April Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

Similar documents
Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. Predator/Prey Component. Terms of Reference

PROCEDURE MANUAL of 6. Moose Harvest Management. This Procedure Replaces: None

Grizzly Bear Management Plan for the Gwich in Settlement Area

Environmental Appeal Board

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

NEWS RELEASE. Harvest allocation ensures certainty for hunting sector

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

ALBERTA FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING PASSED RESOLUTIONS FEBRUARY 21, 2015

Mitigating Vehicle Collisions with Large Wildlife

A SURVEY ON MOOSE MANAGEMENT IN CENTRAL ONTARIO

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Big Game Allocation Policy Sub-Committee Recommendations to AGPAC

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan Progress Board. Annual Report on Activities and Accomplishments of the Mountain Caribou Recovery

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

MOUNTAIN CARIBOU INTERACTIONS WITH WOLVES AND MOOSE IN CENTRAL BRITISH COLUMBIA

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Colorado West Slope Mule Deer Strategy Public Engagement Report

Findings and Guidelines Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Page 1

Stakeholder Activity

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL AND EFFECTS OF LETHAL CONTROL

PETITION TO THE COURT

COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report for Grizzly Bear Western population (Ursus arctos) in Canada SUMMARY

WILDLIFE HARVEST STRATEGY IMPROVING BRITISH COLUMBIA S WILDLIFE HARVEST REGULATIONS

Mining & Petroleum Focus Group Southern Rocky Mountain Management Plan. Synopsis of Focus Group Key Issues

ALGONQUIN MANAGEMENT PLAN BETWEEN

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS. Court File No. A Petitioners, Respondents.

FWCP External Projects Delivered by Stakeholders and First Nations

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

PRESENTATION TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA LEGISALTIVE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE September 26, 2013

Chapter 14. Wildlife, Fisheries and Endangered Species. What are we Saving? Traditional Single-Species Wildlife Management

Proposed 2018 Fisheries Management Measures to Support Recovery of Interior Fraser River Steelhead

2009 Update. Introduction

Regional workshop on the implementation of the CITES shark and ray listings, Dakar, August 2014 Page 1

Splitting seasons into multiple, shorter ones is preferable to long, crowded seasons.

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

Species at Risk. Provincial Government Overview. September 13 rd, Kendra Morgan, R.P.Bio.

Jeffrey M. Ver Steeg Colorado Parks and Wildlife. December 14, 2016

IMPROVING POPULATION MANAGEMENT AND HARVEST QUOTAS OF MOOSE IN RUSSIA

Grizzly Bear Conservation in Alberta: 2010 Management Activities and Recovery Implementation

Monday, November 21, 2011

FISH AND WILDLIFE SPECIAL PURPOSE ACCOUNT

Kootenay (Region 4) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Moose Management in the Peace Region

Bison Conservation in Canada

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

At Risk Species. What do these have in common?

Fish and Wildlife Program

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Effects of Sage-grouse Hunting in Nevada. Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners August 13, 2011

White-tailed Deer Management in Urban/Suburban Environments: Planning for Success

Cambodian Mekong Dolphin Conservation Project. Phay Somany Fisheries Administration Of Cambodia

Environmental Appeal Board

Biology B / Sanderson!

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Teslin Tlingit Council

Questionnaire for Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Interviews on Boreal Caribou LONG VERSION

NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS: 3 CASE STUDIES

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

AmericAn PlAice. consultations on listing under the Species at Risk Act

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

Big Game Season Structure, Background and Context

WILDLIFE RESEARCH PERMIT APPLICATION MACKENZIE BISON POPULATION MONITORING

Project on the evaluation of the human dimensions of the target audiences regarding Eastern wolves conservation in La Mauricie National Park of

Moose Harvest Management Guidelines June 2009

Wildlife Management A Complex Issue

Re: Polar Bear Total Allowable Harvest in the Labrador Inuit Settlement Area 2017

Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

Certification Determination. Louisiana Blue Crab Commercial Fishery

Challenges of Florida Panther Conservation. Presented by: Darrell Land, Florida Panther Team Leader

Northern Mountain Caribou Population Dynamics Peace River Region

Consideration for Moose Management in Ontario Northern Ontario First Nations Environmental Conference

