SR 44 from US 441 / SR 500 to SR 44 / Orange Ave.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SR 44 from US 441 / SR 500 to SR 44 / Orange Ave."

Transcription

1

2 SR 44 from US 441 / SR 500 to SR 44 / Orange Ave. Financial Project ID: LAKE COUNTY DESIGN ALTERNATIVE STUDY FOR MULTI-USE PATH Prepared for: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION District 5 Project Manager: Dennisse Zornan Prepared by: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION Project Manager: Bruno Fiori, PE

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ii PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 PURPOSE FOR DESIGN STUDY 1 LIMITS AND FUNCTIONALITY OF MULTI-USE PATH 1 ALTERNATIVES STUDIED 2 CONSIDERATIONS USED IN STUDY 2 MULTI-USE PATH WITHIN EXISTING 4-LANE SEGMENT 3 ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTION # 1 SECTION 1 ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTION # 2 SECTION 2 ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTION # 3 SECTION 3 ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTION # 4 SECTION 4 ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTION # 5 SECTION 5 ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTION # 6 SECTION 6 ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTION # 7 SECTION 7 ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTION # 8 SECTION 8 ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTION # 9 SECTION 9 ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTION # 10 SECTION 10 CURRENTLY APPROVED TYPICAL SECTIONS ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTION WITH ADDITIONAL R/W FOR MULTI-USE PATH STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES / CRITERIA APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C i

4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Boyle Engineering currently serves as the engineering consultant to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District Five for the final design of SR 44 from US 441 / SR 500 to SR 44 / Orange Ave. in Lake County. The project traverses the City limits of Eustis and Mount Dora. The main purpose of the project is to reconstruct the existing 2-lane rural roadway as a 4-lane divided urban facility with curb and gutter, 4-ft wide bike lanes and sidewalks in each direction. Due to limited right-of-way and the desire to avoid right of way acquisition (other than for retention ponds), several elements of the design are less than the desired standards. These include 11-ft wide travel lanes (versus 12-ft desirable) and a 19.5-ft wide median (versus a desirable of 22-ft). The profile of the roadway will be raised and thus several sections of the roadway will require gravity / retaining walls. The reduced lane and median widths allow for the minimization of walls by providing additional width on the outside of the sidewalks to facilitate tying the new construction back to existing ground at the right-of-way line. The Lake Sumter Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) requested that FDOT investigate the potential of adding a multi-use path to the project. This report documents the results of that analysis. A number of potential alternatives were evaluated to accommodate the path within the existing right-of-way. Also, one alternative was evaluated that would require additional right-of-way to add the path while accommodating desirable standards for all design elements. The results of this study indicate the following: The path cannot be simply added within the existing right of way. Some modifications to the approved design will be required. Modifications that were considered in the various alternatives include: o Eliminating the 4-ft wide bike lanes. o Modifying the 4-ft wide bike lanes to 3-ft wide urban shoulders. o Eliminating the maintenance area behind any gravity / retaining walls. o Eliminating the raised median and instead using a two-way left-turn lane. o Building a 3-lane section. Consideration was given to both a wall solution and a solution with no more walls than currently planned for with the approved Typical Section. Basically, in order to avoid extensive increases in the amount of gravity / retaining wall required for the project, either the bike lanes or the median, or both will need to be eliminated. Under the wall solution gravity / retaining wall will need to be constructed along the majority of both sides of the roadway. This could be an issue with the property owners along the project as they will be faced with walls and hand rails along the frontage of their properties, as well as longer harmonizing easements at connection points. A sidewalk was maintained on the opposite side of the roadway from the trail. This is due to the nature of the area and the lack of safe crossing points. Safety, operations, maintainability, construction cost, design approval requirements, and other factors were impacted differently by the various alternatives. These impacts are identified in this report. The remainder of this report documents the alternatives considered, the advantages and disadvantages of each, and supporting documentation ii

5 DESIGN ALTERNATIVE STUDY FOR MULTI-USE PATH SR 44 Financial Project ID: Lake County PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project consists of milling and resurfacing the existing 4-lane segment from US441/SR500 (MP 0.000) to MP 0.237, and reconstructing the existing 2-lane segment to a 4-lane divided roadway from MP to SR44/Orange Ave. (MP 2.110). The currently approved Typical Section consists of a 4-lane divided urban section with 11- foot wide lanes, a 4-foot wide bicycle lane in each direction, a 19.5-foot wide raised grassed median, and a 5-foot wide sidewalk behind a 2-foot utility strip along each side of the roadway. The typical right-of-way width along this corridor is 100 feet. PURPOSE FOR DESIGN STUDY This study was performed to provide possible solutions to the resolution put forth by the MPO requesting for the following considerations: Redesign the corridor to include a multi-use path along the western side of the corridor for use by pedestrians and bicyclists. Design the multi-use path with widest dimension feasible within the constraints of the existing 100-ft right-of-way. Eliminate or reduce in width, as necessary, roadway/roadside elements including but not limited to bike lanes, median widths, lane widths, and sidewalks; in order to add multi-use path to Typical Section without right-of-way impacts. LIMITS AND FUNCTIONALITY OF MULTI-USE PATH It was assumed for the purpose of this study that the limits of the Multi-Use Path be the same as the limits of the project: from US 441 / SR 500 to SR 44 /Orange Ave. As further defined in the literature attached in Appendix C, a multi-use path is not intended for motor vehicle use. This facility is intended to provide pedestrians, cyclists, joggers, and skaters a recreational and peaceful place away from motor vehicle traffic. 1

6 ALTERNATIVES STUDIED All options were considered and investigated. As a result, excluding the currently approved Typical Section, the following 10 Alternative Typical Sections were developed for this study. 7 alternatives using a 4-lane divided section. 2 alternatives using a 5-lane undivided section. 1 alternative using a 3-lane undivided section. CONSIDERATIONS USED IN STUDY Each of the alternatives presented a unique set of advantages and disadvantages. In developing these alternatives, the following criteria were considered: Can bicycle lanes be included? Can U-turns be negotiated with reduced roadway/median? How much additional retaining / gravity wall will be necessary as a result of adding multi-use path? How will the utilities (above- and under-ground) be impacted? How will gravity / retaining wall be constructed / maintained if right at R/W? Will a Construction / Maintenance Easement be required throughout the length of project? How will off-site drainage be accommodated? Can the multi-use path be constructed without additional R/W in the existing 4- lane segment? What are the Pros and Cons with each Typical? What is the cost associated with each alternative? How does each alternative rate in terms of safety / operation / maintenance / drainage / constructability / utility accommodation? 2

7 MULTI-USE PATH WITHIN EXISTING 4-LANE SEGMENT The Multi-Use Path is shown added to the west side of the existing 4-Lane Typical Section: This existing 4-Lane segment is approximately the first ¼ mile of the project. This segment is not planned for reconstruction, therefore only the existing sidewalk on the west side would be replaced with the 12-ft Multi-Use Path. To accommodate the construction of the Multi- Use Path a minor amount of additional right-of-way would be required, as indicated in the above diagram. 3

8 Alternative Typical Section # 1 4-Lane Divided / 3-ft Urban Shoulders / Standard Median / Min. Lanes / Min. Multi-Use Path / Sidewalk with Utility Strip Elements: 11-ft Travel Lanes 3-ft Striped / Undesignated Bicycle Lanes 22-ft Median 10-ft Shared-Use Path 5-ft Sidewalk with 2-ft Utility Strip Gravity / Retaining Walls on both sides for majority of project length Const. / Maint. Easements on both sides for majority of project length

9 Alternative Typical Section # 1 Evaluation Table Pros Standard Median Width and Criteria Standard Sidewalk with Utility Strip Safety Operation Construction Maintenance Drainage Utility Accommodation Right-of-Way / Easements Cost Other Can make U-Turns with Passenger Vehicles. Level Of Service same as approved Typical and improved from existing 2-lane roadway. Cons Min. Lane Widths, Min. Urban Shoulders, Min. Multi-Use Path Substandard Bicycle Lane width. Cannot construct gravity / retaining walls from within existing R/W. Additional Driveway Connections. Cannot maintain gravity / retaining walls from within existing R/W. No space to accommodate offsite drainage. No space for above-ground utilities. Above-ground utilities cannot be placed between multi-use path or sidewalk and curb and gutter. This alternative will require either additional R/W or permanent easements along both sides of the roadway to accommodate construction, maintenance, and drainage. Construction: $3,314, (19.5%) cost increase compared to Approved Typical Section. R/W or Easements: Undetermined. Utility Relocations: Undetermined. Walls and picket style handrails are aesthetic concerns.

