7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION"

Transcription

1 7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION 7.1 INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY FEASIBILITY REPORT Congestion hot spot problem locations have been assessed using the data and analysis that was developed and presented in the Congestion Analysis Report. The information used to assess the congestion problems include existing speed profile data (Caltrans PeMS), 2035 No- Build level of service results from the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis, 2035 No-Build level of service results from the travel demand model, existing accident history, plus the Combined Congestion Score which includes a combination of these data sources to generate a numerical value representing a common comparison of congestion through freeway segments spanning from interchange to interchange. A critical engineering review of existing geometric conditions and deficiencies along each freeway corridor is also used to help identify the specific congestion locations. All of this data is then used to identify the magnitude and specific congestion characteristics of these hot spots. All analyses have been based on maintaining existing non-standard lane and shoulder configurations with new lane widening proposed at current lane and shoulder width standards. The effects of full standard widening may change the assessment of congestion problem areas, potential solutions and the various impacts of those solutions related to right of way, environmental considerations and cost. To assess the larger footprint of using full standards, a line is included on the conceptual geometric plans to show the extent of additional widening that would be required. Full standards will be evaluated in any subsequent work. The congestion hot spot analysis is presented by individual freeway corridor in the direction of travel to enable the reader to follow and track the analysis in the direction they would be driving on the freeway. A map and congestion explanation for each congestion hot spot location is included herein outlining the following items: Type, characteristic, root cause and specific details of the congestion problem; Contribution (exacerbation) of adjacent congestion problem areas on the congestion area being examined; and Limits and logical terminus of the congestion problem area An effectiveness analysis of components of Concepts A, B and C, as well as No-Build, has been performed to determine how each concept improves (or provides a solution for) the specific congestion problem area, and the magnitude (or extent) of the congestion improvement. The magnitude (or extent) of the improvement and the effectiveness (as specific as possible) of the solutions will be based upon the following elements: 1) the volume of traffic that benefits from the improvement, 2) improvement of a high accident location, 3) complete or partial improvement of the congestion problem, 4) interaction of this congestion problem with those of adjacent congestion problem areas, 5) preliminary cost of the congestion problem solution, and 6) general cost/benefit assessment. Information is also provided for right of way impact Page 73

2 assessment and environmental considerations and issues to provide an additional basis for qualitative assessment. While no further traffic model runs and HCM traffic analyses were performed for this Feasibility Report, other traffic model runs and associated data compiled as part of the Congestion Analysis Report and the Traffic Model Run Summary Report were used to support qualitative assessments of congestion hot spots in specific locations. As discussed in Section 5.0, the choice of the geometric improvement was not significantly affected by the results of the other model runs the geometric improvement is mostly needed with or without the other multimodal improvements. However, in other locations the other traffic model runs were consulted as needed to assess the need for specific improvements on a case-by-case basis. This was assessed through a qualitative analysis consisting of a review of model output data such as change in volume on the mainline segments and change in speeds from the model due to the other (non-geometric improvements). Page 74

3 7.2 SR-91 WESTBOUND CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM ANALYSIS SUMMARY The location and duration of existing congestion along SR-91 westbound (WB) are illustrated in using the PeMS Speed Contour Exhibit in Figure 9. Segment speeds less than 25 mph are shown as red, 25 to 35 mph are shown as orange/brown. Less than 35 mph is typically used to define severe congestion on most maps and reports showing freeway speeds. Thus, both the red and orange/brown colors indicate significant congestion/delay on the freeway systems, and the yellow segments indicate slowing and areas that are nearing the point of significant congestion/delay. Figure 9 shows that existing congestion occurs throughout the entire study area for over three hours in the AM and east of I-605 for two hours in the PM. FIGURE 9: PEMS SPEED CONTOUR FOR WB SR-91 Hour of the day PostMile SR-91 Location ORANGETHORPE RD ARTESIA SHOWMAKER BLOOMFIELD NORWALK NORWALK PIONEER PIONEER STUDEBAKER W OF CALIFORNIA BELLFLOWER BELLFLOWER CLARK LAKEWOOD LAKEWOOD DOWNEY PARAMOUNT CHERRY ORANGE ATLANTIC ATLANTIC LONG BEACH Eleven locations have been documented as the areas that represent significant congestion problem areas for purposes of detailed analysis. The following discussion and the corresponding Figures display the eleven congestion problem hot spot locations along with a description of the congestion issues at each location. The eleven hot spot locations for SR-91 WB are as follows (labeled 91 WB-1 through 91 WB-11 for hot spot locations 1 through 11): Page 75

4 91 WB-1: Artesia Boulevard to Norwalk Boulevard 91 WB-2: Norwalk Boulevard to Pioneer Boulevard 91 WB-3: Pioneer Boulevard to N/S 605 Connector Ramp Diverge 91 WB-4: N/S 605 Connector Ramp Diverge 91 WB-5: S 605 W 91 Connector Ramp Merge 91 WB-6: Clark Avenue to Bellflower Boulevard 91 WB-7: Mainline Lane Addition at Downey Avenue 91 WB-8: Paramount Boulevard to Cherry Avenue 91 WB-9: Atlantic Avenue Off-Ramp Diverge to N/S 710 Connector Ramp Diverge 91 WB-10: N 710 W 91 Connector Ramp/Atlantic Avenue On-Ramp Merge 91 WB-11: S 710 W 91 Connector Ramp Merge to Long Beach Boulevard Based on a careful review of the detailed congestion problem analysis results, each of these locations is determined to experience congestion that warrants some type of improvement and is thus designated as a congestion hot spot. The eleven specific congestion locations are further described in terms of why they were identified as hot spots, including a summary of the analysis results, plus descriptions of the causes of congestion at each location. It has also been determined that although SR-91 WB east of Bloomfield Avenue to the Los Angeles/Orange county line does experience congestion, it is largely the result of downstream congestion west of Bloomfield Avenue that spills back into this segment and not specific freeway deficiencies. CONGESTION HOT SPOT 91 WB-1 Location: Artesia Boulevard to Norwalk Boulevard PeMS Speed Data: The freeway mainline experiences extremely slow speeds with current average speeds of less than 35 mph during the AM peak and during the PM peak No-Build Level of Service: The level of service indicates extreme congestion during both AM and PM peak periods. This is based on the 2035 No-Build HCM LOS E in the AM peak period and LOS F in the PM peak period for the mainline weave. The model V/C LOS D in the AM peak period and LOS F in the PM peak period also indicates extreme congestion. Accident History: Accident history does not exceed statewide average by 30 percent or more. Congestion Score: This location received a combined congestion score of 7 in the AM and 9 in the PM indicating severe congestion from multiple causes. Page 76

5 Westbound SR-91 volumes begin to increase (causing slow down and congestion) in the vicinity of the Bloomfield Avenue entrance ramp. Upstream entrance ramp volumes (516 AM/ 723 PM) are greater than exit ramp volumes (294 AM/421 PM) resulting in mainline congestion. A short weaving distance of approximately 1,000 feet between Bloomfield Avenue and Norwalk Boulevard and between Norwalk Boulevard and Artesia Boulevard contributes to congestion in this area. In the vicinity of Bloomfield/Artesia is the first overhead sign indicating the I-605 connector is 1 ¾ mile ahead. Due to short spacing of the arterial street interchanges from this point to the I-605, some WB 91 vehicles heading to NB 605 will start moving to the right lanes to get positioned to exit. Congestion at this location is also interrelated to Hot Spot WB-2, WB-3 and WB-4. CONGESTION HOT SPOT 91 WB-2 Location: Norwalk Boulevard to Pioneer Boulevard PeMS Speed Data: The freeway mainline experiences extremely slow speeds with current average speeds of less than 35 mph during the AM peak and 35 to 45 mph during the PM peak No-Build Level of Service: The level of service indicates extreme congestion during both AM and PM peak periods. This is based on the 2035 No-Build HCM LOS E in the AM peak period and LOS E in the PM peak period for the mainline weave. The model V/C LOS E in the AM peak period and LOS F in the PM peak period also indicates extreme congestion. Accident History: Accident history exceeds statewide average by 30 percent or more at this location with a predominance of rear end accidents. Congestion Score: This location received a combined congestion score of 10 in the AM and PM peak periods indicating severe congestion from multiple causes. The mainline volumes (6750 AM/8081 PM) approach full capacity. A short weaving distance of approximately 1,000 feet between Norwalk Boulevard and Pioneer Boulevard contributes to congestion in this area. Overhead signs continue in this area indicating the I-605 connector is ahead. Due to short spacing of the arterial street interchanges from this point to the I-605, WB 91 vehicles heading to NB 605 continue moving to the right lanes to get positioned to exit. Congestion at this location is also interrelated to Hot Spot WB-1, WB-3 and WB-4. Page 77

