curvature KT FT/MIN FT/MIN values shall alway be rounded to the nearest FT Page 32 of 39
33 Page 33 of 39
34 CAT OF ACFT A B C D OCA(H) STRAIGHT-IN 179(156) 188(165) 201(178) Circling N/A N/A N/A Note: MISSED APCH: Header: Chart header: AD Services: MSA: Plan view: Noteboxes: Airspace to display: Navaids to display: Procedure annotations (text and arrow): Reversal procedures: Holding: Page 34 of 39
35 Profile view: Page 35 of 39
36 18 Controlling obstacles ILS Final and missed approach Latitude Longitude Altitude Type N E 63.0m Artificial N E 303.0m m Spot height Obstacle types: DTM Cell Artificial Spot height Page 36 of 39
37 19 Control check Control check result: Software validation - Initial approach segment Intermediate approach segment Final approach segment Missed approach segment OCA(H) OK OK OK OK OK Instrument approach chart - Comments: CRM analysis for 5% gradient was done with end abscissa at x = which applies to 2.5% gradient. Changing to the correct x = -6900, however, does only decrease the CAT AB minima slightly. Page 37 of 39
38 20 Version history Date: Version: Comments: Initial document draft Added a section for missed approach segment calculations Spreadsheet calculation fix Updated the missed approach calculations spreadsheet Header numbering automatically updates upon insertion of additional headers Added a section for affected charts Combined the circling area and circling minima section Added vegetation dependencies on the circling minima and MSA spreadsheets. General formatting changes. Added a home button Corrected a MOC calculation error in the circling spreadsheet Modified documentation front page Corrected the ILS SOC calculation through adding HL correction values to glide path angels more than 3.5 degrees. Added a flight validation section Redesign of the missed approach obstacle form Updated the OCA(H) overview Modified rate of descent calculation explanations Added an ADHP export section Added a section for equivalent obstacle calculation Modified the rate of descent calculation spreadsheet to allow for custom speed values. Added a section for new 5LNC & RNAV points Corrected a minor calculation error in the equivalent obstacle spreadsheet Updated the equivalent obstacle spreadsheet Modified the ADHP table format. New rate of descent calculation spreadsheet, accommodating different indicated airspeed values Updated version for AIRAC 18 NOV Updated version for AIRAC 07 APR 2011 Page 38 of 39
39 Redesign of the rate of descent spreadsheet Added a charting data section for each segment Updated version for AIRAC 02 JUN 2011 Redesign of the rate of descent spreadsheet Obstacle definition changed from Antenna to Artificial in controlling obstacle section Modified textual description of SOC calculation in Missed approach segment calculations Removed irrelevant table in section 8 (ILS OAS) Updated version for Windows 7 compatability Changed documentation header Removed ILS OAS / Point definition section Integrated COTE calculations in rate of descent template Updated the ILS rate of descent spreadsheet Page 39 of 39
RNP APCH procedures for BEJAIA Soummam-Abane Ramdane RWY26
RNP APCH procedures for BEJAIA Soummam-Abane Ramdane RWY26 NAME POSITION DATE SIGNATURE Drafted by Fabrizio LOVINO Flight Procedure Designer/Airspace Design Department 18/11/2015 SIGNED Verified by Paolo
More informationFinal Examination Doc 8168 NOT FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES EXAM
EXAM 01 In the turn protection area construction with wind spiral/bounding circle method, for a FLY OVER Turning Point the latest TP is: (2 A. Before the waypoint if the value of the earliest TP calculation
More informationCOSCAP-South Asia ADVISORY CIRCULAR FOR AIR OPERATORS
Cooperative Development of Operational Safety and Continuing Airworthiness Under ICAO Technical Co-operation Programme COSCAP-South Asia ADVISORY CIRCULAR FOR AIR OPERATORS Subject: GUIDANCE FOR OPERATORS
More informationChapter 4 PROCEDURE CONSTRUCTION
Chapter 4 PROCEDURE CONSTRUCTION 4.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES Segments and legs 4.1.1 The arrival, initial and intermediate segments provide a smooth transition from the en-route environment to the FAS. Descent
More informationILS APPROACH WITH A320
1. Introduction ILS APPROACH WITH A320 This document presents an example of an Instrument landing system (ILS) approach performed with an Airbus 320 at LFBO airport runway 32 left. This document does not
More informationAPPENDIX J REQUIRED NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE IMPACTS EVALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX J REQUIRED NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE IMPACTS EVALUATION REPORT February 01, 2007 Naverus, Inc. Seattle, WA This document contains commercially sensitive information and must be treated as Naverus,
More informationAIRAC AIP SUPPLEMENT A 12/17 08 June 2017
Phone: 66 02 568 8831 Fax: 66 02 576 1903 AFT: VTBAYOYX E-mail: aisthai@caat.or.th ais@caat.or.th THE CIVIL AVIATIO AUTHORITY OF THAILAD Aeronautical Information Service Department 333/105 Lak Si Plaza,
More informationAdvance edition (unedited) Doc 9905-AN/471. Notice to Users
Doc 9905-AN/471 REQUIRED NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED (RNP AR) PROCEDURE DESIGN MANUAL Notice to Users This document is an unedited advance version of an ICAO publication as approved,
More information1. You may request a contact approach if there is 1 SM flight visibility and you can operate clear of clouds to the destination airport.
