Report on Bycatch of Tuna Longline Fishing Operation Eastern Indian Ocean by SEAFDEC Research Vessels Year

Similar documents
WORKING GROUP TO REVIEW STOCK ASSESSMENTS 8 TH MEETING

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FOURTH REGULAR SESSION August 2008 Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea

An ecological risk assessment for the effect of the Korean tuna longline fishery in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean

Fishery-induced changes in the subtropical Pacific pelagic ecosystem size structure: Observations and theory

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TWELFTH REGULAR SESSION. Bali, Indonesia 3-11 August 2016

2009 Project Report Update on Gulf of Mexico Pelagic Longline Bluefin Tuna Mitigation Research

Report of Japan s scientific observer program for tuna longline fishery in the Atlantic Ocean in the fishing year of 2007

Present Status of Off-shore Fishery Resources and Information on Tuna Fishery in MYANMAR.

SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FIFTH MEETING

Large Pelagic Fishery Resource Survey using Pelagic Longline in the Bay of Bengal

Shark Catches by the Hawaii-based Longline Fishery. William A. Walsh. Keith A. Bigelow

DOCUMENT SAC-08-INF A(d)

Recent advances, ongoing challenges, and future directions in ecosystem approaches to fisheries management in the central North Pacific

Atlantic Shark Fishery: Gulf of Mexico. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Management Division

Shark catch characteristics by national longliner fleets in Madagascar

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRD REGULAR SESSION August 2007 Honolulu, United States of America

Shark bycatch observation in the ICCAT waters by. Chineses longline observer in 2007

Thailand National Report

The Review of Bycatch in Thailand In Relation to IOTC Species

Indonesian Tuna Protocol Sampling. Case Study on Catch Monitoring in Benoa Port, Bali, Indonesia

Catch of Experimental Longline, Purse Seine and Handline in the South China Sea, Area III: Western Philippines

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRTEENTH REGULAR SESSION. Rarotonga, Cook Islands 9 17 August 2017

Catch reporting under E- Monitoring in the Australian Pacific longline fishery. ERandEMWG2-DP01 Bali, Indonesia. James Larcombe

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SIXTH REGULAR SESSION August 2010 Nuku alofa, Tonga

Elasmobranches Found in the Bay of Bengal from Pelagic Longline and Drift Gill Net Fishing

2016 : STATUS SUMMARY FOR SPECIES OF TUNA AND TUNA-LIKE SPECIES UNDER THE IOTC MANDATE, AS WELL AS OTHER SPECIES IMPACTED BY IOTC FISHERIES.

DOCUMENT SAC-08 INF A(a) 2016 ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC OBSERVER REPORT FOR KOREAN TUNA LONGLINE FISHIERY IN THE IATTC CONVENTION AREA

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SIXTH REGULAR SESSION

STATUS OF IOTC DATABASES FOR BYCATCH SPECIES

BYCATCH OF FISH IN HMS FISHERIES

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ELEVENTH REGULAR SESSION. Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia 5-13 August 2015

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SEVENTH REGULAR SESSION August 2011 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

Bait innovation as a new challenge in pelagic longlining

Report of the Third Session of the IOTC Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch

Agenda Item B.1: Open Public Comment, Bycatch in Pelagic Longline Swordfish Fisheries

Tuna Resource Exploration with Tuna Longline in the South China Sea, Area IV : Vietnamese Waters

PRESENT STATUS of Silky shark, Thresher sharks, Mobulid rays and Banggai cardinafish in Indonesia

DOCUMENT SAC-09 INF A(i )

JAPAN. Japan Fisheries Agency , Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, , Japan. National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries, FRA

DOCUMENT SAC-06 INF-L

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE EIGHTH REGULAR SESSION August 2012 Busan, Republic of Korea

Report of the 14 th Session of the IOTC Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch

Report of the 14 th Session of the IOTC Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch

Sharks caught in Mozambican waters. Barbara Palha de Sousa

IOTC 2013 WPB th Working Party on Billfish. La Réunion 18 th -22 nd September 2013

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Second Regular Session 7-18 August 2006 Manila, Philippines

