DUPAGE COUNTY ON-ROAD BICYCLE CONNECTION GUIDELINES

Similar documents
Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

City of Richmond Bicycle Master Plan

Appendix F: Wayfinding Protocol and Best Practices

May 4, Dear Mr. Thomas and Mr. Snyder,

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Appendix A. Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines. Appendix A: Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines Knox to Oak Ridge Greenway Master Plan

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

Bikeways Network and Facilities

Emergency Response Support Signage on Multi-Use Trails Plan

ARLINGTON COUNTY PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIFICATIONS

Connecting cyclists to work. Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

Bowman-Melton Associates, Inc. june 2011

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

Bicycling Routes on Provincial Roads Policy

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

General Design Factors

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

Color your stress away

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

March 2008 FINAL DRAFT. Supplemental Bikeway Design Guidelines

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

Bike San Mateo County San Mateo County Bicycle Plan Recommendations August 30, 2010

Off-Road Facilities Part 1: Shared Use Path Design

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Task 4 Wayfinding Elements, Placement and Technical Guidance 4.1 Wayfinding Elements

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

APPENDIX A. GIS ANALYSIS FOR THE MRT

Rochester Downtown Bicycle Study 2009

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Who is Toole Design Group?

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

APPENDIX D LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS METHODOLOGY

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

Appendix D: Planning Level Cost Calculator

The 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide: An Overview

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Appendix D. City of Fort Collins Bicycle Wayfinding System Guidance. Appendix D: Bicycle Wayfinding System Guidance Final Draft 11/20/2014 1

Cyclists and Bikeways: What s your match? A guide to bikeway options for a variety of cyclists

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

Bicycle Facilities Planning

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

Staff Report City of Manhattan Beach

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Route 28 Critical Locations Bicycling Network Connectivity November 2017

Designing for Bicyclist Safety at Crossings and Intersections

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: May 10, 2017 MPO Executive Board: May 17, 2017

Peter Kremer, WSP/Parsons Brinckerhoff

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

4. TRAIL DESIGN GUIDELINES

Morristown, NJ Complete Streets Policy

Chapter 13 ORANGE COVE

G AT E WAY PLAN. Community BRIEFING KIT GATEWAY BIKE

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

4. Mobility and Transportation Element. Page Bikes and Pedestrians

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan

Anne Arundel County BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES

Construction Specifications Manual

FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

Roadways. Roadways III.

NORTH DOWNTOWN N EAST WEST

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

2.0 Existing Conditions

Copenhagen Cycling Map. Red Lines Cycling facilities

6.0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 BICYCLE DEMAND AND SUITABILITY Bicycle Demand

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Shared Lane Markings: When and Where to Use Them. Mike Sallaberry, SFMTA Pro Walk/Pro Bike in Seattle September 4, 2008

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

Planning Suburban Bike Networks

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

City of Memphis On-Street Parking Modification Guidelines

OBJECTIVE: Improve safety by designing all bicycle facilities to the latest AASHTO bicycle guidelines and 2009 MUTCD Standards.

PBIC Webinar. How to Create a Bicycle Safety Action Plan: Planning for Safety [IMAGE] Oct. 2, 2014, 2 pm

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Image 32 courtesy of / Dan Burden

Roadway Classification Review

chapter five facility standards

9.1 FUNCTIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEMS IN URBANIZED AREAS Principal Arterial Interstate Principal Arterial Non-Interstate

3.9 Recreational Trails and Natural Areas

Transcription:

DUPAGE COUNTY ON-ROAD BICYCLE CONNECTION GUIDELINES (DRAFT) Prepared For: DuPage County Division of Transportation Jack T. Knuepfer Administration Building 421 North County Farm Road Wheaton, Illinois 60187

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. BICYCLE CONNECTION DEFINITION... 1 III. ESTABLISHING A BICYCLE CONNECTION... 2 IV. SIGNING OF A BICYCLE CONNECTION... 3 V. CONCLUSION... 3 EXHIBIT 1 BICYCLE CONNECTION SIGNS DuPage County On-Road Bicycle Connections Guidelines i

I. INTRODUCTION DuPage County provides in excess of 60 miles of bicycle-accessible off-road trails throughout the county. These trails, including the Great Western Trail and the four branches of the Illinois Prairie Path, link several communities and points of interest together under one system. As bicycle usage increases in the county, on-road bicycle facilities will be needed to supplement the off-road path system. DuPage County has defined three types of on-road bicycle facilities for this purpose: bicycle lanes, bicycle routes and bicycle connections. Of the three, bicycle lanes are the highest form of on-road bicycle facilities, with striped and signed lanes specifically set for bicycle use. Bicycle routes are located on roadways that do not have bicycle lanes, but are still appropriate for casual bicyclists. Each of these types of facilities is discussed in greater detail in the DuPage County On-Road Bicycle Guidelines 1. Bicycle connections are located on roadways that may only be appropriate for experienced bicycle riders. They may be needed to complete connectivity between other off-road paths, bicycle lanes, bicycle routes or other destinations. But bicycle connections do not meet the guidelines for on-road bicycling that is appropriate for casual bicyclists. The figure below illustrates the defined types of bicycle facilities. At the top is off-road multi-use path, the most desirable type of bicycle facility, followed by on-road bicycle lanes, on-road bicycle routes and at the bottom, on-road bicycle connections. This report focuses on the bicycle connections, as highlighted in the figure. II. BICYCLE CONNECTION DEFINITION A bicycle connection is a designated bikeway facility along a shared roadway that does not meet DuPage County s guidelines for an on-road bicycle lane/route. Instead, it supplements the off-road trail and on-road bicycle lane/route network and is intended for experienced riders. These roadways have importance in the overall bicycle network for the following reasons: 1) A bicycle connection could link two on-road bicycle lanes/routes to one another. This connection can be in the form of a perpendicular link between two parallel lanes/routes, or as continuation in series between two on-road bicycle lane/route termini. It would give experienced bicycle riders an opportunity to traverse between the two bicycle lane/route segments. 2) In similar fashion to connecting on-road bicycle lanes/routes, bicycle 1 DuPage County On-Road Bicycle Guidelines, DuPage County Division of Transportation, Wheaton, IL, 2006. DuPage County On-Road Bicycle Connections Guidelines 1

