4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
|
|
- Jasmine Hamilton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 1. INTRODUCTION This section describes potential impacts associated with construction and operational transportation and parking. The section analyzes construction traffic; intersection capacity; the regional transportation system; public transit; access and circulation, including pedestrian and bicycle safety; and parking. The evaluation of intersection capacity examines the impact of the Phase 1 and Full Buildout conditions of the Project relative to existing and future conditions. This section is based on the Traffic Study prepared by Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc. dated May 2016, included as Appendix J 1 of this Draft EIR, which provides more detailed information, data, and analyses. The Traffic Study was prepared pursuant to a memorandum of understanding with the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), which is included as Appendix A of the Traffic Study. The methodology and findings of the Traffic Study were approved by LADOT in an Inter Departmental Correspondence to the Department of City Planning on June 14, 2016; this correspondence precedes the Traffic Study in Appendix J 1 of this Draft EIR. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING a. Existing Conditions (1) Study Area Street System The Project Site is located in the in the Downtown community. The Study Area includes a geographic area of less than one mile that is generally bounded by 8 th Street to the north, Los Angeles Street to the east, Santa Monice Freeway (I 10) to the south, and the Harbor Freeway (I 110/SR 110) to the west. Figure 4.J 1, Traffic Study Area and Analyzed Intersection Locations, depicts the Study Area and the intersections analyzed for potential Project impacts. As described in further detail below, the Study Area is well served by a network of freeways and streets. 1 The streets in the Study Area are under the jurisdiction of the. Freeways are under the jurisdiction of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). (a) Freeways Primary regional access to the Project Site is provided by the I 110/SR 110, located approximately 0.3 miles to the west, and the I 10, located approximately 0.5 miles to the south. I 110/SR 110 generally runs in the northeast south direction. In the vicinity of the Project Site, I 110/SR 110 provides three travel lanes in each direction. Access to and from I 110/SR 110 is available via interchanges at 11th Street/Chick Hearn Court and 9th Street. I 10 generally runs in the east west direction. In the vicinity of the Project Site, I 10 provides four travel lanes in each direction. Access to and from I 10 is available via interchanges at Flower Street, Grand Avenue, and Los Angeles Street. 1 More detailed information regarding the major arterials in the Study Area and lane configurations are presented in the Traffic Study, which is included as Appendix J 1 of this Draft EIR. 4.J 1
2 4.J. Transportation and Traffic September 2016 An analysis was conducted on four freeway mainline segments: two along the SR 110, one along the US 101, and one along the I 10. LOS is a measure used to describe traffic flow conditions or the freedom to maneuver within traffic stream. The LOS ranges from nearly free flow traffic at LOS A to breakdown and oversaturation at LOS F. The definitions of the LOS levels are shown in Table 4.J 1, Congestion Management Program Level of Service Definitions for Freeway Segments. As shown in Table 21 of the Traffic Study, two of the four freeway segments (SR 110 south of US 101 and I 10 at Budlong Avenue) currently operate at LOS E or F during either the AM or PM peak hour. (b) Roadways The Project Site is served by a grid of streets that are generally oriented toward the north south and eastwest directions. The major arterials providing regional and sub regional access to the Project vicinity include Figueroa Street and Olympic Boulevard. The Mobility Plan 2035 (Mobility Plan), which was adopted in January 2016 and is a comprehensive update of the Transportation Element, provides the City's classification system for roadways. The Mobility Plan also provides revised street standards in an effort to provide a more enhanced balance between traffic flow and other important street functions including transit routes and stops, pedestrian environments, bicycle routes, building design, and site access. Although the Mobility Plan was approved, a lawsuit filed on September 9, 2015, seeks to halt its implementation. Given the uncertain legal environment surrounding implementation of the Mobility Plan, the following is a brief description of the major roadways in the Study Area including the classifications under the Mobility Plan and the Transportation Element: Blaine Street, located west of the Project Site, is a designated Collector Street in the Mobility Plan. Blaine Street is oriented in the north south direction and provides two travel lanes, one in each direction, north of Olympic Boulevard and two southbound travel lanes south of Olympic Boulevard. Unmetered parking is generally available on both sides of the street north of Olympic Boulevard and south of 11th Street. Unmetered parking with PM peak hour restrictions is generally unavailable on the west side of the street between Olympic Boulevard and 11th Street. (Blaine Street is designated as a Secondary Highway in the Transportation Element.) LA Live Way is a designated Collector Street between Pico Boulevard and 11th Street/Chick Hearn Court and a designated Local Street south of Pico Boulevard and north of 11th Street/Chick Hearn Court in both the Mobility Plan and Transportation Element. LA Live Way is oriented in the north south direction and is located southwest of the Project Site. LA Live Way provides four travel lanes, two in each direction, and leftturn lanes at intersections between Pico Boulevard and 11th Street/Chick Hearn Court, and four travel lanes in the northbound direction south of Pico Boulevard. Parking is unavailable on either side of the street. Georgia Street is a designated Collector Street in both the Mobility Plan and Transportation Element. Georgia Street is oriented in the north south direction, located west of the Project Site, and provides four travel lanes, two in each direction. Two hour unmetered daytime parking with nighttime restrictions (except by parking permit) is available north of Olympic Boulevard. Parking is generally unavailable south of Olympic Boulevard. Francisco Street is a designated Collector Street in both the Mobility Plan and Transportation Element that runs in the north south direction. Francisco Street is located northwest of the Project Site, and provides four travel lanes, two in each direction. Parking is generally unavailable on either side of the street. 4.J 2
3 PCR N Not to scale Traffic Study Area and Analyzed Intersec on Loca ons FIGURE 4.J-1 Source: Gibson Transporta on Consul ng, Inc., 2016.
