Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program
|
|
- Mary Osborne
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Subject: Noncompliance Section: 9-2 Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program This policy and procedure supersedes those previously drafted. Approved by: Vice President of Research and Graduate Studies, Revision 1 approved by VP Research & Graduate Studies on Revision 2 approved by VP Research & Graduate Studies on Revision 3 approved by VP Research & Graduate Studies on Revision 4 approved by VP Research & Graduate Studies on Related Sections: 2-2-A, 4-8, 5-4, 5-6, 9-3, 9-4 The investigator and the research study team are required to comply with all ethical standards, institutional policies, governmental regulations, and conditions placed on the conduct of the human subject research. Noncompliance with human subject protection requirements (e.g., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regulations, Institutional Review Board (IRB) requirements) is a violation of Michigan State University's (MSU) Federal Wide Assurance (FWA ). Noncompliance presents a serious challenge to the IRB. Regardless of investigator intent, unapproved research activities involving human subjects places those subjects at an unacceptable risk. Any incident of noncompliance with human subject protection requirements must be reported to the IRB immediately. Allegations of noncompliance may be reported to the IRB office, IRB chair, or IRB members by anyone, including investigators, research staff, research subjects, students, faculty, staff, administrators, external parties, etc. See the Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Manual 9-4 Subject Complaints. The IRB chair and others when appropriate (e.g., HRPP director, IRB, human research liaisons) investigate allegations and instances of noncompliance, determine immediate actions to protect subjects, report serious or continuing noncompliance to appropriate authorities (including government agencies), require modifications to, suspension or termination of research activities, and take other actions as needed to protect human subjects or comply with institutional policies and procedures. Definitions / Examples Noncompliance Defined as the failure to follow the federal regulations governing human subject protection requirements (e.g., 45 CFR 46, 21 CFR 50, 21 CFR 56) or the requirements and determinations of the IRB. Examples of serious noncompliance may include but are not limited to: Harm to research subjects Exposure of research subjects to a significant risk of substantive harm 1
2 Compromised privacy and confidentiality of the subjects Damage caused to the scientific integrity of the data collected Willful or knowing misconduct on the part of the investigator An adverse impact on ethical principles Conducting or continuing non-exempt human subject research without IRB approval Lack of legally effective informed consent from research subjects Inappropriate oversight of the research to insure the safety of human subjects and/or the integrity of the research data Continuing Noncompliance Defined as repeated noncompliance by an individual investigator either on a single protocol or multiple protocols, or a pattern of ongoing activities that indicate a lack of understanding of human subjects protection requirements that may affect research subjects or the validity of the research and suggest the potential for future noncompliance without intervention. Examples of noncompliant activities may include but are not limited to: Conducting research without IRB approval (i.e., before approval obtained, after research expires, without IRB approval) Non-use or mis-use of consent forms (i.e., consent not obtained, wrong consent form used) Failure to follow approved protocol Changing protocol without IRB approval Failure to report unanticipated problems or serious adverse events Failure to maintain adequate records Failure to renew research studies prior to expiration date Inadequate training of investigators or research staff Other failure to follow University polices and federal regulations Reporting Incidents or Allegations to the IRB Noncompliance or potential noncompliance may be self-reported by researchers, staff, employees, or research subjects, may be discovered by the IRB (e.g., through monitoring visits or other routine review or quality control activities), and may be reported to the IRB by any individual. See HRPP Manual 5-6 Contact Information for multiple mechanisms to report incidents to the IRB. The university will take reasonable steps to protect persons who file reports in good faith from retaliatory actions based on such filing. Procedures for Immediate Action The IRB chair determines if immediate actions are necessary and may consult with others (e.g., members of the IRB, HRPP director) as needed. Immediate issues to consider will be whether to: Protect subjects by suspending the protocols according to HRPP Manual 9-3 Termination or Suspension of Research. 2
