City of Virginia Beach Dune Inventory

Similar documents
Lancaster County Dune Inventory

Accomack County Dune Inventory

Northumberland County DuneInventory

Dune Monitoring Data Update Summary: 2013

The Value of Created Dunes to address Coastal Hazards in Chesapeake Bay: Hurricane Isabel Impacts

Design and Construction of Living

VIMS CCRM Coastal Management Decision Tools. Decision Tree for Undefended Shorelines and Those with Failed Structures

Beach profile surveys and morphological change, Otago Harbour entrance to Karitane May 2014 to June 2015

Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

Long Beach Island Holgate Spit Little Egg Inlet Historical Evolution Introduction Longshore Transport Map, Survey and Photo Historic Sequence

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

Shorelines Earth - Chapter 20 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

Salt Ponds Shore Zone Modeling for Breakwater Placement: Summary Report

For more information or permission to reprint slides, please contact Donna Milligan at 1

Australian Coastal Councils Conference

Reading Material. Inshore oceanography, Anikouchine and Sternberg The World Ocean, Prentice-Hall

Basic Dune Physical Characteristics

Oceans and Coasts. Chapter 18

Figure 106. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

DUXBURY WAVE MODELING STUDY

BEACH PROCESSES AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS

LAB: WHERE S THE BEACH

Shore Zone Management Planning for Middle Peninsula Chesapeake Bay Public Access Authority Properties

Chapter 20 Lecture. Earth: An Introduction to Physical Geology. Eleventh Edition. Shorelines. Tarbuck and Lutgens Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter - Oceans and Coasts

Coastal management has lagged behind the growth in population leading to problems with pollution

Figure 4, Photo mosaic taken on February 14 about an hour before sunset near low tide.

ATLANTIC COUNTY 2006 to 2008

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

DUNE STABILIZATION AND BEACH EROSION

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

Yorktown Beach with Hurricane Isabel Impacts

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the major environments on Mustang Island.

Chapter 10 Lecture Outline. The Restless Oceans

Coastal Engineering 57 (2010) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Coastal Engineering

Estuarine Shoreline Stabilization

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

SPECIAL SPRING 2018 STORM REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES FOR THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Chesil Beach, Dorset UK High energy, shingle coastline. Brighton Beach, Sussex UK Pebble beach

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 15 Earth Science, 12e Tarbuck/Lutgens

Overview. Beach Features. Coastal Regions. Other Beach Profile Features. CHAPTER 10 The Coast: Beaches and Shoreline Processes.

Earth Science Chapter 16 Section 3 Review

An Update of Coastal Erosion in Puerto Rico

Affects of Tides on Lateral Coastal Access at. Las Varas Ranch. Gaviota, California. Photos Courtesy of California Coastal Records Project

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

Chapter. The Dynamic Ocean

Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering - Volume 14 COASTAL STABILIZATION. Richard Silvester John R C Hsu. \v? World Scientific

City of Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan

Beach, dune and development in the Borough of Mantoloking as of January Prepared for The Borough of Mantoloking: April 2, 2008

EVALUATION OF BEACH EROSION UP-DRIFT OF TIDAL INLETS IN SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA, USA. Mohamed A. Dabees 1 and Brett D.

Fairfax County Shoreline Management Plan

SHORE PROTECTION AND HABITAT CREATION AT SHAMROCK ISLAND, TEXAS ABSTRACT

Design Considerations for Living Shorelines in Connecticut. Jennifer E.D. O Donnell Department of Marine Sciences University of Connecticut

Shoreline Studies Program, Department of Physical Sciences, VIMS

RE: Hurricane Matthew Beach Damage Assessment and Recommendations [CSE 2416]

Figure79. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 155

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

Blakely Island, N Thatcher Bay. Restoration Recommendation: Rank Score (total score)

RI Regulatory Setbacks & Buffers: Coastal Management Issues

GONE! Coastal Erosion Happens During Storms! Why Worry About Coastal Setbacks? Goals for Today

Prince George County Shoreline Management Plan

The Sand Beaches of New Hampshire and Maine

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

MAR 110 LECTURE #15 Wave Hazards

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Atlantic County Profile Site Locations

Tangier Island, Virginia. Shoreline Management Plan for the West Coast of the Uppards

Shore - place where ocean meets land Coast - refers to the larger zone affected by the processes that occur at this boundary.

FINAL REPORT FOR 2013 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL OCEANFRONT BEACHES THE BOROUGH OF AVALON, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Brief History of Headland Breakwaters Usage in Chesapeake Bay, USA. 25 Years of Rock, Sand and Plants for Shore Protection

Chapter 12: Coasts (after a brief review of Tides)

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

Julebæk Strand. Effect full beach nourishment

Dynamic Shoreline. Why do we care? Loss of land Damage to structures Recreation

IMPACTS OF COASTAL PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON THE COASTS OF CRETE: NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION

Performance of Upham Beach T-Groin Project and Its Impact to the Downdrift Beach

Low-crested offshore breakwaters: a functional tool for beach management

FINAL REPORT FOR 2013 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES IN THE TOWNSHIP OF UPPER, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Nearshore Morphodynamics. Bars and Nearshore Bathymetry. Sediment packages parallel to shore, that store beach sediment

Q1. What are the primary causes/contributors to coastal erosion at Westshore and the concept of longshore / littoral drift.

