Audit information collected by: Foot Auto Both. Location information collected by: Foot Auto Both LAND USE ENVIRONMENT

Similar documents
Tool used and their usefulness Google Map/Earth Google Street View Microsoft Visual Oblique

Active Neighborhood Checklist: Protocol

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION Active Community Checklist

Route Item and Subscale Reliability Table All Countries

How walk, bike, and transit friendly is your neighbourhood?

Active Transportation Audit

All Season Age Friendly Pedestrian Safety and Walkability Checklist *

MAPS DATA DICTIONARIES - ABBREVIATED

Healthy Corridor Audit Tool

Clarkson Walkability Audit: Results and Recommendations Summary

COMMUNITY CHOICES EVENTS High Schools. February 13-22, 2014

What are the greatest challenges for the Route 9 Corridor? Number of responses received by category

NEWS-CFA: Confirmatory Factor Analysis Scoring for Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (Updated: March 15, 2011)

Florida Coalition CTST COMMUNITY TRAFFIC SAFETY TEAMS COLLEGE OF MEDICINE

Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale Youth (NEWS-Y) Parent Version

Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale Youth (NEWS-Y) Adolescent Version

Charrette #1 Keypad Polling Results. June 27, 2012

Fill in the rating for each section. Total up the ratings to see how your neighbourhood scores overall for walkability.

WALKABILITY CHECKLIST How walkable is your community?

APPENDIX 1 QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Aloha High School Leadership Class Workshop Event Highlights

Cottage Grove Road Activity Centers Plan

Irondale on the Move Public Outreach Summary to Date. July 8, 2015

Property Owner Survey Results

N_RD_ N_RD_ N_RD_ N_RD_ N_RD_ N_RD_6

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

COAST TO COAST AMENITIES WORKSHEET Web PDF Amenities Worksheet

D55 D56 D57 D58 D59 D60 D61. Q# Notes. Introduction

Bottesford Parish Neighbourhood Development Plan Summary of Youth Consultation Results

Excelsior Outer Mission Neighborhood Strategy Youth Focused Conversation Notes July 18th, :30pm to 2:00pm Excelsior Works!

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

11/3/2014 VIA . WALKSacramento has reviewed the Stockton and T Mixed-Use project at 3675 T Street in the

Regional Commercial District Summary of Allowable Uses

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

PART III Neighborhood Priority Lists INTRODUCTION

8/31/2016 VIA . RE: Freeport Arco Fuel Station (P16-039)

9/22/2014 VIA . RE: Butano Apartments Pre App (PAMP )

Areas for Redevelopment or New Development:

6/14/2013 VIA . Evan Compton, Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Sacramento 300 Richards Blvd Sacramento, CA 95814

ASSESSING THE WALKING & BIKING ENVIRONMENT

Controlled. Semi-Controlled PAGE 01 CHAPTER 12 INTERSECTIONS

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

10/8/2014 VIA . RE: CVS Pharmacy (P13-002) Revised August 2014

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

9/21/2016 VIA . RE: The Knot (DR16-270)

Neighbourhood Walkability Checklist How walkable is your community?

Traffic Signs and Signals

Community Retail District Summary of Allowable Uses

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

3/10/2016 VIA th Street, Suite 203 Sacramento, CA

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Use this guide to learn more about walkability and how you can make your community safer to walk

General Design Factors

RIVERSIDE, Newton MA BH NORMANDY RIVERSIDE LLC. Riverside Station. A green, transit-oriented community

Presentation Comments and Questions

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Creating walkable, bikeable and transit-supportive communities in Halton

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table #6 VISION CHARACTERISTICS

Improve sidewalk/sewer drainage so it doesn't flood the streets. Improve the street lights far from each other

3/20/2015 VIA . Teresa Haenggi, Associate Planner Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95811

This chapter describes the proposed circulation system and transportation alternatives associated with

10/30/2012 VIA

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

Business Park District Summary of Allowable Uses

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

University of Michigan & Urban Land Institute Real Estate Forum. Mary Beth Graebert Michigan State University

Roosevelt Estates Neighborhood Improvements

4/14/2017 VIA . Miriam Lim, Junior Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

ROUTE 81 CORRIDOR STUDY DESIGN CONCEPTS

HELM RANCH ROUND 2 - COMMUNITY WORKSHOP AND OPEN HOUSE SUMMARY

Sistrunk Corridor DOTMOCRACY SUMMARY

Victoria Park Master Plan

Pedestrian Survey Report

Walkable Community Workshop Report

DRAFT. System Components. Greenway Trails. Introduction. Trail Types. Zebulon Greenway Master Plan

burlington MobIlITY Hubs study Aldershot GO Mobility Hub

GIS Based Data Collection / Network Planning On a City Scale. Healthy Communities Active Transportation Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio May 10, 2011

