Federal Republic of Nigeria

Transcription

1 Federal Republic of Nigeria Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized THE NIGERIA EROSION AND WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECT (NEWMAP) Final Addendum Report of Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for Odunukwe-Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood Site in Abakaliki, Ebonyi State Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized State Project Management Unit (SPMU), 1 Onwe Street, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State. February, 2018 i P a g e

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 1.0 INTRODUCTION Background Project Development Objective Rational for Resettlement Action Plan for Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood site Scope and Task of the RAP Addendum Report Methodology for the Resettlement Action Plan In-depth Interview Socio-Economic Survey Consultations with PAPs Consultation with Government Ministries, Departments and Agencies Focus Group Discussion PAPs Identification Structure of the RAP Addendum Report DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CIVIL WORKS/COMPONENTS Proposed Civil Works to Control Flooding within the Odunukwe Nkaliki CUT-OFF DATE AND INVENTORY OF IMPACTED ASSETS Eligibility Cut Off Date and Proof of Eligibility for Compensation Cut-off Date Inventory of Impacted Assets Impact on Land and Structures Impact on Agricultural Resources (Crops) Impact on Host Communities and Loss of Access to common Property Cultural Property (Archaeological and cultural sites) Impact on Vulnerable Group Consultation with PAPs Livelihood Restoration COST OF IMPLEMENTATION OF RAP AND TIME-TABLE Budget For Resettlement Activities Related With The Odunukwe Nkaliki Timetable for RAP SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 ii P a g e

3 5.1 Rationale for the Study Summary of Findings Recommendations 15 Appendix I: Inventory of Project Affected Persons (PAPs) 16 Appendix II: PAP Inventory for Affected Community Trees 28 Appendix III: PAP Inventory for Vulnerable 29 Appendix IV: PAP Inventory of JOSEL FARM Following Approved Engineering Design 33 List of Tables Table 1.1: Socioeconomics of the variables PAPs in the proposed project area 3 Table 3.1: Impact on Land Assets 9 Table 3.2: Impact on Community Assets 10 Table 3.3 Vulnerable PAPs in the Project Area 11 Table 4.1: Initial Estimated Resettlement Budget 12 Table 4.2: Updated Estimation Budget Due to Addendum Exercise Strictly Following Approved Engineering Design 13 Table 4.3: Updated Estimation Due to Addendum Exercise with Realignment around JOSEL FARMS 16 Table 4.4: Major Component Tasks and Schedule for the RAP Implementation 17 iii P a g e

4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES 1: Introduction: In 2015 a consultancy service for the preparation of the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood Intervention site under the on-going NEWMAP was executed and a Final Report cleared by the World Bank was prepared and disclosed. However, a realignment in the final engineering design raised some concerns. In an attempt to resolve these concerns on one hand and the need to capture all the genuine PAPs along the proposed drainage alignment on the other, the World Bank recommended a recall of the consultant to site to produce the RAP Addendum Report. ES 2: Aim and Objectives of the RAP The over-riding objective of the study is to prepare a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) Addendum Report for the Ebonyi State sub-project(s) in the Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood site in coordination with the earlier prepared RAP. ES 3: RAP Methodology The strategy/methodology for the preparation of the RAP took into cognizance the Terms of Reference and/scope of Work. The methods/approaches used include In-depth Interview; Consultations; Consultation with Government Ministries, Departments and Agencies; Focus Group Discussion; and PAPs Identification: ES 4: Cut-off date The cut-off date for eligibility for compensation and/or resettlement assistance was the last day of PAPs survey and enumeration along the 5 meter buffer of the Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood Intervention Site. This was 27 th November, 2015 and was latter fixed for 30 th January 2018 to capture those affected due to re-alignment of the RoW of Odunukwe River and the need to update the data ES 5: Estimated Budget for RAP Implementation The total cost of implementation of Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood Intervention site RAP is One Hundred and Four Million, Seven Hundred and Forty T wo Thousand, T wo Hundred and Twenty Naira Only (N 104,742,220) ES 6: Recommendation The approved engineering design passed straight into the JOSEL FARMS and this will result in the demolition of about seven farm buildings. A situation that has skyrocket the RAP cost by about One Hundred Million Naira. A careful observation shows that the channel can take its natural cause around the farm and only the Farm fence and a Duck pen will be affected. The RAP hereby recommends a realignment/adjustment of the design during actual implementation to take its natural cause at the JOSEL FARMS section of the Odunukwe-Nkaliki Hatchery Road flood intervention site. This realigned scenario around JOSEL FARMS will reduce the RAP cost by Ninety Seven Million Naira (N97,000,000). iv P a g e

5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background In 2015 a consultancy service for the preparation of the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood site under the on-going NEWMAP was executed and a Final Report cleared by the World Bank was prepared and disclosed. However, in the course of field verification activities carried out by the SPMU to authenticate the compensation list contained in the RAP, a significant discrepancy between the draft engineering report upon which the safeguard instrument was earlier based and the alignment of the final engineering design report cleared by the World Bank was raised. In an attempt to resolve this issue or observed discrepancy in the property enumeration and valuation on one hand and the need to capture all the genuine PAPs along the proposed drainage alignment on the other, the World Bank recommended a recall of the consultant to site to produce the RAP Addendum Report. The need for the/of the preparation RAP Addendum Report was to achieve the objective of ensuring the inclusion of all the genuine PAPs in the compensation list in order to guarantee a rancor free project implementation. 1.2 Project Development Objective The over-riding objective of the study is to prepare a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) Addendum Report for the Ebonyi State sub-project(s) in the Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood site to be implemented in coordination with the earlier prepared RAP. In specific terms, the RAP Addendum Report was designed to capture the following objectives: Compile the list of all the genuine Project Affected Persons (PAPs) to be included in the compensation list based on the final engineering design. Undertake the valuation of all affected property and drop those in the original report that will no longer be affected. Estimate the total cost of compensation to be paid for affected crops and structures. 1.3 Rational for Resettlement Action Plan for Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood Intervention Site The aim of this RAP is to identify and assess the human impact of the proposed works at the Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood site and to prepare an Action Plan to be implemented in coordination with the proposed civil works in line with the World Bank Policy and Nigeria policies and laws. Preliminary studies during project preparation, site prioritization 1 P a g e

