WindPRO version Nov 2012 Project:

Similar documents
PARK - Main Result Calculation: PARK calculation (5 x 166m, + LT CORR + MITIGATION) N.O. Jensen (RISØ/EMD)

Site Assessment Report. Wind farm: Ascog Farm (GB)

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

windnavigator Site Analyst Report

WindPRO version Jan 2011 Printed/Page :55 / 1. SHADOW - Main Result

HOUTEN WIND FARM WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Measured wake losses By Per Nielsen

Advanced pre and post-processing in Windsim

8 SHADOW FLICKER 8.1 INTRODUCTION 8.2 RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT

Wind Project Siting & Resource Assessment

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report for Kodiak Electric Association

COLLECTOR WIND FARM SHADOW FLICKER ASSESSMENT

Power curves - use of spinner anemometry. Troels Friis Pedersen DTU Wind Energy Professor

Predicting climate conditions for turbine performance

Energy Output. Outline. Characterizing Wind Variability. Characterizing Wind Variability 3/7/2015. for Wind Power Management

NordFoU: External Influences on Spray Patterns (EPAS) Report 16: Wind exposure on the test road at Bygholm

Wind Resource Assessment Østerild National Test Centre for Large Wind Turbines

Draft Kivalina Wind Resource Report

On the use of rotor equivalent wind speed to improve CFD wind resource mapping. Yavor V. Hristov, PhD Plant Performance and Modeling Vestas TSS

Saint Mary s, Alaska Wind Resource Report (for Pitka s Point and Saint Mary s met towers)

7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017

The Wind Resource: Prospecting for Good Sites

Site Description: LOCATION DETAILS Report Prepared By: Tower Site Report Date

Datum Projectnummer

Scoping analysis of the potential yield of the Hollandse Kust (noord) wind farm and the influence on the existing wind farms in the proximity

Site Description: Tower Site

Increased Project Bankability : Thailand's First Ground-Based LiDAR Wind Measurement Campaign

Bankable Wind Resource Assessment

Wind Data Verification Report Arriga 50m

Why does T7 underperform? Individual turbine performance relative to preconstruction estimates.

Buckland Wind Resource Report

Global Flow Solutions Mark Zagar, Cheng Hu-Hu, Yavor Hristov, Søren Holm Mogensen, Line Gulstad Vestas Wind & Site Competence Centre, Technology R&D

Poland is one of the new countries, which seems to have the potential of being a large market for wind energy projects in the near future.

WindPRO version Jan 2011 Printed/Page :09 / 1. SHADOW - Main Result

3D Nacelle Mounted Lidar in Complex Terrain

Pitka s Point, Alaska Wind Resource Report

Session 2a: Wind power spatial planning techniques. IRENA Global Atlas Spatial planning techniques 2-day seminar

Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared by: Mia Devine

Session 2: Wind power spatial planning techniques

Wind Energy Resources Assessment and Micrositting on Different Areas of Libya: The Case Study in Darnah

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

IMPLICATIONS OF THE WEIBULL K FACTOR IN RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Wind Farm Power Performance Test, in the scope of the IEC

July Interim Report. National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE) Wind Resource Assessment & Offshore Unit Chennai, India.

New IEC and Site Conditions in Reality

Wind Projects: Optimizing Site Selection

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

How an extreme wind atlas is made

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Wind Resource Assessment for CHEFORNAK, ALASKA

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report

renewable energy projects by renewable energy people

Design Criteria Data

Scoping analysis of the potential yield of the Hollandse Kust (zuid) wind farm sites and the influence on the existing wind farms in the proximity

Session 2b: Wind power spatial planning techniques

Kake, Alaska Wind Resource Report

WIND DATA REPORT. Swan s Island, ME

Wind Resource Assessment for SAINT PAUL, ALASKA

Wind Resource Assessment for DEADHORSE, ALASKA

Wind farm performance

Rotor Average wind speed for power curve performance. Ioannis Antoniou (LAC), Jochen Cleve (LAC), Apostolos Piperas (LAC)

Measuring power performance with a Wind Iris 4- beam in accordance with EUDP procedure

Kisimigiuktuk Hill (Kivalina), Alaska Wind Resource Assessment and Wind Flow Modeling Report