HOLDING AND INSTRUMENT APPROACHES CONTACT AND VISUAL APPROACHES 1. You may request a contact approach if there is 1 SM flight visibility and you can operate clear of clouds to the destination airport.
More information(SDF) PU402. (MAPt) WELCH PU406
A I P ISTRUMET APPROACH CHART ote : Approach under U.S TERPS. AERODROME ELEV 42 ft HEIGHTS RELATED TO THR RWY 18 ELEV 42 ft POHAG APP 124.25 12.2 ULSA TWR 118.75 RKPU AD CHART 2 12 27 OCT 216 ULSA/Ulsan(RKPU)
More information(SDF) PU402. (MAPt) WELCH PU406
A I P ISTRUMET APPROACH CHART ote : Approach under U.S TERPS. AERODROME ELEV 42 ft HEIGHTS RELATED TO THR RWY 18 ELEV 42 ft POHAG APP 124.25 12.2 ULSA TWR 118.75 RKPU AD CHART 2 12 27 OCT 216 ULSA/Ulsan(RKPU)
More informationMandatory Briefing Bardufoss (ENDU)
Mandatory Briefing Bardufoss (ENDU) Introduction Norwegian CAA has reconsidered and reclassified Bardufoss aerodrome from Cat C to Cat B with the following requirements to be completed: An aerodrome briefing
More informationFLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL
International Civil Aviation Organization 24/04/2015 WORKING PAPER FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL WORKING GROUP SECOND MEETING (FLTOPSP/WG/2) Rome, Italy, 4 to 8 May 2015 Agenda Item 4 : Active work programme
More informationREPUBLIC OF CROATIA. Croatia Control Ltd. Aeronautical Information Service Rudolfa Fizira Velika Gorica, PO Box 103 Croatia
REPUBLIC OF CROATIA NonAIRAC Phone: +385 1 6259 373 +385 1 6259 589 +385 1 6259 372 Fax: +385 1 6259 374 AFS: LDZAYOYX Email: aip@crocontrol.hr URL: http://www.crocontrol.hr Croatia Control Ltd. Aeronautical
More informationAIC FRANCE A 31/12. Publication date: DEC 27. Page 1/7. SUBJECT : Deployment of CDO (continuous descent operations) on the French territory
TECHNICAL SERVICE : +33 (0)5 57 92 57 57 Fax : +33 (0)5 57 92 57 77 : sia-direction@aviation-civile.gouv.fr Site SIA : http://www.sia.aviation-civile.gouv.fr AIC FRANCE A 31/12 Publication date: DEC 27
More informationRef.: SP 65/4-17/78 23 June 2017
International Civil Aviation Organization Organisation de l aviation civile internationale Organización de Aviación Civil Internacional Международная организация гражданской авиации Tel.: +1 514-954-8219
More informationREPUBLIC OF CROATIA. LDZA - New PBN instrument flight procedures at Zagreb Airport
REPUBLIC OF CROATIA NonAIRAC Phone: +385 1 6259 373 +385 1 6259 589 +385 1 6259 372 Fax: +385 1 6259 374 AFS: LDZAYOYX Email: aip@crocontrol.hr URL: http://www.crocontrol.hr Croatia Control Ltd. Aeronautical
More informationENR 3. ATS ROUTES. For detailed descriptions of specific lower altitude ATS routes, refer to current editions of the following publications:
AIP CANADA (ICAO) PART 2 ENROUTE (ENR) ENR 3. ATS ROUTES For route descriptions, distances are in nautical miles and tracks are magnetic, except in the Northern Domestic Airspace (NDA) where tracks are
More informationContinuous Descent Final Approach
Continuous Descent Final Approach Monday, March 12 0900-1000 PRESENTED BY: Don Trekell Kimberly-Clark Corp International Operators Conference San Diego, CA March 21 24, 2016 Continuous Descent Final Approach
More informationPERFORM A NDB APPROACH [A320]
1. Introduction PERFORM A NDB APPROACH [A320] This documentation will illustrate how to perform a NDB approach with an Airbus A320. In addition of NDB approaches, procedures are generally based on conventional
