Satisfaction with getting to work 54% 14% 6% 5% Total distance travelled. miles per week

Similar documents
Satisfaction with getting to work 55% 17% 8% 7% Total distance travelled. miles per week

Satisfaction with getting to work 56% 15% 6% 6% Total distance travelled. miles per week

Travel to Work Survey March % 40% 54% 10% 2% 5% 19% 6% 3% Headlines - FILTON. Main modes of travel (%)

Travel to Work Survey March % 58% 32% 9% 7% 5% 16% 20% 12% Headlines - Bristol LA Area. Main modes of travel (%)

Thursday 18 th January Cambridgeshire Travel Survey Presentation to the Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly

Brighton & Hove Bus Company in Brighton & Hove Council area

Arriva in Medway July 2010 (Kent) Council area

BUS PASSENGER SURVEY Merseyside BUS PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS FOR: November 2009

BUS PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS FOR: BUS PASSENGER SURVEY STAGECOACH Stagecoach in GMPTE area

BUS BUS PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS ARRIVA Arriva in Merseyside November 2009 PTE (Merseytravel) area

STAFF TRAVEL SURVEY 2006 KEY FINDINGS

First in Stoke-on-Trent November 2009 City Council area

BUS BUS PASSENGER SURVEY Cornwall RESULTS FOR:

Stagecoach in Swindon Borough area

Arriva in GMPTE July 2010area

Western Greyhound in Cornwall Council area

Sandwell General Hospital Travel Plan 2014

KLB Travel to School Survey - Summary Report

RE-CYCLING A CITY: EXAMINING THE GROWTH OF CYCLING IN DUBLIN

Final Plan 20 December 2016

UWA Commuting Survey 2013

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

BIKEPLUS Public Bike Share Users Survey Results 2017

15% Survey on Smart Commuting. Factsheet: University of Twente. 435 out of invited employees. This is a response rate of

Cobb Community Transit

A smarter way to get to work. Free advice, support and funding for businesses in Bristol

1.0 FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION CURRENT TRENDS IN TRAVEL FUTURE TRENDS IN TRAVEL...

Federal surveys. Belgian Daily Mobility (Beldam) Commuting (Home-to-Work) The 17th European conference on Mobility Management.

DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY TRAVEL PLAN PROGRESS REPORT

Active Travel Survey for Bridgend and Pencoed towns. Page description:

2011 Countywide Attitudinal and Awareness Survey Results

CONTENTS PREFACE 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE 2.0 POLICY AND GOVERNANCE 3.0 SUMMARY OF PROGRESS 4.0 NATURE OF DEMAND 5.0 TRAVEL AND PARKING INITIATIVES

Staff Travel Survey 2015 Key Findings

2013 Staff Travel Survey Results

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

University of Leeds Travel Plan

Ageing, transport and mobility

6. Transport GAUTENG CITY-REGION OBSERVATORY QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 2015 LANDSCAPES IN TRANSITION

Cabrillo College Transportation Study

ReadyBike. Corporate Packages

National Transport Awards Cambridge Park & Ride

Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings

Commuting by train to work in the Avonmouth - Severnside Enterprise Area

Contents Location Map Welcome and Introduction Travel Plan Management Science Park Accessibility Walking Cycling Bus Rail Car Sharing Contact Details

Accessibility, mobility and social exclusion

PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS

Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin

Rider Satisfaction Survey Total Market 2006

Liverpool Lime Street station engineering work. Knowledge and support for October 2017 improvement work November 2017

Travel Planning WC & NWCD Cycling Group. Thursday 2 nd July Amanda Holden

The Greater Cambridge Travel Survey Report

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

Travel to Work Survey Report

Car Parking Survey Revised

How commuting influences personal wellbeing over time

Travel Costs...in more ways than one! Sara Brook: West Yorkshire Travel Plan Network (WYTPN)

2014 Ontario Works Transit Survey: Final Results

NORTH ADELAIDE LOCAL AREA TRAFFIC AND PARKING MANAGEMENT ENGAGEMENT OUTCOMES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF ADELAIDE

Loughborough University Travel Planning

Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation

Master Transportation Plan Bicycle Element Survey

Travel Patterns and Cycling opportunites

Scottish Parent Teacher Council School Travel Survey Introduction

2014 Metro Transit Customer Survey Highlights

Integration of Sustainable Travel Modes

21/02/2018. How Far is it Acceptable to Walk? Introduction. How Far is it Acceptable to Walk?

