School Report Client Name: Report Type: Cycles Included: Technical Notes and Definitions

Transcription

1 School Report Client Name: Rosehill College Report Type: Progression Report Cycles Included: Technical Notes and Definitions Note: Provider Tariff Group This report classifies higher education providers by tariff group instead of Mission Group, in line with standard UCAS analytical reporting. The tariff grouping of providers is based on the average levels of attainment of their accepted applicants (summarised through UCAS Tariff points) in a period of application cycles spanning from 2004 to Each group of providers accounted for around a third of all UK 18 year old acceptances in these cycles, with the following categories: 'Higher tariff', 'Medium tariff', 'Lower tariff'. Note: Graph Clarity and Small Numbers Graph lines are only plotted where the mean number of applicants or applications over 5 years is above 10 in order to maintain clarity. If no lines meet the criteria then no lines are plotted. Note: Offers and Acceptances 'Offer (application level)' refers to main scheme applications that resulted in an offer. 'Offer (applicant level)' refers to applicants who received at least one offer from their main scheme applications. Note: Provider Decisions When a provider receives an application, they can respond with a 'Conditional' offer, an 'Unconditional' offer, or they can make no offer resulting in an 'Unsuccessful' application. Applications that are not in any of these states, including those for which a decision has not be made, are grouped under 'Other'. Note: Applicant Replies When an applicant receives an offer, they may set it as their 'Firm' choice, their 'Insurance' choice or they may 'Decline' it. Offers still awating a reply or which have been cancelled are grouped under 'Other'. Note: Applicants and Buzz Words An applicant is only assigned to a school if they used that school's buzz word when making an application. Note: Glossary A glossary page is located at the end of the report. School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 1

2 1. Summary Offer and Acceptance Rates Graph Offer and acceptance rates of the applicants Offer Rate Acceptance Rate 95% 90% 85% Rate 80% 75% 70% 65% Summary Statistics Rates Table Offer and acceptance rates of the applicants Statistic Offer Rate 83.6% 87.8% 82.6% 85.8% 91.2% Acceptance Rate 69.9% 79.9% 69.5% 78.5% 75.1% Summary Statistics Data Table Summary statistics of applicants, offers, and acceptances Statistic Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Applications Made Applicants Offered Total Offers Acceptances School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 2

3 2. Acceptance Route Acceptance Route Proportion Graph The proportion of applicant acceptances by acceptance route Adjustment Clearing (Direct) Clearing (Main Scheme) Extra Firm Choice Insurance Choice Other Main Scheme RPA 80% 70% 60% 50% Proportion 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Acceptance Route Proportion Table The proportion of applicant acceptances by acceptance route Route Adjustment 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Firm Choice 73.8% 70.3% 70.5% 77.0% 76.6% Insurance Choice 6.2% 8.4% 7.9% 6.2% 5.8% Extra 2.3% 0.6% 1.4% 1.9% 0.6% Clearing (Main Scheme) 10.0% 9.0% 10.8% 5.6% 6.5% Clearing (Direct) 2.3% 5.8% 2.2% 3.1% 3.9% Other Main Scheme 2.3% 3.2% 1.4% 2.5% 3.2% RPA 2.3% 2.6% 5.8% 3.7% 3.2% School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 3

4 2.3 - Acceptance Route Data Table The number of applicant acceptances by acceptance route Route Adjustment Firm Choice Insurance Choice Extra Clearing (Main Scheme) Clearing (Direct) Other Main Scheme RPA Total Acceptances School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 4

5 3. Provider Decisions Provider Decisons Proportion Graph The proportion of main scheme applications by decision status Conditional Unconditional Unsuccessful Other 70% 60% 50% Proportion 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Provider Decisions Proportion Table The proportion of main scheme applications by decision status Decision Conditional 52.3% 57.3% 54.1% 60.1% 57.7% Unconditional 7.0% 5.7% 8.6% 7.2% 9.4% Unsuccessful 32.5% 27.6% 29.4% 23.0% 23.6% Other 8.2% 9.5% 7.9% 9.7% 9.4% Provider Decisions Data Table The number of main scheme applications by decision status Decision Conditional Unconditional Unsuccessful Other Total School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 5