3 Notify officials who will take appropriate action (e.g., notify Contract and Grant Administration). At any other time during the inquiry or investigation process the IRB chair or IRB may determine that it is necessary to act to protect subjects by terminating or suspending the protocols according to HRPP Manual 9-3 Termination or Suspension of Research. Investigation of Allegations of Noncompliance to Determine if Allegation has Basis in Fact The IRB chair will perform an initial investigation of the alleged noncompliance in order to determine whether the allegation is substantiated or has a basis in fact. Materials reviewed by the IRB chair include all relevant materials (e.g., IRB file, communications, relevant research materials [e.g., survey, consent], audit reports). The IRB chair may gather more information through discussions or correspondence with the principal investigator. The IRB chair may request review by others (e.g., human research liaisons, IRB member(s), the IRB). If the IRB chair determines that such review is necessary, the individual will receive all relevant materials (e.g., IRB file, communications, relevant research materials [e.g., survey, consent], and audit reports). If any individual feels that he/she is not qualified to review the research study, the IRB staff should be notified. The IRB chair will be consulted to determine an appropriate replacement. If additional expertise is not available, the policy and procedures for obtaining additional expertise will be followed, HRPP Manual 5-4 Additional Expertise. The investigator(s) may submit in writing his/her account and explanation of the events possibly constituting noncompliance. At his/her request, the investigator(s) may also appear before the IRB. Investigator(s) under investigation for noncompliance may choose to be accompanied, or represented, by faculty or legal counsel in presenting to the convened IRB. The investigator must notify the IRB in advance if this is the case. Or, the investigator(s) may have a member of the IRB, typically the representative from his/her college, institution, or the chair of the IRB, present on their behalf to the convened IRB. The IRB chair, alone or in consultation with the IRB, determines whether the allegation is substantiated or has a basis in fact (incident involved noncompliance). If the allegation has a basis in fact, the procedures for substantiated noncompliance will be followed to determine whether the noncompliance is serious or continuing. Procedures for Substantiated (or Self-Reported) Noncompliance If a reported incident involved noncompliance, a determination of whether the noncompliance was serious or continuing is made promptly based on the definitions in the section Definitions / Examples above. Incidents of noncompliance that do not clearly meet the definition of serious or continuing should be documented in the IRB file and corrected as appropriate (e.g., 3
4 require investigator signature on application) The IRB chair, IRB staff, or the human research liaison will communicate with the investigator(s) to determine the appropriate corrective action when necessary. See section Procedures for Corrective / Protection Actions, below for possible corrective actions. The actions taken will be appropriate for the type, severity, and frequency of the noncompliance. Incidents of noncompliance that may meet the definition of serious or continuing noncompliance must be reported to the IRB chair. Investigation The IRB chair reviews all relevant materials (e.g., IRB file, communications, relevant research materials [e.g., survey, consent], audit reports) and may gather additional information through discussions or correspondence with the investigator, if needed. The IRB chair may request review by others as needed (e.g., IRB members, human research liaisons). If the IRB chair determines that such review is necessary, the individuals will receive all relevant materials (e.g., IRB file, communications, relevant research materials [e.g., survey, consent], audit reports). If any individual feels that he/she is not qualified to review the research study, the IRB staff should be notified. The IRB chair will be consulted to determine an appropriate replacement. If additional expertise is not available, the policy and procedures for obtaining additional expertise will be followed, see HRPP Manual 5-4 Additional Expertise. Convened IRB Review The IRB chair presents the potentially serious or continuing noncompliance to the convened IRB for review or may request that another individual present such information (e.g., human research liaison, IRB member). Materials provided to IRB members include all relevant materials, e.g., communications, relevant research materials [e.g., survey, consent], audit reports and the IRB file will be available for review (if necessary). Further Investigation The IRB may require further investigation prior to making a determination of whether the noncompliance was serious or continuing. If further investigation is required, the IRB may: Request the individuals continue his/her investigation Impanel an investigative sub-committee of the IRB to review all relevant materials, e.g., IRB file, communications, relevant research materials (e.g., survey, consent), audit reports, etc. Request that the human research liaisons perform an investigation Obtain additional expertise (See HRPP Manual 5-4 Additional Expertise ) The IRB chair or the investigative sub-committee will report back to the convened IRB with recommendations (i.e., severity and frequency of noncompliance, corrective/protective actions). 4