6 CONGESTION HOT SPOT 91 WB-3 Location: Pioneer Boulevard to N/S 605 Connector Ramp Diverge PeMS Speed Data: The freeway mainline experiences extremely slow speeds with current average speed of 35 mph during the AM peak and mph during the PM peak No-Build Level of Service: The level of service indicates extreme congestion during both AM and PM peak periods. This is based on the 2035 No-Build HCM LOS E in the AM peak period and LOS F in the PM peak period for the mainline weave. The model V/C LOS D in the AM peak period and LOS F in the PM peak period also indicates extreme congestion. Accident History: Accident history exceeds statewide average by 30 percent or more at this location with a predominance of rear end accidents. Congestion Score: This location received a combined congestion score of 10 in the AM peak period and 9 in the PM peak period indicating severe congestion from multiple causes. The high 2035 No-Build volume (791 AM / 685 PM) of traffic entering the mainline at Pioneer Boulevard and exiting to I-605 (3208 AM / 3421 PM) and mainline weaving distance of approximately 2,400 feet results in congestion in this segment between Pioneer Boulevard entrance and I-605 exit. Due to short spacing of the arterial street interchanges from this point to the I-605, any remaining WB 91 vehicles heading to NB 605 move to the right lanes to get positioned to exit. Congestion at this location is interrelated to Hot Spots WB-1, WB-2 and WB-4. As a result, westbound SR-91 volumes typically back up at this location on a daily weekday basis to the east past WB-1 and WB-2. CONGESTION HOT SPOT 91 WB-4 Location: W 91 N/S 605 Connector Ramp Diverge PeMS Existing Speed Data: The freeway mainline experiences extremely slow speeds with current average speeds of less than 35 mph during the AM peak period. During the PM peak period the speeds are between 45 and 55 mph which also is an indication of congestion No-Build Level of Service: The level of service indicates extreme congestion during both AM and PM peak periods. This is based on the 2035 No-Build HCM LOS E in Page 78

7 the AM peak period and LOS F in the PM peak period for the mainline weave. The model V/C LOS E in the AM peak period and LOS F in the PM peak period also indicates extreme congestion. Accident History: Accident history exceeds statewide average by 30 percent or more at this location, which is an indication of congestion at this location. Congestion Score: This location received a combined congestion score of 10 in the AM peak period and 9 in the PM peak period indicating severe congestion from multiple causes. The 2035 No-Build freeway mainline volumes (7233 AM/8342 PM) are approaching full capacity. The high 2035 No-Build volume (3208 AM / 3421 PM) approaches capacity of the two-lane WB 91-N/S 605 connector ramp and the 2035 No-Build volume (2199 AM / 2126 PM) exceeds capacity of the one lane connector to NB 605. The weaving distance of 2,400 feet between the Pioneer Boulevard entrance ramp (2035 No-Build volume 791 AM/685 PM) and the two lane N/S 605 connector ramp exit (3208 AM / 3421 PM) is not sufficient for the high volume of weaving vehicles. The two lane connector ramp splits one lane to SB 605 and one lane to NB 605. The high volume of NB 605 traffic exceeds the capacity of a one lane ramp which causes backup that affects WB 91 operations upstream of this point. The NB 605 connector transitions to two lanes shortly after the one lane diverge movement, allowing the traffic congestion to disperse on the NB 605 connector downstream of this point. Nonstandard existing shoulder widths (2 feet LT and 8 feet RT) and non-standard existing superelevation rate (6-8%) on the N/S 605 connector ramp also contribute to reduced capacity and congestion at this location. As a result of the congestion described above, the westbound SR-91 volumes typically back up to the east at this location on a daily weekday basis past WB-1, WB-2 and WB-3. CONGESTION HOT SPOT 91 WB-5 Location: S 605 W 91 Connector Ramp Merge PeMS Existing Speed Data: The freeway mainline experiences extremely slow speeds with current average speeds of less than 35 mph during the AM peak period. During the PM peak period the speeds are mph No-Build Level of Service: The level of service indicates congestion during both AM and PM peak periods. While the 2035 No-Build HCM of LOS C/D in the AM and PM peak indicates moderate congestion, the model V/C LOS E in the AM peak period and LOS E in the PM peak period indicates extreme congestion. Page 79

8 Accident History: Accident history exceeds statewide average by 30 percent or more at this location with a predominance of accidents hitting a fixed object. Congestion Score: This location received a combined congestion score of 8 in the AM peak period and 7 in the PM peak period indicating severe congestion from multiple causes. The high 2035 No-Build volume (1884 AM / 2267 PM) exceeds the capacity of the twolane ramp that merges to one-lane prior to the entrance into the mainline, which also has high volumes (5510 AM/6656 PM). Nonstandard existing left shoulder width of 2 feet and nonstandard existing 8 percent superelevation on the connector ramp also contribute to reduced capacity and congestion at this location. CONGESTION HOT SPOT 91 WB-6 Location: Bellflower Boulevard to Clark Avenue PeMS Speed Data: This segment experiences extremely slow mainline speeds with current average speed of less than 35 mph during the AM peak period. During the PM peak period, speeds are greater than 55 mph, indicating that the congestion issue based on speed measurements occurs only during the AM peak period No-Build Level of Service: The level of service analysis indicates extreme congestion during both the AM and PM peak hours. This is based on the 2035 No-Build HCM LOS F in the AM peak hour and LOS F in the PM peak hour. The model V/C is LOS F in the AM peak hour and LOS F in the PM peak hour. Accident History: Accident history does not exceed statewide average by 30 percent or more. Congestion Score: This segment experiences a combined congestion score of 9 in the AM peak period, indicating severe congestion from multiple causes, and 6 in the PM peak period, indicating moderate congestion problems. The high 2035 No-Build volumes on the Bellflower Boulevard on-ramp (1281 AM / 758 PM) and the mainline (7353 AM / 7842 PM) contribute to congestion. The Clark Avenue off-ramp (268 AM / 556 PM) has moderate volumes. A short weaving distance of approximately 650 feet exists between the Bellflower Boulevard on-ramp and the Clark Avenue off-ramp. This creates an operational issue that backs up westbound traffic due to the very short weaving distance in combination with the large volume of vehicles using the Bellflower Boulevard on-ramp and the Page 80

