RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19 AMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
|
|
- Pearl Watson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19 AMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Match Chichester RFC Dorking RFC Club level 6 Competition League Date of match 14/01/2017 Match venue Chichester RFC PAGE 1 Player s surname Giddins Date of birth 27th June 1987 Forename(s) Mark RFU ID number Club name Chichester RFC Plea Admitted Not admitted Offence 10.4(m) - Match official abuse SELECT: Red card Citing Other Hearing date 01/02/2017 Hearing venue Lewes RFC Chairman Sir James Dingemans Secretary Roger Edmonson Panel member 1 Frank Edmonds Panel member 2 Alan Jenkins Decision Proven Not proven Other disposal (please state) Click to enter other disposal. PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE HEARING DETAILS ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF CITING/REFEREE S REPORT/DVD FOOTAGE The hearing took place at Lewes RFC on Thursday 9 th February There were no objections to the composition of the panel. Eddy Sears from the Referee society, and Brian Vincent, a Sussex panel member, were observing. Nigel Creasey, a member of Chichester RFC represented both Mark Giddings and Richard Adams. David Kay, the President, was also present. Mark Giddings was not present, but had produced a statement. Richard Adams was present. The cases concerning Mr Giddings and Mr Adams were, with the agreement of the parties, heard together as some of the evidence overlapped. We had statements and reports from: Mr Lanch; Ben Wilde, the referee; Mr Adams; Mr Giddings; Matthew Woodhouse, a Chichester player; Sam Renwick, a Chichester player; Roger Spreckley, a spectator; and Russell Austin, a spectator. We heard evidence from: Mr Lanch; Mr Adams; Mr Woodhouse; Mr Renwick and Mr Austin. The charges against Mr Giddings (physical assault of a match official) and Mr Adams (verbal abuse of match official) arose about 33 minutes into the second half of the match between Dorking RFC and Chichester RFC played on 14 th January 2017 at Chichester s home ground. Mr Giddings was playing number 2 for Chichester and Mr Adams was playing number 10 for Chichester. Nigel Lanch is the assistant team manager for Dorking RFC. He is a former referee, and has officiated at level 5, including in a match played by Canada, and was officiating at level 8 until He had stopped refereeing as he was now aged 60 years, and had had two hip replacements. He was asked to be touch judge for the match. It is apparent from the report from the referee and the video (which was taken from a raised tripod near the half way line) that Dorking attacked down the left wing and the ball was passed in field and a try was scored by Dorking, cutting Chichester s lead in the match (a lead which, in the final event, they kept to the final whistle). Mr Lanch was the touch judge on the left hand side. It is apparent that the Chichester players thought that the Dorking player had stepped into touch on the left hand side before the try, and one of the players (Mr Woodhouse, who gave evidence) can be seen on the video pointing to the try line. As a matter of completeness (and indeed fairness to Mr Lanch) we should record that the video shows that the Dorking player did not go into touch. It would not have mattered if he had been in touch. Match officials will, on occasions, make mistakes. However their decisions have to be accepted on the pitch without question. Match officials are protected from verbal or physical abuse, and their protection is not dependent on making accurate decisions. As it was Mr Adams was the Chichester player who chased back and nearly caught and tackled the Dorking player before he scored. Mr Lanch ran back towards the posts to get into position for the conversion to be taken. It was at this stage that Mr Lanch said in his evidence that Mr Adams called him a cheating cunt. Mr Adams gave evidence and denied making any comment directed to Mr Lanch. Mr Adams said that he was very fed up with the tackle missed on the Dorking player on the left side of the pitch and called over to Mr Woodhouse, another Chichester player, that he was a stupid cunt. He assumed that Mr Lanch must have mistaken what was said. Mr Woodhouse said he had heard Mr Adams call him a stupid cunt. Mr Renwick, another Chichester player, said he heard Mr Adams use expletive language towards Mr Woodhouse, which he clarified when he gave oral evidence were the words stupid
2 PAGE 2 ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF CITING/REFEREE S REPORT/DVD FOOTAGE CONTINUED cunt. The video showed that at the time at which Mr Adams must have made his statement (whatever it was) he had turned back after his tackle on the Dorking try scorer and was close to Mr Lanch who was coming into the try line. He was also facing towards Mr Woodhouse, who was near the left hand touchline in the vicinity of the 22 line. Mr Renwick was further towards the try line but on the left hand side of the pitch. Mr Lanch changed direction and went to the referee, which can be seen on the video. The referee, who had provided a written statement but who was not questioned because he did not hear or see the material incidents reported that Mr Lanch pointed across at the referee to get his attention and complained that one of the Chichester players had called him a cheating cunt. As the referee had not heard the comment he asked the touch judge to continue with his duties while the referee spoke to the Chichester captain. The referee called over the Chichester captain as there was a break for treatment to a Dorking player. Mr Lanch turned to go behind the posts for the conversion. At this stage it is apparent from the video that Mr Giddings comes beside Mr Lanch and appears to put his arm round him as both Mr Lanch and Mr Giddings were going to go behind the posts. There was no good reason for Mr Giddings to have put his arm round Mr Lanch to guide him away from the referee, but it is apparent that any contact at this stage could not have been very forceful, because Mr Lanch frankly admitted that he had not realised, before watching the video, that Mr Giddings had had his arm around him. As Mr Lanch was making his way to a position behind the posts, part guided by Mr Giddings, Mr Adams had dropped to the ground to tie up his bootlaces. It was at this stage that Mr Lanch said again that Mr Adams called him again a cheating cunt. Mr Adams denied that he had said that. Mr Woodhouse and Mr Renwick did not hear any further comments from Mr Adams. It does appear that Mr Lanch has veered at some stage towards Mr Adams, but it is not clear on the video when this occurred, or the extent to which this was because Mr Lanch was being guided by Mr Giddings. Mr Lanch said he had veered towards Mr Adams because he had called him a cheating cunt again, but he said he said he should not have gone towards Mr Adams. Mr Giddings and Mr Lanch continued to their position behind the posts. Mr Renwick said he could see Mr Giddings and Mr Lanch walking towards Mr Adams who was tying his shoelaces. Once under the posts Mr Renwick said he heard Mr Lanch say