5 The IRB will then make the determination of whether the noncompliance is serious and/or continuing. IRB Determinations The IRB determines whether the noncompliance is serious or continuing. This is based on the definitions provided above. The IRB will determine whether the investigator satisfactorily resolved the noncompliance, if applicable, and whether corrective/protective or other actions are needed. The IRB chair will communicate with the investigator regarding appropriate corrective / protective actions when necessary. Corrective/protective actions include but are not limited to: Require research study specific corrective action. Require plan for corrective action, based on the type and nature of the issues. Require education of the investigators and research team. Require modification of the protocol. Require that subjects be re-contacted and provided with updated information or re-consent to participation.. Notification of current subjects when such information may relate to subjects willingness to continue to take part in the research. Modification of the information disclosed during the consent process. Providing additional information to past subjects. Requiring current subjects to re-consent to participation. Limit or prohibit publication of data to protect subject s rights and privacy. Suspension or termination of the research. Disqualify the investigator(s) from conducting research involving human subjects at the university. Require periodic monitoring or auditing, such as modification of the continuing review schedule or monitoring of the research or consent process. Referral to other organizational entities. Other actions as needed. Corrective/protective actions taken will be appropriate for the type, severity, and frequency of the noncompliance. The IRB may decide that the investigators found in serious or continuing noncompliance should not be allowed to submit new protocols or renew or revise current research studies until all concerns have been addressed taking into account the best interests of the subjects currently enrolled. See HRPP Manual 9-3 Termination or Suspension of Research for requirements. Reporting Serious or continuing noncompliance will be reported (e.g., to appropriate institutional officials, federal agencies) pursuant to HRPP Manual 4-8 Reporting Policy. Coordination with Other Institutional Officials 5
6 Any possible research misconduct discovered during the IRB s noncompliance investigation can be reported to the MSU Research Integrity Officer (RIO) as an allegation of misconduct. These allegations can be presented to the RIO by the chair, member or staff of the IRB, staff of the HRL, human subjects of the research, or any other individual. The misconduct investigation will be performed independently of IRB procedures (i.e., the IRB will conduct the noncompliance investigation and the RIO will conduct the research misconduct investigation.). If possible noncompliance with IRB requirements, University policies and /or federal regulations protecting human subjects of research is discovered during a misconduct investigation, the RIO will notify the appropriate individuals as outlined by the Faculty Handbook, VI. Research and Creative Endeavors, Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities. No one in the University may approve research that has been disapproved by the IRB (45 CFR ). Investigators who believe that the IRB has acted contrary to provisions of 45 CFR 46 or contrary to terms of its Assurance to the federal government (FWA ) may contact the MSU Office of Regulatory Affairs, or the Office for Human Research Protection at NIH, Investigators who believe that the IRB has acted contrary to provisions of 21 CFR 50 and 56 may contact the MSU Office of Regulatory Affairs, or the FDA, Communications with Investigators An investigator who believes that the IRB has erred in its finding of noncompliance may submit a written request asking the IRB to reconsider within 30 days of the noncompliance determination. The request should clearly indicate the facts or the interpretation in dispute, providing supporting evidence where applicable. The IRB provides notice to investigators of its determinations and corrective/protective actions, if any. Additional Considerations For research subject to the requirements of the U.S. Department of Defense, see HRPP Manual 2-2-A U.S. Department of Defense. 6
NONCOMPLIANCE. 1. Overview
NONCOMPLIANCE 1. Overview Investigators, research staff, the IRBs, (ORRP), and the organization share responsibility for the ethical conduct of human subjects research and for compliance with federal regulations,
More informationWayne State University Institutional Review Board
Wayne State University Institutional Review Board Subject Approvals, Serious & Continuing Non-Compliance and the Institutional Official s Responsibilities Administrative Approval: 07/2011; Office of the
More informationYale University Human Research Protection Program
Yale University Human Research Protection Program HRPP Policy 700 Noncompliance, Suspension and Termination Responsible Office Office of Research Administration Effective Date: February 10, 2009 Responsible
More informationSOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS
University of Oklahoma Office of Human Research Participant Protection : PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS 1. POLICY Protocol deviations and unanticipated problems may be discovered in a variety
More informationChapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities
Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities HSS Institutional Review Board Guidance An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is an appropriately constituted group that has been formally
More informationReporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) OFFICE FOR HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB UPIRTSO Flowchart Content Applies To
More informationCOMPLIANCE MONITORING
In this chapter: 3.1 Policies, Procedures, and Resources Available to Investigators and Research Staff 3.2 Investigators Conflicts of Interest (COI) -Individual Conflict of Interest Policies -Disclosure
More informationIssue in IRB Approvals:
Issue in IRB Approvals: What are the obligations of investigators and the IRB in maintaining IRB approval? What are the consequences of a lapse in IRB approval? How does the IRB evaluate lapses in approval?
More informationIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research Background Principal investigators (PIs) are responsible for ensuring
More informationSOP 903: HRPP AND NON-COMPLIANCE
SOP 903: HRPP AND NON-COMPLIANCE DEFINITIONS a) Non- b) Serious Non- c) Continuing Non- Failure to abide by the policies, requirements, and determination of the IRB, or federal rules and regulations including
More informationSOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities
1. POLICY University of Oklahoma : Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities The purpose of this policy is to outline the qualifications and responsibilities of the principal investigator and key
More informationUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH I. PURPOSE This document outlines the required elements of University of Tennessee
More informationSUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH
P&P: RR 409 Version No:1.2 Effective Date: 11/20/2013 SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH Supercedes: CPHS Policies and Procedures 11/28/2000 1. POLICY The IRB shall have authority to
More informationUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH I. PURPOSE This document outlines the University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional
More informationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES TITLE: SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF IRB APPROVAL DOCUMENT NUMBER: 029 REVISION NUMBER 02 REVISION DATE (SUPERSEDES PRIOR
More informationInstitutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval
Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure University of Missouri-Columbia Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval Effective Date: May 31, 2006 Original Approval Date: May 31, 2006 Revision
More informationUniversity of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) I. OVERVIEW The purpose of this Standard Operating Procedure is to define a process for all University of Iowa
More informationResearch Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7
Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7 Purpose To set forth certain human subjects rights and protections, and to establish a review process intended to ensure compliance with federal regulations
More informationCONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS
POLICY # RESEARCH POLICY & PROCEDURE Approval Date: 4-13-2012 CTM c Review Cycle: 1 2 3 Revision Dates: AAHRPP DOC # 64 Responsible Office: CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS Research Compliance
More informationCUNY HRPP Policy: Suspension or Termination of Human Subject Research
CUNY HRPP Policy: Suspension or Termination of Human Subject Research 1. Overview A UI- IRB or the Vice Chancellor for Research may suspend or terminate a research study for reasons including that: a)
More informationthe HRPP Director will prepare a draft report within three (3) workdays after the IRB meeting at which the determination occurred.
IRB Policy 34: Reporting Policy Revision Date: March 27, 2009, revised June 11, 2010, revised January 27, 2011, revised 9/23/13, revised 9/17/15, revised 4/2/18, revised 9/14/18 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD
More informationAUTHORITY AND PURPOSE
AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE SOP #: 101 VERSION #: 1 THIS POLICY PERTAINS TO: RESPONSIBILITY FOR EXECUTING POLICY: EFFECTIVE DATE: 5/1/09 ALL ACTIVITIES OF THE IRB SUPERSEDES DOCUMENT: IRB STAFF, IRB CHAIRPERSON,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board Continuing Review Number: Date: Author: Approved By: Page(s): UGAHRP-057-2 01/20/2017 HSO IRB Page 1 of 7 1. PURPOSE 1.1. The UGA IRB has developed this
More informationCONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM Human Research Protection Program Introduction CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016 Federal regulations require that DUHS has written procedures which the IRB will follow for (a) conducting
More informationAdministrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval
Office for the Protection of Research Subjects (OPRS) Institutional Review Board FWA# 00000083 Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval 201 AOB (MC 672) 1737 West Polk Street Chicago,
More informationLapse in IRB Approval
Office for the Protection of Research Subjects (OPRS) Institutional Review Board FWA# 00000083 Lapse in IRB Approval Version: 3.2; Date: 01/05/2016 Approved by: Human Protections Administrator, Director
More informationINSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES July 2016 Table of Contents National American University Mission...2 Purposes...2 Core Values...3 Institutional Review Board Policy...4 IRB Membership...6 Training...7
More information2.0 Institutional Review Board
2.0 Institutional Review Board 2.1 Policy Pennington Biomedical Research Center has one IRB to ensure the protection of human subjects in research. IRB Biomedical (IRB 00000708) (IORG00006218) The IRB
More informationTuesday, May 15, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.