6 and even site engineering design shows that land will be acquired and this will lead to both temporary and permanent physical displacement of persons, loss of shelter, loss of livelihoods, loss/ denial of access to economic resources. These as mentioned earlier triggered the World Bank s Safeguard Policy on Involuntary Resettlement OP 4.12, therefore, the need for Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) Scope and Task of the RAP Addendum Report The tasks performed during the RAP Addendum Report preparation include the following: 1. Describe the project and its components for which land acquisition and resettlement are required, and an explanation of why a Resettlement Action Plan Addendum Report is required 2. Reflect relevant sections of the final engineering report (drawings) detailing measures to improve hydraulic flow of the river as well as the river bank protection measures; 3. Conduct a fresh census and enumeration exercise to capture all the genuine affected assets and persons along the proposed drainage alignment; 4. Undertake valuation of all affected agricultural crops, land and structures and estimate the total compensation figure for same. 5. Conduct a census and declare a cut-off date; 6. Estimate population displacement and categories of displaced persons to the extent feasible; 7. Describe arrangements for funding resettlement activities including the preparation and review of cost estimates, the flow of funds, and the contingency arrangements; 1.5 Methodology for the Resettlement Action Plan In-depth Interview One-on-one interviews were held with key informants and the PAPs in the communities. The approach adopted involved the interactions with communities leaders particularly the traditional rulers, community chiefs and the owners of economic trees, farmlands and properties that lie along the 5 meters buffer zone (setback) of the flood intervention project. These are the people whose activities (livelihood or otherwise) will be directly affected during construction and operation of the proposed project. 2 P a g e

7 1.5.2 Socio-Economic Survey Questionnaire administration (Appendix 1) and in-depth interviews were deployed to acquire the socioeconomic information from the PAPs. The survey team organized a phased but flexible schedule of survey activities to ensure the people s participations. Census and survey documents were administered and pictures of PAPs were captured. Records of the assets affected were recorded in the presence of community/village leaders, and a representative of Ebonyi State Project Management Unit (EB-SPMU) NEWMAP NGO. Besides, the vulnerable groups amongst the PAPs were identified. The vulnerable groups classified and identified for adequate consideration under livelihood restoration for the vulnerable groups include; female household heads (widows), the elderly (above 65 years) with dependents, physical challenged persons (blind, physically disabled, and mentally disabled) and HIV-AIDS. Table 1.1 presents the synopsis of the socioeconomics of the area. Table 1.1: Socioeconomics of the Additional PAPs in the proposed project area S/No Socio-Economic Indicator Socio-Economic Findings 1 Gender There are more males (52.26%) than females (44.74%) PAPs. 2 Age Age group of years and above constitutes the highest proportion of the PAPs with 45.5%. 65 years and above age group constitutes 10.0% of the PAPs while years are about 44.5%. This simply a slight difference within the aged and youthful age that are involved in agriculture in this area. 3 Ethnic/Sub-ethnic group The Igbo ethnic stock dominates the area in which the Izzi and Ezza are the major clans within the area. 4 Literacy level/language(s) spoken Literacy level is low in the area with only 40.5% of the PAPs having formal education (at least primary education). This contributes significantly and similarly to the language spoken as only 35.5% can speak and write in English and the mother language. 5 Marital Status Most of the PAPs are married (61%) though with more than one wife while 19.5% are single without marital history. The widows/widowers (19.5%) are mostly within the aged age group. 6 Occupation There are three basic occupational groups identified within the PAPs in this settlement. Most of the individuals are farmers (70.5%), while a few of them are civil servants (15.5%) and 14% are self-employed traders/business. 7 Size of the Family Average family size in this settlement can be grouped into five classes. The minimum is three (18.5%), four (27%), five (10.5%), six (10%) and the maximum is seven (34%). The average family size is six in this settlement. 8 Length of residence/ Residential Status About 79% of the PAPs in this settlement were born and raised in the area. 11% were born in the eastern region while the remaining percentage were born and raised outside the region but returned home afterwards. 9 Income Level of the PAPs Total income structure of the PAPs showed that most (70%) earn less than N40,000 a month. 18.5% earn above N150,000 a month while those that earn N10,000 constitute 11.5% of the population. 11 Migration Only 42.5% of the PAPs in this settlement claimed to have migrated out of the settlement owing to job demands. These are mainly men as women have low migration possibilities. 3 P a g e

8 12 Health Status Most of the PAPs in the area claimed to be healthy going by their external health disposition. Common household diseases such as malaria and flu. These are treated within the community health care centre which is located within the reach of the community. 13 Water Resources Potable water is sourced mainly from community tap (40%), water tankers (45%), others claim to buy water (15%) from vendors while water used for washing is sourced from hand-dug well. 14 Ethno-cultural Relations and Dynamics 15 Awareness of the Proposed Project/Resettlement Plans As stated above, all the PAPs in this area mainly Igbo. However, there are two clans Izzi and Ezza within the area. Despite their differences, they relate well and own agricultural lands and landed proprieties. Conversely, other tribes such as the Yoruba, Hausa, Ibibio living in the area do not own lands nor have any farming activities within the project site. Having learned of the project during the sensitization, and other phases of data collection, all the PAPs claimed to have a prior knowledge about the project indicating their pleasure over the proposed project. They also stated that they are satisfied with the ground works Consultations with PAPs Consultations were carried out to inform key stakeholders about study purpose and plans project compensation. The team, through the representative of the local NGO, first sensitize the community prior to the conduct of the socioeconomic survey. Some of the community leaders were sensitized to inform landowners cum farmers within the stream layout to partake in the census so that their farmlands and crops can be ascertained and included in the report. Other purposes of the consultation include; identifying, addressing and documenting the concerns and views of all stakeholders with a view to curtailing potential conflicts that could arise during project implementation Consultation with Government Ministries, Departments and Agencies Government agencies were consulted for data and additional information pertaining to the proposed project site. Data gathering and information-sourcing visits were paid to Ministries of Environment and Land, Survey and Housing as well as EB-SPMU Focus Group Discussion The second level of consultation involved sensitization of the community leaders and groups on the import of the RAP. Leaders of the concerned communities were contacted separately. Pre-enumeration meetings were held before actual Identification, enumeration and validation of the PAPs took place. 4 P a g e