The use of Traditional FADs in Thai Fisheries and the Review of it's possibility to Apply in IOTC area. Abstract

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SECOND REGULAR SESSION August 2006 Manila, Philippines

SCTB17 Working Paper SWG 5

Status of Albacore Fishing by Malaysian Tuna Longliners in the Southwest of Indian Ocean. Effarina Mohd Faizal, Sallehudin Jamon & Samsudin Basir

Changes in Fishing Gear- Impact on Tropical Tuna Landing

Public consultation on protection of Chagos Archipelago

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

Reviewing effectiveness of conservation and management measures on sharks in Sri Lanka over past five years

IOTC 2015 WPEB11 45 Rev_1

Av. Mao Tsé Tung, nr.389, P.O.Box Maputo, Mozambique

TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PREDATORS CAUGHT BY TUNA PURSE-SEINERS SEINERS IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRTEENTH REGULAR SESSION. Rarotonga, Cook Islands 9 17 August 2017

5th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Shanghai, China, September 2017

Use of productivity and susceptibility indices to evaluate vulnerability in the purse-seine fishery of the eastern Pacific Ocean

Survey Report on Demersal Fishery Resources Living in Un trawlable Area in Rakhine Fishing Ground of Myanmar using Bottom Vertical Longline

FISHING FOR HMS IN STATE WATERS

KENYA National Report to the Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, Author Peter Nyongesa Wekesa

The Extended Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna,

018 COM Doc. No. COC-324A / 2018 November 18, 2018 (3:00 PM)

Regional Cooperation for Sustainable Utilization of Neritic Tunas in Southeast Asia. SEAFDEC Secretariat

Blue sharks are targeted in the pelagic shark longline fishery, and caught as bycatch in the tuna/swordfish longline fishery.

Preliminary Exempted Fishing Permit Application: Alternative Swordfish Target Fishing Methods and Gears

SMALL BOAT TUNA LONGLINE FISHERY NORTH-WEST COAST OF SRI LANKA R. Maldeniya

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SECOND REGULAR SESSION August 2006 Manila, Philippines

NFR-22. National Report: Update on tuna fisheries of Taiwan in the Pacific Region. SCTB15 Working Paper

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

Intersessional Working Group Regional Observer Programme September 2007 WCPFC MINIMUM DATA STANDARDS FOR REGIONAL OBSERVER PROGRAMME (DRAFT)

HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES MANAGEMENT TEAM REPORT. Options for dealing with these four issues are discussed in the following sections of the report.

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

DRAFT: Do not cite without author s permission. Catch and Management of Sharks in Pelagic Fisheries in Hawaii and the Western Pacific Region

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES OF BLUE AND MAKO SHARKS BYCATCH AND CPUE OF TAIWANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

Buoy gear a potential for bycatch reduction in the small-scale swordfish fisheries: a Florida experience and Indian Ocean perspective

SOMALIA National Report to the Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, 2015

Photographic identification guide for non-target fish species taken in WCPO purse seine fisheries

Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Safe Harbor for Sea Turtles

Policy Priorities for the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission

Carcharhinidae. Southern bluefin tuna >6.4kg Bigeye tuna >3.2kg Yellowfin tuna >3.2kg Swordfish >119cm LJFL / >18kg dressed Marlins >210cm LJFL

Mako sharks are targeted in the pelagic shark longline fishery, and caught as bycatch in the tuna/swordfish longline fishery.

Bycatch landings in Mauritius for 2009/2010

PROJECT DOCUMENT ACHIEVEMENTS FOR YEAR 2018 AND PROPOSED ACTIVITY FOR YEAR 2019

Decreases in Shark Catches and Mortality in the Hawaii-Based Longline Fishery as Documented by Fishery Observers

COASTAL & OFFSHORE PACIFIC CORPORATION 242 Rosa Corte Walnut Creek, CA Via

TECHNICAL AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE Tenth Regular Session September 2014 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

Status of Shark fishery in Sri Lanka

Ecopath model of the pelagic ecosystem of the WCPO and related projects. ALLAIN V.