Tuesday, May 15, 2012 Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout. 1 Michelle Dolske, ORA 2 Laura Orem, IRB Must be in list of Categories (see IRBNet Forms and Templates) No more than minimal
More informationINSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL: PURPOSE and POLICIES.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL: PURPOSE and POLICIES. This manual complies with the Office of Human Resource Protection s (OHRP s) regulatory guidance on written procedures in Guidance on Written IRB
More informationUniversity of Wisconsin Colleges Administrative Policy #56 NON-COMPLIANCE IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH
University of Wisconsin Colleges Administrative Policy #56 NON-COMPLIANCE IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH Implemented: February 17, 2014 Approved by Chancellor: February 17, 2014 Recommended by Chancellor s
More informationAMENDMENTS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESEARCH 3/01/2016
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM Human Research Protection Program AMENDMENTS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESEARCH 3/01/2016 The Duke University Health System Institutional Review Board (DUHS IRB) requires that
More informationCeded IRB Review. The project involves prisoners or other vulnerable populations that require special considerations.
The first assessment to make when including collaborators in research is whether the collaborating entity is engaged in research (see OHRP s Guidance on Engagement in Research). IRB oversight of engaged
More informationCONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL
1. POLICY Steering Committee approved / Effective Date: 9/2/15 The IRB conducts continuing review of research taking place within its jurisdiction at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk, but not
More informationCUNY HRPP Procedures: Multisite Non-Exempt Human Subjects Research
CUNY HRPP Procedures: Multisite Non-Exempt Human Subjects Research 1. Applicability These procedures apply to non-exempt multi-site research involving human subjects in which CUNY is engaged. Please refer
More informationThe Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. Cooperative Agreements
Page: 1 of 8 I. PURPOSE This standard operating procedure describes the IRB s procedures for review and oversight of research conducted under a cooperative agreement with an external (outside) IRB. It
More informationStandard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:
Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3: INITIAL AND CONTINUING REVIEW BY THE IRB: REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMISSION OF APPLICATIONS, APPROVAL CRITERIA, EXPEDITED AND CONVENED COMMITTEE REVIEW AND
More informationCONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL
1. POLICY Steering Committee approved / Effective Date: 9/2/19/19/11 The IRB conducts continuing review of research taking place within its jurisdiction at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk,
More informationSupersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY
1. POLICY Steering Committee approved / Effective Date: 9/9/15 An expedited review procedure consists of a review of research involving human subjects by an IRB Chair or by one or more experienced reviewers
More informationInvestigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.
CM-999 001 1 May 2015 Page 1 of 5 What is the purpose of this manual? This document is designed to guide you through policies and procedures related to the conduct of human research that are specific to
More informationBaptist Health Institutional Review Board. Study Closure Report (Expedited Review) IRB #: Study Title:
Baptist Health Institutional Review Board Study Closure Report (Expedited Review) (Please complete ALL sections of this form. Incomplete forms will be returned) Principal Investigator: E-mail: Phone #:
More informationSignature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date: 07/18/2011
University of Kentucky Office of Research Integrity and Institutional Review Board Revision #4 TITLE: HIPAA in Research Page 1 of 8 Approved By: ORI Director Signature Date Date First Effective: 06-10-05
More informationHuman Subjects in Research Review and Monitoring Form. Not applicable
WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FWA 00005865 Sherman Hall, Room 320, Macomb, IL 61455-1390 Phone: 309-298-1191 FAX: 309-298-2091 Website: http://www.wiu.edu/sponsoredprojects/ E-mail:
More informationPOLICY NO EXEMPT RESEARCH... 4 POLICY NO DISCLOSURE OF RESEARCH LAB TEST RESULTS... 5
Table of Contents POLICY NO. 101.01 - EXEMPT RESEARCH... 4 POLICY NO. 101.02 - DISCLOSURE OF RESEARCH LAB TEST RESULTS... 5 POLICY NO. 101.03 - IRB REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH... 6 POLICY NO. 101.04
More informationIllinois Institute of Technology Institutional Review Board Handbook of Procedures for the Protection of Human Research Subjects
Illinois Institute of Technology Institutional Review Board Handbook of Procedures for the Protection of Human Research Subjects The Basics of Human Subject Research Protection Federal regulation (Title
More informationHuman Research Protection Program Policy
Page 1 of 6 POLICY CONTINUING REVIEW BY THE IRB The University of Cincinnati Institutional Review Board (IRB) shall conduct continuing review of human participant research at intervals appropriate to the
More informationFlorida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures
Florida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures 7-IRB-12 Title of Standard Operational Procedure: Cooperative Project/Multi-site projects IRB Review Responsible Executive: Approving Official:
More informationINSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD POLICY
J O H N C A R R O L L U N I V E R S I T Y T H E J E S U I T U N I V E R S I T Y O F C L E V E L A N D INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD POLICY STATEMENT OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES John Carroll University is committed
More informationUniversity of Cincinnati. Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) RSC Guidelines (revision 5)
University of Cincinnati Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) Table of Contents 1 Purpose of the Guidelines 1 2 Committee 1 3 Meetings 4 4 Committee Purpose,
More informationTo assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.
Institutional Review Board.... University of Missouri-Columbia.. Standard Operating Procedure Annual Review of Research Annual Review of Research Effective Date: January 21, 2019 Original Approval Date:
More informationSignature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:
Revision #10 TITLE: Continuation Review Page 1 of 10 Approved By: ORI Director Signature Date Date First Effective: 05-17-05 Approved By: Nonmedical IRB Chair Signature Date Approved By: Medical IRB Chair
More informationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 02 06/30/10 08/01/07 1 OF 6
TITLE: IRB CONTINUING REVIEW REVISION NUMBER SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES REVISION DATE (SUPERSEDES PRIOR VERSION) EFFECTIVE DATE DOCUMENT NUMBER:
More informationIRB COMPOSITION AND IRB MEMBER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
IRB COMPOSITION AND IRB MEMBER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Overview Each IRB must be appropriately constituted for the volume and types of human research to be reviewed, in accordance with federal regulations.
More informationSection 8. Continuing Review of Ongoing IRB-Approved Research (Revised 7/1/10)
Section 8 Continuing Review of Ongoing IRB-Approved Research (Revised 7/1/10) The IRB shall conduct continuing review of all research activity in compliance with 45 CFR 46 and 21 CFR 56. Continuing review
More informationGuidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval
Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval Additional copies are available from: Office of Communication Division of Drug Information,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW I. PURPOSE This document outlines the required elements of Institutional Review Board (IRB)
More informationEffective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: Appendix II. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate
Policy Title: Michigan State University IRB(s) Approved Projects Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: Review Date: December 4, 2015 Section: Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate
More informationIRB Authorization Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool
IRB Authorization Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool This is the preferred selections version. If more flexible terms are needed, download the blank version from the IRB website.
More informationInstitutional Review Board (IRB) Policies and Procedures Manual
The University of Chicago Division of Biological Sciences The Pritzker School of Medicine and The University of Chicago Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB) Policies and Procedures Manual Office
More informationProcedure Department: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM Policy Number: II.B.1
Procedure Department: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM Policy Number: II.B.1 Section: HRPP Compliance Review Responsibility: HRPP Policy and Procedure Committee Original Creation Dare: November 1, 2003
More informationUniversity of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Penn as Central IRB FAQ
Reliance Agreement Guidance: Penn as Central IRB FAQ This document is designed to answer questions frequently asked by individuals who want to know more about Penn s policies and procedures related to
More informationChildren s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Continuing Review of Approved Research
Page: 1 of 6 I. PURPOSE The purpose of this SOP is to describe the submission requirements for investigators and the review requirements for the IRB for the conduct of continuing review in accordance with
More informationIRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION
1. POLICY Steering Committee approved / Effective date: 9/11/15 Except when an expedited review procedure is appropriate or an exemption determination may be made, the IRB will review proposed research
More informationHuman Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
Human Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital To Whom It May Concern: The Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) has an approved Federal Wide Assurance
More informationI. Summary. II. Responsibilities
IRB Procedures 9a: Full review procedures Revision date: October 6, 2008, revision November 11, 2009, revision July 17, 2010, revised January 27, 2011, revised February 9, 2015, revised October 15, 2015
More informationInstitutional Responsibilities Under A Federalwide Assurance
Institutional Responsibilities Under A Federalwide Assurance Lisa A. Rooney, JD Director Aegis Compliance & Ethics Center, LLP June 6, 2013 1 Questions There will be a q&a session at the end of the program.
