Complete Streets for Eastham Prioritization Plan Eastham Library JUNE 13, 2018

Similar documents
Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

Outer Cape Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. PUBLIC WORKSHOP #2 March 26, 2015

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Calming Strategic Implementation Plan. January 18, 2011

Rhode Island Moving Forward Long-Range Transportation Plan 2040 Municipal Roundtable Newport County

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

SR 693 (Pasadena Avenue) Corridor Study from Shore Drive South to 66 th Street

MASHPEE ROTARY CORRIDOR STUDY. Public Listening Session Mashpee Public Library April 11, 2019

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Moving Together Conference Complete Streets from the MassDOT District 5 Perspective

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

Urbana Pedestrian Master Plan

Castro Valley Municipal Advisory Council March 19, 2018

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

A Matter of Fairness: ROCOG s Environmental Justice Protocol. What is Mobility Limitation?

Complete Streets for Louisiana

TULSA CITY COUNCIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK FORCE MEETING JANUARY

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study Phase 2

Complete Streets Workshop Follow-up. April 27, 2011 Rockledge City Hall

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

and Rural Multimodal Networks 2017 ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN

Statewide Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation Plan and Economic Impact Study. Kick off Meeting November 28, Your Planning Team

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

MEETING OF THE CITY OF CONCORD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SAFE ROUTES TO TRANSIT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan Public Comment Report

CHAPTER 3: Vision Statement and Goals

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014

CITY OF CAMBRIDGE 2015 BICYCLE PLAN TOWARDS A BIKABLE FUTURE

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

WELCOME. Stakeholder Involvement Group Meeting #2 Round Lake Public Works October 24, 2018

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Pedestrian Project List and Prioritization

COMPLETE STREETS FUNDING PROGRAM

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Rhode Island Moving Forward Long-Range Transportation Plan 2040 Municipal Roundtable Providence County

Thank you for attending

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

City of Sammamish. Welcome. Issaquah-Fall City Road Improvements Project Phase I Design: 242nd Avenue SE to Klahanie Drive SE

JANUARY 2017 STUDY UPDATE. Logan City, Cache Co., CMPO

Portland International Airport Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (October 2003) Staff Acknowledgements

What Is a Complete Street?

Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

Bike/Multipurpose Trail Study for Glynn County, Georgia MAY 16, 2016

Elon Bicycle, Pedestrian and Lighting Plan. Pedestrian Rail Crossings Study

Evolving Roadway Design Policies for Walking and Bicycling

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009

GIS Based Non-Motorized Transportation Planning APA Ohio Statewide Planning Conference. GIS Assisted Non-Motorized Transportation Planning

Phone: Fax: Project Reference No. (to be filled out by MassHighway):

Route 79/Davol Street Corridor Study

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Agency Advisory Group Meeting #3 and Walk Audit Anchorage Non-Motorized Plan

GIS Based Data Collection / Network Planning On a City Scale. Healthy Communities Active Transportation Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio May 10, 2011

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Route 28 Critical Locations Bicycling Network Connectivity November 2017

Living Streets Policy

Project Status Update

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

This page intentionally left blank.

APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

Hamilton Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation. Public Information Centre One Summary

Palm Beach MPO Complete Streets Working Group

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

This page intentionally left blank.

City of Springboro Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study. Old Colony Planning Council

SNCC Demographic Trends

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

CONTEXT SENSITIVE STREETS STANDARDS COMMITTEE

Beach Cities Living Streets Design Manual and Aviation Boulevard Multimodal Corridor Plan

City of Moorhead Committee of the Whole Meeting

Creating Walkable Communities: January 19, FMW SHIP: Encouraging Healthy Lifestyles in Diverse, Rural Communities!

Orange County s Transportation Planning and Multimodal Corridor Plan

HYATTSVILLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. City Council Update March 19, 2018

Community Transportation Plan Acknowledgements

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

Stakeholder Update. Agenda. Project update Needs Identification Strategy Proposed needs Safety Collectors/Arterials Greenways Local roads

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

Transportation Planning Division

Completing the Street: Denning Drive

Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

Transcription:

Complete Streets for Eastham Prioritization Plan Eastham Library JUNE 13, 2018

Bridge Street Bridge, Eastham What is a Complete Street? Complete Streets Defined: A Complete Street is one that provides safe and accessible options for all travel modes walking, biking, transit and vehicles for people of all ages and abilities. Complete Streets improvements may be large scale, such as corridor wide improvements, or focused on the needs of a single mode. 2

Benefits of Complete Streets Safety Health benefits People with disabilities Children and aging population

Prioritization Plan Up to $400,000 per town available for Complete Streets Prioritization Plan Construction Projects State Highways (Route 6) are not eligible for Complete Streets Funding Healthier Communities Through Design, American Institute of Architects (AIA) Massachusetts Avenue, Arlington

Prioritization Plan Template Rank Project Name Project Description Environmental Justice Population Project Limits Project Start Location Project End Location Complete Streets Project Origin Complete Streets Project Type Complete Streets Needs Will this project be in Coordination with other Communities? Total Estimated Project Cost Complete Streets Funding Request Other Funding Source(s) and Amount Anticipated Construction Duration Desired Construction Start Date