9 1.5.6 PAPs Identification In situ identification method in which a tape was used for measuring each stretch of farmland and the 5 meter buffer at the banks of the river / channel was ascertained. Farmers and owners of economic trees and structures within the buffer were identified first and then enumerated. Each PAP individual without documented right of ownership was confirmed by the community leaders and the members of the community and the EB-SPMU focal NGO (Nnadozie Integrated Development Foundation) representative. However, at the end of the exercise, all parties (Community leader, and the NGO representative) involved in the identification agreed that all concerned individuals have been identified (a comprehensive list of PAPs have been attached as appendices I). However, only two (2) PAPs in the initial report were dropped while the realignment to straighten the channel in order to improve the hydraulic efficiency caused many structures by the river Iyi Okwu bank now to be affected. This however is responsible for the expanded impacts that significantly increased the budget. 1.6 Structure of the RAP Addendum Report The RAP is presented in five chapters as indicated below; Chapter One: Introduction Chapter Two: Description of Proposed Civil works/components Chapter Three: Cut-off Date and Inventory of Impacted Assets Chapter Four: Cost of implementation of RAP and Timetable Chapter Five: Summary of Findings and Recommendations 5 P a g e

10 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CIVIL WORKS/COMPONENTS 2.1 Proposed Civil Works to Control Flooding within the Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood site The flood hot spots within the proposed project site are located along the Iyiokwu River and stretch between the Ebonyi State University Department of Geology, located on the headwaters of the Iyiokwu River and the Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road. There are existing perimeter walls erected to prevent further advancement of the gully. Iyiokwu River meandering channel has been excessively encroached for building construction, development of fish ponds and farming. During the rainstorms, the river overflows its banks in several sections and spill flood waters to adjoining properties. Evidences of channel banks erosion are also observed and the river channel is also used to carry solid wastes through the township. Commercial fish ponds were also created along the Iyiokwu channel. These conditions are responsible for flooding at several reaches of the river channel. Figure 1.1 presents Iyiokwu River a Tributary of the Ebonyi Rivers System and the flood hot spots locations along the river channel. The proposed remediation measures including engineering works that triggered the resettlement issues for the Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road flood site include: a. Channelization of the Iyi-Okwu River by construction of adequately sized reinforced concrete channel that can carry the peak flow of 50-yr return period between the PRESCO Campus of the Ebonyi State University m E, m N and the Hatchery road crossing (Odunukwe-Nkaliki Hatchery Road section). A total channel length of 5km (500m) is involved. The channel width ranges between 1m and 4m while the depth ranges between 1m and 16m across section of Iyiokwu River. The channel design was based on consideration slopes of the different segments of the river and the need to train or straightening out the meandering sections to further prevent flooding b. Channelization of the Iyi-Okwu River and construction of adequately sized reinforced concrete channel between the Hatchery Road to connect existing reinforced concrete channel at Onwe Road (Iyiokwu-Abakaliki Int'l Mkt, Flood Control Project). Covering 2km (200m). c. Continuation of the channelization downstream the Enugu-Abakaliki road at the Abakaliki International Market up to the confluence with the Aboine river. This channel is to discharge its flow into the Aboine River through a culvert under the dyke to be constructed under this project along the Aboine River covering 2km. 6 P a g e

11 d. Provision of a five (5) meters setback floodway on both sides (total of 10ms) of the reinforced concrete channel with gabion protection on sides slopes of the banks above the top level of the concrete channel to prevent erosion and provide aesthetic view along the channel. This will further prevent encroachments of the floodplain by developers for housing and other commercial activities. The 5 meter setback offset on each side was based on the Engineering Design which includes community s participation during its development. However, it must be re-emphasised that Odunukwe-Nkaliki-Hatchery Road flood intervention site traverse through densely populated part of Abakaliki town. This restricted the engineering design to only what will be needed to ensure safe delivery and sustainability of the project without causing excessive loss. e. Construction of adequately sized culverts across the Iyi Okwu River where none is available or the existing culvert is not adequate. f. Provision of 5m length side drains to collect runoff from both sides of the road crossings where they are not available. g. Provision of vegetation measures following construction of the engineering measures. These activities will occupy space along the channels, thereby triggering resettlement issues. Figure 1.2a to 1.2c shows the proposed design for sections of Odunukwe-Nkaliki Hatchery Road flood intervention site. The civil engineering activities will involve the use of low, medium and heavy duty equipment including but not limited to Loader, Water Pumping Machines Grader, Vibration Roller, Bulldozer, Generator, Impact Drill, Mixer, Concrete Pump, Pneumatic Hammer etc. It is, however, estimated that the expected (indicative) labour requirements for pre-construction, construction, operation and maintenance phases will be about 20, 200 and 25 people respectively. 7 P a g e

12 Figure 1.1: Drainage Pattern of Abakaliki Capital City and the Flood Hotspot Sites of Iyiokwu River Figure 1.2 : Proposed design for section of Odunukwe-Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood Site 8 P a g e