The role of the Authority in promoting sustainable transport. Gerry Murphy South East Regional Assembly 27 th May 2011

Dial A Lift Customer Survey 2011 Executive Summary

Birmingham Connected. Edmund Salt. Transportation Policy Birmingham City Council

SUSTAINABLE TRAVEL TOWNS: RESULTS AND LESSONS

Life Transitions and Travel Behaviour Study. Job changes and home moves disrupt established commuting patterns

1.4 The development work will also provide 30 additional car and 50 cycle parking spaces on the campus.

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey

A Strategy for Increasing Walking and Cycling

Student Travel Survey 2012 results

CAMBRIDGE ACCESS STUDY: TACKLING CONGESTION WORKSHOP

January Project No

Cheryl Thole CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associate Tampa, Florida

LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY. Transport Strategy

Rider Satisfaction Survey Phoenix Riders 2004

REGIONAL HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY:

2016 REGIONAL ORIGIN AND DESTINATION STUDY TDCHR WORKSHOP APRIL 27, 2017

Bike Friendly Business Application Form

Walking in New Zealand May 2013

The Who and What: Bus Rapid Transit Riders and Systems in the U.S.

How familiar are you with BRT?

Route User Intercept Survey Report

Satisfaction with Canada Line and Connecting Buses. Wave 2

PERSONALISED TRAVEL PLANNING IN MIDLETON, COUNTY CORK

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

How are your travelling? Travel Diary in Cork

Mobility Constraints of Children in Bangladesh: A Study on Travel to School in Dhaka City

Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy & Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans

Understanding rail passengers is there an average commuter?

Student Travel Survey 2013

York Scarborough Bridge Economic Appraisal Update Technical Note

Walking New Zealand Household Travel Survey September 2015

VI. Market Factors and Deamnd Analysis

Making Dublin More Accessible: The dublinbikes Scheme. Martin Rogers Colm Keenan 13th November 2012

Transcription:

Page/... Travel to Work Survey March 0 Headlines South Gloucestershire LA Area Number of respondents Main modes of travel (%) Satisfaction with getting to work % Satisfaction with getting % (driver with others/ Public Bus Motorbike/ scooter,, electric/hybrid car, run, park & ride, taxi, other Average distance travelled to South Gloucestershire LA Area Assuming a five day week/ day working year (no holidays) miles per day Total distance travelled miles per week vv miles per year Average time spent travelling to work (%) Satisfaction with journey (%) 0 mins 0 mins mins 0 mins 0 mins Very satisfied Quite satisfied Neither satisfied or dissatisfied Quite dissatisfied Very dissatisfied More than. hours To work From work

Page/... Journey Distances Average per employee Assuming a five day week/ day working year (no holidays) Mode of Travel Average distances Mode Proportion Per Day Per Week Per Year 0 0 Miles per day Miles per week Miles per year Miles per day Miles per week Miles per year Miles per day Miles per week Miles per year % Miles per day Miles per week Miles per year 0 Miles per day Miles per week Miles per year Miles per day Miles per week Miles per year Miles per day Miles per week Miles per year

Page/... Journey Length Average per employee Mode of Travel Average time spent travelling to work (%) 0 mins 0 mins mins 0 0 mins 0 mins More than. hours 0 mins 0 mins mins 0 mins 0 mins More than. hours 0 mins 0 mins 0 mins 0 mins 0 mins More than. hours % 0 mins 0 mins mins 0 mins 0 0 mins More than. hours 0 mins 0 mins 0 mins 0 mins 0 mins More than. hours 0 mins 0 mins mins 0 mins 0 mins More than. hours 0 mins 0 mins mins 0 mins 0 mins More than. hours