More informationTERMINAL PROCEDURES PUBLICATION SYMBOLS
TERMINAL PROCEDURES PUBLICATION SYMBOLS 58 AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION STANDARD TERMINAL ARRIVAL (STAR) CHARTS................. 59 DEPARTURE PROCEDURE (DP) CHARTS....................... 59 APPROACH LIGHTING
More informationRNAV/RNP Operations & VNAV Approaches
RNAV/RNP Operations & VNAV Approaches Captain Bill Royce Senior Technical Pilot Flight Operations Training, Technical & Standards Boeing Commercial Airplanes Discussion Objectives Discuss current RNAV
More informationAerodrome Design Manual
Doc 9157 AN/901 Aerodrome Design Manual Part 4 Visual Aids Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority Fourth Edition 2004 International Civil Aviation Organization 8-12 Aerodrome
More informationTutorial - How to interpret an approach plate
1. Introducion Tutorial - How to interpret an approach plate Every real life pilot, flying either a small prop or a heavy jetliner, have to be constantly using Approach Plates. Approach Plates are widely
More informationTECHNIQUES FOR OFF AIRPORT OPERATIONS
Off Airport Ops Guide TECHNIQUES FOR OFF AIRPORT OPERATIONS Note: This document suggests techniques and procedures to improve the safety of off-airport operations. It assumes that pilots have received
More informationFLYING OPERATIONS. Hard Landing
Hard Landing The circling approach takes place close to the ground, at low speed, and in poor weather. Without doubt it is one of aviation s most difficult procedures. How can you reduce the risks? 34
More informationProcedures & Techniques
http://code700.com Procedures & Techniques Continuous Descent Final Approach (CDFA) Figure: CDFA versus conventional approach, from Eddie's notes. Eddie Sez: Years ago, following a "dive and drive" mishap,
More informationLNAV & VNAV Integration Review Basics
HDG / LNAV: LNAV & VNAV Integration Review Basics By Lionel Largmann (Edited and reviewed my anonymous sources) 1. How can we control the lateral guidance of the B747 in-flight? Two primary Roll modes
More informationFrom Nonprecision to Precision-Like Approaches
Coverstory From Nonprecision to Precision-Like Approaches Digital Vision /MediaBakery 12 flight safety foundation AeroSafetyWorld October 2007 coverstory Second in a series focusing on the development
More informationLufthansa Flight Training (LFT) GmbH (Preliminary Text) Instrument Flight Procedures
Lufthansa Flight Training (LFT) GmbH (Preliminary Text) Instrument Flight Procedures Author: Wolf Scheuermann Edition: Bremen 2015, v1.2, BW remarks included 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Principles...............................
More informationT A K E O F F A N D C L I M B
IR Syllabus Supplement FLIGHT PROCEDURES PA34 - with Turbo Intercooler System Page 1 T A K E O F F A N D C L I M B POSITION T/O AND T/O ROLL AT Vrotate POSITIVE ROC 500 FT AGL 1000 FT AGL CLIMB OUT PITCH
More informationOBSTACLE DEPARTURE PROCEDURES Part 3
OBSTACLE DEPARTURE PROCEDURES Part 3 In the last issue, I promised to discuss Visual Climb Over Airport (VCOA) departure procedures and to show examples of more complex ODPs than was discussed in that
More informationTRN DHN RUS DEHNAMAK 3A (DHN 3A) NAGMA 2A, NAGMA 2B, RABAM 2A RABAM 2B, RABAM 1C, RADAL 1A VARAMIN 2A (VR 2A), VARAMIN 2B (VR 2B) ARRIVALS .STAR.