Complete Streets Project Types Traffic Flow and Safety Bicycle Facilities Pedestrian Facilities Transit Facilities

Complete Streets Needs Safety ADA Accessibility Pedestrian Mobility Transit Operations and Access Freight Operations

Sidewalks and Destinations

Roadway Classification

Speed Limits, Crashes, Traffic Volume Bicycle Crashes Pedestrian Crashes Wheelchair Crashes Fatal Crashes Bike Trails Ponds Wetlands Rivers Crash Data based on Massachusetts Department of Transportation crash records, 2013-2015

Walkscore Gap Analysis Roads that do not currently accommodate pedestrians but are near activities are shown using the following priority color scale:

February Workshop Presentation: Definition of a Complete Street Benefits of Complete Streets Funding Available for Complete Streets Prioritization Plan Template Complete Streets Project Types Complete Streets Needs Context Sensitivity Existing Conditions

February Workshop Tabletop Exercise: 4 work tables with a facilitator and 7-8 attendees Maps of town roads annotated with markers and post-it notes Identification of problem areas and potential projects

Complete Streets Projects Location Map

Complete Streets Projects Proj. ID Project Name Project Description p01 Brackett Rd (E) 1 sidewalk w/shoulders p02 Brackett Rd (W) 1 sidewalk + existing sidewalk, no shoulders p03 Bridge Rd 1 sidewalk w/shoulders p04 Cable Rd 1 sidewalk w/shoulders p05 Campground Rd shoulders only p06 Governor Prence Rd shoulders only p07 Great Pond Rd shoulders only p08 Herring Brook Rd/Bridge Rd 1 sidewalk w/shoulders

Complete Streets Projects Proj. ID Project Name Project Description p09 Kingsbury Beach Rd shoulders only p10 Locust Rd & Salt Pond Rd shoulders only p11 Massasoit Rd 1 sidewalk w/shoulders p12 McKoy Rd shoulders only p13 Mill Rd shoulders only p14 Nauset Bike Trail Extension shared use path on new alignment p15 Nauset Rd 1 sidewalk w/shoulders p16 Nauset Rd (N) 1 sidewalk w/shoulders

Complete Streets Projects Proj. ID Project Name Project Description p17 Nauset Rd (S) 1 sidewalk w/shoulders p18 Ocean View Rd shoulders only p19 Old County Rd 1 sidewalk w/shoulders p20 Old Orchard Rd 1 sidewalk w/shoulders p21 Rock Harbor Rd 1 sidewalk, no shoulders p22 Rock Harbor Rd/Bridge Rd 1 sidewalk, no shoulders p23 Samoset Rd (W) 1 sidewalk w/shoulders p24 Samoset Rd (E) 1 sidewalk w/shoulders p25 Schoolhouse Rd 1 sidewalk w/shoulders

Modified/Additional Projects Massasoit Road Sidewalk + Shoulders (extend project #P11 to Wellfleet town line) Dyer Prince Road - (new project #p26 from Bridge Road to beach)

Evaluation Criteria Stage 1: (available scores up to maximum of 10-25 points) [1a] Improvement in pedestrian safety (e.g., near reported crashes) [1b] Improvement in pedestrian mobility (e.g., sidewalks on both sides of road) [1c] Improvement in bicycling safety (e.g., near reported crashes) [1d] Improvement in bicycling mobility (e.g., provision of fully separated facilities on both sides of the road) [1e] Improvement in network connectivity (e.g., connections to existing paths & adjacent towns) Stage 1 Score = sum of above scores x project length

Evaluation Criteria Stage 2: (available scores up to maximum of 10 points) [2a] Access to Environmental Justice areas: (e.g., within 1/2 mile) [2b] Public/Stakeholder support: (e.g., support from stakeholders and many comments from public) [2c] Compatibility with community goals: (e.g., projects identified in local plans) [2d] Environmental impacts: (projects impacting multiple environmental resource areas can receive negative score) Stage 2 Score = sum of above scores

Criteria Scoring Total Benefit Scoring (assumes equal weighting of Stage 1 and Stage 2 scores) Total Benefit Score = Stage 1 Score + Stage 2 Score Project Cost ($millions. Based on project type and unit cost, multiplied by project length) Benefit/Cost Score = Total Benefit Score/Project Cost Ranking

Criteria Evaluation Worksheet

Project Evaluation (1/3)

Project Evaluation (2/3)

Project Evaluation (3/3)

Project Ranking

Next Steps Work with town to revise rankings based on Town of Eastham s priorities (indicated by ) Public comments accepted through June 20 Revise draft plan based on public & town staff input Submit draft plan to MassDOT Receive feedback from MassDOT & resubmit as needed Town of Eastham submits Complete Streets projects for potential MassDOT funding

THANK YOU! For more information or to comment: www.capecodcommission.org/easthamcompletestreets Paul Lagg Eastham Town Planner plagg@eastham-ma.gov 508.240-5900 x3228 Lev Malakhoff Senior Transportation Engineer lmalakhoff@capecodcommission.org 508.362.3828