COASTAL SYSTEMS WAVE ENERGY

USE OF SEGMENTED OFFSHORE BREAKWATERS FOR BEACH EROSION CONTROL

Wind Blow-out Hollow Generated in Fukiage Dune Field, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan

2014 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

Westmoreland County Shoreline Management Plan

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Ocean County Profile Site Locations

A REVIEW OF THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES AS A RESULT OF HURRICANE SANDY IN THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

North Shore of Long Island, Feasibility Study

York County Shoreline Management Plan

page - Laboratory Exercise #5 Shoreline Processes

The Case of the Disappearing Shoreline

Soft Designs for a Harsh Climate: Trends in Coastal Engineering

Living Shoreline Design Guidelines for Shore Protection in Virginia s Estuarine Environments

Marginal Marine Environments

VIRGINIA BARRIER ISLAND BACKGROUND

Response of a Newly Created Marsh-Wetland Affected by Tidal Forcing, Upland Discharge, and Groundwater Interaction

Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet, Long Beach Island, NY Construction Update

Essentials of Oceanography Eleventh Edition

MONITORING SEDIMENT TRANSPORT PROCESSES AT MANAVGAT RIVER MOUTH, ANTALYA TURKEY

Exemplar for Internal Assessment Resource Geography Level 3. Resource title: The Coastal Environment Kaikoura

Transcription:

City of Virginia Beach Dune Inventory Virginia Institute o f Marine Science College of William & Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia June 2003

City of Virginia Beach Dune Inventory C. Scott Hardaway, Jr. 1 Donna A. Milligan 1 Lyle M. Varnell 2 George R. Thomas 1 Walter I. Priest 2 Linda M. Meneghini 1 Thomas A. Barnard 2 Sharon Killeen 2 Shoreline Studies Program 1 Department of Physical Sciences and Wetlands Program 2 Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William & Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia This project was funded by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality s Coastal Resources Management Program through Grant #NA17OZ11142-01 of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. June 2003

Table of Contents Table of Contents... i List of Figures... i List of Tables... i 1 INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 Purpose...1 1.2 Dune Act...1 2 BACKGROUND...2 2.1 Dune System Classification...3 2.2 Site Characteristics...4 List of Figures Figure 1. Location of City of Virginia Beach within the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system...1 Figure 2. Geographic extent of dunes in the City of Virginia Beach...2 Figure 3. Dune classification system developed by Hardaway et al. (2001)...3 Figure 4. Typical profile of a Chesapeake Bay dune...4 List of Tables Table 1. Identified dune sites in City of Virginia Beach as of 2000...5 Table 2. Dune site measurements in City of Virginia Beach as of 2000...6 Table 3. Dune site parameters in City of Virginia Beach as of 2000...6 3 DUNE DATA SUMMARY...5 4 INVENTORY...7 5 REFERENCES...7 Acknowledgments Appendix A. Location of Dune Sites Appendix B. Individual Dune Inventory Sheets Cover Photo Dune site VB 4, First Landing State Park, 25 June 2003 by VIMS, Shoreline Studies Program. i

1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose The City of Virginia Beach is located on the southern shore of Chesapeake Bay (Figure 1). Ocean coast dunes were not included in this assessment. Primary tidal shorelines extend from Cape Henry westward to Little Creek Inlet. Eight (8) dune sites were identified along the City of Virginia Beach shoreline on the southern shore of Chesapeake Bay (Figure 2). It is the intent of this publication to provide the user with information on the status of dunes in City of Virginia Beach. This information comes from research performed in 1999 and 2000 which was presented in a report entitled Chesapeake Bay Dune Systems: Evolution and Status (Hardaway et al., 2001). Since much of the data was collected several years ago and the beach and dune systems may have changed, this report is intended only as a resource for coastal zone managers and homeowners; it is not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits. 1.2 Dune Act N Washington DC Baltimore Coastal dune systems of the Commonwealth of Virginia are a unique and valuable natural resource. Dunes are important to both the littoral marine system (as habitat for flora and fauna) and the adjacent landward environment (as erosion control and protection from storms). These functions form the basis for the Coastal Primary Sand Dune Protection Act of 1980 (Act) 1 and the related resource management effort under which the primary dune and beach components of existing dune systems are protected. Secondary dunes are not protected under the Act; however, as they are an important part of the overall dune system, they were included in the original report (Hardway et al., 2001) and analyzed as part of a risk assessment performed by Varnell and Hardaway (2002). In this inventory, both primary and secondary dunes are included. P c otoma R. Rappahannock R. Primary dunes must meet three criteria in order to fall under the Act s jurisdiction: 1. Substance: a mound of unconsolidated sandy soil contiguous to mean high water 2. Morphology: landward and lateral limits are marked by a change in grade from >10% to <10%. 3. Character: primary dunes must support specific plant species or communities which are named in the Act and include: American beach grass (Ammophila breviligulata); beach heather (Hudsonia tometosa); dune bean (Strophostylis spp.); dusty miller (Artemisia stelleriana): saltmeadow hay (Spartina patens); seabeach sandwort (Arenaria peploides); sea oats (Uniola paniculata); sea rocket (Cakile edentula); seaside goldenrod (Solidago sempervirens); and short dune grass (Panicum ararum). York R. 1 The General Assembly enacted the Coastal Primary Sand Dune Protection Act (the Dune Act) in 1980. The Dune Act was originally codified in Code 62.1-13.21 to -13.28. The Dune Act is now recodified as Coastal Primary Sand Dunes and Beaches in Code 28.2-1400 to -1420. James R. Norfolk Virginia Beach Figure 1. Location of City of Virginia Beach within the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system. 1