WOLF HARVESTING IN MICHIGAN and the PRINCIPLES OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT

Fisheries Management Zone 10:

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM

oose Management Guidelines )uly 96

GENERAL RESOLUTION NUMBER G

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

Lower Mainland Roosevelt Elk Recovery Project

Acquisition & Protection

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

This game has been adapted from SECONDARY PROJECT WILD 1983, 1985

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Regarding the Draft Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) Conservation Strategy

Iroquoia Heights Conservation Area White-tailed Deer Management Strategy

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Regents Biology LAB. NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS

2009 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

Comment Letter 1 for Item 5

Big Game Survey Results

California Steelhead: Management, Monitoring and Recovery Efforts

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Transcription:

April 2013 Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

Nass Wildlife Committee created by the Nisga a Final Agreement Only wildlife co-management body in B.C. First Nass Wildlife Management Plan 2001 Annual management plans since then Preparation of a Wildlife Management Policy (draft) in 2012 o A strategic approach to wildlife management & conservation o Designated and non-designated species

Ongoing participation with regional (Nass Area) initiatives (e.g. SRMPs, Ungulate Winter Range, cumulative effects assessment) Incorporation of wildlife conservation matters and Nisga a interests during industrial developments (e.g., through Nass Area Strategy Working Group)

16,056 km2

One of 3 Designated Species under NFA (plus Grizzly & Mountain Goat) Dramatic population decline since 2001 Demand for moose greatly exceeds available supply Harvest reductions since 2007 have not been effective in reversing the decline Recovery plan is needed

Draft Recovery Plan has been prepared for discussion purposes That document is summarized here Funding to develop the Plan was provided to NLG by Coast Opportunity Funds

Review past and present state of moose population and management in NWA Attempt to identify causes of the decline and key factors now limiting the moose population Gather community feedback in early 2013 (this meeting) Recommend a course of action with the ultimate goal of increasing the number of moose in the NWA that supports a sustainable harvest

Concern!

160 Reported Moose Harvested by Nisga a 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010

Estimates of moose production back in early 2000s may have been too high, resulting in harvest rates that were unsustainable Unregulated and illegal hunting of moose may have been greatly underestimated Likely result was that too many moose were shot in the late 1990s and early 2000s Disease, winter severity, roadkill, and habitat supply are not believed to have caused the decline though any mortality they caused would have added to the decline

A moose population can increase rapidly if calf and adult mortality rates are low, but if mortality is too high, the population will decline Data suggest that the population has declined by 10% each year from 2001-2011 Hunting in the early 2000s likely sparked the decline by killing too many adult moose Moose are now in what is believed to be at a very low population density, termed a Predator Pit That is, wolves and bears are probably keeping moose numbers down regardless of what hunters take

Two considerations here: ecological (habitat and moose ecology) and social (human expectations) A mean population of 1000 moose has been selected as an interim target At a 10% annual growth rate, this could be achieved in at least 7 years if the Plan is effective

Harvest Management and Enforcement Total allowable harvest will remain low for now (i.e., Nisga a allocation 25 bulls; Gitanyow allocation 25 bulls, closed to resident and non-resident hunting) Increased enforcement of laws is required Predator Management Formal predator control program could be effective, but could be politically difficult to implement Perhaps there are other options to increase hunting and trapping rates on wolves, and increase hunting rates on bears Need a long-term approach; short-term actions are not likely to be effective

Access Management Managing human access and reducing road access in and near important moose habitats to reduce moose to illegal harvesting will be important Moose Research and Monitoring Harvest surveys and monitoring (e.g., tooth returns for aging harvested animals) Population surveys every 4 6 years Winter density surveys every 1 2 years Mortality study on adult moose using radio telemetry

Habitat Management Undertake a program to study moose habitat supply and to improve winter range habitat quality over time Outreach and Communications Information sharing with interested people Collaboration with Others Successful recovery of the moose population will depend on the coordinated efforts of all parties (Nisga a, Province, industry, and neighbouring First Nations)

Long-term funding commitment is required to implement the Plan and to monitor its success Industrial operators may be contributing to a provincial fund that will go toward moose and other species (Northwest Assessment and Monitoring Trust)