10 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 1 of 5 2/23/2009 Date: 2/23/2009 6:32:04 PM FDOT Long Range Estimating System - Production R4: Project Details Composite Report By Component Project: XX Letting Date: 01/2099 Description: SR 44 (CR 44B) FROM SR 500 US 441 TO SR 44 District: 05 County: 11 LAKE Project Manager: DRZ-BOYLE Version 5 Project Grand $20,279, Description: Shared Use Path Typical Section Evaluation Alternative 1: 4-lane divided, 11-ft travel lanes, 22-ft raised median, 3-ft urban shoulders, 5-ft sidewalk with 2-ft utility strip, 10-ft shared use path, concrete. EARTHWORK COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit REGULAR EXCAVATION 26, CY $6.50 $170, EMBANKMENT 12, CY $10.00 $126, CLEARING & GRUBBING AC $20, $452, Earthwork Component $748, ROADWAY COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit TYPE B STABILIZATION 81, SY $5.00 $408, OPTIONAL BASE,BASE GROUP 09 67, SY $16.00 $1,083, BOLLARDS EA $ $8, RETRO-REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT EA $5.25 $4, MARKERS MILLING EXIST ASPH PAVT,1 1/2" AVG DEPTH 16, SY $3.00 $48, SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONC, TRAFFIC C 11, TN $ $1,173, ASPH CONC FC,TRAFFIC C,FC- 6, TN $ $829, ,RUBBER PAINTED PAVT NM $1, $19, MARK,STD,WHITE,SOLID,6" PAINTED PAVT 8.44 GM $ $4, MARK,STD,WHITE,SKIP, 6" THERMOPLASTIC, STD, WHITE, SOLID, 8.44 NM $3, $30, " THERMOPLASTIC, STD, WHITE, SKIP, 6" 4.22 GM $1, $5, Roadway Component $3,614, SHOULDER COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit

11 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 2 of 5 2/23/ SOIL TRACKING PREVENTION DEVICE 8.00 EA $3, $27, ROCK BAG 1, EA $6.40 $11, SIDEWALK CONC, 4" THICK 6, SY $45.00 $278, SIDEWALK CONC, 6" THICK 14, SY $55.20 $779, DETECTABLE WARNING ON WALK 6.00 EA $ $4, SURF, RETRO STAKED SILT FENCE, TYPE III 19, LF $1.15 $22, CONC CLASS I, RETAINING WALLS 3, CY $ $2,151, PIPE HANDRAIL - GUIDERAIL, ALUMINUM LF $47.08 $16, PED/BICYCLE RAILING,STL,54"PICKET RAIL 18, LF $65.00 $1,189, CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE F 19, LF $20.00 $390, PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD 7, SY $3.00 $21, Shoulder Component $4,892, MEDIAN COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit CONCRETE TRAFFIC SEPARATOR, SP- VAR WIDT SY $66.53 $55, CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE E 19, LF $20.00 $390, TRAF SEP CONC-TYPE IV, 4' WIDE 4, LF $36.68 $175, PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD 18, SY $3.00 $56, Median Component $678, DRAINAGE COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit REGULAR EXCAVATION 26, CY $6.50 $174, EMBANKMENT CY $10.00 $7, SODDING 7, SY $3.00 $21, CLEARING & GRUBBING 6.00 AC $20, $120, CONC CLASS II, ENDWALLS CY $ $45, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-1, <10' 2.00 EA $4, $8, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-2, <10' 1.00 EA $4, $4, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-5, <10' EA $4, $177, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-6, <10' EA $3, $54, INLETS, CURB TYPE J-1, <10' 4.00 EA $4, $18, INLETS, CURB, TYPE J-2, <10' 3.00 EA $5, $15, INLETS, CURB, TYPE J-6, <10' 5.00 EA $6, $30, INLETS, CURB, TYPE 7, <10' 7.00 EA $4, $29, INLETS, CURB, TYPE 7, J BOT, <10' 1.00 EA $5, $5, INLETS, DT BOT, TYPE D, <10' 2.00 EA $3, $6, MANHOLES, P-7, <10' EA $3, $119, MANHOLES, J-7, <10' EA $5, $70, PIPE CULV OPT MATL, ROUND, 0-24", LF $ $6, SS PIPE CULV OPT MATL, ROUND, 37-48", LF $ $24, SS PIPE CULV OPT MATL, ROUND, 49-60", LF $ $120,562.48

12 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 3 of 5 2/23/2009 SS PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND,0-5, LF $74.56 $436, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND,25-4, LF $77.49 $323, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND,37-2, LF $ $263, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND, LF $ $130, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, OTHER, LF $ $45, "SD U-ENDWALL,STD 261,1:4 SLP, 18" EA $2, $38, MITERED END SECT, OPTIONAL RD, 42" CD 1.00 EA $3, $3, FENCING, TYPE B, , STANDARD 2, LF $11.67 $32, FENCE GATE,TYP B,SLIDE/CANT, EA $2, $5, 'OPEN PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD SY $3.00 $1, Drainage Component $2,343, SIGNING COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit SINGLE POST SIGN, F&I, LESS THAN 12 SF AS $ $15, SINGLE POST SIGN, F&I, SF AS $ $8, SINGLE POST SIGN, RELOCATE 1.00 AS $99.82 $ SINGLE POST SIGN, REMOVE AS $29.45 $ DELINEATOR, FLEXIBLE TUBULAR EA $74.76 $2, Signing Component $26, SIGNALIZATIONS COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, F&I, LED-COUNT DWN, PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, F&I, LED-COUNT DWN, AS $ $1, AS $1, $5, PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, RELOCATE 1.00 AS $ $ SGNL HEAD AUXIL, F&I, BACK PLT EA $ $ SECT SGNL HEAD AUXIL, F&I, CONC PED 6.00 EA $ $5, TYP II SGNL HEAD AUX,F&I, BACK PLT EA $ $ SECT CLU PED DET, F&I, DET STA POLE OR CAB EA $ $1, MTD SIGNAL HEAD TRAFFIC ASSEMBLY 8.00 EA $65.38 $ REMOVAL SPAN WIRE ASSEMBLY REMOVE 2.00 EA $ $ CONDUIT & CABLING REMOVE 1.00 PI $ $ SIGNAL EQUIPMENT MISCELLANOUS 1.00 PI $ $ REMOVE CONDUIT-SIGNALS, F& I, UNDERGROUND LF $7.00 $3,815.00

13 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 4 of 5 2/23/ CONDUIT-SIGNALS,F& I, UG JACKED LF $19.83 $8, CABLE, SIGNAL, FURNISH & INSTALL 2.00 PI $2, $5, SPAN WIRE ASSEMBLY, F&I, 2 WIRE, 1.00 PI $2, $2, OTHER PULL & JUNCTION BOXES, F&I, PULL EA $ $5, BOX PREST CNC POLE,F&I,TYP P-VII 1.00 EA $8, $8, TRAFFIC SIGNAL, F&I, 3 SECT, 1 WAY, 6.00 AS $ $5, STD TRAFFIC SIGNAL, F&I, 5 SECT, 1 WAY, 2.00 AS $1, $3, STD LOOP ASSEMBLY, F&I, TYPE F 9.00 AS $1, $9, VEH DETECTOR ASSEM, F&I, OPTICAL 1.00 EA $3, $3, TYPE TRAFFIC CONTROLLER, MODIFY, 2.00 EA $ $1, NEMA CNTRL ACCESS, F&I, LOAD SWITCH 6.00 EA $83.00 $ POLE REMOVAL, DEEP DIRECT LF $ $2, BURIAL INTERNAL ILLUM SIGN, INSTALL, ST 2.00 EA $ $1, NAME SIGN PANELS, F & I, EA $1, $1, Signalizations Component $80, RETAINING WALLS COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit CONC CLASS II, RETAINING WALLS CY $1, $342, REINF STEEL- RETAINING WALL 1, LB $1.00 $1, Retaining Walls Component $343,799.58

14 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 5 of 5 2/23/2009 Date: 2/23/2009 6:32:04 PM FDOT Long Range Estimating System - Production R4: Project Details Composite Report By Component Project: XX Letting Date: 01/2099 Description: SR 44 (CR 44B) FROM SR 500 US 441 TO SR 44 District: 05 County: 11 LAKE Project Manager: DRZ-BOYLE Version 5 Project Grand $20,279, Description: Shared Use Path Typical Section Evaluation Alternative 1: 4-lane divided, 11-ft travel lanes, 22-ft raised median, 3-ft urban shoulders, 5-ft sidewalk with 2-ft utility strip, 10-ft shared use path, concrete. Project Sequences Subtotal $12,729, MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC $1,909, MOBILIZATION $1,463, Project Sequences $16,103, Project Unknowns 25.00% $4,025, Non-Bid Components: Pay item Description Unit Extended INITIAL CONTINGENCY AMOUNT (DO NOT BID) 1.00 LS $150, $150, Project Non-Bid Subtotal $150, Version 5 Project Grand $20,279,002.85

15 Alternative Typical Section # 2 4-Lane Divided / 3-ft urban shoulders / Standard Median / Min. Lanes Full Multi-Use Path / Sidewalk against Curb and Gutter Elements: 11-ft Travel Lanes 3-ft Striped / Undesignated Bicycle Lanes 22-ft Median 12-ft Shared-Use Path 6-ft Sidewalk against Curb and Gutter Gravity / Retaining Walls on both sides for majority of project length Const. / Maint. Easements on both sides for majority of project length

16 Alternative Typical Section # 2 Evaluation Table Pros Criteria Standard Median Width and Standard Multi-Use Path Cons Min. Lane Widths, Min. Urban Shoulders, Sidewalk against Curb and Gutter Safety Operation Construction Maintenance Drainage Utility Accommodation Right-of-Way / Easements Cost Other Can make U-Turns with Passenger Vehicles. Level Of Service same as approved Typical and improved from existing 2-lane roadway. Substandard Bicycle Lane width. Cannot construct gravity / retaining walls from within existing R/W. Additional Driveway Connections. Cannot maintain gravity / retaining walls from within existing R/W. No space to accommodate offsite drainage. No space for above-ground utilities. Above-ground utilities cannot be placed between multi-use path and curb and gutter. This alternative will require either additional R/W or permanent easements along both sides of the roadway to accommodate construction, maintenance, and drainage. Construction: $2,986, (17.6%) cost increase compared to Approved Typical Section. R/W or Easements: Undetermined. Utility Relocations: Undetermined. Walls and picket style handrails are aesthetic concerns.