come on then, what are you going to do about it but he had his back turned so he was unable to see what had happened. We had written statements from two spectators being Roger Spreckley, a former police officer who had travelled to Dorking, and Russell Austin, who also attended to give oral evidence. Mr Spreckley referred to Mr Lanch being followed closely by a Chichester player, before Mr Lanch got to his position and turned to face the player. Mr Spreckley said that the player moved into Mr Lanch s personal space and without any further action I then saw the Chichester player head butt Nigel who instantly fell backwards onto his back and lay in a prone position motionless. Mr Austin said that the touch judge was winding up Chichester players before the conversion and said he seemed to target [Mr Giddings], there were more exchanges of aggressive language. [Mr Lanch] had reached his postion and was still engaged in an argument with [Mr Giddings], at this point he initiated a walked back towards [Mr Giddings] as if to entice him into squaring up face to face they were engaged in a verbal dispute and as they became closer together there was a contact of heads as they squared up to each other this contact of heads was generated by both [Mr Lanch] and [Mr Giddings]. As their heads touched [Mr Lanch] shouted out and he dived backwards to the floor. Mr Austin gave evidence and was shown the video. He accepted that Mr Giddings actions looked a lot worse on the video, and that rather than Mr Lanch targeting Mr Giddings, it appeared that Mr Giddings had come into contact with the referee and put his arm around him to guide him, but he said that what he had written was his recollection at the time. He did not recall any punch but he did recall Mr Giddings with open hands pushing back. Mr Lanch said in his statement that Mr Giddings had advanced towards him and Mr Lanch had backed away. Mr Giddings had walked forward, touched his forehead with his, and then headbutted him. He had followed that up with a left hook which had made him fall to the ground. In evidence Mr Lanch accepted that he had got emotionally involved as a result of being called a cheating cunt by Mr Adams, that he had gone towards Mr Adams when he should not have done, that he could not recall what words were exchanged, but that both he and Mr Giddings had leaned heads into each other. He also confirmed that he had then been pushed over, but could not recall what part of his body had been hit. Mr Giddings, in his written statement, said he denied the allegations against him. He said he was aware of how the video looked, but said he did not push the touch judge, and did not even get the chance to make physical contact with him. He said he could not say what he was doing with his left hand, but could state that he did not push him. The video shows that after Mr Giddings and Mr Lanch have passed Mr Adams they break away and Mr Lanch backs off. There does appear to be some movement from side to side by Mr Lanch as he is away from Mr Giddings, and the two come together. Although it is not entirely clear from the video there does appear to be contact between the heads of Mr Giddings and Mr Lanch but it was not (on the video before us) possible to say whether there was further contact between the heads. However the video shows that Mr Giddings does pull back his arm, and then it goes forward to Mr Lanch.
3 After the incident Mr Lanch said that he was himself happy to get up and was being helped up by a Chichester player, but the Dorking physiotherapists had insisted he remain lying down to be properly checked and assessed. Mr Lanch confirmed that he had suffered no physical injuries, but he had been badly shaken up and had not been in a good place on Sunday. Our findings of fact: We find that Mr Adams did call Mr Lanch a cheating cunt immediately before Mr Lanch reported this to the referee, and as Mr Lanch passed Mr Adams when he was doing up his shoe laces. Mr Lanch gave clear evidence, and Mr Lanch was frank in his evidence, accepting that he should not have veered towards Mr Adams when he was doing up his shoe laces. It was plain that Mr Lanch believed immediately that he had been called a cheating cunt and not a stupid cunt, and that the comment was directed at him, because that was what he reported to the referee. This must have been said by Mr Adams near to the try line. At the time that this was said Mr Woodhouse was nearly at the 22 metre line and at the edge of the pitch, and we consider that the comment was more likely to have been directed to Mr Lanch. We find that Mr Woodhouse and Mr Renwick were mistaken in believing that any comment was directed to Mr Woodhouse because it was made to Mr Lanch. We also consider that they only heard part of the comment (the use of the c word) and not the cheating part. We did consider that Mr Adams had convinced himself after the event that he was shouting towards Mr Woodhouse but for the reasons given above, do not accept his evidence. In these circumstances we also accept the clear and consistent evidence of Mr Lanch about the second incident. We find that Mr Giddings did, as is shown on the video, guide Mr Lanch to their respective positions behind the post. It was a condescending action, and we consider it more likely than not, and find, that Mr Giddings was part exercised by the fact that he considered that Mr Lanch was reporting another Chichester player to the referee when Mr Giddings thought, honestly but wrongly, that Mr Lanch had allowed a try to stand when there had been a foot in touch. Thereafter we accept that Mr Lanch reacted to his treatment by Mr Giddings and what had been said by Mr Adams, and did become, as Mr Lanch accepted emotionally involved. We are unable to make any findings about what was said between Mr Lanch and Mr Giddings, but we do not accept and reject the suggestion that Mr Lanch was threatening Mr Giddings as alleged by Mr Giddings. This is because Mr Lanch gave clear evidence denying that allegation, there was no clear agreement by others about what had been said, and Mr Giddings did not give oral evidence, and the weight that can be given to a written statement is less than would be given to an oral statement. Although the evidence given by both Mr Austin and Mr Spreckley was no doubt their honest recollection of events, it is apparent that it does not tally with the video. For example Mr Austin did not see Mr Giddings guide Mr Lanch, and Mr Spreckley had Mr Giddings following Mr Lanch and did not see any movement of Mr Giddings arm. We do accept that both Mr Giddings and Mr Lanch did lean their heads together, as accepted by Mr Lanch, and we find that Mr Giddings did punch Mr Lanch, causing him to fall backwards. We reject the suggestion that Mr Lanch dived, although we also find that the punch was not forceful because Mr Lanch was unable to recall what part of his body had been hit, and there were no marks afterwards. However the punch was enough to cause him to lose his balance and fall backwards. We find that the incident shook up Mr Lanch, but that he suffered no physical injuries, and it was apparent that he had made a full recovery by the time of the hearing.