Dunes act as a reservoir of sand which can buffer inland areas from the effects of storm waves and, in the process, act as natural levees against coastal flooding. During high energy conditions, such as the northeast storms which frequent the Eastern Seaboard, primary dunes may be subject to attack by wind-driven waves aided by storm surges. The dune may be eroded, and the sand deposited in an offshore bar. Then, under low-energy conditions, the sand may move back to the beach. All dunes in the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system are mobile features especially with regards to coastal zone management. Unlike ocean dune fields that are relatively continuous features exposed to the open ocean, the dunes of the Chesapeake form across a temporal and spatial geomorphic matrix driven by sand volume, varying wave climate, and shoreline geology. The coastal geology, in large part, determines whether shoreline erosion acts upon the upland (high bank) or marsh (low bank). Sand supply and the long-term local wave climate are significant factors in the location of dunes. The stability or ability of a dune/beach system to accrete over time is necessary for the formation of secondary dunes. Figure 2. Geographic extent of dunes in the City of Virginia Beach. 2 BACKGROUND Coastal primary sand dunes form by the accumulation of sand due to the interaction of wind and wave action along the shore. Sand deposited on the beach during periods of relatively low wave energy is moved landward by onshore winds. The deposition of material above the intertidal zone allows vegetation to take root along the wrack line which then acts as a baffle, slowing wind speed and causing wind-borne sand to settle and be trapped in the vegetation, thereby resulting in further accretion of the dune. Therefore, the size and location of a primary dune is determined by the amount of sand available and the ability of wind and waves to move it as well as the degree to which any existing vegetation can act to trap it. Just as the intensity, direction, and duration of winds and waves constantly change through the seasons, so too, do coastal dunes. They exist in a state of flux. Natural dunes in the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system vary in size and nature, but all require an accreted feature, such as a beach washover or a spit to become vegetated above the intertidal zone. Vegetation and a continuous beach/dune profile are required to create the jurisdictional primary dune. If the dune/beach forms across a low marsh shoreline, the system will move landward in response to storms, and only a low primary dune will exist. If sand can accrete bayward due to shoals, spits, or man-made features such as jetties and groins, then a secondary dune may develop from the original primary dune. Hardaway et al. (2001) found that the occurrence of dunes around Chesapeake Bay is due, in part, to three factors: 1) morphologic opportunity (i.e., relatively stable setting), 2) abundant sand supply in the littoral transport system, and 3) conducive onshore wind/wave climate. Deposited sand must remain above a stable backshore to allow dune vegetation to become established. Each dune documented by Hardaway et al. (2001) has its own history of change -- growth and decay; natural and anthropogenic. Many miles of natural dunes have been altered by development, and many have been formed in response to processes altered by man s influence. Dunes around the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system in the localities within the Act encompass only about 40 miles of shoreline (Hardaway et al., 2001). This is about 0.4% of the total Bay shore - making it an important, but rare, shore type. 2

2.1 Dune System Classification The Chesapeake Bay dune classification was developed in Hardaway et al. (2001) and is portrayed in Figure 3. This classification is based on factors that are unique to certain dune systems and has a basis in the dune field evolution, vegetative zones, lateral and vertical extent of primary and secondary dune features, and anthropogenic impacts. Dunes are categorized as Natural (1), Man Influenced (2), or Man Made (3). These three types reflect how the state of the dune is most impacted. The parameters (A through G) are most influential in defining the status of a given dune system. Parameter values within each category assign a range of limits or characteristics. Categories A, B, and C relate to the nature of the impinging wave climate at a given site while categories D, E, and F relate to geologic parameters. Dune parameter G relates to the type of anthropogenic influence. Fetch Exposure (A) is a qualitative assessment of the wave exposure and wave climate across open water. Wave impact is the dominant natural process driving shoreline erosion and sediment transport along the Bay coasts. Riverine, Bay Influenced (A.1) is somewhere between the Open Bay exposure (A.2) and Riverine Exposure (A.3). Generally, A.1 sites have fetches of 5-10 nautical miles (nm); A.2 have fetches of >10 nm; and A.3 have fetches <5 nm. Shore Orientation (B) is the direction the main dune shore faces according to eight points on the compass. Shoreline exposure to dominant directions of wind and waves is a component of fetch exposure (A) and wave climate as well as aeolian processes that assist in dune growth and decay. Nearshore Gradient (C) controls wave refraction and shoaling that, in turn, affect the nature of wave approach and longshore sand transport as well as onshore/offshore transport. The presence or absence of bars indicates the relative amount of nearshore sediment available for transport. The Morphologic Setting (D) is significant in the genesis of a particular dune site. Aerial imagery from VIMS SAV Archive and field observations were used to determine and classify the Morphologic Setting. Four basic categories were developed including: 1) Isolated dunes, 2) Creek mouth barrier dune/spit, 3) Spit and 4) Dune fields. Morphological Settings 1 and 4 are distinguished only by shore length (i.e. Morphologic Setting 1 < 500 ft and Morphologic Setting 4 > 500 ft) as an arbitrary boundary. These categories were subdivided to reflect the nature of the setting into four subcategories which are 1) Pocket, 2) Linear, 3) Shallow Bay and 4) Salient. The Relative Stability (E) of a dune is very subjective. It is meant as a value judgement as to the overall current and future integrity at the time of the site visit. If the site had wave cut scarps along the primary dune face and/or was actively moving landward (overwash), it was termed Land Transgressive/Erosional (E.3). If the backshore/dune face had a slight gradient with stabilizing vegetation, it was stable (E.2) or, possibly, accretionary (E.1). Dune Classification System 1. Natural 2. Man Influenced 3. Manmade Dune Parameters A. Exposure: fetch 1. Riverine, Bay Influenced 2. Open Bay 3. Riverine B. Shore Orientation (direction of face) 1. North 5. South 2. Northeast 6. Southwest 3. East 7. West 4. Southeast 8. Northwest C. Nearshore Gradient 1. 0 to 1,000 ft 2. 1,000 to 3,000 ft 3. Greater than 3,000 ft (Distance to the 6 ft contour) D. Morphologic Setting 1. Isolated (less than 500 ft alongshore) 1. Pocket 2. Linear 3. Shallow Bay (curvilinear) 4. Salient (point) 2. Creek Mouth Barrier/Spit 3. Spit 4. Dune Field 1. Pocket 2. Linear 3. Shallow Bay (curvilinear) 4. Salient (point) Dune Type 1. Extensive Bars 2. No Bars (greater than 500 ft alongshore) E. Relative Stability 1. Stable 2. Accretionary 3. Land Transgressive/Erosional F. Underlying Substrate 1. Marsh/Creek Bottom 2. Upland G. Structure/Fill 1. Groin 2. Revetment/Bulkhead 3. Breakwater 4. Jetty 5. Beach Fill Figure 3. Classification system for Chesapeake Bay identified dune systems (from Hardaway et al., 2001). 3