13 3.0 CUT-OFF DATE AND INVENTORY OF IMPACTED ASSETS 3.1 Eligibility Only those whose farm crops, economic trees, buildings and landed assets lie along the 5 meter buffer zone each on both sides of the Odunukwe-Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood Site alignment for the proposed project would be eligible for compensation under this RAP. 3.2 Cut Off Date and Proof of Eligibility for Compensation Cut-off Date The cut-off date for eligibility for compensation and/or resettlement assistance was the last day of PAPs survey and enumeration along the 5 meter buffer each on both sides of the Odunukwe-Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood Site alignment. This was 27 th November, 2015 and was latter fixed for 30 th January 2018 to capture those affected due to re-alignment of the RoW of Iyi Okwu River and the need to update the data since the initial enumeration was over two years. Persons whose moves into the project site after this date will not be entitled to any compensation or any form of assistance. 3.3 Inventory of Impacted Assets The affected assets essentially include structures and farmlands. This have been identified and discussed in the following subsection. As mentioned in section in this report, only two (2) PAPs were dropped all the farmers PAPs along the Iyi-Okwu River will still be affected by the 5m buffer at both side of the river Impact on Land and Structures The structures that could be affected in the course of work or that could constitute hindrances to civil work have been identified as outlined. Within the defined buffer concerning the proposed project, 2 PAPs whose physical structures will be affected were identified during the RAP enumeration exercise while 21 additional PAPs whose physical structure will be affected were captured during the addendum exercise. This brings the total PAPs whose physical structures will be affected to 23. Table 3.1 shows impact on landed structures and assets. A total of 307 PAPs were identified during the initial RAP exercise out of which 2 were dropped during the addendum exercise. A total of 347 PAPs were identified during the addendum 9 P a g e

14 exercise which shows an increase of 42 additional PAPs out of which 21 are PAPs with physical structures and 21 PAPs with crops / economic trees. 10 P a g e

15 Table 3.1: Impact on Land Assets PAP ID EB/NEWMAP/O-N/342 EB/NEWMAP/O-N/303 EB/NEWMAP/O-N/312 Fence (Dimension) Fence of 15 m length made of 9 inch block and 1.85 m high and four concrete pillars holding the fence Fence of 21 m length made of 9 inch block and 1.80 m high and four concrete pillars holding the fence Low height fence of 10 m length made of 6 inch block and 0.95 m high and no concrete pillar holding it together Fishpond (Dimension) N/A One fishpond measuring 3.4 m long and 5 wide with cemented wall. N/A Land Assets and Dimensions Duck pen (Dimension) Duck pen measuring 15 m by 6 m fixed to the fence wall. N/A N/A EB/NEWMAP/O-N/318 N/A N/A N/A EB/NEWMAP/O-N/329 EB/NEWMAP/O-N/330 EB/NEWMAP/O-N/331 N/A Fence of 16 m length made of 9 inch block and 1.90 m high and three concrete bricks Fence of 25 m length made of 6 inches block and 1.81 m high and without concrete bricks separating coaches of Three fishponds: (a.) length of 3 m by width 1.8 m and 0.5 m in depth (b.) Length of 1.9 m width of 1.8 m and 0.5 m deep. (c.) length of 4.8 m by 1.4 m wide and 0.5 m deep. Duck pen measuring 18 m by 9.5 m fixed to the fence wall. Land (Dimension) N/A N/A Land measuring 2 plots completely taken over by the project The entire land completely taken over by the project measuring One plot and half N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Building (Dimension) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11 P a g e

16 PAP ID EB/NEWMAP/O-N/332 EB/NEWMAP/O-N/333 EB/NEWMAP/O-N/336 Fence (Dimension) blocks and not cemented Fence measuring 43 meters long made of size 9 inches block and separated with concrete pillars and 2.1 m high with wired fencing for security purposes Fence measuring 21 meters long made of size 9 inches block and separated with concrete pillars and 2.5 m high with no wired fencing Fishpond (Dimension) Land Assets and Dimensions Duck pen (Dimension) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Land (Dimension) Building (Dimension) N/A Bungalow building partly completed (at lintel level) made up of 2-bedroom flats. Building constructed with 9 inches block and roofing space already carved out with Bungalow level buildings with 8 self-contain rooms at lintel level. This is made of size 6 inches block with 12 concrete pillars at separate sections of the separated rooms with four shared toilets at the extreme end of the building. EB/NEWMAP/O-N/337 EB/NEWMAP/O-N/338 EB/NEWMAP/O-N/339 EB/NEWMAP/O-N/340 EB/NEWMAP/O-N/341 Fence of 25 m length with 9 inches block and 1.90 m high Fence of 2.1 m high with 9 inches block and 15 concrete pillar and 35 metres long Fence made up of 21 m long 9 inches block 3 m high 31m x 3m with size 9inches block 6 inches, at DPC level and 22 pillars, 25m long, 3m. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Bungalow building with 2 bedroom flats at lintel level (under construction). The building is made with 9 inches block and not yet cemented. There are 15 concrete pillars at specific sections of the building. 12 P a g e

17 PAP ID EB/NEWMAP/O-N/342 Fence (Dimension) Fence of 200 m long 9 inches block 3 m high Fishpond (Dimension) Land Assets and Dimensions Duck pen (Dimension) N/A 15x6 NA Land (Dimension) Building (Dimension) NA EB/IU/NEWMAP/AL/352 Fence measuring 31 meters long made of size 9 inches block and separated with concrete pillars and 3 m high with no wired fence N/A N/A N/A Bungalow building with four self-contain rooms. The building is completed, painted with cemented floors and walls and covered with corrugated roofing sheets. EB/NEWMAP/O-N/297 EB/IU/NEWMAP/AL/343 EB/IU/NEWMAP/AL/344 45m long 2 m high fence with concrete pillars and made of size 9 inches block 43m long 2.5m high with 6 inches block, electric fenced security, and concrete floor and with iron gate. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Two buildings (1) Building at roofing level with only size 6 inches blocks and 28 concrete pillars and floor not cemented. (2) Competed bungalow building with 4 separate bedroom sharing one living room. All rooms are fully tiled and ensuite with toilets and washing rooms. 4 Master Rooms and 5 bedrooms with parlours, 14 aluminium windows, measuring 12.3 m by 19.7 m, metrotile long span aluminium roofing sheet, Italian tiles in all rooms. 6 Rooms with mud made of cement, 9 aluminium windows, local zinc, cemented floors, PVC in rooms and 7 wooden doors EB/IU/NEWMAP/AL/345 EB/IU/NEWMAP/AL/346 EB/IU/NEWMAP/AL/347 49m with 1.50 height, 9inches blocks & 40 pillars 50m with 15 pillars and 9inches block N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 Bedroom Flats at lintel level, concretized DPC with concrete pillars sq. metres land 38% inside water channel. All these enlisted PAPs will lose the assets enumerated with them as these falls completely within the flood watershed. This is consequent on the commencement of the proposed project. However, of all the listed PAPs in table 3.1, only EB/NEWMAP/O-N/297 and EB/NEWMAP/O-N/342 were in the initial enumeration. 13 P a g e