6 4. Applicant Replies Applicant Reply Proportion Graph The proportion of offers by reply status Firm Reply Insurance Reply Decline Other 55% 50% 45% 40% Proportion 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% Applicant Reply Proportion Table The proportion of offers by reply status Applicant Reply Firm Reply 29.6% 30.7% 28.4% 27.7% 28.6% Insurance Reply 20.1% 19.7% 19.8% 20.0% 19.2% Decline 47.1% 46.7% 51.2% 51.6% 51.1% Other 3.2% 3.0% 0.6% 0.7% 1.1% Applicant Reply Data Table The number of offers by reply status Applicant Reply Firm Reply Insurance Reply Decline Other Total Offers School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 6

7 5. Decisions and Replies Decisions and Replies Graph The proportion of main scheme choices that become acceptances by decision and reply at June deadline Conditional Firm Conditional Insurance Conditional Other Unconditional Firm Unconditional Insurance Unconditional Other Unsuccessful Other All 100% 80% Proportion Accepted 60% 40% 20% 0% Decisions and Replies Rates Table The proportion of main scheme choices that become acceptances by decision and reply at June deadline Decision and Reply Conditional Firm 70.1% 71.3% 63.1% 79.3% 68.9% Conditional Insurance 8.4% 12.1% 12.0% 9.6% 7.1% Conditional Other 8.3% 21.4% 0.0% 50.0% 16.7% Unconditional Firm 87.5% 95.7% 100.0% 96.6% 92.3% Unconditional Insurance 16.7% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% Unconditional Other 50.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Unsuccessful 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Other 1.6% 2.8% 1.6% 2.6% 5.2% All 14.4% 16.9% 14.2% 17.2% 16.0% School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 7

8 5.3 - Decisions and Replies Data Table The number of applications and acceptances by decision and reply for main scheme choices Decision and Reply Conditional Firm Applications Applications Accepted Conditional Insurance Applications Applications Accepted Conditional Decline Applications Applications Accepted Conditional Other Applications Applications Accepted Unconditional Firm Applications Applications Accepted Unconditional Insurance Applications Applications Accepted Unconditional Decline Applications Applications Accepted Unconditional Other Applications Applications Accepted Unsuccessful Applications Applications Accepted Other Applications Applications Accepted All Applications Applications Accepted School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 8

9 6. Sex - Acceptances Acceptance Rates by Sex Graph The acceptance rates by sex Men Women All 84% 82% 80% 78% Acceptance Rate 76% 74% 72% 70% 68% 66% 64% Acceptance Rates by Sex Table The acceptance rates by sex Sex Men 66.7% 79.3% 74.5% 83.7% 73.7% Women 72.5% 80.4% 65.1% 74.3% 76.4% All 69.9% 79.9% 69.5% 78.5% 75.1% Acceptances by Sex Data Table The number of applicants and acceptances by sex Sex Men Applicants Applicants Accepted Women Applicants Applicants Accepted All Applicants Applicants Accepted School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 9

10 7. Sex - Offers Offer Rates (Applicant Level) by Sex Graph The offer rates (applicant level) by sex Men Women All 94% 92% 90% Offer Rate 88% 86% 84% 82% Offer Rates (Applicant Level) by Sex Table The offer rates (applicant level) by sex Sex Men 84.4% 90.1% 83.3% 89.5% 93.7% Women 83.0% 85.9% 82.0% 82.7% 88.8% All 83.6% 87.8% 82.6% 85.8% 91.2% Offers by Sex Data Table The number of main scheme applicants and offers by sex Sex Men Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Women Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered All Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 10

11 8. Age Group - Acceptances Acceptance Rates by Age Group Graph The acceptance rates by age group 17 and under and over All 90% 85% 80% Acceptance Rate 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% Acceptance Rates by Age Group Table The acceptance rates by age group Age Group and under 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 60.0% 50.0% % 88.2% 75.0% 87.8% 72.7% % 83.3% 88.1% 81.8% 84.8% % 66.7% 81.3% 85.0% 73.3% 21 and over 55.4% 71.2% 50.9% 56.1% 72.2% All 69.9% 79.9% 69.5% 78.5% 75.1% School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 11