The underlying substrate (F) is a general category for the type of substrate or sediment the dune resides on and against. Two broad categories were chosen - marsh and upland. The marsh category includes creek bottoms which should be a separate category because beach/dune development can occur across the mouth of a creek bottom without a true marsh. The distinction between upland and marsh was that the marsh substrate is usually a low bank subject to washover processes, whereas the upland area offered a backstop to land beach/dune migration. If the site was not Natural (1), then the nature of man s impact was determined by the type of modification. The shore structures include Groins (G.1), Bulkheads and Revetments (G.2), Breakwaters (G.3), Jetties (G.4), and Beach Fill (G.5). The degree of impact any given structure or combination of structures had on the dune site was not always clear. The Relative Stability (E) relates in part to whether man s influence was erosive (destructive) or accretionary/stable (constructive). measured, but the back or landward extent of the secondary dune could not always be reached. The dimensions, including lateral position and elevation of various profile components were measured. These include: primary dune crest elevation, distance from primary dune crest to back of dune, distance from primary dune crest to MLW, secondary dune crest elevation, secondary dune crest to back of primary dune, secondary dune crest to back of secondary dune, distance from back of primary dune to back of secondary dune, width of secondary dune, and width of primary and secondary dune. During each site visit, dominant plant communities occupying the primary and secondary dunes (if present) were analyzed (Figure 4). Plant species distribution is based on observed percent cover in the general area of profiling and sampling within the identified dune reach. 2.2 Site Characteristics Coastal zone profile and vegetation types present on dunes were determined by site visit. Beach profile transects were performed at most sites to measure the primary and secondary dune (where present) within 100 feet of the shoreline. Standard surveying and biological procedures were utilized. Not all dune sites were surveyed. Each surveyed transect used the crest of the primary dune as the horizontal control and mean low water (MLW) as the vertical control. The primary dune crest was determined on site. The MLW line was indirectly obtained from water level measurements. The observed water level position and elevation were checked against recorded tidal elevations at the nearest NOAA tide station and time of day to establish MLW on the profile. The typical dune profile has several components (Figure 4). A continuous sand sheet exists from the offshore landward and consists of a 1) nearshore region, bayward of MLW, 2 ) an intertidal beach, berm, and backshore region between MLW and base of primary dune, 3) a primary dune from bayside to landside including the crest, and, where present, 4) a secondary dune. All profiles extended bayward beyond MLW and landward to at least the back of the primary dune. The secondary dune crest was always Maritime Forest Back of Secondary Dune Typical Chesapeake Bay Dune Profile S. patens, shrubs, trees Secondary Dune (where present) Secondary Dune Crest Vegetation Zones Back of Primary Dune Figure 4. Typical profile of a Chesapeake Bay dune system (from Hardaway et al., 2001). Ammophila S. Patens Primary Dune Primary Dune Crest 0 ft Sea Rocket Inter- Backshore tidal Front of Primary Dune Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Nearshore Beach Berm 0 ft MLW 4

3 DUNE DATA SUMMARY Approximately 6.1 miles of dune shore have been identified along Virginia Beach s Chesapeake Bay shore. Previous work by Hardaway et al. (2001) indicated a total of 19 possible dune sites in Virginia Beach, but site visits verified 8 (Table 1). Sites 4 and 15 were described by three subreaches within each site createing a total of 12 areas surveyed. Due to inaccessibility, site 13 was not profiled past the primary dune even though it is a secondary dune site. At several other dune profiles, the secondary dune crest was reached but not the landward dune-upland interface. Most of the dune sites in along the southern Chesapeake Bay in Virginia Beach are dune fields. Only one isolated dune site existed at the time of survey. The open Chesapeake Bay coast has a history of dynamic shore change and geomorphic evolution particularly at it s mouth. An active sea swell wave climate and large quantity of sand within the littoral system has resulted in the creation of large dune fields. In general, dunes resided in areas of sand accretion and stability, such as around tidal creek mouths, embayed shorelines, in front of older dune features, as washovers, as spits and against man-made structures like channel jetties or groin fields. Site visits occurred in 1999 and 2000; site characteristics may now be different due to natural or man-induced shoreline change. In Virginia Beach, 4 of the 8 dune sites have primary and secondary dunes. Table 2 presents the measurements of the dune attributes. The average length of primary dune only sites was 2,100 ft whereas the average length of the primary with secondary dunes was 5,000 ft when the subreaches are combined to reflect one site length. The 3 main categories of Natural, Man-Influenced and Man-Made were used to portray a site s potentially most influential element. In Virginia Beach, 45% are Natural, 55% are Man- Influenced and 0% are Man-Made (Table 3). The Natural sites are the publicly-owned sites. Table 1. Identified dune sites in City of Virginia Beach as of 2000. Site characteristics may now be different due to natural or man-induced shoreline change. Location^ Dune Primary Secondary *Public Dune Shore Dune Dune Ownership? Site Easting Northing Date Length Site? Site? No. (Feet) (Feet) Visited (Feet) 4A 2,716,250 223,550 Jul 6, 2000 3,700 Yes Yes Yes 4B 2,714,950 222,400 Jul 6, 2000 1,850 Yes Yes Yes 4C 2,713,200 221,350 Jul 6, 2000 3,750 Yes Yes 6 2,705,600 218,750 Aug 16, 2000 2,450 Yes Yes 9 2,698,350 219,650 Aug 16, 2000 3,620 Yes 10 2,695,600 220,550 Aug 16, 2000 2,850 Yes 11 2,692,150 221,950 Aug 16, 2000 1,020 Yes 12 2,691,200 222,500 Aug 16, 2000 1,020 Yes 13 2,690,050 223,050 Jun 19, 2002 1,250 Yes Yes Yes 15A 2,687,900 223,450 Aug 16, 2000 2,160 Yes Yes Yes 15B 2,685,850 223,800 Aug 16, 2000 1,070 Yes Yes Yes 15C 2,685,050 223,900 Aug 16, 2000 1,200 Yes Yes Yes *Public ownership includes governmental entities including local, state, and federal; otherwise ownership is by the private individual. ^Location is in Virginia State Plane South, NAD 1927 One site with variable alongshore dune conditions 5

