Spatial responses to human hunting: a comparison between two sympatric populations of wild boar (Sus scrofa) and red deer (Cervus elaphus)
|
|
- Sabrina Briggs
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IUGB Congress 24/8/217 Spatial responses to human hunting: a comparison between two sympatric populations of wild boar (Sus scrofa) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) Chassagneux A.1, Calenge C. 1, Baubet B. 1 & Saïd S. 1 1ONCFS, Unité cervidés-sanglier, 133 Birieux, France
2 CONTEXT Population growth and spatial expansion of ungulates in the northern hemisphere Species coexistence Increasing conflicts with human activities Agricultural damage Forest damage Hunting regulation but diminution of hunters Collision with vehicle
3 OBJECTIVES How two sympatric populations of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) differ in their spatial behaviour during the hunting period? Movement Space use Does drive hunt affect individual spatial behaviour? Is the individual response similar for both species? Spatial response Temporal scale of the response
4 SPECIES DATA Two species red deer and wild boar : Popular game species Responsible for crops and forests damage Hunting event = conjunction between an individual and a battue Individuals Hunting events Species Sex Red deer Female Wild boar Female 14 9 monitored Similar environmental and hunting conditions
5 STUDY SITE One study site: National Hunting and Wildlife Reserve of La Petite Pierre ( N, E) 267 ha of unfenced forest Habitat types: forest without understorey, bushes, meadows, roadsides Hunting conditions: Multi-species battue One battue per week Mean number of hunters: 25 Mean number of dogs: 6
6 SPATIAL BEHAVIOUR METRICS Spatial behaviour Movement Distance Speed Sinusoity Home range X & Y Space use Forest Bushes Meadows Road Metrics Movement Total daily distance Daily maximum speed Mean sinusoity Daily home range size Daily maximum activity Space use Proportion of daily locations in each habitat types Meanings Movement Flight Flight Flight Exploration Mobility Space use Forest use Secure areas use Open areas use Disturbance areas use
7 OBJECTIVES How two sympatric populations of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) differ in their spatial behaviour during the hunting period? Movement Space use Does drive hunt affect individual spatial behaviour? Is the individual response similar for both species? Spatial response Temporal scale of the response
8 SPATIAL BEHAVIOUR DESCRIPTION Projection of the variables chose to describe the spatial behaviour on the Projection of the variables chose to describe the spatial plane defined principal component behaviour by on the plane defined by principal component axes axes 1 and 2 1 and 2 Projection of individuals from both species on the plane defined by principal component axes 1 and 2 1. Meadow use Distance.5 Dim2 (18.2%) Forest use Home range size. Speed Sinusoity Y X -.5 Road use sdspeed Bushes use Dim1 (31.8%).5 1. Red deer before Red deer after Wild boar before Wild boar after
9 SPATIAL BEHAVIOUR DESCRIPTION Red deer and wild boar differ in their spatial behaviour: Meadow use and speed No clear detection of any spatial behaviour change in response to the battue for either species Refining the temporal scale Study the individual level
10 OBJECTIVES How two sympatric populations of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) differ in their spatial behaviour during the hunting period? Movement Space use Does drive hunt affect individual spatial behaviour? Is the individual response similar for both species? Spatial response Temporal scale of the response