12 8.3 - Acceptances by Age Group Data Table The number of applicants and acceptances by age group Age Group and under Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted and over Applicants Applicants Accepted All Applicants Applicants Accepted School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 12

13 9. Age Group - Offers Offer Rates (Applicant Level) by Age Group Graph The offer rates (applicant level) by age group 17 and under and over All 100% 95% 90% 85% Offer Rate 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% Offer Rates (Applicant Level) by Age Group Table The offer rates (applicant level) by age group Age Group and under 100.0% 75.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% % 92.4% 92.3% 95.5% 96.5% % 92.9% 92.5% 90.2% 93.2% % 92.3% 83.3% 80.0% 84.6% 21 and over 61.5% 74.4% 61.2% 60.0% 81.3% All 83.6% 87.8% 82.6% 85.8% 91.2% School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 13

14 9.3 - Offers by Age Group Data Table The number of main scheme applicants and offers by age group Age Group and under Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered and over Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered All Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 14

15 10. Ethnic Group - Acceptances Acceptance Rates by Ethnic Group Graph The acceptance rates by ethnic group Asian Black Chinese Mixed Other Unknown White All 90% 85% 80% 75% Acceptance Rate 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% 45% 40% Acceptance Rates by Ethnic Group Table The acceptance rates by ethnic group Ethnic Group Asian 83.3% 85.7% 60.0% 80.0% 78.6% Black 56.3% 90.0% 63.2% 80.0% 78.6% Chinese 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Mixed 80.0% 66.7% 80.0% 75.0% 100.0% Other 100.0% 75.0% 0.0% 33.3% 50.0% Unknown 42.4% 42.4% 50.0% 64.3% 67.5% White 77.8% 89.0% 79.2% 84.4% 76.2% All 69.9% 79.9% 69.5% 78.5% 75.1% School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 15

16 Acceptances by Ethnic Group Data Table The number of applicants and acceptances by ethnic group Ethnic Group Asian Applicants Applicants Accepted Black Applicants Applicants Accepted Chinese Applicants Applicants Accepted Mixed Applicants Applicants Accepted Other Applicants Applicants Accepted Unknown Applicants Applicants Accepted White Applicants Applicants Accepted All Applicants Applicants Accepted School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 16

17 11. Ethnic Group - Offers Offer Rates (Applicant Level) by Ethnic Group Graph The offer rates (applicant level) by ethnic group Asian Black Chinese Mixed Other Unknown White All 100% 95% 90% Offer Rate 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% Offer Rates (Applicant Level) by Ethnic Group Table The offer rates (applicant level) by ethnic group Ethnic Group Asian 88.9% 72.7% 87.5% 80.0% 100.0% Black 66.7% 80.0% 73.3% 77.8% 75.0% Chinese 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Mixed 40.0% 100.0% 100.0% 85.7% 100.0% Other 100.0% 66.7% 100.0% 66.7% 100.0% Unknown 90.3% 75.0% 78.9% 82.1% 89.5% White 86.0% 93.2% 84.5% 89.3% 91.8% All 83.6% 87.8% 82.6% 85.8% 91.2% School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 17

18 Offers (applicant level) by Ethnic Group Data Table The number of main scheme applicants and offers by ethnic group Ethnic Group Asian Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Black Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Chinese Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Mixed Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Other Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Unknown Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered White Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered All Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 18

19 12. Applicants Applied by UCAS Deadline Proportion Applied by UCAS Deadlines Graph The proportion of applicants that applied by the UCAS deadlines October January March June Post June 80% 70% 60% 50% Proportion 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Proportion Applied by UCAS Deadlines Table The proportion of applicants that applied by the UCAS deadlines Deadline October 8.6% 8.2% 11.0% 11.2% 13.2% January 75.8% 68.0% 71.5% 68.8% 69.3% March 4.8% 6.7% 4.0% 3.9% 2.9% June 5.9% 9.8% 5.5% 9.3% 8.8% Post June 10.8% 17.0% 13.5% 16.1% 14.6% Applied by UCAS Deadlines Data Table The number of applicants that applied by the UCAS deadlines Deadline October January March June Post June Total School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 19