4 4.J. Transportation and Traffic September 2016 This page intentionally blank. 4.J 4
5 September J. Transportation and Traffic Table 4.J 1 Congestion Management Program Level of Service Definitions for Freeway Segments Level of Service Volume/Capacity Ratio A B C D E F(0) F(1) F(2) F(3) > 1.45 Flow conditions Highest quality of service. Free traffic flow, low volumes and densities. Little or no restriction on maneuverability or speed. Stable traffic flow, speed becoming slightly restricted. Low restriction on maneuverability. Stable traffic flow, but less freedom to select speed, change lanes, or pass. Density increasing. Approaching unstable flow. Speeds tolerable but subject to sudden and considerable variation. Less maneuverability and driver comfort. Unstable traffic flow with rapidly fluctuating speeds and flow rates. Short headways, low maneuverability and low driver comfort. Forced traffic flow. Speed and flow may be greatly reduced with high densities. Forced traffic flow. Severe congested conditions prevail for more than one hour. Speed and flow may drop to zero with high densities. Forced traffic flow. Severe congested conditions prevail for more than one hour. Speed and flow may drop to zero with high densities. Forced traffic flow. Severe congested conditions prevail for more than one hour. Speed and flow may drop to zero with high densities. Source: 2010 Congestion Management Program, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2010 Figueroa Street is a designated Boulevard II/Modified Major Highway Class II north of Wilshire Boulevard, a designated Avenue I/Modified Major Highway Class II north of 9th Street/James M. Wood Boulevard, a designated Modified Avenue I/Modified Major Highway Class II between James M. Wood Boulevard and Olympic Boulevard, and a designated Modified Boulevard II/Modified Major Highway Class II south of Olympic Boulevard. Figueroa Street runs in the north south direction and is located adjacent to the western boundary of the Project Site. Figueroa Street provides five travel lanes, two to three in each direction, and left turn lanes at intersections south of Olympic Boulevard. Figueroa Street provides four northbound travel lanes north of Olympic Boulevard. Two hour and four hour metered daytime parking with peak hour restrictions is generally available on both sides of the street north of Olympic Boulevard within the Study Area. Two hour and four hour metered daytime parking with peak hour restrictions is generally available on the east side of the street south of Pico Boulevard within the Study Area. Flower Street is a designated Avenue I/Modified Secondary Highway north of 6th Street, a designated Modified Avenue II/Modified Secondary Highway between 6th Street and 11th Street, and a designated Modified Avenue I/Modified Secondary Highway between 11th Street and Venice Boulevard. Flower Street runs in the north south direction and is located adjacent to the eastern boundary of the Project Site. Flower 4.J 5
6 4.J. Transportation and Traffic September 2016 Street provides three southbound travel lanes within the Study Area. One hour and two hour metered daytime parking with peak hour restrictions is generally available on the west side of the street and twohour daytime metered parking is generally available on the east side of the street north of 9th Street within the Study Area. Two hour and four hour metered daytime parking is generally available on both sides of the street north of 11th Street. One hour unmetered daytime parking with PM peak hour restrictions is generally available on the west side of the street south of Pico Boulevard within the Study Area. Hope Street is a designated Modified Avenue II/Secondary Highway between 6 th Street and Olympic Boulevard and a designated Avenue II/Secondary Highway north of 6 th Street and south of Olympic Boulevard that runs in the north south direction. Hope Street is located east of the Project Site, and provides four travel lanes, two in each direction. One hour and two hour metered daytime parking is generally available north of 9th Street and south of Olympic Boulevard within the Study Area. Grand Avenue is a designated Avenue II that runs in the north south direction. Grand Avenue is located east of the Project Site, and provides four southbound travel lanes. Daytime four hour metered parking is generally available on both sides of the street within the Study Area. (Grand Avenue is designated as a Modified Major Highway Class II in the Transportation Element.) 8th Street is a designated Modified Avenue II/Secondary Highway east of I 110/SR 110 and a designated Avenue II/Secondary Highway west of I 110/SR 110 that runs in the east west direction. 8 th Street is located north of the Project Site, and provides four westbound travel lanes. Two hour metered daytime parking is generally available on the south side of the street between Flower Street and Figueroa Street within the Study Area. 9th Street/James M. Wood Boulevard is a designated Modified Avenue II that runs in the east west direction. 9 th Street/James M. Wood Boulevard is located north of the Project Site, and provides four eastbound travel lanes. Two hour and four hour metered daytime parking is generally available on both sides of the street, with peak hour restrictions on the north side, east of Flower Street within the Study Area. (9 th Street/James M. Wood Boulevard is designated as a Secondary Highway in the Transportation Element.) Olympic Boulevard is a designated Modified Avenue I/Modified Major Highway Class II east of Hope Street, Modified Boulevard II/Major Highway Class II between Hope Street and Flower Street, and a designated Boulevard II/Modified Major Highway Class II west of Flower Street. Olympic Boulevard runs in the eastwest direction and is located adjacent to the northern boundary of the Project Site. Olympic Boulevard provides four travel lanes, two in each direction, and left turn lanes at intersections. Four hour daytime metered parking is generally available on the north side of the street with peak hour restrictions within the Study Area. 11th Street is a designated Modified Collector Street in both the Mobility Plan and Transportation Element that runs in the east west direction and is located adjacent to the southern boundary of the Project Site. 11 th Street provides two westbound travel lanes. Daytime two hour metered parking is generally available east of Flower Street on both sides of the street within the Study Area. 12th Street is a designated Avenue II/Collector Street between Figueroa Street and Flower Street, and a Modified Collector Street east of Flower Street, that runs in the east west direction and is located south of the 4.J 6
7 September J. Transportation and Traffic Project Site. 12 th Street provides two eastbound travel lanes. Four hour metered daytime parking is generally available on both sides of the street east of Flower Street within the Study Area. Pico Boulevard is a designated Avenue I/Modified Secondary Highway east of Flower Street, a designated Modified Boulevard II/Modified Secondary Highway between Flower Street and Figueroa Street, and designated Modified Avenue II/Modified Secondary Highway west of Figueroa Street. Pico Boulevard runs in the east west direction and is located south of the Project Site. Pico Boulevard provides four travel lanes, two in each direction. Four hour metered daytime parking is generally available on both sides of the street, with peak hour restrictions, east of Hope Street within the Study Area, and one hour metered daytime parking is generally available on both sides of the street, with AM peak hour restrictions on the south side and PM peak hour restrictions on the north side, west of SR 110 within the Study Area. Venice Boulevard is a designated Modified Avenue II that runs in the east west direction. Venice Boulevard is located south of the Project Site, and provides four travel lanes, two in each direction. Unmetered nighttime parking is generally permitted on both sides of the street west of Figueroa Street within the Study Area. (Venice Boulevard is designated as a Modified Secondary Highway in the Transportation Element.) 17th Street is a designated Collector Street in both the Mobility Plan and Transportation Element that runs in the east west direction and is located south of the Project Site. 17 th Street provides two westbound travel lanes. Four hour metered daytime parking is generally available on both sides of the street east of Broadway within the Study Area. 18th Street is a designated Collector Street/Local Street between Georgia Street and Figueroa Street, and a designated Local Street east of Figueroa Street, that runs in the east west direction and is located south of the Project Site. It provides two eastbound travel lanes. Four hour metered daytime parking is generally available on both sides of the street within the Study Area. (2) Existing Intersection Service Levels Thirty four intersections were selected for the Project traffic analysis in consultation with LADOT. LOS is a qualitative measure used to describe traffic flow conditions, which range from excellent, nearly free flow traffic at LOS A to stop and go conditions at LOS F. The definitions of the LOS levels and their related V/C ratio for signalized intersections are shown in Table 4.J 2, Level of Service Definitions for Intersections. The 34 intersections and respective LOS are summarized in Table 4.J 3, Existing Conditions Intersection Levels of Service. As shown in Table 4.J 11 all 34 study intersections currently operate at LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. (3) Congestion Management Program Monitoring Stations The following Congestion Management Program (CMP) arterial monitoring intersection is located within approximately 2.0 miles of the Study Area: Alvarado Street and Wilshire Boulevard (1.18 miles northwest of the Project Site) 4.J 7