FEASIBILITY STUDY Small Scale Wind Park

windpro WP A15-Lingewaard WTGs Shadow receptor-input

1 PIPESYS Application

Chart Discussion: Fri-25-May-2018 Rainfall Last Week

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Lincoln Pelham, MA

Wind Project Siting and Permitting Blaine Loos

Wind Resource Assessment for KING SALMON, ALASKA

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

Wind Regimes 1. 1 Wind Regimes

Wind Power Potential Assessment of Complex Terrain at RGPV Hill Top

Strategic Advice about Floating LiDAR Campaigns. Borssele offshore wind farm

Lely Aircon LA30 Wind turbine

WMS 8.4 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HY-8 Modeling Wizard Learn how to model a culvert using HY-8 and WMS

Levelock, Alaska Wind Resource Assessment Report

MEMO CC: Summary. ESMWT16419: _MEM_RVO_HKZ floating LiDAR uncertainty_v3.docx 1/8

Ris0-I-668(EN) PARK- User's Guide. A PC-program for calculation of wind turbine park performance. Peter Sanderhoff

Upgrading Vestas V47-660kW

Modelling Wind for Wind Farm Layout Optimization Using Joint Distribution of Wind Speed and Wind Direction

Outline. Wind Turbine Siting. Roughness. Wind Farm Design 4/7/2015

WIND DATA REPORT. Ragged Mt Maine

WIND DATA REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

Valerijs Bezrukovs, Vladislavs Bezrukovs Ventspils University College Latvia. WREF2012 Denver, CO May 13-17, 2012

Test Summary Report Giraffe 2.0 Hybrid Wind-Solar Power Station - for wind: according to IEC Annex M - for solar: measurement report

Department of Wind Energy

Egegik, Alaska Wind Resource Assessment Report

WIND DATA REPORT. Quincy DPW, MA

Chevak, Alaska Wind Resource Report

Lake Michigan Wind Assessment Project Data Summary and Analysis: October 2012

Wind Speed and Energy at Different Heights on the Latvian Coast of the Baltic Sea

Shorter wind measurement campaigns Re-thinking with LiDAR

Wind resource assessment using the WAsP software (DTU Wind Energy E-0135)

Sonic Detection and Ranging (SODAR) Data Collection and Evaluation Report

Wind Turbine, Layout and AEP

Transcription:

23/11/2012 15:21 / 1 WAsP interface - Main Result Calculation: WAsP Interface example Name for WAsP Site coordinates UTM NAD27 Zone: 14 East: 451,101 North: 5,110,347 Air density calculation mode Result for WTG at hub altitude Air density relative to standard Hub altitude above sea level (asl) Annual mean temperature at hub alt. Pressure at WTGs Individual per WTG 1.165 kg/m³ 95.1 % 744.6 m 3.5 C 924.9 hpa The calculation is based on conversion of a wind statistic (wind climate for the region) through a terrain modeling (roughness, elevation and local obstacles) to wind distribution on the turbine position based on the WINDATLAS method (Risø/DTU), where the software package WAsP (Risø/DTU) is used for performing the calculations. The calculated wind distribution is converted to expected annual energy production (AEP) through the power curve and air density correction. WAsP version WAsP 1 RVEA0164.dll 3.0.1.100 Wind statistics US wishek met mast 7-01 to 6-02 - 40 m.wws Scale 1:25,000 Site Data Calculation Results Key results for height 8 m above ground level Wind energy: 5,168 kwh/m²; Mean wind speed: 8.9 m/s; Equivalent roughness: 1.8 Calculated Annual Energy WTG type Power curve Valid Manufact. Type-generator Power, Rotor Hub Creator Name rated diameter height Yes VESTAS V100-1,800 [kw] 1,800 [m] 10 [m] 8 EMD Annual Energy Result Result-1% Mean Capacity wind factor speed Level 0 - Estimated - Mode 0-04-2011 10,180.8 9,163 8.90 64.5