20 13. Provider Tariff Group - Acceptances Applicant Placement Proportion by Provider Tariff Group Graph The applicant placement proportion by the tariff group of the accepting provider Lower Tariff Medium Tariff Higher Tariff Unplaced 36% 34% 32% 30% 28% Proportion 26% 24% 22% 20% 18% 16% Applicant Placement Proportion by Provider Tariff Group Table The applicant placement proportion by the tariff group of the accepting provider Tariff Group Lower Tariff 32.3% 34.0% 28.0% 28.8% 26.8% Medium Tariff 18.3% 26.3% 25.0% 25.4% 23.4% Higher Tariff 19.4% 19.6% 16.5% 24.4% 24.9% Unplaced 30.1% 20.1% 30.5% 21.5% 24.9% Provider Tariff Group Data Table The number of acceptances by the tariff group of the accepting provider Tariff Group Lower Tariff Medium Tariff Higher Tariff Total Acceptances Unplaced Total Applicants School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 20

21 14. Provider Tariff Group - Offers Offer Rates (Application Level) by Provider Tariff Group Graph The offer rates (application level) by the tariff group of the provider applied to Lower Tariff Medium Tariff Higher Tariff All 80% 75% 70% Offer Rate 65% 60% 55% 50% Offer Rates (Application Level) by Provider Tariff Group Table The offer rates (application level) by the tariff group of the provider applied to Tariff Group Lower Tariff 61.0% 69.9% 61.7% 72.0% 61.6% Medium Tariff 61.4% 67.6% 67.1% 66.3% 75.8% Higher Tariff 55.1% 52.3% 59.5% 63.6% 64.2% All 59.3% 63.0% 62.7% 67.3% 67.1% Provider Tariff Group Data Table The number of offers by the tariff group of the provider applied to Tariff Group Lower Tariff Applications to Received Offers Medium Tariff Applications to Received Offers Higher Tariff Applications to Received Offers All Applications to Received Offers School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 21

22 15. Applicant Tariff Band - Acceptances Applicant Tariff Band Acceptance Rates Graph The acceptance rates by applicant tariff band No Points All 100% 95% 90% 85% Acceptance Rate 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% Applicant Tariff Band Acceptance Rates Table The acceptance rates by applicant tariff band Tariff Band No Points 57.3% 65.3% 54.4% 70.7% 70.2% % 100.0% 25.0% 33.3% 0.0% % 40.0% 57.1% 70.0% 60.0% % 93.9% 86.7% 75.9% 71.9% % 87.2% 88.9% 87.0% 75.0% % 95.5% 70.6% 95.5% 96.4% % 100.0% 93.8% 92.3% 80.0% All 69.9% 79.9% 69.5% 78.5% 75.1% School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 22

23 Applicant Tariff Band Acceptances Data Table The number of applicants and acceptances by applicant tariff band Tariff Band No Points Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted All Applicants Applicants Accepted School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 23

24 16. Applicant Tariff Band - Offers Applicant Tariff Band Offer Rates (Applicant Level) Graph The offer rates (applicant level) by applicant tariff band No Points All 100% 95% 90% Offer Rate 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% Applicant Tariff Band Offer Rates (Applicant Level) Table The offer rates (applicant level) by applicant tariff band Tariff Band No Points 71.2% 75.9% 67.6% 73.1% 83.3% % 75.0% 25.0% 66.7% 0.0% % 80.0% 85.7% 80.0% 100.0% % 97.0% 100.0% 89.7% 93.8% % 92.3% 97.2% 95.7% 91.7% % 95.5% 82.4% 95.5% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% All 83.6% 87.8% 82.6% 85.8% 91.2% School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 24

25 Applicant Tariff Band Offers Data Table The number of applicants and offers by applicant tariff band Tariff Band No Points Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered All Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 25

26 17. Detailed Applicant Tariff Band - Acceptances Detailed Applicant Tariff Band Acceptances Data Table The number of applicants and acceptances by detailed applicant tariff band Tariff Band Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted Applicants Applicants Accepted School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 26