8 4.J. Transportation and Traffic September 2016 Table 4.J 2 Level of Service Definitions for Intersections Level of Service Signalized V/C Ratio a Definition A EXCELLENT. No vehicle waits longer than one red light and no approach phase is fully used. B VERY GOOD. An occasional approach phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. C GOOD. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red light; backups may develop behind turning vehicles. D FAIR. Delays may be substantial during portions of the rush hours, but enough lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines, preventing excessive backups. E POOR. Represents the most vehicles intersection approaches can accommodate; may be long lines of waiting vehicles through several signal cycles. F > FAILURE. Backups from nearby locations or on cross streets may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches. Tremendous delays with continuously increasing queue lengths. a Transportation Research Circular No. 212, Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, Transportation Research Board, Source: Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc., J 8
9 September 2016 J. Transportation and Traffic Table 4.J 3 Existing Conditions Intersection Levels of Service No. Intersection Peak Hour Existing Conditions V/C LOS 1. Blaine Street/SR 110 SB On Ramp & AM A 11th Street PM A 2. Bixel Street/SR 110 SB On Ramp & AM A 8th Street PM A 3. LA Live Way/SR 110 NB On Ramp & AM A 11th Street PM A 4. LA Live Way/I 10 WB Off Ramp/ AM A I 110 NB Off Ramp & Bond Street PM A 5. Georgia Street/SR 110 NB On Ramp & AM A 9th Street PM A 6. Georgia Street & AM A Olympic Boulevard PM A 7. Francisco Street & AM A 8th Street PM A 8. Francisco Street & AM A 9th Street/SR 110 NB Off Ramp PM A 9. Francisco Street & AM A Olympic Boulevard PM A 10. Figueroa Street & AM A 8th Street PM A 11. Figueroa Street & AM A 9th Street PM A 12. Figueroa Street & AM B Olympic Boulevard PM A 13. Figueroa Street & AM A 11th Street PM B 14. Figueroa Street & AM A 12th Street PM A 15. Figueroa Street & AM B Pico Boulevard PM A 16. Flower Street & AM A 8th Street PM A 17. Flower Street & AM A 9th Street PM A 18. Flower Street & AM A Olympic Boulevard PM B 19. Flower Street & AM A 11th Street PM A 20. Flower Street & AM A 12th Street PM A 21. Flower Street & AM A 4.J 9
10 4.J. Transportation and Traffic September 2016 Table 4.J 3 (Continued) Existing Conditions Intersection Levels of Service No. Intersection Peak Hour Existing Conditions V/C LOS Pico Boulevard PM A 22. Hope Street & AM A 9th Street PM A 23. Hope Street & AM A Olympic Boulevard PM A 24. Hope Street & AM A 11th Street PM A 25. Grand Avenue & AM A Olympic Boulevard PM B 26. Grand Avenue & AM A 11th Street PM A 27. Grand Avenue & AM A 12th Street PM A 28. Grand Avenue & AM A Pico Boulevard PM A 29. Grand Avenue & AM A Venice Boulevard PM A 30. Grand Avenue & AM A 17th Street/I 10 WB On Ramp PM C 31. Grand Avenue & AM A 18th Street/I 10 EB Off Ramp PM A 32. Los Angeles Street & AM A 17th Street/I 10 WB Off Ramp PM A 33. Los Angeles Street & AM A 18th Street PM C 34. Flower Street & AM A I 10 EB On Ramp/18th Street PM A Source: Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc., 2015 (4) Public Transit The Project area is served by bus lines operated by Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), LADOT s Downtown Area Shuttle (DASH), LADOT Commuter Express, Santa Monica Big Blue Bus, Foothill Transit, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), and Torrance Transit. Figure 4.J 2, Existing Transit Service, illustrates the existing transit service in the Study Area. The following is a summary of the bus lines providing service in the Project vicinity: 4.J 10
11 September J. Transportation and Traffic Metro Local 14 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to Beverly Hills and provides service to West Hollywood, Park La Brea, and the Metro Red Line Vermont/Beverly Station. This line travels along Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Grand Avenue/11th Street and Grand Avenue/Olympic Boulevard. Metro Local 28 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to Century City via W. Olympic Boulevard and provides service to Beverly Hills, the Miracle Mile community, and Koreatown. This line travels along Olympic Boulevard in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Grand Avenue/Olympic Boulevard. Metro Local 30 travels from West Hollywood to the Metro Gold Line Indiana Station and provides service to the Miracle Mile community, Downtown Los Angeles, and Boyle Heights. This line travels along Pico Boulevard in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/Pico Boulevard and Hope Street/Pico Boulevard. Metro Local 33 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to Santa Monica and provides service to Venice, Culver City, and the Mid City community. This line travels along Venice Boulevard in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Figueroa Street/Venice Boulevard. Metro Local 37 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to the Washington/Fairfax Transit Hub and provides service to Culver City, University of Southern California (USC), and North University Park. This line travels along Grand Avenue with stops at Grand Avenue/Olympic Boulevard and Grand Avenue/11th Street. Metro Local 55 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to the Metro Willowbrook Station via Compton Avenue and provides service to the Martin Luther King Jr. Transit Center/Metro Blue Line Compton Station, Watts, and the Metro Blue Line Grand Station. This line travels along 17th Street and 18th Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Main Street/11th Street. Metro Local 66 travels from Wilshire Center to Montebello and provides service to Koreatown, Downtown Los Angeles, and East Los Angeles. This line travels along 8th Street and 9th Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Flower Street/8th Street and Hope Street/9th Street. Metro Local 70 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to El Monte and provides service to Boyle Heights, Monterey Park, and the USC Medical Center. This line travels along Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Grand Avenue/Olympic Boulevard and Grand Avenue/11th Street. Metro Local 71 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to California State University, Los Angeles and provides service to the L.A. County and USC Medical Centers. This line travels along Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Grand Avenue/Olympic Boulevard and Grand Avenue/11th Street. Metro Local 76 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to El Monte and provides service to Lincoln Heights, Alhambra, and Rosemead. This line travels along Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Grand Avenue/11th Street. 4.J 11
12 4.J. Transportation and Traffic September 2016 Metro Local 78 and 79 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to Arcadia and provides service to El Sereno, Alhambra, and South Arcadia. This line travels along Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Grand Avenue/11th Street. Metro Local 81 travels from Eagle Rock to the Metro Green Line Harbor Freeway Station and provides service to Exposition Park, Downtown Los Angeles, and Highland Park. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Flower Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/9th Street and Flower Street/11th Street. Metro Local 96 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to the Burbank Station and provides service to Chinatown, Silver Lake, and Griffith Park. This line travels along Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Grand Avenue/11th Street. Metro Limited 330 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to West Hollywood and provides service the Miracle Mile community, Downtown Los Angeles, and Boyle Heights. This line travels along Pico Boulevard in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Figueroa Street/Pico Boulevard. Metro Limited 355 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to the Metro Willowbrook Station and provides service to the Martin Luther King Jr. Transit Center/Metro Blue Line Compton Station, Watts, and the Metro Blue Line Grand Station. This line travels along 17th Street and 18th Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Main Street/11th Street. Metro Limited 378 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to Arcadia and provides service to El Sereno, Alhambra, and South Arcadia. This line travels along Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Grand Avenue/11th Street. Metro Express 442 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to the Metro Green Line Hawthorne/Lennox Station and provides service to Union Station, Inglewood, and Lennox. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Flower Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/9th Street and Flower Street/ 11th Street. Metro Express 460 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to Disneyland and provides service to Knott s Berry Farm, the Metro Green Line Norwalk Station, and the Los Angeles Convention Center. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Flower Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/11th Street and Flower Street/11th Street. Metro Rapid 728 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to Century City and provides service to Beverly Hills, the Miracle Mile community, and Koreatown. This line travels along Olympic Boulevard in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Figueroa Street/Olympic Boulevard. Metro Rapid 733 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to Santa Monica Boulevard and provides service to Venice, Culver City, and the Mid City community. This line travels along Venice Boulevard in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Figueroa Street/Venice Boulevard. 4.J 12
13 N Not to scale ExisƟng Transit Service PCR Source: Gibson TransportaƟon ConsulƟng, Inc., FIGURE 4.J-2
14 4.J. Transportation and Traffic September 2016 This page intentionally blank. 4.J 14