4 PAGE 3 ASSESSMENT OF SERIOUSNESS REGULATION PLEASE TICK APPROPRIATE BOX Intentional/deliberate (a) Reckless (b) Gravity of player s actions (c) This involved a deliberate punch towards a touch judge, albeit after the touch judge had become emotionally involved and both player and touch judge had leaned heads into each other. Nature of actions (d) See the description set out above. Existence of provocation (e) There was no provocation properly so called, but as noted above it did occur after the touch judge had become emotionally involved and both player and touch judge had leaned heads into each other. Whether player retaliated (f) No. Self-defence (g) Not applicable. Effect on victim (h) See above. Shaken up by the incident, but no physical injuries and a full recovery. Effect on match (i) The actions led to Dorking players running to join in (and one was yellow carded). After a delay for treatment the match continued. Vulnerability of victim (j) The touch judge was a match official. He was 60 years old and had had 2 replacement hips. Level of participation/premeditation (k) This started because the player involved himself with the touch judge when he had no reason to do so. His actions were not thought out. Conduct completed/attempted (l) Completed. Other features of player s conduct (m) See above.
5 PAGE 4 ASSESSMENT OF SERIOUSNESS REGULATION CONTINUED Entry point Top end* 131 weeks Mid-range Click weeks Low end Click weeks *If top end, the Panel should identify an entry point between the top end and the maximum sanction ( ) - see Appendix 2 In making the above assessment, the Panel should consider the RFU guidance (Note 2) set out in Appendix 5 to Regulation 19. Significant weight should be given to RFU regulation (a), (h) and (i). Reasons for entry point: This was a punch of a touch judge. Any punch of a match official means that it will be top end which is 96 weeks or more and a starting point of suspension for life would be considered, see RFU v Lockwood, 29th September However in this case the punch followed a situation where the touch judge accepted that he had leaned his head in towards the player (as the player had also leaned in his head). Further the punch, while sufficient to knock over the touch judge, was not very strong, the touch judge could not recall where the punch landed, it did not leave any mark, and the touch judge suffered no physical injuries. Taking all these matters into account we determined that an entry point of 131 weeks was appropriate. In aggregate the entry point (131 weeks) and aggravating off field factors (25 weeks) -see below- make a total of 3 years. In these circumstances there is no need to adjust the ban to reflect off field periods, because the intended effect is a 3 year ban. ADDITIONAL RELEVANT OFF-FIELD AGGRAVATING FACTORS (REGULATION ) Player s status as an offender of the Laws of the game (a) Mr Giddings has a very poor record being punching (2 weeks) in 2007; punching (8 weeks in 2008); and punching (52 weeks) in He had a ban for 4 weeks for stamping in This is a serious record in respect of other serious offences, and justifies a further 25 weeks. Need for deterrent (b) No. Any other off-field aggravating factors (c) No. Number of additional weeks: 25 weeks
6 PAGE 5 RELEVANT OFF-FIELD MITIGATING FACTORS (REGULATION ) Acknowledgement of guilt (a) No. Although there had been an indication that he would plead guilty he did not do so. Player s disciplinary record/good character (b) Very poor, but ignored for this purpose to avoid any double counting. Youth & inexperience of player (c) Not applicable. Conduct prior to and at hearing (d) He did not attend either the Chichester RFC internal hearing or this hearing. Remorse & timing of remorse (e) None apparent. Other off-field mitigation (f) It is apparent that he made an effort to turn his game around following his last lengthy ban, but then this incident occurred. Number of weeks deducted: 0 weeks NOTE: SUBJECT TO REGULATION , A DISCIPLINARY PANEL CANNOT APPLY A GREATER REDUCTION THAN 50% OF THE RELEVANT ENTRY POINT SUSPENSION SANCTION Banned from 14/01/2017 Banned to 14/01/2020 Ban split from Click here to enter a date. Ban split to Click here to enter a date. Free to play 15/01/2020 Total sanction 156 weeks Sending off sufficient NOTE: UNDER RFU REGULATION , PLAYERS ORDERED OFF ARE PROVISIONALLY SUSPENDED PENDING THE HEARING OF THEIR CASE, SUCH SUSPENSION SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN SANCTIONING Costs 50 Final date for appeal: 28/02/2017 Signature (Chairman) James Dingemans Date 13/02/2017 Signature (Secretary) Roger Edmonson Date entered to GMS 14/02/2017
RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19
RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19 Match Sale Sharks London Irish Club level 1 Competition Aviva Premiership Date of match 15/09/2017 Match venue Sale Sharks PAGE 1 PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE Player
More informationRFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19
RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19 Match Blackheath Ladies Saracens Women Club level 2 Competition RFUW Junior Cup Date of match 15/10/2017 Match venue Blackheath PAGE 1 PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE Player
More informationRFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19
RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19 Match Macclesfield Leicester Lions Club level 4 Competition National League 2 North Date of match 30/09/2017 Match venue Macclesfield PAGE 1 PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
More informationRFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19
RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19 Match Doncaster Knights Rotherham Titans Club level 2 Competition Greene King IPA Championship Date of match 09/09/2017 Match venue Doncaster Knights PAGE 1 PARTICULARS
More informationRFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19
RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19 Match Richmond Ladies RFC Aylesford Bulls RFC Club level 1 Competition RFUW Date of match 08/01/2017 Match venue Richmond PAGE 1 PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE Player
More informationRFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19
RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19 Match Bedford Blues Bristol Rugby Club level 2 Competition Championship Date of match 23/09/2017 Match venue Bedford PAGE 1 PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE Player s surname
More informationRFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19
RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19 Match Camborne Penryn Club level 8 Competition Duchy League Date of match 21/10/2017 Match venue Camborne PAGE 1 PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE Player s surname Hoon Date
More informationRFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19
RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19 Match Cardiff Blues Ospreys Club level 1 Competition Anglo-Welsh Cup Date of match 18/11/2016 Match venue Cardiff PAGE 1 PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE Player s surname
More informationRFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19
RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19 Match Richmond FC Doncaster Knights Club level 2 Competition Greene King Championship Date of match 10/11/2017 Match venue Richmond PAGE 1 PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
More informationRFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19
RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19 Match London Welsh RFC Jersey Reds RFC Club level 2 Competition Greene King IPA Championship Date of match 01/10/2016 Match venue Old Deer Park PAGE 1 Player s
More informationRFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM
RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM Match Richmond Vs London Scottish Club s County Competition Greene King Championship Date of match 1/9/18 Match venue Richmond PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE Player s surname Mitchell Date
More informationRFU Short Judgment Form
RFU Short Judgment Form Match Club s Date of match Hinckley Vs Preston Grasshoppers Level 4 Competition National 2 North 24/11/2018 Match Venue Hinckley Particulars of Offence Player s Surname Howard Date
More informationDISCIPLINARY DECISION
DISCIPLINARY DECISION Match Argentina v Wales Player s Union Welsh Rugby Union Competition June International Date of match 16 June 2018 Match venue Santa Fe, Argentina Rules to apply Regulation 17 World
More informationDISCIPLINARY DECISION
DISCIPLIRY DECISION Match England U20s v Italy U20s Player s Union England Competition World Rugby U20s Championship Date of match 3 rd June 2018 Match venue Perpignan Rules to apply Tournament Disciplinary
More informationDISCIPLINARY DECISION
DISCIPLINARY DECISION Match NEW ZEALAND U20 V FRANCE U20 Player s Union FRANCE Competition World Rugby U20 Championship Date of match 13 th June 2017 Match venue MIKHEIL MESKHI STADIUM, TBILISI Rules to
More informationDISCIPLINARY DECISION
DISCIPLINARY DECISION Match ITALY v ARGENTINA Player s Union ITALY Competition World Rugby U20 World Championships 2018 Date of match 07/06/2018 Match venue Beziers Rules to apply Tournament Disciplinary
More informationEPCR SHORT JUDGMENT FORM
EPCR SHORT JUDGMENT FORM Match Timisoara Saracens Vs Rugby Calvisano Club s Country Romania Competition European Rugby Continental Shield Date of match 9 December 2017 Match venue Dan Paltinisanu Stadium
More informationWORLD RUGBY DECISION
WORLD RUGBY DECISION Match ENGLAND U20 V SAMOA U20 Player s Union SAMOA Competition World Rugby U20 Championship Date of match 31 st MAY 2017 Match venue Avchala Stadium, Tiblisi, Georgia Rules to apply
More informationWORLD RUGBY DECISION
WORLD RUGBY DECISION Match France v Japan Player s Union Japan Competition WRWC 2017 Date of match 9 August 2017 Match venue Billings Park, UCD Rules to apply WRWC 2017 Tournament Disciplinary Program
More informationDISCIPLINARY DECISION
DISCIPLINARY DECISION Match Samoa U20 v Romania U20 U20 Trophy Player s Union Samoa Competition U20 Trophy Date of match 1 September 2018 Match venue STADIONUL NATIONAL ARCUL DE TRIUMF, BUCURESTI Rules
More informationEPCR SHORT JUDGMENT FORM
EPCR SHORT JUDGMENT FORM Match Lyon Vs Cardiff Blues Club s Country France Competition European Rugby Championship Cup Date of match 14.10.18 Match venue Matmut Stadium de Garland, Lyon Rules to apply
More informationDISCIPLINARY DECISION
DISCIPLINARY DECISION Match NEW ZEALAND U20 V FRANCE U20 Player s Union FRANCE Competition World Rugby U20 Championship Date of match 13 th June 2017 Match venue MIKHEIL MESKHI STADIUM, TBILISI Rules to
More informationRUGBY FOOTBALL UNION
RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION DISCIPLINARY HEARING Held at the Holiday Inn, Bloomsbury 13 January 2015 Player: George KRUIS Club: Saracens Match: Gloucester v Saracens Venue: Kingsholm Date of match: 9 January
More informationEPCR SHORT JUDGMENT FORM
EPCR SHORT JUDGMENT FORM Match Bath Rugby Vs Toulouse Club s Country France Competition Heineken Champions Cup Date of match 13 October 2018 Match venue Recreation Ground, Bath Rules to apply EPCR Disciplinary
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE FOOTBALL FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA. Steve Pantelidis, Gold Coast United FC
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE FOOTBALL FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA DETERMINATION IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER: Player and club Alleged offence Steve Pantelidis, Gold Coast United FC Item R2 of clause 6.2 of the
More informationFootball Operations:
1 CONTENTS 2 Cautions - Page 3 Dismissals - Page 3 Misconduct Charges - Page 4 Hearings - Page 5 Friendly Football - Page 5 Missing Notifications - Page 5 Suspensions - Page 6 Player Details - Page 6 Multi-Player
More informationRFU DISCIPLINARY PANEL RELATING TO (1) WILL CROKER; (2) NIALL CATLIN; (3) FREDDIE GLEADOWE; (4)
RFU DISCIPLINARY PANEL RELATING TO (1) WILL CROKER; (2) NIALL CATLIN; (3) FREDDIE GLEADOWE; (4) MARK RANDELL; (5) CHRIS GUYETT; (6) STEPHEN TRISTRAM; and (7) DAVID CRABBE Venue: Holiday Inn, Bloomsbury,
More informationWORLD RUGBY DECISION
WORLD RUGBY DECISION Match England v USA Player s Union USA Competition Women s Rugby World Cup 2017 Date of match 17 August 2017 Match venue Billings Park, UCD (Dublin) Rules to apply Tournament Disciplinary
More informationDISCIPLINARY DECISION
DISCIPLINARY DECISION Match Romania v Hong Kong Player s Union Romania Competition U20 World Trophy Tournament Date of match 5 th September 2018 Match venue Bucharest Romania Rules to apply U20 World Rugby
More informationDISCIPLINARY DECISION
DISCIPLINARY DECISION Match England Women v USA Women Player s Union USA Rugby Competition Autumn Internationals 2018 Date of match 9 November 2018 Match venue Allianz Park, Hendon, England Rules to apply
More informationCranbrook Sports Club Cranbrook Rugby Football Club
3.3 DISCIPLINE POLICY It is the Club s responsibility to deal with any act of indiscipline on the field of play by players, and/or any of their supporters and spectators on the touch line, or any \ Cranbrook
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE FOOTBALL FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA DETERMINATION IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER: Dane Milovanovic South Melbourne FC
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE FOOTBALL FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA DETERMINATION IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER: Player and club Alleged offence Dane Milovanovic South Melbourne FC Unsporting conduct toward a match
More informationRFU DISCIPLINARY HEARING
RFU DISCIPLINARY HEARING PLAYER: CLUB: ROCHELLE CLARK WORCESTER VALKYRIES DATE: 26 JANUARY 2017 VENUE: PANEL: HOLIDAY INN ROTHERHAM SAMANTHA HILLAS (CHAIR) JOHN LOUGHTON TONY WHEAT There were no objections
More informationBRIDPORT RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB DISCIPLINE POLICY
DISCIPLINE POLICY The Club is responsible for dealing with any act of indiscipline on or off the field of play by players, supporters, officials, parents and spectators, or any Club member who uses threatening
More informationRFL ON FIELD COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES and SENTENCING GUIDELINES 2016
RFL ON FIELD COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES and SENTENCING GUIDELINES 2016 These guidelines are intended to aid consistency and decision making when applying sanctions for breaches of the RFL Operational Rules.
More informationAPPENDIX 6. RFU REGULATION 19 DISCIPLINE Appendix 6 AGE-GRADE RUGBY DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES. 1. Applicability and Overriding Objective
APPENDIX AGE-GRADE RUGBY DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES. Applicability and Overriding Objective. The following disciplinary procedures ( the procedures ) shall apply to Age-Grade Rugby, save where specific arrangements
More informationHearing held at the offices of Clifford Chance, 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London. Tuesday 13 October 2015 starting at 6:45 pm
Decision of the Independent Judicial Officer Hearing held at the offices of Clifford Chance, 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London. Tuesday 13 October 2015 starting at 6:45 pm In respect of Marcelo
More informationb) the disciplinary procedure should be simple, easy to understand and conducted more informally than the adult procedure;
RFU REGULATION 19 DISCIPLINE (APPENDIX 6) AGE-GRADE RUGBY DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES 1. Applicability and Overriding Objective 1.1 The following disciplinary procedures ( the procedures ) shall apply to Age-Grade
More informationHearing held at the offices of Clifford Chance, 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London on 25 September 2015 at 12.00pm.
Decision of the Independent Judicial Officer Hearing held at the offices of Clifford Chance, 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London on 25 September 2015 at 12.00pm. In respect of Valentin Ursache of
More informationDiscipline Guidance for RFU Clubs
Discipline Guidance for RFU Clubs The Rugby Football Union s Core Values of Teamwork, Respect, Enjoyment, Discipline and Sportsmanship define our sport and make it special for players, coaches, match officials,
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE FOOTBALL FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA. Determination of 7 February 2013 in the following matter. Spitting at opposing player
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE FOOTBALL FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA Determination of 7 February 2013 in the following matter Player and club Alleged offence Mr Adriano Pellegrino, Central Gold Coast Mariners
More informationFootball Association Disciplinary Commission
Football Association Disciplinary Commission The Football Association ex parte Surrey FA v James Rudkin Case ID: 8940139M WRITTEN REASONS Factual Background and Chronology 1. These are the Reasons for
More informationGPT NOTICE OF DETERMINATION.
GPT NOTICE OF DETERMINATION. Proceeding under section 8.5 of the FNSW Grievance and Disciplinary Regulations Proceeding Details: Tribunal reference MGPT 16-71 Date of hearing 3 November 2016 Time of hearing
More informationThe FA Discipline Handbook 2011/12 Season
The FA Discipline Handbook 2011/12 Season 4 Introduction This handbook covers Disciplinary Procedures for teams dealt with by County Associations under Match Based and Time Based Discipline Regulations.