ATIS 128. TRANS LEVEL: BY ATC TRANS ALT: ' 17' 9^ 27^ 75' 1' 36^ MSA VOR 2 OCT.STAR. 1-2.Eff.2.Nov. EHNAMAK 3A (HN 3A) NAGMA 2A, NAGMA 2B, RABAM 2A RABAM 2B, RABAM 1C, RAAL 1A VARAMIN 2A (VR 2A), VARAMIN
More informationPPL Exam 3 Working File. Where significant calculation/thinking is required.
Copyright Avfacts 2014 - All rights reserved. PPL practice exam 3/page 1. PPL Exam 3 Working File. Where significant calculation/thinking is required. Q5. Refer to the P Chart figure 3 in the CASA Training
More informationNoise Abatement Takeoff 1 Close In Profile
PF Duties Captain: Advance thrust to 70% N1 (Allow Engines to stabilize) Noise Abatement Takeoff 1 Close In Profile Flaps Increase Speed to Vref 30 +80kts Climb Checklist Push N1 Button to set Takeoff
More informationNew Stuyahok-Ekwok Intertie Route Wind Power Site Options
New Stuyahok-Ekwok Intertie Route Wind Power Site Options November 30, 2015 Douglas Vaught, P.E. V3 Energy, LLC Anchorage, Alaska www.v3energy.com New Stuyahok-Ekwok Intertie Wind Power Site Options Page
More informationTROMSO, NORWAY JEPPESEN ' Y ARP. Elev 25' Meters 18-55
ENC Apt Elev ' - 9.^/. from RO.8, NORWAY N69.9 E8 55. *AIS * ower 6. 8. 8-5 8-5 8-5 8-55 8-56 8-57 8-58 8' 9 89^ Elev ' ^E ' Wind shear/eddies may occur on short final to rwy /9 with wind ^-7^ above K.
More informationOPERATIONS MANUAL PART A INSTRUCTIONS AND TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF CONTROLLED FLIGHT INTO TERRAIN AND POLICIES FOR THE USE OF GPWS
PAGE: 1 Table of Contents A.GENERAL /CHAPTER 31. -...3 31. POLICIES FOR THE USE OF GPWS... 3 31.1 GPWS and Upset Training Requirements... 3 31.2 GPWS General... 3 31.3 Alerts and Warnings... 3 31.4 Levels
More informationMountain Fury Mountain Search Flying Course Syllabus Fourth Sortie : High Altitude Search
Mountain Fury Mountain Search Flying Course Syllabus Fourth Sortie : High Altitude Search Objectives 1. Develop trainee's proficiency in planning and execution of mountain search sorties. 2. Develop trainee's
More informationCRITERIA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INSTRUMENT PROCEDURES TP 308 / GPH 209 CHANGE 7 VOLUME 3 PRECISION APPROACH (PA) PROCEDURE CONSTRUCTION
TP 308/GPH 209 CRITERIA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INSTRUMENT PROCEDURES TP 308 / GPH 209 CHANGE 7 VOLUME 3 PRECISION APPROACH (PA) PROCEDURE CONSTRUCTION TRANSPORT CANADA NATIONAL DEFENSE 5 January 2017 INTENTIONALLY
More informationBonanza/Debonair Pilots
Bonanza/Debonair Pilots Completing this worksheet is a great way to reinforce the proper speeds for operating your Bonanza or Debonair under varying operating conditions, and to understand the changes
More informationLearning. Goals LAND. basics as. Abeam C B. Abeam G C. Page 1 of 13. Document : V1.1
Learning Goals CIRCLE TO LAND APPROACH : CIRCLE TO LAND Circle to land is a difficult approach maneuver for which you need a good understanding of how to read charts and flying skills. In essence its a
More informationVISUAL AIDS FOR DENOTING OBSTACLES
CHAPTER 6. VISUAL AIDS FOR DENOTING OBSTACLES 6.1 Objects to be marked and/or lighted Note. The marking and/or lighting of obstacles is intended to reduce hazards to aircraft by indicating the presence
More informationSafety assessments for Aerodromes (Chapter 3 of the PANS-Aerodromes, 1 st ed)
Safety assessments for Aerodromes (Chapter 3 of the PANS-Aerodromes, 1 st ed) ICAO MID Seminar on Aerodrome Operational Procedures (PANS-Aerodromes) Cairo, November 2017 Avner Shilo, Technical officer
More informationPRECISION APPROACH PNF
NON PF PRECISION (MANAGED) Initial APP Interm. APP Final APP IAF FAF D MDA/H FLYING REF : TRACK/FPA (FPD) - Version 02a 1.a. INITIAL SEAT BELTS.......ON/AUTO ENG MODE sel....... AS RQRD NAV ACCURACY......