18 3.3.2 Impact on Agricultural Resources (Crops) Vegetable, Maize, Potatoes, Coconut, Cassava, Bitter leaf, Plantain, Palm tree, Cassava, Pawpaw, Banana, Kolanut, Pear, Mango and Bamboo are the crops that are affected as outlined in Appendix 4. The PAPs will be allowed to harvest their crops and/or compensated for damaged crops before work starts Impact on Host Communities and Loss of Access to common Property Economic trees belonging to the two communities will be affected by the project. The inventory of affected trees is presented in table 3.2. Table 3.2: Impact on Community Assets Economic Tree Mgbabor (Qty) Nkaliki (Qty) Gmelina Oil Palm Kolanut 13 5 Mango 10 8 Local Pear 18 5 Total Cultural Property (Archaeological and cultural sites) Two (2) cultural property or traditional worship sites (shrines) in Nkaliki community have been identified to be affected and the protocols to mitigate any adverse effects which include continual consultation with traditional authorities and local communities have been initiated. Specifically, the following guidelines will be followed: After consultations with ritual practitioners (chief priest), PAPs will be compensated for the both the logistical and ritual costs and relocating shrines to new site; Full compensation in kind would be administered for physical items required for the relocation of shrines as part of the ritual cost; and Full compensation in cash would be administered for the relocation allowances as part of the ritual cost. Site committee has already been formed Impact on Vulnerable Group The criteria for vulnerable group and number identified amongst the PAPS are shown in table P a g e

19 Table 3.3 Vulnerable PAPs in the Project Area S/N Initial Vulnerable Groups Number 1 The Aged (i.e. PAP(s) with age above 65 years) with dependents 9 2 Female household heads (Widows) 4 3 Physical challenged persons (blind, crippled, physically and mentally disabled) 0 4 HIV-AIDS 0 Sub-Total 13 Vulnerable groups from Addendum exercise 1 The Aged (i.e. PAP(s) with age above 65 years) with dependents 1 2 Female household heads (Widows) 2 3 Physical challenged persons (blind, crippled, physically and mentally disabled) 0 4 HIV-AIDS 0 Sub-Total 3 Total Vulnerable Group Consultation with PAPs Several consultations were held with stakeholders during the actual RAP exercise, this particular consultation was to address the concerns of the new PAPs owing to the re-alignment in the final engineering design. It was however, observed that all the new PAPs are fully aware of the proposed intervention project and has been part of one activity or the other during initial enumerations and or preparation of other baseline information / safeguards. Their only concern was adequate compensation. They were however, assured that the purpose of this addendum exercises was to ensure that all PAPs were captured and properly enumerated. 3.5 Livelihood Restoration The newly identified PAPs do not have any special characteristics that have not been captured in the main Odunukwe Nkalaki Hatchery Road RAP report. Therefore, the livelihood restoration highlighted in the main report also applied to the newly identified PAPs 4.0 COST OF IMPLEMENTATION OF RAP AND TIME-TABLE 15 P a g e

20 4.1 Budget for Resettlement Activities Related with the Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood Intervention Project The budget for resettlement activities associated with the implementation of the Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood Intervention Site Project RAP is to be fully funded by the Ebonyi State Government through EB-SPMU. The total cost estimates for compensation of the PAPs is estimated at: Two Hundred and Eleven Million Four Hundred and Eighty Six Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty Naira (N 211,486,220) for the option following the approved engineering design strictly (table 4.2) while it was estimated at One Hundred and Four Million, Seven Hundred and Eighty Six Thousand, Two Hundred and Twenty Naira Only (N 104,786,220) for option B recommending realignment of engineering design to avoid the high cost as a result of demolition of structures at JOSEL FARMS (table 4.3). Appendix IV shows the cost for JOSEL FARMS following the approved engineering design. Table 4.1: Initial Estimated Resettlement Budget ITEM COST (N) Total Compensation for Land/Structures 5,076, Community Trees 2,312, Agricultural resources (Individual farms) 28,569, Vulnerable PAPs 520, Sub-total 36,477, ,477, ADDITIONAL MITIGATIONS Livelihood restoration measures/assistance 2,000, Grievance management 500, Sub-total 2,500, ,500, IMPLEMENTATION COSTS Compensation Commission & NGO witness 500, Capacity building/institutional Strengthening 1,000, Disclosure 500, Management 3,500, Sub-total 5,500, ,477, Contingencies 10% 4,447, ,924, *Allow time for annual/seasonal crop owners to harvest their crops 16 P a g e