17 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 1 of 5 2/23/2009 Date: 2/23/2009 6:35:02 PM FDOT Long Range Estimating System - Production R4: Project Details Composite Report By Component Project: XX Letting Date: 01/2099 Description: SR 44 (CR 44B) FROM SR 500 US 441 TO SR 44 District: 05 County: 11 LAKE Project Manager: DRZ-BOYLE Version 7 Project Grand $19,951, Description: Shared Use Path Typical Section Evaluation Alternative 2: 4-lane divided, 11-ft travel lanes, 22-ft raised median, 3-ft wide curb lanes, 6-ft sidewalk, 12-ft shared use path. EARTHWORK COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit REGULAR EXCAVATION 26, CY $6.50 $169, EMBANKMENT 12, CY $10.00 $124, CLEARING & GRUBBING AC $20, $452, Earthwork Component $746, ROADWAY COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit TYPE B STABILIZATION 121, SY $5.00 $606, OPTIONAL BASE,BASE GROUP 01 15, SY $8.48 $129, OPTIONAL BASE,BASE GROUP 09 67, SY $16.00 $1,083, BOLLARDS EA $ $8, RETRO-REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT EA $5.25 $4, MARKERS MILLING EXIST ASPH PAVT,1 1/2" AVG 16, SY $3.00 $48, DEPTH SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONC, TRAFFIC A TN $ $99, SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONC, TRAFFIC C 11, TN $ $1,173, ASPH CONC FC,TRAFFIC C,FC- 6, TN $ $829, ,RUBBER PAINTED PAVT NM $1, $28, MARK,STD,WHITE,SOLID,6" PAINTED PAVT 8.44 GM $ $4, MARK,STD,WHITE,SKIP, 6" THERMOPLASTIC, STD, WHITE, SOLID, 8.44 NM $3, $30, " THERMOPLASTIC, STD, WHITE, SKIP, 6" 4.22 GM $1, $5, Roadway Component $4,050, SHOULDER COMPONENT

18 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 2 of 5 2/23/2009 Pay Item Description Unit SOIL TRACKING PREVENTION DEVICE 8.00 EA $3, $27, ROCK BAG 1, EA $6.40 $11, SIDEWALK CONC, 4" THICK 7, SY $45.00 $327, SIDEWALK CONC, 6" THICK 1, SY $55.20 $96, DETECTABLE WARNING ON WALK 6.00 EA $ $4, SURF, RETRO STAKED SILT FENCE, TYPE III 19, LF $1.15 $22, CONC CLASS I, RETAINING WALLS 3, CY $ $2,151, PIPE HANDRAIL - GUIDERAIL, ALUMINUM LF $47.08 $16, PED/BICYCLE RAILING,STL,54"PICKET RAIL 18, LF $65.00 $1,189, CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE F 19, LF $20.00 $390, PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD 5, SY $3.00 $15, Shoulder Component $4,251, MEDIAN COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit CONCRETE TRAFFIC SEPARATOR, SP- VAR WIDT SY $66.53 $55, CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE E 19, LF $20.00 $390, TRAF SEP CONC-TYPE IV, 4' WIDE 4, LF $36.68 $175, PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD 18, SY $3.00 $56, Median Component $678, DRAINAGE COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit REGULAR EXCAVATION 26, CY $6.50 $174, EMBANKMENT CY $10.00 $7, SODDING 7, SY $3.00 $21, CLEARING & GRUBBING 6.00 AC $20, $120, CONC CLASS II, ENDWALLS CY $ $45, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-1, <10' 2.00 EA $4, $8, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-2, <10' 1.00 EA $4, $4, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-5, <10' EA $4, $177, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-6, <10' EA $3, $54, INLETS, CURB TYPE J-1, <10' 4.00 EA $4, $18, INLETS, CURB, TYPE J-2, <10' 3.00 EA $5, $15, INLETS, CURB, TYPE J-6, <10' 5.00 EA $6, $30, INLETS, CURB, TYPE 7, <10' 7.00 EA $4, $29, INLETS, CURB, TYPE 7, J BOT, <10' 1.00 EA $5, $5, INLETS, DT BOT, TYPE D, <10' 2.00 EA $3, $6, MANHOLES, P-7, <10' EA $3, $119, MANHOLES, J-7, <10' EA $5, $70, PIPE CULV OPT MATL, ROUND, 0-24", LF $ $6, SS PIPE CULV OPT MATL, ROUND, 37-48", LF $ $24,745.76

19 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 3 of 5 2/23/2009 SS PIPE CULV OPT MATL, ROUND, 49-60", LF $ $120, SS PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND,0-5, LF $74.56 $436, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND,25-4, LF $77.49 $323, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND,37-2, LF $ $263, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND, LF $ $130, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, OTHER, LF $ $45, "SD U-ENDWALL,STD 261,1:4 SLP, 18" EA $2, $38, MITERED END SECT, OPTIONAL RD, 42" CD 1.00 EA $3, $3, FENCING, TYPE B, , STANDARD 2, LF $11.67 $32, FENCE GATE,TYP B,SLIDE/CANT, EA $2, $5, 'OPEN PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD SY $3.00 $1, Drainage Component $2,343, SIGNING COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit SINGLE POST SIGN, F&I, LESS THAN 12 SF AS $ $15, SINGLE POST SIGN, F&I, SF AS $ $8, SINGLE POST SIGN, RELOCATE 1.00 AS $99.82 $ SINGLE POST SIGN, REMOVE AS $29.45 $ DELINEATOR, FLEXIBLE TUBULAR EA $74.76 $2, Signing Component $26, SIGNALIZATIONS COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, F&I, LED- COUNT DWN, PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, F&I, LED- COUNT DWN, AS $ $1, AS $1, $5, PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, RELOCATE 1.00 AS $ $ SGNL HEAD AUXIL, F&I, BACK PLT EA $ $ SECT SGNL HEAD AUXIL, F&I, CONC PED 6.00 EA $ $5, TYP II SGNL HEAD AUX,F&I, BACK PLT EA $ $ SECT CLU PED DET, F&I, DET STA POLE OR CAB EA $ $1, MTD SIGNAL HEAD TRAFFIC ASSEMBLY 8.00 EA $65.38 $ REMOVAL SPAN WIRE ASSEMBLY REMOVE 2.00 EA $ $ CONDUIT & CABLING REMOVE 1.00 PI $ $ SIGNAL EQUIPMENT MISCELLANOUS REMOVE 1.00 PI $ $663.40

20 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 4 of 5 2/23/ CONDUIT-SIGNALS, F& I, LF $7.00 $3, UNDERGROUND CONDUIT-SIGNALS,F& I, UG JACKED LF $19.83 $8, CABLE, SIGNAL, FURNISH & INSTALL 2.00 PI $2, $5, SPAN WIRE ASSEMBLY, F&I, 2 WIRE, 1.00 PI $2, $2, OTHER PULL & JUNCTION BOXES, F&I, PULL EA $ $5, BOX PREST CNC POLE,F&I,TYP P-VII 1.00 EA $8, $8, TRAFFIC SIGNAL, F&I, 3 SECT, 1 WAY, 6.00 AS $ $5, STD TRAFFIC SIGNAL, F&I, 5 SECT, 1 WAY, 2.00 AS $1, $3, STD LOOP ASSEMBLY, F&I, TYPE F 9.00 AS $1, $9, VEH DETECTOR ASSEM, F&I, OPTICAL 1.00 EA $3, $3, TYPE TRAFFIC CONTROLLER, MODIFY, 2.00 EA $ $1, NEMA CNTRL ACCESS, F&I, LOAD SWITCH 6.00 EA $83.00 $ POLE REMOVAL, DEEP DIRECT LF $ $2, BURIAL INTERNAL ILLUM SIGN, INSTALL, ST 2.00 EA $ $1, NAME SIGN PANELS, F & I, EA $1, $1, Signalizations Component $80, RETAINING WALLS COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit CONC CLASS II, RETAINING WALLS CY $1, $342, REINF STEEL- RETAINING WALL 1, LB $1.00 $1, Retaining Walls Component $343,799.58

21 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 5 of 5 2/23/2009 Date: 2/23/2009 6:35:03 PM FDOT Long Range Estimating System - Production R4: Project Details Composite Report By Component Project: XX Letting Date: 01/2099 Description: SR 44 (CR 44B) FROM SR 500 US 441 TO SR 44 District: 05 County: 11 LAKE Project Manager: DRZ-BOYLE Version 7 Project Grand $19,951, Description: Shared Use Path Typical Section Evaluation Alternative 2: 4-lane divided, 11-ft travel lanes, 22-ft raised median, 3-ft wide curb lanes, 6-ft sidewalk, 12-ft shared use path. Project Sequences Subtotal $12,522, MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC $1,878, MOBILIZATION $1,440, Project Sequences $15,840, Project Unknowns 25.00% $3,960, Non-Bid Components: Pay item Description Unit Extended INITIAL CONTINGENCY AMOUNT (DO NOT BID) 1.00 LS $150, $150, Project Non-Bid Subtotal $150, Version 7 Project Grand $19,951,160.04

22 Alternative Typical Section # 3 4-Lane Divided / 4-ft Bicycle Lanes / Min. Median / Min. Lanes / Min. Multi-Use Path / Sidewalk with Utility Strip Elements: 11-ft Travel Lanes 4-ft Striped / Undesignated Bicycle Lanes 19.5-ft Median 10-ft Shared-Use Path 5-ft Sidewalk with 2-ft Utility Strip Gravity / Retaining Walls on both sides for majority of project length Const. / Maint. Easements on both sides for majority of project length

23 Alternative Typical Section # 3 Evaluation Table Pros Cons Criteria Safety Operation Construction Maintenance Drainage Utility Accommodation Right-of-Way / Easements Cost Other Standard Bicycle Lanes, Standard Sidewalk with Utility Strip. Can make U-Turns with Passenger Vehicles. Full Bicycle Lane width. Level Of Service same as approved Typical and improved from existing 2-lane roadway. Min. Median Width, Min. Lane Widths, Min. Multi-Use Path. Cannot construct gravity / retaining walls from within existing R/W. Additional Driveway Connections. Cannot maintain gravity / retaining walls from within existing R/W. No space to accommodate offsite drainage. No space for above-ground utilities. Above-ground utilities cannot be placed between multi-use path or sidewalk and curb and gutter. This alternative will require either additional R/W or permanent easements along both sides of the roadway to accommodate construction, maintenance, and drainage. Construction: $3,513, (20.7%) cost increase compared to Approved Typical Section. R/W or Easements: Undetermined. Utility Relocations: Undetermined. Walls and picket style handrails are aesthetic concerns.