9 mainline. For instance, the high volumes entering the freeway on the Bellflower Boulevard on-ramp are required to weave over one lane to enter the freeway. Clark Boulevard is a half-diamond (partial) interchange, with ramps only on the easterly side. CONGESTION HOT SPOT 91 WB-7 Location: Mainline Lane Addition at Downey Avenue PEMS Speed Data: The segment immediately upstream of the lane addition at Downey Avenue experiences extremely slow speeds with current average speeds of less than 35 mph during the AM peak and over 55 mph in the PM peak, indicating that the congestion issue based on speed measurements occurs only during the AM peak period No-Build Level of Service: The level of service analysis indicates extreme congestion during both the AM and PM peak hours. This is based on the 2035 No-Build HCM LOS E in the AM peak hour and LOS F in the PM peak hour. The model V/C is LOS F in the AM peak hour and LOS F in the PM peak hour. Accident History: Accident history does not exceed statewide average by 30 percent or more. Congestion Score: This segment experiences a combined congestion score of 8 in the AM peak period, indicating severe congestion from multiple causes, and 6 in the PM peak period, indicating moderate congestion problems. The high 2035 No-Build volumes on the mainline (7846 AM / 7934 PM), Lakewood Boulevard loop on-ramp (633 AM / 520 PM), Lakewood Boulevard diamond on-ramp (504 AM / 601 PM) and Bellflower Boulevard on-ramp (1281 AM / 758 PM) contribute to congestion. A 5 th general purpose lane is added westbound via the Downey Avenue on-ramp. Upstream of this added lane (where there are only 4 general purpose lanes) has considerable congestion due to restricted capacity of the mainline. The high volumes on the mainline and on-ramps east of Downey Avenue are greater than the capacity of the freeway at this location. This causes congestion between Downey Avenue and I-605 where the four mainline general purpose lanes do not provide enough capacity. Page 81

10 CONGESTION HOT SPOT WB-8 Location: Paramount Boulevard to Cherry Avenue PeMS Speed Data: This segment experiences slow mainline speeds with current average speed of mph during the AM peak period. During the PM peak period, speeds are greater than 55 mph, indicating that the congestion issue based on speed measurements occurs only during the AM peak period No-Build Level of Service: The level of service analysis indicates extreme congestion during both the AM and PM peak hours. This is based on the 2035 No-Build HCM LOS F in the AM peak hour and LOS F in the PM peak hour. The model V/C is LOS E in the AM peak hour and LOS E in the PM peak hour. Accident History: Accident history does not exceed statewide average by 30 percent or more. Congestion Score: This segment experiences a combined congestion score of 7 in the AM peak period, indicating severe congestion from multiple causes, and 4 in the PM peak period, indicating limited congestion problems. The high 2035 No-Build volume on the mainline (8,876 AM / 8,471 PM) and the moderate volumes on Paramount Boulevard on-ramp (592 AM / 776 PM) and Cherry Avenue off-ramp (432 AM / 672 PM) contribute to the congestion at this location. A short weaving distance of approximately 700 feet exists between the Paramount Boulevard on-ramp and the Cherry Avenue off-ramp. This creates an operational issue due to the very short weaving distance in combination with the large volume of vehicles on the mainline and moderate volumes on the on- and off-ramps. CONGESTION HOT SPOT 91 WB-9 Location: Atlantic Avenue Off-Ramp Diverge to N/S 710 Connector Ramp Diverge PeMS Speed Data: This segment experiences extremely slow mainline speeds with current average speed of less than 35 mph during the AM peak and greater than 55 mph in the PM peak, indicating that the congestion issue is exclusively during the AM peak period No-Build Level of Service: The level of service analysis indicates congestion during both the AM and PM peak hours. This is based on the 2035 No-Build HCM LOS D Page 82

11 in the AM peak hour and LOS D in the PM peak hour. The model V/C is LOS D in the AM peak hour and LOS E in the PM peak hour. Accident History: Accident history does not exceed statewide average by 30 percent or more. Congestion Score: This segment experiences a combined congestion score of 5 in the AM peak hour, indicating moderate congestion and 3 in the PM peak period, indicating limited congestion problems. The high 2035 No-Build volume on the mainline (9,590 AM / 9,397 PM), W 91 N/S 710 connector off-ramp (3,741 AM / 3,640 PM) and Atlantic Avenue off-ramp (960 AM / 945 PM) are all nearing capacity and contribute to the congestion at this location. The high volumes mentioned above on the mainline and on the two closely spaced successive off-ramps create a situation where the vehicles extensively utilize the outside lanes to get ready to exit. The two successive off-ramps are approximately 740 feet apart. This natural movement to the outer right lanes causes a significant operational deficiency that is not necessarily captured by HCM. CONGESTION HOT SPOT 91 WB-10 Location: N 710 W 91 Connector Ramp/Atlantic Avenue On-Ramp Merge PEMS Speed Data: The segment immediately upstream from this merge experiences extremely slow speeds with current average speed of less than 35 mph during the AM peak and greater than 55 mph in the PM peak, indicating that the congestion issue is exclusively during the AM peak period No-Build Level of Service: The 2035 No-Build HCM LOS is F during the AM peak hour and LOS C in the PM peak hour for this merge junction. Accident History: Accident history does not exceed statewide average by 30 percent or more. Congestion Score: This segment experiences a combined congestion score of 5 in the AM peak hour, indicating moderate congestion and 3 in the PM peak period, indicating limited congestion problems. The high 2035 No-Build volume on the N 710 W 91 Connector Ramp/Atlantic Avenue On-Ramp (1,446 AM / 1,307 PM) is above capacity for a one-lane ramp and the mainline has moderate volume (4,889 AM / 4,812 PM) at this location. Page 83

12 The N 710 to W 91 connector loop on-ramp joins with the Atlantic Avenue WB on-ramp to create a two-lane on-ramp to WB 91. This two-lane ramp immediately drops to one lane as it joins the freeway (which has three general purpose lanes prior to the on-ramp merge). This lane drop is the primary cause of the LOS F at this merge junction. As a result of the congestion described above, the westbound SR-91 typically backs up to the east at this location past WB-8 and WB-9. CONGESTION HOT SPOT 91 WB-11 Location: S 710 W 91 Connector Ramp Merge to Long Beach Boulevard PEMS Speed Data: This segment experiences extremely slow speeds with current average speed of less than 35 mph during the AM peak and greater than 55 mph in the PM peak, indicating that the congestion issue is exclusively during the AM peak period No-Build Level of Service: The level of service analysis indicates significant congestion during both the AM and PM peak hours. This is based on the 2035 No-Build HCM LOS E in the AM peak hour and LOS D in the PM peak hour. The model V/C is LOS D in the AM peak hour and LOS E in the PM peak hour. Accident History: Accident history does not exceed statewide average by 30 percent or more. Congestion Score: This segment experiences a combined congestion score of 5 in the AM peak hour, indicating moderate congestion and 3 in the PM peak period, indicating limited congestion problems. The high 2035 No-Build volume on the mainline (9,432 AM / 7,616 PM) and the S 710 W 91 connector on-ramp (3,366 AM, 1,844 PM) are approaching capacity. The Long Beach Boulevard off-ramp (332 AM / 440 PM) has moderate volumes at this location. A short weaving distance of approximately 1,100 between the S 710 W 91 connector on-ramp and the off-ramp to Long Beach Boulevard creates an operational issue due to the large volume of vehicles using the connector and the mainline in the AM peak hour. A mainline lane drop occurs immediately west of the off-ramp to Long Beach Boulevard, which further exacerbates the operations in this area. The relatively short distance between the Long Beach Blvd. ramps and the ramps serving Alameda St. and Santa Fe Avenue also contribute to congestion at WB-11. The congestion resulting from WB-10 and WB-11 in the AM backs up the westbound freeway into WB-8 and WB-9 (or even further east on a frequent daily basis). Once past WB-11 (and alameda St./Santa Fe Interchange) westbound SR-91 generally appears to open up. Page 84