21 Table 4.2: Updated Estimation Budget Due to Addendum Exercise Strictly Following Approved Engineering Design ITEM COST (N) TOTAL Compensation for Land/Structures 181,308,200 Vulnerable PAPs 640,000 Community Trees: Mgbabor (1,233,000) Nkaliki (1,079,000) 2,312,000 Sub-Total 184,260,200 ADDITIONAL MITIGATIONS Livelihood restoration measures/assistance 2,000, Grievance management 500, Sub-Total 2,500,000 IMPLEMENTATION COSTS Compensation Commission & NGO witness 500,000 Capacity building/institutional Strengthening 1,000,000 Disclosure 500,000 Management 3,500,000 Subtotal 5,500, ,260,200 + Contingencies 10% 19,226,020 TOTAL 211,486,220 Table 4.3: Updated Estimation Due to Addendum Exercise with Realignment around JOSEL FARMS ITEM COST (N) TOTAL Compensation for Land/Structures 58,275,000 Agricultural resources (Individual farms) 26,033,200 Vulnerable PAPs 640,000 Community Trees: Mgbabor (1,233,000) Nkaliki (1,079,000) 2,312,000 Sub-Total 87,260,200 ADDITIONAL MITIGATIONS Livelihood restoration measures/assistance 2,000, Grievance management 500, Sub-Total 2,500,000 IMPLEMENTATION COSTS Compensation Commission & NGO witness 500,000 Capacity building/institutional Strengthening 1,000,000 Disclosure 500,000 Management 3,500,000 Subtotal 5,500, P a g e

22 95,260,200 + Contingencies 10% 9,526,020 TOTAL 104,786,220 *Allow time for annual/seasonal crop owners to harvest their crops 4.2 Timetable for RAP The timetable and schedules for the completion of the RAP is presented in Table 4.4 below. The RAP has to be completed and PAPs adequately compensated before operation in the designated affected areas. The timeline in table 4.4 is only indicative since the external factors not envisaged at this period such as delay in reviewing and addressing comments and other administrative and operational matters may cause a delay in the project time line. 18 P a g e

23 Table 4.4: Major Component Tasks and Schedule for the RAP Implementation Activities Additional Consultation /Community participation and Information to people affected, cut-off date announcement and census. AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APRI L MA Y REMARKS Aug 2017-Jan 2018 Disclosure of RAP [Extended Period for Affected Parties] RAP Implementation including payment of Compensation and/or supplementary assistance Rehabilitation/civil works - commencement of project construction operations. Feb-March 2018 March-April 2018 April-May 2018 Follow-up visit by responsible stakeholders/spmu Mar 2018 Income Restoration Assessment May P a g e

24 5.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Rationale for the Study The preparation of the Addendum RAP Report was predicated on the need to update the enumeration of property valuation of affected assets as well as compilation of the project affected persons (PAPs) due to the re-alignment contained in the Final Engineering Design Report of the Odunukwe Nkaliki Hatchery Road Flood Intervention Site cleared by the World Bank. The rationale of the exercise was to ensure the inclusion of all the genuine PAPs in the compensation list in order to guarantee a rancor free project implementation of the proposed Iyiokwu River training and river bank protection civil works. 5.2 Summary of Findings Following a number of public sensitization and consultation activities, an enumeration of property, compilation of project affected persons (PAPs) and valuation of affected assets (crops, land and building structures) was carried out by the RAP consultant team, in coordination with SPMU officials, Site Committee members, officials of the Ebonyi State Government and other critical stakeholders. It was realized that both the number of PAPs and the estimated cost of compensation are higher compared to the values or figures contained in the main RAP report. That is, most PAPs along the Iyiokwu River flood plain corridor captured in the RAP report are still within the impact zone with additional structures along the floodplain avoided in the initial design now being impacted upon. Only two (2) PAPs in the initial report were dropped while realignment to straighten the channel in order to improve the hydraulic efficiency caused many structures now to be affected. This however is responsible for the expanded impacts that significantly increased the budget. The level of satisfaction expressed by the PAPs, SPMU officials, members of the Site Committee and other stakeholders during this exercise was high as no major disagreement nor was rancour witnessed throughout the period of the exercise. A new schedule/timetable including an estimated total cost and funding arrangement for implementation of the RAP has been proposed and included in the addendum RAP Report. 5.3 Recommendations The approved engineering design passed straight into the JOSEL FARMS and this will result in the demolition of about seven farm buildings. A situation that has skyrocket the RAP cost by about One Hundred Million Naira. A careful observation shows that the channel can take its natural cause around the farm and only the Farm fence and a Duck pen will be affected. The RAP hereby recommends a realignment/adjustment of the design during actual implementation 20 P a g e

25 to take its natural cause at the JOSEL FARMS section of the Odunukwe-Nkaliki Hatchery Road flood intervention site. This realigned scenario around JOSEL FARMS will reduce the RAP cost by Ninety Seven Million Naira (N97, 000,000) 21 P a g e

26 Appendix I: Inventory of Project Affected Persons (PAPs) S/N Name of PAP PAP ID Phone No Longitude Latitude 1 Nwankwo Dennis EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N Nwankwo Friday EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N Cecilia Ogbaga EB/NEWMAP/O-N/003 N/A E N Regina Ogbaga EB/NEWMAP/O-N/004 N/A E N Nweze John EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N Sunday Nwankwo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N John Igwe EB/NEWMAP/O-N/007 N/A E N Ogbaga Samuel EB/NEWMAP/O-N/008 N/A E N Osondu Maria EB/NEWMAP/O-N/009 N/A E N Blessing Eze EB/NEWMAP/O-N/010 N/A E N Igwe Mathew EB/NEWMAP/O-N/011 N/A E N Ede Amechi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/012 N/A E N Igwe Emmanuel EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N Fidelis Nwibo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N Nnena Nwibo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/015 N/A E N Ogido Chidi Joseph EB/NEWMAP/O-N/016 N/A E8 4'52.58" N6 18' Luice Ighe EB/NEWMAP/O-N/017 N/A E8 4'53.89 N6 18'44.45" 18 Igwe Ngozi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/018 N/A E N Stella Ogbaga EB/NEWMAP/O-N/019 N/A E8 4'52.08" N6 18'44.19" 20 Regina Mbamagbo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/020 N/A E N Iziogo Samuel EB/NEWMAP/O-N/021 N/A E N Obaga Joseph EB/NEWMAP/O-N/022 N/A E N Okpaga Chukwuma EB/NEWMAP/O-N/023 N/A E N Osondu Maria EB/NEWMAP/O-N/024 N/A E N Monday Ishdagi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/025 N/A E N Ijeoma Mbam Agbo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/026 N/A E N Ogbaga Samuel EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N Elizabeth Ogidi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/028 N/A E N P a g e