NEW DEEP SETTING TECHNIQUE TESTED IN MOOLOOLABA, AUSTRALIA

Catch rates with variable strength circle hooks in the Hawaii-based tuna longline fishery

HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES MANAGEMENT TEAM REPORT ON DRIFT GILLNET MONITORING, MANAGEMENT, AND ALTERNATIVE GEAR REPORT

Recreational fisheries for sharks

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FOURTEENTH REGULAR SESSION. Busan, Republic of Korea 8-16 August 2018

SHARK CHECK SHEETS RECEIVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REC (As of 16 October 2017, Madrid time)

Thai Tuna Longline Fishing in the Indian Ocean from 2000 to 2006

PSAT Meta Data Analysis Project

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SIXTH REGULAR SESSION August 2010 Nuku alofa, Tonga

Transcription:

Report on Bycatch of Tuna Longline Fishing Operation Eastern Indian Ocean by SEAFDEC Research Vessels Year 2005-2011 Sayan promjinda, Isara Chanrachkij Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center 1) Abstract Catch data, by three SEAFDEC research vessels namely, M.V.SEAFDEC and M.V. SEAFDEC2, recorded through fishing logbook from year 2005 to 2011, is summarized and calculated the hook rate in Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE). Total numbers of fishing operation are 73 tuna longline operations. Total numbers of hook deployed are 38,333 hooks. Numbers of deployed hooks are ranged from 90 to 620 hooks in an operation and average in an operation is 490 hooks. Numbers of individual bycatch were 494 individual fishes with 6940.26 kg. Distribution of CPUEs in kilogram per haul and hook rate (%) from the longline operations is 1.29 individual fish/100 hooks, 18.1 kg/100 hooks. Three dominant catch is listed; 1) Lancetfish (Alepisaurus ferox); 2) Big-eye Thresher Shark (Alopias superciliosus); and 3) Sting Ray (Dasyatis spp.) 2) Introduction: Bycatch species of tuna longline fisheries i.e. shark and rays, sea turtle, marine mammal and seabird, is group of importance species concerned by international organization what increase magnitude to force the fishers on conservation issues in recently year. Since 1968, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Training Department (SEAFDEC/TD) has established for enhance human capacity on modern marine capture in Southeast Asia. Tuna longline is one of the major fishing gears appointed to train SEAFDEC trainees. Thus, tuna longline operations have been carried out every year around the fishing ground of South China Sea and Indian Ocean. For South China Sea, tuna longline fishing operations were conducted in west coast of the Philippines and Sabah-Sarawak waters. In Indian Ocean, tuna longline fishing operations were conducted around eastern part of Indian Ocean particular in Andaman Sea. Regarding to the direction of organization what adapted after year 2000, SEAFDEC has been more focus on responsible fishing promotion and fisheries management. SEAFDEC/TD has been strengthened on the responsible marine capture, Fisheries resource research survey. By changing the role, tuna longline fishing gear has been renamed as pelagic longline and operated as sampling gear for large pelagic and meso-pelagic species i.e. tuna, swordfish marlin and etc, however there are some non-target species caught by pelagic/tuna longline regularly. In order to initiate appropriate research works on tuna longline bycatch reduction, information collection on bycatch of tuna longline operation caught by research vessels could be supported to fisheries scientist and mitigates the impact to the pelagic resources as well as reduce the risk of overfishing and harmful to marine endanger species.