15 September J. Transportation and Traffic Metro Rapid 770 travels from Downtown Los Angeles to the Metro Gold Line El Monte Station and provides service to East Los Angeles, Monterey Park, and South El Monte. This line travels along Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Grand Avenue/Olympic Boulevard. Metro Silver Line is a bus rapid transit (BRT) service that travels from the Harbor Gateway Transit Center to El Monte and provides service to Gardena, Downtown Los Angeles, and the USC Medical Center. This line travels along the Harbor Transitway in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/Olympic Boulevard and Flower Street/Olympic Boulevard. DASH D is a local line that travels from Union Station to South Park. It travels along Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Grand Avenue/Venice Boulevard. DASH F is a local line that travels from the Financial District to Exposition Park/USC. It travels along Figueroa Street and Flower Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/11th Street and Flower Street/Olympic Boulevard. Commuter Express 419 travels from Chatsworth to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to Northridge, Granada Hills, and Mission Hills. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Flower Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/11th Street and Flower Street/Olympic Boulevard. Commuter Express 431 travels from Westwood to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to Rancho Park and Palms. This line travels along Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Grand Avenue/Olympic Boulevard. Commuter Express 437 travels from Venice to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to Marina Del Rey, Mar Vista, and Culver City. This line travels along Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Grand Avenue/Olympic Boulevard. Commuter Express 438 travels from Redondo Beach to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach, and El Segundo. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Flower Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/11th Street and Flower Street/Olympic Boulevard. Commuter Express 448 travels from Rancho Palos Verdes to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to Rolling Hills Estates and Harbor City. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Flower Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/11th Street and Flower Street/11th Street. Commuter Express 534 travels from Westwood to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to Century City and West Los Angeles. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Flower Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/Olympic Boulevard and Flower Street/Olympic Boulevard. Foothill Transit 493 is a weekday peak hour express line that travels from Diamond Bar to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to the Industry City Hall Park and Ride, the Puente Hill Mall Transit Center, and 4.J 15
16 4.J. Transportation and Traffic September 2016 the USC Medical Center. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Hope Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/11th Street and Hope Street/12th Street. Foothill Transit 497 is a weekday peak hour express line that travels from the Chino Park and Ride to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to the Industry City Hall Park and Ride, California State University, Los Angeles, and the USC Medical Center. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Hope Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/9th Street and Hope Street/9th Street. Foothill Transit 498 is a weekday peak hour express line that travels from Azusa to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to the Citrus College Park and Ride, California State University, Los Angeles, and the USC Medical Center. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Hope Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/9th Street and Hope Street/9th Street. Foothill Transit 499 is a weekday peak hour express line that travels from the San Dimas Park and Ride to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to the Via Verde Park and Ride, California State University, Los Angeles, and the USC Medical Center. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Hope Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/9th Street and Hope Street/9th Street. Foothill Transit 699 is a weekday peak hour express line that travels from Montclair to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to the Fairplex Park and Ride, California State University, Los Angeles, and the USC Medical Center. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Hope Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/9th Street and Hope Street/9th Street. Foothill Transit Silver Streak is an express line that travels from Montclair to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to the Pomona Transit Center, California State University, Los Angeles, and the USC Medical Center. This line travels along Flower Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Flower Street/11th Street. OCTA 701 is a weekday peak hour express line that travels from Huntington Beach to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to Los Alamitos, Garden Grove, and Seal Beach. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Flower Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/Olympic Boulevard and Flower Street/Olympic Boulevard. OCTA 721 is a weekday peak hour express line that travels from Fullerton to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to the Metro Green Line Harbor Freeway Station, the Manchester Transitway Station, and the Slauson Transitway Station. This line travels along Figueroa Street and Flower Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/Olympic Boulevard and Flower Street/Olympic Boulevard. Santa Monica Big Blue Bus Rapid 10 travels from Santa Monica to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to Third Street Promenade, the Music Center, and Union Station. This line travels along Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the Project Site with a stop at Grand Avenue/Olympic Boulevard. Torrance Transit 4 is a weekday peak hour local line that travels from Torrance to Downtown Los Angeles and provides service to the Harbor Gateway Transit Center, the Carson/Hawthorne Hub, and USC. This line 4.J 16
17 September J. Transportation and Traffic travels along Figueroa Street and Flower Street in the vicinity of the Project Site with stops at Figueroa Street/Olympic Boulevard and Flower Street/Olympic Boulevard. Metro Blue Line subway operates in the Study Area and runs between the City of Long Beach and Downtown Los Angeles. The Metro Blue Line has connecting service to the Metro Purple Line and Red Line at the 7th Street/Metro Center station. In the Project vicinity, the Metro Blue Line has a station at Flower Street/Pico Boulevard, approximately 0.2 miles south of the Project Site. Metro Expo Line subway operates in the Study Area and runs between Santa Monica, Culver City and Downtown Los Angeles. The Metro Expo Line has connecting service to the Metro Purple Line and Red Line at the 7th Street/Metro Center station. In the Project vicinity, the Metro Expo Line has a station at Flower Street/Pico Boulevard (Pico Station), approximately 0.2 miles south of the Project Site. Metro Red Line subway operates in the Study Area and runs between the North Hollywood and Downtown Los Angeles. The Metro Red Line has connecting service to the Metro Blue Line and Expo Line at the 7th Street/Metro Center station (approximately 0.4 miles northeast of the Project Site). Metro Purple Line subway operates in the Study Area and runs between Koreatown and Downtown Los Angeles. The Metro Purple Line has connecting service to the Metro Blue Line and Expo Line at the 7th Street/Metro Center station (approximately 0.4 miles northeast of the Project Site). Table 4.J 4, Existing Transit Service Patronage Lines Serving the Project Site, summarize the total residual capacity of the Metro, DASH, Commuter Express, and Santa Monica Big Blue Bus during the AM and PM peak hours based on the frequency of service of each line and the maximum seated and standing capacity of each bus. As shown therein, the total residual capacity of the bus lines within the Project periphery during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours is approximately 4,508 and 3,922 transit trips, respectively. In addition, the Metro Blue Line, Expo Line, Red Line, Purple Line, Silver Line, Foothill Transit, OCTA, and Torrance Transit bus lines provide additional capacity for transit trips during both the AM and PM peak hours. (5) Bicycle Network Based on the Bicycle Plan (Los Angeles Department of City Planning, 2010), the existing bicycle system in the study area consists of a limited number of bicycle lanes (Class II) and bicycle routes (Class III). Bicycle lanes are a component of street design with dedicated striping, separating vehicular traffic from bicycle traffic. These facilities offer a safer environment for both cyclists and motorists. Bicycle routes and bicycle friendly streets, which are located on collector and lower volume arterial streets, are those where motorists and cyclists share the roadway and there is no dedicated striping of a bicycle lane. Bicycle routes with shared lane markings, or sharrows, remind bicyclists to ride further from parked cars to prevent collisions, makes motorists aware of bicycles potentially in the travel lane, and shows bicyclists the correct direction of travel. 4.J 17
18 J. Transportation and Traffic September 2016 Table 4.J 4 Existing Transit Service Patronage Lines Serving the Project Site A.M. Peak Period Number of Runs During Peak Hour a Capacity b Maximum Load c Load Factor Maximum Load/Capacity Residual Capacity Provider Route per Run Metro LADOT DASH D F LADOT CE Foothill Transit no data provided no data provided no data provided no data provided no data provided SS no data provided Residual Capacity in Peak Hour d 4.J 18