13 7.3 SR-91 WESTBOUND CONGESTION HOT SPOT SOLUTION PROJECT DEFINITION SUMMARY The eleven congestion hot spot locations along SR-91 WB were further assessed and compared to determine how the congestion problem areas interrelate to one another. While some hot spots may stand alone in terms of their unique congestion and operational issues, others experience problems which are clearly related to upstream or downstream locations. The assessment of hot spot interconnectivity leads to a logical grouping of project definition segments that is then used to define a hybrid master plan of proposed freeway improvements that can provide the best investment for the maximum improvement benefit. In the case of SR-91 in the westbound direction, the eleven hot spot locations are combined into three logical project definition segments. The data and review of these segments show that they share operational issues and/or geometric issues. The three combined project definition segments for SR-91 westbound are as follows: WB-1 WB-4: Artesia Boulevard to W 91 - N/S 605 Connector Ramp Diverge WB-5 WB-7: S 605 W 91 Connector Ramp Merge - Downey Avenue WB-8 WB-11: Paramount Boulevard to Long Beach Boulevard CONGESTION SOLUTION PROJECT DEFINITION FOR SR-91 WB HOT SPOTS 91 WB-1 TO 91 WB-4 Location: Artesia Boulevard to W 91 - N/S 605 Connector Ramp Diverge Congestion Problem: This two mile segment is characterized by existing average speeds of less than 35 mph in the AM peak period and 45 to 55 mph in the PM peak period. Four local interchanges are spaced approximately ½ mile apart to the east of the SR-91/I-605 system interchange. Caltrans and FHWA standard for spacing between a system interchange and a local interchange is two miles and the standard spacing between local interchanges is one mile. The closely spaced interchanges do not meet Caltrans and FHWA Standards and contributes to mainline congestion as a result of merging and weaving of vehicles entering and exiting the freeway. Traffic volumes on westbound SR-91 begin to increase in the vicinity of the Artesia Boulevard entrance ramp, as more vehicles enter the freeway mainline than exit at the following Norwalk Blvd. interchange. This is also the location where vehicles begin to merge right to access mainline SR-91 WB mainline lanes 4 and 5 which exit on the N/S 605 connector. The two lane N/S 605 connector experiences congestion as the one lane NB 605 connector is over capacity. Congestion at this location results in queuing that backs up to the location where the N/S connector ramp diverges from the SR-91 mainline and also creates a long queue of congestion in mainline lanes 4 and 5 upstream of the N/S 605 connector ramp through the closely spaced local interchanges. The four localized hot spots result in a continuous, highly Page 85

14 congested 2 mile segment of westbound SR-91. Future projected mainline freeway volumes will contribute to making congestion in this segment worse in the future too. Congestion Solution: To address the congestion problem the following improvements provide a measurable congestion improvement as summarized below: Add 1 mainline lane from Artesia Boulevard to I-605 and widen N/S 605 connector ramp diverge from 2 lanes to 3 lanes. Maintain existing auxiliary lanes from Bloomfield Avenue to Norwalk Boulevard; Norwalk Boulevard to Pioneer Boulevard; and Pioneer Boulevard to I-605 connector exit. Remove existing Norwalk Boulevard to WB-91 direct on-ramp and convert to D ramp configuration. A D ramp configuration involves converting the existing uncontrolled, high speed movement onto the ramp to a signal-controlled, slow right-turn movement. Remove existing Pioneer Boulevard to WB-91 direct on-ramp and convert to D ramp configuration. Widen existing WB 91 Pioneer Boulevard and Artesia Boulevard exit ramps to provide 2- lane exits. Congestion Improvement and Benefit/Cost Assessment: The improvement to congestion conditions and other key performance assessments relative to the cost for the improvements of the WB-1 to WB-4 reach include: Preliminary Cost Range: $ 50 M - $ 60 M (assuming modification of the full 91/605 system interchange is not included and would be a separate project) 2035 Level of Service: The 2035 Build level of service analysis indicates reduced congestion. This is based on comparing the 2035 No-Build HCM, which is generally LOS E in the AM peak period and LOS E in the PM peak period for the mainline, to the 2035 Build HCM which is generally LOS D in the AM peak period and LOS D in the PM peak period. The 2035 mainline peak hour volumes that experience improved congestion conditions with the improvements are approximately 7,500 AM/9,000 PM in this reach. Accidents: Existing accident history generally exceeds the statewide average by 30 percent or more in this reach, particularly at the N/S 605 connector, which is expected to decrease with the proposed improvements. Environmental/Right of Way: Environmental considerations for this reach of improvements are anticipated to be of moderate significance. Right of way acquisition requirements are anticipated to be of low significance. Congestion Score: This reach experiences a combined congestion score range of 2-3 in the AM peak period and 3-4 in the PM peak period for 2035 Build compared to 5-10 in the AM and 7-10 in the PM for 2035 No-Build indicating a high significance of reduced congestion. Low/Moderate/High Qualitative Benefit/Cost Assessment: The assessment of 91 WB-1 to WB-4 is considered to be of high value based on the significance of the improvement Page 86

15 benefit gained for the cost invested and the significant reduction in the future congestion. CONGESTION SOLUTION PROJECT DEFINITION FOR SR-91 WB HOT SPOTS 91 WB-5 TO 91 WB-7 Location: S 605 W 91 Connector Ramp Merge Downey Avenue Congestion Problem: This three mile segment is characterized by existing average speeds of less than 35 mph in the AM peak period and over 55 mph in the PM peak period. The lane drop from two to one lane on the S 605 W 91 connector ramp, combined with the heavy volumes on this connector ramp, result in congestion at the merge with westbound SR-91. A short weaving distance of approximately 650 between the Bellflower Boulevard on-ramp and the Clark Avenue off-ramp, combined with the large volumes using Bellflower Boulevard on-ramp and the mainline, result in congestion at this location. A general characteristic of this segment is a lack of capacity on the mainline. West of Downey Avenue the freeway has five general purpose lanes; however, there are only four general purpose lanes between Downey Avenue and I-605. This lack of capacity and other issues within this segment causes considerable congestion and backups in the westbound direction. The three localized hot spots result in a continuous highly congested 3 mile segment of westbound SR-91. Congestion Solution: To address the congestion problem the following improvements provide a measurable congestion improvement as summarized below: Reconstruct S 605 connector ramp to be two lanes as it merges onto WB SR-91. One of these lanes will be an additional general purpose lane extending to Downey Avenue (to join the existing 5 th general purpose lane near Downey Avenue) and one lane will be for maintaining the existing auxiliary lane to Bellflower Boulevard. Provide two-lane exit ramp to Bellflower Boulevard. Eliminate the Clark Boulevard off-ramp. Maintain existing auxiliary lane between Bellflower Boulevard on-ramp and Lakewood Boulevard off-ramp (connect auxiliary lane through the closed Clark Boulevard interchange). Maintain existing auxiliary lane between Lakewood Boulevard on-ramp and Downey Avenue off-ramp. Provide two-lane exit ramp to Downey Boulevard. Congestion Improvement and Benefit/Cost Assessment: The improvement to congestion conditions and other key performance assessments relative to the cost for the improvements of the WB-5 to WB-7 reach include: Preliminary Cost Range: $ 75 M - $ 85 M 2035 Level of Service: The 2035 Build level of service analysis indicates reduced congestion. This is based on comparing the 2035 No-Build HCM, which is generally LOS E Page 87