24 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 1 of 5 2/23/2009 Date: 2/23/2009 6:36:45 PM FDOT Long Range Estimating System - Production R4: Project Details Composite Report By Component Project: XX Letting Date: 01/2099 Description: SR 44 (CR 44B) FROM SR 500 US 441 TO SR 44 District: 05 County: 11 LAKE Project Manager: DRZ-BOYLE Version 8 Project Grand $20,478, Description: Shared Use Path Typical Section Evaluation Alternative 3: 4-lane divided, 11-ft travel lanes, 19.5-ft raised median, 4-ft bicycle lanes, 5-ft sidewalk with 2-ft utility strip, 10-ft shared use path, concrete. EARTHWORK COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit REGULAR EXCAVATION 27, CY $6.50 $175, EMBANKMENT 12, CY $10.00 $124, CLEARING & GRUBBING AC $20, $452, Earthwork Component $752, ROADWAY COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit TYPE B STABILIZATION 84, SY $5.00 $422, OPTIONAL BASE,BASE GROUP 09 70, SY $16.00 $1,126, BOLLARDS EA $ $8, RETRO-REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT EA $5.25 $4, MARKERS MILLING EXIST ASPH PAVT,1 1/2" AVG DEPTH 16, SY $3.00 $48, SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONC, TRAFFIC C 11, TN $ $1,220, ASPH CONC FC,TRAFFIC C,FC- 7, TN $ $856, ,RUBBER PAINTED PAVT NM $1, $19, MARK,STD,WHITE,SOLID,6" PAINTED PAVT 8.44 GM $ $4, MARK,STD,WHITE,SKIP, 6" THERMOPLASTIC, STD, WHITE, SOLID, 8.44 NM $3, $30, " THERMOPLASTIC, STD, WHITE, SKIP, 6" 4.22 GM $1, $5, Roadway Component $3,745, SHOULDER COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit

25 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 2 of 5 2/23/ SOIL TRACKING PREVENTION DEVICE 8.00 EA $3, $27, ROCK BAG 1, EA $6.40 $11, SIDEWALK CONC, 4" THICK 6, SY $45.00 $278, SIDEWALK CONC, 6" THICK 14, SY $55.20 $779, DETECTABLE WARNING ON WALK 6.00 EA $ $4, SURF, RETRO STAKED SILT FENCE, TYPE III 19, LF $1.15 $22, CONC CLASS I, RETAINING WALLS 3, CY $ $2,151, PIPE HANDRAIL - GUIDERAIL, ALUMINUM LF $47.08 $16, PED/BICYCLE RAILING,STL,54"PICKET RAIL 18, LF $65.00 $1,189, CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE F 19, LF $20.00 $390, PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD 7, SY $3.00 $21, Shoulder Component $4,892, MEDIAN COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit CONCRETE TRAFFIC SEPARATOR, SP- VAR WIDT SY $66.53 $55, CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE E 19, LF $20.00 $390, TRAF SEP CONC-TYPE IV, 4' WIDE 4, LF $36.68 $175, PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD 16, SY $3.00 $48, Median Component $670, DRAINAGE COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit REGULAR EXCAVATION 26, CY $6.50 $174, EMBANKMENT CY $10.00 $7, SODDING 7, SY $3.00 $21, CLEARING & GRUBBING 6.00 AC $20, $120, CONC CLASS II, ENDWALLS CY $ $45, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-1, <10' 2.00 EA $4, $8, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-2, <10' 1.00 EA $4, $4, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-5, <10' EA $4, $177, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-6, <10' EA $3, $54, INLETS, CURB TYPE J-1, <10' 4.00 EA $4, $18, INLETS, CURB, TYPE J-2, <10' 3.00 EA $5, $15, INLETS, CURB, TYPE J-6, <10' 5.00 EA $6, $30, INLETS, CURB, TYPE 7, <10' 7.00 EA $4, $29, INLETS, CURB, TYPE 7, J BOT, <10' 1.00 EA $5, $5, INLETS, DT BOT, TYPE D, <10' 2.00 EA $3, $6, MANHOLES, P-7, <10' EA $3, $119, MANHOLES, J-7, <10' EA $5, $70, PIPE CULV OPT MATL, ROUND, 0-24", LF $ $6, SS PIPE CULV OPT MATL, ROUND, 37-48", LF $ $24, SS PIPE CULV OPT MATL, ROUND, 49-60", LF $ $120,562.48

26 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 3 of 5 2/23/2009 SS PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND,0-5, LF $74.56 $436, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND,25-4, LF $77.49 $323, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND,37-2, LF $ $263, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND, LF $ $130, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, OTHER, LF $ $45, "SD U-ENDWALL,STD 261,1:4 SLP, 18" EA $2, $38, MITERED END SECT, OPTIONAL RD, 42" CD 1.00 EA $3, $3, FENCING, TYPE B, , STANDARD 2, LF $11.67 $32, FENCE GATE,TYP B,SLIDE/CANT, EA $2, $5, 'OPEN PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD SY $3.00 $1, Drainage Component $2,343, SIGNING COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit SINGLE POST SIGN, F&I, LESS THAN 12 SF AS $ $15, SINGLE POST SIGN, F&I, SF AS $ $8, SINGLE POST SIGN, RELOCATE 1.00 AS $99.82 $ SINGLE POST SIGN, REMOVE AS $29.45 $ DELINEATOR, FLEXIBLE TUBULAR EA $74.76 $2, Signing Component $26, SIGNALIZATIONS COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, F&I, LED-COUNT DWN, PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, F&I, LED-COUNT DWN, AS $ $1, AS $1, $5, PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, RELOCATE 1.00 AS $ $ SGNL HEAD AUXIL, F&I, BACK PLT EA $ $ SECT SGNL HEAD AUXIL, F&I, CONC PED 6.00 EA $ $5, TYP II SGNL HEAD AUX,F&I, BACK PLT EA $ $ SECT CLU PED DET, F&I, DET STA POLE OR CAB EA $ $1, MTD SIGNAL HEAD TRAFFIC ASSEMBLY 8.00 EA $65.38 $ REMOVAL SPAN WIRE ASSEMBLY REMOVE 2.00 EA $ $ CONDUIT & CABLING REMOVE 1.00 PI $ $ SIGNAL EQUIPMENT MISCELLANOUS 1.00 PI $ $ REMOVE CONDUIT-SIGNALS, F& I, UNDERGROUND LF $7.00 $3,815.00

27 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 4 of 5 2/23/ CONDUIT-SIGNALS,F& I, UG JACKED LF $19.83 $8, CABLE, SIGNAL, FURNISH & INSTALL 2.00 PI $2, $5, SPAN WIRE ASSEMBLY, F&I, 2 WIRE, 1.00 PI $2, $2, OTHER PULL & JUNCTION BOXES, F&I, PULL EA $ $5, BOX PREST CNC POLE,F&I,TYP P-VII 1.00 EA $8, $8, TRAFFIC SIGNAL, F&I, 3 SECT, 1 WAY, 6.00 AS $ $5, STD TRAFFIC SIGNAL, F&I, 5 SECT, 1 WAY, 2.00 AS $1, $3, STD LOOP ASSEMBLY, F&I, TYPE F 9.00 AS $1, $9, VEH DETECTOR ASSEM, F&I, OPTICAL 1.00 EA $3, $3, TYPE TRAFFIC CONTROLLER, MODIFY, 2.00 EA $ $1, NEMA CNTRL ACCESS, F&I, LOAD SWITCH 6.00 EA $83.00 $ POLE REMOVAL, DEEP DIRECT LF $ $2, BURIAL INTERNAL ILLUM SIGN, INSTALL, ST 2.00 EA $ $1, NAME SIGN PANELS, F & I, EA $1, $1, Signalizations Component $80, RETAINING WALLS COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit CONC CLASS II, RETAINING WALLS CY $1, $342, REINF STEEL- RETAINING WALL 1, LB $1.00 $1, Retaining Walls Component $343,799.58

28 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 5 of 5 2/23/2009 Date: 2/23/2009 6:36:45 PM FDOT Long Range Estimating System - Production R4: Project Details Composite Report By Component Project: XX Letting Date: 01/2099 Description: SR 44 (CR 44B) FROM SR 500 US 441 TO SR 44 District: 05 County: 11 LAKE Project Manager: DRZ-BOYLE Version 8 Project Grand $20,478, Description: Shared Use Path Typical Section Evaluation Alternative 3: 4-lane divided, 11-ft travel lanes, 19.5-ft raised median, 4-ft bicycle lanes, 5-ft sidewalk with 2-ft utility strip, 10-ft shared use path, concrete. Project Sequences Subtotal $12,856, MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC $1,928, MOBILIZATION $1,478, Project Sequences $16,262, Project Unknowns 25.00% $4,065, Non-Bid Components: Pay item Description Unit Extended INITIAL CONTINGENCY AMOUNT (DO NOT BID) 1.00 LS $150, $150, Project Non-Bid Subtotal $150, Version 8 Project Grand $20,478,562.25