Table 2. Dune site measurements in City of Virginia Beach as of 2000. Site characteristics may now be different due to natural or man-induced shoreline change. Dune Site Measurements Dune Primary Dune Secondary Dune Shore Crest Distance from Crest Distance From Length Elev landward To MLW 2nd Crest Primary Crest 2ndCrest 2nd Crest seaward Site to back base Dune Elev to 2 nd Crest landward to 1st back base No. (Feet) (ft MLW) (Feet) (Feet) Site (ft MLW) (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) VB 4A 3,700 11.2 14 109 Yes 12.8 59 340 45 VB 4B 1,850 10.8 40 138 Yes 13.8 72 180 32 VB 4C 3,750 16.6 40 182 Yes 18.2 91 59 51 VB 6 2,450 12.2 113 228 Yes 19.2 177 no data 64 VB 9 3,620 19.5 55 108 VB 10 2,850 19.0 62 278 VB 11 1,020 16.7 18 210 VB 12 1,020 18.8 29 207 VB 13 1,250 25 no data 155 Yes no data no data no data no data VB 15A 2,160 20.8 48 111 Yes 16.7 83 no data 144 VB 15B 1,070 15.6 45 107 Yes 19.2 79 no data 34 VB 15C 1,200 20.5 50 227 Yes 17.9 192 45 33 Table 3. Dune site parameters in City of Virginia Beach as of 2000. Site characteristics may now be different due to natural or man-induced shoreline change. Dune Site Parameters Fetch Shoreline Nearshore Morphologic Relative Underlying Structure Exposure Direction Gradient Setting Stability Substrate or Fill Site Type of Face No. A B C D E F G VB 4A Natural Open Bay Northwest Steep Bars Dune Field, linear Accretion Upland VB 4B Natural Open Bay Northwest Steep Bars Dune Field, Sh. Bay Stable Upland VB 4C Natural Open Bay Northwest Steep Bars Dune Field, linear Stable Upland VB 6 Man Inf Open Bay Northwest Steep Bars Dune Field, linear Stable Upland VB 9 Man Inf Open Bay North Steep Bars Dune Field, linear Stable Upland Fill VB 10 Man Inf Open Bay North Steep Bars Dune Field, linear Stable Upland Fill VB 11 Man Inf Open Bay Northeast Steep No Bars Dune Field, linear Erosional Upland Fill&fencing VB 12 Man Inf Open Bay Northeast Steep No Bars Isolated, linear Erosional Upland BH VB 13 Man Inf Open Bay North Steep Bars Dune Field, linear Erosional Upland Groin VB 15A Man Inf Open Bay North Steep Bars Dune Field, linear Erosional Upland Revet/BH VB 15B Natural Open Bay North Steep Bars Dune Field, linear Erosional Upland VB 15C Natural Open Bay North Steep Bars Dune Field, linear Erosional Upland 6

4 INVENTORY Each dune site is located on plates in Appendix A. The individual site inventory sheets are in Appendix B. Due to the mobile nature of dunes, their extent and morphology changes through time. The data presented in this report represents the status of the site at the time of assessment and to the best of the author s knowledge. This information is for general management purposes and should not be used for delineation. For detailed delineation of any dune site, the reader should contact the local wetlands board or Virginia Marine Resources Commission. See Figures 3 and 4 for description of the site parameters and measurements listed below. Each dune site has the following information on its inventory page: 1. Date visited 2. Central site coordinates in Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 1927 3. Coordinates of profile origin 4. Site length in feet 5. Ownership 6. Site Type 7. Fetch Exposure 8. Shoreline Direction of Face 9. Nearshore gradient 10. Morphologic Setting 11. Relative Stability 12. Underlying Substrate 13. Type of structure or fill (man-influenced only) 14. Primary Dune Crest Elevation in feet above Mean Low Water (MLW) 15. Landward extent of Primary Dune from Dune Crest in feet 16. Distance from Dune Crest to MLW 17. Secondary Dune Crest Elevation in feet above MLW (if present) 18. Distance between Secondary Dune Crest and Primary Dune Crest 19. Landward extent of Secondary Dune from Secondary Dune Crest 20. Primary Dune vegetation communities 21. Secondary Dune vegetation communities 22. General Remarks 5 REFERENCES Hardaway, C.S., Jr., G.R. Thomas, J.B. Glover, J.B. Smithson, M.R. Berman, and A.K. Kenne, 1992. Bank Erosion Study. Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Number 319. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia. Hardaway, C.S., Jr., L.M. Varnell, D.A. Milligan, G.R. Thomas, C.H. Hobbs, III, 2001. Chesapeake Bay Dune Systems: Evolution and Status. Technical Report. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia. Varnell, L.M. and C.S. Hardaway, 2002. An Analysis of Shoreline Development Risk for Secondary Dune Systems in Tidewater Virginia With Associated Management Recommendations. Final report to the Virginia Coastal Program. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Carl Hobbs, III, for his critical review and editing of the report as well as the personnel in VIMS Publications Center, particularly Susan Stein, Ruth Hershner, and Sylvia Motley, for their work in printing and compiling the final report. Also included on the dune site inventory page is the site cross-section, if surveyed, and ground photos, if taken. Long sites may have been represented with two or more profiles because the general morphology differs alongshore. Each profile was intended to be representative of that dune portion of the site. 7

Appendix A Location of Dune Sites Plate 1 Plate 2

Chesapeake Bay Plate 1A Cape Henry City of Virginia Beach 4C 4B 4A Chesapeake Bay Plate 1B 9 Lynnhaven Inlet 6 VIMS Shoreline Studies Program A-1

Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel Chesapeake Bay Plate 2A City of Virginia Beach 13 12 11 10 Little Creek Naval Amphib Base Plate 2B Chesapeake Bay 15C 15B 15A VIMS Shoreline Studies Program Little Creek Naval Amphib Base A-2

Appendix B Individual Dune Inventory Sheets VB4A VB4B VB4C VB6 VB9 VB10 VB11 VB12 VB13 VB15A VB15B VB15C

