WSF ASSESSMENT SHEET

Transcription

1 WSF ASSESSMENT SHEET Assessed against: WSFR or RR or NR Standard An existing WSFR may be assessed only against WSFR Standard. An existing RR may be assessed against either WSFR or RR Standards. An existing NR may be assessed against WSFR, RR or NR Standards. CANDI COUNTRY CURRENT REFEREE LEVEL PLAYER A RANK: PLAYER B RANK: EVENT ROUND VENUE ASSESSOR REFEREEING SYSTEM USED: 3-REFEREE WITH VIDEO REVIEW 3-REFEREE REFEREE/MARKER INTERFERENCE CODE OTHER CODE CONDUCT CODE KEY TO ERRORS CODE DECISION DECISION PENALTY Stroke S Not Up NU Conduct Warning CW Yes, Let YL Down D Conduct Stroke CS Marginal Difference on Interference (1) No Let NL Out O Conduct CG Incorrect Decision on Interference (2) Good G Conduct Match CM Totally Wrong Decision X Unsure U R = Referee, A = Assessor, 3 = Three Ref Team, A/B = Player, I/D = Influential/ Difficult Decision, Cat = Category of Int (fw, da, eff, min, ci, win, sw) # R A 3 A/B I/D Cat COMMENTS Start Finish SUMMARY OF DECISIONS TOTAL # DECISIONS TOTAL # ERRORS (WEIGHTED) ERRORS AS % OF TOTAL DECISIONS _WSF Assessment Sheet 1

2 ASSESSMENT SHEET SUPPLEMENTARY PAGE CANDI # R A 3 A/B I/D Cat COMMENTS _WSF Assessment Sheet 2

3 ASSESSMENT SHEET SUPPLEMENTARY PAGE CANDI # R A 3 A/B I/D Cat COMMENTS _WSF Assessment Sheet 3

4 RULES INTERPRETATION AND DECISION-MAKING CANDI DESCRIPTION OF /S 1. Knows thoroughly all rules arising in the match and applies them correctly with: WSFR/RR no totally wrong decisions NR no more than 1 totally wrong decision TO WSFR 25 + Decisions I/D at least 5 10% Errors TO RR 20 + Decisions I/D at least 4 12½% Errors TO NR 20 + Decisions I/D at least 3 15% Errors NOT ABLE TO BE ASSESSED 2. Good consistency in decision-making For each of the Interference categories in 3 9 below: WSFR Standard - no Totally Wrong Decisions, OR only 1 Incorrect Decision OR only 2 Marginal Differences RR Standard - no Totally Wrong Decisions, OR only 2 Incorrect Decisions OR only 3 Marginal Differences NR Standard no more than 1 Totally Wrong Decision, OR only 3 Incorrect Decisions OR only 4 Marginal Differences 3. Recognising front wall interference 4. Recognising the failure to provide direct access to the ball 5. Recognising poor effort to get to and play the ball 6. Recognising swing-interference 7. Recognising minimal interference 8. Recognising created interference 9. Recognising winning returns 10. Management of the match, using Conduct Penalties when necessary 11. Composure, avoiding confrontation when under stress 12. Effective communication with the players, avoiding lengthy discussion 13. Independent decision-making in a 3-Referee System 14. Effective working with Side Referees or Marker Refer to the Guidelines for WSF Assessors on the WSF website for further explanation of standards 1-14 ASSESSOR S COMMENTS (on specific competency elements): _WSF Assessment Sheet 4

5 CANDI DESCRIPTION OF MATCH Winner: : Match Length (minutes) Easier than the required standard Met the required standard More difficult match REFEREE & ASSESSOR POSITIONING Referee: Good Reasonable Poor Comment: Assessor : Good Reasonable Poor Comment: SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF THIS MATCH 1. Met WSFR Standard on this match 2. Not at WSFR Standard on this match 3. Met Regional Referee Standard on this match 4. Not at Regional Referee Standard on this match 5. Met National Referee Standard on this match 6. Not at National Referee Standard on this match 7. Match was not valid for assessment Assessors should tick only one box. The seven statements may not be modified. ASSESSOR S SUMMARY (refer to specific strengths and weaknesses of the candidate): Candidate was receptive to feedback Yes No Signed (Assessor): Date: The Assessor has discussed with me my performance on this match. Signed (Candidate): Date: For an assessment against WSFR standard, the signed Assessment Sheet must be sent to the WSF Office by the Assessor within two weeks. A copy of the signed Assessment Sheet must be given to the Candidate by the WSF Assessor _WSF Assessment Sheet 5