27 29 Paul Igwe EB/NEWMAP/O-N/029 N/A E N Ugochukwu Ogidi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/030 N/A E N Izzigo Samuel EB/NEWMAP/O-N/031 N/A E N Igboke Nwankwo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/032 N/A E8 4'56.12" N6 18'43.27" 33 Ngozi Dom EB/NEWMAP/O-N/033 N/A E N Ofoke Francis EB/NEWMAP/O-N/034 N/A E N Idenyi Ndubuisi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/035 N/A E N Nwigugbe Sunday EB/NEWMAP/O-N/036 N/A E N Okpaga Cletus EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N Ogbaga Nwite EB/NEWMAP/O-N/038 N/A E N Ogbaga Paul EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N Ogbaga Ejike EB/NEWMAP/O-N/040 N/A E N Nwibo Nwite EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N Nwanlaro Okwudiri EB/NEWMAP/O-N/042 N/A E N Mbam Ikechukwu EB/NEWMAP/O-N/043 N/A E N Nwaofoke Peter EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E8 4'59.64" N6 18'44.00" 45 Mbam Anthony EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N Ngozi Nwuzor EB/NEWMAP/O-N/046 N/A E N Igwe Happiness EB/NEWMAP/O-N/047 N/A E N Uchenna Nwibo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/048 N/A E N Aloyisus Nwankwo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N Idenyi Ndubuisi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/050 N/A E N Monday Ishiamage EB/NEWMAP/O-N/051 N/A E N Okpaga Cletus EB/NEWMAP/O-N/052 N/A E N Uchenna Nwuguru EB/NEWMAP/O-N/053 N/A E N Peter Nwofoke EB/NEWMAP/O-N/054 N/A E N Ede Chinedu Godwin Nwankwo Okwudiri EB/NEWMAP/O-N/055 N/A E N EB/NEWMAP/O-N/056 N/A E N Mbam Gabriel EB/NEWMAP/O-N/057 N/A E N Mbam Ikenna EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N P a g e

28 59 Helen Mbam EB/NEWMAP/O-N/059 N/A E N Nwibo Ejiofor EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E N Mbam Emeka EB/NEWMAP/O-N/061 N/A E N Anthony Nwiboko EB/NEWMAP/O-N/062 N/A E N Nnenna Okpaga EB/NEWMAP/O-N/063 N/A E N Onwe Theresa EB/NEWMAP/O-N/064 N/A E N Nnenna Okpaga EB/NEWMAP/O-N/065 N/A E N Okpaga Cletus EB/NEWMAP/O-N/066 N/A E N Ogbaga nkenna EB/NEWMAP/O-N/067 N/A E N Nnena Nwibo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/068 N/A E N Nwibo Ndubuisi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/069 N/A E N Okechukwu Iziogo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/070 N/A E8 5'1.33" N6 18'44.97" 71 Isaiah Nkwegu F. EB/NEWMAP/O-N/071 N/A E8 5'0.14" N6 18'46.47" 72 Mgboroko Chika F. EB/NEWMAP/O-N/072 N/A E8 4'59.59" N6 18'46.87" 73 Ogbonna Ikechukwu Eli EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ E8 5'1.34" N6 18'48.89" 74 Alieze James EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '0.29"E 6 18'42.44"N 75 Rose Nwoduma EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '5.34"E 6 18'46.76"N 76 Grace Nwoduma EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '6.24"E 6 18'46.05"N 77 Benedeth Nwali EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '3.02"E 6 18'49.93"N 78 Ajah Loritha EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.22"E 6 18'50.59"N 79 Livinus Onele EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '11.36"E 6 18'43.74"N 80 Onyebuchi Nwankwo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '11.51"E 6 18'45.69"N 81 Hycenth Nwankwo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '12.03"E 6 18'46.72"N 82 Ofoke James EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '6.46"E 6 18'50.88"N 83 Akwegu Godwin EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '3.12"E 6 18'45.01"N 84 Ogbaga Sunday EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '7.94"E 6 18'47.60"N 85 Titus Alichi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '7.40"E 6 18'49.25"N 86 Nwode Joseph O. EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '9.55"E 6 18'49.87"N 87 Nwabueze Agbon EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '4.05"E 6 18'39.37"N 88 Michael Nwamini EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '3.70"E 6 18'38.16"N 24 P a g e

29 89 Nkweagu Chika EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '1.12"E 6 18'36.59"N 90 Nwoke Chidi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '50.76"E 6 18'45.54"N 91 Otozi Stephen J. EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '10.15"E 6 18'46.15"N 92 Chukwu Victor EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '8.62"E 6 18'43.05"N 93 Nkwegu Uchenna Michael EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '6.45"E 6 18'41.92"N 94 Igboke Friday EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.54"E 6 18'37.43"N 95 Victor Nkweghe EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '58.10"E 6 18'40.35"N 96 Gabriel Opah EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '1.07"E 6 18'39.51"N 97 Nwojiji Stephen EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '4.50"E 6 18'43.41"N 98 Okoro Thomas EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '3.43"E 6 18'41.51"N 99 Nwonkwegu Chritiana EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '54.76"E 6 18'45.31"N 100 Agboke Williams EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '3.04"E 6 18'38.47"N 101 Agatha Ejelonu EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.81"E 6 18'37.50"N 102 Nwibo Nwakpuma EB/NEWMAP/O-N/102 N/A 8 4'55.41"E 6 18'46.53"N 103 Regina Aloh Nweji EB/NEWMAP/O-N/103 N/A 8 4'53.99"E 6 18'46.16"N 104 Solomon Nwojiji A. EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '59.62"E 6 18'44.76"N 105 Oligbo Uchenna EB/NEWMAP/O-N/105 N/A 8 5'4.19"E 6 18'47.81"N 106 Nwakego Nweze Okemini EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '7.94"E 6 18'45.47"N 107 Maria Agbem EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '7.79"E 6 18'42.64"N 108 Agboke Agnes EB/NEWMAP/O-N/108 N/A 8 5'6.53"E 6 18'42.06"N 109 Nnenna Nweze EB/NEWMAP/O-N/109 N/A 8 5'4.64"E 6 18'41.11"N 110 Silvanus Nwali EB/NEWMAP/O-N/110 N/A 8 5'4.11"E 6 18'39.14"N 111 Maria Nkwede EB/NEWMAP/O-N/111 N/A 8 5'0.18"E 6 18'35.13"N 112 Chinyere Akam EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '0.27"E 6 18'34.58"N 113 Mbam Ikechukwu EB/NEWMAP/O-N/113 N/A 8 5'0.92"E 6 18'34.30"N 114 Nenna Nkwede Nwite EB/NEWMAP/O-N/114 N/A 8 5'8.95"E 6 18'48.67"N 115 Nneka Ogbaga EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '10.21"E 6 18'50.74"N 116 Alichi Abah EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '59.94"E 6 18'43.98"N 25 P a g e