29 Alternative Typical Section # 4 4-Lane Divided / 4-ft Bicycle Lanes / Min. Median / Min. Lanes / Full Multi-Use Path / Sidewalk against Curb and Gutter Elements: 11-ft Travel Lanes 4-ft Striped / Undesignated Bicycle Lanes 19.5-ft Median 12-ft Shared-Use Path 6-ft Sidewalk against Curb and Gutter Gravity / Retaining Walls on both sides for majority of project length Construction / Maintenance Easements on both sides for majority of project length

30 Alternative Typical Section # 4 Evaluation Table Pros Criteria Safety Operation Construction Maintenance Drainage Utility Accommodation Right-of-Way / Easements Cost Other Standard Bicycle Lanes, Standard Multi-Use Path Can make U-Turns with Passenger Vehicles. Full Bicycle Lane width. Level Of Service same as approved Typical and improved from existing 2-lane roadway. Cons Min. Median Width, Min. Lane Widths, Sidewalk against Curb and Gutter. Cannot construct gravity / retaining walls from within existing R/W. Additional Driveway Connections. Cannot maintain gravity / retaining walls from within existing R/W. No space to accommodate offsite drainage. No space for above-ground utilities. Above-ground utilities cannot be placed between multi-use path and curb and gutter. This alternative will require either additional R/W or permanent easements along both sides of the roadway to accommodate construction, maintenance, and drainage. Construction: $3,185, (18.8%) cost increase compared to Approved Typical Section. R/W or Easements: Undetermined. Utility Relocations: Undetermined. Walls and picket style handrails are aesthetic concerns.

31 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 1 of 5 2/23/2009 Date: 2/23/2009 6:38:00 PM FDOT Long Range Estimating System - Production R4: Project Details Composite Report By Component Project: XX Letting Date: 01/2099 Description: SR 44 (CR 44B) FROM SR 500 US 441 TO SR 44 District: 05 County: 11 LAKE Project Manager: DRZ-BOYLE Version 4 Project Grand $20,150, Description: Shared Use Path Typical Section Evaluation Alternative 4: 4-lane divided, 11-ft travel lanes, 19.5-ft raised median, 4-ft bicycle lanes, 6-ft sidewalk, 12-ft shared use path. EARTHWORK COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit REGULAR EXCAVATION 26, CY $6.50 $174, EMBANKMENT 12, CY $10.00 $122, CLEARING & GRUBBING AC $20, $452, Earthwork Component $750, ROADWAY COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit TYPE B STABILIZATION 124, SY $5.00 $620, OPTIONAL BASE,BASE GROUP 01 15, SY $8.48 $129, OPTIONAL BASE,BASE GROUP 09 70, SY $16.00 $1,126, BOLLARDS EA $ $8, RETRO-REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT EA $5.25 $4, MARKERS MILLING EXIST ASPH PAVT,1 1/2" AVG 16, SY $3.00 $48, DEPTH SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONC, TRAFFIC A TN $ $99, SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONC, TRAFFIC C 11, TN $ $1,220, ASPH CONC FC,TRAFFIC C,FC- 7, TN $ $856, ,RUBBER PAINTED PAVT NM $1, $28, MARK,STD,WHITE,SOLID,6" PAINTED PAVT 8.44 GM $ $4, MARK,STD,WHITE,SKIP, 6" THERMOPLASTIC, STD, WHITE, SOLID, 8.44 NM $3, $30, " THERMOPLASTIC, STD, WHITE, SKIP, 6" 4.22 GM $1, $5, Roadway Component $4,181, SHOULDER COMPONENT

32 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 2 of 5 2/23/2009 Pay Item Description Unit SOIL TRACKING PREVENTION DEVICE 8.00 EA $3, $27, ROCK BAG 1, EA $6.40 $11, SIDEWALK CONC, 4" THICK 7, SY $45.00 $327, SIDEWALK CONC, 6" THICK 1, SY $55.20 $96, DETECTABLE WARNING ON WALK 6.00 EA $ $4, SURF, RETRO STAKED SILT FENCE, TYPE III 19, LF $1.15 $22, CONC CLASS I, RETAINING WALLS 3, CY $ $2,151, PIPE HANDRAIL - GUIDERAIL, ALUMINUM LF $47.08 $16, PED/BICYCLE RAILING,STL,54"PICKET RAIL 18, LF $65.00 $1,189, CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE F 19, LF $20.00 $390, PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD 5, SY $3.00 $15, Shoulder Component $4,251, MEDIAN COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit CONCRETE TRAFFIC SEPARATOR, SP- VAR WIDT SY $66.53 $55, CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE E 19, LF $20.00 $390, TRAF SEP CONC-TYPE IV, 4' WIDE 4, LF $36.68 $175, PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD 16, SY $3.00 $48, Median Component $670, DRAINAGE COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit REGULAR EXCAVATION 26, CY $6.50 $174, EMBANKMENT CY $10.00 $7, SODDING 7, SY $3.00 $21, CLEARING & GRUBBING 6.00 AC $20, $120, CONC CLASS II, ENDWALLS CY $ $45, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-1, <10' 2.00 EA $4, $8, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-2, <10' 1.00 EA $4, $4, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-5, <10' EA $4, $177, INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-6, <10' EA $3, $54, INLETS, CURB TYPE J-1, <10' 4.00 EA $4, $18, INLETS, CURB, TYPE J-2, <10' 3.00 EA $5, $15, INLETS, CURB, TYPE J-6, <10' 5.00 EA $6, $30, INLETS, CURB, TYPE 7, <10' 7.00 EA $4, $29, INLETS, CURB, TYPE 7, J BOT, <10' 1.00 EA $5, $5, INLETS, DT BOT, TYPE D, <10' 2.00 EA $3, $6, MANHOLES, P-7, <10' EA $3, $119, MANHOLES, J-7, <10' EA $5, $70, PIPE CULV OPT MATL, ROUND, 0-24", LF $ $6, SS PIPE CULV OPT MATL, ROUND, 37-48", LF $ $24,745.76

33 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 3 of 5 2/23/2009 SS PIPE CULV OPT MATL, ROUND, 49-60", LF $ $120, SS PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND,0-5, LF $74.56 $436, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND,25-4, LF $77.49 $323, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND,37-2, LF $ $263, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND, LF $ $130, "SD PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, OTHER, LF $ $45, "SD U-ENDWALL,STD 261,1:4 SLP, 18" EA $2, $38, MITERED END SECT, OPTIONAL RD, 42" CD 1.00 EA $3, $3, FENCING, TYPE B, , STANDARD 2, LF $11.67 $32, FENCE GATE,TYP B,SLIDE/CANT, EA $2, $5, 'OPEN PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD SY $3.00 $1, Drainage Component $2,343, SIGNING COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit SINGLE POST SIGN, F&I, LESS THAN 12 SF AS $ $15, SINGLE POST SIGN, F&I, SF AS $ $8, SINGLE POST SIGN, RELOCATE 1.00 AS $99.82 $ SINGLE POST SIGN, REMOVE AS $29.45 $ DELINEATOR, FLEXIBLE TUBULAR EA $74.76 $2, Signing Component $26, SIGNALIZATIONS COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, F&I, LED- COUNT DWN, PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, F&I, LED- COUNT DWN, AS $ $1, AS $1, $5, PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, RELOCATE 1.00 AS $ $ SGNL HEAD AUXIL, F&I, BACK PLT EA $ $ SECT SGNL HEAD AUXIL, F&I, CONC PED 6.00 EA $ $5, TYP II SGNL HEAD AUX,F&I, BACK PLT EA $ $ SECT CLU PED DET, F&I, DET STA POLE OR CAB EA $ $1, MTD SIGNAL HEAD TRAFFIC ASSEMBLY 8.00 EA $65.38 $ REMOVAL SPAN WIRE ASSEMBLY REMOVE 2.00 EA $ $ CONDUIT & CABLING REMOVE 1.00 PI $ $ SIGNAL EQUIPMENT MISCELLANOUS REMOVE 1.00 PI $ $663.40

34 LRE - R4: Project Details Composite Report Page 4 of 5 2/23/ CONDUIT-SIGNALS, F& I, LF $7.00 $3, UNDERGROUND CONDUIT-SIGNALS,F& I, UG JACKED LF $19.83 $8, CABLE, SIGNAL, FURNISH & INSTALL 2.00 PI $2, $5, SPAN WIRE ASSEMBLY, F&I, 2 WIRE, 1.00 PI $2, $2, OTHER PULL & JUNCTION BOXES, F&I, PULL EA $ $5, BOX PREST CNC POLE,F&I,TYP P-VII 1.00 EA $8, $8, TRAFFIC SIGNAL, F&I, 3 SECT, 1 WAY, 6.00 AS $ $5, STD TRAFFIC SIGNAL, F&I, 5 SECT, 1 WAY, 2.00 AS $1, $3, STD LOOP ASSEMBLY, F&I, TYPE F 9.00 AS $1, $9, VEH DETECTOR ASSEM, F&I, OPTICAL 1.00 EA $3, $3, TYPE TRAFFIC CONTROLLER, MODIFY, 2.00 EA $ $1, NEMA CNTRL ACCESS, F&I, LOAD SWITCH 6.00 EA $83.00 $ POLE REMOVAL, DEEP DIRECT LF $ $2, BURIAL INTERNAL ILLUM SIGN, INSTALL, ST 2.00 EA $ $1, NAME SIGN PANELS, F & I, EA $1, $1, Signalizations Component $80, RETAINING WALLS COMPONENT Pay Item Description Unit CONC CLASS II, RETAINING WALLS CY $1, $342, REINF STEEL- RETAINING WALL 1, LB $1.00 $1, Retaining Walls Component $343,799.58

APPENDIX L: COST ESTIMATING TOOLS

APPENDIX L: COST ESTIMATING TOOLS APPENDIX L: COST ESTIMATING TOOLS Rural Arterial From LRE MOT * Mobilization * Subtotal Scope Contingency (25%) Total PE Design (15%) CEI (15%) Total Project ** New (2-Lane Roadway) with 5' Paved Shoulders

More information

Trail Feasibility. 1. Introduction FINAL. October What s inside?