More informationSAASL DISCIPLINARY RULES FOR PLAYERS AND CLUBS
Disciplinary Rules for Players and Clubs P a g e 1 SAASL DISCIPLINARY RULES FOR PLAYERS AND CLUBS These Rules are made by the Management Committee of the South Australian Amateur Soccer League Inc. pursuant
More informationAPPENDIX 6. RFU REGULATION 19 DISCIPLINE Appendix 6 AGE-GRADE RUGBY DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES. 1. Applicability and Overriding Objective
APPENDIX AGE-GRADE RUGBY DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES. Applicability and Overriding Objective. The following disciplinary procedures ( the procedures ) shall apply to Age-Grade Rugby, save where specific arrangements
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE FOOTBALL FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA DETERMINATION IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER:
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE FOOTBALL FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA DETERMINATION IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER: Official and club Alleged offence John Aloisi Melbourne Heart FC Use of offensive, insulting or abusive
More informationDisciplinary Procedures for Players in Scottish Women s Football Youth Leagues. Season 2018
Disciplinary Procedures for Players in Scottish Women s Football Youth Leagues Season 2018 Scottish Women s Football Youth Regional Leagues Scottish Women s Football Youth Regional League Cups Scottish
More informationBank of England Rugby Football Club
Bank of England Rugby Football Club Mini/Youth Discipline Policy 1. It is the responsibility of Bank of England Rugby Football Club (BOERFC) to deal with any act of indiscipline on the field of play by
More informationTHE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION. and MR ARSENE WENGER
IN THE MATTER OF A FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION INDEPENDENT REGULATORY COMMISSION BETWEEN: THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION and MR ARSENE WENGER WRITTEN REASONS AND DECISION OF THE INDEPENDENT REGULATORY COMMISSION FOLLOWING
More informationRUGBY FOOTBALL UNION INDEPENDENT APPEAL HEARING. VENUE: Holiday Inn, Filton, Bristol. DATE: 23 February 2017
RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION INDEPENDENT APPEAL HEARING VENUE: Holiday Inn, Filton, Bristol. DATE: 23 February 2017 Player: Francois LOUW Club: Bath Rugby Match: Bath Rugby v Harlequins RFC Venue: The Recreation
More informationJUDICIARY COMMITTEE GUIDELINES (Amended February 2010)
JUDICIARY COMMITTEE GUIDELINES (Amended February 2010) 1. The Judiciary Committee shall consist of four (4) members, including the J.C. Chairman, with no more than one person from any one club. The Chairman
More informationON-FIELD REGULATIONS SECTION THREE: PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO CATEGORY 5 GENERAL CHARGES. 2 Nothing in this Section Three shall preclude:
ON-FIELD REGULATIONS SECTION THREE: PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO CATEGORY 5 GENERAL 1 Each Affiliated Association must set out in its rules or regulations a copy of this Section Three, which is to be followed
More informationCHANNEL 9 ADELAIDE FOOTBALL LEAGUE
CHANNEL 9 ADELAIDE FOOTBALL LEAGUE 2016 TRIBUNAL REFERENCE MANUAL 1 P a g e CH9 ADELAIDE FOOTBALL LEAGUE ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS FOR TRIBUNAL HEARINGS Appointment of Chairman The tribunal shall satisfy itself
More informationDisciplinary Procedures For Players in Scottish Women s Football Youth Regional Leagues. Season 2016
Disciplinary Procedures For Players in Scottish Women s Football Youth Regional Leagues Season 2016 Scottish Women s Football Youth Regional Leagues Scottish Women s Football Youth Regional League Cups
More informationWORLD RUGBY U20 CHAMPIONSHIP Decision of an Independent Judicial Officer. Held at The Park Inn Hotel Manchester on 22nd June 2016
WORLD RUGBY U20 CHAMPIONSHIP 2016 Decision of an Independent Judicial Officer Held at The Park Inn Hotel Manchester on 22nd June 2016 In respect of Jeremy Ward No 13 South Africa ( The Player ) AND A citing
More informationDISCIPLINARY (AND ETHICS) COMMITTEE OF THE FOOTBALL FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA DETERMINATION IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER:
DISCIPLINARY (AND ETHICS) COMMITTEE OF THE FOOTBALL FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA DETERMINATION IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER: Player and club Alleged offence Roy O Donovan, Central Coast Mariners Assault on a Player
More informationBUNDABERG JUNIOR RUGBY LEAGUE RULES (to commence 2010)
BUNDABERG JUNIOR RUGBY LEAGUE RULES (to commence 2010) COACH Section 2 A coach s behaviour at training and at every junior rugby league match must be above reproach and be a positive example to all others.
More informationModel Discipline Regulations and Guidance
Model Discipline Regulations and Guidance Version 2 January 2018 Contents 1. Code of Conduct and Spirit of Cricket... 1 Code of Conduct... 1 Spirit of Cricket... 1 Fair and Unfair Play... 2 Umpires authority...
More informationNote: Any act of foul play which results in contact with the head shall result in at least a mid-range sanction
RFU REGULATION 19 - DISCIPLINE (APPENDIX 2) Sanction Entry Points Note: Any act of foul play which results in contact with the head shall result in at least a mid-range sanction 9.11 Players must not do
More informationDISCIPLINARY REGULATIONS 2016/2017
DISCIPLINARY REGULATIONS 2016/2017 DISCIPLINARY REGULATIONS 2016/2017 DEFINITIONS In these Disciplinary Regulations 2016/17 (the Disciplinary Regulations ), the following words shall have the following
More informationCODES OF CONDUCT AND PENALTIES ADAPTED FROM SACA GRADE CRICKET BYLAWS PREAMBLE
CODES OF CONDUCT AND PENALTIES ADAPTED FROM SACA GRADE CRICKET BYLAWS PREAMBLE Cricket is a game that owes much of its unique appeal to the fact that it is to be played not only within its Laws, but also
More informationIN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT UNDER THE ICC ANTI-CORRUPTION CODE. Between: THE INTERNATIONAL CRICKET COUNCIL. and MR IRFAN AHMED DECISION
IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT UNDER THE ICC ANTI-CORRUPTION CODE Between: THE INTERNATIONAL CRICKET COUNCIL and MR IRFAN AHMED DECISION Introduction 1. The International Cricket Council ( ICC )