30 117 Jacob Nwobu EB/NEWMAP/O-N/117 N/A 8 5'0.88"E 6 18'44.49"N 118 Christopher Nwonji EB/NEWMAP/O-N/118 N/A 8 5'3.75"E 6 18'47.70"N 119 Nwoke Cletus EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '4.76"E 6 18'49.99"N 120 Nkwede Akarama EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '53.46"E 6 18'46.56"N 121 Mbam Anayo Peter EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '52.63"E 6 18'46.08"N 122 Titus Alichi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/122 N/A 8 5'7.86"E 6 18'45.37"N 123 Nwaomaga Princewill EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '8.94"E 6 18'44.05"N 124 Agala Christopher EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '4.27"E 6 18'40.04"N 125 Ike Onyekaechi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '4.18"E 6 18'39.27"N 126 Nwota James EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '3.17"E 6 18'38.78"N 127 Friday Nwaogbaja Oke Izzi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '5.73"E 6 18'51.27"N 128 Opah Henry EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '57.87"E 6 18'44.04"N 129 Mbam Edwin EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '59.10"E 6 18'45.32"N 130 Linus Ogboloke EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '59.88"E 6 18'32.28"N 131 Michael Nwodoma EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.12"E 6 18'33.79"N 132 Hycentti Aleke EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.87"E 6 18'33.57"N 133 Pius Idenyi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '57.99"E 6 18'45.50"N 134 Nwon Henry Chidi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '8.01"E 6 18'47.72"N 135 Nwote Godwin EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '6.01"E 6 18'51.99"N 136 Ben Friday Onele EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.88"E 6 18'45.52"N 137 James Nwibo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.44"E 6 18'44.23"N 138 Nweze Nwokpuru EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '0.49"E 6 18'44.25"N 139 Friday Peter EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '3.92"E 6 18'41.77"N 140 Chinedu Emonike EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '6.99"E 6 18'43.43"N 141 Cletus Aleke EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '7.31"E 6 18'43.86"N 142 Mbam John Nwofoke EB/NEWMAP/O-N/142 N/A 8 5'7.34"E 6 18'45.60"N 143 Agboke Afuru EB/NEWMAP/O-N/143 N/A 8 5'3.49"E 6 18'48.19"N 144 Onele Stanley EB/NEWMAP/O-N/144 N/A 8 5'4.32"E 6 18'48.74"N 145 Oji Onyemaechi E. EB/NEWMAP/O-N/145 N/A 8 5'9.71"E 6 18'48.76"N 26 P a g e

31 146 Ejike Agboke EB/NEWMAP/O-N/146 N/A 8 5'0.27"E 6 18'34.63"N 147 Chidi Ominyi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '6.99"E 6 18'43.43"N 148 Onyema Nwibo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.87"E 6 18'33.57"N 149 Oriji Innocent EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '57.99"E 6 18'45.50"N 150 John Uguru EB/NEWMAP/O-N/150 N/A 8 5'8.01"E 6 18'47.72"N 151 John Okemini EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '6.01"E 6 18'51.99"N 152 Nwife Emelia EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.88"E 6 18'45.52"N 153 Onyebuchi Mbam EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.44"E 6 18'44.23"N 154 Mgbolo Jeremiah C. EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '0.49"E 6 18'44.25"N 155 Ndubuisi Nwoke EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '3.92"E 6 18'41.77"N 156 Chukwudi Felix EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.87"E 6 18'33.57"N 157 Ogbula Kingsley EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '57.99"E 6 18'45.50"N 158 Ogbonna Nwamgbam EB/NEWMAP/O-N/158 N/A 8 5'8.01"E 6 18'47.72"N 159 Emenike Chinedu EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '6.01"E 6 18'51.99"N 160 Fidelis Nweze EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.88"E 6 18'45.52"N 161 Ifeanyi Edigbo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.44"E 6 18'44.23"N 162 Emmanuel Nwogbaga EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '4.07"E 6 18'34.56"N 163 Jonah Nwibo EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '3.15"E 6 18'33.89"N Nwigwe Onyedikachi Okemini Friday Peter Emenike Ekenechukwu Kenneth EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '2.24"E 6 18'33.54"N EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '5.74"E 6 18'33.03"N EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '5.62"E 6 18'32.20"N 167 Ogbonna Chukwudi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '6.64"E 6 18'32.59"N 168 James Nweji EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '50.95"E 6 18'45.78"N Ofoke Ndubuisi Romanus Ibashi Onyekachi Francis EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '51.81"E 6 18'46.65"N EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '59.10"E 6 18'45.26"N 171 Obinna Alichi EB/NEWMAP/O-N/ '59.54"E 6 18'44.06"N 27 P a g e