23/11/2012 15:21 / 2 WAsP interface - Production Analysis Calculation: WAsP Interface examplewtg: VESTAS V100 1800 10!O!, Hub height: 8 m, Air density: 1.165 kg/m³ Directional Analysis Sector Roughness based energy +Increase due to hills Resulting energy Specific energy Specific energy Increase due to hills Directional Distribution Utilization Operational Full Load Equivalent A- parameter Mean wind speed k- parameter Frequency Power density [kwh/m²] [kwh/kw] [Hours/year] [Hours/year] [W/m²] 0N 1 NNE 2 ENE 3 E 4 ESE 5 SSE 6S 7 SSW 8 WSW 9 W 10 WNW 11 NNW Total 1,436.1 662.1 466.2 431.8 485.9 813.3 1,453.4 1,034.4 714.4 594.7 751.2 1,308.1 10,151.6-0.7-3.0-0.9 2.6 6.3 10.6 0.1-3.2-1.1 3.9 7.9 6.7 29.2 1,435.4 659.1 465.2 434.4 492.2 824.0 1,453.5 1,031.2 713.3 598.6 759.1 1,314.8 10,180.8 1,296 5,656-0.5-0.6 1.3 1.3 - - 0.7 1.1 0.5 9 14.1 4.6 4.3 4.8 8.1 14.3 10.1 5.9 12.9 10 22.7 25.1 27.1 28.0 30.5 32.6 22.1 23.5 26.9 32.1 29.6 21.3 25.1 1,119 607 494 483 573 758 1,096 714 577 524 653 1,070 8,670 797 366 258 241 273 458 808 573 396 333 422 730 5,656 10.7 9.6 8.7 8.2 9.1 11.0 11.3 10.1 9.4 9.6 10.6 1 9.6 7.7 7.3 8.2 9.8 1 9.1 8.4 8.6 9.5 8.9 3.05 2.63 2.40 2.37 2.47 3.45 3.16 3.92 3.33 3.61 3.35 2.74 2.88 12.9 5.7 5.6 6.6 8.7 12.6 8.2 6.7 12.3 10 590

23/11/2012 15:21 / 3 WAsP interface - Power Curve Analysis Calculation: WAsP Interface examplewtg: VESTAS V100 1800 10!O! Level 0 - Estimated - Mode 0-04-2011, Hub height: 8 m Name: Source: Level 0 - Estimated - Mode 0-04-2011 Manufacturer Source/Date Created by Created Edited Stop wind speed Power control CT curve type Generator type Specific power kw/m² 29/04/2011 EMD 02/07/2010 01/11/2011 2 Pitch User defined Variable 3 Estimated power curve based on item n. 0004-0153 V12. HP curve comparison - Note: For standard air density and weibull k parameter = 2 Vmean HP value Pitch, variable speed (2012) VESTAS V100 1800 10!O! Level 0 - Estimated - Mode 0-04-2011 Check value 5 6 7 8 9 10 3,756 5,477 7,045 8,379 9,468 10,313 3,728 5,465 7,025 8,283 9,190 9,748 1 0 0 1 3 6 The table shows comparison between annual energy production calculated on basis of simplified "HP-curves" which assume that all WTGs performs quite similar - only specific power loading (kw/m^2) and single/dual speed or stall/pitch decides the calculated values. Productions are without wake losses. For further details, ask at the Danish Energy Agency for project report J.nr. 51171/00-0016 or see WindPRO manual chapter 3.5.2. The method is refined in EMD report "20 Detailed Case Studies comparing Project Design Calculations and actual Energy Productions for Wind Energy Projects worldwide", jan 2003. Use the table to evaluate if the given power curve is reasonable - if the check value are lower than -5%, the power curve probably is too optimistic due to uncertainty in power curve measurement. Power, Efficiency and energy vs. wind speed Power curve Original data from Windcat, Air density: 1.225 kg/m³ Wind speed 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 8.0 9.0 9.5 1 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 1 1 18.0 19.0 2 Power [kw] 13.0 52.0 108.0 17 25 35 458.0 589.0 744.0 91 1,10 1,312.0 1,51 1,663.0 1,749.0 1,784.0 1,79 1,799.0 Ce 0.10 5 5 0.40 0.43 0.44 0.44 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.44 0.43 0.40 6 2 8 5 2 0.17 0.14 0.11 9 8 6 5 5 Wind speed Ct curve 3.0 0.87 3.5 0.89 4.0 0.88 4.5 0.85 5.0 0.83 0.81 0.80 0.82 0.81 0.81 8.0 0.79 0.76 9.0 0.71 9.5 0.63 1 0.54 10.5 0.46 11.0 9 11.5 3 12.0 9 12.5 5 13.0 2 13.5 0 14.0 0.18 14.5 0.16 15.0 0.14 1 0.13 1 0.12 1 0.11 1 0.10 1 9 18.0 8 1 8 19.0 7 19.5 7 2 6 Data used in calculation, Air density: 1.165 kg/m³ New WindPRO method (adjusted IEC method, improved to match turbine control) <RECOMMENDED> Wind speed 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 8.0 9.0 1 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 1 1 18.0 19.0 2 Power [kw] 9.0 10 242.4 435.7 706.6 1,053.2 1,443.5 1,712.2 1,789.3 1,799.3 Ce 0 0 7 4 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.45 0.43 7 9 3 0.18 0.14 0.12 0.10 8 7 6 5 Interval 0.50-1.50 1.50-2.50 2.50-3.50 3.50-4.50 4.50-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-9.50 9.50-10.50 10.50-11.50 11.50-12.50 12.50-13.50 13.50-14.50 14.50-10 10-10 10-10 10-10 10-19.50 19.50-20.50 Energy Acc.Energy Relative 7.8 7.8 0.1 49.1 56.9 0.6 153.4 21 2.1 34 556.3 650.6 1,206.9 11.9 1,047.9 2,254.7 22.1 1,423.5 3,678.2 36.1 1,578.3 5,256.4 51.6 1,450.6 6,70 65.9 1,174.6 7,881.6 77.4 871.0 8,752.6 8 597.2 9,349.7 91.8 379.6 9,729.3 95.6 224.3 9,953.6 97.8 123.4 10,077.1 99.0 63.5 10,140.6 99.6 30.6 10,171.1 99.9 9.7 10,180.8 10