11 INDIVIDUAL RESPONSES Daily maximum speed (m/h) One metric describing spatial behaviour and calculated per day D-1 D+1
12 INDIVIDUAL RESPONSES 5 Normal behaviour 1 3 Higher speed Lower speed Maximum speed per day during the hunting period (5-95 % quantiles and median) Daily maximum speed (m/h) One metric describing spatial behaviour and calculated per day D-1 D+1
13 INDIVIDUAL RESPONSES 5 3 Normal behaviour Lower speed Maximum speed per day for 5 days: battue (), the days before ( and D-1), the days after (D+1 and ) Higher speed 1 Maximum speed per day during the hunting period (5-95 % quantiles and median) Daily maximum speed (m/h) One metric describing spatial behaviour and calculated per day For both species and one metric per dimension D-1 D+1
14 6 Fifi 4 6 Lost 3 6 Pub Pub Lost 2 2 Huitte Huitte Lost Aurelie 6 Bertha 2 6 Nael 4 Female wild boar 4 Lou Panthere Melanie Gabrielle Milka 4 2 Huguette 2 Cloe Vanessa 4 6 Caramel Fari 2 6 Female red deer 6 MAXIMUM SPEED
15 6 Fifi 4 6 Lost 3 6 Pub Pub Lost 2 2 Huitte Huitte Lost Aurelie 6 Bertha 2 6 Nael 4 Female wild boar 4 Lou Panthere Melanie Gabrielle Milka 4 2 Huguette 2 Cloe Vanessa 4 6 Caramel Fari 2 6 Female red deer 6 MAXIMUM SPEED
16 6 Fifi 4 6 Lost 3 6 Pub Pub Lost 2 2 Huitte Huitte Lost Aurelie 6 Bertha 2 6 Nael 4 Female wild boar 4 Lou Panthere Melanie Gabrielle Milka 4 2 Huguette 2 Cloe Vanessa 4 6 Caramel Fari 2 6 Female red deer 6 MAXIMUM SPEED
17 6 Fifi 4 6 Lost 3 6 Pub Pub Lost 2 2 Huitte Huitte Lost Aurelie 6 Bertha 2 6 Nael 4 Female wild boar 4 Lou Panthere Melanie Gabrielle Milka 4 2 Huguette 2 Cloe Vanessa 4 6 Caramel Fari 2 6 Female red deer 6 MAXIMUM SPEED
18 MAXIMUM SPEED Two responses at the individual scale: increase the speed during the drive hunt (flight?) no change in speed during or after the drive hunt (no disturbance or no detection of the hiding phase) Wild boar individuals appear to react more intensively to the drive hunt than red deer individuals.
19 MAXIMUM ACTIVITY 2 Fifi Pub 2 2 Pub Huitte 2 2 Bertha 2 Lost Vanessa Lost Lost Melanie 15 Romaine 2 Huitte Catherine 1 15 Lou Female wild boar Nael Milka 2 2 Festive Cloe Huguette 15 2 Caramel Fari Female red deer
20 MAXIMUM ACTIVITY 2 Fifi Pub 2 2 Pub Huitte 2 2 Bertha 2 Lost Vanessa Lost Lost Melanie 15 Romaine 2 Huitte Catherine 1 15 Lou Female wild boar Nael Milka 2 2 Festive Cloe Huguette 15 2 Caramel Fari Female red deer
21 MAXIMUM ACTIVITY Two responses at the individual scale: increase activity during the hunt no change in activity during or after the hunt But responses less clear than for the speed metric. Wild boar individuals appear to have a higher activity than red deer individuals. But reactions during the drive hunt seem to be similar for both species.
22 SPACE USE For red deer, two responses at the individual scale: increasing meadows use one day after the hunt (n = 2) no change in space use during or after the hunt For wild boar, no change detected in space use during or after the hunt. Wild boar and red deer differ in their use of meadows.
23 CONCLUSIONS Both species differ in their spatial behaviour during the hunting period: Red deer appears to use more meadows than wild boar because of their diet. Wild boar appears to have more intense active phases. At the individual scale, changes in speed and activity the day of the drive hunt for both species (flee or hide), but no clear modification in space use. Management perspectives: multi-species drive hunt vs. Single species drive hunt.