More informationIV. Basic Procedures for Human Research Protections
Human Research Protection Program Procedures IV. Basic Procedures for Human Research Protections D. IRB Membership [45CFR46.107] (21CFR56.107) (1) General considerations The IRB shall have at least twelve
More informationTarleton State University
Tarleton State University Policy and Procedures Manual Institutional Review Board For Protection of Human Subjects July 15, 2015 Version 14 Table of Contents Section 1. Institutional Review Board Human
More informationPolicy Number: 42 Title: Investigational Devices Date of Last Revision: 06/12/2008; 07/22/2010; 05/29/2013; 05/01/2016; 10/16/2018
University of California, Irvine Human Research Protections Standard Operating Policies and Procedures Policy Number: 42 Title: Investigational Devices Date of Last Revision: 06/12/2008; 07/22/2010; 05/29/2013;
More informationSMART IRB Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool
SMART IRB Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool Purpose: (1) to highlight the flexible provisions of the SMART IRB Agreement, and (2) to document which options institutions will implement
More informationOHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures
Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) Department of Health and Human Services Date: OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures Scope: This document outlines the required elements of written Institutional
More informationOklahoma State University Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures
Oklahoma State University Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures Duties of IRB Members SOP # OR 203 Effective Date 1/1/2012 Revision Date 08/12/2015 Revision # 1 Approval: IRB 08/12/2015
More informationTitle: EXPEDITED IRB REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES TITLE: EXPEDITED IRB REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH DOCUMENT NUMBER: 012 REVISION NUMBER REVISION DATE (SUPERSEDES
More informationIRB Chair Responsibilities
IRB Chair Responsibilities Introduction: The Saint Luke s Health System (SLHS) Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) is guided by the ethical principles regarding research
More informationYour Roadmap to Single IRB Review Serving as a Reviewing IRB
Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Serving as a Reviewing IRB Funded by the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program, grant number 3 UL1 TR002541-01S1 Nichelle Cobb, PhD Director, Health
More informationEXPEDITED REVIEW. Terms used in this policy, but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Glossary.
1. POLICY Steering Committee approved / Effective Date: 9/19/11 An expedited review procedure consists of a review of research involving human subjects by an IRB Chair or by one or more experienced reviewers
More informationIndependent Ethics Committees
GCP Independent Ethics Committees 1 GCP What is an Ethics Committee? An ethics committee is a committee formally designated to review and approve the initiation of a clinical research study involving human
More informationCollaborative Research
University of Hawai i HRPP Standard Operating Procedures Purpose and Scope Collaborative Research SOP 120.2 Revised: December 18, 2015 This document covers procedures for establishing IRB coverage of collaborative
More informationInstitutional Review Board - Restriction s Impo sed
('/(.s~ ll $L'P.VIC' s '0 ~t: 'o
More informationTo assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the continuing review procedure of approved projects for the IRB.