19 September J. Transportation and Traffic Provider Route Table 4.J 4 (Continued) Existing Transit Service Patronage Lines Serving the Project Site A.M. Peak Period Number of Runs During Peak Hour a Capacity b Maximum Load c Load Factor Maximum Load/Capacity Residual Capacity per Run Residual Capacity in Peak Hour d OCTA no data provided no data provided Santa Monica BBB R Torrance Transit no data provided Total Residual Capacity in Peak Hour 4,508 Metro Rail Red ,100 Purple ,100 Blue ,790 Expo ,690 Metro Transitway Silver Total Residual Capacity in Peak Hour Rail Line/Transitway 14,680 4.J 19
20 4.J. Transportation and Traffic September 2016 Table 4.J 4 (Continued) Existing Transit Service Patronage Lines Serving the Project Site P.M. Peak Period Number of Runs During Maximum Load Peak Hour a Capacity b c Load Factor Maximum Load/Capacity Residual Capacity Provider Route per Run Metro LADOT DASH D F LADOT CE Foothill Transit no data provided no data provided no data provided no data provided no data provided SS no data provided Residual Capacity in Peak Hour d 4.J 20
21 September J. Transportation and Traffic Provider Route Table 4.J 4 (Continued) Existing Transit Service Patronage Lines Serving the Project Site P.M. Peak Period Number of Runs During Maximum Load Peak Hour a Capacity b c Load Factor Maximum Load/Capacity Residual Capacity per Run Residual Capacity in Peak Hour d OCTA no data provided no data provided Santa Monica BBB R Torrance Transit no data provided Total Residual Capacity in Peak Hour 3,922 Metro Rail Red Purple Blue ,890 Expo ,080 Metro Transitway Silver Total Residual Capacity in Peak Hour Rail Line/Transitway 8,970 a b c d Number of runs in both directions combined during peak hour. Capacity assumptions based on discussions with agencies: Metro Regular Bus 40 seated / 50 seated and standing. Metro Articulated Bus 66 seated / 75 seated and standing. LADOT DASH 25 seated / 30 seated and standing. LADOT Commuter Express Bus 49 seated Foothill Transit 50 seated and standing OCTA 50 seated and standing Santa Monica Big Blue Bus 50 seated / 60 standing Torrance Transit 50 seated and standing Maximum Load is the maximum number of people per bus in the peak direction, based on ridership data provided by Metro in July Maximum residual capacity in peak hours = (Maximum residual capacity per run) x (number of peak hour runs). Source: Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc., J 21
22 4.J. Transportation and Traffic September 2016 There are designated bicycle facilities on several streets within the Study Area, including dedicated bicycle lanes and bicycle routes as follows: Bicycle Lanes (Class II) Grand Avenue Olive Street Main Street north of Venice Boulevard Spring Street north of 9 th Street 7 th Street west of Main Street 11 th Street east of Broadway Bicycle Routes (Class III) Figueroa Street south of Olympic Boulevard Venice Boulevard west of Figueroa Street Broadway north of 11 th Street The City s 2010 Bicycle Plan is incorporated into the Mobility Plan. As with the street designations of the 1999 Transportation Element, the Mobility Plan redesignates the bicycle facilities based on the Bicycle Enhanced Network (Low Stress Network) and a Bicycle Lane Network. The Bicycle Enhanced Network is comprised of protected bicycle lanes and bicycle paths. Although some routes are incorporated into the Bicycle Enhanced Network and Bicycle Lane Network, the Backbone Bikeway Network and Neighborhood Bikeway Network are relatively unchanged from the 2010 Bicycle Plan. Within the Project vicinity, Bicycle Lanes are proposed in the 2010 Bicycle Plan for Figueroa Street, Flower Street, Hill Street, 11 th Street east of Main Street, Pico Boulevard, and Venice Boulevard. Bicycle Routes/bicycle friendly streets are also proposed on Hope Street north of Pico Boulevard, 11 th Street west of Main Street, and Pico Boulevard east of Hope Street. The dedicated bicycle lanes on Figueroa Street are estimated to be installed by the completion of Phase 1 of the Project (second quarter of 2020). As shown in the Mobility Plan, within the Study Area the Bicycle Enhanced Network designates Figueroa Street (between 7 th Street and 11 th Street), and 11 th Street (between Figueroa Street and Broadway) for priority planned bicycle lanes, and 11 th Street (west of Figueroa) for inclusion in the Priority Neighborhood Enhanced Network. The Bicycle Lane Network would include priority planned bicycle lanes on Venice Boulevard/16 th Street and planned bicycle lanes on Flower Street, Hill Street, Pico Boulevard, and Washington Boulevard. (6) Pedestrian Routes The walkability of existing facilities is based on the availability of pedestrian routes necessary to accomplish daily tasks without the use of an automobile. These attributes are quantified by WalkScore.com and assigned a score out of 100 points. With the various commercial businesses and entertainment facilities 4.J 22
23 September J. Transportation and Traffic adjacent to residential neighborhoods of the Downtown area and proximity to public transit, the walkability of the Downtown area is approximately 90 points; 2 this compares to the citywide score of 64 points. The sidewalks that serve as routes to the Project Site provide proper connectivity and adequate widths for a comfortable and safe pedestrian environment. The sidewalks provide connectivity to pedestrian crossings at intersections within the Study Area. The following signalized intersections provide pedestrian facilities to limit illegal mid block crossings to the Project Site (all intersections have marked pedestrian crossings on all approaches): No. 12: Figueroa Street/Olympic Boulevard No. 13: Figueroa Street/11 th Street No. 18: Flower Street/Olympic Boulevard No. 19: Flower Street/11 th Street Each of the listed signalized intersections provides pedestrian phasing, crosswalk striping, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) wheelchair ramps. The pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Figueroa Street and 11 th Street provides connectivity between the Project Site and LA LIVE to the west. The Neighborhood Network, established in the 2010 Bicycle Plan, could also serve local pedestrian activity, as recognized in the Mobility Plan. The Neighborhood Enhanced Network has designated the following streets within the Study Area as part of the Neighborhood Network: Hope Street between Pico Boulevard and 6th Street, Hill Street south of 6th Street, Pico Boulevard east of Hope Street, and 11th Street east of Main Street. The Pedestrian Enhanced District of the Mobility Plan has designated the arterial streets within the Study Area as Pedestrian Segments, where pedestrian improvements could be prioritized to provide better connectivity to and from major destinations within communities. As shown on Map F of the Mobility Plan, these include the following streets adjacent to the Project Site: Figueroa Street, Flower Street, and Olympic Boulevard. (7) My Figueroa Project My Figueroa Project is a four mile long streetscape project that includes Figueroa Street (between 7th Street to 41st Street), 11th Street (between Figueroa Street and Broadway), and Martin Luther King Dr. Boulevard (between Figueroa Street and Vermont Avenue). The My Figueroa Project would provide a complete, multimodal street that better serves the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders, while still accommodating drivers. The My Figueroa Project would add better signalization and signage, high visibility crosswalks, transit platforms, and more street trees; develop a three mile long bikeway to connect downtown Los Angeles with south Los Angeles and expand the City s bicycle network; and create separated cycle tracks, where bicycles would be separated from roadway traffic to decrease injury crashes between non motorized and motorized users. Within the Study Area, Figueroa Street (between 11 th Street and Venice Boulevard) would be improved to include four travel lanes, two in each direction, as well as a bus only lane and a two way left turn median. Between 7 th Street and Olympic Boulevard, Figueroa Street would be 2 WalkScore.com( rates the Project Site(1020 S. Figueroa Street) with a score of 90 of 100 possible points(scores accessed on March 16, 2016 for the Downtown Los Angeles district). Walk Score calculates the walkability of specific addresses by taking into account the ease of living in the neighborhood with a reduced reliance on automobile travel. 4.J 23
24 4.J. Transportation and Traffic September 2016 improved to include three travel lanes in the northbound direction and a bus only lane. 11 th Street (between Figueroa Street and Broadway) would be reduced from two lanes westbound to one lane westbound. Upgraded signal controllers would be installed along Figueroa Street and 11th Street within the Study Area, however, the improved operations along the corridors were conservatively not considered as part of the future year analyses. The installation of a raised bus platform is also proposed along Figueroa Street north of 11th Street, adjacent to the Project Site. (8) Los Angeles Streetcar Project The Los Angeles Streetcar Project would revive the historic streetcar service that one spanned 600 miles of the City in the early 20 th Century. The proposed four mile route of the Los Angeles Streetcar project would closely follow the alignments that originally ran through Downtown. In the vicinity of the Project Site this includes 11 th Street and Figueroa Avenue. The Los Angeles Streetcar is estimated to begin operation in b. Regulatory Framework (1) State (a) Congestion Management Program The CMP is a State mandated program enacted by the State legislature and was last updated in The program is intended to address the impact of local growth on the regional transportation system. Statutory requirements of the CMP include monitoring LOS on the CMP Highway and Roadway network, measuring frequency and routing of public transit, implementing the Transportation Demand Management and Land Use Analysis Program, and helping local jurisdictions meet their responsibilities under the CMP. Metro, the local CMP agency, has established a Countywide approach to implement the statutory requirements of the CMP. This approach includes designating a highway network that includes all State highways and principal arterials within the County and monitoring traffic conditions on the designated transportation network; performance measures to evaluate current and future system performance; promotion of alternative transportation methods; analysis of the impact of land use decisions on the transportation network; and mitigation to reduce impacts on the network. If LOS standards deteriorate, then local jurisdictions must prepare a deficiency plan to be in conformance with the Countywide plan. The CMP requires an EIR to evaluate traffic and public transit impact analyses for select regional facilities based on the quantity of project traffic expected to use those facilities. The CMP guidelines state that areas selected for analysis should be those that include the following locations: All CMP arterial monitoring intersections, including monitored on or off ramp intersections, where the proposed project will add 50 or more trips during either the A.M. or P.M. weekday peak hours of adjacent street traffic; and Mainline freeway monitoring locations where the project will add 150 or more trips, in either direction, during either the A.M. or P.M. weekday peak hours. 3 Los Angeles Streetcar, Accessed June 15, J 24