24 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Keywords: 7SI/Brown bear/harvest/harvest quota/hunting/malme/management/ mortality/population size/trend/ursus arctos
Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning. Management with the brown bear population in Slovenia. Report: 1-6. 2006. Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning. Keywords:
More informationOREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL AND EFFECTS OF LETHAL CONTROL
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL ODFW is authorized to reduce human-cougar conflict, livestock depredation, and benefit native ungulate populations through the
More information021 Deer Management Unit
021 Deer Management Unit Geographic Location: Deer Management Unit (DMU) 021 is 1,464 square miles in size and is located in the central Upper Peninsula (UP). This DMU is dominated by publicly owned land
More informationSuccess and failure of a stakeholder based approach mitigating human-wild boar conflicts in rural areas in Bavaria (South East Germany)
Success and failure of a stakeholder based approach mitigating human-wild boar conflicts in rural areas in Bavaria (South East Germany) & Bavarian State Institute of Forestry (LWF) Wildlife under human
More informationALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units
ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units Arizona Game and Fish Department April 4, 2006 Alternative Deer Management
More informationPredation risk theory for optimising control of wild deer. A.D.M. Latham, M.C. Latham & D. Herries
Predation risk theory for optimising control of wild deer A.D.M. Latham, M.C. Latham & D. Herries Introduction Introduced game species are a resource for some stakeholders They can have negative impacts
More informationThe impact of the grey squirrel as an invasive species on red squirrel populations. Deborah Brady
The impact of the grey squirrel as an invasive species on red squirrel populations. Deborah Brady Squirrels in the UK Native 270-360g Length (excluding tail) 19-23cm Density
More information2009 WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer
Section Author: Dave Moyles 2009 WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer Suggested Citation: Moyle, D. 2009. WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer. Pages 84 88 In: N. Webb and R. Anderson.
More informationDifficulties in Coexistence with Wild Animals: A Brief Discussion on Future Possibilities
Difficulties in Coexistence with Wild Animals: A Brief Discussion on Future Possibilities Yukichika Kawata Department of Animal and Food Hygiene Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine
More informationDeer Management Unit 255
Deer Management Unit 255 Area Description DMU 255 is located primarily in northern Menominee County, but also extends into a small portion of Dickinson, Marquette, and Delta counties. It has totaled 463
More informationDeer and Deer Management in Central New York: Local Residents Interests and Concerns
Deer and Deer Management in Central New York: Local Residents Interests and Concerns NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources and the Human Dimensions
More information2018 MINNESOTA PRAIRIE-CHICKEN HARVEST SURVEY
2018 MINNESOTA PRAIRIE-CHICKEN HARVEST SURVEY Charlotte Roy Forest Wildlife Populations and Research Group Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Grand Rapids, Minnesota 14 December 2018 SUMMARY OF
More informationBTSF. Better Training for Safer Food Initiative. Wild Boar ecology
Better Training for Safer Food Initiative Wild Boar ecology BTSF This presentation is delivered under contract with the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (http://ec.europa.eu/chafea).
More informationCO-EXISTENCE OF NATURE TOURISM AND WILDLIFE IN LITHUANIA
CO-EXISTENCE OF NATURE TOURISM AND WILDLIFE IN LITHUANIA Olgirda Belova Lithuanian Forest Research Institute Liepu st. 1, Girionys LT-53101; Lithuanian University of Agriculture, Studentu st. 11, LT- 53361
More informationRegulatory Control of Deer in Australia
Regulatory Control of Deer in Australia Ellen Freeman: Central Queensland University School of Medical & Applied Sciences Rockhampton, Australia Neal Finch: The University of Queensland School of Agriculture
More informationDeer Management Unit 127
Deer Management Unit 127 Area Description Deer Management Unit (DMU) 127 is 328 sq. miles in size and is found in far western Gogebic County surrounding Ironwood, Bessemer and adjacent rural communities.