Elevation (ft) 20 15 10 5 0 06 Jul 2000 MLW CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH DUNE SITE 4A -5-400 -300-200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 Looking westward across the secondary dune field. Not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits. Secondary Dune Crest Distance Offshore (ft) VB 4A 06 Jul 2000 Primary Dune Crest 06 Jul 2000 Looking westward along the low, slightly scarped, dune face. The overall system is accretionary. Site Information 1. Date Surveyed: 06 Jul 2000 2. Central Coordinates: 3. Profile Coordinates: N: 223,550 ft N: 223,550 ft E: 2,716,250 ft E: 2,716,250 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 1927 [4502] 4. Site Length: 3,700 ft 5. Ownership: Public-First Landing State Park Plate: 1A Site Parameters 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Northwest 9. Nearshore Gradient: 0 to 1,000 ft (Bars) 10. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >500 ft/linear 11. Relative Stability: Erosional 12. Underlying Substrate: Upland 13. Structure or Fill: N/A Site Measurements Primary Dune: 14. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 11.2 15. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 14 16. Extent from Crest: To MLW (ft): 109 Secondary Dune: 17. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 12.8 18. Extent between Second and Primary Crest (ft): 19. Second Crest Landward (ft): 340 Vegetation Communities 20. Primary Dune: Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Cakile edentulata (sea rocket) Panicum virgatum (switch grass) 21. Secondary Dune: Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Uniola paniculata (sea oats) Solidago sempervirens (seaside goldenrod) 22. Remarks: Site VB 4 extends from the east boundary of First Landing State Park (FLSP) westward for about 9,300 ft to a condominium complex at Lynnhaven Shores. FLSP has about 5,000 ft of dune and beach coast, and the remainder is private residential. Site 4A represents the dune field on the east half of FLSP. This system has migrated bayward over the past 50 years creating a series of secondary, tertiary and even a fourth row of dune ridges. 59 B-1

Elevation (ft) 20 15 10 5 0 MLW CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH DUNE SITE 4B -5-300 -200-100 0 100 200 300 Looking west along the foredune region and beach backshore. Not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits. Secondary Dune Crest Distance Offshore (ft) VB 4B 06 Jul 2000 Primary Dune Crest 06 Jul 2000 06 Jul 2000 Looking east. Note: foredune ridge growth. With time and continual accretion, this could become the next primary dune. Site Information 1. Date Surveyed: 06 Jul 2000 2. Central Coordinates: 3. Profile Coordinates: N: 222,400 ft N: 222,400 ft E: 2,714,950 ft E: 2,714,950 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 1927 [4502] 4. Site Length: 1,850 ft 5. Ownership: Public-First Landing State Park Site Parameters 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Northwest 9. Nearshore Gradient: 0 to 1,000 ft (Bars) 10. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >500 ft/linear 11. Relative Stability: Stable 12. Underlying Substrate: Upland Plate: 13. Structure or Fill: N/A Site Measurements Primary Dune: 14. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 10.8 15. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 40 16. Extent from Crest: To MLW (ft): 138 Secondary Dune: 17. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 13.8 18. Extent between Second and Primary Crest (ft): 72 19. Second Crest Landward (ft): 180 Vegetation Communities 20. Primary Dune: Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Cakile edentulata (sea rocket) Panicum virgatum (switch grass) 21. Secondary Dune: Carex kobomugi (Japanese sedge) Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Uniola paniculata (sea oats) 22. Remarks: Site VB 4B is typical of the western half of First Landing State Park which has broader crest than VB 4A. Extensive nearshore sand bars are evidence of the abundance of sand in the littoral system. VB 4B lies about midway along the larger VB 4 dune field. 1A B-2

Elevation (ft) 20 15 10 5 0 MLW Secondary Crest CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH DUNE SITE 4C Primary Dune Crest -5-200 -100 0 100 200 300 Distance Offshore (ft) VB 4C 06 Jul 2000 06 Jul 2000 06 Jul 2000 Looking across the primary and secondary dune toward the Bay front homes. Looking west along a heavily vegetative primary dune face. Site Information 1. Date Surveyed: 06 Jul 2000 2. Central Coordinates: 3. Profile Coordinates: N: 221,350 ft N: 221,350 ft E: 2,713,200 ft E: 2,713,200 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 1927 [4502] 4. Site Length: 3,750 ft 5. Ownership: Private Site Parameters 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Northwest 9. Nearshore Gradient: 0 to 1,000 ft (Bars) 10. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >500 ft/linear 11. Relative Stability: Stable 12. Underlying Substrate: Upland 13. Structure or Fill: N/A Site Measurements Primary Dune: 14. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 16.6 15. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 40 16. Extent from Crest: To MLW (ft): 182 Secondary Dune: 17. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 18.2 18. Extent between Second and Primary Crest (ft): 91 19. Second Crest Landward (ft): 59 Vegetation Communities 20. Primary Dune: Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Uniola paniculata (sea oats) Cakile edentulata (sea rocket) 21. Secondary Dune: 22. Remarks: Plate: Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Solidago sempervirens (seaside goldenrod) shrub/woody Site VB 4C represents the western portion of the VB 4 dune field and is primarily residential. 1A Not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits. B-3

Elevation (ft) 20 15 10 5 0 MLW Primary Dune Crest CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH DUNE SITE 6-5 -200-100 0 100 200 300 400 Distance Offshore (ft) VB 6 16 Aug 2000 16 AUG 2000 16 AUG 2000 Site Information 1. Date Surveyed: 16 Aug 2000 2. Central Coordinates: 3. Profile Coordinates: N: 218,750 ft N: 218,750 ft E: 2,705,600 ft E: 2,705,600 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 1927 [4502] 4. Site Length: 2,450 ft 5. Ownership: Private Plate: 1B Site Parameters 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Northwest 9. Nearshore Gradient: 1,000 to 3,000 ft (Bars) 10. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >500 ft/linear 11. Relative Stability: Stable 12. Underlying Substrate: Upland 13. Structure or Fill: N/A Primary Dune: Site Measurements 14. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 12.2 15. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 113 16. Extent from Crest: To MLW (ft): 228 Secondary Dune: 17. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 19.2 18. Extent between Second and Primary Crest (ft): 177 19. Second Crest Landward (ft): N/A Vegetation Communities 20. Primary Dune: Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) 21. Secondary Dune: Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) 22. Remarks: Looking west toward Lynnhaven Inlet. Not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits. Looking east. Site VB 6 occurs in front of a series of condominiums east of Lynnhaven Inlet. This reach of coast has a history of shoreline advance (accretion) since 1937 and remains in a fairly stable condition. B-4