2) Term of Definition Bycatch: non-target species and incidental catch which were caught by tuna longline gears. Eastern Indian Ocean: Area of fishing operations where covers 29.88 million km² including the Bay of Bengal in the north, the Andaman Sea and northern part of the Malacca Straits in the east, and the waters around the west and south of Australia. The main shelf areas include those of the Bay of Bengal and the Gulf of Martaban and the narrower shelf areas on the western and southern sides of Indonesia and Australia for a total of 2.37 million km² of shelf area Tuna Longline: Tuna longline is categorized into drifting longline. These longline are kept near the surface or at a certain depth by mean of regular space floats. Drifting longline may be of considerable length, and the snoods are usually longer and more widely space than for bottom longline. SEAFDEC Research Vessels: The training and research vessels, namely MV SEAFDEC and MV SEAFDEC2 are used for this study 3) Materials and Methods: 3.1 Fishing Operation Information The training and research vessels, namely MV SEAFDEC and MV SEAFDEC2 are used for this study. Fishing gear is employed both vessels is tuna longline. Both vessels have installed an automatic longline system. The system is composed with mainline spool, automatic line shooting machine and branch line setting beeper. Main line spool is made by aluminum alloy diameter 100 cm and 130 cm length. The spool is able to contain monofilament mainline, diameter 4 mm, more than 30 kilometers. The mainline shooter is made by aluminum alloy. Function of mainline shooter is, to release the mainline from spool with accurate shooting rate in order to control the depth of branch line in the sea. While the controller wants to emergency stop the mainline shooter, mainline spool must be instantly stopped as well. Setting speed of mainline shooter needs to compatible control with the speed of vessel. M.V. SEAFDEC2 is shooting with speed around 6-8 knots and setting mainline shooter at speed around 7-8 knots. In order to control speed of mainline shooter SEAFDEC/TD technician develop the computer software to command the shooting of branch line and float, as well as counting length of mainline and number of branch line. Complete set of tuna longline is composed by mainline, branch line and buoy line. Mainline is made from Nylon monofilament diameter 4 mm. Branch line is made by Nylon monofilament diameter 2.0 mm length 11 m. Twenty (20) hooks are set between float intervals. Temperature and Depth sensors (TD sensors) 2 sets, were attached at the branch line No.1 and 10 in order to check the actual depth of hook. TD sensors have shown that the shallowest branch line was 30 to 70 m and deepest branch line No.10 and 11 was 150 to 300 m., from the surface (SEAFDEC, 2007) Fishing area of M.V. SEAFDEC is in the Indian Ocean from Latitude 18 N to 10 S and Longitude 88 to 96 E, radiating around the Ninety East Ridge. The fishing periods were from October to March of

following year. Fishing area of M.V. SEAFDEC2 is in Andaman Sea from Latitude 18 N to 10 S and Longitude 88 to 96 E. The fishing periods were from October to March of following year. M.V.SEAFDEC (1998 Present) M.V. SEAFDEC2 (2004 Present) Figure 1 shows SEAFDEC research vessels; MV.SEAFDEC and M.V.SEAFDEC2 3.2 Data Collection and Analysis Review secondary data on tuna longline fishing operation by SEAFDEC research vessels, i.e. M.V. SEAFDEC and M.V. SEAFDEC2, from 2005 to April 2011, all species caught in each operation were recorded and measured for both length and weight. CPUEs are in term of number of fish and total weight of catch. Catching efficiency of tuna longline was also presented in term of Hook Rate Ratio (%). Catching depth was measured by Depth sensor. 4) Results and Discussion 4.1 Longline Fishing Operation Within a period from February 2005 to January 2011, M.V. SEAFDEC and M.V.SEAFDEC2 operated tuna longline in the Eastern Indian Ocean 73 operations. Forty (40) operations, 20,753 hooks of these were in the Andaman Sea within the EEZ of Thailand and Myanmar under the national collaborative of large pelagic survey by tuna longline. Others 33 operations, 17,580 hooks were in Bay of Bengal and Eastern Indian Ocean (Southern hemisphere). Total numbers of hooks deployed were 38,333 hooks. Numbers of hook deployed is ranged from 90 to 682 hooks in an operation and average in an operation is 525 hooks. In additional, standardization of hook settings by SEAFDEC research vessels, since year 2004, has been five hundred (500) hooks in minimum for a fishing operation. 4.2 CPUE and Hook Rate (1000 hooks of Longline) Bycatch species is shown in Figure 3. Numbers of individual bycatch were 494 individual fishes with 6940.26 kg. Distribution of CPUEs in kilogram per haul and hook rate (%) from the longline operations is 1.29 individual fish/100 hooks, 18.1 kg/100 hooks. Hook rate of bycatch species from longline is 1.38 individual fish/100 hooks, 11.0 kg/100 hooks in the Eastern Indian Ocean and is 0.4 individual fish/100 hooks, 20.8 kg/100 hooks in the Andaman Sea.