More informationDeer Management Unit 152
Deer Management Unit 152 Geographic Location: Deer Management Unit (DMU) 152 is 386 miles 2 in size and is primarily in southwestern Marquette County. This DMU falls within the moderate snowfall zone and
More informationmake people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,
Investing in Wisconsin s Whitetails 1 Over the last 60 years, the department has developed a deer herd monitoring and management system that seeks to use the best science and data possible. The deer monitoring
More informationEpidemiological analyses of African swine fever in the Baltic States and Poland (Update September 2016 September 2017)
Epidemiological analyses of African swine fever in the Baltic States and Poland (Update September 2016 September 2017) Standing committee on Plants, Animals Food and Feed November 30, 2017, Brussels Brussels,
More informationTITLE 35. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY CHAPTER 15. ANIMAL INDUSTRY SUBCHAPTER 34. FERAL SWINE
TITLE 35. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY CHAPTER 15. ANIMAL INDUSTRY SUBCHAPTER 34. FERAL SWINE 35:15-34-1. Purpose The purpose of these rules is to implement the provisions of
More informationDeer Management in Maryland -Overview. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader
Deer Management in Maryland -Overview Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Management History -Pre-colonial/Colonial Deer abundant Important to eastern tribes Legislatively protected in Maryland 1729 Nearly
More informationUnderstanding the Conflict between Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) and Humans in the Department of the Moselle, France
Understanding the Conflict between Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) and Humans in the Department of the Moselle, France Introduction RYAN, Mark C. & ANTHONY, Brandon P. Department of Environmental Sciences & Policy,
More informationDeer Management in Maryland. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Maryland DNR
Deer Management in Maryland Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Maryland DNR 301-842-0332 beyler@dnr.state.md.us General Behavior Social groups Social hierarchy Home range Nocturnal Bedding Food Habits Ruminants
More informationDeer Management Unit 249
Deer Management Unit 249 Geographic Location: DMU 249 lies along the Lake Michigan shoreline and is comprised largely of Mackinac and Chippewa counties with a small portion of southeastern Luce County
More informationAnnual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.
Annual Report 2005 Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia. PROJECT INVESTIGATORS: Stephen S. Ditchkoff, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Forestry and Wildlife Sciences Bldg.,
More informationGray Wolf Prey Base Ecology in the North Fork Flathead River Drainage
University of Wyoming National Park Service Research Center Annual Report Volume 13 13th Annual Report, 1989 Article 35 1-1-1989 Gray Wolf Prey Base Ecology in the North Fork Flathead River Drainage C.
More informationUSING THE CAMERA ESTIMATE METHOD FOR POPULATION ESTIMATES OF WILD RED DEER (Cervus elaphus) IN SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND
USING THE CAMERA ESTIMATE METHOD FOR POPULATION ESTIMATES OF WILD RED DEER (Cervus elaphus) IN SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND Simon Chinnock 1, Greg Baxter 2, Neal Finch 1, Peter Murray 1 1. School of Agriculture
More informationEvaluating genetic connectivity and re-colonization dynamics of moose in the Northeast.
Evaluating genetic connectivity and re-colonization dynamics of moose in the Northeast. Theme 4, Principal Investigator(s): Dr. Heidi Kretser and Dr. Michale Glennon, Wildlife Conservation Society hkretser@wcs.org
More informationDMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit
DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Arenac County Deer Management Unit (DMU) 006 is in the Northern Lower Peninsula (NLP) Region. It has roughly 248,320 acres and consists of
More information2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer
2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer Section Authors: Barb Maile and Velma Hudson Suggested Citation: Maile, B., and V. Hudson. 2010. Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer. Pages 73 77.