Elevation (ft) CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH DUNE SITE 9 30 20 10 0 Primary Dune Crest MLW -10-120 -100-80 -60-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Distance Offshore (ft) VB 9 16 Aug 2000 16 AUG 2000 16 AUG 2000 Site Information 1. Date Surveyed: 16 Aug 2000 2. Central Coordinates: 3. Profile Coordinates: N: 219,650 ft N: 219,650 ft E: 2,698,350 ft E: 2,698,350 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 1927 [4502] 4. Site Length: 3,620 ft 5. Ownership: Private Site Parameters 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: North 9. Nearshore Gradient: 1,000 to 3,000 ft (Bars) 10. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >500 ft/linear 11. Relative Stability: Erosional 12. Underlying Substrate: Upland 13. Structure or Fill: Beach Fill Plate: Site Measurements Primary Dune: 14. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 19.5 15. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 55 16. Extent from Crest: To MLW (ft): 108 Secondary Dune: None 17. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): N/A 18. Extent between Second and Primary Crest (ft): N/A 19. Second Crest Landward (ft): N/A Vegetation Communities 20. Primary Dune: Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) 21. Secondary Dune: Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Carex kobomugi (Japanese sedge) 1B Looking west along the high scarped dune face. Not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits. Looking east. 22. Remarks: The Virginia Beach coastline west of Lynnhaven Inlet to Little Creek Inlet has a continuous beach system with several sections of beach and dune that are described by VB 9, VB 10, VB 11, VB 12, and VB 15. VB 9 is bounded on the east by bulkheaded lots and is seperated from VB 10 by a single bulkheaded lot with no dune; otherwise, VB 9 and VB 10 would be a continuous dune field. However, their dune morphologies are different since VB 9 has a steep, unstable dune face. B-5

Elevation (ft) 20 15 10 5 0 Primary Dune Crest MLW CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH DUNE SITE 10-5 -100 0 100 200 300 400 Distance Offshore (ft) VB 10 16 Aug 2000 16 AUG 2000 16 AUG 2000 Site Information 1. Date Surveyed: 16 Aug 2000 2. Central Coordinates: 3. Profile Coordinates: N: 220,550 ft N: 220,550 ft E: 2,695,600 ft E: 2,695,600 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 1927 [4502] 4. Site Length: 2,850 ft 5. Ownership: Private Plate: 2A Site Parameters 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: North 9. Nearshore Gradient: 0 to 1,000 ft (Bars) 10. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >500 ft/linear 11. Relative Stability: Stable 12. Underlying Substrate: Upland 13. Structure or Fill: Beach Fill Primary Dune: Site Measurements 14. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 19.0 15. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 62 16. Extent from Crest: To MLW (ft): 278 Secondary Dune: None 17. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): N/A 18. Extent between Second and Primary Crest (ft): N/A 19. Second Crest Landward (ft): N/A Vegetation Communities 20. Primary Dune: Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Cakile edentulata (sea rocket) 21. Secondary Dune: N/A 22. Remarks: VB 10 is the western portion of the VB 9/VB 10 dune field. The dune face showed signs of sand accretion and stability at the time of the site visit. Looking east. Note the Sea Rocket growth across the dune face. Not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits. Looking west. B-6

Elevation (ft) CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH DUNE SITE 11 20 15 10 5 0 Primary Dune Crest MLW -5-100 0 100 200 300 Distance Offshore (ft) VB 11 16 Aug 2000 16 AUG 2000 16 AUG 2000 Site Information 1. Date Surveyed: 16 Aug 2000 2. Central Coordinates: 3. Profile Coordinates: N: 221,950 ft N: 221,950 ft E: 2,692,150 ft E: 2,692,150 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 1927 [4502] 4. Site Length: 1,020 ft 5. Ownership: Private Plate: 2A Site Parameters 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Northeast 9. Nearshore Gradient: 0 to 1,000 ft (No Bars) 10. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >500 ft Alongshore/Linear 11. Relative Stability: Land Transgressive/Erosional 12. Underlying Substrate: Upland 13. Structure or Fill: Sand Fencing, Beach Fill at Ocean Park Primary Dune: Site Measurements 14. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 16.7 15. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 18 16. Extent from Crest: To MLW (ft): 210 Secondary Dune: None 17. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): N/A 18. Extent between Second and Primary Crest (ft): N/A 19. Second Crest Landward (ft): N/A Vegetation Communities 20. Primary Dune: Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) 21. Secondary Dune: N/A Looking west along the dune face with sand fencing. Not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits. Looking east toward the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel, Route 13. 22. Remarks: Site VB 11and VB 12 are the same dune field separated by several hundred feet of bare coast in terms of the existence of a continuous primary dune. VB 11 had extensive sand fencing which seemed to help stabilize the dune, at the time of the site visit. B-7

Elevation (ft) CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH DUNE SITE 12 20 15 10 5 0 Primary Dune Crest MLW -5-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Distance Offshore (ft) VB 12 16 Aug 2000 16 AUG 2000 16 AUG 2000 Site Information 1. Date Surveyed: 16 Aug 2000 2. Central Coordinates: N: 222,500 ft 3. Profile Coordinates: N: 222,500 ft E: 2,691,200 ft E: 2,691,200 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 1927 [4502] 4. Site Length: 1,020 ft 5. Ownership: Private Plate: 2A Site Parameters 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Northeast 9. Nearshore Gradient: 0 to 1,000 ft (No Bars) 10. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >500 ft Alongshore/Linear 11. Relative Stability: Land Transgressive/Erosional 12. Underlying Substrate: Upland 13. Structure or Fill: Bulkheaded Headland Primary Dune: Site Measurements 14. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 18.8 15. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 29 16. Extent from Crest: To MLW (ft): 207 Secondary Dune: None 17. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): N/A 18. Extent between Second and Primary Crest (ft): N/A 19. Second Crest Landward (ft): N/A Vegetation Communities 20. Primary Dune: Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) 21. Secondary Dune: N/A Looking east. Looking west toward the bulkheaded headland. 22. Remarks: Site VB 12 is bounded on the west end by a bulkheaded lot/cottage that crosses the beach to create a headland. Extensive sand fencing has been installed along the dune face at this site as well. Not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits. B-8