IV. Environmental Impact Analysis B.1 Transportation
IV. Environmental Impact Analysis B.1 Transportation 1. Introduction A transportation study, titled, Convention Center Modernization and Event Center, EIR Transportation Study (Transportation Study), dated
More informationPlanning Committee STAFF REPORT March 7, 2018 Page 2 of 4 The following MTSOs are being used across the five subregions: Intersection Level of Service
Planning Committee STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: March 7, 2018 Subject Summary of Issues Recommendations Financial Implications Options Attachments Changes from Committee Review Draft 2017 Multimodal Transportation
More informationCHAPTER 3. Transportation and Circulation
CHAPTER 3 Transportation and Circulation 3.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION This chapter evaluates traffic circulation, transit, parking, pedestrian, bicycle, and rail operational conditions in the Project
More information4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 4.9.1 INTRODUCTION The following section addresses the Proposed Project s impact on transportation and traffic based on the Traffic Study
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE CHAMPAIGN UNIT#4 SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL (SPALDING PARK SITE) IN THE CITY OF CHAMPAIGN Final Report Champaign Urbana Urbanized Area Transportation Study 6/24/2014
More informationSection 3.5 Transportation and Traffic
Section 3.5 Transportation and Traffic 3.5.1 Introduction This section presents the transportation and traffic analysis conducted for the proposed project. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality
More information1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter provides an overview of the purpose, authorization and focus of this Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR), an identification of the Lead Agency, an outline
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION The information in this section is based primarily on the Traffic Impact Analysis Report prepared by Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting,
More informationIV. Environmental Impact Analysis B.3 Pedestrian Circulation and Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety
IV. Environmental Impact Analysis B.3 Pedestrian Circulation and Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety 1. Introduction This section analyzes the potential impacts of the Project on pedestrian circulation and bicycle
More informationMagnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Magnolia Place Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: City of San Mateo Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Updated January 4, 2010 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1 2. Existing Conditions...6
More information4 MOBILITY PLAN. Mobility Plan Objectives. Mobility Context. 1. Integrate with Local and Regional Transit Improvements
Harbor Mixed Use CHAPTER Transit Corridor 4: Mobility Plan 4 MOBILITY PLAN Mobility Plan Objectives The Harbor Corridor Plan seeks to expand and improve the ways that people move along and through the
More informationTraffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas
ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA February 13, 2015 Mr. Meran Dadgostar P.E., R.S. Town of Highland Park 4700 Drexel Dr. Highland Park, Texas 75205 Re: Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest
More informationTABLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
4.11 TRANSPORTATION The potential traffic impacts of the proposed project are evaluated in the Buena Park Beach/Orangethorpe Mixed Use Project Traffic Analysis (Traffic Analysis) by Austin-Foust Associates
More informationSimulating Street-Running LRT Terminus Station Options in Dense Urban Environments Shaumik Pal, Rajat Parashar and Michael Meyer
Simulating Street-Running LRT Terminus Station Options in Dense Urban Environments Shaumik Pal, Rajat Parashar and Michael Meyer Abstract The Exposition Corridor transit project is a light rail project
More informationAbrams Associates. Transportation Impact Analysis. City of Rocklin. Prepared for: David Mohlenbrok City of Rocklin 4081 Alvis Court Rocklin, CA 95677
Transportation Impact Analysis Sierra College Boulevard Commercial Project City of Rocklin Prepared for: David Mohlenbrok City of Rocklin 081 Alvis Court Rocklin, CA 95677 Prepared by: 1875 Olympic Boulevard,
More informationCity of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING 00 N. SPRING STREET, ROOM 55 LOS ANGELES, CA 9001-4801 AND 66 VAN NUYS BLVD., SUITE 351 VAN NUYS, CA 91401 C CITY PLANNING COMMISSION WILLIAM ROSCHEN PRESIDENT REGINA M. FREER
More informationMEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner
MEMORANDUM Date: Updated August 22, 2017 To: Organization: Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner Boston Transportation Department From: Jason DeGray, P.E., PTOE, Regional Director of Engineering
More informationTRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO
TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO Draft February 2017 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 The Traffic Forum Process... 4 Neighborhood Traffic Issues... 6 Neighborhood Recommendations
More informationChapter 6 Transportation Plan
Chapter 6 Transportation Plan Transportation Plan Introduction Chapter 6 Transportation Plan Transportation Plan Introduction This chapter describes the components of Arvada s transportation system, comprised
More information3.9 - Transportation and Traffic
Transportation and Traffic 3.9 - Transportation and Traffic This section describes the potential transportation and traffic effects of project implementation on the project site and its surrounding area.
More informationC C C
C-012-001 Thank you for your support for the creation of new public space and nonmotorized access between downtown and the waterfront through the Overlook Walk, the East-West Connections, and the Promenade.
More informationCITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE Date: May 9, 2017 To: Honorable City Council c/o City Clerk, Room 395, City Hall Attention: Honorable Mike Bonin, Chair, Transportation Committee From:
More informationChapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS
Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS The purpose of this chapter is to describe potential bus improvement strategies and potential impacts or implications associated with BRT implementation within the existing
More information5.3 TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND PARKING
5.3 TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND PARKING This section is based upon the Downtown Lancaster Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (April 2, 2008) and the Downtown Lancaster Specific Plan Parking Analysis (May
More informationMOBILITY WORKSHOP. Joint City Council and Transportation Commission May 5, 2014
MOBILITY WORKSHOP Joint City Council and Transportation Commission May 5, 2014 Review of General Plan M-1 Develop world-class transit system M-3 Maintain/enhance pedestrian-oriented City M-4 Create comprehensive
More informationCITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Date: April 1, 219 To: Honorable City Council c/o City Clerk, Room 395, City Hall Attention: Honorable Mike Bonin, Chair, Transportation Committee From:
More informationCITY OF OAKLAND. 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design. Final Report (v3) March 23, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CITY OF OAKLAND 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design Final Report (v3) March 23, 2007 PREPARED BY: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. 27 th Street/Bay Place Corridor
More informationCHAPTER 3 TRANSPORTATION
CHAPTER 3 TRANSPORTATION This chapter presents information on transportation impacts of Section 2 of the Project that have changed from those identified in the published Westside Subway Extension Final
More informationTRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO
TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO Draft January 2017 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 The Traffic Forum Process... 5 Neighborhood Traffic Issues... 7 Neighborhood Recommendations
More informationWaterford Lakes Small Area Study
Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Existing Traffic Conditions PREPARED FOR: ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION ORLANDO, FLORIDA PREPARED WITH: INWOOD CONSULTING ENGINEERS
More information3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The following section of the Draft EIR contains a description of the proposed Elk Grove Boulevard/SR 99 Interchange Modification project, consistent with the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15124.