More informationJeff Gagnon Norris Dodd Sue Boe. Scott Sprague Ray Schweinsburg Arizona Game and Fish Department
EVALUATION OF AN ANIMAL ACTIVATED ACTIVATED HIGHWAY CROSSWALK INTEGRATED WITH RETROFIT FENCING Jeff Gagnon Norris Dodd Sue Boe Kari Ogren Scott Sprague Ray Schweinsburg Arizona Game and Fish Department
More informationPopulation Parameters and Their Estimation. Uses of Survey Results. Population Terms. Why Estimate Population Parameters? Population Estimation Terms
Population Parameters and Their Estimation Data should be collected with a clear purpose in mind. Not only a clear purpose, but a clear idea as to the precise way in which they will be analysed so as to
More informationDMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit
DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit Area Description Mason County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP) on the Lake Michigan coast. Only 17% of the land base is public
More informationA Review of Mule and Black-tailed Deer Population Dynamics
A Review of Mule and Black-tailed Deer Population Dynamics Tavis Forrester and Heiko Wittmer Wildlife, Fish & Conservation Biology University of California, Davis Background Role of predation in mule deer
More information5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit
5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Otsego County Deer Management Unit (DMU 069) is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has roughly 159 Square miles (101,800
More informationDeer Management Unit 252
Deer Management Unit 252 Geographic Location: Deer Management Unit (DMU) 252 is 297 miles 2 in size and is primarily in southeastern Marquette, southwestern Alger and northwestern Delta County. This DMU
More informationEcology and Environmental Impact of Javan Rusa Deer (Cervus timorensis russa) in the Royal National Park
Ecology and Environmental Impact of Javan Rusa Deer (Cervus timorensis russa) in the Royal National Park Andrew James Moriarty B. App. Sc. (Hons.) A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements
More informationDMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit
DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit Area Description Antrim County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has roughly 74 square miles (47,451 acres) of public land
More informationCentral Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results
Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Table of Contents Public Surveys for Deer Goal Setting... 1 Methods... 1 Hunter Survey... 2 Demographics... 2 Population
More informationRYAN WALKER, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, P. O. Box 1145, Raton, NM 87740, (575) ,
State Status Reports RYAN WALKER, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, P. O. Box 1145, Raton, NM 87740, (575) 445-2311, ryan.walker@state.nm.us Abstract: Overall population estimates for all deer species
More informationMichigan Predator-Prey Project Phase 1 Preliminary Results and Management Recommendations. Study Background
Michigan Predator-Prey Project Phase 1 Preliminary Results and Management Recommendations Study Background White-tailed deer are important ecologically, socially, and economically throughout their geographic
More informationWhite-tailed Deer Age Report from the Deer Harvest
White-tailed Deer Age Report from the 2016 Deer Harvest The Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department has made a concerted effort, beginning in 2015, to increase the amount of age data collected from harvested
More informationDMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit
DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit Area Description Emmet County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has roughly 126 square miles (80,371 acres) of public land
More informationDeer Management Unit 122
Deer Management Unit 122 Area Description DMU 122 is located in south Dickinson County and includes a small portion of west central Menominee County. It encompasses 163 sq. miles and has remained unchanged
More informationProject on the evaluation of the human dimensions of the target audiences regarding Eastern wolves conservation in La Mauricie National Park of
Project on the evaluation of the human dimensions of the target audiences regarding Eastern wolves conservation in La Mauricie National Park of Canada Presentation plan Context and project objectives Planning
More informationCopyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg
Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the publisher,
More information2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose
2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose Photo: Shevenell Webb Section Authors: Kristina Norstrom and Shevenell Webb Suggested Citation: Norstrom, K., and S. Webb. 2010. Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose.
More informationNorthwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results
Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Table of Contents Public Surveys for Deer Goal Setting... 1 Methods... 1 Hunter Survey... 2 Demographics... 2 Population
More informationEXAMINING VARIABILITY ASSOCIATED WITH BULLET FRAGMENTATION AND DEPOSITION IN WHITE-TAILED DEER AND DOMESTIC SHEEP
165 EXAMINING VARIABILITY ASSOCIATED WITH BULLET FRAGMENTATION AND DEPOSITION IN WHITE-TAILED DEER AND DOMESTIC SHEEP Marrett Grund, Lou Cornicelli, Leah Carlson, Michelle Carstensen, and Erika Butler
More informationAfrican Swine fever in wild boar in Belgium
African Swine fever in wild boar in Belgium PAFF Committee 16 January 2019 Confirmed cases in wild boar On the 13 th January 2019 : 973 wild boars sampled 323 confirmed cases of AVP in wild boar 321 in
More informationSection 1 Basic Pig Biology. Section 1 Basic Pig Biology
Section 1 Basic Pig Biology 1 Introduction All wild pigs, wild boar, feral swine, and Eurasian boar are members of the same biological species - Sus scrofa. Pigs, or swine, were first introduced to North
More informationHunters vs. Non-hunters Attitudes Toward Canada Goose Management in Illinois