Figure 2 shows area of operation in Andaman Sea, Bay of Bengal and Eastern Indian Ocean 4.3 Species composition Table 1 Figure 3 and Figure 4 shows bycatch results from tuna longline found in areas, Eastern Indian Ocean, Bay of Bengal and Andaman Sea. In this report, Bycatch found by longline mainly were sharks namely Bigeye thresher shark, Blue Shark, White-tipped shark, Spottail shark, Crocodile shark, Silky Shark and Sting Ray. In addition, others bycatch were Lancet fish, Escolar, Snake mackerel, Great barracuda, Oilfish, Common Dolphinfish, Sickle pomfret and Wahoo. From SEAFDEC survey year 2005-2011, none of sea turtles were found as bycatch. Species composition of bycatch results from tuna longline by SEAFDEC research vessels from 2005 to 2011 is dominant by Lancetfish (Alepisaurus ferox); 106 samples, Bigeye thresher shark (Alopias superciliosus); 80 samples, unidentified string ray (further classification is appeared Pelagic String Ray, Dasyatis violacea); 74 samples and Snake mackerel (Gempylus serpen); 54 samples. Focus on group of catch, Sharks and Rays is shown highest number, 227 individual samples. Result of Shark and Ray shows highest in individual number and weight, there are seven (17) shark and ray species are able to identified. Bigeye thresher shark (Alopias superciliosus) is the most dominant species caught by longline and second dominant species is unidentified string ray (further classification is appeared Pelagic String Ray, Dasyatis violacea). Other important species is Pelagic thresher shark (Alopias pelagicus), Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis) and Sharpnose seven-gill shark (Heptranchias perlo)

Unid SHARK SPK SNA PTH BTH BSH OCS DUS PSK TIG FAL CCL AML DSS TIK GUP HXT MNT STR TST, 8, 2% SVH, 33, 7% Other, 14, 3% WAH, 6, 1% GES, 54, 11% Shark, 227, 46% ALX, 106, 21% LEC, 34, 7% GBA, 12, 2% Shark LEC GBA ALX GES Figure 3 shows bycatch results from tuna longline Shark Species Composition Caught by Tuna Longline SEAFDEC Research Vessel 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 3 1 2 15 80 5 1 2 9 2 13 3 1 1 1 1 10 3 74 Figure 4 shows group of shark and rays results from tuna longline 5) Recommendation In order to promote the responsible fishing through fishing technology selectivity, SEAFDEC/TD has attempted to reduce numbers of unwanted catch/bycatch, caught by tuna longline fishing operation. Fishing gear design and fishing practices has been applied in tuna longline operating, however it is not able to definitely mitigate the catch of these species in pelagic longline fishing operation by SEAFDEC training vessels. Furthermore hook rate of unwanted catches seem higher than the past. It may be caused by development of fishing gear material, i.e. monofilament for branch line and deck machineries, i.e. main line storage system, etc. It is, however, recognized that fishing capacity of research vessel is less than commercial tuna longliners, it is unable to precisely estimate that catch on bycatch by commercial tuna longliners but presumes much higher than