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

David Hung, Associate Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA

Merrick and Memorial Neighborhood Study 5/14/2014 Public Meeting

Rock Spring Kick-Off Meeting 09/01/15 Walter Johnson High School Break Out Table Summaries. Rock Spring Break Out Table Comments. Table 1: Strengths:

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

LEED Pilot Credit Library

NORTH LAUDERDALE WALKING AUDIT: VIRTUAL APPENDIX

Introduction. North 12 th Complete Street Project Overview

River Road Healthy Neighborhood Walkabout October 15, 2016

Neighborhood Activities Questionnaire

Strategies to Promote the Availability of Affordable Healthy Food and Beverages

CHAPTER 3: Vision Statement and Goals

10/6/2014 VIA . RE: Design Review for Delta Shores Regional Commercial Center (P14-025)

Giles Run Connector Road

Illustrated Principles of Good Planning

State Street Corridor Plan Project Management Team

Transcription:

Audit information collected by: Foot Auto Both Location information collected by: Foot Auto Both LAND USE ENVIRONMENT 1. Are residential and non-residential land uses visible in this segment? Integration of diverse land uses 2. What types of buildings or features are present in this segment? Types of residential destinations Not a. Single-family home? b. Two-, three-, four-, five-, or six-family home ( walk-ups )? c. Apartment building/complex or condominium? d. Apartment over retail in multi-story building? e. Mobile home or trailer? f. Mobile home or trailer park/community? g. Other? Specify: 3. What types of commercial destinations are visible in this segment? (Land Use Diversity) Types of commercial destinations Not a. Gas station (i.e., any destination that sells gasoline)? b. Fast food restaurant (i.e., national/local chain or other destination that primarily sells carry-out burgers, fried chicken, pizza, or americanized Mexican, Chinese, etc.)? c. Other restaurant? d. Convenience or small grocery store (i.e., those that do not fall under a or e)? e. Supermarket (e.g., Sam s, Cosco, Kroger, Winn Dixie, Save Right, Dierbergs)? f. Bank or credit union? g. Pharmacy or drug store (e.g., CVS, Eckerts, Drug Emporium, Walgreens)? h. Coffee shop (e.g., Starbuck s, Gloria Jeans)? i. Laundry or dry cleaners? j. Movie theater? k. Other entertainment (i.e., entertainment provided on-site)? l. Hotel or motel? m. Indoor mall or super center (e.g., Super Walmart)? n. Department store or big box store (e.g., Home Depot, Best Buy, Sears)? o. Strip mall or shopping center (i.e., multiple shops housed in linked buildings)? p. Warehouses, factories, or industrial buildings? q. Office building? r. Bar? Liquor store? s. Auto shop (e.g., car repair, detail, tires, oil, brakes, car wash)? t. Other retail (e.g., bakery, card shop, video rental, florist)? u. Other services (e.g., beautician, lawyer, accountant)?

LAND USE ENVIRONMENT (continued) 4. What types of public or government service destinations are visible in this segment? (Land Use Diversity) Types of public or government service destinations Not a. Post office? b. Library? c. Place of worship (e.g., church, synagogue, convent, chapel)? d. Day care or preschool? e. Elementary school? f. Middle school, junior high school or high school? g. Junior college, college or university campus? h. Health or social services (e.g., hospital, adult care facility, health dept)? i. Airport, train station, bus station, or other transportation facility? j. Police department or fire department? k. Museum? l. Community Center? m. Other (courthouse, utilities, real estate, military, prison, sanitation, cemetery)? Specify: 5. What types of recreational facilities/destinations are visible in this segment? (Land Use Diversity) Types of recreational facilities/destinations Not a. Indoor fitness facility (e.g., YMCA, Bally s, New Lady Fitness)? b. Park? c. Playground (i.e., park or school)? d. Outdoor pool? e. Beach? f. Golf course? g. Sports/playing field, basketball court or tennis court (i.e., park or school)? h. Sports track (i.e., park or school)? i. Marina? j. Other recreational facility? Specify: LAND USE ENVIRONMENT (continued) 6. What other types of destinations are visible in this segment? (Land Use Diversity) Other types of destinations Not a. Parking lot or parking garage (i.e., any size not including on-street parking)? b. Driveway (i.e., residential or non-residential)? c. Abandoned building or vacant lot (i.e., vacant lot is about the size of the buildings on the segment or surrounding segments)? d. Railroad, bridge, tunnel, highway, or overpass? e. Other destination? Specify:

7. What types of natural features are visible in this segment? (Land Use Diversity) Type of feature Not a. Large body of water (e.g., ocean, lake, large river)? b. Small body of water (e.g., pond, stream)? c. Mountains or canyons? d. Open natural space (e.g., wooded area, swamp, meadow not a vacant lot)? TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENT 8. Is availability of alternative transportation modes visible in this segment? Availability of alternative transportation modes 9. How would you rate the walkability or bikability of this segment? Rating Criteria a. Presence of sidewalks? b. Presence of bike lanes? c. Presence of street shoulders or wide outside lanes? d. Presence of bus stops or transit stations? e. Presence of paths or trails (i.e., multi-use, biking, walking)? 10a. This segment has a posted general speed limit of: Enter 99 for None posted. 10b. This segment has a posted special speed limit of: Enter 99 for None posted. 11. This segment has on-street parking available. Yes No 12. Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about street characteristics for this segment. Rating Criteria a. Is the street type less than or equal to two narrow lanes? b. Does the segment have good connectivity (i.e., straight with intersections versus cul-de-sac)? c. Does the segment have other street design characteristics to reduce volume or speed (e.g., roundabouts)? d. Does the segment have traffic calming devices to reduce volume or speed (e.g., traffic signals, speed humps)? e. Are there aggressive drivers on the segment (e.g., speeding, not giving pedestrians/bicyclists right-of-way)? f. Does the segment have crossing aids for pedestrians and bicyclists to cross the street safely. (e.g., crosswalks, stop light, overpass, traffic island, curb extension)? g. Does the segment have street lighting for sidewalks, street shoulders, and/or bike lanes at night?

FACILITIES 13. Is availability of recreational facilities visible in this segment? Availability of recreational facilities 14. Is availability of recreational equipment visible in this segment? Availability of recreational equipment 15. What types of recreational equipment are visible in this segment? Type of equipment Not a. Playground equipment (e.g., swings, slide) b. Complete sports equipment (i.e., all necessary elements are visible posts, nets, etc.) c. Incomplete sports equipment (i.e., missing elements) 16. What types of service amenities are visible in this segment? Type of service amenity Not a. Equipment rental b. Sports stands/seating c. Picnic tables and/or grills d. Water fountains e. Restrooms f. Vending machines g. Public telephones h. Trash bins AESTHETICS 17. Are attractive features visible in this segment? Presence of attractive features (e.g. architectural design, building variety, pedestrian and bicycle traffic, vegetation, signage)? 18. Are comfort features visible in this segment? Presence of comfort features (e.g. shade trees, benches, or other types of amenities)? Yes Yes No No

19. Is air pollution visible or detectable through odors in this segment? Presence of air pollutants (e.g. diesel fumes, factory emissions)? 20. Is noise pollution audible in this segment? Presence of loud ambient sounds (e.g. trains, construction, factories)? 21. Is physical disorder visible in this segment? Presence of physical disorder (e.g. litter, rubbish, graffiti, broken glass, or discarded items)? Yes No 22. Is physical disorder visible in this segment? Rating Criteria a. Are there whole or broken beer or liquor bottles or cans visible in streets, yards, or alleys? b. Are there cigarette or cigar butts or discarded cigarette packages on sidewalk or in gutters? c. Are there condoms on the sidewalk, in gutters, or on the street? d. Are there needles, syringes, or drug-related paraphernalia on sidewalk, in gutters, or on the street? e. Is there garbage, litter, or broken glass in the street or on the sidewalks? f. Are there abandoned cars? g. Is there graffiti on the buildings, signs or walls? h. Are there broken windows on the buildings? SIGNAGE 23. What types of signs are visible in this segment? Sign Type Not a. Cultural or religious message or event? b. Political message or event? c. Neighborhood/social message or event? d. Share the road sign? e. Other pedestrian or bicyclist friendly traffic sign? f. Physical activity message? g. Athletic event? h. Other entertainment or event? i. Neighborhood/crime watch (e.g., drug-free zone)? j. Security warning sign? k. No trespassing/beware of dog? l. Tobacco or alcohol billboard? m. Fast food billboard? n. Physical activity billboard? o. Unreadable sign or billboard?

SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT 24. Are people visible in this segment? Comments: Rating Criteria a. Are there any people visible in this segment? b. Are there any children visible in this segment (i.e., less than 13 years old)? d. Are there children engaging in active behaviors [e.g., playing a sport, running, climbing]? c. Are there any teenagers or adults visible in this segment (i.e., 13 to 65 years old)? d. Are there teenagers or adults engaging in active behaviors [e.g., walking, biking, playing a sport]? e. Are there any older adults visible in this segment (i.e., 65 years or older)? f. Are there older adults engaging in active behaviors (e.g., walking, biking, jogging, playing a sport)? g. Are there people stopping to talk or greet one another? h. Are there people fighting, acting hostile or threatening? i. Are there stray dogs or animals in the segment (i.e., not squirrels or rabbits)?