16 in the AM peak period and LOS F in the PM peak period for the mainline, to the 2035 Build HCM which is generally LOS D in the AM peak period and LOS E in the PM peak period. The 2035 mainline peak hour volumes that experience improved congestion conditions with the improvements are approximately 7,500 AM/8,500 PM in this reach. Accidents: Existing accident history generally does not exceed the statewide average by 30 percent or more in this reach, except at the S 605 connector ramp, which is expected to decrease with the proposed improvements. Environmental/Right of Way: Environmental considerations for this reach of improvements are anticipated to be of moderate significance. Right of way acquisition requirements are anticipated to be of moderate significance (primarily related to Bellflower Blvd widening). Congestion Score: This reach experiences a future combined congestion score range of 5-6 in the AM peak period and 3-5 in the PM peak period for 2035 Build compared to 7-9 in the AM and 5-6 in the PM for 2035 No-Build, indicating a high significance of reduced congestion. Low/Moderate/High Qualitative Benefit/Cost Assessment: The assessment of 91 WB-5 to WB-7 is considered to be of moderate value based on the improvement benefit gained for the cost invested and that some congestion is only moderately improved. CONGESTION SOLUTION PROJECT DEFINITION FOR SR-91 WB HOT SPOTS 91 WB-8 TO 91 WB-11 Location: Paramount Boulevard Long Beach Boulevard Congestion Problem: This two mile segment is characterized by existing average speeds of generally less than 35 mph in the AM peak period and over 55 mph in the PM peak period. The segment between Paramount Boulevard and Cherry Avenue has a short weaving distance of 700. This creates an area of congestion due to the short weaving distance in combination with the large volumes on the mainline, Paramount Boulevard on-ramp and Cherry Avenue offramp. Approaching the I-710 interchange, there are two closely spaced successive off-ramps (one to Atlantic Avenue and the other to N/S 710) with very heavy volumes associated with each off-ramp and the mainline. This creates a situation where vehicles extensively use the outside lanes to get ready to exit. In the future, a third off-ramp will potentially be added in this area to access the S 710 Freight Corridor as part of the I-710 Corridor Project. Another cause of congestion is where the N 710 W 91 connector/atlantic Avenue on-ramp merges with the mainline. The heavy volumes associated with this on-ramp and the mainline and the reduction to a one-lane ramp create a merge junction that is operating at LOS F. Lastly, a short weaving distance of approximately 1,100 between the S 710 W 91 connector on-ramp and the Long Beach Boulevard off-ramp, in combination with the large volumes on the mainline and connector, causes congestion at this critical area. A mainline lane drop occurs immediately west of the off-ramp to Long Beach Boulevard, which further exacerbates the operations in the westbound direction (plus congestion related impacts associated with the ramps to Alameda St./Santa Fe Ave. west of Long Beach Blvd.). The four localized hot spots result in a continuous highly congested 2 mile segment of westbound SR-91. Page 88

17 Congestion Solution: To address the congestion problem the following improvements provide a measurable congestion improvement as summarized below: Braid Paramount Boulevard on-ramp and Cherry Avenue off-ramp. Provide new auxiliary lane from Cherry Avenue on-ramp to Atlantic Avenue off-ramp. Maintain existing auxiliary lane prior to N/S 710 off-ramp. Add one general purpose lane from N/S 710 off-ramp (near Atlantic Avenue) to Santa Fe Avenue. Provide two-lane exit to Long Beach Boulevard. Relocate N 710 W 91 connector ramp as shown for the I-710 Corridor Project. Congestion Improvement and Benefit/Cost Assessment: The improvement to congestion conditions and other key performance assessments relative to the cost for the improvements of the WB-8 to WB-11 reach include: Preliminary Cost Range: $ 160 M - $ 200 M 2035 Level of Service: The 2035 Build level of service analysis indicates some reduced congestion. This is based on comparing the 2035 No-Build HCM, which is generally LOS D-F in the AM peak period and LOS D-F in the PM peak period for the mainline, to the 2035 Build HCM which is generally LOS D-E in the AM peak period and LOS D-E in the PM peak period. The 2035 mainline peak hour volumes that experience improved congestion conditions with the improvements are approximately 9,000 AM/8,500 PM in this reach. Accidents: Existing accident history does not exceed the statewide average by 30 percent or more in this reach. Environmental/Right of Way: Environmental considerations for this reach of improvements are anticipated to be of moderate significance. Right of way acquisition requirements are anticipated to be of moderate significance. Congestion Score: This reach experiences a combined congestion score range of 2-7 in the AM peak period and 1-4 in the PM peak period for 2035 Build compared to 5-7 in the AM and 3-5 in the PM for 2035 No-Build indicating a moderate significance of reduced congestion. Low/Moderate/High Qualitative Benefit/Cost Assessment: The assessment of 91 WB-1 to WB-4 is considered to be of moderate value based on the significance of the improvement benefit gained for the cost invested and the moderate improvements in congestion scores. Page 89

TABLE OF CONTENTS FEASIBILITY REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS FEASIBILITY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary... 1 2.0 Introduction... 6 2.1 BACKGROUND... 6 2.2 PURPOSE OF STUDY... 7 2.3 STUDY AREA... 8 2.4 STUDY PROCESS / STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT... 8 3.0 Summary of Freeways

More information

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis MEMORANDUM Transportation Bill Troe, AICP Jason Carbee, AICP 12120 Shamrock Plaza Suite 300 Omaha, NE 68154 (402) 334-8181 (402) 334-1984 (Fax) To: Project File Date: Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade

More information

Northwest Corridor Project Interchange Modification, Interchange Justification and System Analysis Report Reassessment (Phase I)

Northwest Corridor Project Interchange Modification, Interchange Justification and System Analysis Report Reassessment (Phase I) Northwest Corridor Project Interchange Modification, Interchange Justification and System Analysis Report Reassessment (Phase I) Introduction The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) prepared a

More information

TABLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS

TABLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS 4.11 TRANSPORTATION The potential traffic impacts of the proposed project are evaluated in the Buena Park Beach/Orangethorpe Mixed Use Project Traffic Analysis (Traffic Analysis) by Austin-Foust Associates

More information

I-264 CORRIDOR EVALUATION STUDY. September 7, 2016 Eric Stringfield VDOT Planning Director Chris Lawrence AECOM Senior Transportation Engineer

I-264 CORRIDOR EVALUATION STUDY. September 7, 2016 Eric Stringfield VDOT Planning Director Chris Lawrence AECOM Senior Transportation Engineer I-264 CORRIDOR EVALUATION STUDY September 7, 2016 Eric Stringfield VDOT Planning Director Chris Lawrence AECOM Senior Transportation Engineer Study Overview Interchange Locations Study Context Follow-up

More information

PRELIMINARY DRAFT WADDLE ROAD / I-99 INTERCHANGE PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS FINAL TRAFFIC SUMMARY REPORT

PRELIMINARY DRAFT WADDLE ROAD / I-99 INTERCHANGE PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS FINAL TRAFFIC SUMMARY REPORT PRELIMINARY DRAFT WADDLE ROAD / I-99 INTERCHANGE PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS FINAL TRAFFIC SUMMARY REPORT Prepared by: In Association with: November 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Patton Township, in partnership

More information

MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network

MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network Prepared by: The University of Texas at Austin Center for Transportation Research Prepared for: Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority

More information

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report ROUTE 7 (HARRY BYRD HIGHWAY) WESTBOUND FROM WEST MARKET STREET TO ROUTE 9 (CHARLES TOWN PIKE) Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report Project No. 6007-053-133, P 101 Ι UPC No. 58599 Prepared by:

More information

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA February 13, 2015 Mr. Meran Dadgostar P.E., R.S. Town of Highland Park 4700 Drexel Dr. Highland Park, Texas 75205 Re: Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest

More information

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh) Chapter 5 Traffic Analysis 5.1 SUMMARY US /West 6 th Street assumes a unique role in the Lawrence Douglas County transportation system. This principal arterial street currently conveys commuter traffic

More information

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis PURPOSE The traffic analysis component of the K-68 Corridor Management Plan incorporates information on the existing transportation network, such as traffic volumes and intersection

More information

Operational & Geometrical Analysis Technical Memorandum

Operational & Geometrical Analysis Technical Memorandum I-395 Southbound between Duke Street & Edsall Road: Congestion Relief Feasibility Study Operational & Geometrical Analysis Technical Memorandum Task Order #92 Prepared by: July 17, 2012 Rummel, Klepper

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 1.1. Site Location and Study Area...1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access...2 1.3.