Trail Feasibility. 1. Introduction FINAL. October What s inside? VOLUSIA COUNTY MPO CITY OF PORT ORANGE FINAL Trail Feasibility October 2006 What s inside? 1 Introduction 2 Project Purpose & Scope 3 Physical Inventory & Assessment of Right-of- Way 4 Trail Concept Plan

More information

Mid Rivers Mall Drive Multi-Use Path (Rte. N to MO 364)

Mid Rivers Mall Drive Multi-Use Path (Rte. N to MO 364) Mid Rivers Mall Drive Multi-Use Path (Rte. N to MO 364) Sponsor St Peters Project No. RB19-000022 Project Type Other TOTAL FUNDING Total County Sponsor Federal $1,177,251.00 $238,179.00 $59,546.00 $879,526.00

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS EXHIBIT 1 LOCATION MAP... 2 LIST OF TABLES

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS EXHIBIT 1 LOCATION MAP... 2 LIST OF TABLES TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES... 3 III. STUDY METHODOLOGY... 4 IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 V. SHARED USE PATH CONCEPT PLAN FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS... 9 VI. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY...

More information

CORE MPO Non-motorized Transportation Plan. Appendix F. Technical Report on Cost Estimation Methodology

CORE MPO Non-motorized Transportation Plan. Appendix F. Technical Report on Cost Estimation Methodology Appendix F Technical Report on Cost Estimation Methodology This page is intentionally left blank. Technical Report on Cost Estimation Methodology The total costs of the projects in the Non-motorized Transportation

More information

Souder, Miller & Associates 401 W. Broadway Farmington, NM

Souder, Miller & Associates 401 W. Broadway Farmington, NM Souder, Miller & Associates 401 W. Broadway Farmington, NM Purpose: To solicit public input before the preparation of construction documents for Foothills Drive from Holmes Drive to 300 north of the intersection

More information

Riverside County Transportation Department Summary of Bids

Riverside County Transportation Department Summary of Bids COUNTY'S ESTIMATE R. J. Noble Company Orange, CA 92856 ITEM NO. ITEM CODE CONTRACT ITEM UNITS QUANTITY UNIT PRICE ENG ESTIMATE BID AMOUNT 1 190101 ROADWAY EXCAVATION CY 8,500 16.00 136,000.00 9.50 80,750.00

More information

FINAL MCDONALD ROAD SIDEWALK FEASIBILITY STUDY

FINAL MCDONALD ROAD SIDEWALK FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL MCDONALD ROAD SIDEWALK FEASIBILITY STUDY APRIL 2015 Prepared For: Prepared By: CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 4 2 INTRODUCTION... 5 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES... 5 CITY OF PORT ORANGE... 7 PROJECT HISTORY...

More information

East Downtown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) No. 15 Infrastructure Assessment Study

East Downtown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) No. 15 Infrastructure Assessment Study East Downtown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) No. 15 Infrastructure Assessment Study Houston, TX Technical Memorandum April 15 th, 2009 Prepare by: 2950 North Loop West, Ste. 900 Houston, TX 77092

More information

Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction

Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction TOWN OF SUNDERLAND Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction Presented by Lou Rabito, P.E. Presented to Town of Sunderland June 11, 2018 Project Overview MassDOT Project No. 607245 Resurfacing and Related

More information

Final Sidewalk Feasibility Study

Final Sidewalk Feasibility Study Garfield Drive From Anastasia Drive to Elizabeth Place City of South Daytona July 23, 2009 Final Sidewalk Feasibility Study Prepared for: Prepared by: Final Sidewalk Feasibility Study Garfield Drive 2

More information

IMPLEMENTATION WORKBOOK

IMPLEMENTATION WORKBOOK Lawrence Township Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Assistance Study IMPLEMENTATION WORKBOOK Final Action Plan - Part 2 April 2009 Prepared For: The Township of Lawrence and the New Jersey Department of

More information

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 9 - BICYCLE FACILITIES 900 GENERAL... 9-3 900-1 General Background... 9-3 900-2 Designated Bicycle Routes... 9-3 901 SIGNINGS... 9-4 902 MARKINGS... 9-4 902-1 General... 9-4 902-2

More information

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD INTERSECTION NEEDS AT SR 7 and OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SR 7 Extension Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study From Okeechobee Boulevard (SR

More information

Poor pavement condition Substandard Intersections. / Substandard bike/pedestrian/transit accommodations. Driveway access Environmental concerns

Poor pavement condition Substandard Intersections. / Substandard bike/pedestrian/transit accommodations. Driveway access Environmental concerns Public Informational Meeting University Avenue (Allen Boulevard Segoe Road) March 23, 2011 City of Madison City of Middleton Village of Shorewood Hills Dane County Existing Roadway Conditions Poor pavement

More information

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016 APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016 Complete Streets Checklist MetroPlan Orlando s Complete Streets Checklist is an internal planning tool for staff to further implementation of

More information

Name Roads Station Distance Miles

Name Roads Station Distance Miles Name Roads Station Distance Miles Saw Mill to San Mateo 62+00 to 135+00 1.382575758 San Mateo to Alamo 135+00 to 261+50 2.395833333 Alamo to NM 599 261+50 to 305+00 0.823863636 Sidewalk and Curb Only Rabbit

More information

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Active Transportation Facility Glossary Active Transportation Facility Glossary This document defines different active transportation facilities and suggests appropriate corridor types. Click on a facility type to jump to its definition. Bike

More information

FDOT Treasure Coast Traffic Report

FDOT Treasure Coast Traffic Report July 6, 2018 Barbara Kelleher, 954 777 4090 Barbara.Kelleher@dot.state.fl.us FDOT Treasure Coast Traffic Report July 6 through July 13, 2018 TREASURE COAST Construction and maintenance related lane closures

More information

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report Page 1 MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report August 1, 2012 MAG Project #481 Page 2 Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report Introduction

More information

CHAPTER 8 STAKING SIGNALS AND LIGHTING FIELD GUIDE. 8.1 Staking Traffic Control Signal Systems

CHAPTER 8 STAKING SIGNALS AND LIGHTING FIELD GUIDE. 8.1 Staking Traffic Control Signal Systems CHAPTER 8 STAKING STAKING Correct staking of traffic control signal or lighting systems is critical to the appropriate placement of system components. 8.1 Traffic Control Signal Systems Locating the components

More information

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX Acceleration lane, see Lanes, Acceleration Access, 8.1 Access Management and Functional Classification 8.2 Access Management by Design Classification 8.3 Access Configuration 8.4 Building Set-Back Guidelines

More information

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS 13-1 GENERAL The City of Roseville bikeway standards are designed to insure that transportation and recreational bikeways are constructed in a manner that would provide a safe and comfortable

More information

Span-Wire Intersections Study SPAN-WIRE INTERSECTIONS STUDY. City of Naples Streets & Stormwater Department 1

Span-Wire Intersections Study SPAN-WIRE INTERSECTIONS STUDY. City of Naples Streets & Stormwater Department 1 SPAN-WIRE INTERSECTIONS STUDY City of Naples Streets & Stormwater Department 1 Intersection Traffic Control and Design Feasibility Analysis a.k.a Span-Wire Intersections Study Streets & Stormwater Department

More information

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 16.1 General... 16-1 16.1.1 AASHTO Reference... 16-1 16.1.2 ADA Requirements... 16-1 16.2 Sidewalks...

More information

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department) To: From: Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering Date: March 20, 2001 Subject: Roadway Geometric Design Criteria Project: TH 14/218 Design-Build Project, SP 7408-29,

More information

Malabar Road (SR 514) PD&E. Town of Malabar Briefing (July 17, 2017)

Malabar Road (SR 514) PD&E. Town of Malabar Briefing (July 17, 2017) Malabar Road (SR 514) PD&E Town of Malabar Briefing (July 17, 2017) 1 Agenda Project limits and briefing focus PD&E process and project status Public and agency project comments Review Recommended Alternatives:

More information

Roadway Design Manual

Roadway Design Manual Roadway Design Manual Manual Notice Archive by Texas Department of Transportation (512) 302-2453 all rights reserved Manual Notice 2009-1 From: Manual: Mark A. Marek, P.E Roadway Design Manual Effective

More information

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting Multimodal Design Guidance October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting Introductions Jessica Wilson TDOT Multimodal Division Office of Multimodal Planning Program Supervisor Jessica.L.Wilson@tn.gov Ali Hangul TDOT

More information

Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT

Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT OVERVIEW This chapter describes a cohesive set of strategies to create a bicycle boulevard, namely to make streets safer and more efficient for bicycle

More information

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans. 4.1 GENERAL This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans. These Roadway Standards are for new construction and modification

More information

Public Information Meeting. Orange Camp Road. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway to I-4. Presented by: Volusia County August 2, 2018

Public Information Meeting. Orange Camp Road. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway to I-4. Presented by: Volusia County August 2, 2018 Public Information Meeting Orange Camp Road Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway to I-4 Presented by: Volusia County August 2, 2018 1 Project Goals To improve the operations and safety for Orange Camp Road

More information

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive South Carolina Department of Transportation Engineering Directive Directive Number: ED-22 Effective: December 16, 2009 Subject: References: Purpose: This Directive Applies to: Considerations for Bicycle

More information

City of Hyattsville Transportation Study Project Recommendations Planning Level Cost Estimate

City of Hyattsville Transportation Study Project Recommendations Planning Level Cost Estimate City of Hyattsville Transportation Study Project Recommendations Planning Level Cost Estimate Project ID Project Category Project Name Qty/Len(Mi) Cost Estimate BB 1 Bike boulevard Jefferson Street or

More information

List of Tables. Appendix

List of Tables. Appendix Complete Streets Program Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Review of Plans and Policies... 2 Public Involvement and Project Prioritization... 3 Project Prioritization Matrix... 5 Complete Streets Components...