27 Acceptance Rates by Detailed Tariff Band Table The acceptance rates by detailed applicant tariff band Tariff Band % 100.0% 25.0% 50.0% 0.0% % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 60.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% % 25.0% 66.7% 85.7% 75.0% % 87.5% 77.8% 66.7% 50.0% % 93.3% 83.3% 71.4% 66.7% % 80.0% 89.5% 70.0% 92.3% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 64.7% % 93.8% 83.3% 95.0% 86.7% % 92.9% 60.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% 85.7% 83.3% 90.9% % 100.0% 66.7% 75.0% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% % 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% % 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 27

28 18. Detailed Applicant Tariff Band - Offers Detailed Applicant Tariff Band Offers Data Table The number of applicants and offers by detailed applicant tariff band Tariff Band Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered Main Scheme Applicants Main Scheme Applicants Offered School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 28

29 Offer Rates (Applicant Level) by Detailed Applicant Tariff Band Table The offer rates (applicant level) by detailed applicant tariff band Tariff Band % 100.0% 25.0% 50.0% 0.0% % 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 100.0% % 75.0% 83.3% 85.7% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 83.3% 75.0% % 93.3% 100.0% 85.7% 100.0% % 95.0% 94.7% 95.0% 92.3% % 100.0% 100.0% 93.3% 88.2% % 87.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 92.9% 80.0% 92.9% 100.0% % 100.0% 85.7% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% % 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 29

30 19. Subject Group - Acceptances Acceptances by Subject Group Table The number of acceptances by subject group Subject Groups Group A Medicine and Dentistry Group B Subjects Allied to Medicine Group C Biological Sciences Group D Veterinary Sciences, Agriculture and related subjects Group F Physical Sciences Group G Mathematical Sciences Group H Engineering Group I Computer Sciences Group J Technologies Group K Architecture, Building and Planning Group L Social studies Group M Law Group N Business and Administrative studies Group P Mass Communication and Documentation Group Q Linguistics, Classics and related subjects Group R European Languages, Literature and related subjects Group T Eastern, Asiatic, African, American and Australasian Languages, Literature and related subjects Group V Historical and Philosophical studies Group W Creative Arts and Design Group X Education Y Combined arts Y Combined sciences Y Combined social sciences Y Sciences combined with social sciences or arts Y Social sciences combined with arts Z General, other combined & unknown Total School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 30

31 20. Most Popular Providers by Acceptances, Offers and Applications Most Popular Providers Acceptances Table The most popular providers for applicants in 2016 by acceptances 2016 Rank University of Portsmouth Falmouth University Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU) Northumbria University The Manchester Metropolitan University The University of Birmingham The University of Manchester Cardiff University Durham University Lancaster University Leeds Beckett University Nottingham Trent University Oxford University Plymouth University University of Bristol Most Popular Providers Offers Table The most popular providers for applicants in 2016 by offers 2016 Rank The University of Birmingham The University of Warwick The University of Manchester University of Southampton Nottingham Trent University Sheffield Hallam University University of Exeter Durham University Plymouth University The Manchester Metropolitan University University of Bristol University of Portsmouth King's College London (University of London) The University of Nottingham UCL (University College London) School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 31

32 Most Popular Providers Applications Table The most popular providers for applicants in 2016 by main scheme applications 2016 Rank University of Southampton The University of Warwick The University of Birmingham The University of Manchester King's College London (University of London) University of Bristol The Manchester Metropolitan University UCL (University College London) University of Bath Durham University The University of Edinburgh Sheffield Hallam University University of Exeter University of the West of Scotland Nottingham Trent University School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 32

33 21. Most Popular Detailed Subject Groups by Acceptances, Offers and Applications Most Popular Detailed Subject Groups Acceptances Table The most popular detailed subject groups for applicants in 2016 by acceptances 2016 Rank B7 - Nursing M1 - Law by Area W2 - Design studies L5 - Social Work N2 - Management studies W6 - Cinematics and Photography Y Combs of social studies/bus/law with arts/humanities I1 - Computer Science V1 - History by Period X3 - Academic studies in Education Z Combs of 3 subjects, or other general courses C1 - Biology C6 - Sport and Exercise Science C8 - Psychology G1 - Mathematics Most Popular Detailed Subject Groups Offers Table The most popular detailed subject groups for applicants in 2016 by offers 2016 Rank M1 - Law by Area C8 - Psychology G1 - Mathematics N1 - Business studies B7 - Nursing NN - Combinations within Business & Admin. Studies P3 - Media studies Y Combs of social studies/bus/law with arts/humanities C1 - Biology I1 - Computer Science N2 - Management studies L2 - Politics L1 - Economics W2 - Design studies C6 - Sport and Exercise Science School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 33