Hunters vs. Non-hunters Attitudes Toward Canada Goose Management in Illinois Laura A. Schweizer Andrew L. Stephenson Craig A. Miller Human Dimensions Research Program Illinois Natural History Survey University
More informationDeer and Bison Artiodactyla
Deer and Bison Artiodactyla Moose: Linda Shaw 100 Wapiti Cervus elaphus When Europeans first settled Canada, the eastern race of Wapiti or Elk (C. e. canadensis) were found in the Rainy River area and
More informationALBERTA FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING PASSED RESOLUTIONS FEBRUARY 21, 2015
ALBERTA FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING PASSED RESOLUTIONS FEBRUARY 21, 2015 GENERAL RESOLUTION NUMBER G-1-2015 and Sustainable Resource Development permit the use of crossbows during
More informationHowell Woods Orientation and Safety Open Book Test
Name: Date: 1 Howell Woods Orientation and Safety Open Book Test Each hunter must pass this test with a maximum of three questions answered incorrectly, with all of the safety questions answered correctly
More informationTennessee Black Bear Public Opinion Survey
Tennessee Black Bear Public Opinion Survey Executive Summary 2012 Survey TWRA Technical Report 12 02 This electronic publication was developed by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency s Division of Wildlife
More informationMule and Black-tailed Deer
Mule and Black-tailed Deer Mule and Black-tailed Deer: Because mule deer are closely tied to the history, development, and future of the West, this species has become one of the true barometers of environmental
More informationJob Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion
SPECIES: Goal: Manage the mountain lion population, its numbers and distribution, as an important part of Arizona s fauna and to provide mountain lion hunting recreation opportunity while maintaining existing
More informationDeer Management Unit 349
Deer Management Unit 349 Geographic Location: DMU 349 lies along the lake Michigan shoreline and is largely comprised of western Mackinac county with small portions of southern Luce county and southeastern
More informationPeace Region Wildlife Regulations Proposed Changes for Comment ( )
Peace Region Wildlife Regulations Proposed Changes for Comment (2010-11) INTRODUCTION This document summarizes changes to hunting regulations currently under consideration in the Peace Region. These changes,
More informationDMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit
DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Wayne Deer Management Unit (DMU 082) lies in the Southeast Region and borders Lake Erie to the East and includes Celeron and Stony Islands
More informationMonitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group
Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota - 2014 Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group INTRODUCTION White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) represent one
More informationIN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development
BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS 217 IN PROGRESS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/departments/erd.html MOOSE HARVEST REPORT 217 Summary Each year, moose
More informationLIFE+ COORNATA. "New perspectives in the coordinated management of a protected species: the case study of the Apennine chamois"
LIFE+ COORNATA "New perspectives in the coordinated management of a protected species: the case study of the Apennine chamois" A «special» species The only Italian endemic mammal species to be included
More informationWhite-Tailed Deer Management FAQ
December 6 th, 217 Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ What are current white-tailed deer management objectives in the Kootenay
More informationWinter Steelhead Redd to Fish conversions, Spawning Ground Survey Data
Winter Steelhead Redd to Fish conversions, Spawning Ground Survey Data Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW); Corvallis Research Office Oregon Adult Salmonid Inventory and Sampling Project (June
More informationDMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit
DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Midland County Deer Management Unit (DMU) 056 is in the Northern Lower Peninsula (NLP) Region. It has roughly 333, 440 acres and consists
More informationTrophy Fees for Hunting in Bulgaria. Based on the international CIC point system. All prices are in EURO. Preserve shooting
Trophy Fees for Hunting in Bulgaria Based on the international CIC point system All prices are in EURO I. BIG GAME 1. RED DEER - Cervus Elaphus L. Hunting period stag and calf 01.09.- 31.01., hind 01.10.-
More informationEastern Brook Trout Joint Venture. Update
Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture (EBTJV) Update Mark Hudy USDA Forest Service, Fish and Aquatic Ecology Unit NFHAB Board Meeting April 17, 2012 Introduction Assessment Case History 1. Evaluate the distribution
More informationMarch 14, Public Opinion Survey Results: Restoration of Wild Bison in Montana
March 14, 2011 TO: FROM: RE: Kit Fischer, National Wildlife Federation Kelly Middendorff, Public Opinion Survey Results: Restoration of Wild Bison in Montana Methodology This memo contains results of a
More informationManagement of Canada Geese
Management of Canada Geese Erika Lok, Canadian Wildlife Service Union of BC Municipalities Convention - Urban Wildlife Workshop September 27, 2011 Historical and current distribution of southern breeding
More informationDMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit
DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit Area Description Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has roughly 99,000 acres of public land which is about
More informationBig Game Season Structure, Background and Context
To: Members of the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission From: Danielle Isenhart, Regulations Manager Date: April 16, 2018 Re: 2020-2024 Big Game Season Structure, Background and Context At the May Commission
More informationInvasive Species. 1. What do you think might happen if a species is moved out of its native habitat and into a new environment?