23/11/2012 15:21 / 4 WAsP interface - Terrain Calculation: WAsP Interface examplesite Data: A - for WAsP Obstacles: 0 Obstacles used Roughness: Calculation uses following MAP files: C:\Users\nathan\Documents\WindPRO Data\Projects\ project\roughnessline training_project_0.wpo Min X: 419,194, Max X: 479,542, Min Y: 5,080,472, Max Y: 5,141,088, Width: 60,348 m, Height: 60,616 m Limited by a square on 4 km x 4 km around the current site Orography: Calculation uses following MAP files: C:\Users\nathan\Documents\WindPRO Data\Projects\ project\dem\demo SHP FILE HCL\10 ft HCL from GM.wpo Min X: 443,759, Max X: 457,286, Min Y: 5,103,359, Max Y: 5,116,945, Width: 13,527 m, Height: 13,586 m Limited by a square on 1 km x 1 km around the current site

23/11/2012 15:21 / 5 WAsP interface - Wind Data Analysis Calculation: WAsP Interface examplewind data: A - for WAsP; Hub height: 8 Site coordinates UTM NAD27 Zone: 14 East: 451,101 North: 5,110,347 VESTAS V100 1800 10!O! Wind statistics US wishek met mast 7-01 to 6-02 - 40 m.wws Weibull Data Current site Reference: Roughness class 1 AWind kfrequency AkFrequency parameter speed parameter parameter parameter 0N 10.72 9.58 3.049 12.9 11.55 3.059 13.2 1 NNE 9.56 0 2.627 19 2.639 7.3 2 ENE 8.72 7.73 2.404 5.7 9.46 2.418 5.8 3E 8.47 0 2.365 5.6 9.11 2.372 4 ESE 8.18 7.26 2.471 6.6 8.63 2.412 5 SSE 9.11 8.19 3.451 8.7 9.51 3.579 8.4 6S 10.98 9.83 3.158 12.6 11.63 3.109 12.8 7 SSW 11.30 13 3.916 8.2 12.09 3.900 8 WSW 10.11 9.07 3.330 6.7 10.84 3.346 6.7 9W 9.36 8.43 3.607 9.98 3.609 10 WNW 9.60 8.62 3.354 10.10 3.492 7.2 11 NNW 10.62 9.45 2.744 12.3 11.24 2.726 12.1 All 9.99 8.90 2.885 10 10.66 2.884 10 Sector