More informationUniversity Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007
Technical Memorandum May 2007 Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council Edwards and Kelcey with Wallace Roberts and Todd Alta Planning and Design CONTENTS SECTION ONE- INTRODUCTION...1 SECTION TWO-
More informationMetro Bike/Bus Interface Study
Metro Bike/Bus Interface Study Agenda 1. Background & Process 2. Corridors & Metrics 3. General Findings 4. Training Recommendations 5. Design Guidelines 6. Questions L.A. County Bus Service LA Metro 1,433
More information4.11 TRANSPORTATION 4.11 TRANSPORTATION Environmental Setting Intersection, Roadway, and Freeway Evaluation Methodology
4.11 TRANSPORTATION This section describes the road transportation system in the vicinity of the proposed Project and the potential impacts to this system from the proposed Project. The analysis in this
More informationI-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)
I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS) Metro Streets and Freeways Subcommittee March 21, 2019 Gary Hamrick Cambridge Systematics, Inc. I-105 CSS Project History & Background Funded by Caltrans Sustainable
More information5.13 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
5.13 This section of the program EIR evaluates the potential for implementation of the SUP to impact pedestrian safety in the District. This section discusses plans and policies from several jurisdictional
More informationSANTA MONICA BOULEVARD CORRIDOR
CIRCULATION ELEMENT WHITE PAPER NO. 3 SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD CORRIDOR INTRODUCTION From the 1930s to the beginning of Los Angeles freeway era, Santa Monica Boulevard, (previously Route 66, the Beverly
More informationSanta Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY
Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY OCTOBER 2017 PREPARED BY: 1.1 Background The I-280 Corridor Study within Santa Clara County is a high-level highway planning study led by the Santa Clara VTA, in partnership
More informationLyons Avenue/Dockweiler Road Extension Project Draft Environmental Impact Report. Appendix I Traffic Impact Study
Lyons Avenue/Dockweiler Road Extension Project Draft Environmental Impact Report Appendix I Traffic Impact Study Street 0 80-1947 500.4501 RITA ld Court 0 91355-1096 400.7401 LA n Avenue 0 590-3745 300-9301
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. Photo here CAL MET ROYAL MRF EXPANSION. City of Paramount, CA. arch beach C O N S U L T I N G.
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS z Photo here CAL MET ROYAL MRF EXPANSION City of Paramount, CA arch beach C O N S U L T I N G June 23, 214 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CAL MET ROYAL MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY (MRF)
More informationPEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN
ATTACHMENT 2 CITY OF SANTA MONICA PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN CITY OF SANTA MONICA PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN This page intentionally left blank EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Setting the Stage
More informationStaff Report City of Manhattan Beach
Agenda Item #: Staff Report City of Manhattan Beach TO: THROUGH: FROM: Honorable Mayor Wilson and Members of the City Council Geoff Dolan, City Manager Richard Thompson, Director of Community Development
More informationSection 5.4 Traffic and Circulation
Section 5.4 Traffic and Circulation SECTION 5.4 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This section addresses the impacts of future traffic growth, planned physical improvements, and additional improvements to accommodate
More information4.12 TRANSPORTATION Executive Summary. Setting
4.12 TRANSPORTATION 4.12.1 Executive Summary This section is based on the Multimodal Transportation Impact Study (TIS; 2016) prepared by Omni-Means, Ltd. to evaluate projected transportation impact conditions
More informationDear Mr. Tweed: Sincerely, Min Zhou, P.E. Vice President
December 17, 2012 Mr. Steve Tweed City of Long Beach, Department of Public Works Traffic & Transportation Bureau, 10 th Floor City Hall 333 West Ocean Boulevard Long Beach, CA 90802 Subject: Broadway and
More informationCity of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA. Traffic and Safety Assessment
DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING 200 N. SPRING STREET, ROOM 525 LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-4801 AND 6262 VAN NUYS BLVD., SUITE 351 VAN NUYS, CA 91401 - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION WILLIAM ROSCHEN PRESIDENT REGINA M.
More informationCITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies
CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies Adopted August 6, 2015 by Ordinance No. 1591 VIII MOBILITY ELEMENT Table of Contents Page Number
More informationLincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial
Lincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial Data Collection Report June 1, 2015 Department of Transportation Table of Contents I. Introduction...... 3 II. Data Collection Methodology & Results...... 5 A. Traffic Volume
More informationV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION
V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The following section is based on the Draft Traffic Circulation Study for the Malibu La Paz Project (Traffic Study),
More information1. Operate along freeways, either in regular traffic lanes, in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, or along the shoulders.
Most decisions about whether or not to use transit involve time and cost, and most transit services are slower than travel by private vehicle. However, when transit is faster or nearly as fast as travel
More informationHILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Bona Building & Management Co. Ltd. Place Vanier, 333 North River Road Vanier, Ontario K1L 8B9 October
More informationCirculation and Mobility
SECTION 4 Circulation and Mobility OVERVIEW The first phase of the circulation analysis is to address specific concerns regarding the circulation system in the vicinity of the Gateway Specific Plan area
More informationWestside Transportation Access Needs Assessment - Short and Long Term Improvements
ABSTRACT The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) adopted the 2001 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), which sets out the County s transportation investments for the next 20-25
More informationAMENDING MOTION: Mobility Plan - Pedestrians and Disadvantaged Communities
I MOVE that the Council: AMENDING MOTION: Mobility Plan - Pedestrians and Disadvantaged Communities 1. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to amend the proposed Mobility Plan to include the following;
More informationSANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008
SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008 To assist VTA and Member Agencies in the planning, development and programming of bicycle improvements in Santa Clara County. Vision Statement To establish,
More informationCITY OF LOMITA CITY COUNCIL REPORT
CITY OF LOMITA CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: FROM: City Council Ryan Smoot, City Manager Item No. SCH 12 PREPARED BY: Mark A. McAvoy, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer MEETING DATE: August 1, 2017 SUBJECT:
More informationTRANSPORTATION IMPACTS AND MITIGATION
Chapter 3 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS AND MITIGATION This chapter summarizes the existing traffic circulation, transit, parking, pedestrian, and bicycle transportation conditions in the project area, and the
More informationCentral Freeway and Octavia Circulation Study
Central Freeway and Octavia Circulation Study Final Report Plans and Programs Committee San Francisco County Transportation Authority September 18, 2012 Presentation Outline Background and Study Purpose
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS...
TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS... IX 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Project Overview... 1 1.2 Analysis Scenarios...