Name Date Hr Invasive Species Every animal and plant species has a native habitat, or environment where it naturally and normally lives and grows. Humans sometimes relocate a species, either by accident
More informationTargeted Wild Pig Feeder by WPF, Inc.
Targeted Wild Pig Feeder by WPF, Inc. There are only two types of people in Texas, those who have pigs and those who re goin to get em. Is this an exaggeration or an overstatement? Texas A&M University
More informationResident Outdoor Recreation for Fremont County, WY July 1999
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING 'P.O. Box 3354 Cooperative Extension Service Laramie, WY 82071-3354 College of Agriculture Phone: 307-766-2386 Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics Fax: 307-766-5544 Resident
More informationFIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF EAST REGION WILDLIFE RESEARCH PROGRAM
FIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF EAST REGION WILDLIFE RESEARCH PROGRAM The Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife (ODFW) Statewide Research Grant consists of multiple programs that investigate issues related to the
More informationPREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE
PREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE BEN H. KOERTH, Institute for White-tailed Deer Management and Research, Box 6109, Arthur Temple College of Forestry, Stephen F. Austin State
More informationBROWN BEAR MANAGEMENT IN SLOVENIA. Marko JONOZOVIČ, B.Sc. Slovenia Forest Service Head of Wildlife & Hunting Department
BROWN BEAR MANAGEMENT IN SLOVENIA Marko JONOZOVIČ, B.Sc. Slovenia Forest Service Head of Wildlife & Hunting Department BROWN BEAR IN SLOVENIA - HISTORY - Population of Brown bear has never been extinct
More informationDMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit
DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit Area Description Missaukee County Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). It has over 100,000 acres of state land, just over
More informationIMPROVING POPULATION MANAGEMENT AND HARVEST QUOTAS OF MOOSE IN RUSSIA
IMPROVING POPULATION MANAGEMENT AND HARVEST QUOTAS OF MOOSE IN RUSSIA Vladimir M. Glushkov Research Institute of Game Management and Fur Farming, Kirov, Russia. ABSTRACT: Annual harvest quotas for moose
More information1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;
British Columbia Deer Status Report forthe 1987 Western ~ tates~cinces Deer workshop - 1. Attending Representative: Ian Hatter Wildlife Branch Ministry of Environment and Parks Victoria, British Columbia
More informationMANAGING GEESE WITH RECREATIONAL HUNTING
MANAGING GEESE WITH RECREATIONAL HUNTING Getting to know goose hunters: their behaviours and motivations James H. Williams Thorsten J. S. Balsby Helle Ørsted Nielsen Tommy Asferg Jesper Madsen Photo: Ove
More informationImplementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association
Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association QDMA Deer Population Trends 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000
More informationAfrican swine fever in wild boar in Latvia. Edvins Olsevskis, DVM, PhD Food and Veterinary Service, Latvia
African swine fever in wild boar in Latvia Edvins Olsevskis, DVM, PhD Food and Veterinary Service, Latvia Minsk, Belarus December 1-2, 2014 1 ASF cases in Latvia (up to 27 November) 2 Restricted areas
More informationWILD HOGS IN MISSISSIPPI
WILD HOGS IN MISSISSIPPI Emerging Issues and Potential Problems Wild hogs are not native to North America and are not classified as wildlife. In the late 1980s, established populations of wild hogs in
More informationFactors Influencing Cattle, Elk, and Mule Deer Distribution in Managed Forests