More informationUSA Rugby Disciplinary Regulations and Procedures. General Information and Requirements
USA Rugby Disciplinary Regulations and Procedures General Information and Requirements Officials at every level (LAU, SBRO, GU, Territorial Union, College Conference, National) have a responsibility to
More informationWellington Hockey Association. Judicial Guidelines
Wellington Hockey Association Judicial Guidelines 1.1 The code of conduct This section of the policy outlines the Code of Conduct as to the standards expected of players, coaches, managers, officials,
More informationASHLEY DOWN OLD BOYS RFC DISCIPLINE POLICY
ASHLEY DOWN OLD BOYS RFC DISCIPLINE POLICY It is ADOB RFC s responsibility to deal with any act of indiscipline on the field of play by players and/or their supporters and spectators on the touch line,
More informationGREATER MANCHESTER CRICKET LEAGUE DISCIPLINARY REGULATIONS
GREATER MANCHESTER CRICKET LEAGUE DISCIPLINARY REGULATIONS AIMS AND JURISDICTIONS 1. CODE OF CONDUCT AND SPIRIT OF CRICKET 2. BREACHES 3. PROCEDURE 4. DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS 5. PENALTIES 6. APPEALS 7. NON-PAYMENT
More informationEUROPEAN RUGBY CUP DECISION OF JUDICIAL OFFICER HELD AT NEATH
EUROPEAN RUGBY CUP DECISION OF JUDICIAL OFFICER HELD AT NEATH 22 nd December 2010 at 11.00am IN RESPECT OF:- Vincent Roux ( the Player ) AND The Ordering-Off of the Player in the Amlin Cup match between
More informationECB PREMIER LEAGUE DISCIPLINARY REGULATIONS
ECB PREMIER LEAGUE DISCIPLINARY REGULATIONS CONTENTS 1. AIMS AND JURISDICTION 2. CODE OF CONDUCT AND SPIRIT OF CRICKET 3. BREACHES 4. PROCEDURE 5. DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS 6. PENALTIES 7. APPEALS 8. NON-PAYMENT
More informationRFU APPEAL PANEL RELATING TO (1) PETER RANN; (2) MEDWAY RFC. Attendance: Simon Pritchard on behalf of Mr Peter Rann (present) and Medway
RFU APPEAL PANEL RELATING TO (1) PETER RANN; (2) MEDWAY RFC Venue: Holiday Inn, Bloomsbury, London Date of hearing: Thursday 24 th March 2016 Panel: Sir James Dingemans; Mike Curling; John Vale Attendance:
More informationIN THE MATTER OF RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS CONCERNING RULE 5.12 RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION DANNY LIGAIRI-BADHAM JUDGMENT
IN THE MATTER OF RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS CONCERNING RULE 5.12 RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION V DANNY LIGAIRI-BADHAM JUDGMENT PANEL: DR JULIAN MORRIS, TIM WARD QC, AIDAN O BRIEN SECRETARY: REBECCA
More informationHearing held at the offices of Clifford Chance, 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London. Monday 28 September,
Decision of the Independent Judicial Officer Hearing held at the offices of Clifford Chance, 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London. Monday 28 September, 2015 10.00 In respect of Nemani Nadolo of Fiji
More informationCODES OF CONDUCT AND PENALTIES
CODES OF CONDUCT AND PENALTIES PREAMBLE Cricket is a game that owes much of its unique appeal to the fact that it is to be played not only within its Laws, but also within the spirit of the game. Any action
More informationNON-PERSONAL HEARING THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION. and. Mr MARTIN SKRTEL Liverpool FC T H E D E C I S I O N A N D R E A S O N S
NON-PERSONAL HEARING THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION and Mr MARTIN SKRTEL Liverpool FC T H E D E C I S I O N A N D R E A S O N S O F T H E F A R E G U L A T O R Y C O M M I S S I O N Content Page Paragraphs Introduction...
More informationEuropean Challenge Cup 2016/17 Decision of Discipline Committee Held at The Sheraton Hotel, Charles de Gaulle Airport, Paris on 26 April 2017
European Challenge Cup 2016/17 Decision of Discipline Committee Held at The Sheraton Hotel, Charles de Gaulle Airport, Paris on 26 April 2017 In respect of the citing of Jone Quovo Nailiko (the player)
More informationDiscipline Procedure for Dunnington Cricket Club
Discipline Procedure for Dunnington Cricket Club 1 Scope Dunnington Cricket Club is committed to encouraging its players and representatives to abide by and promote the Spirit of Cricket at all times.
More information2014 Misconduct Regulations
2014 Misconduct Regulations 11.04.12 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 OBJECTIVE...1 2 SCOPE...1 3 DISCIPLINARY MEASURES...2 4 DUTIES OF A REFEREE...2 5 ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY NZF OR A DISTRICT FEDERATION ON RECEIPT
More informationAUSTRALIAN RUGBY UNION LIMITED (ACN ) ARU DISCIPLINARY RULES
AUSTRALIAN RUGBY UNION LIMITED (ACN 002 898 544) ARU DISCIPLINARY RULES CONTENTS PREAMBLE SECTION 1: ARU DISCIPLINARY RULES SECTION 2: JUDICIAL PROCEDURES PART 1: INITIAL PROCEDURES - ORDERED OFF ( RED
More informationFFSA Respect Program Guidelines
FFSA Respect Program Guidelines Your Guide to the FFSA s Respect Program FFSA Respect Program Guidelines - February 2012 I WELCOME TO RESPECT Football Federation SA is please to launch the RESPECT campaign
More informationAPPENDIX 2 - SANCTION ENTRY POINTS
APPENDIX 2 - SANCTION ENTRY POINTS Law No Description Entry Point based on Scale Maximum 9. Players must not do LE 2 weeks 52 week anything that is reckless MR 4 weeks or dangerous to others TE 8+ weeks
More information1.1.1 Appeal Panel means the appeal panel appointed by the Union under the Disciplinary Rules;
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES 1. Discipline 2. Procedures following a sending off 3. Sin Bin / Yellow Cards Procedures 4. Citing Procedures 5. Disciplinary Hearings 6. Appeals and Penalty Review
More informationSEASON : NOTES FOR MANAGERS
SEASON -19: NOTES FOR MANAGERS All Managers These notes are designed to help managers and although many of you will have heard most of this in past notes I think some of the basic rules are worth repeating
More informationTelephone Hearing on Friday 24 June 2016
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS B E T W E E N:- WORLD PROFESSIONAL BILLIARDS AND SNOOKER ASSOCIATION and LEO FERNANDEZ Telephone Hearing on Friday 24 June 2016 Present: Tim Ollerenshaw Chair
More informationQUEENSLAND MASTERS FOOTBALL. Disciplinary Policy 2016
QUEENSLAND MASTERS FOOTBALL Disciplinary Policy 2016 March 2016 1. DEFINITION OF PENALTIES Penalties fall into two categories: (i) (ii) Mandatory Match Suspensions Additional Disciplinary Sanctions 2.