research vessel. Refer to Praulei Nuotmorn et.,al, in http://www.fisheries.go.th/mf-afdec/site/ access on 1 October 2011) reports number of total landing catch during year 1994 to 2003, at Port of Phuket has been appeared since 1-2% of miscellaneous species i.e. Shark, Lepidocybium spp., Coryphaena spp., Molar spp., Ruretlus pretiosus, Sphyraena spp. and Taractichtis spp. Landing weight of these miscellaneous species is calculated as 6 to 50 mts/year during 1994 to 2004. In addition, it is doubtfully that fishers always discard some unutilized bycatch e.g. Lancet fish, Snakeliked mackerel and etc. Thus, record of bycatch landing by commercial vessel may not be adequate to pelagic resource management. By this rational, information collection on bycatch caught by research vessel could be supported to fisheries manager on the status of bycatch in tuna longline fisheries. It is in order to enhance sustainable fisheries on pelagic resources in tuna longline fisheries and reduce risky on some endangered species, e.g. Shark, Sea turtle and etc finally. Species Individual Weight(kg) Unidentified Shark UnidSHK 3 17.70 Great hammerhead (Sphyrna mokarran) SPK 1 80.00 Shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) SNA 2 195.00 Pelagic thresher (Alopias pelagicus) PTH 15 383.00 Bigeye thresher (Alopias superciliosus) BTH 80 4311.20 Blue Shark (Prionace glauca) BSH 5 110.50 Oceanic whitetip shark (Carcharhinus longimanus) OCS 1 27.00 Dusky shark (Carcharhinus obscurus) DUS 2 105.00 Crocodile shark (Pseudocarcharias kamoharai) PSK 9 47.10 Tiger Shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) TIG 2 62.00 Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis ) FAL 13 145.50 Blacktip shark (Carcharhinus limbatus) CCL 3 43.90 Grey reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) AML 1 39.00 Deepsea shark/ Lantern Shark (Etmopterus sp.) DSS 1 2.20 Longnose hound shark Iago spp. TIK 1 2.10 Gulper shark (Centroprorus granulosus) GUP 1 5.80 Sharpnose sevengill shark (Heptranchias perlo) HXT 10 37.70 Devil Ray (Mobula spp.) MNT 3 160.00 Sting ray (Dasyatis spp.) STR 74 334 Escolar (Lepidocybium flavobrunneum) LEC 34 213.35 Great barracuda (Sphyraena barracuda) GBA 12 64.60 Lancet fish (Alepisaurus ferox) ALX 106 187.67 Snake mackerel (Gempylus serpen) GES 54 65.64 Wahoo (Acanthcybium solandri) WAH 6 43.10 Sickle pomfret (Taractichthys steindachneri) TST 8 48.50 Savalani hairtail (Lepturacanthus savala) SVH 33 49.20 Deep Sea Fish (Coryphaehoides pectoralis) DSF 5 22.00 Common dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) DOL 4 6.10 Giant travallly Caranx ignobilis GTV 2 15.60 Oilfish (Ruvettus pretiosus) OIL 2 16.30 Sunfish (Mola mola) MOX 1 100.00 Total 494 6940.26 Table 1 bycatch results from tuna longline by SEAFDEC research vessels from 2005 to 2011

6) Acknowledgement Authors would like to express appreciation to Department of Fisheries Thailand, Myanmar and BIMSTEC countries in collaboration on pelagic resource research survey. In addition authors thank all crews of M.V. SEAFDEC and M.V.SEAFDEC2 for their collaboration in fishing In Andaman Sea by MV SEAFDEC in 2004 7) Reference SEAFDEC. 2003. Tuna Longline Fishing (TD/LN/64); In Thai. SEAFDEC/TD, Samutprakarn, Thailand SEAFDEC. 2003. Pelagic Longline (TD/LN/118). SEAFDEC/TD, Samutprakarn, Thailand SEAFDEC. 2005 Cruise report No.73-2/2005. SEAFDEC/TD, Samutprakarn, Thailand SEAFDEC. 2007. Cruise report No. 75-1/2007. SEAFDEC/TD, Samutprakarn, Thailand SEAFDEC. 2010. Cruise report No.81-3/2010, 82-2/2010. SEAFDEC/TD, Samutprakarn, Thailand SEAFDEC. 2011. Cruise report No.83-1/2011. SEAFDEC/TD, Samutprakarn, Thailand SEAFDEC. 2011. Cruise report No.85-1/2011. SEAFDEC/TD, Samutprakarn, Thailand SEAFDEC. 2004. Cruise report No.1-1/2004. SEAFDEC/TD, Samutprakarn, Thailand SEAFDEC. 2006. Cruise report No. 17-1/2006. SEAFDEC/TD, Samutprakarn, Thailand SEAFDEC. 2007. Cruise report No.23-1/2010, 24-1/2010. SEAFDEC/TD, Samutprakarn, Thailand SEAFDEC. 2008. Cruise report No.30-1/2008. SEAFDEC/TD, Samutprakarn, Thailand Sutee Rajrujithong, et.,al,. 2005 Bycatch from Tuna Purse Seine and Longline Fishing Gears in the Eastern Indian Ocean by MV SEAFDEC (IOTC-2005-WPBy-07) Praulei Nuotmorn et.,al, in http://www.fisheries.go.th/mf-afdec/site/ access on 1 October 2011