34 Most Popular Detailed Subject Groups Applications Table The most popular detailed subject groups for applicants in 2016 by main scheme applications 2016 Rank B7 - Nursing M1 - Law by Area C8 - Psychology W2 - Design studies NN - Combinations within Business & Admin. Studies A1 - Pre-clinical Medicine N1 - Business studies I1 - Computer Science N2 - Management studies P3 - Media studies Y Combs of social studies/bus/law with arts/humanities G1 - Mathematics W4 - Drama C1 - Biology L1 - Economics School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 34

35 22. Glossary Term Acceptance Acceptance rate Adjustment Age Clearing Conditional firm Conditional offer Detailed Subject Group Extra Firm choice Insurance choice Main scheme Offer Provider Provider tariff group RPA Tariff Unconditional offer Definition An applicant who at the end of the cycle has been placed for entry into higher education. The number of acceptances divided by the number of applicants. An acceptance route where applicants who have met and exceeded the conditions of their firm choice choose to take up an alternative offer. This analysis uses country-specific age definitions that align with the cut off points for school and college cohorts within the different administrations of the UK. For England and Wales, ages are defined on the 31 August, for Northern Ireland on the 1 July and for Scotland on the 28 February the following year. Defining ages in this way matches the assignment of children to school cohorts. For applicants outside of the UK the cohort cut off for England and Wales has been used. An acceptance route available late in the application cycle. An offer made by a provider dependent on achieving specified conditions which has been accepted by the applicant as their first choice. Offer made by provider depend on meeting specified conditions which may include academic and/or non academic conditions. Classifies courses into a detailed level of 215 subjects. Each course is assigned up to three valid JACS3 subject codes (e.g. G100 Mathematics) and a course balance indicator by UCAS, which are available for review by the provider. The course is assigned a subject based on these JACS3 subject codes and balance indicator, it largely correlates to the first two characters of the subject codes. Where there are more than one JACS3 subject codes for a given course, and the balance indicator is dual or triple, the first two characters of each subject code are reported in combination to a relevant category (e.g. Course with dual balance indicator with JACS3 subject codes L370 = Social Theory and M900 = Others in Law is assigned a subject Y Combs of soc studies/law ). An acceptance route where applicants who held no offers after using all five main scheme choices make additional choices. An offer made by a provider which has been confirmed by the applicant as their first choice. These can be either conditional (dependent on achieving specified conditions) or unconditional (applicant has met specified conditions and are assumed to be accepted or placed at the provider). An offer made by a provider which has been confirmed by the applicant as their second choice, in case the conditions of the firm choice are not met. These can be either conditional (dependent on achieving specified requirements) or unconditional (no further requirements to be met). The main UCAS application scheme through which up to five providers/courses can be applied to. This opens in September and closes to new applications on 30 June the following year. Provider decision to grant a place to an applicant; may be subject to satisfying academic and/or other criteria. Based on choice state at the June 30th deadline. A higher education provider - a university or college. The grouping of providers based on the average levels of attainment of their accepted applicants (summarised through UCAS Tariff points) in a period of application cycles spanning from 2004 to Each group of providers accounted for around a third of all UK 18 year old acceptances in these cycles. Each group of providers accounted for around a third of all UK 18 year old acceptances in these cycles, with the following categories: 'Higher tariff', 'Medium tariff' and 'Lower tariff'. Record of Prior Acceptance, where an application is submitted to UCAS by a provider when an unconditional firm has been offered and accepted by the applicant. A numerical summary of qualification level. Offer made by provider when it is satisfied that the applicant has met specific conditions. School Progression Report Cycle - Client: Rosehill College Page 35