More informationRoute 7 Corridor Study
Route 7 Corridor Study Executive Summary Study Area The following report analyzes a segment of the Virginia State Route 7 corridor. The corridor study area, spanning over 5 miles in length, is a multi
More informationALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY
ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY in City of Frostburg, Maryland January 2013 3566 Teays Valley Road Hurricane, WV Office: (304) 397-5508 www.denniscorporation.com Alley 24 Traffic Study January 2013 Frostburg, Maryland
More informationGeneral Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701
General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Meeting Agenda 1. Purpose of Scoping Meeting 2. Project Overview 3.
More informationD.13 Transportation and Traffic
This section addresses transportation and traffic issues and impacts related to the Proposed Project. Section D.13.1 provides a description of the affected environment for the Proposed Project. Applicable
More informationTraffic Study North Shore School District 112
Traffic Study North Shore School District 112 Proposed Expansion of Northwood Junior High School Prepared By: May 1, 2015 1. Introduction Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) has been retained
More informationPurpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need
Chapter 2 Purpose and Need 2.1 Introduction The El Camino Real Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project (Project) would make transit and other transportation improvements along a 17.6-mile segment of the El Camino
More informationFigure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing
Page 2 of 9 Figure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing The Montebello Drive extension will run north south and connect Wilsonville Road to the Boones Ferry Road to Brown Road
More information4.13 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
4.13 This chapter describes the regulatory framework and existing conditions in the vicinity of the Project site related to transportation and traffic, and the potential impacts of the proposed Project
More informationREVIEW OF LOCAL TRAFFIC FLOW / LONG RANGE PLANNING SOLUTIONS STUDY
ITEM Town of Atherton TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ROBERT OVADIA, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: FEBRUARY 12, 2019 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF LOCAL TRAFFIC FLOW / LONG
More information4.0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
Transportation Systems 4.0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS This chapter examines the impacts of the Central Corridor Extension on existing roadways and traffic operations and discusses the transit service, operations,
More informationAPPENDIX H TRAFFIC REPORT
APPENDIX H TRAFFIC REPORT Keith Higgins Traffic En ginee r WEST END SAND CITY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DRAFT REPORT SAND CITY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for DBO Development No. 3 Monterey, CA Prepared by Keith
More informationOTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:
OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: The Ottawa Train Yards Inc. 223 Colonnade Road South, Suite 212 Nepean, Ontario K2E 7K3 January 17, 2012
More informationMETHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)
Chapter 5 Traffic Analysis 5.1 SUMMARY US /West 6 th Street assumes a unique role in the Lawrence Douglas County transportation system. This principal arterial street currently conveys commuter traffic
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CANYON HILLS PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION This traffic analysis has been conducted to identify and evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed Canyon Hills
More informationSolana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)
Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS) 3.0 Goals & Policies The Solana Beach CATS goals and objectives outlined below were largely drawn from the Solana Beach Circulation Element
More informationALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
West Valley Connector Corridor ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FINAL September 2014 Ontario International Airport Ontario Mills Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station Kaiser Permanente PARSONS EXECUTIVE
More informationComplete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias, Bill Cisco Abstract As part of evaluating the feasibility of a road diet on Orange Grove Boulevard in Pasadena,
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives
Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW... 1-1 1.1 Study Scope... 1-1 1.2 Study Area... 1-1 1.3 Study Objectives... 1-3 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 2-1 2.1 Existing Freeway Conditions... 2-4 2.1.1
More informationPreliminary Transportation Analysis
Preliminary Transportation Analysis Goals of a Robust, Multimodal Transportation Network Safe Accessible/Connected Efficient Comfortable Context-Sensitive Motor Vehicle: Continue to analyze the data to
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION Transportation Consultants, LLC 1101 17 TH AVENUE SOUTH NASHVILLE, TN 37212
More information5.0 Roadway System Plan
Southwest Boise Transportation Study Page 16 5.0 Roadway System Plan The Roadway System Plan outlines roadway improvements in the Initial Study Area. It forecasts future deficiencies on the arterial system,
More informationLos Coyotes Country Club Development Plan Traffic Impact Analysis
Los Coyotes Country Club Development Plan Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared For: Phil Martin Associates 2073007450 Los Coyotes Country Club Development Plan Traffic Impact Analysis June 19, 2014 Prepared
More informationActive Transportation Facility Glossary
Active Transportation Facility Glossary This document defines different active transportation facilities and suggests appropriate corridor types. Click on a facility type to jump to its definition. Bike
More informationSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO.: 10.3 DIVISION: Sustainable Streets BRIEF DESCRIPTION: SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Approving various traffic and parking modifications on Bay Street
More informationBicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies
Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies Mobilizing 5 This chapter outlines the overarching goals, action statements, and action items Long Beach will take in order to achieve its vision of
More informationAPPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD INTERSECTION NEEDS AT SR 7 and OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SR 7 Extension Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study From Okeechobee Boulevard (SR
More informationWelcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015
Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015 Vision Zero The City and County of San Francisco adopted Vision Zero San Francisco Vision Zero High Injury Network as a policy in 2014, committing an
More informationOFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.
OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 9402209 Canada Inc. December 15, 2015 115-625 Report_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation
More informationCHAPTER THREE MOBILITY
CHAPTER THREE MOBILITY 70 MAJOR THOROUGHFARES Operations. The City of Ames is served by a combination of federal, state and local highways/streets that are interlinked in creating a regional and inter-city
More informationChapter 8.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
and Reporting Program CEQA requires agencies that adopt EIRs and mitigated negative declarations (MNDs) to take affirmative steps to determine that approved measures are implemented subsequent to approval.
More informationFAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Bona Building & Management Co. Ltd. Place Vanier, 333 North River Road Vanier, Ontario K1L 8B9 August 12,
More informationFROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04
TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04 SUBJECT: FINANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC
More informationAppendix B. Environmental Resource Technical Memorandum. Assessment on Travel Pattern and Access Impacts
Appendix B Environmental Resource Technical Memorandum Assessment on Travel Pattern and Access Impacts TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ENVIRONMENTAL RE-EVALUATION FOR UNION STATION TO OAK CLIFF DALLAS STREETCAR To:
More informationOwnership Lots 17 & 18 (Part of Lot 14), Montgomery Auto Sales Park
Traffic Impact Analysis Ownership Lots 17 & 18 (Part of Lot 14), Montgomery Auto Sales Park Silver Spring, MD Lot 17: Site Plan No. 821413 Lot 18: Site Plan No. 821414 Filing Number: 13-TS-1198527A Prepared
More informationTable of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents
Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: 151714A Table of Contents Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 III. 215 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS... 6
More informationClackamas County Comprehensive Plan
ROADWAYS The County s road system permits the movement of goods and people between communities and regions, using any of a variety of modes of travel. Roads provide access to virtually all property. They
More informationTHIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
GA SR 25 Spur at Canal Road Transportation Impact Analysis PREPARED FOR GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA 1725 Reynolds Street, Suite 300 Brunswick, Georgia 31520 PREPARED BY 217 Arrowhead Boulevard Suite 26 Jonesboro,
More informationMOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.
CHAPTER NINE: TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 9.1 INTRODUCTION 9.1 9.2 ASSUMPTIONS 9.1 9.3 TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 9.1 9.4 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.3 LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES Figure
More informationAppendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station
Appendix C NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station Prepared for: Regional Transportation Department and URS Corporation as part of the North Metro EIS David Evans and Associates,
More informationTRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio December 12, 2012 Prepared for: The City of Huron 417 Main Huron, OH 44839 Providing Practical Experience Technical Excellence and Client
More informationIssue Paper on Transportation and Circulation
Issue Paper on Transportation and Circulation General Plan Update Prepared by: Rincon Consultants, Inc. 1530 Monterey Street, Suite D San Luis Obispo, California 93401 July 2008 Table of Contents Introduction...
More information