More informationVISUAL AIDS FOR DENOTING OBSTACLES
CHAPTER 6. VISUAL AIDS FOR DENOTING OBSTACLES 6.1 Objects to be marked and/or lighted Note.C The marking and/or lighting of obstacles is intended to reduce hazards to aircraft by indicating the presence
More informationNew Airfield Risk Assessment / Categorisation
New Airfield Risk Assessment / Categorisation Airfield Risk Assessment Prior to commencing operations to a new airfield, airfield risk assessment and categorisation will take place. For continued operations
More informationMull of Kintyre -Analysis of Available Data
Mull of Kintyre -Analysis of Available Data Summary 8-7D20-DS S-03 06, Enclosure 4 Dated: June 18,2002 This report has evaluated the available data associated with the Mull of Kintyre accident investigation,
More informationTakeoff Performance. A 1 C change in temperature from ISA will increase or decrease the takeoff ground roll by 10%.
The precise pilot does not fly by rules of thumb, axioms, or formulas. But there are times when knowledge of an approximate way to calculate things or knowledge of a simple rule can pay big dividends.
More informationCessna 152 Standardization Manual
Cessna 152 Standardization Manual This manual is to be utilized in conjunction with the manufacturers approved POH/ AFM and the Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3A). This manual should be used as a
More informationI2102 WORKSHEET. Planned Route: Takeoff: KNSE, RWY 32 Altitude: 12,000 Route: RADAR DEPARTURE. Syllabus Notes None. Special Syllabus Requirements None
Planned Route: Takeoff: KNSE, RWY 32 Altitude: 12,000 Route: RADAR DEPARTURE Syllabus Notes None Special Syllabus Requirements None I2102 WORKSHEET Discuss a. IMC Emergencies NATOPS statement on sound
More informationFLIGHT PERFORMANCE AND PLANNING (2) PERFORMANCE
1 Any acceleration in climb, with a constant power setting, A improves the climb gradient if the airspeed is below VX. B decreases the rate of climb and the angle of climb. C decreases rate of climb and
More informationSTUDY OF LANDING TECHNIQUE DURING VISUAL APPROACH
24 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES STUDY OF LANDING TECHNIQUE DURING VISUAL APPROACH Hiroshi TAKAHARA*, Takashi KONDO*, Shinji SUZUKI** *All Nippon Airways Co., LTD., **University
More informationPříloha 1. Standardní provozní postupy pro výcvik přiblížení RNP v letecké škole F AIR
Příloha 1 Standardní provozní postupy pro výcvik přiblížení RNP v letecké škole F AIR 1 PROCEDURES FOR RNP APPROACH LNAV 1.1 General This chapter describes approach using RNAV(GNSS) RWY XY chart. This
More informationCompiled by Matt Zagoren
The information provided in this document is to be used during simulated flight only and is not intended to be used in real life. Attention VA's - you may post this file on your site for download. Please
More informationS-TEC. Pilot s Operating Handbook
S-TEC Pilot s Operating Handbook List of Effective Pages * Asterisk indicates pages changed, added, or deleted by current revision. Retain this record in front of handbook. Upon receipt of a Record of
More informationRevision Number Revision Date Insertion Date/Initials 1 st Ed. Oct 26, 00 2nd Ed. Jan 15, 08
List of Effective Pages * Asterisk indicates pages changed, added, or deleted by current revision. Retain this record in front of handbook. Upon receipt of a Record of Revisions revision, insert changes
More informationIVAO International Virtual Aviation Organization Training department
1 Introduction IVAO International Virtual Aviation Organization Training department TRAFFIC PATTERN DESCRIPTION An aerodrome traffic pattern is used by VFR traffic for training purpose or to prepare the
More informationPerformance/Pilot Math