Elevation (ft) 19 Jun 2002 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH DUNE SITE 13 30 Primary Dune Crest 20 10 0-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 Distance Offshore (ft) Site Information 1. Date Surveyed: 19 Jun 2002 2. Central Coordinates: 3. Profile Coordinates: N: 223,050 ft N: 223,050 ft E: 2,690,050 ft E: 2,690,050 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 1927 [4502] 4. Site Length: 5. Ownership: 1,250 ft Public - Military Site Parameters 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: North 9. Nearshore Gradient: 0 to 1,000 ft (Bars) 10. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >500 ft Alongshore/Linear 11. Relative Stability: Land Transgressive/Erosional 12. Underlying Substrate: Upland 13. Structure or Fill: Groin Site Measurements Primary Dune: 14. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 25 15. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): No data 16. Extent from Crest: To MLW (ft): 155 Secondary Dune: 17. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): No data 18. Extent between Second and Primary Crest (ft): No data 19. Second Crest Landward (ft): No data Vegetation Communities 20. Primary Dune: Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) 21. Secondary Dune: No data 22. Remarks: Plate: Site VB 13 extends from just east of the east property line (fence) of Little Creek NAB westward to the stone groin at the Officers Beach (O Beach). 2B Not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits. B-9

Elevation (ft) 30 20 10 0 Primary Dune Crest Secondary Dune Crest MLW CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH DUNE SITE 15A -10-200 -100 0 100 200 300 Distance Offshore (ft) VB 15A 16 Aug 2000 22 22 SEP 2000 22 SEP 2000 Site Information 1. Date Surveyed: 16 Aug 2000 2. Central Coordinates: N: 223,450 ft 3. Profile Coordinates: N: 223,450 ft E: 2,687,900 ft E: 2,687,900 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 1927 [4502] 4. Site Length: 2,160 ft 5. Ownership: Public - Military Plate: 2B Site Parameters 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: North 9. Nearshore Gradient: 0 to 1,000 ft (Bars) 10. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >500 ft Alongshore/Linear 11. Relative Stability: Land Transgressive/Erosional 12. Underlying Substrate: Upland 13. Structure or Fill: Revetment Primary Dune: Site Measurements 14. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 20.8 15. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 48 16. Extent from Crest: To MLW (ft): 111 Secondary Dune: None 17. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 16.7 18.Extent between Second and Primary Crest (ft): 83 19. Second Crest Landward (ft): N/A Looking west along the dune face. Looking east toward the Officer s beach. 20. Primary Dune: Live oak 21. Secondary Dune: Vegetation Communities N/A 22. Remarks: Site VB 15 extends from the west end of the revetment at the Officer s Beach/Rifle Range westward to the fence at the Enlisted Beach (E Beach), a distance of about 4,400 ft. The site has variable dune morphology along it s length and is segmented into 3 subreaches for discussion. VB 15A is on the eastern-most portion of the site and is characterized by a severely eroding dune face such that the secondary dune feature has become the jurisdictional primary dune. Not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits. B-10

Elevation (ft) 20 10 0 Secondary Dune Crest Primary Dune Crest MLW CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH DUNE SITE 15B -10-100 0 100 200 300 Distance Offshore (ft) VB 15B 16 Aug 2000 22 SEP 2000 22 SEP 2000 Site Information 1. Date Surveyed: 16 Aug 2000 2. Central Coordinates: N: 223,800 ft 3. Profile Coordinates: N: 223,800 ft E: 2,685,850 ft E: 2,685,850 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 1927 [4502] 4. Site Length: 1,070 ft 5. Ownership: Public - Military Plate: 2B Site Parameters 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: North 9. Nearshore Gradient: 0 to 1,000 ft (Bars) 10. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >500 ft Alongshore/Linear 11. Relative Stability: Land Transgressive/Erosional 12. Underlying Substrate: Upland 13. Structure or Fill: N/A Primary Dune: Site Measurements 14. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 15.6 15. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 45 16. Extent from Crest: To MLW (ft): 1071 Secondary Dune: None 17. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 19.2 18. Extent between Second and Primary Crest (ft): 79 19. Second Crest Landward (ft): N/A 20. Primary Dune: 21. Secondary Dune: Vegetation Communities N/A N/A 22. Remarks: Site VB 15 B (see VB 15A for discussion) represents the central portion of VB 15. It has a dune face that is often scarped by waves during storms, but has maintained its relative position over the past 5 years. It is also a training beach for the Navy s Amphibious operations. Looking west. Looking east. Not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits. B-11

Elevation (ft) 30 20 10 0 Secondary Dune Crest Primary Dune Crest MLW CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH DUNE SITE 15C -10-200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 Distance Offshore (ft) VB 15C 16 Aug 2000 22 SEP 2000 22 SEP 2000 Site Information 1. Date Surveyed: 16 Aug 2000 2. Central Coordinates: N: 223,900 ft 3. Profile Coordinates: N: 223,900 ft E: 2,685,050 ft E: 2,685,050 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 1927 [4502] 4. Site Length: 1,200 ft 5. Ownership: Public Military Plate: 2B Site Parameters 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: North 9. Nearshore Gradient: 0 to 1,000 ft (Bars) 10. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >500 ft Alongshore/Linear 11. Relative Stability: Land Transgressive/Erosional 12. Underlying Substrate: Upland 13. Structure or Fill: N/A Primary Dune: Site Measurements 14. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 20.5 15. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 50 16. Extent from Crest: To MLW (ft): 227 Secondary Dune: None 17. Crest Elevation (ft MLW): 17.9 18. Extent between Second and Primary Crest (ft): 192 19. Second Crest Landward (ft): 45 20. Primary Dune: 21. Secondary Dune: Vegetation Communities N/A N/A 22. Remarks: Site VB 15C (see 15A for discussion) represents the western third of VB 15. It is the most heavily used for Naval Amphibious operations resulting in an array of access roads through and across the dune. The result is a fragmented primary dune field with isolated hammocks that are slightly erosional. Not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits. B-12