More information

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them? Overview Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation Aren Kriks, P.E. District One Bicycle Coordinator and Bureau of Programming Project Engineer History of Complete Streets IDOT Policy

More information

Atwood Avenue Fair Oaks Avenue Cottage Grove Road

Atwood Avenue Fair Oaks Avenue Cottage Grove Road Atwood Avenue Fair Oaks Avenue Cottage Grove Road Agenda Purpose Review project scope & goals Present design alternatives Gather feedback Answer Questions Format Open House Presentation Q&A Open House

More information

MPO Staff Report MPO Technical Advisory Committee: December 13, 2017 MPO Executive Board: December 20, 2017

MPO Staff Report MPO Technical Advisory Committee: December 13, 2017 MPO Executive Board: December 20, 2017 MPO Staff Report MPO Technical Advisory Committee: December 13, 2017 MPO Executive Board: December 20, 2017 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Consider HSIP Candidate Projects for the FY2019-2022 TIP as Being Consistent

More information

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY A1 Roadway Resurfacing $23,846,000 TYPE: Preservation of existing system Roadway resurfacing A2 Signal Replacement $6,000,000 TYPE: Preservation of existing system Replace traffic signals. B1 W 6th St

More information

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton Item No. 14 Town of Atherton CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSENT AGENDA TO: THROUGH: FROM: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL GEORGE RODERICKS, CITY MANAGER MICHAEL KASHIWAGI, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR MARTY

More information

SR-714 (Monterey Road) Martin County, Florida

SR-714 (Monterey Road) Martin County, Florida S-714 (Monterey oad) Martin County, Florida Financial Project ID:228861-1-21-01 Work Program Item No. (Old):4116331 Federal Project ID:FL62-033 Grade Separation Feasibility at Dixie Highway and FEC ailroad

More information

POLICIES FOR COST PARTICIPATION BETWEEN HENNEPIN COUNTY AND OTHER AGENCIES FOR COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY PROJECTS

POLICIES FOR COST PARTICIPATION BETWEEN HENNEPIN COUNTY AND OTHER AGENCIES FOR COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY PROJECTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BUSINESS LINE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT POLICIES FOR COST PARTICIPATION BETWEEN HENNEPIN COUNTY AND OTHER AGENCIES FOR COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY PROJECTS AS ADOPTED ON FEBRUARY 7,

More information

STAKING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEMS

STAKING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEMS Locating the components of a traffic control signal is not an exact science; many factors influence the location of the components. These factors include: lane widths, radii, pedestrian curb ramp requirements,

More information

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 9 - BICYCLE FACILITIES 900 GENERAL... 9-3 900-1 General Background... 9-3 900-2 Designated Bicycle Routes... 9-3 901 SIGNING... 9-4 901-1 General... 9-4 901-2 Bicycle 3-Foot Clearance

More information

Mark Malone, P.E. SD DOT

Mark Malone, P.E. SD DOT Mark Malone, P.E. SD DOT SD10 Grading & Surfacing From 8 th Ave W to 8 th Ave E 1 mile plus transition lengths Complete Urban Reconstruction Grading, C&G, Storm Sewer, Sidewalk, Concrete Surfacing Railroad

More information

Chapter 4: Funding and Implementation

Chapter 4: Funding and Implementation Chapter 4: Funding and Implementation 83 84 Cost Estimating Cost estimating is an iterative process. When a project is in the conceptual stage, preliminary cost estimates are also provided conceptually,

More information

CTH M Reconstruction

CTH M Reconstruction CTH M Reconstruction ID 5992 09 81 City of Madison, South Pleasant View Road (Cross Country Road Prairie Hill Road) CTH M Dane County Public Information Meeting Thursday, May 24, 2012 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.

More information

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES 5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES These guidelines should be considered collectively when making runningway decisions. A runningway is the linear component of the transit system that forms the right-of-way reserved

More information

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections Design Best Practices Sections It is along street segments where the separation and protection methods of cycle tracks offer more comfort than conventional bicycle lanes, and are more attractive to a wide

More information

SECTION 14: LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION

SECTION 14: LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION SECTION 14: LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION RULE 14.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 14.1.1 The rules and guidelines contained in this section have been established to provide proper guidelines for the beautification

More information

Riverside County Transportation Department Summary of Bids Project BOS Approval: July 25, 2017 (Agenda Item No. 3.60)

Riverside County Transportation Department Summary of Bids Project BOS Approval: July 25, 2017 (Agenda Item No. 3.60) Company Name Base Bid Schedule A Base Bid Schedule B Total COUNTY'S ESTIMATE 367,150.00 328,300.00 $695,450.00 1 All American Asphalt 481,360.00 108,180.00 $589,540.00 2 PTM General Eng Services, Inc.

More information

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards OTO Transportation Plan 2040 4/20/2017 Page A3-1 Adopted Standards The adopted OTO Design Standards and Major Thoroughfare Plan are contained herein.

More information

TABLE OF WHITE PAVEMENT LETTERS ITEM ALIGN CL STATION SIDE DESCRIPTION C RT BIKE THROUGH ARROW 1

TABLE OF WHITE PAVEMENT LETTERS ITEM ALIGN CL STATION SIDE DESCRIPTION C RT BIKE THROUGH ARROW 1 WHITE EPOXY REFLECTORIZED PAVEMENT STRIPES, 20 MILS ITEM 685.11 (FT) CL STATION ALIGN FROM TO SIDE DESCRIPTION FACTOR LENGTH (FT) E 18+62 62 18+79.19 RT STOP BAR 6 16.6 99.4 E 18+55 00 20+08.00 LT B KE

More information

MNDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL

MNDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL MNDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL Chapter 6 Ramps, Shoulders, Turn Lanes & Miscellaneous Pavements MnDOT Pavement Engineer Date Contents Introduction... 1 600 Ramps and Loops... 1 610 - Shoulders... 2 620 -

More information

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements For additional design details for Marymoor Subarea infrastructure, refer to the 2017 Marymoor Subarea Infrastructure Planning Report. STREET REQUIREMENTS

More information

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004 Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004 Table of Contents Page Chapter 1. General Provisions 1.1 Jurisdiction 3 1.2 Purpose and Intent 3 1.3 Modification 3

More information

APPENDIX D COST SUMMARY TABLES

APPENDIX D COST SUMMARY TABLES APPENDIX D COST SUMMARY TABLES Section 1 Between Route 50 and Evergreen Mills Road 3850 linear feet of one 12 foot wide additional lane in southbound direction of Rte 606; from north side of Rte 50 to

More information

CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Trench Backfill Utility Trench Paving Backfill and Embedment TB 1 HDPE, SRHDPE & PVC Storm Drain Pipe Only (Nonrigid) Bedding and Backfill TB2 Deep Cut

More information

DESIGN CRITERIA DIVISION 4900 TRAFFIC SIGNALS

DESIGN CRITERIA DIVISION 4900 TRAFFIC SIGNALS DESIGN CRITERIA DIVISION 4900 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 4901 GENERAL: These criteria shall be adhered to for the design of all publiclyfinanced or privately-financed traffic signal systems to be installed in the

More information

Whitney Road Intersection and Sidewalk Evaluation

Whitney Road Intersection and Sidewalk Evaluation Whitney Road Intersection and Sidewalk Evaluation Whitney Road Drainage and Safety Enhancements Phase II Prepared For: Pinellas County Department of Environment and Infrastructure Division of Engineering

More information

BID SUMMARY SHEET. S. Brothers Inc. CONTRACTOR'S NAME CONTRACT QUANTITY & UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

BID SUMMARY SHEET. S. Brothers Inc. CONTRACTOR'S NAME CONTRACT QUANTITY & UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT CONTRACT. 13-31-01 : TALMADGE ROAD RESURFACING Fischer Contracting Inc. Z Brothers Concrete Contractors Inc. S. Brothers Inc. 10 Short Hills Ln 304 Jernee Mill Rd P.O. Box 317 Scotch Plains, NJ 07076 Sayreville,

More information

Steps to Conducting a Complete Streets Assessment

Steps to Conducting a Complete Streets Assessment Steps to Conducting a Complete Streets Assessment Familiarize yourself with Complete Streets Read through the Complete Streets Assessment Guidelines. This will give you an idea of what Complete Streets

More information

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS Brampton PathWays Planning and Design Guidelines 27 Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS 3.1 CLASS 1 MULTI-USE PATH Off-road multi-use trails are the backbone of the Brampton PathWays Network. They are typically

More information

Does It Work? THE BENCHMARKING PROJECT. State Department of Transportation Project Assessment. Bill Wilkinson and Bob Chauncey

Does It Work? THE BENCHMARKING PROJECT. State Department of Transportation Project Assessment. Bill Wilkinson and Bob Chauncey THE BENCHMARKING PROJECT Does It Work? State Department of Transportation Project Assessment Bill Wilkinson and Bob Chauncey National Center for Bicycling & Walking 1506 21 st Street NW, Washington, DC