23/11/2012 15:21 / 6 WAsP interface - Wind Data Analysis Calculation: WAsP Interface examplewind data: A - for WAsP; Hub height: 5.0 Site coordinates UTM NAD27 Zone: 14 East: 451,101 North: 5,110,347 Wind statistics US wishek met mast 7-01 to 6-02 - 40 m.wws Weibull Data Current site Reference: Roughness class 1 AWind kfrequency AkFrequency parameter speed parameter parameter parameter 0N 1 5.33 2.486 13.3 6.86 2.509 13.2 1 NNE 5.12 4.54 2.068 4 2.109 7.3 2 ENE 4.43 3.94 1.842 5.32 1.854 5.8 3E 4.21 3.75 1.764 5.3 5.03 1.802 4 ESE 4.14 3.68 1.818 4.69 1.797 5 SSE 4.80 4.26 2.529 8.9 5.26 2.664 8.4 6S 6.25 5 2.604 13.1 6.91 2.559 12.8 7 SSW 6.23 7 3.123 8.2 7.15 3.161 8 WSW 5.29 4.70 2.568 6.4 6.21 2.594 6.7 9W 4.72 4.19 2.662 5.8 1 2.676 10 WNW 4.95 4.39 2.482 7.4 8 2.594 7.2 11 NNW 5.97 5.29 2.252 12.6 6.68 2.254 12.1 All 5.40 4.78 2.248 10 6.15 2.273 10 Sector

23/11/2012 15:21 / 7 WAsP interface - Wind Data Analysis Calculation: WAsP Interface examplewind data: A - for WAsP; Hub height: 1 Site coordinates UTM NAD27 Zone: 14 East: 451,101 North: 5,110,347 Wind statistics US wishek met mast 7-01 to 6-02 - 40 m.wws Weibull Data Current site Reference: Roughness class 1 AWind kfrequency AkFrequency parameter speed parameter parameter parameter 0N 8 6.29 2.592 13.1 7.92 2.600 13.2 1 NNE 6.14 5.43 2.178 0 2.200 7.3 2 ENE 5.40 4.79 1.951 5.6 6.21 1.960 5.8 3E 5.17 4.59 1.885 5.4 5.90 1.900 4 ESE 5.04 4.47 1.951 6.6 2 1.910 5 SSE 5.75 5.11 2.717 8.9 6.16 2.830 8.4 6S 7.33 2 2.701 12.9 7.98 2.650 12.8 7 SSW 7.40 6.64 3.287 8.2 8.26 3.290 8 WSW 6.39 5.68 2.717 7.22 2.730 6.7 9W 5.76 5.14 2.854 5.9 6.46 2.850 10 WNW 5.98 5.32 2.662 4 2.760 7.2 11 NNW 5 6.25 2.346 12.5 7.72 2.330 12.1 All 6.43 5.70 2.377 10 7.14 2.379 10 Sector