More information

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The following section of the Draft EIR contains a description of the proposed Elk Grove Boulevard/SR 99 Interchange Modification project, consistent with the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15124.

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1. Location and Study Area... 1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Access... 2 1.3. Adjacent Land Uses... 2 1.4. Existing ways...

More information

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007 Technical Memorandum May 2007 Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council Edwards and Kelcey with Wallace Roberts and Todd Alta Planning and Design CONTENTS SECTION ONE- INTRODUCTION...1 SECTION TWO-

More information

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: DECEMBER 2007 Glenn Avenue Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background

More information

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County Executive Summary March 2015 Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

More information

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA May 5, 2016 Mr. Anthony Beach, P.E. BSP Engineers 4800 Lakewood Drive, Suite 4 Waco, Texas 76710 Re: Intersection and Access Analysis along Business 190 in Copperas Cove

More information

Harrah s Station Square Casino

Harrah s Station Square Casino Transportation Analysis Harrah s Station Square Casino Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Submitted To: City of Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board Prepared By: DKS Associates GAI Consultants December

More information

Gwinnett County Department of Transportation SR 324 / Gravel Springs Road at I-85 / SR 403 Interchange Project Number F , PI No.

Gwinnett County Department of Transportation SR 324 / Gravel Springs Road at I-85 / SR 403 Interchange Project Number F , PI No. June 4, 2015 Dear Resident: Thank you for attending this public information meeting for the proposed SR 324 / Gravel Springs Road at I-85 Interchange. The purpose of this meeting is two-fold: to provide

More information

Route 7 Corridor Study

Route 7 Corridor Study Route 7 Corridor Study Executive Summary Study Area The following report analyzes a segment of the Virginia State Route 7 corridor. The corridor study area, spanning over 5 miles in length, is a multi

More information

5.3 TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND PARKING

5.3 TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND PARKING 5.3 TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND PARKING This section is based upon the Downtown Lancaster Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (April 2, 2008) and the Downtown Lancaster Specific Plan Parking Analysis (May

More information

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, 2015 AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation Previous Presentations Los Altos Hills Town Council in May 2014 and February 2015 Palo Alto

More information

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies Revision Submitted on: November, 0 Author: Adriana Rodriguez, E.I Assistant Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff 0 South Orange Avenue, Suite 00 Orlando,

More information

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS REPORT. Pacheco Boulevard Alignment Study and Alternatives Analysis

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS REPORT. Pacheco Boulevard Alignment Study and Alternatives Analysis TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS REPORT Pacheco Boulevard Alignment Study and Alternatives Analysis PREPARED FOR: CITY OF MARTINEZ AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY OCTOBER 2016 FINAL REPORT Prepared By: under contract

More information

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING Final Report August 3, 216 #31, 316 5th Avenue NE Calgary, AB T2A 6K4 Phone: 43.273.91 Fax: 43.273.344 wattconsultinggroup.com Dunbow Road Functional Planning Final Report

More information

NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS

NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS 3. 23 NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS This section addresses the operations of the transportation system and details how it would be expected to function under year 23 No Build conditions with the projected

More information

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station Appendix C NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station Prepared for: Regional Transportation Department and URS Corporation as part of the North Metro EIS David Evans and Associates,

More information

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study 5858 N COLLEGE, LLC nue Traffic Impact Study August 22, 2016 Contents Traffic Impact Study Page Preparer Qualifications... 1 Introduction... 2 Existing Roadway Conditions... 5 Existing Traffic Conditions...

More information

APPENDIXB. Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum

APPENDIXB. Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum APPENDIXB Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum Environmental Assessment - Lincoln County, SD 85 th Street: Sundowner Avenue to Louise Avenue November 2017 MEMORANDUM Transportation Jim Kollbaum, PE

More information

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MEMORANDUM. DATE June 2, 2011

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MEMORANDUM. DATE June 2, 2011 BOSTON METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION State Transportation Building Ten Park Plaza, Suite 2150 Boston, MA 02116-3968 Tel. (617) 973-7100 Fax (617) 973-8855 TTY (617) 973-7089 www.bostonmpo.org Jeffrey

More information

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: JANUARY 2007 Donahue Drive Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background

More information

I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report

I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report July 2018 Prepared by: Prepared for: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction... 1 Study Area Limits... 1 Purpose and Need of the Study... 1 Safety

More information

Proposed Action, Purpose and Need Technical Memorandum

Proposed Action, Purpose and Need Technical Memorandum Proposed Action, Purpose and Need Technical Memorandum MoPac (State Loop 1) Intersections, Austin District From North of Slaughter Lane to South of La Crosse Avenue CSJ: 3136-01-015 Travis County, Texas

More information

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Richmond, Virginia August 14, 2013 Prepared For City of Richmond Department of Public Works Prepared By 1001 Boulders Pkwy Suite 300, Richmond, VA

More information

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2005 TO: Ted Idlof, URS FROM: Jeff Clark, Fehr & Peers RE: U.S. 50 Interchange Planning Study 1042-2011 This memorandum describes conceptual improvements for the

More information

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum State Road 7 Extension PD&E Study Design Traffic Technical Memorandum Palm Beach County, FL October 2010 State Road 7 Extension PD&E Study Design Traffic Technical Memorandum Palm Beach County, FL Prepared

More information

Los Coyotes Country Club Development Plan Traffic Impact Analysis

Los Coyotes Country Club Development Plan Traffic Impact Analysis Los Coyotes Country Club Development Plan Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared For: Phil Martin Associates 2073007450 Los Coyotes Country Club Development Plan Traffic Impact Analysis June 19, 2014 Prepared

More information

CHAPTER 3 STUDY AREA OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW

CHAPTER 3 STUDY AREA OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW HPTER 3 STUY RE OPERTIONL OVERVIEW This chapter describes the overall traffic operations within the study area under existing and future conditions and focuses on individual intersections not directly

More information

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for: NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: Solidex Holdings Limited & Investissement Maurice Lemieux Investments Attn: Mr. Anthony

More information

Grant Avenue Streetscape

Grant Avenue Streetscape REPORT TYPE GOES HERE Grant Avenue Streetscape PREPARED FOR City of Manassas 9027 Center Street Manassas, VA 20110 PREPARED BY 8300 Boone Boulevard Suite 700 Vienna, Virginia 22182 571.389.8121 July 31,

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. Photo here CAL MET ROYAL MRF EXPANSION. City of Paramount, CA. arch beach C O N S U L T I N G.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. Photo here CAL MET ROYAL MRF EXPANSION. City of Paramount, CA. arch beach C O N S U L T I N G. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS z Photo here CAL MET ROYAL MRF EXPANSION City of Paramount, CA arch beach C O N S U L T I N G June 23, 214 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CAL MET ROYAL MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY (MRF)

More information

Table of Contents SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN i

Table of Contents SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS... I SECTION 1: 2011 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE... 1 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN... 8 BY YEAR 2016... 9 BY YEAR 2025... 16 BY YEAR 2035... 20 SECTION 3: COMPLETED PROJECT

More information

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016 Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 216 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE WestBranch Residential Development LOCATED IN DAVIDSON, NC Prepared For: Lennar Carolinas, LLC

More information

INTERSTATE 540 IMPROVEMENT STUDY

INTERSTATE 540 IMPROVEMENT STUDY INTERSTATE 540 IMPROVEMENT STUDY WASHINGTON COUNTY AND BENTON COUNTY APRIL, 2006 INTERSTATE 540 IMPROVEMENT STUDY WASHINGTON COUNTY AND BENTON COUNTY April, 2006 Prepared by Parsons Transportation Group