More information

WELCOME. City of Eden Prairie West 70 th Street

WELCOME. City of Eden Prairie West 70 th Street WELCOME City of Eden Prairie West 70 th Street Project Schedule Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug >>> May WEST SEGMENT Concept Plan Fall 2014 Plan Development Winter 2014 Summer 2015 Construction

More information

SRTS IMPLEMENTATION COSTS

SRTS IMPLEMENTATION COSTS SRTS IMPLEMENTATION COSTS What Is a Estimate? A cost estimate establishes the anticipated budget required to implement the actions (the improvement projects and programs) identified in your School Travel

More information

APPENDIX L. Design Criteria

APPENDIX L. Design Criteria APPENDIX L Design Criteria DRAFT PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA Page 1 of 18 APPROVALS MANAGER, ENGINEERING CITY OF HAMILTON MANAGER, ENGINEERING REGION OF HALTON DATE This Design Criteria for the New East-West

More information

Driveway Design Criteria

Driveway Design Criteria Design Manual Chapter 5 - Roadway Design 5L - Access Management 5L-4 Driveway Design Criteria A. General For efficient and safe operations, access drives and minor public street intersections can be improved

More information

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual City of Margate, Florida Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual Table of Contents Page No. I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. TRAFFIC CALMING REQUEST AND PROCESSING PROCEDURES... 2 1. COMPLETE AND SUBMIT PROJECT

More information

ADA Training Standard Plans

ADA Training Standard Plans ADA Training Standard Plans SCREEN READABLE VERSION IS IN THE MAKING AND WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE SOON 2018 MnDOT 2 Standard Plans 2017 Overview Overview PROWAG and Curb Ramp Basics Curb Ramp Types ADA Curb

More information

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Projects

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Projects Barclay Street Viaduct NS9807 NS9807 This project will provide for the rehabilitation of the Barclay Street Viaduct, from Route 19 to Marshall Street, in order to increase the weight load of the structure.

More information

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS 901 South Mopac Expressway Building V, Suite 220 Austin, Texas 78746 Texas P.E. Firm Registration No. F-929 Klotz Associates Final Report Submittal: March 20, 2015 Revised Final

More information

NORTH DOWNTOWN N EAST WEST

NORTH DOWNTOWN N EAST WEST ORTH DOWTOW CHURCH STREET ALTERATE o. 1 BIKE LAES, O-STREET PARKIG, SIDEWALK AD MULTI-USE PATH This alternate incorporates a 5-foot sidewalk along the eastern side of Church Street, a 10-foot Multi-Use

More information

Construction Specifications Manual

Construction Specifications Manual Isle of Wight County Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Construction Specifications Manual Adopted August 20, 2009 Introduction The Isle of Wight County Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Master Plan was

More information

Chapter 6: Along the Street

Chapter 6: Along the Street Chapter 6: Along the Street This section describes the types of infrastructure that should be in place along school routes to make walking and bicycling to school safer. Sidewalks In communities with sidewalks,

More information

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods: 13.1 GENERAL APPLICATION PROCESS Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods: A. Planned Developments may set general locations for access points.

More information

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road West Dimond Blvd Jodhpur St to Sand Lake CSS Transportation Project Summary Municipality of Anchorage Project # 05 005 Project Manager: John Smith, P.E. (MOA PM&E) Project Administrator: Julie Makela,

More information

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS TECHNICAL MANUALS AND SPECIFICATIONS 2 YEAR MANDATORY UPDATES (2017) COMMENTS & RESPONSES COMMENT / JUSTIFICATION

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS TECHNICAL MANUALS AND SPECIFICATIONS 2 YEAR MANDATORY UPDATES (2017) COMMENTS & RESPONSES COMMENT / JUSTIFICATION Services Division 1 County Staff 1.1 Recommend adding a paragraph advising the EOR/developer that all streets within and contiguous to a proposed development must be coordinated with other existing or

More information

FDOT Treasure Coast Traffic Report

FDOT Treasure Coast Traffic Report July 13, 2018 Barbara Kelleher, 954 777 4090 Barbara.Kelleher@dot.state.fl.us FDOT Treasure Coast Traffic Report July 13 through July 20, 2018 TREASURE COAST Construction and maintenance related lane closures

More information

ODOT Major Construction, Bikeways and Enhancements Report for Miami County. (State Fiscal Years 2007 to 2010)

ODOT Major Construction, Bikeways and Enhancements Report for Miami County. (State Fiscal Years 2007 to 2010) Bikeways and Enhancements Report for Miami County (State Fiscal Years 2007 to 2010) Statewide Construction Summary by Major Work Type (in Millions) WORK TYPE SFY 2007 SFY 2008 SFY 2009 SFY 2010 TOTAL #

More information

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER Complete Streets City Commission adopted a Complete Streets policy in 2012 Complete Streets are road networks that are designed for all users:

More information

Hale iwa Improvement District Project

Hale iwa Improvement District Project Hale iwa Improvement District Project Hale iwa, North Shore, O ahu October 10, 2017 Public Informational Meeting Environmental Impact Statement Preparation Notice Waialua Elementary School 67-020 Waialua

More information

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN 3.01 GENERAL SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN For purposes of geometric and structural design, streets shall be classified according to the following table. The City Engineer will determine the class of all proposed

More information

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

Design Criteria. Design Criteria F Design Criteria Design Criteria Ministry of Transportation Ministère des Transports DESIGN CRITERIA Page: 1 of 13 WORK PROJECT NO. N/A GO Bloomington Station TYPE OF PROJECT LOCATION Bloomington Road

More information

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities Approved: Policy: 20-004(P) Responsible Office: Planning Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities I. POLICY STATEMENT: This policy

More information

Northside School Class I Bike Path, Cool, CA Application Attachments

Northside School Class I Bike Path, Cool, CA Application Attachments PLHD Grant Application, 12/9/2011 County of El Dorado Department of Transportation Northside School Class I Bike Path, Cool, CA Application Attachments 1. Project Site Map 2. Auburn State Recreation Area

More information

TANGIBLE CAPITAL ASSET (TCA) Reporting Guidelines for Land Development Projects

TANGIBLE CAPITAL ASSET (TCA) Reporting Guidelines for Land Development Projects January 2012 TANGIBLE CAPITAL ASSET (TCA) Reporting Guidelines for Land Development Projects 1. PURPOSE OF REPORTING The purpose of Tangible Capital Asset (TCA) reporting is to comply with PSAB 3150 reporting

More information

DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY BOULDER AVENUE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT CITY OF HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY BOULDER AVENUE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT CITY OF HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DRAFT CITY OF HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA August 8, 2006 DRAFT CITY OF HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: City of Highland 27215 Baseline Highland, California 92346

More information

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018 Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018 What s Happening The City plans to mill and resurface Dr. M.L.

More information

SR 580/West Hillsborough Avenue Multimodal Improvements Feasibility and Cost Estimation

SR 580/West Hillsborough Avenue Multimodal Improvements Feasibility and Cost Estimation SR 580/West Hillsborough Avenue Multimodal Improvements Feasibility and Cost Estimation April 2018 Completed For: In Coordination With: Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organization 601 East West

More information

APPENDIX G SIGNAGE AND STRIPING SUPPLEMENT

APPENDIX G SIGNAGE AND STRIPING SUPPLEMENT APPENDIX G SIGNAGE AND STRIPING SUPPLEMENT DOUGLAS COUNTY SIGNAGE AND STRIPING SUPPLEMENT TO DOUGLAS COUNTY ROADWAY DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS UPDATED MAY 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.00: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS...

More information

Preliminary Engineering Study

Preliminary Engineering Study Preliminary Engineering Study Open House # 2 June 6, 2018 PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: Agenda Background and status of preliminary engineering study County Road 26 design summary County Road 63 design summary

More information

APPENDIX G: DETAILED COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX G: DETAILED COST ESTIMATES APPENDIX G: DETAILED COST ESTIMATES August 2012 7 YUBA COUNTY BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN Preliminary Estimate Memorandum Prepared for: Fehr and Peers Transportation Consultants & Yuba County Department of Public

More information

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE 2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE Road Engineering Design Guidelines Version 2.0.1 May 2018 City of Toronto, Transportation Services City of Toronto Page 0 Background In early 2014, Transportation Services initiated

More information

Road Diets FDOT Process

Road Diets FDOT Process Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Road Diets FDOT Process Humberto Castillero, PE, PTOE Roadway Design Office Purpose of Guide Develop a statewide lane elimination review process Balance state & local

More information

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design Yes No N/A Design Requirements I. GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges A. Culvert design is in accordance with the Culverts chapter of Volume 2 of the UDFCD Manual for additional

More information

New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007

New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007 New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007 City Street and County Road Maintenance Program The preservation and keeping of public street and road rights-of-way

More information

GWINNETT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

GWINNETT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GWINNETT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 of 7 June 20, 2007 GENERAL: The following guidelines shall be used in the determination of the requirement for left turn lanes for development projects and

More information

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Off-road Trails. Guidance Off-road Trails Off-road trails are shared use paths located on an independent alignment that provide two-way travel for people walking, bicycling, and other non-motorized users. Trails specifically along

More information

ROADWAY AND PARKING DETAILS TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL NOT TO SCALE

ROADWAY AND PARKING DETAILS TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL NOT TO SCALE NOTES: O:\Division Information\Engineering\Documents\Engineering and Construction\COMMERCE CITY\CAD files\2016 Updated Files\307-01 thru 307-09 (Roadway & Parking Typical Sections).dwg 6' SIDEWALK MAY

More information