Performance/Pilot Math Charath Ranganathan, AGI http://pfactor.io/ facebook.com/pfactor.io (chuh-ruh-th) License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
More informationCessna 172S Skyhawk Standardization Manual
Cessna 172S Skyhawk Standardization Manual This manual is to be utilized in conjunction with the manufacturers approved POH/ AFM and the Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3A). This manual should be
More information2 ETSO-C115c#9 Airborne Area Navigation Equipment Flight Management Systems (FMS) Using Multi-Sensor Inputs
Deviation Request ETSO-C115c#8 for an ETSO approval for CS-ETSO applicable to Airborne Area Navigation Equipment Flight Management Systems (FMS) Using Multi-Sensor Inputs (ETSO-C115c) Consultation Paper
More informationFlight Profiles are designed as a guideline. Power settings are recommended and subject to change based
MANEUVERS AND PROCEDURES Flight Profiles are designed as a guideline. Power settings are recommended and subject to change based upon actual conditions (i.e. aircraft weight, pressure altitude, icing conditions,
More informationCESSNA 172-SP PRIVATE & COMMERCIAL COURSE
CESSNA 172-SP PRIVATE & COMMERCIAL COURSE University of Dubuque INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Revision 1 Standard Operating Procedures 1 CALLOUTS CONDITION Parking Brake Released After Takeoff Power has been
More informationAIR NAVIGATION ORDER
AIR NAVIGATION ORDER VERSION : 3.0 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION : 15-11-2014 OFFICE OF PRIME INTEREST : Aerodrome Standards Branch Directorate of Airspace & Aerodrome Regulations (DAAR) 15/11/2014 ANO-005-DRAS-3.0
More information2100 Autopilot Programmer/Computer PN Software Mod Code L or Later WAAS Capable Pilot s Operating Handbook
2100 Autopilot Programmer/Computer PN 01304 Software Mod Code L or Later WAAS Capable Pilot s Operating Handbook NAV VS 500 ALT 12 5 00 List of Effective Pages * Asterisk indicates pages changed, added,
More informationI2103 WORKSHEET. Planned Route: Takeoff: KNSE, RWY 32 Altitude: 12,000 Route: RADAR DEPARTURE. Syllabus Notes None
Planned Route: Takeoff: KNSE, RWY 32 Altitude: 12,000 Route: RADAR DEPARTURE Syllabus Notes None I2103 WORKSHEET Special Syllabus Requirements Proceed direct to homefield using any available NAVAID. Discuss
More informationLesson 5 Buffet Boundaries VMO/MMO Limits
Copyright Avfacts 2000. Buffet page 1. Lesson 5 Buffet Boundaries VMO/MMO Limits General High speed jet aircraft may suffer both high and low speed stall buffet. The high speed buffet is caused by flow
More information3rd Eurocontrol CDO Workshop
Airbus Aircraft Energy management in descent phase using FMS Airbus fleet performance Presented by Alexandre Buisson Airbus Operations, Aircraft Performance Specialist Brussels, March 18 th 2013 Table
More informationClimbing and Descending
Basic Concepts Climbing and Descending This lesson builds on the coordination skills learnt in the previous lesson, Straight and Level. Check with the student what the important elements of the last lesson
More informationRNAV (GPS) RWY 10 RNAV (GPS) RWY 10 NE-1,25 NOV 2004 NE-1,25 NOV 2004 (BID) 104^ 284^ 104^ 104^ ^ 284^
P X 00 RV (GPS) RWY 0 A Inoperative table does not apply to Cat C. GPS or RNP-0.3 required. DME/DME RNP-0.3. MALSF MISSED APPROACH: Climbing right turn to direct WP and hold. 34.775 25.75 39.2 20. 23.0
More informationCivil Air Patrol Auxiliary of the United States Air Force
Mountain Flying Qualification Course Civil Air Patrol Auxiliary of the United States Air Force Mountain Flying Flying in Mountain Winds Determine direction and velocity of steady winds by observing dust,
More informationB-757 FLEET OPERATIONS
