Impact of climate variability and change on winter survival of Bristol Bay sockeye salmon Alaska Fisheries Science Center Ed Farley (NOAA), Greg Ruggerone (NRC) Phil Mundy (NOAA), Ellen Yasumiishi (NOAA) Bev Agler (ADFG) PICES - NPAFC Workshop W2 Linkages between the winter distribution of Pacific salmon and their marine ecosystems and how this might be altered with climate change October 17, 12:1 (W2-9583) PICES 214 Annual Meeting Yeosu, Korea
Ocean distribution Period when juvenile sockeye salmon need to grow and put on lipid Myers et al. North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission Bulletin 4; 27
A Series of Related Concepts 1. Climate states can impact prey quality and quantity on the eastern Bering Sea shelf 2. Prey quality and quantity during their first summer at sea determines size and fitness of juvenile (marine Age-) salmon 3. Size and fitness of juvenile salmon drives size-selective mortality, SSM, during winter. 4. Winter size-selective mortality occurs because smaller, less fit fish must feed during winter to maintain protein levels, which may lead to higher risk of predation; whereas larger fish are able to burn more lipid to reduce predation risk. 5. Other winter mortality factors may operate, such as pinks predator-buffering sockeye salmon during winter. Recent data on competition support a positive relationship between Asian pink salmon abundance and Bristol Bay sockeye salmon survival and abundance.
Critical Size and Period Hypothesis H1: The effects of climate and ecosystem function on fish recruitment are most evident during 2 critical periods: Critical Periods First Spring First Winter Faster growing sockeye salmon escape predation Larger and more energetic sockeye salmon survive winter U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 4
Evidence of Critical Size Juvenile sockeye salmon surveys (measure length/collect scales for age and growth) Adult scales to back-calculate length of Juvenile sockeye salmon F/V Sea Storm (US BASIS)
Tracking length-frequency distributions in natural populations. Probability of survival = AUC back-calculated juvenile length AUC observed juvenile length Frequency of occurrence SSM Smolts or Juveniles [Survivors & non-survivors] Adults [Survivors] Smolt or juvenile length (mm)
Probability of Size Selective Mortality 1.9 Broad range of ~5% probability of size-selective mortality Probability of Size Selective Mortality.8.7.6.5.4.3.2.1 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3 Length (mm)
Evidence of Winter Mortality Juvenile Sockeye salmon < 22 mm before winter not likely to survive 6 5 Fall Winter Ocean Age 1 Frequency of occurrence 4 3 2 Ocean Age Juveniles 1 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 1 19 2 21 22 Fork length (mm) 31 3 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 Farley et al. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68: 1138 1146.
Climate Prey Quality and Quantity Fish Size and Fitness U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 9
3 2 1-1 -2-3 e.g. Bering Sea Climate States and Ecosystem Response SST Anomalies Large zooplankton (No. m-3) 18 16 14 large small 12 1 12 8 1 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 Small zooplankton (No. m-3) Warm SST Warm SST Juvenile Sockeye Salmon Diets Other Zoop Cool SST Other Fish Amphipod Euphausiids Age pollock Crab larvae Limacina Other Zoop Other Fish Amphipod Euphausiids Age pollock Crab larvae Limacina fish zooplankton
Climate and Fitness 7.5 7 Juvenile (Ocean Age-) sockeye salmon Eastern Bering Sea 23 28 x 7) 6.5 6 ED 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 9 14 19 24 29 Fork Length (mm) 23 24 25 26 28 Linear (23) Linear (24) Linear (25) Linear (26) Linear (28)
Fitness Related to Marine Survival Index for Sockeye Juveniles (Ocean Age-) 23 27 Using Adult Returns 25-21 7 6 5 MSI 4 3 2 1 y = 85.9x - 422.5 r² =.69 4.75 5. 5.25 5.5 5.75 6. ED (KJ g -1 wet weight) Farley et al. 211
Starvation Three phases: GLUCOSE, LIPIDS, PROTEIN Phase 1: Animals burn glucose and begin to mobilize stored lipids Phase 2: Increased oxidation of lipids and partial sparing of protein. (animals in this phase are still considered fit enough to survive once prey items are restored) Phase 3: Terminal starvation when 3-5% of the body protein has been used. (cardiac muscle is one of the first sources of protein utilized and other organs compromised too) Castellini and Rea 1992
Sockeye Salmon Protein and Lipid Black boxes = juveniles Clear diamonds = ocean age 1 7 6 5 y =.38x - 58.9 r² =.82 16 14 12 y =.11x - 18.6 r² =.75 Protein (g) 4 3 2 1 y =.32x - 47.3 r² =.94 15 2 25 3 35 Fork length (mm) Lipid (g) 1 8 6 4 2 y =.2x - 2.3 r² =.14 15 2 25 3 35 Fork length (mm) No evidence of starvation Farley et al. 211
COMPETITION Springer et al. PNAS
Asian Pinks (millions) 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Trends in Asian Pink Salmon Even Year Pinks Abundance 1977-28 Odd Year Pinks 1975 198 1985 199 1995 2 25 Sockeye Smolt Year After Ruggerone et al. (21), Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science, Number 21:36-328. 21. See also Rogers (21)
Sockeye Juvenile Survival Index and Associated Asian Pink Abundance Survival Index 1..8.6.4.2. Juvenile Survival Asian Pinks r =.43 22 23 24 25 26 27 Smolt Year 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Pinks (millions)
Average Odd/Even Returns of Bristol Bay Sockeye and Asian Pink Salmon, 22-7 Juvenile Years Millions of Sockeye 6 5 4 3 2 1 Even Odd Odd Even Sockeye Juvenile Year Asian Pink Salmon Wertheimer in prep. 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Millions of Pinks
Conclusions 1. Climate states can impact prey quality and quantity on the eastern Bering Sea shelf 2. Prey quality and quantity during their first summer at sea determines size and fitness of juvenile (marine Age-) salmon 3. Size and fitness of juvenile salmon drives size-selective mortality, SSM, during winter. 4. Winter size-selective mortality occurs because smaller, less fit fish must feed during winter to maintain protein levels, which may lead to higher risk of predation; whereas larger fish are able to burn more lipid to reduce predation risk. 5. Other winter mortality factors may operate, such as pinks predator-buffering sockeye salmon during winter. Recent data on competition support a positive relationship between Asian pink salmon abundance and Bristol Bay sockeye salmon survival and abundance.
Thanks to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and Natural Resource Consultants for making it possible for us to do this work. Also thanks to the many other scientists whose Published and unpublished work made our work possible. The End
Bristol Bay Region