23/11/2012 15:21 / 8 WAsP interface - Wind profile detailed Calculation: WAsP Interface examplewtg: VESTAS V100 1800 10!O! Level 0 - Estimated - Mode 0-04-2011, Hub height: 8 m Site Data Site coordinates Air density calculation mode Result for WTG at hub altitude Air density relative to standard Hub altitude above sea level (asl) Annual mean temperature at hub alt. Pressure at WTGs for WAsP UTM NAD27 Zone: 14 East: 451,101 North: 5,110,347 Individual per WTG 1.165 kg/m³ 95.1 % 744.6 m 3.5 C 924.9 hpa Wind statisticsus wishek met mast 7-01 to 6-02 - 40 m.wws All sectors Height Mean wind AkWind energy speed parameter parameter [kwh/m²] 5 4.78 5.4 2.25 962 10 5.70 6.4 2.38 1,562 15 6.24 2.44 2,008 20 6.63 2.48 2,373 25 6.92 7.8 2.51 2,682 30 7.21 8.1 2.56 2,975 35 7.44 8.4 2.61 3,236 40 7.65 8.6 2.64 3,478 45 7.83 8.8 2.68 3,696 50 7.99 9.0 2.71 3,903 55 8.18 9.2 2.74 4,139 60 8.34 9.4 2.78 4,367 65 0 9.5 2.81 4,580 70 8.64 9.7 2.83 4,786 75 8.78 9.8 2.86 4,980 80 8.90 1 2.88 5,168 85 9.02 10.1 2.91 5,347 90 9.13 1 2.93 5,523 95 9.23 1 2.95 5,691 100 9.33 10.5 2.97 5,852 105 9.47 10.6 2.96 6,104 110 9.59 10.7 2.96 6,352 115 9.71 10.9 2.96 6,595 120 9.83 11.0 2.95 6,833 125 9.94 11.1 2.95 7,067 130 14 11.3 2.94 7,296 135 10.15 11.4 2.94 7,522 140 14 11.5 2.94 7,738 145 14 11.6 2.94 7,956 150 10.43 11.7 2.93 8,169 155 10.52 11.8 2.93 8,380 160 10.60 11.9 2.93 8,580 165 10.69 12.0 2.92 8,783 170 10.77 12.1 2.92 8,983 175 10.85 12.2 2.92 9,172 180 10.92 12.2 2.92 9,365 185 11.00 12.3 2.92 9,548 190 11.07 12.4 2.91 9,734 195 11.14 12.5 2.91 9,910 200 11.21 12.6 2.91 10,090 Yield 3,039 4,664 5,668 6,377 6,911 7,412 7,829 8,183 8,489 8,757 9,062 9,333 9,577 9,797 9,998 10,181 10,348 10,504 10,646 10,779 10,924 11,054 11,171 11,279 11,378 11,467 11,549 11,624 11,693 11,755 11,810 11,863 11,910 11,953 11,993 12,029 12,062 12,092 12,117 12,140 Yield Orography change -7,142 1.1-5,517 0.8-4,513 0.7-3,804 0.7-3,270 0.7-2,769 0.6-2,352 0.5-1,998 0.5-1,692 0.4-1,424 0.4-1,119 0.4-848 -604-384 -183 0 167 323 466 599 743 873 991 1,098 1,197 1,286 1,369 1,443 1,512 1,574 1,629 1,682 1,729 1,772 1,812 1,848 1,881 1,911 1,936 1,959 0.1

23/11/2012 15:21 / 9 WAsP interface - Wind profile detailed Calculation: WAsP Interface examplewtg: VESTAS V100 1800 10!O! Level 0 - Estimated - Mode 0-04-2011, Hub height: 8 m

23/11/2012 15:21 / 10 WAsP interface - Wind profile detailed Calculation: WAsP Interface examplewtg: VESTAS V100 1800 10!O! Level 0 - Estimated - Mode 0-04-2011, Hub height: 8 m

23/11/2012 15:21 / 11 WAsP interface - Wind statistics info Calculation: WAsP Interface examplewtg: VESTAS V100 1800 10!O! Level 0 - Estimated - Mode 0-04-2011, Hub height: 8 m Main data for wind statistic File Name Country Source Mast coordinates Created Edited Sectors WAsP version C:\Users\nathan\Documents\WindPRO Data\Projects\ project\us wishek met mast 7-01 to 6-02 - 40 m.wws wishek met mast 7/01 to 6/02-40 m United States USER UTM NAD27 Zone: 14 East: 450,366 North: 5,110,717 20/06/2012 20/06/2012 12 WAsP 6-9 RVEA0011.dll 1, 0, 0, 13 Additional info for wind statistic Source data Data from Data to Measurement length Recovery rate Efficient measurement length wishek met mast 7/01 to 6/02 01/07/2001 30/06/2002 12.0 Months 10 % 12.0 Months Note Note that to get most correct result, the wind statistic should be generated with same WAsP version as used in calculations. For WAsP versions before WAsP 10 although there will be no differences.

23/11/2012 15:21 / 12 WAsP interface - Map Calculation: WAsP Interface examplewtg: VESTAS V100 1800 10!O! Level 0 - Estimated - Mode 0-04-2011, Hub height: 8 m 0 250 500 750 1000m Map: 100k topo, Print scale 1:25,000, Map center UTM NAD27 Zone: 14 East: 451,101 North: 5,110,347 Site Data