Institutional Review Board.... University of Missouri-Columbia.. Standard Operating Procedure Continuing Review Report (CRR) Continuing Review Report (CRR) Effective Date: July 1, 2004 Original Approval
More informationHSPP Standard Operating Procedures
HSPP Standard Operating Procedures General HRP 001 Definitions HRP 012 Observation of Consent Process HRP 013 Legally Authorized Representatives, Children, and Guardians Management of Incoming Information
More informationI. Summary. II. Responsibilities
IRB Procedure 11a: Continuing Review Revision Date: May 15, 2007, revised November 11, 2009, revision July 17, 2010, revised March 1, 2011, revised February 9, 2015 I. Summary The IRB policy is to make
More informationINSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES April 2013 Table of Contents National American University Mission...2 Purposes...2 Core Values...3 Institutional Review Board Policy...4 IRB Membership...6 Training...7
More informationSOP 5.06 Full Committee Review: Initial IRB Review
Office of Research Integrity - Human Subjects SOP #: ORI-HS(HS)- Page #: Page 1 of 5 Approved By: ORI-HS Executive Director *Signature on file Date: Date First Effective: 10/13/2016 Approved by: Biomedical
More informationVersion 1. Submission Guide and Policies
Submission Guide and Policies Pearl IRB Investigator Manual Table of Contents 1.1 Pearl IRB overview... 3 1.2 What is the purpose of this manual?... 3 1.3 What is Human Research?... 3 1.4 What is the Human
More informationHarvard University Area IRB Standard Operating Procedures
Harvard University Area IRB Standard Operating Procedures HARVARD UNIVERSITY Version 1.0 Revised January 19, 2018 Table of Contents HRP-001 - SOP - Definitions - Pre 2018 HRP-012 - SOP - Observation of
More informationFrequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Introduction... 1 The SMART IRB Reliance Model... 2 Scope of Covered Research... 3 Eligibility to Participate... 5 How to Join SMART IRB... 9 The Agreement: selected provisions
More informationEffective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board
Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board Effective Date Revisions Date 8.1.2018 1.0 Purpose: The purpose of this standard operating practice (SOP) is to define and describe the process of review
More informationDate Effective 4/21/2008 Identification
OHSU Research Integrity Office Human Research Protection Program Policies & Procedures Title: Research with Medical Devices Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification Supersedes P&P dated: Page 1 of BACKGROUND
More informationReview of Research by the Convened IRB
Office for the Protection of Research Subjects (OPRS) Institutional Review Board FWA# 00000083 Review of Research by the Convened IRB 201 AOB (MC 672) 1737 West Polk Street Chicago, IL 60612-7227 Phone:
More informationWhat s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies
Vol. 8, No. 8, August 2012 Happy Trials to You What s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies Reprinted from the Guide to Good Clinical Practice
More information2 Institutional Review Board
2 Institutional Review Board 2.1 Policy The University has established two Institutional Review Boards ( IRBs ) to ensure the protection of Human Subjects in Research Under the Auspices of the Institution.
More informationYale University Institutional Review Boards
Yale University Institutional Review Boards 100 PR.1 Review by a Convened Institutional Review Board (IRB) Overview... 1 Meeting Dates and Distribution of Materials... 1 Materials Provided to Members for
More informationEffective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: MHC_RP0107. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate
Policy Title: Initial Review of Human Subject Research Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: Review Date: November 20, 2015 Section: Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate
More informationInstitutional Review Board (IRB)
Institutional Review Board (IRB) POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL IRB #1: Lubbock/Odessa IRB #2: Amarillo/Dallas IRB #3: Paul L. Foster School of Medicine at El Paso IRB #4: Paul L. Foster School of Medicine
More information(y9. &i?r, JUL t Certified-Return Receipt Requested WARNING LE7TER
... (y9 &i?r, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH a HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Food and Drug Admini~ation Center for Biologics Evaluation and Rem 1401 Rockville Pike Rockville MD 20852-1448 JUL t 71997 Certified-Return
More informationCentralized IRB Models
Centralized IRB Models NWABR / OHRP Conference July 31, 2014 James Riddle, MCSE, CIP, CPIA Assistant Director, Institutional Review Office Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Outline Central IRB s Why
More informationOffice of the Vice President for Research
Contents Introduction... 9 Overview of the Human Research Protection Program... 9 Reporting Structure... 9 Ethical Principles Governing Research... 9 Authority from the Institution... 10 Policy Implementation...
More informationCeded IRB Review. The University of Arizona has standing agreements in place for the following entities regarding ceded IRB review:
Investigators working at multiple institutions and with multiple IRBs may choose to have one IRB become the IRB of record over some or all participating sites (commonly referred to as ceded review, reliance
More informationInitial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents
Institutional Review Board University of Missouri-Columbia Standard Operating Procedure Initial Review Initial Review Effective Date: September 1, 2004 Original Approval Date: September 1, 2004 Revision
More information