B-757 FLEET OPERATIONS TRAINING AND STANDARDS Non Precision Approaches 02/28/12 Approach Planning Close The 757 is not capable of intercepting and tracking of VOR or NDB courses or bearings. Therefore
More informationTutorial for the. Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3
Tutorial for the Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3 May, 2011 1. Introduction The Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3 has been designed to facilitate a determination
More informationSontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004
Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004 INTRODUCTION Sontek/YSI has introduced new firmware and software for their RiverSurveyor product line. Firmware changes
More informationFlying The Boeing
Flying The Boeing 757-200 This section includes Pilot s Operating Handbook and Checklists. The POH section is first, followed by the Checklists. FOM: This section includes performance data on the Boeing
More informationNORMAL TAKEOFF AND CLIMB
NORMAL TAKEOFF AND CLIMB CROSSWIND TAKEOFF AND CLIMB The normal takeoff is one in which the airplane is headed directly into the wind or the wind is very light, and the takeoff surface is firm with no
More informationNORMAL TAKEOFF PILOT TRAINING MANUAL KING AIR 200 SERIES OF AIRCRAFT
NORMAL TAKEOFF Climb-Out 1. Accelerate to 160 KIAS 2. Landing/Taxi lights: Out 3. Climb Checklist complete 1. 160 KIAS up to 10,000 ft 2. Decrease 2 KIAS per 1,000 ft above 10,000 ft to 130 KIAS at 25,000
More informationFigure 1 Example feature overview.
1. Introduction This case focuses on the northeastern region of Onslow Bay, NC, and includes an initial shoreline, regional contour, wave gauges, inlets, dredging, and beach fills. Most of the features
More information1. Sign in personnel, aircraft, and vehicles. Use mission flow chart
A. PRE-FLIGHT BRIEFING 1. Sign in personnel, aircraft, and vehicles. Use mission flow chart 2. Discuss how the scanner watches for other aircraft during departure, cruise, and approach. 3. Have the trainee
More informationILS Approach Nomenclature
ILS Approaches 1 ILS Approach Nomenclature ILS Converging ILS ILS or LOC ILS LOC ONLY N/A ILS Y & Z designators indicate important differences (IAP s, FAP s, MAP s, FAC s, Minimums, etc.) between multiple
More informationFliteDeck Pro. User Guide. Software Version 9.0
FliteDeck Pro User Guide Software Version 9.0 FliteDeck Pro User Guide Software Version 9.0 Jeppesen 55 Inverness Drive East Englewood, Colorado 80112-5498 2017 Jeppesen, All Rights Reserved Any charts
More informationOPERATIONAL NAVIGATION T-45TS, TAILHOOK, AND IUT
NAVAL AIR TRAINING COMMAND NAS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CNATRA P-1271 (Rev. 01-09) LECTURE GUIDE OPERATIONAL NAVIGATION T-45TS, TAILHOOK, AND IUT 2009 LECTURE GUIDE FOR OPERATIONAL NAVIGATION P-1271 iii
More informationFlying The Embraer Brasilia (EMB-120)
Flying The Embraer Brasilia (EMB-120) This section includes Pilot s Operating Handbook and Checklists. The POH section is first, followed by the Checklists. FOM: This section includes performance data
More informationAccident Prevention Program
Accident Prevention Program Wind Shear "Tonto 55, final controller, how do you read...?" "55, loud and clear." This has been a good flight thought the Instructor Pilot (IP) as the pilot in front smoothly
More informationCAP 232 Surveys. Airside Operational Instruction 17
Airside Operational Instruction 17 1. Introduction 1.1 The purpose of the aerodrome survey is to enable the Aerodrome Certificate holder to meet their safety responsibilities and to provide the data required
More informationPPL Exam 1 Working File. Where significant calculation/thinking is required.