More information

Stakeholder Focus Group Meeting #3 January 9, 2013 Cattlemens, 2000 Taylor Road, Roseville

Stakeholder Focus Group Meeting #3 January 9, 2013 Cattlemens, 2000 Taylor Road, Roseville PRESENT Stakeholder Focus Group Meeting #3 January 9, 2013 Cattlemens, 2000 Taylor Road, Roseville PROJECT TEAM REPRESENTATIVES Name Organization Celia McAdam Luke McNeel Caird Leo Heuston Judy Matsui

More information

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc. INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED Prepared for: 7849648 Canada Inc. Octiober 1, 2015 114-598 Overview_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting

More information

Capital Region Council of Governments

Capital Region Council of Governments March 23, 2018 Capital Region Council of Governments PROJECT CONCEPT REPORT Realignment of Swamp and Northfield Road s approaches to Route 44 (Boston Turnpike) Town of Coventry SUMMARY: The Town of Coventry

More information

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: First Bay Properties Inc. 311 Richmond Road, Suite 203 Ottawa, ON K1Z 6X3 August 8, 2017 117-663 Brief_1.doc

More information

Traffic Analysis and Design Report. NW Bethany Boulevard. NW Bronson Road to NW West Union Road. Washington County, Oregon

Traffic Analysis and Design Report. NW Bethany Boulevard. NW Bronson Road to NW West Union Road. Washington County, Oregon Traffic Analysis and Design Report NW Bethany Boulevard NW Bronson Road to NW West Union Road Washington County, Oregon May 2011 Table of Contents Table of Contents Section 1 Executive Summary... 2 Section

More information

V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The following section is based on the Draft Traffic Circulation Study for the Malibu La Paz Project (Traffic Study),

More information

CITY OF OAKLAND. 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design. Final Report (v3) March 23, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

CITY OF OAKLAND. 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design. Final Report (v3) March 23, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CITY OF OAKLAND 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design Final Report (v3) March 23, 2007 PREPARED BY: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. 27 th Street/Bay Place Corridor

More information

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Simluc Contractors Limited 2550 Blackwell Street, Ottawa K1B 5R1 October 18, 2013 113-584 Overview_1.doc D. J.

More information

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Bona Building & Management Co. Ltd. Place Vanier, 333 North River Road Vanier, Ontario K1L 8B9 August 12,

More information

INTRODUCTION. The focus of this study is to reduce congestion and improve mobility for all modes of transportation. Figure ES-1 Study Corridor Map

INTRODUCTION. The focus of this study is to reduce congestion and improve mobility for all modes of transportation. Figure ES-1 Study Corridor Map INTRODUCTION The I-280 Corridor Study is a highway planning study led by Santa Clara VTA, in partnership with the City of Cupertino and in coordination with other stakeholders in the study area. The study

More information

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM July 2014 FINAL (SR 43) Project Development and Environment Study From State Road 60 (Adamo Drive) to I-4 (SR 400) Hillsborough County, Florida Work Program Item

More information

7.0 Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept

7.0 Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept .0 Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept This section evaluates the traffic operations for all of the study years for the Build conditions as related to the Preferred Alternative with Service

More information

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc. OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 9402209 Canada Inc. December 15, 2015 115-625 Report_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation

More information

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Bona Building & Management Co. Ltd. Place Vanier, 333 North River Road Vanier, Ontario K1L 8B9 October

More information

MEMORANDUM. Date: September 22, Don Skillingstad, Spokane Transit Authority. Yongliang Zhu, Lochner

MEMORANDUM. Date: September 22, Don Skillingstad, Spokane Transit Authority. Yongliang Zhu, Lochner MEMORANDUM Date: September 22, 2014 To: Don Skillingstad, Spokane Transit Authority From: Yongliang Zhu, Lochner Re: Attachments: Median Flyer Stop Weave Analysis West Plains Transit Center IJR Project

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CANYON HILLS PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION This traffic analysis has been conducted to identify and evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed Canyon Hills

More information

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin #118274 May 24, 2006 1 Introduction The Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) is the official areawide planning agency

More information

Traffic Technical Environmental Study

Traffic Technical Environmental Study Traffic Technical Environmental Study US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration New Jersey Department of Transportation Table of Contents I. Introduction Project Background. 1 Purpose

More information

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9 MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9 December 18, 2012 112-566 Brief_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates

More information

EVALUATION OF METHODOLOGIES FOR THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FREEWAY WEAVING SECTIONS. Alexander Skabardonis 1 and Eleni Christofa 2

EVALUATION OF METHODOLOGIES FOR THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FREEWAY WEAVING SECTIONS. Alexander Skabardonis 1 and Eleni Christofa 2 EVALUATION OF METHODOLOGIES FOR THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FREEWAY WEAVING SECTIONS Alexander Skabardonis 1 and Eleni Christofa 2 1: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies,

More information

Let s Make I-40 Better Action Team. Friday, March 29, 2019 Hosted by RTP Foundation

Let s Make I-40 Better Action Team. Friday, March 29, 2019 Hosted by RTP Foundation Let s Make I-40 Better Action Team Friday, March 29, 2019 Hosted by RTP Foundation RTA Welcome Geoff Lang, MetLife, RTA Chair Jim Beley, The Umstead Hotel & Spa, RTA regional travel experience chair NCDOT

More information

SR 9/I-95 Interchange at 45 th Street PD&E Study Palm Beach County, Florida FPID No.: FAP No.: ETDM No.

SR 9/I-95 Interchange at 45 th Street PD&E Study Palm Beach County, Florida FPID No.: FAP No.: ETDM No. SR 9/I-95 Interchange at PD&E Study Palm Beach County, Florida FPID No.: 436519-1-22-01 FAP No.: 0951-682-1 ETDM No.: 14225 Palm Beach County MPO October 19, 2017 SR 9/I-95 Interchange at PD&E Study Presentation

More information

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015 Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015 Vision Zero The City and County of San Francisco adopted Vision Zero San Francisco Vision Zero High Injury Network as a policy in 2014, committing an

More information

Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY

Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY OCTOBER 2017 PREPARED BY: 1.1 Background The I-280 Corridor Study within Santa Clara County is a high-level highway planning study led by the Santa Clara VTA, in partnership

More information

#!! "$% ##! &! # '#! % $ #!

#!! $% ##! &! # '#! % $ #! Executive Summary US Highway 16 (US 16) is the primary corridor connecting Rapid City to the Black Hills region. It serves a growing population of commercial and residential traffic, as well as seasonal

More information

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners DRAFT Corridor study Honeysuckle Road October 2017 Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I... 1 STUDY SUMMARY... 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 CONCLUSIONS... 5 SECTION II... 7

More information

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT March 7, 2018 Page 2 of 4 The following MTSOs are being used across the five subregions: Intersection Level of Service

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT March 7, 2018 Page 2 of 4 The following MTSOs are being used across the five subregions: Intersection Level of Service Planning Committee STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: March 7, 2018 Subject Summary of Issues Recommendations Financial Implications Options Attachments Changes from Committee Review Draft 2017 Multimodal Transportation

More information

Abrams Associates. Transportation Impact Analysis. City of Rocklin. Prepared for: David Mohlenbrok City of Rocklin 4081 Alvis Court Rocklin, CA 95677

Abrams Associates. Transportation Impact Analysis. City of Rocklin. Prepared for: David Mohlenbrok City of Rocklin 4081 Alvis Court Rocklin, CA 95677 Transportation Impact Analysis Sierra College Boulevard Commercial Project City of Rocklin Prepared for: David Mohlenbrok City of Rocklin 081 Alvis Court Rocklin, CA 95677 Prepared by: 1875 Olympic Boulevard,