Page/... How you compare Benchmarking How do you normally get to work? (%) or Walk Run Public South Gloucestershire LA Area All organisations South Gloucestershire LA Area () All organisations () or Walk Run Public % % % % % % % % % %

Page/... How you compare Benchmarking Satisfaction with normal journey to work (% satisfied) or Walk Run Public 0 0 0 0 South Gloucestershire LA Area All organisations Satisfaction with normal journey (% satisfied) or Walk Run Public 0 0 0 0 0 South Gloucestershire LA Area All organisations

Page/... How you compare Benchmarking Satisfaction with normal journey to work (% dissatisfied) or Walk Run Public 0 0 0 0 00 South Gloucestershire LA Area All organisations Satisfaction with normal journey (% dissatisfied) 0 or Walk Run 0 Public 0 0 0 0 00 South Gloucestershire LA Area All organisations

Page/... Getting to work Normally... Travel mode overall (%) This chart and table compares how people travelled to work on the day they completed the survey compared to how they normally travel to work. The percentages in the table should be read from left to right (not vertically). or passenger (driver or / Walk Run Public Travel to Work NORMALLY () How did you travel to work TODAY? () or Walk Run Public Travel to Work NORMALLY () How did you travel to work TODAY? () 0 % % % 0 % % % % % % 0 % Travel mode split by gender (%) This chart and table compares the normal mode of travel for men and women. The percentages in the table are read vertically so you can identify the scores for men and women separately. or passenger (driver or / Walk Run Public Female Male or Walk Run Public Female () Male () 00 % % % 0 % % % % % 0

Page/... Getting to work Normally... Travel mode split by age group (%) This chart and table compares the normal mode of travel for different age groups. The percentages in the table are read vertically so that you can compare the proportions using each mode of transport for each age group. 0 or passenger (driver or / Walk Run Public Under 0 years old () 0 to () 0 and over () or Walk Run Public Under 0 years old () 0 to () 0 and over () 0 0 % 0 % % % % 0 % 0 % % % % 0 0 % % 0 0 0 % 0 Travel mode split by mobility (%) This chart and table compares the normal mode of travel for disabled and nondisabled respondents and the percentages in the table are read vertically. 0 or passenger (driver or / Walk Run Public Disabled () Non disabled () or Walk Run Public Disabled () Non disabled () 0 % % % % 0 % % % %

Page/... Getting to work Normally... Travel mode split by length of service (%) This chart and table compares the normal mode of travel for members of staff that have worked with you for different time periods. The table is set up so that you can compare the scores for these different groups when reading the percentages vertically. 0 0 or passenger (driver or / Walk Run Public Less than months (0) months up to year () year up to years () years up to years () years and over (0) or Walk Run Public Less than months (0) months up to year () year up to years () years up to years () years and over (0) % 0 % % % % % % % % 0 % % % % 0 % % % % % % % % 0 % 0 %

Page/0... Getting to work Normally... Travel mode split by contract type (%) This chart and table compares the normal mode of travel for members of staff with different types of contract. The table is set up so that you can compare the scores for these different groups when reading the percentages vertically. or passenger (driver or / Walk Run Public Permanent () Temporary/Fixed Term () or Walk Run Public Permanent () Temporary/Fixed Term () % % 0 % % 0 % % 0 0 % Travel mode split by working hours (%) This chart and table compares the normal mode of travel for members of full time and part time staff. The table is set up so that you can compare the scores for these different groups when the data is read vertically. or passenger (driver or / Walk Run Public Full time () Part time () or Walk Run Public Full time () Part time () % % % 0 % % 0 % % % 0 0 0

Page/... Getting to work Normally... Travel mode split by working patterns (%) This chart and table compares the normal mode of travel for staff working different shift patterns. The table is set up so that you can compare the scores for these different groups when reading the data vertically. or passenger (driver or / Walk Run Public Standard fixed working hours (e.g. ampm) (0) Flexible working hours () Variable shift pattern () Standard fixed part time working hours () or Walk Run Public Standard fixed working hours (e.g. ampm) (0) Flexible working hours () Variable shift pattern () Standard fixed part time working hours () 0 0 % % % % % % % % 0 % 0 % % 0 % % 0 % % % % % 0 % % % % % 0 0