Copyright Avfacts 2014 - All rights reserved. PPL practice exam 1/page 1. PPL Exam 1 Working File. Where significant calculation/thinking is required. Q8. If both the outside static vents and the pitot
More informationCirrus SR20/22 Aircraft with Cirrus Perspective Avionics. Pilot s Operating Handbook
Cirrus SR20/22 Aircraft with Cirrus Perspective Avionics Pilot s Operating Handbook List of Effective Pages * Asterisk indicates pages changed, added, or deleted by current revision. Page No. Issue Retain
More information6.7 Aircraft Protection
Schedules to Decision 377 6.7 Aircraft Protection 6.7.1 Introduction This introduction is to assist the lay reader to understand how this sub-chapter works and what it applies to. It is not an aid to interpretation
More informationVI.A-E. Basic Attitude Instrument Flight
References: FAA-H-8083-3; FAA-8083-3-15 Objectives Key Elements Elements Schedule Equipment IP s Actions SP s Actions Completion Standards The student should develop knowledge of the elements related to
More informationAIP MACAO GUANG ZHOU FIR HONG KONG FIR AD2-VMMC-60 SID MACAO RWY MAY 2016 (BIGRO 4 D, MIPAG 5 D, NLG 5 D, SHL 5 D) CAT A, B, C, D
AIP MACAO GUANG ZHOU FIR HONG KONG FIR AD2-VMMC-60 SID MACAO RWY 34 26 MAY 2016 (BIGRO 4 D, MIPAG 5 D, NLG 5 D, SHL 5 D) CAT A, B, C, D BIGRO 4 D (minimum climb gradient of 4.8% required until leaving
More information13. TIDES Tidal waters
Water levels vary in tidal and non-tidal waters: sailors should be aware that the depths shown on the charts do not always represent the actual amount of water under the boat. 13.1 Tidal waters In tidal
More informationCross-Country Madness: Run for Your Life
Cross-Country Madness: Run for Your Life BY: THE MAPSTERBATORS- JHON AFRIDI, EMMA LUNDBERG, LUCAS REYES 12TH OF DECEMBER, 2014 Abstract Athletic facilities at Redwood Fields in Eureka, CA are assessed
More informationAerodrome Safeguarding Airside Operational Instruction 16. AOI Owner - Operations Developments & Safety Manager
AOI Owner - Operations Developments & Safety Manager 1. Assessment and Treatment of Obstacles 1.1 Obstacles are surveyed in accordance with the requirements of CAP 232 Aerodrome Survey Requirements and
More information7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017
7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017 Sound power level measurements 3.0 ir. L.M. Eilders, Peutz bv: l.eilders@peutz.nl ing. E.H.A. de Beer, Peutz bv: e.debeer@peutz.nl
More informationMeter Data Distribution Market Trials
Meter Data Distribution Market Trials IESO Response to Participant Feedback Issue Date: June 5, 2015 Public Copyright 2015 Independent Electricity System Operator. All rights reserved. Public Page 2 of
More informationSUPPLEMENT SEPTEMBER 2010 HIGH ALTITUDE TAKEOFF AND LANDING (ABOVE 14,000 FEET PRESSURE ALTITUDE) MODEL AND ON 68FM-S28-00 S28-1
MODEL 680 680-0001 AND ON HIGH ALTITUDE TAKEOFF AND LANDING (ABOVE 14,000 FEET PRESSURE ALTITUDE) COPYRIGHT 2010 CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY WICHITA, KANSAS, USA 15 SEPTEMBER 2010 S28-1 SECTION V - SUPPLEMENTS
More informationLesson: Airspeed Control
11/20/2018 Airspeed Control Page 1 Lesson: Airspeed Control Objectives: o Knowledge o An understanding of the aerodynamics related to airspeed control o Skill o The ability to establish and maintain a
More informationFliteDeck Pro. User Guide. Release Version 9.0 Update 1 for Windows
FliteDeck Pro User Guide Release Version 9.0 Update 1 for Windows Release Version 9.0 Update 1 for Windows Jeppesen 55 Inverness Drive East Englewood, Colorado 80112-5498 Any diagrams or maps that appear
More informationFAA-S-ACS-6 June 2016 Private Pilot Airplane Airman Certification Standards. Task ACS Settings
FAA-S-ACS-6 June 2016 Private Pilot Airplane Airman Certification Standards Cessna 172: mixture rich, carb heat out if below the green arc. Clearing Turns all manuevers! Task ACS Settings Traffic Pattern
More informationPROCEDURES AND PROFILES TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROCEDURES AND PROFILES 10-1 PROCEDURES AND PROFILES TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECT PAGE AUTOFLIGHT NORMS...3 Overview...3 Aircraft Control...3 Control Norms...3 Autothrottle...3 MCP Command Speed Bug...3 FMC
More information