More informationDisciplinary Commission. Case No Decision of the ISU Disciplinary Commission. In the matter of. against. and
I N T E R N A T I O N A L S K A T I N G U N I O N HEADQUARTERS ADDRESS: AVENUE JUSTE OLIVIER 17 - CH 1006 LAUSANNE - SWITZERLAND TELEPHONE (+41) 21 612 66 66 TELEFAX (+41) 21 612 66 77 E-MAIL: info@isu.ch
More informationISU Disciplinary Commission. Case No Decision of the ISU Disciplinary Commission. In the matter of. against.
I N T E R N A T I O N A L S K A T I N G U N I O N HEADQUARTERS ADDRESS: AVENUE JUSTE OLIVIER 17 - CH 1006 LAUSANNE - SWITZERLAND TELEPHONE (+41) 21 612 66 66 TELEFAX (+41) 21 612 66 77 E-MAIL: info@isu.ch
More informationBYLAWS FOR HKHA MIXED SUMMER HOCKEY LEAGUE
BYLAWS FOR HKHA MIXED SUMMER HOCKEY LEAGUE (1) Composition of Teams All players participating for a team must be registered for that team prior to the start of the match. The maximum number of players
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE FOOTBALL FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA. Item R2 of clause 6.2 of the Disciplinary Regulations (violent conduct)
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE FOOTBALL FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA DETERMINATION IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER: Player and club Alleged offence Nick Mrdja, Melbourne Victory FC Item R2 of clause 6.2 of the Disciplinary
More informationHearing held at the offices of Clifford Chance, 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London on 9 October 2015 commencing at 2:00 pm.
Decision of the Independent Judicial Officer Hearing held at the offices of Clifford Chance, 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London on 9 October 2015 commencing at 2:00 pm. In respect of Nick Blevins
More informationEngland and Wales Cricket Board MODEL DISCIPLINE REGULATIONS
MODEL DISCIPLINE REGULATIONS 1. ECB CODE OF CONDUCT AND SPIRIT OF CRICKET 1.1 Code of Conduct 1.1.1 The ECB is committed to maintaining the highest standards of behaviour and conduct. This Code of Conduct
More informationDECISION OF THE INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL OFFICER
DECISION OF THE INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL OFFICER EPRC Held at Sofitel Hotel, Heathrow, London on 20 th January 2016 In respect of: Ryan Wilson of Glasgow Warriors ( the Player ) and The citing of the Player
More informationLEAGUE INFORMATION 11v11 LEAGUES
LEAGUE INFORMATION 11v11 LEAGUES Men s and Coed 11v11 2018 Spring ADULT SOCCER The City of Irvine will not assume responsibility for injury. EVERYONE PARTICIPATES AT THEIR OWN RISK. League play will be
More informationNew Brunswick Rugby Union, Inc. By-laws 1. Membership Policy 2. Game Regulations
New Brunswick Rugby Union, Inc. By-laws 1. Membership Policy i) The NBRU requires all individuals participating in the sport of Rugby in the province of New Brunswick to be members of the NBRU. ii) Membership
More informationISU Disciplinary Commission. Case No Decision of the ISU Disciplinary Commission. In the matter of. against.
I N T E R N A T I O N A L S K A T I N G U N I O N HEADQUARTERS ADDRESS: AVENUE JUSTE OLIVIER 17 - CH 1006 LAUSANNE - SWITZERLAND TELEPHONE (+41) 21 612 66 66 TELEFAX (+41) 21 612 66 77 E-MAIL: info@isu.ch
More informationUmpire Manager s Briefing for Umpires Version 1 16 December 2014
Umpire Manager s Briefing for Umpires 2015 Version 1 16 December 2014 Preparation Be thorough in your match preparation Make sure that you understand the Briefing this is our match plan You are expected
More informationT RIPPON MID-ESSEX CRICKET LEAGUE
T RIPPON MID-ESSEX CRICKET LEAGUE DISCIPLINE REGULATIONS 1 ECB CODE OF CONDUCT AND SPIRIT OF CRICKET 1.1 Code of Conduct 1.1.1 The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) is committed to maintaining the
More informationSCHOOLS RUGBY LEAGUE CHAMPION SCHOOL TOURNAMENT RULES 2016 /17
SCHOOLS RUGBY LEAGUE CHAMPION SCHOOL TOURNAMENT RULES 2016 /17 1. THE TOURNAMENT 1.1 The schools tournament shall be conducted under the rules of the Rugby Football League (RFL) and shall be organised
More informationDECISION OF THE INDEPENDENT DISCIPLINARY PANEL EUROPEAN PROFESSIONAL CLUB RUGBY Held at Sofitel Heathrow, London on 25 October 2017
DECISION OF THE INDEPENDENT DISCIPLINARY PANEL EUROPEAN PROFESSIONAL CLUB RUGBY Held at Sofitel Heathrow, London on 25 October 2017 In respect of:- Dave Ward of Harlequins ( the Player ) and The citing
More informationSOCCER CITY FOOTBALL Tournament
SOCCER CITY FOOTBALL Tournament Participation Copy Tournament Rules & Regulations Forms BD 325 Only with the completion of this form and with providing the full payment along with submitting it on time
More informationDISCIPLINARY CODE A Code of Conduct. DISCIPLINARY CODE B Offenses & Mandatory Actions
DISCIPLINARY CODE A Code of Conduct Particular reference is made to the Preamble of the Laws of Cricket 2000 Code. A 1 Persons must not assault, attempt to assault or threaten to assault a spectator, another
More information