Page/... Getting to work Normally... Travel mode split by journey time (%) This chart and table compares the normal mode of travel for staff and their length of journey in hours. The table is set up so that you can compare the scores for these different journey lengths when reading the data vertically. 0 or passenger (driver or / Walk Run Public 0 mins () 0 mins (0) mins () 0 mins (0) 0 mins () More than. hours (0) or Walk Run Public 0 mins () 0 mins (0) mins () 0 mins (0) 0 mins () More than. hours (0) 0 00 % % 0 % 0 % % 0 % % % % % % % % 0 % % % 0 0 % % % % % % 0 % % % % %

Page/... Getting to work Normally... Travel mode split by journey distance (%) This chart and table compares the normal mode of travel for staff and their length of journey in miles. The table is set up so that you can compare the scores for these different journey distances. 0 0 0 or passenger (driver or / Walk Run Public Under miles () to. miles () to. miles (0) 0 to. miles () to. miles () 0 to. miles () 00+ miles () or Walk Run Public Under miles () to. miles () to. miles (0) 0 to. miles () to. miles () 0 to. miles () 00+ miles () % % 0 % % % % % % % % % % % % 0 % 0 % % % % 0 0 % 0 % % 0 % 0 % 0 % % % %

Page/... Satisfaction with normal Journey... Split by journey duration (% satisfied) Split by journey distance (% satisfied) 0 mins 0 Under miles 0 mins mins 0 mins 0 mins 0 to. miles to. miles 0 to. miles to. miles 0 to. miles 0 More than. hours 00+ miles To work From work To work From work Split by journey type (% satisfied with journey to work) or Walk Run Public 0 0 0 To work From work

Page/... Changing travel habits... People who travel to work by car were asked what influences their decision to travel to work by this method, and what would encourage them to choose an alternative way of travelling. Reasons for travelling to work by car rather than using public transport, walking, cycling or car sharing Too far to walk sharing would not give me the flexibility I need Quicker journey times There are no practical alternatives for my commute Infrequent public transport Poor reliability of public transport Too far to cycle ing responsibilities / school runs Weather conditions Cost savings Needing a car for iness travel Safety concerns Limited mobility or disability 0 Influences for choosing an alternative way of travelling to work (i.e. driving less often) Availability / increased provision of alternatives to the car for iness travel Discounted fares Discounted rail fares Increased flexibility with regards to working patterns 0 More information and support on my travel options Improved facilities at my work place (e.g. locker, shower and drying facilities) Introduction or increase of car parking charges Involvement in sustainable travel events and competitions Better cycle parking

Page/... Changes in normal Journey to work... Awareness of local transport initiatives (%) Respondents were shown a list of various local transport initiatives and were asked for each if they were aware of them or not and whether they had used them. Travelwest website () Travelwest journey planner () Travel Challenge (0) Travelwest roadshows () Yo Bikes () share services () Improvements in cycle network (0) Slide (0) Loan Bike Scheme () Wheels to Work West (00) Next Bike () 0 Aware of this but have not used Have used Was not aware of this

Page/... Respondent Profile... Gender (%) Age (%) to 0 to 0 to Female 0 to Male Prefer not to say 0 to 0 to 0 or over Prefer not to say Disability (%) Length of service (%) Less than months months up to year Yes No Prefer not to say year up to years years up to years years and over

Page/... Respondent Profile... Working hours (%) Contract type (%) Full time Part time Permanent Temporary/Fixed Term Employment type (%) Working hours (%) Professional/Senior managerial Standard fixed working hours (e.g. am pm) Skilled manual professional qualifications/serviced apprenticeship) Flexible working hours Middle management Unskilled manual (no qualifications/not served an apprenticeship) Variable shift pattern Junior management/clerical/supervisory Standard fixed part time working hours