Factors Influencing Cattle, Elk, and Mule Deer Distribution in Managed Forests Marty Vavra SUMMARY Intensive research involving elk, mule deer, and cattle has been conducted on the Starkey Experimental
More informationDMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit
Area Description DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit The Saginaw County Deer Management Unit (DMU 073) is located in the Southern Lower Peninsula in the Saginaw Bay region of Wildlife Division
More informationMammal Management and Diseases In Delaware
Mammal Management and Diseases In Delaware Emily Boyd Deer & Furbearer Biologist Delaware Division of Fish & Wildlife We Bring you Delaware s Great Outdoors Through science and Service Era of Abundance
More informationSP-472 AUGUST Feral Hog Population Growth, Density and Harvest in Texas
SP-472 AUGUST 2012 Feral Hog Population Growth, Density and Harvest in Texas Photo courtesy Jared Timmons, Texas AgriLife Extension Service Feral hogs (Sus scrofa) are non-native, highly adaptable, and
More informationJob Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion
Job Title:, Subsection B Goal: Manage the mountain lion population, its numbers and distribution, as an important part of Arizona s fauna and to provide mountain lion hunting recreation opportunity while
More informationChapter 14. Wildlife, Fisheries and Endangered Species. What are we Saving? Traditional Single-Species Wildlife Management
Chapter 14 Wildlife, Fisheries and Endangered Species What are we Saving? 1. Wild Creature in a wild habitat 2. Wild creature in a managed habitat 3. A population in a zoo 4. Genetic material The choice
More informationEvaluation of Wildlife Mitigation Measures,
Evaluation of Wildlife Mitigation Measures, US93 Evaro-Polson: Preconstruction Monitoring and Research Results Marcel Huijser, Amanda Hardy, Julie Fuller, Angela Kociolek, Meredith Evans, Pat McGowen September
More information2008 WMU 359 moose, mule deer, and white tailed deer
2008 WMU 359 moose, mule deer, and white tailed deer Section Authors: Dave Stepnisky and Robb Stavne Suggested citation: Stepnisky, D. and R. Stavne. 2009. WMU 359 moose, mule deer, and white tailed deer.
More informationA Non-Native Species?
A Non-Native Species? Issues with the management of the re-emerging wild boar population in the Forest of Dean Dr John Dutton and Hayley Clayton University of Worcester Overview Native or non-native?
More information2008 WMU 106 mule deer
2008 WMU 106 mule deer Section Authors: Mike Grue and Kim Morton Suggested citation: Grue, M. and K. Morton. 2009. WMU 106 mule deer. Pages 50 54. In: N. Webb and R. Anderson. Delegated aerial ungulate
More informationWildlife Crossings: A Solution for Moose Vehicle Collisions in Alaska
Wildlife Crossings: A Solution for Moose Vehicle Collisions in Alaska M elchisedek Jean & Katy Wright April 8, 2017 Prepared for: Dr. Protasel PADM A628: Public Financial M anagement Statement of Need
More informationStatus and Distribution of the Bobcat (Lynx rufus) in Illinois
Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science received 9/14/99 (2000), Volume 93, #2, pp. 165-173 accepted 1/16/00 Status and Distribution of the Bobcat (Lynx rufus) in Illinois Alan Woolf 1, Clayton
More informationSPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY
SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY WRITTEN BY: SHANE KIEFER, CWB SARAH KAHLICH, AWB PLATEAU LAND & WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AUGUST 1, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
More informationFISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
216 FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT www.gnb.ca/erd/naturalresources MOOSE HARVEST REPORT 216 Summary Each year, moose licence quotas are
More information