connections could also link two off-road trails either linking parallel trails or as continuation in series between two off-road trail termini. 3) A bicycle connection could also link two destinations. For instance, a bicycle connection could link a commuter rail station with a residential area or a bicycle lane/route leading to a residential area. OFF-ROAD MULTI-USE PATH ON-ROAD BICYCLE LANE Separate lane for bicycle use with appropriate signs and stenciling on the pavement. Measures five feet wide with curb and gutter or four feet wide when adjacent to shoulder. Meets the criteria in the DuPage On-Road Bicycling Guidelines. ON-ROAD BICYCLE ROUTE Bicycle accommodated on the roadway with either a shared lane or a paved shoulder. Meets the criteria in the DuPage On-Road Bicycle Guidelines. ON-ROAD BICYCLE CONNECTION Provides connectivity between other paths, bicycle lanes, routes, and destinations. Does not meet the criteria in the DuPage On-Road Bicycle Guidelines. Generally intended for experienced bicyclists only. Figure 1. DuPage County Bicycle Classifications III. ESTABLISHING A BICYCLE CONNECTION Bicycle connections are designated based on engineering judgment. Some of the factors that should be considered as part of engineering judgment include safety, proximity to other bikeways and length of the connection. First, safety should be the most important priority when considering a bicycle connection. Roadway width, traffic, posted speed limit and mean travel speed are all considerations that should be analyzed. Second, proximity to other onroad bicycle facilities and off-road trails should be considered. Care should be taken not to create a redundancy with other on-road bicycle routes or off-road trails in the area. Third, the length of the connection should be considered. Bicycle connections are intended to be supplemental to other on-road bicycle routes and off-road trails. Therefore, bicycle connections are generally limited in length. Bicycle routes and bicycle connections should be reviewed periodically to confirm that the appropriate designation remains applicable. In addition, when a designated bicycle connection roadway undergoes improvement, consideration should be given to upgrading the DuPage County On-Road Bicycle Connections Guidelines 2

roadway where practical to improve conditions for bicycling. Thus, the roadway designation could be changed from a bicycle connection to a bicycle lane or route. IV. SIGNING OF A BICYCLE CONNECTION Signs should be posted along the roadway to inform bicyclists of the start of a bicycle connection. These signs may appear at the end of off-road trails, at the end of an on-road bicycle lanes or bicycle routes. Exhibit 1 shows such signs at the end of an on-road bicycle route. Note that a similar sign scheme may be used for connecting bicycle lanes or destinations. Along the bicycle route, the first set of signs signifies the end of the bicycle route per MUTCD standard. These signs are green with white lettering and graphics. The second set of signs introduces the bicycle connection. The top sign guides the bicyclists to the next bicycle route, off-road trail or other point of interest via the bicycle connection. It would also be green with white lettering and graphics. The bottom sign describes that a bicycle connection may have higher traffic volumes and higher speed limits than a bicycle route. This sign would be white with black lettering and would be posted at selected locations where appropriate. On the bicycle connection itself, there are two additional sets of signs shown. The first set shows a white bicycle symbol on a green background. The sign below it depicts the logo of the trail the connection may be a part of (if applicable). Approaching the bicycle route, a bicycle route sign and arrow (both white on green) will direct bicyclists back onto a bicycle route. These signs should be placed at appropriate locations and frequencies to be determined on a case-by-case basis. V. CONCLUSION In order to supplement the off-road trail and on-road bicycle network, bicycle connections may be established along roadways that do not meet the guidelines DuPage County has established for on-road bicycle routes. This report provides direction for establishing bicycle connections. Through the use of bicycle connections, the DuPage County bikeway network can provide more mobility and for experienced bicycle riders. DuPage County On-Road Bicycle Connections Guidelines 3

CONNECTION TO ROAD A BIKE ROUTE 0.5 MI. CONNECTION MAY CONTAIN HIGHER TRAFFIC VOLUMES & SPEED LIMITS THAN ROUTES DRAFT BK/W* 100 BICYCLE CONNECTION SIGNS EXHIBIT 1 << BIKE ROUTE << BICYCLE CONNECTION >> (does not meet criteria) BOULEVARD B 100 BIKE ROUTE >> ROAD C ROAD A * CONNECTION MAY CONTAIN HIGHER TRAFFIC VOLUMES & SPEED LIMITS THAN ROUTES CONNECTION TO ROAD C BIKE ROUTE 0.5 MI. CONNECTION MAY CONTAIN HIGHER TRAFFIC VOLUMES & SPEED LIMITS THAN ROUTES BK/W*