Construction Specifications Manual

Similar documents
Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Off-Road Facilities Part 1: Shared Use Path Design

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Connecting cyclists to work. Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

Shared Use Facili es. Mul -Use Trails. Chapter 3 Design Elements BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN MULTI USE TRAILS

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Anne Arundel County BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

General Design Factors

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Bicycling Routes on Provincial Roads Policy

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

PEDESTRIAN FENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 30

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Hampton Roads Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

LANCASTER CITY BICYCLE NETWORK

Table of Contents Introduction. 2 Purpose of the Plan...2 The Benefits of Walking and Bicycling...3 Vision and Goals of the Plan...

Living Streets Policy

DRAFT. System Components. Greenway Trails. Introduction. Trail Types. Zebulon Greenway Master Plan

City Snapshot September 27, 2018

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bicycle and Pedestrian Level of Service Measures

Regional School District #19 Transportation Policy

Hampton Roads Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

OBJECTIVE: Improve safety by designing all bicycle facilities to the latest AASHTO bicycle guidelines and 2009 MUTCD Standards.

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Memorandum. Exhibit 60 SSDP To: Jenny Bailey, Senior Planner. From: Bill Schultheiss, P.E. (WA. P.E. #46108) Date: June 20, 2017

Driveway Design Criteria

Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Toolbox (Excerpt from Figure 3.1)

4. TRAIL DESIGN GUIDELINES

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

Color your stress away

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

2.0 Existing Conditions

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

chapter five facility standards

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Bikeways Network and Facilities

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

CITY OF ELKO BICYCLE AND PATHWAY PLAN

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

St. Francis Drive through the City of Santa Fe Corridor Study

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

Who is Toole Design Group?

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

BIKE ON ROAD NETWORKS: URBAN & RURAL. Non-motorized Transportation Networks. Madison County Council of Governments

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

ENFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION ENFIELD, CONNECTICUT

Bicyclist Signing Guidelines

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

WHEREAS, the New Jersey Department of Transportation' s Complete Streets

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

REMOVE BARRIERS TO, ENCOURAGE CREATION OF AND PROVIDE GUIDELINES FOR SAFE ROUTES (ALL DISTRICTS)

Appendix F: Wayfinding Protocol and Best Practices

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Chapter 5 Shared-Use Paths

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements

Roads that are intended to be included in the VDOT system of maintained roadways must meet the standards and specifications prescribed by the VDOT.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Development of Guidelines for Bicycle Use of Controlled Access Facilities in Virginia

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

2012 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF TORRINGTON, CONNECTICUT TRANSPORTATION POLICY 6200

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Chapter 6: Along the Street

Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan

City of Waterloo Complete Streets Policy

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

Central Arkansas Regional Transportation Study Area ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS And Implementation Procedures

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

4. Mobility and Transportation Element. Page Bikes and Pedestrians

BPP / SUB

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Transcription:

Isle of Wight County Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Construction Specifications Manual Adopted August 20, 2009

Introduction The Isle of Wight County Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Master Plan was prepared in July 2006 and adopted by the Board of Supervisors in October 2006. The Master Plan was adopted by reference as Appendix B to the County s Comprehensive Plan in 2008. The Master Plan was developed by the Toole Design Group, LLC, in conjunction with the Isle of Wight County Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Committee through a public input process. The final vision developed with the plan was that Isle of Wight will become a place: Page 2 of 11 Where people have the convenient and safe option of traveling on foot and by bicycle throughout the County for transportation and recreation, and; Where pedestrian and bicycle activity is promoted for the health of residents, preservation of community character and the environment, and economic vitality of the County. The Master Plan identified five main goals for achieving this vision, including: connectivity, economic benefits, preservation of community character and integrity, recreation and health, and safety. The Plan also recommended specific short term, medium term, and long term facility improvements and policy changes for the County to pursue in achieving this vision. Purpose The purpose of these specifications is to provide for connectivity and continuity in the design of bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the County. They are meant to ensure the safety of users, provide reasonable accessibility for all user groups, and maintain the existing rural character in our transportation corridors. This manual is also meant to provide landowners and future applicants and/or project developers with specific construction and design criteria for providing multi-modal facilities in their projects as outlined in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Master Plan and other policy documents approved by the County. Where there are standards imposed by this document which are more restrictive than other standards which may be applied to the project, the more restrictive standards shall apply. In the case of an unresolved hardship on the part of the applicant in meeting these standards, the applicant may request a waiver of these specifications from the County s Development Review Committee (DRC). Map The trail types identified in this specifications manual relate directly to the trail types identified on the Bike and Pedestrian Trail Types map. Specific parcels or areas in question should be located on the map to determine the trail type or types required for that parcel or area. Typical construction specifications for each applicable trail type are found on pages 3-6 of this document.