More information

Purpose and Need Report. Appendix B. Purpose and Need Report

Purpose and Need Report. Appendix B. Purpose and Need Report Purpose and Need Report Appendix B Purpose and Need Report I-35W North Corridor Project EA Minnesota Department of Transportation Purpose and Need Statement I-35W North Corridor Preliminary Design Project

More information

Interstate Route 77 / US Route 62 / State Route 687 (Fulton Road) Transportation Improvement Project. Prepared September 6, 2017

Interstate Route 77 / US Route 62 / State Route 687 (Fulton Road) Transportation Improvement Project. Prepared September 6, 2017 EODOT Project: ODOT Project: STA-IR 77-.50; PID 00290 Interstate Route 77 / US Route 62 / State Route 687 (Fulton Road) Transportation Improvement Project Summary of Public Comments Received and Responses

More information

Introduction Roundabouts are an increasingly popular alternative to traffic signals for intersection control in the United States. Roundabouts have a

Introduction Roundabouts are an increasingly popular alternative to traffic signals for intersection control in the United States. Roundabouts have a HIGH-CAPACITY ROUNDABOUT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS: GOING AROUND IN CIRCLES David Stanek, PE and Ronald T. Milam, AICP Abstract. Roundabouts have become increasingly popular in recent years as an innovative

More information

TRAFFIC CONDITIONS REPORT FOR INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 225 (I-225) PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGES (PEL) STUDY

TRAFFIC CONDITIONS REPORT FOR INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 225 (I-225) PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGES (PEL) STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS REPORT FOR INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 225 (I-225) PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGES (PEL) STUDY CDOT Project No. STA 2254 85 (19187) Prepared for: Colorado Department of Transportation Region

More information

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Existing Traffic Conditions PREPARED FOR: ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION ORLANDO, FLORIDA PREPARED WITH: INWOOD CONSULTING ENGINEERS

More information

Reference number /VP. Lafayette Downtown Congestion Study - Additional Traffic Analysis

Reference number /VP. Lafayette Downtown Congestion Study - Additional Traffic Analysis To James Hinkamp and Tony Coe, City of Lafayette Date January 19, 2017 Copies Reference number 243381/VP From Michael Iswalt and Vanessa Peers File reference 4-05 Subject Lafayette Downtown Congestion

More information

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017 Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North arolina June 2017 N. Little Egypt Road DQ\ QDQFLQJ VDOHV RU RWKHU SHUIRUPDQFH EDVHG FULWHULD Proposed Site Driveways Site Driveway 1 TRAFFI

More information

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for: OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: The Ottawa Train Yards Inc. 223 Colonnade Road South, Suite 212 Nepean, Ontario K2E 7K3 January 17, 2012

More information

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016 M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Prepared for CITY OF BELTON By May 2016 Introduction Missouri State Highway 58 (M-58 Highway) is a major commercial corridor in the City of Belton. As development has

More information

4.10 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION

4.10 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 4.10 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION The following section is based on a traffic and circulation study prepared by Fehr & Peers, Inc. (November 2003; refer to Appendix F for technical calculations). The effects

More information

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias, Bill Cisco Abstract As part of evaluating the feasibility of a road diet on Orange Grove Boulevard in Pasadena,

More information

Appendix D: Concept Screening

Appendix D: Concept Screening Concept Description Concept #1 Route 288 Roadway Widening This concept consists of constructing a third lane on northbound and southbound Route 288 between Powhite Parkway and US 360. This improvement

More information

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY GA SR 25 Spur at Canal Road Transportation Impact Analysis PREPARED FOR GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA 1725 Reynolds Street, Suite 300 Brunswick, Georgia 31520 PREPARED BY 217 Arrowhead Boulevard Suite 26 Jonesboro,

More information

Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum

Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum To From Gwen Pipkin Bill Howell Date June 18, 2013 Subject Roundabout Feasibility Study SR 29 PD&E Study From Oil Well Road to SR 82 Collier County, FL FPID 417540-1-22-01

More information

Washington St. Corridor Study

Washington St. Corridor Study FIGURE 7.17 Bridge Alternatives - Cross Sections 86 Discarded Alternative: Short-Term Bridge Repair Short-term repairs and west bridge span replacement were considered during analysis. Short-term repairs

More information

ATTACHMENT NO. 18 GMI-C. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices GMI SIGNS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

ATTACHMENT NO. 18 GMI-C. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices GMI SIGNS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 1 2 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 18 GMI-C 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 GMI agenda item II.H.2., January 19, 2012 National Committee on Uniform

More information

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report Preparedby: ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS Final Report Prepared for Maricopa County Department of Transportation Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1

More information

MEMORANDUM. TO: Transportation Planning and Programming April 1, 2009 Committee. FROM: Seth Asante, Mark Abbott, Efi Pagitsas, and Alicia Wilson

MEMORANDUM. TO: Transportation Planning and Programming April 1, 2009 Committee. FROM: Seth Asante, Mark Abbott, Efi Pagitsas, and Alicia Wilson MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation Planning and Programming April 1, 009 Committee FROM: Seth Asante, Mark Abbott, Efi Pagitsas, and Alicia Wilson RE: Traffic Operations and Bus Access and Egress at the Route

More information

Northbound San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project

Northbound San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project Project Overview Fed by a two-lane Interstate-280 (I-280) off-ramp, high vehicular volumes and speeds are longstanding issues along San Jose Avenue. Residents in the surrounding neighborhoods have expressed

More information

Technical Memorandum TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. RIDLEY ROAD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, VA. Prepared for: Mr. David Williams.

Technical Memorandum TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. RIDLEY ROAD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, VA. Prepared for: Mr. David Williams. Technical Memorandum TRFFIC IMPCT STUDY RIDLEY ROD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, V Prepared for: Mr. David Williams By: Charles Smith, P.E., PTOE EPR Charlottesville, V July 2014 1 TBLE OF CONTENTS

More information

Core of Rosslyn Transportation Study Existing Conditions Report - Appendix. Appendix E: VISSIM Model Calibration Summary

Core of Rosslyn Transportation Study Existing Conditions Report - Appendix. Appendix E: VISSIM Model Calibration Summary Core of Rosslyn Transportation Study Existing Conditions Report - Appendix Appendix E: Model Calibration Summary Core of Rosslyn Transportation Study Model Calibration Summary 5.9.218 Model Calibration

More information

4.1 Evaluation Criteria

4.1 Evaluation Criteria Section 3 of the I-280 Corridor Study report discussed potential improvements for the I-280 corridor improve mobility for all modes of transportation. This section evaluates those potential improvements

More information

LIVERPOOL TRANSPORTATION MODELING TECHNICAL MEMO MAY 2009

LIVERPOOL TRANSPORTATION MODELING TECHNICAL MEMO MAY 2009 LIVERPOOL TRANSPORTATION MODELING TECHNICAL MEMO MAY 2009 Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council 100 Clinton Square 126 N. Salina Street, Suite 100 Syracuse, NY 13202 Telephone (315) 422-5716; Fax

More information

4 Level of Service Results: HOV and Express Lanes

4 Level of Service Results: HOV and Express Lanes 4 Level of Service Results: HOV and Express Lanes Considering the importance of managed lanes (such as HOV and express lanes) in improving the overall performance of a corridor, Alameda CTC started monitoring

More information

# Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan

# Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan #70421 Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan Public Information Meetings and Hearings May June 2002 1 Reason for Freeway System Study 270-mile

More information

Appendix G. Traffic Study

Appendix G. Traffic Study Appendix G Traffic Study City of Lake Forest SPORTS PARK AND RECREATION CENTER Traffic Study March 2010 Draft City of Lake Forest SPORTS PARK AND RECREATION CENTER Traffic Study Prepared by: Austin-Foust

More information