Bike and Pedestrian Trail Types Multi-Use Path The multi-use path is expected to be a completely separate, off-road facility meant to serve a wide variety of non-motorized users, including: bicyclists, runners, walkers, inline skaters and wheelchair users. This trail type is expected to be provided along major transportation corridors, particularly within higher density areas such as the County s Development Service Districts (DSDs) and connecting specific community points of interest such as recreational facilities and schools. Certain areas of the County may also benefit from multi-use paths which are designed to accommodate equine users. These types of multi-use paths/equine trails are detailed further in this section. Multi-use paths shall be located parallel to existing roadways, within a dedicated easement on private property and shall be constructed a minimum of five (5) feet outside of any existing Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) right-of-ways or a minimum of five (5) feet from any existing roadside drainage ditches whichever is greater. Figure MU-1, Mutli-Use Path, roadway typical. Page 3 of 11

Multi-use paths shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet wide and surfaced in asphalt. The path shall be located within a dedicated easement not less than twelve (12) feet wide and containing at least two (2) feet of graded area maintained as grass on each side of the hard surface trail. Eight (8) feet of vertical clearance shall be maintained over the trail surface. Figure MU-2, Multi-Use Path, construction typical In the case of a public project which is required to be located within a state or municipal right-of-way, construction shall meet the minimum national standards, as defined by the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO), the American with Disabilities Act, Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access (by US Department of Transportation), and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Locations may be identified in the future to serve as multi-use path/equine trails. These shall include a minimum easement of sixteen (16) feet. Construction shall include six (6) feet of asphalt surfaced pathway with at least two (2) feet of graded area on the side nearest to vehicular traffic and a board fence a minimum of 48 inches tall and a maximum of 54 inches tall on the far side of the path with at least six (6) feet of compacted aggregate with fines (such as moon dust, stone dust or screenings) on the other side with at least two (2) feet of graded area on the far side. Multi-use path/equine trails shall require at least fourteen (14) feet of vertical clearance over the easement area. Large aggregate material such as crush and run shall not be used. Page 4 of 11

Figure MU-3, Multi-Use Path/Equine Trails, roadway typical. Landscaping is encouraged along the path, particularly in the area between the pathway and the roadway. Root barrier shall be installed along any segments of the path which include landscaping (existing or new) within three (3) feet of the asphalt surface. All landscaping between the path and the roadway shall be either less than thirty-six (36) inches in height or greater than twenty (20) feet in height at maturity. Vertical clearance above the trail surface shall be maintained as noted for each trail type. Page 5 of 11

Dedicated Bicycle Lanes A dedicated bicycle lane is a portion of the roadway that has been designated by striping, signing, and pavement markings for the preferential or exclusive use of bicyclists. Dedicated bicycle lanes are always located on both sides of the road (except one way streets), and carry bicyclists in the same direction as adjacent motor vehicle traffic. The Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan has recommended dedicated bicycle lanes along roadways which are proposed as a component of a regional trail system or are major connections for existing routes which have been found to be heavily utilized in and through the County. Bike lanes shall be paved surface, six (6) feet wide, with a solid six (6) inch white stripe between the bike lane and the vehicle travel lane. These facilities will be located within VDOT right-of-ways. In individual cases where 6 feet is not available within the existing right-of-way and additional right-of-way can not be acquired, a minimum of four (4) feet of paved width can be utilized. However, due to the numerous documented and expected user groups based on the County s proposed regional trail connections, facilities less than six (6) feet wide are strongly discouraged. Figure BL-1, Dedicated Bicycle Lanes, roadway typical. Page 6 of 11

Figure BL-2, Dedicated Bicycle Lanes, construction typical. Page 7 of 11

Non-dedicated Bicycle Routes (Paved Shoulders) Non-dedicated bike routes are roadways which have been identified as heavily used cycling routes by recreational bicyclists and clubs or which have been identified by the County as significant points of interest or connectivity in the greater, County-wide transportation network. These routes are proposed to incorporate paved shoulders and targeted signage to increase safety and functionality for cyclists of all skill levels. Paved shoulders are not designated or restricted specifically to bicyclists and have the added benefit of improving roadway safety and functionality for all users, including vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Roadways identified as non-dedicated bicycle routes should be improved to include a minimum of six (6) feet wide shoulders with a six (6) inch edge stripe between the facility and the vehicle travel lane. These facilities will be located within the VDOT right-of-ways. In individual cases where 6 feet is not available and the designated roadway speed is less than forty (40) miles per hour, a minimum of four (4) feet of paved width can be utilized. Figure BR-1, Non-dedicated Bicycle Routes, roadway typical. Page 8 of 11

Figure BR-2, Non-dedicated Bicycle Routes, construction typical. Page 9 of 11

Summary Table Trail Type Pavement width Easement width Vertical Clearance Ownership/Maintenance Multi-Use Path 8 12 8 Private/County Multi-Use Path/Equine Trail 6 paved 6 compacted aggregate 16 14 Private/County Dedicated Bike Lanes 4 min 6 max N/A 8 VDOT/VDOT Non-dedicated Bike Routes- Paved Shoulders 4 min 6 preferred N/A 8 VDOT/VDOT References Guide to the Development of Bicycle Facilities. Updated in 1999 by the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Available from FHWA or AASHTO. www.aashto.org/bookstore/abs.html Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Published by the U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington,DC, 2001 Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines. U.S. Department of Justice, United States Access Board. Guidelines are available at http://www.access-board.gov/adaag/html/adaag.htm Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access: Part Two - Best Practices Design Guide. Published by U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 2001 Greenways: A Guide to Planning, Design and Development. Published by Island Press, 1993. Authors: Charles A. Flink and Robert Searns. www.greenways.com Page 10 of 11

Trails for the Twenty-First Century. Published by Island Press, 2001. Authors: Charles A. Flink, Robert Searns, and Kristine Olka. www.greenways.com Other useful web sites for information include: Rails-to-Trails Conservancy - www.railtrails.org National Park Service - www.nps.org U.S. Department of Transportation - www.walkinginfo.org and www.bicyclinginfo.org Trails and Greenways Clearinghouse - www.trailsandgreenways.org National Bicycle and Pedestrian Clearinghouse - www.bikefed.org/clear.htm Page 11 of 11